<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_30_175250</id>
	<title>China Delays "Green Dam" Internet Filter</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1246384860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.sailorspork.org/" rel="nofollow">SailorSpork</a> sends in a BBC report that "<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8126832.stm">China is delaying a controversial plan</a> requiring all new computers sold in the country to be equipped with an Internet filtering software, state media says. The filter, called Green Dam Youth Escort, was to have been required from Wednesday, but the ministry of industry said computer makers needed more time." The submitter adds: <i>"Except of course for Sony, who as reported earlier lacked the moral fiber to hold off installing the spyware, which reportedly is <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/06/11/1347219/Chinese-Govt-Spyware-Puts-Computers-At-Risk"> ridden with security holes</a> and <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/16/1422235/Chinas-Green-Dam-No-Longer-Compulsory-May-Have-Lifted-Code">uses stolen code</a>. Sony actually managed to ship <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/30/0128231/Sony-Begins-Shipping-PCs-With-Green-Dam-In-China">ahead of the schedule.</a>"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>SailorSpork sends in a BBC report that " China is delaying a controversial plan requiring all new computers sold in the country to be equipped with an Internet filtering software , state media says .
The filter , called Green Dam Youth Escort , was to have been required from Wednesday , but the ministry of industry said computer makers needed more time .
" The submitter adds : " Except of course for Sony , who as reported earlier lacked the moral fiber to hold off installing the spyware , which reportedly is ridden with security holes and uses stolen code .
Sony actually managed to ship ahead of the schedule .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SailorSpork sends in a BBC report that "China is delaying a controversial plan requiring all new computers sold in the country to be equipped with an Internet filtering software, state media says.
The filter, called Green Dam Youth Escort, was to have been required from Wednesday, but the ministry of industry said computer makers needed more time.
" The submitter adds: "Except of course for Sony, who as reported earlier lacked the moral fiber to hold off installing the spyware, which reportedly is  ridden with security holes and uses stolen code.
Sony actually managed to ship ahead of the schedule.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155</id>
	<title>Transcends "Filter" Status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246388880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>The filter</b>, called Green Dam Youth Escort</p></div><p>Filters are censorship.  But, if implemented correctly, they're one of the most innocuous forms of censorship.  I was initially lead to believe that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green\_Dam\_Youth\_Escort" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Green Dam Youth Escort</a> [wikipedia.org] was community driven:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In 2008, under instructions from political leaders, the MIIT implemented a "community-oriented green open Internet filtering software project" with the support of the Central Civilisation Office and the Ministry of Finance. Its aim was to build a "green, healthy network environment, to protect the healthy growth of young people".<br> <br>

Trials commenced in Zhengzhou, Nanjing, Lanzhou, and Xi'an in October 2008 after the ministry negotiated with the software suppliers and 50 web portals to make the software publicly available without charge, and more than 2,000 installations took place. Trials rolled out to 10 more cities, including Chengdu, Shenyang, Harbin, and Qingdao. The ministry claimed that by December 2008, the software had been downloaded more than 100,000 times, and 3 million times since the end of March 2009. Five leading PC vendors in mainland China, Founder, Lenovo, Tongfang, Great Wall and HEDY, also participated in trial installations.</p></div><p>Ok, no biggie.  We've got Spamhaus, right?  That's a community censorship project against something we don't want--spam!  And I love it.  But Green Dam Youth Escort seems to be passing the boundaries of what a "filter" does:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>According to <a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/18096/" title="theepochtimes.com" rel="nofollow">the Epoch Times</a> [theepochtimes.com], hackers in China had accessed the keyword library and administrative codes, revealing only 2,700 keywords relating to pornography, and over <b>6,500 politically sensitive keywords which included '4 June', 'Tibet' and 'Falun Gong'</b>. Chinese users of the software have apparently found that it <b>injects a DLL file into Internet Explorer that prohibits the usage of FreeGate, one of the programs commonly used to bypass the Golden Shield Project</b>.</p></div><p>Alright, swapping out a dynamically linked library is transcending a "filter"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or any label we've invented so far.  I must have missed the reports on that but that's pretty shocking to me.  If I had to dub this anything it'd be 1984ware.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The filter , called Green Dam Youth EscortFilters are censorship .
But , if implemented correctly , they 're one of the most innocuous forms of censorship .
I was initially lead to believe that Green Dam Youth Escort [ wikipedia.org ] was community driven : In 2008 , under instructions from political leaders , the MIIT implemented a " community-oriented green open Internet filtering software project " with the support of the Central Civilisation Office and the Ministry of Finance .
Its aim was to build a " green , healthy network environment , to protect the healthy growth of young people " .
Trials commenced in Zhengzhou , Nanjing , Lanzhou , and Xi'an in October 2008 after the ministry negotiated with the software suppliers and 50 web portals to make the software publicly available without charge , and more than 2,000 installations took place .
