<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_14_2035220</id>
	<title>Repulsive Force Discovered In Light</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1247586660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Aurispector writes in with news that the Yale team that recently discovered an attractive force between two light beams in waveguides has now found <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090713131556.htm">a corresponding repulsive force</a>. <i>"'This completes the picture,' [team lead Hong] Tang said. 'We've shown that this is indeed a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component.' The attractive and repulsive light forces Tang's team discovered are separate from the force created by light's radiation pressure, which pushes against an object as light shines on it. Instead, they push out or pull in sideways from the direction the light travels. Previously, the engineers used the attractive force they discovered to move components on the silicon chip in one direction, such as pulling on a nanoscale switch to open it, but were unable to push it in the opposite direction. Using both forces means they can now have complete control and can manipulate components in both directions. 'We've demonstrated that these are tunable forces we can engineer,' Tang said."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aurispector writes in with news that the Yale team that recently discovered an attractive force between two light beams in waveguides has now found a corresponding repulsive force .
" 'This completes the picture, ' [ team lead Hong ] Tang said .
'We 've shown that this is indeed a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component .
' The attractive and repulsive light forces Tang 's team discovered are separate from the force created by light 's radiation pressure , which pushes against an object as light shines on it .
Instead , they push out or pull in sideways from the direction the light travels .
Previously , the engineers used the attractive force they discovered to move components on the silicon chip in one direction , such as pulling on a nanoscale switch to open it , but were unable to push it in the opposite direction .
Using both forces means they can now have complete control and can manipulate components in both directions .
'We 've demonstrated that these are tunable forces we can engineer, ' Tang said .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aurispector writes in with news that the Yale team that recently discovered an attractive force between two light beams in waveguides has now found a corresponding repulsive force.
"'This completes the picture,' [team lead Hong] Tang said.
'We've shown that this is indeed a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component.
' The attractive and repulsive light forces Tang's team discovered are separate from the force created by light's radiation pressure, which pushes against an object as light shines on it.
Instead, they push out or pull in sideways from the direction the light travels.
Previously, the engineers used the attractive force they discovered to move components on the silicon chip in one direction, such as pulling on a nanoscale switch to open it, but were unable to push it in the opposite direction.
Using both forces means they can now have complete control and can manipulate components in both directions.
'We've demonstrated that these are tunable forces we can engineer,' Tang said.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701009</id>
	<title>Re:New lightbulb from GE!</title>
	<author>muzicman</author>
	<datestamp>1247649600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well that explains all the damn Moths!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that explains all the damn Moths ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that explains all the damn Moths!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701899</id>
	<title>How Repulsive.</title>
	<author>ryanvm</author>
	<datestamp>1247663040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ugh. That is so digusting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh .
That is so digusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh.
That is so digusting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699897</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>mldi</author>
	<datestamp>1247590800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... an explanation as to why so many WoW geeks shriek when they leave their parents'.... errrmmm.... their basements during the day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... an explanation as to why so many WoW geeks shriek when they leave their parents'.... errrmmm.... their basements during the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... an explanation as to why so many WoW geeks shriek when they leave their parents'.... errrmmm.... their basements during the day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702173</id>
	<title>Re:Force source?</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1247665500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was just the 'for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction' going on here. But then again, I'm just on my first cup of coffee and haven't thought about it very much yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was just the 'for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction ' going on here .
But then again , I 'm just on my first cup of coffee and have n't thought about it very much yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was just the 'for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction' going on here.
But then again, I'm just on my first cup of coffee and haven't thought about it very much yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28707099</id>
	<title>Best wishes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247689680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May the attractive and repulsive force be with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May the attractive and repulsive force be with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May the attractive and repulsive force be with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701847</id>
	<title>That's easy.</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1247662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I ever needed to create something repulsive with light was Google Image Search.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I ever needed to create something repulsive with light was Google Image Search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I ever needed to create something repulsive with light was Google Image Search.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700729</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds familiar....</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1247600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Just like my ex-girlfriend!</i> <br> <br>So they make inflatable sheep that light up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like my ex-girlfriend !
So they make inflatable sheep that light up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like my ex-girlfriend!
So they make inflatable sheep that light up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703331</id>
	<title>Next job for this team...</title>
	<author>mrjb</author>
	<datestamp>1247671800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Find anti-gravity already. I want my flying car!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Find anti-gravity already .
