<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_29_139256</id>
	<title>Unlocking Android</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246299960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ross.ws/" rel="nofollow">Michael J. Ross</a> writes <i>"Of all the potential challengers to Apple's phenomenally popular iPhone, perhaps the one with the best prospects is Google's Android, which is not a mobile phone per se, but rather an open-source platform that the company encourages phone manufacturers to deploy in their own products.  Similarly, Google encourages computer programmers to develop applications for the Android environment.  But learning how to create such applications is daunting to the uninitiated, particularly for developers who have never before worked with the user interface controls, Web services, and other resources involved.  A recently published book, <em>Unlocking Android</em>, is designed to help such developers."</i> Read below for the rest of Michael's review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael J. Ross writes " Of all the potential challengers to Apple 's phenomenally popular iPhone , perhaps the one with the best prospects is Google 's Android , which is not a mobile phone per se , but rather an open-source platform that the company encourages phone manufacturers to deploy in their own products .
Similarly , Google encourages computer programmers to develop applications for the Android environment .
But learning how to create such applications is daunting to the uninitiated , particularly for developers who have never before worked with the user interface controls , Web services , and other resources involved .
A recently published book , Unlocking Android , is designed to help such developers .
" Read below for the rest of Michael 's review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael J. Ross writes "Of all the potential challengers to Apple's phenomenally popular iPhone, perhaps the one with the best prospects is Google's Android, which is not a mobile phone per se, but rather an open-source platform that the company encourages phone manufacturers to deploy in their own products.
Similarly, Google encourages computer programmers to develop applications for the Android environment.
But learning how to create such applications is daunting to the uninitiated, particularly for developers who have never before worked with the user interface controls, Web services, and other resources involved.
A recently published book, Unlocking Android, is designed to help such developers.
" Read below for the rest of Michael's review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518417</id>
	<title>Re:Ads Disabled</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246308240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, it also doesn't block stupid comments. Oh well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , it also does n't block stupid comments .
Oh well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, it also doesn't block stupid comments.
Oh well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28545837</id>
	<title>On Green Paper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246474260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;a white paper on Android (oddly termed a "green paper")</p><p>Just an FYI, Manning uses the term "green paper" to refer to papers introducing new and emerging technologies. Many more are listed on a variety of subjects on the Manning home page--http://www.manning.com--along the right end column.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; a white paper on Android ( oddly termed a " green paper " ) Just an FYI , Manning uses the term " green paper " to refer to papers introducing new and emerging technologies .
Many more are listed on a variety of subjects on the Manning home page--http : //www.manning.com--along the right end column .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;a white paper on Android (oddly termed a "green paper")Just an FYI, Manning uses the term "green paper" to refer to papers introducing new and emerging technologies.
Many more are listed on a variety of subjects on the Manning home page--http://www.manning.com--along the right end column.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517269</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246303620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My android wont let me near him because hes a little paranoid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My android wont let me near him because hes a little paranoid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My android wont let me near him because hes a little paranoid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517977</id>
	<title>FailzVors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">you to join the Mir3 Of decay,</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>you to join the Mir3 Of decay , [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you to join the Mir3 Of decay, [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517607</id>
	<title>Scripting now available as well.</title>
	<author>rusty0101</author>
	<datestamp>1246304880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you would rather program in python, lau or bsh (not bash, but bean shell, a java based shell scripting language) and have an android based phone, have a look at ASE. Currently at version 0.8, found at <a href="http://code.google.com/p/android-scripting/" title="google.com">http://code.google.com/p/android-scripting/</a> [google.com]</p><p>You will want to follow the instructions under help once you have ASE installed. I found it easiest to save the script interpreters for python and lau along with the sample scripts to my phone's sd card as a separate action, then run the ASE application which immediately installed the interpreters and made the scripts available.</p><p>See also the wiki and related pages for explanations of why ASE might be of interest to you. Or may not be of interest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you would rather program in python , lau or bsh ( not bash , but bean shell , a java based shell scripting language ) and have an android based phone , have a look at ASE .
Currently at version 0.8 , found at http : //code.google.com/p/android-scripting/ [ google.com ] You will want to follow the instructions under help once you have ASE installed .
I found it easiest to save the script interpreters for python and lau along with the sample scripts to my phone 's sd card as a separate action , then run the ASE application which immediately installed the interpreters and made the scripts available.See also the wiki and related pages for explanations of why ASE might be of interest to you .
Or may not be of interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you would rather program in python, lau or bsh (not bash, but bean shell, a java based shell scripting language) and have an android based phone, have a look at ASE.
Currently at version 0.8, found at http://code.google.com/p/android-scripting/ [google.com]You will want to follow the instructions under help once you have ASE installed.
I found it easiest to save the script interpreters for python and lau along with the sample scripts to my phone's sd card as a separate action, then run the ASE application which immediately installed the interpreters and made the scripts available.See also the wiki and related pages for explanations of why ASE might be of interest to you.
Or may not be of interest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518497</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1246308660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would I pay for an app?  I just pirate the drm-free version.  Developers can make money giving lectures and selling support contracts, neither of which I'll pay for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would I pay for an app ?
I just pirate the drm-free version .
Developers can make money giving lectures and selling support contracts , neither of which I 'll pay for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would I pay for an app?
I just pirate the drm-free version.
Developers can make money giving lectures and selling support contracts, neither of which I'll pay for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518541</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>EBMN</author>
	<datestamp>1246308840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>HTC Hero will be out in Europe mid-July and that is one fine device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>HTC Hero will be out in Europe mid-July and that is one fine device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HTC Hero will be out in Europe mid-July and that is one fine device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517555</id>
	<title>OT:What the hell is that on the cover of the book?</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1246304640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Catdroid?</p><p>Hope it's nothing like catbert.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Catdroid ? Hope it 's nothing like catbert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Catdroid?Hope it's nothing like catbert.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517737</id>
	<title>I got as far as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'per se' and you lost me there....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'per se ' and you lost me there... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'per se' and you lost me there....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859</id>
	<title>The Android Platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone please simplify the Android Platform for us developers?  Is it a Java VM with some extra libs, and a linux kernel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone please simplify the Android Platform for us developers ?
Is it a Java VM with some extra libs , and a linux kernel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone please simplify the Android Platform for us developers?
Is it a Java VM with some extra libs, and a linux kernel?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345</id>
	<title>Ads Disabled</title>
	<author>googlesmith123</author>
	<datestamp>1246303920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>------------------<br>
Ads Disabled<br>
Thanks again for helping make Slashdot great!<br>
------------------<br>
<br>
Unfortunately this doesn't disable stupid book "reviews" (otherwise know as ads).</htmltext>
<tokenext>------------------ Ads Disabled Thanks again for helping make Slashdot great !
------------------ Unfortunately this does n't disable stupid book " reviews " ( otherwise know as ads ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>------------------
Ads Disabled
Thanks again for helping make Slashdot great!
------------------

