<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_07_1946217</id>
	<title>Gaze-Tracking Software Protects Computer Privacy</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1246960200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://poncacityweloveyou.com/" rel="nofollow">Ponca City, We Love You</a> writes <i>"Two years ago computer security expert Bill Anderson read about scientific research on how the human eye moves as it reads and processes text and images. 'This obscure characteristic... suddenly struck me as (a solution to) a security problem,' says Anderson. With the help of a couple of software developers, Anderson developed a software program called Chameleon that tracks a viewer's gaze patterns and <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci\_12743292">only allows an authorized user to read text on the screen</a>, while everyone else sees gibberish. Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes to show only that one person the correct text. After a 15-second calibration period in which the software learns the viewer's gaze patterns, anyone looking over that user's shoulder sees dummy text that randomly and constantly changes. To tap the broader consumer market, Anderson built a more consumer-friendly version called PrivateEye, which can work with a simple Webcam to <a href="http://oculislabs.com/Products/PrivateEye.html">blur a user's monitor when he or she turns away</a>. It also detects other faces in the background, and a small video screen pops up to alert the user that someone is looking at the screen. 'There have been inventions in the space of gaze-tracking. There have been inventions in the space of security,' says Anderson. 'But nobody has put the two ideas together, as far as we know.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ponca City , We Love You writes " Two years ago computer security expert Bill Anderson read about scientific research on how the human eye moves as it reads and processes text and images .
'This obscure characteristic... suddenly struck me as ( a solution to ) a security problem, ' says Anderson .
With the help of a couple of software developers , Anderson developed a software program called Chameleon that tracks a viewer 's gaze patterns and only allows an authorized user to read text on the screen , while everyone else sees gibberish .
Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader 's eyes to show only that one person the correct text .
After a 15-second calibration period in which the software learns the viewer 's gaze patterns , anyone looking over that user 's shoulder sees dummy text that randomly and constantly changes .
To tap the broader consumer market , Anderson built a more consumer-friendly version called PrivateEye , which can work with a simple Webcam to blur a user 's monitor when he or she turns away .
It also detects other faces in the background , and a small video screen pops up to alert the user that someone is looking at the screen .
'There have been inventions in the space of gaze-tracking .
There have been inventions in the space of security, ' says Anderson .
'But nobody has put the two ideas together , as far as we know .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ponca City, We Love You writes "Two years ago computer security expert Bill Anderson read about scientific research on how the human eye moves as it reads and processes text and images.
'This obscure characteristic... suddenly struck me as (a solution to) a security problem,' says Anderson.
With the help of a couple of software developers, Anderson developed a software program called Chameleon that tracks a viewer's gaze patterns and only allows an authorized user to read text on the screen, while everyone else sees gibberish.
Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes to show only that one person the correct text.
After a 15-second calibration period in which the software learns the viewer's gaze patterns, anyone looking over that user's shoulder sees dummy text that randomly and constantly changes.
To tap the broader consumer market, Anderson built a more consumer-friendly version called PrivateEye, which can work with a simple Webcam to blur a user's monitor when he or she turns away.
It also detects other faces in the background, and a small video screen pops up to alert the user that someone is looking at the screen.
'There have been inventions in the space of gaze-tracking.
There have been inventions in the space of security,' says Anderson.
'But nobody has put the two ideas together, as far as we know.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616311</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246974300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And your point is?  I think this is a great idea.  There are lots of times when I don't want someone seeing what I am reading or writing on my computer/laptop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And your point is ?
I think this is a great idea .
There are lots of times when I do n't want someone seeing what I am reading or writing on my computer/laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And your point is?
I think this is a great idea.
There are lots of times when I don't want someone seeing what I am reading or writing on my computer/laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628367</id>
	<title>xkcd predicted it</title>
	<author>cybercobra</author>
	<datestamp>1247047680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://xkcd.com/129/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/129/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/129/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/129/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616915</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246979400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem will be when someone applies this to force the focused eyes to look at an advertisement (and probably also the real goal of the research, not some semi-useful shoulder-security application).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem will be when someone applies this to force the focused eyes to look at an advertisement ( and probably also the real goal of the research , not some semi-useful shoulder-security application ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem will be when someone applies this to force the focused eyes to look at an advertisement (and probably also the real goal of the research, not some semi-useful shoulder-security application).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615159</id>
	<title>Just you wait...</title>
	<author>dugrrr</author>
	<datestamp>1246966140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...it will be like the <i>scramble suit</i> from Philip K. Dick's "A Scanner Darkly", but for computer monitors.
<br> <br>
(ie. no one will know exactly what kind of porn your looking at)</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it will be like the scramble suit from Philip K. Dick 's " A Scanner Darkly " , but for computer monitors .
( ie. no one will know exactly what kind of porn your looking at )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it will be like the scramble suit from Philip K. Dick's "A Scanner Darkly", but for computer monitors.
(ie. no one will know exactly what kind of porn your looking at)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28623335</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247071860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, that will work:</p><p>BOSS: Are you looking at porn?!?!<br>YOU: Uh, no.  What would make you think that?<br>BOSS: Your screen is blurred out but I can still tell it's a naked person!<br>YOU: No way. I'm just editing a document with a peach colored background and red-ish purple text.  Honest!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , that will work : BOSS : Are you looking at porn ? ! ?
! YOU : Uh , no .
What would make you think that ? BOSS : Your screen is blurred out but I can still tell it 's a naked person ! YOU : No way .
I 'm just editing a document with a peach colored background and red-ish purple text .
Honest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, that will work:BOSS: Are you looking at porn?!?
!YOU: Uh, no.
What would make you think that?BOSS: Your screen is blurred out but I can still tell it's a naked person!YOU: No way.
I'm just editing a document with a peach colored background and red-ish purple text.
Honest!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615071</id>
	<title>Eye strain</title>
	<author>slummy</author>
	<datestamp>1246965720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about eye strain from the constant blurring/clarification process?<br>

I would think a person using this technology would have to train themselves not to try and focus on an area of the screen that would normally be in focus until the "gaze" sensor figures out what they're trying to look at.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about eye strain from the constant blurring/clarification process ?
I would think a person using this technology would have to train themselves not to try and focus on an area of the screen that would normally be in focus until the " gaze " sensor figures out what they 're trying to look at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about eye strain from the constant blurring/clarification process?
I would think a person using this technology would have to train themselves not to try and focus on an area of the screen that would normally be in focus until the "gaze" sensor figures out what they're trying to look at.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615575</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1246968840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes... "Check, that's doable now."</p></div></blockquote><p>

Well, sort of.  A decent eye tracker (<a href="http://www.smarteye.se/" title="smarteye.se">example 1</a> [smarteye.se], <a href="http://www.tobii.com/scientific\_research/products\_services/eye\_tracking\_hardware.aspx" title="tobii.com">example 2</a> [tobii.com]) costs $15,000 to $30,000 (please do not request a link to a price quote - the fact that they <i>don't</i> list prices on their pages should be a good clue).  And this scrambling system would be worse than useless with a bad eye tracker.  (PS, please, <i>please</i> prove me wrong by posting a link to a cheap, robust, accurate eye-tracking solution!)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader 's eyes... " Check , that 's doable now .
" Well , sort of .
A decent eye tracker ( example 1 [ smarteye.se ] , example 2 [ tobii.com ] ) costs $ 15,000 to $ 30,000 ( please do not request a link to a price quote - the fact that they do n't list prices on their pages should be a good clue ) .
And this scrambling system would be worse than useless with a bad eye tracker .
( PS , please , please prove me wrong by posting a link to a cheap , robust , accurate eye-tracking solution !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes... "Check, that's doable now.
"

Well, sort of.
A decent eye tracker (example 1 [smarteye.se], example 2 [tobii.com]) costs $15,000 to $30,000 (please do not request a link to a price quote - the fact that they don't list prices on their pages should be a good clue).
And this scrambling system would be worse than useless with a bad eye tracker.
(PS, please, please prove me wrong by posting a link to a cheap, robust, accurate eye-tracking solution!
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616713</id>
	<title>Uh-oh</title>
	<author>brusk</author>
	<datestamp>1246977600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sunglasses will be considered a DMCA violation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sunglasses will be considered a DMCA violation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sunglasses will be considered a DMCA violation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28617361</id>
	<title>TEMPEST shines on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246983960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need a simple, open source solution for blocking TEMPEST.</p><p>Zero Pad Emission software is free but old and proprietary for Windows (works under Wine). I use it for opening up my passwords lists within my TrueCrypt partitions and containers, but I have no way to know if it really works or not.</p><p>Once a simple, open source solution is worked out, it can be something applied to every application, why not in X/org itself?</p><p>Blurring the screen may work for local peeping toms in and around the computer rooms, but when it is not blurred and visible, it can be compromised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need a simple , open source solution for blocking TEMPEST.Zero Pad Emission software is free but old and proprietary for Windows ( works under Wine ) .
I use it for opening up my passwords lists within my TrueCrypt partitions and containers , but I have no way to know if it really works or not.Once a simple , open source solution is worked out , it can be something applied to every application , why not in X/org itself ? Blurring the screen may work for local peeping toms in and around the computer rooms , but when it is not blurred and visible , it can be compromised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need a simple, open source solution for blocking TEMPEST.Zero Pad Emission software is free but old and proprietary for Windows (works under Wine).
