<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_30_2156249</id>
	<title>Yahoo's "Chicken Coop" Data Center Design</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1246376400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gamehostingguide.com/" rel="nofollow">1sockchuck</a> writes <i>"Yahoo has come up with a data center design called the <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/30/yahoos-fresh-air-computing-coop/">Yahoo Computing Coop</a>, which it says will make its new data center in Lockport, NY one of the most efficient on earth. The design features 120-foot by 60-foot metal prefabricated facilities with louvers on the side to support <a href="//it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/18/1938251&amp;tid=232">free cooling</a>, and a peaked roof to manage the release of waste heat from the hot aisle. Chief Yahoo David Filo said the name was adopted 'because <a href="http://ycorpblog.com/2009/06/30/serving-up-greener-data-centers/">it looks like something chickens live in</a>.' The $150 million data center in Western New York, which was <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/30/its-official-yahoo-building-in-lockport-ny/">announced earlier today</a>, will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>1sockchuck writes " Yahoo has come up with a data center design called the Yahoo Computing Coop , which it says will make its new data center in Lockport , NY one of the most efficient on earth .
The design features 120-foot by 60-foot metal prefabricated facilities with louvers on the side to support free cooling , and a peaked roof to manage the release of waste heat from the hot aisle .
Chief Yahoo David Filo said the name was adopted 'because it looks like something chickens live in .
' The $ 150 million data center in Western New York , which was announced earlier today , will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1sockchuck writes "Yahoo has come up with a data center design called the Yahoo Computing Coop, which it says will make its new data center in Lockport, NY one of the most efficient on earth.
The design features 120-foot by 60-foot metal prefabricated facilities with louvers on the side to support free cooling, and a peaked roof to manage the release of waste heat from the hot aisle.
Chief Yahoo David Filo said the name was adopted 'because it looks like something chickens live in.
' The $150 million data center in Western New York, which was announced earlier today, will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540537</id>
	<title>Re:um...grets?</title>
	<author>gafisher</author>
	<datestamp>1246451940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The market allows for an OpenOffice even in a world dominated by MSWord.  Ruths Chris still sells meat even though McDonalds sells more.  Ford isn't expected to roll over and die in the face of Toyota's market share.  Corn flakes and shredded wheat, Java and Ruby, PC and Mac, Hertz and Avis -- competition is not about destroying the second tier, it's about compelling both it and the market leader to keep getting better.  Would Google work so hard if it didn't have Yahoo on its heels?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The market allows for an OpenOffice even in a world dominated by MSWord .
Ruths Chris still sells meat even though McDonalds sells more .
Ford is n't expected to roll over and die in the face of Toyota 's market share .
Corn flakes and shredded wheat , Java and Ruby , PC and Mac , Hertz and Avis -- competition is not about destroying the second tier , it 's about compelling both it and the market leader to keep getting better .
Would Google work so hard if it did n't have Yahoo on its heels ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The market allows for an OpenOffice even in a world dominated by MSWord.
Ruths Chris still sells meat even though McDonalds sells more.
Ford isn't expected to roll over and die in the face of Toyota's market share.
Corn flakes and shredded wheat, Java and Ruby, PC and Mac, Hertz and Avis -- competition is not about destroying the second tier, it's about compelling both it and the market leader to keep getting better.
Would Google work so hard if it didn't have Yahoo on its heels?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538789</id>
	<title>Lockport</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246385820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lockport is where the Erie Canal climbs the Niagara Escarpment.</p><p> The canal itself was and is a source of hydro-power - think of it as a 350 mile nineteenth century industrial corridor cut across upstate New York. The work of self-taught engineers and Irish immigrant labor - with no better tools available than the pick axe and black powder.</p><p>Lockport is a small city of about 20,000 that has been spared the frauds and fancies that have plagued the redevelopment of Niagara Falls. It is about 16 miles northeast of the SUNY Amherst campus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lockport is where the Erie Canal climbs the Niagara Escarpment .
The canal itself was and is a source of hydro-power - think of it as a 350 mile nineteenth century industrial corridor cut across upstate New York .
The work of self-taught engineers and Irish immigrant labor - with no better tools available than the pick axe and black powder.Lockport is a small city of about 20,000 that has been spared the frauds and fancies that have plagued the redevelopment of Niagara Falls .
It is about 16 miles northeast of the SUNY Amherst campus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lockport is where the Erie Canal climbs the Niagara Escarpment.
The canal itself was and is a source of hydro-power - think of it as a 350 mile nineteenth century industrial corridor cut across upstate New York.
The work of self-taught engineers and Irish immigrant labor - with no better tools available than the pick axe and black powder.Lockport is a small city of about 20,000 that has been spared the frauds and fancies that have plagued the redevelopment of Niagara Falls.
It is about 16 miles northeast of the SUNY Amherst campus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543613</id>
	<title>Re:Flickr and games.yahoo.com</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1246467780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, and don't forget about the Web Chat that people use at work because they <i>think</i> IT can't see what they are doing.</p><p>(Note: Sys Admins, get <a href="http://www.formessengers.com/mdetect.htm" title="formessengers.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [formessengers.com] neat util.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and do n't forget about the Web Chat that people use at work because they think IT ca n't see what they are doing .
( Note : Sys Admins , get this [ formessengers.com ] neat util .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and don't forget about the Web Chat that people use at work because they think IT can't see what they are doing.
(Note: Sys Admins, get this [formessengers.com] neat util.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538475</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck you, sexist jackass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't you be in the kitchen?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't you be in the kitchen ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't you be in the kitchen?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538521</id>
	<title>Now we get...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246382340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NYFC instead of KFC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NYFC instead of KFC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NYFC instead of KFC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541701</id>
	<title>Another PILOT scam.</title>
	<author>Andy\_w715</author>
	<datestamp>1246460400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah another project brought to you by PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes).  Screwing the homeowners and tax payers of Niagara County once again.

Niagara county is one of the most taxed counties in NY, PILOT was supposed to help start-ups get their feet off the ground, but has since been abused by large companies by promising high paying jobs in return for sales tax exemptions and property tax waiving.
Case in point AES Sumerset.

