<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_10_1835252</id>
	<title>Cell Phones That Learn the Sounds of Your Life</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1247213580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Researchers at Dartmouth College have developed new software that uses the microphone on the iPhone to <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/22907/">track and interpret a user's everyday activities</a> using sound. The software, called <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAKplAaPAHE">SoundSense</a>,
picks up sounds and tries to classify them into certain
categories. SoundSense can recognize completely unfamiliar
sounds and runs entirely on the phone. It automatically classifies
sounds as 'voice,' 'music,' or 'ambient noise.' If a sound is repeated
often enough or for long enough, SoundSense gives it a high 'sound
rank' and asks the user to confirm that it is a significant sound and
offers the option to label the sound. In testing, the SoundSense
software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a
particular coffee shop, walking outside, brushing her teeth, cycling,
and driving in the car. It also picked up the noise of an ATM and a fan in a particular room. The <a href="http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~sensorlab/pubs/s3\_mobisys09.pdf">results</a> [PDF]
of the experiments were recently presented at the MobiSys 2009 conference."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Researchers at Dartmouth College have developed new software that uses the microphone on the iPhone to track and interpret a user 's everyday activities using sound .
The software , called SoundSense , picks up sounds and tries to classify them into certain categories .
SoundSense can recognize completely unfamiliar sounds and runs entirely on the phone .
It automatically classifies sounds as 'voice, ' 'music, ' or 'ambient noise .
' If a sound is repeated often enough or for long enough , SoundSense gives it a high 'sound rank ' and asks the user to confirm that it is a significant sound and offers the option to label the sound .
In testing , the SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a particular coffee shop , walking outside , brushing her teeth , cycling , and driving in the car .
It also picked up the noise of an ATM and a fan in a particular room .
The results [ PDF ] of the experiments were recently presented at the MobiSys 2009 conference .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at Dartmouth College have developed new software that uses the microphone on the iPhone to track and interpret a user's everyday activities using sound.
The software, called SoundSense,
picks up sounds and tries to classify them into certain
categories.
SoundSense can recognize completely unfamiliar
sounds and runs entirely on the phone.
It automatically classifies
sounds as 'voice,' 'music,' or 'ambient noise.
' If a sound is repeated
often enough or for long enough, SoundSense gives it a high 'sound
rank' and asks the user to confirm that it is a significant sound and
offers the option to label the sound.
In testing, the SoundSense
software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a
particular coffee shop, walking outside, brushing her teeth, cycling,
and driving in the car.
It also picked up the noise of an ATM and a fan in a particular room.
The results [PDF]
of the experiments were recently presented at the MobiSys 2009 conference.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654639</id>
	<title>How Long Before...</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1247218500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long before it learns all of the curse words in your life?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before it learns all of the curse words in your life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before it learns all of the curse words in your life?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654457</id>
	<title>It's easy to say 'OMG PRIVACY!!' but..</title>
	<author>synthesizerpatel</author>
	<datestamp>1247217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets be honest people. If a device is capable, someone will write the software to enable it. This shouldn't be surprising or shocking. When 'wearable computers' started getting buzz it was because people were walking around with web-cams attached to their heads seeing everything they could see and slashdot thought it while amazingly geeky, was cool. This isn't that different except there's no soldering required.</p><p>To be honest, we haven't even seen the worst of it yet. Considering the deluge of FPGA and EEPROM powered embedded devices out there you'd best be scared of the things that are \_hard\_ to reprogram, not the ones with complete IDEs and API documentation available.</p><p>I'm more concerned about someone snooping on me from my Jura Capresso than I am from my cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets be honest people .
If a device is capable , someone will write the software to enable it .
This should n't be surprising or shocking .
When 'wearable computers ' started getting buzz it was because people were walking around with web-cams attached to their heads seeing everything they could see and slashdot thought it while amazingly geeky , was cool .
This is n't that different except there 's no soldering required.To be honest , we have n't even seen the worst of it yet .
Considering the deluge of FPGA and EEPROM powered embedded devices out there you 'd best be scared of the things that are \ _hard \ _ to reprogram , not the ones with complete IDEs and API documentation available.I 'm more concerned about someone snooping on me from my Jura Capresso than I am from my cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets be honest people.
If a device is capable, someone will write the software to enable it.
This shouldn't be surprising or shocking.
When 'wearable computers' started getting buzz it was because people were walking around with web-cams attached to their heads seeing everything they could see and slashdot thought it while amazingly geeky, was cool.
This isn't that different except there's no soldering required.To be honest, we haven't even seen the worst of it yet.
Considering the deluge of FPGA and EEPROM powered embedded devices out there you'd best be scared of the things that are \_hard\_ to reprogram, not the ones with complete IDEs and API documentation available.I'm more concerned about someone snooping on me from my Jura Capresso than I am from my cell phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654651</id>
	<title>reboot</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1247218560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many of these SoundSense users will end up having the "awooaaaa" sound of a booting Mac get classified as a "significant sound".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many of these SoundSense users will end up having the " awooaaaa " sound of a booting Mac get classified as a " significant sound " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many of these SoundSense users will end up having the "awooaaaa" sound of a booting Mac get classified as a "significant sound".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654739</id>
	<title>"ATM Machine"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"ATM machine" appears in two summaries in one day? That sure is redundantly redundant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ATM machine " appears in two summaries in one day ?
That sure is redundantly redundant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"ATM machine" appears in two summaries in one day?
That sure is redundantly redundant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655515</id>
	<title>I've always wanted to...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>keep track of my flatulence and orgasm noises and share stats on those with my friends.  Now thanks to technology I can!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>keep track of my flatulence and orgasm noises and share stats on those with my friends .
Now thanks to technology I can !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>keep track of my flatulence and orgasm noises and share stats on those with my friends.
Now thanks to technology I can!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654763</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, will it play Homer's Beer Song when I burp ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , will it play Homer 's Beer Song when I burp ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, will it play Homer's Beer Song when I burp ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654441</id>
	<title>Next level of twittering</title>
	<author>Blixinator</author>
	<datestamp>1247217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have the phone tell everyone what you're doing at every moment in time.

Someone get on that.

Then when it happens, we'll have a YRO article about how this could be an invasion of privacy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have the phone tell everyone what you 're doing at every moment in time .
Someone get on that .
Then when it happens , we 'll have a YRO article about how this could be an invasion of privacy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have the phone tell everyone what you're doing at every moment in time.
Someone get on that.
Then when it happens, we'll have a YRO article about how this could be an invasion of privacy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656349</id>
	<title>Re:Bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have the app only sample sounds rather than monitor a constant stream.  For example, one second each minute or so.  Make both the sample length and the interval length configurable for maximum accuracy or maximum battery life.</p><p>Even if the app is running all the time, it really isn't going to use a lot of battery if it spends most of its time just waiting to take another sample.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have the app only sample sounds rather than monitor a constant stream .
For example , one second each minute or so .
Make both the sample length and the interval length configurable for maximum accuracy or maximum battery life.Even if the app is running all the time , it really is n't going to use a lot of battery if it spends most of its time just waiting to take another sample .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have the app only sample sounds rather than monitor a constant stream.
For example, one second each minute or so.
Make both the sample length and the interval length configurable for maximum accuracy or maximum battery life.Even if the app is running all the time, it really isn't going to use a lot of battery if it spends most of its time just waiting to take another sample.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654551</id>
	<title>Sounds cool (no pun intended) but</title>
	<author>Nonillion</author>
	<datestamp>1247218080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now my phone will ask why it's <b>4:20</b> all the time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now my phone will ask why it 's 4 : 20 all the time ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now my phone will ask why it's 4:20 all the time ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541</id>
	<title>Another use for this technology</title>
	<author>al0ha</author>
	<datestamp>1247218020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>could be to anonymously feed thousands of opt-in users current sound input into a public algorithmic service which provides data facilitating the creation of truely random numbers.  Similar to the use of atmospheric noise by sites like Random.org; but this could be better because the sound input devices are decentralized and always moving.
