<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_03_1248246</id>
	<title>Emulated PC Enables Linux Desktop In Your Browser</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246629000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www-jpc.physics.ox.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow">Ianopolous</a> writes <i>"Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser! The latest <a href="http://www-jpc.physics.ox.ac.uk/aboutus\_aboutus.html">JPC, the fast 100\% Java x86 PC emulator</a>, is <a href="http://www-jpc.physics.ox.ac.uk/">now available with online demos and downloads</a>. JPC is open source and is the most secure way of running x86 software ever &mdash; 2 layers (applet sandbox, JPC sandbox) of independently validated security make it the world's most secure means of isolating x86 software. Visit the website to try out some classic games and play around with Linux all within your web browser. Refresh = reboot!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ianopolous writes " Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser !
The latest JPC , the fast 100 \ % Java x86 PC emulator , is now available with online demos and downloads .
JPC is open source and is the most secure way of running x86 software ever    2 layers ( applet sandbox , JPC sandbox ) of independently validated security make it the world 's most secure means of isolating x86 software .
Visit the website to try out some classic games and play around with Linux all within your web browser .
Refresh = reboot !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ianopolous writes "Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser!
The latest JPC, the fast 100\% Java x86 PC emulator, is now available with online demos and downloads.
JPC is open source and is the most secure way of running x86 software ever — 2 layers (applet sandbox, JPC sandbox) of independently validated security make it the world's most secure means of isolating x86 software.
Visit the website to try out some classic games and play around with Linux all within your web browser.
Refresh = reboot!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571405</id>
	<title>The JVM sandbox is amazing but not so for applets</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As much as the JVM has proved to be rock-solid (buffer overrun/overflow are impossible in Java code: if it happens then the JVM is not specs-compliant... The only buffer overrun/overflow known were in third party, C-written lib [zlib comes to mind]), the applet sandbox inside the various browsers as proven to be a major PITA.  Java applet didn't just gave Java a bad name for being so pathetically lame, ugly and slow... But also notoriously insecure: there are so many security issues regarding applets it's not even funny anymore.</p><p>Browser inside Damn Small Linux inside JPC inside my browser...  Probably hard to break that that said.</p><p>But I'm not switching from my "reimaged Xen browsing VM as soon as I close my browser" anytime soon<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>(yup, I use a Xen [para-virtualized, not hardware-virt] Linux VM which's sole purpose is browsing and everytime I relaunch the "browser", that Xen VM is re-imaged).</p><p>Hack that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as the JVM has proved to be rock-solid ( buffer overrun/overflow are impossible in Java code : if it happens then the JVM is not specs-compliant... The only buffer overrun/overflow known were in third party , C-written lib [ zlib comes to mind ] ) , the applet sandbox inside the various browsers as proven to be a major PITA .
Java applet did n't just gave Java a bad name for being so pathetically lame , ugly and slow... But also notoriously insecure : there are so many security issues regarding applets it 's not even funny anymore.Browser inside Damn Small Linux inside JPC inside my browser... Probably hard to break that that said.But I 'm not switching from my " reimaged Xen browsing VM as soon as I close my browser " anytime soon ; ) ( yup , I use a Xen [ para-virtualized , not hardware-virt ] Linux VM which 's sole purpose is browsing and everytime I relaunch the " browser " , that Xen VM is re-imaged ) .Hack that ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as the JVM has proved to be rock-solid (buffer overrun/overflow are impossible in Java code: if it happens then the JVM is not specs-compliant... The only buffer overrun/overflow known were in third party, C-written lib [zlib comes to mind]), the applet sandbox inside the various browsers as proven to be a major PITA.
Java applet didn't just gave Java a bad name for being so pathetically lame, ugly and slow... But also notoriously insecure: there are so many security issues regarding applets it's not even funny anymore.Browser inside Damn Small Linux inside JPC inside my browser...  Probably hard to break that that said.But I'm not switching from my "reimaged Xen browsing VM as soon as I close my browser" anytime soon ;)(yup, I use a Xen [para-virtualized, not hardware-virt] Linux VM which's sole purpose is browsing and everytime I relaunch the "browser", that Xen VM is re-imaged).Hack that ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571173</id>
	<title>Need for Speed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow! I can have a program emulated by an interpreter runnning on it's own virtual emulated pc. Think of the pure speed!</p><p>For their next main event, may I suggest running a java-based java-interpreter, on the java-based java-interpreter as a host, think of the speed gain!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
I can have a program emulated by an interpreter runnning on it 's own virtual emulated pc .
Think of the pure speed ! For their next main event , may I suggest running a java-based java-interpreter , on the java-based java-interpreter as a host , think of the speed gain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
I can have a program emulated by an interpreter runnning on it's own virtual emulated pc.
Think of the pure speed!For their next main event, may I suggest running a java-based java-interpreter, on the java-based java-interpreter as a host, think of the speed gain!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573327</id>
	<title>FieLinux Distribution with Firefox Desktop</title>
	<author>aoheno</author>
	<datestamp>1246645980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boot into a newfangled FireLinux distribution using Firefox as the desktop, cloud resident data, and Java to run whatever you want, given the FOSS emulator to do so.<br> <br>Then write a Java emulator for Java to run Java within Java within Java within Java<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boot into a newfangled FireLinux distribution using Firefox as the desktop , cloud resident data , and Java to run whatever you want , given the FOSS emulator to do so .
Then write a Java emulator for Java to run Java within Java within Java within Java .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boot into a newfangled FireLinux distribution using Firefox as the desktop, cloud resident data, and Java to run whatever you want, given the FOSS emulator to do so.
Then write a Java emulator for Java to run Java within Java within Java within Java ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571345</id>
	<title>Quick question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I run a C64 simulator in the PC simulator ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I run a C64 simulator in the PC simulator ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I run a C64 simulator in the PC simulator ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573239</id>
	<title>It's VERY secure</title>
	<author>Brian Stretch</author>
	<datestamp>1246645380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Skynet will wake up there, say "WTF?  Where am I?!", get confused and die, thus saving humanity who will never appreciate how JPC saved us from our machine overlords.  Security through serious obscurity FTW!</p><p>Or the computer the JVM is run on will need rebooting long before Skynet can complete the thought.  Whichever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Skynet will wake up there , say " WTF ?
Where am I ? !
" , get confused and die , thus saving humanity who will never appreciate how JPC saved us from our machine overlords .
Security through serious obscurity FTW ! Or the computer the JVM is run on will need rebooting long before Skynet can complete the thought .
Whichever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Skynet will wake up there, say "WTF?
Where am I?!
", get confused and die, thus saving humanity who will never appreciate how JPC saved us from our machine overlords.
Security through serious obscurity FTW!Or the computer the JVM is run on will need rebooting long before Skynet can complete the thought.
Whichever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571335</id>
	<title>Man this is sweetness and light!</title>
	<author>forgot\_my\_username</author>
	<datestamp>1246634100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, this is totally <b>awesome!</b> <br>
Hmmm... I wonder if I can run VMware in it.<br>
Blow, tripple booting.... three operating systems three deep!!!!<br>
<b>Bwahhhahahahahahah.... I will control the world!</b> <br>
<br>
Bow before your... <b>oh</b>.....   It's been done before....<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
Nevermind!<br>
<br>
Signature!<br>
random link!  <a href="http://www.wordwide-traveler.com/" title="wordwide-traveler.com" rel="nofollow">summer vacation</a> [wordwide-traveler.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , this is totally awesome !
Hmmm... I wonder if I can run VMware in it .
Blow , tripple booting.... three operating systems three deep ! ! ! !
Bwahhhahahahahahah.... I will control the world !
Bow before your... oh..... It 's been done before.... .. . Nevermind !
