<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_01_2230220</id>
	<title>Record-Breaking Solar Cells Tailored To Location</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246449360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/" rel="nofollow">Urchin</a> writes <i>"The quality of sunlight varies depending on where you live, but off-the-shelf solar cells are all identical. <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17401-recordbreaking-solar-cells-are-tailored-to-their-location.html">A new solar cell</a> designed by UK firm Quantasol is easily tuned to adapt to the local light conditions, which boosts its long-term performance. Its short-term performance isn't bad though &mdash; the single junction solar cell has a peak efficiency greater than any previous device, beating a world record that's stood for 21 years."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Urchin writes " The quality of sunlight varies depending on where you live , but off-the-shelf solar cells are all identical .
A new solar cell designed by UK firm Quantasol is easily tuned to adapt to the local light conditions , which boosts its long-term performance .
Its short-term performance is n't bad though    the single junction solar cell has a peak efficiency greater than any previous device , beating a world record that 's stood for 21 years .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Urchin writes "The quality of sunlight varies depending on where you live, but off-the-shelf solar cells are all identical.
A new solar cell designed by UK firm Quantasol is easily tuned to adapt to the local light conditions, which boosts its long-term performance.
Its short-term performance isn't bad though — the single junction solar cell has a peak efficiency greater than any previous device, beating a world record that's stood for 21 years.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552219</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246454460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, and those things owned by you are Chriss rather than Chris's.

Possession is 9/10 of the law.

Chris is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and those things owned by you are Chriss rather than Chris 's .
Possession is 9/10 of the law .
Chris is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and those things owned by you are Chriss rather than Chris's.
Possession is 9/10 of the law.
Chris is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560283</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246559040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's simply that more and more people are writing. A lot of those people wouldn't have done so pre-Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's simply that more and more people are writing .
A lot of those people would n't have done so pre-Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's simply that more and more people are writing.
A lot of those people wouldn't have done so pre-Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557359</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>XnavxeMiyyep</author>
	<datestamp>1246547940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers.</p></div><p>You are assuming that many readers actually RTFS. I, for one, take offense to that notion!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers.You are assuming that many readers actually RTFS .
I , for one , take offense to that notion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers.You are assuming that many readers actually RTFS.
I, for one, take offense to that notion!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552951</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>embsysdev</author>
	<datestamp>1246460100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either the editors have already corrected it, or you have it backwards.  "It's" is a contraction for "it is" and "its" is the possessive form.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either the editors have already corrected it , or you have it backwards .
" It 's " is a contraction for " it is " and " its " is the possessive form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either the editors have already corrected it, or you have it backwards.
"It's" is a contraction for "it is" and "its" is the possessive form.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552083</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246453620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh boo hoo hoo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh boo hoo hoo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh boo hoo hoo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28553281</id>
	<title>Re:The Solar Panel in My Soul</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246462680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It won't, for the simple reason that it, like everything else in this world, cannot understand the pain you feel.
<br> <br>I suggest installing one of these <a href="http://www.liteupnovelty.com/sdp/503181/4/pl-2693990/0/Product\_Catalog.html" title="liteupnovelty.com">novelty light-up toys</a> [liteupnovelty.com] instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't , for the simple reason that it , like everything else in this world , can not understand the pain you feel .
I suggest installing one of these novelty light-up toys [ liteupnovelty.com ] instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't, for the simple reason that it, like everything else in this world, cannot understand the pain you feel.
I suggest installing one of these novelty light-up toys [liteupnovelty.com] instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1246455720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are ALL lazy.  Not just Slashdot.  Since everything went online the quality of spelling and grammar has hit Elementary school levels.  AP, Reuters, The New York Frikkin' Times, etc.  ALL have various errors these days.</p><p>My mind seems to auto-correct for these mistakes pretty quickly while I am reading, but it does make me wonder if we would not be better off hiring 3rd graders to write these things out instead of journalism majors.</p><p>Let's face it.  If you don't get a red line underneath what you are typing we know just assume that its okay to submit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are ALL lazy .
Not just Slashdot .
Since everything went online the quality of spelling and grammar has hit Elementary school levels .
AP , Reuters , The New York Frikkin ' Times , etc .
ALL have various errors these days.My mind seems to auto-correct for these mistakes pretty quickly while I am reading , but it does make me wonder if we would not be better off hiring 3rd graders to write these things out instead of journalism majors.Let 's face it .
If you do n't get a red line underneath what you are typing we know just assume that its okay to submit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are ALL lazy.
Not just Slashdot.
Since everything went online the quality of spelling and grammar has hit Elementary school levels.
AP, Reuters, The New York Frikkin' Times, etc.
ALL have various errors these days.My mind seems to auto-correct for these mistakes pretty quickly while I am reading, but it does make me wonder if we would not be better off hiring 3rd graders to write these things out instead of journalism majors.Let's face it.