As with Google (in Lenoir county NC), its likely only a small fraction of the 175 announced jobs will be filled.  Many of them being building maintenance jobs with most of the admins and engineers working remotely and not really contributing to the local economy (after all who wants to live in Lockport?, where yes the houses are cheap...but you have to pay 5000/year property tax on your 100k house).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah another project brought to you by PILOT ( payment in lieu of taxes ) .
Screwing the homeowners and tax payers of Niagara County once again .
Niagara county is one of the most taxed counties in NY , PILOT was supposed to help start-ups get their feet off the ground , but has since been abused by large companies by promising high paying jobs in return for sales tax exemptions and property tax waiving .
Case in point AES Sumerset .
As with Google ( in Lenoir county NC ) , its likely only a small fraction of the 175 announced jobs will be filled .
Many of them being building maintenance jobs with most of the admins and engineers working remotely and not really contributing to the local economy ( after all who wants to live in Lockport ? , where yes the houses are cheap...but you have to pay 5000/year property tax on your 100k house ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah another project brought to you by PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes).
Screwing the homeowners and tax payers of Niagara County once again.
Niagara county is one of the most taxed counties in NY, PILOT was supposed to help start-ups get their feet off the ground, but has since been abused by large companies by promising high paying jobs in return for sales tax exemptions and property tax waiving.
Case in point AES Sumerset.
As with Google (in Lenoir county NC), its likely only a small fraction of the 175 announced jobs will be filled.
Many of them being building maintenance jobs with most of the admins and engineers working remotely and not really contributing to the local economy (after all who wants to live in Lockport?, where yes the houses are cheap...but you have to pay 5000/year property tax on your 100k house).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543569</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>alphajim</author>
	<datestamp>1246467660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, no "build it and they will come"?  The Niagara Frontier are has had job availability issues since the 80's.  They've got power, people, reasonably cheap land, a single fault that shakes about once every 30 years so little you can't feel it.  They do get snow, but usually not as bad as further south near Buffalo and the lake Erie shore. With good air flow, they'll probably only need to run the chillers 2-3 months out of the year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , no " build it and they will come " ?
The Niagara Frontier are has had job availability issues since the 80 's .
They 've got power , people , reasonably cheap land , a single fault that shakes about once every 30 years so little you ca n't feel it .
They do get snow , but usually not as bad as further south near Buffalo and the lake Erie shore .
With good air flow , they 'll probably only need to run the chillers 2-3 months out of the year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, no "build it and they will come"?
The Niagara Frontier are has had job availability issues since the 80's.
They've got power, people, reasonably cheap land, a single fault that shakes about once every 30 years so little you can't feel it.
They do get snow, but usually not as bad as further south near Buffalo and the lake Erie shore.
With good air flow, they'll probably only need to run the chillers 2-3 months out of the year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</id>
	<title>um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm rather mystified that there's still interest in Yahoo.  Although I'm aware that their hand-edited, directory-like coverage is actually popular in countries that use non-ascii character sets, Yahoo's search results haven't seemed competitive to me since '97.</p><p>Honestly, I'm not trying to troll; just wondering why a site that's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.</p><p>Anyone still using them?  Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm rather mystified that there 's still interest in Yahoo .
Although I 'm aware that their hand-edited , directory-like coverage is actually popular in countries that use non-ascii character sets , Yahoo 's search results have n't seemed competitive to me since '97.Honestly , I 'm not trying to troll ; just wondering why a site that 's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.Anyone still using them ?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they 're up to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm rather mystified that there's still interest in Yahoo.
Although I'm aware that their hand-edited, directory-like coverage is actually popular in countries that use non-ascii character sets, Yahoo's search results haven't seemed competitive to me since '97.Honestly, I'm not trying to troll; just wondering why a site that's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.Anyone still using them?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539249</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Jeeeb</author>
	<datestamp>1246390920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For one mail - Even when gmail came out with all the hype about 1gb of storage space, I stuck with yahoo and the puny 4mb it was offering, for the simple reason that changing mail address is a pita. Now I'm not sure if there is even a storage limit at all. I also now have multiple yahoo address all redirecting to my main one. That way I have an address with my real name for things like resumes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.etc.<br> <br>

There are lots of other services though. Yahoo auctions is extremely popular in Japan. I've never heard anyone mention e-bay here.<br> <br>

The Yahoo Japan travel service is also pretty popular and convenient. I've booked night bus tickets between Osaka and Tokyo several times through it. Could search and compare prices, all the form details are stored with my yahoo ID and you can use the payment systems at convenience stores here to pay in cash rather than giving out your credit card details<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br> <br>

Another big one is the biggest of the job-hunting sites here (rikunabi) is linked to yahoo. You login with your Yahoo Japan ID.<br> <br>

Then there's TV guides, news, shopping, weather etc. Through yahoo sports you can get live updated coverage of sporting events. Great for things where you don't want to sit watching it but do want to track the score<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).<br> <br>

To be honest I'm surprised yahoo isn't more popular in the west. For most of what people want to do on the web you don't really need search and having a central hub to deal with it all actually makes a lot of sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For one mail - Even when gmail came out with all the hype about 1gb of storage space , I stuck with yahoo and the puny 4mb it was offering , for the simple reason that changing mail address is a pita .
Now I 'm not sure if there is even a storage limit at all .
I also now have multiple yahoo address all redirecting to my main one .
That way I have an address with my real name for things like resumes .etc .
There are lots of other services though .
Yahoo auctions is extremely popular in Japan .
I 've never heard anyone mention e-bay here .
The Yahoo Japan travel service is also pretty popular and convenient .
I 've booked night bus tickets between Osaka and Tokyo several times through it .
Could search and compare prices , all the form details are stored with my yahoo ID and you can use the payment systems at convenience stores here to pay in cash rather than giving out your credit card details : ) Another big one is the biggest of the job-hunting sites here ( rikunabi ) is linked to yahoo .
You login with your Yahoo Japan ID .
Then there 's TV guides , news , shopping , weather etc .
Through yahoo sports you can get live updated coverage of sporting events .
Great for things where you do n't want to sit watching it but do want to track the score : ) .
To be honest I 'm surprised yahoo is n't more popular in the west .
For most of what people want to do on the web you do n't really need search and having a central hub to deal with it all actually makes a lot of sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For one mail - Even when gmail came out with all the hype about 1gb of storage space, I stuck with yahoo and the puny 4mb it was offering, for the simple reason that changing mail address is a pita.
Now I'm not sure if there is even a storage limit at all.
I also now have multiple yahoo address all redirecting to my main one.
That way I have an address with my real name for things like resumes .etc.
There are lots of other services though.
Yahoo auctions is extremely popular in Japan.
I've never heard anyone mention e-bay here.
The Yahoo Japan travel service is also pretty popular and convenient.
I've booked night bus tickets between Osaka and Tokyo several times through it.
Could search and compare prices, all the form details are stored with my yahoo ID and you can use the payment systems at convenience stores here to pay in cash rather than giving out your credit card details :) 

