<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_10_2310235</id>
	<title>Researchers Enable Mice To Exhale Fat</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247227260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.destinyland.org/" rel="nofollow">destinyland</a> writes <i>"UCLA researchers made a startling discovery: <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/health-medicine/inhale-exhale-diet">genetic alterations enable mice to convert fat into carbon dioxide</a>.
Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria &mdash; so researchers <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22757/">introduced bacteria genes</a> into mouse livers, and 'the excess fat was literally released into thin air.' (One researcher calls it 'an unconventional idea which we borrowed from plants and bacteria.') The research potentially could help treat serious medical conditions including diabetes, heart disease &mdash; and of course, obesity."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " UCLA researchers made a startling discovery : genetic alterations enable mice to convert fat into carbon dioxide .
Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria    so researchers introduced bacteria genes into mouse livers , and 'the excess fat was literally released into thin air .
' ( One researcher calls it 'an unconventional idea which we borrowed from plants and bacteria .
' ) The research potentially could help treat serious medical conditions including diabetes , heart disease    and of course , obesity .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "UCLA researchers made a startling discovery: genetic alterations enable mice to convert fat into carbon dioxide.
Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria — so researchers introduced bacteria genes into mouse livers, and 'the excess fat was literally released into thin air.
' (One researcher calls it 'an unconventional idea which we borrowed from plants and bacteria.
') The research potentially could help treat serious medical conditions including diabetes, heart disease — and of course, obesity.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657085</id>
	<title>Richard Simmons' new DVD</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1247238420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Panting to the Oldies"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Panting to the Oldies "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Panting to the Oldies"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658855</id>
	<title>So now we get:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247312280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- Tons of CO released into the athmosphere.<br>- People learning *nothing*.<br>- Sugar and other too short carbohydrates without any other vital substances still being the no. 1 unhealthy stuff.<br>- Very likely other bad side-effects of the bacteria genes.</p><p>And all so we all can eat tons of fat.</p><p>Wow, what a... uum... great... deal!</p><p>I know something better to make people "exhale" the saturated fat* *and* the sugar:<br>Make them vomit vigorously, as soon as an overdose of saturated fats and short carbohydrates enters their body, without the vital substances and fibers to cope with it.<br>Or even better, add detector cells to the tongue.</p><p>And then watch their eating habits change all by themselves.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>\_\_\_<br>* Because fat all by itself is a good thing. You just should not eat a whole pound of it. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Tons of CO released into the athmosphere.- People learning * nothing * .- Sugar and other too short carbohydrates without any other vital substances still being the no .
1 unhealthy stuff.- Very likely other bad side-effects of the bacteria genes.And all so we all can eat tons of fat.Wow , what a... uum... great... deal ! I know something better to make people " exhale " the saturated fat * * and * the sugar : Make them vomit vigorously , as soon as an overdose of saturated fats and short carbohydrates enters their body , without the vital substances and fibers to cope with it.Or even better , add detector cells to the tongue.And then watch their eating habits change all by themselves .
: ) \ _ \ _ \ _ * Because fat all by itself is a good thing .
You just should not eat a whole pound of it .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Tons of CO released into the athmosphere.- People learning *nothing*.- Sugar and other too short carbohydrates without any other vital substances still being the no.
1 unhealthy stuff.- Very likely other bad side-effects of the bacteria genes.And all so we all can eat tons of fat.Wow, what a... uum... great... deal!I know something better to make people "exhale" the saturated fat* *and* the sugar:Make them vomit vigorously, as soon as an overdose of saturated fats and short carbohydrates enters their body, without the vital substances and fibers to cope with it.Or even better, add detector cells to the tongue.And then watch their eating habits change all by themselves.
:)\_\_\_* Because fat all by itself is a good thing.
You just should not eat a whole pound of it.
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657061</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Eternauta3k</author>
	<datestamp>1247238120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem. The CO2 from your tailpipe is</p></div><p>I read this and started wondering at what point CO2 comes out of one's ass...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Your tailpipe is different. The hydrocarbons you're burning come from fossil fuels</p></div><p>fossil fuels!? Oh. Cars.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe isI read this and started wondering at what point CO2 comes out of one 's ass...Your tailpipe is different .
The hydrocarbons you 're burning come from fossil fuelsfossil fuels ! ?
Oh. Cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe isI read this and started wondering at what point CO2 comes out of one's ass...Your tailpipe is different.
The hydrocarbons you're burning come from fossil fuelsfossil fuels!?
Oh. Cars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657165</id>
	<title>Mammals convert Fat into CO2 anyway...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247239320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*sigh*</p><p>Lipolysis -&gt; Beta Oxidation -&gt; Acetyl-COA -&gt; TCA Cycle -&gt; NADH/FADH -&gt; ETC -&gt; ATP -&gt; CO2</p><p>It's completely natural and spontaneous in the absence of excess blood sugar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* sigh * Lipolysis - &gt; Beta Oxidation - &gt; Acetyl-COA - &gt; TCA Cycle - &gt; NADH/FADH - &gt; ETC - &gt; ATP - &gt; CO2It 's completely natural and spontaneous in the absence of excess blood sugar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*sigh*Lipolysis -&gt; Beta Oxidation -&gt; Acetyl-COA -&gt; TCA Cycle -&gt; NADH/FADH -&gt; ETC -&gt; ATP -&gt; CO2It's completely natural and spontaneous in the absence of excess blood sugar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656863</id>
	<title>TinyMCE</title>
	<author>pi865</author>
	<datestamp>1247236020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>gives new meaning to TinyMCE</htmltext>
<tokenext>gives new meaning to TinyMCE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gives new meaning to TinyMCE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657439</id>
	<title>Re:Except that fat is not the problem...</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1247242920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a myth that eating too much sugar causes diabetes.</p><p><a href="http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-myths.jsp" title="diabetes.org">http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-myths.jsp</a> [diabetes.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a myth that eating too much sugar causes diabetes.http : //www.diabetes.org/diabetes-myths.jsp [ diabetes.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a myth that eating too much sugar causes diabetes.http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-myths.jsp [diabetes.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28660919</id>
	<title>Window gunk</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1247333220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh man, imagine all the condensate on the furniture, computer screens and keyboards, windows and the like.  Fortunately a typical geek lair doesn't have windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , imagine all the condensate on the furniture , computer screens and keyboards , windows and the like .