If you don't get a red line underneath what you are typing we know just assume that its okay to submit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471</id>
	<title>Re:What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1246456380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no average efficiency, because unfortunately the bastard that designed this version of Earth didn't make solar radiation distribution gaussian. You could file a complaint with Him, but I understand there's quite a backlog. In the meantime, I'd suggest moving to a desert near the equator if you want to eek out those few extra watts. Whatever you do, don't move to Minnesota -- For some reason, snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no average efficiency , because unfortunately the bastard that designed this version of Earth did n't make solar radiation distribution gaussian .
You could file a complaint with Him , but I understand there 's quite a backlog .
In the meantime , I 'd suggest moving to a desert near the equator if you want to eek out those few extra watts .
Whatever you do , do n't move to Minnesota -- For some reason , snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no average efficiency, because unfortunately the bastard that designed this version of Earth didn't make solar radiation distribution gaussian.
You could file a complaint with Him, but I understand there's quite a backlog.
In the meantime, I'd suggest moving to a desert near the equator if you want to eek out those few extra watts.
Whatever you do, don't move to Minnesota -- For some reason, snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28569759</id>
	<title>Re:Greater than any previous *single junction* dev</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246618440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes but this cell isn't meant for production it's a proof of concept which would go into a mulitjunction cell to hopefully get the efficiency over 40\%. The big hurdle for MJ cells at the moment is finding a 4th 1eV bandgap cell. Perhaps this could provide it. It's other advantage is that efficiency is a poor metric for meauring performance. What's really important is kwh/year. These cells can be tuned to the spectral conditions of a specific place: Southern Spain/California/the Middle East have similar quantities of solar energy but are spectrally different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes but this cell is n't meant for production it 's a proof of concept which would go into a mulitjunction cell to hopefully get the efficiency over 40 \ % .
The big hurdle for MJ cells at the moment is finding a 4th 1eV bandgap cell .
Perhaps this could provide it .
It 's other advantage is that efficiency is a poor metric for meauring performance .
What 's really important is kwh/year .
These cells can be tuned to the spectral conditions of a specific place : Southern Spain/California/the Middle East have similar quantities of solar energy but are spectrally different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes but this cell isn't meant for production it's a proof of concept which would go into a mulitjunction cell to hopefully get the efficiency over 40\%.
The big hurdle for MJ cells at the moment is finding a 4th 1eV bandgap cell.
Perhaps this could provide it.
It's other advantage is that efficiency is a poor metric for meauring performance.
What's really important is kwh/year.
These cells can be tuned to the spectral conditions of a specific place: Southern Spain/California/the Middle East have similar quantities of solar energy but are spectrally different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552889</id>
	<title>Re:Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>daryl\_and\_daryl</author>
	<datestamp>1246459560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of it as sequestering arsenic. You just need to think outside the box on this 'green' thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of it as sequestering arsenic .
You just need to think outside the box on this 'green ' thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of it as sequestering arsenic.
You just need to think outside the box on this 'green' thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141</id>
	<title>Wanted: cheap, not efficient</title>
	<author>Carnildo</author>
	<datestamp>1246453920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>30\%?  40\%?  Efficiency only matters if you're constrained by space (airplanes) or by weight (satellites).  15\%-efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof -- or would be, if they were produced cheaply and in quantity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>30 \ % ?
40 \ % ? Efficiency only matters if you 're constrained by space ( airplanes ) or by weight ( satellites ) .
15 \ % -efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof -- or would be , if they were produced cheaply and in quantity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>30\%?
40\%?  Efficiency only matters if you're constrained by space (airplanes) or by weight (satellites).
15\%-efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof -- or would be, if they were produced cheaply and in quantity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159</id>
	<title>What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>SirLurksAlot</author>
	<datestamp>1246454100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to belittle this accomplishment, but I'd prefer to see an increase in average efficiency. According to the article the peak efficiency is found when panels are exposed to light 500 times that of normal light.  How does that translate to efficiency under normal operating conditions (such as a semi-cloudy day in the midwest)?  The article is rather short on details concerning how well the solar cells operate when they are "tailored to their locations."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to belittle this accomplishment , but I 'd prefer to see an increase in average efficiency .
According to the article the peak efficiency is found when panels are exposed to light 500 times that of normal light .
How does that translate to efficiency under normal operating conditions ( such as a semi-cloudy day in the midwest ) ?
The article is rather short on details concerning how well the solar cells operate when they are " tailored to their locations .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to belittle this accomplishment, but I'd prefer to see an increase in average efficiency.
According to the article the peak efficiency is found when panels are exposed to light 500 times that of normal light.
How does that translate to efficiency under normal operating conditions (such as a semi-cloudy day in the midwest)?
The article is rather short on details concerning how well the solar cells operate when they are "tailored to their locations.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081</id>
	<title>Efficiency VS Cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246453620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Efficiency doesn't really matter.  What we really want is the lowest cost per kWh.  What's the price of these?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Efficiency does n't really matter .
What we really want is the lowest cost per kWh .
What 's the price of these ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Efficiency doesn't really matter.
What we really want is the lowest cost per kWh.
