<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_01_2249208</id>
	<title>Daily Sex Helps Improve Fertility</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246455420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>mmmscience writes <i>"While fertility studies lately seem to have been exclusively focused on in vitro fertilization [IVF], new data coming out of Australia may help with unaided successful conceptions.  The study has found that <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-1242-Science-News-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Daily-sex-helps-improve-fertility">men who have ejaculate daily produce sperm with less damaged DNA</a>.  While such actions decrease sperm concentration, it does increase motility, meaning healthier sperm have a better chance of making it all the way to the egg.  Good news, as <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub\_releases/2009-07/esfh-cpa063009.php">another report</a> has found severe chromosome abnormalities in over 90\% of IVF eggs, meaning artificial insemination is just now discovering a whole new field of problems."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>mmmscience writes " While fertility studies lately seem to have been exclusively focused on in vitro fertilization [ IVF ] , new data coming out of Australia may help with unaided successful conceptions .
The study has found that men who have ejaculate daily produce sperm with less damaged DNA .
While such actions decrease sperm concentration , it does increase motility , meaning healthier sperm have a better chance of making it all the way to the egg .
Good news , as another report has found severe chromosome abnormalities in over 90 \ % of IVF eggs , meaning artificial insemination is just now discovering a whole new field of problems .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mmmscience writes "While fertility studies lately seem to have been exclusively focused on in vitro fertilization [IVF], new data coming out of Australia may help with unaided successful conceptions.
The study has found that men who have ejaculate daily produce sperm with less damaged DNA.
While such actions decrease sperm concentration, it does increase motility, meaning healthier sperm have a better chance of making it all the way to the egg.
Good news, as another report has found severe chromosome abnormalities in over 90\% of IVF eggs, meaning artificial insemination is just now discovering a whole new field of problems.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823</id>
	<title>Summary misleading</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1246459200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the news services have all been reporting that Daily Sex will improve fertility - surely a more accurate description would be that daily ejaculation (via whatever means) improves fertility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the news services have all been reporting that Daily Sex will improve fertility - surely a more accurate description would be that daily ejaculation ( via whatever means ) improves fertility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the news services have all been reporting that Daily Sex will improve fertility - surely a more accurate description would be that daily ejaculation (via whatever means) improves fertility.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553607</id>
	<title>So....</title>
	<author>reidiq</author>
	<datestamp>1246465860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't have sex everyday = less chance to have baby.
Take note<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'ers</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't have sex everyday = less chance to have baby .
Take note / .
'ers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't have sex everyday = less chance to have baby.
Take note /.
'ers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555915</id>
	<title>Great news!</title>
	<author>LizardKing</author>
	<datestamp>1246538640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm just off to the office toilets with a copy of The Sun to "improve my fertility".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just off to the office toilets with a copy of The Sun to " improve my fertility " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just off to the office toilets with a copy of The Sun to "improve my fertility".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554493</id>
	<title>Re:Summary misleading</title>
	<author>ocularDeathRay</author>
	<datestamp>1246476720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if I understand this article, your sig alone has already helped my fertility 3 times</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if I understand this article , your sig alone has already helped my fertility 3 times</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if I understand this article, your sig alone has already helped my fertility 3 times</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553429</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246464240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a very interesting sci-fi book called Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon. The main character is autistic and its told from his point of view. He works with a group of other autistic programmers on pattern recognition software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a very interesting sci-fi book called Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon .
The main character is autistic and its told from his point of view .
He works with a group of other autistic programmers on pattern recognition software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a very interesting sci-fi book called Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon.
The main character is autistic and its told from his point of view.
He works with a group of other autistic programmers on pattern recognition software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554237</id>
	<title>Re:Hold on...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246473900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it matter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it matter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28562871</id>
	<title>Ironic...</title>
	<author>bodland</author>
	<datestamp>1246567080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Socks and bath towels aren't the best choice for procreation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Socks and bath towels are n't the best choice for procreation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Socks and bath towels aren't the best choice for procreation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554377</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246475400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps, but you still come off as a weird fuck, internet or no.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps , but you still come off as a weird fuck , internet or no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps, but you still come off as a weird fuck, internet or no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28560285</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1246559040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.</p></div><p>It... depends on your interpretation.  There is just enough truth in that statement to make it thoroughly confusing.<br> <br>Psychological problems are diagnosed almost solely based upon symptoms (as you cannot test positive for the nonexistent a BPD bacteria or schizophrenia antibodies).  As a result, a few select kids who actually have a digestive issue [preventing certain nutrients from being absorbed and presented to the brain], but no underlying brain architecture problems, are being diagnosed as "autistic".  <br> <br>We are beginning to understand some of the 'wiring' differences in autism, such as reduced neural connectivity in certain high-level areas of the brain (which seems to result in an increase in connectivity within sub-sections), and even a larger-than-normal brain.  An fMRI of an autistic brain shows clear and measurable differences in activity and excitation from a neurotypical brain.  It is certain, however, that these changes to the brain structure begin in the womb and are permanent.  <br> <br>What this boils down to is that, while a GF diet may aid in the treatment of a digestive/endocrine system-related condition which causes symptoms similar to autism, autism spectrum disorders (as defined by the re-wiring of the brain) cannot be treated quite so easily.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.It... depends on your interpretation .
There is just enough truth in that statement to make it thoroughly confusing .
Psychological problems are diagnosed almost solely based upon symptoms ( as you can not test positive for the nonexistent a BPD bacteria or schizophrenia antibodies ) .
As a result , a few select kids who actually have a digestive issue [ preventing certain nutrients from being absorbed and presented to the brain ] , but no underlying brain architecture problems , are being diagnosed as " autistic " .
We are beginning to understand some of the 'wiring ' differences in autism , such as reduced neural connectivity in certain high-level areas of the brain ( which seems to result in an increase in connectivity within sub-sections ) , and even a larger-than-normal brain .
An fMRI of an autistic brain shows clear and measurable differences in activity and excitation from a neurotypical brain .
It is certain , however , that these changes to the brain structure begin in the womb and are permanent .
What this boils down to is that , while a GF diet may aid in the treatment of a digestive/endocrine system-related condition which causes symptoms similar to autism , autism spectrum disorders ( as defined by the re-wiring of the brain ) can not be treated quite so easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.It... depends on your interpretation.
There is just enough truth in that statement to make it thoroughly confusing.
Psychological problems are diagnosed almost solely based upon symptoms (as you cannot test positive for the nonexistent a BPD bacteria or schizophrenia antibodies).
As a result, a few select kids who actually have a digestive issue [preventing certain nutrients from being absorbed and presented to the brain], but no underlying brain architecture problems, are being diagnosed as "autistic".
We are beginning to understand some of the 'wiring' differences in autism, such as reduced neural connectivity in certain high-level areas of the brain (which seems to result in an increase in connectivity within sub-sections), and even a larger-than-normal brain.
An fMRI of an autistic brain shows clear and measurable differences in activity and excitation from a neurotypical brain.
It is certain, however, that these changes to the brain structure begin in the womb and are permanent.
What this boils down to is that, while a GF diet may aid in the treatment of a digestive/endocrine system-related condition which causes symptoms similar to autism, autism spectrum disorders (as defined by the re-wiring of the brain) cannot be treated quite so easily.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556709</id>
	<title>Re:Summary misleading</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246544640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately there's a built in negative feedback loop.  Improved fertility inhibits daily ejaculation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately there 's a built in negative feedback loop .
Improved fertility inhibits daily ejaculation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately there's a built in negative feedback loop.