I want my flying car !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Find anti-gravity already.
I want my flying car!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700127</id>
	<title>Maybe with metamaterials.</title>
	<author>TiberSeptm</author>
	<datestamp>1247592720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Possibly, but this looks like the effect of light beams interacting inside of a target dialectric combined with the differences in light's angular momentum at the different speeds of c inside and outside the target.  Aside from also cooking whatever you wanted to tractor, you might be able to accomplish this with very powerful laser pulses and "cloaking" metamaterials.  Since the metamaterials bend the relevent light frequencey around a target you may be able to exert the force on the material, use a vastly powerful laser pulse, and not cook the target.  This could impart enough force to be useful and could be used to maintain a cloud of such objects over vast distances using a web of laser pulses pushing and pulling the disparate objects into a desired position.  Kind of a neat idea and a good intuitive leap to suggest tractor beams

<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12961080/" title="msn.com">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12961080/</a> [msn.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Possibly , but this looks like the effect of light beams interacting inside of a target dialectric combined with the differences in light 's angular momentum at the different speeds of c inside and outside the target .
Aside from also cooking whatever you wanted to tractor , you might be able to accomplish this with very powerful laser pulses and " cloaking " metamaterials .
Since the metamaterials bend the relevent light frequencey around a target you may be able to exert the force on the material , use a vastly powerful laser pulse , and not cook the target .
This could impart enough force to be useful and could be used to maintain a cloud of such objects over vast distances using a web of laser pulses pushing and pulling the disparate objects into a desired position .
Kind of a neat idea and a good intuitive leap to suggest tractor beams http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12961080/ [ msn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possibly, but this looks like the effect of light beams interacting inside of a target dialectric combined with the differences in light's angular momentum at the different speeds of c inside and outside the target.
Aside from also cooking whatever you wanted to tractor, you might be able to accomplish this with very powerful laser pulses and "cloaking" metamaterials.
Since the metamaterials bend the relevent light frequencey around a target you may be able to exert the force on the material, use a vastly powerful laser pulse, and not cook the target.
This could impart enough force to be useful and could be used to maintain a cloud of such objects over vast distances using a web of laser pulses pushing and pulling the disparate objects into a desired position.
Kind of a neat idea and a good intuitive leap to suggest tractor beams

 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12961080/ [msn.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700217</id>
	<title>So Earth Finally Discovers It!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247593920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Earth finally discovers the repulsive force from the ninth light ray that they've known about on the dying planet of Barsoom for millennia.  Does that mean that soon we can have navies of huge floating ships like the Kingdom of Helium does?  Or that soon we'll be able to see the two colors they know about on Barsoom that we've never seen on Earth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Earth finally discovers the repulsive force from the ninth light ray that they 've known about on the dying planet of Barsoom for millennia .
Does that mean that soon we can have navies of huge floating ships like the Kingdom of Helium does ?
Or that soon we 'll be able to see the two colors they know about on Barsoom that we 've never seen on Earth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Earth finally discovers the repulsive force from the ninth light ray that they've known about on the dying planet of Barsoom for millennia.
Does that mean that soon we can have navies of huge floating ships like the Kingdom of Helium does?
Or that soon we'll be able to see the two colors they know about on Barsoom that we've never seen on Earth?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702703</id>
	<title>Gravity Gun!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247668560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This means, theoretically, that the gravity gun is possible.  At least, on a nano level.  So all they have to do now is figure out how to create a gun with a light source powerful enough to move all of the nano particles stored in a bathtub, and HL2 will be a reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This means , theoretically , that the gravity gun is possible .
At least , on a nano level .
So all they have to do now is figure out how to create a gun with a light source powerful enough to move all of the nano particles stored in a bathtub , and HL2 will be a reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means, theoretically, that the gravity gun is possible.
At least, on a nano level.
So all they have to do now is figure out how to create a gun with a light source powerful enough to move all of the nano particles stored in a bathtub, and HL2 will be a reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702607</id>
	<title>No such benefits</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1247668080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>An added benefit of using light rather than electricity is that it can be routed through a circuit with almost no interference in signal, and it eliminates the need to lay down large numbers of electrical wires.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
There's no interference from electrical signals, but there is interference from light.  And rather than needing a large number of electrical wires, this requires large numbers of light waveguides.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An added benefit of using light rather than electricity is that it can be routed through a circuit with almost no interference in signal , and it eliminates the need to lay down large numbers of electrical wires .
