<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_29_003214</id>
	<title>Google Mistook Jackson Searches For Net Attack</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246277280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Slatterz writes <i>"Web giant Google has admitted it thought the sudden spike in searches for Michael Jackson on Thursday was a <a href="http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/148727,google-mistook-mj-searches-for-net-attack.aspx">massive, coordinated internet attack</a>, leading it to post an error page on Google News. The company's director of product management, RJ Pittman, explained that search volume began to increase around 2pm PDT on Thursday and 'skyrocketed' by 3pm, finally stabilising at around 8pm. According to Pittman, last week also saw one of the largest mobile search spikes ever seen, with 5 of the top 20 searches about Jackson. Google wasn't the only site caught out by the extraordinary events. The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson's death."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slatterz writes " Web giant Google has admitted it thought the sudden spike in searches for Michael Jackson on Thursday was a massive , coordinated internet attack , leading it to post an error page on Google News .
The company 's director of product management , RJ Pittman , explained that search volume began to increase around 2pm PDT on Thursday and 'skyrocketed ' by 3pm , finally stabilising at around 8pm .
According to Pittman , last week also saw one of the largest mobile search spikes ever seen , with 5 of the top 20 searches about Jackson .
Google was n't the only site caught out by the extraordinary events .
The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson 's death .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slatterz writes "Web giant Google has admitted it thought the sudden spike in searches for Michael Jackson on Thursday was a massive, coordinated internet attack, leading it to post an error page on Google News.
The company's director of product management, RJ Pittman, explained that search volume began to increase around 2pm PDT on Thursday and 'skyrocketed' by 3pm, finally stabilising at around 8pm.
According to Pittman, last week also saw one of the largest mobile search spikes ever seen, with 5 of the top 20 searches about Jackson.
Google wasn't the only site caught out by the extraordinary events.
The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson's death.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509269</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>KamuZ</author>
	<datestamp>1246205280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internet</p></div><p>That reminds me the last time i tried to use my cellphone to call my relatives after an earthquake, impossible, it was only 2 years ago or so.

We will see (hopefully not) when something really bad happens how the net behaves. Probably like in 9/11, we will only get text news pages. What i am worried is twitter, probably won't make it and if they did, who knows the kind of misinformation it will deliver to people... not that actual news are 100\% accurate either...

*sigh*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internetThat reminds me the last time i tried to use my cellphone to call my relatives after an earthquake , impossible , it was only 2 years ago or so .
We will see ( hopefully not ) when something really bad happens how the net behaves .
Probably like in 9/11 , we will only get text news pages .
What i am worried is twitter , probably wo n't make it and if they did , who knows the kind of misinformation it will deliver to people... not that actual news are 100 \ % accurate either.. . * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internetThat reminds me the last time i tried to use my cellphone to call my relatives after an earthquake, impossible, it was only 2 years ago or so.
We will see (hopefully not) when something really bad happens how the net behaves.
Probably like in 9/11, we will only get text news pages.
What i am worried is twitter, probably won't make it and if they did, who knows the kind of misinformation it will deliver to people... not that actual news are 100\% accurate either...

*sigh*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510991</id>
	<title>Gotta go when to go dark like Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1246307460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I literally *hid* from the news from first report through this weekend. I knew the bullshit would be enough catastrophically raise the ocean levels once it all got flushed. All I saw was a quick shot of two girls who were weeping over Jackson's death as if they just witnessed their entire families, every friend and their pets get killed in a giant fireball. Seriously, being *that* emotionally invested in a media figure has *got* to be some sort of mental illness.</p><p>So, I'm a bit out of sync. Did North Korea nuke Maui yet?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>Oh, and I was on amazon looking for a book and I saw everyone was rushing to buy his albums. WTF? A musician dying makes you suddenly want to buy his album? WTF is that ghoulishness? Seriously! What mass hysteria or delusion is happening there? There's a PhD thesis waiting for someone there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I literally * hid * from the news from first report through this weekend .
I knew the bullshit would be enough catastrophically raise the ocean levels once it all got flushed .
All I saw was a quick shot of two girls who were weeping over Jackson 's death as if they just witnessed their entire families , every friend and their pets get killed in a giant fireball .
Seriously , being * that * emotionally invested in a media figure has * got * to be some sort of mental illness.So , I 'm a bit out of sync .
