<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_10_0536202</id>
	<title>NASA Successfully Tests Orion's New Crew Escape System</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1247215800000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Boccaccio writes <i>"<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/">NASA</a> on Wednesday <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1924900/nasa\_tests\_new\_crew\_escape\_system.html?cat=15">successfully tested its MLAS alternative launch escape system</a> designed for the new Orion Crew module.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLAS">MLAS</a>, or Max Launch Abort System, is named after the inventor of the crew escape system on the Mercury program, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxime\_Faget">Maxime (Max) Faget</a> and consists of four rocket motors built into a fairing that encloses an Orion module during Launch.  MLAS is designed to pull the crew away from the main rocket stack during the critical first 2.5 minutes of flight in the event of a catastrophic failure. The advantage of the MLAS system over the more traditional LAS (Launch Abort System) is that it reduces the total height of the rocket, lowering the center of gravity and adding stability, and potentially allowing higher fuel load.
You can watch a <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/centers/wallops/missions/mlas.html">video of the launch at the NASA website</a>, and there are also a bunch of pictures."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boccaccio writes " NASA on Wednesday successfully tested its MLAS alternative launch escape system designed for the new Orion Crew module .
MLAS , or Max Launch Abort System , is named after the inventor of the crew escape system on the Mercury program , Maxime ( Max ) Faget and consists of four rocket motors built into a fairing that encloses an Orion module during Launch .
MLAS is designed to pull the crew away from the main rocket stack during the critical first 2.5 minutes of flight in the event of a catastrophic failure .
The advantage of the MLAS system over the more traditional LAS ( Launch Abort System ) is that it reduces the total height of the rocket , lowering the center of gravity and adding stability , and potentially allowing higher fuel load .
You can watch a video of the launch at the NASA website , and there are also a bunch of pictures .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boccaccio writes "NASA on Wednesday successfully tested its MLAS alternative launch escape system designed for the new Orion Crew module.
MLAS, or Max Launch Abort System, is named after the inventor of the crew escape system on the Mercury program, Maxime (Max) Faget and consists of four rocket motors built into a fairing that encloses an Orion module during Launch.
MLAS is designed to pull the crew away from the main rocket stack during the critical first 2.5 minutes of flight in the event of a catastrophic failure.
The advantage of the MLAS system over the more traditional LAS (Launch Abort System) is that it reduces the total height of the rocket, lowering the center of gravity and adding stability, and potentially allowing higher fuel load.
You can watch a video of the launch at the NASA website, and there are also a bunch of pictures.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647973</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247231280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it may be a Russian design.<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka\_doll</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it may be a Russian design.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka \ _doll</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it may be a Russian design.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka\_doll</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648141</id>
	<title>Simplify</title>
	<author>Robert Larson</author>
	<datestamp>1247232660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This system appears to be in need of simplification.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This system appears to be in need of simplification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This system appears to be in need of simplification.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647165</id>
	<title>Launch video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the NASA site, here is the video of the launch:<br><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/on\_demand\_video.html?param=http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/qt.nasa-global/ccvideos/larc/mlas-launch.mov&amp;\_id=undefined&amp;\_title=undefined&amp;\_tnimage=test.gif#" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/on\_demand\_video.html?param=http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/qt.nasa-global/ccvideos/larc/mlas-launch.mov&amp;\_id=undefined&amp;\_title=undefined&amp;\_tnimage=test.gif#</a> [nasa.gov]</p><p>However, I cannot get it to play on my Kubuntu system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the NASA site , here is the video of the launch : http : //www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/on \ _demand \ _video.html ? param = http : //anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/qt.nasa-global/ccvideos/larc/mlas-launch.mov&amp; \ _id = undefined&amp; \ _title = undefined&amp; \ _tnimage = test.gif # [ nasa.gov ] However , I can not get it to play on my Kubuntu system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the NASA site, here is the video of the launch:http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/on\_demand\_video.html?param=http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/qt.nasa-global/ccvideos/larc/mlas-launch.mov&amp;\_id=undefined&amp;\_title=undefined&amp;\_tnimage=test.gif# [nasa.gov]However, I cannot get it to play on my Kubuntu system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647141</id>
	<title>So hard!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trying so hard to come up with a joke incorporating the name Faget with an escape system without being too crude...</p><p>How about, at least we know they would be exiting through the same hatch as they would be entering?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trying so hard to come up with a joke incorporating the name Faget with an escape system without being too crude...How about , at least we know they would be exiting through the same hatch as they would be entering ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trying so hard to come up with a joke incorporating the name Faget with an escape system without being too crude...How about, at least we know they would be exiting through the same hatch as they would be entering?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649273</id>
