<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_06_1948229</id>
	<title>LucasArts To Re-Release Old Games Through Steam</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246869660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>LucasArts today announced that they will soon be <a href="http://kotaku.com/5308431/lucasarts-amazing-news">releasing games from their back catalog through Steam</a>. The releases begin this Wednesday with a group of eight games, including <em>Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis</em>, <em>The Dig</em>, <em>LOOM</em>, and <em>Star Wars: Battlefront II</em>. This is apparently just "the first round of releases," so we can doubtless expect to see more of their old games before long. Joystiq spoke with LucasArts CEO Darrell Rodriguez, who said the company is <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/breaking-lucasarts-classics-coming-to-steam-this-wednesday/#continued">considering updated versions of the old games</a>, depending on how well <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/discover-the-secret-of-monkey-island-again-on-july-15/">next week's launch of <em>Secret of Monkey Island: Special Edition</em></a>  goes. He also hinted at the possibility that some games could be ported to mobile gaming devices, such as the PSP Go and the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>LucasArts today announced that they will soon be releasing games from their back catalog through Steam .
The releases begin this Wednesday with a group of eight games , including Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis , The Dig , LOOM , and Star Wars : Battlefront II .
This is apparently just " the first round of releases , " so we can doubtless expect to see more of their old games before long .
Joystiq spoke with LucasArts CEO Darrell Rodriguez , who said the company is considering updated versions of the old games , depending on how well next week 's launch of Secret of Monkey Island : Special Edition goes .
He also hinted at the possibility that some games could be ported to mobile gaming devices , such as the PSP Go and the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LucasArts today announced that they will soon be releasing games from their back catalog through Steam.
The releases begin this Wednesday with a group of eight games, including Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis, The Dig, LOOM, and Star Wars: Battlefront II.
This is apparently just "the first round of releases," so we can doubtless expect to see more of their old games before long.
Joystiq spoke with LucasArts CEO Darrell Rodriguez, who said the company is considering updated versions of the old games, depending on how well next week's launch of Secret of Monkey Island: Special Edition  goes.
He also hinted at the possibility that some games could be ported to mobile gaming devices, such as the PSP Go and the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517</id>
	<title>Bring back...</title>
	<author>maino82</author>
	<datestamp>1246873920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tie Fighter! Or any of the same ilk. Updated graphics would be nice, but it would totally be worth going out and buying a joystick if they brought the space sims back even in their original form.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tie Fighter !
Or any of the same ilk .
Updated graphics would be nice , but it would totally be worth going out and buying a joystick if they brought the space sims back even in their original form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tie Fighter!
Or any of the same ilk.
Updated graphics would be nice, but it would totally be worth going out and buying a joystick if they brought the space sims back even in their original form.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602749</id>
	<title>Re:Excited, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246891980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ones I would buy are the ones I already bought 10+ years ago. I can still play them using scummvm even in OpenBSD. I won't use a DRM-laden platform to repurchase them.<br>However, if some kid is watching this and is using Steam anyways, be sure to get the Indiana Jones games and the two first Monkey Islands, you won't regret it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ones I would buy are the ones I already bought 10 + years ago .
I can still play them using scummvm even in OpenBSD .
I wo n't use a DRM-laden platform to repurchase them.However , if some kid is watching this and is using Steam anyways , be sure to get the Indiana Jones games and the two first Monkey Islands , you wo n't regret it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ones I would buy are the ones I already bought 10+ years ago.
I can still play them using scummvm even in OpenBSD.
I won't use a DRM-laden platform to repurchase them.However, if some kid is watching this and is using Steam anyways, be sure to get the Indiana Jones games and the two first Monkey Islands, you won't regret it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600167</id>
	<title>Brilliant!</title>
	<author>hurting now</author>
	<datestamp>1246876860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is brilliant marketing by LucasArts... and they are going to make a crap load of cash off it.
<br> <br>
By using Steam &amp;/or XBL, they don't have to "go gold", market deals with big box distributors, remaking packaging, etc.  And we as the players don't have to screw around with DOSBox or SCUMVM.
<br> <br>
I'm excited and ready to buy some classics!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is brilliant marketing by LucasArts... and they are going to make a crap load of cash off it .
By using Steam &amp;/or XBL , they do n't have to " go gold " , market deals with big box distributors , remaking packaging , etc .
And we as the players do n't have to screw around with DOSBox or SCUMVM .
I 'm excited and ready to buy some classics !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is brilliant marketing by LucasArts... and they are going to make a crap load of cash off it.
By using Steam &amp;/or XBL, they don't have to "go gold", market deals with big box distributors, remaking packaging, etc.
And we as the players don't have to screw around with DOSBox or SCUMVM.
I'm excited and ready to buy some classics!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601833</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1246885560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only DRM for dosbox games over steam is the encryption used to send your CC# to Valve. You can take your<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dosboxgame directory and play it in linux under dosbox there and it works just fine. Also all of Valve's games work just fine in offline mode. (i.e. Valve auth servers destroyed in a nuclear attack or---heaven forbid the internet goes down for a day). Steam has gone down repeatedly recently with all their steamcloud updates (particularly during major TF2 updates) and nobody notices that steam's not working until they stop getting random unlocks for an hour or two. <br>
&nbsp; <br>So yes, Virginia, you can backup your precious $2.99 dosbox steam-bought games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only DRM for dosbox games over steam is the encryption used to send your CC # to Valve .
You can take your /dosboxgame directory and play it in linux under dosbox there and it works just fine .
Also all of Valve 's games work just fine in offline mode .
( i.e. Valve auth servers destroyed in a nuclear attack or---heaven forbid the internet goes down for a day ) .
Steam has gone down repeatedly recently with all their steamcloud updates ( particularly during major TF2 updates ) and nobody notices that steam 's not working until they stop getting random unlocks for an hour or two .
  So yes , Virginia , you can backup your precious $ 2.99 dosbox steam-bought games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only DRM for dosbox games over steam is the encryption used to send your CC# to Valve.
You can take your /dosboxgame directory and play it in linux under dosbox there and it works just fine.
Also all of Valve's games work just fine in offline mode.