Unfortunately this doesn't disable stupid book "reviews" (otherwise know as ads).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517671</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1246305180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.</i></p><p>I know the OP is being a bit hostile, but with many Open Source projects UI are basically "what would I like to have" following then "what would my user's like to have" and followed "what my user's should have but don't know they need" last.</p><p>I think more thought should be done to the interface via a graphic design and human nature standpoint rather than simply doing what you are the user asks for.</p><p>I'm not saying that the developers or users are stupid, it is just that often when asked they really want, they don't know what they really want so they throw everything in and end up with feature UI bloat.</p><p>Sometimes less is more, and if you work from a standpoint of what you shouldn't or can't do, and work around that, then sometimes you will make users less frustrated when having to remember what random command or finger swipe gesture does what.</p><p>That said, if my iPhone resets its damn icon order again because I had my finger on the screen too long I'm GOING TO THROW IT VERY HARD!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces , and more generally , at design ; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software , or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.I know the OP is being a bit hostile , but with many Open Source projects UI are basically " what would I like to have " following then " what would my user 's like to have " and followed " what my user 's should have but do n't know they need " last.I think more thought should be done to the interface via a graphic design and human nature standpoint rather than simply doing what you are the user asks for.I 'm not saying that the developers or users are stupid , it is just that often when asked they really want , they do n't know what they really want so they throw everything in and end up with feature UI bloat.Sometimes less is more , and if you work from a standpoint of what you should n't or ca n't do , and work around that , then sometimes you will make users less frustrated when having to remember what random command or finger swipe gesture does what.That said , if my iPhone resets its damn icon order again because I had my finger on the screen too long I 'm GOING TO THROW IT VERY HARD !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.I know the OP is being a bit hostile, but with many Open Source projects UI are basically "what would I like to have" following then "what would my user's like to have" and followed "what my user's should have but don't know they need" last.I think more thought should be done to the interface via a graphic design and human nature standpoint rather than simply doing what you are the user asks for.I'm not saying that the developers or users are stupid, it is just that often when asked they really want, they don't know what they really want so they throw everything in and end up with feature UI bloat.Sometimes less is more, and if you work from a standpoint of what you shouldn't or can't do, and work around that, then sometimes you will make users less frustrated when having to remember what random command or finger swipe gesture does what.That said, if my iPhone resets its damn icon order again because I had my finger on the screen too long I'm GOING TO THROW IT VERY HARD!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520355</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>jackspenn</author>
	<datestamp>1246271940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface</p></div><p>
Here is the best AD for Android, you run it the end of this year or early 2010.
<br> <br>
You have a cut of the Apple conference where they show how many apps they have compared to other phones with the date.  <b> - Advantage iPhone</b>
<br> <br>
Then you show the current apps between Android and the iPhone with trend lines and the date Android will pass the iPhone sometime next year. <b> - Advantage Android</b>
<br> <br>
Then you show apps that Apple has banned but are available for Android, starting with wifi tethering that allows you to connect multiple Windows, Linux and OS X machines to your service providers network, etc.  <b> - Advantage Android</b>
<br> <br>
Then you run the number of iPhone models available versus the number of Android phones available.  Phones with keyboards or without keyboards, phones from HTC, motorola and Samsung (all will have phones by the end of 2009).<b> - Advantage Android</b>
<br> <br>
Then you show how iPhone only works on AT&amp;T and how Android works on T-Mobile or AT&amp;T and probably other providers by the end of year.  <b> - Advantage Android</b>
<br> <br>
So you basically say, do you want the most censored apps you can play in the foreground right now?  Apps that are policed by Apple and AT&amp;T?
<br> <br>
Or do you want the phone what has the most apps by end of 2010, is open, with advanced apps, background services and alerts, etc. with more choices on service providers and hardware manufactures?
<br> <br>
Do you want a phone that you can hack and customize endlessly, a phone you can tweak infinitely and even code for yourself or your friends?
<br> <br>
In short do you want to <i>feel</i>  cool, or do you want to be free (which is what makes most people cool)?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface Here is the best AD for Android , you run it the end of this year or early 2010 .
You have a cut of the Apple conference where they show how many apps they have compared to other phones with the date .
- Advantage iPhone Then you show the current apps between Android and the iPhone with trend lines and the date Android will pass the iPhone sometime next year .
- Advantage Android Then you show apps that Apple has banned but are available for Android , starting with wifi tethering that allows you to connect multiple Windows , Linux and OS X machines to your service providers network , etc .
- Advantage Android Then you run the number of iPhone models available versus the number of Android phones available .
Phones with keyboards or without keyboards , phones from HTC , motorola and Samsung ( all will have phones by the end of 2009 ) .
- Advantage Android Then you show how iPhone only works on AT&amp;T and how Android works on T-Mobile or AT&amp;T and probably other providers by the end of year .
- Advantage Android So you basically say , do you want the most censored apps you can play in the foreground right now ?
Apps that are policed by Apple and AT&amp;T ?
Or do you want the phone what has the most apps by end of 2010 , is open , with advanced apps , background services and alerts , etc .
with more choices on service providers and hardware manufactures ?
Do you want a phone that you can hack and customize endlessly , a phone you can tweak infinitely and even code for yourself or your friends ?
In short do you want to feel cool , or do you want to be free ( which is what makes most people cool ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface
Here is the best AD for Android, you run it the end of this year or early 2010.
You have a cut of the Apple conference where they show how many apps they have compared to other phones with the date.
- Advantage iPhone
 