Fortunately a typical geek lair does n't have windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, imagine all the condensate on the furniture, computer screens and keyboards, windows and the like.
Fortunately a typical geek lair doesn't have windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663731</id>
	<title>Re:Except that fat is not the problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247310780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read the rest: "However, being overweight does increase your risk for developing type 2 diabetes."

Sugar and easily digestible carbs are the reason people are overweight. Then there's the insulin spikes from eating these, the studies on rats where they caused type 2 diabetes via giving them only carbs....oh nevermind. Not like you will listen anyway. The science is all there, a few bad studies in the 50's and media overblowing them ruined it for so many.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the rest : " However , being overweight does increase your risk for developing type 2 diabetes .
" Sugar and easily digestible carbs are the reason people are overweight .
Then there 's the insulin spikes from eating these , the studies on rats where they caused type 2 diabetes via giving them only carbs....oh nevermind .
Not like you will listen anyway .
The science is all there , a few bad studies in the 50 's and media overblowing them ruined it for so many .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the rest: "However, being overweight does increase your risk for developing type 2 diabetes.
"

Sugar and easily digestible carbs are the reason people are overweight.
Then there's the insulin spikes from eating these, the studies on rats where they caused type 2 diabetes via giving them only carbs....oh nevermind.
Not like you will listen anyway.
The science is all there, a few bad studies in the 50's and media overblowing them ruined it for so many.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657971</id>
	<title>Swell</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1247252340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So soon I might be breathing other people's second hand fat? Thanks!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</htmltext>
<tokenext>So soon I might be breathing other people 's second hand fat ?
Thanks ! : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So soon I might be breathing other people's second hand fat?
Thanks! :-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656617</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>tacarat</author>
	<datestamp>1247233380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans. Bad news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica. Good news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins.</p></div><p>This message brought to you by the People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans .
Bad news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica .
Good news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins.This message brought to you by the People for the Eating of Tasty Animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans.
Bad news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica.
Good news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins.This message brought to you by the People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663667</id>
	<title>shut up and eat your bacon</title>
	<author>FatIsGood</author>
	<datestamp>1247310240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"and of course, obesity". Actually, no. fat does not make you fat, carbs do, so like any low-fat diet it would add to the obesity problem. eat no fat -&gt; be hungry -&gt; eat more carbs -&gt; insulin spikes -&gt; carbs convert to fat not sugar -&gt; get hungry because you have no energy. so eat more bacon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" and of course , obesity " .
Actually , no .
fat does not make you fat , carbs do , so like any low-fat diet it would add to the obesity problem .
eat no fat - &gt; be hungry - &gt; eat more carbs - &gt; insulin spikes - &gt; carbs convert to fat not sugar - &gt; get hungry because you have no energy .
so eat more bacon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"and of course, obesity".
Actually, no.
fat does not make you fat, carbs do, so like any low-fat diet it would add to the obesity problem.
eat no fat -&gt; be hungry -&gt; eat more carbs -&gt; insulin spikes -&gt; carbs convert to fat not sugar -&gt; get hungry because you have no energy.
so eat more bacon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28659159</id>
	<title>It's grammar nazi time!</title>
	<author>sqldr</author>
	<datestamp>1247318820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria"

Mammals digest fats differently to bacteria.

Write it out 100 times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria " Mammals digest fats differently to bacteria .
Write it out 100 times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Mammals digest fats differently than bacteria"

Mammals digest fats differently to bacteria.
Write it out 100 times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656479</id>
	<title>MMmmm</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1247232000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you tasted penguin?  It's fucking delicious.  Almost as good as bald eagle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tasted penguin ?
It 's fucking delicious .
Almost as good as bald eagle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tasted penguin?
It's fucking delicious.
Almost as good as bald eagle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657499</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247243640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>am i the only one who thought you meant something other than a car exhaust system when you first mentioned tailpipe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>am i the only one who thought you meant something other than a car exhaust system when you first mentioned tailpipe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>am i the only one who thought you meant something other than a car exhaust system when you first mentioned tailpipe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656939</id>
	<title>Exhale only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247236740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me fart out the CO2 and you have a deal!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me fart out the CO2 and you have a deal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me fart out the CO2 and you have a deal!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658197</id>
	<title>converting gluttony to greenhouse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247342640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just what we fucking need. a mountain of fat american and australian cunts doing their selfish bit to make the greenhouse effect even worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just what we fucking need .
a mountain of fat american and australian cunts doing their selfish bit to make the greenhouse effect even worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just what we fucking need.
a mountain of fat american and australian cunts doing their selfish bit to make the greenhouse effect even worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657221</id>
	<title>This is awesome and timely news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247240100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...as I'm about to check into UCLA's Resnick Neuropsychiatric (4-North) for help with my anorexia nervosa...  If I could exhale the fat I wouldn't have to restrict / over-exercise!  (Would fat exhaling be considered 'purging'?  A whole new class of bulimics?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...as I 'm about to check into UCLA 's Resnick Neuropsychiatric ( 4-North ) for help with my anorexia nervosa... If I could exhale the fat I would n't have to restrict / over-exercise !