(i.e. Valve auth servers destroyed in a nuclear attack or---heaven forbid the internet goes down for a day).
Steam has gone down repeatedly recently with all their steamcloud updates (particularly during major TF2 updates) and nobody notices that steam's not working until they stop getting random unlocks for an hour or two.
  So yes, Virginia, you can backup your precious $2.99 dosbox steam-bought games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600387</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga (Nostalgia?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246878120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am actually disappointed by this announcement, precisely because I would rather get the games from Good Old Games and be sure they -are- DRM free, and, more importantly, made to work on modern systems.</p><p>Not to look far, the Steam release of X-Com refused to run on a friend's Vista machine, whereas a DOSbox setup for my old copy of the original release worked without issues.</p><p>Otherwise blow them, at this point asking money for something rightfully belonging in public archives without doing any effort to actually put value in it is just.. well, typical business model of the media companies...<br>If you want to milk old games, at least make them bloody playable on modern systems - which is what I pay GOG for - not just the game itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am actually disappointed by this announcement , precisely because I would rather get the games from Good Old Games and be sure they -are- DRM free , and , more importantly , made to work on modern systems.Not to look far , the Steam release of X-Com refused to run on a friend 's Vista machine , whereas a DOSbox setup for my old copy of the original release worked without issues.Otherwise blow them , at this point asking money for something rightfully belonging in public archives without doing any effort to actually put value in it is just.. well , typical business model of the media companies...If you want to milk old games , at least make them bloody playable on modern systems - which is what I pay GOG for - not just the game itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am actually disappointed by this announcement, precisely because I would rather get the games from Good Old Games and be sure they -are- DRM free, and, more importantly, made to work on modern systems.Not to look far, the Steam release of X-Com refused to run on a friend's Vista machine, whereas a DOSbox setup for my old copy of the original release worked without issues.Otherwise blow them, at this point asking money for something rightfully belonging in public archives without doing any effort to actually put value in it is just.. well, typical business model of the media companies...If you want to milk old games, at least make them bloody playable on modern systems - which is what I pay GOG for - not just the game itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602385</id>
	<title>Re:What I dont get...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246888860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and such and such and such</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and such and such and such</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and such and such and such</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857</id>
	<title>What I dont get...</title>
	<author>Drakin020</author>
	<datestamp>1246875480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not create games based on older models? I mean...Megaman 9 showed us that even legacy games are still desired by older generations.</p><p>Rather that put thought into graphics and such, you could focus your minds on what makes the game fun, and such...</p><p>Me personally, I'd LOVE to see another old school RPG game involving sprites and such.</p><p>There is a market out there, and developers should take advantage of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not create games based on older models ?
I mean...Megaman 9 showed us that even legacy games are still desired by older generations.Rather that put thought into graphics and such , you could focus your minds on what makes the game fun , and such...Me personally , I 'd LOVE to see another old school RPG game involving sprites and such.There is a market out there , and developers should take advantage of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not create games based on older models?
I mean...Megaman 9 showed us that even legacy games are still desired by older generations.Rather that put thought into graphics and such, you could focus your minds on what makes the game fun, and such...Me personally, I'd LOVE to see another old school RPG game involving sprites and such.There is a market out there, and developers should take advantage of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602003</id>
	<title>Re:Still Waiting on KOTOR</title>
	<author>ryl000</author>
	<datestamp>1246886520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's always eBay.

I got my KOTOR from a local Half-Price Bookstore for $5 a month ago, and now I'm kicking myself for not having gotten this years earlier.  I'm just thankful at this point that I never stumbled upon story spoilers before!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's always eBay .
I got my KOTOR from a local Half-Price Bookstore for $ 5 a month ago , and now I 'm kicking myself for not having gotten this years earlier .
I 'm just thankful at this point that I never stumbled upon story spoilers before !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's always eBay.
I got my KOTOR from a local Half-Price Bookstore for $5 a month ago, and now I'm kicking myself for not having gotten this years earlier.
I'm just thankful at this point that I never stumbled upon story spoilers before!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28608067</id>
	<title>Re:TIE Fighter, Day of the Tentacle</title>
	<author>MrNiceguy\_KS</author>
	<datestamp>1246981200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tie Fighter...  X-Wing was good, and you were playing the good side. But Tie Fighter... the story was better, the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships. And it was balanced just right... for a game, anyway. And there were large battles going around you. The game was the ultimate space combat "sim" for me.</p></div><p>I wasted far too much of my high-school/college years playing Tie Fighter.  (It was a fairly old game even then, but being a DOS game, it was easy to get running on any PC handy, including in classrooms with video projectors.)  Tie Fighter really was the high point of the series.  XWing vs Tie Fighter was alright, but it was too heavily geared toward multiplayer in an age before broadband.  The single-player mode was a thrown-together afterthought.  And XWing Alliance was fun at first, but the game mechanics just weren't there.  I think part of the problem was trying to use the turret guns.  It was necessary on a lot of the "Family Business" missions.  And too many of the missions seemed to focus on trying to intercept missiles or protect small, fragile ships.  One of the things I loved about Tie Fighter was flying my tiny craft along some huge enemy ship, just skimming the surface, taking out gun batteries.  Alliance seemed like too much micro-managing.</p><p>But for an even greater sense of "small part in a big war", I humbly direct you to Decent: Freespace and Freespace 2.  It's a shame Volition went under - I'd really love another chapter in that story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tie Fighter... X-Wing was good , and you were playing the good side .
But Tie Fighter... the story was better , the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships .
And it was balanced just right... for a game , anyway .
And there were large battles going around you .
The game was the ultimate space combat " sim " for me.I wasted far too much of my high-school/college years playing Tie Fighter .
( It was a fairly old game even then , but being a DOS game , it was easy to get running on any PC handy , including in classrooms with video projectors .
) Tie Fighter really was the high point of the series .
XWing vs Tie Fighter was alright , but it was too heavily geared toward multiplayer in an age before broadband .
The single-player mode was a thrown-together afterthought .
And XWing Alliance was fun at first , but the game mechanics just were n't there .
I think part of the problem was trying to use the turret guns .
