<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_05_1556256</id>
	<title>Unicellular "Enigma" Changes From Predator To Plant and Back</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246816140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>SilverEar writes <i>"Imagine a creature that swims and preys on others, but once it eats a certain kind of plant, that plant grows inside it, causing the predator to <a href="http://bytesizebio.net/index.php/2009/07/04/from-predator-to-plant-in-one-gulp/">lose its ability to prey and start using sunlight</a> to make its food. Its preying mouth is replaced by an eye that is needed to find sunlight. This is the <em>Hatena</em> ('enigma' in Japanese). The kicker: when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>SilverEar writes " Imagine a creature that swims and preys on others , but once it eats a certain kind of plant , that plant grows inside it , causing the predator to lose its ability to prey and start using sunlight to make its food .
Its preying mouth is replaced by an eye that is needed to find sunlight .
This is the Hatena ( 'enigma ' in Japanese ) .
The kicker : when Hatena reproduces , one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye , while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SilverEar writes "Imagine a creature that swims and preys on others, but once it eats a certain kind of plant, that plant grows inside it, causing the predator to lose its ability to prey and start using sunlight to make its food.
Its preying mouth is replaced by an eye that is needed to find sunlight.
This is the Hatena ('enigma' in Japanese).
The kicker: when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596421</id>
	<title>Re:I hate to admit...</title>
	<author>Hillgiant</author>
	<datestamp>1246903980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The eye (or mouth, depending on where it is in the life cycle) is replaced with a tentacle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The eye ( or mouth , depending on where it is in the life cycle ) is replaced with a tentacle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The eye (or mouth, depending on where it is in the life cycle) is replaced with a tentacle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594057</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1246892640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A food that, when eaten, transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....</p><p>Wedding cake.</p></div><p>Passive-aggressive life form you mean.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A food that , when eaten , transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....Wedding cake.Passive-aggressive life form you mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A food that, when eaten, transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....Wedding cake.Passive-aggressive life form you mean.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588341</id>
	<title>Re:Spore</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246785840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd wager that nature has the prior art rights on that one. Another reason why I think patents for genoms are a wee bit silly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd wager that nature has the prior art rights on that one .
Another reason why I think patents for genoms are a wee bit silly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd wager that nature has the prior art rights on that one.
Another reason why I think patents for genoms are a wee bit silly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587559</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246822320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Animals are multicelular eukaryotic. No animal there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Animals are multicelular eukaryotic .
No animal there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Animals are multicelular eukaryotic.
No animal there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28593085</id>
	<title>When one hates haters</title>
	<author>statemachine</author>
	<datestamp>1246886700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's amusing, considering that your argument is a correlation vs. causation argument in itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's amusing , considering that your argument is a correlation vs. causation argument in itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's amusing, considering that your argument is a correlation vs. causation argument in itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589351</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1246796340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder what's stopping the killer baby from eating the parent and the herbivore baby...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what 's stopping the killer baby from eating the parent and the herbivore baby.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what's stopping the killer baby from eating the parent and the herbivore baby...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588265</id>
	<title>I hate to admit...</title>
	<author>hedgemage</author>
	<datestamp>1246785300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But when I read the article summary, one of the first questions on my mind was... How does it interact with Japanese schoolgirls?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But when I read the article summary , one of the first questions on my mind was... How does it interact with Japanese schoolgirls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when I read the article summary, one of the first questions on my mind was... How does it interact with Japanese schoolgirls?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587357</id>
	<title>journal link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246820220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Definitely an interesting result. The original article is published in <i>Science</i>. A free abstract can be found <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/310/5746/287" title="sciencemag.org">here</a> [sciencemag.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Definitely an interesting result .
The original article is published in Science .
A free abstract can be found here [ sciencemag.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Definitely an interesting result.
The original article is published in Science.
A free abstract can be found here [sciencemag.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28609953</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the foundation for a 5-volume fanta</title>
	<author>sbjornda</author>
	<datestamp>1246988640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>1. Mother eats plant 2. Plant grows inside mother 3. Mother morphs 4. Diametrically opposed sons are born 5. Decades of hilarity ensue</i></p> </div><p> &lt;oblig&gt;<br>6. Profit!<br>&lt;/oblig&gt;</p><p>--<br>.nosig</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Mother eats plant 2 .
Plant grows inside mother 3 .
Mother morphs 4 .
Diametrically opposed sons are born 5 .
Decades of hilarity ensue 6 .
Profit ! --.nosig</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 1.
Mother eats plant 2.
Plant grows inside mother 3.
Mother morphs 4.
Diametrically opposed sons are born 5.
Decades of hilarity ensue  6.