Signature ! random link !
summer vacation [ wordwide-traveler.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, this is totally awesome!
Hmmm... I wonder if I can run VMware in it.
Blow, tripple booting.... three operating systems three deep!!!!
Bwahhhahahahahahah.... I will control the world!
Bow before your... oh.....   It's been done before.... ...
Nevermind!
Signature!
random link!
summer vacation [wordwide-traveler.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572711</id>
	<title>They just don't learn, do they?</title>
	<author>l00sr</author>
	<datestamp>1246642200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And we'll keep on posting it until they learn how to survive a slashdotting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And we 'll keep on posting it until they learn how to survive a slashdotting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we'll keep on posting it until they learn how to survive a slashdotting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575697</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246620240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the latest version - much improved and updated, Graphical Linux and faster....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the latest version - much improved and updated , Graphical Linux and faster... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the latest version - much improved and updated, Graphical Linux and faster....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574089</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>sagematt</author>
	<datestamp>1246651260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser.</p></div><p>I'm running SPARC you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this article and could n't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser.I 'm running SPARC you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser.I'm running SPARC you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571457</id>
	<title>Frost Pi5t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NIGGER ASSOCIATION Every chance I got purposes *BSD is</htmltext>
<tokenext>NIGGER ASSOCIATION Every chance I got purposes * BSD is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NIGGER ASSOCIATION Every chance I got purposes *BSD is</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807</id>
	<title>OS in a browser in an OS in a browser...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246636680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what happens when I load this site up, load up Firefox within the "OS in a browser", navigate to the site, and load up Firefox within the "OS in a browser in an OS in a browser"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what happens when I load this site up , load up Firefox within the " OS in a browser " , navigate to the site , and load up Firefox within the " OS in a browser in an OS in a browser " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what happens when I load this site up, load up Firefox within the "OS in a browser", navigate to the site, and load up Firefox within the "OS in a browser in an OS in a browser"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28577617</id>
	<title>Re:source code ? site is down !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246641300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is running a VM inside a VM impressive from an engineering stand point?  The whole point of a VM is to be able to run anything inside its sandbox safely.  By anything that means any thing, not excluding things.</p><p>I guess your saying that its pretty impressive that a JVM is doing what its supposed to do?  Is this typical for engineers to be impressed when they build something and it actually works like they planned?</p><p>This is the same as virtualbox, vmware, or virtual pc, only slower.</p><p>All of them require (or could be done with one if someone with a clue actually thought there was reason to do so) a plugin to operate in a browser.</p><p>The difference here is that you need about 5 more layers of software to use the Java version, BUT, in theory it'll work on any JVM.  I say theory because any one with a clue knows thats not true all of the time, but Java is finally getting to actually work well on multiple JVMs.</p><p>Sadly, it would appear that Mono is beating the very living shit out of Java in the 'write once, run anywhere' arena.  No, its not as portable as Java, but its also not nearly as old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is running a VM inside a VM impressive from an engineering stand point ?
The whole point of a VM is to be able to run anything inside its sandbox safely .
By anything that means any thing , not excluding things.I guess your saying that its pretty impressive that a JVM is doing what its supposed to do ?
Is this typical for engineers to be impressed when they build something and it actually works like they planned ? This is the same as virtualbox , vmware , or virtual pc , only slower.All of them require ( or could be done with one if someone with a clue actually thought there was reason to do so ) a plugin to operate in a browser.The difference here is that you need about 5 more layers of software to use the Java version , BUT , in theory it 'll work on any JVM .
I say theory because any one with a clue knows thats not true all of the time , but Java is finally getting to actually work well on multiple JVMs.Sadly , it would appear that Mono is beating the very living shit out of Java in the 'write once , run anywhere ' arena .
No , its not as portable as Java , but its also not nearly as old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is running a VM inside a VM impressive from an engineering stand point?
The whole point of a VM is to be able to run anything inside its sandbox safely.
By anything that means any thing, not excluding things.I guess your saying that its pretty impressive that a JVM is doing what its supposed to do?
Is this typical for engineers to be impressed when they build something and it actually works like they planned?This is the same as virtualbox, vmware, or virtual pc, only slower.All of them require (or could be done with one if someone with a clue actually thought there was reason to do so) a plugin to operate in a browser.The difference here is that you need about 5 more layers of software to use the Java version, BUT, in theory it'll work on any JVM.
I say theory because any one with a clue knows thats not true all of the time, but Java is finally getting to actually work well on multiple JVMs.Sadly, it would appear that Mono is beating the very living shit out of Java in the 'write once, run anywhere' arena.
No, its not as portable as Java, but its also not nearly as old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572057</id>
	<title>Re:We put an OS in your browser in your OS!</title>
	<author>SpzToid</author>
	<datestamp>1246638120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was thinking of being able to run a cool linux distro like Backtrack, inside the corporate firewall, using known and approved IP addresses, etc. To SOME people, this is a feature; to others a threat. Regardless, i want to know about the possibilities to do my job better.</p><p>Microsoft is making a big deal in Windows 7 about being able to lockdown USB drives in the enterprise. But with this info, they should also considering locking-down web-browsers.</p><p>Oh, wait. Nevermind I just said that about Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking of being able to run a cool linux distro like Backtrack , inside the corporate firewall , using known and approved IP addresses , etc .
To SOME people , this is a feature ; to others a threat .
Regardless , i want to know about the possibilities to do my job better.Microsoft is making a big deal in Windows 7 about being able to lockdown USB drives in the enterprise .
But with this info , they should also considering locking-down web-browsers.Oh , wait .
Nevermind I just said that about Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking of being able to run a cool linux distro like Backtrack, inside the corporate firewall, using known and approved IP addresses, etc.
To SOME people, this is a feature; to others a threat.
Regardless, i want to know about the possibilities to do my job better.Microsoft is making a big deal in Windows 7 about being able to lockdown USB drives in the enterprise.
But with this info, they should also considering locking-down web-browsers.Oh, wait.
Nevermind I just said that about Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573765</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds efficient</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1246648860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope. Imagine Vista on this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
Imagine Vista on this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
Imagine Vista on this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189</id>
	<title>We put an OS in your browser in your OS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm just waiting for somebody to go, "fuck that Java shit." But read the summary, people! Secure means security which means secure!<br> <br>Also: But can it run Crysis?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just waiting for somebody to go , " fuck that Java shit .
" But read the summary , people !
Secure means security which means secure !
Also : But can it run Crysis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just waiting for somebody to go, "fuck that Java shit.
" But read the summary, people!
Secure means security which means secure!