It was necessary on a lot of the " Family Business " missions .
And too many of the missions seemed to focus on trying to intercept missiles or protect small , fragile ships .
One of the things I loved about Tie Fighter was flying my tiny craft along some huge enemy ship , just skimming the surface , taking out gun batteries .
Alliance seemed like too much micro-managing.But for an even greater sense of " small part in a big war " , I humbly direct you to Decent : Freespace and Freespace 2 .
It 's a shame Volition went under - I 'd really love another chapter in that story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tie Fighter...  X-Wing was good, and you were playing the good side.
But Tie Fighter... the story was better, the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships.
And it was balanced just right... for a game, anyway.
And there were large battles going around you.
The game was the ultimate space combat "sim" for me.I wasted far too much of my high-school/college years playing Tie Fighter.
(It was a fairly old game even then, but being a DOS game, it was easy to get running on any PC handy, including in classrooms with video projectors.
)  Tie Fighter really was the high point of the series.
XWing vs Tie Fighter was alright, but it was too heavily geared toward multiplayer in an age before broadband.
The single-player mode was a thrown-together afterthought.
And XWing Alliance was fun at first, but the game mechanics just weren't there.
I think part of the problem was trying to use the turret guns.
It was necessary on a lot of the "Family Business" missions.
And too many of the missions seemed to focus on trying to intercept missiles or protect small, fragile ships.
One of the things I loved about Tie Fighter was flying my tiny craft along some huge enemy ship, just skimming the surface, taking out gun batteries.
Alliance seemed like too much micro-managing.But for an even greater sense of "small part in a big war", I humbly direct you to Decent: Freespace and Freespace 2.
It's a shame Volition went under - I'd really love another chapter in that story.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599395</id>
	<title>niggers etc...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the 8th day, God took a massive dump, and there were niggers.</p><p>And God saw the niggers' poor work ethic and low intelligence, but left them as a curse on humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the 8th day , God took a massive dump , and there were niggers.And God saw the niggers ' poor work ethic and low intelligence , but left them as a curse on humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the 8th day, God took a massive dump, and there were niggers.And God saw the niggers' poor work ethic and low intelligence, but left them as a curse on humanity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601647</id>
	<title>The Dig FTW</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1246884660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I played that first in a 6-pack of games (came with ultima I-VI, stellar 7, spear of Destiny, etc) then bought it again a few years ago for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.99 at Goodwill. DOSBox FTW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I played that first in a 6-pack of games ( came with ultima I-VI , stellar 7 , spear of Destiny , etc ) then bought it again a few years ago for .99 at Goodwill .
DOSBox FTW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I played that first in a 6-pack of games (came with ultima I-VI, stellar 7, spear of Destiny, etc) then bought it again a few years ago for .99 at Goodwill.
DOSBox FTW.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600649</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>Sheafification</author>
	<datestamp>1246879440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen to this. I was actually a little disappointed to hear that LucasArts would be going with Steam as I only buy DRM-free versions via GOG.</p><p>I know, I know. Steam has minimal intrusion and they promise they'll release patches to remove the DRM if they go out of business. I, however, much prefer the no-intrusion system where I don't have take any promises on faith.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen to this .
I was actually a little disappointed to hear that LucasArts would be going with Steam as I only buy DRM-free versions via GOG.I know , I know .
Steam has minimal intrusion and they promise they 'll release patches to remove the DRM if they go out of business .
I , however , much prefer the no-intrusion system where I do n't have take any promises on faith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen to this.
I was actually a little disappointed to hear that LucasArts would be going with Steam as I only buy DRM-free versions via GOG.I know, I know.
Steam has minimal intrusion and they promise they'll release patches to remove the DRM if they go out of business.
I, however, much prefer the no-intrusion system where I don't have take any promises on faith.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600067</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1246876440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hehe, there's some good ones on there! I just picked up Septerra Core and Disciples II. I can live with the hard-coded resolutions of the past; these games are still fun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehe , there 's some good ones on there !
I just picked up Septerra Core and Disciples II .
I can live with the hard-coded resolutions of the past ; these games are still fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehe, there's some good ones on there!
I just picked up Septerra Core and Disciples II.
I can live with the hard-coded resolutions of the past; these games are still fun!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602191</id>
	<title>Re:What I dont get...</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1246887660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would easily pay $60-70 for some sort of sequel to FF6 (US 3 for SNES). In that 16 bit style. I've played most of the translated 16 bit RPGs and there's a certain charm there, the sweet spot for RPGs  that really made the SNES the console to beat. I bought/played FF3 (Jap3) for the DS but there's a certian appeal for that legend of zelda a link to the past style overhead view and blocky graphics<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) In other news, upon further googling, it looks like they're releasing another DS FF RPG. I really wish they'd allow an option to use D-pad only for movement, using styli to control movement/menu just seems counter intuitive to an RPG.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would easily pay $ 60-70 for some sort of sequel to FF6 ( US 3 for SNES ) .
In that 16 bit style .
I 've played most of the translated 16 bit RPGs and there 's a certain charm there , the sweet spot for RPGs that really made the SNES the console to beat .
I bought/played FF3 ( Jap3 ) for the DS but there 's a certian appeal for that legend of zelda a link to the past style overhead view and blocky graphics : ) In other news , upon further googling , it looks like they 're releasing another DS FF RPG .
I really wish they 'd allow an option to use D-pad only for movement , using styli to control movement/menu just seems counter intuitive to an RPG .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would easily pay $60-70 for some sort of sequel to FF6 (US 3 for SNES).
In that 16 bit style.
I've played most of the translated 16 bit RPGs and there's a certain charm there, the sweet spot for RPGs  that really made the SNES the console to beat.
I bought/played FF3 (Jap3) for the DS but there's a certian appeal for that legend of zelda a link to the past style overhead view and blocky graphics :) In other news, upon further googling, it looks like they're releasing another DS FF RPG.