Trials rolled out to 10 more cities , including Chengdu , Shenyang , Harbin , and Qingdao .
The ministry claimed that by December 2008 , the software had been downloaded more than 100,000 times , and 3 million times since the end of March 2009 .
Five leading PC vendors in mainland China , Founder , Lenovo , Tongfang , Great Wall and HEDY , also participated in trial installations.Ok , no biggie .
We 've got Spamhaus , right ?
That 's a community censorship project against something we do n't want--spam !
And I love it .
But Green Dam Youth Escort seems to be passing the boundaries of what a " filter " does : According to the Epoch Times [ theepochtimes.com ] , hackers in China had accessed the keyword library and administrative codes , revealing only 2,700 keywords relating to pornography , and over 6,500 politically sensitive keywords which included '4 June ' , 'Tibet ' and 'Falun Gong' .
Chinese users of the software have apparently found that it injects a DLL file into Internet Explorer that prohibits the usage of FreeGate , one of the programs commonly used to bypass the Golden Shield Project.Alright , swapping out a dynamically linked library is transcending a " filter " ... or any label we 've invented so far .
I must have missed the reports on that but that 's pretty shocking to me .
If I had to dub this anything it 'd be 1984ware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The filter, called Green Dam Youth EscortFilters are censorship.
But, if implemented correctly, they're one of the most innocuous forms of censorship.
I was initially lead to believe that Green Dam Youth Escort [wikipedia.org] was community driven:In 2008, under instructions from political leaders, the MIIT implemented a "community-oriented green open Internet filtering software project" with the support of the Central Civilisation Office and the Ministry of Finance.
Its aim was to build a "green, healthy network environment, to protect the healthy growth of young people".
Trials commenced in Zhengzhou, Nanjing, Lanzhou, and Xi'an in October 2008 after the ministry negotiated with the software suppliers and 50 web portals to make the software publicly available without charge, and more than 2,000 installations took place.
Trials rolled out to 10 more cities, including Chengdu, Shenyang, Harbin, and Qingdao.
The ministry claimed that by December 2008, the software had been downloaded more than 100,000 times, and 3 million times since the end of March 2009.
Five leading PC vendors in mainland China, Founder, Lenovo, Tongfang, Great Wall and HEDY, also participated in trial installations.Ok, no biggie.
We've got Spamhaus, right?
That's a community censorship project against something we don't want--spam!
And I love it.
But Green Dam Youth Escort seems to be passing the boundaries of what a "filter" does:According to the Epoch Times [theepochtimes.com], hackers in China had accessed the keyword library and administrative codes, revealing only 2,700 keywords relating to pornography, and over 6,500 politically sensitive keywords which included '4 June', 'Tibet' and 'Falun Gong'.
Chinese users of the software have apparently found that it injects a DLL file into Internet Explorer that prohibits the usage of FreeGate, one of the programs commonly used to bypass the Golden Shield Project.Alright, swapping out a dynamically linked library is transcending a "filter" ... or any label we've invented so far.
I must have missed the reports on that but that's pretty shocking to me.
If I had to dub this anything it'd be 1984ware.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533853</id>
	<title>Re:Transcends "Filter" Status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246352520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Epoch Time is an unofficial mouthpiece for Falun Gong and is wildly sensationalist (at best). I've seen stories claiming that the Chinese Communist Party is harvesting organs from live Falun Gong members and one that said a Chinese General was advocating nuking the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Epoch Time is an unofficial mouthpiece for Falun Gong and is wildly sensationalist ( at best ) .
I 've seen stories claiming that the Chinese Communist Party is harvesting organs from live Falun Gong members and one that said a Chinese General was advocating nuking the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Epoch Time is an unofficial mouthpiece for Falun Gong and is wildly sensationalist (at best).
I've seen stories claiming that the Chinese Communist Party is harvesting organs from live Falun Gong members and one that said a Chinese General was advocating nuking the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</id>
	<title>A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Bonker</author>
	<datestamp>1246388940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been Sony-Free since about 2004. I purchase no products, services, or media that allows Sony to profit.</p><p>It's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days. However, I've made a game out of it, carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they don't contain any Sony parts or licenses.</p><p>There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony. Why not join me over this one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been Sony-Free since about 2004 .
I purchase no products , services , or media that allows Sony to profit.It 's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days .
However , I 've made a game out of it , carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they do n't contain any Sony parts or licenses.There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony .
Why not join me over this one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been Sony-Free since about 2004.
I purchase no products, services, or media that allows Sony to profit.It's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days.
However, I've made a game out of it, carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they don't contain any Sony parts or licenses.There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony.
