<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_09_1451223</id>
	<title>Vint Cerf Imagines the Net's Future At NASA</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1247151600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.destinyland.org/" rel="nofollow">destinyland</a> writes <i>"Vint Cerf performed an hour-long Q&amp;A at NASA for their 'Singularity University' (which is partially funded by Google ). A question about Twitter led Cerf to <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/singularity-university-day-three-vint-cerf-social-networking">imagine even more useful micro-applications using the wireless internet and cell phones,</a> including real-time health data and checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks.
'These systems have applications which I think we will discover over time,' Cerf says, adding 'For me, the exciting thing to just anticipate, are the new ideas for using these instruments.' Also speaking were <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/singularity-university-day-two-evening-ray-kurzweil">Ray Kurzweil</a> and <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/singularity-university-day-three-ralph-merkle-nanotechnology-part-1-2">nanotechnology expert Ray Merkle.</a> (Read an interview with SU co-founder Peter Diamandis in <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/digitaledition/2009-summer/">the new issue of H+ magazine</a>)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " Vint Cerf performed an hour-long Q&amp;A at NASA for their 'Singularity University ' ( which is partially funded by Google ) .
A question about Twitter led Cerf to imagine even more useful micro-applications using the wireless internet and cell phones , including real-time health data and checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks .
'These systems have applications which I think we will discover over time, ' Cerf says , adding 'For me , the exciting thing to just anticipate , are the new ideas for using these instruments .
' Also speaking were Ray Kurzweil and nanotechnology expert Ray Merkle .
( Read an interview with SU co-founder Peter Diamandis in the new issue of H + magazine ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "Vint Cerf performed an hour-long Q&amp;A at NASA for their 'Singularity University' (which is partially funded by Google ).
A question about Twitter led Cerf to imagine even more useful micro-applications using the wireless internet and cell phones, including real-time health data and checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks.
'These systems have applications which I think we will discover over time,' Cerf says, adding 'For me, the exciting thing to just anticipate, are the new ideas for using these instruments.
' Also speaking were Ray Kurzweil and nanotechnology expert Ray Merkle.
(Read an interview with SU co-founder Peter Diamandis in the new issue of H+ magazine).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637513</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>fl!ptop</author>
	<datestamp>1247157780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap, it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it.</p></div></blockquote><p>the other problem is that it takes gov't a long time to do anything, so by the time the gov't bureaucrat assigned to monitor your device (assuming we get nationalized health care) gets around to calling the ambulance, you'll probably already be dead.  from old age, not a heart attack or stroke.</p><p>or at least, that's what they'll tell your next of kin.  that you died of old age, not red tape and inefficiency.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap , it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it.the other problem is that it takes gov't a long time to do anything , so by the time the gov't bureaucrat assigned to monitor your device ( assuming we get nationalized health care ) gets around to calling the ambulance , you 'll probably already be dead .
from old age , not a heart attack or stroke.or at least , that 's what they 'll tell your next of kin .
that you died of old age , not red tape and inefficiency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap, it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it.the other problem is that it takes gov't a long time to do anything, so by the time the gov't bureaucrat assigned to monitor your device (assuming we get nationalized health care) gets around to calling the ambulance, you'll probably already be dead.
from old age, not a heart attack or stroke.or at least, that's what they'll tell your next of kin.
that you died of old age, not red tape and inefficiency.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636971</id>
	<title>Schwarzkophf</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247155620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice information<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice information .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice information ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637839</id>
	<title>Vint Cerf Talk at RIT</title>
	<author>Danathar</author>
	<datestamp>1247159280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a recent talk by Vint Cerf about the early days of the Internet and it's future.</p><p><a href="http://www.wuala.com/Danathar/Videos+Music/Cerf.mp4" title="wuala.com">http://www.wuala.com/Danathar/Videos+Music/Cerf.mp4</a> [wuala.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a recent talk by Vint Cerf about the early days of the Internet and it 's future.http : //www.wuala.com/Danathar/Videos + Music/Cerf.mp4 [ wuala.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a recent talk by Vint Cerf about the early days of the Internet and it's future.http://www.wuala.com/Danathar/Videos+Music/Cerf.mp4 [wuala.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638653</id>
	<title>Citing the proper people</title>
	<author>bradbury</author>
	<datestamp>1247162760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The introduction note contains a typo.  It is Ralph Merkle, not "Ray Merkle", that is involved in nanotechnology and the Singularity University as can be seen from his WikiPedia page and his web site (www.merkle.com).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The introduction note contains a typo .
It is Ralph Merkle , not " Ray Merkle " , that is involved in nanotechnology and the Singularity University as can be seen from his WikiPedia page and his web site ( www.merkle.com ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The introduction note contains a typo.