I really wish they'd allow an option to use D-pad only for movement, using styli to control movement/menu just seems counter intuitive to an RPG.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599415</id>
	<title>Expect lots of changes.</title>
	<author>seeker\_1us</author>
	<datestamp>1246873560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Greedo will shoot first in the games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Greedo will shoot first in the games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greedo will shoot first in the games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599865</id>
	<title>Re:The Dig</title>
	<author>Chris Pimlott</author>
	<datestamp>1246875540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It plays pretty well with <a href="http://wiibrew.org/wiki/Homebrew\_apps/ScummVM" title="wiibrew.org">ScummVM on the Wii</a> [wiibrew.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It plays pretty well with ScummVM on the Wii [ wiibrew.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It plays pretty well with ScummVM on the Wii [wiibrew.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28603139</id>
	<title>X-Wing and Tie Fighter and XvT</title>
	<author>Christianfreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246894860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please!</p><p>Absolutely loved those games and I would love to mix it up on XvT on my FiOS connection after playing it on dial-up back in the day</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please ! Absolutely loved those games and I would love to mix it up on XvT on my FiOS connection after playing it on dial-up back in the day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please!Absolutely loved those games and I would love to mix it up on XvT on my FiOS connection after playing it on dial-up back in the day</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28606757</id>
	<title>Re:Ballblazer?</title>
	<author>Mike Morgan</author>
	<datestamp>1246975800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Came here to say exactly that.  Played <i>Rescue on Fractalus</i> for hours on the Atari 8bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Came here to say exactly that .
Played Rescue on Fractalus for hours on the Atari 8bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Came here to say exactly that.
Played Rescue on Fractalus for hours on the Atari 8bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1246876500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if only there were more of a focus on emulation of the platforms these games play on.  I tried playing Fallout 2 on one of my computers a little while back, and even though it should run on Windows XP, it kept crashing because of a conflict with my video card.  I've tried playing some old DOS games in an emulator on my Mac, and some worked, but they took a fair amount of mucking around and lots of things just didn't work.
</p><p>It'd be nice if some company like GOG were to release (or endorse) an open source emulator platform and certify the games to run on them, basically guaranteeing you future proof access to the games you bought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if only there were more of a focus on emulation of the platforms these games play on .
I tried playing Fallout 2 on one of my computers a little while back , and even though it should run on Windows XP , it kept crashing because of a conflict with my video card .
I 've tried playing some old DOS games in an emulator on my Mac , and some worked , but they took a fair amount of mucking around and lots of things just did n't work .
It 'd be nice if some company like GOG were to release ( or endorse ) an open source emulator platform and certify the games to run on them , basically guaranteeing you future proof access to the games you bought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if only there were more of a focus on emulation of the platforms these games play on.
I tried playing Fallout 2 on one of my computers a little while back, and even though it should run on Windows XP, it kept crashing because of a conflict with my video card.
I've tried playing some old DOS games in an emulator on my Mac, and some worked, but they took a fair amount of mucking around and lots of things just didn't work.
It'd be nice if some company like GOG were to release (or endorse) an open source emulator platform and certify the games to run on them, basically guaranteeing you future proof access to the games you bought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28605065</id>
	<title>Graphics vs. game depth</title>
	<author>ScaledLizard</author>
	<datestamp>1246958340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a sucker for good graphics found in many modern games, but they often lack the depth found in the older LucasArts titles.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/discover-the-secret-of-monkey-island-again-on-july-15/" title="joystiq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/discover-the-secret-of-monkey-island-again-on-july-15/</a> [joystiq.com] (cited in the summary):<br>"The Secret of Monkey Island:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... rendered in splendid HD graphics, surrounded by newly recorded voices<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</p><p>That does sound like a worthwhile update.</p><p>I would welcome the campaigns and scenarios of the Star Wars space sims being ported to a newer engine, even if it is only Star Wars Alliance's.</p><p>Note also that publishing games through Steam will delay their becoming abandonware, which is good for the seller, but bad for the public if the games are just re-released without brushing up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a sucker for good graphics found in many modern games , but they often lack the depth found in the older LucasArts titles.From http : //www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/discover-the-secret-of-monkey-island-again-on-july-15/ [ joystiq.com ] ( cited in the summary ) : " The Secret of Monkey Island : ... rendered in splendid HD graphics , surrounded by newly recorded voices ... " That does sound like a worthwhile update.I would welcome the campaigns and scenarios of the Star Wars space sims being ported to a newer engine , even if it is only Star Wars Alliance 's.Note also that publishing games through Steam will delay their becoming abandonware , which is good for the seller , but bad for the public if the games are just re-released without brushing up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a sucker for good graphics found in many modern games, but they often lack the depth found in the older LucasArts titles.From http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/06/discover-the-secret-of-monkey-island-again-on-july-15/ [joystiq.com] (cited in the summary):"The Secret of Monkey Island: ... rendered in splendid HD graphics, surrounded by newly recorded voices ..."That does sound like a worthwhile update.I would welcome the campaigns and scenarios of the Star Wars space sims being ported to a newer engine, even if it is only Star Wars Alliance's.Note also that publishing games through Steam will delay their becoming abandonware, which is good for the seller, but bad for the public if the games are just re-released without brushing up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601329</id>
	<title>This is great</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1246883040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because if there is one thing I've always wanted it's those old school awesome, completely single player, Lucasarts adventure games that to play require a constant internet connection or at least loading through a top-heavy DRM platform that's unlikely to properly support them anyway.</p><p>My next wish will be that all the boxed copies of those games that I've got and have been meaning to sell on Ebay for the last 6 months will now be worth a lot less. Oh, wait. Shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if there is one thing I 've always wanted it 's those old school awesome , completely single player , Lucasarts adventure games that to play require a constant internet connection or at least loading through a top-heavy DRM platform that 's unlikely to properly support them anyway.My next wish will be that all the boxed copies of those games that I 've got and have been meaning to sell on Ebay for the last 6 months will now be worth a lot less .
Oh , wait .
Shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if there is one thing I've always wanted it's those old school awesome, completely single player, Lucasarts adventure games that to play require a constant internet connection or at least loading through a top-heavy DRM platform that's unlikely to properly support them anyway.My next wish will be that all the boxed copies of those games that I've got and have been meaning to sell on Ebay for the last 6 months will now be worth a lot less.
