<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_01_1327226</id>
	<title>The Twitter Book</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246468500000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://geekbook.org/" rel="nofollow">stoolpigeon</a> writes <i>"Microblogging service <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> has undeniably been a hit, with growth rates that were at times in <a href="http://promomagazine.com/interactivemarketing/news/twitter-growth-slow-0623/">excess of 1400\%</a>.  The growth was rapid enough that the site became well known for its periodic, and, at times, extensive downtime.  Even with these issues, the service continued to grow rapidly, and with <a href="http://twittercelebrities.org/">celebrities</a> getting into the mix Twitter was quickly on the radar of mainstream media.  The ubiquity of Twitter and ever-increasing coverage of 'tweets' has also brought the inevitable backlash.  As with anything that gains high-profile popularity, there are plenty of Twitter haters out there, though the role Twitter has played in the recent Iranian elections seems to have brought more <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/22/former-deputy-national-security-advisor-twitter-founders-should-get-nobel-peace-prize/">legitimacy to Twitter</a> in the eyes of many.  With popularity come books, and quite a few are already out there about and for Twitter, but my favorite so far is <em>The Twitter Book</em> by Tim O'Reilly and Sarah Milstein."</i> Read below for the rest of JR's review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>stoolpigeon writes " Microblogging service Twitter has undeniably been a hit , with growth rates that were at times in excess of 1400 \ % .
The growth was rapid enough that the site became well known for its periodic , and , at times , extensive downtime .
Even with these issues , the service continued to grow rapidly , and with celebrities getting into the mix Twitter was quickly on the radar of mainstream media .
The ubiquity of Twitter and ever-increasing coverage of 'tweets ' has also brought the inevitable backlash .
As with anything that gains high-profile popularity , there are plenty of Twitter haters out there , though the role Twitter has played in the recent Iranian elections seems to have brought more legitimacy to Twitter in the eyes of many .
With popularity come books , and quite a few are already out there about and for Twitter , but my favorite so far is The Twitter Book by Tim O'Reilly and Sarah Milstein .
" Read below for the rest of JR 's review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stoolpigeon writes "Microblogging service Twitter has undeniably been a hit, with growth rates that were at times in excess of 1400\%.
The growth was rapid enough that the site became well known for its periodic, and, at times, extensive downtime.
Even with these issues, the service continued to grow rapidly, and with celebrities getting into the mix Twitter was quickly on the radar of mainstream media.
The ubiquity of Twitter and ever-increasing coverage of 'tweets' has also brought the inevitable backlash.
As with anything that gains high-profile popularity, there are plenty of Twitter haters out there, though the role Twitter has played in the recent Iranian elections seems to have brought more legitimacy to Twitter in the eyes of many.
With popularity come books, and quite a few are already out there about and for Twitter, but my favorite so far is The Twitter Book by Tim O'Reilly and Sarah Milstein.
" Read below for the rest of JR's review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545835</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1246474260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone."



I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time.</p></div><p>Wow, your quality of content argument could almost stand on it's own...If it were not for those other rather small sites that host the same level of utterly pointless shit, Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube.</p><p>Pretty much resembles what the major networks are broadcasting these days as well, with just a splash of (biased) news and weather in there for flavor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing , but from what I can see 99 \ % of Twitter traffic boils down to " I had a bagel for lunch " and " I 'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone .
" I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time.Wow , your quality of content argument could almost stand on it 's own...If it were not for those other rather small sites that host the same level of utterly pointless shit , Facebook , MySpace , and YouTube.Pretty much resembles what the major networks are broadcasting these days as well , with just a splash of ( biased ) news and weather in there for flavor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone.
"



I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time.Wow, your quality of content argument could almost stand on it's own...If it were not for those other rather small sites that host the same level of utterly pointless shit, Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube.Pretty much resembles what the major networks are broadcasting these days as well, with just a splash of (biased) news and weather in there for flavor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546351</id>
	<title>Too much information...</title>
	<author>bgspence</author>
	<datestamp>1246475700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This book is way too complicated.</p><p>I Just couldn't get through it.</p><p>I preferred 'Ping for Dummies."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This book is way too complicated.I Just could n't get through it.I preferred 'Ping for Dummies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This book is way too complicated.I Just couldn't get through it.I preferred 'Ping for Dummies.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548801</id>
	<title>I don't buy it.</title>
	<author>PeanutButterBreath</author>
	<datestamp>1246440240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you acknowledge that its a rare instance when how someone is doing is actually worth hearing, how is a service that encourages as many people as possible to constantly update their status not a step in the wrong direction?  Now you have that much more noise to filter through.</p><p>I also see nothing about Twitter that would make it the only way one could possibly learn about "exclusive parties, specials and news" (which sounds like a euphemism for "advertising" anyway).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you acknowledge that its a rare instance when how someone is doing is actually worth hearing , how is a service that encourages as many people as possible to constantly update their status not a step in the wrong direction ?