( Would fat exhaling be considered 'purging ' ?
A whole new class of bulimics ?
... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as I'm about to check into UCLA's Resnick Neuropsychiatric (4-North) for help with my anorexia nervosa...  If I could exhale the fat I wouldn't have to restrict / over-exercise!
(Would fat exhaling be considered 'purging'?
A whole new class of bulimics?
...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656439</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247231640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't they heard of global warming? Can't they get them to exhale chocolate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't they heard of global warming ?
Ca n't they get them to exhale chocolate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't they heard of global warming?
Can't they get them to exhale chocolate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657923</id>
	<title>We already exhale fat as CO2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247250960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already break down fat in our body into carbon dioxide and water.  This is done mainly through the liver, kidneys and muscle tissue.  People will tell you that fat is converted to energy, but this is not true.  It is actually the breaking of chemical bonds that releases energy.  The fat itself just changes chemically; it does not loose mass.  In fact, if a person converted even just one kilo of fat to energy, it would release more energy than the atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima.  The majority of fat lost (about 80\%) ends up being exhaled as carbon dioxide, with the rest being water secreted through urination or through sweat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already break down fat in our body into carbon dioxide and water .
This is done mainly through the liver , kidneys and muscle tissue .
People will tell you that fat is converted to energy , but this is not true .
It is actually the breaking of chemical bonds that releases energy .
The fat itself just changes chemically ; it does not loose mass .
In fact , if a person converted even just one kilo of fat to energy , it would release more energy than the atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima .
The majority of fat lost ( about 80 \ % ) ends up being exhaled as carbon dioxide , with the rest being water secreted through urination or through sweat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already break down fat in our body into carbon dioxide and water.
This is done mainly through the liver, kidneys and muscle tissue.
People will tell you that fat is converted to energy, but this is not true.
It is actually the breaking of chemical bonds that releases energy.
The fat itself just changes chemically; it does not loose mass.
In fact, if a person converted even just one kilo of fat to energy, it would release more energy than the atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima.
The majority of fat lost (about 80\%) ends up being exhaled as carbon dioxide, with the rest being water secreted through urination or through sweat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657713</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247247000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some reason I thought tailpipe was referring to something else entirely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason I thought tailpipe was referring to something else entirely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason I thought tailpipe was referring to something else entirely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658715</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1247309280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, of course you're right, but technically you could see the carbon in the lard around your hips as "sequestered" too. It was once in the atmosphere, it got scooped up by a plant, eaten by a cow, eaten by a fatty guy and now it sits there in his belly. And unless he exhales it, it's going to sit there, if we're lucky 'til he dies.</p><p>So fight global warming! Get fat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , of course you 're right , but technically you could see the carbon in the lard around your hips as " sequestered " too .
It was once in the atmosphere , it got scooped up by a plant , eaten by a cow , eaten by a fatty guy and now it sits there in his belly .
And unless he exhales it , it 's going to sit there , if we 're lucky 'til he dies.So fight global warming !
Get fat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, of course you're right, but technically you could see the carbon in the lard around your hips as "sequestered" too.
It was once in the atmosphere, it got scooped up by a plant, eaten by a cow, eaten by a fatty guy and now it sits there in his belly.
And unless he exhales it, it's going to sit there, if we're lucky 'til he dies.So fight global warming!
Get fat!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657263</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Samah</author>
	<datestamp>1247240580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem. The CO2 from your tailpipe is.</p></div><p>I was of the understanding that vehicle exhaust is carbon MONoxide, ie. CO <br>
Unless it produces both and I'm mistaken...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.I was of the understanding that vehicle exhaust is carbon MONoxide , ie .
CO Unless it produces both and I 'm mistaken.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.I was of the understanding that vehicle exhaust is carbon MONoxide, ie.
CO 
Unless it produces both and I'm mistaken...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657045</id>
	<title>Brilliant!</title>
	<author>naz404</author>
	<datestamp>1247237940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>now all we need is for scientists to discover a way to turn humans into mice!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>now all we need is for scientists to discover a way to turn humans into mice !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now all we need is for scientists to discover a way to turn humans into mice!
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656677</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1247233800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've been livin in cave or something?  The Chinese beat us to it! There is the Hunan Village serving take-out Kung-Pao Penguin!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've been livin in cave or something ?
The Chinese beat us to it !
There is the Hunan Village serving take-out Kung-Pao Penguin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've been livin in cave or something?
The Chinese beat us to it!