I use it for opening up my passwords lists within my TrueCrypt partitions and containers, but I have no way to know if it really works or not.Once a simple, open source solution is worked out, it can be something applied to every application, why not in X/org itself?Blurring the screen may work for local peeping toms in and around the computer rooms, but when it is not blurred and visible, it can be compromised.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616059</id>
	<title>Be careful where you look!</title>
	<author>Bladesonfire</author>
	<datestamp>1246972440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, now my girlfriend is going to know I'm looking right at the pictures of those "singles" ads when that image is the only thing clear on a blurry screen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , now my girlfriend is going to know I 'm looking right at the pictures of those " singles " ads when that image is the only thing clear on a blurry screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, now my girlfriend is going to know I'm looking right at the pictures of those "singles" ads when that image is the only thing clear on a blurry screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621717</id>
	<title>Re:Loony Bin</title>
	<author>Seraphim\_72</author>
	<datestamp>1247066100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...or the halo/corona of a coming migraine....<br> <br>Ow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or the halo/corona of a coming migraine.... Ow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or the halo/corona of a coming migraine.... Ow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616545</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>Annorax</author>
	<datestamp>1246976280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This works until someone makes a mask of your face, puts it on, and then browses your bank account information.</p><p>Worse yet, someone cuts off your head and props it up on your joystick while they browse...</p><p>I prefer the idea of measuring something that isn't so easily duplicated like gaze-tracking!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This works until someone makes a mask of your face , puts it on , and then browses your bank account information.Worse yet , someone cuts off your head and props it up on your joystick while they browse...I prefer the idea of measuring something that is n't so easily duplicated like gaze-tracking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This works until someone makes a mask of your face, puts it on, and then browses your bank account information.Worse yet, someone cuts off your head and props it up on your joystick while they browse...I prefer the idea of measuring something that isn't so easily duplicated like gaze-tracking!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</id>
	<title>Flat screens!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246963980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology.  I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops.  All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's.  I don't care much for saving a few inches in depth, so I try to use CRT's whenever I can, because unless you're sitting directly in front and center of a flat screen anything, it's very difficult to read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we already had this technology , and it was called " flat screen " technology .
I swear I 'm not a crotchety old man , but I ca n't stand flat screen monitors/TV 's/laptops .
All of them have this same effect , when compared to the bright , clear , viewable-from-any-direction CRT 's .
I do n't care much for saving a few inches in depth , so I try to use CRT 's whenever I can , because unless you 're sitting directly in front and center of a flat screen anything , it 's very difficult to read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology.
I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops.
All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's.
I don't care much for saving a few inches in depth, so I try to use CRT's whenever I can, because unless you're sitting directly in front and center of a flat screen anything, it's very difficult to read.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621407</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>gstoddart</author>
	<datestamp>1247064840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology. I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops. All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's.</p></div></blockquote><p>Try some newer models.</p><p>I'm sitting in front of an Acer 23" LCD with a contrast of  40000:1, with 160 degree horizontal and 160 degree vertical viewing angles, and a 5ms response time.</p><p>It's a pretty sweet monitor, and doesn't suffer from much of what you decry.  It also runs natively at 1920x1080.</p><p>Acer X233H is the model number.  Absolutely the best flat panel I've ever seen.</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we already had this technology , and it was called " flat screen " technology .
I swear I 'm not a crotchety old man , but I ca n't stand flat screen monitors/TV 's/laptops .
All of them have this same effect , when compared to the bright , clear , viewable-from-any-direction CRT 's.Try some newer models.I 'm sitting in front of an Acer 23 " LCD with a contrast of 40000 : 1 , with 160 degree horizontal and 160 degree vertical viewing angles , and a 5ms response time.It 's a pretty sweet monitor , and does n't suffer from much of what you decry .
It also runs natively at 1920x1080.Acer X233H is the model number .
Absolutely the best flat panel I 've ever seen.Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology.
I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops.
All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's.Try some newer models.I'm sitting in front of an Acer 23" LCD with a contrast of  40000:1, with 160 degree horizontal and 160 degree vertical viewing angles, and a 5ms response time.It's a pretty sweet monitor, and doesn't suffer from much of what you decry.
It also runs natively at 1920x1080.Acer X233H is the model number.
Absolutely the best flat panel I've ever seen.Cheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614877</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Eternauta3k</author>
	<datestamp>1246964760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read the part where it shows random text everywhere else. It's probably just meant to buy you time to tell any shoulder-surfers to fuck off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the part where it shows random text everywhere else .
It 's probably just meant to buy you time to tell any shoulder-surfers to fuck off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the part where it shows random text everywhere else.
It's probably just meant to buy you time to tell any shoulder-surfers to fuck off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616283</id>
	<title>Re:OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246974120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Eye signatures? Doubtful. But it provides security once you've logged in. That's a fairly big deal itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eye signatures ?
Doubtful. But it provides security once you 've logged in .
That 's a fairly big deal itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eye signatures?
Doubtful. But it provides security once you've logged in.
That's a fairly big deal itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614745</id>
	<title>or you can just add a privacy screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know. Just seems simpler to me.</p><p>Perhaps this technology might be useful elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know .
Just seems simpler to me.Perhaps this technology might be useful elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know.
Just seems simpler to me.Perhaps this technology might be useful elsewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28624121</id>
	<title>Re:A better use for gaze tech</title>
	<author>PopeAlien</author>
	<datestamp>1247074740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Screw privacy</p></div><p>..They're still working on that, but you'll be glad to know things are progressing well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw privacy..They 're still working on that , but you 'll be glad to know things are progressing well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw privacy..They're still working on that, but you'll be glad to know things are progressing well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615031</id>
	<title>Read a story once...</title>
	<author>i.r.id10t</author>
	<datestamp>1246965420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where a guy working for some TLA (three letter agency) was working out of a 'net cafe using a custom boot CD/DVD.  The software on it would somehow figure out that there was someone else that could see his screen - gaze tracking, hax0ring the security cam in the establishment, etc - and throw up all sorts of porn.  So to the waitress, etc. it seemed he was just a run of the mill perv...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where a guy working for some TLA ( three letter agency ) was working out of a 'net cafe using a custom boot CD/DVD .
The software on it would somehow figure out that there was someone else that could see his screen - gaze tracking , hax0ring the security cam in the establishment , etc - and throw up all sorts of porn .
So to the waitress , etc .
it seemed he was just a run of the mill perv.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where a guy working for some TLA (three letter agency) was working out of a 'net cafe using a custom boot CD/DVD.
The software on it would somehow figure out that there was someone else that could see his screen - gaze tracking, hax0ring the security cam in the establishment, etc - and throw up all sorts of porn.
So to the waitress, etc.
it seemed he was just a run of the mill perv...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781</id>
	<title>more inexpensive solution</title>
	<author>davek</author>
	<datestamp>1246964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98.  Can't work without it.</p><p><a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/" title="thinkgeek.com">http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/</a> [thinkgeek.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With regard to over-the-shoulder power , I bought by first CHIMP in 98 .
Ca n't work without it.http : //www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/ [ thinkgeek.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98.
Can't work without it.http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/ [thinkgeek.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614813</id>
	<title>demo?</title>
	<author>ubrgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1246964460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't seem to see a link for a demo (no pun intended). Anyone able to help, pls?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't seem to see a link for a demo ( no pun intended ) .
Anyone able to help , pls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't seem to see a link for a demo (no pun intended).
Anyone able to help, pls?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616277</id>
	<title>Re:Technology vs People Problems</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246974060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. And they should never be on an airplane and try to get work done, or in a coffee shop, or anything like that. I mean, it's never critical to send an email before the deadline, is it?<br> <br>
Hell... what if you just want to read some shitty porn or do your taxes or banking or something and don't want people shoulder surfing? Isn't that a good enough reason to protect your privacy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
And they should never be on an airplane and try to get work done , or in a coffee shop , or anything like that .
I mean , it 's never critical to send an email before the deadline , is it ?
Hell... what if you just want to read some shitty porn or do your taxes or banking or something and do n't want people shoulder surfing ?
Is n't that a good enough reason to protect your privacy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
And they should never be on an airplane and try to get work done, or in a coffee shop, or anything like that.
I mean, it's never critical to send an email before the deadline, is it?
Hell... what if you just want to read some shitty porn or do your taxes or banking or something and don't want people shoulder surfing?
Isn't that a good enough reason to protect your privacy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616175</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246973280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most LCDs use cheap TN panels with comparatively awful color reproduction and viewing angles. It can be a bit more difficult to find a nice display (the non-TN type), but the quality is certainly much nicer and more comparable to "classic" CRTs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most LCDs use cheap TN panels with comparatively awful color reproduction and viewing angles .
It can be a bit more difficult to find a nice display ( the non-TN type ) , but the quality is certainly much nicer and more comparable to " classic " CRTs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most LCDs use cheap TN panels with comparatively awful color reproduction and viewing angles.