Now you have that much more noise to filter through.I also see nothing about Twitter that would make it the only way one could possibly learn about " exclusive parties , specials and news " ( which sounds like a euphemism for " advertising " anyway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you acknowledge that its a rare instance when how someone is doing is actually worth hearing, how is a service that encourages as many people as possible to constantly update their status not a step in the wrong direction?
Now you have that much more noise to filter through.I also see nothing about Twitter that would make it the only way one could possibly learn about "exclusive parties, specials and news" (which sounds like a euphemism for "advertising" anyway).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546059</id>
	<title>Charlie Brooker's Response to a 'twitter book'</title>
	<author>Dekks</author>
	<datestamp>1246474860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who is familiar with bitter cynical social commentator Charlie Brooker might of already seen this:</p><p><a href="http://twitter.com/charltonbrooker/status/1603115783" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/charltonbrooker/status/1603115783</a> [twitter.com]</p><p>"HarperCollins just asked to use one of my msgs in a book called 'Twitter Wit'. They can use this one for free: "HarperCollins R cunts LOL"."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who is familiar with bitter cynical social commentator Charlie Brooker might of already seen this : http : //twitter.com/charltonbrooker/status/1603115783 [ twitter.com ] " HarperCollins just asked to use one of my msgs in a book called 'Twitter Wit' .
They can use this one for free : " HarperCollins R cunts LOL " .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who is familiar with bitter cynical social commentator Charlie Brooker might of already seen this:http://twitter.com/charltonbrooker/status/1603115783 [twitter.com]"HarperCollins just asked to use one of my msgs in a book called 'Twitter Wit'.
They can use this one for free: "HarperCollins R cunts LOL".
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545727</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246473960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to cash in it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to cash in it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to cash in it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545209</id>
	<title>You can "twitter" my Willy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246472400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine your willy being "twittered" until it bleeds.</p><p>Kanonkas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine your willy being " twittered " until it bleeds.Kanonkas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine your willy being "twittered" until it bleeds.Kanonkas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545347</id>
	<title>Toilet Paper, The Book.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246472760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel the need for this book about as much as a book on using toilet paper, which oddly enough, has something in common with Twitter.  They're both used to collect shit.  That's about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel the need for this book about as much as a book on using toilet paper , which oddly enough , has something in common with Twitter .
They 're both used to collect shit .
That 's about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel the need for this book about as much as a book on using toilet paper, which oddly enough, has something in common with Twitter.
They're both used to collect shit.
That's about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553167</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246461540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. We "younger" people know, that our beloved ICQ or SMS, are just what Twitter is, if you put the log file of the IM client up on the net for everyone to "subscribe".<br>And we also know that it is pointless, except for karma whores.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
We " younger " people know , that our beloved ICQ or SMS , are just what Twitter is , if you put the log file of the IM client up on the net for everyone to " subscribe " .And we also know that it is pointless , except for karma whores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
We "younger" people know, that our beloved ICQ or SMS, are just what Twitter is, if you put the log file of the IM client up on the net for everyone to "subscribe".And we also know that it is pointless, except for karma whores.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551795</id>
	<title>If Shia LaBeouf were an internet company..</title>
	<author>synthesizerpatel</author>
	<datestamp>1246451940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He'd be twitter.</p><p>1) A bland product with demand created out of thin air by skillful marketing</p><p>2) Overrated and seemingly pointless</p><p>3) Far less interesting than those that came before and will come after</p><p>4) Probably driven by nice enough people but backlash or complete disinterest is on the horizon.</p><p>SMS aggregation isn't a fad, it's definitely a way of life -- but there isn't any barrier for entry for competition. All it will take is a company that does it slightly better to unseat them and twitter will be the next orcut, tribe.net, friendster, myspace. Take your pick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 'd be twitter.1 ) A bland product with demand created out of thin air by skillful marketing2 ) Overrated and seemingly pointless3 ) Far less interesting than those that came before and will come after4 ) Probably driven by nice enough people but backlash or complete disinterest is on the horizon.SMS aggregation is n't a fad , it 's definitely a way of life -- but there is n't any barrier for entry for competition .
All it will take is a company that does it slightly better to unseat them and twitter will be the next orcut , tribe.net , friendster , myspace .
Take your pick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He'd be twitter.1) A bland product with demand created out of thin air by skillful marketing2) Overrated and seemingly pointless3) Far less interesting than those that came before and will come after4) Probably driven by nice enough people but backlash or complete disinterest is on the horizon.SMS aggregation isn't a fad, it's definitely a way of life -- but there isn't any barrier for entry for competition.
All it will take is a company that does it slightly better to unseat them and twitter will be the next orcut, tribe.net, friendster, myspace.