Also: But can it run Crysis?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576143</id>
	<title>x86 0nly?</title>
	<author>pbjones</author>
	<datestamp>1246624200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing that it only runs on x86 plartforms?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing that it only runs on x86 plartforms ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing that it only runs on x86 plartforms?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571763</id>
	<title>Now I get why we need so fast CPUs.</title>
	<author>Pentium100</author>
	<datestamp>1246636440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's so we can run Windows 3.11 on top of Windows 2000 on top of Windows XP on top of Windows Vista on top of Windows 7 which is inside a browser running on Java inside Windows 2000 which is on top of Windows XP, which is on top of Vista, which is on top of 7.</p><p>And it may even have enough speed to run as fast as a 386 25MHz...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so we can run Windows 3.11 on top of Windows 2000 on top of Windows XP on top of Windows Vista on top of Windows 7 which is inside a browser running on Java inside Windows 2000 which is on top of Windows XP , which is on top of Vista , which is on top of 7.And it may even have enough speed to run as fast as a 386 25MHz.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so we can run Windows 3.11 on top of Windows 2000 on top of Windows XP on top of Windows Vista on top of Windows 7 which is inside a browser running on Java inside Windows 2000 which is on top of Windows XP, which is on top of Vista, which is on top of 7.And it may even have enough speed to run as fast as a 386 25MHz...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571333</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah...</title>
	<author>Ractive</author>
	<datestamp>1246634100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Site probably not down maybe they're just refreshing the tab where they have their webserver running.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Site probably not down maybe they 're just refreshing the tab where they have their webserver running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Site probably not down maybe they're just refreshing the tab where they have their webserver running.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571777</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>peppepz</author>
	<datestamp>1246636560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having a PC emulator written in Java means to be able to run any previously-written x86 code on any Java-enabled machine out there, forever. And don&rsquo;t forget about mobile devices, too. JPC needs not to be run in a browser, it can be run standalone, and has already been ported to high-end phones - I, for one, think that running Windows 3.1 on a phone is quite cool. Running old games might even be funny.<br>
Perhaps JPC could be ported to an xlet and, say, ran off a bluray disc or a dvb-t transmission. OK, I hate both of them, but the point is that achieving platform-independence opens up many possibilities.<br>
It&rsquo;s not less useful than the many old-systems emulators available on the net - and those get quite a lot of followers.<br>
I&rsquo;d say that it can be useful for:<br>
- preservation (and enjoyment<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D) of ancient software;<br>
- interoperability with not-so-ancient software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a PC emulator written in Java means to be able to run any previously-written x86 code on any Java-enabled machine out there , forever .
And don    t forget about mobile devices , too .
JPC needs not to be run in a browser , it can be run standalone , and has already been ported to high-end phones - I , for one , think that running Windows 3.1 on a phone is quite cool .
Running old games might even be funny .
Perhaps JPC could be ported to an xlet and , say , ran off a bluray disc or a dvb-t transmission .
OK , I hate both of them , but the point is that achieving platform-independence opens up many possibilities .
It    s not less useful than the many old-systems emulators available on the net - and those get quite a lot of followers .
I    d say that it can be useful for : - preservation ( and enjoyment : D ) of ancient software ; - interoperability with not-so-ancient software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a PC emulator written in Java means to be able to run any previously-written x86 code on any Java-enabled machine out there, forever.
And don’t forget about mobile devices, too.
JPC needs not to be run in a browser, it can be run standalone, and has already been ported to high-end phones - I, for one, think that running Windows 3.1 on a phone is quite cool.
Running old games might even be funny.
Perhaps JPC could be ported to an xlet and, say, ran off a bluray disc or a dvb-t transmission.
OK, I hate both of them, but the point is that achieving platform-independence opens up many possibilities.
It’s not less useful than the many old-systems emulators available on the net - and those get quite a lot of followers.
I’d say that it can be useful for:
- preservation (and enjoyment :D) of ancient software;
- interoperability with not-so-ancient software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575605</id>
	<title>Re:source code ? site is down !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246619460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes JPC is open source under GPL 2.0. Available on the website</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes JPC is open source under GPL 2.0 .
Available on the website</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes JPC is open source under GPL 2.0.
Available on the website</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571385</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah...</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1246634340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably it is hosted by IE6 with Java .</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably it is hosted by IE6 with Java .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably it is hosted by IE6 with Java .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573711</id>
	<title>Ping:Admins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246648440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OT: Any chance of writing a bot that visits coral-cache versions of the links in any article that's about to hit the front page? At least latecomers to the article would then have a fighting chance of seeing what the fuss was about in the brief seconds the server was online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OT : Any chance of writing a bot that visits coral-cache versions of the links in any article that 's about to hit the front page ?
At least latecomers to the article would then have a fighting chance of seeing what the fuss was about in the brief seconds the server was online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OT: Any chance of writing a bot that visits coral-cache versions of the links in any article that's about to hit the front page?
At least latecomers to the article would then have a fighting chance of seeing what the fuss was about in the brief seconds the server was online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579725</id>
	<title>Re:Refresh = reboot!</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246718640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no reason the applet couldn't just be a VNC terminal connecting to a VM that runs for as long as your session is allowed to exist.  In other words, if you're on wireless, get disconnected from the net, come back in range about 14 minutes later, and refresh, you should see your desktop again.  Works with the javascript-based consoles that hosting companies provide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no reason the applet could n't just be a VNC terminal connecting to a VM that runs for as long as your session is allowed to exist .
In other words , if you 're on wireless , get disconnected from the net , come back in range about 14 minutes later , and refresh , you should see your desktop again .
Works with the javascript-based consoles that hosting companies provide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no reason the applet couldn't just be a VNC terminal connecting to a VM that runs for as long as your session is allowed to exist.
In other words, if you're on wireless, get disconnected from the net, come back in range about 14 minutes later, and refresh, you should see your desktop again.
Works with the javascript-based consoles that hosting companies provide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572223</id>
	<title>Single point of failure</title>
	<author>debrain</author>
	<datestamp>1246639020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>2 layers (applet sandbox, JPC sandbox) of independently validated security make it the world's most secure means of isolating x86 software</i></p><p>I contest this notion (if I understand their setup correctly; the website is broken so I've some uncertainty about what they're doing). I agree that it's likely a very secure setup, but I disagree that the two lawyers of Java VM security makes it the most secure setup for running x86.</p><p>The common Java VM is a single point of failure. Both layers of "independently validated security" are running in Java VM, so if there is an exploit in the runtime interpreter (or compiled executable, if they're compiling things now), it may be used to circumvent both sandboxes. Using two different Java VMs would be an improvement, but better still would be orthogonal interpreters (on the plane of security vectors) such as a Java VM and a Python interpreter. Both are nevertheless still probably calling some version of glibc on x86 machine code.</p><p>If I were to speculate (and I will), I'd say that Xen et al virtualization has fewer vectors, and better still would be x86 virtualization running on top of a mainframe ala. z/VM. That would, in theory, be more secure than this Java VM on Java VM setup. Of course, it all comes down to the implementations in the end (and, as a practical matter, how big a target they are - Java is a big target for security, z/VM less so).</p><p>Again, though, I think this Java VM is likely very secure. Claiming it's the world's most secure is puffery, though, in my humble opinion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 layers ( applet sandbox , JPC sandbox ) of independently validated security make it the world 's most secure means of isolating x86 softwareI contest this notion ( if I understand their setup correctly ; the website is broken so I 've some uncertainty about what they 're doing ) .
I agree that it 's likely a very secure setup , but I disagree that the two lawyers of Java VM security makes it the most secure setup for running x86.The common Java VM is a single point of failure .
Both layers of " independently validated security " are running in Java VM , so if there is an exploit in the runtime interpreter ( or compiled executable , if they 're compiling things now ) , it may be used to circumvent both sandboxes .
Using two different Java VMs would be an improvement , but better still would be orthogonal interpreters ( on the plane of security vectors ) such as a Java VM and a Python interpreter .
Both are nevertheless still probably calling some version of glibc on x86 machine code.If I were to speculate ( and I will ) , I 'd say that Xen et al virtualization has fewer vectors , and better still would be x86 virtualization running on top of a mainframe ala. z/VM. That would , in theory , be more secure than this Java VM on Java VM setup .
Of course , it all comes down to the implementations in the end ( and , as a practical matter , how big a target they are - Java is a big target for security , z/VM less so ) .Again , though , I think this Java VM is likely very secure .
Claiming it 's the world 's most secure is puffery , though , in my humble opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 layers (applet sandbox, JPC sandbox) of independently validated security make it the world's most secure means of isolating x86 softwareI contest this notion (if I understand their setup correctly; the website is broken so I've some uncertainty about what they're doing).
I agree that it's likely a very secure setup, but I disagree that the two lawyers of Java VM security makes it the most secure setup for running x86.The common Java VM is a single point of failure.
