<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_02_1627218</id>
	<title>Land Rover Unveils "World's Toughest Phone"</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246552860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Land Rover says their new S1 mobile is <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5720517/Land-Rover-unveils-worlds-toughest-phone.html">the world's strongest phone</a>. Testing done by Land Rover and the staff at The Sun showed the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade. A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight. The phone comes with 1,500 hours of battery life, a 2.0 megapixel camera, an extra loud ringtone and an unconditional three-year guarantee.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Land Rover says their new S1 mobile is the world 's strongest phone .
Testing done by Land Rover and the staff at The Sun showed the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant , run over by a Land Rover , dropped from a second-story window , buried in mud , soaked in a pint of beer , and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade .
A forklift truck proved to be its match , and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight .
The phone comes with 1,500 hours of battery life , a 2.0 megapixel camera , an extra loud ringtone and an unconditional three-year guarantee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Land Rover says their new S1 mobile is the world's strongest phone.
Testing done by Land Rover and the staff at The Sun showed the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade.
A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight.
The phone comes with 1,500 hours of battery life, a 2.0 megapixel camera, an extra loud ringtone and an unconditional three-year guarantee.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28570415</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246627620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You got it right about great for tradesmen. I am a carpenter, and i go through phones at an unbelievable rate. I have been careful with some to not drop them, however the biggest problem is dust. I must have the phone on me and quickly accessible at all times (as i am the site superintendent). the dust and grit in my environment will find its way into any little crack that can be found. the first symptom is usually the speaker getting 'crackly'  and death usually follows within weeks. what we need is a water-proof phone. if it keeps out water it should keep out dust.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I will try this out for my next phone. which wont be long now, my current one is on it way out.</p><p>while there have been some phones that are good for impact resistance, (notably some older nokia models) this is the first i have heard of one that may survive the atmospheric conditions.</p><p>Makes me wonder : if "breathing" this kills my phones.. whats it doing to me?  Hmm.. best not to think about it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got it right about great for tradesmen .
I am a carpenter , and i go through phones at an unbelievable rate .
I have been careful with some to not drop them , however the biggest problem is dust .
I must have the phone on me and quickly accessible at all times ( as i am the site superintendent ) .
the dust and grit in my environment will find its way into any little crack that can be found .
the first symptom is usually the speaker getting 'crackly ' and death usually follows within weeks .
what we need is a water-proof phone .
if it keeps out water it should keep out dust .
    I will try this out for my next phone .
which wont be long now , my current one is on it way out.while there have been some phones that are good for impact resistance , ( notably some older nokia models ) this is the first i have heard of one that may survive the atmospheric conditions.Makes me wonder : if " breathing " this kills my phones.. whats it doing to me ?
Hmm.. best not to think about it : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got it right about great for tradesmen.
I am a carpenter, and i go through phones at an unbelievable rate.
I have been careful with some to not drop them, however the biggest problem is dust.
I must have the phone on me and quickly accessible at all times (as i am the site superintendent).
the dust and grit in my environment will find its way into any little crack that can be found.
the first symptom is usually the speaker getting 'crackly'  and death usually follows within weeks.
what we need is a water-proof phone.
if it keeps out water it should keep out dust.
    I will try this out for my next phone.
which wont be long now, my current one is on it way out.while there have been some phones that are good for impact resistance, (notably some older nokia models) this is the first i have heard of one that may survive the atmospheric conditions.Makes me wonder : if "breathing" this kills my phones.. whats it doing to me?
Hmm.. best not to think about it :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28563575</id>
	<title>Timex</title>
	<author>schlick</author>
	<datestamp>1246526160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Timex's shtick.  Hey I'd probably buy a Timex phone if they actually made one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Timex 's shtick .
Hey I 'd probably buy a Timex phone if they actually made one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Timex's shtick.
Hey I'd probably buy a Timex phone if they actually made one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559565</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the phone that drunk college kids everywhere have been waiting for</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the phone that drunk college kids everywhere have been waiting for</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the phone that drunk college kids everywhere have been waiting for</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Just take better care of your shit.</p></div><p>Or don't have a job where you are in a rough environment.<br> <br>
As it said in TFA, this is just the thing for tradesmen.<br>I regularly see electricians, plumbers, carpenters and movers phones being dropped from ladders, or bashed into in some way. Or splashed with anything from paint to concrete to sewage.  <br>It's a tool for them, and as such it needs to be durable. Just like their other tools.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Just take better care of your shit.Or do n't have a job where you are in a rough environment .
As it said in TFA , this is just the thing for tradesmen.I regularly see electricians , plumbers , carpenters and movers phones being dropped from ladders , or bashed into in some way .
Or splashed with anything from paint to concrete to sewage .
It 's a tool for them , and as such it needs to be durable .
Just like their other tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Just take better care of your shit.Or don't have a job where you are in a rough environment.
As it said in TFA, this is just the thing for tradesmen.I regularly see electricians, plumbers, carpenters and movers phones being dropped from ladders, or bashed into in some way.
Or splashed with anything from paint to concrete to sewage.
It's a tool for them, and as such it needs to be durable.
Just like their other tools.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28565095</id>
	<title>Not sure this proves anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246532220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a boss who had one of the first Motorola razor V3's. His was from cingular, but it took a lot for him to kill it. He had a construction company and his phone had been through the works: been run over by a track hoe twice, dropped in a visit in NY traffic (reportedly run over by 6 cars), dropped in dirt, dropped in soda while driving, run over by the bulldozer once (2nd time killed it), run over by the front end loader twice, dropped on concrete or pavement dozens of time from various heights, the outer screen was cracked for a while but the phone was still functional until he finally killed it by running it over with the bulldozer. The battery cover was extremely loose and the flip joint was extremely loose, but it kept working till the very end. He replace that with 3 more razor phones which all broke within 4 weeks time for each.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a boss who had one of the first Motorola razor V3 's .
His was from cingular , but it took a lot for him to kill it .
He had a construction company and his phone had been through the works : been run over by a track hoe twice , dropped in a visit in NY traffic ( reportedly run over by 6 cars ) , dropped in dirt , dropped in soda while driving , run over by the bulldozer once ( 2nd time killed it ) , run over by the front end loader twice , dropped on concrete or pavement dozens of time from various heights , the outer screen was cracked for a while but the phone was still functional until he finally killed it by running it over with the bulldozer .
The battery cover was extremely loose and the flip joint was extremely loose , but it kept working till the very end .
He replace that with 3 more razor phones which all broke within 4 weeks time for each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a boss who had one of the first Motorola razor V3's.
His was from cingular, but it took a lot for him to kill it.
He had a construction company and his phone had been through the works: been run over by a track hoe twice, dropped in a visit in NY traffic (reportedly run over by 6 cars), dropped in dirt, dropped in soda while driving, run over by the bulldozer once (2nd time killed it), run over by the front end loader twice, dropped on concrete or pavement dozens of time from various heights, the outer screen was cracked for a while but the phone was still functional until he finally killed it by running it over with the bulldozer.
The battery cover was extremely loose and the flip joint was extremely loose, but it kept working till the very end.
He replace that with 3 more razor phones which all broke within 4 weeks time for each.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28572563</id>
	<title>Panasonic Toughbook</title>
	<author>FreeFull</author>
	<datestamp>1246641360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally the phone equivalent of the Panasonic toughbook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally the phone equivalent of the Panasonic toughbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally the phone equivalent of the Panasonic toughbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560041</id>
	<title>Can it deflect bullets?</title>
	<author>Ouizardus</author>
	<datestamp>1246558320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could James Bond or Jack Bauer use it to stop a bullet? If they want it to be rugged and work in the toughest conditions, that's the true test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could James Bond or Jack Bauer use it to stop a bullet ?
If they want it to be rugged and work in the toughest conditions , that 's the true test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could James Bond or Jack Bauer use it to stop a bullet?