Did North Korea nuke Maui yet ?
; - ) Oh , and I was on amazon looking for a book and I saw everyone was rushing to buy his albums .
WTF ? A musician dying makes you suddenly want to buy his album ?
WTF is that ghoulishness ?
Seriously ! What mass hysteria or delusion is happening there ?
There 's a PhD thesis waiting for someone there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I literally *hid* from the news from first report through this weekend.
I knew the bullshit would be enough catastrophically raise the ocean levels once it all got flushed.
All I saw was a quick shot of two girls who were weeping over Jackson's death as if they just witnessed their entire families, every friend and their pets get killed in a giant fireball.
Seriously, being *that* emotionally invested in a media figure has *got* to be some sort of mental illness.So, I'm a bit out of sync.
Did North Korea nuke Maui yet?
;-)Oh, and I was on amazon looking for a book and I saw everyone was rushing to buy his albums.
WTF? A musician dying makes you suddenly want to buy his album?
WTF is that ghoulishness?
Seriously! What mass hysteria or delusion is happening there?
There's a PhD thesis waiting for someone there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510589</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>allcoolnameswheretak</author>
	<datestamp>1246217100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Michael Jacksons death was very real news to me, and I suspect millions of other people. I've listened to MJs music almost all my life. I have fond childhood memories watching the "Moonwalker" movie. Therefore MJs cultural impact and musical career are a very "real" part of my life. Quite alot more real than the financial crisis we seem to be having right now or some ships getting hijacked off the coast of Somalia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Jacksons death was very real news to me , and I suspect millions of other people .
I 've listened to MJs music almost all my life .
I have fond childhood memories watching the " Moonwalker " movie .
Therefore MJs cultural impact and musical career are a very " real " part of my life .
Quite alot more real than the financial crisis we seem to be having right now or some ships getting hijacked off the coast of Somalia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Jacksons death was very real news to me, and I suspect millions of other people.
I've listened to MJs music almost all my life.
I have fond childhood memories watching the "Moonwalker" movie.
Therefore MJs cultural impact and musical career are a very "real" part of my life.
Quite alot more real than the financial crisis we seem to be having right now or some ships getting hijacked off the coast of Somalia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513831</id>
	<title>Wa Wa Waaaahhhhh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246289400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what everybody gets for relying on a single source for information!</p><p>Any news on whether Bing or Yahoo had problems?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what everybody gets for relying on a single source for information ! Any news on whether Bing or Yahoo had problems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what everybody gets for relying on a single source for information!Any news on whether Bing or Yahoo had problems?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510641</id>
	<title>Patience required...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>News media web sites may have crashed under the strain, but all I had to do was wait a few hours and read the news on paper. Paper doesn't crash.</p><p>Can't wait a few hours? Okay, switch the TV on and find a 24-hour news channel (even here in the channel-starved UK we get a choice of two). TV doesn't get slashdotted.</p><p>Old media WINS in these situations. Sure you can't write comments for all to see at the end of a news bulletin, but then you don't have to read the inane rantings of the masses after every news bulletin. See what I mean about WIN?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>News media web sites may have crashed under the strain , but all I had to do was wait a few hours and read the news on paper .
Paper does n't crash.Ca n't wait a few hours ?
Okay , switch the TV on and find a 24-hour news channel ( even here in the channel-starved UK we get a choice of two ) .
TV does n't get slashdotted.Old media WINS in these situations .
Sure you ca n't write comments for all to see at the end of a news bulletin , but then you do n't have to read the inane rantings of the masses after every news bulletin .
See what I mean about WIN ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News media web sites may have crashed under the strain, but all I had to do was wait a few hours and read the news on paper.
Paper doesn't crash.Can't wait a few hours?
Okay, switch the TV on and find a 24-hour news channel (even here in the channel-starved UK we get a choice of two).
TV doesn't get slashdotted.Old media WINS in these situations.
Sure you can't write comments for all to see at the end of a news bulletin, but then you don't have to read the inane rantings of the masses after every news bulletin.
