<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_30_139231</id>
	<title>Comcast Bringing Metropolitan WiMAX To Subscribers</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246369020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://brainscroll.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">RickRussellTX</a> writes <i>"<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE55S50220090629">Comcast plans to offer 4 megabits/sec WiMAX services</a> to customers in Portland, Oregon starting tomorrow. Branded as 'Comcast High-Speed 2go' and '4G,' the service will require a $44.99 per month subscription in addition to existing Comcast home service. For $69.99 they will offer a dual-mode card with access to both Comcast WiMAX and Sprint's national 3G wireless network. Future rollouts are planned for Chicago, Philadelphia, and Atlanta. Say what you will about Comcast (and I know many Slashdot readers have plenty to say about Comcast), this is a daring attempt to bypass entrenched cell phone companies with a direct-to-consumer wireless service."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RickRussellTX writes " Comcast plans to offer 4 megabits/sec WiMAX services to customers in Portland , Oregon starting tomorrow .
Branded as 'Comcast High-Speed 2go ' and '4G, ' the service will require a $ 44.99 per month subscription in addition to existing Comcast home service .
For $ 69.99 they will offer a dual-mode card with access to both Comcast WiMAX and Sprint 's national 3G wireless network .
Future rollouts are planned for Chicago , Philadelphia , and Atlanta .
Say what you will about Comcast ( and I know many Slashdot readers have plenty to say about Comcast ) , this is a daring attempt to bypass entrenched cell phone companies with a direct-to-consumer wireless service .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RickRussellTX writes "Comcast plans to offer 4 megabits/sec WiMAX services to customers in Portland, Oregon starting tomorrow.
Branded as 'Comcast High-Speed 2go' and '4G,' the service will require a $44.99 per month subscription in addition to existing Comcast home service.
For $69.99 they will offer a dual-mode card with access to both Comcast WiMAX and Sprint's national 3G wireless network.
Future rollouts are planned for Chicago, Philadelphia, and Atlanta.
Say what you will about Comcast (and I know many Slashdot readers have plenty to say about Comcast), this is a daring attempt to bypass entrenched cell phone companies with a direct-to-consumer wireless service.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528769</id>
	<title>Re:I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246378440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the new WiMax company Clear has also deployed in Portland.  You don't have to be an "existing customer of Comcast" (what a load of bollocks bundling) AND their service is completely straightforward with no hidden crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the new WiMax company Clear has also deployed in Portland .
You do n't have to be an " existing customer of Comcast " ( what a load of bollocks bundling ) AND their service is completely straightforward with no hidden crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the new WiMax company Clear has also deployed in Portland.
You don't have to be an "existing customer of Comcast" (what a load of bollocks bundling) AND their service is completely straightforward with no hidden crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527459</id>
	<title>This is just reselling of Clearwire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246372860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bypass entrenched cell phone companies"   LOL</p><p>This is the Clearwire network ( A spinoff of Sprint) which Comcast and several other cable providers are joint partners with Sprint on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bypass entrenched cell phone companies " LOLThis is the Clearwire network ( A spinoff of Sprint ) which Comcast and several other cable providers are joint partners with Sprint on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bypass entrenched cell phone companies"   LOLThis is the Clearwire network ( A spinoff of Sprint) which Comcast and several other cable providers are joint partners with Sprint on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528301</id>
	<title>h\%como</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">andj promotes Our Don't be a sling</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>andj promotes Our Do n't be a sling [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>andj promotes Our Don't be a sling [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28536743</id>
	<title>Uh...  Same as Clear, but with bundle requirement?</title>
	<author>Anonymous Freak</author>
	<datestamp>1246366800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Comcast is just reselling Clear WiMax service, at the same price as Clear (okay, fine, $0.01 a month cheaper,) then tacking on the requirement that you have Comcast home internet already.</p><p>Uh, okay...</p><p>If they offered some kind of discount, it might be worth getting; but I suppose some people will do it just because of the whole 'single bill' thing.</p><p>I wanted to switch to Clear with a home/mobile bundle a few months ago; but my house has zero signal.  (Even though I'm well within the service area.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Comcast is just reselling Clear WiMax service , at the same price as Clear ( okay , fine , $ 0.01 a month cheaper , ) then tacking on the requirement that you have Comcast home internet already.Uh , okay...If they offered some kind of discount , it might be worth getting ; but I suppose some people will do it just because of the whole 'single bill ' thing.I wanted to switch to Clear with a home/mobile bundle a few months ago ; but my house has zero signal .
( Even though I 'm well within the service area .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Comcast is just reselling Clear WiMax service, at the same price as Clear (okay, fine, $0.01 a month cheaper,) then tacking on the requirement that you have Comcast home internet already.Uh, okay...If they offered some kind of discount, it might be worth getting; but I suppose some people will do it just because of the whole 'single bill' thing.I wanted to switch to Clear with a home/mobile bundle a few months ago; but my house has zero signal.
(Even though I'm well within the service area.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527551</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>Miros</author>
	<datestamp>1246373280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This kind of makes sense.  For Sprint, it's probably a great way to sell nationwide data services plans through bundling which are usually highly profitable.  For Comcast, it's a competitive advantage (wireless metro internet service) that's hard for the other traditional more "hard-wired" ISPs to match.  It will be interesting to see how they market it on TV, and what types of non-techie people buy it and why</htmltext>
<tokenext>This kind of makes sense .
For Sprint , it 's probably a great way to sell nationwide data services plans through bundling which are usually highly profitable .
For Comcast , it 's a competitive advantage ( wireless metro internet service ) that 's hard for the other traditional more " hard-wired " ISPs to match .
It will be interesting to see how they market it on TV , and what types of non-techie people buy it and why</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This kind of makes sense.
For Sprint, it's probably a great way to sell nationwide data services plans through bundling which are usually highly profitable.
For Comcast, it's a competitive advantage (wireless metro internet service) that's hard for the other traditional more "hard-wired" ISPs to match.