What's the price of these?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554175</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Eivind</author>
	<datestamp>1246473420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, spelling grammar and punctuation was always horrible. It's just that 15 years ago, the 90\% of people who are the poorest language-users, didn't usually publicize a lot of text.<br>The Internet didn't make people worse -- it just made them a lot more visible.</p><p>Also, it reduced geographical boundaries, english is my third language, it's not reasonable to expect the same knowledge of ones third language as a mother-tongue. Yeah, I make more mistakes than many native english-speakers, but no, it's not because I'm particularily lazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , spelling grammar and punctuation was always horrible .
It 's just that 15 years ago , the 90 \ % of people who are the poorest language-users , did n't usually publicize a lot of text.The Internet did n't make people worse -- it just made them a lot more visible.Also , it reduced geographical boundaries , english is my third language , it 's not reasonable to expect the same knowledge of ones third language as a mother-tongue .
Yeah , I make more mistakes than many native english-speakers , but no , it 's not because I 'm particularily lazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, spelling grammar and punctuation was always horrible.
It's just that 15 years ago, the 90\% of people who are the poorest language-users, didn't usually publicize a lot of text.The Internet didn't make people worse -- it just made them a lot more visible.Also, it reduced geographical boundaries, english is my third language, it's not reasonable to expect the same knowledge of ones third language as a mother-tongue.
Yeah, I make more mistakes than many native english-speakers, but no, it's not because I'm particularily lazy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</id>
	<title>It's vs its</title>
	<author>ChrisCampbell47</author>
	<datestamp>1246453260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know I'm heading to the moderation cellar for this, but COME ON guys, don't be so damn lazy about your language.  See my sig below.</p><p>That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers.  You're blowing your chance to communicate with your audience when you make (and belittle complaints about) adolescent mistakes like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I 'm heading to the moderation cellar for this , but COME ON guys , do n't be so damn lazy about your language .
See my sig below.That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers .
You 're blowing your chance to communicate with your audience when you make ( and belittle complaints about ) adolescent mistakes like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I'm heading to the moderation cellar for this, but COME ON guys, don't be so damn lazy about your language.
See my sig below.That kind of mistake is a huge cognitive speed bump for many readers.
You're blowing your chance to communicate with your audience when you make (and belittle complaints about) adolescent mistakes like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28577861</id>
	<title>Re:Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1246644000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, let's wait for a perfect, 100\% pure solution before replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now.</p></div><p>Well, it's better than replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now with expensive, under-developed, and potentially dangerous alternatives.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , let 's wait for a perfect , 100 \ % pure solution before replacing the ugly , dirty , nasty coal energy plants we have right now.Well , it 's better than replacing the ugly , dirty , nasty coal energy plants we have right now with expensive , under-developed , and potentially dangerous alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, let's wait for a perfect, 100\% pure solution before replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now.Well, it's better than replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now with expensive, under-developed, and potentially dangerous alternatives.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560719</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1246560240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course your little rules for using such a thing COMPLETELY forget about the possessive sense. 'It' is a noun and 'it's' can work not as 'it is' but as a possessive statement. Kind of like<br>"This is a cat's dinner bowl. Here is it's water bowl."</p><p>In English the apostrophe has two main functions: it marks omissions, and it assists in marking the possessives of nouns and some pronouns. In strictly limited cases, it is allowed to assist in marking plurals, but most authorities now disapprove of such usage. An apostrophe is also used by some writers to form a plural for abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols where adding just s rather than 's may leave things ambiguous or inelegant.</p><p>What's really sad was I was taught this in 6th grade English. Now I see it only being taught as a high-school level concept.</p><p>The USA's educational system is going to shit. You might wish to get rid of your incorrect little flower.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course your little rules for using such a thing COMPLETELY forget about the possessive sense .
'It ' is a noun and 'it 's ' can work not as 'it is ' but as a possessive statement .
Kind of like " This is a cat 's dinner bowl .
Here is it 's water bowl .
" In English the apostrophe has two main functions : it marks omissions , and it assists in marking the possessives of nouns and some pronouns .
In strictly limited cases , it is allowed to assist in marking plurals , but most authorities now disapprove of such usage .
An apostrophe is also used by some writers to form a plural for abbreviations , acronyms , and symbols where adding just s rather than 's may leave things ambiguous or inelegant.What 's really sad was I was taught this in 6th grade English .
Now I see it only being taught as a high-school level concept.The USA 's educational system is going to shit .
You might wish to get rid of your incorrect little flower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course your little rules for using such a thing COMPLETELY forget about the possessive sense.
'It' is a noun and 'it's' can work not as 'it is' but as a possessive statement.
Kind of like"This is a cat's dinner bowl.
Here is it's water bowl.
"In English the apostrophe has two main functions: it marks omissions, and it assists in marking the possessives of nouns and some pronouns.
In strictly limited cases, it is allowed to assist in marking plurals, but most authorities now disapprove of such usage.
An apostrophe is also used by some writers to form a plural for abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols where adding just s rather than 's may leave things ambiguous or inelegant.What's really sad was I was taught this in 6th grade English.