	<title>Re:Orion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247238720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to know if they are trying to bury the memory of Orion forever, or desensitize the public  so they can use nukes later?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to know if they are trying to bury the memory of Orion forever , or desensitize the public so they can use nukes later ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to know if they are trying to bury the memory of Orion forever, or desensitize the public  so they can use nukes later?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28652715</id>
	<title>Comples, Yes. Overly-Complex, No.</title>
	<author>Phairdon</author>
	<datestamp>1247253240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This system is only as complex as necessary. If it could be simplified, it would. Do you have any idea of how recovery of spacecraft components works, such as recovery of the solid rocket motors? The first parachutes, the small ones, help to slow down the capsule. These parachutes can withstand a certain amount of load. Do you know what dynamic pressure is and how it drives the aero forces in atmo? The next batch of parachutes can withstand another set of forces, and finally the huge babies are released when the dynamic pressure is just right and those 'chutes will bring the capsule in for a landing.</p><p>They don't have all those 'chutes just for the fun of it. The budget is just too tight to do crap like that.</p><p>First stage recovery has more than 1 set of 'chutes as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This system is only as complex as necessary .
If it could be simplified , it would .
Do you have any idea of how recovery of spacecraft components works , such as recovery of the solid rocket motors ?
The first parachutes , the small ones , help to slow down the capsule .
These parachutes can withstand a certain amount of load .
Do you know what dynamic pressure is and how it drives the aero forces in atmo ?
The next batch of parachutes can withstand another set of forces , and finally the huge babies are released when the dynamic pressure is just right and those 'chutes will bring the capsule in for a landing.They do n't have all those 'chutes just for the fun of it .
The budget is just too tight to do crap like that.First stage recovery has more than 1 set of 'chutes as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This system is only as complex as necessary.
If it could be simplified, it would.
Do you have any idea of how recovery of spacecraft components works, such as recovery of the solid rocket motors?
The first parachutes, the small ones, help to slow down the capsule.
These parachutes can withstand a certain amount of load.
Do you know what dynamic pressure is and how it drives the aero forces in atmo?
The next batch of parachutes can withstand another set of forces, and finally the huge babies are released when the dynamic pressure is just right and those 'chutes will bring the capsule in for a landing.They don't have all those 'chutes just for the fun of it.
The budget is just too tight to do crap like that.First stage recovery has more than 1 set of 'chutes as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647393</id>
	<title>Apollo 11 nearly tested their LES</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1247223120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is from Carrying the Fire, by Michael Collins. The story as Collins tells it is that as the crew entered the capsule for the launch he noticed that Armstrong had a loose strap on the thigh of his pressure suit which was about to snare a T shaped hand controller. The launch escape system is triggered by twisting the controller so there was a risk of accidently triggering it. In the book he suggests the last word spoken in the CM before the LES fired would be "oops".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is from Carrying the Fire , by Michael Collins .
The story as Collins tells it is that as the crew entered the capsule for the launch he noticed that Armstrong had a loose strap on the thigh of his pressure suit which was about to snare a T shaped hand controller .
The launch escape system is triggered by twisting the controller so there was a risk of accidently triggering it .
In the book he suggests the last word spoken in the CM before the LES fired would be " oops " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is from Carrying the Fire, by Michael Collins.
The story as Collins tells it is that as the crew entered the capsule for the launch he noticed that Armstrong had a loose strap on the thigh of his pressure suit which was about to snare a T shaped hand controller.
The launch escape system is triggered by twisting the controller so there was a risk of accidently triggering it.
In the book he suggests the last word spoken in the CM before the LES fired would be "oops".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648311</id>
	<title>40 years ago called.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247233860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soviets did it, and used it successfully since 1960s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soviets did it , and used it successfully since 1960s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soviets did it, and used it successfully since 1960s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28650925</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1247245080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That way you always have to take it back to the dealer for maintenance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That way you always have to take it back to the dealer for maintenance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That way you always have to take it back to the dealer for maintenance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483</id>
	<title>Orion?</title>
	<author>tcdk</author>
	<datestamp>1247224320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, do not call it Orion unless it has small nukes coming out it's ass. Confuses this old timer, it does, yes?