It will be interesting to see how they market it on TV, and what types of non-techie people buy it and why</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529337</id>
	<title>Re:4G?</title>
	<author>santiagoanders</author>
	<datestamp>1246380540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how many actual HSPA customers even get over 3Mbps? Check out the speed tests at dslreports.com.</p><p>I'm sick of everybody touting these stupid max speeds of a wireless standard, when most vendors won't even implement them. What phone is going to have 4 antennas to reach a 4x4 MIMO rate anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how many actual HSPA customers even get over 3Mbps ?
Check out the speed tests at dslreports.com.I 'm sick of everybody touting these stupid max speeds of a wireless standard , when most vendors wo n't even implement them .
What phone is going to have 4 antennas to reach a 4x4 MIMO rate anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how many actual HSPA customers even get over 3Mbps?
Check out the speed tests at dslreports.com.I'm sick of everybody touting these stupid max speeds of a wireless standard, when most vendors won't even implement them.
What phone is going to have 4 antennas to reach a 4x4 MIMO rate anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529981</id>
	<title>Re:Not a lot of help for the rest of us</title>
	<author>kdekorte</author>
	<datestamp>1246382580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Totally agree on this... love that the cities get multiple high speed options and I can't get anything where I live other than cellular.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Totally agree on this... love that the cities get multiple high speed options and I ca n't get anything where I live other than cellular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Totally agree on this... love that the cities get multiple high speed options and I can't get anything where I live other than cellular.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528295</id>
	<title>WiMAX is pretty awesome.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been using it for the better part of the past two weeks. And I'm pretty satisfied with the service. Although I live in Saudi Arabia, which is...a bit far from Oregon.<br><br>I pay about $190 for a six-month subscription at 2 megabit. ~$30 a month. 2 megabit is the maximum speed they offer, but it's not bad at all- only slightly more expensive than ADSL (which goes all the way up to 20mbit, but costs an arm and a leg at that tier), and I get a ~150ms ping on US servers. More than adaquate for gaming.<br><br>Thing is, the service has been trumpeted out for eons now. Well, since 2004 or so at least. I had long given up on practical residential WiMAX as vaporware, until earlier this year when the service was rolled out in earnest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using it for the better part of the past two weeks .
And I 'm pretty satisfied with the service .
Although I live in Saudi Arabia , which is...a bit far from Oregon.I pay about $ 190 for a six-month subscription at 2 megabit .
~ $ 30 a month .
2 megabit is the maximum speed they offer , but it 's not bad at all- only slightly more expensive than ADSL ( which goes all the way up to 20mbit , but costs an arm and a leg at that tier ) , and I get a ~ 150ms ping on US servers .
More than adaquate for gaming.Thing is , the service has been trumpeted out for eons now .
Well , since 2004 or so at least .
I had long given up on practical residential WiMAX as vaporware , until earlier this year when the service was rolled out in earnest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using it for the better part of the past two weeks.
And I'm pretty satisfied with the service.
Although I live in Saudi Arabia, which is...a bit far from Oregon.I pay about $190 for a six-month subscription at 2 megabit.
~$30 a month.
2 megabit is the maximum speed they offer, but it's not bad at all- only slightly more expensive than ADSL (which goes all the way up to 20mbit, but costs an arm and a leg at that tier), and I get a ~150ms ping on US servers.
More than adaquate for gaming.Thing is, the service has been trumpeted out for eons now.
Well, since 2004 or so at least.
I had long given up on practical residential WiMAX as vaporware, until earlier this year when the service was rolled out in earnest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528385</id>
	<title>Re:I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246377000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you were really a customer like I am perhaps you would remember that it is spelled Qwest. Drop Comcast today!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you were really a customer like I am perhaps you would remember that it is spelled Qwest .
Drop Comcast today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you were really a customer like I am perhaps you would remember that it is spelled Qwest.
Drop Comcast today!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527681</id>
	<title>Re:4G?</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246373880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they gave everyone full speed how will they sell upgrades?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they gave everyone full speed how will they sell upgrades ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they gave everyone full speed how will they sell upgrades?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529697</id>
	<title>From a long time Comcast customer's words...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to see what you will actually be getting from their offered service, divide everything they are promising for your service by 4* (this includes the unlimited bandwidth).</p><p>* - 4 maybe a little too low.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to see what you will actually be getting from their offered service , divide everything they are promising for your service by 4 * ( this includes the unlimited bandwidth ) .
* - 4 maybe a little too low .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to see what you will actually be getting from their offered service, divide everything they are promising for your service by 4* (this includes the unlimited bandwidth).
* - 4 maybe a little too low.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528543</id>
	<title>Re:4G?</title>
	<author>QuantumRiff</author>
	<datestamp>1246377540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could 4MB  be the actual speed of the internet portion of the network?  I have a 100MB connection to my ISP, but only have a 5Mb/s internet speed at the office. They advertise it as 5MB of internet access. The cable modem is capable of many hundreds of Mb/s, but you only usually get 5 or 10Mb or so..  They have some set aside for actual TV channels..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could 4MB be the actual speed of the internet portion of the network ?
I have a 100MB connection to my ISP , but only have a 5Mb/s internet speed at the office .
They advertise it as 5MB of internet access .
The cable modem is capable of many hundreds of Mb/s , but you only usually get 5 or 10Mb or so.. They have some set aside for actual TV channels. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could 4MB  be the actual speed of the internet portion of the network?
I have a 100MB connection to my ISP, but only have a 5Mb/s internet speed at the office.
They advertise it as 5MB of internet access.
The cable modem is capable of many hundreds of Mb/s, but you only usually get 5 or 10Mb or so..  They have some set aside for actual TV channels..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28531937</id>
	<title>Skynet is here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246388100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wifi is the first step. The next steps are cloud computing and biometric monitoring, through more camz and microphones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wifi is the first step .
The next steps are cloud computing and biometric monitoring , through more camz and microphones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wifi is the first step.