Then you show the current apps between Android and the iPhone with trend lines and the date Android will pass the iPhone sometime next year.
- Advantage Android
 
Then you show apps that Apple has banned but are available for Android, starting with wifi tethering that allows you to connect multiple Windows, Linux and OS X machines to your service providers network, etc.
- Advantage Android
 
Then you run the number of iPhone models available versus the number of Android phones available.
Phones with keyboards or without keyboards, phones from HTC, motorola and Samsung (all will have phones by the end of 2009).
- Advantage Android
 
Then you show how iPhone only works on AT&amp;T and how Android works on T-Mobile or AT&amp;T and probably other providers by the end of year.
- Advantage Android
 
So you basically say, do you want the most censored apps you can play in the foreground right now?
Apps that are policed by Apple and AT&amp;T?
Or do you want the phone what has the most apps by end of 2010, is open, with advanced apps, background services and alerts, etc.
with more choices on service providers and hardware manufactures?
Do you want a phone that you can hack and customize endlessly, a phone you can tweak infinitely and even code for yourself or your friends?
In short do you want to feel  cool, or do you want to be free (which is what makes most people cool)?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520591</id>
	<title>Android Java is java is syntax only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246272960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Android java is java in syntax only.  Google/Android created their own classes, etc so it you know any  Sun Java classes then you don't know anything except the syntax.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Android java is java in syntax only .
Google/Android created their own classes , etc so it you know any Sun Java classes then you do n't know anything except the syntax .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Android java is java in syntax only.
Google/Android created their own classes, etc so it you know any  Sun Java classes then you don't know anything except the syntax.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517531</id>
	<title>Catwoman on the cover?</title>
	<author>themightythor</author>
	<datestamp>1246304520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is that thing on the cover?  It looks kind of like Catwoman got a bunch of crappy henna tattoos.  Though the idea of her with a tramp stamp does...things...for me.  I'll be in my bunk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is that thing on the cover ?
It looks kind of like Catwoman got a bunch of crappy henna tattoos .
Though the idea of her with a tramp stamp does...things...for me .
I 'll be in my bunk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is that thing on the cover?
It looks kind of like Catwoman got a bunch of crappy henna tattoos.
Though the idea of her with a tramp stamp does...things...for me.
I'll be in my bunk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517783</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>jbacon</author>
	<datestamp>1246305660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as I actually own a G1, I enjoy the ability to make my interface whatever the hell I want it to be.  On the Market alone are several complete Home screen replacement apps, offering a plethora of features including iPhone-style dock bars, skinnability, and more.  And once you break out of the one-click comfort zone and check out <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=446" title="xda-developers.com" rel="nofollow">xda-developers</a> [xda-developers.com], the opportunities abound.  Custom roms, roms for other phones that are ported to the G1, and so much more.</p><p>So, the G1 ends up being a delightfully hackable, surprisingly polished platform.  Considering Apple has a year's head start on them, the Android platform is doing superbly.  Further considering that there are many, many phones on many carriers slated for release that run Android, I'm fairly confident in saying that the platform will be taken to a whole new level this time next year.  Once carriers start learning that Android makes them money, they will throw their support behind it, and that'll be the game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as I actually own a G1 , I enjoy the ability to make my interface whatever the hell I want it to be .
On the Market alone are several complete Home screen replacement apps , offering a plethora of features including iPhone-style dock bars , skinnability , and more .
And once you break out of the one-click comfort zone and check out xda-developers [ xda-developers.com ] , the opportunities abound .
Custom roms , roms for other phones that are ported to the G1 , and so much more.So , the G1 ends up being a delightfully hackable , surprisingly polished platform .
Considering Apple has a year 's head start on them , the Android platform is doing superbly .
Further considering that there are many , many phones on many carriers slated for release that run Android , I 'm fairly confident in saying that the platform will be taken to a whole new level this time next year .
Once carriers start learning that Android makes them money , they will throw their support behind it , and that 'll be the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as I actually own a G1, I enjoy the ability to make my interface whatever the hell I want it to be.
On the Market alone are several complete Home screen replacement apps, offering a plethora of features including iPhone-style dock bars, skinnability, and more.
And once you break out of the one-click comfort zone and check out xda-developers [xda-developers.com], the opportunities abound.
Custom roms, roms for other phones that are ported to the G1, and so much more.So, the G1 ends up being a delightfully hackable, surprisingly polished platform.
Considering Apple has a year's head start on them, the Android platform is doing superbly.
Further considering that there are many, many phones on many carriers slated for release that run Android, I'm fairly confident in saying that the platform will be taken to a whole new level this time next year.
Once carriers start learning that Android makes them money, they will throw their support behind it, and that'll be the game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517387</id>
	<title>txt of Unlocking Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Page 1: Android is already unlocked, sucker.</p><p>Fin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Page 1 : Android is already unlocked , sucker.Fin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Page 1: Android is already unlocked, sucker.Fin</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519057</id>
	<title>Michael Jackson BREAKING NEWZ!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246267440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just heard on Irish television.  Michael Jackson still dead.  Polaksky Frenseh confirms it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just heard on Irish television .
Michael Jackson still dead .
Polaksky Frenseh confirms it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just heard on Irish television.
Michael Jackson still dead.
Polaksky Frenseh confirms it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28587411</id>
	<title>http://web.zone.ee/009/swimgearb8/index.html</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246820820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://web.zone.ee/009/swimgearb8/index.html" title="web.zone.ee" rel="nofollow">swim</a> [web.zone.ee]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>swim [ web.zone.ee ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>swim [web.zone.ee]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28525067</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246392240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.androphones.com/" title="androphones.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.androphones.com/</a> [androphones.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.androphones.com/ [ androphones.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.androphones.com/ [androphones.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427</id>
	<title>It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>goffster</author>
	<datestamp>1246304160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you buy an unlocked android phone, you can not run applications *you paid for*<br>because of DRM.</p><p>If you buy an android phone and then unlock it, all is well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you buy an unlocked android phone , you can not run applications * you paid for * because of DRM.If you buy an android phone and then unlock it , all is well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you buy an unlocked android phone, you can not run applications *you paid for*because of DRM.If you buy an android phone and then unlock it, all is well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517429</id>
	<title>The Killer App Wll Be: +1, Informative</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Intenet games of SKILL  for your iPhone to kill time during job search.   What else will the U.S.A. proletariat do given that their jobs have been exported to Mexico and China with the approval of their  Criminals-In-Congress and corporate executies?</p><p>Why throw money away on a lottery when you can you use your SKILLS to play poker.  Poker is NOT gambling !!</p><p>P.S.: Of course, this entertainment option requires payment with a credit card which is preferable form of payment in hedonistic U.S.A.</p><p>Yours In Entertainment,<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkJ6zayr-Qg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Kilgore Trout</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intenet games of SKILL for your iPhone to kill time during job search .
What else will the U.S.A. proletariat do given that their jobs have been exported to Mexico and China with the approval of their Criminals-In-Congress and corporate executies ? Why throw money away on a lottery when you can you use your SKILLS to play poker .
Poker is NOT gambling ! ! P.S .
: Of course , this entertainment option requires payment with a credit card which is preferable form of payment in hedonistic U.S.A.Yours In Entertainment,Kilgore Trout [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intenet games of SKILL  for your iPhone to kill time during job search.
What else will the U.S.A. proletariat do given that their jobs have been exported to Mexico and China with the approval of their  Criminals-In-Congress and corporate executies?Why throw money away on a lottery when you can you use your SKILLS to play poker.
Poker is NOT gambling !!P.S.
: Of course, this entertainment option requires payment with a credit card which is preferable form of payment in hedonistic U.S.A.Yours In Entertainment,Kilgore Trout [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518509</id>
	<title>Sorry....have to say it....the cover</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246308720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The platform is called "Android".  It basically TELLS you what the cover should have.</p><p>Instead they have a tattooed aboriginal hunter with hair from the boss on the Dilbert comics.</p><p>Because when I think "android", I think "mostly naked male aboriginal tattoed hunter with Dilbert boss hair".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The platform is called " Android " .
It basically TELLS you what the cover should have.Instead they have a tattooed aboriginal hunter with hair from the boss on the Dilbert comics.Because when I think " android " , I think " mostly naked male aboriginal tattoed hunter with Dilbert boss hair " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The platform is called "Android".
It basically TELLS you what the cover should have.Instead they have a tattooed aboriginal hunter with hair from the boss on the Dilbert comics.Because when I think "android", I think "mostly naked male aboriginal tattoed hunter with Dilbert boss hair".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1246305360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a related question... Are there any new android phones coming up?</p><p>The G1 is not available in my country</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a related question... Are there any new android phones coming up ? The G1 is not available in my country</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a related question... Are there any new android phones coming up?The G1 is not available in my country</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28524639</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1246300380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Parent should really be nodded down on account of the fact he hasnt got a clue.<blockquote><div><p>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Entirely subjective. Try defining interface, do you mean the look, Google is the undisputed king of creating functional minimal interfaces, Apple has a love affair with shiny thus is far too subjective to make a definitive judgement on. Responsiveness, on par, the Iphone has a better basic interface but android is far superior with multi-tasking, apple has no way to rapidly switch between two running programs unlike Android which has one button, for that matter you cant even run two non apple programs on an iphone.</p><blockquote><div><p>Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design;</p></div></blockquote><p>