There 's no interference from electrical signals , but there is interference from light .
And rather than needing a large number of electrical wires , this requires large numbers of light waveguides .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An added benefit of using light rather than electricity is that it can be routed through a circuit with almost no interference in signal, and it eliminates the need to lay down large numbers of electrical wires.
There's no interference from electrical signals, but there is interference from light.
And rather than needing a large number of electrical wires, this requires large numbers of light waveguides.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873</id>
	<title>This is why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247590620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me!  Its not my lude jokes... its light!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me !
Its not my lude jokes... its light !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me!
Its not my lude jokes... its light!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701715</id>
	<title>Re:Angular momentum</title>
	<author>Digital Vomit</author>
	<datestamp>1247661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same "handedness."</p></div></blockquote><p>Ummm...yeah...me, too...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light 's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same " handedness .
" Ummm...yeah...me , too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same "handedness.
"Ummm...yeah...me, too...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699895</id>
	<title>Now all we need</title>
	<author>spacefiddle</author>
	<datestamp>1247590800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>is for an alcoholic millionaire to cram it into a suit of armor!</htmltext>
<tokenext>is for an alcoholic millionaire to cram it into a suit of armor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is for an alcoholic millionaire to cram it into a suit of armor!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702383</id>
	<title>So a gravity gun is possible?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is epic.  This means, theoretically, that on a nano scale, you can build a gravity gun, like the one in Half-Life 2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is epic .
This means , theoretically , that on a nano scale , you can build a gravity gun , like the one in Half-Life 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is epic.
This means, theoretically, that on a nano scale, you can build a gravity gun, like the one in Half-Life 2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699863</id>
	<title>Repulsiveness in light, you say?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247590560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wondered where CowboyNeal was off to since he's not in the polls anymore. He's in your lights!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered where CowboyNeal was off to since he 's not in the polls anymore .
He 's in your lights !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered where CowboyNeal was off to since he's not in the polls anymore.
He's in your lights!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700691</id>
	<title>Re:Psssssssshhhhhhh!!!!!!   Jusssst GREAT...</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1247599920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, data (or Data) can join the dark side, and display a tension-deficit disorder</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , data ( or Data ) can join the dark side , and display a tension-deficit disorder</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, data (or Data) can join the dark side, and display a tension-deficit disorder</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703399</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't this stuff excite you?</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1247672100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that it's fascinating but....electricity travels almost as fast as light.  I hardly think that would be the reason to go for optical computing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that it 's fascinating but....electricity travels almost as fast as light .
I hardly think that would be the reason to go for optical computing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that it's fascinating but....electricity travels almost as fast as light.
I hardly think that would be the reason to go for optical computing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703867</id>
	<title>Proof in the putting</title>
	<author>Rambo Tribble</author>
	<datestamp>1247674980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The repulsive force of light has long been documented by those facing Saturday's inevitable dawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The repulsive force of light has long been documented by those facing Saturday 's inevitable dawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The repulsive force of light has long been documented by those facing Saturday's inevitable dawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951</id>
	<title>Angular momentum</title>
	<author>TiberSeptm</author>
	<datestamp>1247591280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Huh, I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same "handedness."  I wonder if this can be used to explain that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light 's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same " handedness .
" I wonder if this can be used to explain that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh, I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of phtons of the same "handedness.
"  I wonder if this can be used to explain that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700125</id>
	<title>tags</title>
	<author>Odinlake</author>
	<datestamp>1247592720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Post is tagged "disgusting", "repulsorblast" and "midichlorians"... Fascinating, the minds of whoever comes up with such tags all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Post is tagged " disgusting " , " repulsorblast " and " midichlorians " ... Fascinating , the minds of whoever comes up with such tags all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Post is tagged "disgusting", "repulsorblast" and "midichlorians"... Fascinating, the minds of whoever comes up with such tags all the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871</id>
	<title>Psssssssshhhhhhh!!!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247590620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet! Next up, how lightsabers don't work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet !
Next up , how lightsabers do n't work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet!