If they want it to be rugged and work in the toughest conditions, that's the true test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559695</id>
	<title>elephant?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>stepped on by an elephant</p></div></blockquote><p>This one doesn't seem to be of any value.  Elephants have extremely sensitive feet, and are unlikely to step on antyhing that might hurt them.  Ever stepped on a child's toy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>stepped on by an elephantThis one does n't seem to be of any value .
Elephants have extremely sensitive feet , and are unlikely to step on antyhing that might hurt them .
Ever stepped on a child 's toy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stepped on by an elephantThis one doesn't seem to be of any value.
Elephants have extremely sensitive feet, and are unlikely to step on antyhing that might hurt them.
Ever stepped on a child's toy?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28573337</id>
	<title>It's actually a Sonim phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246645980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know if anyone mentioned it earlier but the Land Rover phone is just a relabeled Sonim XP3 Quest. http://www.sonimtech.com/index.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know if anyone mentioned it earlier but the Land Rover phone is just a relabeled Sonim XP3 Quest .
http : //www.sonimtech.com/index.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know if anyone mentioned it earlier but the Land Rover phone is just a relabeled Sonim XP3 Quest.
http://www.sonimtech.com/index.php</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560921</id>
	<title>I wish the iPhone was like this.</title>
	<author>Blimey85</author>
	<datestamp>1246560900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dropped my iPhone 3g on the pavement about a month ago. Screen shattered. I love the features the iPhone has so I'm not going to switch, but I sure wish it was more rugged.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dropped my iPhone 3g on the pavement about a month ago .
Screen shattered .
I love the features the iPhone has so I 'm not going to switch , but I sure wish it was more rugged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dropped my iPhone 3g on the pavement about a month ago.
Screen shattered.
I love the features the iPhone has so I'm not going to switch, but I sure wish it was more rugged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571729</id>
	<title>Re:Psh</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1246636260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A forklift? Or possibly Chuck Norris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A forklift ?
Or possibly Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A forklift?
Or possibly Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559719</id>
	<title>With optional battery pack</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1246557480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>62.5 days of battery life?! Is this for real!? </i></p><p>Yes, when attached to your Land Rover.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>62.5 days of battery life ? !
Is this for real ! ?
Yes , when attached to your Land Rover .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>62.5 days of battery life?!
Is this for real!?
Yes, when attached to your Land Rover.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559645</id>
	<title>You forget this destructive force: +1, Informative</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PWzfOXTtFk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>Cheers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this [ youtube.com ] Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this [youtube.com]Cheers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560029</id>
	<title>Re:1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>GameMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1246558320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they put an oversize battery in it and got rid of any features other than basic phone service.  Even so, I, also, find that number to be hard to believe even if it just assumes 62.5 days in sleep mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they put an oversize battery in it and got rid of any features other than basic phone service .
Even so , I , also , find that number to be hard to believe even if it just assumes 62.5 days in sleep mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they put an oversize battery in it and got rid of any features other than basic phone service.
Even so, I, also, find that number to be hard to believe even if it just assumes 62.5 days in sleep mode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561975</id>
	<title>Re:Not, quite, as impressive as it seems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246564440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, first person who comments on how ridiculous the tests actually are. They do not prove toughness in any way. Just cheap advertising.</p><p>You want real tests, check out MIL-STD-810 (latest revision is now G). These tests are more real world, fully standardised and repeatable, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , first person who comments on how ridiculous the tests actually are .
They do not prove toughness in any way .
Just cheap advertising.You want real tests , check out MIL-STD-810 ( latest revision is now G ) .
These tests are more real world , fully standardised and repeatable , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, first person who comments on how ridiculous the tests actually are.
They do not prove toughness in any way.
Just cheap advertising.You want real tests, check out MIL-STD-810 (latest revision is now G).
These tests are more real world, fully standardised and repeatable, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559913</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it toss up check engine and abs fault codes too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it toss up check engine and abs fault codes too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it toss up check engine and abs fault codes too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560063</id>
	<title>Episode 310: Fugitive Alien</title>
	<author>Guppy</author>
	<datestamp>1246558380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight.</p> </div><p>He tried to kill me with a forklift... <i>Ole!</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A forklift truck proved to be its match , and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight .
He tried to kill me with a forklift... Ole !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight.
He tried to kill me with a forklift... Ole!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560833</id>
	<title>You don't work in construction...</title>
	<author>BulletMagnet</author>
	<datestamp>1246560540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an IT Manager for a construction company, one thing I've been looking for is a phone that field people cannot break within a week.  The defacto standard (or former standard) would be Nextel, but the new Motorola units they've been pushing are anything short of unbreakable. Gone are the days of the bulletproof brickphone that you can run over with a grader and it still live to make another call.  Motorola's replacements for the bricks are rather flimsy flip phones and rather weak candybar phones.</p><p>Well, on to Verizon we go (for the better coverage and cheaper costs) and we get into their "hardened" phones...the Casio/Verizon GZ1 Boulder, which is a complete and utter joke of misnomer.  These units are the worst designed hardened units I've ever seen.  The battery retention mechanism (a metal looking but actually plastic screw) will break off/apart after 1 drop and breaks the phone unless you have some duct tape handy to hold your battery in place.  Of the 4 dozen we've taken delivery of, we had to replace two as DOA out of the box (bad sign #1) and 4 more within a week (bad sign #2) Now they have a problem with losing the call logs which Verizon is already aware of and the unit needs a firmware update.</p><p>If this Land Rover unit is actually as good as it says it is, US cell phone companies should take note.  THIS is what we want (in construction) - not these half assed phones that Verizon and Nextel put out.  I want something I can hand to my people and say "See you in a year or two"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... not next week after it gets dropped twice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an IT Manager for a construction company , one thing I 've been looking for is a phone that field people can not break within a week .
The defacto standard ( or former standard ) would be Nextel , but the new Motorola units they 've been pushing are anything short of unbreakable .
Gone are the days of the bulletproof brickphone that you can run over with a grader and it still live to make another call .
Motorola 's replacements for the bricks are rather flimsy flip phones and rather weak candybar phones.Well , on to Verizon we go ( for the better coverage and cheaper costs ) and we get into their " hardened " phones...the Casio/Verizon GZ1 Boulder , which is a complete and utter joke of misnomer .
These units are the worst designed hardened units I 've ever seen .
The battery retention mechanism ( a metal looking but actually plastic screw ) will break off/apart after 1 drop and breaks the phone unless you have some duct tape handy to hold your battery in place .
Of the 4 dozen we 've taken delivery of , we had to replace two as DOA out of the box ( bad sign # 1 ) and 4 more within a week ( bad sign # 2 ) Now they have a problem with losing the call logs which Verizon is already aware of and the unit needs a firmware update.If this Land Rover unit is actually as good as it says it is , US cell phone companies should take note .
THIS is what we want ( in construction ) - not these half assed phones that Verizon and Nextel put out .
I want something I can hand to my people and say " See you in a year or two " ... not next week after it gets dropped twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an IT Manager for a construction company, one thing I've been looking for is a phone that field people cannot break within a week.
The defacto standard (or former standard) would be Nextel, but the new Motorola units they've been pushing are anything short of unbreakable.
Gone are the days of the bulletproof brickphone that you can run over with a grader and it still live to make another call.
Motorola's replacements for the bricks are rather flimsy flip phones and rather weak candybar phones.Well, on to Verizon we go (for the better coverage and cheaper costs) and we get into their "hardened" phones...the Casio/Verizon GZ1 Boulder, which is a complete and utter joke of misnomer.
These units are the worst designed hardened units I've ever seen.
The battery retention mechanism (a metal looking but actually plastic screw) will break off/apart after 1 drop and breaks the phone unless you have some duct tape handy to hold your battery in place.
Of the 4 dozen we've taken delivery of, we had to replace two as DOA out of the box (bad sign #1) and 4 more within a week (bad sign #2) Now they have a problem with losing the call logs which Verizon is already aware of and the unit needs a firmware update.If this Land Rover unit is actually as good as it says it is, US cell phone companies should take note.