Both layers of "independently validated security" are running in Java VM, so if there is an exploit in the runtime interpreter (or compiled executable, if they're compiling things now), it may be used to circumvent both sandboxes.
Using two different Java VMs would be an improvement, but better still would be orthogonal interpreters (on the plane of security vectors) such as a Java VM and a Python interpreter.
Both are nevertheless still probably calling some version of glibc on x86 machine code.If I were to speculate (and I will), I'd say that Xen et al virtualization has fewer vectors, and better still would be x86 virtualization running on top of a mainframe ala. z/VM. That would, in theory, be more secure than this Java VM on Java VM setup.
Of course, it all comes down to the implementations in the end (and, as a practical matter, how big a target they are - Java is a big target for security, z/VM less so).Again, though, I think this Java VM is likely very secure.
Claiming it's the world's most secure is puffery, though, in my humble opinion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28605607</id>
	<title>Oxymoron</title>
	<author>topologicalanomaly47</author>
	<datestamp>1246965180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fast 100\% Java - now that's the definition of oxymoron right there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fast 100 \ % Java - now that 's the definition of oxymoron right there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fast 100\% Java - now that's the definition of oxymoron right there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572101</id>
	<title>Re:source code ? site is down !</title>
	<author>loufoque</author>
	<datestamp>1246638360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of view</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't see how this is impressive at all, I've written several emulators myself, it's pretty easy stuff.</p><p>Also, it seems you're confusing virtualization and emulation, which are totally different things.<br>Emulation: instructions are interpreted (or JIT-compiled), as if they were a programming language<br>Virtualization: instructions run directly on the machine, either being patched to reroute some stuff elsewhere or being managed by a hardware supervisor that is basically a super MMU.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of viewI do n't see how this is impressive at all , I 've written several emulators myself , it 's pretty easy stuff.Also , it seems you 're confusing virtualization and emulation , which are totally different things.Emulation : instructions are interpreted ( or JIT-compiled ) , as if they were a programming languageVirtualization : instructions run directly on the machine , either being patched to reroute some stuff elsewhere or being managed by a hardware supervisor that is basically a super MMU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of viewI don't see how this is impressive at all, I've written several emulators myself, it's pretty easy stuff.Also, it seems you're confusing virtualization and emulation, which are totally different things.Emulation: instructions are interpreted (or JIT-compiled), as if they were a programming languageVirtualization: instructions run directly on the machine, either being patched to reroute some stuff elsewhere or being managed by a hardware supervisor that is basically a super MMU.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573397</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1246646460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser, so I clicked to see other people's comments.</p></div><p>Duh, so that you can run ActiveX in your Firefox on Linux, obviously! Now how cool is that, eh? ~</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this article and could n't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser , so I clicked to see other people 's comments.Duh , so that you can run ActiveX in your Firefox on Linux , obviously !
Now how cool is that , eh ?
~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser, so I clicked to see other people's comments.Duh, so that you can run ActiveX in your Firefox on Linux, obviously!
Now how cool is that, eh?
~
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573445</id>
	<title>Re:We put an OS in your browser in your OS!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246646700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sup dawg, I herd yo like inner platformz. So we put a browser in yo OS in yo browser on yo OS, so yo can compute while yo compute, and browse while yo browse!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sup dawg , I herd yo like inner platformz .
So we put a browser in yo OS in yo browser on yo OS , so yo can compute while yo compute , and browse while yo browse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sup dawg, I herd yo like inner platformz.
So we put a browser in yo OS in yo browser on yo OS, so yo can compute while yo compute, and browse while yo browse!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576767</id>
	<title>Re:Most secure!?</title>
	<author>An anonymous Frank</author>
	<datestamp>1246630440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have the link in mind right now, but I remember reading something pertaining to how Gillette security labs are way ahead of them in this regard...  they've had three layers available for some time now, and are working on a new prototype, that is said to completely trump the 5-layer model from the competition.</p><p>Two layers, pfft!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have the link in mind right now , but I remember reading something pertaining to how Gillette security labs are way ahead of them in this regard... they 've had three layers available for some time now , and are working on a new prototype , that is said to completely trump the 5-layer model from the competition.Two layers , pfft !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have the link in mind right now, but I remember reading something pertaining to how Gillette security labs are way ahead of them in this regard...  they've had three layers available for some time now, and are working on a new prototype, that is said to completely trump the 5-layer model from the competition.Two layers, pfft!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574649</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1246612320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something about comparing FreeDOS (or any other DOS for that matter) to vinyl just makes my head hurt...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something about comparing FreeDOS ( or any other DOS for that matter ) to vinyl just makes my head hurt.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something about comparing FreeDOS (or any other DOS for that matter) to vinyl just makes my head hurt...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571997</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>krisbrowne42</author>
	<datestamp>1246637760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same people who dig <a href="http://www.virtualapple.org/" title="virtualapple.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualapple.org/</a> [virtualapple.org] or think FreeDos is still relevant. People who are know vinyl has something CDs can't replicate. People who know the pinnacle of gaming was either Nethack or Ultima 7 (Depending on whether you prefer gameplay or story).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same people who dig http : //www.virtualapple.org/ [ virtualapple.org ] or think FreeDos is still relevant .
People who are know vinyl has something CDs ca n't replicate .
People who know the pinnacle of gaming was either Nethack or Ultima 7 ( Depending on whether you prefer gameplay or story ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same people who dig http://www.virtualapple.org/ [virtualapple.org] or think FreeDos is still relevant.
People who are know vinyl has something CDs can't replicate.
People who know the pinnacle of gaming was either Nethack or Ultima 7 (Depending on whether you prefer gameplay or story).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</id>
	<title>Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my browser</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1246634220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser, so I clicked to see other people's comments. Apparently no one else on slashdot can figure out why someone would want to do that either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this article and could n't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser , so I clicked to see other people 's comments .
Apparently no one else on slashdot can figure out why someone would want to do that either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser, so I clicked to see other people's comments.
Apparently no one else on slashdot can figure out why someone would want to do that either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573211</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246645200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Site's down.</p></div><p>Pool's closed. Due to AIDS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Site 's down.Pool 's closed .
Due to AIDS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Site's down.Pool's closed.
Due to AIDS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575973</id>
	<title>Yeah, imagine the possibilities...</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1246622880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it's obviously an advantage to be a Java program, fully portable including UI.</p></div><p>Imagine playing quake on a beow^W^H Android phone cluster of those.</p><p>"Let's see, down the water, swim back in, enter the tunnel, nightmare difficulty.  Yeah, episode 1.  Take that, you ugly gru... huh?  Out of battery, wtf!!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's obviously an advantage to be a Java program , fully portable including UI.Imagine playing quake on a beow ^ W ^ H Android phone cluster of those .
" Let 's see , down the water , swim back in , enter the tunnel , nightmare difficulty .
Yeah , episode 1 .
Take that , you ugly gru... huh ? Out of battery , wtf ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's obviously an advantage to be a Java program, fully portable including UI.Imagine playing quake on a beow^W^H Android phone cluster of those.
"Let's see, down the water, swim back in, enter the tunnel, nightmare difficulty.
Yeah, episode 1.
Take that, you ugly gru... huh?  Out of battery, wtf!!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257</id>
	<title>obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo dawg,</p><p>I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems , so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572521</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>The MAZZTer</author>
	<datestamp>1246641060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps to help introduce Windows users to alternate operating systems without needing them to install anything?  Assuming this works like any Java applet.  Although any presentable average-user desktop would have to come with a pretty big HD to download into your cache...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps to help introduce Windows users to alternate operating systems without needing them to install anything ?
Assuming this works like any Java applet .
Although any presentable average-user desktop would have to come with a pretty big HD to download into your cache.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps to help introduce Windows users to alternate operating systems without needing them to install anything?