<br>
<br>
There are the obvious problems to overcome with attempts to game this sort of system, but I think it an interesting idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>could be to anonymously feed thousands of opt-in users current sound input into a public algorithmic service which provides data facilitating the creation of truely random numbers .
Similar to the use of atmospheric noise by sites like Random.org ; but this could be better because the sound input devices are decentralized and always moving .
There are the obvious problems to overcome with attempts to game this sort of system , but I think it an interesting idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could be to anonymously feed thousands of opt-in users current sound input into a public algorithmic service which provides data facilitating the creation of truely random numbers.
Similar to the use of atmospheric noise by sites like Random.org; but this could be better because the sound input devices are decentralized and always moving.
There are the obvious problems to overcome with attempts to game this sort of system, but I think it an interesting idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654903</id>
	<title>Real motivation behind this</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1247220000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, a phone that can automatically disable the ringer when the phone's owner is having sex (or snoring).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , a phone that can automatically disable the ringer when the phone 's owner is having sex ( or snoring ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, a phone that can automatically disable the ringer when the phone's owner is having sex (or snoring).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654681</id>
	<title>Seriously, WHY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247218680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What would be the point of identifying the sounds?  Would the phone do anything useful with the info?  And, why would anyone put useless software on a phone?  OK, I know most of the software people use is useless, but this sounds unbelievably useless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the point of identifying the sounds ?
Would the phone do anything useful with the info ?
And , why would anyone put useless software on a phone ?
OK , I know most of the software people use is useless , but this sounds unbelievably useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the point of identifying the sounds?
Would the phone do anything useful with the info?
And, why would anyone put useless software on a phone?
OK, I know most of the software people use is useless, but this sounds unbelievably useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654621</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1247218380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No kidding. Yet another way to track people's whereabouts. What is this, a way to close the gap when there's no GPS reception? Are we going to have to take the battery out of our phones when we're not actively using them? Perhaps install a hardware switch on the phone to disconnect the microphone? WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding .
Yet another way to track people 's whereabouts .
What is this , a way to close the gap when there 's no GPS reception ?
Are we going to have to take the battery out of our phones when we 're not actively using them ?
Perhaps install a hardware switch on the phone to disconnect the microphone ?
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding.
Yet another way to track people's whereabouts.
What is this, a way to close the gap when there's no GPS reception?
Are we going to have to take the battery out of our phones when we're not actively using them?
Perhaps install a hardware switch on the phone to disconnect the microphone?
WTF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654635</id>
	<title>Artificial intelligence algorithms on an iPhone</title>
	<author>bvankuik</author>
	<datestamp>1247218440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The application in question categories sounds and thus tries<br>to label them. This is typically done using AI algorithms like<br>a combo of a neural net and fuzzy logic. That is pretty impressive to have it running on a mobile<br>phone of all things.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I think it's very cool<br>that we have come to the point that we basically have a device<br>in our pocket that resembles a combination of the stuff mentioned<br>in books like the Hitchhiker's Guide and the Ender saga.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The application in question categories sounds and thus triesto label them .
This is typically done using AI algorithms likea combo of a neural net and fuzzy logic .
That is pretty impressive to have it running on a mobilephone of all things .
    I think it 's very coolthat we have come to the point that we basically have a devicein our pocket that resembles a combination of the stuff mentionedin books like the Hitchhiker 's Guide and the Ender saga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The application in question categories sounds and thus triesto label them.
This is typically done using AI algorithms likea combo of a neural net and fuzzy logic.
That is pretty impressive to have it running on a mobilephone of all things.
    I think it's very coolthat we have come to the point that we basically have a devicein our pocket that resembles a combination of the stuff mentionedin books like the Hitchhiker's Guide and the Ender saga.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654453</id>
	<title>new and improved ways to tweet your life</title>
	<author>ilblissli</author>
	<datestamp>1247217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>so in other words this will effectively let me tweet when i'm pooping without having to type it up on my phone. it may also be handy finding out if people have washed their hands after such an event<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>so in other words this will effectively let me tweet when i 'm pooping without having to type it up on my phone .
it may also be handy finding out if people have washed their hands after such an event ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so in other words this will effectively let me tweet when i'm pooping without having to type it up on my phone.
it may also be handy finding out if people have washed their hands after such an event ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654513</id>
	<title>ob. Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It sounds like you're going pee."</p><p>Then, if male: "Please, remember that there are ladies in the house, and put the seat down when you're done."<br>Else, if female: "If you're out of toilet paper again, I can call your sister to bring it to you."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It sounds like you 're going pee .
" Then , if male : " Please , remember that there are ladies in the house , and put the seat down when you 're done .
" Else , if female : " If you 're out of toilet paper again , I can call your sister to bring it to you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It sounds like you're going pee.
"Then, if male: "Please, remember that there are ladies in the house, and put the seat down when you're done.
"Else, if female: "If you're out of toilet paper again, I can call your sister to bring it to you.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655675</id>
	<title>Arbitron would love this</title>
	<author>merreborn</author>
	<datestamp>1247225640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arbitron is already using something somewhat like this.</p><p>They have their "test families", or whatever they're called, carry small devices they call "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable\_people\_meter" title="wikipedia.org">portable people meters</a> [wikipedia.org]".  Television programming includes sonic markers outside of the audible range, which these devices pick up via a small mic.</p><p>One would think that being able to identify television/radio programming without pre-inserting said inaudible watermarks could simplify their process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arbitron is already using something somewhat like this.They have their " test families " , or whatever they 're called , carry small devices they call " portable people meters [ wikipedia.org ] " .
Television programming includes sonic markers outside of the audible range , which these devices pick up via a small mic.One would think that being able to identify television/radio programming without pre-inserting said inaudible watermarks could simplify their process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arbitron is already using something somewhat like this.They have their "test families", or whatever they're called, carry small devices they call "portable people meters [wikipedia.org]".
Television programming includes sonic markers outside of the audible range, which these devices pick up via a small mic.One would think that being able to identify television/radio programming without pre-inserting said inaudible watermarks could simplify their process.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654911</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247220060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...your phone listens to you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...your phone listens to you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...your phone listens to you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481</id>
	<title>Oh great....</title>
	<author>cptdondo</author>
	<datestamp>1247217600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me, or the kids are whining...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me , or the kids are whining.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me, or the kids are whining...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655297</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247222700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this might be the dumbest thing I have ever read.. why would any one want this on there phone!!<br>so that your phone knows when your brushing your teeth and then can up date your twitter, myspace, and face book.  ok  i'll give you this point only cuz I know there are social network slaves out there that update there every move of the day.  Mike status = taking a dump</p><p>the only reason this would be put on a phone is for the government to lesson to you but you might be a little suspect if your phone keep asking your to confirm sounds.<br>are you making and drug deal...? why yes iphone I am making a drug deal. lol</p><p>even as a spy tool this thing sucks for the fact that the phone will ask you to confirm the sounds lmao...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this might be the dumbest thing I have ever read.. why would any one want this on there phone !
! so that your phone knows when your brushing your teeth and then can up date your twitter , myspace , and face book .
ok i 'll give you this point only cuz I know there are social network slaves out there that update there every move of the day .
Mike status = taking a dumpthe only reason this would be put on a phone is for the government to lesson to you but you might be a little suspect if your phone keep asking your to confirm sounds.are you making and drug deal... ?
why yes iphone I am making a drug deal .
loleven as a spy tool this thing sucks for the fact that the phone will ask you to confirm the sounds lmao.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this might be the dumbest thing I have ever read.. why would any one want this on there phone!
!so that your phone knows when your brushing your teeth and then can up date your twitter, myspace, and face book.
ok  i'll give you this point only cuz I know there are social network slaves out there that update there every move of the day.