Now I see it only being taught as a high-school level concept.The USA's educational system is going to shit.
You might wish to get rid of your incorrect little flower.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28555509</id>
	<title>Not really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246532880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It does not matter at all when solar cells take more energy to make than they will generate through their entire lives. Which was at least true for solar cells a decade ago. Maybe even today.</p><p>What is the ratio (energy produced):(enery to make)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does not matter at all when solar cells take more energy to make than they will generate through their entire lives .
Which was at least true for solar cells a decade ago .
Maybe even today.What is the ratio ( energy produced ) : ( enery to make ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does not matter at all when solar cells take more energy to make than they will generate through their entire lives.
Which was at least true for solar cells a decade ago.
Maybe even today.What is the ratio (energy produced):(enery to make)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558247</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>rrhal</author>
	<datestamp>1246552200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its about time we all agreed to stop using the apostrophe.  Its nothing but a syntactic speed bump that grammar Nazis cling onto for what ever reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its about time we all agreed to stop using the apostrophe .
Its nothing but a syntactic speed bump that grammar Nazis cling onto for what ever reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its about time we all agreed to stop using the apostrophe.
Its nothing but a syntactic speed bump that grammar Nazis cling onto for what ever reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552113</id>
	<title>No prices given...</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1246453800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The commercial market doesn't just want high efficiency, they want the device to be optimised to the environment," he says. "In the past we measured performance in dollars per watt. Now it's cents per kilowatt-hour that's more important."</p></div><p>This actually sounds like they're on the right track, but until I see prices I'm not convinced the process is a cost-saver.  Also it sounds like it's only useful in concentrating designs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The commercial market does n't just want high efficiency , they want the device to be optimised to the environment , " he says .
" In the past we measured performance in dollars per watt .
Now it 's cents per kilowatt-hour that 's more important .
" This actually sounds like they 're on the right track , but until I see prices I 'm not convinced the process is a cost-saver .
Also it sounds like it 's only useful in concentrating designs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The commercial market doesn't just want high efficiency, they want the device to be optimised to the environment," he says.
"In the past we measured performance in dollars per watt.
Now it's cents per kilowatt-hour that's more important.
"This actually sounds like they're on the right track, but until I see prices I'm not convinced the process is a cost-saver.
Also it sounds like it's only useful in concentrating designs.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554489</id>
	<title>Re:Greater than any previous *single junction* dev</title>
	<author>itwerx</author>
	<datestamp>1246476720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Eh, beat me to it!
   And there have been incremental increases in efficiency across a whole range of cell technologies on a regular basis, including the use of quantum wells, (and other quantum effects), in other materials.  In fact, the only reason it's even possible to insinuate any big hoopla about GaAs cells is that they've been around so long a lot of experimenters have stopped trying to improve them.  Badly worded article/summary for sure...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh , beat me to it !
And there have been incremental increases in efficiency across a whole range of cell technologies on a regular basis , including the use of quantum wells , ( and other quantum effects ) , in other materials .
In fact , the only reason it 's even possible to insinuate any big hoopla about GaAs cells is that they 've been around so long a lot of experimenters have stopped trying to improve them .
Badly worded article/summary for sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh, beat me to it!
And there have been incremental increases in efficiency across a whole range of cell technologies on a regular basis, including the use of quantum wells, (and other quantum effects), in other materials.
In fact, the only reason it's even possible to insinuate any big hoopla about GaAs cells is that they've been around so long a lot of experimenters have stopped trying to improve them.
Badly worded article/summary for sure...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552543</id>
	<title>Re:What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1246456860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Quantasol device can cope with much brighter light without becoming overloaded, <b>making it possible to use a very small solar cell to absorb light collected by a system of cheap lenses and mirrors.</b></p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Quantasol device can cope with much brighter light without becoming overloaded , making it possible to use a very small solar cell to absorb light collected by a system of cheap lenses and mirrors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Quantasol device can cope with much brighter light without becoming overloaded, making it possible to use a very small solar cell to absorb light collected by a system of cheap lenses and mirrors. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067</id>
	<title>Greater than any previous *single junction* device</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1246453560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Multi-junction cells are over 40\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Multi-junction cells are over 40 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Multi-junction cells are over 40\%.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554071</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Hojima</author>
	<datestamp>1246472220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>just assume that its okay to submit.</p></div><p>Does anyone else see the irony in this post? No? Well that's because all of us have the great advantage of the neocortex. You see, when you see a word in context, even if <b>it's</b> spelled wrong <b>its</b> meaning is properly interpreted. I know <b>it's</b> useless to yell at you grammar Nazis, but I have this small shimmer of hope that this message will make the following posters WRITE ABOUT FUCKING SOLAR ENERGY.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>just assume that its okay to submit.Does anyone else see the irony in this post ?
No ? Well that 's because all of us have the great advantage of the neocortex .
You see , when you see a word in context , even if it 's spelled wrong its meaning is properly interpreted .