See what I mean about WIN?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508809</id>
	<title>Peer-to-peer protcols as a solution to demand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246200180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we take a step back and see what Sept. 11 did to CNN and now The Times website, we can see that the internet can suffer from its own major over-subscription of users to servers/services. Particularly in times of significant current events when almost every connencted user demands information from authoritative sources.<br>
<br>
And I'm sure the audience here is no stranger to the Slashdot/Schumaker-Levey effect?<br>
<br>
There needs to be a blend between the ability of peer to peer protocols (bittorrent?) to service and distribute massive amounts of content and HTTP. Such technology would permit the audience (or data sinks) to service itself in times of major crisis and permit the important information to reach people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we take a step back and see what Sept. 11 did to CNN and now The Times website , we can see that the internet can suffer from its own major over-subscription of users to servers/services .
Particularly in times of significant current events when almost every connencted user demands information from authoritative sources .
And I 'm sure the audience here is no stranger to the Slashdot/Schumaker-Levey effect ?
There needs to be a blend between the ability of peer to peer protocols ( bittorrent ?
) to service and distribute massive amounts of content and HTTP .
Such technology would permit the audience ( or data sinks ) to service itself in times of major crisis and permit the important information to reach people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we take a step back and see what Sept. 11 did to CNN and now The Times website, we can see that the internet can suffer from its own major over-subscription of users to servers/services.
Particularly in times of significant current events when almost every connencted user demands information from authoritative sources.
And I'm sure the audience here is no stranger to the Slashdot/Schumaker-Levey effect?
There needs to be a blend between the ability of peer to peer protocols (bittorrent?
) to service and distribute massive amounts of content and HTTP.
Such technology would permit the audience (or data sinks) to service itself in times of major crisis and permit the important information to reach people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>cetialphav</author>
	<datestamp>1246199340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity, this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes, Google in particular.</p></div><p>It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internet.  After all, it worked fine for you and most other people.  Sites have gotten much better at handling heavy traffic so it is harder to bring them down.  In Google's case, it wasn't so much the amount of traffic as it was misinterpreting what that traffic meant.  They thought it was an attack and started playing defence instead of serving it.  Once they realized the problem, they could easily handle the volume.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity , this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes , Google in particular.It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internet .
After all , it worked fine for you and most other people .
Sites have gotten much better at handling heavy traffic so it is harder to bring them down .
In Google 's case , it was n't so much the amount of traffic as it was misinterpreting what that traffic meant .
They thought it was an attack and started playing defence instead of serving it .
Once they realized the problem , they could easily handle the volume .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity, this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes, Google in particular.It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internet.
After all, it worked fine for you and most other people.
Sites have gotten much better at handling heavy traffic so it is harder to bring them down.
In Google's case, it wasn't so much the amount of traffic as it was misinterpreting what that traffic meant.
They thought it was an attack and started playing defence instead of serving it.
Once they realized the problem, they could easily handle the volume.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513009</id>
	<title>Fake 'DoS Attack' Attack!</title>
	<author>John Guilt</author>
	<datestamp>1246284420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just launch a topic into the internets that is so interesting that the server[s] you wish to attack will presume that a DoS attack is in progress.

Maybe via some sort of semi-popular forum....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just launch a topic into the internets that is so interesting that the server [ s ] you wish to attack will presume that a DoS attack is in progress .
Maybe via some sort of semi-popular forum... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just launch a topic into the internets that is so interesting that the server[s] you wish to attack will presume that a DoS attack is in progress.
Maybe via some sort of semi-popular forum....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28524751</id>
	<title>4chan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People always google an artists name when a "Good night sweet prince" thread comes up at 4chan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People always google an artists name when a " Good night sweet prince " thread comes up at 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People always google an artists name when a "Good night sweet prince" thread comes up at 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508451</id>
	<title>Well  "PC AUTHORITY"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246196640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure their servers "crashed" or perhaps they had just reached their maximum and did not respond to all requests? If they actually "crashed" I'd say that they were not configured properly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure their servers " crashed " or perhaps they had just reached their maximum and did not respond to all requests ?
If they actually " crashed " I 'd say that they were not configured properly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure their servers "crashed" or perhaps they had just reached their maximum and did not respond to all requests?
If they actually "crashed" I'd say that they were not configured properly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512475</id>
	<title>LA Times???</title>
	<author>jag7720</author>
	<datestamp>1246280580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LA Times???  I thought TMZ broke this news</htmltext>
<tokenext>LA Times ? ? ?
I thought TMZ broke this news</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LA Times???