Another big one is the biggest of the job-hunting sites here (rikunabi) is linked to yahoo.
You login with your Yahoo Japan ID.
Then there's TV guides, news, shopping, weather etc.
Through yahoo sports you can get live updated coverage of sporting events.
Great for things where you don't want to sit watching it but do want to track the score :).
To be honest I'm surprised yahoo isn't more popular in the west.
For most of what people want to do on the web you don't really need search and having a central hub to deal with it all actually makes a lot of sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393</id>
	<title>Fuck you, sexist jackass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's waiter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's waiter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's waiter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538535</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246382460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone still using them?  Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?</p></div><p>I still use it.  Competition is good.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone still using them ?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they 're up to ? I still use it .
Competition is good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone still using them?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?I still use it.
Competition is good.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538491</id>
	<title>pSHIT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>my efforts were taken over by BSDiI</htmltext>
<tokenext>my efforts were taken over by BSDiI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my efforts were taken over by BSDiI</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538473</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>WaXHeLL</author>
	<datestamp>1246381740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, Yahoo changed to a robot based crawler listing way back in 2002 for their main search results.  Prior to that point, they had search engine results complimenting their directory.</p><p>In the past, they've used Inktomi (which they now own) as well as Google to power their searches.  In 2003, they went to their own internal search engine.</p><p>Now that being said, they still maintain a web directory, but it has lost a lot of significance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , Yahoo changed to a robot based crawler listing way back in 2002 for their main search results .
Prior to that point , they had search engine results complimenting their directory.In the past , they 've used Inktomi ( which they now own ) as well as Google to power their searches .
In 2003 , they went to their own internal search engine.Now that being said , they still maintain a web directory , but it has lost a lot of significance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, Yahoo changed to a robot based crawler listing way back in 2002 for their main search results.
Prior to that point, they had search engine results complimenting their directory.In the past, they've used Inktomi (which they now own) as well as Google to power their searches.
In 2003, they went to their own internal search engine.Now that being said, they still maintain a web directory, but it has lost a lot of significance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538865</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1246386600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally like <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/" title="yahoo.com">http://finance.yahoo.com/</a> [yahoo.com] much better than <a href="http://finance.google.com/" title="google.com">http://finance.google.com/</a> [google.com].  The portfolio, quote and chart information is much better with yahoo.</p><p>Additionally, instant messaging. Why should I pick a platform/protocol/client that none of my friends or family use? I guess I could spend plenty of time getting them to switch, however, then they in turn have to convince their friends/family to convert as well.</p><p>Google is great at search, but beyond that.. not that much else attracts me to it from an application point of view.  Someone once said, "Google is a method of getting somewhere, Yahoo is a destination."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally like http : //finance.yahoo.com/ [ yahoo.com ] much better than http : //finance.google.com/ [ google.com ] .
The portfolio , quote and chart information is much better with yahoo.Additionally , instant messaging .
Why should I pick a platform/protocol/client that none of my friends or family use ?
I guess I could spend plenty of time getting them to switch , however , then they in turn have to convince their friends/family to convert as well.Google is great at search , but beyond that.. not that much else attracts me to it from an application point of view .
Someone once said , " Google is a method of getting somewhere , Yahoo is a destination .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally like http://finance.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com] much better than http://finance.google.com/ [google.com].
The portfolio, quote and chart information is much better with yahoo.Additionally, instant messaging.
Why should I pick a platform/protocol/client that none of my friends or family use?
I guess I could spend plenty of time getting them to switch, however, then they in turn have to convince their friends/family to convert as well.Google is great at search, but beyond that.. not that much else attracts me to it from an application point of view.
Someone once said, "Google is a method of getting somewhere, Yahoo is a destination.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542141</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1246462320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, you just found the secret to their 'power savings' method.  They're not building a new facility, they're taking an old one and enabling SpeedStep or Cool'n'Quiet on all of the processors.  Just like that, they get 60-70\% power savings!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you just found the secret to their 'power savings ' method .
They 're not building a new facility , they 're taking an old one and enabling SpeedStep or Cool'n'Quiet on all of the processors .
Just like that , they get 60-70 \ % power savings !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you just found the secret to their 'power savings' method.
They're not building a new facility, they're taking an old one and enabling SpeedStep or Cool'n'Quiet on all of the processors.
Just like that, they get 60-70\% power savings!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544821</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246471260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you actually used http://search.yahoo.com/ in the last few years?  Its look, speed, and results are virtually indistinguishable from Google (and you yes, can disable its more aggressive suggestion thing)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you actually used http : //search.yahoo.com/ in the last few years ?
Its look , speed , and results are virtually indistinguishable from Google ( and you yes , can disable its more aggressive suggestion thing )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you actually used http://search.yahoo.com/ in the last few years?
Its look, speed, and results are virtually indistinguishable from Google (and you yes, can disable its more aggressive suggestion thing)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28550457</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246445580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm mystified by the "cheap hydro power from the Niagara River" part.</i> </p><p>Yahoo chose to build <b>new</b> here - a $150 million dollar investment.</p><p> It's a bit of a adjustment to think of "cheap hydro" as being as significant to the data center as to the mile long chemical plants that line the upper Niagara River.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm mystified by the " cheap hydro power from the Niagara River " part .
Yahoo chose to build new here - a $ 150 million dollar investment .
It 's a bit of a adjustment to think of " cheap hydro " as being as significant to the data center as to the mile long chemical plants that line the upper Niagara River .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm mystified by the "cheap hydro power from the Niagara River" part.
Yahoo chose to build new here - a $150 million dollar investment.
It's a bit of a adjustment to think of "cheap hydro" as being as significant to the data center as to the mile long chemical plants that line the upper Niagara River.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538621</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1246383660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since this is a hardware story, the mediocrity of their software side isn't a serious drawback.<br> <br>

In fact, that mediocrity might actually be driving some of their hardware/facilities innovation. If you are kicking ass on the software side, getting favorable ad rates, lots of buzz keeping the investors happy no matter what your P/E is, etc. you can get away with some infrastructure inefficiency(under good management you will still work to reduce this; but not doing so is easier than doing so, and you'll survive). If, however, your buzz is gone, your ad rates are slipping, and you have sharks gnawing on your stock, you can't afford to run a sloppy operation. If your revenue per visitor is poor, catering to that visitor had better be damn cheap.<br> <br>