True, but this really doesn't matter, besides I don't see any designers volunteering to help with FOSS. When design has to be done by engineers you get this. However it doesn't matter how pretty something is if it doesn't run, engineering always comes first, design just takes all the credit. On the back end, Android is far superior, multi-tasking, superior CPU and memory management, more support for hardware.</p><blockquote><div><p>Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.</p></div></blockquote><p>

When break it down enough, everything is derivative. Apple has rarely invented anything, much like Microsoft they purchased, borrowed or stole almost all their major advancements, made minor tweaks to them and then patented the hell out of them. Many of the major computing inventions started out as military projects, the computer itself out of the WWII need for rapid code breaking, the Internet out of the US military's need for rapid, reliable and redundant communication. Things like HTTP came out of universities. Companies don't do theoretical research, Apple is definitely no exemption to this.<br> <br>

Apple has sold the iphone entirely on hype and not on its own merits, on its own merits the iphone is inferior to the less sophisticated and far cheaper Nokia E71/E63. As a result of apple selling the iphone on hype it experienced a meteoric rise in sales, this will reverse the iphone will experience an equally meteoric decrease in sales as the general public becomes accustomed to the level of hype surrounding the iphone (in other words the iphone will become passe). In the mean time Android will be available of many handsets, cheaper handsets at that as the cost of building/licensing and supporting an OS decreases and competition for the same space increases. Apple made a lot of noise with the iphone but Google made deals.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Parent should really be nodded down on account of the fact he hasnt got a clue.The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface .
Entirely subjective .
Try defining interface , do you mean the look , Google is the undisputed king of creating functional minimal interfaces , Apple has a love affair with shiny thus is far too subjective to make a definitive judgement on .
Responsiveness , on par , the Iphone has a better basic interface but android is far superior with multi-tasking , apple has no way to rapidly switch between two running programs unlike Android which has one button , for that matter you cant even run two non apple programs on an iphone.Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces , and more generally , at design ; True , but this really does n't matter , besides I do n't see any designers volunteering to help with FOSS .
When design has to be done by engineers you get this .
However it does n't matter how pretty something is if it does n't run , engineering always comes first , design just takes all the credit .
On the back end , Android is far superior , multi-tasking , superior CPU and memory management , more support for hardware.Very often superior clones , mind you , but it 's still derivative .
When break it down enough , everything is derivative .
Apple has rarely invented anything , much like Microsoft they purchased , borrowed or stole almost all their major advancements , made minor tweaks to them and then patented the hell out of them .
Many of the major computing inventions started out as military projects , the computer itself out of the WWII need for rapid code breaking , the Internet out of the US military 's need for rapid , reliable and redundant communication .
Things like HTTP came out of universities .
Companies do n't do theoretical research , Apple is definitely no exemption to this .
Apple has sold the iphone entirely on hype and not on its own merits , on its own merits the iphone is inferior to the less sophisticated and far cheaper Nokia E71/E63 .
As a result of apple selling the iphone on hype it experienced a meteoric rise in sales , this will reverse the iphone will experience an equally meteoric decrease in sales as the general public becomes accustomed to the level of hype surrounding the iphone ( in other words the iphone will become passe ) .
In the mean time Android will be available of many handsets , cheaper handsets at that as the cost of building/licensing and supporting an OS decreases and competition for the same space increases .
Apple made a lot of noise with the iphone but Google made deals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Parent should really be nodded down on account of the fact he hasnt got a clue.The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.
Entirely subjective.
Try defining interface, do you mean the look, Google is the undisputed king of creating functional minimal interfaces, Apple has a love affair with shiny thus is far too subjective to make a definitive judgement on.
Responsiveness, on par, the Iphone has a better basic interface but android is far superior with multi-tasking, apple has no way to rapidly switch between two running programs unlike Android which has one button, for that matter you cant even run two non apple programs on an iphone.Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design;