There is the Hunan Village serving take-out Kung-Pao Penguin!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661253</id>
	<title>The Bacall Diet:  You know how to diet don't you?</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1247335320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just put your lips together and blow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just put your lips together and blow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just put your lips together and blow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658911</id>
	<title>Re:obPublic Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247313720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best thing is, that <em>eating</em> fat, and <em>being</em> fat, are two completely different things.</p><p>All energy gets transformed into sugar anyway. But it depends on how fast it enters the blood stream.<br>If it enters too fast, the cells can't use it, and the body has to remove it from the stream, because it damages the blood vessels.<br>It removes it, by transforming it into body fat. If not, you got diabetes, and can die from it.</p><p>And what enters the blood steam how fast?<br>Short carbohydrates are the number one here. Because they basically already are sugars. So next to no processing has to occur.<br>Fat on the other hand, has a very high energy density. But it also is slower to process. Which makes it risky to eat more than you actually need, because you are trying to fill your stomach.<br>But in the presence of both, the pure sugar is way worse. Especially, because usually, to process the sugar in your body, you need B vitamins. Which whole grains bring with them. While sugar does not. So your body has to take it away from other processes. Like some in your brain, etc. Creating an imbalance and faulty processes. What this results in, should be clear.<br>Of course, saturated fats are worse than unsaturated ones. (But beware that the saturatedness is pretty much equal to its liquidity. Which makes it clear that margarine is artificially saturated, and then filled with some unsaturated fats, to make it not just as bad. This creates trans-fats which are even worse. So real butter in fact is way more healthy here.)</p><p>Because of that thing with energy density, it is also not the only factor, how much you eat. That is why you can eat food with a low glycemic load all day long, stuffing you to the ears with it, and still not get fat.</p><p>Isn't that great? You can eat tons of food. You can even eat fat (in moderation). And it still does not make you fat!</p><p>The only problem: We do not have that much recipes for food that tastes well to us, and contains that kind of food.<br>This is because we are used to, and are even a bit addicted to that bad food. We expect that taste, and do not like other tastes that much. But if you go trough it, you will become used to it, and it will taste just as good. This is simple psychology.</p><p>Of course, this lets us get to the bottom of the problem: Why do we not eat that well, when we know exactly how to do it?<br>Simple: Because eating disorders are a psychological problem. No nutritional education in the world is going to fix that.<br>We have to find the cause of that what blocks us from just going trough it, and eating better.</p><p>Is at that the food was designed for maximum addictiveness?<br>That we just are sad because our life is not that great (prehaps even with the feedback loop of being fat now, and the bad food changing out mood for the worse)?</p><p>I don't know, but at least this is a start.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>Because we have to face this taboo: Eating healthy <em>has</em> to be <em>fun</em>. It has to taste good. We have to like it. Not because we have to, but because we really like it!<br>As long as this is ignored, the problem won't ever go away!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best thing is , that eating fat , and being fat , are two completely different things.All energy gets transformed into sugar anyway .
But it depends on how fast it enters the blood stream.If it enters too fast , the cells ca n't use it , and the body has to remove it from the stream , because it damages the blood vessels.It removes it , by transforming it into body fat .
If not , you got diabetes , and can die from it.And what enters the blood steam how fast ? Short carbohydrates are the number one here .
Because they basically already are sugars .
So next to no processing has to occur.Fat on the other hand , has a very high energy density .
But it also is slower to process .
Which makes it risky to eat more than you actually need , because you are trying to fill your stomach.But in the presence of both , the pure sugar is way worse .
Especially , because usually , to process the sugar in your body , you need B vitamins .
Which whole grains bring with them .
While sugar does not .
So your body has to take it away from other processes .
Like some in your brain , etc .
Creating an imbalance and faulty processes .
What this results in , should be clear.Of course , saturated fats are worse than unsaturated ones .
( But beware that the saturatedness is pretty much equal to its liquidity .
Which makes it clear that margarine is artificially saturated , and then filled with some unsaturated fats , to make it not just as bad .
This creates trans-fats which are even worse .
So real butter in fact is way more healthy here .
) Because of that thing with energy density , it is also not the only factor , how much you eat .
That is why you can eat food with a low glycemic load all day long , stuffing you to the ears with it , and still not get fat.Is n't that great ?
You can eat tons of food .
You can even eat fat ( in moderation ) .
And it still does not make you fat ! The only problem : We do not have that much recipes for food that tastes well to us , and contains that kind of food.This is because we are used to , and are even a bit addicted to that bad food .
We expect that taste , and do not like other tastes that much .
But if you go trough it , you will become used to it , and it will taste just as good .
This is simple psychology.Of course , this lets us get to the bottom of the problem : Why do we not eat that well , when we know exactly how to do it ? Simple : Because eating disorders are a psychological problem .
No nutritional education in the world is going to fix that.We have to find the cause of that what blocks us from just going trough it , and eating better.Is at that the food was designed for maximum addictiveness ? That we just are sad because our life is not that great ( prehaps even with the feedback loop of being fat now , and the bad food changing out mood for the worse ) ? I do n't know , but at least this is a start .
: ) Because we have to face this taboo : Eating healthy has to be fun .
It has to taste good .
We have to like it .
Not because we have to , but because we really like it ! As long as this is ignored , the problem wo n't ever go away !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best thing is, that eating fat, and being fat, are two completely different things.All energy gets transformed into sugar anyway.
But it depends on how fast it enters the blood stream.If it enters too fast, the cells can't use it, and the body has to remove it from the stream, because it damages the blood vessels.It removes it, by transforming it into body fat.
If not, you got diabetes, and can die from it.And what enters the blood steam how fast?Short carbohydrates are the number one here.
Because they basically already are sugars.
So next to no processing has to occur.Fat on the other hand, has a very high energy density.
But it also is slower to process.
Which makes it risky to eat more than you actually need, because you are trying to fill your stomach.But in the presence of both, the pure sugar is way worse.
Especially, because usually, to process the sugar in your body, you need B vitamins.
Which whole grains bring with them.
While sugar does not.
So your body has to take it away from other processes.
Like some in your brain, etc.
Creating an imbalance and faulty processes.
What this results in, should be clear.Of course, saturated fats are worse than unsaturated ones.
(But beware that the saturatedness is pretty much equal to its liquidity.
Which makes it clear that margarine is artificially saturated, and then filled with some unsaturated fats, to make it not just as bad.
This creates trans-fats which are even worse.
So real butter in fact is way more healthy here.
)Because of that thing with energy density, it is also not the only factor, how much you eat.
That is why you can eat food with a low glycemic load all day long, stuffing you to the ears with it, and still not get fat.Isn't that great?
You can eat tons of food.
You can even eat fat (in moderation).
And it still does not make you fat!The only problem: We do not have that much recipes for food that tastes well to us, and contains that kind of food.This is because we are used to, and are even a bit addicted to that bad food.
We expect that taste, and do not like other tastes that much.
But if you go trough it, you will become used to it, and it will taste just as good.