Take your pick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545353</id>
	<title>Thanks for this</title>
	<author>librarybob</author>
	<datestamp>1246472760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another reason why we librarian types should be reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason why we librarian types should be reading / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason why we librarian types should be reading /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545399</id>
	<title>Look at the Rackspace Twitter page</title>
	<author>tcopeland</author>
	<datestamp>1246472880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://twitter.com/rackspace" title="twitter.com">Here</a> [twitter.com].  I think that's why I like twitter.  A big company like Rackspace can use it to keep in touch with customers, and the discussion continues through thick and thin.  So Rackspace suffers a rare outage, tweets about it, and people have some idea of what's going on... or at least we know they're working on it.</p><p>Plus twitter's search functionality works well.  5 minutes into the outage you could seach for "rackspace" and see a bunch of folks confirming that it was down for them too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ twitter.com ] .
I think that 's why I like twitter .
A big company like Rackspace can use it to keep in touch with customers , and the discussion continues through thick and thin .
So Rackspace suffers a rare outage , tweets about it , and people have some idea of what 's going on... or at least we know they 're working on it.Plus twitter 's search functionality works well .
5 minutes into the outage you could seach for " rackspace " and see a bunch of folks confirming that it was down for them too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [twitter.com].
I think that's why I like twitter.
A big company like Rackspace can use it to keep in touch with customers, and the discussion continues through thick and thin.
So Rackspace suffers a rare outage, tweets about it, and people have some idea of what's going on... or at least we know they're working on it.Plus twitter's search functionality works well.
5 minutes into the outage you could seach for "rackspace" and see a bunch of folks confirming that it was down for them too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546007</id>
	<title>Obligatory comic</title>
	<author>stillnotelf</author>
	<datestamp>1246474740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone."</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/" title="penny-arcade.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/</a> [penny-arcade.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone .
" http : //www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/ [ penny-arcade.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone.
" http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/ [penny-arcade.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551561</id>
	<title>What's with twitter!?</title>
	<author>Ponga</author>
	<datestamp>1246450680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously man, what exactly is the fascination with twitter? Everyone is on twitter and if you want to hang with the "cool kids", OMG, you must be on twitter! Newscasters on twitter, politicians on twitter... all the while I'm saying WTF!?
<br>
I have often wondered what the fascination is with these social networking sites. myspace, facebook and now twitter. I don't understand it at all. Does anyone out there have any insight or theory why people blow their load over these sites?? I'd appreciate it. In the mean time, just the phrase "social networking" makes me sick. Yet here I am posting on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... am I being hypocritical? I'm willing to accept if I'm wrong and just being a jackass...
<br> <br>
Thoughts??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously man , what exactly is the fascination with twitter ?
Everyone is on twitter and if you want to hang with the " cool kids " , OMG , you must be on twitter !
Newscasters on twitter , politicians on twitter... all the while I 'm saying WTF ! ?
I have often wondered what the fascination is with these social networking sites .
myspace , facebook and now twitter .
I do n't understand it at all .
Does anyone out there have any insight or theory why people blow their load over these sites ? ?
I 'd appreciate it .
In the mean time , just the phrase " social networking " makes me sick .
Yet here I am posting on ./ ... am I being hypocritical ?
I 'm willing to accept if I 'm wrong and just being a jackass.. .
Thoughts ? ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously man, what exactly is the fascination with twitter?
Everyone is on twitter and if you want to hang with the "cool kids", OMG, you must be on twitter!
Newscasters on twitter, politicians on twitter... all the while I'm saying WTF!?
I have often wondered what the fascination is with these social networking sites.
myspace, facebook and now twitter.
I don't understand it at all.
Does anyone out there have any insight or theory why people blow their load over these sites??
I'd appreciate it.
In the mean time, just the phrase "social networking" makes me sick.
Yet here I am posting on ./ ... am I being hypocritical?
I'm willing to accept if I'm wrong and just being a jackass...
Thoughts??</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546023</id>
	<title>Twitter ate my balls!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246474800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter instantly became its own ball eating meme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter instantly became its own ball eating meme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter instantly became its own ball eating meme.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545819</id>
	<title>They did</title>
	<author>wsanders</author>
	<datestamp>1246474260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it had 2 many WORDZ!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it had 2 many WORDZ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it had 2 many WORDZ!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691</id>
	<title>Twitter is actually pretty handy.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1246473840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>At first, I thought it was a waste of time and was kind of waiting for it to disappear. It was only after I attended many networking events that I realized how ingenious the idea really is.
<br> <br>
Think about it: <i>Everybody</i> asks each other how they're doing. It's even customary business etiquette; even if the two parties could care less how they're doing, they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk. Sometimes, it remains just that, but there are other, much rarer, times where someone's day actually is quite interesting.
<br> <br>
Maybe that person had some life-changing experience that could change one's life upon hearing about it. Maybe they learned of critical news that could change one's life for the better. If one never asks, one will never know. Hence the premise of Twitter.
<br> <br>
For most people, Twitter is pretty useless; George Carlin put it best, "People are fucking boring." However, it's those <i>other</i> people that make it the amazing and highly informative service that it is. I've found out about exclusive parties, specials and news that can only be found through the agility and brevity offered by Twitter.
<br> <br>
So if you don't see the value in it, make a couple of friends and try to find it. At worst, I can see it being bought out by a bigger Internet presence, like Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At first , I thought it was a waste of time and was kind of waiting for it to disappear .