It can be a bit more difficult to find a nice display (the non-TN type), but the quality is certainly much nicer and more comparable to "classic" CRTs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614969</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246965180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-Gaze- tracking, not head tracking.<br> <br>

It's watching your pupils, not your whole head.</htmltext>
<tokenext>-Gaze- tracking , not head tracking .
It 's watching your pupils , not your whole head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-Gaze- tracking, not head tracking.
It's watching your pupils, not your whole head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615521</id>
	<title>But excuse me</title>
	<author>anonymousNR</author>
	<datestamp>1246968480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This means if I my monitor faces my cubicle entrance and my cubicle happens to be on the way to the bathroom or cafeteria then this software will totally screw my eyes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This means if I my monitor faces my cubicle entrance and my cubicle happens to be on the way to the bathroom or cafeteria then this software will totally screw my eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means if I my monitor faces my cubicle entrance and my cubicle happens to be on the way to the bathroom or cafeteria then this software will totally screw my eyes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614719</id>
	<title>misread headline</title>
	<author>ocularDeathRay</author>
	<datestamp>1246964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>am I the only one that did a double take thinking we were geezer-tracking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>am I the only one that did a double take thinking we were geezer-tracking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>am I the only one that did a double take thinking we were geezer-tracking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619215</id>
	<title>Another DRM</title>
	<author>Nephrite</author>
	<datestamp>1247047740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And now it's not a joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And now it 's not a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And now it's not a joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619519</id>
	<title>point your monitor away from your door</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247053140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>duh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>duh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>duh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618383</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>citizenr</author>
	<datestamp>1246994160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs? I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle. Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.</p></div><p>today YES. You are using old LCDs with Samsung PVA panels. Great angles on those. Today almost EVERYTHING is TN and sucks. Only top of the line stuff at 2-3x the price is SPVA/SMVA/SIPS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this still bother you , even with today 's LCDs ?
I 'm currently sitting at the side of my desk , typing this on a laptop , and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk , with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle .
Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text ( PDFs ) at 90dpi.today YES .
You are using old LCDs with Samsung PVA panels .
Great angles on those .
Today almost EVERYTHING is TN and sucks .
Only top of the line stuff at 2-3x the price is SPVA/SMVA/SIPS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs?
I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle.
Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.today YES.
You are using old LCDs with Samsung PVA panels.
Great angles on those.
Today almost EVERYTHING is TN and sucks.
Only top of the line stuff at 2-3x the price is SPVA/SMVA/SIPS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616507</id>
	<title>Re:OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text</title>
	<author>WNight</author>
	<datestamp>1246975920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it's a password I'll be able to steal simply by watching you read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it 's a password I 'll be able to steal simply by watching you read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it's a password I'll be able to steal simply by watching you read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511</id>
	<title>A better use for gaze tech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw privacy, I want my window manager to focus the window I'm looking at.  Now that would be useful.</p><p>Sheldon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw privacy , I want my window manager to focus the window I 'm looking at .
Now that would be useful.Sheldon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw privacy, I want my window manager to focus the window I'm looking at.
Now that would be useful.Sheldon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28623123</id>
	<title>Gays tracking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247071020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're gonna be soOOOooOOoo pissed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Expect melodramatic sighs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're gon na be soOOOooOOoo pissed : ) Expect melodramatic sighs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're gonna be soOOOooOOoo pissed :)Expect melodramatic sighs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614799</id>
	<title>Gaze-Tracking Software</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This gaze-tracking software will hurt the US military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This gaze-tracking software will hurt the US military 's " Do n't ask , do n't tell " policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This gaze-tracking software will hurt the US military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614911</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get an IPS panel LCD instead of a cheap TN panel LCD.  Costs more, but looks much better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get an IPS panel LCD instead of a cheap TN panel LCD .
Costs more , but looks much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get an IPS panel LCD instead of a cheap TN panel LCD.
Costs more, but looks much better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615263</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hey, could you help me find the bug in my code?"</p><p>"Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hey , could you help me find the bug in my code ?
" " Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hey, could you help me find the bug in my code?
""Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1246965300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess the important part of your argument is "to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area."</p><p>Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at. Plus, if you moved your eyes at all, the unauthorized viewer would have to figure out which new point on the screen to watch. Because of this, it would be extremely difficult (although not impossible) for anyone to figure out exactly what you were reading unless they were standing right over your shoulder.</p><p>Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the important part of your argument is " to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area .
" Because the screen shows constantly changing random words , it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at .
Plus , if you moved your eyes at all , the unauthorized viewer would have to figure out which new point on the screen to watch .
Because of this , it would be extremely difficult ( although not impossible ) for anyone to figure out exactly what you were reading unless they were standing right over your shoulder.Overall , though , it would probably make more sense , and be cheaper , to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the important part of your argument is "to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.
"Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at.
Plus, if you moved your eyes at all, the unauthorized viewer would have to figure out which new point on the screen to watch.
Because of this, it would be extremely difficult (although not impossible) for anyone to figure out exactly what you were reading unless they were standing right over your shoulder.Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615419</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>sortius\_nod</author>
	<datestamp>1246967880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe that was the case 5 or so years ago, but I can read my LCDs both at work (Dell 19") and at home (Samsung 24") from distance and from quite good angles. I'd suggest getting an eye test, and not just for long or short sightedness. <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/07/06/2043251/Laser-Treatment-Could-Save-the-Sight-of-Millions" title="slashdot.org">You might have a degenerative condition that can be solved with laser therapy</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p>In all seriousness, there is no reason to use a CRT in this day and age. The size, energy efficiency, contrast ratios, etc, of CRT monitors makes for a less than practical display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that was the case 5 or so years ago , but I can read my LCDs both at work ( Dell 19 " ) and at home ( Samsung 24 " ) from distance and from quite good angles .
I 'd suggest getting an eye test , and not just for long or short sightedness .
You might have a degenerative condition that can be solved with laser therapy [ slashdot.org ] .In all seriousness , there is no reason to use a CRT in this day and age .
The size , energy efficiency , contrast ratios , etc , of CRT monitors makes for a less than practical display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that was the case 5 or so years ago, but I can read my LCDs both at work (Dell 19") and at home (Samsung 24") from distance and from quite good angles.
I'd suggest getting an eye test, and not just for long or short sightedness.
You might have a degenerative condition that can be solved with laser therapy [slashdot.org].In all seriousness, there is no reason to use a CRT in this day and age.
The size, energy efficiency, contrast ratios, etc, of CRT monitors makes for a less than practical display.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614901</id>
	<title>Password masking</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1246964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This could be the answer Nielsen is <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/06/25/1856214/Nielsen-Recommends-Not-Masking-Passwords" title="slashdot.org">looking for</a> [slashdot.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be the answer Nielsen is looking for [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be the answer Nielsen is looking for [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>Enleth</author>
	<datestamp>1246964640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs? I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle. Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this still bother you , even with today 's LCDs ?
I 'm currently sitting at the side of my desk , typing this on a laptop , and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk , with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle .
Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text ( PDFs ) at 90dpi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs?
I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle.
Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</id>
	<title>I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1246964460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA's description of the technology contains a bit of hand-waving:<p> <i>Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes</i> </p><p>Check, that's doable now.</p><p> <i>to show only that one person the correct text.</i> </p><p>How? Elfin magic? If a screen region under the "authorized reader's" field of view is displaying the protected content to the authorized reader, it's also displaying <strong>exactly the same thing</strong> to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.</p><p>So far as I can tell, this is the part of the proof labeled "Magic happens here". Also known as the part of the technology that needs more investment. So invest now!</p><p>Where's my flying car, dammit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA 's description of the technology contains a bit of hand-waving : Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader 's eyes Check , that 's doable now .
to show only that one person the correct text .
How ? Elfin magic ?
If a screen region under the " authorized reader 's " field of view is displaying the protected content to the authorized reader , it 's also displaying exactly the same thing to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.So far as I can tell , this is the part of the proof labeled " Magic happens here " .
Also known as the part of the technology that needs more investment .
So invest now ! Where 's my flying car , dammit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA's description of the technology contains a bit of hand-waving: Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes Check, that's doable now.
to show only that one person the correct text.
How? Elfin magic?
If a screen region under the "authorized reader's" field of view is displaying the protected content to the authorized reader, it's also displaying exactly the same thing to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.So far as I can tell, this is the part of the proof labeled "Magic happens here".
Also known as the part of the technology that needs more investment.
So invest now!Where's my flying car, dammit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28623865</id>
	<title>What if</title>
	<author>jeevan</author>
	<datestamp>1247073720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... &amp; what if  someone just uses a camera<br>
<b>without facing the monitor at all?</b> <br>
<br>
He could then quickly continue to the cafeteria &amp; check the image, no prob<br>
<br>
<br>
Now there's a feature-hole for you</htmltext>
<tokenext>... &amp; what if someone just uses a camera without facing the monitor at all ?
He could then quickly continue to the cafeteria &amp; check the image , no prob Now there 's a feature-hole for you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... &amp; what if  someone just uses a camera
without facing the monitor at all?