This is simple psychology.Of course, this lets us get to the bottom of the problem: Why do we not eat that well, when we know exactly how to do it?Simple: Because eating disorders are a psychological problem.
No nutritional education in the world is going to fix that.We have to find the cause of that what blocks us from just going trough it, and eating better.Is at that the food was designed for maximum addictiveness?That we just are sad because our life is not that great (prehaps even with the feedback loop of being fat now, and the bad food changing out mood for the worse)?I don't know, but at least this is a start.
:)Because we have to face this taboo: Eating healthy has to be fun.
It has to taste good.
We have to like it.
Not because we have to, but because we really like it!As long as this is ignored, the problem won't ever go away!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657967</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>BillGod</author>
	<datestamp>1247252220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new fat breathing mice overlords</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new fat breathing mice overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new fat breathing mice overlords</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28739187</id>
	<title>Re:Fat - CO2?</title>
	<author>JordanL</author>
	<datestamp>1247910420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I should have used  tags.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I should have used tags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I should have used  tags.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661177</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247334840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heat does not care where the CO2 came from. It will be held in the atmosphere if the CO2 is there and not if it isn't. The carbon in all of our fat little bodies is sequestered there. If we all exhale it as CO2 then it will, in fact, be in the air having an effect on global warming. In point of fact, the CO2 coming out of your tail pipe came from gasoline, made from oil, a product of compressed and decayed plants and dinosaurs, who also extracted the carbon from the air millions of years ago. It's still a closed loop. Climate change is only about what's in the air, regardless of where it came from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heat does not care where the CO2 came from .
It will be held in the atmosphere if the CO2 is there and not if it is n't .
The carbon in all of our fat little bodies is sequestered there .
If we all exhale it as CO2 then it will , in fact , be in the air having an effect on global warming .
In point of fact , the CO2 coming out of your tail pipe came from gasoline , made from oil , a product of compressed and decayed plants and dinosaurs , who also extracted the carbon from the air millions of years ago .
It 's still a closed loop .
Climate change is only about what 's in the air , regardless of where it came from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heat does not care where the CO2 came from.
It will be held in the atmosphere if the CO2 is there and not if it isn't.
The carbon in all of our fat little bodies is sequestered there.
If we all exhale it as CO2 then it will, in fact, be in the air having an effect on global warming.
In point of fact, the CO2 coming out of your tail pipe came from gasoline, made from oil, a product of compressed and decayed plants and dinosaurs, who also extracted the carbon from the air millions of years ago.
It's still a closed loop.
Climate change is only about what's in the air, regardless of where it came from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656515</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247232420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd have to be able to exhale fat if you ate penguin burgers.  Those guys are so fat, they can go for a month or two without eating practically anything.</p><p>Being fat actually gets the males more loving, as the females of some species are more likely to mate with those who have a more resonant mating call, indicating thickness and thus likelyhood of not keeling over from hunger while the female runs off for weeks at a time.</p><p>You could practically cook an emperor penguin on a fire of its own grease.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd have to be able to exhale fat if you ate penguin burgers .
Those guys are so fat , they can go for a month or two without eating practically anything.Being fat actually gets the males more loving , as the females of some species are more likely to mate with those who have a more resonant mating call , indicating thickness and thus likelyhood of not keeling over from hunger while the female runs off for weeks at a time.You could practically cook an emperor penguin on a fire of its own grease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd have to be able to exhale fat if you ate penguin burgers.
Those guys are so fat, they can go for a month or two without eating practically anything.Being fat actually gets the males more loving, as the females of some species are more likely to mate with those who have a more resonant mating call, indicating thickness and thus likelyhood of not keeling over from hunger while the female runs off for weeks at a time.You could practically cook an emperor penguin on a fire of its own grease.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28659571</id>
	<title>no it won't</title>
	<author>Breakthru</author>
	<datestamp>1247323980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and of course, obesity.</p></div><p>Like how exactly? "We'll clone you with some modifications so your clone
will not be fat!" ?!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and of course , obesity.Like how exactly ?
" We 'll clone you with some modifications so your clone will not be fat !
" ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and of course, obesity.Like how exactly?
"We'll clone you with some modifications so your clone
will not be fat!
" ?!
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28666591</id>
	<title>Inconsistency in story! :-)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247402640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the exhaled air is full of fat, how come it's "thin air"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the exhaled air is full of fat , how come it 's " thin air " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the exhaled air is full of fat, how come it's "thin air"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656529</id>
	<title>Re:Fat - CO2?</title>
	<author>bunratty</author>
	<datestamp>1247232600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those that don't understand the carbon cycle are doomed to... uh... make stupid comments about global warming, I guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those that do n't understand the carbon cycle are doomed to... uh... make stupid comments about global warming , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those that don't understand the carbon cycle are doomed to... uh... make stupid comments about global warming, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656359</id>
	<title>obPublic Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247230980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a stunning and amazing medical breakthrough -- finally, people don't have to be fat! In other news, eating a well balanced diet, excercise, seen sulking in the corner for not being hip enough. Dr. House overheard saying "It's stuff like this that makes me want to not dangle anymore."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a stunning and amazing medical breakthrough -- finally , people do n't have to be fat !
In other news , eating a well balanced diet , excercise , seen sulking in the corner for not being hip enough .
Dr. House overheard saying " It 's stuff like this that makes me want to not dangle anymore .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a stunning and amazing medical breakthrough -- finally, people don't have to be fat!
In other news, eating a well balanced diet, excercise, seen sulking in the corner for not being hip enough.
Dr. House overheard saying "It's stuff like this that makes me want to not dangle anymore.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28664997</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247327340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read "Tailpipe" as a word for anus.</p><p>-AC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " Tailpipe " as a word for anus.-AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read "Tailpipe" as a word for anus.-AC</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657391</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>w3woody</author>
	<datestamp>1247242260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The CO2 from your breath is not the problem. The CO2 from your tailpipe is."