Now, if a company is too far gone, or under the influence of Wall street oriented buzzsaw management, they won't have the talent needed to innovate, having lost/sacked their R&amp;D people, and it is game over; but if a company is on the ropes but not yet down, or if their margins are simply not very good, you might expect them to do some interesting infrastructure stuff. Dell would be another one I'd put in the category. Software/design stories about them tend to be a yawn, or an embarrassment(Adamo, WTF?) but their logistics and supply chain guys are probably all cyborg ninja assassins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this is a hardware story , the mediocrity of their software side is n't a serious drawback .
In fact , that mediocrity might actually be driving some of their hardware/facilities innovation .
If you are kicking ass on the software side , getting favorable ad rates , lots of buzz keeping the investors happy no matter what your P/E is , etc .
you can get away with some infrastructure inefficiency ( under good management you will still work to reduce this ; but not doing so is easier than doing so , and you 'll survive ) .
If , however , your buzz is gone , your ad rates are slipping , and you have sharks gnawing on your stock , you ca n't afford to run a sloppy operation .
If your revenue per visitor is poor , catering to that visitor had better be damn cheap .
Now , if a company is too far gone , or under the influence of Wall street oriented buzzsaw management , they wo n't have the talent needed to innovate , having lost/sacked their R&amp;D people , and it is game over ; but if a company is on the ropes but not yet down , or if their margins are simply not very good , you might expect them to do some interesting infrastructure stuff .
Dell would be another one I 'd put in the category .
Software/design stories about them tend to be a yawn , or an embarrassment ( Adamo , WTF ?
) but their logistics and supply chain guys are probably all cyborg ninja assassins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this is a hardware story, the mediocrity of their software side isn't a serious drawback.
In fact, that mediocrity might actually be driving some of their hardware/facilities innovation.
If you are kicking ass on the software side, getting favorable ad rates, lots of buzz keeping the investors happy no matter what your P/E is, etc.
you can get away with some infrastructure inefficiency(under good management you will still work to reduce this; but not doing so is easier than doing so, and you'll survive).
If, however, your buzz is gone, your ad rates are slipping, and you have sharks gnawing on your stock, you can't afford to run a sloppy operation.
If your revenue per visitor is poor, catering to that visitor had better be damn cheap.
Now, if a company is too far gone, or under the influence of Wall street oriented buzzsaw management, they won't have the talent needed to innovate, having lost/sacked their R&amp;D people, and it is game over; but if a company is on the ropes but not yet down, or if their margins are simply not very good, you might expect them to do some interesting infrastructure stuff.
Dell would be another one I'd put in the category.
Software/design stories about them tend to be a yawn, or an embarrassment(Adamo, WTF?
) but their logistics and supply chain guys are probably all cyborg ninja assassins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538725</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246385040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yahoo's search results haven't seemed competitive to me since '97.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hint:  There's much more to do on the web than search, and thus Yahoo! (and Google) provide a lot more services than search.<br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Honestly, I'm not trying to troll; just wondering why a site that's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.</p></div></blockquote><p>Honestly, not trying to troll or flamebait, but are you really as ignorant as your posting makes you sound?  Are you really too lazy to visit <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/" title="yahoo.com">http://www.yahoo.com</a> [yahoo.com] and spend a little time just reading the page and clicking around on the services offered?</p><blockquote><div><p>Anyone still using them? Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm still using them because Google offers nothing to match the Yahoo! page I use as a homepage.  (<a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb" title="yahoo.com">http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb</a> [yahoo.com].)  I still use Yahoo! mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down.  I still track my finances at Yahoo! because their management and analysis tools are superior to those provided by Google.  I use Flickr because the collaboration and other tools it provides are superior to Picasa's.  Etc... Etc...<br>
&nbsp; <br>Google's predominance in search and advertising blinds people to the 'also ran' status of so many of it's other services.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo 's search results have n't seemed competitive to me since '97.Hint : There 's much more to do on the web than search , and thus Yahoo !
( and Google ) provide a lot more services than search .
    Honestly , I 'm not trying to troll ; just wondering why a site that 's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.Honestly , not trying to troll or flamebait , but are you really as ignorant as your posting makes you sound ?
Are you really too lazy to visit http : //www.yahoo.com [ yahoo.com ] and spend a little time just reading the page and clicking around on the services offered ? Anyone still using them ?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they 're up to ? I 'm still using them because Google offers nothing to match the Yahoo !
page I use as a homepage .
( http : //sports.yahoo.com/mlb [ yahoo.com ] .
) I still use Yahoo !
mail for some functions as it 's UI beats Gmail hands down .
I still track my finances at Yahoo !
because their management and analysis tools are superior to those provided by Google .
I use Flickr because the collaboration and other tools it provides are superior to Picasa 's .
Etc... Etc.. .   Google 's predominance in search and advertising blinds people to the 'also ran ' status of so many of it 's other services .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo's search results haven't seemed competitive to me since '97.Hint:  There's much more to do on the web than search, and thus Yahoo!
(and Google) provide a lot more services than search.
  
  Honestly, I'm not trying to troll; just wondering why a site that's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.Honestly, not trying to troll or flamebait, but are you really as ignorant as your posting makes you sound?
Are you really too lazy to visit http://www.yahoo.com [yahoo.com] and spend a little time just reading the page and clicking around on the services offered?Anyone still using them?
Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?I'm still using them because Google offers nothing to match the Yahoo!
page I use as a homepage.
(http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb [yahoo.com].
)  I still use Yahoo!
mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down.
I still track my finances at Yahoo!
because their management and analysis tools are superior to those provided by Google.
I use Flickr because the collaboration and other tools it provides are superior to Picasa's.
Etc... Etc...
  Google's predominance in search and advertising blinds people to the 'also ran' status of so many of it's other services.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538761</id>
	<title>Re:Bawk, bawk Yahoo! in Niagara</title>
	<author>Angry\_Admin</author>
	<datestamp>1246385520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in Lockport, NY and I can attest, it isn't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Lockport , NY and I can attest , it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Lockport, NY and I can attest, it isn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545251</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Air</title>
	<author>donrich39</author>
	<datestamp>1246472520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should build the "Chicken Coops" IN the river, thus taking advantage of free water cooling.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should build the " Chicken Coops " IN the river , thus taking advantage of free water cooling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should build the "Chicken Coops" IN the river, thus taking advantage of free water cooling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538505</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>HuckleCom</author>
	<datestamp>1246382160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yahoo, like google doesn't -JUST- provide a search engine nad I hope you've noticed that. In my world at least Yahoo definately has it going on with YUI - so much so that google homepages are using yui components</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo , like google does n't -JUST- provide a search engine nad I hope you 've noticed that .
In my world at least Yahoo definately has it going on with YUI - so much so that google homepages are using yui components</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo, like google doesn't -JUST- provide a search engine nad I hope you've noticed that.
In my world at least Yahoo definately has it going on with YUI - so much so that google homepages are using yui components</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538519</id>
	<title>Phew</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246382280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a moment there I panicked about a chicken coup trying to overtake Yahoo. Although chickens can not make it any worse for Yahoo than it already is.</p><p>The image of millions of chickens rising up against the tyranny of Yahoo and running around all excited is simply awesome. I, therefore, petition that Yahoo at least change the name to Chicken Coup if not go all the way to welcoming their new chicken overlords!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a moment there I panicked about a chicken coup trying to overtake Yahoo .
Although chickens can not make it any worse for Yahoo than it already is.The image of millions of chickens rising up against the tyranny of Yahoo and running around all excited is simply awesome .
I , therefore , petition that Yahoo at least change the name to Chicken Coup if not go all the way to welcoming their new chicken overlords !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a moment there I panicked about a chicken coup trying to overtake Yahoo.
Although chickens can not make it any worse for Yahoo than it already is.The image of millions of chickens rising up against the tyranny of Yahoo and running around all excited is simply awesome.
I, therefore, petition that Yahoo at least change the name to Chicken Coup if not go all the way to welcoming their new chicken overlords!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538471</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>dubbayu\_d\_40</author>
	<datestamp>1246381740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I care.

I have 10 years worth of email on their servers.