THIS is what we want (in construction) - not these half assed phones that Verizon and Nextel put out.
I want something I can hand to my people and say "See you in a year or two" ... not next week after it gets dropped twice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560131</id>
	<title>ORLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this anything like those "unbreakable" combs or MagLites which are guaranteed to never break? Cuz I've broken both. With proper normal usage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this anything like those " unbreakable " combs or MagLites which are guaranteed to never break ?
Cuz I 've broken both .
With proper normal usage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this anything like those "unbreakable" combs or MagLites which are guaranteed to never break?
Cuz I've broken both.
With proper normal usage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28582393</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Mattsson</author>
	<datestamp>1246700100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wonder if it takes on oil. Both my father and both my brothers has had several phones dropped into the manholes of tanker-trucks or oil-cisterns. (Phone in breast pocket while inspecting...)<br>Even if the tank is empty, there's usually enough oil in the bottom to kill most phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if it takes on oil .
Both my father and both my brothers has had several phones dropped into the manholes of tanker-trucks or oil-cisterns .
( Phone in breast pocket while inspecting... ) Even if the tank is empty , there 's usually enough oil in the bottom to kill most phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if it takes on oil.
Both my father and both my brothers has had several phones dropped into the manholes of tanker-trucks or oil-cisterns.
(Phone in breast pocket while inspecting...)Even if the tank is empty, there's usually enough oil in the bottom to kill most phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560381</id>
	<title>Laptop?</title>
	<author>Gerald</author>
	<datestamp>1246559340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still want my DeWALT laptop, dammit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still want my DeWALT laptop , dammit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still want my DeWALT laptop, dammit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559647</id>
	<title>But can I make a phone call on it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can honestly say that none of the mobile phones I have owned, nor any that anyone else I have known has owned, have lost phones through inadvertently driving a Land Rover over them.</p><p>What a load of mind diminishing crapola.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can honestly say that none of the mobile phones I have owned , nor any that anyone else I have known has owned , have lost phones through inadvertently driving a Land Rover over them.What a load of mind diminishing crapola .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can honestly say that none of the mobile phones I have owned, nor any that anyone else I have known has owned, have lost phones through inadvertently driving a Land Rover over them.What a load of mind diminishing crapola.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561521</id>
	<title>what about the test vehicle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246562820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if the Land Rover test vehicle suffered any damage, if it's like mine, its probably back at the dealer to have the suspension over hauled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the Land Rover test vehicle suffered any damage , if it 's like mine , its probably back at the dealer to have the suspension over hauled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the Land Rover test vehicle suffered any damage, if it's like mine, its probably back at the dealer to have the suspension over hauled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560153</id>
	<title>Re:Psh</title>
	<author>fridaynightsmoke</author>
	<datestamp>1246558680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there ANYTHING that's forklift-proof?
Walls, crates, freight containers, steel I-beams.. nothing can resist the awesome power of a forklift.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there ANYTHING that 's forklift-proof ?
Walls , crates , freight containers , steel I-beams.. nothing can resist the awesome power of a forklift .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there ANYTHING that's forklift-proof?
Walls, crates, freight containers, steel I-beams.. nothing can resist the awesome power of a forklift.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447</id>
	<title>the obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but does it blend?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but does it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but does it blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560695</id>
	<title>Re:ORLY?</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1246560240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What could you possibly break on a LED Maglite? The only thing I have ever seen is the top of the rubber cover for the switch being torn off and even then the switch still works, it's just not as water resistant. If you're saying you broke the bulb on a filament Maglite, that's nothing special.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What could you possibly break on a LED Maglite ?
The only thing I have ever seen is the top of the rubber cover for the switch being torn off and even then the switch still works , it 's just not as water resistant .
If you 're saying you broke the bulb on a filament Maglite , that 's nothing special .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could you possibly break on a LED Maglite?
The only thing I have ever seen is the top of the rubber cover for the switch being torn off and even then the switch still works, it's just not as water resistant.
If you're saying you broke the bulb on a filament Maglite, that's nothing special.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513</id>
	<title>Psh</title>
	<author>sys.stdout.write</author>
	<datestamp>1246556940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight</p></div><p>
Well then it's no good to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A forklift truck proved to be its match , and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight Well then it 's no good to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight
Well then it's no good to me.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560397</id>
	<title>Hey, I'm still working</title>
	<author>RevDigger</author>
	<datestamp>1246559340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees c</p><p>Hey, coincidentally, that exactly describes what happened to me last night.  And I'm still working.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; stepped on by an elephant , run over by a Land Rover , dropped from a second-story window , buried in mud , soaked in a pint of beer , and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees cHey , coincidentally , that exactly describes what happened to me last night .
And I 'm still working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees cHey, coincidentally, that exactly describes what happened to me last night.
And I'm still working.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28570509</id>
	<title>150 degrees centigrade?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246628340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade</p></div><p>Pah!

The iPhone 3GS can roast <i>itself</i> at 150 degrees C.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigradePah !
The iPhone 3GS can roast itself at 150 degrees C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigradePah!
The iPhone 3GS can roast itself at 150 degrees C.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559485</id>
	<title>Rumor has it</title>
	<author>Critical Facilities</author>
	<datestamp>1246556820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1178538,00.html" title="people.com">Naomi Campbell</a> [people.com] is first on the waiting list to get one.<br> <br>Nothing can stop her now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naomi Campbell [ people.com ] is first on the waiting list to get one .
Nothing can stop her now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naomi Campbell [people.com] is first on the waiting list to get one.
Nothing can stop her now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451</id>
	<title>Not, quite, as impressive as it seems?</title>
	<author>GameMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1246559460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of those tests aren't as impressive as they sound.</p><p>The Beer/Mud tests are, effectively, the same thing.  The phone's waterproofing gaskets will either hold the moisture out or they won't, much like a water proof watch.  This gets even easier to accomplish if they installed an iPhone style "permanent" battery, eliminated the headset jack in favor of Bluetooth, and installed an inductive charging system like a cordless toothbrush.</p><p>The test where it's being run over by a Land Rover is easier than it sounds because the flexibility of the tires serves to spread out the weight of the vehicle.  As long as they don't over-inflate the tires or use ultra-high efficiency/low rolling resistance tires then the actual PSI on the phone should be relatively low.  Coincidental, they featured a stunt just like this last night on that Billy Mays show "Pitchmen".  In the show they were trying to sell a gel pad designed to absorb force so they ran over one of the salesmen's hands with an SUV.  As for the elephant, I don't know enough about the forces at the bottom of an elephant's foot but it might be the same issue.  Another thing to consider is how soft the surface was under the tire or the elephants foot.  If either was done on earth instead of pavement/concrete then that will play a factor too.</p><p>Inversely, the above explanation serves to explain why the phone, finally, broke under the forklift.  The tires on most forklifts I've ever seen tend to be made of a very hard rubber-like material (possibly just pure natural rubber).  I'm sure that this manages to eliminate the need to replace tires over the life of the forklift and forklifts don't need the shock absorbing effects of a pneumatic tire since they move so slow and are only designed to be used over very flat surfaces.  The hard tires transmit a much higher percentage of the forklift's weight to a much smaller patch of ground and the 3 ton forklift is, probably, as heavy or heavier than the Land Rover.</p><p>As for being dropped from a second story window, I would want to know what kind of surface it was dropped on.  It would be much more impressive if it were dropped onto concrete.  It would be less impressive if it were dropped onto thick grass and much less impressive if it were dropped onto a mattress (I doubt that one but, as it wasn't mentioned, I wouldn't put it past some marketing agencies).</p><p>As for the oven test, I would want to know how long it was left in. 150C is a pretty high temperature but people have been walking over 1000+ degree Fahrenheit coals for a long time and I've seen Shaolin monks lick red hot pokers.  The trick is how long your body part is in contact with the hot stuff.  In both cases, you move your foot/tough away from the contact immediately and don't give enough time for most of the heat to transfer.  In the case of licking the red hot poker, they also have a thick layer of spit on their tough that absorbs much of the heat and evaporates away protecting the tongue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of those tests are n't as impressive as they sound.The Beer/Mud tests are , effectively , the same thing .