Mike status = taking a dumpthe only reason this would be put on a phone is for the government to lesson to you but you might be a little suspect if your phone keep asking your to confirm sounds.are you making and drug deal...?
why yes iphone I am making a drug deal.
loleven as a spy tool this thing sucks for the fact that the phone will ask you to confirm the sounds lmao...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655497</id>
	<title>Auto Twitter??</title>
	<author>link15672</author>
	<datestamp>1247224200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once the phone learns what the sounds are, you could bridge the gap, and just have it auto-twitter what your doing... but make sure you have a blacklist of items NOT to post... such items; Pirating music/movies, having sex with that hooker while your gf/wife is at work, grunting so hard you blow an o-ring after eating chillicheese dogs for a week from A&amp;W...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once the phone learns what the sounds are , you could bridge the gap , and just have it auto-twitter what your doing... but make sure you have a blacklist of items NOT to post... such items ; Pirating music/movies , having sex with that hooker while your gf/wife is at work , grunting so hard you blow an o-ring after eating chillicheese dogs for a week from A&amp;W.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once the phone learns what the sounds are, you could bridge the gap, and just have it auto-twitter what your doing... but make sure you have a blacklist of items NOT to post... such items; Pirating music/movies, having sex with that hooker while your gf/wife is at work, grunting so hard you blow an o-ring after eating chillicheese dogs for a week from A&amp;W...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655011</id>
	<title>Re:Another use for this technology</title>
	<author>evanbd</author>
	<datestamp>1247220780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you could just use the quantum resistor noise from the input impedance of your <a href="http://www.digital-scurf.org/software/randomsound" title="digital-scurf.org">sound card</a> [digital-scurf.org].  Seriously, people seem to think getting good quality quantum entropy is hard.  It isn't.  The hard part is turning that entropy into bits: ensuring you have enough entropy to be generating as many bits as you are, and making sure that those bits are whitened and debiased properly, and that the entropy is properly distributed among them so that the non-random stuff in your input stream doesn't leak through.  Not to mention more mundane things like ensuring that if your sound card or geiger counter or whatever dies and stops producing entropy you notice before you output a whole lot of "random" bits that look somewhat random but don't have any real entropy in them.</p><p>Can we stop talking about how the random bits come from background sound, lava lamps, radioactive decay, or wherever, and instead worry about whether they've been handled properly after they were gathered?  After all, that's the hard part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could just use the quantum resistor noise from the input impedance of your sound card [ digital-scurf.org ] .
Seriously , people seem to think getting good quality quantum entropy is hard .
It is n't .
The hard part is turning that entropy into bits : ensuring you have enough entropy to be generating as many bits as you are , and making sure that those bits are whitened and debiased properly , and that the entropy is properly distributed among them so that the non-random stuff in your input stream does n't leak through .
Not to mention more mundane things like ensuring that if your sound card or geiger counter or whatever dies and stops producing entropy you notice before you output a whole lot of " random " bits that look somewhat random but do n't have any real entropy in them.Can we stop talking about how the random bits come from background sound , lava lamps , radioactive decay , or wherever , and instead worry about whether they 've been handled properly after they were gathered ?
After all , that 's the hard part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could just use the quantum resistor noise from the input impedance of your sound card [digital-scurf.org].
Seriously, people seem to think getting good quality quantum entropy is hard.
It isn't.
The hard part is turning that entropy into bits: ensuring you have enough entropy to be generating as many bits as you are, and making sure that those bits are whitened and debiased properly, and that the entropy is properly distributed among them so that the non-random stuff in your input stream doesn't leak through.
Not to mention more mundane things like ensuring that if your sound card or geiger counter or whatever dies and stops producing entropy you notice before you output a whole lot of "random" bits that look somewhat random but don't have any real entropy in them.Can we stop talking about how the random bits come from background sound, lava lamps, radioactive decay, or wherever, and instead worry about whether they've been handled properly after they were gathered?
After all, that's the hard part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654725</id>
	<title>Patellar reflex desensitization</title>
	<author>Petrini</author>
	<datestamp>1247218920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole government?  If so, I'm pretty sure they'd never be able to agree on how to get to my house.<br>
&nbsp; </p><p>What useless fearmongering.  When cell phones first became pervasive, people had this same kind of hysteria: Oh no, we're all carrying microphones attached to a phone network!  The government can work with cell phone companies to eavesdrop on our lives!  1984 was just a decade late!<br>
&nbsp; </p><p>After all the repetition of not outlawing technology that has legitimate alternative uses (i.e. p2p software), it's sad to see how many kneejerk fear responses there still are to each new advance that could be misused.  The point of the article isn't that cell phones now have microphones that can be enabled, it's that the software is getting better at sound identification in context.  And that has plenty of good uses, which the article lists, if you could disturb your paranoia to take look.<br>
&nbsp; </p><p>Yes, I readily agree that spying via mining of the resulting data could easily accomplished.  But let's be serious: most of these phones already have a GPS receiver -- you're not panicking about "the government" tracking your every movement already, are you?  And if you are -- just don't buy one.  Nothing's making you use a phone with these capabilities.<br>
&nbsp; </p><p>Friday afternoon, when all the crazies come out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole government ?
If so , I 'm pretty sure they 'd never be able to agree on how to get to my house .
  What useless fearmongering .
When cell phones first became pervasive , people had this same kind of hysteria : Oh no , we 're all carrying microphones attached to a phone network !
The government can work with cell phone companies to eavesdrop on our lives !
1984 was just a decade late !
  After all the repetition of not outlawing technology that has legitimate alternative uses ( i.e .
p2p software ) , it 's sad to see how many kneejerk fear responses there still are to each new advance that could be misused .
The point of the article is n't that cell phones now have microphones that can be enabled , it 's that the software is getting better at sound identification in context .
And that has plenty of good uses , which the article lists , if you could disturb your paranoia to take look .
  Yes , I readily agree that spying via mining of the resulting data could easily accomplished .
But let 's be serious : most of these phones already have a GPS receiver -- you 're not panicking about " the government " tracking your every movement already , are you ?
And if you are -- just do n't buy one .
Nothing 's making you use a phone with these capabilities .
  Friday afternoon , when all the crazies come out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole government?
If so, I'm pretty sure they'd never be able to agree on how to get to my house.
  What useless fearmongering.
When cell phones first became pervasive, people had this same kind of hysteria: Oh no, we're all carrying microphones attached to a phone network!
The government can work with cell phone companies to eavesdrop on our lives!
1984 was just a decade late!
  After all the repetition of not outlawing technology that has legitimate alternative uses (i.e.
p2p software), it's sad to see how many kneejerk fear responses there still are to each new advance that could be misused.
The point of the article isn't that cell phones now have microphones that can be enabled, it's that the software is getting better at sound identification in context.
And that has plenty of good uses, which the article lists, if you could disturb your paranoia to take look.
  Yes, I readily agree that spying via mining of the resulting data could easily accomplished.
But let's be serious: most of these phones already have a GPS receiver -- you're not panicking about "the government" tracking your every movement already, are you?
And if you are -- just don't buy one.
Nothing's making you use a phone with these capabilities.
  Friday afternoon, when all the crazies come out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655323</id>
	<title>Clippy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247222820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds like you are having trouble reaching orgasm.  Would you like me to<br>1) Moan real loud<br>2) Show erotic video<br>3) or, just vibrate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like you are having trouble reaching orgasm .
Would you like me to1 ) Moan real loud2 ) Show erotic video3 ) or , just vibrate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like you are having trouble reaching orgasm.
Would you like me to1) Moan real loud2) Show erotic video3) or, just vibrate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654449</id>
	<title>If Geogre Orwell knew this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1984 wold be boring. No chance at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1984 wold be boring .
No chance at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1984 wold be boring.