Why not join me over this one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532167</id>
	<title>Green dam won't ever ship in its current form</title>
	<author>sunjay</author>
	<datestamp>1246388880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Green dam won't ship until it goes through a major change. Even the Chinese government would be embarrassed to relese such an unpopular piece of software. Even more so after it was discovered that a good chunk of the code was stolen</htmltext>
<tokenext>Green dam wo n't ship until it goes through a major change .
Even the Chinese government would be embarrassed to relese such an unpopular piece of software .
Even more so after it was discovered that a good chunk of the code was stolen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Green dam won't ship until it goes through a major change.
Even the Chinese government would be embarrassed to relese such an unpopular piece of software.
Even more so after it was discovered that a good chunk of the code was stolen</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533009</id>
	<title>Any Chinese here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246392000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am curious - I often hear that Chinese projects have some name that seems utterly random to me, but probably has some connotations or meaning to them.</p><p>Does "Green Dam" have a different meaning, or carry some form of meaning beyond its name?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am curious - I often hear that Chinese projects have some name that seems utterly random to me , but probably has some connotations or meaning to them.Does " Green Dam " have a different meaning , or carry some form of meaning beyond its name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am curious - I often hear that Chinese projects have some name that seems utterly random to me, but probably has some connotations or meaning to them.Does "Green Dam" have a different meaning, or carry some form of meaning beyond its name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532143</id>
	<title>Sony should be sued for copyright infringement</title>
	<author>kubitus</author>
	<datestamp>1246388820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>where are Sony Entertainment Industry Copyright lawyers?

as obviously stolen code is in the green dam software, Sony should be responsible for providing it.<p>
A direct violation of Copyright.</p><p>
Where are Sony's Copyright lawers this time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where are Sony Entertainment Industry Copyright lawyers ?
as obviously stolen code is in the green dam software , Sony should be responsible for providing it .
A direct violation of Copyright .
Where are Sony 's Copyright lawers this time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where are Sony Entertainment Industry Copyright lawyers?
as obviously stolen code is in the green dam software, Sony should be responsible for providing it.
A direct violation of Copyright.
Where are Sony's Copyright lawers this time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28538499</id>
	<title>The next step...</title>
	<author>JoCat</author>
	<datestamp>1246382040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Green Dam is the alleged predecessor to a larger and more invasive firewall nicknamed, 'God Damn.'"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Green Dam is the alleged predecessor to a larger and more invasive firewall nicknamed , 'God Damn .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Green Dam is the alleged predecessor to a larger and more invasive firewall nicknamed, 'God Damn.
'"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532867</id>
	<title>Re:I think the "vulnerabilities" were intentional.</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1246391460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with that idea is that it cuts both ways.  Someone could create a virus that uses those back doors to do anything the like.  Normally that would be steal people's information, display pop-up ads, harass people into buying fake anti-virus software, etc.  But there's nothing preventing a virus from (for example) routing all internet traffic through a proxy (bypassing both Green Dam and the great firewall), playing a video about Tiananmen square, display information about the private lives of the government leadership, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with that idea is that it cuts both ways .
Someone could create a virus that uses those back doors to do anything the like .
Normally that would be steal people 's information , display pop-up ads , harass people into buying fake anti-virus software , etc .
But there 's nothing preventing a virus from ( for example ) routing all internet traffic through a proxy ( bypassing both Green Dam and the great firewall ) , playing a video about Tiananmen square , display information about the private lives of the government leadership , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with that idea is that it cuts both ways.
Someone could create a virus that uses those back doors to do anything the like.
Normally that would be steal people's information, display pop-up ads, harass people into buying fake anti-virus software, etc.
But there's nothing preventing a virus from (for example) routing all internet traffic through a proxy (bypassing both Green Dam and the great firewall), playing a video about Tiananmen square, display information about the private lives of the government leadership, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533481</id>
	<title>Amusing bedfellows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246394160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have any of you ever bought a computer or been to China? When you buy a comp you go to a store where a vendor asks you what programs pirated or otherwise you want installed on your PC, then you hand over the cash and you get your computer with a pirated WinXP or Vista. That's how the majority buy their PCs. Hence why the people in China don't see "Green Dam" as an issue because the transaction completely side steps the software. In other words enforcing the installation of "Green Dam" is extremly hard.</p><p>The real issue people are pissed about here is the collusion of business and government, ie. why the government contracted an unknown company to make a software using $6 million dollars worth of public money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have any of you ever bought a computer or been to China ?
When you buy a comp you go to a store where a vendor asks you what programs pirated or otherwise you want installed on your PC , then you hand over the cash and you get your computer with a pirated WinXP or Vista .
That 's how the majority buy their PCs .
Hence why the people in China do n't see " Green Dam " as an issue because the transaction completely side steps the software .
In other words enforcing the installation of " Green Dam " is extremly hard.The real issue people are pissed about here is the collusion of business and government , ie .
why the government contracted an unknown company to make a software using $ 6 million dollars worth of public money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have any of you ever bought a computer or been to China?