The next steps are cloud computing and biometric monitoring, through more camz and microphones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527901</id>
	<title>Re:This is just reselling of Clearwire</title>
	<author>mrchaotica</author>
	<datestamp>1246375020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so <em>that's</em> why they're going for all the same markets as Clearwire (which was just launched here in Atlanta last week or so). I figured Comcast was trying to steal Clearwire's thunder...</p><p>Of course, who the <em>fuck</em> would pick Comcast over Clearwire -- or really, <em>anyone</em> else -- given the choice?! Even suicidal masochists have <em>limits</em>, and Comcast's BS is infinitely beyond them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so that 's why they 're going for all the same markets as Clearwire ( which was just launched here in Atlanta last week or so ) .
I figured Comcast was trying to steal Clearwire 's thunder...Of course , who the fuck would pick Comcast over Clearwire -- or really , anyone else -- given the choice ? !
Even suicidal masochists have limits , and Comcast 's BS is infinitely beyond them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so that's why they're going for all the same markets as Clearwire (which was just launched here in Atlanta last week or so).
I figured Comcast was trying to steal Clearwire's thunder...Of course, who the fuck would pick Comcast over Clearwire -- or really, anyone else -- given the choice?!
Even suicidal masochists have limits, and Comcast's BS is infinitely beyond them!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</id>
	<title>I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>leftie</author>
	<datestamp>1246373160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cheaper, better service, no threats of filters, uploading caps, and they're the only major US telecom to say no to Bush wiretaps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheaper , better service , no threats of filters , uploading caps , and they 're the only major US telecom to say no to Bush wiretaps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheaper, better service, no threats of filters, uploading caps, and they're the only major US telecom to say no to Bush wiretaps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527411</id>
	<title>anonymous coward bringing sexy back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246372740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>eat my asshole, you rimjobbing linux ass munchers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>eat my asshole , you rimjobbing linux ass munchers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eat my asshole, you rimjobbing linux ass munchers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28542569</id>
	<title>Re:4G?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246464180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to be picky, a 4G system is an IMT-advanced systems and none exist yet. It's not even LTE, it will be LTE advanced and the next gen WiMAX (802.16m, when current is 802.16e).</p><p>If you're more open minded, system optimized for non line of sight (NLOS) operation using an OFDMA waveform are 4G. Then you include current WiMAX, and LTE (to come).</p><p>Despite all the hype and misleading figures based on unrealistic set-ups, WiMAX and LTE are close enough --- some advantage to LTE that arrived later, and has less overhead, but in the 15 to 10\% range all things being equal. And there won't be a dramatic advantage (*in the same set-up*) for the next gen. The major gains showns up are brought by comparing a 20 MHz channel to a 10 MHz one, or by multiplying antennas and counting on spatial multiplexing MIMO. Nice, but in practice many operators don't have super large bandwidth allocation. And although large antennas MIMO may be ok for a CPE (and even then, not trivial), it's not so practical for a handset.</p><p>So all these super giant figures are mostly marketing BS. That won't prevent a true mobile broadband Internet to happen anyway, but at more reasonnable average speeds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to be picky , a 4G system is an IMT-advanced systems and none exist yet .
It 's not even LTE , it will be LTE advanced and the next gen WiMAX ( 802.16m , when current is 802.16e ) .If you 're more open minded , system optimized for non line of sight ( NLOS ) operation using an OFDMA waveform are 4G .
Then you include current WiMAX , and LTE ( to come ) .Despite all the hype and misleading figures based on unrealistic set-ups , WiMAX and LTE are close enough --- some advantage to LTE that arrived later , and has less overhead , but in the 15 to 10 \ % range all things being equal .
And there wo n't be a dramatic advantage ( * in the same set-up * ) for the next gen. The major gains showns up are brought by comparing a 20 MHz channel to a 10 MHz one , or by multiplying antennas and counting on spatial multiplexing MIMO .
Nice , but in practice many operators do n't have super large bandwidth allocation .
And although large antennas MIMO may be ok for a CPE ( and even then , not trivial ) , it 's not so practical for a handset.So all these super giant figures are mostly marketing BS .
That wo n't prevent a true mobile broadband Internet to happen anyway , but at more reasonnable average speeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to be picky, a 4G system is an IMT-advanced systems and none exist yet.
It's not even LTE, it will be LTE advanced and the next gen WiMAX (802.16m, when current is 802.16e).If you're more open minded, system optimized for non line of sight (NLOS) operation using an OFDMA waveform are 4G.
Then you include current WiMAX, and LTE (to come).Despite all the hype and misleading figures based on unrealistic set-ups, WiMAX and LTE are close enough --- some advantage to LTE that arrived later, and has less overhead, but in the 15 to 10\% range all things being equal.
And there won't be a dramatic advantage (*in the same set-up*) for the next gen. The major gains showns up are brought by comparing a 20 MHz channel to a 10 MHz one, or by multiplying antennas and counting on spatial multiplexing MIMO.
Nice, but in practice many operators don't have super large bandwidth allocation.
And although large antennas MIMO may be ok for a CPE (and even then, not trivial), it's not so practical for a handset.So all these super giant figures are mostly marketing BS.
That won't prevent a true mobile broadband Internet to happen anyway, but at more reasonnable average speeds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</id>
	<title>4G?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246372920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I recall, a 4G system is defined by, among other things, 10ms latency, 100Mb/s nominal throughput and an all-IP network.  Mobile WiMAX is all-IP, but 4Mb/s is a long way away from 100Mb/s.  HSPA, which is 3.5G or 3.75G depending on the implementation goes from 7.2Mb/s to 42Mb/s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I recall , a 4G system is defined by , among other things , 10ms latency , 100Mb/s nominal throughput and an all-IP network .
Mobile WiMAX is all-IP , but 4Mb/s is a long way away from 100Mb/s .