Improved fertility inhibits daily ejaculation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28560585</id>
	<title>Yeah... sensationalize (lie) much?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246559880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this headline were actually made by the scientists who did the research, it would be 'Regular Periodic Ejaculation Improves Sperm Motility in Males'. Not as exciting, huh? Doesn't mention SEX at all. How boring... the truth IS boring. Get over it. Go back to sleep, people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this headline were actually made by the scientists who did the research , it would be 'Regular Periodic Ejaculation Improves Sperm Motility in Males' .
Not as exciting , huh ?
Does n't mention SEX at all .
How boring... the truth IS boring .
Get over it .
Go back to sleep , people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this headline were actually made by the scientists who did the research, it would be 'Regular Periodic Ejaculation Improves Sperm Motility in Males'.
Not as exciting, huh?
Doesn't mention SEX at all.
How boring... the truth IS boring.
Get over it.
Go back to sleep, people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>niktemadur</author>
	<datestamp>1246531860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.</p><p>Now to just find someone to spread it to..</p></div><p>That's one way of looking at it.</p><p>Here's another, less obvious one, which I read in a Timothy Leary essay about fifteen years ago:<br>The anatomy contains organs that serve to keep the individual alive, such as heart, lungs, liver, etc.<br>The anatomy also contains organs that serve no purpose in keeping the individual alive, but are focused on the preservation of the species, such as ovaries, whose sole function is to produce the female egg, and the prostate, whose sole function is to secrete a lubricant which aids in ejaculation, a strange little organ.<br>Statistically, it seems these organs are the ones that do us in first, by "virtue" of being the most vulnerable to cancer, the highest rates among females being of the ovarian and breast variety, while the highest among males of the prostate variety.</p><p>Could it be that as we gradually cease to use our procreative organs, as we are no longer useful to the natural order of things, nature itself has a mechanism to push us aside?</p><p>And so, in inimitable style, Mr Leary, who was dying of prostate cancer then, concluded his musings with the following empirical conclusion and advice for us all:  "Use it or lose it!"</p><p>As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?"  Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although if 'twice a day ' helps , all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.Now to just find someone to spread it to..That 's one way of looking at it.Here 's another , less obvious one , which I read in a Timothy Leary essay about fifteen years ago : The anatomy contains organs that serve to keep the individual alive , such as heart , lungs , liver , etc.The anatomy also contains organs that serve no purpose in keeping the individual alive , but are focused on the preservation of the species , such as ovaries , whose sole function is to produce the female egg , and the prostate , whose sole function is to secrete a lubricant which aids in ejaculation , a strange little organ.Statistically , it seems these organs are the ones that do us in first , by " virtue " of being the most vulnerable to cancer , the highest rates among females being of the ovarian and breast variety , while the highest among males of the prostate variety.Could it be that as we gradually cease to use our procreative organs , as we are no longer useful to the natural order of things , nature itself has a mechanism to push us aside ? And so , in inimitable style , Mr Leary , who was dying of prostate cancer then , concluded his musings with the following empirical conclusion and advice for us all : " Use it or lose it !
" As an amusing afterthought , when I mentioned this article to friends , some of them said " So that means I should fuck every day ?
" , while others said " So that means it 's okay if I jack off every day ?
" Caught them with their guard down , spilled the beans all by themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.Now to just find someone to spread it to..That's one way of looking at it.Here's another, less obvious one, which I read in a Timothy Leary essay about fifteen years ago:The anatomy contains organs that serve to keep the individual alive, such as heart, lungs, liver, etc.The anatomy also contains organs that serve no purpose in keeping the individual alive, but are focused on the preservation of the species, such as ovaries, whose sole function is to produce the female egg, and the prostate, whose sole function is to secrete a lubricant which aids in ejaculation, a strange little organ.Statistically, it seems these organs are the ones that do us in first, by "virtue" of being the most vulnerable to cancer, the highest rates among females being of the ovarian and breast variety, while the highest among males of the prostate variety.Could it be that as we gradually cease to use our procreative organs, as we are no longer useful to the natural order of things, nature itself has a mechanism to push us aside?And so, in inimitable style, Mr Leary, who was dying of prostate cancer then, concluded his musings with the following empirical conclusion and advice for us all:  "Use it or lose it!
"As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?
", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?
"  Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553649</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>AmigaHeretic</author>
	<datestamp>1246466100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt;Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

<br> <br>
Yeah, the Mormons should start recruiting on Slashdot.  We could breed like mofos for them if we could just get girls.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Although if 'twice a day ' helps , all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA .
Yeah , the Mormons should start recruiting on Slashdot .
We could breed like mofos for them if we could just get girls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.
Yeah, the Mormons should start recruiting on Slashdot.
We could breed like mofos for them if we could just get girls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554725</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1246565580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My son, our second child, has an austism diagnosis. Personally I think his difficulty with language and resulting early behavioral issues stem from him being too smart, his mum and older sister being too talkative, and me being too lazy.
</p><p>To clarify a little; as a toddler he didn't need any help with anything he could reach, he'd grunt and point for anything he wanted that he couldn't reach, and we'd play 20 questions to work out what he needed help with. But mostly he didn't seem to need or what our help so he avoided learning to communicate with us.
</p><p>I see a lot of myself in my son. I can usually guess what he's thinking, because that's what I would be thinking. I'm very strong in maths / spacial problem solving, and very weak in creating writing and communication skills. But when I was growing up I had 2 teachers for parents who encouraged me all the time. My son doesn't have that advantage mainly because me and my wife were always busy with work or entertainment and being so self sufficient he was never very demanding of our time.
</p><p>I wasn't surprised or angry by his diagnosis as I don't think it changed my understanding of who he is at all. I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him, than the fault of any environmental agent or genetic disorder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My son , our second child , has an austism diagnosis .
Personally I think his difficulty with language and resulting early behavioral issues stem from him being too smart , his mum and older sister being too talkative , and me being too lazy .
To clarify a little ; as a toddler he did n't need any help with anything he could reach , he 'd grunt and point for anything he wanted that he could n't reach , and we 'd play 20 questions to work out what he needed help with .
But mostly he did n't seem to need or what our help so he avoided learning to communicate with us .
I see a lot of myself in my son .
I can usually guess what he 's thinking , because that 's what I would be thinking .
I 'm very strong in maths / spacial problem solving , and very weak in creating writing and communication skills .
But when I was growing up I had 2 teachers for parents who encouraged me all the time .
My son does n't have that advantage mainly because me and my wife were always busy with work or entertainment and being so self sufficient he was never very demanding of our time .
I was n't surprised or angry by his diagnosis as I do n't think it changed my understanding of who he is at all .
I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him , than the fault of any environmental agent or genetic disorder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My son, our second child, has an austism diagnosis.
Personally I think his difficulty with language and resulting early behavioral issues stem from him being too smart, his mum and older sister being too talkative, and me being too lazy.
To clarify a little; as a toddler he didn't need any help with anything he could reach, he'd grunt and point for anything he wanted that he couldn't reach, and we'd play 20 questions to work out what he needed help with.
But mostly he didn't seem to need or what our help so he avoided learning to communicate with us.
I see a lot of myself in my son.
I can usually guess what he's thinking, because that's what I would be thinking.
I'm very strong in maths / spacial problem solving, and very weak in creating writing and communication skills.
But when I was growing up I had 2 teachers for parents who encouraged me all the time.
My son doesn't have that advantage mainly because me and my wife were always busy with work or entertainment and being so self sufficient he was never very demanding of our time.