When you buy a comp you go to a store where a vendor asks you what programs pirated or otherwise you want installed on your PC, then you hand over the cash and you get your computer with a pirated WinXP or Vista.
That's how the majority buy their PCs.
Hence why the people in China don't see "Green Dam" as an issue because the transaction completely side steps the software.
In other words enforcing the installation of "Green Dam" is extremly hard.The real issue people are pissed about here is the collusion of business and government, ie.
why the government contracted an unknown company to make a software using $6 million dollars worth of public money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28538325</id>
	<title>Re:Transcends "Filter" Status</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1246380060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The distinction between pornography and political dissent is meaningless. Both corrupt the soul.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The distinction between pornography and political dissent is meaningless .
Both corrupt the soul .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The distinction between pornography and political dissent is meaningless.
Both corrupt the soul.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532557</id>
	<title>I think the "vulnerabilities" were intentional.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246390260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, call it a crazy theory and call me cynical for thinking that Chinese government wants even more control over the citizens, but the exploit found allowed an attacker to remotely control any system running the software. My guess the coders need more time to "fix" that issue and implement another hole for the government to take even more control.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , call it a crazy theory and call me cynical for thinking that Chinese government wants even more control over the citizens , but the exploit found allowed an attacker to remotely control any system running the software .
My guess the coders need more time to " fix " that issue and implement another hole for the government to take even more control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, call it a crazy theory and call me cynical for thinking that Chinese government wants even more control over the citizens, but the exploit found allowed an attacker to remotely control any system running the software.
My guess the coders need more time to "fix" that issue and implement another hole for the government to take even more control.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532623</id>
	<title>Moral fiber my ass</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1246390500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You want to sell computers in China and CCP tells you need to put that on, you put that on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You want to sell computers in China and CCP tells you need to put that on , you put that on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want to sell computers in China and CCP tells you need to put that on, you put that on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532701</id>
	<title>Corporations...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246390740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Corporations have no moral values. I hope someday people will be understand that the behavior of a corporation is tied to the moral values of the board of directors/people to take decisions, and I want the law to be enforced on them instead of just applying fines to the company</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Corporations have no moral values .
I hope someday people will be understand that the behavior of a corporation is tied to the moral values of the board of directors/people to take decisions , and I want the law to be enforced on them instead of just applying fines to the company</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Corporations have no moral values.
I hope someday people will be understand that the behavior of a corporation is tied to the moral values of the board of directors/people to take decisions, and I want the law to be enforced on them instead of just applying fines to the company</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533715</id>
	<title>Re:"Ridden"</title>
	<author>Chirs</author>
	<datestamp>1246395180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That one is actually a bit subtle though.  In the context, it should have been "riddled with security holes" however it would have been correct to say "security hole ridden".  (The latter using the alternate definition of "afflicted or affected by the thing specified".)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That one is actually a bit subtle though .
In the context , it should have been " riddled with security holes " however it would have been correct to say " security hole ridden " .
( The latter using the alternate definition of " afflicted or affected by the thing specified " .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That one is actually a bit subtle though.
In the context, it should have been "riddled with security holes" however it would have been correct to say "security hole ridden".
(The latter using the alternate definition of "afflicted or affected by the thing specified".
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533021</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532337</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246389540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FWIW, they didn't INSTALL it but put it on the computer for the end user to install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW , they did n't INSTALL it but put it on the computer for the end user to install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW, they didn't INSTALL it but put it on the computer for the end user to install.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532767</id>
	<title>"Except of course for Sony..."</title>
	<author>AdetheRare</author>
	<datestamp>1246391040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet they still pre-installed all the shitty AOL components on them though...<p>
I'd rather have a communist dictatorship robbing me of my privacy tbh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet they still pre-installed all the shitty AOL components on them though.. . I 'd rather have a communist dictatorship robbing me of my privacy tbh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet they still pre-installed all the shitty AOL components on them though...
I'd rather have a communist dictatorship robbing me of my privacy tbh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532313</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Laebshade</author>
	<datestamp>1246389480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think anything I own is Sony-made, and it was never really a conscious choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anything I own is Sony-made , and it was never really a conscious choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anything I own is Sony-made, and it was never really a conscious choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532043</id>
	<title>Dear Xiam:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246388520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Green Dam",<br>
Total sham.<br>
Real security:<br>
Green eggs and ham.<br>
<b>Burma Shave</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Green Dam " , Total sham .
Real security : Green eggs and ham .
Burma Shave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Green Dam",
Total sham.
Real security:
Green eggs and ham.