Next up, how lightsabers don't work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702727</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>skeeto</author>
	<datestamp>1247668680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And it's probably the cause of <a href="http://dwarf.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/Cave\_adaption" title="lendemaindeveille.com">cave adaption</a> [lendemaindeveille.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's probably the cause of cave adaption [ lendemaindeveille.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's probably the cause of cave adaption [lendemaindeveille.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699897</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702753</id>
	<title>Re:Force source?</title>
	<author>noshellswill</author>
	<datestamp>1247668860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this "field-gradient" force is in-principle old news<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so called optical tweezers. Been around for a decade. F ~ GRAD\_E</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this " field-gradient " force is in-principle old news ... so called optical tweezers .
Been around for a decade .
F ~ GRAD \ _E</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this "field-gradient" force is in-principle old news ... so called optical tweezers.
Been around for a decade.
F ~ GRAD\_E</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700505</id>
	<title>Kabbalah</title>
	<author>taucross</author>
	<datestamp>1247597220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kabbalah refers to these two alternating properties of light as "direct light" and "returning light". Light alternates between these two opposing, yet mutually complementary characteristics as it is either reflected or absorbed by the observer (depending on the current configuration of the observer).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kabbalah refers to these two alternating properties of light as " direct light " and " returning light " .
Light alternates between these two opposing , yet mutually complementary characteristics as it is either reflected or absorbed by the observer ( depending on the current configuration of the observer ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kabbalah refers to these two alternating properties of light as "direct light" and "returning light".
Light alternates between these two opposing, yet mutually complementary characteristics as it is either reflected or absorbed by the observer (depending on the current configuration of the observer).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704499</id>
	<title>Re:Angular momentum</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1247678340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses</p></div><p>So having known for many years that we're not supposed to cross the beams, I guess now we know <i>why</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>during destructive interference of collinear laser pulsesSo having known for many years that we 're not supposed to cross the beams , I guess now we know why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>during destructive interference of collinear laser pulsesSo having known for many years that we're not supposed to cross the beams, I guess now we know why.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701689</id>
	<title>How is this different from the Yarkovsky Effect?</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1247660820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarkovsky\_effect" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarkovsky\_effect</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>They look related...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarkovsky \ _effect [ wikipedia.org ] They look related.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarkovsky\_effect [wikipedia.org]They look related...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111</id>
	<title>Nice. But.</title>
	<author>terbo</author>
	<datestamp>1247592660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While discovering new properties of old phenomena is interesting,<br>does anyone ever question the 'bravado' of the wording of such<br>discoveries?</p><p>Does it inhibit later discoveries, in creating artificial limitations<br>through language and subsequently expectation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While discovering new properties of old phenomena is interesting,does anyone ever question the 'bravado ' of the wording of suchdiscoveries ? Does it inhibit later discoveries , in creating artificial limitationsthrough language and subsequently expectation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While discovering new properties of old phenomena is interesting,does anyone ever question the 'bravado' of the wording of suchdiscoveries?Does it inhibit later discoveries, in creating artificial limitationsthrough language and subsequently expectation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28706449</id>
	<title>Re:Yup. Been there, done that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247686860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This fits in with my corollary to the theory of relativity where the further away someone is and the faster they are moving, the better they look!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This fits in with my corollary to the theory of relativity where the further away someone is and the faster they are moving , the better they look !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This fits in with my corollary to the theory of relativity where the further away someone is and the faster they are moving, the better they look!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701015</id>
	<title>Re:Angular momentum</title>
	<author>Angstroem</author>
	<datestamp>1247649840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <em>I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of ph[o]tons of the same "handedness."</em></p></div> </blockquote><p>

Bingo, Sir.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light 's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of ph [ o ] tons of the same " handedness .
" Bingo , Sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I had always wondered how to resolve conservation of light's angular momentum during destructive interference of collinear laser pulses consisting of ph[o]tons of the same "handedness.
" 

Bingo, Sir.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699919</id>
	<title>Yup. Been there, done that.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1247590980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Repulsive Force Discovered In Light"--well DUH. Anyone who's ever been in a strip club at closing time has witnessed this phenomenon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Repulsive Force Discovered In Light " --well DUH .
Anyone who 's ever been in a strip club at closing time has witnessed this phenomenon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Repulsive Force Discovered In Light"--well DUH.