I wasn't surprised or angry by his diagnosis as I don't think it changed my understanding of who he is at all.
I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him, than the fault of any environmental agent or genetic disorder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553185</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1246461660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, the next step in evolution is to be inept-by-default at communication?

One of the reasons we're so advanced?

I agree that some social customs are way too complex, and that people need to be more forthcoming in general, but those are more personal flaws than flaws with society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the next step in evolution is to be inept-by-default at communication ?
One of the reasons we 're so advanced ?
I agree that some social customs are way too complex , and that people need to be more forthcoming in general , but those are more personal flaws than flaws with society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the next step in evolution is to be inept-by-default at communication?
One of the reasons we're so advanced?
I agree that some social customs are way too complex, and that people need to be more forthcoming in general, but those are more personal flaws than flaws with society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555047</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1246526400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Autism has been around for a long, long time.</p><p>It's just that no one really diagnosed it before the 1900s.</p><p>Now every time a toddler babbles or talks to themselves, their parents think they have autism and demand that their doctor do something about it.  Parents can be very convincing and many have resorted to lawyers to prove that they know more than the medical community.</p><p>In contrast, a lot of psychs and doctors are more educated in things like autism, so they're more likely to find and diagnose real cases.</p><p>I don't think that autism has gone up disproportionally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Autism has been around for a long , long time.It 's just that no one really diagnosed it before the 1900s.Now every time a toddler babbles or talks to themselves , their parents think they have autism and demand that their doctor do something about it .
Parents can be very convincing and many have resorted to lawyers to prove that they know more than the medical community.In contrast , a lot of psychs and doctors are more educated in things like autism , so they 're more likely to find and diagnose real cases.I do n't think that autism has gone up disproportionally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Autism has been around for a long, long time.It's just that no one really diagnosed it before the 1900s.Now every time a toddler babbles or talks to themselves, their parents think they have autism and demand that their doctor do something about it.
Parents can be very convincing and many have resorted to lawyers to prove that they know more than the medical community.In contrast, a lot of psychs and doctors are more educated in things like autism, so they're more likely to find and diagnose real cases.I don't think that autism has gone up disproportionally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555759</id>
	<title>Sorry pal , its genetic</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1246536720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him"</p><p>Many people don't get taught properly when they're young. Then don't end up autistic. So I would suggest you get off your cross and accept his condition for what it is, not what you want it to be and pretend that in some way he might one day get better. He won't. Deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him " Many people do n't get taught properly when they 're young .
Then do n't end up autistic .
So I would suggest you get off your cross and accept his condition for what it is , not what you want it to be and pretend that in some way he might one day get better .
He wo n't .
Deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him"Many people don't get taught properly when they're young.
Then don't end up autistic.
So I would suggest you get off your cross and accept his condition for what it is, not what you want it to be and pretend that in some way he might one day get better.
He won't.
Deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554911</id>
	<title>sight</title>
	<author>peas\_n\_carrots</author>
	<datestamp>1246567860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it doesn't really make you go blind?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it does n't really make you go blind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it doesn't really make you go blind?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556175</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246541040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool Story bro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool Story bro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool Story bro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28564355</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246529160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call bs on your second link. How do you know a high masturbation frequency isn't the result of high testosterone levels to begin with? There could conceivably be some sort of positive feedback effect but either way that website has no references (but plenty of herbal products though...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bs on your second link .
How do you know a high masturbation frequency is n't the result of high testosterone levels to begin with ?
There could conceivably be some sort of positive feedback effect but either way that website has no references ( but plenty of herbal products though... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bs on your second link.
How do you know a high masturbation frequency isn't the result of high testosterone levels to begin with?
There could conceivably be some sort of positive feedback effect but either way that website has no references (but plenty of herbal products though...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553743</id>
	<title>Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246467300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could that explain why wankers seem to have more kids?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could that explain why wankers seem to have more kids ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could that explain why wankers seem to have more kids?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28567275</id>
	<title>Re:great...</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1246545600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Resisstence is futile?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Resisstence is futile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Resisstence is futile?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556707</id>
	<title>Daily Sex Helps Improve</title>
	<author>dhermann</author>
	<datestamp>1246544640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Daily Sex Helps Improve</p></div><p>...<i>everything</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Daily Sex Helps Improve...everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Daily Sex Helps Improve...everything.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246463760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be all Jenny Mcarthy on you, because I don't agree with her opinions on vaccinations, but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.  FWIW, I have no medical background other than that I happen to be celiac (which I know makes me inherently biased towards GF) and am a huge nerd who reads lots of boring research.  Not implying that gluten is a 'cause', as you say, but just that the diet seems to work very well for many with autism.  You've very likely heard of/explored that option, but thought I'd throw that out there just in case.</p><p>I admire you very much for your honesty, particularly about your initial feelings about your situation.  I'm very glad you are in a good place.  I wish you and yours the best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be all Jenny Mcarthy on you , because I do n't agree with her opinions on vaccinations , but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet .
FWIW , I have no medical background other than that I happen to be celiac ( which I know makes me inherently biased towards GF ) and am a huge nerd who reads lots of boring research .
Not implying that gluten is a 'cause ' , as you say , but just that the diet seems to work very well for many with autism .
You 've very likely heard of/explored that option , but thought I 'd throw that out there just in case.I admire you very much for your honesty , particularly about your initial feelings about your situation .
I 'm very glad you are in a good place .
I wish you and yours the best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be all Jenny Mcarthy on you, because I don't agree with her opinions on vaccinations, but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.
FWIW, I have no medical background other than that I happen to be celiac (which I know makes me inherently biased towards GF) and am a huge nerd who reads lots of boring research.
Not implying that gluten is a 'cause', as you say, but just that the diet seems to work very well for many with autism.
You've very likely heard of/explored that option, but thought I'd throw that out there just in case.I admire you very much for your honesty, particularly about your initial feelings about your situation.
I'm very glad you are in a good place.
I wish you and yours the best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553867</id>
	<title>Re:90\% ??? I call Bull.</title>
	<author>JuzzFunky</author>
	<datestamp>1246468860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm no molecular geneticist, but I am the proud father of a baby who was conceived through IVF.  He shows no sign of chromosomal abnormalities (well, at least compared to his father).  <br>
We were lucky.  It only took us a couple of cycles - our first miscarried and we were told that it was almost certainly due to severe chromosomal abnormalities.<p><div class="quote"><p>"Less than 30\% of conceptions result in a successful pregnancy" (TFA)</p> </div><p>I understand that statistic to mean that more than 70\% of natural conceptions have chromosomal abnormalities so severe that the embryo fails to implant.  I find it quite plausible that 90\% of the embryos from people who are having trouble conceiving are flawed.
<br>
Incidentally, It was recommended that we have sex every second day before my appointment with myself in the little room with the magazines.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no molecular geneticist , but I am the proud father of a baby who was conceived through IVF .
He shows no sign of chromosomal abnormalities ( well , at least compared to his father ) .
We were lucky .
It only took us a couple of cycles - our first miscarried and we were told that it was almost certainly due to severe chromosomal abnormalities .
" Less than 30 \ % of conceptions result in a successful pregnancy " ( TFA ) I understand that statistic to mean that more than 70 \ % of natural conceptions have chromosomal abnormalities so severe that the embryo fails to implant .
I find it quite plausible that 90 \ % of the embryos from people who are having trouble conceiving are flawed .
Incidentally , It was recommended that we have sex every second day before my appointment with myself in the little room with the magazines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no molecular geneticist, but I am the proud father of a baby who was conceived through IVF.
