<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_05_2151220</id>
	<title>uSocial Sells Twitter Followers By the Thousand</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246822440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bfire writes to tell us that marketing firm uSocial has decided to apply a new <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/149303,aussie-firm-sells-twitter-followers.aspx">monetization scheme to the Twitter service</a> by providing packages of followers for purchase.  <i>"According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month. It is selling followers in various packages, starting at 1,000 for $87, which is delivered in seven days, and going all the way up to 100,000 followers at a cost of $3,479, delivered over a year."</i>  This is just the latest in a number of different <a href="http://www.daniweb.com/blogs/entry4496.html">exploits</a> and <a href="http://www.daniweb.com/blogs/entry4402.html">problems</a> of the Twitter universe as individuals try to subvert a popular tool into a self-serving device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bfire writes to tell us that marketing firm uSocial has decided to apply a new monetization scheme to the Twitter service by providing packages of followers for purchase .
" According to the firm , a single Twitter follower could be worth $ 0.10 a month .
It is selling followers in various packages , starting at 1,000 for $ 87 , which is delivered in seven days , and going all the way up to 100,000 followers at a cost of $ 3,479 , delivered over a year .
" This is just the latest in a number of different exploits and problems of the Twitter universe as individuals try to subvert a popular tool into a self-serving device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bfire writes to tell us that marketing firm uSocial has decided to apply a new monetization scheme to the Twitter service by providing packages of followers for purchase.
"According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month.
It is selling followers in various packages, starting at 1,000 for $87, which is delivered in seven days, and going all the way up to 100,000 followers at a cost of $3,479, delivered over a year.
"  This is just the latest in a number of different exploits and problems of the Twitter universe as individuals try to subvert a popular tool into a self-serving device.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592063</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting business stratagy</title>
	<author>wisty</author>
	<datestamp>1246872360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they also sell gmail invites? I think I have a few of those under the mattress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they also sell gmail invites ?
I think I have a few of those under the mattress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they also sell gmail invites?
I think I have a few of those under the mattress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593067</id>
	<title>modL 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246886400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">project faces a set the facts and includes where you to place a paper HowevEr I do8't writing is on the recent article put around are in need</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>project faces a set the facts and includes where you to place a paper HowevEr I do8't writing is on the recent article put around are in need [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>project faces a set the facts and includes where you to place a paper HowevEr I do8't writing is on the recent article put around are in need [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592353</id>
	<title>a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1246876920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month.</p></div></blockquote><p>Dead or alive?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the firm , a single Twitter follower could be worth $ 0.10 a month.Dead or alive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month.Dead or alive?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592167</id>
	<title>Barbara</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so! really nice post.
Barbara
<a href="http://themastercleanse.org/cabbage-soup-diet" title="themastercleanse.org" rel="nofollow">Review of the cabbage soup diet</a> [themastercleanse.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Generally I do not post on blogs , but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so !
really nice post .
Barbara Review of the cabbage soup diet [ themastercleanse.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so!
really nice post.
Barbara
Review of the cabbage soup diet [themastercleanse.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592367</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>blackraven14250</author>
	<datestamp>1246877040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't matter if anyone is an idiot or not. They're making money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't matter if anyone is an idiot or not .
They 're making money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't matter if anyone is an idiot or not.
They're making money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592921</id>
	<title>Re:What is this twitter btw?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246885260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's a long-standing Slashdot troll, known for rabidly anti-MS (always spelt M$) posts and operating a dozen or so sockpuppet accounts.  Apparently there's some social networking / microblogging thingy named after him too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's a long-standing Slashdot troll , known for rabidly anti-MS ( always spelt M $ ) posts and operating a dozen or so sockpuppet accounts .
Apparently there 's some social networking / microblogging thingy named after him too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's a long-standing Slashdot troll, known for rabidly anti-MS (always spelt M$) posts and operating a dozen or so sockpuppet accounts.
Apparently there's some social networking / microblogging thingy named after him too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592605</id>
	<title>Re:What is this twitter btw?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A good (and amusing) summary can be found <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2HAroA12w" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [youtube.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>A good ( and amusing ) summary can be found here [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good (and amusing) summary can be found here [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28601295</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1246882860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiots</p></div><p>Those people are the best targets for marketing campaigns.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who 'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiotsThose people are the best targets for marketing campaigns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiotsThose people are the best targets for marketing campaigns.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592553</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm as worried about this uSocial crap destroying Twitter as I am someone running over Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps. In fact, I'd view it as equally good news should any of those things happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm as worried about this uSocial crap destroying Twitter as I am someone running over Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps .
In fact , I 'd view it as equally good news should any of those things happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm as worried about this uSocial crap destroying Twitter as I am someone running over Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps.
In fact, I'd view it as equally good news should any of those things happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594277</id>
	<title>Re:Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>Quirkz</author>
	<datestamp>1246894140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use a twitter account to provide updates about the game I run. It's superhero themed, but because it has the word "Twilight" in the name (with the implication you've got a day job and go out at dusk to fight crime), I get a couple of people a day with accounts that are named "Cullen." No amount of saying "this is a superhero game" or "there are no vampires here" seems to dissuade them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a twitter account to provide updates about the game I run .
It 's superhero themed , but because it has the word " Twilight " in the name ( with the implication you 've got a day job and go out at dusk to fight crime ) , I get a couple of people a day with accounts that are named " Cullen .
" No amount of saying " this is a superhero game " or " there are no vampires here " seems to dissuade them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a twitter account to provide updates about the game I run.
It's superhero themed, but because it has the word "Twilight" in the name (with the implication you've got a day job and go out at dusk to fight crime), I get a couple of people a day with accounts that are named "Cullen.
" No amount of saying "this is a superhero game" or "there are no vampires here" seems to dissuade them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592371</id>
	<title>Twitter Users Can Now Buy Followers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246877340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BBC reports that uSocial, a social media marketing company based in Australia, has <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8130456.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">launched a paid service to find followers for Twitter users for a fee of $87 for a block of 1,000</a> [bbc.co.uk]. The company finds potential followers by searching through Twitter to discover areas of common interest to match people more closely. uSocial then send these potential followers a message, alerting them that there is someone on Twitter they might want to follow and the potential follower then decides whether or not to follow that person. "A woman who runs yoga classes is one of our clients," says Leon Hill, chief executive of uSocial,. "So are some religious organizations including one man that just wants to get the word out about God. Twitter started as a way for just friends to keep in touch, but as with any social media site once they get big, every business or marketer jumps on the bandwagon. <a href="http://www.usocial.net/twitter\_marketing/" title="usocial.net" rel="nofollow">It's an excellent marketing medium</a> [usocial.net]." Some commentators have expressed concerns that this sort of practice could lead to an increase in "Twitter spam", as users are bombarded with irrelevant tweets. "As a Twitter user, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5732543/Twitter-users-can-buy-followers.html" title="telegraph.co.uk" rel="nofollow">I only want to follow people whose tweets I like, and only expect to be followed by people who find my tweets worth the time</a> [telegraph.co.uk]," writes Harry McCracken, a technology expert. "I know that I'd rather have fifty engaged followers than 5,000 whose attention I had to pay for."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BBC reports that uSocial , a social media marketing company based in Australia , has launched a paid service to find followers for Twitter users for a fee of $ 87 for a block of 1,000 [ bbc.co.uk ] .
The company finds potential followers by searching through Twitter to discover areas of common interest to match people more closely .
uSocial then send these potential followers a message , alerting them that there is someone on Twitter they might want to follow and the potential follower then decides whether or not to follow that person .
" A woman who runs yoga classes is one of our clients , " says Leon Hill , chief executive of uSocial, .
" So are some religious organizations including one man that just wants to get the word out about God .
Twitter started as a way for just friends to keep in touch , but as with any social media site once they get big , every business or marketer jumps on the bandwagon .
It 's an excellent marketing medium [ usocial.net ] .
" Some commentators have expressed concerns that this sort of practice could lead to an increase in " Twitter spam " , as users are bombarded with irrelevant tweets .
" As a Twitter user , I only want to follow people whose tweets I like , and only expect to be followed by people who find my tweets worth the time [ telegraph.co.uk ] , " writes Harry McCracken , a technology expert .
" I know that I 'd rather have fifty engaged followers than 5,000 whose attention I had to pay for .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BBC reports that uSocial, a social media marketing company based in Australia, has launched a paid service to find followers for Twitter users for a fee of $87 for a block of 1,000 [bbc.co.uk].