Anyone who's ever been in a strip club at closing time has witnessed this phenomenon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700597</id>
	<title>Observation of distant objects....</title>
	<author>zekt</author>
	<datestamp>1247598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I understand it, current thinking is that light bends because of gravity, and this is how distant planets and other distant objects are found.</p><p>Could it be that it is, instead, is just light being pulled or pushed against something that is being observed, rather than an observation of the gravity that the body has?<br>The next effect is the same I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it , current thinking is that light bends because of gravity , and this is how distant planets and other distant objects are found.Could it be that it is , instead , is just light being pulled or pushed against something that is being observed , rather than an observation of the gravity that the body has ? The next effect is the same I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it, current thinking is that light bends because of gravity, and this is how distant planets and other distant objects are found.Could it be that it is, instead, is just light being pulled or pushed against something that is being observed, rather than an observation of the gravity that the body has?The next effect is the same I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700573</id>
	<title>just what we needed for optical computing!</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1247598240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>finally, they've found out what was missing from the promise of a low-energy, low-heat, ultra-fast future in optical computing: Moving parts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>finally , they 've found out what was missing from the promise of a low-energy , low-heat , ultra-fast future in optical computing : Moving parts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>finally, they've found out what was missing from the promise of a low-energy, low-heat, ultra-fast future in optical computing: Moving parts!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700501</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds familiar....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component...</p></div></blockquote><p>Just like my ex-girlfriend!</p></div><p>Yeah mine ex-girlfriend too! Fucked in the head but really hot!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component...Just like my ex-girlfriend ! Yeah mine ex-girlfriend too !
Fucked in the head but really hot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component...Just like my ex-girlfriend!Yeah mine ex-girlfriend too!
Fucked in the head but really hot!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702099</id>
	<title>I'm definitely getting old</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1247664900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got this. Some moderator not only didn't get the reference, they didn't even bother to look it up.<p>Reading stuff like this at a too early age helped get me into physics rather than law...my bank account hates science fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got this .
Some moderator not only did n't get the reference , they did n't even bother to look it up.Reading stuff like this at a too early age helped get me into physics rather than law...my bank account hates science fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got this.
Some moderator not only didn't get the reference, they didn't even bother to look it up.Reading stuff like this at a too early age helped get me into physics rather than law...my bank account hates science fiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700295</id>
	<title>Cockroaches...</title>
	<author>carpefishus</author>
	<datestamp>1247594820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was previously demonstrated by cockroaches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was previously demonstrated by cockroaches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was previously demonstrated by cockroaches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700587</id>
	<title>Your girlfriend was a photon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247598420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your girlfriend was a photon?  Now I know some guys who like skinny girls, but that's ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your girlfriend was a photon ?
Now I know some guys who like skinny girls , but that 's ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your girlfriend was a photon?
Now I know some guys who like skinny girls, but that's ridiculous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700271</id>
	<title>I work IT.</title>
	<author>eosp</author>
	<datestamp>1247594700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already knew that light repelled me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already knew that light repelled me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already knew that light repelled me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701159</id>
	<title>Yawn...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tesla??? didnt he demonstrate this before? yawn...</p><p>www.twilightcampaign.net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tesla ? ? ?
didnt he demonstrate this before ?
yawn...www.twilightcampaign.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tesla???
didnt he demonstrate this before?
yawn...www.twilightcampaign.net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702585</id>
	<title>There is a joke in there somewhere...</title>
	<author>PinchDuck</author>
	<datestamp>1247667960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>about photons from images of fat people having sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>about photons from images of fat people having sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about photons from images of fat people having sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702133</id>
	<title>Re:Nice. But.</title>
	<author>domatic</author>
	<datestamp>1247665200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably not.  Things are worded this way to explain them to laymen.  Physicists are going to describe these phenomena with systems of equations and words and the equations will suggest deeper intuitive meaning to those used to working with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not .
Things are worded this way to explain them to laymen .
Physicists are going to describe these phenomena with systems of equations and words and the equations will suggest deeper intuitive meaning to those used to working with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not.
Things are worded this way to explain them to laymen.
Physicists are going to describe these phenomena with systems of equations and words and the equations will suggest deeper intuitive meaning to those used to working with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700753</id>
	<title>I discovered the repulsive force of light long tim</title>
	<author>melted</author>
	<datestamp>1247601480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I discovered the repulsive force of light long time ago here on Slashdot. There are even convincing demos to demonstrate the effect: Goatse, Tubgirl, 2 girs 1 cup and Lemon Party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I discovered the repulsive force of light long time ago here on Slashdot .
There are even convincing demos to demonstrate the effect : Goatse , Tubgirl , 2 girs 1 cup and Lemon Party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I discovered the repulsive force of light long time ago here on Slashdot.