He shows no sign of chromosomal abnormalities (well, at least compared to his father).
We were lucky.
It only took us a couple of cycles - our first miscarried and we were told that it was almost certainly due to severe chromosomal abnormalities.
"Less than 30\% of conceptions result in a successful pregnancy" (TFA) I understand that statistic to mean that more than 70\% of natural conceptions have chromosomal abnormalities so severe that the embryo fails to implant.
I find it quite plausible that 90\% of the embryos from people who are having trouble conceiving are flawed.
Incidentally, It was recommended that we have sex every second day before my appointment with myself in the little room with the magazines.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556665</id>
	<title>Sperm Helps Diminish Wrinkles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246544400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article's advice to ejaculate every day would be an interesting combination with <a href="http://laurenbernat.com/2009/06/want-to-diminish-wrinkles-use-human-sperm/" title="laurenbernat.com">this article's</a> [laurenbernat.com] suggestion that human sperm can help diminish wrinkles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article 's advice to ejaculate every day would be an interesting combination with this article 's [ laurenbernat.com ] suggestion that human sperm can help diminish wrinkles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article's advice to ejaculate every day would be an interesting combination with this article's [laurenbernat.com] suggestion that human sperm can help diminish wrinkles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556323</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Aggrajag</author>
	<datestamp>1246542120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, that helps keeping the prostate clean. I had prostate problems<br>about six month ago and my doctor suggested ejaculation as a cure:<br>sex (yes, I have a wife) or masturbation. The alternative was to<br>eat alfa-blockers (Tamsulosin) which reduce blood pressure but in<br>my case BP was getting way too low and causing a lot of problems.</p><p>So a lot of ejaculations will keep your prostate in good shape.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , that helps keeping the prostate clean .
I had prostate problemsabout six month ago and my doctor suggested ejaculation as a cure : sex ( yes , I have a wife ) or masturbation .
The alternative was toeat alfa-blockers ( Tamsulosin ) which reduce blood pressure but inmy case BP was getting way too low and causing a lot of problems.So a lot of ejaculations will keep your prostate in good shape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, that helps keeping the prostate clean.
I had prostate problemsabout six month ago and my doctor suggested ejaculation as a cure:sex (yes, I have a wife) or masturbation.
The alternative was toeat alfa-blockers (Tamsulosin) which reduce blood pressure but inmy case BP was getting way too low and causing a lot of problems.So a lot of ejaculations will keep your prostate in good shape.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556021</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1246539660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly it's an old news, I remember 20 years ago when we talked about sex in school, the teacher said it is ok to wank, since the sperm gets renewed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly it 's an old news , I remember 20 years ago when we talked about sex in school , the teacher said it is ok to wank , since the sperm gets renewed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly it's an old news, I remember 20 years ago when we talked about sex in school, the teacher said it is ok to wank, since the sperm gets renewed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555731</id>
	<title>I wonder how they phrased the ad.</title>
	<author>bostei2008</author>
	<datestamp>1246536300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"After a week of daily ejaculations, the sperm was re-measured. "</p><p>For this to make sense, they must have started out with men who don't ejaculate daily. How do you find those men?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" After a week of daily ejaculations , the sperm was re-measured .
" For this to make sense , they must have started out with men who do n't ejaculate daily .
How do you find those men ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"After a week of daily ejaculations, the sperm was re-measured.
"For this to make sense, they must have started out with men who don't ejaculate daily.
How do you find those men?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556691</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>anarkavre</author>
	<datestamp>1246544520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe the opposite is the reason for so many insane religious zealots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the opposite is the reason for so many insane religious zealots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the opposite is the reason for so many insane religious zealots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554523</id>
	<title>Re:90\% ??? I call Bull.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246477020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything for MORE flipper Babies! Yay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything for MORE flipper Babies !
Yay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything for MORE flipper Babies!
Yay!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28562775</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246566780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?"</p></div><p>I don't even understand that question.  In what sense could it possibly not be okay?  Do your friends think they'll get hairy palms or go blind or something?  Do they live in the middle ages?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" So that means it 's okay if I jack off every day ?
" I do n't even understand that question .
In what sense could it possibly not be okay ?
Do your friends think they 'll get hairy palms or go blind or something ?
Do they live in the middle ages ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?
"I don't even understand that question.
In what sense could it possibly not be okay?
Do your friends think they'll get hairy palms or go blind or something?
Do they live in the middle ages?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</id>
	<title>Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1246459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.</p><p>Now to just find someone to spread it to..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although if 'twice a day ' helps , all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.Now to just find someone to spread it to. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.Now to just find someone to spread it to..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553749</id>
	<title>Artificial insemination is more than just IVF</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1246467360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary ends by jumping straight from IVF to artificial insemination; those are two different (though overlapping) procedures.  While IVF does essentially require artificial insemination to occur, artificial insemination can happen inside the uterus as well.  Artificial insemination is a commonly employed technique for infertile couples who aren't willing, interested, or financially capable of undergoing IVF.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary ends by jumping straight from IVF to artificial insemination ; those are two different ( though overlapping ) procedures .
While IVF does essentially require artificial insemination to occur , artificial insemination can happen inside the uterus as well .
Artificial insemination is a commonly employed technique for infertile couples who are n't willing , interested , or financially capable of undergoing IVF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary ends by jumping straight from IVF to artificial insemination; those are two different (though overlapping) procedures.
While IVF does essentially require artificial insemination to occur, artificial insemination can happen inside the uterus as well.
Artificial insemination is a commonly employed technique for infertile couples who aren't willing, interested, or financially capable of undergoing IVF.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552891</id>
	<title>No worries, Slashdotters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246459560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Masturbation works too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Masturbation works too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Masturbation works too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553899</id>
	<title>International Fertility Week</title>
	<author>Lord\_of\_the\_nerf</author>
	<datestamp>1246469460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I declare an International Fertility Week.

Actually scratch that, it would probably also end up also being International Unintentional Denial of Service Week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I declare an International Fertility Week .
Actually scratch that , it would probably also end up also being International Unintentional Denial of Service Week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I declare an International Fertility Week.
Actually scratch that, it would probably also end up also being International Unintentional Denial of Service Week.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553547</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246465140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your son is a retard! a fucking retard! you're probably a retard too! i forgot, you openly admit to being a republican. you're definitely a retard!!~!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>your son is a retard !
a fucking retard !
you 're probably a retard too !
i forgot , you openly admit to being a republican .
you 're definitely a retard ! ! ~ ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your son is a retard!
a fucking retard!
you're probably a retard too!
i forgot, you openly admit to being a republican.
you're definitely a retard!!~!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553017</id>
	<title>Re:90\% ??? I call Bull.</title>
	<author>tpjunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1246460580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guessed, and confirmed upon reading, that the linked article is referring to the fact that human embryos naturally have a high rate of genetic abnormalities, and thus the fact that not every copulation during a woman's fertile period results in a pregnancy. The article explains that newer, more thorough screening mechanisms are flagging embryos that previously went undetected.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guessed , and confirmed upon reading , that the linked article is referring to the fact that human embryos naturally have a high rate of genetic abnormalities , and thus the fact that not every copulation during a woman 's fertile period results in a pregnancy .
The article explains that newer , more thorough screening mechanisms are flagging embryos that previously went undetected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guessed, and confirmed upon reading, that the linked article is referring to the fact that human embryos naturally have a high rate of genetic abnormalities, and thus the fact that not every copulation during a woman's fertile period results in a pregnancy.