Profit!--.nosig
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28615525</id>
	<title>cheap wow gold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246968480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weekends to people<a href="http://www.ig2t.net/" title="ig2t.net" rel="nofollow">ig2t</a> [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day <a href="http://www.wowgold4europe.net/" title="wowgold4europe.net" rel="nofollow">wowgold4europe</a> [wowgold4europe.net] good rest. For example&#239;&#188;OE people <a href="http://www.gameusd.org/" title="gameusd.org" rel="nofollow">gameusd</a> [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get <a href="http://www.meinwowgold.com/" title="meinwowgold.com" rel="nofollow">meinwowgold</a> [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each <a href="http://www.storeingame.net/" title="storeingame.net" rel="nofollow">storeingame</a> [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the <a href="http://www.speebie.org/" title="speebie.org" rel="nofollow">speebie</a> [speebie.org] whole family.<br>Everyone spends <a href="http://www.agamegold.org/" title="agamegold.org" rel="nofollow">agamegold</a> [agamegold.org] weekends in his own<a href="http://www.mmofly.org/" title="mmofly.org" rel="nofollow">mmofly</a> [mmofly.org] way. Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music&#239;&#188;OE reading novels&#239;&#188;OEor watching<a href="http://www.ogeworld.org/" title="ogeworld.org" rel="nofollow">ogeworld</a> [ogeworld.org] films. Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball&#239;&#188;OEwimming or<a href="http://www.mmorpgvip.net/" title="mmorpgvip.net" rel="nofollow">mmorpgvip</a> [mmorpgvip.net] dancing. Different people have different <a href="http://www.gamesavor.net/" title="gamesavor.net" rel="nofollow">gamesavor</a> [gamesavor.net] relaxations.<br>I often spend weekends with<a href="http://www.oggsale.net/" title="oggsale.net" rel="nofollow">oggsale</a> [oggsale.net] my family or my friends. Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends. Sometimes<a href="http://www.gamersell.net/" title="gamersell.net" rel="nofollow">gamersell</a> [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books to<a href="http://www.mmovirtex.net/" title="mmovirtex.net" rel="nofollow">mmovirtex</a> [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge. I also go to see various exhibition to broaden<a href="http://www.rpg-trader.net/" title="rpg-trader.net" rel="nofollow">rpg trader</a> [rpg-trader.net] my vision. An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends. Weekends are always enjoyable for me.<br><a href="http://www.igxe.org/" title="igxe.org" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [igxe.org] <a href="http://www.swagvault.org/" title="swagvault.org" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.org] oforu <a href="http://www.wowgold-usa.org/" title="wowgold-usa.org" rel="nofollow">wowgold-usa</a> [wowgold-usa.org] <a href="http://www.ignmax.org/" title="ignmax.org" rel="nofollow">ignmax</a> [ignmax.org] <a href="http://www.wowgoldlive.net/" title="wowgoldlive.net" rel="nofollow">wowgoldlive</a> [wowgoldlive.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.net/" title="brogame.net" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.net]  <a href="http://www.thsale.org/" title="thsale.org" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.org] <a href="http://www.goldrocku.net/" title="goldrocku.net" rel="nofollow">GoldRockU</a> [goldrocku.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.us/" title="brogame.us" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.us]<br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://www.swagvault.us/" title="swagvault.us" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.us] <a href="http://www.goldsoon.us/" title="goldsoon.us" rel="nofollow">goldsoon</a> [goldsoon.us] <a href="http://www.oforu.us/" title="oforu.us" rel="nofollow">oforu</a> [oforu.us] <a href="http://www.igxe.us/" title="www.igxe.us" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [www.igxe.us] <a href="http://www.thsale.us/" title="thsale.us" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ ig2t.net ] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [ wowgold4europe.net ] good rest .
For example     OE people gameusd [ gameusd.org ] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [ meinwowgold.com ] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [ storeingame.net ] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [ speebie.org ] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [ agamegold.org ] weekends in his ownmmofly [ mmofly.org ] way .
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music     OE reading novels     OEor watchingogeworld [ ogeworld.org ] films .
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball     OEwimming ormmorpgvip [ mmorpgvip.net ] dancing .
Different people have different gamesavor [ gamesavor.net ] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [ oggsale.net ] my family or my friends .
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends .
Sometimesgamersell [ gamersell.net ] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [ mmovirtex.net ] gain much knowledge .
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [ rpg-trader.net ] my vision .
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends .
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [ igxe.org ] swagvault [ swagvault.org ] oforu wowgold-usa [ wowgold-usa.org ] ignmax [ ignmax.org ] wowgoldlive [ wowgoldlive.net ] brogame [ brogame.net ] thsale [ thsale.org ] GoldRockU [ goldrocku.net ] brogame [ brogame.us ]   swagvault [ swagvault.us ] goldsoon [ goldsoon.us ] oforu [ oforu.us ] igxe [ www.igxe.us ] thsale [ thsale.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [wowgold4europe.net] good rest.
For exampleï¼OE people gameusd [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [speebie.org] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [agamegold.org] weekends in his ownmmofly [mmofly.org] way.
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to musicï¼OE reading novelsï¼OEor watchingogeworld [ogeworld.org] films.
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketballï¼OEwimming ormmorpgvip [mmorpgvip.net] dancing.
Different people have different gamesavor [gamesavor.net] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [oggsale.net] my family or my friends.
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends.
Sometimesgamersell [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge.
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [rpg-trader.net] my vision.
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends.
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [igxe.org] swagvault [swagvault.org] oforu wowgold-usa [wowgold-usa.org] ignmax [ignmax.org] wowgoldlive [wowgoldlive.net] brogame [brogame.net]  thsale [thsale.org] GoldRockU [goldrocku.net] brogame [brogame.us]
  swagvault [swagvault.us] goldsoon [goldsoon.us] oforu [oforu.us] igxe [www.igxe.us] thsale [thsale.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588951</id>
	<title>Advantageous Evolutionary trait</title>
	<author>DadLeopard</author>
	<datestamp>1246791480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This  gives the organism the ability to take advantage of any advances in Photosynthesis that the prey has made! Thereby incorporating them in future generations! Like some people I know! Always upgrading to the latest and greatest!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This gives the organism the ability to take advantage of any advances in Photosynthesis that the prey has made !
Thereby incorporating them in future generations !
Like some people I know !
Always upgrading to the latest and greatest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This  gives the organism the ability to take advantage of any advances in Photosynthesis that the prey has made!
Thereby incorporating them in future generations!
Like some people I know!
Always upgrading to the latest and greatest!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28603607</id>
	<title>I've seen that before...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246898160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen similar behavior in humans all the time -- it's called "marriage".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen similar behavior in humans all the time -- it 's called " marriage " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen similar behavior in humans all the time -- it's called "marriage".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325</id>
	<title>PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246820040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Plant or animal! Prepare the soft padded cells.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plant or animal !
Prepare the soft padded cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plant or animal!
Prepare the soft padded cells.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591591</id>
	<title>Re:Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>laejoh</author>
	<datestamp>1246822380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pssst, it's not a bar, it's a restaurant!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pssst , it 's not a bar , it 's a restaurant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pssst, it's not a bar, it's a restaurant!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587995</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>Nocturnal Deviant</author>
	<datestamp>1246826400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You sir are lucky...my wife only has the predator aspect...and shes usually preying on my wallet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You sir are lucky...my wife only has the predator aspect...and shes usually preying on my wallet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sir are lucky...my wife only has the predator aspect...and shes usually preying on my wallet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583</id>
	<title>What happens when chloroplasts are removed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246822620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Biology is full of promoter-inhibitor relationships, and this seems like an interesting one.  When the algae is inside the protist, the host's "animal" behaviors and anatomy are suppressed, but they clearly remain in a latent state, ready to reactivate after fission.  It makes one wonder to what extent chloroplasts remain as endosymbionts versus organelles in genuine plant species.  So . . .<br>. . .<br>Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture, to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking state?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Biology is full of promoter-inhibitor relationships , and this seems like an interesting one .
When the algae is inside the protist , the host 's " animal " behaviors and anatomy are suppressed , but they clearly remain in a latent state , ready to reactivate after fission .
It makes one wonder to what extent chloroplasts remain as endosymbionts versus organelles in genuine plant species .