He could then quickly continue to the cafeteria &amp; check the image, no prob


Now there's a feature-hole for you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618215</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246992060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like to use sunglasses while at the computer because I'm cool, will it work for me?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like to use sunglasses while at the computer because I 'm cool , will it work for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like to use sunglasses while at the computer because I'm cool, will it work for me?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621289</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247064420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds. Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter... i.e., anything not obviously random. Humans are damn good at pattern recognition.</p> </div><p>Actually, it works pretty well.  You think your eyes are moving in a steady motion along the sentences, but they are actually flitting all over the place in unpredictable ways.  How do I know it works well, you ask?  Because I saw a demonstration of exactly this system in the 1990's.  It used a standard text-only 80x24 display, and you had to wear a head-mounted gaze-tracker, but the wearer barely noticed that the screen wasn't completely normal, and the person looking over his shoulder could make no sense of the display at all.  Worked like magic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds .
Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface , flowing sentences , coherent subject matter.. .
i.e. , anything not obviously random .
Humans are damn good at pattern recognition .
Actually , it works pretty well .
You think your eyes are moving in a steady motion along the sentences , but they are actually flitting all over the place in unpredictable ways .
How do I know it works well , you ask ?
Because I saw a demonstration of exactly this system in the 1990 's .
It used a standard text-only 80x24 display , and you had to wear a head-mounted gaze-tracker , but the wearer barely noticed that the screen was n't completely normal , and the person looking over his shoulder could make no sense of the display at all .
Worked like magic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds.
Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter...
i.e., anything not obviously random.
Humans are damn good at pattern recognition.
Actually, it works pretty well.
You think your eyes are moving in a steady motion along the sentences, but they are actually flitting all over the place in unpredictable ways.
How do I know it works well, you ask?
Because I saw a demonstration of exactly this system in the 1990's.
It used a standard text-only 80x24 display, and you had to wear a head-mounted gaze-tracker, but the wearer barely noticed that the screen wasn't completely normal, and the person looking over his shoulder could make no sense of the display at all.
Worked like magic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28622927</id>
	<title>Does it actually recognize you?</title>
	<author>Briden</author>
	<datestamp>1247070300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it know exactly what *you* look like?  if not, when you go for lunch and someone else sits down, does it just show them the same thing you'd see?</p><p>Article, website, nor video mentions facial recognition, only gaze tracking.  he literally waves his hand over the webcam to make it switch the screen, which all switches at once.  lame!  I don't see any useful security application for this at all, though the technology of gaze tracing is neat, especially the expensive stuff linked above.</p><p>make my mouse pointer go where i look and i'll be impressed.</p><p>whats wrong with using CTRL+ALT+DELETE, ENTER to lock your box?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it know exactly what * you * look like ?
if not , when you go for lunch and someone else sits down , does it just show them the same thing you 'd see ? Article , website , nor video mentions facial recognition , only gaze tracking .
he literally waves his hand over the webcam to make it switch the screen , which all switches at once .
lame ! I do n't see any useful security application for this at all , though the technology of gaze tracing is neat , especially the expensive stuff linked above.make my mouse pointer go where i look and i 'll be impressed.whats wrong with using CTRL + ALT + DELETE , ENTER to lock your box ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it know exactly what *you* look like?
if not, when you go for lunch and someone else sits down, does it just show them the same thing you'd see?Article, website, nor video mentions facial recognition, only gaze tracking.
he literally waves his hand over the webcam to make it switch the screen, which all switches at once.
lame!  I don't see any useful security application for this at all, though the technology of gaze tracing is neat, especially the expensive stuff linked above.make my mouse pointer go where i look and i'll be impressed.whats wrong with using CTRL+ALT+DELETE, ENTER to lock your box?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28620901</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247063160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I watched the video on their website. Not the case... it litterally maps your face to determine if you are looking at the screen. When you look away the entire screen is changed or blured. This does not appear to use any type of advanced methods to hide data from prying eyes if you are reading the screen at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched the video on their website .
Not the case... it litterally maps your face to determine if you are looking at the screen .
When you look away the entire screen is changed or blured .
This does not appear to use any type of advanced methods to hide data from prying eyes if you are reading the screen at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched the video on their website.
Not the case... it litterally maps your face to determine if you are looking at the screen.
When you look away the entire screen is changed or blured.
This does not appear to use any type of advanced methods to hide data from prying eyes if you are reading the screen at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28622105</id>
	<title>Re:A better use for gaze tech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247067540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or selectively render higher levels of detail in 3D apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or selectively render higher levels of detail in 3D apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or selectively render higher levels of detail in 3D apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616029</id>
	<title>2005 system used eye-contact for security (ACM)</title>
	<author>ottffs</author>
	<datestamp>1246972200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this paper from the 2005 ACM UIST (<a href="http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/index.html" title="acm.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/index.html</a> [acm.org]) conference a system is described that knew when more than one set of eyes were looking at a screen and then tinting the screen red to indicate a possible breech of security.  Moreover this system was implemented on a mobile device, thus placing it in public situations where unauthorized eyes were likely to be a problem.
<p>
PAPER
</p><p>
"eyeLook:&#194;using attention to facilitate mobile media consumption"
<a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1095034.1095050&amp;coll=GUIDE&amp;dl=GUIDE&amp;CFID=43353856&amp;CFTOKEN=45571461" title="acm.org" rel="nofollow">http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1095034.1095050&amp;coll=GUIDE&amp;dl=GUIDE&amp;CFID=43353856&amp;CFTOKEN=45571461</a> [acm.org]
</p><p>
ABSTRACT:
</p><p>
<i>One of the problems with mobile media devices is that they may distract users during critical everyday tasks, such as navigating the streets of a busy city. We addressed this issue in the design of eyeLook: a platform for attention sensitive mobile computing. eyeLook appliances use embedded low cost eyeCONTACT sensors (ECS) to detect when the user looks at the display. We discuss two eyeLook applications, seeTV and seeTXT, that facilitate courteous media consumption in mobile contexts by using the ECS to respond to user attention. seeTV is an attentive mobile video player that automatically pauses content when the user is not looking. seeTXT is an attentive speed reading application that flashes words on the display, advancing text only when the user is looking. By making mobile media devices sensitive to actual user attention, eyeLook allows applications to gracefully transition users between consuming media, and managing life.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this paper from the 2005 ACM UIST ( http : //www.acm.org/uist/archive/index.html [ acm.org ] ) conference a system is described that knew when more than one set of eyes were looking at a screen and then tinting the screen red to indicate a possible breech of security .
Moreover this system was implemented on a mobile device , thus placing it in public situations where unauthorized eyes were likely to be a problem .
PAPER " eyeLook :   using attention to facilitate mobile media consumption " http : //portal.acm.org/citation.cfm ? id = 1095034.1095050&amp;coll = GUIDE&amp;dl = GUIDE&amp;CFID = 43353856&amp;CFTOKEN = 45571461 [ acm.org ] ABSTRACT : One of the problems with mobile media devices is that they may distract users during critical everyday tasks , such as navigating the streets of a busy city .
We addressed this issue in the design of eyeLook : a platform for attention sensitive mobile computing .
eyeLook appliances use embedded low cost eyeCONTACT sensors ( ECS ) to detect when the user looks at the display .
We discuss two eyeLook applications , seeTV and seeTXT , that facilitate courteous media consumption in mobile contexts by using the ECS to respond to user attention .
seeTV is an attentive mobile video player that automatically pauses content when the user is not looking .
seeTXT is an attentive speed reading application that flashes words on the display , advancing text only when the user is looking .
By making mobile media devices sensitive to actual user attention , eyeLook allows applications to gracefully transition users between consuming media , and managing life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this paper from the 2005 ACM UIST (http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/index.html [acm.org]) conference a system is described that knew when more than one set of eyes were looking at a screen and then tinting the screen red to indicate a possible breech of security.
Moreover this system was implemented on a mobile device, thus placing it in public situations where unauthorized eyes were likely to be a problem.
PAPER

"eyeLook:Âusing attention to facilitate mobile media consumption"
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1095034.1095050&amp;coll=GUIDE&amp;dl=GUIDE&amp;CFID=43353856&amp;CFTOKEN=45571461 [acm.org]

ABSTRACT:

One of the problems with mobile media devices is that they may distract users during critical everyday tasks, such as navigating the streets of a busy city.
We addressed this issue in the design of eyeLook: a platform for attention sensitive mobile computing.
eyeLook appliances use embedded low cost eyeCONTACT sensors (ECS) to detect when the user looks at the display.
We discuss two eyeLook applications, seeTV and seeTXT, that facilitate courteous media consumption in mobile contexts by using the ECS to respond to user attention.
seeTV is an attentive mobile video player that automatically pauses content when the user is not looking.
seeTXT is an attentive speed reading application that flashes words on the display, advancing text only when the user is looking.
By making mobile media devices sensitive to actual user attention, eyeLook allows applications to gracefully transition users between consuming media, and managing life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628451</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247048040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why go as far as eye tracking for that though? It would be way cheaper/easier to just use a bluetooth dongle and lock the screen when it goes out of range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why go as far as eye tracking for that though ?
It would be way cheaper/easier to just use a bluetooth dongle and lock the screen when it goes out of range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why go as far as eye tracking for that though?