The article explains that newer, more thorough screening mechanisms are flagging embryos that previously went undetected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554045</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246471680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah use the taxpayers money when it suits you and then turn your back when another child needs YOUR help. You, my friend, may or may not have a wonderful son. I don't know about that, but you are nonetheless a fucking douche. Two faced asshole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah use the taxpayers money when it suits you and then turn your back when another child needs YOUR help .
You , my friend , may or may not have a wonderful son .
I do n't know about that , but you are nonetheless a fucking douche .
Two faced asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah use the taxpayers money when it suits you and then turn your back when another child needs YOUR help.
You, my friend, may or may not have a wonderful son.
I don't know about that, but you are nonetheless a fucking douche.
Two faced asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556859</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I second trying to eliminate common foods (such as milk, wheat, and nuts) that can cause allergic attacks or are poorly digested in some individuals.  Not just for children with Asperger's, but for any child with behavioral problems.  These sort of foods can cause a myriad of symptoms such as headaches and bodyaches that are chronic to the point that the person experiencing them may become accustomed to them and not realize they are experiencing a pain that shouldn't be there.  These aches cause physiological and psychological problems since the body reacts to them with the same chemical responses of being physically hurt.</p><p>It will take at least a couple of weeks of dietary changes before any improvements are visible (and that assumes your child sticks to the diet and does not swap items during lunch).  You will want to see a doctor first before implementing a diet.  There are no guarantees that a modified diet will result in any improvement, but it's worth a shot even if to eliminate the possibility.</p><p>If your son has problems waking or falling asleep, try administering melatonin at night and light during the morning.  Something like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.3mg (or less) an hour before bedtime, and if he's still awake an hour and a half later, administer another.  There's nothing like chronically waking up groggy to affect someone's personality and their performance in life.</p><p>And yeah, having a lot of talkative family members could lead to someone being silent.. if they listen all the time without given a chance to speak.  Try to find a social/family group for him with people who talk a bit slower and pause every once in a while so he is given an opportunity to express himself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I second trying to eliminate common foods ( such as milk , wheat , and nuts ) that can cause allergic attacks or are poorly digested in some individuals .
Not just for children with Asperger 's , but for any child with behavioral problems .
These sort of foods can cause a myriad of symptoms such as headaches and bodyaches that are chronic to the point that the person experiencing them may become accustomed to them and not realize they are experiencing a pain that should n't be there .
These aches cause physiological and psychological problems since the body reacts to them with the same chemical responses of being physically hurt.It will take at least a couple of weeks of dietary changes before any improvements are visible ( and that assumes your child sticks to the diet and does not swap items during lunch ) .
You will want to see a doctor first before implementing a diet .
There are no guarantees that a modified diet will result in any improvement , but it 's worth a shot even if to eliminate the possibility.If your son has problems waking or falling asleep , try administering melatonin at night and light during the morning .
Something like .3mg ( or less ) an hour before bedtime , and if he 's still awake an hour and a half later , administer another .
There 's nothing like chronically waking up groggy to affect someone 's personality and their performance in life.And yeah , having a lot of talkative family members could lead to someone being silent.. if they listen all the time without given a chance to speak .
Try to find a social/family group for him with people who talk a bit slower and pause every once in a while so he is given an opportunity to express himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I second trying to eliminate common foods (such as milk, wheat, and nuts) that can cause allergic attacks or are poorly digested in some individuals.
Not just for children with Asperger's, but for any child with behavioral problems.
These sort of foods can cause a myriad of symptoms such as headaches and bodyaches that are chronic to the point that the person experiencing them may become accustomed to them and not realize they are experiencing a pain that shouldn't be there.
These aches cause physiological and psychological problems since the body reacts to them with the same chemical responses of being physically hurt.It will take at least a couple of weeks of dietary changes before any improvements are visible (and that assumes your child sticks to the diet and does not swap items during lunch).
You will want to see a doctor first before implementing a diet.
There are no guarantees that a modified diet will result in any improvement, but it's worth a shot even if to eliminate the possibility.If your son has problems waking or falling asleep, try administering melatonin at night and light during the morning.
Something like .3mg (or less) an hour before bedtime, and if he's still awake an hour and a half later, administer another.
There's nothing like chronically waking up groggy to affect someone's personality and their performance in life.And yeah, having a lot of talkative family members could lead to someone being silent.. if they listen all the time without given a chance to speak.
Try to find a social/family group for him with people who talk a bit slower and pause every once in a while so he is given an opportunity to express himself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246464600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I am proud of who I am (officially diagnosed, you insensitive clod!) - and, judging from the growth of forums such as Wrongplanet, the rise in Autism may be perfectly balanced with the rise in the prominence of the Internet.  Over textual communication, nobody cares that you flap your hands, or that you can't keep eye contact without getting this weird fidgety feeling, or that you don't quite get anything until the second or third time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I am proud of who I am ( officially diagnosed , you insensitive clod !
) - and , judging from the growth of forums such as Wrongplanet , the rise in Autism may be perfectly balanced with the rise in the prominence of the Internet .
Over textual communication , nobody cares that you flap your hands , or that you ca n't keep eye contact without getting this weird fidgety feeling , or that you do n't quite get anything until the second or third time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I am proud of who I am (officially diagnosed, you insensitive clod!
) - and, judging from the growth of forums such as Wrongplanet, the rise in Autism may be perfectly balanced with the rise in the prominence of the Internet.
Over textual communication, nobody cares that you flap your hands, or that you can't keep eye contact without getting this weird fidgety feeling, or that you don't quite get anything until the second or third time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553201</id>
	<title>Re:On autism! - Wrong!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246461960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, unless your son is like 65 years old, then <b>you and your wife</b> have had a lifetime of exposure to these toxins, and you merely passed it on to him.
</p><p>Wise up and read the studies about toxic chemicals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , unless your son is like 65 years old , then you and your wife have had a lifetime of exposure to these toxins , and you merely passed it on to him .
Wise up and read the studies about toxic chemicals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, unless your son is like 65 years old, then you and your wife have had a lifetime of exposure to these toxins, and you merely passed it on to him.
Wise up and read the studies about toxic chemicals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553767</id>
	<title>that's what I've been telling my wife for years!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246467600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>however, drinking alcohol frequently and smoking damages sperm, no matter how often you "produce" sperm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>however , drinking alcohol frequently and smoking damages sperm , no matter how often you " produce " sperm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>however, drinking alcohol frequently and smoking damages sperm, no matter how often you "produce" sperm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246465080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, we knew most of this same information in the 60's/70's. Not exactly news now, we knew that sperm "aged" and degraded.
<br> <br>More work happened in the 90's.  <a href="http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/8/1251" title="oxfordjournals.org" rel="nofollow">http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/8/1251</a> [oxfordjournals.org]
<br> <br>Meanwhile, this article pretty well describes the reason that most slashdotters have (or will soon have) pattern baldness:
<a href="http://www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences\_of\_over\_masturbation\_a589\_f0.html" title="steadyhealth.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences\_of\_over\_masturbation\_a589\_f0.html</a> [steadyhealth.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , we knew most of this same information in the 60 's/70 's .
Not exactly news now , we knew that sperm " aged " and degraded .
More work happened in the 90 's .
http : //humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/8/1251 [ oxfordjournals.org ] Meanwhile , this article pretty well describes the reason that most slashdotters have ( or will soon have ) pattern baldness : http : //www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences \ _of \ _over \ _masturbation \ _a589 \ _f0.html [ steadyhealth.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, we knew most of this same information in the 60's/70's.