So .
. .. . .Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture , to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking state ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Biology is full of promoter-inhibitor relationships, and this seems like an interesting one.
When the algae is inside the protist, the host's "animal" behaviors and anatomy are suppressed, but they clearly remain in a latent state, ready to reactivate after fission.
It makes one wonder to what extent chloroplasts remain as endosymbionts versus organelles in genuine plant species.
So .
. .. . .Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture, to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking state?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589435</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1246797240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation.</i></p><p>A statement which is misused far more often than it is used correctly.</p><p><i>Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related.</i></p><p>You and every other human being on Earth, regardless of hair color, are far more closely related than 99.9999...(some very large number of 9's)\% of living organisms.</p><p><i>At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.</i></p><p>Ah, now you play your hand.  You're deliberately ignorant of scientific vocabulary, and of the way science is done; probably a creationist and climate change denialist to boot.  Tell you what, why don't you educate yourself on the meanings of the words "hypothesis," "theory," and "fact" -- and why you will pretty much never hear any scientific result described with that last -- and come back when you're ready to play in the big kids' sandbox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation.A statement which is misused far more often than it is used correctly.Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities does n't mean both of us are related.You and every other human being on Earth , regardless of hair color , are far more closely related than 99.9999... ( some very large number of 9 's ) \ % of living organisms.At least they called it a " hypothesis " instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.Ah , now you play your hand .
You 're deliberately ignorant of scientific vocabulary , and of the way science is done ; probably a creationist and climate change denialist to boot .
Tell you what , why do n't you educate yourself on the meanings of the words " hypothesis , " " theory , " and " fact " -- and why you will pretty much never hear any scientific result described with that last -- and come back when you 're ready to play in the big kids ' sandbox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation.A statement which is misused far more often than it is used correctly.Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related.You and every other human being on Earth, regardless of hair color, are far more closely related than 99.9999...(some very large number of 9's)\% of living organisms.At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.Ah, now you play your hand.
You're deliberately ignorant of scientific vocabulary, and of the way science is done; probably a creationist and climate change denialist to boot.
Tell you what, why don't you educate yourself on the meanings of the words "hypothesis," "theory," and "fact" -- and why you will pretty much never hear any scientific result described with that last -- and come back when you're ready to play in the big kids' sandbox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592995</id>
	<title>why is this different than most corals?</title>
	<author>Uzik2</author>
	<datestamp>1246885800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A large number of your average corals on the reef do this daily. They both capture plankton and use symbiosis with photosynthetic algae in their bodies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A large number of your average corals on the reef do this daily .
They both capture plankton and use symbiosis with photosynthetic algae in their bodies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A large number of your average corals on the reef do this daily.
They both capture plankton and use symbiosis with photosynthetic algae in their bodies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355</id>
	<title>Interesting find...</title>
	<author>glitch23</author>
	<datestamp>1246820220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to say the least, however:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The endosymbiotic hypothesis maintains that eukaryotes evolved from  symbiotic interactions between bacteria. There is plenty of evidence for that in  chloroplasts and mitochondria: they have their own DNA; their membranes, their DNA,  their ribosomes all resemble those of bacteria.</p></div><p>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation. Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related. At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>to say the least , however : The endosymbiotic hypothesis maintains that eukaryotes evolved from symbiotic interactions between bacteria .
There is plenty of evidence for that in chloroplasts and mitochondria : they have their own DNA ; their membranes , their DNA , their ribosomes all resemble those of bacteria.This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation .
Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities does n't mean both of us are related .
At least they called it a " hypothesis " instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to say the least, however:The endosymbiotic hypothesis maintains that eukaryotes evolved from  symbiotic interactions between bacteria.
There is plenty of evidence for that in  chloroplasts and mitochondria: they have their own DNA; their membranes, their DNA,  their ribosomes all resemble those of bacteria.This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation.
Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related.
At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588263</id>
	<title>Re:What happens when chloroplasts are removed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246785300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't happen -- they're endosymbionts. Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells can't function -- no electron transport chain. That's why people with mitochondrial myopathy are sick, as their mitochondria don't work properly so they don't make enough ATP.<br>The chloroplasts/mitochondria have outsourced  amino acid production (among other things), so without the host, they can't survive.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't happen -- they 're endosymbionts .
Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells ca n't function -- no electron transport chain .
That 's why people with mitochondrial myopathy are sick , as their mitochondria do n't work properly so they do n't make enough ATP.The chloroplasts/mitochondria have outsourced amino acid production ( among other things ) , so without the host , they ca n't survive .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't happen -- they're endosymbionts.
Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells can't function -- no electron transport chain.
That's why people with mitochondrial myopathy are sick, as their mitochondria don't work properly so they don't make enough ATP.The chloroplasts/mitochondria have outsourced  amino acid production (among other things), so without the host, they can't survive.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591361</id>
	<title>Seen it before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246819560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is old new. I'm pretty sure one of these was discovered in around 1998 by Professor Oak. It's called a bulbasaur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is old new .
I 'm pretty sure one of these was discovered in around 1998 by Professor Oak .
It 's called a bulbasaur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is old new.
I'm pretty sure one of these was discovered in around 1998 by Professor Oak.
It's called a bulbasaur.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587629</id>
	<title>Google text cache</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:http://bytesizebio.net/index.php/2009/07/04/from-predator-to-plant-in-one-gulp/&amp;hl=en&amp;strip=1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //74.125.155.132/search ? q = cache : http : //bytesizebio.net/index.php/2009/07/04/from-predator-to-plant-in-one-gulp/&amp;hl = en&amp;strip = 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:http://bytesizebio.net/index.php/2009/07/04/from-predator-to-plant-in-one-gulp/&amp;hl=en&amp;strip=1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587637</id>
	<title>Spore</title>
	<author>asCii88</author>
	<datestamp>1246823160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean EA can sue nature due to copyright infringement?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean EA can sue nature due to copyright infringement ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean EA can sue nature due to copyright infringement?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587927</id>
	<title>Re:Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246825860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, you haven't seen the platypus?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you have n't seen the platypus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you haven't seen the platypus?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588581</id>
	<title>Gives a whole new meaning to...</title>
	<author>Randwulf</author>
	<datestamp>1246788060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are what you eat!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are what you eat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are what you eat!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467</id>
	<title>Is this your blog?</title>
	<author>caseih</author>
	<datestamp>1246821540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While this is extremely interesting, we need a link to the actual journal article, or to some source material, not just a link to a blog.  Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is extremely interesting , we need a link to the actual journal article , or to some source material , not just a link to a blog .
Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this is extremely interesting, we need a link to the actual journal article, or to some source material, not just a link to a blog.
Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587417</id>
	<title>Don't Tell PETA!</title>
	<author>Comatose51</author>
	<datestamp>1246820940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If PETA finds out about this, we will all have a third eye and no mouth!  You might think that's a good thing because most of what comes out of our mouths is garbage anyways.  Then you realize people can still Twitter with no mouth!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If PETA finds out about this , we will all have a third eye and no mouth !
You might think that 's a good thing because most of what comes out of our mouths is garbage anyways .
Then you realize people can still Twitter with no mouth !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If PETA finds out about this, we will all have a third eye and no mouth!
You might think that's a good thing because most of what comes out of our mouths is garbage anyways.
Then you realize people can still Twitter with no mouth!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596105</id>
	<title>Re:Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246902720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do n't you know there ai n't no devil , there 's just God when he 's drunk .
" - Tom Waits</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk.
" - Tom Waits</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588779</id>
	<title>So... plants evolved from predators?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246789980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I'm missing something, but this whole field of evolution by combination (ingestion) appears to be really underdeveloped. It's obvious in the case of mitochondriae and chloroplasts. But where did other organelles come from? Is it conceivable that they too were autonomous life forms at one point? What about our blood cells? What about our organs? Why are evolutionists still trying to explain everything by mutation, selection and reproduction, when the "tree of life" doesn't look so tree-shaped any more? To me it looks more like a DAG, to say the least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm missing something , but this whole field of evolution by combination ( ingestion ) appears to be really underdeveloped .
It 's obvious in the case of mitochondriae and chloroplasts .
But where did other organelles come from ?
Is it conceivable that they too were autonomous life forms at one point ?
What about our blood cells ?
What about our organs ?
Why are evolutionists still trying to explain everything by mutation , selection and reproduction , when the " tree of life " does n't look so tree-shaped any more ?
To me it looks more like a DAG , to say the least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm missing something, but this whole field of evolution by combination (ingestion) appears to be really underdeveloped.
It's obvious in the case of mitochondriae and chloroplasts.
But where did other organelles come from?
Is it conceivable that they too were autonomous life forms at one point?
What about our blood cells?
What about our organs?
Why are evolutionists still trying to explain everything by mutation, selection and reproduction, when the "tree of life" doesn't look so tree-shaped any more?
To me it looks more like a DAG, to say the least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589369</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246796520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Creationists will be even more confused.  If God made everything according to its kind, where does this one fit in?</p><p>Not really joking.  Modern creationism with its false "microevolution/macroevolution" dichotomy rests on the idea that there are specific boundaries outside which "kinds" of organisms can't go.  Organisms like this one show how inane that argument is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Creationists will be even more confused .
If God made everything according to its kind , where does this one fit in ? Not really joking .
Modern creationism with its false " microevolution/macroevolution " dichotomy rests on the idea that there are specific boundaries outside which " kinds " of organisms ca n't go .
Organisms like this one show how inane that argument is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creationists will be even more confused.
If God made everything according to its kind, where does this one fit in?Not really joking.
Modern creationism with its false "microevolution/macroevolution" dichotomy rests on the idea that there are specific boundaries outside which "kinds" of organisms can't go.
Organisms like this one show how inane that argument is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587685</id>
	<title>Twist on the article</title>
	<author>VampireByte</author>
	<datestamp>1246823700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine a blogger that submits its link to slashdot, but once it appears there, that blog can no longer serve pages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a blogger that submits its link to slashdot , but once it appears there , that blog can no longer serve pages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a blogger that submits its link to slashdot, but once it appears there, that blog can no longer serve pages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587451</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.</i>
<br> <br>
You say this as though "hypothesis" were some kind of weasel word, as though they actually <i>do</i> consider it a fact but are just calling it something else to avoid criticism.
<br> <br>
Did it ever occur to you that this is precisely what a hypothesis <i>is</i>, and that the correlation =/= causation thing is the very <i>reason</i> that it is considered a hypothesis? I'm sure that these biologists have some vague idea what they're doing. If they thought that they had hard and fast proof they'd be moving this on to the "theory" stage. The very fact that they call it a hypothesis means that they agree with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they called it a " hypothesis " instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact .
You say this as though " hypothesis " were some kind of weasel word , as though they actually do consider it a fact but are just calling it something else to avoid criticism .
Did it ever occur to you that this is precisely what a hypothesis is , and that the correlation = / = causation thing is the very reason that it is considered a hypothesis ?
I 'm sure that these biologists have some vague idea what they 're doing .
If they thought that they had hard and fast proof they 'd be moving this on to the " theory " stage .
The very fact that they call it a hypothesis means that they agree with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.
You say this as though "hypothesis" were some kind of weasel word, as though they actually do consider it a fact but are just calling it something else to avoid criticism.
Did it ever occur to you that this is precisely what a hypothesis is, and that the correlation =/= causation thing is the very reason that it is considered a hypothesis?
I'm sure that these biologists have some vague idea what they're doing.
If they thought that they had hard and fast proof they'd be moving this on to the "theory" stage.
The very fact that they call it a hypothesis means that they agree with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587529</id>
	<title>Sounds like the Bee Flower</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246822020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bees and flowers are the same life form, right?  Can one exist without the other?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bees and flowers are the same life form , right ?
Can one exist without the other ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bees and flowers are the same life form, right?
Can one exist without the other?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587675</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually once this cell totally integrates this endosymbiotic lifeform (the next step) it might very well become eukaryotic. Ironically that would make it an eukaryotic plant, which would presumably very easily evolve back into a predator.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth."</p></div><p>The explanation is simple : cell division in the parent organism does not trigger cell division in the endosymbiotic lifeform. That endosymbiotic lifeform might very well be thought of as an infection.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually once this cell totally integrates this endosymbiotic lifeform ( the next step ) it might very well become eukaryotic .
Ironically that would make it an eukaryotic plant , which would presumably very easily evolve back into a predator.when Hatena reproduces , one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye , while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth .
" The explanation is simple : cell division in the parent organism does not trigger cell division in the endosymbiotic lifeform .
That endosymbiotic lifeform might very well be thought of as an infection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually once this cell totally integrates this endosymbiotic lifeform (the next step) it might very well become eukaryotic.