It would be way cheaper/easier to just use a bluetooth dongle and lock the screen when it goes out of range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615689</id>
	<title>More biometric nonsense!</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1246969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet another piece of biometric technology that means if I'm having an off day, get a twitch in my eye etc. I get locked out of my own data. Yippee!!! Yay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another piece of biometric technology that means if I 'm having an off day , get a twitch in my eye etc .
I get locked out of my own data .
Yippee ! ! ! Yay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another piece of biometric technology that means if I'm having an off day, get a twitch in my eye etc.
I get locked out of my own data.
Yippee!!! Yay!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614685</id>
	<title>Just like the Matrix!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246963980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds pretty cool, it would be a bit like "reading" the matrix. I guess you would get over the distraction of text you're not looking at turning into garbage and start to tune it out.</p><p>Does anyone know of a video of this software in action, I'd love to see what it looks like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds pretty cool , it would be a bit like " reading " the matrix .
I guess you would get over the distraction of text you 're not looking at turning into garbage and start to tune it out.Does anyone know of a video of this software in action , I 'd love to see what it looks like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds pretty cool, it would be a bit like "reading" the matrix.
I guess you would get over the distraction of text you're not looking at turning into garbage and start to tune it out.Does anyone know of a video of this software in action, I'd love to see what it looks like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775</id>
	<title>OMG PONIES!......oh wait it's turning into text!</title>
	<author>S7urm</author>
	<datestamp>1246964340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just kidding</p><p>I think this is actually going to be a REALLY big deal. Especially if they can prove that the eye signatures are truly one of a kind in regards to individuals specific patterns. If this is along the same vain as fingerprints in relation to scarcity, then you may now be reading of what could eventually make things like the need for encryption, or even some forms of basic information security obsolete. That is a BIG frickin deal, and may in fact be of such importance that you may see security/encryption companies try to squash this before it could ever become something more than just an idea.</p><p>I think this is definetly something worth keeping an eye on (sorry for the pun)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just kiddingI think this is actually going to be a REALLY big deal .
Especially if they can prove that the eye signatures are truly one of a kind in regards to individuals specific patterns .
If this is along the same vain as fingerprints in relation to scarcity , then you may now be reading of what could eventually make things like the need for encryption , or even some forms of basic information security obsolete .
That is a BIG frickin deal , and may in fact be of such importance that you may see security/encryption companies try to squash this before it could ever become something more than just an idea.I think this is definetly something worth keeping an eye on ( sorry for the pun )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just kiddingI think this is actually going to be a REALLY big deal.
Especially if they can prove that the eye signatures are truly one of a kind in regards to individuals specific patterns.
If this is along the same vain as fingerprints in relation to scarcity, then you may now be reading of what could eventually make things like the need for encryption, or even some forms of basic information security obsolete.
That is a BIG frickin deal, and may in fact be of such importance that you may see security/encryption companies try to squash this before it could ever become something more than just an idea.I think this is definetly something worth keeping an eye on (sorry for the pun)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616163</id>
	<title>Re:A better use for gaze tech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246973220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What happens when you are looking at text from one window and typing into a different window?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when you are looking at text from one window and typing into a different window ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when you are looking at text from one window and typing into a different window?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614883</id>
	<title>Here's the Video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://oculislabs.com/Products/PrivateEye\_Video.html" title="oculislabs.com" rel="nofollow"> Her's the Video of Private Eye</a> [oculislabs.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Her 's the Video of Private Eye [ oculislabs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Her's the Video of Private Eye [oculislabs.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615673</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>JCSoRocks</author>
	<datestamp>1246969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's all about the quality of the monitor. Cheap LCDs are lousy just like cheap CRTs were lousy - they just fail in different ways. Shop around and you can find a flat panel with a good viewing angle as well as decent color reproduction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all about the quality of the monitor .
Cheap LCDs are lousy just like cheap CRTs were lousy - they just fail in different ways .
Shop around and you can find a flat panel with a good viewing angle as well as decent color reproduction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all about the quality of the monitor.
Cheap LCDs are lousy just like cheap CRTs were lousy - they just fail in different ways.
Shop around and you can find a flat panel with a good viewing angle as well as decent color reproduction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621369</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247064720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw a demo of this software one time.  It actually works really well for what it's supposed to do, we just had no real need for it.  When they pitch it, they explain how it works a lot better, and they really know their stuff about how your eyes work.  The downside was, I think it was just some plugins for Word and Excel (there could have been others that I'm not remembering too).  It would replace all the words outside of where you were looking with random words that fit (approximately) the length, the part of speech and capitalization of the original words.   Everything was changing regularly so there is no time to find a "pattern", especially as all of the text was mostly grammatical, but completely non-sensical.  With Excel it would even put in fake numeric data and change the units.  Pretty cool stuff, but I just don't see too many people with a need for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw a demo of this software one time .
It actually works really well for what it 's supposed to do , we just had no real need for it .
When they pitch it , they explain how it works a lot better , and they really know their stuff about how your eyes work .
The downside was , I think it was just some plugins for Word and Excel ( there could have been others that I 'm not remembering too ) .
It would replace all the words outside of where you were looking with random words that fit ( approximately ) the length , the part of speech and capitalization of the original words .
Everything was changing regularly so there is no time to find a " pattern " , especially as all of the text was mostly grammatical , but completely non-sensical .
With Excel it would even put in fake numeric data and change the units .
Pretty cool stuff , but I just do n't see too many people with a need for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw a demo of this software one time.
It actually works really well for what it's supposed to do, we just had no real need for it.
When they pitch it, they explain how it works a lot better, and they really know their stuff about how your eyes work.
The downside was, I think it was just some plugins for Word and Excel (there could have been others that I'm not remembering too).
It would replace all the words outside of where you were looking with random words that fit (approximately) the length, the part of speech and capitalization of the original words.
Everything was changing regularly so there is no time to find a "pattern", especially as all of the text was mostly grammatical, but completely non-sensical.
With Excel it would even put in fake numeric data and change the units.
Pretty cool stuff, but I just don't see too many people with a need for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615469</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1246968240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try using most types of laptop display. They have some very narrow viewing angles if you want things to look okay.</p><p>Side to side isn't nearly as bad as up and down. The laptop I'm using (HP Pavilion dv9572) has a decent side to side angle, but if I reposition myself in the chair (moving it up/down or slumping/straightening my back) I have to readjust the display to get the proper look.</p><p>And from what I understand, <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/displays/showdoc.aspx?i=3584" title="anandtech.com">others are desperately seeking quality displays as well</a> [anandtech.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try using most types of laptop display .
They have some very narrow viewing angles if you want things to look okay.Side to side is n't nearly as bad as up and down .
The laptop I 'm using ( HP Pavilion dv9572 ) has a decent side to side angle , but if I reposition myself in the chair ( moving it up/down or slumping/straightening my back ) I have to readjust the display to get the proper look.And from what I understand , others are desperately seeking quality displays as well [ anandtech.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try using most types of laptop display.
They have some very narrow viewing angles if you want things to look okay.Side to side isn't nearly as bad as up and down.
The laptop I'm using (HP Pavilion dv9572) has a decent side to side angle, but if I reposition myself in the chair (moving it up/down or slumping/straightening my back) I have to readjust the display to get the proper look.And from what I understand, others are desperately seeking quality displays as well [anandtech.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615431</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246968000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a commercial product that does precisely this from a company called (I think) Occulus systems that works with MS office.  Rather than blurring, it swaps out words except where you are looking.  Very cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a commercial product that does precisely this from a company called ( I think ) Occulus systems that works with MS office .
Rather than blurring , it swaps out words except where you are looking .
Very cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a commercial product that does precisely this from a company called (I think) Occulus systems that works with MS office.
Rather than blurring, it swaps out words except where you are looking.
Very cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616853</id>
	<title>Confusing web site</title>
	<author>gonz</author>
	<datestamp>1246978620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The web site doesn't clearly explain the difference between "Chameleon" versus "PrivateEye".  I found the answers in this PDF:</p><p><a href="http://oculislabs.com/Oculis\_Whitepaper\_1.pdf" title="oculislabs.com" rel="nofollow">http://oculislabs.com/Oculis\_Whitepaper\_1.pdf</a> [oculislabs.com]</p><p>It sounds like PrivateEye is the $19.95 edition for consumers using a simple web cam.  Whereas Chameleon is the "high end" version using a special "Gazetracker" hardware device that probably has a much better reaction time.  There's no price listing for Chameleon, i.e. it's intended for someone spending taxpayer's money rather than their own.</p><p>The demo is on the Chameleon page:</p><p><a href="http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm" title="oculislabs.com" rel="nofollow">http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm</a> [oculislabs.com]</p><p>It took me awhile to figure out that this "PROTECTING DATA IN USE" image is actually an interactive Flash applet.  What you do is hover the mouse over "Oculus in Action", and then wait until a blue/red oval slides across the screen.  After the oval disappears, you can use the mouse to bring it back on the screen and move it around.  The text inside the oval is readable, everything outside is scrambled.</p><p>The obscured text is pretty strange actually.  On the "This is what the attacker sees" preview tab, the letters in each word are shuffled and easily deciphered.  But on the "Oculus in Action" tab, they substitute random words of equal length, apparently sampled from a corpus of gay Satanic rites:</p><p>States --&gt; Yapper<br>Government --&gt; Satanology<br>degree --&gt; faerie<br>classifies --&gt; spermatova<br>determine --&gt; doohinkus<br>classifying --&gt; luciferidae</p><p>(No joke, these are real excerpts!)</p><p>From moving the oval around and trying to read what's inside, it's pretty apparent that reaction time is extremely important to the usability of this product.  Since there's no downloadable demo program (and a whole lot of marketing patter), I'm guessing that PrivateEye is way too sluggish to be practical.  Chameleon might be usable, but you probably have to pay full price to find that out as well heheh.</p><p>-Gonz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The web site does n't clearly explain the difference between " Chameleon " versus " PrivateEye " .