The phone 's waterproofing gaskets will either hold the moisture out or they wo n't , much like a water proof watch .
This gets even easier to accomplish if they installed an iPhone style " permanent " battery , eliminated the headset jack in favor of Bluetooth , and installed an inductive charging system like a cordless toothbrush.The test where it 's being run over by a Land Rover is easier than it sounds because the flexibility of the tires serves to spread out the weight of the vehicle .
As long as they do n't over-inflate the tires or use ultra-high efficiency/low rolling resistance tires then the actual PSI on the phone should be relatively low .
Coincidental , they featured a stunt just like this last night on that Billy Mays show " Pitchmen " .
In the show they were trying to sell a gel pad designed to absorb force so they ran over one of the salesmen 's hands with an SUV .
As for the elephant , I do n't know enough about the forces at the bottom of an elephant 's foot but it might be the same issue .
Another thing to consider is how soft the surface was under the tire or the elephants foot .
If either was done on earth instead of pavement/concrete then that will play a factor too.Inversely , the above explanation serves to explain why the phone , finally , broke under the forklift .
The tires on most forklifts I 've ever seen tend to be made of a very hard rubber-like material ( possibly just pure natural rubber ) .
I 'm sure that this manages to eliminate the need to replace tires over the life of the forklift and forklifts do n't need the shock absorbing effects of a pneumatic tire since they move so slow and are only designed to be used over very flat surfaces .
The hard tires transmit a much higher percentage of the forklift 's weight to a much smaller patch of ground and the 3 ton forklift is , probably , as heavy or heavier than the Land Rover.As for being dropped from a second story window , I would want to know what kind of surface it was dropped on .
It would be much more impressive if it were dropped onto concrete .
It would be less impressive if it were dropped onto thick grass and much less impressive if it were dropped onto a mattress ( I doubt that one but , as it was n't mentioned , I would n't put it past some marketing agencies ) .As for the oven test , I would want to know how long it was left in .
150C is a pretty high temperature but people have been walking over 1000 + degree Fahrenheit coals for a long time and I 've seen Shaolin monks lick red hot pokers .
The trick is how long your body part is in contact with the hot stuff .
In both cases , you move your foot/tough away from the contact immediately and do n't give enough time for most of the heat to transfer .
In the case of licking the red hot poker , they also have a thick layer of spit on their tough that absorbs much of the heat and evaporates away protecting the tongue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of those tests aren't as impressive as they sound.The Beer/Mud tests are, effectively, the same thing.
The phone's waterproofing gaskets will either hold the moisture out or they won't, much like a water proof watch.
This gets even easier to accomplish if they installed an iPhone style "permanent" battery, eliminated the headset jack in favor of Bluetooth, and installed an inductive charging system like a cordless toothbrush.The test where it's being run over by a Land Rover is easier than it sounds because the flexibility of the tires serves to spread out the weight of the vehicle.
As long as they don't over-inflate the tires or use ultra-high efficiency/low rolling resistance tires then the actual PSI on the phone should be relatively low.
Coincidental, they featured a stunt just like this last night on that Billy Mays show "Pitchmen".
In the show they were trying to sell a gel pad designed to absorb force so they ran over one of the salesmen's hands with an SUV.
As for the elephant, I don't know enough about the forces at the bottom of an elephant's foot but it might be the same issue.
Another thing to consider is how soft the surface was under the tire or the elephants foot.
If either was done on earth instead of pavement/concrete then that will play a factor too.Inversely, the above explanation serves to explain why the phone, finally, broke under the forklift.
The tires on most forklifts I've ever seen tend to be made of a very hard rubber-like material (possibly just pure natural rubber).
I'm sure that this manages to eliminate the need to replace tires over the life of the forklift and forklifts don't need the shock absorbing effects of a pneumatic tire since they move so slow and are only designed to be used over very flat surfaces.
The hard tires transmit a much higher percentage of the forklift's weight to a much smaller patch of ground and the 3 ton forklift is, probably, as heavy or heavier than the Land Rover.As for being dropped from a second story window, I would want to know what kind of surface it was dropped on.
It would be much more impressive if it were dropped onto concrete.
It would be less impressive if it were dropped onto thick grass and much less impressive if it were dropped onto a mattress (I doubt that one but, as it wasn't mentioned, I wouldn't put it past some marketing agencies).As for the oven test, I would want to know how long it was left in.
150C is a pretty high temperature but people have been walking over 1000+ degree Fahrenheit coals for a long time and I've seen Shaolin monks lick red hot pokers.
The trick is how long your body part is in contact with the hot stuff.
In both cases, you move your foot/tough away from the contact immediately and don't give enough time for most of the heat to transfer.
In the case of licking the red hot poker, they also have a thick layer of spit on their tough that absorbs much of the heat and evaporates away protecting the tongue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560977</id>
	<title>Yes, but...</title>
	<author>mastermemorex</author>
	<datestamp>1246561020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it waterproof?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it waterproof ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it waterproof?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562505</id>
	<title>I don't know what the fuss is all about</title>
	<author>osoroco</author>
	<datestamp>1246566060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a Nokia (candy bar style from early 2000's aka the immortals) that fell from a 4th floor. Sure the battery, body, and covers went in different directions, but put together again and it worked.<br> <br>

Seriously, if they wanted to make a real tough phone, they should've sided with Nokia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a Nokia ( candy bar style from early 2000 's aka the immortals ) that fell from a 4th floor .
Sure the battery , body , and covers went in different directions , but put together again and it worked .
Seriously , if they wanted to make a real tough phone , they should 've sided with Nokia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a Nokia (candy bar style from early 2000's aka the immortals) that fell from a 4th floor.
Sure the battery, body, and covers went in different directions, but put together again and it worked.
Seriously, if they wanted to make a real tough phone, they should've sided with Nokia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560537</id>
	<title>G'Zone</title>
	<author>Mordac</author>
	<datestamp>1246559760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing shocking here. Casio has there G'zone which is pretty damn hard to break. I got mine for Mountain Climbing,and also because I seem to drop phones into any water source (don't know if I'm cursed or not.)</p><p>One thing not advertised, these phones are rather large for a cellphone these days, so you can also use it as a blunt weapon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing shocking here .
Casio has there G'zone which is pretty damn hard to break .
I got mine for Mountain Climbing,and also because I seem to drop phones into any water source ( do n't know if I 'm cursed or not .
) One thing not advertised , these phones are rather large for a cellphone these days , so you can also use it as a blunt weapon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing shocking here.
Casio has there G'zone which is pretty damn hard to break.
I got mine for Mountain Climbing,and also because I seem to drop phones into any water source (don't know if I'm cursed or not.
)One thing not advertised, these phones are rather large for a cellphone these days, so you can also use it as a blunt weapon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489</id>
	<title>Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Just take better care of your shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Just take better care of your shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Just take better care of your shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569271</id>
	<title>ahh but...</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1246611900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=will+it+blend" title="google.com">will it blend?</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... will it blend ?
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... will it blend?
[google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559975</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Spike15</author>
	<datestamp>1246558200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...this is the AK-47 of phones or...?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...this is the AK-47 of phones or... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...this is the AK-47 of phones or...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571323</id>
	<title>Re:1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>fridaynightsmoke</author>
	<datestamp>1246633980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No; in the UK (where The Telegraph is based) 1,500 == 1500 , NOT 1.5 .
IIRC in <i>mainland</i> Europe ',' is the decimal separator, but not here (UK).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No ; in the UK ( where The Telegraph is based ) 1,500 = = 1500 , NOT 1.5 .