True, but this really doesn't matter, besides I don't see any designers volunteering to help with FOSS.
When design has to be done by engineers you get this.
However it doesn't matter how pretty something is if it doesn't run, engineering always comes first, design just takes all the credit.
On the back end, Android is far superior, multi-tasking, superior CPU and memory management, more support for hardware.Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.
When break it down enough, everything is derivative.
Apple has rarely invented anything, much like Microsoft they purchased, borrowed or stole almost all their major advancements, made minor tweaks to them and then patented the hell out of them.
Many of the major computing inventions started out as military projects, the computer itself out of the WWII need for rapid code breaking, the Internet out of the US military's need for rapid, reliable and redundant communication.
Things like HTTP came out of universities.
Companies don't do theoretical research, Apple is definitely no exemption to this.
Apple has sold the iphone entirely on hype and not on its own merits, on its own merits the iphone is inferior to the less sophisticated and far cheaper Nokia E71/E63.
As a result of apple selling the iphone on hype it experienced a meteoric rise in sales, this will reverse the iphone will experience an equally meteoric decrease in sales as the general public becomes accustomed to the level of hype surrounding the iphone (in other words the iphone will become passe).
In the mean time Android will be available of many handsets, cheaper handsets at that as the cost of building/licensing and supporting an OS decreases and competition for the same space increases.
Apple made a lot of noise with the iphone but Google made deals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520225</id>
	<title>And no, the TX won't be the standard bearer.</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1246271400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Unlocking Android</p><p>Assholes!  We're already past 2:14 AM easter daylight time, August 29, 1997 and riding on thin ice.  Leave them locked up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Unlocking AndroidAssholes !
We 're already past 2 : 14 AM easter daylight time , August 29 , 1997 and riding on thin ice .
Leave them locked up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Unlocking AndroidAssholes!
We're already past 2:14 AM easter daylight time, August 29, 1997 and riding on thin ice.
Leave them locked up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517669</id>
	<title>Got COMSEC?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anybody know if Android got it's security locked down? Last I heard when it came out there were a bunch of Vulns in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody know if Android got it 's security locked down ?
Last I heard when it came out there were a bunch of Vulns in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody know if Android got it's security locked down?
Last I heard when it came out there were a bunch of Vulns in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517677</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>[Citation Needed]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Citation Needed ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Citation Needed]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517767</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't you be picking lettuce?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't you be picking lettuce ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't you be picking lettuce?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519001</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246267200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, just tell him to bring the guests from the engine room up to the bridge then</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , just tell him to bring the guests from the engine room up to the bridge then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, just tell him to bring the guests from the engine room up to the bridge then</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517457</id>
	<title>eclipse</title>
	<author>LDoggg\_</author>
	<datestamp>1246304340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The online Android installation instructions are much more useful, because they also include the latest version of Eclipse, 3.4. </i> <br> <br>Actually 3.5 (Galileo) is out now.  There aren't explicit instructions for it on developer.android.com, but it's still works the same way.  Add the update site, and install the plugin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The online Android installation instructions are much more useful , because they also include the latest version of Eclipse , 3.4 .
Actually 3.5 ( Galileo ) is out now .
There are n't explicit instructions for it on developer.android.com , but it 's still works the same way .
Add the update site , and install the plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The online Android installation instructions are much more useful, because they also include the latest version of Eclipse, 3.4.
Actually 3.5 (Galileo) is out now.
There aren't explicit instructions for it on developer.android.com, but it's still works the same way.
Add the update site, and install the plugin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518135</id>
	<title>Re:It still has quite a bit of "suckiness"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246307100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you're spreading FUD, thats completely false.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're spreading FUD , thats completely false .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're spreading FUD, thats completely false.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</id>
	<title>Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>Estanislao Martínez</author>
	<datestamp>1246304220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.  Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.  Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface .
Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces , and more generally , at design ; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software , or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP .
Very often superior clones , mind you , but it 's still derivative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.
Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.
Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518289</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246307760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is hilariously wrong. For one thing, the UI of Android is distinctive, and not derivative of the iPhone in any appreciable manner (like the iPhone it has a lot of similarities with other, earlier touch-screen smartphones and PDAs, going back as far as the DEC Itsy and the Compaq iPaq, and the Palm VII).</p><p>The snipe about open source being bad at 'design' is crass stupidity, unless you think that gcc, BSD, TCP/IP and webkit are all bad design... Apple doesn't. Android's design is subtle and sophisticated, with advanced features like gesture-based screen unlocking, and the "Intent"-based mechanism that allows apps to interact.</p><p>Android apps are capable of some things that iPhone apps simply cannot do, and the hardware of the devices launched so far, designed by HTC, is significantly more advanced than the iPhone 3GS until it was launched. There are apps built on Android that were simply not possible on the iPhone until the 3GS (check out wikitude, Layar, Lastminute NRU and IBM's new Wimbledon navigator if you don't believe me).</p><p>The iPhone is winning at the moment because of an astonishingly clever and successful marketing effort, polished delivery of product and the attention to detail that has allowed, for example, games to flourish, but unless you're a complete idiot you can't possibly believe it will remain dominant over a capable, fast-advancing, more hardware-agnostic OS that has sold a couple of million handsets on the back of almost no marketing whatsoever and is available for the entire industry to adopt. The fact that it is open source is not really that significant.</p><p>iPhone's destiny is as a major but not dominant player, like the (lovely) Mac I am typing this on. Android is not broken, nor is it bad, and it has no flaws significant enough to stop it being deployed and improved by any number of players.</p><p>Competition is a wonderful thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is hilariously wrong .
