<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_04_1439239</id>
	<title>CrunchPad Will Be a 'Dead Simple Web Tablet'</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246722960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://peacecorpslibrary.org/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"TechCrunch's Michael Arrington has been talking for a year about building a touch-screen tablet for Web surfing and now <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/07/06/story2.html?b=1246852800\%5E1855381">it appears that the CrunchPad is close to becoming a reality</a>. 'We're going to make some really big announcements,' said Arrington, who predicted a prototype would be ready for unveiling by the end of July. <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/apple-acer-arrington/">The purpose of the CrunchPad will be very simple: surfing the Web</a>. Turn it on and up comes a browser &mdash; 'an Internet consumption device,' for reading, checking e-mail or watching video. The CrunchPad will not have a hard drive or keyboard and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/03/crunchpad-the-launch-prototype/">photos of the latest prototype</a> show a device with a 12 inch screen. 'The screen is now flush with the case and we've decreased the overall thickness to about 18 mm,' writes Arrington. 'The case will be aluminum, which is more expensive than plastic but is sturdier and lets us shave a little more off the overall thickness of the device.' The CrunchPad boots directly into the browser with a Linux-based operating system and a WebKit-based browser. A <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP-0Nce5oTQ&amp;eurl=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.youtube.com\%2Fmy\_videos\_edit&amp;feature=player\_embedded">video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action</a> shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash. 'The next time we talk about the CrunchPad publicly will be at a special press and user event in July in Silicon Valley,' writes Arrington. 'We're full on. These prototypes are real.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " TechCrunch 's Michael Arrington has been talking for a year about building a touch-screen tablet for Web surfing and now it appears that the CrunchPad is close to becoming a reality .
'We 're going to make some really big announcements, ' said Arrington , who predicted a prototype would be ready for unveiling by the end of July .
The purpose of the CrunchPad will be very simple : surfing the Web .
Turn it on and up comes a browser    'an Internet consumption device, ' for reading , checking e-mail or watching video .
The CrunchPad will not have a hard drive or keyboard and photos of the latest prototype show a device with a 12 inch screen .
'The screen is now flush with the case and we 've decreased the overall thickness to about 18 mm, ' writes Arrington .
'The case will be aluminum , which is more expensive than plastic but is sturdier and lets us shave a little more off the overall thickness of the device .
' The CrunchPad boots directly into the browser with a Linux-based operating system and a WebKit-based browser .
A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which , unlike the iPhone , runs flash .
'The next time we talk about the CrunchPad publicly will be at a special press and user event in July in Silicon Valley, ' writes Arrington .
'We 're full on .
These prototypes are real .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "TechCrunch's Michael Arrington has been talking for a year about building a touch-screen tablet for Web surfing and now it appears that the CrunchPad is close to becoming a reality.
'We're going to make some really big announcements,' said Arrington, who predicted a prototype would be ready for unveiling by the end of July.
The purpose of the CrunchPad will be very simple: surfing the Web.
Turn it on and up comes a browser — 'an Internet consumption device,' for reading, checking e-mail or watching video.
The CrunchPad will not have a hard drive or keyboard and photos of the latest prototype show a device with a 12 inch screen.
'The screen is now flush with the case and we've decreased the overall thickness to about 18 mm,' writes Arrington.
'The case will be aluminum, which is more expensive than plastic but is sturdier and lets us shave a little more off the overall thickness of the device.
' The CrunchPad boots directly into the browser with a Linux-based operating system and a WebKit-based browser.
A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash.
'The next time we talk about the CrunchPad publicly will be at a special press and user event in July in Silicon Valley,' writes Arrington.
'We're full on.
These prototypes are real.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580701</id>
	<title>vapourware</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1246727640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>perfect for the cloud computing age...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>perfect for the cloud computing age.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perfect for the cloud computing age...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582933</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246706220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.</p></div><p>Less space than a Nomad?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a netbook and I do n't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.Less space than a Nomad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.Less space than a Nomad?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581051</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Procasinator</author>
	<datestamp>1246730520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
How about making a detachable touch screen. Oh wait, <a href="http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/" title="alwaysinnovating.com" rel="nofollow">these guys have done it</a> [alwaysinnovating.com].
</p><p>
I know I'd prefer to use a design more similar to Always Innovating, as:
</p><ul>
<li>I can get the same usage from it as the CrunchPad, if I want</li><li>I can use the keyboard if I keep the screen attached, and use it like a normal laptop (with a fully feature OS)</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about making a detachable touch screen .
Oh wait , these guys have done it [ alwaysinnovating.com ] .
I know I 'd prefer to use a design more similar to Always Innovating , as : I can get the same usage from it as the CrunchPad , if I wantI can use the keyboard if I keep the screen attached , and use it like a normal laptop ( with a fully feature OS )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
How about making a detachable touch screen.
Oh wait, these guys have done it [alwaysinnovating.com].
I know I'd prefer to use a design more similar to Always Innovating, as:

I can get the same usage from it as the CrunchPad, if I wantI can use the keyboard if I keep the screen attached, and use it like a normal laptop (with a fully feature OS)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580901</id>
	<title>If you make it dead simple...</title>
	<author>dvh.tosomja</author>
	<datestamp>1246729380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you make it dead simple, only brain dead will be using it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you make it dead simple , only brain dead will be using it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you make it dead simple, only brain dead will be using it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581583</id>
	<title>I'd buy it if..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246734540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it was double the price and had an apple logo on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it was double the price and had an apple logo on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was double the price and had an apple logo on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619</id>
	<title>Wanna sell them like hot bread ?</title>
	<author>da5idnetlimit.com</author>
	<datestamp>1246727040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then please add a strong (8\10 meters) IR interface.</p><p>It can then become my universal remote AND my (potato) couch web browser.<br>Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then please add a strong ( 8 \ 10 meters ) IR interface.It can then become my universal remote AND my ( potato ) couch web browser.Otherwise , I already found some solutions to browse from the couch ( aka iphone )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then please add a strong (8\10 meters) IR interface.It can then become my universal remote AND my (potato) couch web browser.Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777</id>
	<title>Web "Consumer" device</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1246728420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Overall cool - iphone with big enough screen</p><p>But they really should focus on design of a virtual keyboard that is large and ergonomically laid out.</p><p>We have to avoid trending toward encouraging passive web surfers who are only "channel surfing"<br>just like the advertisers want you to.</p><p>The internet is way more interesting and useful when it is truely two-way, peer-to-peer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Overall cool - iphone with big enough screenBut they really should focus on design of a virtual keyboard that is large and ergonomically laid out.We have to avoid trending toward encouraging passive web surfers who are only " channel surfing " just like the advertisers want you to.The internet is way more interesting and useful when it is truely two-way , peer-to-peer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Overall cool - iphone with big enough screenBut they really should focus on design of a virtual keyboard that is large and ergonomically laid out.We have to avoid trending toward encouraging passive web surfers who are only "channel surfing"just like the advertisers want you to.The internet is way more interesting and useful when it is truely two-way, peer-to-peer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</id>
	<title>It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Browsing the web" also involves buying online. For this to be useful for many users, it needs a reasonably efficient means of basic text entry that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard. A small Bluetooth keypad/touchpad combo would be better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Browsing the web " also involves buying online .