IIRC in mainland Europe ', ' is the decimal separator , but not here ( UK ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No; in the UK (where The Telegraph is based) 1,500 == 1500 , NOT 1.5 .
IIRC in mainland Europe ',' is the decimal separator, but not here (UK).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564081</id>
	<title>Now what would be impressive..</title>
	<author>ProxyUser</author>
	<datestamp>1246528020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is a phone that just works under normal usage pattern for most people. I'm talking about a simple candy bar phone like the ones Nokia used to make in 2001. Nowdays you cannot find a phone that does not have internet capable browser, email, etc. What happened to building a phone that does its primary function well. My ideal phone would have:
1. Excellent voice reception
2. 1 week + battery life
3. Bluetooth capability (hands free driving laws in my state)
4. sturdy design - survive a 3 ft fall to concrete - I don't expect to be chucking it out of a 2nd floor window!

I can loose all the other bells-and-whitles. Of course, one simply can't buy a phone like this anymore in the US (especially if one wants it to work with AT&amp;T).</htmltext>
<tokenext>is a phone that just works under normal usage pattern for most people .
I 'm talking about a simple candy bar phone like the ones Nokia used to make in 2001 .
Nowdays you can not find a phone that does not have internet capable browser , email , etc .
What happened to building a phone that does its primary function well .
My ideal phone would have : 1 .
Excellent voice reception 2 .
1 week + battery life 3 .
Bluetooth capability ( hands free driving laws in my state ) 4. sturdy design - survive a 3 ft fall to concrete - I do n't expect to be chucking it out of a 2nd floor window !
I can loose all the other bells-and-whitles .
Of course , one simply ca n't buy a phone like this anymore in the US ( especially if one wants it to work with AT&amp;T ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is a phone that just works under normal usage pattern for most people.
I'm talking about a simple candy bar phone like the ones Nokia used to make in 2001.
Nowdays you cannot find a phone that does not have internet capable browser, email, etc.
What happened to building a phone that does its primary function well.
My ideal phone would have:
1.
Excellent voice reception
2.
1 week + battery life
3.
Bluetooth capability (hands free driving laws in my state)
4. sturdy design - survive a 3 ft fall to concrete - I don't expect to be chucking it out of a 2nd floor window!
I can loose all the other bells-and-whitles.
Of course, one simply can't buy a phone like this anymore in the US (especially if one wants it to work with AT&amp;T).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28566945</id>
	<title>Re:the obligatory...</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1246543380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny, but seriously though:<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade.</p></div><p>Am I the only one who finds this severely retarded? Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it? Or even have it run over by a car, buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven? I can see the beer scenario, or any other liquid drink for that matter, but the rest of the tests are just fucking absurd.<br> <br>-Hey us guys here at Tampax have just created a new sturdy tampon that can handle the strain of space shuttle launch g-forces.<br>-Just what I need.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , but seriously though : ... the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant , run over by a Land Rover , dropped from a second-story window , buried in mud , soaked in a pint of beer , and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade.Am I the only one who finds this severely retarded ?
Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it ?
Or even have it run over by a car , buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven ?
I can see the beer scenario , or any other liquid drink for that matter , but the rest of the tests are just fucking absurd .
-Hey us guys here at Tampax have just created a new sturdy tampon that can handle the strain of space shuttle launch g-forces.-Just what I need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, but seriously though: ... the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade.Am I the only one who finds this severely retarded?
Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it?
Or even have it run over by a car, buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven?
I can see the beer scenario, or any other liquid drink for that matter, but the rest of the tests are just fucking absurd.
-Hey us guys here at Tampax have just created a new sturdy tampon that can handle the strain of space shuttle launch g-forces.-Just what I need.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28563655</id>
	<title>Re:the obligatory...</title>
	<author>chiller2</author>
	<datestamp>1246526340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Almost!</p><p>There's a great interview by Dan Lane with a chap from Sonim about the phone / Land Rover deal over at <a href="http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/06/the-launch-of-the-land-rover-s1-by-sonim/" title="thereallym...roject.com">The Really Mobile Project</a> [thereallym...roject.com]. It's a few weeks old if that tells you anything about the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. story! They drove around the Land Rover test track with it attached to one of the wheels, so it got to be spun around, submerged, and I think at one point they drive over it too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost ! There 's a great interview by Dan Lane with a chap from Sonim about the phone / Land Rover deal over at The Really Mobile Project [ thereallym...roject.com ] .
It 's a few weeks old if that tells you anything about the / .
story ! They drove around the Land Rover test track with it attached to one of the wheels , so it got to be spun around , submerged , and I think at one point they drive over it too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost!There's a great interview by Dan Lane with a chap from Sonim about the phone / Land Rover deal over at The Really Mobile Project [thereallym...roject.com].
It's a few weeks old if that tells you anything about the /.
story! They drove around the Land Rover test track with it attached to one of the wheels, so it got to be spun around, submerged, and I think at one point they drive over it too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568901</id>
	<title>Re:Not, quite, as impressive as it seems?</title>
	<author>dickens</author>
	<datestamp>1246563240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fork truck drivers slow?  I take it you've never seen a 2 ton fork truck powersliding through an ess with a half-ton of paper on the forks.. it doesn't look slow.</p><p>Time is money, and those guys can load a truck in a hurry when it's crunch time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fork truck drivers slow ?
I take it you 've never seen a 2 ton fork truck powersliding through an ess with a half-ton of paper on the forks.. it does n't look slow.Time is money , and those guys can load a truck in a hurry when it 's crunch time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fork truck drivers slow?
I take it you've never seen a 2 ton fork truck powersliding through an ess with a half-ton of paper on the forks.. it doesn't look slow.Time is money, and those guys can load a truck in a hurry when it's crunch time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559469</id>
	<title>Want it!</title>
	<author>courteaudotbiz</author>
	<datestamp>1246556820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although it's unbelievably ugly, I need this phone! I broke 2 to 3 phones a year for the last 5 years... It'd be nice if it came to Canada. My last misadventure with my last Sony Ericsson: the screen died after a bicycle ride.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although it 's unbelievably ugly , I need this phone !
I broke 2 to 3 phones a year for the last 5 years... It 'd be nice if it came to Canada .
My last misadventure with my last Sony Ericsson : the screen died after a bicycle ride .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although it's unbelievably ugly, I need this phone!
I broke 2 to 3 phones a year for the last 5 years... It'd be nice if it came to Canada.
My last misadventure with my last Sony Ericsson: the screen died after a bicycle ride.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569495</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>lga</author>
	<datestamp>1246615380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work for a timber distributer. I have to provide phones to warehouse staff, lorry loaders and sawmill operators. Even if the environment wasn't so hostile I think the workmen would be! We have a large site with lots of warehouses so phones are essential to get the job done.</p><p>I have one loader who in the last few years has been through several Nokia 6310s, a Nokia 5210, 5410, and a JCB phone. The JCB was supposed to be indistructible and had a similar demo video to this Land Rover phone but he still broke it. At least they gave me a refund without arguing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work for a timber distributer .
I have to provide phones to warehouse staff , lorry loaders and sawmill operators .
Even if the environment was n't so hostile I think the workmen would be !
We have a large site with lots of warehouses so phones are essential to get the job done.I have one loader who in the last few years has been through several Nokia 6310s , a Nokia 5210 , 5410 , and a JCB phone .
The JCB was supposed to be indistructible and had a similar demo video to this Land Rover phone but he still broke it .
At least they gave me a refund without arguing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work for a timber distributer.
I have to provide phones to warehouse staff, lorry loaders and sawmill operators.
Even if the environment wasn't so hostile I think the workmen would be!
We have a large site with lots of warehouses so phones are essential to get the job done.I have one loader who in the last few years has been through several Nokia 6310s, a Nokia 5210, 5410, and a JCB phone.
The JCB was supposed to be indistructible and had a similar demo video to this Land Rover phone but he still broke it.