Oh, wait.
Shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599559</id>
	<title>Grim Fandango?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246874100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can they not give this game the credit it deserves?

One of the few games I almost cried when I finished it - it was the perfect game, I just didn't want it to end.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can they not give this game the credit it deserves ?
One of the few games I almost cried when I finished it - it was the perfect game , I just did n't want it to end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can they not give this game the credit it deserves?
One of the few games I almost cried when I finished it - it was the perfect game, I just didn't want it to end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599461</id>
	<title>Extremely cool</title>
	<author>Jarlsberg</author>
	<datestamp>1246873680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too bad the talent has withered away since they closed down their adventure division. Still got my Amiga and PC originals, but if they release all games in one box eventually, like the Orange Box, I'll get these enhanced versions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad the talent has withered away since they closed down their adventure division .
Still got my Amiga and PC originals , but if they release all games in one box eventually , like the Orange Box , I 'll get these enhanced versions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad the talent has withered away since they closed down their adventure division.
Still got my Amiga and PC originals, but if they release all games in one box eventually, like the Orange Box, I'll get these enhanced versions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600447</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>Tibor the Hun</author>
	<datestamp>1246878420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what might be a stupid question, but do you know if those games run on parallels/fusion/virtual box, or crossover games on OS X?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what might be a stupid question , but do you know if those games run on parallels/fusion/virtual box , or crossover games on OS X ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what might be a stupid question, but do you know if those games run on parallels/fusion/virtual box, or crossover games on OS X?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28620153</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>Bob of Dole</author>
	<datestamp>1247060160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not abandonware until the goddamn copyright has expired. Does it look like 2079 to you?</p><p>No? THEN NOTHING LUCASARTS/LUCASFILM GAMES HAS EVER RELEASED IS ABANDONWARE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not abandonware until the goddamn copyright has expired .
Does it look like 2079 to you ? No ?
THEN NOTHING LUCASARTS/LUCASFILM GAMES HAS EVER RELEASED IS ABANDONWARE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not abandonware until the goddamn copyright has expired.
Does it look like 2079 to you?No?
THEN NOTHING LUCASARTS/LUCASFILM GAMES HAS EVER RELEASED IS ABANDONWARE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599451</id>
	<title>Excited, but...</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1246873680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have almost all of the old SCUMM games, and would gladly repurchase them all on Steam if the price is decent. Considering their extreme age, however, anything more than $5 is just insulting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have almost all of the old SCUMM games , and would gladly repurchase them all on Steam if the price is decent .
Considering their extreme age , however , anything more than $ 5 is just insulting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have almost all of the old SCUMM games, and would gladly repurchase them all on Steam if the price is decent.
Considering their extreme age, however, anything more than $5 is just insulting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600873</id>
	<title>Re:The Dig</title>
	<author>leon.gandalf</author>
	<datestamp>1246880520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A Steam client for the PS3 would be nice...</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Steam client for the PS3 would be nice.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Steam client for the PS3 would be nice...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600005</id>
	<title>Re:Tie Fighter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246876140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tachyon: The Fringe is pretty freakin' good, but it's the last good one I'm aware of.</p><p>X-Wing: Alliance is good, too--it has the X-Wing/Tie Fighter feel, unlike that (IMO) crappy X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter game.  Not up to the level of the original two games, but pretty good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tachyon : The Fringe is pretty freakin ' good , but it 's the last good one I 'm aware of.X-Wing : Alliance is good , too--it has the X-Wing/Tie Fighter feel , unlike that ( IMO ) crappy X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter game .
Not up to the level of the original two games , but pretty good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tachyon: The Fringe is pretty freakin' good, but it's the last good one I'm aware of.X-Wing: Alliance is good, too--it has the X-Wing/Tie Fighter feel, unlike that (IMO) crappy X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter game.
Not up to the level of the original two games, but pretty good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600087</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246876500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not Abandonware if the company owning the rights is still selling it through some venue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Abandonware if the company owning the rights is still selling it through some venue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Abandonware if the company owning the rights is still selling it through some venue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28611675</id>
	<title>Not again...</title>
	<author>jones\_supa</author>
	<datestamp>1246995180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, the LucasArts' oldies are pure gold, but not again! I have already gone even through the "nostalgia phase" with these years ago. Why must the same handful of games be replayed over and over? Some new stuff instead, please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , the LucasArts ' oldies are pure gold , but not again !
I have already gone even through the " nostalgia phase " with these years ago .
Why must the same handful of games be replayed over and over ?
Some new stuff instead , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, the LucasArts' oldies are pure gold, but not again!
I have already gone even through the "nostalgia phase" with these years ago.
Why must the same handful of games be replayed over and over?
Some new stuff instead, please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601015</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1246881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>gog just uses dosbox for damn near everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>gog just uses dosbox for damn near everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gog just uses dosbox for damn near everything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599775</id>
	<title>Re:Bring back...</title>
	<author>TrippTDF</author>
	<datestamp>1246875120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I completely agree... it's been ten years since a Star Wars simulation was released, and that's just too long!  There's been a fair amount of homebrew work at updating the models for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star\_Wars:\_X-Wing\_Alliance" title="wikipedia.org">X-Wing: Alliance</a> [wikipedia.org], but I think it's time to see another game built from the ground up taking advantage of newer hardware and internet play.  And there is a ton of unexplored room with the first three episode's.  <br> <br>

I think there's a lot of room for a MMORPG that is just around a Star Wars space sim.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree... it 's been ten years since a Star Wars simulation was released , and that 's just too long !
There 's been a fair amount of homebrew work at updating the models for X-Wing : Alliance [ wikipedia.org ] , but I think it 's time to see another game built from the ground up taking advantage of newer hardware and internet play .
And there is a ton of unexplored room with the first three episode 's .
I think there 's a lot of room for a MMORPG that is just around a Star Wars space sim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree... it's been ten years since a Star Wars simulation was released, and that's just too long!
There's been a fair amount of homebrew work at updating the models for X-Wing: Alliance [wikipedia.org], but I think it's time to see another game built from the ground up taking advantage of newer hardware and internet play.