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\_Orion\_(nuclear\_propulsion)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\_Orion\_(nuclear\_propulsion)</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , do not call it Orion unless it has small nukes coming out it 's ass .
Confuses this old timer , it does , yes ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project \ _Orion \ _ ( nuclear \ _propulsion ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, do not call it Orion unless it has small nukes coming out it's ass.
Confuses this old timer, it does, yes?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\_Orion\_(nuclear\_propulsion) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647813</id>
	<title>There goes another one...</title>
	<author>PinkyDead</author>
	<datestamp>1247229600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hold your fire. There are no life forms. It must have been short-circuited.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hold your fire .
There are no life forms .
It must have been short-circuited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hold your fire.
There are no life forms.
It must have been short-circuited.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647961</id>
	<title>Experience counts</title>
	<author>John Guilt</author>
	<datestamp>1247231220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though any of the steps can go wrong, the likelihood of each going wrong also matters.  I don't know the record of failed separations and parachute deployments well enough to really say, but both technologies pre-date manned space flight, and have been continuously necessary, so they might be down pat.  If there's a very low rate for either or both, it might be safer than a system with fewer stages but more inherent danger for the crew.  Depending on the odds, I might prefer five low-risk threats to three moderate-risk threats.
<br> <br>
And, asking from near-complete ignorance: would the failure of the fairing to separate be fatal to the crew?  It will be hot, but it seems to me that if it weren't well thermally-isolated from the capsule, they'd be in trouble to begin-with...but maybe it's only insulated well enough to keep them safer from it until expected separation, and much longer than that would be pushing it....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though any of the steps can go wrong , the likelihood of each going wrong also matters .
I do n't know the record of failed separations and parachute deployments well enough to really say , but both technologies pre-date manned space flight , and have been continuously necessary , so they might be down pat .
If there 's a very low rate for either or both , it might be safer than a system with fewer stages but more inherent danger for the crew .
Depending on the odds , I might prefer five low-risk threats to three moderate-risk threats .
And , asking from near-complete ignorance : would the failure of the fairing to separate be fatal to the crew ?
It will be hot , but it seems to me that if it were n't well thermally-isolated from the capsule , they 'd be in trouble to begin-with...but maybe it 's only insulated well enough to keep them safer from it until expected separation , and much longer than that would be pushing it... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though any of the steps can go wrong, the likelihood of each going wrong also matters.
I don't know the record of failed separations and parachute deployments well enough to really say, but both technologies pre-date manned space flight, and have been continuously necessary, so they might be down pat.
If there's a very low rate for either or both, it might be safer than a system with fewer stages but more inherent danger for the crew.
Depending on the odds, I might prefer five low-risk threats to three moderate-risk threats.
And, asking from near-complete ignorance: would the failure of the fairing to separate be fatal to the crew?
It will be hot, but it seems to me that if it weren't well thermally-isolated from the capsule, they'd be in trouble to begin-with...but maybe it's only insulated well enough to keep them safer from it until expected separation, and much longer than that would be pushing it....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647521</id>
	<title>Re:Its an alternate solution.</title>
	<author>teridon</author>
	<datestamp>1247225100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why should it be in the summary?  It's in the <i>first paragraph</i> of the article.</p><p>Oh, wait, this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should it be in the summary ?
It 's in the first paragraph of the article.Oh , wait , this is / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should it be in the summary?
It's in the first paragraph of the article.Oh, wait, this is /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28654279</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247216820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A simpler solution: use rovers to allow the crew to escape in the design phase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A simpler solution : use rovers to allow the crew to escape in the design phase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A simpler solution: use rovers to allow the crew to escape in the design phase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647223</id>
	<title>Satire?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247220540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't want to trust Onion's news Crew Escape System, it's probably a hatch to infinity. Don't they know it's a satirical magazine and not a space exploration tech company?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't want to trust Onion 's news Crew Escape System , it 's probably a hatch to infinity .
Do n't they know it 's a satirical magazine and not a space exploration tech company ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't want to trust Onion's news Crew Escape System, it's probably a hatch to infinity.