I thought TMZ broke this news</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>sayfawa</author>
	<datestamp>1246196820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, right after the sept 11th attacks, the internets was pretty useless. I had access to a T3 at the time, and no news sites took less than a minute to reload. OTOH, when MJ died, I don't remember having trouble with any of my usual sources. Maybe Google had a problem, but neither thestar.com or the BBC did.<br> <br>So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity, this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes, Google in particular.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , right after the sept 11th attacks , the internets was pretty useless .
I had access to a T3 at the time , and no news sites took less than a minute to reload .
OTOH , when MJ died , I do n't remember having trouble with any of my usual sources .
Maybe Google had a problem , but neither thestar.com or the BBC did .
So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity , this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes , Google in particular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, right after the sept 11th attacks, the internets was pretty useless.
I had access to a T3 at the time, and no news sites took less than a minute to reload.
OTOH, when MJ died, I don't remember having trouble with any of my usual sources.
Maybe Google had a problem, but neither thestar.com or the BBC did.
So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity, this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes, Google in particular.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511563</id>
	<title>Re:sheesh!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246271520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's not being buried or cremated, but turned into shopping bags.</p><p>That way he can remain white, plastic and dangerous to children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not being buried or cremated , but turned into shopping bags.That way he can remain white , plastic and dangerous to children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not being buried or cremated, but turned into shopping bags.That way he can remain white, plastic and dangerous to children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509181</id>
	<title>It was a Triller Zombie Attack on the net!</title>
	<author>itsybitsy</author>
	<datestamp>1246204200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, couldn't resist.</p><p>Just eat it. Your table manners are a crying shame... just eat it...<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyfcOriVKBM" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyfcOriVKBM</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , could n't resist.Just eat it .
Your table manners are a crying shame... just eat it...http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = HyfcOriVKBM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, couldn't resist.Just eat it.
Your table manners are a crying shame... just eat it...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyfcOriVKBM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509671</id>
	<title>Why shouldn't MJ generate such a big response?</title>
	<author>Phantasmagoria</author>
	<datestamp>1246208640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I keep reading comments that it is "a sad state of affairs" that news of a celebrity's death has garnered much more response from the world then, say, news of a recent scientific breakthrough.</p><p>The fact of the matter is, Michael Jackson is one of the most recognized persons in the world, and for quite a long time too. So what if he has contributed nothing/little to science? You think without music, art, and other culture we would be the same human beings? Art and music define us and advance us as much as science - why else would cavemen draw?</p><p>So what if so-and-so was responsible for inventing solar-power, or discovered water on mars. That isn't affecting the majority of the poor population in Bangladesh. Yet, they ALL listen to Michael Jackson.</p><p>Get over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep reading comments that it is " a sad state of affairs " that news of a celebrity 's death has garnered much more response from the world then , say , news of a recent scientific breakthrough.The fact of the matter is , Michael Jackson is one of the most recognized persons in the world , and for quite a long time too .
So what if he has contributed nothing/little to science ?
You think without music , art , and other culture we would be the same human beings ?
Art and music define us and advance us as much as science - why else would cavemen draw ? So what if so-and-so was responsible for inventing solar-power , or discovered water on mars .
That is n't affecting the majority of the poor population in Bangladesh .
Yet , they ALL listen to Michael Jackson.Get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep reading comments that it is "a sad state of affairs" that news of a celebrity's death has garnered much more response from the world then, say, news of a recent scientific breakthrough.The fact of the matter is, Michael Jackson is one of the most recognized persons in the world, and for quite a long time too.
So what if he has contributed nothing/little to science?
You think without music, art, and other culture we would be the same human beings?
Art and music define us and advance us as much as science - why else would cavemen draw?So what if so-and-so was responsible for inventing solar-power, or discovered water on mars.
That isn't affecting the majority of the poor population in Bangladesh.
Yet, they ALL listen to Michael Jackson.Get over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512031</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>jimbob666</author>
	<datestamp>1246276140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading something about a whole lot of international telecommunications and fibre links were housed in one of the Twin Towers.

I might be wrong here, but didn't a lot of the cross-ocean fibre links terminate around the Twin Towers area or at least that is where top level ISPs were?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading something about a whole lot of international telecommunications and fibre links were housed in one of the Twin Towers .
I might be wrong here , but did n't a lot of the cross-ocean fibre links terminate around the Twin Towers area or at least that is where top level ISPs were ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading something about a whole lot of international telecommunications and fibre links were housed in one of the Twin Towers.