For this to be useful for many users , it needs a reasonably efficient means of basic text entry that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard .
A small Bluetooth keypad/touchpad combo would be better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Browsing the web" also involves buying online.
For this to be useful for many users, it needs a reasonably efficient means of basic text entry that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard.
A small Bluetooth keypad/touchpad combo would be better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580967</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1246729860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure</i><br><i>The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games</i></p><p>A pitifully small library of crappy books, and games I didn't want to play when they were state of the art? Where do I sign up!</p><p>I seriously can't believe there are people who don't understand that there is a market for lightweight, touchscreen tablet. It's the fucking Internet, stupid! How much time do people spend on their ass, surfing the web? Who wouldn't rather do that in a comfy chair, in a manner doesn't give them carpal tunnel or make their balls sweat like the foolishly named "laptop"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasureThe Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows gamesA pitifully small library of crappy books , and games I did n't want to play when they were state of the art ?
Where do I sign up ! I seriously ca n't believe there are people who do n't understand that there is a market for lightweight , touchscreen tablet .
It 's the fucking Internet , stupid !
How much time do people spend on their ass , surfing the web ?
Who would n't rather do that in a comfy chair , in a manner does n't give them carpal tunnel or make their balls sweat like the foolishly named " laptop " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasureThe Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows gamesA pitifully small library of crappy books, and games I didn't want to play when they were state of the art?
Where do I sign up!I seriously can't believe there are people who don't understand that there is a market for lightweight, touchscreen tablet.
It's the fucking Internet, stupid!
How much time do people spend on their ass, surfing the web?
Who wouldn't rather do that in a comfy chair, in a manner doesn't give them carpal tunnel or make their balls sweat like the foolishly named "laptop"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581729</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1246735860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.

Which no one wants and no one buys.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's a challenging use case.  For the form factor we're talking about, lacking a keyboard but being very thin, having limited proc, and being only marginaly cheaper than a netbook, the real competition in its market is <em>paper</em>.  If this thing isn't as useful as paper, why bother getting this for someone to use when an actual nominal "computer" is only marginally more expensive.</p><p>I think it's clear that someday something like this will replace a lot of paper, not all of it, but lots of ephemera.  I already use my knidle to read my screenplays, and that's already saved 500 sheets in the past 3 months.  If something like the kindle had better searching and browsing, and could actually read HTML documents in the manner they were intended, I could be keeping phonebooks full of film codebooks and sound library stuff in their right now.</p><p>Something I've noticed with my iPhone, on the other hand, despite the fact that it's a little small to use properly as paper, is that it's extremely difficult to be browsing something on my computer, and then to continue my browsing session on the phone, or  vice versus.  The only way to do it is to email links to yourself, and that's a supreme pain....  Something I still think about from <em>Minority Report</em> were the larger pad-like storage devices they used to move files from one rig to another, like when Tom Cruise's assistant would look up a series of mugshots on one machine and bring them over to his.  The assistant would collect the mugshots, drag them off his screen and ONTO the screen of the pad, as if the pad, by nature of touching the computer, were an extension of his monitor, and then he could take the pad, which had a display and could show everything it held, and carried it to the other computer.  From there, the pad then became an extention on Anderton's monitor, and he could look at the material directly on the pad or drag it to his system, completing the loop.  Why the fuck can't someone build an internet tablet that can do <em>that</em>?  All that haptic stuff was cool, but for some reason, in my work, I'm constantly wishing I could take something I'm working on at this moment, drag it to a pad, and carry it somewhere, perhaps to move, perhaps just to work in-situ on the pad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance .
Which no one wants and no one buys.It 's a challenging use case .
For the form factor we 're talking about , lacking a keyboard but being very thin , having limited proc , and being only marginaly cheaper than a netbook , the real competition in its market is paper .
If this thing is n't as useful as paper , why bother getting this for someone to use when an actual nominal " computer " is only marginally more expensive.I think it 's clear that someday something like this will replace a lot of paper , not all of it , but lots of ephemera .
I already use my knidle to read my screenplays , and that 's already saved 500 sheets in the past 3 months .
If something like the kindle had better searching and browsing , and could actually read HTML documents in the manner they were intended , I could be keeping phonebooks full of film codebooks and sound library stuff in their right now.Something I 've noticed with my iPhone , on the other hand , despite the fact that it 's a little small to use properly as paper , is that it 's extremely difficult to be browsing something on my computer , and then to continue my browsing session on the phone , or vice versus .
The only way to do it is to email links to yourself , and that 's a supreme pain.... Something I still think about from Minority Report were the larger pad-like storage devices they used to move files from one rig to another , like when Tom Cruise 's assistant would look up a series of mugshots on one machine and bring them over to his .
The assistant would collect the mugshots , drag them off his screen and ONTO the screen of the pad , as if the pad , by nature of touching the computer , were an extension of his monitor , and then he could take the pad , which had a display and could show everything it held , and carried it to the other computer .
From there , the pad then became an extention on Anderton 's monitor , and he could look at the material directly on the pad or drag it to his system , completing the loop .
Why the fuck ca n't someone build an internet tablet that can do that ?
All that haptic stuff was cool , but for some reason , in my work , I 'm constantly wishing I could take something I 'm working on at this moment , drag it to a pad , and carry it somewhere , perhaps to move , perhaps just to work in-situ on the pad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.
Which no one wants and no one buys.It's a challenging use case.
For the form factor we're talking about, lacking a keyboard but being very thin, having limited proc, and being only marginaly cheaper than a netbook, the real competition in its market is paper.
If this thing isn't as useful as paper, why bother getting this for someone to use when an actual nominal "computer" is only marginally more expensive.I think it's clear that someday something like this will replace a lot of paper, not all of it, but lots of ephemera.
I already use my knidle to read my screenplays, and that's already saved 500 sheets in the past 3 months.
If something like the kindle had better searching and browsing, and could actually read HTML documents in the manner they were intended, I could be keeping phonebooks full of film codebooks and sound library stuff in their right now.Something I've noticed with my iPhone, on the other hand, despite the fact that it's a little small to use properly as paper, is that it's extremely difficult to be browsing something on my computer, and then to continue my browsing session on the phone, or  vice versus.
The only way to do it is to email links to yourself, and that's a supreme pain....  Something I still think about from Minority Report were the larger pad-like storage devices they used to move files from one rig to another, like when Tom Cruise's assistant would look up a series of mugshots on one machine and bring them over to his.
The assistant would collect the mugshots, drag them off his screen and ONTO the screen of the pad, as if the pad, by nature of touching the computer, were an extension of his monitor, and then he could take the pad, which had a display and could show everything it held, and carried it to the other computer.
From there, the pad then became an extention on Anderton's monitor, and he could look at the material directly on the pad or drag it to his system, completing the loop.
Why the fuck can't someone build an internet tablet that can do that?