Ironically that would make it an eukaryotic plant, which would presumably very easily evolve back into a predator.when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth.
"The explanation is simple : cell division in the parent organism does not trigger cell division in the endosymbiotic lifeform.
That endosymbiotic lifeform might very well be thought of as an infection.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589733</id>
	<title>OT, but just FYI</title>
	<author>Shin-LaC</author>
	<datestamp>1246800780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Hatena" doesn't really mean "enigma". It's actually an interjection, and a more accurate translation would be something like "Weird!" or "Oh man!".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hatena " does n't really mean " enigma " .
It 's actually an interjection , and a more accurate translation would be something like " Weird !
" or " Oh man !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hatena" doesn't really mean "enigma".
It's actually an interjection, and a more accurate translation would be something like "Weird!
" or "Oh man!
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590857</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>beckett</author>
	<datestamp>1246814820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so at least you can bang her sun bathing sister, rite?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so at least you can bang her sun bathing sister , rite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so at least you can bang her sun bathing sister, rite?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1246798020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot, I want to smack them.</i></p><p><i>I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis, because suggesting causation would just encourage them.</i></p><p>Sing it, brother!</p><p>It's a kind of pseudo-intellectual argument which is, unfortunately, very appealing to geeks.  Stupid, ignorant people are prone to assuming that correlation <b>always</b> implies causation (even if they don't know to put it in those words) and drawing conclusions that reasonably intelligent, slightly less ignorant people can clearly see are false.  So at some point they read a Philosophy 101 list of logical fallacies on the web, come across "correlation does not imply causation," and think, "Ah hah!  That explains what all those stupid people are doing!"  At which point it becomes the proverbial hammer for which every problem is a nail.</p><p>...</p><p>In case it isn't clear:  correlation, when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance, is the <b>only way</b> we have to establish causation in the natural world.  It is exactly how every accepted scientific "fact" (i.e., theory, which is as close to fact as science can ever get) was established.  Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation so significant that nobody seriously expects it to turn out the be an artifact.  And that's all we've got.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot , I want to smack them.I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis , because suggesting causation would just encourage them.Sing it , brother ! It 's a kind of pseudo-intellectual argument which is , unfortunately , very appealing to geeks .
Stupid , ignorant people are prone to assuming that correlation always implies causation ( even if they do n't know to put it in those words ) and drawing conclusions that reasonably intelligent , slightly less ignorant people can clearly see are false .
So at some point they read a Philosophy 101 list of logical fallacies on the web , come across " correlation does not imply causation , " and think , " Ah hah !
That explains what all those stupid people are doing !
" At which point it becomes the proverbial hammer for which every problem is a nail....In case it is n't clear : correlation , when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance , is the only way we have to establish causation in the natural world .
It is exactly how every accepted scientific " fact " ( i.e. , theory , which is as close to fact as science can ever get ) was established .
Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation so significant that nobody seriously expects it to turn out the be an artifact .
And that 's all we 've got .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot, I want to smack them.I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis, because suggesting causation would just encourage them.Sing it, brother!It's a kind of pseudo-intellectual argument which is, unfortunately, very appealing to geeks.
Stupid, ignorant people are prone to assuming that correlation always implies causation (even if they don't know to put it in those words) and drawing conclusions that reasonably intelligent, slightly less ignorant people can clearly see are false.
So at some point they read a Philosophy 101 list of logical fallacies on the web, come across "correlation does not imply causation," and think, "Ah hah!
That explains what all those stupid people are doing!
"  At which point it becomes the proverbial hammer for which every problem is a nail....In case it isn't clear:  correlation, when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance, is the only way we have to establish causation in the natural world.
It is exactly how every accepted scientific "fact" (i.e., theory, which is as close to fact as science can ever get) was established.
Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation so significant that nobody seriously expects it to turn out the be an artifact.
And that's all we've got.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587791</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246824840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how biased Slashdotters are.  They're ALL Democrats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how biased Slashdotters are .
They 're ALL Democrats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how biased Slashdotters are.
They're ALL Democrats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587677</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587499</id>
	<title>Memeaholic</title>
	<author>senorpoco</author>
	<datestamp>1246821780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new single celled predatory overlords, but deride their single celled hippy photosynthesizing cousins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new single celled predatory overlords , but deride their single celled hippy photosynthesizing cousins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new single celled predatory overlords, but deride their single celled hippy photosynthesizing cousins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587445</id>
	<title>Sounds like the foundation for a 5-volume fantasy</title>
	<author>olsmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1246821180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>1.  Mother eats plant
2.  Plant grows inside mother
3.  Mother morphs
4.  Diametrically opposed sons are born
5.  Decades of hilarity ensue</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Mother eats plant 2 .
Plant grows inside mother 3 .
Mother morphs 4 .
Diametrically opposed sons are born 5 .
Decades of hilarity ensue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Mother eats plant
2.
Plant grows inside mother
3.
Mother morphs
4.
Diametrically opposed sons are born
5.
Decades of hilarity ensue</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588285</id>
	<title>Re:journal link</title>
	<author>funkatron</author>
	<datestamp>1246785360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about the full article???</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the full article ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the full article??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587357</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592901</id>
	<title>Time dependence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246885020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can always get around the correlation !=&gt; causation or whatever by showing time dependence. So not *everything* depends on blind adherence to correlation... or at least it shouldn't...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can always get around the correlation ! = &gt; causation or whatever by showing time dependence .
So not * everything * depends on blind adherence to correlation... or at least it should n't.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can always get around the correlation !=&gt; causation or whatever by showing time dependence.
So not *everything* depends on blind adherence to correlation... or at least it shouldn't...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421</id>
	<title>Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is your creator deity...  And this is your creator deity on drugs.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is your creator deity... And this is your creator deity on drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is your creator deity...  And this is your creator deity on drugs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587475</id>
	<title>Why does this sound so familiar?</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1246821660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hrm, one sibling is conniving and aggressive; and the other prefers to be left to its own devices. Sounds just like humans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hrm , one sibling is conniving and aggressive ; and the other prefers to be left to its own devices .
Sounds just like humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hrm, one sibling is conniving and aggressive; and the other prefers to be left to its own devices.