At least they gave me a refund without arguing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561323</id>
	<title>Re:I have a question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246562100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently you have never tried to break a bowling ball.</p><p>Back in high school it took a cop car hitting one at 90 Mph to break one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently you have never tried to break a bowling ball.Back in high school it took a cop car hitting one at 90 Mph to break one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently you have never tried to break a bowling ball.Back in high school it took a cop car hitting one at 90 Mph to break one...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564125</id>
	<title>Re:I have a question</title>
	<author>socz</author>
	<datestamp>1246528200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so the real question is, where did they get the bucket from?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>so the real question is , where did they get the bucket from ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so the real question is, where did they get the bucket from?
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561223</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246561800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Or don't have a job where you are in a rough environment.</i></p><p>Or, just get a solid case. Not one of those rubber skins, but a rugged one for extreme abuse.</p><p>(I'm sure there's a joke to be told about rubber skins &amp; extreme abuse, but I can't think of a good one)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or do n't have a job where you are in a rough environment.Or , just get a solid case .
Not one of those rubber skins , but a rugged one for extreme abuse .
( I 'm sure there 's a joke to be told about rubber skins &amp; extreme abuse , but I ca n't think of a good one )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or don't have a job where you are in a rough environment.Or, just get a solid case.
Not one of those rubber skins, but a rugged one for extreme abuse.
(I'm sure there's a joke to be told about rubber skins &amp; extreme abuse, but I can't think of a good one)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559483</id>
	<title>Must be the heat</title>
	<author>jurgemaister</author>
	<datestamp>1246556820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read "World's Thoughest iPhone".

Think I have to stay off the Apple news for a while...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " World 's Thoughest iPhone " .
Think I have to stay off the Apple news for a while.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read "World's Thoughest iPhone".
Think I have to stay off the Apple news for a while...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568021</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246552800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just clean the inside once in a while.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just clean the inside once in a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just clean the inside once in a while.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561627</id>
	<title>Destroy my SIM</title>
	<author>itomato</author>
	<datestamp>1246563180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The phone is fragile.  Less fragile, but it has considerably more chinks than my SIM card.  If the phone numbers are the important thing, keep them on the SIM.  They cost what - $0.02?  $0.05?</p><p>I can't understand why, aside from status, anyone would need this particular phone.  Granted, it's a ruggedized phone with GPS, but the screen is something from 2002, barely pocketizable, and has glitzy buttons.  What kind of GPS could it be packing, if it's (A:) a proprietary phone, (B:) has 600 pixels to work with?  If location was so important to me, and I were driving my Land Rover, or my Hyundai (and pretending it's more than it is), why wouldn't I put my eggs in more baskets, and bring along my Suunto watch, TomTom, or traditional GPS unit?</p><p>If the ability to make a phone call after leaving your phone in a pint (or similarly brown, wet, and bubbly environment) is the question, how is this better than my SIM alone, with a spare clunker phone/charger in the glovebox?</p><p>I bet an average SIM could tolerate 3 tonnes of compression without a sneeze.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phone is fragile .
Less fragile , but it has considerably more chinks than my SIM card .
If the phone numbers are the important thing , keep them on the SIM .
They cost what - $ 0.02 ?
$ 0.05 ? I ca n't understand why , aside from status , anyone would need this particular phone .
Granted , it 's a ruggedized phone with GPS , but the screen is something from 2002 , barely pocketizable , and has glitzy buttons .
What kind of GPS could it be packing , if it 's ( A : ) a proprietary phone , ( B : ) has 600 pixels to work with ?
If location was so important to me , and I were driving my Land Rover , or my Hyundai ( and pretending it 's more than it is ) , why would n't I put my eggs in more baskets , and bring along my Suunto watch , TomTom , or traditional GPS unit ? If the ability to make a phone call after leaving your phone in a pint ( or similarly brown , wet , and bubbly environment ) is the question , how is this better than my SIM alone , with a spare clunker phone/charger in the glovebox ? I bet an average SIM could tolerate 3 tonnes of compression without a sneeze .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phone is fragile.
Less fragile, but it has considerably more chinks than my SIM card.
If the phone numbers are the important thing, keep them on the SIM.
They cost what - $0.02?
$0.05?I can't understand why, aside from status, anyone would need this particular phone.
Granted, it's a ruggedized phone with GPS, but the screen is something from 2002, barely pocketizable, and has glitzy buttons.
What kind of GPS could it be packing, if it's (A:) a proprietary phone, (B:) has 600 pixels to work with?
If location was so important to me, and I were driving my Land Rover, or my Hyundai (and pretending it's more than it is), why wouldn't I put my eggs in more baskets, and bring along my Suunto watch, TomTom, or traditional GPS unit?If the ability to make a phone call after leaving your phone in a pint (or similarly brown, wet, and bubbly environment) is the question, how is this better than my SIM alone, with a spare clunker phone/charger in the glovebox?I bet an average SIM could tolerate 3 tonnes of compression without a sneeze.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560025</id>
	<title>Already done</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't they already make the "World's Toughest Phone" a long time ago?</p><p>I swear I've seen <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Zack\%20Morris\%20phone" title="urbandictionary.com">one</a> [urbandictionary.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they already make the " World 's Toughest Phone " a long time ago ? I swear I 've seen one [ urbandictionary.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they already make the "World's Toughest Phone" a long time ago?I swear I've seen one [urbandictionary.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561003</id>
	<title>Re:How about the phone?</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1246561080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the Sun. If phones had breasts the picture would have been fine, but the photographer didn't know what to do when they said "hey, photograph this".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the Sun .
If phones had breasts the picture would have been fine , but the photographer did n't know what to do when they said " hey , photograph this " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the Sun.
If phones had breasts the picture would have been fine, but the photographer didn't know what to do when they said "hey, photograph this".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562033</id>
	<title>Re:1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>jbeaupre</author>
	<datestamp>1246564680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No no no.  The comma is a decimal separator.  For American's, it would be 1.500 hours.  What's impressive isn't the life, but that they predict it with such precision.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no .
The comma is a decimal separator .
For American 's , it would be 1.500 hours .
What 's impressive is n't the life , but that they predict it with such precision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no.
The comma is a decimal separator.
For American's, it would be 1.500 hours.
What's impressive isn't the life, but that they predict it with such precision.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561971</id>
	<title>Re:Or...</title>
	<author>Albert Sandberg</author>
	<datestamp>1246564380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dust kills my phones... I work in the tile laying business</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dust kills my phones... I work in the tile laying business</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dust kills my phones... I work in the tile laying business</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571803</id>
	<title>Re:Destroy my SIM</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1246636620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>barely pocketizable, and has glitzy buttons</p></div><p>Why do you want to make it into a pocket? Perhaps if it were pocketable too, then you could keep a spare inside the "pocketizable" one?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>barely pocketizable , and has glitzy buttonsWhy do you want to make it into a pocket ?
Perhaps if it were pocketable too , then you could keep a spare inside the " pocketizable " one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>barely pocketizable, and has glitzy buttonsWhy do you want to make it into a pocket?
Perhaps if it were pocketable too, then you could keep a spare inside the "pocketizable" one?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559663</id>
	<title>Ultimate test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was it given to an eight year old boy? Those tender little blossoms can destroy anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it given to an eight year old boy ?
Those tender little blossoms can destroy anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it given to an eight year old boy?
Those tender little blossoms can destroy anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560489</id>
	<title>Re:Must be the heat</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1246559640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then you shouldn't be on Slashdot.  Though I am very surprised a non-apple phone made the headlines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you should n't be on Slashdot .
Though I am very surprised a non-apple phone made the headlines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you shouldn't be on Slashdot.