It is Ralph Merkle, not "Ray Merkle", that is involved in nanotechnology and the Singularity University as can be seen from his WikiPedia page and his web site (www.merkle.com).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637983</id>
	<title>Re:Dimensional analysis = innovation</title>
	<author>smallfries</author>
	<datestamp>1247160000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tough problem... I think you should try and get this in as a poll. I'm leaning towards B although that could just be an aspect of my two-dimensional perspective and A is also a strong candidate...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tough problem... I think you should try and get this in as a poll .
I 'm leaning towards B although that could just be an aspect of my two-dimensional perspective and A is also a strong candidate.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tough problem... I think you should try and get this in as a poll.
I'm leaning towards B although that could just be an aspect of my two-dimensional perspective and A is also a strong candidate...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637491</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1247157660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak?</p></div><p>Doesn't this happen in Phillip K Dick novels a lot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak ? Does n't this happen in Phillip K Dick novels a lot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak?Doesn't this happen in Phillip K Dick novels a lot?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28639271</id>
	<title>All just pie in the sky,</title>
	<author>Perp Atuitie</author>
	<datestamp>1247165160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>at least in the US of A, as long as the "broadband" part remains at the mercy of "providers" like the cablecos and phonecos.

But I'm very happy for those who live in the developed world. Life will be good there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>at least in the US of A , as long as the " broadband " part remains at the mercy of " providers " like the cablecos and phonecos .
But I 'm very happy for those who live in the developed world .
Life will be good there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at least in the US of A, as long as the "broadband" part remains at the mercy of "providers" like the cablecos and phonecos.
But I'm very happy for those who live in the developed world.
Life will be good there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28642771</id>
	<title>Re:Singularity ain't going to happen!</title>
	<author>Quackers\_McDuck</author>
	<datestamp>1247135940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the singularity is not really about exponential growth -- I mean, sure, Ray Kurzweil writes about it a lot and uses it as evidence to get people excited, but the main idea of the singularity is that once we can create a high-level AI (at or greater than human), it can modify itself to become "smarter", and then that modified self could modify itself, and then it recursively continues.

"Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an &#226;intelligence explosion,&#226;(TM) and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make."

Also, I don't know about Cerf, but Kurzweil definitely doesn't use this idea to incite fear -- he has been criticized for being too optimistic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the singularity is not really about exponential growth -- I mean , sure , Ray Kurzweil writes about it a lot and uses it as evidence to get people excited , but the main idea of the singularity is that once we can create a high-level AI ( at or greater than human ) , it can modify itself to become " smarter " , and then that modified self could modify itself , and then it recursively continues .
" Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever .
Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities , an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines ; there would then unquestionably be an   intelligence explosion ,   ( TM ) and the intelligence of man would be left far behind .
Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make .
" Also , I do n't know about Cerf , but Kurzweil definitely does n't use this idea to incite fear -- he has been criticized for being too optimistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the singularity is not really about exponential growth -- I mean, sure, Ray Kurzweil writes about it a lot and uses it as evidence to get people excited, but the main idea of the singularity is that once we can create a high-level AI (at or greater than human), it can modify itself to become "smarter", and then that modified self could modify itself, and then it recursively continues.
"Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever.
Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an âintelligence explosion,â(TM) and the intelligence of man would be left far behind.
Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make.
"

Also, I don't know about Cerf, but Kurzweil definitely doesn't use this idea to incite fear -- he has been criticized for being too optimistic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637189</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1247156340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke.</p></div></blockquote><p>Imagine having a device hookedup that could monitor basically everything about you, and report it in real time to the government.  Or anyone else that you might not like knowing everything about you.
</p><p>In the ideal, this could be really incredibly useful.  In actual practice, it sounds like the worst nightmare of basically anyone who wants privacy of any kind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke.Imagine having a device hookedup that could monitor basically everything about you , and report it in real time to the government .
Or anyone else that you might not like knowing everything about you .
In the ideal , this could be really incredibly useful .
In actual practice , it sounds like the worst nightmare of basically anyone who wants privacy of any kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke.Imagine having a device hookedup that could monitor basically everything about you, and report it in real time to the government.
Or anyone else that you might not like knowing everything about you.
In the ideal, this could be really incredibly useful.
In actual practice, it sounds like the worst nightmare of basically anyone who wants privacy of any kind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411</id>
	<title>Re:Dimensional analysis = innovation</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1247157300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, help me out here Slashdot crowd. Is the above post an example of:</p><p>A) Sufficiently advanced trolling is indistinguishable from stupidity<br>B) Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trolling<br>C) A and B<br>D) None of the above</p><p>Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , help me out here Slashdot crowd .
Is the above post an example of : A ) Sufficiently advanced trolling is indistinguishable from stupidityB ) Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trollingC ) A and BD ) None of the aboveThanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, help me out here Slashdot crowd.