HSPA , which is 3.5G or 3.75G depending on the implementation goes from 7.2Mb/s to 42Mb/s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I recall, a 4G system is defined by, among other things, 10ms latency, 100Mb/s nominal throughput and an all-IP network.
Mobile WiMAX is all-IP, but 4Mb/s is a long way away from 100Mb/s.
HSPA, which is 3.5G or 3.75G depending on the implementation goes from 7.2Mb/s to 42Mb/s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28531107</id>
	<title>Here's a *really* innovative idea for them:</title>
	<author>The Cisco Kid</author>
	<datestamp>1246385520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ditch the requirement to be a wired comcast subscriber. Seriously, there are probably tons of people who arent serviced by comcast (or any cable company) that would love the opportunity to pay $45/mo for high speed wireless.  But they are too shortsighted to recognize the potential, and instead want to use this as leverage to sell their cable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ditch the requirement to be a wired comcast subscriber .
Seriously , there are probably tons of people who arent serviced by comcast ( or any cable company ) that would love the opportunity to pay $ 45/mo for high speed wireless .
But they are too shortsighted to recognize the potential , and instead want to use this as leverage to sell their cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ditch the requirement to be a wired comcast subscriber.
Seriously, there are probably tons of people who arent serviced by comcast (or any cable company) that would love the opportunity to pay $45/mo for high speed wireless.
But they are too shortsighted to recognize the potential, and instead want to use this as leverage to sell their cable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529475</id>
	<title>Re:I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't we call them Obama wiretaps now since he had a chance, and refused, to abolish them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't we call them Obama wiretaps now since he had a chance , and refused , to abolish them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't we call them Obama wiretaps now since he had a chance, and refused, to abolish them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528551</id>
	<title>I'll go with Clear if I want WiMAX thanks</title>
	<author>sircastor</author>
	<datestamp>1246377540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I'll only pay $55, rather than the absurd markup you're asking...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'll only pay $ 55 , rather than the absurd markup you 're asking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'll only pay $55, rather than the absurd markup you're asking...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527723</id>
	<title>Change? Transparency?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246374120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then what's with the rush to cram several 1000+ page bills through Congress with no one having actually had time to read them?  What's with the dead-of-night document dumps of non-searchable PDFs of bills to be voted on the next day?  Anyone who wonders why this country finds itself in the predicament that it does is a clueless moron.  Even if we WANTED to pay attention, our "elected" leaders don't give us the chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then what 's with the rush to cram several 1000 + page bills through Congress with no one having actually had time to read them ?
What 's with the dead-of-night document dumps of non-searchable PDFs of bills to be voted on the next day ?
Anyone who wonders why this country finds itself in the predicament that it does is a clueless moron .
Even if we WANTED to pay attention , our " elected " leaders do n't give us the chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then what's with the rush to cram several 1000+ page bills through Congress with no one having actually had time to read them?
What's with the dead-of-night document dumps of non-searchable PDFs of bills to be voted on the next day?
Anyone who wonders why this country finds itself in the predicament that it does is a clueless moron.
Even if we WANTED to pay attention, our "elected" leaders don't give us the chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28530857</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246384800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they are unaware of the economic crisis?  They think $$$ grows on trees?  Are they INSANE????  Oh, they're Comcast, duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they are unaware of the economic crisis ?
They think $ $ $ grows on trees ?
Are they INSANE ? ? ? ?
Oh , they 're Comcast , duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they are unaware of the economic crisis?
They think $$$ grows on trees?
Are they INSANE????
Oh, they're Comcast, duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28538149</id>
	<title>49.99 for mobile and home internet bundled</title>
	<author>StormUP</author>
	<datestamp>1246378320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard an ad for this on the radio today. The ad was for a promotional price of 49.99 for their mobile "4G" internet along with home internet for x # of months. I think 12 months. That said I was wondering if they are renting part of Clear's network and rebranding it, especially since the ad was for a bundle rather than standalone service.

I was part of the beta for Clear near the end of this year and continued to use it until they shut down the network to go live in about early February. Service was continually improving throughout the time I used it although it still had a few dead spots in places where I would like to use it. 3 or 4 were left on my hour long commute on the MAX (our light rail system in Portland), which was much better than at the start of the beta.

I have 6 months free for being part of the beta with Clear coming up here when I decide to redeem it and am looking forward to using the system again and am hoping they have continued to improve</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard an ad for this on the radio today .
The ad was for a promotional price of 49.99 for their mobile " 4G " internet along with home internet for x # of months .
I think 12 months .
That said I was wondering if they are renting part of Clear 's network and rebranding it , especially since the ad was for a bundle rather than standalone service .
I was part of the beta for Clear near the end of this year and continued to use it until they shut down the network to go live in about early February .
Service was continually improving throughout the time I used it although it still had a few dead spots in places where I would like to use it .
3 or 4 were left on my hour long commute on the MAX ( our light rail system in Portland ) , which was much better than at the start of the beta .
I have 6 months free for being part of the beta with Clear coming up here when I decide to redeem it and am looking forward to using the system again and am hoping they have continued to improve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard an ad for this on the radio today.
The ad was for a promotional price of 49.99 for their mobile "4G" internet along with home internet for x # of months.
I think 12 months.
That said I was wondering if they are renting part of Clear's network and rebranding it, especially since the ad was for a bundle rather than standalone service.
I was part of the beta for Clear near the end of this year and continued to use it until they shut down the network to go live in about early February.
Service was continually improving throughout the time I used it although it still had a few dead spots in places where I would like to use it.
3 or 4 were left on my hour long commute on the MAX (our light rail system in Portland), which was much better than at the start of the beta.