All that haptic stuff was cool, but for some reason, in my work, I'm constantly wishing I could take something I'm working on at this moment, drag it to a pad, and carry it somewhere, perhaps to move, perhaps just to work in-situ on the pad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581511</id>
	<title>Re:What is the need ???</title>
	<author>mrchaotica</author>
	<datestamp>1246734000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100.</p></div></blockquote><p>A $400 laptop isn't one pound and a quarter inch thick (my estimate from the pictures). A $400 laptop can't be easily held like a clipboard. A $400 laptop doesn't have battery life nearly as long as this ought to have. And even if a laptop did manage to have <em>one</em> of these characteristics, it sure as Hell wouldn't have <em>all three</em> and still be $400!</p><blockquote><div><p>Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ? Read but not reply ? While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's got a USB port; if they include USB-host (and they'd be brain-dead not to), you can just add one of those roll-up keyboards or something.</p><p>Of course, I'm personally hoping for a stylus and handwriting recognition (or at least character recognition, which they could add easily).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $ 100.A $ 400 laptop is n't one pound and a quarter inch thick ( my estimate from the pictures ) .
A $ 400 laptop ca n't be easily held like a clipboard .
A $ 400 laptop does n't have battery life nearly as long as this ought to have .
And even if a laptop did manage to have one of these characteristics , it sure as Hell would n't have all three and still be $ 400 ! Without a keyboard , how much email can you do ?
Read but not reply ?
While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes , a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.It 's got a USB port ; if they include USB-host ( and they 'd be brain-dead not to ) , you can just add one of those roll-up keyboards or something.Of course , I 'm personally hoping for a stylus and handwriting recognition ( or at least character recognition , which they could add easily ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100.A $400 laptop isn't one pound and a quarter inch thick (my estimate from the pictures).
A $400 laptop can't be easily held like a clipboard.
A $400 laptop doesn't have battery life nearly as long as this ought to have.
And even if a laptop did manage to have one of these characteristics, it sure as Hell wouldn't have all three and still be $400!Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ?
Read but not reply ?
While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.It's got a USB port; if they include USB-host (and they'd be brain-dead not to), you can just add one of those roll-up keyboards or something.Of course, I'm personally hoping for a stylus and handwriting recognition (or at least character recognition, which they could add easily).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581447</id>
	<title>Re:CrunchPad</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1246733520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WebKit, not firefox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WebKit , not firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WebKit, not firefox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580691</id>
	<title>Virtual Keyboard</title>
	<author>dean.collins</author>
	<datestamp>1246727580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it have a virtual keyboard though?

I cant wait for these to be released to use for watching baseball games and chatting on <a href="http://www.livebaseballchat.com/" title="livebaseballchat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.livebaseballchat.com/</a> [livebaseballchat.com] but the only problem is that with a netbook and wifi i'm not sure what additional value this is going to be offering.

I think i'd miss the keyboard for typing.


Cheers,
Dean</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it have a virtual keyboard though ?
I cant wait for these to be released to use for watching baseball games and chatting on http : //www.livebaseballchat.com/ [ livebaseballchat.com ] but the only problem is that with a netbook and wifi i 'm not sure what additional value this is going to be offering .
I think i 'd miss the keyboard for typing .
Cheers , Dean</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it have a virtual keyboard though?
I cant wait for these to be released to use for watching baseball games and chatting on http://www.livebaseballchat.com/ [livebaseballchat.com] but the only problem is that with a netbook and wifi i'm not sure what additional value this is going to be offering.
I think i'd miss the keyboard for typing.
Cheers,
Dean</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</id>
	<title>Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246728660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.</p><p>Which no one wants and no one buys.</p><p> Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.</p><p>The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure.</p><p> The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games - available as dirt-cheep downloads from places like <a href="http://www.gog.com/" title="gog.com"> Gog.com</a> [gog.com] ["Good Old Games"]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.Which no one wants and no one buys .
Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure .
The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games - available as dirt-cheep downloads from places like Gog.com [ gog.com ] [ " Good Old Games " ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.Which no one wants and no one buys.
Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure.
The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games - available as dirt-cheep downloads from places like  Gog.com [gog.com] ["Good Old Games"]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580617</id>
	<title>dumb terminal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246726980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wonderful, what will they think of next</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wonderful , what will they think of next</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wonderful, what will they think of next</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807</id>
	<title>What is the need ???</title>
	<author>Archfeld</author>
	<datestamp>1246728720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100. Seems like this device is a dead end niche minus the niche. Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ? Read but not reply ? While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $ 100 .
Seems like this device is a dead end niche minus the niche .
Without a keyboard , how much email can you do ?
Read but not reply ?
While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes , a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100.
Seems like this device is a dead end niche minus the niche.
Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ?
Read but not reply ?
While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581811</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1246736760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netbooks and 'pads' are different markets.</p><p>Lets hope they don't price themselves out of their target market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netbooks and 'pads ' are different markets.Lets hope they do n't price themselves out of their target market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netbooks and 'pads' are different markets.Lets hope they don't price themselves out of their target market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28583305</id>
	<title>Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ?</title>
	<author>bjwest</author>
	<datestamp>1246711500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right, I've never used an iPhone.  I do, however know how small a 3.5 inch screen is.  I don't care how high of a resolution is has, it cannot, in any way, be used for anything but extreme casual browsing.  It can zoom all it wants, but the fact is for casual browsing, I need more than a portion of each line viewable.  Scrolling back and forth and up and down would be too much of a bother for more than a few minutes at a time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , I 've never used an iPhone .
I do , however know how small a 3.5 inch screen is .
I do n't care how high of a resolution is has , it can not , in any way , be used for anything but extreme casual browsing .
It can zoom all it wants , but the fact is for casual browsing , I need more than a portion of each line viewable .
Scrolling back and forth and up and down would be too much of a bother for more than a few minutes at a time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, I've never used an iPhone.
I do, however know how small a 3.5 inch screen is.
I don't care how high of a resolution is has, it cannot, in any way, be used for anything but extreme casual browsing.
It can zoom all it wants, but the fact is for casual browsing, I need more than a portion of each line viewable.
Scrolling back and forth and up and down would be too much of a bother for more than a few minutes at a time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581083</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246730700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.</p></div><p>Or do you mean a Star Trek DataPad...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.Or do you mean a Star Trek DataPad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.Or do you mean a Star Trek DataPad...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584141</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Hecatonchires</author>
	<datestamp>1246723860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forget buying, it needs some way beyond pre-loaded links of entering target destinations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget buying , it needs some way beyond pre-loaded links of entering target destinations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget buying, it needs some way beyond pre-loaded links of entering target destinations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581033</id>
	<title>do touch screens need wind shield wipers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246730400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Compared to my screen, my keyboard is awfully dirty. It's shiny with grime, even though I clean it about once month. I'm thinking if I had a touch screen, I'd have to wipe that screen clean about once an hour, at least.
</p><p>
Either that, or stop licking my fingers.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compared to my screen , my keyboard is awfully dirty .
It 's shiny with grime , even though I clean it about once month .
I 'm thinking if I had a touch screen , I 'd have to wipe that screen clean about once an hour , at least .
Either that , or stop licking my fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Compared to my screen, my keyboard is awfully dirty.
It's shiny with grime, even though I clean it about once month.
I'm thinking if I had a touch screen, I'd have to wipe that screen clean about once an hour, at least.