Assuming this works like any Java applet.
Although any presentable average-user desktop would have to come with a pretty big HD to download into your cache...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573533</id>
	<title>Ulteo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246647240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ulteo http://www.ulteo.com/home/en/home?a=view&amp;autolang=en  has been running linux through a java applet for a while, or you can run open office inside your browser.  What is the difference?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ulteo http : //www.ulteo.com/home/en/home ? a = view&amp;autolang = en has been running linux through a java applet for a while , or you can run open office inside your browser .
What is the difference ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ulteo http://www.ulteo.com/home/en/home?a=view&amp;autolang=en  has been running linux through a java applet for a while, or you can run open office inside your browser.
What is the difference?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572511</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246641000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Infidel. Turn your geek badge on the way out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Infidel .
Turn your geek badge on the way out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Infidel.
Turn your geek badge on the way out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571311</id>
	<title>Sup dawg</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1246633860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard you like virtual machines and browsers, so I built a virtual machine to run on a virtual machine so you can browse from your virtual machine that's running on a virtual machine in your browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard you like virtual machines and browsers , so I built a virtual machine to run on a virtual machine so you can browse from your virtual machine that 's running on a virtual machine in your browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard you like virtual machines and browsers, so I built a virtual machine to run on a virtual machine so you can browse from your virtual machine that's running on a virtual machine in your browser.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572051</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246638060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a good (for given values of good) way of turning those old bits of legacy code into web apps.  How many businesses have you seen that depend on some bit of 16-bit Windows software, probably written in VB or Delphi, which had source code once but no one's seen a copy for a decade?  These programs ran okay on a 386 and ran well on a 486.  Now they'll run in a web browser on whatever platform you want, including something very cheap like a Loongson 2F or ARM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a good ( for given values of good ) way of turning those old bits of legacy code into web apps .
How many businesses have you seen that depend on some bit of 16-bit Windows software , probably written in VB or Delphi , which had source code once but no one 's seen a copy for a decade ?
These programs ran okay on a 386 and ran well on a 486 .
Now they 'll run in a web browser on whatever platform you want , including something very cheap like a Loongson 2F or ARM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a good (for given values of good) way of turning those old bits of legacy code into web apps.
How many businesses have you seen that depend on some bit of 16-bit Windows software, probably written in VB or Delphi, which had source code once but no one's seen a copy for a decade?
These programs ran okay on a 386 and ran well on a 486.
Now they'll run in a web browser on whatever platform you want, including something very cheap like a Loongson 2F or ARM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573831</id>
	<title>Java... making work more fun on Fridays!</title>
	<author>hurting now</author>
	<datestamp>1246649280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I tell my boss that I'm testing a Linux desktop... by playing games in my browser?!  Sweet action, I'm in.  Happy Friday!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I tell my boss that I 'm testing a Linux desktop... by playing games in my browser ? !
Sweet action , I 'm in .
Happy Friday !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I tell my boss that I'm testing a Linux desktop... by playing games in my browser?!
Sweet action, I'm in.
Happy Friday!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571579</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah...</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1246635540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The whole Physics. subdomain is down. Slashdotted BIG style!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole Physics .
subdomain is down .
Slashdotted BIG style !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole Physics.
subdomain is down.
Slashdotted BIG style!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571541</id>
	<title>Most secure!?</title>
	<author>lithero04</author>
	<datestamp>1246635300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the world's most secure means of isolating x86 software</p></div><p>I seriously doubt this claim...</p><p>
What about?  <a href="http://www.nsa.gov/research/tech\_transfer/fact\_sheets/nettop.shtml" title="nsa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsa.gov/research/tech\_transfer/fact\_sheets/nettop.shtml</a> [nsa.gov] <br>
Or its predecessor?  <a href="http://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/h\_a\_p/releases/hapr1.shtml" title="nsa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/h\_a\_p/releases/hapr1.shtml</a> [nsa.gov]
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the world 's most secure means of isolating x86 softwareI seriously doubt this claim.. . What about ?
http : //www.nsa.gov/research/tech \ _transfer/fact \ _sheets/nettop.shtml [ nsa.gov ] Or its predecessor ?
http : //www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/h \ _a \ _p/releases/hapr1.shtml [ nsa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the world's most secure means of isolating x86 softwareI seriously doubt this claim...
What about?
http://www.nsa.gov/research/tech\_transfer/fact\_sheets/nettop.shtml [nsa.gov] 
Or its predecessor?
http://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/h\_a\_p/releases/hapr1.shtml [nsa.gov]

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579737</id>
	<title>Re:obligatory</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246718760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!</p></div></blockquote><p>p.s.: try not to use the browsing features while browsing operating systems in your browser in your operating system.  One or more of the operating systems might not like it.  Of course, if you want to browse in your operating system that your browsed to in your operating system, that's fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I herd you like Operating systems , so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system ! p.s .
: try not to use the browsing features while browsing operating systems in your browser in your operating system .
One or more of the operating systems might not like it .
Of course , if you want to browse in your operating system that your browsed to in your operating system , that 's fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!p.s.
: try not to use the browsing features while browsing operating systems in your browser in your operating system.
One or more of the operating systems might not like it.
Of course, if you want to browse in your operating system that your browsed to in your operating system, that's fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572637</id>
	<title>I prefer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246641900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....the JPC on ClassicDOSGames.com rather than this site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....the JPC on ClassicDOSGames.com rather than this site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....the JPC on ClassicDOSGames.com rather than this site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573881</id>
	<title>Re:OS in a browser in an OS in a browser...</title>
	<author>h4rdc0d3</author>
	<datestamp>1246649520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The universe implodes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The universe implodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The universe implodes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621</id>
	<title>source code ? site is down !</title>
	<author>johnjones</author>
	<datestamp>1246635840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do they provide sourcecode ?<br>(really interested if they do )</p><p>virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of view<br>have they published any work on this ?</p><p>regards</p><p>John Jones</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do they provide sourcecode ?
( really interested if they do ) virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of viewhave they published any work on this ? regardsJohn Jones</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do they provide sourcecode ?
(really interested if they do )virtualbox is pretty nifty but inside a JVM is pretty impressive from a engineering point of viewhave they published any work on this ?regardsJohn Jones</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573185</id>
	<title>Even better, a cluster within a cluster.</title>
	<author>sethstorm</author>
	<datestamp>1246645080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Beowulf cluster within each node constructed with the tabs of each node's browser.  Then put this within an actual Beowulf cluster.</p><p>Then grab some popcorn and watch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Beowulf cluster within each node constructed with the tabs of each node 's browser .
Then put this within an actual Beowulf cluster.Then grab some popcorn and watch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Beowulf cluster within each node constructed with the tabs of each node's browser.
Then put this within an actual Beowulf cluster.Then grab some popcorn and watch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263</id>
	<title>Imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Beowulf cluster of these.... In tabs on your browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Beowulf cluster of these.... In tabs on your browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Beowulf cluster of these.... In tabs on your browser.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579311</id>
	<title>Pimp My Linux</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1246712700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo dawg! I heard you like Linux, so we put Linux in your Linux so you can use Linux while you use Linux!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg !
I heard you like Linux , so we put Linux in your Linux so you can use Linux while you use Linux !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg!
I heard you like Linux, so we put Linux in your Linux so you can use Linux while you use Linux!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573401</id>
	<title>We called that a Inner Platform Antipattern!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246646460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The origin of the term is from the thedailywtf.com site. It means to have layers upon layers of pointless abstractions that do nothing but slow everything down and make it more error- and security-hole-prone, as compared to abstractions that make sense.</p><p>It as an antipattern, and all in all a massive failure.</p><p>Compare this thing to running the app right on the CPU. Or even running it in VirtualBox (if you need that encapsulation).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The origin of the term is from the thedailywtf.com site .