Sounds just like humans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587635</id>
	<title>Hetena's Picture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>here: <a href="http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/cbs/home1.html" title="tsukuba.ac.jp" rel="nofollow">http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/cbs/home1.html</a> [tsukuba.ac.jp]</htmltext>
<tokenext>here : http : //www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/cbs/home1.html [ tsukuba.ac.jp ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here: http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/cbs/home1.html [tsukuba.ac.jp]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594299</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>mooingyak</author>
	<datestamp>1246894260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In case it isn't clear: correlation, when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance, is the <b>only way</b> we have to establish causation in the natural world. It is exactly how every accepted scientific "fact" (i.e., theory, which is as close to fact as science can ever get) was established.</p></div><p>Just because correlation has a high correlation with causation does not mean that correlation is causation.  Have you considered that some factor other than correlation may be contributing to the causation?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In case it is n't clear : correlation , when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance , is the only way we have to establish causation in the natural world .
It is exactly how every accepted scientific " fact " ( i.e. , theory , which is as close to fact as science can ever get ) was established.Just because correlation has a high correlation with causation does not mean that correlation is causation .
Have you considered that some factor other than correlation may be contributing to the causation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case it isn't clear: correlation, when calculated to account for confounding factors and observed enough to establish significance, is the only way we have to establish causation in the natural world.
It is exactly how every accepted scientific "fact" (i.e., theory, which is as close to fact as science can ever get) was established.Just because correlation has a high correlation with causation does not mean that correlation is causation.
Have you considered that some factor other than correlation may be contributing to the causation?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592391</id>
	<title>Meh....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246877520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a unicellular organism, even if it's a eukaryote, so it's not very surprising that this would happen. Prokaryotes, which are unicellular but simpler than eukaryotes, have this happen to them a lot with horizontal gene transfer.</p><p>Good Show!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a unicellular organism , even if it 's a eukaryote , so it 's not very surprising that this would happen .
Prokaryotes , which are unicellular but simpler than eukaryotes , have this happen to them a lot with horizontal gene transfer.Good Show ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a unicellular organism, even if it's a eukaryote, so it's not very surprising that this would happen.
Prokaryotes, which are unicellular but simpler than eukaryotes, have this happen to them a lot with horizontal gene transfer.Good Show!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot, I want to smack them.</p><p>I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis, because suggesting causation would just encourage them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot , I want to smack them.I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis , because suggesting causation would just encourage them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time someone posts a stupid correlation versus causation argument on Slashdot, I want to smack them.I call this the violence-inducing-argument hypothesis, because suggesting causation would just encourage them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589011</id>
	<title>Food</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1246792020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After ingesting the algae, this mouth disappears. Instead, it is replaced by an eyespot from the algae. The eyespot is a light sensing organelle, a very primitive eye that guides algae to light sources. In this case, it also guides the host, Hatena, to light. Hatena has obvioulsy stopped feeding, and least through its mouth. It is now swimming to the light, letting the alga photosynthesize its food for both of them.</p></div><p>Doesn't that quality the hatena as a parasite?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After ingesting the algae , this mouth disappears .
Instead , it is replaced by an eyespot from the algae .
The eyespot is a light sensing organelle , a very primitive eye that guides algae to light sources .
In this case , it also guides the host , Hatena , to light .
Hatena has obvioulsy stopped feeding , and least through its mouth .
It is now swimming to the light , letting the alga photosynthesize its food for both of them.Does n't that quality the hatena as a parasite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After ingesting the algae, this mouth disappears.
Instead, it is replaced by an eyespot from the algae.
The eyespot is a light sensing organelle, a very primitive eye that guides algae to light sources.
In this case, it also guides the host, Hatena, to light.
Hatena has obvioulsy stopped feeding, and least through its mouth.
It is now swimming to the light, letting the alga photosynthesize its food for both of them.Doesn't that quality the hatena as a parasite?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600369</id>
	<title>Re:What happens when chloroplasts are removed?</title>
	<author>jeff4747</author>
	<datestamp>1246878000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture, to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking state</p></div></blockquote><p>This pretty much already happens in all plants, in the roots.  While chloroplasts are technically present, they are inactive since there's no light.  The cells survive by eating sugar produced by the other parts of the plant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture , to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking stateThis pretty much already happens in all plants , in the roots .
While chloroplasts are technically present , they are inactive since there 's no light .
The cells survive by eating sugar produced by the other parts of the plant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know of any research where chloroplasts were removed from plant cells in culture, to see if the remaining cells revert to some atavistic animal-like exogenous-food-seeking stateThis pretty much already happens in all plants, in the roots.
While chloroplasts are technically present, they are inactive since there's no light.
The cells survive by eating sugar produced by the other parts of the plant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600337</id>
	<title>Re:What happens when chloroplasts are removed?</title>
	<author>jeff4747</author>
	<datestamp>1246877880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells can't function -- no electron transport chain</p></div></blockquote><p>Incorrect.  Plant cells have both chloroplasts and mitochondria.  Removal/inactivation of the chloroplasts wouldn't kill the cell as long as it was supplied with food for the mitochondria.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells ca n't function -- no electron transport chainIncorrect .
Plant cells have both chloroplasts and mitochondria .
Removal/inactivation of the chloroplasts would n't kill the cell as long as it was supplied with food for the mitochondria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without chloroplasts/mitochondria regular plant/animal cells can't function -- no electron transport chainIncorrect.
Plant cells have both chloroplasts and mitochondria.
Removal/inactivation of the chloroplasts wouldn't kill the cell as long as it was supplied with food for the mitochondria.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28603367</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246896360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the record, you only hear from the overly loud, obnoxious, and self righteous ones. Kind of like any bad representation of a group of people. Or, at least, that's how it is in this case. The noticeable aren't usually representation of the majority. The same goes for the religious. You only hear from the crazies, not the humble, society-serving ones that will travel all over the world, spending every dime to help another human being out that needs it.</p><p>Anybody who makes generalizations based on political, religious, or philosophical point of views is just as big of a close-minded, bigoted fool as the people they accuse of the same thing.</p><p>It's easy to criminalize people who don't agree with you when you're surrounded by more of you. It's cowardly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the record , you only hear from the overly loud , obnoxious , and self righteous ones .
Kind of like any bad representation of a group of people .
Or , at least , that 's how it is in this case .
The noticeable are n't usually representation of the majority .
The same goes for the religious .
You only hear from the crazies , not the humble , society-serving ones that will travel all over the world , spending every dime to help another human being out that needs it.Anybody who makes generalizations based on political , religious , or philosophical point of views is just as big of a close-minded , bigoted fool as the people they accuse of the same thing.It 's easy to criminalize people who do n't agree with you when you 're surrounded by more of you .