Either that, or stop licking my fingers.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581127</id>
	<title>Re:What is the need ???</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246731060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I award myself 5 points and hand you a pickle:</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1291861&amp;cid=28580643" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1291861&amp;cid=28580643</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I award myself 5 points and hand you a pickle : http : //hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1291861&amp;cid = 28580643 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I award myself 5 points and hand you a pickle:http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1291861&amp;cid=28580643 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580909</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>basementman</author>
	<datestamp>1246729500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not just MSDOS games, my netbook can run counter strike source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just MSDOS games , my netbook can run counter strike source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just MSDOS games, my netbook can run counter strike source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580849</id>
	<title>Android?</title>
	<author>MaggieL</author>
	<datestamp>1246729020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a natural for <a href="http://www.android.com/" title="android.com">http://www.android.com/</a> [android.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a natural for http : //www.android.com/ [ android.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a natural for http://www.android.com/ [android.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580661</id>
	<title>Intgrate an E-book/PDF reader into it to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And let it play MAME with some SD storage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And let it play MAME with some SD storage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let it play MAME with some SD storage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581407</id>
	<title>But will it tweet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246733280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a crunch product if it isn't all about twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a crunch product if it is n't all about twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a crunch product if it isn't all about twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582017</id>
	<title>Apple's Safari Pad</title>
	<author>Udo Schmitz</author>
	<datestamp>1246739400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>John Markoff in the NY-Times in March 2008:<br>"Apple's multitouch technology began life not as a cellphone, but as a notepad-sized skunkworks project internally dubbed Safari Pad, run by Tim Bucher, then Apple's head of Macintosh hardware. To his credit, Mr. Jobs seized on the technology and morphed it into the iPhone.<br>At Macworld, when I asked Mr. Jobs about the idea of an iPod Touch in a larger "Safari Pad" format, he snapped at me, "I can't talk about unannounced products.""</p><p>Originally at <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/reading-steve-jobs/" title="nytimes.com">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/reading-steve-jobs/</a> [nytimes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>John Markoff in the NY-Times in March 2008 : " Apple 's multitouch technology began life not as a cellphone , but as a notepad-sized skunkworks project internally dubbed Safari Pad , run by Tim Bucher , then Apple 's head of Macintosh hardware .
To his credit , Mr. Jobs seized on the technology and morphed it into the iPhone.At Macworld , when I asked Mr. Jobs about the idea of an iPod Touch in a larger " Safari Pad " format , he snapped at me , " I ca n't talk about unannounced products .
" " Originally at http : //bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/reading-steve-jobs/ [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John Markoff in the NY-Times in March 2008:"Apple's multitouch technology began life not as a cellphone, but as a notepad-sized skunkworks project internally dubbed Safari Pad, run by Tim Bucher, then Apple's head of Macintosh hardware.
To his credit, Mr. Jobs seized on the technology and morphed it into the iPhone.At Macworld, when I asked Mr. Jobs about the idea of an iPod Touch in a larger "Safari Pad" format, he snapped at me, "I can't talk about unannounced products.
""Originally at http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/reading-steve-jobs/ [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581291</id>
	<title>adblock? noscript?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246732260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no thanks if it makes browsing worse</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no thanks if it makes browsing worse</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no thanks if it makes browsing worse</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582731</id>
	<title>Re:Web "Consumer" device</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1246703760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont' forget Flash support. I don't personally *like* Flash, but it's a pretty important part of the modern web. The fact that the iPhone lacks it (and don't give me any of Jobs' crap as to why; lower-spec ARM devices support it) could be a big deal in promoting this thing. Additionally, the larger (and presumably much higher-res) display should make a big difference... except it's too big for a pocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont ' forget Flash support .
I do n't personally * like * Flash , but it 's a pretty important part of the modern web .
The fact that the iPhone lacks it ( and do n't give me any of Jobs ' crap as to why ; lower-spec ARM devices support it ) could be a big deal in promoting this thing .
Additionally , the larger ( and presumably much higher-res ) display should make a big difference... except it 's too big for a pocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont' forget Flash support.
I don't personally *like* Flash, but it's a pretty important part of the modern web.
The fact that the iPhone lacks it (and don't give me any of Jobs' crap as to why; lower-spec ARM devices support it) could be a big deal in promoting this thing.
Additionally, the larger (and presumably much higher-res) display should make a big difference... except it's too big for a pocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580673</id>
	<title>Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Article originally posted June 3rd. Old news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Article originally posted June 3rd .
Old news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article originally posted June 3rd.
Old news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581935</id>
	<title>I'll take two</title>
	<author>Bysshe</author>
	<datestamp>1246738500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the two most important places in my house: The kitchen table and the porcelain throne. More real-time than tucking a newspaper under my arm!</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the two most important places in my house : The kitchen table and the porcelain throne .
More real-time than tucking a newspaper under my arm !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the two most important places in my house: The kitchen table and the porcelain throne.
More real-time than tucking a newspaper under my arm!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582245</id>
	<title>Yeah, and the iPhone is just a phone...</title>
	<author>cjonslashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1246698720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A dead-simple web tablet. That's like saying that the iPhone will be just a simple to use phone.</p><p>I believe the real appeal of the thing will be in the simplicity and elegance of its design, but also in its ability to do just about everything once one installs add-on apps to it. After all, it has a CPU and Linux - why <i>woundn't</i> one do other things on it?</p><p>Now if only it can eventually have a super low power display (like the Kindle, but color), so that we are finally free of the tyranny of being near an electric outlet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A dead-simple web tablet .
That 's like saying that the iPhone will be just a simple to use phone.I believe the real appeal of the thing will be in the simplicity and elegance of its design , but also in its ability to do just about everything once one installs add-on apps to it .
After all , it has a CPU and Linux - why wound n't one do other things on it ? Now if only it can eventually have a super low power display ( like the Kindle , but color ) , so that we are finally free of the tyranny of being near an electric outlet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A dead-simple web tablet.
That's like saying that the iPhone will be just a simple to use phone.I believe the real appeal of the thing will be in the simplicity and elegance of its design, but also in its ability to do just about everything once one installs add-on apps to it.
After all, it has a CPU and Linux - why woundn't one do other things on it?Now if only it can eventually have a super low power display (like the Kindle, but color), so that we are finally free of the tyranny of being near an electric outlet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581049</id>
	<title>Michael Arrington is a Troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246730520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For proof, check out:<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsV-lgnAjps</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For proof , check out : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = IsV-lgnAjps</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For proof, check out:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsV-lgnAjps</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581269</id>
	<title>Will it be possible to close the browser?</title>
	<author>arrenlex</author>
	<datestamp>1246732140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it at all possible to close the browser and use the tablet as a proper computer? That would be magical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it at all possible to close the browser and use the tablet as a proper computer ?
That would be magical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it at all possible to close the browser and use the tablet as a proper computer?
That would be magical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580771</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Captain Splendid</author>
	<datestamp>1246728420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard</i> <br> <br>

As someone who uses the Ipod touch onscreen keyboard, <i>and</i> has huge gorilla hands, an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss.  Of all the criticisms of the Crunchpad, this is the one that baffles me the most.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard As someone who uses the Ipod touch onscreen keyboard , and has huge gorilla hands , an onscreen keyboard on a 12 " screen will be a piece of piss .
Of all the criticisms of the Crunchpad , this is the one that baffles me the most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard  

As someone who uses the Ipod touch onscreen keyboard, and has huge gorilla hands, an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss.