For one thing , the UI of Android is distinctive , and not derivative of the iPhone in any appreciable manner ( like the iPhone it has a lot of similarities with other , earlier touch-screen smartphones and PDAs , going back as far as the DEC Itsy and the Compaq iPaq , and the Palm VII ) .The snipe about open source being bad at 'design ' is crass stupidity , unless you think that gcc , BSD , TCP/IP and webkit are all bad design... Apple does n't .
Android 's design is subtle and sophisticated , with advanced features like gesture-based screen unlocking , and the " Intent " -based mechanism that allows apps to interact.Android apps are capable of some things that iPhone apps simply can not do , and the hardware of the devices launched so far , designed by HTC , is significantly more advanced than the iPhone 3GS until it was launched .
There are apps built on Android that were simply not possible on the iPhone until the 3GS ( check out wikitude , Layar , Lastminute NRU and IBM 's new Wimbledon navigator if you do n't believe me ) .The iPhone is winning at the moment because of an astonishingly clever and successful marketing effort , polished delivery of product and the attention to detail that has allowed , for example , games to flourish , but unless you 're a complete idiot you ca n't possibly believe it will remain dominant over a capable , fast-advancing , more hardware-agnostic OS that has sold a couple of million handsets on the back of almost no marketing whatsoever and is available for the entire industry to adopt .
The fact that it is open source is not really that significant.iPhone 's destiny is as a major but not dominant player , like the ( lovely ) Mac I am typing this on .
Android is not broken , nor is it bad , and it has no flaws significant enough to stop it being deployed and improved by any number of players.Competition is a wonderful thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is hilariously wrong.
For one thing, the UI of Android is distinctive, and not derivative of the iPhone in any appreciable manner (like the iPhone it has a lot of similarities with other, earlier touch-screen smartphones and PDAs, going back as far as the DEC Itsy and the Compaq iPaq, and the Palm VII).The snipe about open source being bad at 'design' is crass stupidity, unless you think that gcc, BSD, TCP/IP and webkit are all bad design... Apple doesn't.
Android's design is subtle and sophisticated, with advanced features like gesture-based screen unlocking, and the "Intent"-based mechanism that allows apps to interact.Android apps are capable of some things that iPhone apps simply cannot do, and the hardware of the devices launched so far, designed by HTC, is significantly more advanced than the iPhone 3GS until it was launched.
There are apps built on Android that were simply not possible on the iPhone until the 3GS (check out wikitude, Layar, Lastminute NRU and IBM's new Wimbledon navigator if you don't believe me).The iPhone is winning at the moment because of an astonishingly clever and successful marketing effort, polished delivery of product and the attention to detail that has allowed, for example, games to flourish, but unless you're a complete idiot you can't possibly believe it will remain dominant over a capable, fast-advancing, more hardware-agnostic OS that has sold a couple of million handsets on the back of almost no marketing whatsoever and is available for the entire industry to adopt.
The fact that it is open source is not really that significant.iPhone's destiny is as a major but not dominant player, like the (lovely) Mac I am typing this on.
Android is not broken, nor is it bad, and it has no flaws significant enough to stop it being deployed and improved by any number of players.Competition is a wonderful thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517507</id>
	<title>furries?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is there a furry on the cover? I thought the mascot was a cute little robot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is there a furry on the cover ?
I thought the mascot was a cute little robot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is there a furry on the cover?
I thought the mascot was a cute little robot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519945</id>
	<title>Re:Scripting now available as well.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246270380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Awesome but, how much support does the python interpreter have for all the cool modules you can import in the regular python?  Is it just a toy or can I do the cool things I can do on my desktop with python?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome but , how much support does the python interpreter have for all the cool modules you can import in the regular python ?
Is it just a toy or can I do the cool things I can do on my desktop with python ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome but, how much support does the python interpreter have for all the cool modules you can import in the regular python?
Is it just a toy or can I do the cool things I can do on my desktop with python?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517917</id>
	<title>Re:Ads Disabled</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yo dawg, I heard you like adblocking so we block the ads here so we can block ads while you block ads (with adblock).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg , I heard you like adblocking so we block the ads here so we can block ads while you block ads ( with adblock ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg, I heard you like adblocking so we block the ads here so we can block ads while you block ads (with adblock).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517755</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you used one?  The interface is pretty nice if you ask me. The main thing I would change about the G1 is battery life, other than that I think it's on par with the iphone. Tactile feedback FTW.
<br> <br>
The main things I see Android has going for it:<br>
lots of (cheaper) devices<br>
great dev tools<br>
Java &gt; ObjectiveC (at least more people know it)<br>
no need to buy a mac for development<br>
<br>
The android challenge 2 seems to have created a lull in released apps, but over time I think the better environment for developers will ensure more and better apps than for the iphone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you used one ?
The interface is pretty nice if you ask me .
The main thing I would change about the G1 is battery life , other than that I think it 's on par with the iphone .
Tactile feedback FTW .
The main things I see Android has going for it : lots of ( cheaper ) devices great dev tools Java &gt; ObjectiveC ( at least more people know it ) no need to buy a mac for development The android challenge 2 seems to have created a lull in released apps , but over time I think the better environment for developers will ensure more and better apps than for the iphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you used one?
The interface is pretty nice if you ask me.
The main thing I would change about the G1 is battery life, other than that I think it's on par with the iphone.
Tactile feedback FTW.
The main things I see Android has going for it:
lots of (cheaper) devices
great dev tools
Java &gt; ObjectiveC (at least more people know it)
no need to buy a mac for development