Not exactly news now, we knew that sperm "aged" and degraded.
More work happened in the 90's.
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/8/1251 [oxfordjournals.org]
 Meanwhile, this article pretty well describes the reason that most slashdotters have (or will soon have) pattern baldness:
http://www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences\_of\_over\_masturbation\_a589\_f0.html [steadyhealth.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28557465</id>
	<title>Scientific evidence for self satisfaction?</title>
	<author>zazenation</author>
	<datestamp>1246548300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll bet this new info will jack off---er--up-- Fleshlight sales....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bet this new info will jack off---er--up-- Fleshlight sales... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bet this new info will jack off---er--up-- Fleshlight sales....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552855</id>
	<title>I got ten bucks</title>
	<author>Deagol</author>
	<datestamp>1246459380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the first person who applies a "fap" tag!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the first person who applies a " fap " tag !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the first person who applies a "fap" tag!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552921</id>
	<title>Whoo-hoo!</title>
	<author>IonOtter</author>
	<datestamp>1246459860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if frequent masturbation <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=4&amp;url=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.sfgate.com\%2Fcgi-bin\%2Farticle.cgi\%3Ffile\%3D\%2Fc\%2Fa\%2F2004\%2F04\%2F07\%2FMNGS161ML91.DTL&amp;ei=iRFMSvb1GpSftgfbrLiRDQ&amp;rct=j&amp;q=frequent+masturbation+prevents+prostate+cancer+slashdot&amp;usg=AFQjCNFLbmUu6zBdiQDySRCdgyJtoihKRw" title="google.com">prevents cancer</a> [google.com], then baby, lemme tell ya?  I could CURE cancer.  And now this?</p><p>I just might start selling it, now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if frequent masturbation prevents cancer [ google.com ] , then baby , lem me tell ya ?
I could CURE cancer .
And now this ? I just might start selling it , now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if frequent masturbation prevents cancer [google.com], then baby, lemme tell ya?
I could CURE cancer.
And now this?I just might start selling it, now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552993</id>
	<title>Fresher Sperm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246460340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems pretty simple to me: fresh sperm are better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems pretty simple to me : fresh sperm are better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems pretty simple to me: fresh sperm are better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555323</id>
	<title>Cruel</title>
	<author>slave\_to\_coffee</author>
	<datestamp>1246530240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting this on Slashdot is like sending Pizza Hut circulars to Ethiopia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting this on Slashdot is like sending Pizza Hut circulars to Ethiopia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting this on Slashdot is like sending Pizza Hut circulars to Ethiopia</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555981</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My son was diagnosed with very-mild-autism when he was 3 years old.<br>Instead of a series of drugs, our doctors prescribed an action course: no TV, all active plays, puzzles, and talking a lot to him.<br>Now, at age 4 1/2, he as slowly come out of his shell and is talking normally at 80\% efficiency.<br>The doctors say he lags 6 months behind others of his age. His IQ is 90 for his age of 4 years.<br>Of course he still is silent in school and does what he is told. His drawing skills are exceptional for his age and his teacher praises him sky-high for this.<br>But he still has issues mingling with new kids.<br>We checked for Lead poisoning, but nothing of that sort.<br>His speech is still childish- meaning the words are not pronounced clearly. Doctors say it will go away only after constant practice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My son was diagnosed with very-mild-autism when he was 3 years old.Instead of a series of drugs , our doctors prescribed an action course : no TV , all active plays , puzzles , and talking a lot to him.Now , at age 4 1/2 , he as slowly come out of his shell and is talking normally at 80 \ % efficiency.The doctors say he lags 6 months behind others of his age .
His IQ is 90 for his age of 4 years.Of course he still is silent in school and does what he is told .
His drawing skills are exceptional for his age and his teacher praises him sky-high for this.But he still has issues mingling with new kids.We checked for Lead poisoning , but nothing of that sort.His speech is still childish- meaning the words are not pronounced clearly .
Doctors say it will go away only after constant practice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My son was diagnosed with very-mild-autism when he was 3 years old.Instead of a series of drugs, our doctors prescribed an action course: no TV, all active plays, puzzles, and talking a lot to him.Now, at age 4 1/2, he as slowly come out of his shell and is talking normally at 80\% efficiency.The doctors say he lags 6 months behind others of his age.
His IQ is 90 for his age of 4 years.Of course he still is silent in school and does what he is told.
His drawing skills are exceptional for his age and his teacher praises him sky-high for this.But he still has issues mingling with new kids.We checked for Lead poisoning, but nothing of that sort.His speech is still childish- meaning the words are not pronounced clearly.
Doctors say it will go away only after constant practice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555461</id>
	<title>Specially if you have sex with a woman...</title>
	<author>viraltus</author>
	<datestamp>1246532340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or so I heard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or so I heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or so I heard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555615</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246534500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Wow, I guess every sprem is sacred</p></div></blockquote><p>I, for one, welcome our new dyslexic sprem overlords.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I guess every sprem is sacredI , for one , welcome our new dyslexic sprem overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I guess every sprem is sacredI, for one, welcome our new dyslexic sprem overlords.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999</id>
	<title>On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246460400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an autistic son and I think that "causes of autism" are something that is used far too often.  My wife and I have thought about this and we see in our son's autism some of our own traits as its forbears. Rather than the litany of plastic bottles, vaccines, carbon monoxide, indoor air pollution and other bogus causes, we now wonder if autism is actually part of a natural evolutionary response to dealing with an increasingly complex human society.</p><p>Perhaps we've evolved to deal with the fact that we are increasingly specialized, as our society feeds back into our own natural selection, and, we've reached a sort of a tipping point where autism is the next step.</p><p>We've been very fortunate in that our son has responded extremely well to aggressive therapy, all, by the way, provided by the taxpayer... (makes this old Republican rethink some of his own values).  And, we wonder if, perhaps, a different sort of society might emerge from autism, that, we see it as a disability because we value our own communication so much. Perhaps autism is something that will never be cured, but, people who are autistic can move onto lead intelligent and productive lives if only there is intervention and ever better education and socialization for them and in a way that makes sense, for them.</p><p>Regardless of all of that though, I can say this.  I'm proud of my son for who he is.   When I first heard of his diagnosis, I almost felt like he had died and I was very angry about it.  Sometimes, I admit, I still am.  But, overall, if I could do it all over again, and make a choice about having an autistic child, I would gladly keep the son that I have.</p><p>I wouldn't trade him for anything in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an autistic son and I think that " causes of autism " are something that is used far too often .
My wife and I have thought about this and we see in our son 's autism some of our own traits as its forbears .
Rather than the litany of plastic bottles , vaccines , carbon monoxide , indoor air pollution and other bogus causes , we now wonder if autism is actually part of a natural evolutionary response to dealing with an increasingly complex human society.Perhaps we 've evolved to deal with the fact that we are increasingly specialized , as our society feeds back into our own natural selection , and , we 've reached a sort of a tipping point where autism is the next step.We 've been very fortunate in that our son has responded extremely well to aggressive therapy , all , by the way , provided by the taxpayer... ( makes this old Republican rethink some of his own values ) .
And , we wonder if , perhaps , a different sort of society might emerge from autism , that , we see it as a disability because we value our own communication so much .
Perhaps autism is something that will never be cured , but , people who are autistic can move onto lead intelligent and productive lives if only there is intervention and ever better education and socialization for them and in a way that makes sense , for them.Regardless of all of that though , I can say this .