Of all the criticisms of the Crunchpad, this is the one that baffles me the most.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580725</id>
	<title>But, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has no tabs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has no tabs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has no tabs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581067</id>
	<title>This is the solution I've been looking for</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246730640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for a while.</p><p>I already do all my computing from my couch, on an expensive, ugly, and loud computer (and a decent tele, with a freaking awesome keyboard).  It is nice to play video games while watching Star Trek.  It is also nice to be able to set my  data a'calculating or code a'compiling and maximize my<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...HD-DVD.... of The Bourne Identity.</p><p>But writing, drawing, and graphics/design are frustrating.  I would prefer to have my typing directly in front of me.  I have flirted with the idea of mounting an additional monitor on a swingarm beside my couch, so I could write or do graphics, but I don't want a monitor cable running across my floor, and I do not want to invest heavily a wireless solution for a monitor.  'They' say a bluetooth 3 system is in the works.</p><p>I've often considered that computing on a tablet would be great.  However, the loss of computing power makes doing anything resource intensive prohibitive.</p><p>So my next solution was going to be to 'dumb terminal' the setup on a tablet, and park my tower in a closet.  But that makes 80\% (even more?) of the resources of a good tablet a waste.</p><p>With one of these and browser desktop, like logmein, I'd have exactly what I was looking for.  I imagine you'd use a free (and local) solution, considering that your intranet could handle all the bandwidth necessary for a reasonably fast terminal.  I've only used a few 'pro' (ie. expensive) solutions* for rdping over a network and over the tubes, but they really sucked compared to logmein.</p><p>I think if this thing comes out affordable, and is a little less fruity then prototype C, this may be the next component for my PC.</p><p>*Offtopic note: I will absolutely never, ever buy a Firebox, thanks to WatchGaurd and their fantastic 'Enterprise' vpn solutions.  Ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for a while.I already do all my computing from my couch , on an expensive , ugly , and loud computer ( and a decent tele , with a freaking awesome keyboard ) .
It is nice to play video games while watching Star Trek .
It is also nice to be able to set my data a'calculating or code a'compiling and maximize my ...HD-DVD.... of The Bourne Identity.But writing , drawing , and graphics/design are frustrating .
I would prefer to have my typing directly in front of me .
I have flirted with the idea of mounting an additional monitor on a swingarm beside my couch , so I could write or do graphics , but I do n't want a monitor cable running across my floor , and I do not want to invest heavily a wireless solution for a monitor .
'They ' say a bluetooth 3 system is in the works.I 've often considered that computing on a tablet would be great .
However , the loss of computing power makes doing anything resource intensive prohibitive.So my next solution was going to be to 'dumb terminal ' the setup on a tablet , and park my tower in a closet .
But that makes 80 \ % ( even more ?
) of the resources of a good tablet a waste.With one of these and browser desktop , like logmein , I 'd have exactly what I was looking for .
I imagine you 'd use a free ( and local ) solution , considering that your intranet could handle all the bandwidth necessary for a reasonably fast terminal .
I 've only used a few 'pro ' ( ie .
expensive ) solutions * for rdping over a network and over the tubes , but they really sucked compared to logmein.I think if this thing comes out affordable , and is a little less fruity then prototype C , this may be the next component for my PC .
* Offtopic note : I will absolutely never , ever buy a Firebox , thanks to WatchGaurd and their fantastic 'Enterprise ' vpn solutions .
Ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for a while.I already do all my computing from my couch, on an expensive, ugly, and loud computer (and a decent tele, with a freaking awesome keyboard).
It is nice to play video games while watching Star Trek.
It is also nice to be able to set my  data a'calculating or code a'compiling and maximize my ...HD-DVD.... of The Bourne Identity.But writing, drawing, and graphics/design are frustrating.
I would prefer to have my typing directly in front of me.
I have flirted with the idea of mounting an additional monitor on a swingarm beside my couch, so I could write or do graphics, but I don't want a monitor cable running across my floor, and I do not want to invest heavily a wireless solution for a monitor.
'They' say a bluetooth 3 system is in the works.I've often considered that computing on a tablet would be great.
However, the loss of computing power makes doing anything resource intensive prohibitive.So my next solution was going to be to 'dumb terminal' the setup on a tablet, and park my tower in a closet.
But that makes 80\% (even more?
) of the resources of a good tablet a waste.With one of these and browser desktop, like logmein, I'd have exactly what I was looking for.
I imagine you'd use a free (and local) solution, considering that your intranet could handle all the bandwidth necessary for a reasonably fast terminal.
I've only used a few 'pro' (ie.
expensive) solutions* for rdping over a network and over the tubes, but they really sucked compared to logmein.I think if this thing comes out affordable, and is a little less fruity then prototype C, this may be the next component for my PC.
*Offtopic note: I will absolutely never, ever buy a Firebox, thanks to WatchGaurd and their fantastic 'Enterprise' vpn solutions.
Ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584105</id>
	<title>Ebook format support?</title>
	<author>Hecatonchires</author>
	<datestamp>1246723440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I can get it to read the various ebook formats - mob, lit, pdf, htm (you'd be surprised how many devices with web browsers won't let u load a html file from disk) I'm sold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I can get it to read the various ebook formats - mob , lit , pdf , htm ( you 'd be surprised how many devices with web browsers wo n't let u load a html file from disk ) I 'm sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I can get it to read the various ebook formats - mob, lit, pdf, htm (you'd be surprised how many devices with web browsers won't let u load a html file from disk) I'm sold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582501</id>
	<title>Horrible UI</title>
	<author>vertigoCiel</author>
	<datestamp>1246701180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The UI gestures on this thing are terrible. They're not at all obvious. I don't imaging anyone will be able to figure out how to bring up, say, text entry without being told. It's also unclear how some of the gestures (such as the upward swipe) are distinguished from scrolling.

Just stick an address bar and a few buttons in there, it'll make all of your user's lives easier. There's definitely room. Sacrificing usability for a "full-screen-web" aesthetic isn't a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UI gestures on this thing are terrible .
They 're not at all obvious .
I do n't imaging anyone will be able to figure out how to bring up , say , text entry without being told .
It 's also unclear how some of the gestures ( such as the upward swipe ) are distinguished from scrolling .
Just stick an address bar and a few buttons in there , it 'll make all of your user 's lives easier .
There 's definitely room .
Sacrificing usability for a " full-screen-web " aesthetic is n't a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UI gestures on this thing are terrible.
They're not at all obvious.
I don't imaging anyone will be able to figure out how to bring up, say, text entry without being told.
It's also unclear how some of the gestures (such as the upward swipe) are distinguished from scrolling.
Just stick an address bar and a few buttons in there, it'll make all of your user's lives easier.
There's definitely room.