The android challenge 2 seems to have created a lull in released apps, but over time I think the better environment for developers will ensure more and better apps than for the iphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518071</id>
	<title>I can sum it up in a single word.</title>
	<author>codepunk</author>
	<datestamp>1246306800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SLOW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SLOW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SLOW!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28522171</id>
	<title>I h8 iPhone development</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1246281180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so to develop for the iPhone I have to 1) learn a new version of C and 2) deal with yet another overly complex set of classes, invented to make your life more difficult.</p><p>Where is the "Visual Basic" for iPhone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so to develop for the iPhone I have to 1 ) learn a new version of C and 2 ) deal with yet another overly complex set of classes , invented to make your life more difficult.Where is the " Visual Basic " for iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so to develop for the iPhone I have to 1) learn a new version of C and 2) deal with yet another overly complex set of classes, invented to make your life more difficult.Where is the "Visual Basic" for iPhone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28522875</id>
	<title>I hope you aint trolling. Here's food.</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1246285260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why would I pay for an app? I just pirate the drm-free version.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, so the people who develop a game, for example resort to killing the game play by putting in ads. So noone uses the game. So they go broke.</p><p>No, hang on, that doesn't work. They developers give it away for free because they are nice people who don't really need to eat. But, although thoroughly nice, being so destitute, noone could be bothered listening to lectures by them about how they to could waste their talent and energy on a plan that is sure to fail. And who buys a support contract for a game? Don't people just try a different game?</p><p>That doesn't work either. Hey maybe, just maybe, USD0.99 is nothing to pay for 6 months of boredom relief while waiting for a train. Maybe, if the market is global, ten thousand people pay and the dev can live for a bit from it? Maybe the dev might create something that a couple of million end up paying for it and the dev can set him/her self up pretty well for? That works.</p><p>What works even better is where the dev gets the USD0.66 (after google takes a cut) and spends a portion of it on buying off law enforcement and hiring a personal security detail. Then, and here is the brilliant bit, they can track down arseholes who just run the 'pirated' version and force them to give the lectures. Naked. With fresh chilli shoved up their arses. At gun point with the threat of more chillis.</p><p> <i>For the record, I have an unlocked G1, I use loads of free software - no MS or Apple at home, and I donate to projects that create software I like. I pay for games if they work on wine and then download a no cd crack if required. I would pay for apps for Android if I could get them on my market.</i> </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would I pay for an app ?
I just pirate the drm-free version.Yeah , so the people who develop a game , for example resort to killing the game play by putting in ads .
So noone uses the game .
So they go broke.No , hang on , that does n't work .
They developers give it away for free because they are nice people who do n't really need to eat .
But , although thoroughly nice , being so destitute , noone could be bothered listening to lectures by them about how they to could waste their talent and energy on a plan that is sure to fail .
And who buys a support contract for a game ?
Do n't people just try a different game ? That does n't work either .
Hey maybe , just maybe , USD0.99 is nothing to pay for 6 months of boredom relief while waiting for a train .
Maybe , if the market is global , ten thousand people pay and the dev can live for a bit from it ?
Maybe the dev might create something that a couple of million end up paying for it and the dev can set him/her self up pretty well for ?
That works.What works even better is where the dev gets the USD0.66 ( after google takes a cut ) and spends a portion of it on buying off law enforcement and hiring a personal security detail .
Then , and here is the brilliant bit , they can track down arseholes who just run the 'pirated ' version and force them to give the lectures .
Naked. With fresh chilli shoved up their arses .
At gun point with the threat of more chillis .
For the record , I have an unlocked G1 , I use loads of free software - no MS or Apple at home , and I donate to projects that create software I like .
I pay for games if they work on wine and then download a no cd crack if required .
I would pay for apps for Android if I could get them on my market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would I pay for an app?
I just pirate the drm-free version.Yeah, so the people who develop a game, for example resort to killing the game play by putting in ads.
So noone uses the game.
So they go broke.No, hang on, that doesn't work.
They developers give it away for free because they are nice people who don't really need to eat.
But, although thoroughly nice, being so destitute, noone could be bothered listening to lectures by them about how they to could waste their talent and energy on a plan that is sure to fail.
And who buys a support contract for a game?
Don't people just try a different game?That doesn't work either.
Hey maybe, just maybe, USD0.99 is nothing to pay for 6 months of boredom relief while waiting for a train.
Maybe, if the market is global, ten thousand people pay and the dev can live for a bit from it?
Maybe the dev might create something that a couple of million end up paying for it and the dev can set him/her self up pretty well for?
That works.What works even better is where the dev gets the USD0.66 (after google takes a cut) and spends a portion of it on buying off law enforcement and hiring a personal security detail.
Then, and here is the brilliant bit, they can track down arseholes who just run the 'pirated' version and force them to give the lectures.
Naked. With fresh chilli shoved up their arses.
At gun point with the threat of more chillis.
For the record, I have an unlocked G1, I use loads of free software - no MS or Apple at home, and I donate to projects that create software I like.
I pay for games if they work on wine and then download a no cd crack if required.
I would pay for apps for Android if I could get them on my market. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520009</id>
	<title>Better than the O'Reilly book</title>
	<author>canowhoopass.com</author>
	<datestamp>1246270620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm subscribed to O'Reilly Safari, where I have both <a href="http://my.safaribooksonline.com/9781933988672" title="safaribooksonline.com" rel="nofollow">Unlocking Android</a> [safaribooksonline.com] and O'Reilly's <a href="http://my.safaribooksonline.com/9780596156220" title="safaribooksonline.com" rel="nofollow">Android Application Development</a> [safaribooksonline.com] in my bookshelf.