And I'm still quite happy with My Yahoo page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I care .
I have 10 years worth of email on their servers .
And I 'm still quite happy with My Yahoo page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I care.
I have 10 years worth of email on their servers.
And I'm still quite happy with My Yahoo page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541627</id>
	<title>Good news and bad news</title>
	<author>GameMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1246459860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went to school in Rochester, NY, so I'm familiar with the area.  The good news is that the power up there is obscenely cheap (if you're in a township that gets the hydro power) and that they should have no problem cooling the facility for much of the year.  The bad news is that the snow gets so bad that they've, routinely, had to shut down the NY State Thruway West of Rochester during winter storms.  Good luck getting to work in those conditions, they may want to consider setting up cots for the Admins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to school in Rochester , NY , so I 'm familiar with the area .
The good news is that the power up there is obscenely cheap ( if you 're in a township that gets the hydro power ) and that they should have no problem cooling the facility for much of the year .
The bad news is that the snow gets so bad that they 've , routinely , had to shut down the NY State Thruway West of Rochester during winter storms .
Good luck getting to work in those conditions , they may want to consider setting up cots for the Admins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to school in Rochester, NY, so I'm familiar with the area.
The good news is that the power up there is obscenely cheap (if you're in a township that gets the hydro power) and that they should have no problem cooling the facility for much of the year.
The bad news is that the snow gets so bad that they've, routinely, had to shut down the NY State Thruway West of Rochester during winter storms.
Good luck getting to work in those conditions, they may want to consider setting up cots for the Admins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538449</id>
	<title>Bawk, bawk Yahoo! in Niagara</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like the ideal spot for a Slashdotter's honeymoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like the ideal spot for a Slashdotter 's honeymoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like the ideal spot for a Slashdotter's honeymoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540877</id>
	<title>Chicken or the Eggs?</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1246455240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though this is an interesting design, I'm wondering if the savings would be better served from using simply less servers?  Does Y! use a high-tech design and still have a ton of servers or do they spend less on design and more on higher-capacacity servers running virtualization?<br><br>Hey, I was just in a massive data center yesterday for a tour. (100,000 sq ft) They had a spare s390 sitting on the side of the room. Maybe Y! can borrow that baby and put on a few hundred linux and/or windows VMs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though this is an interesting design , I 'm wondering if the savings would be better served from using simply less servers ?
Does Y !
use a high-tech design and still have a ton of servers or do they spend less on design and more on higher-capacacity servers running virtualization ? Hey , I was just in a massive data center yesterday for a tour .
( 100,000 sq ft ) They had a spare s390 sitting on the side of the room .
Maybe Y !
can borrow that baby and put on a few hundred linux and/or windows VMs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though this is an interesting design, I'm wondering if the savings would be better served from using simply less servers?
Does Y!
use a high-tech design and still have a ton of servers or do they spend less on design and more on higher-capacacity servers running virtualization?Hey, I was just in a massive data center yesterday for a tour.
(100,000 sq ft) They had a spare s390 sitting on the side of the room.
Maybe Y!
can borrow that baby and put on a few hundred linux and/or windows VMs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545713</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>ceswiedler</author>
	<datestamp>1246473960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wha? Sorry, dude, but I don't buy it. The data center is near the dam, and is getting its power from there. So if you consider hydroelectric power clean (most people do) then their power is clean. Electricity takes money and effort to move around; it's not as if Yahoo is somehow causing people in West Virginia to burn more coal than they otherwise would have.</p><p>Of course, the reason data centers are near hydro power is because it's cheap and reliable, and because it doesn't matter too much exactly where a data center is. Being clean is a nice benefit though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wha ?
Sorry , dude , but I do n't buy it .
The data center is near the dam , and is getting its power from there .
So if you consider hydroelectric power clean ( most people do ) then their power is clean .
Electricity takes money and effort to move around ; it 's not as if Yahoo is somehow causing people in West Virginia to burn more coal than they otherwise would have.Of course , the reason data centers are near hydro power is because it 's cheap and reliable , and because it does n't matter too much exactly where a data center is .
Being clean is a nice benefit though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wha?
Sorry, dude, but I don't buy it.
The data center is near the dam, and is getting its power from there.
So if you consider hydroelectric power clean (most people do) then their power is clean.
Electricity takes money and effort to move around; it's not as if Yahoo is somehow causing people in West Virginia to burn more coal than they otherwise would have.Of course, the reason data centers are near hydro power is because it's cheap and reliable, and because it doesn't matter too much exactly where a data center is.
Being clean is a nice benefit though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538565</id>
	<title>Will this Yahoo idea live up to the hype?</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1246382880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I certainly hope it does. You see, I have doubts on the viability of whatever Yahoo does. A company that shuts down three services in less than 8 months (Y!Live, Jumpcut and Maven Networks), you begin to wonder whether they know what they are doing.</p><p>On my mail account, Yahoo have decided to make it more bloated with Facebook/Twitter like services while requiring money to mark more than 500 addresses as spam addresses. By the way, you cannot redirect mail from a Yahoo account or access it via POP3 without shelling out cash. Insane with the likes of free Gmail out there.</p><p>I have also noticed that Yahoo search is capturing any invalid URLs I enter into the Google search page...adding to my agony and dislike of the company. If I want to search, I know where to go. Bottom line, Yahoo do not know what they are doing in my not so humble opinion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I certainly hope it does .
You see , I have doubts on the viability of whatever Yahoo does .
A company that shuts down three services in less than 8 months ( Y ! Live , Jumpcut and Maven Networks ) , you begin to wonder whether they know what they are doing.On my mail account , Yahoo have decided to make it more bloated with Facebook/Twitter like services while requiring money to mark more than 500 addresses as spam addresses .
By the way , you can not redirect mail from a Yahoo account or access it via POP3 without shelling out cash .
Insane with the likes of free Gmail out there.I have also noticed that Yahoo search is capturing any invalid URLs I enter into the Google search page...adding to my agony and dislike of the company .
If I want to search , I know where to go .
Bottom line , Yahoo do not know what they are doing in my not so humble opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I certainly hope it does.
You see, I have doubts on the viability of whatever Yahoo does.
A company that shuts down three services in less than 8 months (Y!Live, Jumpcut and Maven Networks), you begin to wonder whether they know what they are doing.On my mail account, Yahoo have decided to make it more bloated with Facebook/Twitter like services while requiring money to mark more than 500 addresses as spam addresses.
By the way, you cannot redirect mail from a Yahoo account or access it via POP3 without shelling out cash.
Insane with the likes of free Gmail out there.I have also noticed that Yahoo search is capturing any invalid URLs I enter into the Google search page...adding to my agony and dislike of the company.
If I want to search, I know where to go.
Bottom line, Yahoo do not know what they are doing in my not so humble opinion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538541</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1246382520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yahoo! does a lot more than just search or portal services.  I wouldn't be surprised to learn if most of their revenue comes from providing secure web stores.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo !
does a lot more than just search or portal services .
I would n't be surprised to learn if most of their revenue comes from providing secure web stores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo!
does a lot more than just search or portal services.
I wouldn't be surprised to learn if most of their revenue comes from providing secure web stores.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542003</id>
	<title>2 doors?</title>
	<author>kvap</author>
	<datestamp>1246461840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know why the Yahoo Computing Coop only has 2 doors?
<br> <br>
Because if it was 4 doors, it'd be a Computing Sedan!

<br> <br> <br>

Thank you, I'll be here all night.  Please tip your server.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know why the Yahoo Computing Coop only has 2 doors ?
Because if it was 4 doors , it 'd be a Computing Sedan !
Thank you , I 'll be here all night .
Please tip your server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know why the Yahoo Computing Coop only has 2 doors?
Because if it was 4 doors, it'd be a Computing Sedan!
Thank you, I'll be here all night.
Please tip your server.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538871</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1246386660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What sorta chicken shit operation is Yahoo turning into?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What sorta chicken shit operation is Yahoo turning into ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What sorta chicken shit operation is Yahoo turning into?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538803</id>
	<title>Flickr and games.yahoo.com</title>
	<author>sofakingon</author>
	<datestamp>1246385880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been using Yahoo! Flickr on a nearly daily basis, and for online card/board games, yahoo is a great place to play.