No chance at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655923</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great....</title>
	<author>Green Salad</author>
	<datestamp>1247227260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me...</p></div><p>That's better than telling her <i>you</i> believe she's bitching at you!</p><p>Just point to the phone's labeling, smile and shrug helplessly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me...That 's better than telling her you believe she 's bitching at you ! Just point to the phone 's labeling , smile and shrug helplessly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like I really my phone to tell me my wife is bitching at me...That's better than telling her you believe she's bitching at you!Just point to the phone's labeling, smile and shrug helplessly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654865</id>
	<title>In response to "Why?"</title>
	<author>bobetov</author>
	<datestamp>1247219820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a lot of tags/comments asking what this is useful for.  There are a few uber-nerd things like recording your life and whatnot that I'm not going to get into, but the big one is determining location.</p><p>There are a TON of sweet things you can do with accurate location information, but the one that I'm most yearning for is to control my bluetooth, wifi, ringer volume, etc based on where I am during the day.</p><p>I'm an Android user, and there's a very nice applet called Locale that attempts to do this, but it proves to be pretty useless.  The reason is that you're either using GPS (drains battery, doesn't work indoors) or wifi (drains lots of battery, and is the primary thing you want to control) to figure out where you are.  If using the microphone and cpu is cheaper in energy, then this will be a big win.</p><p>Beyond the energy use argument, one of the main things you want to control is bluetooth - again, it drains batteries when on, and is not generally useful.  But it's EXTRAORDINARILY useful in the car if you have a hands-free setup.  Again, figuring out when you're in a car is hard via GPS or wifi, but this technique would seem to knock that one out of the park.</p><p>So, in summary, having your phone know where you are in your daily routine allows it to be more intelligent about what services and functionality it enables, and thus makes your cell phone that much smarter and more valuable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a lot of tags/comments asking what this is useful for .
There are a few uber-nerd things like recording your life and whatnot that I 'm not going to get into , but the big one is determining location.There are a TON of sweet things you can do with accurate location information , but the one that I 'm most yearning for is to control my bluetooth , wifi , ringer volume , etc based on where I am during the day.I 'm an Android user , and there 's a very nice applet called Locale that attempts to do this , but it proves to be pretty useless .
The reason is that you 're either using GPS ( drains battery , does n't work indoors ) or wifi ( drains lots of battery , and is the primary thing you want to control ) to figure out where you are .
If using the microphone and cpu is cheaper in energy , then this will be a big win.Beyond the energy use argument , one of the main things you want to control is bluetooth - again , it drains batteries when on , and is not generally useful .
But it 's EXTRAORDINARILY useful in the car if you have a hands-free setup .
Again , figuring out when you 're in a car is hard via GPS or wifi , but this technique would seem to knock that one out of the park.So , in summary , having your phone know where you are in your daily routine allows it to be more intelligent about what services and functionality it enables , and thus makes your cell phone that much smarter and more valuable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a lot of tags/comments asking what this is useful for.
There are a few uber-nerd things like recording your life and whatnot that I'm not going to get into, but the big one is determining location.There are a TON of sweet things you can do with accurate location information, but the one that I'm most yearning for is to control my bluetooth, wifi, ringer volume, etc based on where I am during the day.I'm an Android user, and there's a very nice applet called Locale that attempts to do this, but it proves to be pretty useless.
The reason is that you're either using GPS (drains battery, doesn't work indoors) or wifi (drains lots of battery, and is the primary thing you want to control) to figure out where you are.
If using the microphone and cpu is cheaper in energy, then this will be a big win.Beyond the energy use argument, one of the main things you want to control is bluetooth - again, it drains batteries when on, and is not generally useful.
But it's EXTRAORDINARILY useful in the car if you have a hands-free setup.
Again, figuring out when you're in a car is hard via GPS or wifi, but this technique would seem to knock that one out of the park.So, in summary, having your phone know where you are in your daily routine allows it to be more intelligent about what services and functionality it enables, and thus makes your cell phone that much smarter and more valuable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654805</id>
	<title>Ah, the paranoia...</title>
	<author>MaXintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1247219520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... though I suppose most of the Slashdotters would say "Someone really <i>is</i> out to get me!" Maybe. Let's ignore that for a moment, and address a question that arose multiple times in the comments. What possible use was this developed for?<br> <br>Research. That's right. Research. Actually finding out what people are doing/eating/etc. is actually really hard. People's recollection is full of holes. Think about it: What were you doing exactly 1 hour ago? Most people will be able to name the task, but not what specific activity in that task they were doing. Where you talking? Where you typing. Where you taking a two minute mental break and staring off into space? Yeah. It's hard to recall these inane details. But things like how many people you have contact with, how often you're in public-public (and not in an office, etc.) are hard to get at. How many times have I been to the caf&#195;&#169; down the street in the last week? Hell if I know. But if I volunteer for a study - let's say, time spent in a restaurant by number of colds people get (totally made up on the spot for the purpose of illustration), this way the researcher doesn't have to trust a potentially erroneous recollection... they can get another, good estimate. It's <b>made</b> to be opt-in, and for research of this, that or the other thing.<br> <br>Is there a potential for abuse? Sure. There's lots of things with abuse potential. But I hate to break it to you, but they tracked Pablo Escobar in 93 from his phone. And it's only got easier since. If you want perfect privacy, don't get a cellphone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... though I suppose most of the Slashdotters would say " Someone really is out to get me !
" Maybe .
Let 's ignore that for a moment , and address a question that arose multiple times in the comments .
What possible use was this developed for ?
Research. That 's right .
Research. Actually finding out what people are doing/eating/etc .
is actually really hard .
People 's recollection is full of holes .
Think about it : What were you doing exactly 1 hour ago ?
Most people will be able to name the task , but not what specific activity in that task they were doing .
Where you talking ?
Where you typing .
Where you taking a two minute mental break and staring off into space ?
Yeah. It 's hard to recall these inane details .
But things like how many people you have contact with , how often you 're in public-public ( and not in an office , etc .
) are hard to get at .
How many times have I been to the caf     down the street in the last week ?
Hell if I know .
But if I volunteer for a study - let 's say , time spent in a restaurant by number of colds people get ( totally made up on the spot for the purpose of illustration ) , this way the researcher does n't have to trust a potentially erroneous recollection... they can get another , good estimate .
It 's made to be opt-in , and for research of this , that or the other thing .
Is there a potential for abuse ?
Sure. There 's lots of things with abuse potential .
But I hate to break it to you , but they tracked Pablo Escobar in 93 from his phone .
And it 's only got easier since .
If you want perfect privacy , do n't get a cellphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... though I suppose most of the Slashdotters would say "Someone really is out to get me!
" Maybe.
Let's ignore that for a moment, and address a question that arose multiple times in the comments.
What possible use was this developed for?
Research. That's right.
Research. Actually finding out what people are doing/eating/etc.
is actually really hard.
People's recollection is full of holes.
Think about it: What were you doing exactly 1 hour ago?
Most people will be able to name the task, but not what specific activity in that task they were doing.
Where you talking?
Where you typing.
Where you taking a two minute mental break and staring off into space?
Yeah. It's hard to recall these inane details.
But things like how many people you have contact with, how often you're in public-public (and not in an office, etc.
) are hard to get at.
How many times have I been to the cafÃ© down the street in the last week?
Hell if I know.
But if I volunteer for a study - let's say, time spent in a restaurant by number of colds people get (totally made up on the spot for the purpose of illustration), this way the researcher doesn't have to trust a potentially erroneous recollection... they can get another, good estimate.
It's made to be opt-in, and for research of this, that or the other thing.
Is there a potential for abuse?
Sure. There's lots of things with abuse potential.
But I hate to break it to you, but they tracked Pablo Escobar in 93 from his phone.
And it's only got easier since.