The company finds potential followers by searching through Twitter to discover areas of common interest to match people more closely.
uSocial then send these potential followers a message, alerting them that there is someone on Twitter they might want to follow and the potential follower then decides whether or not to follow that person.
"A woman who runs yoga classes is one of our clients," says Leon Hill, chief executive of uSocial,.
"So are some religious organizations including one man that just wants to get the word out about God.
Twitter started as a way for just friends to keep in touch, but as with any social media site once they get big, every business or marketer jumps on the bandwagon.
It's an excellent marketing medium [usocial.net].
" Some commentators have expressed concerns that this sort of practice could lead to an increase in "Twitter spam", as users are bombarded with irrelevant tweets.
"As a Twitter user, I only want to follow people whose tweets I like, and only expect to be followed by people who find my tweets worth the time [telegraph.co.uk]," writes Harry McCracken, a technology expert.
"I know that I'd rather have fifty engaged followers than 5,000 whose attention I had to pay for.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592567</id>
	<title>Re:Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what we call 'twalkers'...lock your door!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what we call 'twalkers'...lock your door !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what we call 'twalkers'...lock your door!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117</id>
	<title>Ummm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246872960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get it, is that like paying people to be your friend?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it , is that like paying people to be your friend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it, is that like paying people to be your friend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592543</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246879980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, more like paying someone else to get some idiot who doesn't see a cent to become your friend.
</p><p>Wait, that sounds a lot like a dating service....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , more like paying someone else to get some idiot who does n't see a cent to become your friend .
Wait , that sounds a lot like a dating service... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, more like paying someone else to get some idiot who doesn't see a cent to become your friend.
Wait, that sounds a lot like a dating service....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591895</id>
	<title>Hurray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246913340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was rather hoping for this fad to die</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was rather hoping for this fad to die</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was rather hoping for this fad to die</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592151</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so! really nice post.<br>Barbara<br><a href="http://themastercleanse.org/cabbage-soup-diet" title="themastercleanse.org" rel="nofollow">Review of the cabbage soup diet</a> [themastercleanse.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Generally I do not post on blogs , but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so !
really nice post.BarbaraReview of the cabbage soup diet [ themastercleanse.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so!
really nice post.BarbaraReview of the cabbage soup diet [themastercleanse.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592165</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>nem75</author>
	<datestamp>1246873860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiots</p></div><p>So is it really a waste then? Presuming that someone who pays to get followers is trying to sell something in turn, this might not be such a waste. Sure, the followers would be idiots. And fool<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... money<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... soon to part - I guess you see what I'm getting at.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who 'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiotsSo is it really a waste then ?
Presuming that someone who pays to get followers is trying to sell something in turn , this might not be such a waste .
Sure , the followers would be idiots .
And fool ... money ... soon to part - I guess you see what I 'm getting at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiotsSo is it really a waste then?
Presuming that someone who pays to get followers is trying to sell something in turn, this might not be such a waste.
Sure, the followers would be idiots.
And fool ... money ... soon to part - I guess you see what I'm getting at.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592359</id>
	<title>oblig cartoon</title>
	<author>will\_die</author>
	<datestamp>1246876980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2009/06/30/" title="gocomics.com">http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2009/06/30/</a> [gocomics.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2009/06/30/ [ gocomics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2009/06/30/ [gocomics.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592757</id>
	<title>Re:Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>Punto</author>
	<datestamp>1246883400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find your ideas intriguing and would like you follow you on twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your ideas intriguing and would like you follow you on twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your ideas intriguing and would like you follow you on twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592339</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1246876500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't get it, is that like paying people to be your friend?</p></div><p>Yeah, but the fraternity system is already saturated...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it , is that like paying people to be your friend ? Yeah , but the fraternity system is already saturated.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it, is that like paying people to be your friend?Yeah, but the fraternity system is already saturated...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594503</id>
	<title>Eighth Grade Math?</title>
	<author>nileshp88</author>
	<datestamp>1246895460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe its just me, but the odds they gave are wrong. with 20,000 entries, and 10 laptops, the odds would be 1 in 20,000 of winning. not 1 in 200,000 as the article states.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe its just me , but the odds they gave are wrong .
with 20,000 entries , and 10 laptops , the odds would be 1 in 20,000 of winning .
not 1 in 200,000 as the article states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe its just me, but the odds they gave are wrong.
with 20,000 entries, and 10 laptops, the odds would be 1 in 20,000 of winning.
not 1 in 200,000 as the article states.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593025</id>
	<title>Re:What is this twitter btw?</title>
	<author>Fnord666</author>
	<datestamp>1246886100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What is actually this twitter thing?</p></div>

</blockquote><p>
From the name I would guess that it's a social site for twits.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is actually this twitter thing ?