So... What you're saying is I shouldn't eat beans?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe is .
" So... What you 're saying is I should n't eat beans ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.
"

So... What you're saying is I shouldn't eat beans?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656361</id>
	<title>Fat - CO2?</title>
	<author>JordanL</author>
	<datestamp>1247230980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And we thought global warming was bad before...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And we thought global warming was bad before.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we thought global warming was bad before...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747</id>
	<title>Except that fat is not the problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247234580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The human body is in essence a fat-burning machine. It is made to burn fat, and fat is its most efficient, most safest form of energy. As a coincidence it can also handle pure sugars and carbs (which break down to sugars) by secreting insulin into the bloodstream when carbs/sugars are ingested. When insulin enters the bloodstream, two things happen: Firstly, the body's lipolysis stops (the breaking-down of fat), resulting in the body stopping its burning of your fat reserves, and instead starts storing the fat you ingested (ever had a "pasta diet" for a longer while and noticed the effect of it?). Secondly, the insulin (and not the sugar) results in the familiar increased heart activity (and sometimes palpitations) that come from sugar ingestion, which is a contributing factor to reduced cardiac health. Last of all, stressful production of insulin due a diet overly rich in carbs or sugars, as known since long, increases the risk of developing diabetes - simply put, a burned out pancreas.</p><p>Carbs/sugars are the catalysts for storing fat instead of burning it. The problem is solved by reducing your carb/sugar intake, and replacing that energy amount by a fat intake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The human body is in essence a fat-burning machine .
It is made to burn fat , and fat is its most efficient , most safest form of energy .
As a coincidence it can also handle pure sugars and carbs ( which break down to sugars ) by secreting insulin into the bloodstream when carbs/sugars are ingested .
When insulin enters the bloodstream , two things happen : Firstly , the body 's lipolysis stops ( the breaking-down of fat ) , resulting in the body stopping its burning of your fat reserves , and instead starts storing the fat you ingested ( ever had a " pasta diet " for a longer while and noticed the effect of it ? ) .
Secondly , the insulin ( and not the sugar ) results in the familiar increased heart activity ( and sometimes palpitations ) that come from sugar ingestion , which is a contributing factor to reduced cardiac health .
Last of all , stressful production of insulin due a diet overly rich in carbs or sugars , as known since long , increases the risk of developing diabetes - simply put , a burned out pancreas.Carbs/sugars are the catalysts for storing fat instead of burning it .
The problem is solved by reducing your carb/sugar intake , and replacing that energy amount by a fat intake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The human body is in essence a fat-burning machine.
It is made to burn fat, and fat is its most efficient, most safest form of energy.
As a coincidence it can also handle pure sugars and carbs (which break down to sugars) by secreting insulin into the bloodstream when carbs/sugars are ingested.
When insulin enters the bloodstream, two things happen: Firstly, the body's lipolysis stops (the breaking-down of fat), resulting in the body stopping its burning of your fat reserves, and instead starts storing the fat you ingested (ever had a "pasta diet" for a longer while and noticed the effect of it?).
Secondly, the insulin (and not the sugar) results in the familiar increased heart activity (and sometimes palpitations) that come from sugar ingestion, which is a contributing factor to reduced cardiac health.
Last of all, stressful production of insulin due a diet overly rich in carbs or sugars, as known since long, increases the risk of developing diabetes - simply put, a burned out pancreas.Carbs/sugars are the catalysts for storing fat instead of burning it.
The problem is solved by reducing your carb/sugar intake, and replacing that energy amount by a fat intake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657335</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>realcoolguy425</author>
	<datestamp>1247241480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>UGH.  Seriously, put the kool-aide away for a bit and look at the numbers.  I know you have all these big happy dreams of flying magical unicorns that will exist when we stop burning fossil fuels, but that's not what we're seeing.
<br>
<br>

Quite literally, we're enhancing our crop yields by burning fossil fuels.  It's a minute increase in CO2, and I do mean very small.  When compared with all greenhouse gases, it's not even background noise.  Increased CO2 = Bigger, better, healthier plant life.  Which will equate to more available food for the human population.
<br>
<br>
Fossil fuels do not add to the green house gases in the atmosphere in amounts that we can even measure.  By their own accords, those who want to see greenhouse gases curtailed, are only talking about 1/20th of a degree in terms of climate change.  That number is probably being generous.
<br>
<br>
The numbers supporting a huge campaign to combat global climate change just simply do not add up.  I hate this issue, because so many people do not look at the numbers, and believe the FUD that we've been taught since we were children.  I too believed all of it, up until a couple of years ago.  I took a good long look at the numbers, what was being said.  Low and behold, I made my own decision, and every time I hear combating carbon emissions, well let's just say whoever said it goes down a few levels on my credibility meter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>UGH .
Seriously , put the kool-aide away for a bit and look at the numbers .
I know you have all these big happy dreams of flying magical unicorns that will exist when we stop burning fossil fuels , but that 's not what we 're seeing .
Quite literally , we 're enhancing our crop yields by burning fossil fuels .
It 's a minute increase in CO2 , and I do mean very small .
When compared with all greenhouse gases , it 's not even background noise .
Increased CO2 = Bigger , better , healthier plant life .
Which will equate to more available food for the human population .
Fossil fuels do not add to the green house gases in the atmosphere in amounts that we can even measure .
By their own accords , those who want to see greenhouse gases curtailed , are only talking about 1/20th of a degree in terms of climate change .
That number is probably being generous .
The numbers supporting a huge campaign to combat global climate change just simply do not add up .
I hate this issue , because so many people do not look at the numbers , and believe the FUD that we 've been taught since we were children .