And there is a ton of unexplored room with the first three episode's.
I think there's a lot of room for a MMORPG that is just around a Star Wars space sim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602445</id>
	<title>Re:Bring back...</title>
	<author>xSauronx</author>
	<datestamp>1246889220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>another vote for TIE Fighter, or X vs T. I played the bejesus out of TIE Fighter, X wing was good, but broadband wasnt quite available enough for me to enjoy X vs T</p><p>I dont have a copy of any of those anymore, but Id gladly buy them if they got a revamp and were available as a set for a decent price</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>another vote for TIE Fighter , or X vs T. I played the bejesus out of TIE Fighter , X wing was good , but broadband wasnt quite available enough for me to enjoy X vs TI dont have a copy of any of those anymore , but Id gladly buy them if they got a revamp and were available as a set for a decent price</tokentext>
<sentencetext>another vote for TIE Fighter, or X vs T. I played the bejesus out of TIE Fighter, X wing was good, but broadband wasnt quite available enough for me to enjoy X vs TI dont have a copy of any of those anymore, but Id gladly buy them if they got a revamp and were available as a set for a decent price</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599693</id>
	<title>Hmph</title>
	<author>CaptSaltyJack</author>
	<datestamp>1246874700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like vaporware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like vaporware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like vaporware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601103</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>wjousts</author>
	<datestamp>1246881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, this. Put them on GOG.com and I'll buy them. I want Grim Fandango myself as I missed that one when it first came out. But I'm not touching Steam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , this .
Put them on GOG.com and I 'll buy them .
I want Grim Fandango myself as I missed that one when it first came out .
But I 'm not touching Steam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, this.
Put them on GOG.com and I'll buy them.
I want Grim Fandango myself as I missed that one when it first came out.
But I'm not touching Steam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600059</id>
	<title>Full Throttle</title>
	<author>JasonWM</author>
	<datestamp>1246876380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I still have my copy of Tie Fighter, but I'd love to be able to get my hands on Full Throttle again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still have my copy of Tie Fighter , but I 'd love to be able to get my hands on Full Throttle again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still have my copy of Tie Fighter, but I'd love to be able to get my hands on Full Throttle again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599377</id>
	<title>Worthless humans...</title>
	<author>Verteiron</author>
	<datestamp>1246873440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd love an updated version of Day of the Tentacle.</p><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love an updated version of Day of the Tentacle.That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love an updated version of Day of the Tentacle.That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599553</id>
	<title>Full Throttle....or else...</title>
	<author>Ceseuron</author>
	<datestamp>1246874100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I demand a re-release of Full Throttle to be included in this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I demand a re-release of Full Throttle to be included in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I demand a re-release of Full Throttle to be included in this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599367</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say...</title>
	<author>Jeian</author>
	<datestamp>1246873380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... AWESOME.</p><p>Childhood memories, here I come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... AWESOME.Childhood memories , here I come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... AWESOME.Childhood memories, here I come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599567</id>
	<title>Great - Tie Fighter, please come back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246874160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they release Tie Fighter. I loved that game.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star\_Wars:\_TIE\_Fighter" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Star Wars: TIE Fighter</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they release Tie Fighter .
I loved that game.Star Wars : TIE Fighter [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they release Tie Fighter.
I loved that game.Star Wars: TIE Fighter [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28604981</id>
	<title>Real copies?</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1246957320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's all well and good, but what about those of us who don't want to rent our retro games through some "must be connected to the Net" DRM system and want a real copy? My brother managed to find a copy of Monkey Island 3 for me a year or two back, but most of the Monkey Island games are difficult to get hold of (or severely over-priced) in the UK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all well and good , but what about those of us who do n't want to rent our retro games through some " must be connected to the Net " DRM system and want a real copy ?
My brother managed to find a copy of Monkey Island 3 for me a year or two back , but most of the Monkey Island games are difficult to get hold of ( or severely over-priced ) in the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all well and good, but what about those of us who don't want to rent our retro games through some "must be connected to the Net" DRM system and want a real copy?
My brother managed to find a copy of Monkey Island 3 for me a year or two back, but most of the Monkey Island games are difficult to get hold of (or severely over-priced) in the UK.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599939</id>
	<title>Tie Fighter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246875780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>PLEASE!!!!! There havn't been any good space combat sims since this game.</htmltext>
<tokenext>PLEASE ! ! ! ! !
There hav n't been any good space combat sims since this game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PLEASE!!!!!
There havn't been any good space combat sims since this game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601703</id>
	<title>Re:Bring back...</title>
	<author>Nimey</author>
	<datestamp>1246884960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, that'd be the fourth rehash of TIE Fighter.  First was the floppy MS-DOS version, then the CD-ROM MS-DOS "Collector's Edition", and then a Windows 9x version with 3D effects.</p><p>I think X-Wing had the same number and types of re-releases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , that 'd be the fourth rehash of TIE Fighter .
First was the floppy MS-DOS version , then the CD-ROM MS-DOS " Collector 's Edition " , and then a Windows 9x version with 3D effects.I think X-Wing had the same number and types of re-releases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, that'd be the fourth rehash of TIE Fighter.
First was the floppy MS-DOS version, then the CD-ROM MS-DOS "Collector's Edition", and then a Windows 9x version with 3D effects.I think X-Wing had the same number and types of re-releases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599633</id>
	<title>TIE Fighter, Day of the Tentacle</title>
	<author>teg</author>
	<datestamp>1246874400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I'm looking forward to these releases... and like many others here, there are some jewels I look forward to even more than the rest.
</p><p>
Day of the Tentacle was the best of all their adventures... the jokes, the plot, the characters - and even the voice acting - were unsurpassed. I was lucky enough to get the CD edition in the mid-nineties, and it's one of the gaming experiences that are burned into my mind - like the Baldur's Gate series and Gabriel Knight: Sins Of the Fathers.

</p><p>
Tie Fighter...  X-Wing was good, and you were playing the good side. But Tie Fighter... the story was better, the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships. And it was balanced just right... for a game, anyway. And there were large battles going around you. The game was the ultimate space combat "sim" for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking forward to these releases... and like many others here , there are some jewels I look forward to even more than the rest .