From the name I would guess that it 's a social site for twits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is actually this twitter thing?
From the name I would guess that it's a social site for twits.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592207</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1246874640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a problem because it will be used for search engine spamming, with the result that free speech such as we're seeing out of Iran that makes use of Twitter to spread itself gets lowered search rankings by association when the search engines react to the new source of spam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a problem because it will be used for search engine spamming , with the result that free speech such as we 're seeing out of Iran that makes use of Twitter to spread itself gets lowered search rankings by association when the search engines react to the new source of spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a problem because it will be used for search engine spamming, with the result that free speech such as we're seeing out of Iran that makes use of Twitter to spread itself gets lowered search rankings by association when the search engines react to the new source of spam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</id>
	<title>Interesting business stratagy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246912860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Essentially, what they do is they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it. Not entirely a bad idea. What is unknown here is how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds. In the worst case, they have a bunch of sock puppet accounts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Essentially , what they do is they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds , and then charges the feeds for it .
Not entirely a bad idea .
What is unknown here is how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds .
In the worst case , they have a bunch of sock puppet accounts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Essentially, what they do is they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it.
Not entirely a bad idea.
What is unknown here is how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds.
In the worst case, they have a bunch of sock puppet accounts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592755</id>
	<title>Great article</title>
	<author>roesti</author>
	<datestamp>1246883340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great article. Totally tweeting this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great article .
Totally tweeting this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great article.
Totally tweeting this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</id>
	<title>Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>sl149q</author>
	<datestamp>1246875300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name...

What is interesting is that I get one or two "followers" a week, and they are people who I have never heard of. And I suspect that would really have no particular reason to follow my (non-existent) tweets...

It could just be accidental but it seems like too many for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name.. . What is interesting is that I get one or two " followers " a week , and they are people who I have never heard of .
And I suspect that would really have no particular reason to follow my ( non-existent ) tweets.. . It could just be accidental but it seems like too many for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name...

What is interesting is that I get one or two "followers" a week, and they are people who I have never heard of.
And I suspect that would really have no particular reason to follow my (non-existent) tweets...

It could just be accidental but it seems like too many for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592045</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting business stratagy[sic]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246872120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it. Not entirely a bad idea.</i> <br> <br>If it serves to hasten the demise of Twitter, it's a great idea. Maybe the sheeple can go find something more worthwhile to do than go "Baaaa! Baaa!" at each other instead. But I guess it would be stupid to underestimate the inanity of people in large numbers...</htmltext>
<tokenext>they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds , and then charges the feeds for it .
Not entirely a bad idea .
If it serves to hasten the demise of Twitter , it 's a great idea .
Maybe the sheeple can go find something more worthwhile to do than go " Baaaa !
Baaa ! " at each other instead .
But I guess it would be stupid to underestimate the inanity of people in large numbers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it.
Not entirely a bad idea.
If it serves to hasten the demise of Twitter, it's a great idea.
Maybe the sheeple can go find something more worthwhile to do than go "Baaaa!
Baaa!" at each other instead.
But I guess it would be stupid to underestimate the inanity of people in large numbers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594259</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>dave1791</author>
	<datestamp>1246894020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I made one last year.  At the time, I was following the Silicon Valley VC bloggers because I was thinking of founding a startup.  Those people would not shut up about twitter, so I checked it out.  After my median one tweet (and deciding that the whole VC scene is about navel gazing), I never logged in again and I'm not even sure what my password is anymore.</p><p>But I still get emails about once a week that XYZ is now following me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I made one last year .
At the time , I was following the Silicon Valley VC bloggers because I was thinking of founding a startup .
Those people would not shut up about twitter , so I checked it out .