If you want perfect privacy, don't get a cellphone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655883</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously, WHY?</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1247226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would be the point of identifying the sounds?</p></div><p>It would be kind of cool if, say, my phone said: "Ahh, Lee is at church!  I'll go into silent/vibrate mode.  Ahh, Lee is in the bathroom!  I'll go into silent/vibrate mode.  Ahh, Lee is at a rock concert!  I'll go full volume ring and vibrate mode.  Ahh, Lee is on the motorcycle!  I'll just give up even trying to alert him of a call."</p><p>There are plenty of nifty applications for this.  And quite a few nefarious ones, at that.  Don't poo poo it just because you can't think of an idea off the top of your head.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the point of identifying the sounds ? It would be kind of cool if , say , my phone said : " Ahh , Lee is at church !
I 'll go into silent/vibrate mode .
Ahh , Lee is in the bathroom !
I 'll go into silent/vibrate mode .
Ahh , Lee is at a rock concert !
I 'll go full volume ring and vibrate mode .
Ahh , Lee is on the motorcycle !
I 'll just give up even trying to alert him of a call .
" There are plenty of nifty applications for this .
And quite a few nefarious ones , at that .
Do n't poo poo it just because you ca n't think of an idea off the top of your head .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the point of identifying the sounds?It would be kind of cool if, say, my phone said: "Ahh, Lee is at church!
I'll go into silent/vibrate mode.
Ahh, Lee is in the bathroom!
I'll go into silent/vibrate mode.
Ahh, Lee is at a rock concert!
I'll go full volume ring and vibrate mode.
Ahh, Lee is on the motorcycle!
I'll just give up even trying to alert him of a call.
"There are plenty of nifty applications for this.
And quite a few nefarious ones, at that.
Don't poo poo it just because you can't think of an idea off the top of your head.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654855</id>
	<title>Furbies</title>
	<author>omgarthas</author>
	<datestamp>1247219760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We had Furbies doing this several years ago and nobody freak'd out</htmltext>
<tokenext>We had Furbies doing this several years ago and nobody freak 'd out</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had Furbies doing this several years ago and nobody freak'd out</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654573</id>
	<title>Practical Application</title>
	<author>TornCityVenz</author>
	<datestamp>1247218200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, so jokes aside, could not this be used to build profiles of areas where you might be trying to hold a coversation and apply noise cancellation activily to the phone?  blocking out all the background noise for the person you are talking too, perhaps even making it a bit eaiser for you to hear in the process?</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so jokes aside , could not this be used to build profiles of areas where you might be trying to hold a coversation and apply noise cancellation activily to the phone ?
blocking out all the background noise for the person you are talking too , perhaps even making it a bit eaiser for you to hear in the process ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so jokes aside, could not this be used to build profiles of areas where you might be trying to hold a coversation and apply noise cancellation activily to the phone?
blocking out all the background noise for the person you are talking too, perhaps even making it a bit eaiser for you to hear in the process?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654535</id>
	<title>Social networking?</title>
	<author>Ambitwistor</author>
	<datestamp>1247218020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><i>"The SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was [...] brushing her teeth [...] Choudhury says that enabling the software to learn to recognize new sounds will be essential for practical applications. 'A system that can recognize sounds in a person's life can be used to search for others who have the same preferences'"</i></p><p>That sounds like great functionality.  " If you like brushing your teeth, you may be interested to know that 21 out of 23 people on your Contacts list also enjoy brushing their teeth."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " The SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was [ ... ] brushing her teeth [ ... ] Choudhury says that enabling the software to learn to recognize new sounds will be essential for practical applications .
'A system that can recognize sounds in a person 's life can be used to search for others who have the same preferences ' " That sounds like great functionality .
" If you like brushing your teeth , you may be interested to know that 21 out of 23 people on your Contacts list also enjoy brushing their teeth .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:"The SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was [...] brushing her teeth [...] Choudhury says that enabling the software to learn to recognize new sounds will be essential for practical applications.
'A system that can recognize sounds in a person's life can be used to search for others who have the same preferences'"That sounds like great functionality.
" If you like brushing your teeth, you may be interested to know that 21 out of 23 people on your Contacts list also enjoy brushing their teeth.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654413</id>
	<title>SoundSense This</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PaoLy7PHwk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">@#$\%#@!</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>@ # $ \ % # @ !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>@#$\%#@!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654791</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next year?  Try about 30 years ago.  Oh, you meant ON your CELLPHONE, not just the network?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next year ?
Try about 30 years ago .
Oh , you meant ON your CELLPHONE , not just the network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next year?
Try about 30 years ago.
Oh, you meant ON your CELLPHONE, not just the network?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654501</id>
	<title>Advanced new capabilities</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1247217780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With this amazing new software, your smart phone can notify you when you are in a coffee shop, and when you are at home relaxing. Will wonders never cease?</p><p>I can see some use for the stuff mentioned at the end, where the software would classify periods of time to make them easier to search through, but I don't have any particular desire to have a continuous recording of my life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With this amazing new software , your smart phone can notify you when you are in a coffee shop , and when you are at home relaxing .
Will wonders never cease ? I can see some use for the stuff mentioned at the end , where the software would classify periods of time to make them easier to search through , but I do n't have any particular desire to have a continuous recording of my life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With this amazing new software, your smart phone can notify you when you are in a coffee shop, and when you are at home relaxing.
Will wonders never cease?I can see some use for the stuff mentioned at the end, where the software would classify periods of time to make them easier to search through, but I don't have any particular desire to have a continuous recording of my life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654863</id>
	<title>People don't care about privacy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People don't care about privacy, they just don't. Everyone here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. upset about govenment civilian spy programs and such, and then everyone else gives up everything about themselves, willingly and deliberately, on sites such as Facebook.</p><p>Let me say that again, just so it's clear - most people just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/don't care/ about privacy.</p><p>And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/they/ are the ones that we need the laws to protect, those not smart or competent enough to take care of themselves.</p><p>Bringing the point back to the article - as soon as some flashy popular website springs up that takes this stuff into account, you'll have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/millions/ of people uploading this information about themselves.</p><p>Is it still an invasion of privacy when people give up the information willingly?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't care about privacy , they just do n't .
Everyone here on / .
upset about govenment civilian spy programs and such , and then everyone else gives up everything about themselves , willingly and deliberately , on sites such as Facebook.Let me say that again , just so it 's clear - most people just /do n't care/ about privacy.And /they/ are the ones that we need the laws to protect , those not smart or competent enough to take care of themselves.Bringing the point back to the article - as soon as some flashy popular website springs up that takes this stuff into account , you 'll have /millions/ of people uploading this information about themselves.Is it still an invasion of privacy when people give up the information willingly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't care about privacy, they just don't.
Everyone here on /.
upset about govenment civilian spy programs and such, and then everyone else gives up everything about themselves, willingly and deliberately, on sites such as Facebook.Let me say that again, just so it's clear - most people just /don't care/ about privacy.And /they/ are the ones that we need the laws to protect, those not smart or competent enough to take care of themselves.Bringing the point back to the article - as soon as some flashy popular website springs up that takes this stuff into account, you'll have /millions/ of people uploading this information about themselves.Is it still an invasion of privacy when people give up the information willingly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654679</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247218680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But in contrast to previous technologies, at least this runs standalone on the device, rather than as a web service.
<p>
Also, it doesn't record everything verbatim, but rather just tries to find characteristics of different environments, and classify them.  (I don't have direct knowledge of this, but it would be very resource-intensive and pointless to record all the ambient noise used to recognize you're in the office, for example).
</p><p>
I think it is a sensible idea.  Obviously humans use their senses to be aware of where they are and what they should be doing, and AI will be no different.  Sound will certainly be part of that.  However, my concern for the value of this technology is that smartphones also have GPS, which seems to greatly decrease the need for using sound signatures just to infer general context.  (Of course specific information such as speech must still be recognized, but that's not what this is, from what I can tell).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But in contrast to previous technologies , at least this runs standalone on the device , rather than as a web service .
Also , it does n't record everything verbatim , but rather just tries to find characteristics of different environments , and classify them .