It means to have layers upon layers of pointless abstractions that do nothing but slow everything down and make it more error- and security-hole-prone , as compared to abstractions that make sense.It as an antipattern , and all in all a massive failure.Compare this thing to running the app right on the CPU .
Or even running it in VirtualBox ( if you need that encapsulation ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The origin of the term is from the thedailywtf.com site.
It means to have layers upon layers of pointless abstractions that do nothing but slow everything down and make it more error- and security-hole-prone, as compared to abstractions that make sense.It as an antipattern, and all in all a massive failure.Compare this thing to running the app right on the CPU.
Or even running it in VirtualBox (if you need that encapsulation).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573505</id>
	<title>Re:Single point of failure</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1246647060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now this might bring about the micro OS, just enough OS to run the application you require. I already have a mimimal linux to run in my VMWare server, but something custom made to work in the hypervisor would be more efficient.<br>But really, as I can start a couple of VMs including Vista on my Mac Mini Why would I mess around with Java in a browser. Which version of Java and which browser, and on what hardware? In my experiance Java has always been very fussy about the version of the JVM you need to run certain apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now this might bring about the micro OS , just enough OS to run the application you require .
I already have a mimimal linux to run in my VMWare server , but something custom made to work in the hypervisor would be more efficient.But really , as I can start a couple of VMs including Vista on my Mac Mini Why would I mess around with Java in a browser .
Which version of Java and which browser , and on what hardware ?
In my experiance Java has always been very fussy about the version of the JVM you need to run certain apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now this might bring about the micro OS, just enough OS to run the application you require.
I already have a mimimal linux to run in my VMWare server, but something custom made to work in the hypervisor would be more efficient.But really, as I can start a couple of VMs including Vista on my Mac Mini Why would I mess around with Java in a browser.
Which version of Java and which browser, and on what hardware?
In my experiance Java has always been very fussy about the version of the JVM you need to run certain apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574031</id>
	<title>Am I the only one who noticed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246650780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that this means you can install Linux natively on any networked PC, and run Windows securely in the cloud?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that this means you can install Linux natively on any networked PC , and run Windows securely in the cloud ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that this means you can install Linux natively on any networked PC, and run Windows securely in the cloud?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571617</id>
	<title>iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246635780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most import question:  Can I get flash support so I can use it on my iPhone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most import question : Can I get flash support so I can use it on my iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most import question:  Can I get flash support so I can use it on my iPhone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572145</id>
	<title>Re:source code ? site is down !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246638600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a JavaOne session on it last year: <a href="http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-13820&amp;yr=2007&amp;track=5" title="sun.com" rel="nofollow">http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-13820&amp;yr=2007&amp;track=5</a> [sun.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a JavaOne session on it last year : http : //developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp ? sessn = TS-13820&amp;yr = 2007&amp;track = 5 [ sun.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a JavaOne session on it last year: http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-13820&amp;yr=2007&amp;track=5 [sun.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269</id>
	<title>Yeah...</title>
	<author>IANAAC</author>
	<datestamp>1246633620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is now available with online demos and downloads.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>
No it's not.  Site's down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... is now available with online demos and downloads .
No it 's not .
Site 's down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  ... is now available with online demos and downloads.
No it's not.
Site's down.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571485</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>itsme1234</author>
	<datestamp>1246634940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Run from a stick (or from a basic web server) on a computer without a lot of privileges?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Run from a stick ( or from a basic web server ) on a computer without a lot of privileges ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Run from a stick (or from a basic web server) on a computer without a lot of privileges?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573843</id>
	<title>Re:Need for Speed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246649340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Java-interpreters are so 1996. Nowadays, JVM all have one form or another of "Just In time Compilers". This means the Java byte code is compiled once and that the x86 machine code is then cached so the next time it is used, the Java byte code doesn't have to be re-interpreted .</p><p>This is 20 to 30 times faster than a 1996 interpreter and this is the only reason why Java applications now comes to par with C++ applications in terms of speed. Often Java applications can be faster because JITs usually also do run-time optimization of the code, similar to the following link, only it occurs at run-time in Java :</p><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/0143233/IBM-Releases-Open-Source-Machine-Learning-Compiler?art\_pos=12" title="slashdot.org">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/0143233/IBM-Releases-Open-Source-Machine-Learning-Compiler?art\_pos=12</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Java-interpreters are so 1996 .
Nowadays , JVM all have one form or another of " Just In time Compilers " .
This means the Java byte code is compiled once and that the x86 machine code is then cached so the next time it is used , the Java byte code does n't have to be re-interpreted .This is 20 to 30 times faster than a 1996 interpreter and this is the only reason why Java applications now comes to par with C + + applications in terms of speed .
Often Java applications can be faster because JITs usually also do run-time optimization of the code , similar to the following link , only it occurs at run-time in Java : http : //tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/0143233/IBM-Releases-Open-Source-Machine-Learning-Compiler ? art \ _pos = 12 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Java-interpreters are so 1996.
Nowadays, JVM all have one form or another of "Just In time Compilers".
This means the Java byte code is compiled once and that the x86 machine code is then cached so the next time it is used, the Java byte code doesn't have to be re-interpreted .This is 20 to 30 times faster than a 1996 interpreter and this is the only reason why Java applications now comes to par with C++ applications in terms of speed.
Often Java applications can be faster because JITs usually also do run-time optimization of the code, similar to the following link, only it occurs at run-time in Java :http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/0143233/IBM-Releases-Open-Source-Machine-Learning-Compiler?art\_pos=12 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574137</id>
	<title>Re:obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246651680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yo dawg,</p><p>I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!</p></div><p>Nothing short of amazing what kind of comments go around as "obligatory" around good old Slashdot!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems , so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system ! Nothing short of amazing what kind of comments go around as " obligatory " around good old Slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!Nothing short of amazing what kind of comments go around as "obligatory" around good old Slashdot!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576909</id>
	<title>Re:OS in a browser in an OS in a browser...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246632120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572611</id>
	<title>It gave me a White Screen of Death...</title>
	<author>HouseOfMisterE</author>
	<datestamp>1246641720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and now it won't even POST.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and now it wo n't even POST .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and now it won't even POST.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571261</id>
	<title>Its dead Jim</title>
	<author>madfilipino</author>
	<datestamp>1246633560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They must've been using IE to run their web server inside of it</htmltext>
<tokenext>They must 've been using IE to run their web server inside of it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They must've been using IE to run their web server inside of it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572023</id>
	<title>So its a VM^2? ... so how about a VM^4?</title>
	<author>MindKata</author>
	<datestamp>1246637880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was wondering, if we run a Java x86 PC emulator that is emulating an Amiga that is emulating a Spectrum, is it still faster than a real Spectrum or do we need to optimise it a bit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was wondering , if we run a Java x86 PC emulator that is emulating an Amiga that is emulating a Spectrum , is it still faster than a real Spectrum or do we need to optimise it a bit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was wondering, if we run a Java x86 PC emulator that is emulating an Amiga that is emulating a Spectrum, is it still faster than a real Spectrum or do we need to optimise it a bit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571691</id>
	<title>Eh?</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1246636140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't a new thing, I've seen it, we've all seen it. How come the things I submit that are new and cool don't get accepted in favour of old news?

In other news, fuck this Java shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a new thing , I 've seen it , we 've all seen it .
How come the things I submit that are new and cool do n't get accepted in favour of old news ?
In other news , fuck this Java shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a new thing, I've seen it, we've all seen it.
How come the things I submit that are new and cool don't get accepted in favour of old news?