After my median one tweet ( and deciding that the whole VC scene is about navel gazing ) , I never logged in again and I 'm not even sure what my password is anymore.But I still get emails about once a week that XYZ is now following me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I made one last year.
At the time, I was following the Silicon Valley VC bloggers because I was thinking of founding a startup.
Those people would not shut up about twitter, so I checked it out.
After my median one tweet (and deciding that the whole VC scene is about navel gazing), I never logged in again and I'm not even sure what my password is anymore.But I still get emails about once a week that XYZ is now following me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592927</id>
	<title>Harvard confirms twitter is dying ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246885260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/146975,just-a-few-on-twitter-do-all-the-tweeting---study.aspx" title="itnews.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.itnews.com.au/News/146975,just-a-few-on-twitter-do-all-the-tweeting---study.aspx</a> [itnews.com.au] </p><blockquote><div><p>The Harvard study examined public entries of a randomly selected group of 300,000 Twitter users. The researchers studied in May the content created in the lifetime of the users' Twitter accounts.
</p><p>
It found that <b>10 percent of Twitter users generated more than 90 percent of the content</b>, said Mikolaj Jan Piskorski, who led the research.
</p><p>
More than half of all Twitter users post messages on the site <b>less than once every 74 days</b>.
</p><p>
<b>The median number of lifetime "tweets" per user is just one</b>, according the research.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Twitter gets a lot of hype, but aside from everyone who's doing it in an attempt to cash in one way or another, nothing to see there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.itnews.com.au/News/146975,just-a-few-on-twitter-do-all-the-tweeting---study.aspx [ itnews.com.au ] The Harvard study examined public entries of a randomly selected group of 300,000 Twitter users .
The researchers studied in May the content created in the lifetime of the users ' Twitter accounts .
It found that 10 percent of Twitter users generated more than 90 percent of the content , said Mikolaj Jan Piskorski , who led the research .
More than half of all Twitter users post messages on the site less than once every 74 days .
The median number of lifetime " tweets " per user is just one , according the research .
Twitter gets a lot of hype , but aside from everyone who 's doing it in an attempt to cash in one way or another , nothing to see there .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/146975,just-a-few-on-twitter-do-all-the-tweeting---study.aspx [itnews.com.au] The Harvard study examined public entries of a randomly selected group of 300,000 Twitter users.
The researchers studied in May the content created in the lifetime of the users' Twitter accounts.
It found that 10 percent of Twitter users generated more than 90 percent of the content, said Mikolaj Jan Piskorski, who led the research.
More than half of all Twitter users post messages on the site less than once every 74 days.
The median number of lifetime "tweets" per user is just one, according the research.
Twitter gets a lot of hype, but aside from everyone who's doing it in an attempt to cash in one way or another, nothing to see there ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28595779</id>
	<title>Et Tu Youtube</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246901460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.</p></div> </blockquote><p>And I thought only Hulu were anal about copyright restrictions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions .
And I thought only Hulu were anal about copyright restrictions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
And I thought only Hulu were anal about copyright restrictions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592833</id>
	<title>Not surprised</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1246884180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you manage to gather enough gullible people together in one service, it's inevitable that they are going to be exploited. What, after all, is even the point of twitter if you weren't going to somehow make money off its users?<br> <br>

The twitter audience is ripe for exploitation: not overly bright, slaves to peer pressure, naive, shallow, celebutard-obsessed, narcissistic and self-obsessed. That's pure gold, right there.<br> <br>

It was only a question of time before someone started farming those sheeple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you manage to gather enough gullible people together in one service , it 's inevitable that they are going to be exploited .
What , after all , is even the point of twitter if you were n't going to somehow make money off its users ?
The twitter audience is ripe for exploitation : not overly bright , slaves to peer pressure , naive , shallow , celebutard-obsessed , narcissistic and self-obsessed .
That 's pure gold , right there .
It was only a question of time before someone started farming those sheeple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you manage to gather enough gullible people together in one service, it's inevitable that they are going to be exploited.
What, after all, is even the point of twitter if you weren't going to somehow make money off its users?
The twitter audience is ripe for exploitation: not overly bright, slaves to peer pressure, naive, shallow, celebutard-obsessed, narcissistic and self-obsessed.
That's pure gold, right there.