( I do n't have direct knowledge of this , but it would be very resource-intensive and pointless to record all the ambient noise used to recognize you 're in the office , for example ) .
I think it is a sensible idea .
Obviously humans use their senses to be aware of where they are and what they should be doing , and AI will be no different .
Sound will certainly be part of that .
However , my concern for the value of this technology is that smartphones also have GPS , which seems to greatly decrease the need for using sound signatures just to infer general context .
( Of course specific information such as speech must still be recognized , but that 's not what this is , from what I can tell ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in contrast to previous technologies, at least this runs standalone on the device, rather than as a web service.
Also, it doesn't record everything verbatim, but rather just tries to find characteristics of different environments, and classify them.
(I don't have direct knowledge of this, but it would be very resource-intensive and pointless to record all the ambient noise used to recognize you're in the office, for example).
I think it is a sensible idea.
Obviously humans use their senses to be aware of where they are and what they should be doing, and AI will be no different.
Sound will certainly be part of that.
However, my concern for the value of this technology is that smartphones also have GPS, which seems to greatly decrease the need for using sound signatures just to infer general context.
(Of course specific information such as speech must still be recognized, but that's not what this is, from what I can tell).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654999</id>
	<title>Great!!!</title>
	<author>1080bogus</author>
	<datestamp>1247220720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I can make use of my extended battery that I bought off of woot today. Seriously though, it would be a pointless app to drain and deteriorate the already poor life of the battery. But as others have posted, the application would be better suited for something other than the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can make use of my extended battery that I bought off of woot today .
Seriously though , it would be a pointless app to drain and deteriorate the already poor life of the battery .
But as others have posted , the application would be better suited for something other than the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can make use of my extended battery that I bought off of woot today.
Seriously though, it would be a pointless app to drain and deteriorate the already poor life of the battery.
But as others have posted, the application would be better suited for something other than the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654853</id>
	<title>how much battery power will this suck down?</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1247219700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how much battery power will this suck down?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how much battery power will this suck down ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how much battery power will this suck down?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654421</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3 categories. Less audio sensitivity than a nomad. Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3 categories .
Less audio sensitivity than a nomad .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3 categories.
Less audio sensitivity than a nomad.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28660873</id>
	<title>Re:Another use for this technology</title>
	<author>elgatozorbas</author>
	<datestamp>1247332920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How would this be an easy way to get random numbers? Why not just sample an analog noise source? Admittedly, I wasn't even aware of this apparent need for random numbers and the difficulty of getting them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How would this be an easy way to get random numbers ?
Why not just sample an analog noise source ?
Admittedly , I was n't even aware of this apparent need for random numbers and the difficulty of getting them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would this be an easy way to get random numbers?
Why not just sample an analog noise source?
Admittedly, I wasn't even aware of this apparent need for random numbers and the difficulty of getting them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654965</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1247220420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no way in hell an app constantly running and listening to the mic is going to last 8 hours.</p><p>I'm on my second iPhone, both the original and the 3G, there is no way in hell they have the battery life to do this.</p><p>If by 'everyday life' the author means sitting in front of your PC with the USB cable attached, then okay, not my definition of everyday life, but okay.  Otherwise, I call bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way in hell an app constantly running and listening to the mic is going to last 8 hours.I 'm on my second iPhone , both the original and the 3G , there is no way in hell they have the battery life to do this.If by 'everyday life ' the author means sitting in front of your PC with the USB cable attached , then okay , not my definition of everyday life , but okay .
Otherwise , I call bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way in hell an app constantly running and listening to the mic is going to last 8 hours.I'm on my second iPhone, both the original and the 3G, there is no way in hell they have the battery life to do this.If by 'everyday life' the author means sitting in front of your PC with the USB cable attached, then okay, not my definition of everyday life, but okay.
Otherwise, I call bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655659</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1247225460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> the SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a particular coffee shop, walking outside, brushing her teeth, cycling, and driving in the car</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>at least this runs standalone on the device, rather than as a web service</p></div></blockquote><p>This sounds more like proof-of-concept than anything practical...for now.  I'm not so worried about the "government" using this technology as I am concerned that it is a marketer's dream.</p><p>It's curious that there is so much concern about the government having some sort of dominion over our lives when corporations, through the use of advertisement, data-mining, targeting, etc have already exerted such a negative influence on us for more than a quarter-century.</p><p>Our jobs, our relationships, our belongings, our free-time, even our sex have been so thoroughly shaped by purposeful use of the tools of advertisement and marketing that the areas of free choice regarding our behavior has come down to "extra large or supersize".    The tools that corporations use are so shockingly effective that we actually think we're being radical and individualist for choosing one brand over another.  Even the best efforts of government to control our behavior have failed miserably (war on drugs) thanks to built-in limitations.  No such limitations exist in the corporate world.  You can vote out your mayor, senator, president.  What similar influence do you have over the direction of Aetna, AT&amp;T or KBR, Inc?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a particular coffee shop , walking outside , brushing her teeth , cycling , and driving in the carat least this runs standalone on the device , rather than as a web serviceThis sounds more like proof-of-concept than anything practical...for now .
I 'm not so worried about the " government " using this technology as I am concerned that it is a marketer 's dream.It 's curious that there is so much concern about the government having some sort of dominion over our lives when corporations , through the use of advertisement , data-mining , targeting , etc have already exerted such a negative influence on us for more than a quarter-century.Our jobs , our relationships , our belongings , our free-time , even our sex have been so thoroughly shaped by purposeful use of the tools of advertisement and marketing that the areas of free choice regarding our behavior has come down to " extra large or supersize " .
The tools that corporations use are so shockingly effective that we actually think we 're being radical and individualist for choosing one brand over another .
Even the best efforts of government to control our behavior have failed miserably ( war on drugs ) thanks to built-in limitations .
No such limitations exist in the corporate world .
You can vote out your mayor , senator , president .
What similar influence do you have over the direction of Aetna , AT&amp;T or KBR , Inc ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the SoundSense software was able to correctly determine when the user was in a particular coffee shop, walking outside, brushing her teeth, cycling, and driving in the carat least this runs standalone on the device, rather than as a web serviceThis sounds more like proof-of-concept than anything practical...for now.
I'm not so worried about the "government" using this technology as I am concerned that it is a marketer's dream.It's curious that there is so much concern about the government having some sort of dominion over our lives when corporations, through the use of advertisement, data-mining, targeting, etc have already exerted such a negative influence on us for more than a quarter-century.Our jobs, our relationships, our belongings, our free-time, even our sex have been so thoroughly shaped by purposeful use of the tools of advertisement and marketing that the areas of free choice regarding our behavior has come down to "extra large or supersize".
The tools that corporations use are so shockingly effective that we actually think we're being radical and individualist for choosing one brand over another.
Even the best efforts of government to control our behavior have failed miserably (war on drugs) thanks to built-in limitations.
No such limitations exist in the corporate world.
You can vote out your mayor, senator, president.
What similar influence do you have over the direction of Aetna, AT&amp;T or KBR, Inc?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</id>
	<title>Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of us who dont want to pay for it, dont worry! Next year the goverment will install it to your phone for free!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of us who dont want to pay for it , dont worry !
Next year the goverment will install it to your phone for free !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of us who dont want to pay for it, dont worry!
Next year the goverment will install it to your phone for free!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656203</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great....</title>
	<author>Maniacal</author>
	<datestamp>1247229660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, this could work for me.  I could have it kick off a macro that plays my ringtone.  She starts bitching and "Oh baby, sorry to interrupt.  It's work.  Probably have a server down.  I have to take this."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , this could work for me .
I could have it kick off a macro that plays my ringtone .
She starts bitching and " Oh baby , sorry to interrupt .
It 's work .
Probably have a server down .
I have to take this .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, this could work for me.
I could have it kick off a macro that plays my ringtone.
She starts bitching and "Oh baby, sorry to interrupt.
It's work.
Probably have a server down.