It was only after I attended many networking events that I realized how ingenious the idea really is .
Think about it : Everybody asks each other how they 're doing .
It 's even customary business etiquette ; even if the two parties could care less how they 're doing , they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk .
Sometimes , it remains just that , but there are other , much rarer , times where someone 's day actually is quite interesting .
Maybe that person had some life-changing experience that could change one 's life upon hearing about it .
Maybe they learned of critical news that could change one 's life for the better .
If one never asks , one will never know .
Hence the premise of Twitter .
For most people , Twitter is pretty useless ; George Carlin put it best , " People are fucking boring .
" However , it 's those other people that make it the amazing and highly informative service that it is .
I 've found out about exclusive parties , specials and news that can only be found through the agility and brevity offered by Twitter .
So if you do n't see the value in it , make a couple of friends and try to find it .
At worst , I can see it being bought out by a bigger Internet presence , like Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first, I thought it was a waste of time and was kind of waiting for it to disappear.
It was only after I attended many networking events that I realized how ingenious the idea really is.
Think about it: Everybody asks each other how they're doing.
It's even customary business etiquette; even if the two parties could care less how they're doing, they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk.
Sometimes, it remains just that, but there are other, much rarer, times where someone's day actually is quite interesting.
Maybe that person had some life-changing experience that could change one's life upon hearing about it.
Maybe they learned of critical news that could change one's life for the better.
If one never asks, one will never know.
Hence the premise of Twitter.
For most people, Twitter is pretty useless; George Carlin put it best, "People are fucking boring.
" However, it's those other people that make it the amazing and highly informative service that it is.
I've found out about exclusive parties, specials and news that can only be found through the agility and brevity offered by Twitter.
So if you don't see the value in it, make a couple of friends and try to find it.
At worst, I can see it being bought out by a bigger Internet presence, like Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545545</id>
	<title>Twitter</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1246473360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new second life.</p><p>Seriously, I have been looking at some messages on twitterfall and I realise how useless this is. All I see is a bunch of self-absorbed people letting the world know of their mundane daily activities.</p><p>For example, the anti Iranian goverment channel (called #iranelection) is a useless collection of messages. The post, who are limited to 140 characters are mostly useless. I'd say that 40\% of the messages is people posting short angry rants, 30\% is a retransmit of old messages, 20\% is relevant data but in itself not nearly enough information and 10\% spam and other deceptions.</p><p>Some good articles would be far more useful than people screaming short sentences and then letting other people rehash it. There is no real content, no background, no philosofy, no substance. Twitter does not add any value to the internet, even Second Life did more for innovation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new second life.Seriously , I have been looking at some messages on twitterfall and I realise how useless this is .
All I see is a bunch of self-absorbed people letting the world know of their mundane daily activities.For example , the anti Iranian goverment channel ( called # iranelection ) is a useless collection of messages .
The post , who are limited to 140 characters are mostly useless .
I 'd say that 40 \ % of the messages is people posting short angry rants , 30 \ % is a retransmit of old messages , 20 \ % is relevant data but in itself not nearly enough information and 10 \ % spam and other deceptions.Some good articles would be far more useful than people screaming short sentences and then letting other people rehash it .
There is no real content , no background , no philosofy , no substance .
Twitter does not add any value to the internet , even Second Life did more for innovation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new second life.Seriously, I have been looking at some messages on twitterfall and I realise how useless this is.
All I see is a bunch of self-absorbed people letting the world know of their mundane daily activities.For example, the anti Iranian goverment channel (called #iranelection) is a useless collection of messages.
The post, who are limited to 140 characters are mostly useless.
I'd say that 40\% of the messages is people posting short angry rants, 30\% is a retransmit of old messages, 20\% is relevant data but in itself not nearly enough information and 10\% spam and other deceptions.Some good articles would be far more useful than people screaming short sentences and then letting other people rehash it.
There is no real content, no background, no philosofy, no substance.
Twitter does not add any value to the internet, even Second Life did more for innovation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551463</id>
	<title>Re:My mistake . . . .</title>
	<author>Ponga</author>
	<datestamp>1246450140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously. I hope to God that I'm not the only one here that DESPISES myspace / facebook / twitter!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
I hope to God that I 'm not the only one here that DESPISES myspace / facebook / twitter !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
I hope to God that I'm not the only one here that DESPISES myspace / facebook / twitter!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550649</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246446300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that market was already covered by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Twitter-Dummies-Laura-Fitton/dp/0470479914" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Twitter for Dummies</a> [amazon.com] -- brought to you by the Department of Redundant Titles Department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that market was already covered by Twitter for Dummies [ amazon.com ] -- brought to you by the Department of Redundant Titles Department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that market was already covered by Twitter for Dummies [amazon.com] -- brought to you by the Department of Redundant Titles Department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545375</id>
	<title>I can write it in under 140 characters.</title>
	<author>Avenger546</author>
	<datestamp>1246472880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Tweet" what you're thinking about. Reply to other people's tweets. Follow interesting people. Don't be a douche.</p><p>(Wait, scratch that. Obviously "don't be a douche" has no place in social networks.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Tweet " what you 're thinking about .