I might be wrong here, but didn't a lot of the cross-ocean fibre links terminate around the Twin Towers area or at least that is where top level ISPs were?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510077</id>
	<title>MJ, half off.</title>
	<author>JBritt1234</author>
	<datestamp>1246212540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting enough this is the second thing that Michael Jackson has taken down.

The first was prompted by his Blue Light Special at K-Mart, little boys pants for half-off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting enough this is the second thing that Michael Jackson has taken down .
The first was prompted by his Blue Light Special at K-Mart , little boys pants for half-off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting enough this is the second thing that Michael Jackson has taken down.
The first was prompted by his Blue Light Special at K-Mart, little boys pants for half-off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511135</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1246266120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My wife was in tears.</p></div><p>That grounds for divorce in my book.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>I'm tired of the "king of pop" thing, too. Am I the only one who remembers that the title did not evolve naturally, but that Jackson *demanded* he be called that? The media, of course, opened wide and took every inch of that one.</p><p>A sane media with a spine would have blinked and said, "Hey, buddy, you do decide how to do the singing and we'll decide how to do the reporting. Capisca? Now go back to that creepy amusement park you live in."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife was in tears.That grounds for divorce in my book .
; - ) I 'm tired of the " king of pop " thing , too .
Am I the only one who remembers that the title did not evolve naturally , but that Jackson * demanded * he be called that ?
The media , of course , opened wide and took every inch of that one.A sane media with a spine would have blinked and said , " Hey , buddy , you do decide how to do the singing and we 'll decide how to do the reporting .
Capisca ? Now go back to that creepy amusement park you live in .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife was in tears.That grounds for divorce in my book.
;-)I'm tired of the "king of pop" thing, too.
Am I the only one who remembers that the title did not evolve naturally, but that Jackson *demanded* he be called that?
The media, of course, opened wide and took every inch of that one.A sane media with a spine would have blinked and said, "Hey, buddy, you do decide how to do the singing and we'll decide how to do the reporting.
Capisca? Now go back to that creepy amusement park you live in.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508829</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1246200300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music. The importance of "Thriller" can't really be overestimated.</i>
<br> <br>
Well, I suppose that depends on how you estimate the importance of modern music, doesn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music .
The importance of " Thriller " ca n't really be overestimated .
Well , I suppose that depends on how you estimate the importance of modern music , does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music.
The importance of "Thriller" can't really be overestimated.
Well, I suppose that depends on how you estimate the importance of modern music, doesn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511803</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>redcaboodle</author>
	<datestamp>1246273860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.</p></div><p>There's people for you. We are a social species after all. As a society we lost someone who meant something or other to everyone.</p><p>I found it rather amazing to hear all kinds of groups, temporary and permanent, talk about Jackson. I work in an office building with a lot of small companies and there was Jackson music coming from most offices on Friday, either from the Net or any local FM station.</p><p>People were talking conciliatory about him, mostly praising his music and pitying him for being such a screwed up character. As far as it is proven in court, he never hurt any child, so very few people felt the need to discuss his alleged child-abuse. We do not talk ill of the dead.</p><p>Still, I enjoyed the jokes about this demise. Humour is one way of dealing with loss.</p><p>Very few people get such a worldwide eulogy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If any other news " event " has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people are n't this into any " real " news that actually impacts them.There 's people for you .
We are a social species after all .
As a society we lost someone who meant something or other to everyone.I found it rather amazing to hear all kinds of groups , temporary and permanent , talk about Jackson .
I work in an office building with a lot of small companies and there was Jackson music coming from most offices on Friday , either from the Net or any local FM station.People were talking conciliatory about him , mostly praising his music and pitying him for being such a screwed up character .
As far as it is proven in court , he never hurt any child , so very few people felt the need to discuss his alleged child-abuse .
We do not talk ill of the dead.Still , I enjoyed the jokes about this demise .
Humour is one way of dealing with loss.Very few people get such a worldwide eulogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.There's people for you.
We are a social species after all.
As a society we lost someone who meant something or other to everyone.I found it rather amazing to hear all kinds of groups, temporary and permanent, talk about Jackson.
I work in an office building with a lot of small companies and there was Jackson music coming from most offices on Friday, either from the Net or any local FM station.People were talking conciliatory about him, mostly praising his music and pitying him for being such a screwed up character.