Don't they know it's a satirical magazine and not a space exploration tech company?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647405</id>
	<title>Re:Satire?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247223240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shame they didn't call it the Faget Launch Abort System.  I think that it has a nicer ring to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shame they did n't call it the Faget Launch Abort System .
I think that it has a nicer ring to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shame they didn't call it the Faget Launch Abort System.
I think that it has a nicer ring to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28651571</id>
	<title>Who needs an amusment park?</title>
	<author>Sleepyhead5</author>
	<datestamp>1247248380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although I agree with many of the posts about the process being a tad complicated, if you watch the video, that looks like one hell of a ride.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I agree with many of the posts about the process being a tad complicated , if you watch the video , that looks like one hell of a ride .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I agree with many of the posts about the process being a tad complicated, if you watch the video, that looks like one hell of a ride.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647913</id>
	<title>Re:Orion?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was to a Mexican restaurant yesterday. So by your definition I can call myself "Orion" now?</p><p>Yay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was to a Mexican restaurant yesterday .
So by your definition I can call myself " Orion " now ? Yay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was to a Mexican restaurant yesterday.
So by your definition I can call myself "Orion" now?Yay!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648827</id>
	<title>Look:</title>
	<author>Philip K Dickhead</author>
	<datestamp>1247236860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Max Faggot writes itself!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Max Faggot writes itself !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Max Faggot writes itself!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647347</id>
	<title>We should be proud...</title>
	<author>shacky003</author>
	<datestamp>1247222220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of the efforts and genius that is going into these..  (ok, moment over, bash away..)</htmltext>
<tokenext>of the efforts and genius that is going into these.. ( ok , moment over , bash away.. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of the efforts and genius that is going into these..  (ok, moment over, bash away..)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648887</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247237040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yea, I mean, this shouldn't be rocket science!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , I mean , this should n't be rocket science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, I mean, this shouldn't be rocket science!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28651021</id>
	<title>way too complicated</title>
	<author>viralMeme</author>
	<datestamp>1247245440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Way too complicated, if everything is expected to work perfectly in an emergency, where things like 'unknown error' are bound to occur.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way too complicated , if everything is expected to work perfectly in an emergency , where things like 'unknown error ' are bound to occur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way too complicated, if everything is expected to work perfectly in an emergency, where things like 'unknown error' are bound to occur.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</id>
	<title>Quite complex</title>
	<author>the\_other\_chewey</author>
	<datestamp>1247221860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately came<br>
to mind is the increased complexity of the system. I counted five separations (the launch itself<br>
would be a separation in reality) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the<br>
crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes.<br>

<br>I'm sure there's redundancy in there so a single failure wouldn't be fatal (although not dropping the<br>
casing preventing main chute deployment would be bad), but it is quite a step up from the regular<br>
"<i>separate, fire one solid booster, wait a bit, deploy chutes</i>" apporach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept , what immediately came to mind is the increased complexity of the system .
I counted five separations ( the launch itself would be a separation in reality ) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes .
I 'm sure there 's redundancy in there so a single failure would n't be fatal ( although not dropping the casing preventing main chute deployment would be bad ) , but it is quite a step up from the regular " separate , fire one solid booster , wait a bit , deploy chutes " apporach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately came
to mind is the increased complexity of the system.
I counted five separations (the launch itself
would be a separation in reality) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the
crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes.
I'm sure there's redundancy in there so a single failure wouldn't be fatal (although not dropping the
casing preventing main chute deployment would be bad), but it is quite a step up from the regular
"separate, fire one solid booster, wait a bit, deploy chutes" apporach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649395</id>
	<title>Re:Orion?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1247239200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it only confuses pedantic old timers who are unable to keep straight the difference between a project long dead and an active project.  The rest of us old timers have no problems at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it only confuses pedantic old timers who are unable to keep straight the difference between a project long dead and an active project .
The rest of us old timers have no problems at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it only confuses pedantic old timers who are unable to keep straight the difference between a project long dead and an active project.
The rest of us old timers have no problems at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647377</id>
	<title>Re:Its an alternate solution.</title>
	<author>Boccaccio</author>
	<datestamp>1247222820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fair point.  I should have been clearer about that.  Thanks for clearing it up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fair point .
I should have been clearer about that .
Thanks for clearing it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fair point.