Reply to other people 's tweets .
Follow interesting people .
Do n't be a douche .
( Wait , scratch that .
Obviously " do n't be a douche " has no place in social networks .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Tweet" what you're thinking about.
Reply to other people's tweets.
Follow interesting people.
Don't be a douche.
(Wait, scratch that.
Obviously "don't be a douche" has no place in social networks.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28547287</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>radish</author>
	<datestamp>1246478760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like you need to find more interesting people to follow. Twitter's what you make of it, you need to be thoughtful about who you listen to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you need to find more interesting people to follow .
Twitter 's what you make of it , you need to be thoughtful about who you listen to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you need to find more interesting people to follow.
Twitter's what you make of it, you need to be thoughtful about who you listen to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545211</id>
	<title>My review:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246472400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read book while taking a shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read book while taking a shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read book while taking a shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551613</id>
	<title>a free book from tim o'reilly, about dune</title>
	<author>arbitraryaardvark</author>
	<datestamp>1246450980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The twitter book costs.12-14$ + shipping.<br>Here's a free copy of tim's first book, the one that turned him into a writer.<br>"My first book, Frank Herbert, is online at <a href="http://tim.oreilly.com/sci-fi/herbert/" title="oreilly.com">http://tim.oreilly.com/sci-fi/herbert/</a> [oreilly.com]."<br>It's about the author of Dune,<br>and it's one of the best pieces of literary criticism I've ever read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The twitter book costs.12-14 $ + shipping.Here 's a free copy of tim 's first book , the one that turned him into a writer .
" My first book , Frank Herbert , is online at http : //tim.oreilly.com/sci-fi/herbert/ [ oreilly.com ] .
" It 's about the author of Dune,and it 's one of the best pieces of literary criticism I 've ever read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The twitter book costs.12-14$ + shipping.Here's a free copy of tim's first book, the one that turned him into a writer.
"My first book, Frank Herbert, is online at http://tim.oreilly.com/sci-fi/herbert/ [oreilly.com].
"It's about the author of Dune,and it's one of the best pieces of literary criticism I've ever read.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548713</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246439940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My idea for ending this fad IS SUGGESTING that BOT writers use TWITTER instead of IRC.</p><p>Did you got it? control your botnet using twitter instead of iRC</p><p>Control your botnets using twitter. Several networks are blocking IRC traffic, But I can't come out with a reason to block twitter, so you can help me ok?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My idea for ending this fad IS SUGGESTING that BOT writers use TWITTER instead of IRC.Did you got it ?
control your botnet using twitter instead of iRCControl your botnets using twitter .
Several networks are blocking IRC traffic , But I ca n't come out with a reason to block twitter , so you can help me ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My idea for ending this fad IS SUGGESTING that BOT writers use TWITTER instead of IRC.Did you got it?
control your botnet using twitter instead of iRCControl your botnets using twitter.
Several networks are blocking IRC traffic, But I can't come out with a reason to block twitter, so you can help me ok?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550163</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1246444440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, the problem with Twitter isn't Twitter itself, but the people, and what they think passes as something worthy of being read.

</p><p>Same thing for blogs, but blogs failed Joe Sixpack because everyone including his friends and family think his blogs are TL;DR. Twitter works because your long-winded and poorly written recollections and thoughts must be condensed into something to the effect and length of "I just dreamt I was a pirate! It was awesome!!". Still no one really cares, but at least it's concise enough so that people will read the whole of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the problem with Twitter is n't Twitter itself , but the people , and what they think passes as something worthy of being read .
Same thing for blogs , but blogs failed Joe Sixpack because everyone including his friends and family think his blogs are TL ; DR. Twitter works because your long-winded and poorly written recollections and thoughts must be condensed into something to the effect and length of " I just dreamt I was a pirate !
It was awesome ! ! " .
Still no one really cares , but at least it 's concise enough so that people will read the whole of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the problem with Twitter isn't Twitter itself, but the people, and what they think passes as something worthy of being read.
Same thing for blogs, but blogs failed Joe Sixpack because everyone including his friends and family think his blogs are TL;DR. Twitter works because your long-winded and poorly written recollections and thoughts must be condensed into something to the effect and length of "I just dreamt I was a pirate!
It was awesome!!".
Still no one really cares, but at least it's concise enough so that people will read the whole of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545419</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>gzearfoss</author>
	<datestamp>1246473000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Necessary?  No.<br>Profitable?  Probably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Necessary ?
No.Profitable ? Probably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Necessary?