It was only a question of time before someone started farming those sheeple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592017</id>
	<title>what's use?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246871760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if followed by a huge number of ppl who don't really care much about u, just ignore ur tweets, what's use for the money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if followed by a huge number of ppl who do n't really care much about u , just ignore ur tweets , what 's use for the money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if followed by a huge number of ppl who don't really care much about u, just ignore ur tweets, what's use for the money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592693</id>
	<title>Re:What is this twitter btw?</title>
	<author>SpooForBrains</author>
	<datestamp>1246882740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=twitter" title="lmgtfy.com">Maybe this will help</a> [lmgtfy.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this will help [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this will help [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592717</id>
	<title>Re:a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10</title>
	<author>Exitar</author>
	<datestamp>1246882980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the difference?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the difference ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the difference?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593983</id>
	<title>Twitter Followers/Sockpuppets</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246892340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" uSocial Sells Twitter Followers By the Thousand"</p><p>Its confirmed <a href="http://www.slashdot.org/~twitter" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a> [slashdot.org] has thousands of sockpuppet accounts?  Is usocial going to update the <a href="http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">sock disclosure</a> [slashdot.org] list?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" uSocial Sells Twitter Followers By the Thousand " Its confirmed Twitter [ slashdot.org ] has thousands of sockpuppet accounts ?
Is usocial going to update the sock disclosure [ slashdot.org ] list ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" uSocial Sells Twitter Followers By the Thousand"Its confirmed Twitter [slashdot.org] has thousands of sockpuppet accounts?
Is usocial going to update the sock disclosure [slashdot.org] list?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592021</id>
	<title>okay</title>
	<author>ILongForDarkness</author>
	<datestamp>1246871820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so who's the tool and what's the device?</htmltext>
<tokenext>so who 's the tool and what 's the device ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so who's the tool and what's the device?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592357</id>
	<title>Re:Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246876980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name...</p></div><p>Damnit... *I* wanted to register sl149q!</p><p>You wouldn't consider selling it..?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name...Damnit... * I * wanted to register sl149q ! You would n't consider selling it.. ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't use twitter but signed up just to reserve my name...Damnit... *I* wanted to register sl149q!You wouldn't consider selling it..?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592633</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>John Pfeiffer</author>
	<datestamp>1246881540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I finally gave in and made a twitter account last week, and I already have four followers, none of whom are people I know online or off.  Seems to me you get enough random followers no matter WHAT you do.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;o</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I finally gave in and made a twitter account last week , and I already have four followers , none of whom are people I know online or off .
Seems to me you get enough random followers no matter WHAT you do .
; o</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I finally gave in and made a twitter account last week, and I already have four followers, none of whom are people I know online or off.
Seems to me you get enough random followers no matter WHAT you do.
;o</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592609</id>
	<title>Re:Already get followers that I don't know</title>
	<author>tokyoahead</author>
	<datestamp>1246880820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are trend scouts.<br>They follow everyone who does not tweet at all.<br>They want to be there while you are a twitter-nobody.<br>And then, when you are famous, they can claim "I followed him before his first tweet already!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are trend scouts.They follow everyone who does not tweet at all.They want to be there while you are a twitter-nobody.And then , when you are famous , they can claim " I followed him before his first tweet already !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are trend scouts.They follow everyone who does not tweet at all.They want to be there while you are a twitter-nobody.And then, when you are famous, they can claim "I followed him before his first tweet already!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594173</id>
	<title>Re:a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1246893540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p> According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month.</p></div><p>Dead or alive?</p></div><p>What's the difference?</p></div><p>You get less spam from the dead ones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the firm , a single Twitter follower could be worth $ 0.10 a month.Dead or alive ? What 's the difference ? You get less spam from the dead ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> According to the firm, a single Twitter follower could be worth $0.10 a month.Dead or alive?What's the difference?You get less spam from the dead ones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594499</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1246895460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idiots with money. Isn't it what it's all about? The point is getting people to buy what you tweet about. Having enough followers can be worth money. So with enough followers your tweet can go something like "gee, I'm stuck in LA traffic again. But my new Lexus makes it so much more pleasant." Lexus get also the tweet and sends you $5.00 for the publicity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiots with money .
Is n't it what it 's all about ?
The point is getting people to buy what you tweet about .
Having enough followers can be worth money .
So with enough followers your tweet can go something like " gee , I 'm stuck in LA traffic again .