Is the above post an example of:A) Sufficiently advanced trolling is indistinguishable from stupidityB) Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trollingC) A and BD) None of the aboveThanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637229</id>
	<title>How's this:</title>
	<author>netruner</author>
	<datestamp>1247156460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about we try to develop an app platform that is vendor independent - not simply so we can have homegrown apps, but so that you don't have to choose your cell service provider based on what apps you want to run.  While we're at it, can we make software for phones that will run reasonably fast?  I hate having to hit the power button 7 times, each time wondering if the button is worn out or if the software just hasn't caught up yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we try to develop an app platform that is vendor independent - not simply so we can have homegrown apps , but so that you do n't have to choose your cell service provider based on what apps you want to run .
While we 're at it , can we make software for phones that will run reasonably fast ?
I hate having to hit the power button 7 times , each time wondering if the button is worn out or if the software just has n't caught up yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we try to develop an app platform that is vendor independent - not simply so we can have homegrown apps, but so that you don't have to choose your cell service provider based on what apps you want to run.
While we're at it, can we make software for phones that will run reasonably fast?
I hate having to hit the power button 7 times, each time wondering if the button is worn out or if the software just hasn't caught up yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640601</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247170080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine having a method, that could prevent getting any heart attacks at all. If detected, trashy food could be thrown in the trash where it belongs automatically. If reliable, what would <em>this</em> do for survival rates?</p><p>Now imagine what this would do to the incomes of big "health" companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine having a method , that could prevent getting any heart attacks at all .
If detected , trashy food could be thrown in the trash where it belongs automatically .
If reliable , what would this do for survival rates ? Now imagine what this would do to the incomes of big " health " companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine having a method, that could prevent getting any heart attacks at all.
If detected, trashy food could be thrown in the trash where it belongs automatically.
If reliable, what would this do for survival rates?Now imagine what this would do to the incomes of big "health" companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637345</id>
	<title>Re:real time health data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247157000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of a sudden, the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the "red alert" sound from Star Trek. You take your phone out of your pocket, read the message and run hysterically and as quickly as you can at a random direction. People seem to do exactly the same. After what seemed to be a lifetime you reach a dead end alley. Someone taps your shoulder from behind. You turn around and there he is, Patrick Swayze. Seconds later you explode.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of a sudden , the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the " red alert " sound from Star Trek .
You take your phone out of your pocket , read the message and run hysterically and as quickly as you can at a random direction .
People seem to do exactly the same .
After what seemed to be a lifetime you reach a dead end alley .
Someone taps your shoulder from behind .
You turn around and there he is , Patrick Swayze .
Seconds later you explode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of a sudden, the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the "red alert" sound from Star Trek.
You take your phone out of your pocket, read the message and run hysterically and as quickly as you can at a random direction.
People seem to do exactly the same.
After what seemed to be a lifetime you reach a dead end alley.
Someone taps your shoulder from behind.
You turn around and there he is, Patrick Swayze.
Seconds later you explode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28642611</id>
	<title>Nerd alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247135340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Singularity is their maritial status.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Singularity is their maritial status .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Singularity is their maritial status.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637311</id>
	<title>Why should we listen to this guy???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all, he's a little past Marc Andreessen's recommended age limit of 24 for being a visionary.  Sorry Vint!  What NASA really needs is a bunch of kids showing off their latest iPhone/twitteresque/web 2.0 widget.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , he 's a little past Marc Andreessen 's recommended age limit of 24 for being a visionary .
Sorry Vint !
What NASA really needs is a bunch of kids showing off their latest iPhone/twitteresque/web 2.0 widget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, he's a little past Marc Andreessen's recommended age limit of 24 for being a visionary.
Sorry Vint!
What NASA really needs is a bunch of kids showing off their latest iPhone/twitteresque/web 2.0 widget.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433</id>
	<title>Singularity ain't going to happen!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247169420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I can prove it with this little explanation:</p><p>If you look at natural processes, they grow exponentially. Until limiting factors come into place. Then the curve flattens again, until it is horizontal, and the limiting factors and the growth balance each other out.</p><p>The inability to cope with the speed of change, close to the singularity, will itself be such a limiting factor.<br>Which will mean, that the speed of change will limit our ability to change things, slowing that speed of change itself down, until they balance each other out.</p><p>But how would Kurzweil and Cerf get any media attention, if that core object of fear would simply vanish into the air? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I can prove it with this little explanation : If you look at natural processes , they grow exponentially .
Until limiting factors come into place .