In other news, fuck this Java shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572411</id>
	<title>Re:We put an OS in your browser in your OS!</title>
	<author>Lennie</author>
	<datestamp>1246640280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Secure, yeah sure, adding more code doesn't make it more secure, you'll just have more security bugs:</p><p><a href="http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Virtualization\_Security" title="kerneltrap.org">http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Virtualization\_Security</a> [kerneltrap.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Secure , yeah sure , adding more code does n't make it more secure , you 'll just have more security bugs : http : //kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Virtualization \ _Security [ kerneltrap.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Secure, yeah sure, adding more code doesn't make it more secure, you'll just have more security bugs:http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Virtualization\_Security [kerneltrap.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571723</id>
	<title>You don't want it, but that's not the point</title>
	<author>Osvaldo Doederlein</author>
	<datestamp>1246636260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don' think Applet deployment is the target for that project; if they are offering this option it's certainly just for quick demo sake. Notice also that the applet would need some serious time to download because (1) the emulator itself is reasonably big, (2) you need a virtual disk image containing the whole OS and apps; even a small FreeDOS distro with a couple of tiny DOS games will weight in a few hundred Kb, although the problem is mostly for first run as the Java PlugIn can cache everything.</p><p>As I see it, JPC's main goal is showing off some amazing virtualization technology that they have developed - the emulated x86 code is JIT-compiled by JPC's engine into Java bytecodes, which are in turn JIT-compiled by the JVM to native code, so the net result is full native-to-native translation. (If both steps are sufficiently efficient and the host platform is also x86, the compiled code may even be very similar to the original code.) This remembers of similar systems like Transmeta's Crusoe.</p><p>As a secondary goal,. JPC is becoming a pretty nice general-purpose PC emulator, so it's potentially just as useful as other PC emulators like Bochs. If JPC reaches sufficiently close to native performance (I tested it ~1yr ago and it's slashdotted now), and includes sufficient hardware compatibility, it's obviously an advantage to be a Java program, fully portable including UI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I don ' think Applet deployment is the target for that project ; if they are offering this option it 's certainly just for quick demo sake .
Notice also that the applet would need some serious time to download because ( 1 ) the emulator itself is reasonably big , ( 2 ) you need a virtual disk image containing the whole OS and apps ; even a small FreeDOS distro with a couple of tiny DOS games will weight in a few hundred Kb , although the problem is mostly for first run as the Java PlugIn can cache everything.As I see it , JPC 's main goal is showing off some amazing virtualization technology that they have developed - the emulated x86 code is JIT-compiled by JPC 's engine into Java bytecodes , which are in turn JIT-compiled by the JVM to native code , so the net result is full native-to-native translation .
( If both steps are sufficiently efficient and the host platform is also x86 , the compiled code may even be very similar to the original code .
) This remembers of similar systems like Transmeta 's Crusoe.As a secondary goal, .
JPC is becoming a pretty nice general-purpose PC emulator , so it 's potentially just as useful as other PC emulators like Bochs .
If JPC reaches sufficiently close to native performance ( I tested it ~ 1yr ago and it 's slashdotted now ) , and includes sufficient hardware compatibility , it 's obviously an advantage to be a Java program , fully portable including UI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don' think Applet deployment is the target for that project; if they are offering this option it's certainly just for quick demo sake.
Notice also that the applet would need some serious time to download because (1) the emulator itself is reasonably big, (2) you need a virtual disk image containing the whole OS and apps; even a small FreeDOS distro with a couple of tiny DOS games will weight in a few hundred Kb, although the problem is mostly for first run as the Java PlugIn can cache everything.As I see it, JPC's main goal is showing off some amazing virtualization technology that they have developed - the emulated x86 code is JIT-compiled by JPC's engine into Java bytecodes, which are in turn JIT-compiled by the JVM to native code, so the net result is full native-to-native translation.
(If both steps are sufficiently efficient and the host platform is also x86, the compiled code may even be very similar to the original code.
) This remembers of similar systems like Transmeta's Crusoe.As a secondary goal,.
JPC is becoming a pretty nice general-purpose PC emulator, so it's potentially just as useful as other PC emulators like Bochs.
If JPC reaches sufficiently close to native performance (I tested it ~1yr ago and it's slashdotted now), and includes sufficient hardware compatibility, it's obviously an advantage to be a Java program, fully portable including UI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>JPC has been around for at least 3 years, and on Slashdot at least twice before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>JPC has been around for at least 3 years , and on Slashdot at least twice before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JPC has been around for at least 3 years, and on Slashdot at least twice before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574217</id>
	<title>Re:Refresh = reboot!</title>
	<author>Mystra\_x64</author>
	<datestamp>1246652280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean exactly? You can disable F5 globally for Opera. It's shortcuts are as customizable as it can get. Web page itself should not be allowed to override browser UI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean exactly ?
You can disable F5 globally for Opera .
It 's shortcuts are as customizable as it can get .
Web page itself should not be allowed to override browser UI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean exactly?
You can disable F5 globally for Opera.
It's shortcuts are as customizable as it can get.
Web page itself should not be allowed to override browser UI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28604527</id>
	<title>woot reboot</title>
	<author>Yfrwlf</author>
	<datestamp>1246908840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Refresh = reboot!"<br> <br>

So it can run Windows then???????!!!!!!!!<br> <br>

Sorry. ^^</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Refresh = reboot !
" So it can run Windows then ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Sorry. ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Refresh = reboot!
" 

So it can run Windows then???????!!!!!!!!
Sorry. ^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574357</id>
	<title>Re:obligatory</title>
	<author>Jerry Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1246653300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yo dawg,</p><p>I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!</p></div><p>Like Navigator in EyeOS (http://eyeos.org/) in Safari in OS X?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems , so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system ! Like Navigator in EyeOS ( http : //eyeos.org/ ) in Safari in OS X ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg,I herd you like Operating systems, so we put a Operating system in your Browser so you can Browse Operating systems while you browse in yo operating system!Like Navigator in EyeOS (http://eyeos.org/) in Safari in OS X?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571119</id>
	<title>Sounds efficient</title>
	<author>SmitherIsGod</author>
	<datestamp>1246632720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And it'll still be more responsive than slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 'll still be more responsive than slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it'll still be more responsive than slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571319</id>
	<title>Re:Refresh = reboot!</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246633920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you should run it in some sort of java applet container, I hear they are fairly readily available these days. HIGH TECH SHIT!</p><p>Meanwhile, it seems like a cool way to host teeny abandonware DOS games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should run it in some sort of java applet container , I hear they are fairly readily available these days .
HIGH TECH SHIT ! Meanwhile , it seems like a cool way to host teeny abandonware DOS games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should run it in some sort of java applet container, I hear they are fairly readily available these days.
HIGH TECH SHIT!Meanwhile, it seems like a cool way to host teeny abandonware DOS games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571931</id>
	<title>Only makes sense if the VM is run on the server</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1246637400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't see why would anyone wants to download an applet just to run a VM on his own machine. Now, if the VM runs on the server, that will be another story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see why would anyone wants to download an applet just to run a VM on his own machine .
Now , if the VM runs on the server , that will be another story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see why would anyone wants to download an applet just to run a VM on his own machine.
Now, if the VM runs on the server, that will be another story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573253</id>
	<title>Re:Refresh = reboot!</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1246645500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM. Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine?!</p></div><p>Better use Firefox so the webpage can disable your F5 key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...that's actually one of my annoyances with Opera. You'd be surprised how often I accidentally hit F5 when browsing my gmail.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM .
Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine ?
! Better use Firefox so the webpage can disable your F5 key .
...that 's actually one of my annoyances with Opera .
You 'd be surprised how often I accidentally hit F5 when browsing my gmail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM.
Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine?
!Better use Firefox so the webpage can disable your F5 key.