I 'm proud of my son for who he is .
When I first heard of his diagnosis , I almost felt like he had died and I was very angry about it .
Sometimes , I admit , I still am .
But , overall , if I could do it all over again , and make a choice about having an autistic child , I would gladly keep the son that I have.I would n't trade him for anything in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an autistic son and I think that "causes of autism" are something that is used far too often.
My wife and I have thought about this and we see in our son's autism some of our own traits as its forbears.
Rather than the litany of plastic bottles, vaccines, carbon monoxide, indoor air pollution and other bogus causes, we now wonder if autism is actually part of a natural evolutionary response to dealing with an increasingly complex human society.Perhaps we've evolved to deal with the fact that we are increasingly specialized, as our society feeds back into our own natural selection, and, we've reached a sort of a tipping point where autism is the next step.We've been very fortunate in that our son has responded extremely well to aggressive therapy, all, by the way, provided by the taxpayer... (makes this old Republican rethink some of his own values).
And, we wonder if, perhaps, a different sort of society might emerge from autism, that, we see it as a disability because we value our own communication so much.
Perhaps autism is something that will never be cured, but, people who are autistic can move onto lead intelligent and productive lives if only there is intervention and ever better education and socialization for them and in a way that makes sense, for them.Regardless of all of that though, I can say this.
I'm proud of my son for who he is.
When I first heard of his diagnosis, I almost felt like he had died and I was very angry about it.
Sometimes, I admit, I still am.
But, overall, if I could do it all over again, and make a choice about having an autistic child, I would gladly keep the son that I have.I wouldn't trade him for anything in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552827</id>
	<title>Hold on...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246459200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does masturbation count?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does masturbation count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does masturbation count?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553779</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246467660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm married, you insensitive clod!</p><p>All joking aside, all technical reasons aside, I didn't RTFA, but.. did a study really need to show this?<br>Barring no contraceptive;<br>Copulation + Occasionally = Possible conception<br>Copulation + Daily over 28+ (average) days = much higher chance of conception</p><p>This took a major study, in which some scientist was paid?</p><p>I'd sure love to be part of studies like this.<br>Where do I sign up, and convince my wife it's necessary for science?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm married , you insensitive clod ! All joking aside , all technical reasons aside , I did n't RTFA , but.. did a study really need to show this ? Barring no contraceptive ; Copulation + Occasionally = Possible conceptionCopulation + Daily over 28 + ( average ) days = much higher chance of conceptionThis took a major study , in which some scientist was paid ? I 'd sure love to be part of studies like this.Where do I sign up , and convince my wife it 's necessary for science ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm married, you insensitive clod!All joking aside, all technical reasons aside, I didn't RTFA, but.. did a study really need to show this?Barring no contraceptive;Copulation + Occasionally = Possible conceptionCopulation + Daily over 28+ (average) days = much higher chance of conceptionThis took a major study, in which some scientist was paid?I'd sure love to be part of studies like this.Where do I sign up, and convince my wife it's necessary for science?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552943</id>
	<title>Re:Summary misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246459980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good heavens!  All my ejaculations are verbal!  I have a ghastly feeling that they're not going to help!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good heavens !
All my ejaculations are verbal !
I have a ghastly feeling that they 're not going to help !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good heavens!
All my ejaculations are verbal!
I have a ghastly feeling that they're not going to help!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28568049</id>
	<title>Re:On autism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246552920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also have celiac, and while reading up on it I started reading about "enzyme therapy" and how autistic kids benefit from that as well as a gluten free diet. if you're curious you should check it out, just google for starters</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also have celiac , and while reading up on it I started reading about " enzyme therapy " and how autistic kids benefit from that as well as a gluten free diet .
if you 're curious you should check it out , just google for starters</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also have celiac, and while reading up on it I started reading about "enzyme therapy" and how autistic kids benefit from that as well as a gluten free diet.
if you're curious you should check it out, just google for starters</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28558697</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>jahudabudy</author>
	<datestamp>1246554000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?" Caught them with their guard down, <b>spilled the beans all by themselves.</b></i>  <br> <br>
Only the second group...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an amusing afterthought , when I mentioned this article to friends , some of them said " So that means I should fuck every day ?
" , while others said " So that means it 's okay if I jack off every day ?
" Caught them with their guard down , spilled the beans all by themselves .
Only the second group.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?
", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?
" Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.
Only the second group...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552841</id>
	<title>slashdotters...</title>
	<author>Luyseyal</author>
	<datestamp>1246459320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...</p><p>-l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month , much less daily...-l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...-l</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553081</id>
	<title>Re:90\% ??? I call Bull.</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1246461000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They pack plenty of eggs in there and still only get 30\%-40\%(if you trust numbers from US clinics selling IVF) and of those</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In 2008, an analysis of the data of the National Birth Defects Study in the US found that certain birth defects were significantly more common in infants conceived with IVF, notably septal heart defects, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, esophageal atresia, and anorectal atresia; the mechanism of causality is unclear.</p></div><p>time for a back of the napkin calculation to not-really-but-sort-of prove my point:<br>10\%*7(couldn't find a number for how many they fill you up with, so i made one up)*50\%(other factors and multiple pregnancies counting as one) ~=30-40\%</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They pack plenty of eggs in there and still only get 30 \ % -40 \ % ( if you trust numbers from US clinics selling IVF ) and of thoseIn 2008 , an analysis of the data of the National Birth Defects Study in the US found that certain birth defects were significantly more common in infants conceived with IVF , notably septal heart defects , cleft lip with or without cleft palate , esophageal atresia , and anorectal atresia ; the mechanism of causality is unclear.time for a back of the napkin calculation to not-really-but-sort-of prove my point : 10 \ % * 7 ( could n't find a number for how many they fill you up with , so i made one up ) * 50 \ % ( other factors and multiple pregnancies counting as one ) ~ = 30-40 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They pack plenty of eggs in there and still only get 30\%-40\%(if you trust numbers from US clinics selling IVF) and of thoseIn 2008, an analysis of the data of the National Birth Defects Study in the US found that certain birth defects were significantly more common in infants conceived with IVF, notably septal heart defects, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, esophageal atresia, and anorectal atresia; the mechanism of causality is unclear.time for a back of the napkin calculation to not-really-but-sort-of prove my point:10\%*7(couldn't find a number for how many they fill you up with, so i made one up)*50\%(other factors and multiple pregnancies counting as one) ~=30-40\%
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555897</id>
	<title>Re:great...</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1246538460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>so i am single AND extremly <b>furtile</b>
</p><p>
I think you need to see a doctor about that...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>so i am single AND extremly furtile I think you need to see a doctor about that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so i am single AND extremly furtile

I think you need to see a doctor about that...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553003</id>
	<title>Re:Summary misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246460460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leave it to a slashdotter to take focus away from the benefits of daily sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave it to a slashdotter to take focus away from the benefits of daily sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave it to a slashdotter to take focus away from the benefits of daily sex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552929</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>sys.stdout.write</author>
	<datestamp>1246459860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, I guess every sprem <i>is</i> sacred, for its death helps others succeed.<br> <br>Catholicism could learn a lot from this study!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I guess every sprem is sacred , for its death helps others succeed .
Catholicism could learn a lot from this study !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I guess every sprem is sacred, for its death helps others succeed.
Catholicism could learn a lot from this study!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28557195</id>
	<title>Error in summary</title>
	<author>DudeTheMath</author>
	<datestamp>1246547280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA says it's 90\% of <i>embryos</i>, not <i>eggs</i>. That makes a difference!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says it 's 90 \ % of embryos , not eggs .