Yahoo stopped being a search engine a looooong time ago, but still does other things quite well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been using Yahoo !
Flickr on a nearly daily basis , and for online card/board games , yahoo is a great place to play .
Yahoo stopped being a search engine a looooong time ago , but still does other things quite well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been using Yahoo!
Flickr on a nearly daily basis, and for online card/board games, yahoo is a great place to play.
Yahoo stopped being a search engine a looooong time ago, but still does other things quite well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540675</id>
	<title>The Niagara area</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246453440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The $150 million data center in Western New York, which was announced earlier today, will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River.</p></div></blockquote><p>Specifically, it will run on power generated from Niagara Falls.  The Western New York (Niagara Falls/Buffalo) area is an outstanding candidate for green-themed projects like this.  In addition to the power plant, the weather here is ideal (it rarely gets grossly hot and humid in the summers--it's very comfortable), WNY is &lt; 8 hours' drive/1 hour plane ride from several large US and Canadian cities (Toronto is just an hour or so away, NYC is 6 hours, DC is 7.5), and despite what you may think from watching/listening to the news, there is a lot of sunlight for solar (the University at Buffalo is just kicking off a large solar project now, actually...).</p><p>On top of that, it's a great place to live.  Cost of living is low (I'm closing my first house now for $116,000 -- housing never went stupid here like it did elsewhere so there's no foreclosing parties) so companies can pay salaries that are great compared to the cost of living--but cheap compared to most other areas.  People are extremely friendly, commuting is a breeze (though it's hardly a ghost town), there are excellent colleges and universities in the area to hire new grads out of, and there are tons of local, unique, family owned restaurants and businesses.</p><p>We've been growing quite a bit (but wisely, not recklessly) the last few years.  I wouldn't at all be surprised if other major service providers came knocking.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The $ 150 million data center in Western New York , which was announced earlier today , will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River.Specifically , it will run on power generated from Niagara Falls .
The Western New York ( Niagara Falls/Buffalo ) area is an outstanding candidate for green-themed projects like this .
In addition to the power plant , the weather here is ideal ( it rarely gets grossly hot and humid in the summers--it 's very comfortable ) , WNY is On top of that , it 's a great place to live .
Cost of living is low ( I 'm closing my first house now for $ 116,000 -- housing never went stupid here like it did elsewhere so there 's no foreclosing parties ) so companies can pay salaries that are great compared to the cost of living--but cheap compared to most other areas .
People are extremely friendly , commuting is a breeze ( though it 's hardly a ghost town ) , there are excellent colleges and universities in the area to hire new grads out of , and there are tons of local , unique , family owned restaurants and businesses.We 've been growing quite a bit ( but wisely , not recklessly ) the last few years .
I would n't at all be surprised if other major service providers came knocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The $150 million data center in Western New York, which was announced earlier today, will run on cheap hydro power from the Niagara River.Specifically, it will run on power generated from Niagara Falls.
The Western New York (Niagara Falls/Buffalo) area is an outstanding candidate for green-themed projects like this.
In addition to the power plant, the weather here is ideal (it rarely gets grossly hot and humid in the summers--it's very comfortable), WNY is On top of that, it's a great place to live.
Cost of living is low (I'm closing my first house now for $116,000 -- housing never went stupid here like it did elsewhere so there's no foreclosing parties) so companies can pay salaries that are great compared to the cost of living--but cheap compared to most other areas.
People are extremely friendly, commuting is a breeze (though it's hardly a ghost town), there are excellent colleges and universities in the area to hire new grads out of, and there are tons of local, unique, family owned restaurants and businesses.We've been growing quite a bit (but wisely, not recklessly) the last few years.
I wouldn't at all be surprised if other major service providers came knocking.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538989</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>master5o1</author>
	<datestamp>1246388220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't they own Flickr or something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't they own Flickr or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't they own Flickr or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246390860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm mystified by the "cheap hydro power from the Niagara River" part.</p><p>Since the story doesn't claim that they are funding the construction of a new hydro-electric dam, they are just saying 'well, we're close to a dam, so we'll claim that our power needs are clean, and you bastards further away, that were going to get this electricity if we didn't use it, you are using electricity from those ozone-destroying, greenhouse gas-generating, scarce fossil-fuel burning power plants'.</p><p>Why do we let companies get away with these stupid claims.  Unless they actually are responsible for building the clean power source, they should be denied the ability to claim they are using so-called 'clean' energy just because they happen to be physically near a pre-existing 'clean' energy source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm mystified by the " cheap hydro power from the Niagara River " part.Since the story does n't claim that they are funding the construction of a new hydro-electric dam , they are just saying 'well , we 're close to a dam , so we 'll claim that our power needs are clean , and you bastards further away , that were going to get this electricity if we did n't use it , you are using electricity from those ozone-destroying , greenhouse gas-generating , scarce fossil-fuel burning power plants'.Why do we let companies get away with these stupid claims .
Unless they actually are responsible for building the clean power source , they should be denied the ability to claim they are using so-called 'clean ' energy just because they happen to be physically near a pre-existing 'clean ' energy source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm mystified by the "cheap hydro power from the Niagara River" part.Since the story doesn't claim that they are funding the construction of a new hydro-electric dam, they are just saying 'well, we're close to a dam, so we'll claim that our power needs are clean, and you bastards further away, that were going to get this electricity if we didn't use it, you are using electricity from those ozone-destroying, greenhouse gas-generating, scarce fossil-fuel burning power plants'.Why do we let companies get away with these stupid claims.
Unless they actually are responsible for building the clean power source, they should be denied the ability to claim they are using so-called 'clean' energy just because they happen to be physically near a pre-existing 'clean' energy source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539529</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1246481460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems more like you're trying to flame bait people.</p><p>I use several Yahoo services, I've forgotten about their directory system that you've brought up.  Yellow pages is good, and I switch between them and Google for mapping &amp; directions.  I like the formatting of information in their finance section, though Google has the nifty chart applet, so I go between both services there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems more like you 're trying to flame bait people.I use several Yahoo services , I 've forgotten about their directory system that you 've brought up .
Yellow pages is good , and I switch between them and Google for mapping &amp; directions .
I like the formatting of information in their finance section , though Google has the nifty chart applet , so I go between both services there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems more like you're trying to flame bait people.I use several Yahoo services, I've forgotten about their directory system that you've brought up.
Yellow pages is good, and I switch between them and Google for mapping &amp; directions.
I like the formatting of information in their finance section, though Google has the nifty chart applet, so I go between both services there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28551837</id>
	<title>Re:Good news and bad news</title>
	<author>Jaime2</author>
	<datestamp>1246452180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in Lockport.  Over the past twenty years, I have probably missed four days of work due to weather.  When the northeast was blacked out in 2003, south Lockport had power.  When the city of Buffalo got 24 inches of snow in a few hours and shut down in 2000, the northtowns were snow-free.  When the whole Western New York area had serious power problems from an early snow fall while the leaves were still on the trees back in October of 2006, my neighborhood in Lockport was unaffected.  Our Cincinnati office seems to be closed at least twice a years for wind or ice storms.  South of Buffalo gets a lot of snow, but we get about half as much in the north.<br>
<br>
I have worked 30 miles from home since March 2007 and I don't know how to fill out a "snow day" on my time sheet because I've never needed to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Lockport .
Over the past twenty years , I have probably missed four days of work due to weather .
When the northeast was blacked out in 2003 , south Lockport had power .
When the city of Buffalo got 24 inches of snow in a few hours and shut down in 2000 , the northtowns were snow-free .
When the whole Western New York area had serious power problems from an early snow fall while the leaves were still on the trees back in October of 2006 , my neighborhood in Lockport was unaffected .
Our Cincinnati office seems to be closed at least twice a years for wind or ice storms .
South of Buffalo gets a lot of snow , but we get about half as much in the north .
I have worked 30 miles from home since March 2007 and I do n't know how to fill out a " snow day " on my time sheet because I 've never needed to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Lockport.
Over the past twenty years, I have probably missed four days of work due to weather.
When the northeast was blacked out in 2003, south Lockport had power.
When the city of Buffalo got 24 inches of snow in a few hours and shut down in 2000, the northtowns were snow-free.
When the whole Western New York area had serious power problems from an early snow fall while the leaves were still on the trees back in October of 2006, my neighborhood in Lockport was unaffected.
Our Cincinnati office seems to be closed at least twice a years for wind or ice storms.
South of Buffalo gets a lot of snow, but we get about half as much in the north.
I have worked 30 miles from home since March 2007 and I don't know how to fill out a "snow day" on my time sheet because I've never needed to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542045</id>
	<title>Go green: Free range servers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246461960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Me and all my hippie vegan friends insist that Yahoo quit this outrageous behavior at once!</p><p>We demand socially responsible computing!  We demand free range servers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me and all my hippie vegan friends insist that Yahoo quit this outrageous behavior at once ! We demand socially responsible computing !
We demand free range servers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me and all my hippie vegan friends insist that Yahoo quit this outrageous behavior at once!We demand socially responsible computing!
We demand free range servers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542959</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>agilen</author>
	<datestamp>1246465800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in your opinion data centers should be built in the middle of a desert where they need to be cooled heavily all year by a coal plant?</p><p>Yahoo gets a subsidy on their power to operate a data center (and create jobs) in Niagara County, because most of the power generated by a huge public work in Niagara County benefits people in larger cities far away who pay more for the electricity.  There is a savings on transmission costs, the weather in Niagara County is very favorable to cooling a data center, there is ample space, no history of natural disasters, etc.</p><p>They absolutely chose this spot because of the abundance of clean and cheap energy, and even though it was money talking, I applaud Yahoo for letting "green power" buy them instead of plain old "tax breaks".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in your opinion data centers should be built in the middle of a desert where they need to be cooled heavily all year by a coal plant ? Yahoo gets a subsidy on their power to operate a data center ( and create jobs ) in Niagara County , because most of the power generated by a huge public work in Niagara County benefits people in larger cities far away who pay more for the electricity .
There is a savings on transmission costs , the weather in Niagara County is very favorable to cooling a data center , there is ample space , no history of natural disasters , etc.They absolutely chose this spot because of the abundance of clean and cheap energy , and even though it was money talking , I applaud Yahoo for letting " green power " buy them instead of plain old " tax breaks " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in your opinion data centers should be built in the middle of a desert where they need to be cooled heavily all year by a coal plant?Yahoo gets a subsidy on their power to operate a data center (and create jobs) in Niagara County, because most of the power generated by a huge public work in Niagara County benefits people in larger cities far away who pay more for the electricity.
There is a savings on transmission costs, the weather in Niagara County is very favorable to cooling a data center, there is ample space, no history of natural disasters, etc.They absolutely chose this spot because of the abundance of clean and cheap energy, and even though it was money talking, I applaud Yahoo for letting "green power" buy them instead of plain old "tax breaks".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538445</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>powerslave12r</author>
	<datestamp>1246381440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google tends to be for people who know what they want.
<br> <br>