I should have been clearer about that.
Thanks for clearing it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649649</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247240160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also wonder about the survivability of an event even if you are on top of the fuel.  Challenger's explosion of liquid hydrogen didn't seem nearly as fierce as the explosions I've seen of rockets with solid fuel.  Even with Challenger sitting next to the stack, the cockpit remained mostly intact IIRC.  Has anyone tested how the a capsule sitting on top of a solid rocket explosion would fair?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also wonder about the survivability of an event even if you are on top of the fuel .
Challenger 's explosion of liquid hydrogen did n't seem nearly as fierce as the explosions I 've seen of rockets with solid fuel .
Even with Challenger sitting next to the stack , the cockpit remained mostly intact IIRC .
Has anyone tested how the a capsule sitting on top of a solid rocket explosion would fair ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also wonder about the survivability of an event even if you are on top of the fuel.
Challenger's explosion of liquid hydrogen didn't seem nearly as fierce as the explosions I've seen of rockets with solid fuel.
Even with Challenger sitting next to the stack, the cockpit remained mostly intact IIRC.
Has anyone tested how the a capsule sitting on top of a solid rocket explosion would fair?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647345</id>
	<title>So, it's the...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247222160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Faget escape system?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Faget escape system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Faget escape system?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649575</id>
	<title>Space 1999</title>
	<author>Migraineman</author>
	<datestamp>1247239920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, I swear I'm looking at the cockpit module from an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle\_(Space:\_1999)" title="wikipedia.org">Eagle.</a> [wikipedia.org]  BTW, what's Catherine Schell up to these days?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , I swear I 'm looking at the cockpit module from an Eagle .
[ wikipedia.org ] BTW , what 's Catherine Schell up to these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, I swear I'm looking at the cockpit module from an Eagle.
[wikipedia.org]  BTW, what's Catherine Schell up to these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647503</id>
	<title>Overly complex + more chances to fail.</title>
	<author>assemblerex</author>
	<datestamp>1247224620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jettison + primary escape stage + jettison stage + deploy nose cone parachutes + jettison nosecone + deploy primary parachute primers + deploy primary chutes
<br>

Failure of any of those steps results in loss of crew.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jettison + primary escape stage + jettison stage + deploy nose cone parachutes + jettison nosecone + deploy primary parachute primers + deploy primary chutes Failure of any of those steps results in loss of crew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jettison + primary escape stage + jettison stage + deploy nose cone parachutes + jettison nosecone + deploy primary parachute primers + deploy primary chutes


Failure of any of those steps results in loss of crew.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649365</id>
	<title>Re:Quite complex</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1247239020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately came to mind is the increased complexity of the system. I counted five separations (the launch itself would be a separation in reality) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes.</p></div></blockquote><p>What the video and accompanying article doesn't make clear is that most of those separation events were part of the test vehicle, not part of the proposed flight configuration.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept , what immediately came to mind is the increased complexity of the system .
I counted five separations ( the launch itself would be a separation in reality ) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes.What the video and accompanying article does n't make clear is that most of those separation events were part of the test vehicle , not part of the proposed flight configuration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately came to mind is the increased complexity of the system.
I counted five separations (the launch itself would be a separation in reality) of some piece or another and multiple chute deployments before the crew capsule was safely floating down on its main parachutes.What the video and accompanying article doesn't make clear is that most of those separation events were part of the test vehicle, not part of the proposed flight configuration.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648507</id>
	<title>KISS principle violated? What am I missing?</title>
	<author>JavaManJim</author>
	<datestamp>1247235060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with others here that the MLAS appears to be overly<br>complex. Too many things need to happen.  I prefer the "KISS"<br>philosophy.</p><p>As a backup system this is good.</p><p>I liked the earlier Apollo escape system. Fire rockets, drop the<br>rockets, deploy parachute. They did the same type tests viewable<br>in "The Mighty Saturns" (see web link below). However This<br>system might not be practical with the larger and heavier module<br>being used today.</p><p>"The Mighty Saturns" Spacecraft Films<br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mighty-Saturns-Saturn-Extended-Collectors/dp/B0001NBM5I" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/Mighty-Saturns-Saturn-Extended-Collectors/dp/B0001NBM5I</a> [amazon.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with others here that the MLAS appears to be overlycomplex .