Sacrificing usability for a "full-screen-web" aesthetic isn't a good idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581413</id>
	<title>Dead simple products, for dead simple people!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246733280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For users like<br>- Simple Jack<br>- President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho<br>- George W. Bush<br>- Joe Sixpack<br>- The drooling guy in the wheelchair.<br>- Your baby that is still in the womb.<br>- And even Flippy the chimp!</p><p>Nobody has to feel left out from the forums because he can't even enter some simple letters. The possibilities are <em>endless</em>!</p><p>With just one clickwheel, you can wheel all day long! Whooo! Wheeee! *lisping* It's so <em>simple</em>!</p><p>Company Boss (deep voice, huge pack of muscles, looks like a peasant in a suit): "Our clients love it! Some of them even came to company headquarters to.. stand there... and... like... drool... and make cavemen noises for no reason. Of course there is also some grunting. But we take that as a suggestion, about where to make our system even simpler, and what feature to remove next. We always listen to our clients, and fullfill their every wish, no matter how lazy and stupid, and lazy and fucking idiots, and stinking creepy retards and stupid and backwards and plain and simple the most retarded stupid fucks that mother nature ever shat out of her ass they are." *takes out hankie* *wipes sweat* *pops his pills*</p><p>Now for only one plus one plus one plus one plus one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...(goes on for half an hour)... plus one credits from that big hole in the ground where you hack the dirt out of the ground for the great monkey of steel that tells you what to do!</p><p>Don't miss it! Buy now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For users like- Simple Jack- President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho- George W. Bush- Joe Sixpack- The drooling guy in the wheelchair.- Your baby that is still in the womb.- And even Flippy the chimp ! Nobody has to feel left out from the forums because he ca n't even enter some simple letters .
The possibilities are endless ! With just one clickwheel , you can wheel all day long !
Whooo ! Wheeee !
* lisping * It 's so simple ! Company Boss ( deep voice , huge pack of muscles , looks like a peasant in a suit ) : " Our clients love it !
Some of them even came to company headquarters to.. stand there... and... like... drool... and make cavemen noises for no reason .
Of course there is also some grunting .
But we take that as a suggestion , about where to make our system even simpler , and what feature to remove next .
We always listen to our clients , and fullfill their every wish , no matter how lazy and stupid , and lazy and fucking idiots , and stinking creepy retards and stupid and backwards and plain and simple the most retarded stupid fucks that mother nature ever shat out of her ass they are .
" * takes out hankie * * wipes sweat * * pops his pills * Now for only one plus one plus one plus one plus one ... ( goes on for half an hour ) ... plus one credits from that big hole in the ground where you hack the dirt out of the ground for the great monkey of steel that tells you what to do ! Do n't miss it !
Buy now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For users like- Simple Jack- President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho- George W. Bush- Joe Sixpack- The drooling guy in the wheelchair.- Your baby that is still in the womb.- And even Flippy the chimp!Nobody has to feel left out from the forums because he can't even enter some simple letters.
The possibilities are endless!With just one clickwheel, you can wheel all day long!
Whooo! Wheeee!
*lisping* It's so simple!Company Boss (deep voice, huge pack of muscles, looks like a peasant in a suit): "Our clients love it!
Some of them even came to company headquarters to.. stand there... and... like... drool... and make cavemen noises for no reason.
Of course there is also some grunting.
But we take that as a suggestion, about where to make our system even simpler, and what feature to remove next.
We always listen to our clients, and fullfill their every wish, no matter how lazy and stupid, and lazy and fucking idiots, and stinking creepy retards and stupid and backwards and plain and simple the most retarded stupid fucks that mother nature ever shat out of her ass they are.
" *takes out hankie* *wipes sweat* *pops his pills*Now for only one plus one plus one plus one plus one ...(goes on for half an hour)... plus one credits from that big hole in the ground where you hack the dirt out of the ground for the great monkey of steel that tells you what to do!Don't miss it!
Buy now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580609</id>
	<title>you could have a virtual keyboard</title>
	<author>cryophan</author>
	<datestamp>1246726920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>click it with the mouse. Nice spacesaver</htmltext>
<tokenext>click it with the mouse .
Nice spacesaver</tokentext>
<sentencetext>click it with the mouse.
Nice spacesaver</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582927</id>
	<title>Re:Dead simple products, for dead simple people!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246706220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was this supposed to be funny?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was this supposed to be funny ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was this supposed to be funny?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581413</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581989</id>
	<title>Too much masturbation renders Iphone useless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246739220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)</p><p>Yes because, everyone enjoys reading for more than 2 minutes on a 3 inch screen.</p><p>Stop comparing apples to oranges.<br>Literally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Otherwise , I already found some solutions to browse from the couch ( aka iphone ) Yes because , everyone enjoys reading for more than 2 minutes on a 3 inch screen.Stop comparing apples to oranges.Literally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)Yes because, everyone enjoys reading for more than 2 minutes on a 3 inch screen.Stop comparing apples to oranges.Literally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581307</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1246732380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing is obviously designed to be your lounging-on-the-couch, don't-want-to-have-your-notebook-in-your-lap machine.  Have we degenerated so far that any new device is useless if it doesn't allow us to buy stuff and that we're too lazy to get off the couch and walk over to our regular computers when we want to buy stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is obviously designed to be your lounging-on-the-couch , do n't-want-to-have-your-notebook-in-your-lap machine .
Have we degenerated so far that any new device is useless if it does n't allow us to buy stuff and that we 're too lazy to get off the couch and walk over to our regular computers when we want to buy stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is obviously designed to be your lounging-on-the-couch, don't-want-to-have-your-notebook-in-your-lap machine.
Have we degenerated so far that any new device is useless if it doesn't allow us to buy stuff and that we're too lazy to get off the couch and walk over to our regular computers when we want to buy stuff?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580835</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Soul-Burn666</author>
	<datestamp>1246728900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a 8.9" tablet-convertible netbook installed with Windows 7.<br>Even with this relatively small screen, the built-in onscreen keyboard is really quite nice.<br>While I can't easily touch-type on it, I can definitely "hunt-and-peck" with 2 hands. On a 12" screen I should be able to use all my fingers.</p><p>In a previous video of the Crunchpad, they used some clunky looking onscreen keyboard and I hope they switch to something better (like the Win7 one).<br>A multi-touch screen will make it even better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a 8.9 " tablet-convertible netbook installed with Windows 7.Even with this relatively small screen , the built-in onscreen keyboard is really quite nice.While I ca n't easily touch-type on it , I can definitely " hunt-and-peck " with 2 hands .
On a 12 " screen I should be able to use all my fingers.In a previous video of the Crunchpad , they used some clunky looking onscreen keyboard and I hope they switch to something better ( like the Win7 one ) .A multi-touch screen will make it even better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a 8.9" tablet-convertible netbook installed with Windows 7.Even with this relatively small screen, the built-in onscreen keyboard is really quite nice.While I can't easily touch-type on it, I can definitely "hunt-and-peck" with 2 hands.
On a 12" screen I should be able to use all my fingers.In a previous video of the Crunchpad, they used some clunky looking onscreen keyboard and I hope they switch to something better (like the Win7 one).A multi-touch screen will make it even better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582499</id>
	<title>Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246701120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>An iphone[sic] for general browsing? You're kidding right? There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.</p></div><p>You've clearly never used an iPhone. The 3.5" screen is very high resolution, so the text is quite sharp and readable at smaller sizes. Safari's ability to zoom the page (scaling everything, not just increasing the font size), its ability to zoom to specific sections of a web page, and the overall speed and smoothness of the multitouch interface makes it a <i>very</i> viable web browsing device.</p><p>Coupled with the fact that it's always with you (pocketable, which is not possible a larger display), and always connected increases its utility.</p><p>I'm not saying a larger screen wouldn't make web browsing better, but to say (as you did) that a 3.5 inch screen can't be used for serious browsing is demonstrably false.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An iphone [ sic ] for general browsing ?