I have to take this.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656473</id>
	<title>A flight recorder for your life</title>
	<author>dmomo</author>
	<datestamp>1247231880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your personal black box</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your personal black box</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your personal black box</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28657977</id>
	<title>Sex</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1247252580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I hope for me it can recognize the sound of hot lingerie models having screaming orgasms! Heh heh heh!</p><p>No, not really.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-( Pretty much just silence here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I hope for me it can recognize the sound of hot lingerie models having screaming orgasms !
Heh heh heh ! No , not really .
: - ( Pretty much just silence here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I hope for me it can recognize the sound of hot lingerie models having screaming orgasms!
Heh heh heh!No, not really.
:-( Pretty much just silence here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656197</id>
	<title>Re:People don't care about privacy.</title>
	<author>not-my-real-name</author>
	<datestamp>1247229600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is that I can control what information about myself I put up on Facebook.  I can project a nice clean-cut professional image there and just not talk about what I do with my wife in bed.</p><p>It's about control.  If I can control the information about me, then it's not a problem.  If someone is peeping in my windows and posting about it, then it is a problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is that I can control what information about myself I put up on Facebook .
I can project a nice clean-cut professional image there and just not talk about what I do with my wife in bed.It 's about control .
If I can control the information about me , then it 's not a problem .
If someone is peeping in my windows and posting about it , then it is a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is that I can control what information about myself I put up on Facebook.
I can project a nice clean-cut professional image there and just not talk about what I do with my wife in bed.It's about control.
If I can control the information about me, then it's not a problem.
If someone is peeping in my windows and posting about it, then it is a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654753</id>
	<title>Really?  Sounds?</title>
	<author>fataugie</author>
	<datestamp>1247219100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it rings you to ask if it's a significant sound?</p><p>After 30 minutes...I'll get a buzz saying:<br>
&nbsp; "Do you want me to remember the fart sound I keep picking up?  And by the way, you better get some fresh air"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it rings you to ask if it 's a significant sound ? After 30 minutes...I 'll get a buzz saying :   " Do you want me to remember the fart sound I keep picking up ?
And by the way , you better get some fresh air "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it rings you to ask if it's a significant sound?After 30 minutes...I'll get a buzz saying:
  "Do you want me to remember the fart sound I keep picking up?
And by the way, you better get some fresh air"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28665061</id>
	<title>the sound of a password</title>
	<author>dfries</author>
	<datestamp>1247328300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>iPhone: That clicky sequence you made just now, I hear that a couple dozen times a day, what is it?
<br>user: That's my password.
<br>iPhone: Thanks, let me just back that up for future reference.
<br>user: &lt;BLINK&gt; "Where's the battery on this thing?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone : That clicky sequence you made just now , I hear that a couple dozen times a day , what is it ?
user : That 's my password .
iPhone : Thanks , let me just back that up for future reference .
user : " Where 's the battery on this thing ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone: That clicky sequence you made just now, I hear that a couple dozen times a day, what is it?
user: That's my password.
iPhone: Thanks, let me just back that up for future reference.
user:  "Where's the battery on this thing?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655405</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1247223480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was the sound of you shooting someone.  For a monthly charge of $500 on your cell-phone bill, the phone won't call the police.  Accept the charge?</p><p>Yes        No</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the sound of you shooting someone .
For a monthly charge of $ 500 on your cell-phone bill , the phone wo n't call the police .
Accept the charge ? Yes No</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the sound of you shooting someone.
For a monthly charge of $500 on your cell-phone bill, the phone won't call the police.
Accept the charge?Yes        No</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654383</id>
	<title>crew</title>
	<author>mnogo</author>
	<datestamp>1247217300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/ndidisenge.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> chicago personal injury attorney </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/sothadexayis.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> california motorcycle accident attorney </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/govadin.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> philadelphia auto accident lawyer </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/itingoandur.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> hawaii car accident attorney </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/fomendishith.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> tax lawyers virginia </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/kotereitedo.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> orlando car accident lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/nezererovi.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> group response system </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/edendd.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> conference calling services </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/polyanveli.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> car accident attorneys new haven </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/mexighth.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> reporting software piracy </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/tonedeveda.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> tampa auto accident attorney </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/zedoullsug.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> atlanta mesothelioma claims </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/index.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> low rate secured loans </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/index.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> los angeles drunk driving lawyer </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/veingheit.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> las vegas auto accident lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/senchet.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> atlanta car accident lawyer </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/ddlyioma.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> best term life insurances </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/trwangesotr.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> columbus auto accident lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/furlys.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> accident lawyers new york city </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/earui.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> portland car accident lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/hineredlim.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> gieco auto insurance quotes </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/veredinerowo.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> hartford asbestos lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/zedethal.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> home equity loans refinance credit </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/pinyied.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> nashville car accident lawyers </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/utheloucow.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> loan consolidation rate </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/areededond.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> perkins loan consolidation </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/emerigrad.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> fort worth lasik vision correction </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/ziedlo.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> philadelphia motorcycle accident lawyers </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/strend.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> discounted conference calling services </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/zdanerese.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> compare car insurance rates </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/oladet.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> call cheapest conference rate </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/ghivedou.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> motorcycle accident attorney california </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/histh.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> new york motorcycle accident lawyers </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/sansoniv.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> galveston mesothelioma attorney </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/neangoke.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> personal injury lawyers atlanta </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/pomedo.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> indiana accident attorneys </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/new-york/byistet.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> car accident attorney los angeles </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/utheiker.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> auto accident lawyer philadelphia </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/nthiceron.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> tax attorneys virginia </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/fadlaratrim.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> sell annuity settlement </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/wrrastho.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> san francisco truck accident lawyers </a> [isgre.at]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/dui-lawyers/hinathersal.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> car accident lawyers salt lake city </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://nlo.fw.nu/irs-problem/vecove.html" title="nlo.fw.nu" rel="nofollow"> consolidate loan refinance student </a> [nlo.fw.nu]
<a href="http://newbie.isgre.at/portland-oregon/melan.html" title="isgre.at" rel="nofollow"> georgia auto accident a</a> [isgre.at]</htmltext>