It 's cowardly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the record, you only hear from the overly loud, obnoxious, and self righteous ones.
Kind of like any bad representation of a group of people.
Or, at least, that's how it is in this case.
The noticeable aren't usually representation of the majority.
The same goes for the religious.
You only hear from the crazies, not the humble, society-serving ones that will travel all over the world, spending every dime to help another human being out that needs it.Anybody who makes generalizations based on political, religious, or philosophical point of views is just as big of a close-minded, bigoted fool as the people they accuse of the same thing.It's easy to criminalize people who don't agree with you when you're surrounded by more of you.
It's cowardly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588329</id>
	<title>first po4st?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246785720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>w,asn't 0n Steve's FreeBSD project,</htmltext>
<tokenext>w,as n't 0n Steve 's FreeBSD project,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>w,asn't 0n Steve's FreeBSD project,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587487</id>
	<title>Cordyceps</title>
	<author>natmakarvitch</author>
	<datestamp>1246821780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordyceps\_sinensis" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordyceps\_sinensis</a> [wikipedia.org] , albeit multicellular, is also somewhat astonishing</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordyceps \ _sinensis [ wikipedia.org ] , albeit multicellular , is also somewhat astonishing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordyceps\_sinensis [wikipedia.org] , albeit multicellular, is also somewhat astonishing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587923</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>haifastudent</author>
	<datestamp>1246825800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sound like my wife</p></div><p>What's my father in law doing browsing Slashdot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sound like my wifeWhat 's my father in law doing browsing Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sound like my wifeWhat's my father in law doing browsing Slashdot?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590649</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246812180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A food that, when eaten, transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....</p><p>Wedding cake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A food that , when eaten , transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....Wedding cake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A food that, when eaten, transforms an agressive predator into a passive life form....Wedding cake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590789</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1246814040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a bacteria with a parasite that radically alters the host's "body" chemistry, and one of the daughter cells will inherit the parasite. And I presume that daughter cell will spawn a similar pair at the next mitosis division. I see no changing of species here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bacteria with a parasite that radically alters the host 's " body " chemistry , and one of the daughter cells will inherit the parasite .
And I presume that daughter cell will spawn a similar pair at the next mitosis division .
I see no changing of species here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bacteria with a parasite that radically alters the host's "body" chemistry, and one of the daughter cells will inherit the parasite.
And I presume that daughter cell will spawn a similar pair at the next mitosis division.
I see no changing of species here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589369</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591805</id>
	<title>Re:Is this your blog?</title>
	<author>Shipud</author>
	<datestamp>1246912080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While this is extremely interesting, we need a link to the actual journal article, or to some source material, not just a link to a blog.  Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues.</p></div><p>1) The blog has no ads
2) The links to the original article are in the end of the post
3) How do you expect to understand an article in a scientific journal, when your reading skills are so obviously lacking as to not notice (1) and (2)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is extremely interesting , we need a link to the actual journal article , or to some source material , not just a link to a blog .
Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues.1 ) The blog has no ads 2 ) The links to the original article are in the end of the post 3 ) How do you expect to understand an article in a scientific journal , when your reading skills are so obviously lacking as to not notice ( 1 ) and ( 2 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this is extremely interesting, we need a link to the actual journal article, or to some source material, not just a link to a blog.
Without that we can only assume this is an attempt to turf slashdot to drive traffic to your blog and generate ad revenues.1) The blog has no ads
2) The links to the original article are in the end of the post
3) How do you expect to understand an article in a scientific journal, when your reading skills are so obviously lacking as to not notice (1) and (2)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591687</id>
	<title>I don't think it's especially weird.</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1246823700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's very interesting, nonetheless. The real question is: Does the plant tame the predator, or does the predator domesticate the plant?

Btw, no one tagged this story "symbiosis"? I can't seem to tag stories.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's very interesting , nonetheless .
The real question is : Does the plant tame the predator , or does the predator domesticate the plant ?
Btw , no one tagged this story " symbiosis " ?
I ca n't seem to tag stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's very interesting, nonetheless.
The real question is: Does the plant tame the predator, or does the predator domesticate the plant?
Btw, no one tagged this story "symbiosis"?
I can't seem to tag stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587979</id>
	<title>Re:Is this your blog?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246826340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/310/5746/287" title="sciencemag.org" rel="nofollow">Here you go.</a> [sciencemag.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here you go .
[ sciencemag.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here you go.
[sciencemag.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587709</id>
	<title>Re:Is this your blog?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The blog contains two citations as endnotes:<p><div class="quote"><p>Okamoto, N. (2005). A Secondary Symbiosis in Progress? Science, 310 (5746), 287-287 DOI: 10.1126/science.1116125

OKAMOTO, N., &amp; INOUYE, I. (2006). Hatena arenicola gen. et sp. nov., a Katablepharid Undergoing Probable Plastid Acquisition Protist, 157 (4), 401-419 DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.05.011</p></div><p>Also, whereas blogs are freely-available, you need a subscription to read the journal article -- so I think that the way this was done is the best way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The blog contains two citations as endnotes : Okamoto , N. ( 2005 ) . A Secondary Symbiosis in Progress ?
Science , 310 ( 5746 ) , 287-287 DOI : 10.1126/science.1116125 OKAMOTO , N. , &amp; INOUYE , I .
( 2006 ) . Hatena arenicola gen. et sp .
nov. , a Katablepharid Undergoing Probable Plastid Acquisition Protist , 157 ( 4 ) , 401-419 DOI : 10.1016/j.protis.2006.05.011Also , whereas blogs are freely-available , you need a subscription to read the journal article -- so I think that the way this was done is the best way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The blog contains two citations as endnotes:Okamoto, N. (2005). A Secondary Symbiosis in Progress?
Science, 310 (5746), 287-287 DOI: 10.1126/science.1116125

OKAMOTO, N., &amp; INOUYE, I.
(2006). Hatena arenicola gen. et sp.
nov., a Katablepharid Undergoing Probable Plastid Acquisition Protist, 157 (4), 401-419 DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.05.011Also, whereas blogs are freely-available, you need a subscription to read the journal article -- so I think that the way this was done is the best way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587321</id>
	<title>POST YOUR NIGGER JOKES HERE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246819980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reply and post a good nigger joke.  Ooo Ooo I got one!
<br> <br>
How come police dogs keep licking their asses?  To get the taste of NIGGER out of their mouths!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reply and post a good nigger joke .
Ooo Ooo I got one !