Then the curve flattens again , until it is horizontal , and the limiting factors and the growth balance each other out.The inability to cope with the speed of change , close to the singularity , will itself be such a limiting factor.Which will mean , that the speed of change will limit our ability to change things , slowing that speed of change itself down , until they balance each other out.But how would Kurzweil and Cerf get any media attention , if that core object of fear would simply vanish into the air ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I can prove it with this little explanation:If you look at natural processes, they grow exponentially.
Until limiting factors come into place.
Then the curve flattens again, until it is horizontal, and the limiting factors and the growth balance each other out.The inability to cope with the speed of change, close to the singularity, will itself be such a limiting factor.Which will mean, that the speed of change will limit our ability to change things, slowing that speed of change itself down, until they balance each other out.But how would Kurzweil and Cerf get any media attention, if that core object of fear would simply vanish into the air?
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638227</id>
	<title>Seek Help</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1247161080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Friend, do you remember when new ideas and new paradimes <i>enthralled and excited you</i>? But now, the cognitive straightjacket of your two-dimensional GOOGle-approved "web browsing" has transformed this natural <i>human</i> inquisitiveness into a <i>cynicism</i> bred by a <i>pathalogically limited</i> "worldview."</p><p>Your scoffing dismissal of my comments only lends credence to the <i>urgent</i> need to reanimate the internet by empowering multi-dimensional perspectives in its software applications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Friend , do you remember when new ideas and new paradimes enthralled and excited you ?
But now , the cognitive straightjacket of your two-dimensional GOOGle-approved " web browsing " has transformed this natural human inquisitiveness into a cynicism bred by a pathalogically limited " worldview .
" Your scoffing dismissal of my comments only lends credence to the urgent need to reanimate the internet by empowering multi-dimensional perspectives in its software applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Friend, do you remember when new ideas and new paradimes enthralled and excited you?
But now, the cognitive straightjacket of your two-dimensional GOOGle-approved "web browsing" has transformed this natural human inquisitiveness into a cynicism bred by a pathalogically limited "worldview.
"Your scoffing dismissal of my comments only lends credence to the urgent need to reanimate the internet by empowering multi-dimensional perspectives in its software applications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637081</id>
	<title>real time health data</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1247155980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of a sudden, the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the "red alert" sound from Star Trek. You take your phone out of your pocket. "Swine Flu Reported Nearby" flashes on the red screen. Covering your mouth with your shirt, you and everyone else start running in all directions, spreading the flu immediately to the surrounding communities. The process repeats like the grand-finale of the fireworks display, until the deadly disease is evenly distributed throughout the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of a sudden , the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the " red alert " sound from Star Trek .
You take your phone out of your pocket .
" Swine Flu Reported Nearby " flashes on the red screen .
Covering your mouth with your shirt , you and everyone else start running in all directions , spreading the flu immediately to the surrounding communities .
The process repeats like the grand-finale of the fireworks display , until the deadly disease is evenly distributed throughout the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of a sudden, the cellphones of everyone around you whoop with the "red alert" sound from Star Trek.
You take your phone out of your pocket.
"Swine Flu Reported Nearby" flashes on the red screen.
Covering your mouth with your shirt, you and everyone else start running in all directions, spreading the flu immediately to the surrounding communities.
The process repeats like the grand-finale of the fireworks display, until the deadly disease is evenly distributed throughout the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637353</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1247157060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke. If detected, emergency could be called automatically. If reliable, what would this do for survival rates? In many cases, survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins. I think something like this, if reliable and unobtrusive, would be a major leap forward for health treatment.</p></div><p>You do know that tyranny and the invasion of privacy is always "for the good of the land," right?  I'm going to engate in some speculation here, something you might call a plausible scenario.
<br> <br>
The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap, it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it.  The stated reason will be cost.  So, in that way it's going to be required of everyone whether or not they care about the privacy aspects.  I find that scenario a little too likely.  That probable lack of voluntary, opt-in-only participation is one of your first clues that you are dealing with something the goals of which deviate from its stated purpose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke .
If detected , emergency could be called automatically .
If reliable , what would this do for survival rates ?
In many cases , survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins .
I think something like this , if reliable and unobtrusive , would be a major leap forward for health treatment.You do know that tyranny and the invasion of privacy is always " for the good of the land , " right ?
I 'm going to engate in some speculation here , something you might call a plausible scenario .
The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap , it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it .
The stated reason will be cost .
So , in that way it 's going to be required of everyone whether or not they care about the privacy aspects .
I find that scenario a little too likely .
That probable lack of voluntary , opt-in-only participation is one of your first clues that you are dealing with something the goals of which deviate from its stated purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke.
If detected, emergency could be called automatically.
If reliable, what would this do for survival rates?
In many cases, survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins.
I think something like this, if reliable and unobtrusive, would be a major leap forward for health treatment.You do know that tyranny and the invasion of privacy is always "for the good of the land," right?