Yahoo tends to be for people who want to be fed/entertained/informed by whatever's there on the table (say like a TV channel).

<br> <br>

Of course I generalize.


<br> <br> Opinion: I'm sure, the answer to your question about who uses them is "A lot of people."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google tends to be for people who know what they want .
Yahoo tends to be for people who want to be fed/entertained/informed by whatever 's there on the table ( say like a TV channel ) .
Of course I generalize .
Opinion : I 'm sure , the answer to your question about who uses them is " A lot of people .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google tends to be for people who know what they want.
Yahoo tends to be for people who want to be fed/entertained/informed by whatever's there on the table (say like a TV channel).
Of course I generalize.
Opinion: I'm sure, the answer to your question about who uses them is "A lot of people.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539465</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246480500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still use Yahoo! mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down.</p> </div><p>Heretic!...Troll!... get off my third favourite website!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Honestly, the only part of Yahoo that I personally cared about was <a href="http://www.jumpcut.com/" title="jumpcut.com">Jumpcut.</a> [jumpcut.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still use Yahoo !
mail for some functions as it 's UI beats Gmail hands down .
Heretic ! ...Troll ! ... get off my third favourite website !
; ) Honestly , the only part of Yahoo that I personally cared about was Jumpcut .
[ jumpcut.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still use Yahoo!
mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down.
Heretic!...Troll!... get off my third favourite website!
;)Honestly, the only part of Yahoo that I personally cared about was Jumpcut.
[jumpcut.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544851</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1246471320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use them kinda, as my ATT.net page is "powered by" Yahoo.. I originally had no interest in Yahoo because I always used Excite, but Excite had email problems for like 45 days. and they got all flakey updating their content.. So I started searching for another portal.. As I had DSL through AT&amp;T I figured I'd give it a try.. and it's turned out to be pretty good.. Not as customizable as Excite, but has the benefit in that I can just get my email through the web site which is handy with my dual booting.. Don't know if it will affect my ATT page, but recently read that there is a major change coming to Yahoo allowing much more customizing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use them kinda , as my ATT.net page is " powered by " Yahoo.. I originally had no interest in Yahoo because I always used Excite , but Excite had email problems for like 45 days .
and they got all flakey updating their content.. So I started searching for another portal.. As I had DSL through AT&amp;T I figured I 'd give it a try.. and it 's turned out to be pretty good.. Not as customizable as Excite , but has the benefit in that I can just get my email through the web site which is handy with my dual booting.. Do n't know if it will affect my ATT page , but recently read that there is a major change coming to Yahoo allowing much more customizing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use them kinda, as my ATT.net page is "powered by" Yahoo.. I originally had no interest in Yahoo because I always used Excite, but Excite had email problems for like 45 days.
and they got all flakey updating their content.. So I started searching for another portal.. As I had DSL through AT&amp;T I figured I'd give it a try.. and it's turned out to be pretty good.. Not as customizable as Excite, but has the benefit in that I can just get my email through the web site which is handy with my dual booting.. Don't know if it will affect my ATT page, but recently read that there is a major change coming to Yahoo allowing much more customizing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541263</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246457880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what I hate about Google - Gmail. It's a bloody nightmare. Label's suck, and the conversation-style replies are confusing.</p><p>Sure enough, Gmail helped shake-up the world of free webmail services, blah blah blah... But those c0cksucking labels are driving me nuts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what I hate about Google - Gmail .
It 's a bloody nightmare .
Label 's suck , and the conversation-style replies are confusing.Sure enough , Gmail helped shake-up the world of free webmail services , blah blah blah... But those c0cksucking labels are driving me nuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what I hate about Google - Gmail.
It's a bloody nightmare.
Label's suck, and the conversation-style replies are confusing.Sure enough, Gmail helped shake-up the world of free webmail services, blah blah blah... But those c0cksucking labels are driving me nuts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341</id>
	<title>Hot Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well with a roof like that, I guess at least they can say Yahoo isn't full of hot air.<br> <br>