Burma Shave</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532403</id>
	<title>Blame Dick Cheney</title>
	<author>cryfreedomlove</author>
	<datestamp>1246389720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Green Dam<br>Some small dams are made of wood<br>Wet wood can turn green<br>You could call the boards in this Green Dam 'Water Boards'<br>Dick Cheney loves Water Boarding<br>Coincidence?  I think not<br> <br>I blame Dick Cheney for this fiasco.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Green DamSome small dams are made of woodWet wood can turn greenYou could call the boards in this Green Dam 'Water Boards'Dick Cheney loves Water BoardingCoincidence ?
I think not I blame Dick Cheney for this fiasco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Green DamSome small dams are made of woodWet wood can turn greenYou could call the boards in this Green Dam 'Water Boards'Dick Cheney loves Water BoardingCoincidence?
I think not I blame Dick Cheney for this fiasco.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532499</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246390080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been Sony-Free since about 2004. I purchase no products, services, or media that allows Sony to profit.</p><p>It's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days. However, I've made a game out of it, carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they don't contain any Sony parts or licenses.</p><p>There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony. Why not join me over this one?</p></div><p>Dude, That is too much effort and I am way too lazy for that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been Sony-Free since about 2004 .
I purchase no products , services , or media that allows Sony to profit.It 's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days .
However , I 've made a game out of it , carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they do n't contain any Sony parts or licenses.There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony .
Why not join me over this one ? Dude , That is too much effort and I am way too lazy for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been Sony-Free since about 2004.
I purchase no products, services, or media that allows Sony to profit.It's a pain in the ass since Sony owns patents and rights on a huge amount of computer hardware that people take for granted these days.
However, I've made a game out of it, carefully researching all my purchases beforehand to make sure they don't contain any Sony parts or licenses.There are lots of reasons to boycott Sony.
Why not join me over this one?Dude, That is too much effort and I am way too lazy for that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532439</id>
	<title>As previously stated: useless anyway.</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1246389840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if they mandate that the software somehow be made "uninstallable", determined people will hack around it or hack it out completely in no time anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if they mandate that the software somehow be made " uninstallable " , determined people will hack around it or hack it out completely in no time anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if they mandate that the software somehow be made "uninstallable", determined people will hack around it or hack it out completely in no time anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532037</id>
	<title>Linux is an OS for script kiddies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246388520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux is an OS for a bunch of anti-Microsoft script kiddies who are too stupid to use a real Unix OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is an OS for a bunch of anti-Microsoft script kiddies who are too stupid to use a real Unix OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is an OS for a bunch of anti-Microsoft script kiddies who are too stupid to use a real Unix OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535703</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1246361220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be great if you created a web page with a list of products/services to avoid.</p><p>Although, who am I kidding, I'll probably keep using Sony Vegas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be great if you created a web page with a list of products/services to avoid.Although , who am I kidding , I 'll probably keep using Sony Vegas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be great if you created a web page with a list of products/services to avoid.Although, who am I kidding, I'll probably keep using Sony Vegas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533213</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Mathonwy</author>
	<datestamp>1246392900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hear hear!</p><p>I've been Sony free since around 2000, when the DMCA convinced me (a programmer) that Sony was actively attacking my beliefs.  (Code is free speech, etc.)</p><p>Not that any of their later debacles (CD rootkits, etc) made me like them much more.</p><p>So yeah.  I second that!  Screw Sony, if you don't like what they're doing, vote with your wallet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hear hear ! I 've been Sony free since around 2000 , when the DMCA convinced me ( a programmer ) that Sony was actively attacking my beliefs .
( Code is free speech , etc .
) Not that any of their later debacles ( CD rootkits , etc ) made me like them much more.So yeah .
I second that !
Screw Sony , if you do n't like what they 're doing , vote with your wallet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hear hear!I've been Sony free since around 2000, when the DMCA convinced me (a programmer) that Sony was actively attacking my beliefs.
(Code is free speech, etc.
)Not that any of their later debacles (CD rootkits, etc) made me like them much more.So yeah.
I second that!
Screw Sony, if you don't like what they're doing, vote with your wallet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535675</id>
	<title>Re:Transcends "Filter" Status</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1246361160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You got me at "hackers in China."</p><p>I expect the next generation of encrypted distributed or even steganography-based proxy software to come from the people who really really need it.</p><p>Creativity thrives on restriction. Exciting times!</p><p>The Chinese government is not the only one trying to censor the internet, you know. It's the first one implementing it on a such massive scale.</p><p>Your own government is watching and learning.</p><p>Have a nice day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got me at " hackers in China .
" I expect the next generation of encrypted distributed or even steganography-based proxy software to come from the people who really really need it.Creativity thrives on restriction .
Exciting times ! The Chinese government is not the only one trying to censor the internet , you know .
It 's the first one implementing it on a such massive scale.Your own government is watching and learning.Have a nice day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got me at "hackers in China.
"I expect the next generation of encrypted distributed or even steganography-based proxy software to come from the people who really really need it.Creativity thrives on restriction.
Exciting times!The Chinese government is not the only one trying to censor the internet, you know.