I'm going to engate in some speculation here, something you might call a plausible scenario.
The problem is that if this health monitor becomes available and reasonably cheap, it will probably become difficult to obtain health insurance without it.
The stated reason will be cost.
So, in that way it's going to be required of everyone whether or not they care about the privacy aspects.
I find that scenario a little too likely.
That probable lack of voluntary, opt-in-only participation is one of your first clues that you are dealing with something the goals of which deviate from its stated purpose.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637783</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>tomcode</author>
	<datestamp>1247159040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Best idea since Bear Patrol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best idea since Bear Patrol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best idea since Bear Patrol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637773</id>
	<title>I am The Architect. I created the Internets.</title>
	<author>sfraggle</author>
	<datestamp>1247158920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone else noticed how much Vint Cerf resembles the Architect out of the Matrix films?<br><a href="http://www.wired.com/images\_blogs/photos/uncategorized/2009/02/27/vintcerf.jpg" title="wired.com">The Architect</a> [wired.com]<br><a href="http://www.cyberpunkreview.com/images/matrixreloaded63.jpg" title="cyberpunkreview.com">Vint Cerf</a> [cyberpunkreview.com]</p><p>I think maybe we should be worried, especially if he's lecturing at "<a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Technological\_singularity" title="wikimedia.org">Singularity</a> [wikimedia.org] University".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone else noticed how much Vint Cerf resembles the Architect out of the Matrix films ? The Architect [ wired.com ] Vint Cerf [ cyberpunkreview.com ] I think maybe we should be worried , especially if he 's lecturing at " Singularity [ wikimedia.org ] University " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone else noticed how much Vint Cerf resembles the Architect out of the Matrix films?The Architect [wired.com]Vint Cerf [cyberpunkreview.com]I think maybe we should be worried, especially if he's lecturing at "Singularity [wikimedia.org] University".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28644881</id>
	<title>Re:Singularity ain't going to happen!</title>
	<author>feelbad\_feelsgood</author>
	<datestamp>1247147580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you suggesting that change that is faster than "people" can "cope" with, simply doesn't happen?

This would come as quite a surprise to coal miners, polar bears, Iranian ayatollahs, newspaper publishers, and the RIAA, to name a few.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you suggesting that change that is faster than " people " can " cope " with , simply does n't happen ?
This would come as quite a surprise to coal miners , polar bears , Iranian ayatollahs , newspaper publishers , and the RIAA , to name a few .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you suggesting that change that is faster than "people" can "cope" with, simply doesn't happen?
This would come as quite a surprise to coal miners, polar bears, Iranian ayatollahs, newspaper publishers, and the RIAA, to name a few.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211</id>
	<title>Dimensional analysis = innovation</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1247156400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GOOGle's strangle-lock on our Internet has irrationally limited the perspective of the Web to a two-dimensional aspect. Why limit ourselves to two dimensions, when scientists have long proven that human consciousness has at least four dimensions?</p><p>HOWEVER, I don't know if another government panel like NASA is the answer to this. What's needed is some forward thinking <i>innovation</i> to evolutionarily expand the organic dimensions of web "pages" into multi-dimensional info-spheres.</p><p>With everyone focused on the "cloud" it seems we all forgot about the fiundamentally <i>networked</i> nature of the internet. Vin't Cerf's article is unfortunately no exception.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GOOGle 's strangle-lock on our Internet has irrationally limited the perspective of the Web to a two-dimensional aspect .
Why limit ourselves to two dimensions , when scientists have long proven that human consciousness has at least four dimensions ? HOWEVER , I do n't know if another government panel like NASA is the answer to this .
What 's needed is some forward thinking innovation to evolutionarily expand the organic dimensions of web " pages " into multi-dimensional info-spheres.With everyone focused on the " cloud " it seems we all forgot about the fiundamentally networked nature of the internet .
Vi n't Cerf 's article is unfortunately no exception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOOGle's strangle-lock on our Internet has irrationally limited the perspective of the Web to a two-dimensional aspect.
Why limit ourselves to two dimensions, when scientists have long proven that human consciousness has at least four dimensions?HOWEVER, I don't know if another government panel like NASA is the answer to this.
What's needed is some forward thinking innovation to evolutionarily expand the organic dimensions of web "pages" into multi-dimensional info-spheres.With everyone focused on the "cloud" it seems we all forgot about the fiundamentally networked nature of the internet.
Vin't Cerf's article is unfortunately no exception.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637225</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>ShiftyOne</author>
	<datestamp>1247156460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That could be an early possibility.  This technology could also be used to monitor your body in real-time, ensuring that you are staying healthy.  This would allow for prevention of heart attacks and strokes, instead of allowing for fast treatment after the problems occur.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That could be an early possibility .