I have 6 months free for being part of the beta with Clear coming up here when I decide to redeem it and am looking forward to using the system again and am hoping they have continued to improve</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28532687</id>
	<title>TFS Has The Pricing All Wrong</title>
	<author>rsmith-mac</author>
	<datestamp>1246390680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently proofreading has gone out of style with the Slashdot editors, since they let the summary get the pricing and details all wrong. The prices Comcast gives in TFA are for <b>WiMAX + Comcast HSI</b>, not just the WiMAX service. Furthermore they're the introductory prices, not the final prices. I'm just going to rip off the <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comcast-Unveils-Mobile-WiMax-Service-103174" title="dslreports.com">DSL Reports piece on this</a> [dslreports.com], since they get it right.</p><blockquote><div><p>Comcast today gave their rebranded version of Clearwire Mobile WiMax service a  new name: "Comcast High-Speed 2Go." According to a Comcast <a href="http://www.comcast.com/About/PressRelease/PressReleaseDetail.ashx?PRID=887" title="comcast.com">press release</a> [comcast.com], the new service launches tomorrow in Portland. The "up to 4Mbps" service will launch everywhere Clearwire deploys Mobile WiMax -- a plan that should see nine cities live by the end fo this year. According to Comcast, the company is offering two different wireless data plans:</p><ul> <li> <b>Comcast High-Speed 2go Metro service</b> costs $49.99 for twelve months ($72.95 thereafter)  and comes with 12Mbps Comcast home broadband service and a Wi-Fi router. The service uses a Mobile WiMax data card that will obviously only work in areas where there's Comcast/Clearwire Mobile WiMax.</li></ul><ul> <li> <b>Comcast High-Speed 2go Nationwide service</b> costs $69.99 ($92.95 thereafter) and also comes with Comcast 12Mbps home broadband service and a home Wi-Fi router. The service uses a dual-mode data card that allows users to float between Clearwire's Mobile WiMax network and Sprint's 3G EVDO network.</li></ul><p>You can of course compare this to <a href="https://www.clear.com/shop/clear\_services.php?changezip=1&amp;page=mobile\_internet" title="clear.com">standalone Clearwire pricing</a> [clear.com]. Comcast tells us existing double and triple play customers will be able to add Mobile WiMax service on to their current bundles for $30 more a month. Comcast invested roughly a billion dollars into the Sprint and Clearwire joint venture -- and is buying bandwidth wholesale from the new operator.<br> <br>Comcast's wireless service won't involve voice product initially, though the carrier suggests that may change. As for caps, Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas tells us that Comcast is "deferring to Clearwire's TOS on usage" while customers are connected to the Clearwire network. Clearwire's service comes with 200MB, 2GB and unlimited flavors, so we'll have to wait and see which "deferment" Comcast chooses. When connected to the Sprint EVDO network, customers are restricted to just 5 gigabytes of usage per month.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Once you factor out the first-year incentives, what Comcast is doing is reselling WiMAX for $30 a month on top of your current bill, and they are reselling WiMAX + Sprint's 3G service for $50 a month on top of your current bill.</p><p>The 3G service comes with the standard 5GB cap (making it slightly cheaper than regular plans since pro-rated it's $20, while stand-alone plans usually start at $30), while the WiMAX service is undefined. Clear has a $30 tier, but it's only 200MB. Presumably Comcast is getting a better deal here and reselling the $40 package that comes with a 2GB plan, but someone is going to have to find out the finer details on that since Comcast isn't spilling the beans on the matter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently proofreading has gone out of style with the Slashdot editors , since they let the summary get the pricing and details all wrong .
The prices Comcast gives in TFA are for WiMAX + Comcast HSI , not just the WiMAX service .
Furthermore they 're the introductory prices , not the final prices .
I 'm just going to rip off the DSL Reports piece on this [ dslreports.com ] , since they get it right.Comcast today gave their rebranded version of Clearwire Mobile WiMax service a new name : " Comcast High-Speed 2Go .
" According to a Comcast press release [ comcast.com ] , the new service launches tomorrow in Portland .
The " up to 4Mbps " service will launch everywhere Clearwire deploys Mobile WiMax -- a plan that should see nine cities live by the end fo this year .
According to Comcast , the company is offering two different wireless data plans : Comcast High-Speed 2go Metro service costs $ 49.99 for twelve months ( $ 72.95 thereafter ) and comes with 12Mbps Comcast home broadband service and a Wi-Fi router .
The service uses a Mobile WiMax data card that will obviously only work in areas where there 's Comcast/Clearwire Mobile WiMax .
Comcast High-Speed 2go Nationwide service costs $ 69.99 ( $ 92.95 thereafter ) and also comes with Comcast 12Mbps home broadband service and a home Wi-Fi router .
The service uses a dual-mode data card that allows users to float between Clearwire 's Mobile WiMax network and Sprint 's 3G EVDO network.You can of course compare this to standalone Clearwire pricing [ clear.com ] .
Comcast tells us existing double and triple play customers will be able to add Mobile WiMax service on to their current bundles for $ 30 more a month .
Comcast invested roughly a billion dollars into the Sprint and Clearwire joint venture -- and is buying bandwidth wholesale from the new operator .
Comcast 's wireless service wo n't involve voice product initially , though the carrier suggests that may change .
As for caps , Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas tells us that Comcast is " deferring to Clearwire 's TOS on usage " while customers are connected to the Clearwire network .
Clearwire 's service comes with 200MB , 2GB and unlimited flavors , so we 'll have to wait and see which " deferment " Comcast chooses .
When connected to the Sprint EVDO network , customers are restricted to just 5 gigabytes of usage per month .
Once you factor out the first-year incentives , what Comcast is doing is reselling WiMAX for $ 30 a month on top of your current bill , and they are reselling WiMAX + Sprint 's 3G service for $ 50 a month on top of your current bill.The 3G service comes with the standard 5GB cap ( making it slightly cheaper than regular plans since pro-rated it 's $ 20 , while stand-alone plans usually start at $ 30 ) , while the WiMAX service is undefined .
Clear has a $ 30 tier , but it 's only 200MB .
Presumably Comcast is getting a better deal here and reselling the $ 40 package that comes with a 2GB plan , but someone is going to have to find out the finer details on that since Comcast is n't spilling the beans on the matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently proofreading has gone out of style with the Slashdot editors, since they let the summary get the pricing and details all wrong.