No.Profitable?  Probably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545153</id>
	<title>Hey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246472220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why didn't they just send this review in a twitter, if it's so popular?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't they just send this review in a twitter , if it 's so popular ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't they just send this review in a twitter, if it's so popular?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545453</id>
	<title>I see no sharks</title>
	<author>sir\_eccles</author>
	<datestamp>1246473120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this a sign that the Twitter Shark has been jumped?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a sign that the Twitter Shark has been jumped ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a sign that the Twitter Shark has been jumped?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550593</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1246446120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was firmly in the "pointless waste of time" camp; but the more I see, the more I am unsure. People post<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. erm.. 'tweet' what they're thnking at the moment.  This means we can dip into the collective stream of consciousness of hundreds of thousands of people at any give moment.    There's a certain value to that - no matter how pointless the individual thoughts are.   Fascinating for someone who likes to study the human animal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was firmly in the " pointless waste of time " camp ; but the more I see , the more I am unsure .
People post .. erm.. 'tweet ' what they 're thnking at the moment .
This means we can dip into the collective stream of consciousness of hundreds of thousands of people at any give moment .
There 's a certain value to that - no matter how pointless the individual thoughts are .
Fascinating for someone who likes to study the human animal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was firmly in the "pointless waste of time" camp; but the more I see, the more I am unsure.
People post .. erm.. 'tweet' what they're thnking at the moment.
This means we can dip into the collective stream of consciousness of hundreds of thousands of people at any give moment.
There's a certain value to that - no matter how pointless the individual thoughts are.
Fascinating for someone who likes to study the human animal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553209</id>
	<title>nonsense</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1246462020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone."</p></div><p>Thats not true at all.  I follow a lot of people on twitter and though there are frequent poo messages, people actually eat a lot of different things for lunch.  Bagels aren't nearly as common as you think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing , but from what I can see 99 \ % of Twitter traffic boils down to " I had a bagel for lunch " and " I 'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone .
" Thats not true at all .
I follow a lot of people on twitter and though there are frequent poo messages , people actually eat a lot of different things for lunch .
Bagels are n't nearly as common as you think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone.
"Thats not true at all.
I follow a lot of people on twitter and though there are frequent poo messages, people actually eat a lot of different things for lunch.
Bagels aren't nearly as common as you think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545615</id>
	<title>Tweet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246473600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twat should supplant Tweet in reference to posts.
<p>
Mostly because it makes a good double entendre since most tweets are made by twats.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twat should supplant Tweet in reference to posts .
Mostly because it makes a good double entendre since most tweets are made by twats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twat should supplant Tweet in reference to posts.
Mostly because it makes a good double entendre since most tweets are made by twats.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28549841</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>zaren</author>
	<datestamp>1246443240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people you DON'T follow make it interesting, too. Thanks to my mindless personal ramblings on Twitter that other people found, I have learned about, among other things:</p><p>o Where to buy a good digeridoo<br>o Modern-day old-school radio plays being performed in Britain<br>o The benefits of acupuncture over chiropracters</p><p>I have also won a $25 Amazon gift card thanks to Twitter, and gotten a free cell phone upgrade (from my provider's support contact) as well!</p><p>I used to have the same complaints about Facebook that others have about Twitter. Just like any other service on the Internet, Twitter is what you make of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people you DO N'T follow make it interesting , too .
Thanks to my mindless personal ramblings on Twitter that other people found , I have learned about , among other things : o Where to buy a good digeridooo Modern-day old-school radio plays being performed in Britaino The benefits of acupuncture over chiropractersI have also won a $ 25 Amazon gift card thanks to Twitter , and gotten a free cell phone upgrade ( from my provider 's support contact ) as well ! I used to have the same complaints about Facebook that others have about Twitter .
Just like any other service on the Internet , Twitter is what you make of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people you DON'T follow make it interesting, too.
Thanks to my mindless personal ramblings on Twitter that other people found, I have learned about, among other things:o Where to buy a good digeridooo Modern-day old-school radio plays being performed in Britaino The benefits of acupuncture over chiropractersI have also won a $25 Amazon gift card thanks to Twitter, and gotten a free cell phone upgrade (from my provider's support contact) as well!I used to have the same complaints about Facebook that others have about Twitter.
Just like any other service on the Internet, Twitter is what you make of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28547287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546309</id>
	<title>Re:And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246475640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people are twits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people are twits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people are twits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315</id>
	<title>And what could be more pointless than Twitter?</title>
	<author>rueger</author>
	<datestamp>1246472700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone."<br> <br>

I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing , but from what I can see 99 \ % of Twitter traffic boils down to " I had a bagel for lunch " and " I 'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone .
" I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Following Iranian elections on Twitter was amazing, but from what I can see 99\% of Twitter traffic boils down to "I had a bagel for lunch" and "I'm going poo-poo and Twittering it on my iPhone.
" 

I still think Twitter is grossly overrated and expect that it has already peaked big time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548927</id>
	<title>What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246440600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Microblogging service Twitter has undeniably been a hit, with growth rates that were at times in excess of 1400\%"</p><p>1400\% is not a rate, in the same sense that 1400 miles is not a speed.<br>1400\% over a day? Over a year? Each second?</p><p>And that's "at times". So maybe there was 1 user and then 14 people joined? And it was 1400\%<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for the period of time it took for them all to join?</p><p>For shit's sake, there is NO context to this number! AAAAAAAARGH.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Microblogging service Twitter has undeniably been a hit , with growth rates that were at times in excess of 1400 \ % " 1400 \ % is not a rate , in the same sense that 1400 miles is not a speed.1400 \ % over a day ?