This technology could also be used to monitor your body in real-time , ensuring that you are staying healthy .
This would allow for prevention of heart attacks and strokes , instead of allowing for fast treatment after the problems occur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That could be an early possibility.
This technology could also be used to monitor your body in real-time, ensuring that you are staying healthy.
This would allow for prevention of heart attacks and strokes, instead of allowing for fast treatment after the problems occur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638463</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine</title>
	<author>LKM</author>
	<datestamp>1247161980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine if you could decide who gets what information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine if you could decide who gets what information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine if you could decide who gets what information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28641625</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Arslan ibn Da'ud</author>
	<datestamp>1247131140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last week I stepped in some dog poop. Does that count?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last week I stepped in some dog poop .
Does that count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last week I stepped in some dog poop.
Does that count?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637501</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1247157720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never, but for some reason <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/02/1627218" title="slashdot.org">elephants</a> [slashdot.org] constantly step on my phones. But we'll show them, won't we Land Rover?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never , but for some reason elephants [ slashdot.org ] constantly step on my phones .
But we 'll show them , wo n't we Land Rover ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never, but for some reason elephants [slashdot.org] constantly step on my phones.
But we'll show them, won't we Land Rover?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951</id>
	<title>Imagine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247155560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke. If detected, emergency could be called automatically. If reliable, what would this do for survival rates? In many cases, survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins. I think something like this, if reliable and unobtrusive, would be a major leap forward for health treatment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke .
If detected , emergency could be called automatically .
If reliable , what would this do for survival rates ?
In many cases , survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins .
I think something like this , if reliable and unobtrusive , would be a major leap forward for health treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine having advice hooked up that could monitor for a heart attack or a stroke.
If detected, emergency could be called automatically.
If reliable, what would this do for survival rates?
In many cases, survival or simply the degree of damage is determined by how quickly treatment begins.
I think something like this, if reliable and unobtrusive, would be a major leap forward for health treatment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>
Seriously?
<br> <br>
When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak?  While I can see the utility and potential upside to a lot of the ideas being implemented on mobile devices these days, some of them seem to be solutions looking for a problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks .
Seriously ? When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak ?
While I can see the utility and potential upside to a lot of the ideas being implemented on mobile devices these days , some of them seem to be solutions looking for a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> checking your location against a map of known biohazards and disease outbreaks.
Seriously?
 
When was the last time you rounded a corner and stepped right in a pile of biohazard or disease outbreak?
While I can see the utility and potential upside to a lot of the ideas being implemented on mobile devices these days, some of them seem to be solutions looking for a problem.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637485</id>
	<title>The Swarm: A BUNCH of dampers</title>
	<author>starglider29a</author>
	<datestamp>1247157660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can think of A BUNCH dampers to The Swarm (smartphone micronetwork):<br> <br>
<b>Privacy</b> <br>
Until we learn to balance paranoiac fears of privacy invasion with "the good of the collective", these things will not reach a fraction of the potential. For example, I drive an hour to a choke point. I don't want the world to know where I am at any instant, but would like to know that if I slow down 3 mph, I'll get through the choke point sooner. <br>
<b>Civility</b> <br>
I would like to use my smart phone to talk to people in the commuter swarm around me. "Dude, your left rear tire is low." But, being a Slashdotter, we know where that would go. "Dude, you have an Apple sticker, yer a fking fanboi! die die die!"
<b>Lawyers</b> <br>
From inter-network contracts to micro-restraining orders (from the apple fanboi above), the potential for litigiousness will throw sand and syrup into this machine. And don't get me started on "intercept trajectories" with that hot chick who walks down the bike path every other day. "Hey, I just happened to..." "Right, get lost..." She presses the 'repel' button and is steered away from me henceforth.<br>
<b>Money/ROI</b> <br>
Throughput caps, and the exceeding thereof, will get expensive. Texts cost nothing, should be free, but they are not. If everything I do costs a penny, that adds up. The ROI won't hold up. Not everything I do is worth a penny. I make money 8 hours a day, but can spend it 60/60/24/7/365. How long can I sustain that?<br>
<b>Life (as in getting one)</b> <br>
I was a chat maven. Made some good, REAL relationships. No one is on chat anymore. People not on Facebook are virtually vanished. For now. I drive, I work, I cook, I eat, I sleep. Where does micronetworking ADD to that? "Say, I detect that you are adding Worcestershire sauce to that burger. Here are some Swarm Coupons for Baconnaise instead. Say, I detect that your cholesterol level is too high to warrant eating a burger. Say, I noted that you haven't moved outside the house in 4 days despite my detecting good weather in your area. Perhaps you should skip the burger and walk to the store for some lo-fat yogurt with bactieria cultures that I detect you are low in. Your neighbor 2 houses down has smelled your burger and wishes he could have it. Give it to him instead. I detect from his Swarmer that he has a 23\% chance of dying of obesity in a month anyway."<br>
<b>Time</b> <br>
Nothing I do with a smartphone will get me time back. Sleep, chill, read, kiss. None of these require a Swarmer. It takes away. I watched 16 innings of baseball and went to sleep. Just as I drifted off, my phone texted me regarding the results. Thanks for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of A BUNCH dampers to The Swarm ( smartphone micronetwork ) : Privacy Until we learn to balance paranoiac fears of privacy invasion with " the good of the collective " , these things will not reach a fraction of the potential .