I too believed all of it , up until a couple of years ago .
I took a good long look at the numbers , what was being said .
Low and behold , I made my own decision , and every time I hear combating carbon emissions , well let 's just say whoever said it goes down a few levels on my credibility meter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UGH.
Seriously, put the kool-aide away for a bit and look at the numbers.
I know you have all these big happy dreams of flying magical unicorns that will exist when we stop burning fossil fuels, but that's not what we're seeing.
Quite literally, we're enhancing our crop yields by burning fossil fuels.
It's a minute increase in CO2, and I do mean very small.
When compared with all greenhouse gases, it's not even background noise.
Increased CO2 = Bigger, better, healthier plant life.
Which will equate to more available food for the human population.
Fossil fuels do not add to the green house gases in the atmosphere in amounts that we can even measure.
By their own accords, those who want to see greenhouse gases curtailed, are only talking about 1/20th of a degree in terms of climate change.
That number is probably being generous.
The numbers supporting a huge campaign to combat global climate change just simply do not add up.
I hate this issue, because so many people do not look at the numbers, and believe the FUD that we've been taught since we were children.
I too believed all of it, up until a couple of years ago.
I took a good long look at the numbers, what was being said.
Low and behold, I made my own decision, and every time I hear combating carbon emissions, well let's just say whoever said it goes down a few levels on my credibility meter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658809</id>
	<title>movie</title>
	<author>Fuzzums</author>
	<datestamp>1247311140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nice moment to watch Thinner again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nice moment to watch Thinner again ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nice moment to watch Thinner again ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656997</id>
	<title>Something else to blame....</title>
	<author>ZonkerWilliam</author>
	<datestamp>1247237340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we have those little fat bastiges to blame for global warming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we have those little fat bastiges to blame for global warming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we have those little fat bastiges to blame for global warming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657531</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247244120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.  The CO2 from your tailpipe is.</p></div><p>Actually the food that you eat is a bigger problem (with regards to greenhouse gasses) than your tailpipe. See the UN Food and Agriculture Organization report titled <a href="http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html" title="fao.org" rel="nofollow">Livestock's Long Shadow</a> [fao.org]. When looking at all the greenhouse gasses and land use changes involved, animal agriculture was contributing more greenhouse gasses than the entire transport sector combined.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.Actually the food that you eat is a bigger problem ( with regards to greenhouse gasses ) than your tailpipe .
See the UN Food and Agriculture Organization report titled Livestock 's Long Shadow [ fao.org ] .
When looking at all the greenhouse gasses and land use changes involved , animal agriculture was contributing more greenhouse gasses than the entire transport sector combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.Actually the food that you eat is a bigger problem (with regards to greenhouse gasses) than your tailpipe.
See the UN Food and Agriculture Organization report titled Livestock's Long Shadow [fao.org].
When looking at all the greenhouse gasses and land use changes involved, animal agriculture was contributing more greenhouse gasses than the entire transport sector combined.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657853</id>
	<title>Next step: breathing fire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247249880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat is combustible, so if we can exhale fat along with unmetabolized oxygen, all we need is to bioengineer some source of ignition in order to breathe fire.  I would suggest the shock-generating organs of the electric eel or perhaps some gland capable of purifying small quantities of phosphorous.</p><p>Soon enough, there will be dragons.  Or at least fiery rodents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat is combustible , so if we can exhale fat along with unmetabolized oxygen , all we need is to bioengineer some source of ignition in order to breathe fire .
I would suggest the shock-generating organs of the electric eel or perhaps some gland capable of purifying small quantities of phosphorous.Soon enough , there will be dragons .
Or at least fiery rodents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat is combustible, so if we can exhale fat along with unmetabolized oxygen, all we need is to bioengineer some source of ignition in order to breathe fire.
I would suggest the shock-generating organs of the electric eel or perhaps some gland capable of purifying small quantities of phosphorous.Soon enough, there will be dragons.
Or at least fiery rodents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663603</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>BoogieChile</author>
	<datestamp>1247309640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1/20th of a degree per year<br>
<br>
There, fixed that for you!<br>
<br>
What's that? Five degrees by the end of the century?<br>
<br>
Is that right? <br>
<br>
See, I knew mathematics cuold be fun!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1/20th of a degree per year There , fixed that for you !
What 's that ?
Five degrees by the end of the century ?
Is that right ?
See , I knew mathematics cuold be fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1/20th of a degree per year

There, fixed that for you!
What's that?
Five degrees by the end of the century?
Is that right?
See, I knew mathematics cuold be fun!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663787</id>
	<title>Re:Except that fat is not the problem...</title>
	<author>FatIsGood</author>
	<datestamp>1247311380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't you ever get tired of telling people this? I do. All this hand wringing and silly new diets and 'nutritionists' telling people to lower fat intake. If everyone cut down their carbs and fructose intake and stop worrying about eating fat, the problem would be solved. *sigh*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you ever get tired of telling people this ?
I do .
All this hand wringing and silly new diets and 'nutritionists ' telling people to lower fat intake .
If everyone cut down their carbs and fructose intake and stop worrying about eating fat , the problem would be solved .
* sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you ever get tired of telling people this?
I do.
All this hand wringing and silly new diets and 'nutritionists' telling people to lower fat intake.
If everyone cut down their carbs and fructose intake and stop worrying about eating fat, the problem would be solved.