Over a year ?
Each second ? And that 's " at times " .
So maybe there was 1 user and then 14 people joined ?
And it was 1400 \ % ... for the period of time it took for them all to join ? For shit 's sake , there is NO context to this number !
AAAAAAAARGH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Microblogging service Twitter has undeniably been a hit, with growth rates that were at times in excess of 1400\%"1400\% is not a rate, in the same sense that 1400 miles is not a speed.1400\% over a day?
Over a year?
Each second?And that's "at times".
So maybe there was 1 user and then 14 people joined?
And it was 1400\% ... for the period of time it took for them all to join?For shit's sake, there is NO context to this number!
AAAAAAAARGH.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548787</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter is actually pretty handy.</title>
	<author>Actually, I do RTFA</author>
	<datestamp>1246440180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Think about it: Everybody asks each other how they're doing. It's even customary business etiquette; even if the two parties could care less how they're doing, they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk. Sometimes, it remains just that, but there are other, much rarer, times where someone's day actually is quite interesting.</p></div></blockquote><p>The reason you ask in a business setting is to make small talk, contacts, etc.  It's not the response but the subtext that's important.  Twitter strips the subtext and leaves only the boring minuta.</p><p>Using it to find parties is almost interesting... it's the only reason I log onto facebook.  But it pisses me off that what used to be acceptable (email a few people, have a private bulletin board on my own server for people to RSVP and chat) now needs to be done through some third party.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about it : Everybody asks each other how they 're doing .
It 's even customary business etiquette ; even if the two parties could care less how they 're doing , they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk .
Sometimes , it remains just that , but there are other , much rarer , times where someone 's day actually is quite interesting.The reason you ask in a business setting is to make small talk , contacts , etc .
It 's not the response but the subtext that 's important .
Twitter strips the subtext and leaves only the boring minuta.Using it to find parties is almost interesting... it 's the only reason I log onto facebook .
But it pisses me off that what used to be acceptable ( email a few people , have a private bulletin board on my own server for people to RSVP and chat ) now needs to be done through some third party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about it: Everybody asks each other how they're doing.
It's even customary business etiquette; even if the two parties could care less how they're doing, they ask each other anyway to relieve tension and make small talk.
Sometimes, it remains just that, but there are other, much rarer, times where someone's day actually is quite interesting.The reason you ask in a business setting is to make small talk, contacts, etc.
It's not the response but the subtext that's important.
Twitter strips the subtext and leaves only the boring minuta.Using it to find parties is almost interesting... it's the only reason I log onto facebook.
But it pisses me off that what used to be acceptable (email a few people, have a private bulletin board on my own server for people to RSVP and chat) now needs to be done through some third party.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545165</id>
	<title>My mistake . . . .</title>
	<author>reboot246</author>
	<datestamp>1246472280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought this was going to be about the death of Twitter.<br><br>I'm soooo disappointed!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this was going to be about the death of Twitter.I 'm soooo disappointed !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this was going to be about the death of Twitter.I'm soooo disappointed!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>akadruid</author>
	<datestamp>1246473120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Young people mostly don't use Twitter - it's just older people desperately trying to be cool.  A perfect market for this book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Young people mostly do n't use Twitter - it 's just older people desperately trying to be cool .
A perfect market for this book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Young people mostly don't use Twitter - it's just older people desperately trying to be cool.
A perfect market for this book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545509</id>
	<title>You know what I find funny about Twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246473240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The funniest (or perhaps most depressing) part of Twitter is the apparent rise of Twitter-based protocols. It's funny, because various applications have started to train humans to write things that are transparent in other protocols. Just look at these hash tags, or whatever they're called, the @ symbol, and the control text used for the 200,000 different "apps" controlled by Twitter. Between that and the horrible contortions people subject their messages to in order to fit in 140 characters, Twitter can look like a Wireshark session. And it's all manually written by humans. Ah, progress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The funniest ( or perhaps most depressing ) part of Twitter is the apparent rise of Twitter-based protocols .
It 's funny , because various applications have started to train humans to write things that are transparent in other protocols .
Just look at these hash tags , or whatever they 're called , the @ symbol , and the control text used for the 200,000 different " apps " controlled by Twitter .
Between that and the horrible contortions people subject their messages to in order to fit in 140 characters , Twitter can look like a Wireshark session .
And it 's all manually written by humans .
Ah , progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funniest (or perhaps most depressing) part of Twitter is the apparent rise of Twitter-based protocols.
It's funny, because various applications have started to train humans to write things that are transparent in other protocols.
Just look at these hash tags, or whatever they're called, the @ symbol, and the control text used for the 200,000 different "apps" controlled by Twitter.
Between that and the horrible contortions people subject their messages to in order to fit in 140 characters, Twitter can look like a Wireshark session.