I found the answers in this PDF : http : //oculislabs.com/Oculis \ _Whitepaper \ _1.pdf [ oculislabs.com ] It sounds like PrivateEye is the $ 19.95 edition for consumers using a simple web cam .
Whereas Chameleon is the " high end " version using a special " Gazetracker " hardware device that probably has a much better reaction time .
There 's no price listing for Chameleon , i.e .
it 's intended for someone spending taxpayer 's money rather than their own.The demo is on the Chameleon page : http : //oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm [ oculislabs.com ] It took me awhile to figure out that this " PROTECTING DATA IN USE " image is actually an interactive Flash applet .
What you do is hover the mouse over " Oculus in Action " , and then wait until a blue/red oval slides across the screen .
After the oval disappears , you can use the mouse to bring it back on the screen and move it around .
The text inside the oval is readable , everything outside is scrambled.The obscured text is pretty strange actually .
On the " This is what the attacker sees " preview tab , the letters in each word are shuffled and easily deciphered .
But on the " Oculus in Action " tab , they substitute random words of equal length , apparently sampled from a corpus of gay Satanic rites : States -- &gt; YapperGovernment -- &gt; Satanologydegree -- &gt; faerieclassifies -- &gt; spermatovadetermine -- &gt; doohinkusclassifying -- &gt; luciferidae ( No joke , these are real excerpts !
) From moving the oval around and trying to read what 's inside , it 's pretty apparent that reaction time is extremely important to the usability of this product .
Since there 's no downloadable demo program ( and a whole lot of marketing patter ) , I 'm guessing that PrivateEye is way too sluggish to be practical .
Chameleon might be usable , but you probably have to pay full price to find that out as well heheh.-Gonz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The web site doesn't clearly explain the difference between "Chameleon" versus "PrivateEye".
I found the answers in this PDF:http://oculislabs.com/Oculis\_Whitepaper\_1.pdf [oculislabs.com]It sounds like PrivateEye is the $19.95 edition for consumers using a simple web cam.
Whereas Chameleon is the "high end" version using a special "Gazetracker" hardware device that probably has a much better reaction time.
There's no price listing for Chameleon, i.e.
it's intended for someone spending taxpayer's money rather than their own.The demo is on the Chameleon page:http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm [oculislabs.com]It took me awhile to figure out that this "PROTECTING DATA IN USE" image is actually an interactive Flash applet.
What you do is hover the mouse over "Oculus in Action", and then wait until a blue/red oval slides across the screen.
After the oval disappears, you can use the mouse to bring it back on the screen and move it around.
The text inside the oval is readable, everything outside is scrambled.The obscured text is pretty strange actually.
On the "This is what the attacker sees" preview tab, the letters in each word are shuffled and easily deciphered.
But on the "Oculus in Action" tab, they substitute random words of equal length, apparently sampled from a corpus of gay Satanic rites:States --&gt; YapperGovernment --&gt; Satanologydegree --&gt; faerieclassifies --&gt; spermatovadetermine --&gt; doohinkusclassifying --&gt; luciferidae(No joke, these are real excerpts!
)From moving the oval around and trying to read what's inside, it's pretty apparent that reaction time is extremely important to the usability of this product.
Since there's no downloadable demo program (and a whole lot of marketing patter), I'm guessing that PrivateEye is way too sluggish to be practical.
Chameleon might be usable, but you probably have to pay full price to find that out as well heheh.-Gonz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619157</id>
	<title>Example screen - Only you can see this...</title>
	<author>clickety6</author>
	<datestamp>1247046780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*        SCREW YOU THIS IS PRIVATE         fnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * SCREW YOU THIS IS PRIVATE fnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O ^ * ) ^ T * TB * T * GD&amp; * TD * BSGDIYDNR I * &amp;BOXDT&amp; * WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t ( &amp; * ^ &amp; * \ % HJGFYR \ % ^ # TJFTFYFB&amp; ^ \ % E ^ $ VFBUFB&amp; * ^ \ % \ % ( BITKN * O \ % ^ ^ * \ % V YDDHFU ^ &amp; ^ 4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678 ^ T&amp;T&amp; * TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*        SCREW YOU THIS IS PRIVATE         fnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi wefwefrweqrdfweofj3rqogfefpbvjfiwdugcevj e90348t73527&amp;O^*)^T*TB*T*GD&amp;*TD*BSGDIYDNR I*&amp;BOXDT&amp;*WTbkgfsdkfgksdfgksdgfksdfdsf5y9 t55t(&amp;*^&amp;*\%HJGFYR\%^#TJFTFYFB&amp;^\%E^$VFBUFB&amp;*^\%\%(BITKN*O\%^^*\%V YDDHFU^&amp;^4yrfasukdytweifnwdfidysddy78678^T&amp;T&amp;*TBTIT8DGWDCSDKCSHDohdsvsdksdivhks ksdghfisdisdb sdifyiuyi</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28626609</id>
	<title>Unlikely</title>
	<author>nixdroid</author>
	<datestamp>1247083140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see how this could ever possib@#$\%&amp;*@!!!!#$*(-:''.9&gt;^?#?@:&amp;?(+$@(?}*^|?\%#@!|{}(*&amp;?^)"}&gt;*&gt;\%#</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how this could ever possib @ # $ \ % &amp; * @ ! ! ! ! # $ * ( - : ''.9 &gt; ^ ? # ? @ : &amp; ? ( + $ @ ( ?
} * ^ | ? \ % # @ ! | { } ( * &amp; ? ^ ) " } &gt; * &gt; \ % #</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how this could ever possib@#$\%&amp;*@!!!!#$*(-:''.9&gt;^?#?@:&amp;?(+$@(?
}*^|?\%#@!|{}(*&amp;?^)"}&gt;*&gt;\%#</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628171</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the Video</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1247046660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting that the "demonstrations" in the video are not only faked, but really unconvincingly faked. The only part which looks like it <i>might</i> be a genuine live demo is when they demonstrate that holding a hand over the webcam causes the software to activate, albeit with considerable lag. Pretty impressive technology!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that the " demonstrations " in the video are not only faked , but really unconvincingly faked .
The only part which looks like it might be a genuine live demo is when they demonstrate that holding a hand over the webcam causes the software to activate , albeit with considerable lag .
Pretty impressive technology !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that the "demonstrations" in the video are not only faked, but really unconvincingly faked.
The only part which looks like it might be a genuine live demo is when they demonstrate that holding a hand over the webcam causes the software to activate, albeit with considerable lag.
Pretty impressive technology!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614951</id>
	<title>Loony Bin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246965120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now things really will wiggle around when I'm not looking right at them.<br> <br>

How am I supposed to tell the difference between PrivateEye and gremlins?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now things really will wiggle around when I 'm not looking right at them .
How am I supposed to tell the difference between PrivateEye and gremlins ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now things really will wiggle around when I'm not looking right at them.
How am I supposed to tell the difference between PrivateEye and gremlins?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616073</id>
	<title>Re:Flat screens!</title>
	<author>donaggie03</author>
	<datestamp>1246972560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just goes to show, one man's big is another man's feature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just goes to show , one man 's big is another man 's feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just goes to show, one man's big is another man's feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616027</id>
	<title>Overly difficult solution to an easy problem</title>
	<author>Sir Holo</author>
	<datestamp>1246972200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Line-of-sight security is not difficult.  just don't face the monitor to the door.<br>
<br>
If you're working on something that <i>really</i> is sensitive, then it's worth it to arrange for physical security.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Line-of-sight security is not difficult .
just do n't face the monitor to the door .
If you 're working on something that really is sensitive , then it 's worth it to arrange for physical security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Line-of-sight security is not difficult.
just don't face the monitor to the door.
If you're working on something that really is sensitive, then it's worth it to arrange for physical security.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614773</id>
	<title>oh, it's "gaze" tracking</title>
	<author>erg5hp</author>
	<datestamp>1246964340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>thought they were picking on Clay and the boys . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>thought they were picking on Clay and the boys .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thought they were picking on Clay and the boys .
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619911</id>
	<title>Re:Technology vs People Problems</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247058720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. With their back to the large windows we can spy on him much better.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>your competition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
With their back to the large windows we can spy on him much better.Sincerely,your competition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
With their back to the large windows we can spy on him much better.Sincerely,your competition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615671</id>
	<title>Awesome!</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1246969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds like an awesome development in the area of personal security alright -- especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work. Your boss or co-worker peers over the wall to try to catch you? No problem, it blurs the screen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like an awesome development in the area of personal security alright -- especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work .