For example , I drive an hour to a choke point .
I do n't want the world to know where I am at any instant , but would like to know that if I slow down 3 mph , I 'll get through the choke point sooner .
Civility I would like to use my smart phone to talk to people in the commuter swarm around me .
" Dude , your left rear tire is low .
" But , being a Slashdotter , we know where that would go .
" Dude , you have an Apple sticker , yer a fking fanboi !
die die die !
" Lawyers From inter-network contracts to micro-restraining orders ( from the apple fanboi above ) , the potential for litigiousness will throw sand and syrup into this machine .
And do n't get me started on " intercept trajectories " with that hot chick who walks down the bike path every other day .
" Hey , I just happened to... " " Right , get lost... " She presses the 'repel ' button and is steered away from me henceforth .
Money/ROI Throughput caps , and the exceeding thereof , will get expensive .
Texts cost nothing , should be free , but they are not .
If everything I do costs a penny , that adds up .
The ROI wo n't hold up .
Not everything I do is worth a penny .
I make money 8 hours a day , but can spend it 60/60/24/7/365 .
How long can I sustain that ?
Life ( as in getting one ) I was a chat maven .
Made some good , REAL relationships .
No one is on chat anymore .
People not on Facebook are virtually vanished .
For now .
I drive , I work , I cook , I eat , I sleep .
Where does micronetworking ADD to that ?
" Say , I detect that you are adding Worcestershire sauce to that burger .
Here are some Swarm Coupons for Baconnaise instead .
Say , I detect that your cholesterol level is too high to warrant eating a burger .
Say , I noted that you have n't moved outside the house in 4 days despite my detecting good weather in your area .
Perhaps you should skip the burger and walk to the store for some lo-fat yogurt with bactieria cultures that I detect you are low in .
Your neighbor 2 houses down has smelled your burger and wishes he could have it .
Give it to him instead .
I detect from his Swarmer that he has a 23 \ % chance of dying of obesity in a month anyway .
" Time Nothing I do with a smartphone will get me time back .
Sleep , chill , read , kiss .
None of these require a Swarmer .
It takes away .
I watched 16 innings of baseball and went to sleep .
Just as I drifted off , my phone texted me regarding the results .
Thanks for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of A BUNCH dampers to The Swarm (smartphone micronetwork): 
Privacy 
Until we learn to balance paranoiac fears of privacy invasion with "the good of the collective", these things will not reach a fraction of the potential.
For example, I drive an hour to a choke point.
I don't want the world to know where I am at any instant, but would like to know that if I slow down 3 mph, I'll get through the choke point sooner.
Civility 
I would like to use my smart phone to talk to people in the commuter swarm around me.
"Dude, your left rear tire is low.
" But, being a Slashdotter, we know where that would go.
"Dude, you have an Apple sticker, yer a fking fanboi!
die die die!
"
Lawyers 
From inter-network contracts to micro-restraining orders (from the apple fanboi above), the potential for litigiousness will throw sand and syrup into this machine.
And don't get me started on "intercept trajectories" with that hot chick who walks down the bike path every other day.
"Hey, I just happened to..." "Right, get lost..." She presses the 'repel' button and is steered away from me henceforth.
Money/ROI 
Throughput caps, and the exceeding thereof, will get expensive.
Texts cost nothing, should be free, but they are not.
If everything I do costs a penny, that adds up.
The ROI won't hold up.
Not everything I do is worth a penny.
I make money 8 hours a day, but can spend it 60/60/24/7/365.
How long can I sustain that?
Life (as in getting one) 
I was a chat maven.
Made some good, REAL relationships.
No one is on chat anymore.
People not on Facebook are virtually vanished.
For now.
I drive, I work, I cook, I eat, I sleep.
Where does micronetworking ADD to that?
"Say, I detect that you are adding Worcestershire sauce to that burger.
Here are some Swarm Coupons for Baconnaise instead.
Say, I detect that your cholesterol level is too high to warrant eating a burger.
Say, I noted that you haven't moved outside the house in 4 days despite my detecting good weather in your area.
Perhaps you should skip the burger and walk to the store for some lo-fat yogurt with bactieria cultures that I detect you are low in.