You 're kidding right ?
There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.You 've clearly never used an iPhone .
The 3.5 " screen is very high resolution , so the text is quite sharp and readable at smaller sizes .
Safari 's ability to zoom the page ( scaling everything , not just increasing the font size ) , its ability to zoom to specific sections of a web page , and the overall speed and smoothness of the multitouch interface makes it a very viable web browsing device.Coupled with the fact that it 's always with you ( pocketable , which is not possible a larger display ) , and always connected increases its utility.I 'm not saying a larger screen would n't make web browsing better , but to say ( as you did ) that a 3.5 inch screen ca n't be used for serious browsing is demonstrably false .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An iphone[sic] for general browsing?
You're kidding right?
There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.You've clearly never used an iPhone.
The 3.5" screen is very high resolution, so the text is quite sharp and readable at smaller sizes.
Safari's ability to zoom the page (scaling everything, not just increasing the font size), its ability to zoom to specific sections of a web page, and the overall speed and smoothness of the multitouch interface makes it a very viable web browsing device.Coupled with the fact that it's always with you (pocketable, which is not possible a larger display), and always connected increases its utility.I'm not saying a larger screen wouldn't make web browsing better, but to say (as you did) that a 3.5 inch screen can't be used for serious browsing is demonstrably false.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581179</id>
	<title>Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ?</title>
	<author>bjwest</author>
	<datestamp>1246731600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An iphone for general browsing?  You're kidding right?  There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.  A quick lookup or banking transaction maybe, but if you're doing your daily browsing (news sites, research, what ever) you need more than a couple of five or six word lines at a time, and forget about serious posting.  A remote replacement, yeah, general browser replacement, no way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An iphone for general browsing ?
You 're kidding right ?
There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing .
A quick lookup or banking transaction maybe , but if you 're doing your daily browsing ( news sites , research , what ever ) you need more than a couple of five or six word lines at a time , and forget about serious posting .
A remote replacement , yeah , general browser replacement , no way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An iphone for general browsing?
You're kidding right?
There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.
A quick lookup or banking transaction maybe, but if you're doing your daily browsing (news sites, research, what ever) you need more than a couple of five or six word lines at a time, and forget about serious posting.
A remote replacement, yeah, general browser replacement, no way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28633291</id>
	<title>Google Chrome OS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247172840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds awfully similar to Google Chrome OS... any connections?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds awfully similar to Google Chrome OS... any connections ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds awfully similar to Google Chrome OS... any connections?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580747</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>skreeech</author>
	<datestamp>1246728060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking past the very basic needs of searching and typing addresses I find that most web use today involves typing something</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking past the very basic needs of searching and typing addresses I find that most web use today involves typing something</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking past the very basic needs of searching and typing addresses I find that most web use today involves typing something</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667</id>
	<title>CrunchPad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.</p><p>Sign me up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A $ 300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.Sign me up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.Sign me up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581767</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1246736400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's exceedingly clear that people want a computer which:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; A) Works better (fast, responsive, stable).<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; B) Is simpler (UI &amp; maintenance).</p><blockquote><div><p>Which no one wants and no one buys.<br>Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.</p></div></blockquote><p>You could have said the same thing about MP3 players, before the iPod came along.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.It 's exceedingly clear that people want a computer which :     A ) Works better ( fast , responsive , stable ) .
    B ) Is simpler ( UI &amp; maintenance ) .Which no one wants and no one buys.Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.You could have said the same thing about MP3 players , before the iPod came along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.It's exceedingly clear that people want a computer which:
    A) Works better (fast, responsive, stable).
    B) Is simpler (UI &amp; maintenance).Which no one wants and no one buys.Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.You could have said the same thing about MP3 players, before the iPod came along.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580643</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a netbook and I do n't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580689</id>
	<title>flash video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246727580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash.</i> <br>
<br>
Yes, it's quite impressive. I like watching my YouTube videos at 1 frame every 3 or 4 seconds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which , unlike the iPhone , runs flash .
Yes , it 's quite impressive .
I like watching my YouTube videos at 1 frame every 3 or 4 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash.
Yes, it's quite impressive.
I like watching my YouTube videos at 1 frame every 3 or 4 seconds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580779</id>
	<title>Missing from the feature list</title>
	<author>CubicleView</author>
	<datestamp>1246728420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It must come with velcro on the back to hold it to your lap like in the picture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It must come with velcro on the back to hold it to your lap like in the picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It must come with velcro on the back to hold it to your lap like in the picture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582737</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246703820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss"<br>
Way to sell it! Are you in advertising?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>" an onscreen keyboard on a 12 " screen will be a piece of piss " Way to sell it !
Are you in advertising ?
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss"
Way to sell it!
Are you in advertising?
:p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581305</id>
	<title>Re:CrunchPad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246732380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... with a touchscreen, built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, USB and runs Linux.</p><p>I'm sure nobody can think of use for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A $ 300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox .
... with a touchscreen , built-in WiFi , Bluetooth , USB and runs Linux.I 'm sure nobody can think of use for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.
... with a touchscreen, built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, USB and runs Linux.I'm sure nobody can think of use for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581829</id>
	<title>Re:Once more around the block my friend</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1246737000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My thought exactly. Didn't Nokia have a somewhat unpopular product in their web tablets, which did slight more than just surf the web?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My thought exactly .
Did n't Nokia have a somewhat unpopular product in their web tablets , which did slight more than just surf the web ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thought exactly.
Didn't Nokia have a somewhat unpopular product in their web tablets, which did slight more than just surf the web?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581805</id>
	<title>Got Impatient and Got Myself a Real Tablet</title>
	<author>jacksonyee</author>
	<datestamp>1246736700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Between waiting for the Pandora and the Crunchpad, I found a real tablet at BetaMacs - the Motion Computing M1300 with a USB keyboard for $310 including shipping (They no longer have any stock here at the time of this writing, unfortunately, but GainSaver still has a couple). The battery only lasts about two hours, but I can run a full Windows XP/Ubuntu installation with almost 640x480 x264 playback (stutters a bit during busy scenes).
</p><p>
Thanks for the concepts, Mike. If you had used a Cortex A8 with a 7 inch screen and slide-out keyboard, I might have had a niche for you in my gadgets collection. See you next time!
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Between waiting for the Pandora and the Crunchpad , I found a real tablet at BetaMacs - the Motion Computing M1300 with a USB keyboard for $ 310 including shipping ( They no longer have any stock here at the time of this writing , unfortunately , but GainSaver still has a couple ) .
The battery only lasts about two hours , but I can run a full Windows XP/Ubuntu installation with almost 640x480 x264 playback ( stutters a bit during busy scenes ) .
Thanks for the concepts , Mike .
If you had used a Cortex A8 with a 7 inch screen and slide-out keyboard , I might have had a niche for you in my gadgets collection .
See you next time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Between waiting for the Pandora and the Crunchpad, I found a real tablet at BetaMacs - the Motion Computing M1300 with a USB keyboard for $310 including shipping (They no longer have any stock here at the time of this writing, unfortunately, but GainSaver still has a couple).