Your boss or co-worker peers over the wall to try to catch you ?
No problem , it blurs the screen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like an awesome development in the area of personal security alright -- especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work.
Your boss or co-worker peers over the wall to try to catch you?
No problem, it blurs the screen!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619141</id>
	<title>Re:A better use for gaze tech</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1247046540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You click either a "lock" or a "disable" button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You click either a " lock " or a " disable " button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You click either a "lock" or a "disable" button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28624463</id>
	<title>um</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247075880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a pirate with an eye patch.  Will it work for me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a pirate with an eye patch .
Will it work for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a pirate with an eye patch.
Will it work for me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621479</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>gstoddart</author>
	<datestamp>1247065200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos. Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.</p></div></blockquote><p>You have 10 seconds to comply<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos .
Then if it sees anyone other than your face , it takes corrective action.You have 10 seconds to comply ... : -PCheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos.
Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.You have 10 seconds to comply ... :-PCheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1246966020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at.</i> </p><p>Not that difficult, if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds. Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter... i.e., anything not obviously random. Humans are damn good at pattern recognition. Moreso, if the shoulder-surfer has some idea what he's looking for, and the "authorized reader" is unaware he's being monitored. And don't deny that can happen. Anyone capable of concentrating sufficiently to work well is going to lose some environmental awareness, and a sufficiently sneaky voyeur would be able to benefit from that.
</p><p>
<i>Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen</i> </p><p>Yup. This smells like a solution looking to shoulder out existing and simpler solutions.</p><p>Paradoxically, the "consumer-grade" idea in TFA actually seems more valuable: The display is normal, but when your eyes leave it the whole thing blanks. This helps solve the very-real and not-well-solved problem of leaving terminals unattended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the screen shows constantly changing random words , it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at .
Not that difficult , if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds .
Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface , flowing sentences , coherent subject matter.. .
i.e. , anything not obviously random .
Humans are damn good at pattern recognition .
Moreso , if the shoulder-surfer has some idea what he 's looking for , and the " authorized reader " is unaware he 's being monitored .
And do n't deny that can happen .
Anyone capable of concentrating sufficiently to work well is going to lose some environmental awareness , and a sufficiently sneaky voyeur would be able to benefit from that .
Overall , though , it would probably make more sense , and be cheaper , to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen Yup .
This smells like a solution looking to shoulder out existing and simpler solutions.Paradoxically , the " consumer-grade " idea in TFA actually seems more valuable : The display is normal , but when your eyes leave it the whole thing blanks .
This helps solve the very-real and not-well-solved problem of leaving terminals unattended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at.
Not that difficult, if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds.
Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter...
i.e., anything not obviously random.
Humans are damn good at pattern recognition.
Moreso, if the shoulder-surfer has some idea what he's looking for, and the "authorized reader" is unaware he's being monitored.
And don't deny that can happen.
Anyone capable of concentrating sufficiently to work well is going to lose some environmental awareness, and a sufficiently sneaky voyeur would be able to benefit from that.
Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen Yup.
This smells like a solution looking to shoulder out existing and simpler solutions.Paradoxically, the "consumer-grade" idea in TFA actually seems more valuable: The display is normal, but when your eyes leave it the whole thing blanks.
This helps solve the very-real and not-well-solved problem of leaving terminals unattended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615503</id>
	<title>Re:more inexpensive solution</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1246968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98. Can't work without it.</p></div><p>I use a clear piece of plastic, like half of a CD case with the insert removed.  Stick it on a shelf near the monitor and with the right angle it is just as good for detecting someone behind your back, but since it is not an obvious mirror, they won't know that you know they are there.  I've freaked out a number of people with my 'psychic' ability to detect someone standing at the door to my office while looking the other way and with the music blasting on my headphones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With regard to over-the-shoulder power , I bought by first CHIMP in 98 .
Ca n't work without it.I use a clear piece of plastic , like half of a CD case with the insert removed .
Stick it on a shelf near the monitor and with the right angle it is just as good for detecting someone behind your back , but since it is not an obvious mirror , they wo n't know that you know they are there .
I 've freaked out a number of people with my 'psychic ' ability to detect someone standing at the door to my office while looking the other way and with the music blasting on my headphones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98.
Can't work without it.I use a clear piece of plastic, like half of a CD case with the insert removed.
Stick it on a shelf near the monitor and with the right angle it is just as good for detecting someone behind your back, but since it is not an obvious mirror, they won't know that you know they are there.
I've freaked out a number of people with my 'psychic' ability to detect someone standing at the door to my office while looking the other way and with the music blasting on my headphones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681</id>
	<title>Ok?</title>
	<author>arizwebfoot</author>
	<datestamp>1246963980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what happens when you are typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat?  Will the gaze thingy be able to follow or will you pass in and out of it's "verified" zone?</p><p>Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos.  Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what happens when you are typing and listening to music , you head is swinging back and forth to the beat ?
Will the gaze thingy be able to follow or will you pass in and out of it 's " verified " zone ? Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos .
Then if it sees anyone other than your face , it takes corrective action .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what happens when you are typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat?
Will the gaze thingy be able to follow or will you pass in and out of it's "verified" zone?Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos.
Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615439</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>hacksoncode</author>
	<datestamp>1246968060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't say specifically, but I'm guessing it makes use of the saccade effect. Your brain literally doesn't see changes in the visual field while your eyes are moving from one spot to another (this motion is called a saccade).
<p>
So, basically, the text is only "correct" in the exact spot you're looking at any instant... as soon as your eyes move to the next word, the gibberish that's there before the saccade is changed to the "correct" word for that new spot. And you don't notice.
</p><p>
Anyone that the camera is not tracking would just see random gibberish because the words they are looking at usually haven't been changed to be the "correct" ones for that spot at the instant they are looking at them.
</p><p>
It's a well known process... just never applied to the field of security before. Also, it would take a very high-speed, very high-resolution camera, so I doubt it's applicability to general purpose computers any time soon.
</p><p>
And, of course, if someone watching you has the same high-speed, high-resolution camera that you have, they could just record the whole video stream and perform an analysis on it... so it's not terribly good security either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't say specifically , but I 'm guessing it makes use of the saccade effect .
Your brain literally does n't see changes in the visual field while your eyes are moving from one spot to another ( this motion is called a saccade ) .
So , basically , the text is only " correct " in the exact spot you 're looking at any instant... as soon as your eyes move to the next word , the gibberish that 's there before the saccade is changed to the " correct " word for that new spot .
And you do n't notice .
Anyone that the camera is not tracking would just see random gibberish because the words they are looking at usually have n't been changed to be the " correct " ones for that spot at the instant they are looking at them .
It 's a well known process... just never applied to the field of security before .
Also , it would take a very high-speed , very high-resolution camera , so I doubt it 's applicability to general purpose computers any time soon .
And , of course , if someone watching you has the same high-speed , high-resolution camera that you have , they could just record the whole video stream and perform an analysis on it... so it 's not terribly good security either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't say specifically, but I'm guessing it makes use of the saccade effect.
Your brain literally doesn't see changes in the visual field while your eyes are moving from one spot to another (this motion is called a saccade).
So, basically, the text is only "correct" in the exact spot you're looking at any instant... as soon as your eyes move to the next word, the gibberish that's there before the saccade is changed to the "correct" word for that new spot.
And you don't notice.
Anyone that the camera is not tracking would just see random gibberish because the words they are looking at usually haven't been changed to be the "correct" ones for that spot at the instant they are looking at them.
It's a well known process... just never applied to the field of security before.
Also, it would take a very high-speed, very high-resolution camera, so I doubt it's applicability to general purpose computers any time soon.
And, of course, if someone watching you has the same high-speed, high-resolution camera that you have, they could just record the whole video stream and perform an analysis on it... so it's not terribly good security either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618923</id>
	<title>Re:I smell venture capital PR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247086620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check their webpage on "Chameleon" (not "Private eye") - it shows how "magic" works.<br>It displays proper information only where one person is looking, and gibberish around it.</p><p>To be honest, looking at an example shown on their webpage, you can decipher. If you look long enough at each word, it \_will\_ be displayed in clear. Then you can move to the next word. Sure, it is much slower reading than normal, but you can still see what is on screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check their webpage on " Chameleon " ( not " Private eye " ) - it shows how " magic " works.It displays proper information only where one person is looking , and gibberish around it.To be honest , looking at an example shown on their webpage , you can decipher .
If you look long enough at each word , it \ _will \ _ be displayed in clear .
Then you can move to the next word .
Sure , it is much slower reading than normal , but you can still see what is on screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check their webpage on "Chameleon" (not "Private eye") - it shows how "magic" works.It displays proper information only where one person is looking, and gibberish around it.To be honest, looking at an example shown on their webpage, you can decipher.
If you look long enough at each word, it \_will\_ be displayed in clear.
Then you can move to the next word.