The prices Comcast gives in TFA are for WiMAX + Comcast HSI, not just the WiMAX service.
Furthermore they're the introductory prices, not the final prices.
I'm just going to rip off the DSL Reports piece on this [dslreports.com], since they get it right.Comcast today gave their rebranded version of Clearwire Mobile WiMax service a  new name: "Comcast High-Speed 2Go.
" According to a Comcast press release [comcast.com], the new service launches tomorrow in Portland.
The "up to 4Mbps" service will launch everywhere Clearwire deploys Mobile WiMax -- a plan that should see nine cities live by the end fo this year.
According to Comcast, the company is offering two different wireless data plans:  Comcast High-Speed 2go Metro service costs $49.99 for twelve months ($72.95 thereafter)  and comes with 12Mbps Comcast home broadband service and a Wi-Fi router.
The service uses a Mobile WiMax data card that will obviously only work in areas where there's Comcast/Clearwire Mobile WiMax.
Comcast High-Speed 2go Nationwide service costs $69.99 ($92.95 thereafter) and also comes with Comcast 12Mbps home broadband service and a home Wi-Fi router.
The service uses a dual-mode data card that allows users to float between Clearwire's Mobile WiMax network and Sprint's 3G EVDO network.You can of course compare this to standalone Clearwire pricing [clear.com].
Comcast tells us existing double and triple play customers will be able to add Mobile WiMax service on to their current bundles for $30 more a month.
Comcast invested roughly a billion dollars into the Sprint and Clearwire joint venture -- and is buying bandwidth wholesale from the new operator.
Comcast's wireless service won't involve voice product initially, though the carrier suggests that may change.
As for caps, Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas tells us that Comcast is "deferring to Clearwire's TOS on usage" while customers are connected to the Clearwire network.
Clearwire's service comes with 200MB, 2GB and unlimited flavors, so we'll have to wait and see which "deferment" Comcast chooses.
When connected to the Sprint EVDO network, customers are restricted to just 5 gigabytes of usage per month.
Once you factor out the first-year incentives, what Comcast is doing is reselling WiMAX for $30 a month on top of your current bill, and they are reselling WiMAX + Sprint's 3G service for $50 a month on top of your current bill.The 3G service comes with the standard 5GB cap (making it slightly cheaper than regular plans since pro-rated it's $20, while stand-alone plans usually start at $30), while the WiMAX service is undefined.
Clear has a $30 tier, but it's only 200MB.
Presumably Comcast is getting a better deal here and reselling the $40 package that comes with a 2GB plan, but someone is going to have to find out the finer details on that since Comcast isn't spilling the beans on the matter.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28533571</id>
	<title>Too Expensive.</title>
	<author>aaalcdz</author>
	<datestamp>1246394640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too expensive. Not worth it. Say no to Comcast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too expensive .
Not worth it .
Say no to Comcast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too expensive.
Not worth it.
Say no to Comcast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529207</id>
	<title>Re:Just say no to Comcast</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1246380120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have Comcast.  They're not much more expensive (if at all) than the AT&amp;T U-Verse or DirecTV offerings.  I've configured similar packages for each and they all come out about the same.  As far as service, they seem really attentive on the phone.  If they can fix it while speaking with me, they do.  The couple times someone had to come out has always been a problem ("Be there between noon and 5 PM...oh, sorry, technician was delayed...how about noon and 5 PM tomorrow?") but then I've always been credited something when I've complained.</p><p>Once I actually left a long rant on their phone questionnaire about the service because the technician had canceled, then shown up, and acted as if it were my fault for going back to work.  They called that night to say they'd have a technician at my house at 7 AM sharp if that was appropriate for my work schedule.  I was genuinely surprised -- I didn't think anyone actually listened to those "Customer Service Surveys".</p><p>I haven't been hit by any bandwidth caps yet, though one of my housemates just downloaded 9 DVDs worth of data last month.  I guess I'll see how that affects my bill, if at all.</p><p>My point is, most of the time Comcast just works.  And the times when it doesn't, they're best on the phone, but they do try.</p><p>All that being said, aside from tennis (why I need to watch standard definition anything these days...but the Tennis Channel HD isn't available on Comcast), I hardly watch TV anymore.  I'm considering canceling the TV portion ($100/month) and just keeping the Internet...using that to stream Hulu, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Comcast .
They 're not much more expensive ( if at all ) than the AT&amp;T U-Verse or DirecTV offerings .
I 've configured similar packages for each and they all come out about the same .
As far as service , they seem really attentive on the phone .
If they can fix it while speaking with me , they do .
The couple times someone had to come out has always been a problem ( " Be there between noon and 5 PM...oh , sorry , technician was delayed...how about noon and 5 PM tomorrow ?
" ) but then I 've always been credited something when I 've complained.Once I actually left a long rant on their phone questionnaire about the service because the technician had canceled , then shown up , and acted as if it were my fault for going back to work .
They called that night to say they 'd have a technician at my house at 7 AM sharp if that was appropriate for my work schedule .
I was genuinely surprised -- I did n't think anyone actually listened to those " Customer Service Surveys " .I have n't been hit by any bandwidth caps yet , though one of my housemates just downloaded 9 DVDs worth of data last month .
I guess I 'll see how that affects my bill , if at all.My point is , most of the time Comcast just works .
And the times when it does n't , they 're best on the phone , but they do try.All that being said , aside from tennis ( why I need to watch standard definition anything these days...but the Tennis Channel HD is n't available on Comcast ) , I hardly watch TV anymore .
I 'm considering canceling the TV portion ( $ 100/month ) and just keeping the Internet...using that to stream Hulu , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Comcast.
They're not much more expensive (if at all) than the AT&amp;T U-Verse or DirecTV offerings.
I've configured similar packages for each and they all come out about the same.
As far as service, they seem really attentive on the phone.