It's the first one implementing it on a such massive scale.Your own government is watching and learning.Have a nice day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532523</id>
	<title>Nothing new about Sony shipping harmful software</title>
	<author>DamnStupidElf</author>
	<datestamp>1246390200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone remember the CD rootkits?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember the CD rootkits ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember the CD rootkits?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533781</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246395420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the only problem is Sony actually owns the rights to boycotting Sony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the only problem is Sony actually owns the rights to boycotting Sony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the only problem is Sony actually owns the rights to boycotting Sony.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533825</id>
	<title>Bloodsport anyone?</title>
	<author>binaryseraph</author>
	<datestamp>1246352400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They really should call it the Van Dam filter. Because really, this is like the Dim Muk to computing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They really should call it the Van Dam filter .
Because really , this is like the Dim Muk to computing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They really should call it the Van Dam filter.
Because really, this is like the Dim Muk to computing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535623</id>
	<title>Re:Good work Sony</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1246360860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it fits pretty well under Circus in "Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it fits pretty well under Circus in " Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it fits pretty well under Circus in "Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532325</id>
	<title>At least it's enviromentally friendly</title>
	<author>basementman</author>
	<datestamp>1246389480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and involves underage hookers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and involves underage hookers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and involves underage hookers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533001</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Xiam:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246391940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually they go by Myanmar now, and they BORDER china, they're not part of china.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually they go by Myanmar now , and they BORDER china , they 're not part of china .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually they go by Myanmar now, and they BORDER china, they're not part of china.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28536925</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246368120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I only buy USED Sony products myself, I still get a PSP but Sony doesn't see additional money from it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I only buy USED Sony products myself , I still get a PSP but Sony does n't see additional money from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only buy USED Sony products myself, I still get a PSP but Sony doesn't see additional money from it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535701</id>
	<title>haha, in US an escort is something different</title>
	<author>jsepeta</author>
	<datestamp>1246361220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not sure i'd be pushing for my kids to have an escort... besides they're harder to find with craigslist now lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not sure i 'd be pushing for my kids to have an escort... besides they 're harder to find with craigslist now lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not sure i'd be pushing for my kids to have an escort... besides they're harder to find with craigslist now lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532381</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246389660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sound like a miserable bastard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like a miserable bastard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like a miserable bastard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539307</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Samah</author>
	<datestamp>1246391760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The shutdown of <a href="http://lik-sang.com/" title="lik-sang.com">Lik-Sang</a> [lik-sang.com] was the kicker for me.  It put Sony on the "diaf list" along with Ubisoft and EA.  Ubisoft for discontinuing Dark Messiah support, and EA for disbanding Origin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The shutdown of Lik-Sang [ lik-sang.com ] was the kicker for me .
It put Sony on the " diaf list " along with Ubisoft and EA .
Ubisoft for discontinuing Dark Messiah support , and EA for disbanding Origin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The shutdown of Lik-Sang [lik-sang.com] was the kicker for me.
It put Sony on the "diaf list" along with Ubisoft and EA.
Ubisoft for discontinuing Dark Messiah support, and EA for disbanding Origin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28547481</id>
	<title>Re:Good work Sony</title>
	<author>BOFHelsinki</author>
	<datestamp>1246479480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> Well, Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time. Too bad God of War 3 wasn't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people. </i> <br> <br>

Please don't give Sony Marketing any ideas... "God of War 3, Kim Jong-un Special Evil Regime Edition!" <br> <br>

The sad part is, I'd probably buy it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time .
Too bad God of War 3 was n't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people .
Please do n't give Sony Marketing any ideas... " God of War 3 , Kim Jong-un Special Evil Regime Edition !
" The sad part is , I 'd probably buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Well, Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time.
Too bad God of War 3 wasn't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people.
Please don't give Sony Marketing any ideas... "God of War 3, Kim Jong-un Special Evil Regime Edition!
"  

The sad part is, I'd probably buy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532333</id>
	<title>Old news + Sony Slam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246389540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this is old hat plus a slam on Sony... so it makes slash because it's a slam on Sony?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is old hat plus a slam on Sony... so it makes slash because it 's a slam on Sony ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is old hat plus a slam on Sony... so it makes slash because it's a slam on Sony?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532939</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Piranhaa</author>
	<datestamp>1246391700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dislike Sony too and I try to stay clear of them as much as possible. However, when you compare the price of the Amazon Kindle to the Sony eReader<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... It's really a great bargain (even though it's still 2-300 dollars). Sure still pricey, but it's a relatively new technology and you should expect to pay a little more.</p><p>My brother owns a PS3 for gaming, because his MICROSOFT XBox360 gave him the RROD and he didn't want to mess around with multiple consoles - got it replaced with a PS3 a while back and has had NO issues.</p><p>So while it sometimes make sense to exclude Sony from the picture, it's not always the best way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dislike Sony too and I try to stay clear of them as much as possible .