I know it 's useless to yell at you grammar Nazis , but I have this small shimmer of hope that this message will make the following posters WRITE ABOUT FUCKING SOLAR ENERGY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just assume that its okay to submit.Does anyone else see the irony in this post?
No? Well that's because all of us have the great advantage of the neocortex.
You see, when you see a word in context, even if it's spelled wrong its meaning is properly interpreted.
I know it's useless to yell at you grammar Nazis, but I have this small shimmer of hope that this message will make the following posters WRITE ABOUT FUCKING SOLAR ENERGY.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28561027</id>
	<title>In stores or it did not happen</title>
	<author>toriver</author>
	<datestamp>1246561140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am getting bored with all these technological breakthroughs that mysteriously never seem to actually lead to something I can pay money for and get in my hands. Plastic optical memory, I am looking at you, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am getting bored with all these technological breakthroughs that mysteriously never seem to actually lead to something I can pay money for and get in my hands .
Plastic optical memory , I am looking at you , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am getting bored with all these technological breakthroughs that mysteriously never seem to actually lead to something I can pay money for and get in my hands.
Plastic optical memory, I am looking at you, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558851</id>
	<title>Re:Wanted: cheap, not efficient</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246554600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"15\%-efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof "<br>I'd like to see how you came up with that number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 15 \ % -efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof " I 'd like to see how you came up with that number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"15\%-efficient solar cells are good enough that you can power your house with them by covering your roof "I'd like to see how you came up with that number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552381</id>
	<title>Re:What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>willy\_me</author>
	<datestamp>1246455600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mirrors are cheaper then solar cells.  Being able to focus light onto a solar cell can be a cost effective way of generating electricity - if the solar cell is designed to handle the extra light.  The other possible application would be for satellites.  Thin reflective foil is much lighter then a solar cell.  You would have a similar setup where the foil focuses the light onto a central solar cell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mirrors are cheaper then solar cells .
Being able to focus light onto a solar cell can be a cost effective way of generating electricity - if the solar cell is designed to handle the extra light .
The other possible application would be for satellites .
Thin reflective foil is much lighter then a solar cell .
You would have a similar setup where the foil focuses the light onto a central solar cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mirrors are cheaper then solar cells.
Being able to focus light onto a solar cell can be a cost effective way of generating electricity - if the solar cell is designed to handle the extra light.
The other possible application would be for satellites.
Thin reflective foil is much lighter then a solar cell.
You would have a similar setup where the foil focuses the light onto a central solar cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552317</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246455180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, "Chris" is a singular noun, and therefore the possessive form is "Chris's."  And yes, the period goes inside the quotes, despite logic's demand that it go outside as any stronger sentence-ending punctuation (question mark or exclamation mark) would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , " Chris " is a singular noun , and therefore the possessive form is " Chris 's .
" And yes , the period goes inside the quotes , despite logic 's demand that it go outside as any stronger sentence-ending punctuation ( question mark or exclamation mark ) would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, "Chris" is a singular noun, and therefore the possessive form is "Chris's.
"  And yes, the period goes inside the quotes, despite logic's demand that it go outside as any stronger sentence-ending punctuation (question mark or exclamation mark) would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552103</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246453740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think spelling and grammar mistakes like that communicate something quite clearly, just not what the writer intended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think spelling and grammar mistakes like that communicate something quite clearly , just not what the writer intended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think spelling and grammar mistakes like that communicate something quite clearly, just not what the writer intended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560857</id>
	<title>Re:Wanted: cheap, not efficient</title>
	<author>dtfusion</author>
	<datestamp>1246560660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe for new construction. Half the cost of retrofitting solar cells on existing homes is installation. Even if they were free, it wouldn't be economical to install them. To both efficiency and cost play a role. If I don't need to cover my whole roof, installation is cheaper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe for new construction .
Half the cost of retrofitting solar cells on existing homes is installation .
Even if they were free , it would n't be economical to install them .
To both efficiency and cost play a role .
If I do n't need to cover my whole roof , installation is cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe for new construction.
Half the cost of retrofitting solar cells on existing homes is installation.
Even if they were free, it wouldn't be economical to install them.
To both efficiency and cost play a role.
If I don't need to cover my whole roof, installation is cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552185</id>
	<title>Re:Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>BigPeen</author>
	<datestamp>1246454280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Umm, TONS of electronics use As, that doesn't make them dangerous.  When its covalently bonded to things like Ga its pretty safe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , TONS of electronics use As , that does n't make them dangerous .
When its covalently bonded to things like Ga its pretty safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, TONS of electronics use As, that doesn't make them dangerous.
When its covalently bonded to things like Ga its pretty safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552307</id>
	<title>Re:Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1246455120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Reality: Solar power's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid cannot reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical.</p></div></blockquote><p>What version of reality do you live in?<br> <br>Solar power is economical for large-scale deployments.  That's why Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing has a $52 million backlog.<br> <br>Oh, damn it.  It appears I've fed the troll.<br> <br>But, you know, keep on fighting the good fight against environmental responsibility.  Future generations will thank you for it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reality : Solar power 's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid can not reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical.What version of reality do you live in ?