The battery only lasts about two hours, but I can run a full Windows XP/Ubuntu installation with almost 640x480 x264 playback (stutters a bit during busy scenes).
Thanks for the concepts, Mike.
If you had used a Cortex A8 with a 7 inch screen and slide-out keyboard, I might have had a niche for you in my gadgets collection.
See you next time!
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584761</id>
	<title>Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ?</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1246735440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming this crunchpad thing has some sort of wireless internet connectivity, wouldn't it simply be possible to create a dedicated webserver on some tiny computer have it deal with the technicalities of communicating with the rest of your house? A new type of wireless router could be an ideal computer for this purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming this crunchpad thing has some sort of wireless internet connectivity , would n't it simply be possible to create a dedicated webserver on some tiny computer have it deal with the technicalities of communicating with the rest of your house ?
A new type of wireless router could be an ideal computer for this purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming this crunchpad thing has some sort of wireless internet connectivity, wouldn't it simply be possible to create a dedicated webserver on some tiny computer have it deal with the technicalities of communicating with the rest of your house?
A new type of wireless router could be an ideal computer for this purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584501</id>
	<title>Re:Web "Consumer" device</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1246729620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To me, this looks far from an iPhone with a big screen. At least in this demo the hardware seemed unresponsive, sluggish, and several attempts had to be made to get a gesture to work properly. And it was being used by someone who was already used to the device. Notice how much trouble he was having just exiting full-screen mode in YouTube, which was displaying a video that was clearly choppy (Flash uses no hardware acceleration for video).</p><p>Having said that, if they *did* manage to get the production model to a semi-usable state, enabling users to "theme" the keyboard will be important. At the very least, they'll need to give several keyboard layout options.</p><p>If all I had to go by is the demo video linked here, I'd say they're not even close to a marketable product. Which is a shame, because the overall idea is nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To me , this looks far from an iPhone with a big screen .
At least in this demo the hardware seemed unresponsive , sluggish , and several attempts had to be made to get a gesture to work properly .
And it was being used by someone who was already used to the device .
Notice how much trouble he was having just exiting full-screen mode in YouTube , which was displaying a video that was clearly choppy ( Flash uses no hardware acceleration for video ) .Having said that , if they * did * manage to get the production model to a semi-usable state , enabling users to " theme " the keyboard will be important .
At the very least , they 'll need to give several keyboard layout options.If all I had to go by is the demo video linked here , I 'd say they 're not even close to a marketable product .
Which is a shame , because the overall idea is nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me, this looks far from an iPhone with a big screen.
At least in this demo the hardware seemed unresponsive, sluggish, and several attempts had to be made to get a gesture to work properly.
And it was being used by someone who was already used to the device.
Notice how much trouble he was having just exiting full-screen mode in YouTube, which was displaying a video that was clearly choppy (Flash uses no hardware acceleration for video).Having said that, if they *did* manage to get the production model to a semi-usable state, enabling users to "theme" the keyboard will be important.
At the very least, they'll need to give several keyboard layout options.If all I had to go by is the demo video linked here, I'd say they're not even close to a marketable product.
Which is a shame, because the overall idea is nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582699</id>
	<title>Re:CrunchPad</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1246703400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, more like it run Chromium (WebKit-based, not Gecko-based). Still sounds pretty cool. Quality of the input is going to be the real gotcha, though - on-screen keyboards can be done well, but usually aren't. They have enough screen real-estate it shouldn't be too hard, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , more like it run Chromium ( WebKit-based , not Gecko-based ) .
Still sounds pretty cool .
Quality of the input is going to be the real gotcha , though - on-screen keyboards can be done well , but usually are n't .
They have enough screen real-estate it should n't be too hard , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, more like it run Chromium (WebKit-based, not Gecko-based).
Still sounds pretty cool.
Quality of the input is going to be the real gotcha, though - on-screen keyboards can be done well, but usually aren't.
They have enough screen real-estate it shouldn't be too hard, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582661</id>
	<title>Where oh where have I seen this before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246703040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh yeah, webtv.</p><p>People like to have some extra functionality in their computers other than web browsing, even if they never use that other functionality.</p><p>Same goes for people who want 600 HP cars, in reality, they'll never use all the power of the car, only a fraction of it, but they want it because it has *more*</p><p>Netbooks sold well not because of limited horsepower or features, but because of the functionality they provided in a small form factor, plus they didnt lack all that much horsepower.</p><p>I'm sorry but the crunchpad will fail because it being design with a fad in mind, you know, the whole web 2.0 cloud computing? It might fly, but it will fall like a stone afterwards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh yeah , webtv.People like to have some extra functionality in their computers other than web browsing , even if they never use that other functionality.Same goes for people who want 600 HP cars , in reality , they 'll never use all the power of the car , only a fraction of it , but they want it because it has * more * Netbooks sold well not because of limited horsepower or features , but because of the functionality they provided in a small form factor , plus they didnt lack all that much horsepower.I 'm sorry but the crunchpad will fail because it being design with a fad in mind , you know , the whole web 2.0 cloud computing ?
It might fly , but it will fall like a stone afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh yeah, webtv.People like to have some extra functionality in their computers other than web browsing, even if they never use that other functionality.Same goes for people who want 600 HP cars, in reality, they'll never use all the power of the car, only a fraction of it, but they want it because it has *more*Netbooks sold well not because of limited horsepower or features, but because of the functionality they provided in a small form factor, plus they didnt lack all that much horsepower.I'm sorry but the crunchpad will fail because it being design with a fad in mind, you know, the whole web 2.0 cloud computing?
It might fly, but it will fall like a stone afterwards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581111</id>
	<title>Re:It needs some method of data entry</title>
	<author>zarzu</author>
	<datestamp>1246730880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i am still waiting for a small tablet with a keyboard on it's back. that might sound kind of crazy and it probably is, but i imagine it being absolutely awesome. a keyboard that doesn't take any additional space and can be used by just normally holding the device, it would be split, one keyboard-half for each hand (stuff that already exists for desktops) and obviously would be rotated some. the only problem is that you can't see it and need to actually know where the keys are, but any frequent user wouldn't have a problem with that, so gimme my tablet with back-keyboard, now!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i am still waiting for a small tablet with a keyboard on it 's back .
that might sound kind of crazy and it probably is , but i imagine it being absolutely awesome .
a keyboard that does n't take any additional space and can be used by just normally holding the device , it would be split , one keyboard-half for each hand ( stuff that already exists for desktops ) and obviously would be rotated some .
the only problem is that you ca n't see it and need to actually know where the keys are , but any frequent user would n't have a problem with that , so gim me my tablet with back-keyboard , now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i am still waiting for a small tablet with a keyboard on it's back.
that might sound kind of crazy and it probably is, but i imagine it being absolutely awesome.
a keyboard that doesn't take any additional space and can be used by just normally holding the device, it would be split, one keyboard-half for each hand (stuff that already exists for desktops) and obviously would be rotated some.
the only problem is that you can't see it and need to actually know where the keys are, but any frequent user wouldn't have a problem with that, so gimme my tablet with back-keyboard, now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28583305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_1439239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581033
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580673
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581179
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582499
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28583305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28584141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28580689
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28582927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_1439239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_1439239.28581049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