Though I am very surprised a non-apple phone made the headlines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28566449</id>
	<title>Looks like a rebranded XP3 - that is not new(s)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The photo (didn't read TFA ofcourse) looks a lot like a rebranded Sonim XP3 - http://www.sonimxp3.com/ - even the "world's toughest phone" line is the same. This post is not news. As an owner of an XP1 I can say it's neat hardware-wise, but the software is crap; user interface is clumsy and it frequently crashes. Still a good buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The photo ( did n't read TFA ofcourse ) looks a lot like a rebranded Sonim XP3 - http : //www.sonimxp3.com/ - even the " world 's toughest phone " line is the same .
This post is not news .
As an owner of an XP1 I can say it 's neat hardware-wise , but the software is crap ; user interface is clumsy and it frequently crashes .
Still a good buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The photo (didn't read TFA ofcourse) looks a lot like a rebranded Sonim XP3 - http://www.sonimxp3.com/ - even the "world's toughest phone" line is the same.
This post is not news.
As an owner of an XP1 I can say it's neat hardware-wise, but the software is crap; user interface is clumsy and it frequently crashes.
Still a good buy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559963</id>
	<title>How do spiders survive being stepped on?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The landrover phone is just a branded sonim phone.  The S1's from what I hear were notorious for poor seals around the battery compartment causing them to not be so water resistant but they were never advertised to withstand being submersed in water.</p><p>S3's are fully submersible and twice as expensive.  Both have lousy feature sets (no HSDPA).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The landrover phone is just a branded sonim phone .
The S1 's from what I hear were notorious for poor seals around the battery compartment causing them to not be so water resistant but they were never advertised to withstand being submersed in water.S3 's are fully submersible and twice as expensive .
Both have lousy feature sets ( no HSDPA ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The landrover phone is just a branded sonim phone.
The S1's from what I hear were notorious for poor seals around the battery compartment causing them to not be so water resistant but they were never advertised to withstand being submersed in water.S3's are fully submersible and twice as expensive.
Both have lousy feature sets (no HSDPA).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559467</id>
	<title>Yes But ...</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246556760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>an unconditional three-year guarantee</p></div><p>Will it <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg1ckCkm8YI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">blend</a> [youtube.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>an unconditional three-year guaranteeWill it blend [ youtube.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an unconditional three-year guaranteeWill it blend [youtube.com]?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560459</id>
	<title>Perfect for the Vogon on the go</title>
	<author>synthesizerpatel</author>
	<datestamp>1246559520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they send the bill in triplicate, I think we know what to get our favorite Vogans for christmas this year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they send the bill in triplicate , I think we know what to get our favorite Vogans for christmas this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they send the bill in triplicate, I think we know what to get our favorite Vogans for christmas this year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</id>
	<title>1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>A. B3ttik</author>
	<datestamp>1246557060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>62.5 days of battery life?! Is this for real!?
<br> <br> <br>
What kind of battery are they using?</htmltext>
<tokenext>62.5 days of battery life ? !
Is this for real ! ?
What kind of battery are they using ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>62.5 days of battery life?!
Is this for real!?
What kind of battery are they using?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560235</id>
	<title>mabny years ago</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246558860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a metal rotary phone.<br>I think it was steel. I pretty sure it could withstand everything in these tests as well.<br>Where it failed was in that it ddn't fit into most pockets, it wasn't wireless, and the greatest tragedy of all, it didn't ahve a camera.</p><p>Side note: I can no longer right click on a mispelled word to choose from a list. This happens about 50\% of the time. I don't know if it's caused by firefox 3.5 or slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a metal rotary phone.I think it was steel .
I pretty sure it could withstand everything in these tests as well.Where it failed was in that it dd n't fit into most pockets , it was n't wireless , and the greatest tragedy of all , it did n't ahve a camera.Side note : I can no longer right click on a mispelled word to choose from a list .
This happens about 50 \ % of the time .
I do n't know if it 's caused by firefox 3.5 or slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a metal rotary phone.I think it was steel.
I pretty sure it could withstand everything in these tests as well.Where it failed was in that it ddn't fit into most pockets, it wasn't wireless, and the greatest tragedy of all, it didn't ahve a camera.Side note: I can no longer right click on a mispelled word to choose from a list.
This happens about 50\% of the time.
I don't know if it's caused by firefox 3.5 or slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28567403</id>
	<title>Re:1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1246546800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but it's a single use battery, so when your 1500 hours are up, you have to buy a new phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but it 's a single use battery , so when your 1500 hours are up , you have to buy a new phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but it's a single use battery, so when your 1500 hours are up, you have to buy a new phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560333</id>
	<title>Top Gear</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1246559220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Top Gear features this a few weeks ago, funny stuff:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVgRVyt6N1U" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVgRVyt6N1U</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Top Gear features this a few weeks ago , funny stuff : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = gVgRVyt6N1U [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Top Gear features this a few weeks ago, funny stuff:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVgRVyt6N1U [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531</id>
	<title>I have a question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has it been given to a 3 yr old for an hour?  Or my brother?</p><p>Either one could be given a bowling ball in an empty room...and 5 minutes later come out with a bucket full of pieces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has it been given to a 3 yr old for an hour ?
Or my brother ? Either one could be given a bowling ball in an empty room...and 5 minutes later come out with a bucket full of pieces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has it been given to a 3 yr old for an hour?
Or my brother?Either one could be given a bowling ball in an empty room...and 5 minutes later come out with a bucket full of pieces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560861</id>
	<title>Dinosaurs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246560660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does it fare with man-eating dinosaurs?  Specifically, ones who eat the man with the phone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it fare with man-eating dinosaurs ?
Specifically , ones who eat the man with the phone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it fare with man-eating dinosaurs?
Specifically, ones who eat the man with the phone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569091</id>
	<title>Re:the obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anne Thwacks</author>
	<datestamp>1246652820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it? Or even have it run over by a car, buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven?</i> <p>Here in the UK, some of us have to work for a living.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it ?
Or even have it run over by a car , buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven ?
Here in the UK , some of us have to work for a living .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the fuck has their phone run over by an elephant so often that he feels the need to have a fool proof solution for it?
Or even have it run over by a car, buried in mud or roasted in a fucking oven?
Here in the UK, some of us have to work for a living.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28566945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561737</id>
	<title>Re:Not, quite, as impressive as it seems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246563540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not saying you're wrong, but it doesn't need to be mil-spec. Most of the cell phones on the market today look like they might break if you look at them wrong.</p><p>I suspect, OK, I know there is a market for a phone that is water-resistant and shock-resistant. It doesn't have to be mil-spec with a mil-spec price, it just doesn't have to break the first time it falls out of your pocket when you're climbing a ladder and it lands in the mud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not saying you 're wrong , but it does n't need to be mil-spec .
Most of the cell phones on the market today look like they might break if you look at them wrong.I suspect , OK , I know there is a market for a phone that is water-resistant and shock-resistant .
It does n't have to be mil-spec with a mil-spec price , it just does n't have to break the first time it falls out of your pocket when you 're climbing a ladder and it lands in the mud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not saying you're wrong, but it doesn't need to be mil-spec.
Most of the cell phones on the market today look like they might break if you look at them wrong.I suspect, OK, I know there is a market for a phone that is water-resistant and shock-resistant.
It doesn't have to be mil-spec with a mil-spec price, it just doesn't have to break the first time it falls out of your pocket when you're climbing a ladder and it lands in the mud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28563005</id>
	<title>very doubtfull it's that tough</title>
	<author>OrangeMonkey11</author>
	<datestamp>1246567500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work for an automotive supplier, and we have some of the most interesting phone death (Salt blast, chrome tank, paint oven, acid bath, ect.. and folk lift as well).  Unless this thing can survive two weeks at anyone of my facility.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work for an automotive supplier , and we have some of the most interesting phone death ( Salt blast , chrome tank , paint oven , acid bath , ect.. and folk lift as well ) .
Unless this thing can survive two weeks at anyone of my facility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work for an automotive supplier, and we have some of the most interesting phone death (Salt blast, chrome tank, paint oven, acid bath, ect.. and folk lift as well).