Solar power is economical for large-scale deployments .
That 's why Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing has a $ 52 million backlog .
Oh , damn it .
It appears I 've fed the troll .
But , you know , keep on fighting the good fight against environmental responsibility .
Future generations will thank you for it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reality: Solar power's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid cannot reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical.What version of reality do you live in?
Solar power is economical for large-scale deployments.
That's why Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing has a $52 million backlog.
Oh, damn it.
It appears I've fed the troll.
But, you know, keep on fighting the good fight against environmental responsibility.
Future generations will thank you for it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552119</id>
	<title>GREAT SCOTT!</title>
	<author>greatica</author>
	<datestamp>1246453800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call me when we get to 1.21 Jigawatts...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me when we get to 1.21 Jigawatts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me when we get to 1.21 Jigawatts...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552377</id>
	<title>Silicon efficiency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Current silicon cells are about 15-20\% average efficiency, NOT 10-12\%. They peak at just over 25\% efficient as demonstrated by the research lab at the University of New South Wales in Australia.
<br> <br>
SunPower A300 silicon cells average about 20\% per bin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Current silicon cells are about 15-20 \ % average efficiency , NOT 10-12 \ % .
They peak at just over 25 \ % efficient as demonstrated by the research lab at the University of New South Wales in Australia .
SunPower A300 silicon cells average about 20 \ % per bin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Current silicon cells are about 15-20\% average efficiency, NOT 10-12\%.
They peak at just over 25\% efficient as demonstrated by the research lab at the University of New South Wales in Australia.
SunPower A300 silicon cells average about 20\% per bin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552981</id>
	<title>Re:What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>foxylad</author>
	<datestamp>1246460280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This might be a good thing, cost-wise - you use a parabolic mirror (cheap) to concentrate normal light 500 times onto this collector, instead of needing a normal collector 500 times bigger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This might be a good thing , cost-wise - you use a parabolic mirror ( cheap ) to concentrate normal light 500 times onto this collector , instead of needing a normal collector 500 times bigger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might be a good thing, cost-wise - you use a parabolic mirror (cheap) to concentrate normal light 500 times onto this collector, instead of needing a normal collector 500 times bigger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552575</id>
	<title>Re:It's vs its</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246457280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest you take a look at #3.</p><p>http://www.cracked.com/article\_17522\_p2.html</p><p>At the heart of the real-life OCPD sufferer seems to be an irrational fear that the rest of the world is sloppier, dirtier and more disorganized than it should be, that it's rapidly getting worse, and that the world will fall to pieces unless someone straightens it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest you take a look at # 3.http : //www.cracked.com/article \ _17522 \ _p2.htmlAt the heart of the real-life OCPD sufferer seems to be an irrational fear that the rest of the world is sloppier , dirtier and more disorganized than it should be , that it 's rapidly getting worse , and that the world will fall to pieces unless someone straightens it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest you take a look at #3.http://www.cracked.com/article\_17522\_p2.htmlAt the heart of the real-life OCPD sufferer seems to be an irrational fear that the rest of the world is sloppier, dirtier and more disorganized than it should be, that it's rapidly getting worse, and that the world will fall to pieces unless someone straightens it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552671</id>
	<title>Re:Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>hardburn</author>
	<datestamp>1246458120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, let's wait for a perfect, 100\% pure solution before replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , let 's wait for a perfect , 100 \ % pure solution before replacing the ugly , dirty , nasty coal energy plants we have right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, let's wait for a perfect, 100\% pure solution before replacing the ugly, dirty, nasty coal energy plants we have right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28556313</id>
	<title>Re:Efficiency VS Cost</title>
	<author>savuporo</author>
	<datestamp>1246542060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Efficiency DOES matter to enable lots of applications, especially when your sunlight-exposed real estate is at premium. For example, PHEVs and EVs getting their top-up charge from roof-mounted panels, solar panels on top of laptop cases and so on.<br>
Most importantly it matters for applications like <a href="http://solar-flight.com/" title="solar-flight.com">solar flight</a> [solar-flight.com]. Solar planes of course wouldnt use heavy GaAs silicon cells, but the best of the breed thin-film cells.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Efficiency DOES matter to enable lots of applications , especially when your sunlight-exposed real estate is at premium .
For example , PHEVs and EVs getting their top-up charge from roof-mounted panels , solar panels on top of laptop cases and so on .
Most importantly it matters for applications like solar flight [ solar-flight.com ] .
Solar planes of course wouldnt use heavy GaAs silicon cells , but the best of the breed thin-film cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Efficiency DOES matter to enable lots of applications, especially when your sunlight-exposed real estate is at premium.
For example, PHEVs and EVs getting their top-up charge from roof-mounted panels, solar panels on top of laptop cases and so on.
Most importantly it matters for applications like solar flight [solar-flight.com].