The O'Reilly book uses the "build a big application" approach to teaching. So each chapter goes into adding a different feature. There is an expectation that the reader has the examples installed, but unfortunately they don't work with Android v1.5(cupcake). I was lost since I couldn't follow.

Luckily I found this book which does a much better job of explaining things. The reviewer is absolutely correct on one thing though. It isn't great at explaining the initial install, and doing a hello world example.

If you want to learn Android Development I recommend the following order:
<ol> <li>1) Follow the <a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/1.5\_r2/installing.html" title="android.com" rel="nofollow">Eclipse install guide</a> [android.com] from the Android dev site.</li><li>2) Complete the various <a href="http://developer.android.com/guide/tutorials/hello-world.html" title="android.com" rel="nofollow">Hello World, Hello Views, and Notepad tutorials</a> [android.com] from the Android dev site. They are kept updated and are well written.</li><li>3) Then read through this book. It really is a good one.</li></ol><p>

-Rod</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm subscribed to O'Reilly Safari , where I have both Unlocking Android [ safaribooksonline.com ] and O'Reilly 's Android Application Development [ safaribooksonline.com ] in my bookshelf .
The O'Reilly book uses the " build a big application " approach to teaching .
So each chapter goes into adding a different feature .
There is an expectation that the reader has the examples installed , but unfortunately they do n't work with Android v1.5 ( cupcake ) .
I was lost since I could n't follow .
Luckily I found this book which does a much better job of explaining things .
The reviewer is absolutely correct on one thing though .
It is n't great at explaining the initial install , and doing a hello world example .
If you want to learn Android Development I recommend the following order : 1 ) Follow the Eclipse install guide [ android.com ] from the Android dev site.2 ) Complete the various Hello World , Hello Views , and Notepad tutorials [ android.com ] from the Android dev site .
They are kept updated and are well written.3 ) Then read through this book .
It really is a good one .
-Rod</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm subscribed to O'Reilly Safari, where I have both Unlocking Android [safaribooksonline.com] and O'Reilly's Android Application Development [safaribooksonline.com] in my bookshelf.
The O'Reilly book uses the "build a big application" approach to teaching.
So each chapter goes into adding a different feature.
There is an expectation that the reader has the examples installed, but unfortunately they don't work with Android v1.5(cupcake).
I was lost since I couldn't follow.
Luckily I found this book which does a much better job of explaining things.
The reviewer is absolutely correct on one thing though.
It isn't great at explaining the initial install, and doing a hello world example.
If you want to learn Android Development I recommend the following order:
 1) Follow the Eclipse install guide [android.com] from the Android dev site.2) Complete the various Hello World, Hello Views, and Notepad tutorials [android.com] from the Android dev site.
They are kept updated and are well written.3) Then read through this book.
It really is a good one.
-Rod</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518637</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1246266000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Check your history.  Java is a poor knockoff of objective c.  Sun ditched OpenStep in favor of Java.  Apple ditched Java in favor of OpenStep.
</p><p>
Res Ipsa Loquitur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check your history .
Java is a poor knockoff of objective c. Sun ditched OpenStep in favor of Java .
Apple ditched Java in favor of OpenStep .
Res Ipsa Loquitur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Check your history.
Java is a poor knockoff of objective c.  Sun ditched OpenStep in favor of Java.
Apple ditched Java in favor of OpenStep.
Res Ipsa Loquitur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518781</id>
	<title>Re:The Android Platform</title>
	<author>$1uck</author>
	<datestamp>1246266360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't use a JVM is uses Dalvik vm.   SO it is something more than a typical j2me vm and something less than a full JVM.   It has its own windowing tool kit, it does not use awt or swing or swt.   Personally I think the Android OS is pretty slick,  inter-application communication is interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't use a JVM is uses Dalvik vm .
SO it is something more than a typical j2me vm and something less than a full JVM .
It has its own windowing tool kit , it does not use awt or swing or swt .
Personally I think the Android OS is pretty slick , inter-application communication is interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't use a JVM is uses Dalvik vm.
SO it is something more than a typical j2me vm and something less than a full JVM.
It has its own windowing tool kit, it does not use awt or swing or swt.
Personally I think the Android OS is pretty slick,  inter-application communication is interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517787</id>
	<title>Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone</title>
	<author>FunkyELF</author>
	<datestamp>1246305720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.  Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.  Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.</p></div><p>XBMC has the best user interface of any application I have ever used.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface .
Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces , and more generally , at design ; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software , or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP .
Very often superior clones , mind you , but it 's still derivative.XBMC has the best user interface of any application I have ever used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone is winning on the basis of having a much superior interface.
Open source development has always been notably bad at user interfaces, and more generally, at design; it is no accident that the most successful open source projects are all clones of some other software, or implementations of back-end protocols like HTTP.
Very often superior clones, mind you, but it's still derivative.XBMC has the best user interface of any application I have ever used.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28525067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28522875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28524639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_139256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28524639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28520355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519057
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518509
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517457
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518497
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28522875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517721
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28518541
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28525067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28519945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_139256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_139256.28517669
</commentlist>
</conversation>