Your neighbor 2 houses down has smelled your burger and wishes he could have it.
Give it to him instead.
I detect from his Swarmer that he has a 23\% chance of dying of obesity in a month anyway.
"
Time 
Nothing I do with a smartphone will get me time back.
Sleep, chill, read, kiss.
None of these require a Swarmer.
It takes away.
I watched 16 innings of baseball and went to sleep.
Just as I drifted off, my phone texted me regarding the results.
Thanks for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637239</id>
	<title>Motion Detector iPhone App</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1247156520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems the obvious application:</p><p>"20 meters!"<br>"Get set, folks."<br>"15 meters!"<br>"Short, controlled bursts."<br>"10 meters!  5 meters!"<br>"That's impossible!  That's inside the room!"<br>"It's readin' right, man!"<br>"Well, you're not readin' <i>it</i> right."  Hicks takes the Phone and look at the screen.  "He's right, 3 meters...oh, wait.  Hold on, call for you."  Hands the phone back to Hudson.<br>"Thanks....Yallo.  Going okay.  Yessir.  Yessir.  No sir, not a bug hunt.  Pretty much everyone.  It wasn't <i>me</i>, man!  Yah I remember last time.  Who?  Sorry, he's dead.  He's dead too.  Hicks?  Yeah, sec."  Hands the phone to Hicks who is listening to what can only be described as impatient tapping on the ceiling.<br>"Yah.  No, he's right, only a few of us are left.  Acid for blood.  Hardly believe it myself, sir.  Trying sir, but we need to <i>get to orbit</i> first.  Oh.  Really?  That's new.  Lemme look.  Wow.  There really is an app for everything.  Ok.  Well, five and a half to beam up.  No, Paul Reiser isn't dead.  Yet."  Hicks fires a grenade into the ceiling.  "Energize."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems the obvious application : " 20 meters !
" " Get set , folks .
" " 15 meters !
" " Short , controlled bursts .
" " 10 meters !
5 meters !
" " That 's impossible !
That 's inside the room !
" " It 's readin ' right , man !
" " Well , you 're not readin ' it right .
" Hicks takes the Phone and look at the screen .
" He 's right , 3 meters...oh , wait .
Hold on , call for you .
" Hands the phone back to Hudson. " Thanks....Yallo .
Going okay .
Yessir. Yessir .
No sir , not a bug hunt .
Pretty much everyone .
It was n't me , man !
Yah I remember last time .
Who ? Sorry , he 's dead .
He 's dead too .
Hicks ? Yeah , sec .
" Hands the phone to Hicks who is listening to what can only be described as impatient tapping on the ceiling. " Yah .
No , he 's right , only a few of us are left .
Acid for blood .
Hardly believe it myself , sir .
Trying sir , but we need to get to orbit first .
Oh. Really ?
That 's new .
Lem me look .
Wow. There really is an app for everything .
Ok. Well , five and a half to beam up .
No , Paul Reiser is n't dead .
Yet. " Hicks fires a grenade into the ceiling .
" Energize. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems the obvious application:"20 meters!
""Get set, folks.
""15 meters!
""Short, controlled bursts.
""10 meters!
5 meters!
""That's impossible!
That's inside the room!
""It's readin' right, man!
""Well, you're not readin' it right.
"  Hicks takes the Phone and look at the screen.
"He's right, 3 meters...oh, wait.
Hold on, call for you.
"  Hands the phone back to Hudson."Thanks....Yallo.
Going okay.
Yessir.  Yessir.
No sir, not a bug hunt.
Pretty much everyone.
It wasn't me, man!
Yah I remember last time.
Who?  Sorry, he's dead.
He's dead too.
Hicks?  Yeah, sec.
"  Hands the phone to Hicks who is listening to what can only be described as impatient tapping on the ceiling."Yah.
No, he's right, only a few of us are left.
Acid for blood.
Hardly believe it myself, sir.
Trying sir, but we need to get to orbit first.
Oh.  Really?
That's new.
Lemme look.
Wow.  There really is an app for everything.
Ok.  Well, five and a half to beam up.
No, Paul Reiser isn't dead.
Yet."  Hicks fires a grenade into the ceiling.
"Energize."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638679</id>
	<title>Re:Dimensional analysis = innovation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247162940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kook alert!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kook alert !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kook alert!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637181</id>
	<title>Singularity University</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Impossibly easy entry requirements, but the only way to graduate is virtually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Impossibly easy entry requirements , but the only way to graduate is virtually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impossibly easy entry requirements, but the only way to graduate is virtually.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28641625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28644881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28642771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1451223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28641625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637491
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28642771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28644881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28636951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28640601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637189
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637353
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1451223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637411
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28637983
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1451223.28638679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