And it's all manually written by humans.
Ah, progress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546825</id>
	<title>Twitter was cooler...</title>
	<author>SCHecklerX</author>
	<datestamp>1246477260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... when it was called finger.</p><p>Blogs were better when they were called 'homepages'</p><p>Now get off my lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... when it was called finger.Blogs were better when they were called 'homepages'Now get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when it was called finger.Blogs were better when they were called 'homepages'Now get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545581</id>
	<title>You can toss my salad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246473480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't dis Twitter and the fags who use it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't dis Twitter and the fags who use it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't dis Twitter and the fags who use it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553199</id>
	<title>Dear sir:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246461960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am seated in the smallest room in my house. I have your review in front of me, and very soon it will be behind me.</p><p><em>Answer:</em> I am also seated in the smallest room in my house. I have your book's pages in front of me, and very soon they will be behind me.</p><p><em>Realization:</em> Hey, Tweets have the perfect size to be printed on one sheet of toilet paper. I think I have a business idea! *runs to venture capitalist*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am seated in the smallest room in my house .
I have your review in front of me , and very soon it will be behind me.Answer : I am also seated in the smallest room in my house .
I have your book 's pages in front of me , and very soon they will be behind me.Realization : Hey , Tweets have the perfect size to be printed on one sheet of toilet paper .
I think I have a business idea !
* runs to venture capitalist *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am seated in the smallest room in my house.
I have your review in front of me, and very soon it will be behind me.Answer: I am also seated in the smallest room in my house.
I have your book's pages in front of me, and very soon they will be behind me.Realization: Hey, Tweets have the perfect size to be printed on one sheet of toilet paper.
I think I have a business idea!
*runs to venture capitalist*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545513</id>
	<title>It is what you want it to be.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246473300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't hate Twitter because it is popular; I hate it because of the overexposure.  Twitter is just a service; it is what you want it to be.  I don't care if you're reading about Ashton Kutcher shopping for groceries or Iranians being oppressed; all I ask is that you don't hype it up so much that I want to punch you in the face (alternatively, I would settle for actually punching you in the face).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't hate Twitter because it is popular ; I hate it because of the overexposure .
Twitter is just a service ; it is what you want it to be .
I do n't care if you 're reading about Ashton Kutcher shopping for groceries or Iranians being oppressed ; all I ask is that you do n't hype it up so much that I want to punch you in the face ( alternatively , I would settle for actually punching you in the face ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't hate Twitter because it is popular; I hate it because of the overexposure.
Twitter is just a service; it is what you want it to be.
I don't care if you're reading about Ashton Kutcher shopping for groceries or Iranians being oppressed; all I ask is that you don't hype it up so much that I want to punch you in the face (alternatively, I would settle for actually punching you in the face).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548323</id>
	<title>140 personalities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246438800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have not read the book but I figure they padded it with material from <a href="http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...wait, wrong twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have not read the book but I figure they padded it with material from here [ slashdot.org ] .
...wait , wrong twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have not read the book but I figure they padded it with material from here [slashdot.org].
...wait, wrong twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545253</id>
	<title>Post Card</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246472520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everything that one needs to know about Twitter and the use of Twitter would fit on the back of a post card.  With room left over for an address so you can send it to a friend.</p><p>This book is entirely pointless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything that one needs to know about Twitter and the use of Twitter would fit on the back of a post card .
With room left over for an address so you can send it to a friend.This book is entirely pointless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything that one needs to know about Twitter and the use of Twitter would fit on the back of a post card.
With room left over for an address so you can send it to a friend.This book is entirely pointless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551201</id>
	<title>ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246448940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats great for you,but I dont think anyone on slashdot cares about twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats great for you,but I dont think anyone on slashdot cares about twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats great for you,but I dont think anyone on slashdot cares about twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545237</id>
	<title>Popular == $</title>
	<author>Informative</author>
	<datestamp>1246472520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ka Ching!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ka Ching !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ka Ching!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551667</id>
	<title>Re:Look at the Rackspace Twitter page</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246451220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is rackspace so stupid that they don't post this outage notice to their OWN co-loed website? No. I think the more likely explanation is so that people like you will think rackspace is "cool."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is rackspace so stupid that they do n't post this outage notice to their OWN co-loed website ?
No. I think the more likely explanation is so that people like you will think rackspace is " cool .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is rackspace so stupid that they don't post this outage notice to their OWN co-loed website?
No. I think the more likely explanation is so that people like you will think rackspace is "cool.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Logical Zebra</author>
	<datestamp>1246472280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it really necessary to write a 200+ page book on how to write 140-character "microblog" posts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really necessary to write a 200 + page book on how to write 140-character " microblog " posts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really necessary to write a 200+ page book on how to write 140-character "microblog" posts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28549841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28547287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_01_1327226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551667
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545451
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553167
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551561
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28550163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28553209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28546007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28547287
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28549841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28551463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545253
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_01_1327226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28545691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_01_1327226.28548787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