Solar planes of course wouldnt use heavy GaAs silicon cells, but the best of the breed thin-film cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557985</id>
	<title>what am I missing here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246550640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be missing something, because they used "its" correctly in the original post.  "its" is for possessive because "it's" is reserved for the contraction of "it is".  "Its" is more similar to "his" or  "hers" than "gadget's" or "cell's".  but since you've been modded informative instead of funny, I'm guessing my understanding has been eclipsed by the greater<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. audience's wisdom.  Perhaps someone would condescend to tell me what I'm missing?  Perhaps the original post has been edited since this comment was made?  Knowing my luck I'll get modded 5 funny for my quaint naivete....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be missing something , because they used " its " correctly in the original post .
" its " is for possessive because " it 's " is reserved for the contraction of " it is " .
" Its " is more similar to " his " or " hers " than " gadget 's " or " cell 's " .
but since you 've been modded informative instead of funny , I 'm guessing my understanding has been eclipsed by the greater / .
audience 's wisdom .
Perhaps someone would condescend to tell me what I 'm missing ?
Perhaps the original post has been edited since this comment was made ?
Knowing my luck I 'll get modded 5 funny for my quaint naivete... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be missing something, because they used "its" correctly in the original post.
"its" is for possessive because "it's" is reserved for the contraction of "it is".
"Its" is more similar to "his" or  "hers" than "gadget's" or "cell's".
but since you've been modded informative instead of funny, I'm guessing my understanding has been eclipsed by the greater /.
audience's wisdom.
Perhaps someone would condescend to tell me what I'm missing?
Perhaps the original post has been edited since this comment was made?
Knowing my luck I'll get modded 5 funny for my quaint naivete....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28551985</id>
	<title>Zzzzzz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246453140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me up when I can plug an extension cord from a tree to my data center.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when I can plug an extension cord from a tree to my data center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when I can plug an extension cord from a tree to my data center.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560473</id>
	<title>Whatever you do, don't move to Minnesota</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246559580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>For some reason, snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire.</i></p><p>What I heard is that there are small scale, ie residential, solar installations here in MN.  Heck even <a href="http://articles.directorym.com/Solar\_Energy\_for\_Water\_Heating\_Minnesota-r1158132-Minnesota.html" title="directorym.com">solar thermal water heating</a> [directorym.com] is being used.  MN is also good for wind.  Though not much the state produces megawatts of energy from wind.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason , snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire.What I heard is that there are small scale , ie residential , solar installations here in MN .
Heck even solar thermal water heating [ directorym.com ] is being used .
MN is also good for wind .
Though not much the state produces megawatts of energy from wind .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason, snow and solar panels get along like a big house on fire.What I heard is that there are small scale, ie residential, solar installations here in MN.
Heck even solar thermal water heating [directorym.com] is being used.
MN is also good for wind.
Though not much the state produces megawatts of energy from wind.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133</id>
	<title>Environmentally sound... hehehe.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1246453860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're quite environmentally sound. They're made of arsenic, and many caustic chemicals being used to refine and produce them. In short -- not suitable for mass alternative energy (like just about every other thing called "green").</p><p>Reality: Solar power's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid cannot reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're quite environmentally sound .
They 're made of arsenic , and many caustic chemicals being used to refine and produce them .
In short -- not suitable for mass alternative energy ( like just about every other thing called " green " ) .Reality : Solar power 's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid can not reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're quite environmentally sound.
They're made of arsenic, and many caustic chemicals being used to refine and produce them.
In short -- not suitable for mass alternative energy (like just about every other thing called "green").Reality: Solar power's only economical use right now is for remote sensors and in locations where the power grid cannot reasonably be extended and delivering fuel is impractical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28553835</id>
	<title>The Magic 5 Years</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1246468500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And no doubt these new improved cells will be available for commercial use in only 5 years - for the next 25 years!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And no doubt these new improved cells will be available for commercial use in only 5 years - for the next 25 years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no doubt these new improved cells will be available for commercial use in only 5 years - for the next 25 years!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552117</id>
	<title>But what about price?</title>
	<author>bezking</author>
	<datestamp>1246453800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's expensive nobody will buy it. Regardless of how well it works. For example, if the prius cost $80k the environmentalists wouldn't even buy it. I think that these enviro-tech things just have a zero shot at catching on if they are too damn expensive. Just a thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's expensive nobody will buy it .
Regardless of how well it works .
For example , if the prius cost $ 80k the environmentalists would n't even buy it .
I think that these enviro-tech things just have a zero shot at catching on if they are too damn expensive .
Just a thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's expensive nobody will buy it.
Regardless of how well it works.
For example, if the prius cost $80k the environmentalists wouldn't even buy it.
I think that these enviro-tech things just have a zero shot at catching on if they are too damn expensive.
Just a thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552451</id>
	<title>Re:Greater than any previous *single junction* dev</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246456200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, and since this thing is already made of GaAs, why not go all out and use a triple-junction cell?  Their goal is to tune it to a specific wavelength, but triple-junction cells are already absorbing more wavelengths.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , and since this thing is already made of GaAs , why not go all out and use a triple-junction cell ?