But when you start getting power from the falls, you might be all washed up.
<br> <br>
Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week. Tip your Waitress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well with a roof like that , I guess at least they can say Yahoo is n't full of hot air .
But when you start getting power from the falls , you might be all washed up .
Thank you , thank you , I 'll be here all week .
Tip your Waitress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well with a roof like that, I guess at least they can say Yahoo isn't full of hot air.
But when you start getting power from the falls, you might be all washed up.
Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week.
Tip your Waitress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540453</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck you, sexist jackass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246450620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck you, you 14 year old Coward</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you , you 14 year old Coward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you, you 14 year old Coward</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538477</id>
	<title>Path dependency</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1246381800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a fan of Yahoo! but my Dad (born in 1960) has been using it as his primary e-mail and instant messaging service for years. It does everything he needs it to and he doesn't have the motivation to switch services. As far as I can tell the Yahoo! e-mail service has a comparable feature set to Gmail and Yahoo! messenger has all of the features of Google Talk (IE pop-up e-mail alerts, VOIP, messaging), except that it has been around for far longer.</p><p>Yahoo! isn't "in style" anymore and I was never a huge fan of it myself but for some people "if it ain't broke don't fix it" is enough of a reason not to switch service providers. I bet that Yahoo! will decline in popularity as the years go on and more and more of it's user base kicks the bucket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a fan of Yahoo !
but my Dad ( born in 1960 ) has been using it as his primary e-mail and instant messaging service for years .
It does everything he needs it to and he does n't have the motivation to switch services .
As far as I can tell the Yahoo !
e-mail service has a comparable feature set to Gmail and Yahoo !
messenger has all of the features of Google Talk ( IE pop-up e-mail alerts , VOIP , messaging ) , except that it has been around for far longer.Yahoo !
is n't " in style " anymore and I was never a huge fan of it myself but for some people " if it ai n't broke do n't fix it " is enough of a reason not to switch service providers .
I bet that Yahoo !
will decline in popularity as the years go on and more and more of it 's user base kicks the bucket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a fan of Yahoo!
but my Dad (born in 1960) has been using it as his primary e-mail and instant messaging service for years.
It does everything he needs it to and he doesn't have the motivation to switch services.
As far as I can tell the Yahoo!
e-mail service has a comparable feature set to Gmail and Yahoo!
messenger has all of the features of Google Talk (IE pop-up e-mail alerts, VOIP, messaging), except that it has been around for far longer.Yahoo!
isn't "in style" anymore and I was never a huge fan of it myself but for some people "if it ain't broke don't fix it" is enough of a reason not to switch service providers.
I bet that Yahoo!
will decline in popularity as the years go on and more and more of it's user base kicks the bucket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538523</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246382400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're a web-based technology portfolio company.  One of the problems with portfolio companies is that there is little incentive for engineers and product marketers to create something big.... senior management is always off looking for more startups to buy, and everyone seems to have ADD, wearing hip clothes and giving interviews to rags like Wired, Fast Company and Salon.  If you spent three years doing some meticulous engineering and design work at one of these places... well, chances are you wouldn't have the opportunity to do that.  Your project would be cancelled and you'd be re-org'd or laid off long before you got that far, pushed aside by the latest acquisition in the portfolio.</p><p>Remember those awful "technology incubators" during the dot com era, like Idealab?  Where are they now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're a web-based technology portfolio company .
One of the problems with portfolio companies is that there is little incentive for engineers and product marketers to create something big.... senior management is always off looking for more startups to buy , and everyone seems to have ADD , wearing hip clothes and giving interviews to rags like Wired , Fast Company and Salon .
If you spent three years doing some meticulous engineering and design work at one of these places... well , chances are you would n't have the opportunity to do that .
Your project would be cancelled and you 'd be re-org 'd or laid off long before you got that far , pushed aside by the latest acquisition in the portfolio.Remember those awful " technology incubators " during the dot com era , like Idealab ?
Where are they now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're a web-based technology portfolio company.
One of the problems with portfolio companies is that there is little incentive for engineers and product marketers to create something big.... senior management is always off looking for more startups to buy, and everyone seems to have ADD, wearing hip clothes and giving interviews to rags like Wired, Fast Company and Salon.
If you spent three years doing some meticulous engineering and design work at one of these places... well, chances are you wouldn't have the opportunity to do that.
Your project would be cancelled and you'd be re-org'd or laid off long before you got that far, pushed aside by the latest acquisition in the portfolio.Remember those awful "technology incubators" during the dot com era, like Idealab?
Where are they now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28546811</id>
	<title>Filtering</title>
	<author>vanyel</author>
	<datestamp>1246477200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they don't have really good filters on those louvers, it'll *really* look like a chicken coop inside...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do n't have really good filters on those louvers , it 'll * really * look like a chicken coop inside.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they don't have really good filters on those louvers, it'll *really* look like a chicken coop inside...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538513</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1246382280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone still using them?</p></div><p>I still have a Yahoo mail account catching spam for me. Does that count?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone still using them ? I still have a Yahoo mail account catching spam for me .
Does that count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone still using them?I still have a Yahoo mail account catching spam for me.
Does that count?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544925</id>
	<title>Re:um...grats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246471620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Niagara Power project does not run at a constant 100\% capacity.  Adding a new customer means increasing utilization, not dropping an existing customer.</p><p>If you're ever in Western NY, check out the Power Vista.</p><p>http://www.nypa.gov/vc/niagara.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Niagara Power project does not run at a constant 100 \ % capacity .
Adding a new customer means increasing utilization , not dropping an existing customer.If you 're ever in Western NY , check out the Power Vista.http : //www.nypa.gov/vc/niagara.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Niagara Power project does not run at a constant 100\% capacity.
Adding a new customer means increasing utilization, not dropping an existing customer.If you're ever in Western NY, check out the Power Vista.http://www.nypa.gov/vc/niagara.htm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28550457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28551837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_2156249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538803
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544925
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545713
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28543569
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542959
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28550457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28539529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28544821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28542141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538519
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538393
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28540453
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28545251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28541627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28551837
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_2156249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_2156249.28538789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