There are even convincing demos to demonstrate the effect: Goatse, Tubgirl, 2 girs 1 cup and Lemon Party.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700191</id>
	<title>How does this fit into the Standard Model?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247593500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can anyone enlighten me? I thought there were only the strong and weak interaction, electromagnetism and gravity.</p><p>Is this some effect of electromagnetism? Or of one of the other forces?</p><p>Because if it were none of this forces, it would pretty much throw the whole standard model of quantum physics into a blender and force us to put it together again, wouldn't it?</p><p>This is really really interesting to me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone enlighten me ?
I thought there were only the strong and weak interaction , electromagnetism and gravity.Is this some effect of electromagnetism ?
Or of one of the other forces ? Because if it were none of this forces , it would pretty much throw the whole standard model of quantum physics into a blender and force us to put it together again , would n't it ? This is really really interesting to me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone enlighten me?
I thought there were only the strong and weak interaction, electromagnetism and gravity.Is this some effect of electromagnetism?
Or of one of the other forces?Because if it were none of this forces, it would pretty much throw the whole standard model of quantum physics into a blender and force us to put it together again, wouldn't it?This is really really interesting to me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701805</id>
	<title>A 21st Century Repulsor Beam</title>
	<author>SomeoneGotMyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1247662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry Wesley Crusher. We came up with the idea first.....</p><p>But feel free to take credit for it when you save the Enterprise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Wesley Crusher .
We came up with the idea first.....But feel free to take credit for it when you save the Enterprise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Wesley Crusher.
We came up with the idea first.....But feel free to take credit for it when you save the Enterprise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703045</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe with metamaterials.</title>
	<author>paintballer1087</author>
	<datestamp>1247670360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700769</id>
	<title>Doesn't this stuff excite you?</title>
	<author>generic.individual</author>
	<datestamp>1247688000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are a lot of jokes as replies, I assume partially because the summary sets them up so well and partially because it is rather dense subject matter. But doesn't this stuff excite you? Years ago a friend and I used to talk about how there should be a way to make computers out of light and we should just try for that, because, well, there isn't much faster. Articles like this mean its closer to reality. Even if it never happens in my life time it still excites me to know we are headed there.<br> <br>
I am sure some physicist is now going to tell me how it's actually better to use some other quantum something for computing and how I don't understand light and subatomic particles/waves/strings/finnegans. I know I don't. I just like the idea of light computers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a lot of jokes as replies , I assume partially because the summary sets them up so well and partially because it is rather dense subject matter .
But does n't this stuff excite you ?
Years ago a friend and I used to talk about how there should be a way to make computers out of light and we should just try for that , because , well , there is n't much faster .
Articles like this mean its closer to reality .
Even if it never happens in my life time it still excites me to know we are headed there .
I am sure some physicist is now going to tell me how it 's actually better to use some other quantum something for computing and how I do n't understand light and subatomic particles/waves/strings/finnegans .
I know I do n't .
I just like the idea of light computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a lot of jokes as replies, I assume partially because the summary sets them up so well and partially because it is rather dense subject matter.
But doesn't this stuff excite you?
Years ago a friend and I used to talk about how there should be a way to make computers out of light and we should just try for that, because, well, there isn't much faster.
Articles like this mean its closer to reality.
Even if it never happens in my life time it still excites me to know we are headed there.
I am sure some physicist is now going to tell me how it's actually better to use some other quantum something for computing and how I don't understand light and subatomic particles/waves/strings/finnegans.
I know I don't.
I just like the idea of light computers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701767</id>
	<title>Ubuntu User</title>
	<author>dontgetshocked</author>
	<datestamp>1247661540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, where do I sign up for Ubuntu's light version?
Since everything is going 64 bit and in the cloud!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , where do I sign up for Ubuntu 's light version ?
Since everything is going 64 bit and in the cloud !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, where do I sign up for Ubuntu's light version?
Since everything is going 64 bit and in the cloud!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700099</id>
	<title>Repulsive force in light</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247592540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Augh! The light! It burns! It burnsssssss!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Augh !
The light !
It burns !
It burnsssssss !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Augh!
The light!
It burns!