However , when you compare the price of the Amazon Kindle to the Sony eReader ... It 's really a great bargain ( even though it 's still 2-300 dollars ) .
Sure still pricey , but it 's a relatively new technology and you should expect to pay a little more.My brother owns a PS3 for gaming , because his MICROSOFT XBox360 gave him the RROD and he did n't want to mess around with multiple consoles - got it replaced with a PS3 a while back and has had NO issues.So while it sometimes make sense to exclude Sony from the picture , it 's not always the best way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dislike Sony too and I try to stay clear of them as much as possible.
However, when you compare the price of the Amazon Kindle to the Sony eReader ... It's really a great bargain (even though it's still 2-300 dollars).
Sure still pricey, but it's a relatively new technology and you should expect to pay a little more.My brother owns a PS3 for gaming, because his MICROSOFT XBox360 gave him the RROD and he didn't want to mess around with multiple consoles - got it replaced with a PS3 a while back and has had NO issues.So while it sometimes make sense to exclude Sony from the picture, it's not always the best way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532707</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>Kamokazi</author>
	<datestamp>1246390740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I loathe Sony as much as the next informed geek, but I just limit it to not buying anything with a Sony name.</p><p>Think of it this way...you're causing yourself much more trouble by doing all that research than you are causing Sony by not buying their crap.  You're effectively letting Sony make your life more difficult.  They don't deserve that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I loathe Sony as much as the next informed geek , but I just limit it to not buying anything with a Sony name.Think of it this way...you 're causing yourself much more trouble by doing all that research than you are causing Sony by not buying their crap .
You 're effectively letting Sony make your life more difficult .
They do n't deserve that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loathe Sony as much as the next informed geek, but I just limit it to not buying anything with a Sony name.Think of it this way...you're causing yourself much more trouble by doing all that research than you are causing Sony by not buying their crap.
You're effectively letting Sony make your life more difficult.
They don't deserve that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533021</id>
	<title>"Ridden"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246392060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I'm thinking of starting a fund to raise money and get Slashdot a dictionary. Who's in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 'm thinking of starting a fund to raise money and get Slashdot a dictionary .
Who 's in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I'm thinking of starting a fund to raise money and get Slashdot a dictionary.
Who's in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539549</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1246481880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been Sony-Free since about 1985. I did own a couple of early walkmen and other devices of the time and they all failed within 2 days to 2 weeks. And what utterly pissed me off is that they always refused to repair/replace them with lame excuse like 'dropped', which was just plain bullshit. I've been doing them great dispublicity with great local success ever since.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been Sony-Free since about 1985 .
I did own a couple of early walkmen and other devices of the time and they all failed within 2 days to 2 weeks .
And what utterly pissed me off is that they always refused to repair/replace them with lame excuse like 'dropped ' , which was just plain bullshit .
I 've been doing them great dispublicity with great local success ever since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been Sony-Free since about 1985.
I did own a couple of early walkmen and other devices of the time and they all failed within 2 days to 2 weeks.
And what utterly pissed me off is that they always refused to repair/replace them with lame excuse like 'dropped', which was just plain bullshit.
I've been doing them great dispublicity with great local success ever since.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533743</id>
	<title>Re:A Sony-free life is hard, but not undoable.</title>
	<author>HappyEngineer</author>
	<datestamp>1246395300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like others I just boycott anything with a Sony name. This is particularly easy when it comes to consumer electronics because Sony products almost always use proprietary memory solutions which make the total cost (as opposed to the sticker price) of the product higher.<br><br>If a movie has anything to do with Sony then I just always buy it used even if I have to wait for a while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like others I just boycott anything with a Sony name .
This is particularly easy when it comes to consumer electronics because Sony products almost always use proprietary memory solutions which make the total cost ( as opposed to the sticker price ) of the product higher.If a movie has anything to do with Sony then I just always buy it used even if I have to wait for a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like others I just boycott anything with a Sony name.
This is particularly easy when it comes to consumer electronics because Sony products almost always use proprietary memory solutions which make the total cost (as opposed to the sticker price) of the product higher.If a movie has anything to do with Sony then I just always buy it used even if I have to wait for a while.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532239</id>
	<title>Re:Good work Sony</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1246389180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the reason for the delay is that Sony probably fucked up and they have to un-fuck it up.  I'd suggest they start searching for the same rootkit they installed on people's PCs a year or so ago...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the reason for the delay is that Sony probably fucked up and they have to un-fuck it up .
I 'd suggest they start searching for the same rootkit they installed on people 's PCs a year or so ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the reason for the delay is that Sony probably fucked up and they have to un-fuck it up.