Too many things need to happen .
I prefer the " KISS " philosophy.As a backup system this is good.I liked the earlier Apollo escape system .
Fire rockets , drop therockets , deploy parachute .
They did the same type tests viewablein " The Mighty Saturns " ( see web link below ) .
However Thissystem might not be practical with the larger and heavier modulebeing used today .
" The Mighty Saturns " Spacecraft Filmshttp : //www.amazon.com/Mighty-Saturns-Saturn-Extended-Collectors/dp/B0001NBM5I [ amazon.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with others here that the MLAS appears to be overlycomplex.
Too many things need to happen.
I prefer the "KISS"philosophy.As a backup system this is good.I liked the earlier Apollo escape system.
Fire rockets, drop therockets, deploy parachute.
They did the same type tests viewablein "The Mighty Saturns" (see web link below).
However Thissystem might not be practical with the larger and heavier modulebeing used today.
"The Mighty Saturns" Spacecraft Filmshttp://www.amazon.com/Mighty-Saturns-Saturn-Extended-Collectors/dp/B0001NBM5I [amazon.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399</id>
	<title>Oh the possibilities</title>
	<author>yerktoader</author>
	<datestamp>1247223180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They shoulda ran with it.  Awesome names and acronyms have come out of stranger places.  For example, my Dad knows one of the engineers that built the San Diego Wild Animal park.  They were trying to decide a name for the park's monorail, now known as Wgasa.  Apparently, after they had been at it for days one of the engineers coworkers said "Who gives a shit anyway?"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D  The story has no official evidence to back it up, but Snopes still believes it to be true.
<br> <br>
So I say honor that Faget and give this device a proper name.
<br> <br>
Futile attempts go exit there?<br>
Finally a great ejection technology?<br>
Faget's automatic gravity enhancing technique?<br>
Fuckers are gonna egress tonight!<br> <br>

Discuss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They shoulda ran with it .
Awesome names and acronyms have come out of stranger places .
For example , my Dad knows one of the engineers that built the San Diego Wild Animal park .
They were trying to decide a name for the park 's monorail , now known as Wgasa .
Apparently , after they had been at it for days one of the engineers coworkers said " Who gives a shit anyway ?
" : D The story has no official evidence to back it up , but Snopes still believes it to be true .
So I say honor that Faget and give this device a proper name .
Futile attempts go exit there ?
Finally a great ejection technology ?
Faget 's automatic gravity enhancing technique ?
Fuckers are gon na egress tonight !
Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They shoulda ran with it.
Awesome names and acronyms have come out of stranger places.
For example, my Dad knows one of the engineers that built the San Diego Wild Animal park.
They were trying to decide a name for the park's monorail, now known as Wgasa.
Apparently, after they had been at it for days one of the engineers coworkers said "Who gives a shit anyway?
" :D  The story has no official evidence to back it up, but Snopes still believes it to be true.
So I say honor that Faget and give this device a proper name.
Futile attempts go exit there?
Finally a great ejection technology?
Faget's automatic gravity enhancing technique?
Fuckers are gonna egress tonight!
Discuss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647861</id>
	<title>Re:Oh the possibilities</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247230200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An enhancement is, to alwads add vowels of the original words in between consonants that are hard to spell,<br>Wgasa, for example, would be more easy spelled, if it would have been called Wogasa or Whogasa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An enhancement is , to alwads add vowels of the original words in between consonants that are hard to spell,Wgasa , for example , would be more easy spelled , if it would have been called Wogasa or Whogasa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An enhancement is, to alwads add vowels of the original words in between consonants that are hard to spell,Wgasa, for example, would be more easy spelled, if it would have been called Wogasa or Whogasa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647143</id>
	<title>Root is like crack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247219700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Root is like crack.</b> Don't smoke it.  I did once and got hooked.  I ran Mac OS Updates as root.  ****, I even had sex with my girlfriend as root.  Man, that caused some permissions problems.  When I started the road to recovery (logging in as Zacks) my girlfriend was all like: &quot;**** no!  You can't get any cause you don't own me an I don't go groups.  You don't have the power to read, write OR execute so get out of my FACE&quot;  So I was all HELL NO bitch.  And she wuz like you do not have root (superuser) privlages so get out of my TruBlueEnvironment!  So then I went chown and chmodded her ass to me.  Dat be-otch be up in my hizzouse.  What what.  Holla!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Root is like crack .