Day of the Tentacle was the best of all their adventures... the jokes , the plot , the characters - and even the voice acting - were unsurpassed .
I was lucky enough to get the CD edition in the mid-nineties , and it 's one of the gaming experiences that are burned into my mind - like the Baldur 's Gate series and Gabriel Knight : Sins Of the Fathers .
Tie Fighter... X-Wing was good , and you were playing the good side .
But Tie Fighter... the story was better , the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships .
And it was balanced just right... for a game , anyway .
And there were large battles going around you .
The game was the ultimate space combat " sim " for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I'm looking forward to these releases... and like many others here, there are some jewels I look forward to even more than the rest.
Day of the Tentacle was the best of all their adventures... the jokes, the plot, the characters - and even the voice acting - were unsurpassed.
I was lucky enough to get the CD edition in the mid-nineties, and it's one of the gaming experiences that are burned into my mind - like the Baldur's Gate series and Gabriel Knight: Sins Of the Fathers.
Tie Fighter...  X-Wing was good, and you were playing the good side.
But Tie Fighter... the story was better, the game mechanics and graphics were better and you got to fly all sort of new ships.
And it was balanced just right... for a game, anyway.
And there were large battles going around you.
The game was the ultimate space combat "sim" for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359</id>
	<title>Ballblazer?</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1246873380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, no Ballblazer, Rescue on Fractalus, or Koronis RIft?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , no Ballblazer , Rescue on Fractalus , or Koronis RIft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, no Ballblazer, Rescue on Fractalus, or Koronis RIft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601089</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1246881600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GOG just uses DOSBOX and SCUMMVM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GOG just uses DOSBOX and SCUMMVM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOG just uses DOSBOX and SCUMMVM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601065</id>
	<title>Re:Linux and STEAM?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1246881540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steam has worked great on wine for at least the last two years, probably longer. If you donn;t want to have to do any work just get crossover games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steam has worked great on wine for at least the last two years , probably longer .
If you donn ; t want to have to do any work just get crossover games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steam has worked great on wine for at least the last two years, probably longer.
If you donn;t want to have to do any work just get crossover games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575</id>
	<title>The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246874160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this is now a trend. GOG and now Lucasarts are putting abandonware titles back on the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this is now a trend .
GOG and now Lucasarts are putting abandonware titles back on the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this is now a trend.
GOG and now Lucasarts are putting abandonware titles back on the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599835</id>
	<title>Re:Grim Fandango?</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1246875360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same thoughts here. Grim Fandango is an AMAZING game, quite possibly one of the greatest games ever made. Plus it was one of the very first games to use any sort of hardware acceleration, a pretty big deal in its time. I really hope they consider it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same thoughts here .
Grim Fandango is an AMAZING game , quite possibly one of the greatest games ever made .
Plus it was one of the very first games to use any sort of hardware acceleration , a pretty big deal in its time .
I really hope they consider it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same thoughts here.
Grim Fandango is an AMAZING game, quite possibly one of the greatest games ever made.
Plus it was one of the very first games to use any sort of hardware acceleration, a pretty big deal in its time.
I really hope they consider it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</id>
	<title>Nostalga</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246874100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>while everyone is feeling nostalgic about their old favorite LucasArts games i would like to point out <a href="http://www.gog.com/" title="gog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gog.com/</a> [gog.com] for everyones old game pleasure. Lots of our old classic favorites at great prices, DRM free and even works on vista/7.</htmltext>
<tokenext>while everyone is feeling nostalgic about their old favorite LucasArts games i would like to point out http : //www.gog.com/ [ gog.com ] for everyones old game pleasure .
Lots of our old classic favorites at great prices , DRM free and even works on vista/7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>while everyone is feeling nostalgic about their old favorite LucasArts games i would like to point out http://www.gog.com/ [gog.com] for everyones old game pleasure.
Lots of our old classic favorites at great prices, DRM free and even works on vista/7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28610225</id>
	<title>Re:Ballblazer?</title>
	<author>BlindSpot</author>
	<datestamp>1246989720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget The Eidolon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget The Eidolon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget The Eidolon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601045</id>
	<title>Re:Linux and STEAM?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1246881420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steam works fine with wine, and has for at least the last couple years. If you want everything done for you use crossover games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steam works fine with wine , and has for at least the last couple years .
If you want everything done for you use crossover games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steam works fine with wine, and has for at least the last couple years.
If you want everything done for you use crossover games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365</id>
	<title>The Dig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I loved that game. Wish they would port some of these over to consoles too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I loved that game .
Wish they would port some of these over to consoles too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loved that game.
Wish they would port some of these over to consoles too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599419</id>
	<title>Originality</title>
	<author>Conspiracy\_Of\_Doves</author>
	<datestamp>1246873560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they aren't going to be releasing original stuff, <b>this</b> is the kind of games they need to be retreading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they are n't going to be releasing original stuff , this is the kind of games they need to be retreading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they aren't going to be releasing original stuff, this is the kind of games they need to be retreading.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600113</id>
	<title>Tie Fighter/XWing for iPhone?</title>
	<author>Feyshtey</author>
	<datestamp>1246876680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they were to actually translate XWing and/or Tie fighter to the iPhone using the motion sensing controls, I might actualy have to jump on the bandwagon. I havent really enjoyed a flight sim since those days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they were to actually translate XWing and/or Tie fighter to the iPhone using the motion sensing controls , I might actualy have to jump on the bandwagon .
I havent really enjoyed a flight sim since those days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they were to actually translate XWing and/or Tie fighter to the iPhone using the motion sensing controls, I might actualy have to jump on the bandwagon.
I havent really enjoyed a flight sim since those days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28604625</id>
	<title>Re:Ballblazer?</title>
	<author>VincenzoRomano</author>
	<datestamp>1246909920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maniac Mansion?<br>
Zak McKracken?<br>
Without these two it won't be a "Lucas arts's return"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maniac Mansion ?
Zak McKracken ?
Without these two it wo n't be a " Lucas arts 's return " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maniac Mansion?
Zak McKracken?