*sigh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661051</id>
	<title>Re:So now we get:</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1247334240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>on the plus side, maybe we'll learn to reproduce through fission... then sex wouldn't be such a big deal anymore, and i can finally lose my<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ahem, well, you know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>on the plus side , maybe we 'll learn to reproduce through fission... then sex would n't be such a big deal anymore , and i can finally lose my ... ahem , well , you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the plus side, maybe we'll learn to reproduce through fission... then sex wouldn't be such a big deal anymore, and i can finally lose my ... ahem, well, you know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657479</id>
	<title>can you say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247243400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Xel'Naga mice?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Xel'Naga mice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Xel'Naga mice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657447</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>Yankel</author>
	<datestamp>1247242980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.  The CO2 from your tailpipe is.</p></div><p>When you said CO2 from my tailpipe, I was thinking "CO2 from my tailpipe? Doesn't he mean methane?" Then I realized you meant my CAR'S tailpipe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.When you said CO2 from my tailpipe , I was thinking " CO2 from my tailpipe ?
Does n't he mean methane ?
" Then I realized you meant my CAR 'S tailpipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.When you said CO2 from my tailpipe, I was thinking "CO2 from my tailpipe?
Doesn't he mean methane?
" Then I realized you meant my CAR'S tailpipe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>RsG</author>
	<datestamp>1247235360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ugh.  I get tired of having to explain this.  You'd think it'd stick the first dozen times or so, and I wouldn't have to keep repeating myself.</p><p>The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.  The CO2 from your tailpipe is.</p><p>The reason is their source.  Carbon from food is ultimately bound via photosynthesis; you either eat the plants or eat the animals that eat the plants.  Photosynthesis removes free CO2 from the air and binds the carbon, releasing the oxygen.  Any high school student can tell you this.</p><p>Every last ounce of CO2 coming out of your mouth, right now as you're reading this, was previously bound up as food, which was living tissue once, which (directly or indirectly) grew via taking CO2 out of the air.  It's a closed cycle.  Exhaling more CO2 will not result in a net increase in the carbon cycle.</p><p>Your tailpipe is different.  The hydrocarbons you're burning come from fossil fuels, which have been sequestered from the atmosphere for the past few million years.  Burning them does add a net amount of CO2 to the carbon cycle.</p><p>Climate change is not about what's in the air, it's about what's no longer in the ground.  This is why Biofuels are a solution - the IC engine can be totally identical to one running on fossil fuels, but the hydrocarbons are grown rather than mined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh .
I get tired of having to explain this .
You 'd think it 'd stick the first dozen times or so , and I would n't have to keep repeating myself.The CO2 from your breath is not the problem .
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.The reason is their source .
Carbon from food is ultimately bound via photosynthesis ; you either eat the plants or eat the animals that eat the plants .
Photosynthesis removes free CO2 from the air and binds the carbon , releasing the oxygen .
Any high school student can tell you this.Every last ounce of CO2 coming out of your mouth , right now as you 're reading this , was previously bound up as food , which was living tissue once , which ( directly or indirectly ) grew via taking CO2 out of the air .
It 's a closed cycle .
Exhaling more CO2 will not result in a net increase in the carbon cycle.Your tailpipe is different .
The hydrocarbons you 're burning come from fossil fuels , which have been sequestered from the atmosphere for the past few million years .
Burning them does add a net amount of CO2 to the carbon cycle.Climate change is not about what 's in the air , it 's about what 's no longer in the ground .
This is why Biofuels are a solution - the IC engine can be totally identical to one running on fossil fuels , but the hydrocarbons are grown rather than mined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh.
I get tired of having to explain this.
You'd think it'd stick the first dozen times or so, and I wouldn't have to keep repeating myself.The CO2 from your breath is not the problem.
The CO2 from your tailpipe is.The reason is their source.
Carbon from food is ultimately bound via photosynthesis; you either eat the plants or eat the animals that eat the plants.
Photosynthesis removes free CO2 from the air and binds the carbon, releasing the oxygen.
Any high school student can tell you this.Every last ounce of CO2 coming out of your mouth, right now as you're reading this, was previously bound up as food, which was living tissue once, which (directly or indirectly) grew via taking CO2 out of the air.
It's a closed cycle.
Exhaling more CO2 will not result in a net increase in the carbon cycle.Your tailpipe is different.
The hydrocarbons you're burning come from fossil fuels, which have been sequestered from the atmosphere for the past few million years.
Burning them does add a net amount of CO2 to the carbon cycle.Climate change is not about what's in the air, it's about what's no longer in the ground.
This is why Biofuels are a solution - the IC engine can be totally identical to one running on fossil fuels, but the hydrocarbons are grown rather than mined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656995</id>
	<title>Re:Global warming?</title>
	<author>pitterpatter</author>
	<datestamp>1247237340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ugh.  I get tired of having to explain this.  You'd think it'd stick the first dozen times or so, and I wouldn't have to keep repeating myself.</p></div><p>They say the definition of insanity is repeating the same action and expecting a different result.  Your comment might say more about yourself than about your readership.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p><p>Not that there's anything wrong with that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh .
I get tired of having to explain this .
You 'd think it 'd stick the first dozen times or so , and I would n't have to keep repeating myself.They say the definition of insanity is repeating the same action and expecting a different result .
Your comment might say more about yourself than about your readership .
: -DNot that there 's anything wrong with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh.
I get tired of having to explain this.
You'd think it'd stick the first dozen times or so, and I wouldn't have to keep repeating myself.They say the definition of insanity is repeating the same action and expecting a different result.
Your comment might say more about yourself than about your readership.
:-DNot that there's anything wrong with that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355</id>
	<title>Global warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247230980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans. Good news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica. Bad news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans .
Good news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica .
Bad news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earth is screwed if we ever get this to work on humans.
Good news is that we will be able to build Burger Kings in Antarctica.
Bad news is that the burgers will be made out of penguins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28739187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28664997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_2310235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656529
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28739187
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657061
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28664997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657967
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657335
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657391
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657531
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656995
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28658715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657713
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28661177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656479
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28656747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28663787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_2310235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_2310235.28657221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