But my new Lexus makes it so much more pleasant .
" Lexus get also the tweet and sends you $ 5.00 for the publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiots with money.
Isn't it what it's all about?
The point is getting people to buy what you tweet about.
Having enough followers can be worth money.
So with enough followers your tweet can go something like "gee, I'm stuck in LA traffic again.
But my new Lexus makes it so much more pleasant.
" Lexus get also the tweet and sends you $5.00 for the publicity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592375</id>
	<title>i know a guy that will follow you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246877400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heck, I know a guy that will follow you for free! Sure, he peeps in though your windows at night and for the most part he's harmless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I know a guy that will follow you for free !
Sure , he peeps in though your windows at night and for the most part he 's harmless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I know a guy that will follow you for free!
Sure, he peeps in though your windows at night and for the most part he's harmless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841</id>
	<title>What is this twitter btw?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246912620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is actually this twitter thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is actually this twitter thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is actually this twitter thing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593079</id>
	<title>Spam Traps</title>
	<author>MarcLeeT</author>
	<datestamp>1246886580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only solution I thought of was to have spam traps in place over twitter.  If they keep using buzzwords then they can catch the amount of spam and other rubbish that keeps following people.

Marketers are OK but the amount of other rubbish is mortifying.

Hopefully they already have something like this in place?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only solution I thought of was to have spam traps in place over twitter .
If they keep using buzzwords then they can catch the amount of spam and other rubbish that keeps following people .
Marketers are OK but the amount of other rubbish is mortifying .
Hopefully they already have something like this in place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only solution I thought of was to have spam traps in place over twitter.
If they keep using buzzwords then they can catch the amount of spam and other rubbish that keeps following people.
Marketers are OK but the amount of other rubbish is mortifying.
Hopefully they already have something like this in place?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593885</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting business stratagy</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1246891920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I don't get is who came up with this metric that a Twitter follower is worth 10 cents. I just don't believe it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is who came up with this metric that a Twitter follower is worth 10 cents .
I just do n't believe it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is who came up with this metric that a Twitter follower is worth 10 cents.
I just don't believe it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591853</id>
	<title>First Tweet!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246912740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593461</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting business stratagy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246889280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so thats where twitter went!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so thats where twitter went !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so thats where twitter went!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592729</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting business stratagy</title>
	<author>Punto</author>
	<datestamp>1246883160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds</i></p><p>by sharing some of that $.1 they charge with them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feedsby sharing some of that $ .1 they charge with them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feedsby sharing some of that $.1 they charge with them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591997</id>
	<title>What good is it...</title>
	<author>JerryP</author>
	<datestamp>1246871580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to have a thousand chinese goldfarmers following my tweets?</p><p>I can see someone paying money to have followers in a certain target demographics, but only buying followers from the internet at large does not seem to make sense...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to have a thousand chinese goldfarmers following my tweets ? I can see someone paying money to have followers in a certain target demographics , but only buying followers from the internet at large does not seem to make sense.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to have a thousand chinese goldfarmers following my tweets?I can see someone paying money to have followers in a certain target demographics, but only buying followers from the internet at large does not seem to make sense...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592355</id>
	<title>Ugh</title>
	<author>B33RM17</author>
	<datestamp>1246876920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Im sick of twitter and constantly hearing about it cuz its the latest craze or "in" thing...
<br> <br>
I just shudder to think what the next big "social networking experiment" (read as internet craze shit out by idiots whose ideas, while on paper, seem innocent and ambicious, end up causing shit storm sheeple fuck-fests) will be...
<br> <br>
what a waste of server space...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Im sick of twitter and constantly hearing about it cuz its the latest craze or " in " thing.. . I just shudder to think what the next big " social networking experiment " ( read as internet craze shit out by idiots whose ideas , while on paper , seem innocent and ambicious , end up causing shit storm sheeple fuck-fests ) will be.. . what a waste of server space.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im sick of twitter and constantly hearing about it cuz its the latest craze or "in" thing...
 
I just shudder to think what the next big "social networking experiment" (read as internet craze shit out by idiots whose ideas, while on paper, seem innocent and ambicious, end up causing shit storm sheeple fuck-fests) will be...