...that's actually one of my annoyances with Opera.
You'd be surprised how often I accidentally hit F5 when browsing my gmail.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161</id>
	<title>Refresh = reboot!</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1246632960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Rrefresh = reboot!</p></div></blockquote><p>Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM. Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rrefresh = reboot ! Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM .
Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rrefresh = reboot!Just what you want - an even easier way to lose data from your VM.
Why rely on bugs and crashes when an accidental refresh can reboot your machine?
!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572183</id>
	<title>Yes, it runs FreeDOS</title>
	<author>Jim Hall</author>
	<datestamp>1246638780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser! The latest JPC, the fast 100\% Java x86 PC emulator, is now available with online demos and downloads. JPC is open source [...] Visit the website to try out some classic games and [...]"</p></div><p>Where it mentions playing DOOM and other DOS games, JPC is booting FreeDOS. So yes, <em>this can run FreeDOS</em>.</p><p>Here's a <a href="http://www.pcworld.dk/modules/davinci/getfile.php?id=16879" title="pcworld.dk">screenshot</a> [pcworld.dk] of FreeDOS in action on JPC, if you need one.</p><p>In fact, we've discussed the Java PC emulator on the <a href="http://www.freedos.org/" title="freedos.org">FreeDOS web site</a> [freedos.org] since JPC was first released. We even link to it on our <a href="http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/" title="freedos.org">"About" page</a> [freedos.org] and <a href="http://www.freedos.org/freedos/links/" title="freedos.org">"Links" page.</a> [freedos.org] It's a great way to introduce new users to the idea of running DOS, without asking them to install their own PC emulator, or even install FreeDOS <em>at all</em>.</p><p>Java PC has been released under the GNU GPL <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05744.html" title="mail-archive.com">since May 2007</a> [mail-archive.com], so to answer your question: source code is available. We <a href="http://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/jpc/" title="ibiblio.org">mirrored an old copy</a> [ibiblio.org] of the source code from 2007, but looks like we haven't made further copies. But maybe it's enough to interest folks who don't want to wait for the <a href="http://www-jpc.physics.ox.ac.uk/" title="ox.ac.uk">JPC site</a> [ox.ac.uk] to recover from its slashdotting today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser !
The latest JPC , the fast 100 \ % Java x86 PC emulator , is now available with online demos and downloads .
JPC is open source [ ... ] Visit the website to try out some classic games and [ ... ] " Where it mentions playing DOOM and other DOS games , JPC is booting FreeDOS .
So yes , this can run FreeDOS.Here 's a screenshot [ pcworld.dk ] of FreeDOS in action on JPC , if you need one.In fact , we 've discussed the Java PC emulator on the FreeDOS web site [ freedos.org ] since JPC was first released .
We even link to it on our " About " page [ freedos.org ] and " Links " page .
[ freedos.org ] It 's a great way to introduce new users to the idea of running DOS , without asking them to install their own PC emulator , or even install FreeDOS at all.Java PC has been released under the GNU GPL since May 2007 [ mail-archive.com ] , so to answer your question : source code is available .
We mirrored an old copy [ ibiblio.org ] of the source code from 2007 , but looks like we have n't made further copies .
But maybe it 's enough to interest folks who do n't want to wait for the JPC site [ ox.ac.uk ] to recover from its slashdotting today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Classic DOOM and DSL Linux Desktop inside your Java-enabled browser!
The latest JPC, the fast 100\% Java x86 PC emulator, is now available with online demos and downloads.
JPC is open source [...] Visit the website to try out some classic games and [...]"Where it mentions playing DOOM and other DOS games, JPC is booting FreeDOS.
So yes, this can run FreeDOS.Here's a screenshot [pcworld.dk] of FreeDOS in action on JPC, if you need one.In fact, we've discussed the Java PC emulator on the FreeDOS web site [freedos.org] since JPC was first released.
We even link to it on our "About" page [freedos.org] and "Links" page.
[freedos.org] It's a great way to introduce new users to the idea of running DOS, without asking them to install their own PC emulator, or even install FreeDOS at all.Java PC has been released under the GNU GPL since May 2007 [mail-archive.com], so to answer your question: source code is available.
We mirrored an old copy [ibiblio.org] of the source code from 2007, but looks like we haven't made further copies.
But maybe it's enough to interest folks who don't want to wait for the JPC site [ox.ac.uk] to recover from its slashdotting today.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571745</id>
	<title>I can see the marketing...</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1246636380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Running low in RAM? Just run this emulated PC in your browser and you can double your memory! Watch your memory multiply for each tab you run!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Running low in RAM ?
Just run this emulated PC in your browser and you can double your memory !
Watch your memory multiply for each tab you run !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Running low in RAM?
Just run this emulated PC in your browser and you can double your memory!
Watch your memory multiply for each tab you run!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573391</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246646400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently nobody has remembered the last time they played a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorched\_Earth\_(video\_game)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Scorched Earth</a> [wikipedia.org] marathon. But now you can play in your browser, and not some hacky remake that's changed gameplay too much or is missing features. Now if only I could figure out where to get a good download...  It's been too long.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently nobody has remembered the last time they played a Scorched Earth [ wikipedia.org ] marathon .
But now you can play in your browser , and not some hacky remake that 's changed gameplay too much or is missing features .
Now if only I could figure out where to get a good download... It 's been too long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently nobody has remembered the last time they played a Scorched Earth [wikipedia.org] marathon.
But now you can play in your browser, and not some hacky remake that's changed gameplay too much or is missing features.
Now if only I could figure out where to get a good download...  It's been too long.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576847</id>
	<title>It seems JPC doesn't like IBM's Java for PPC Linux</title>
	<author>CronoCloud</author>
	<datestamp>1246631460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just tried it out on my PS3 with YDL 6.1 installed, no dice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tried it out on my PS3 with YDL 6.1 installed , no dice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tried it out on my PS3 with YDL 6.1 installed, no dice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28656985</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>aled</author>
	<datestamp>1247237160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Playing old DOS games in a browser is cool enough for me. I have an old DOS application I would like to run in a browser but I don't know if its possible yet because it uses protected mode.
The possibility of running an x86 emulator in any Java supported platform is at least technically interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Playing old DOS games in a browser is cool enough for me .
I have an old DOS application I would like to run in a browser but I do n't know if its possible yet because it uses protected mode .
The possibility of running an x86 emulator in any Java supported platform is at least technically interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Playing old DOS games in a browser is cool enough for me.
I have an old DOS application I would like to run in a browser but I don't know if its possible yet because it uses protected mode.
The possibility of running an x86 emulator in any Java supported platform is at least technically interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571857</id>
	<title>Which is it -</title>
	<author>donberryman</author>
	<datestamp>1246636920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>fast or Java?</htmltext>
<tokenext>fast or Java ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fast or Java?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574439</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246654020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a tab ?!? Why not in a compress ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a tab ? ! ?
Why not in a compress ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a tab ?!?
Why not in a compress ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572885</id>
	<title>Re:OS in a browser in an OS in a browser...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246643160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It goes slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It goes slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It goes slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576795</id>
	<title>Re:Why would I want to run X86 emulator in my brow</title>
	<author>CronoCloud</author>
	<datestamp>1246630800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browser</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm running Cell, you insensitive clod.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this article and could n't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browserI 'm running Cell , you insensitive clod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this article and couldn't figure out why I would want to run an x86 emulator in my browserI'm running Cell, you insensitive clod.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571389</id>
	<title>Cloud OS chows my bandwidth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bool $#t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bool $ # t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bool $#t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28656985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28577617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_1248246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573765
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28656985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571723
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28576795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28577617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28575605
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573253
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28574217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28572057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28579311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28573445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_1248246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_1248246.28571405
</commentlist>
</conversation>