Their goal is to tune it to a specific wavelength , but triple-junction cells are already absorbing more wavelengths .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, and since this thing is already made of GaAs, why not go all out and use a triple-junction cell?
Their goal is to tune it to a specific wavelength, but triple-junction cells are already absorbing more wavelengths.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552995</id>
	<title>Re:What about average efficiency?</title>
	<author>daryl\_and\_daryl</author>
	<datestamp>1246460400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Typically big houses and fire work quite well together</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typically big houses and fire work quite well together</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typically big houses and fire work quite well together</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28555599</id>
	<title>Article Short On...  Well, Everything.</title>
	<author>Teufelhunden25</author>
	<datestamp>1246534320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not trying to berate the accomplishment or the effort, but 28.3\% efficiency vs. 10 - 12\% and light 500x brighter than sunlight?  Where on Earth will that occur?  Also, Mr. Arthur states that the new cells can "generate."  Solar cells generate nothing.  They convert one form of energy into another.  As a matter-of-fact, you can neither create nor destroy energy, you can only convert its form.  I'm sick of folks talking about "generating" energy.

I have occasion to build solar-powered repeaters for relay from remote locations.  My first complaint is the size, second is efficiency.  The solar cells are about 3'Hx1.5'W and have an output of around 19VDC for a 12VDC photocell.  What do I do with the extra 7VDC?  It's wasted as heat.  I have to use a charge controller to regulate the voltage down to a useable amount.  This increases my cost and decreases the over-all efficiency of the site.  How much to you really need to convert when you cannot use but a certain amount?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not trying to berate the accomplishment or the effort , but 28.3 \ % efficiency vs. 10 - 12 \ % and light 500x brighter than sunlight ?
Where on Earth will that occur ?
Also , Mr. Arthur states that the new cells can " generate .
" Solar cells generate nothing .
They convert one form of energy into another .
As a matter-of-fact , you can neither create nor destroy energy , you can only convert its form .
I 'm sick of folks talking about " generating " energy .
I have occasion to build solar-powered repeaters for relay from remote locations .
My first complaint is the size , second is efficiency .
The solar cells are about 3'Hx1.5'W and have an output of around 19VDC for a 12VDC photocell .
What do I do with the extra 7VDC ?
It 's wasted as heat .
I have to use a charge controller to regulate the voltage down to a useable amount .
This increases my cost and decreases the over-all efficiency of the site .
How much to you really need to convert when you can not use but a certain amount ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not trying to berate the accomplishment or the effort, but 28.3\% efficiency vs. 10 - 12\% and light 500x brighter than sunlight?
Where on Earth will that occur?
Also, Mr. Arthur states that the new cells can "generate.
"  Solar cells generate nothing.
They convert one form of energy into another.
As a matter-of-fact, you can neither create nor destroy energy, you can only convert its form.
I'm sick of folks talking about "generating" energy.
I have occasion to build solar-powered repeaters for relay from remote locations.
My first complaint is the size, second is efficiency.
The solar cells are about 3'Hx1.5'W and have an output of around 19VDC for a 12VDC photocell.
What do I do with the extra 7VDC?
It's wasted as heat.
I have to use a charge controller to regulate the voltage down to a useable amount.
This increases my cost and decreases the over-all efficiency of the site.
How much to you really need to convert when you cannot use but a certain amount?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552327</id>
	<title>Good for Obama</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246455240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good news for POTUS Obama, given the number of people who believe the sun shines out of his ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news for POTUS Obama , given the number of people who believe the sun shines out of his ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news for POTUS Obama, given the number of people who believe the sun shines out of his ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552917</id>
	<title>500x normal sunlight.</title>
	<author>Jartan</author>
	<datestamp>1246459800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds like the interesting part here isn't the efficiency but that it's efficient enough and can handle a lot of extra sunlight via mirrors.     The article fails to give any info though on what kind of efficiency other solar cells can achieve with mirrors focused on them.    Without any reference it's hard to get an idea for whether or not this is even useful though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like the interesting part here is n't the efficiency but that it 's efficient enough and can handle a lot of extra sunlight via mirrors .
The article fails to give any info though on what kind of efficiency other solar cells can achieve with mirrors focused on them .
Without any reference it 's hard to get an idea for whether or not this is even useful though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like the interesting part here isn't the efficiency but that it's efficient enough and can handle a lot of extra sunlight via mirrors.
The article fails to give any info though on what kind of efficiency other solar cells can achieve with mirrors focused on them.
Without any reference it's hard to get an idea for whether or not this is even useful though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552401</id>
	<title>The Solar Panel in My Soul</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246455720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How would it adapt to the darkness of my soul?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How would it adapt to the darkness of my soul ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would it adapt to the darkness of my soul?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28556313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28577861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28569759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28555509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28553281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_2230220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28555509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28556313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28553281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28551985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552671
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28577861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28555599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552471
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560473
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552395
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28560719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28558247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28557985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_2230220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28554489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28569759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_2230220.28552451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