Unless this thing can survive two weeks at anyone of my facility.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559775</id>
	<title>iPhone needs to cool down before you can use it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246557660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's Apple's shit hardware design for you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's Apple 's shit hardware design for you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's Apple's shit hardware design for you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28574035</id>
	<title>Re:You don't work in construction...</title>
	<author>BuGless</author>
	<datestamp>1246650840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you tried the Samsung B2100?  I just got one last week.  It's waterproof up to one meter deep for 30 minutes, and you can drop it (a lot; tried that already).  The casing looks sturdy enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried the Samsung B2100 ?
I just got one last week .
It 's waterproof up to one meter deep for 30 minutes , and you can drop it ( a lot ; tried that already ) .
The casing looks sturdy enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried the Samsung B2100?
I just got one last week.
It's waterproof up to one meter deep for 30 minutes, and you can drop it (a lot; tried that already).
The casing looks sturdy enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559461</id>
	<title>umm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can i use it for twitter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can i use it for twitter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can i use it for twitter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562753</id>
	<title>Re:Not, quite, as impressive as it seems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246566660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Beer/Mud tests are, effectively, the same thing.</p></div><p>I see you live in the South of England then! For real beer, you need to be north of the border (Nottingham).<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Beer/Mud tests are , effectively , the same thing.I see you live in the South of England then !
For real beer , you need to be north of the border ( Nottingham ) .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Beer/Mud tests are, effectively, the same thing.I see you live in the South of England then!
For real beer, you need to be north of the border (Nottingham).
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560939</id>
	<title>Extra loud ringtone?</title>
	<author>6Yankee</author>
	<datestamp>1246560960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Extra loud ringtone?</p><p>Buy shares in forklift manufacturers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extra loud ringtone ? Buy shares in forklift manufacturers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extra loud ringtone?Buy shares in forklift manufacturers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559651</id>
	<title>Re:1500 Hours of Battery Life?!</title>
	<author>Hansele</author>
	<datestamp>1246557300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What they neglected to mention is that it has 1500 hrs of battery life as long as it is switched off.  My phone is much better and has almost limitless battery life, so long as I have it plugged up to the wall charger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What they neglected to mention is that it has 1500 hrs of battery life as long as it is switched off .
My phone is much better and has almost limitless battery life , so long as I have it plugged up to the wall charger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they neglected to mention is that it has 1500 hrs of battery life as long as it is switched off.
My phone is much better and has almost limitless battery life, so long as I have it plugged up to the wall charger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559465</id>
	<title>How about the phone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be nice if they, I don't know... maybe showed the actual phone instead of an incredibly zoomed in and awkwardly framed shot of the screen. Honestly, it's like a review for a TV in which there's a picture of one corner, incredibly zoomed in, part of the screen cut off by the frame and showing none of the actual controls, shape or size.</p><p>Retarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be nice if they , I do n't know... maybe showed the actual phone instead of an incredibly zoomed in and awkwardly framed shot of the screen .
Honestly , it 's like a review for a TV in which there 's a picture of one corner , incredibly zoomed in , part of the screen cut off by the frame and showing none of the actual controls , shape or size.Retarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be nice if they, I don't know... maybe showed the actual phone instead of an incredibly zoomed in and awkwardly framed shot of the screen.
Honestly, it's like a review for a TV in which there's a picture of one corner, incredibly zoomed in, part of the screen cut off by the frame and showing none of the actual controls, shape or size.Retarded.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561243</id>
	<title>Missing test ...</title>
	<author>BenBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1246561860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>meh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... call me when it survives a 5 year old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>meh ... call me when it survives a 5 year old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>meh ... call me when it survives a 5 year old.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564665</id>
	<title>This story is a joke, right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246530480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Land Rover can't even build a car which isn't being repaired more than it's going.</p><p>I guess this will be included under their company ad slogan: "Pretty Good When They're Working!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Land Rover ca n't even build a car which is n't being repaired more than it 's going.I guess this will be included under their company ad slogan : " Pretty Good When They 're Working !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Land Rover can't even build a car which isn't being repaired more than it's going.I guess this will be included under their company ad slogan: "Pretty Good When They're Working!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560961</id>
	<title>Makes you wonder how realistic are the specs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246561020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call me cynical, but when they claim two MONTHS of standby time and 18 hours of talk time, all on a 1850 mAh battery -- it makes me a bit leery. After all, no matter how efficient its electronics are, it still has to burn power transmitting packets. For example the Nokia 6205 on its 1020mAh BL-5C battery only gets up to 4 hours talk, up to 11 day standby. Spec for Nokia: <a href="http://www.nokiausa.com/find-products/phones/nokia-6205/specifications" title="nokiausa.com">http://www.nokiausa.com/find-products/phones/nokia-6205/specifications</a> [nokiausa.com]

Spec for the phone, I think: <a href="http://www.sonimtech.com/pdf/xp3quest\_ds.pdf" title="sonimtech.com">http://www.sonimtech.com/pdf/xp3quest\_ds.pdf</a> [sonimtech.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me cynical , but when they claim two MONTHS of standby time and 18 hours of talk time , all on a 1850 mAh battery -- it makes me a bit leery .
After all , no matter how efficient its electronics are , it still has to burn power transmitting packets .
For example the Nokia 6205 on its 1020mAh BL-5C battery only gets up to 4 hours talk , up to 11 day standby .
Spec for Nokia : http : //www.nokiausa.com/find-products/phones/nokia-6205/specifications [ nokiausa.com ] Spec for the phone , I think : http : //www.sonimtech.com/pdf/xp3quest \ _ds.pdf [ sonimtech.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me cynical, but when they claim two MONTHS of standby time and 18 hours of talk time, all on a 1850 mAh battery -- it makes me a bit leery.
After all, no matter how efficient its electronics are, it still has to burn power transmitting packets.
For example the Nokia 6205 on its 1020mAh BL-5C battery only gets up to 4 hours talk, up to 11 day standby.
Spec for Nokia: http://www.nokiausa.com/find-products/phones/nokia-6205/specifications [nokiausa.com]

Spec for the phone, I think: http://www.sonimtech.com/pdf/xp3quest\_ds.pdf [sonimtech.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560499</id>
	<title>Alternative</title>
	<author>georgenh16</author>
	<datestamp>1246559640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.casiogzone.com\%2F&amp;ei=3u5MSq\_TNInssQOVsL2hBQ&amp;rct=j&amp;q=gzone+phone&amp;usg=AFQjCNGEBwamwIf4lrPDQ5OBGqlMPGKVDA&amp;sig2=Fj1-w6A\_\_EkLxtTWNF\_u3Q" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Gzone</a> [google.com] comes pretty close, for a bit less, and available in the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Gzone [ google.com ] comes pretty close , for a bit less , and available in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Gzone [google.com] comes pretty close, for a bit less, and available in the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561515</id>
	<title>Looks like a real iPhone Killer!!!</title>
	<author>bADlOGIN</author>
	<datestamp>1246562820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As in, if you smash the device into an iPhone, you can kill the iPhone and the device in question will keep working.  Given what the G1 and Palm Pre have turned out to be, this is the only true valid definition of the term "iPhone killer" in the market today;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>As in , if you smash the device into an iPhone , you can kill the iPhone and the device in question will keep working .
Given what the G1 and Palm Pre have turned out to be , this is the only true valid definition of the term " iPhone killer " in the market today ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As in, if you smash the device into an iPhone, you can kill the iPhone and the device in question will keep working.
Given what the G1 and Palm Pre have turned out to be, this is the only true valid definition of the term "iPhone killer" in the market today;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28570415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28574035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28582393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28563655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28567403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28566945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1627218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560025
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559695
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560489
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559647
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28563655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28566945
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559469
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28574035
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560153
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560961
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28567403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28571323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560235
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28562505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559663
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28564125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561323
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28560695
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559691
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561971
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28568021
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28561223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28570415
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28582393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28569495
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1627218.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1627218.28559467
</commentlist>
</conversation>