If they can fix it while speaking with me, they do.
The couple times someone had to come out has always been a problem ("Be there between noon and 5 PM...oh, sorry, technician was delayed...how about noon and 5 PM tomorrow?
") but then I've always been credited something when I've complained.Once I actually left a long rant on their phone questionnaire about the service because the technician had canceled, then shown up, and acted as if it were my fault for going back to work.
They called that night to say they'd have a technician at my house at 7 AM sharp if that was appropriate for my work schedule.
I was genuinely surprised -- I didn't think anyone actually listened to those "Customer Service Surveys".I haven't been hit by any bandwidth caps yet, though one of my housemates just downloaded 9 DVDs worth of data last month.
I guess I'll see how that affects my bill, if at all.My point is, most of the time Comcast just works.
And the times when it doesn't, they're best on the phone, but they do try.All that being said, aside from tennis (why I need to watch standard definition anything these days...but the Tennis Channel HD isn't available on Comcast), I hardly watch TV anymore.
I'm considering canceling the TV portion ($100/month) and just keeping the Internet...using that to stream Hulu, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527453</id>
	<title>Comcast is great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246372860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, what can you say that's bad about Comcast? Their service is Comcastic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , what can you say that 's bad about Comcast ?
Their service is Comcastic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, what can you say that's bad about Comcast?
Their service is Comcastic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527875</id>
	<title>Because it's Comcast, it will Suck.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246374900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll cap and meter bandwidth, shape traffic, block ports, hamstring the customers with a draconian TOS, etc, etc, rendering this WiMAX service totally 100\% craptastic.</p><p>Oh, and customer support will be stellar, as usual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll cap and meter bandwidth , shape traffic , block ports , hamstring the customers with a draconian TOS , etc , etc , rendering this WiMAX service totally 100 \ % craptastic.Oh , and customer support will be stellar , as usual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll cap and meter bandwidth, shape traffic, block ports, hamstring the customers with a draconian TOS, etc, etc, rendering this WiMAX service totally 100\% craptastic.Oh, and customer support will be stellar, as usual.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527547</id>
	<title>Just say no to Comcast</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1246373220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea they need more power... They are just evil.<br>Helpful hint to my fellow Comcast victims. If you crab on twitter you will get better service than over the phone.<br>Complain long and loud on twitter and use the #Comcast hash tag and you will be surprised how helpful they will be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea they need more power... They are just evil.Helpful hint to my fellow Comcast victims .
If you crab on twitter you will get better service than over the phone.Complain long and loud on twitter and use the # Comcast hash tag and you will be surprised how helpful they will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea they need more power... They are just evil.Helpful hint to my fellow Comcast victims.
If you crab on twitter you will get better service than over the phone.Complain long and loud on twitter and use the #Comcast hash tag and you will be surprised how helpful they will be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529029</id>
	<title>Re:4G?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246379400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4G I believe refers to the connection via Sprint wireless card, which is a seperate technology than the WiMax.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4G I believe refers to the connection via Sprint wireless card , which is a seperate technology than the WiMax .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4G I believe refers to the connection via Sprint wireless card, which is a seperate technology than the WiMax.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528861</id>
	<title>Re:I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1246378800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. It's Qwest.</p><p>2. It's not available everywhere and to everyone (including where I currently reside).</p><p>3. In my experience they force you to bundle data with telephone service (no, I don't want a land line anymore).</p><p>4. 20mbit service is only available in some areas, Comcast has much faster offerings (2x as much) in my area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
It 's Qwest.2 .
It 's not available everywhere and to everyone ( including where I currently reside ) .3 .
In my experience they force you to bundle data with telephone service ( no , I do n't want a land line anymore ) .4 .
20mbit service is only available in some areas , Comcast has much faster offerings ( 2x as much ) in my area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
It's Qwest.2.
It's not available everywhere and to everyone (including where I currently reside).3.
In my experience they force you to bundle data with telephone service (no, I don't want a land line anymore).4.
20mbit service is only available in some areas, Comcast has much faster offerings (2x as much) in my area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529537</id>
	<title>What's the fine print say?</title>
	<author>DragonTHC</author>
	<datestamp>1246381200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are the throughput limits for the service?</p><p>There's always a catch with comcast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the throughput limits for the service ? There 's always a catch with comcast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the throughput limits for the service?There's always a catch with comcast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527985</id>
	<title>Not a lot of help for the rest of us</title>
	<author>weeble75</author>
	<datestamp>1246375500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So those who can already get DSL and Cable service now get WiMAX too..... GREAT!!<br>

How about a wireless service that actually helps the people who can't get the wires!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So those who can already get DSL and Cable service now get WiMAX too.... .
GREAT ! ! How about a wireless service that actually helps the people who ca n't get the wires !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So those who can already get DSL and Cable service now get WiMAX too.....
GREAT!!

How about a wireless service that actually helps the people who can't get the wires!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528469</id>
	<title>Re:I'll stick with Quest, thanks.</title>
	<author>sircastor</author>
	<datestamp>1246377300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only thing that keeps me from going with Qwest has been the contractual obligations. I went with Comcast (sadly) because it was flexible, even though I didn't really want to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing that keeps me from going with Qwest has been the contractual obligations .
I went with Comcast ( sadly ) because it was flexible , even though I did n't really want to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing that keeps me from going with Qwest has been the contractual obligations.
I went with Comcast (sadly) because it was flexible, even though I didn't really want to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28532613</id>
	<title>XOHM</title>
	<author>lwap0</author>
	<datestamp>1246390440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've used XOHM, the Spring WiMax service in Baltimore. I tested it at 3 mbps down, 1.5 up, and you can buy in daily blocks if you don't use it every day (like, 10 a day I think). I stream my Netflix with it, and it's pretty fast, haven't tried any gaming with it though.

The monthly service is way cheaper than what Comcast is offering. Sucks to be in Portland.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've used XOHM , the Spring WiMax service in Baltimore .