It burnsssssss!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700635</id>
	<title>Good Grid! They're right!</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1247599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It <b>IS</b> repulsive!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It IS repulsive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It IS repulsive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703783</id>
	<title>Does this account for dark matter?</title>
	<author>maillemaker</author>
	<datestamp>1247674500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could this new-found force somehow be related to what is causing the universe to continue to expand?  Or otherwise account for forces now attributed to "dark matter"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this new-found force somehow be related to what is causing the universe to continue to expand ?
Or otherwise account for forces now attributed to " dark matter " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this new-found force somehow be related to what is causing the universe to continue to expand?
Or otherwise account for forces now attributed to "dark matter"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699955</id>
	<title>Deflector and tractor fields?</title>
	<author>KDN</author>
	<datestamp>1247591280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Light has an attractive and repulsive component.  Sounds like Star Trek deflector and tractor beams to me.  Who knows what they will be able to do with this in a hundred years or so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Light has an attractive and repulsive component .
Sounds like Star Trek deflector and tractor beams to me .
Who knows what they will be able to do with this in a hundred years or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light has an attractive and repulsive component.
Sounds like Star Trek deflector and tractor beams to me.
Who knows what they will be able to do with this in a hundred years or so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701279</id>
	<title>Re:This is why</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1247653800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually it's because you're out of phase. With light, opposites repulse, whereas like attracts. So try your luck with boys instead!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it 's because you 're out of phase .
With light , opposites repulse , whereas like attracts .
So try your luck with boys instead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it's because you're out of phase.
With light, opposites repulse, whereas like attracts.
So try your luck with boys instead!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703677</id>
	<title>Re:Nice. But.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247673900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This post touches nicely on the interface between the mind and reality, a field that most science-oriented folk find quite uncomfortable. Thomas Hobbes nailed it down with his argument that knowledge derived from mathematics is inherently not knowledge of the real world. Giambattista Vico generalized the argument by maintaining that what is true and what is made are convertible; that is, we can truly know only that which we ourselves have created, and only to the extent it is exclusively our creation. Mathematics, as a prime example, is so pure simply because it is wholly a manufacture of Human minds, according to Vico. Albert Einstein put it similarly: &#226;oeAs far as the propositions of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.&#226;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This post touches nicely on the interface between the mind and reality , a field that most science-oriented folk find quite uncomfortable .
Thomas Hobbes nailed it down with his argument that knowledge derived from mathematics is inherently not knowledge of the real world .
Giambattista Vico generalized the argument by maintaining that what is true and what is made are convertible ; that is , we can truly know only that which we ourselves have created , and only to the extent it is exclusively our creation .
Mathematics , as a prime example , is so pure simply because it is wholly a manufacture of Human minds , according to Vico .
Albert Einstein put it similarly :   oeAs far as the propositions of mathematics refer to reality , they are not certain ; and as far as they are certain , they do not refer to reality.  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post touches nicely on the interface between the mind and reality, a field that most science-oriented folk find quite uncomfortable.
Thomas Hobbes nailed it down with his argument that knowledge derived from mathematics is inherently not knowledge of the real world.
Giambattista Vico generalized the argument by maintaining that what is true and what is made are convertible; that is, we can truly know only that which we ourselves have created, and only to the extent it is exclusively our creation.
Mathematics, as a prime example, is so pure simply because it is wholly a manufacture of Human minds, according to Vico.
Albert Einstein put it similarly: âoeAs far as the propositions of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.â</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703237</id>
	<title>Re:How does this fit into the Standard Model?</title>
	<author>GryMor</author>
	<datestamp>1247671380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Light, aka, the photon, is the force carrier for electromagnetism, so it's either electromagnetism or gravity due to energy density. Gravity can effectively be ignored at the scales they are talking about, so it must be electromagnatism. This is confirmed if you RTFA and see that it's caused by light in dielectric materials.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Light , aka , the photon , is the force carrier for electromagnetism , so it 's either electromagnetism or gravity due to energy density .
Gravity can effectively be ignored at the scales they are talking about , so it must be electromagnatism .
This is confirmed if you RTFA and see that it 's caused by light in dielectric materials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light, aka, the photon, is the force carrier for electromagnetism, so it's either electromagnetism or gravity due to energy density.
Gravity can effectively be ignored at the scales they are talking about, so it must be electromagnatism.
This is confirmed if you RTFA and see that it's caused by light in dielectric materials.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700351</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247595300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone ever noticed that a lot of these discoveries are done by ppl with a Chinese name? And they are mostly in US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ever noticed that a lot of these discoveries are done by ppl with a Chinese name ?