<tokenext>chicago personal injury attorney [ isgre.at ] california motorcycle accident attorney [ isgre.at ] philadelphia auto accident lawyer [ nlo.fw.nu ] hawaii car accident attorney [ isgre.at ] tax lawyers virginia [ nlo.fw.nu ] orlando car accident lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] group response system [ isgre.at ] conference calling services [ nlo.fw.nu ] car accident attorneys new haven [ nlo.fw.nu ] reporting software piracy [ nlo.fw.nu ] tampa auto accident attorney [ isgre.at ] atlanta mesothelioma claims [ nlo.fw.nu ] low rate secured loans [ nlo.fw.nu ] los angeles drunk driving lawyer [ nlo.fw.nu ] las vegas auto accident lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] atlanta car accident lawyer [ isgre.at ] best term life insurances [ isgre.at ] columbus auto accident lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] accident lawyers new york city [ nlo.fw.nu ] portland car accident lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] gieco auto insurance quotes [ nlo.fw.nu ] hartford asbestos lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] home equity loans refinance credit [ isgre.at ] nashville car accident lawyers [ isgre.at ] loan consolidation rate [ isgre.at ] perkins loan consolidation [ isgre.at ] fort worth lasik vision correction [ nlo.fw.nu ] philadelphia motorcycle accident lawyers [ nlo.fw.nu ] discounted conference calling services [ nlo.fw.nu ] compare car insurance rates [ isgre.at ] call cheapest conference rate [ isgre.at ] motorcycle accident attorney california [ isgre.at ] new york motorcycle accident lawyers [ isgre.at ] galveston mesothelioma attorney [ isgre.at ] personal injury lawyers atlanta [ isgre.at ] indiana accident attorneys [ nlo.fw.nu ] car accident attorney los angeles [ isgre.at ] auto accident lawyer philadelphia [ nlo.fw.nu ] tax attorneys virginia [ nlo.fw.nu ] sell annuity settlement [ isgre.at ] san francisco truck accident lawyers [ isgre.at ] car accident lawyers salt lake city [ nlo.fw.nu ] consolidate loan refinance student [ nlo.fw.nu ] georgia auto accident a [ isgre.at ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> chicago personal injury attorney  [isgre.at]
 california motorcycle accident attorney  [isgre.at]
 philadelphia auto accident lawyer  [nlo.fw.nu]
 hawaii car accident attorney  [isgre.at]
 tax lawyers virginia  [nlo.fw.nu]
 orlando car accident lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 group response system  [isgre.at]
 conference calling services  [nlo.fw.nu]
 car accident attorneys new haven  [nlo.fw.nu]
 reporting software piracy  [nlo.fw.nu]
 tampa auto accident attorney  [isgre.at]
 atlanta mesothelioma claims  [nlo.fw.nu]
 low rate secured loans  [nlo.fw.nu]
 los angeles drunk driving lawyer  [nlo.fw.nu]
 las vegas auto accident lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 atlanta car accident lawyer  [isgre.at]
 best term life insurances  [isgre.at]
 columbus auto accident lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 accident lawyers new york city  [nlo.fw.nu]
 portland car accident lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 gieco auto insurance quotes  [nlo.fw.nu]
 hartford asbestos lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 home equity loans refinance credit  [isgre.at]
 nashville car accident lawyers  [isgre.at]
 loan consolidation rate  [isgre.at]
 perkins loan consolidation  [isgre.at]
 fort worth lasik vision correction  [nlo.fw.nu]
 philadelphia motorcycle accident lawyers  [nlo.fw.nu]
 discounted conference calling services  [nlo.fw.nu]
 compare car insurance rates  [isgre.at]
 call cheapest conference rate  [isgre.at]
 motorcycle accident attorney california  [isgre.at]
 new york motorcycle accident lawyers  [isgre.at]
 galveston mesothelioma attorney  [isgre.at]
 personal injury lawyers atlanta  [isgre.at]
 indiana accident attorneys  [nlo.fw.nu]
 car accident attorney los angeles  [isgre.at]
 auto accident lawyer philadelphia  [nlo.fw.nu]
 tax attorneys virginia  [nlo.fw.nu]
 sell annuity settlement  [isgre.at]
 san francisco truck accident lawyers  [isgre.at]
 car accident lawyers salt lake city  [nlo.fw.nu]
 consolidate loan refinance student  [nlo.fw.nu]
 georgia auto accident a [isgre.at]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654391</id>
	<title>What about the sound of ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247217300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..farting a condom out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>..farting a condom out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..farting a condom out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654927</id>
	<title>Incredibly useful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247220120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It sounds like you are sitting next to a fan.<br>Would you like help?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It sounds like you are sitting next to a fan.Would you like help ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It sounds like you are sitting next to a fan.Would you like help?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654583</id>
	<title>Just What Slashdotters Needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247218260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, an app that can automatically record how many times a day we were rejected by women.  It should be called iGiveUp and have an icon of a geek with a gun in his mouth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , an app that can automatically record how many times a day we were rejected by women .
It should be called iGiveUp and have an icon of a geek with a gun in his mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, an app that can automatically record how many times a day we were rejected by women.
It should be called iGiveUp and have an icon of a geek with a gun in his mouth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654799</id>
	<title>Huh</title>
	<author>ilikebees</author>
	<datestamp>1247219460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After looking at the charts I would have thought that the pink asterisk would have muted out the red dot... Maybe the red dot includes the TV?</htmltext>
<tokenext>After looking at the charts I would have thought that the pink asterisk would have muted out the red dot... Maybe the red dot includes the TV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After looking at the charts I would have thought that the pink asterisk would have muted out the red dot... Maybe the red dot includes the TV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654545</id>
	<title>Privacy concerns?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247218020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA: <em>To address privacy concerns, they designed SoundSense so that information is not removed from the device for processing. Additionally, the program itself doesn't store raw audio clips. A user can also tell the software to ignore any sounds deemed off limits.</em></p><p>I can think of lots of fun and interesting uses for this kind of monitoring.  And I can't think of many reasons to limit what sounds my phone can hear.  Total capture and processing of the sounds of my life could have remarkable implications which I'm sure Charlie Stross or somebody is already writing about.</p><p>I'm concerned over the privacy issues.  And these are total dodges on the privacy front.  By the time the useful information has been processed, listed, and categorized, the raw data doesn't count for much.  It's the end result of the algorithm, not the data that goes into it, that is of interest to advertisers, nanny states, and Generally Evil People.  Unless maybe you're trying to use the phone as a bug.  Fortunately, I rarely say (or arguably write) much of interest to anyone but the voices in my head.</p><p>The crux of the privacy issue is this, for me: I want *control* over *who* gets to looks at the results of the reality mining algorithm.  If it's going to an app that determines how best to advertise back at me, well, fuck that.  Or some bureaucrat who wants to make sure I'm not engaging in troublesome activities; fuck that too.  If that's the price, I'll forgo the experiment and just keep track of things myself, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : To address privacy concerns , they designed SoundSense so that information is not removed from the device for processing .
Additionally , the program itself does n't store raw audio clips .
A user can also tell the software to ignore any sounds deemed off limits.I can think of lots of fun and interesting uses for this kind of monitoring .
And I ca n't think of many reasons to limit what sounds my phone can hear .
Total capture and processing of the sounds of my life could have remarkable implications which I 'm sure Charlie Stross or somebody is already writing about.I 'm concerned over the privacy issues .
And these are total dodges on the privacy front .
By the time the useful information has been processed , listed , and categorized , the raw data does n't count for much .
It 's the end result of the algorithm , not the data that goes into it , that is of interest to advertisers , nanny states , and Generally Evil People .
Unless maybe you 're trying to use the phone as a bug .
Fortunately , I rarely say ( or arguably write ) much of interest to anyone but the voices in my head.The crux of the privacy issue is this , for me : I want * control * over * who * gets to looks at the results of the reality mining algorithm .
If it 's going to an app that determines how best to advertise back at me , well , fuck that .
Or some bureaucrat who wants to make sure I 'm not engaging in troublesome activities ; fuck that too .
If that 's the price , I 'll forgo the experiment and just keep track of things myself , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: To address privacy concerns, they designed SoundSense so that information is not removed from the device for processing.
Additionally, the program itself doesn't store raw audio clips.
A user can also tell the software to ignore any sounds deemed off limits.I can think of lots of fun and interesting uses for this kind of monitoring.
And I can't think of many reasons to limit what sounds my phone can hear.
Total capture and processing of the sounds of my life could have remarkable implications which I'm sure Charlie Stross or somebody is already writing about.I'm concerned over the privacy issues.
And these are total dodges on the privacy front.
By the time the useful information has been processed, listed, and categorized, the raw data doesn't count for much.
It's the end result of the algorithm, not the data that goes into it, that is of interest to advertisers, nanny states, and Generally Evil People.
Unless maybe you're trying to use the phone as a bug.
Fortunately, I rarely say (or arguably write) much of interest to anyone but the voices in my head.The crux of the privacy issue is this, for me: I want *control* over *who* gets to looks at the results of the reality mining algorithm.
If it's going to an app that determines how best to advertise back at me, well, fuck that.
Or some bureaucrat who wants to make sure I'm not engaging in troublesome activities; fuck that too.
If that's the price, I'll forgo the experiment and just keep track of things myself, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655829</id>
	<title>Beano Ads?</title>
	<author>c0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1247226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if you fart a lot you'd get beano ads on your iPhone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if you fart a lot you 'd get beano ads on your iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if you fart a lot you'd get beano ads on your iPhone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28660873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_1835252_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654739
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654457
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28660873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654639
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654535
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654805
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655829
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28656203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654679
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28655297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_1835252.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_1835252.28654583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