I tested it at 3 mbps down , 1.5 up , and you can buy in daily blocks if you do n't use it every day ( like , 10 a day I think ) .
I stream my Netflix with it , and it 's pretty fast , have n't tried any gaming with it though .
The monthly service is way cheaper than what Comcast is offering .
Sucks to be in Portland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've used XOHM, the Spring WiMax service in Baltimore.
I tested it at 3 mbps down, 1.5 up, and you can buy in daily blocks if you don't use it every day (like, 10 a day I think).
I stream my Netflix with it, and it's pretty fast, haven't tried any gaming with it though.
The monthly service is way cheaper than what Comcast is offering.
Sucks to be in Portland.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527965</id>
	<title>Why the excitement? Paying twice for access?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246375320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to have Comcast's regular service, and then subscribe to WiMax.</p><p>Here in Baltimore, one of the first cities to get WiMAX, you can get WiMAX only service at a reasonable price, and for just a little more, you can get home and mobile service.</p><p>Leave it to Comcast to try and bilk the consumer for every penny they can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to have Comcast 's regular service , and then subscribe to WiMax.Here in Baltimore , one of the first cities to get WiMAX , you can get WiMAX only service at a reasonable price , and for just a little more , you can get home and mobile service.Leave it to Comcast to try and bilk the consumer for every penny they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to have Comcast's regular service, and then subscribe to WiMax.Here in Baltimore, one of the first cities to get WiMAX, you can get WiMAX only service at a reasonable price, and for just a little more, you can get home and mobile service.Leave it to Comcast to try and bilk the consumer for every penny they can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527509</id>
	<title>Looking good, except...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246373040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking good, except for the outrage that is their DNS ``service'', of course. Me not being in Portland is completely moot because of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking good , except for the outrage that is their DNS ` ` service' ' , of course .
Me not being in Portland is completely moot because of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking good, except for the outrage that is their DNS ``service'', of course.
Me not being in Portland is completely moot because of that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527731</id>
	<title>Re:Comcast is great!</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246374180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, what can you say that's bad about <strong>Comcrap</strong>? Their service is <strong>Craptastic</strong>!</p></div><p>There, FTFY.  And yes, as a former Comcast subscriber I mean it.  And, no, Comcast, I am NOT going to pay you one red cent for that remote you keep claiming I never returned.  Fuck you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , what can you say that 's bad about Comcrap ?
Their service is Craptastic ! There , FTFY .
And yes , as a former Comcast subscriber I mean it .
And , no , Comcast , I am NOT going to pay you one red cent for that remote you keep claiming I never returned .
Fuck you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, what can you say that's bad about Comcrap?
Their service is Craptastic!There, FTFY.
And yes, as a former Comcast subscriber I mean it.
And, no, Comcast, I am NOT going to pay you one red cent for that remote you keep claiming I never returned.
Fuck you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527453</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528143</id>
	<title>Re:Not Bypassing the Wireless Carriers</title>
	<author>rnelsonee</author>
	<datestamp>1246376040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is a shame because I use Clear for $35.00 a month for all my internet at home, and that's a flat fee (no surcharges/taxes). It was $25 for the first 6 months, too.</p><p>It really says something that Comcast charges more for basic cable than what other companies (or brands) are charging for unlimited 4G internet service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is a shame because I use Clear for $ 35.00 a month for all my internet at home , and that 's a flat fee ( no surcharges/taxes ) .
It was $ 25 for the first 6 months , too.It really says something that Comcast charges more for basic cable than what other companies ( or brands ) are charging for unlimited 4G internet service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is a shame because I use Clear for $35.00 a month for all my internet at home, and that's a flat fee (no surcharges/taxes).
It was $25 for the first 6 months, too.It really says something that Comcast charges more for basic cable than what other companies (or brands) are charging for unlimited 4G internet service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527553</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527487</id>
	<title>Clear aleady has service...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246372980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I read this and see the location I just have to think that they are trying to do something as an answer to clear. Portland, OR, has had WiMAX service in the form of Clear now for a few months, without the need to tie it to a home account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read this and see the location I just have to think that they are trying to do something as an answer to clear .
Portland , OR , has had WiMAX service in the form of Clear now for a few months , without the need to tie it to a home account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read this and see the location I just have to think that they are trying to do something as an answer to clear.
Portland, OR, has had WiMAX service in the form of Clear now for a few months, without the need to tie it to a home account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527553</id>
	<title>Not Bypassing the Wireless Carriers</title>
	<author>saterdaies</author>
	<datestamp>1246373280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most likely this service isn't bypassing the wireless carriers.  Comcast (along with TimeWarner and others) are partial owners of a company called Clearwire which Sprint owns roughly half of. Clearwire has been rolling out WiMAX as part of Sprint's 4G strategy.</p><p>So, while it might be being sold under the Comcast name, you're essentially buying service from Clear (http://www.clear.com/) run by Clearwire (http://clearwire.com) which is (half) owned by Sprint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most likely this service is n't bypassing the wireless carriers .
Comcast ( along with TimeWarner and others ) are partial owners of a company called Clearwire which Sprint owns roughly half of .
Clearwire has been rolling out WiMAX as part of Sprint 's 4G strategy.So , while it might be being sold under the Comcast name , you 're essentially buying service from Clear ( http : //www.clear.com/ ) run by Clearwire ( http : //clearwire.com ) which is ( half ) owned by Sprint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most likely this service isn't bypassing the wireless carriers.
Comcast (along with TimeWarner and others) are partial owners of a company called Clearwire which Sprint owns roughly half of.
Clearwire has been rolling out WiMAX as part of Sprint's 4G strategy.So, while it might be being sold under the Comcast name, you're essentially buying service from Clear (http://www.clear.com/) run by Clearwire (http://clearwire.com) which is (half) owned by Sprint.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28542569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_139231_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28531107
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529207
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_139231.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28528543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28542569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28527681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_139231.28529337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