And they are mostly in US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone ever noticed that a lot of these discoveries are done by ppl with a Chinese name?
And they are mostly in US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881</id>
	<title>Sounds familiar....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247590680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component...</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Just like my ex-girlfriend!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component.. . Just like my ex-girlfriend !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a bipolar light force with both an attractive and repulsive component...
Just like my ex-girlfriend!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701595</id>
	<title>Particles and waves</title>
	<author>severn2j</author>
	<datestamp>1247659500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, does this attraction and repulsion explain why photons act like a wave instead of individual particles?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , does this attraction and repulsion explain why photons act like a wave instead of individual particles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, does this attraction and repulsion explain why photons act like a wave instead of individual particles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701529</id>
	<title>How does this apply to astrophysics?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247658480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do these newly-discovered forces change our interpretation of astronomical observations? Although the universe could be considered mostly empty, it does contain a hell of a lot of light. Could these forces be nudging stars and planets and things around? Does it have implications for gravitational lensing? Could it help to explain dark matter and energy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do these newly-discovered forces change our interpretation of astronomical observations ?
Although the universe could be considered mostly empty , it does contain a hell of a lot of light .
Could these forces be nudging stars and planets and things around ?
Does it have implications for gravitational lensing ?
Could it help to explain dark matter and energy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do these newly-discovered forces change our interpretation of astronomical observations?
Although the universe could be considered mostly empty, it does contain a hell of a lot of light.
Could these forces be nudging stars and planets and things around?
Does it have implications for gravitational lensing?
Could it help to explain dark matter and energy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699987</id>
	<title>Re:This is why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247591640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me!  Its not my lude jokes... its light!</p></div><p>It's not the light's fault your face looks like the south end of a northbound mule.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me !
Its not my lude jokes... its light ! It 's not the light 's fault your face looks like the south end of a northbound mule .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh finally a scientific explanation of why girls are repulsed by me!
Its not my lude jokes... its light!It's not the light's fault your face looks like the south end of a northbound mule.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703091</id>
	<title>Repulsive Force Discovered In Light</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247670660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Explanation for Pioneer Anomaly?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Explanation for Pioneer Anomaly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Explanation for Pioneer Anomaly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700337</id>
	<title>Re:Psssssssshhhhhhh!!!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247595180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares about lightsabers? With repulsors, flying cars will finally become a reality!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares about lightsabers ?
With repulsors , flying cars will finally become a reality !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares about lightsabers?
With repulsors, flying cars will finally become a reality!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701277</id>
	<title>Re:Psssssssshhhhhhh!!!!!!</title>
	<author>PermanentMarker</author>
	<datestamp>1247653800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well as soon as we can escape from this tractor beam i'l explain ya.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well as soon as we can escape from this tractor beam i'l explain ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well as soon as we can escape from this tractor beam i'l explain ya.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704037</id>
	<title>Re:Force source?</title>
	<author>anaesthetica</author>
	<datestamp>1247675940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's probably not a force in the same way that we have the weak, strong, electromagnetic and gravitational forces.  My conjecture would be that it's something like light's equivalent of the Bernoulli effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably not a force in the same way that we have the weak , strong , electromagnetic and gravitational forces .
My conjecture would be that it 's something like light 's equivalent of the Bernoulli effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably not a force in the same way that we have the weak, strong, electromagnetic and gravitational forces.
My conjecture would be that it's something like light's equivalent of the Bernoulli effect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119</id>
	<title>Force source?</title>
	<author>aeve</author>
	<datestamp>1247592720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the crap is an article about a newly found force that doesn't explain at least a theory as to the source of the force? Is it magnetic?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the crap is an article about a newly found force that does n't explain at least a theory as to the source of the force ?
Is it magnetic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the crap is an article about a newly found force that doesn't explain at least a theory as to the source of the force?
Is it magnetic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700129</id>
	<title>New lightbulb from GE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247592780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now emits 100\% attractive light. That's twice as much as the next leading brand!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now emits 100 \ % attractive light .
That 's twice as much as the next leading brand !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now emits 100\% attractive light.
That's twice as much as the next leading brand!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28706449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2035220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701277
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701009
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28704037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28701279
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28706449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28702099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28699955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700597
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2035220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28700769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2035220.28703399
</commentlist>
</conversation>