That makes a difference !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says it's 90\% of embryos, not eggs.
That makes a difference!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905</id>
	<title>90\%  ???  I call Bull.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246459680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IVF has been around a few years.  In fact, it's been around since 1978, if you want to take it back to the first test tube baby.</p><p>I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.</p><p>Now, I'm not saying that there isn't any increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the procedure.  But 90\% chance of severe chromosomal abnormalities doesn't sound like it makes sense to me.</p><p>Are there are molecular geneticists in the house?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IVF has been around a few years .
In fact , it 's been around since 1978 , if you want to take it back to the first test tube baby.I 'm sure if there were " severe " chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.Now , I 'm not saying that there is n't any increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the procedure .
But 90 \ % chance of severe chromosomal abnormalities does n't sound like it makes sense to me.Are there are molecular geneticists in the house ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IVF has been around a few years.
In fact, it's been around since 1978, if you want to take it back to the first test tube baby.I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.Now, I'm not saying that there isn't any increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the procedure.
But 90\% chance of severe chromosomal abnormalities doesn't sound like it makes sense to me.Are there are molecular geneticists in the house?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28563523</id>
	<title>It's so obvious</title>
	<author>OrangeMonkey11</author>
	<datestamp>1246525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't any of these scientists learned this little fact in high school health class.

Your man batter is not like wine, it does not get better with aged; so you have to clear it out regularly to get a health fresh batch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't any of these scientists learned this little fact in high school health class .
Your man batter is not like wine , it does not get better with aged ; so you have to clear it out regularly to get a health fresh batch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't any of these scientists learned this little fact in high school health class.
Your man batter is not like wine, it does not get better with aged; so you have to clear it out regularly to get a health fresh batch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555423</id>
	<title>Re:Fresher Sperm</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246531560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean, more taste, less filling?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean , more taste , less filling ?
          -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean, more taste, less filling?
          -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552853</id>
	<title>Internet Filter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246459320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm... does that mean that if Senator Stephen Conroy's internet filter gets built, I can get a medical prescription to download porn?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm... does that mean that if Senator Stephen Conroy 's internet filter gets built , I can get a medical prescription to download porn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm... does that mean that if Senator Stephen Conroy's internet filter gets built, I can get a medical prescription to download porn?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637</id>
	<title>great...</title>
	<author>Noctris</author>
	<datestamp>1246478280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so i am single AND extremly furtile ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>so i am single AND extremly furtile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so i am single AND extremly furtile ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554345</id>
	<title>Having sex 9 times a fay also said to increase cha</title>
	<author>Biswalt</author>
	<datestamp>1246474980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank god!  This puts to end the argument I'd been having a friend that thought peoplewho have almost no sex would have the highest fertility.  I'll file this one under obvious theory ends up being right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god !
This puts to end the argument I 'd been having a friend that thought peoplewho have almost no sex would have the highest fertility .
I 'll file this one under obvious theory ends up being right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god!
This puts to end the argument I'd been having a friend that thought peoplewho have almost no sex would have the highest fertility.
I'll file this one under obvious theory ends up being right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28557011</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to do with sex...</title>
	<author>archermadness</author>
	<datestamp>1246546380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, that is the dumbest article I've read in a while. Among other things, it claims that the void created by ejaculation is filled by air, and this air somehow travels to the brain, causing thermal shock!</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , that is the dumbest article I 've read in a while .
Among other things , it claims that the void created by ejaculation is filled by air , and this air somehow travels to the brain , causing thermal shock !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, that is the dumbest article I've read in a while.
Among other things, it claims that the void created by ejaculation is filled by air, and this air somehow travels to the brain, causing thermal shock!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555925</id>
	<title>some old science</title>
	<author>cinnamon colbert</author>
	<datestamp>1246538700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember reading many (&gt;15) years ago a study about human sperm injected into chinese hamster eggs.<br>The rationale is as follow: the DNA in human cells can be stained b a method called R banding or G banding, which , under the microcsope lets you look at the human genome - you can see something like 100 bands of dark and light, and there is a characteristic pattern; when you have large abnormalities, like an extra part of  a chromosome, or a duplication, you see extra bands.<br>This technique doesn't work on sperm, because the dna is "condensed" in the sperm head' and not stainable; the dna decondenses, and becomes stainable when the sperm enter an egg<br>However, human eggs are hard to obtain (or harder then sperm) but you can use chinese hamster eggs; the human sperm enter the egg and the DNA becomes stainable.<br>When you do this, you find that some (from memory) ~ 15\% of human sperm have a visible defect.<br>This staining technigue is quite crude - the human genome has ~ 2e9 base pairs of DNA, and you probably need something on the order of a change in 1e8 to see it with this stain, so if 15\% are different by this stain....<br>you could argue that the above is an artifact of the chinese hamster eggs, and that if human eggs were available, the sperm would apear better</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading many ( &gt; 15 ) years ago a study about human sperm injected into chinese hamster eggs.The rationale is as follow : the DNA in human cells can be stained b a method called R banding or G banding , which , under the microcsope lets you look at the human genome - you can see something like 100 bands of dark and light , and there is a characteristic pattern ; when you have large abnormalities , like an extra part of a chromosome , or a duplication , you see extra bands.This technique does n't work on sperm , because the dna is " condensed " in the sperm head ' and not stainable ; the dna decondenses , and becomes stainable when the sperm enter an eggHowever , human eggs are hard to obtain ( or harder then sperm ) but you can use chinese hamster eggs ; the human sperm enter the egg and the DNA becomes stainable.When you do this , you find that some ( from memory ) ~ 15 \ % of human sperm have a visible defect.This staining technigue is quite crude - the human genome has ~ 2e9 base pairs of DNA , and you probably need something on the order of a change in 1e8 to see it with this stain , so if 15 \ % are different by this stain....you could argue that the above is an artifact of the chinese hamster eggs , and that if human eggs were available , the sperm would apear better</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading many (&gt;15) years ago a study about human sperm injected into chinese hamster eggs.The rationale is as follow: the DNA in human cells can be stained b a method called R banding or G banding, which , under the microcsope lets you look at the human genome - you can see something like 100 bands of dark and light, and there is a characteristic pattern; when you have large abnormalities, like an extra part of  a chromosome, or a duplication, you see extra bands.This technique doesn't work on sperm, because the dna is "condensed" in the sperm head' and not stainable; the dna decondenses, and becomes stainable when the sperm enter an eggHowever, human eggs are hard to obtain (or harder then sperm) but you can use chinese hamster eggs; the human sperm enter the egg and the DNA becomes stainable.When you do this, you find that some (from memory) ~ 15\% of human sperm have a visible defect.This staining technigue is quite crude - the human genome has ~ 2e9 base pairs of DNA, and you probably need something on the order of a change in 1e8 to see it with this stain, so if 15\% are different by this stain....you could argue that the above is an artifact of the chinese hamster eggs, and that if human eggs were available, the sperm would apear better</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552815</id>
	<title>Good news</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1246459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the porn industry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the porn industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the porn industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555615
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28557011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28567275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28564355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28558697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28562775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28568049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28560285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2249208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552853
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553017
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554493
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553535
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556021
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28557011
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28564355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28558697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28562775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552929
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555423
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555323
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28567275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555897
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553487
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28555047
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553381
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28560285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28568049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28553429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28556707
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2249208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28552827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2249208.28554237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