Sure, it is much slower reading than normal, but you can still see what is on screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619887</id>
	<title>New marketing avenue?</title>
	<author>Drakkenmensch</author>
	<datestamp>1247058240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can see the advertizing world jumping onboard this one, proposing new ad revenue models where an ad pays the website (or network) as long as the viewers are actually looking at the ad, rather than the page just being up or the channel turned on. Big corporations are probably starting to be fed up paying huge chunks of cash just so people without DVRs can get bathroom breaks without missing a single second of Lost or Monday Night Football.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see the advertizing world jumping onboard this one , proposing new ad revenue models where an ad pays the website ( or network ) as long as the viewers are actually looking at the ad , rather than the page just being up or the channel turned on .
Big corporations are probably starting to be fed up paying huge chunks of cash just so people without DVRs can get bathroom breaks without missing a single second of Lost or Monday Night Football .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see the advertizing world jumping onboard this one, proposing new ad revenue models where an ad pays the website (or network) as long as the viewers are actually looking at the ad, rather than the page just being up or the channel turned on.
Big corporations are probably starting to be fed up paying huge chunks of cash just so people without DVRs can get bathroom breaks without missing a single second of Lost or Monday Night Football.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615947</id>
	<title>Could be defeated by a camera</title>
	<author>Jeff Carr</author>
	<datestamp>1246971180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is really interesting, and would solve casual observing to a large extent, but I wouldn't consider it a high security solution as it could be fairly trivially defeated by a video camera.</p><p>I could see where it could be useful for a doctor's office/hospital though to keep medical records secure, or a reception area to automatically screen out snoopers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really interesting , and would solve casual observing to a large extent , but I would n't consider it a high security solution as it could be fairly trivially defeated by a video camera.I could see where it could be useful for a doctor 's office/hospital though to keep medical records secure , or a reception area to automatically screen out snoopers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really interesting, and would solve casual observing to a large extent, but I wouldn't consider it a high security solution as it could be fairly trivially defeated by a video camera.I could see where it could be useful for a doctor's office/hospital though to keep medical records secure, or a reception area to automatically screen out snoopers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615781</id>
	<title>CRAP!! Next DMCA intrusion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Crap! Soon we'll get T.V.s that know that their being watched, who is watching, and exactly what viewers are looking at.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Coming soon to a T.V. near you.
<p>
Viewer: (thinking to himself) Oh great, a commercial. Time for a potty break. la, la, la (walks away from T.V.)
</p><p>
T.V.: (in loud voice) Alert, Alert, Alert. Viewer, you have been away from the television for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. You now risk violating your television and cable provider's ULA and risk violating section 5, paragraph 10, subsection a of the 2010 DMCA redux and expansion act.
</p><p>
Viewer: Coming, coming...just have to give a quick shake....O.K., I'm here. Whew, that was close.
</p><p>
T.V.: Alert, Alert, Alert!!
</p><p>
Viewer: Wha!, I'm here. I'm watching again for God's sake.
</p><p>
T.V.: Viewer, you twice failed to take visual notice of the coke can product placement in this episode of Friends. You have now violated your television and cable provider's ULA and thus also violated the aforementioned DCMA act. Please place your hands on your head and wait for the authorities to arrive....a little higher please...there you go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Crap !
Soon we 'll get T.V.s that know that their being watched , who is watching , and exactly what viewers are looking at .
...Coming soon to a T.V .
near you .
Viewer : ( thinking to himself ) Oh great , a commercial .
Time for a potty break .
la , la , la ( walks away from T.V .
) T.V .
: ( in loud voice ) Alert , Alert , Alert .
Viewer , you have been away from the television for 2 minutes and 30 seconds .
You now risk violating your television and cable provider 's ULA and risk violating section 5 , paragraph 10 , subsection a of the 2010 DMCA redux and expansion act .
Viewer : Coming , coming...just have to give a quick shake....O.K. , I 'm here .
Whew , that was close .
T.V. : Alert , Alert , Alert ! !
Viewer : Wha ! , I 'm here .
I 'm watching again for God 's sake .
T.V. : Viewer , you twice failed to take visual notice of the coke can product placement in this episode of Friends .
You have now violated your television and cable provider 's ULA and thus also violated the aforementioned DCMA act .
Please place your hands on your head and wait for the authorities to arrive....a little higher please...there you go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crap!
Soon we'll get T.V.s that know that their being watched, who is watching, and exactly what viewers are looking at.
...Coming soon to a T.V.
near you.
Viewer: (thinking to himself) Oh great, a commercial.
Time for a potty break.
la, la, la (walks away from T.V.
)

T.V.
: (in loud voice) Alert, Alert, Alert.
Viewer, you have been away from the television for 2 minutes and 30 seconds.
You now risk violating your television and cable provider's ULA and risk violating section 5, paragraph 10, subsection a of the 2010 DMCA redux and expansion act.
Viewer: Coming, coming...just have to give a quick shake....O.K., I'm here.
Whew, that was close.
T.V.: Alert, Alert, Alert!!
Viewer: Wha!, I'm here.
I'm watching again for God's sake.
T.V.: Viewer, you twice failed to take visual notice of the coke can product placement in this episode of Friends.
You have now violated your television and cable provider's ULA and thus also violated the aforementioned DCMA act.
Please place your hands on your head and wait for the authorities to arrive....a little higher please...there you go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615577</id>
	<title>Clever, but probably impractical</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1246968840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem 1: Suppose the gaze-tracking works perfectly under static conditions (during training before the scrambling).  Now the scramble kicks in and you've got crap changing all over the screen.  You're going to notice that; it's going to be irritating.  And when you catch something changing, you're going to look at it.  Thus screwing up the algorithm.</p><p>Problem 2: The algorithm isn't going to be 100\% perfect.  And it doesn't have to be camo far off to make melvin unreliable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem 1 : Suppose the gaze-tracking works perfectly under static conditions ( during training before the scrambling ) .
Now the scramble kicks in and you 've got crap changing all over the screen .
You 're going to notice that ; it 's going to be irritating .
And when you catch something changing , you 're going to look at it .
Thus screwing up the algorithm.Problem 2 : The algorithm is n't going to be 100 \ % perfect .
And it does n't have to be camo far off to make melvin unreliable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem 1: Suppose the gaze-tracking works perfectly under static conditions (during training before the scrambling).
Now the scramble kicks in and you've got crap changing all over the screen.
You're going to notice that; it's going to be irritating.
And when you catch something changing, you're going to look at it.
Thus screwing up the algorithm.Problem 2: The algorithm isn't going to be 100\% perfect.
And it doesn't have to be camo far off to make melvin unreliable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614837</id>
	<title>It's an automatic "Boss" key!!</title>
	<author>thewils</author>
	<datestamp>1246964580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could have used this when I was playing Prince of Persia on one of my previous contracts!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could have used this when I was playing Prince of Persia on one of my previous contracts ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could have used this when I was playing Prince of Persia on one of my previous contracts!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615501</id>
	<title>Re:more inexpensive solution</title>
	<author>ScoLgo</author>
	<datestamp>1246968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Resurrect the Cult of VI"</p><p>I don't get it. Is this 'VI' you refer to some minor demon that is 0.009009 as evil as the beast?</p><p>Oh, what's that? You're not 'Roman' Catholic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Resurrect the Cult of VI " I do n't get it .
Is this 'VI ' you refer to some minor demon that is 0.009009 as evil as the beast ? Oh , what 's that ?
You 're not 'Roman ' Catholic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Resurrect the Cult of VI"I don't get it.
Is this 'VI' you refer to some minor demon that is 0.009009 as evil as the beast?Oh, what's that?
You're not 'Roman' Catholic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619891</id>
	<title>Re:Ok?</title>
	<author>JohhnyTHM</author>
	<datestamp>1247058300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish."</p></div><p>
People have been saying that to me for years, you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish .
" People have been saying that to me for years , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish.
"
People have been saying that to me for years, you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757</id>
	<title>Technology vs People Problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your workers are handling sensitive material maybe you shouldn't have them in a cubicle with their back to the entrance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your workers are handling sensitive material maybe you should n't have them in a cubicle with their back to the entrance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your workers are handling sensitive material maybe you shouldn't have them in a cubicle with their back to the entrance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614733</id>
	<title>No need to recognize gaze</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I need is software that will recognize the approach of the boss -- easily discernible by his pointy hair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I need is software that will recognize the approach of the boss -- easily discernible by his pointy hair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I need is software that will recognize the approach of the boss -- easily discernible by his pointy hair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616335</id>
	<title>Re:Eye strain</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246974480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That depends entirely on how fast the machine reacts. If it goes faster than you can refocus (not out of the question), then you're good to go. If not, then it's pretty much a useless product. I really doubt that it'd be this far in development if it were completely useless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That depends entirely on how fast the machine reacts .
If it goes faster than you can refocus ( not out of the question ) , then you 're good to go .
If not , then it 's pretty much a useless product .
I really doubt that it 'd be this far in development if it were completely useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That depends entirely on how fast the machine reacts.
If it goes faster than you can refocus (not out of the question), then you're good to go.
If not, then it's pretty much a useless product.
I really doubt that it'd be this far in development if it were completely useless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615071</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28624121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28622105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28623335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1946217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28620901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28624121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616163
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28622105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614883
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615469
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618383
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28623335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628367
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28618923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615125
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616915
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621369
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28621289
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28628451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28620901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28615947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1946217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28614757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28616277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1946217.28619911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