How come police dogs keep licking their asses ?
To get the taste of NIGGER out of their mouths !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reply and post a good nigger joke.
Ooo Ooo I got one!
How come police dogs keep licking their asses?
To get the taste of NIGGER out of their mouths!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587623</id>
	<title>You gotta be fucking kidding me...</title>
	<author>lbalbalba</author>
	<datestamp>1246823040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... as Palmer (David Clennon) says in John Carpenters The Thing (1982), as Norris' head grows legs and tries to walk away<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... as Palmer ( David Clennon ) says in John Carpenters The Thing ( 1982 ) , as Norris ' head grows legs and tries to walk away .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... as Palmer (David Clennon) says in John Carpenters The Thing (1982), as Norris' head grows legs and tries to walk away ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587521</id>
	<title>The end is nigh</title>
	<author>nih</author>
	<datestamp>1246821960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The creature has mutated again and shut down the webserver!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The creature has mutated again and shut down the webserver !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The creature has mutated again and shut down the webserver!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588791</id>
	<title>Re:Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1246790040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which somehow brings us to <a href="http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip\_id=199" title="vgcats.com">Spore.</a> [vgcats.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which somehow brings us to Spore .
[ vgcats.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which somehow brings us to Spore.
[vgcats.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425</id>
	<title>Ugh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The kicker: when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth.</i> <br> <br>Sound like my wife</htmltext>
<tokenext>The kicker : when Hatena reproduces , one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye , while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth .
Sound like my wife</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The kicker: when Hatena reproduces, one offspring is a peaceful photosynthesizer with the sun-seeking eye, while the other is yet again a predator with a voracious mouth.
Sound like my wife</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589507</id>
	<title>Whoa</title>
	<author>dristoph</author>
	<datestamp>1246798080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This should totally be a creature spell for Magic: The Gathering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should totally be a creature spell for Magic : The Gathering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should totally be a creature spell for Magic: The Gathering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587677</id>
	<title>Re:PETA will be confused</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246823640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>         This thing sounds worse than a Republican to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing sounds worse than a Republican to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>         This thing sounds worse than a Republican to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587809</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246824960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation. Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related. At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.</p></div><p>0) The claim of relatedness is based on a rigorous mathematical theory based on the theory of common descent, graph theory and Levenshtein distance. No competent mathematician in the world objects to these methods.</p><p>1) Slashbots are fucking retarded on the subject of statistics, and cannot wrap their puny minds around the concept of Bayesian inference. You better believe correlation God damn CAN show causation in some cases.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation .
Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities does n't mean both of us are related .
At least they called it a " hypothesis " instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.0 ) The claim of relatedness is based on a rigorous mathematical theory based on the theory of common descent , graph theory and Levenshtein distance .
No competent mathematician in the world objects to these methods.1 ) Slashbots are fucking retarded on the subject of statistics , and can not wrap their puny minds around the concept of Bayesian inference .
You better believe correlation God damn CAN show causation in some cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is similar to the statement that says correlation does not equal causation.
Just because I have brown hair and someone across the country also has brown hair and many other similarities doesn't mean both of us are related.
At least they called it a "hypothesis" instead of forcing us to accept it as verified fact.0) The claim of relatedness is based on a rigorous mathematical theory based on the theory of common descent, graph theory and Levenshtein distance.
No competent mathematician in the world objects to these methods.1) Slashbots are fucking retarded on the subject of statistics, and cannot wrap their puny minds around the concept of Bayesian inference.
You better believe correlation God damn CAN show causation in some cases.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592587</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting find...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation..."</p><p>I take your point, but in fact we, and most living things "know" stuff without learning it too. Put a girl and a boy on a desert island without giving them any sex education and there's a good chance that if they don't die of starvation, in a few years time, there will be a third person on the island. They don't need to learn about that stuff. It is hard wired in the brain. Obviously that's just an example. There are all manner of ways in which we know something about the world without having to learn about it. Tigers don't learn to crouch and spring, or even what to spring at. Maybe they need to practice it, but they pretty much know what to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation... " I take your point , but in fact we , and most living things " know " stuff without learning it too .
Put a girl and a boy on a desert island without giving them any sex education and there 's a good chance that if they do n't die of starvation , in a few years time , there will be a third person on the island .
They do n't need to learn about that stuff .
It is hard wired in the brain .
Obviously that 's just an example .
There are all manner of ways in which we know something about the world without having to learn about it .
Tigers do n't learn to crouch and spring , or even what to spring at .
Maybe they need to practice it , but they pretty much know what to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Everything you think you know about the way the world works is based on a correlation..."I take your point, but in fact we, and most living things "know" stuff without learning it too.
Put a girl and a boy on a desert island without giving them any sex education and there's a good chance that if they don't die of starvation, in a few years time, there will be a third person on the island.
They don't need to learn about that stuff.
It is hard wired in the brain.
Obviously that's just an example.
There are all manner of ways in which we know something about the world without having to learn about it.
Tigers don't learn to crouch and spring, or even what to spring at.
Maybe they need to practice it, but they pretty much know what to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587707</id>
	<title>Scientific American</title>
	<author>deAtog</author>
	<datestamp>1246823880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all those interested, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=marine-microorganism-play" title="scientificamerican.com" rel="nofollow">Scientific American</a> [scientificamerican.com] has the story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all those interested , Scientific American [ scientificamerican.com ] has the story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all those interested, Scientific American [scientificamerican.com] has the story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293</id>
	<title>Re:Public Service Announcement</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246785420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've known that since the momemt I heard about the platypus.</p><p>I still have this image of God and Devil sitting in a bar at the end of the universe, had a few beer, God doodles the platypus on a napkin and Devil manages to snort out a "dare ya!" between giggles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've known that since the momemt I heard about the platypus.I still have this image of God and Devil sitting in a bar at the end of the universe , had a few beer , God doodles the platypus on a napkin and Devil manages to snort out a " dare ya !
" between giggles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've known that since the momemt I heard about the platypus.I still have this image of God and Devil sitting in a bar at the end of the universe, had a few beer, God doodles the platypus on a napkin and Devil manages to snort out a "dare ya!
" between giggles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28609953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28593085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587675
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28603367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_1556256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28600337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588293
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28596105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594057
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587709
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587503
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589493
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592901
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28592587
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28593085
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28594299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587677
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587791
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28603367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28589369
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28590789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28591687
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28609953
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_1556256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28587637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_1556256.28588341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