Without these two it won't be a "Lucas arts's return"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602329</id>
	<title>Re:Nostalga</title>
	<author>g051051</author>
	<datestamp>1246888380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just to let people know...GOG just bundles the original games with ScummVM and calls it a day.  Not necessarily a problem since they have ScummVM approval, but if you're expecting some kind of port, you'll be disappointed.  They caught me that way with Redneck Rampage.  The web site says "Thanks to our handsome programming team, the classics are now Windows Vista and Windows XP compatible.", but they certainly didn't do any programming in that case.  They just used DosBOX with a custom config file and that was it.  I also got hooked by Sierra when they did the same thing with Kings' Quest and Space Quest collections.  If you still own the games, you can just use <a href="http://www.scummvm.org/" title="scummvm.org" rel="nofollow">ScummVM</a> [scummvm.org] or <a href="http://www.dosbox.com/" title="dosbox.com" rel="nofollow">DosBOX</a> [dosbox.com].</p><p>With that said, if you are looking for legal copies of these games, or aren't technically inclined, then GOG is a good way to get them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to let people know...GOG just bundles the original games with ScummVM and calls it a day .
Not necessarily a problem since they have ScummVM approval , but if you 're expecting some kind of port , you 'll be disappointed .
They caught me that way with Redneck Rampage .
The web site says " Thanks to our handsome programming team , the classics are now Windows Vista and Windows XP compatible .
" , but they certainly did n't do any programming in that case .
They just used DosBOX with a custom config file and that was it .
I also got hooked by Sierra when they did the same thing with Kings ' Quest and Space Quest collections .
If you still own the games , you can just use ScummVM [ scummvm.org ] or DosBOX [ dosbox.com ] .With that said , if you are looking for legal copies of these games , or are n't technically inclined , then GOG is a good way to get them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to let people know...GOG just bundles the original games with ScummVM and calls it a day.
Not necessarily a problem since they have ScummVM approval, but if you're expecting some kind of port, you'll be disappointed.
They caught me that way with Redneck Rampage.
The web site says "Thanks to our handsome programming team, the classics are now Windows Vista and Windows XP compatible.
", but they certainly didn't do any programming in that case.
They just used DosBOX with a custom config file and that was it.
I also got hooked by Sierra when they did the same thing with Kings' Quest and Space Quest collections.
If you still own the games, you can just use ScummVM [scummvm.org] or DosBOX [dosbox.com].With that said, if you are looking for legal copies of these games, or aren't technically inclined, then GOG is a good way to get them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599655</id>
	<title>Re:Bring back...</title>
	<author>Imagix</author>
	<datestamp>1246874460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely yes!  I sorely miss the age of the space combat sims.  X-Wing, Descent Freespace.... those were the days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely yes !
I sorely miss the age of the space combat sims .
X-Wing , Descent Freespace.... those were the days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely yes!
I sorely miss the age of the space combat sims.
X-Wing, Descent Freespace.... those were the days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28604263</id>
	<title>Use an emulator!</title>
	<author>Ianopolous</author>
	<datestamp>1246905120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Presuming people already have a copy of these games, why don't they just use an emulator to run them? As demonstrated at <a href="http://www.classicdosgames.com/" title="classicdosgames.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.classicdosgames.com/</a> [classicdosgames.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Presuming people already have a copy of these games , why do n't they just use an emulator to run them ?
As demonstrated at http : //www.classicdosgames.com/ [ classicdosgames.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presuming people already have a copy of these games, why don't they just use an emulator to run them?
As demonstrated at http://www.classicdosgames.com/ [classicdosgames.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28603177</id>
	<title>Re:The End Of The Abandonware Golden Age?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1246895100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Virtual PC is free; just run Windows 98 and play in that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Virtual PC is free ; just run Windows 98 and play in that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Virtual PC is free; just run Windows 98 and play in that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391</id>
	<title>Linux and STEAM?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246878120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not having been very active with MS Windows for many years, I've missed out on Steam as a tool for managing my games.</p><p>But there are some nice games out there and, DRM issues aside, Steam seems to be nice and convenient to use, but how well does it perform on Linux under WINE? I'm aware that the Codeweavers product has some support for it, but how well does it work? Is it worth the hassle to use it with Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not having been very active with MS Windows for many years , I 've missed out on Steam as a tool for managing my games.But there are some nice games out there and , DRM issues aside , Steam seems to be nice and convenient to use , but how well does it perform on Linux under WINE ?
I 'm aware that the Codeweavers product has some support for it , but how well does it work ?
Is it worth the hassle to use it with Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not having been very active with MS Windows for many years, I've missed out on Steam as a tool for managing my games.But there are some nice games out there and, DRM issues aside, Steam seems to be nice and convenient to use, but how well does it perform on Linux under WINE?
I'm aware that the Codeweavers product has some support for it, but how well does it work?
Is it worth the hassle to use it with Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599433</id>
	<title>Still Waiting on KOTOR</title>
	<author>k\_187</author>
	<datestamp>1246873620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm still waiting on KOTOR to show up on steam.  I missed it when it was new and the only way to get it now is in some bundle with 4 other games I don't care about.  Seriously, it should be in the next round.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still waiting on KOTOR to show up on steam .
I missed it when it was new and the only way to get it now is in some bundle with 4 other games I do n't care about .
Seriously , it should be in the next round .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still waiting on KOTOR to show up on steam.
I missed it when it was new and the only way to get it now is in some bundle with 4 other games I don't care about.
Seriously, it should be in the next round.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599373</id>
	<title>And thank you TellTale Games...</title>
	<author>greatica</author>
	<datestamp>1246873440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For reminding Lucasarts that we were here all along, waiting to purchase more adventure games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For reminding Lucasarts that we were here all along , waiting to purchase more adventure games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For reminding Lucasarts that we were here all along, waiting to purchase more adventure games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28610225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28604625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28603177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28606757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28620153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28608067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_06_1948229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28608067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600649
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599553
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600113
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28606757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28610225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28604625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600005
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600087
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28620153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28603177
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28601089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28600167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28602191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_06_1948229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_06_1948229.28599367
</commentlist>
</conversation>