 
what a waste of server space...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591905</id>
	<title>The true price!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246913580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SO now we know what the current price of a twit is!</p><p>10 cents a month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SO now we know what the current price of a twit is ! 10 cents a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SO now we know what the current price of a twit is!10 cents a month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592055</id>
	<title>And Then..</title>
	<author>upto0013</author>
	<datestamp>1246872240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And then, Candi Nipson the Twitter porn spammer has 100,000 followers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And then , Candi Nipson the Twitter porn spammer has 100,000 followers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then, Candi Nipson the Twitter porn spammer has 100,000 followers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592121</id>
	<title>How will it continue?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. All nerds try to compensate their lack of FB friends by buying fake twitter followers. FB is deserted and closes down.<br>2. uSocial tries to save money &amp; starts to sell all followers to several customers.<br>3. uSocial has to create 50 million fake followers since Kim Jong Il wants that many, but the North Koreans have only 5 PCs.<br>4. All the aforementioned outcasts get investigated by the NSA for their connection to Kim Jong Il, and get send to Gitmo as long as it's still open.<br>5. The US collapses because of the lack of IT personnel and a not properly disinfected telephone.<br>6. Castro takes over Gitmo and makes it the worlds most secure &amp; cheap IT call center.<br>7. India collapses too, because of unemployment.<br>8. China buys India &amp; the US.<br>Better start learning Mandarin!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
All nerds try to compensate their lack of FB friends by buying fake twitter followers .
FB is deserted and closes down.2 .
uSocial tries to save money &amp; starts to sell all followers to several customers.3 .
uSocial has to create 50 million fake followers since Kim Jong Il wants that many , but the North Koreans have only 5 PCs.4 .
All the aforementioned outcasts get investigated by the NSA for their connection to Kim Jong Il , and get send to Gitmo as long as it 's still open.5 .
The US collapses because of the lack of IT personnel and a not properly disinfected telephone.6 .
Castro takes over Gitmo and makes it the worlds most secure &amp; cheap IT call center.7 .
India collapses too , because of unemployment.8 .
China buys India &amp; the US.Better start learning Mandarin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
All nerds try to compensate their lack of FB friends by buying fake twitter followers.
FB is deserted and closes down.2.
uSocial tries to save money &amp; starts to sell all followers to several customers.3.
uSocial has to create 50 million fake followers since Kim Jong Il wants that many, but the North Koreans have only 5 PCs.4.
All the aforementioned outcasts get investigated by the NSA for their connection to Kim Jong Il, and get send to Gitmo as long as it's still open.5.
The US collapses because of the lack of IT personnel and a not properly disinfected telephone.6.
Castro takes over Gitmo and makes it the worlds most secure &amp; cheap IT call center.7.
India collapses too, because of unemployment.8.
China buys India &amp; the US.Better start learning Mandarin!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>onion2k</author>
	<datestamp>1246913220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The service that uSocial are offering is neither an exploit nor a problem. They're not spamming anyone - they're just letting people have access to a pool of people open to "following back" and taking a fee. It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiots, but it's not really anything to worry about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The service that uSocial are offering is neither an exploit nor a problem .
They 're not spamming anyone - they 're just letting people have access to a pool of people open to " following back " and taking a fee .
It 's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who 'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiots , but it 's not really anything to worry about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The service that uSocial are offering is neither an exploit nor a problem.
They're not spamming anyone - they're just letting people have access to a pool of people open to "following back" and taking a fee.
It's a total waste of money buying in because the sort of people who'll follow everyone and care about the number of followers they have are generally idiots, but it's not really anything to worry about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592319</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246876200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No no no, it's like paying people to pretend to be your pretend friend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no , it 's like paying people to pretend to be your pretend friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no, it's like paying people to pretend to be your pretend friend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592087</id>
	<title>yFollow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246872540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uSocial?</p><p>iWon't.</p><p>Burma Shave!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uSocial ? iWo n't.Burma Shave !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uSocial?iWon't.Burma Shave!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591937</id>
	<title>uSocial and Twitter</title>
	<author>Spy Handler</author>
	<datestamp>1246870800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>uDie already... please</htmltext>
<tokenext>uDie already... please</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uDie already... please</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592609
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28601295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28595779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2151220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28595779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593025
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593079
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28593461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28601295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28594499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592207
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591905
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28591997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2151220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2151220.28592319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