Do n't smoke it .
I did once and got hooked .
I ran Mac OS Updates as root .
* * * * , I even had sex with my girlfriend as root .
Man , that caused some permissions problems .
When I started the road to recovery ( logging in as Zacks ) my girlfriend was all like : " * * * * no !
You ca n't get any cause you do n't own me an I do n't go groups .
You do n't have the power to read , write OR execute so get out of my FACE " So I was all HELL NO bitch .
And she wuz like you do not have root ( superuser ) privlages so get out of my TruBlueEnvironment !
So then I went chown and chmodded her ass to me .
Dat be-otch be up in my hizzouse .
What what .
Holla !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Root is like crack.
Don't smoke it.
I did once and got hooked.
I ran Mac OS Updates as root.
****, I even had sex with my girlfriend as root.
Man, that caused some permissions problems.
When I started the road to recovery (logging in as Zacks) my girlfriend was all like: "**** no!
You can't get any cause you don't own me an I don't go groups.
You don't have the power to read, write OR execute so get out of my FACE"  So I was all HELL NO bitch.
And she wuz like you do not have root (superuser) privlages so get out of my TruBlueEnvironment!
So then I went chown and chmodded her ass to me.
Dat be-otch be up in my hizzouse.
What what.
Holla!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647241</id>
	<title>Max Faget</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247220720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL can't spell "phaggot"</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL ca n't spell " phaggot "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL can't spell "phaggot"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647665</id>
	<title>Re:Oh the possibilities</title>
	<author>BabyDave</author>
	<datestamp>1247227440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to wonder it the Windows 98 <b>C</b>ritical <b>U</b>pdate <b>N</b>otification <b>U</b>tility was originally going to have been a <b>T</b>ool.</p><p>Also, Sun supply the <b>S</b>olaris <b>C</b>rash <b>A</b>nalysis <b>T</b>ool, and trust me - if you're googling for the documentation, make sure you turn Safe Search on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to wonder it the Windows 98 Critical Update Notification Utility was originally going to have been a Tool.Also , Sun supply the Solaris Crash Analysis Tool , and trust me - if you 're googling for the documentation , make sure you turn Safe Search on .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to wonder it the Windows 98 Critical Update Notification Utility was originally going to have been a Tool.Also, Sun supply the Solaris Crash Analysis Tool, and trust me - if you're googling for the documentation, make sure you turn Safe Search on ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649275</id>
	<title>The question would be...</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1247238780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately came<br>to mind is the increased complexity of the system</i></p><p>I guess the question is, what does the complexity buy them?  Complexity for complexities sake is foolish, for sure, but if they get something useful out of the complexity,then it might be worth it.  I wonder what the gain is they perceive to be getting, and how much its worth relative to the complexity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept , what immediately cameto mind is the increased complexity of the systemI guess the question is , what does the complexity buy them ?
Complexity for complexities sake is foolish , for sure , but if they get something useful out of the complexity,then it might be worth it .
I wonder what the gain is they perceive to be getting , and how much its worth relative to the complexity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just watched the video - and while it definitely is a cool concept, what immediately cameto mind is the increased complexity of the systemI guess the question is, what does the complexity buy them?
Complexity for complexities sake is foolish, for sure, but if they get something useful out of the complexity,then it might be worth it.
I wonder what the gain is they perceive to be getting, and how much its worth relative to the complexity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647195</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247220300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, that was beautiful!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that was beautiful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that was beautiful!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339</id>
	<title>Its an alternate solution.</title>
	<author>Hozza</author>
	<datestamp>1247222160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary doesn't really make this clear, but the baseline Orion design uses a standard LAS system.</p><p>The MLAS is only being developed as a possible alternate, if the LAS solution proves unworkable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary does n't really make this clear , but the baseline Orion design uses a standard LAS system.The MLAS is only being developed as a possible alternate , if the LAS solution proves unworkable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary doesn't really make this clear, but the baseline Orion design uses a standard LAS system.The MLAS is only being developed as a possible alternate, if the LAS solution proves unworkable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28654279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28650925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28652715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_10_0536202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647405
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28654279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28650925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28652715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28649365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647503
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28648827
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_10_0536202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_10_0536202.28647861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