I'd suggest they start searching for the same rootkit they installed on people's PCs a year or so ago...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532543</id>
	<title>China Does . . .</title>
	<author>TinFoilMan</author>
	<datestamp>1246390200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as China sees fit and no amount of anything will move them from that position.</p><p>So . . . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as China sees fit and no amount of anything will move them from that position.So .
. .
.</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as China sees fit and no amount of anything will move them from that position.So .
. .
.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535117</id>
	<title>I make an exception for Sony DVD blanks.</title>
	<author>HornWumpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246358160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
But only when they are being loss leadered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But only when they are being loss leadered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
But only when they are being loss leadered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532759</id>
	<title>NOT installed</title>
	<author>NivekEnterprises</author>
	<datestamp>1246390980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to all reports that I've read Sony did not install the program, merely placed the executable on the computer to meet the governments requirements. Sounds like a smart compromise to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to all reports that I 've read Sony did not install the program , merely placed the executable on the computer to meet the governments requirements .
Sounds like a smart compromise to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to all reports that I've read Sony did not install the program, merely placed the executable on the computer to meet the governments requirements.
Sounds like a smart compromise to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28537903</id>
	<title>Re:Moral fiber my ass</title>
	<author>bhtooefr</author>
	<datestamp>1246375920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you just don't sell computers in China. But, as has been mentioned, CCP said that they didn't need to put that on yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you just do n't sell computers in China .
But , as has been mentioned , CCP said that they did n't need to put that on yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you just don't sell computers in China.
But, as has been mentioned, CCP said that they didn't need to put that on yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532623</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28540123</id>
	<title>Re:I think the "vulnerabilities" were intentional.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246445880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty easy to make the backdoor only accept instructions signed by a private key.</p><p>Sure, you can hack the executable and obtain the public key, but realistically that doesn't get you any further towards being able to create packets signed with the private key.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty easy to make the backdoor only accept instructions signed by a private key.Sure , you can hack the executable and obtain the public key , but realistically that does n't get you any further towards being able to create packets signed with the private key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty easy to make the backdoor only accept instructions signed by a private key.Sure, you can hack the executable and obtain the public key, but realistically that doesn't get you any further towards being able to create packets signed with the private key.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28534889</id>
	<title>Sony Hate and Facts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246356840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. hates all things Sony and nothing will ever able to make them remotely like the company again but I wish people would at least try and get facts about stuff but this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. so that is a another pipe dream kinda like Hope and Change I guess. Sony does included the files for Green Dam on new computers but it's not installed and it comes with instructions on how to install it but we can't let the facts get in between<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and some good Sony hating</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know / .
hates all things Sony and nothing will ever able to make them remotely like the company again but I wish people would at least try and get facts about stuff but this is / .
so that is a another pipe dream kinda like Hope and Change I guess .
Sony does included the files for Green Dam on new computers but it 's not installed and it comes with instructions on how to install it but we ca n't let the facts get in between / .
and some good Sony hating</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know /.
hates all things Sony and nothing will ever able to make them remotely like the company again but I wish people would at least try and get facts about stuff but this is /.
so that is a another pipe dream kinda like Hope and Change I guess.
Sony does included the files for Green Dam on new computers but it's not installed and it comes with instructions on how to install it but we can't let the facts get in between /.
and some good Sony hating</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533317</id>
	<title>Re:Green dam won't ever ship in its current form</title>
	<author>gclef</author>
	<datestamp>1246393440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I mentioned in the Sony article, I'm really curious to know just how much copyright liability Sony (or anyone else) is exposed to by distributing software that's publicly known to be violating copyright.  If Sony is aware that the company they're buying it from doesn't have the rights to distribute the software, and Sony then re-distributes it knowingly, can the owners of the copyright nail Sony for infringement also?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I mentioned in the Sony article , I 'm really curious to know just how much copyright liability Sony ( or anyone else ) is exposed to by distributing software that 's publicly known to be violating copyright .
If Sony is aware that the company they 're buying it from does n't have the rights to distribute the software , and Sony then re-distributes it knowingly , can the owners of the copyright nail Sony for infringement also ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I mentioned in the Sony article, I'm really curious to know just how much copyright liability Sony (or anyone else) is exposed to by distributing software that's publicly known to be violating copyright.
If Sony is aware that the company they're buying it from doesn't have the rights to distribute the software, and Sony then re-distributes it knowingly, can the owners of the copyright nail Sony for infringement also?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083</id>
	<title>Good work Sony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246388640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time. Too bad God of War 3 wasn't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time .
Too bad God of War 3 was n't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Sony finally manages to get SOMETHING out on time.
Too bad God of War 3 wasn't requested by an evil totalitarian regime to oppress its people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28547481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28540123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533021
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28538325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28536925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535675
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28537903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_175250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28536925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28539307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28538325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532867
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28540123
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28547481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28535623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532333
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28537903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28532037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_175250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_175250.28533715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