As far as it is proven in court, he never hurt any child, so very few people felt the need to discuss his alleged child-abuse.
We do not talk ill of the dead.Still, I enjoyed the jokes about this demise.
Humour is one way of dealing with loss.Very few people get such a worldwide eulogy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513929</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>ukyoCE</author>
	<datestamp>1246289940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly, good call.  I actually heard about it on WOW in a general chat channel.  Sources hadn't announced his death yet, and only a few sources (eg. CNN) even had information posted that he had been sent to the hospital.  People in the chat channel were claiming he was dead, others were accusing them of lying.</p><p>If we had gone from zilch to "yep he's dead" on every news site in 5 minutes, the traffic may not have been nearly as bad.</p><p>The fact that there were rumors and half-released information dragging out the announcement over a few hours meant the same people refreshing the same pages waiting for an update.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , good call .
I actually heard about it on WOW in a general chat channel .
Sources had n't announced his death yet , and only a few sources ( eg .
CNN ) even had information posted that he had been sent to the hospital .
People in the chat channel were claiming he was dead , others were accusing them of lying.If we had gone from zilch to " yep he 's dead " on every news site in 5 minutes , the traffic may not have been nearly as bad.The fact that there were rumors and half-released information dragging out the announcement over a few hours meant the same people refreshing the same pages waiting for an update .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, good call.
I actually heard about it on WOW in a general chat channel.
Sources hadn't announced his death yet, and only a few sources (eg.
CNN) even had information posted that he had been sent to the hospital.
People in the chat channel were claiming he was dead, others were accusing them of lying.If we had gone from zilch to "yep he's dead" on every news site in 5 minutes, the traffic may not have been nearly as bad.The fact that there were rumors and half-released information dragging out the announcement over a few hours meant the same people refreshing the same pages waiting for an update.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509233</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>atraintocry</author>
	<datestamp>1246204800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's more important things than music? That's news to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's more important things than music ?
That 's news to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's more important things than music?
That's news to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511247</id>
	<title>RIAA might shut up</title>
	<author>polyp2000</author>
	<datestamp>1246267500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now they have a big excuse to make money<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>At the record company meeting<br>On their hands - a dead star<br>And oh, the plans they weave<br>And oh, the sickening greed</p><p>At the record company party<br>On their hands - a dead star<br>The sycophantic slags all say :<br>"I knew him first, and I knew him well"</p><p>Re-issue ! Re-package ! Re-package !<br>Re-evaluate the songs<br>Double-pack with a photograph<br>Extra Track (and a tacky badge)</p><p>A-list, playlist<br>"Please them , please them !"<br>"Please them !"<br>(sadly, THIS was your life)</p><p>But you could have said no<br>If you'd wanted to<br>You could have said no<br>If you'd wanted to</p><p>BPI, MTV, BBC<br>"Please them ! Please them !"<br>(sadly this was your life)</p><p>But you could have said no<br>If you'd wanted to<br>You could have walked away<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Couldn't you ?</p><p>I touched you at the soundcheck<br>You had no real way of knowing<br>In my heart I begged "Take me with you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>I don't care where you're going..."</p><p>But to you I was faceless<br>I was fawning, I was boring<br>Just a child from those ugly new houses<br>Who could never begin to know</p><p>Who could never really know<br>Oh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Best of ! Most of !<br>Satiate the need<br>Slip them into different sleeves !<br>Buy both, and feel deceived</p><p>Climber - new entry, re-entry<br>World tour ! ("media whore")<br>"Please the Press in Belgium !"<br>(THIS was your life...)</p><p>And when it fails to recoup ?<br>Well, maybe :<br>You just haven't earned it yet, baby</p><p>I walked a pace behind you at the soundcheck<br>You're just the same as I am<br>What makes most people feel happy<br>Leads us headlong into harm</p><p>So, in my bedroom in those 'ugly new houses'<br>I danced my legs down to the knees<br>But me and my 'true love'<br>Will never meet again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>At the record company meeting<br>On their hands - at last ! - a dead star !<br>But they can never taint you in my eyes<br>No, they can never touch you now</p><p>No, they cannot hurt you, my darling<br>They cannot touch you now<br>But me and my 'true love'<br>Will never meet again</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now they have a big excuse to make money ...At the record company meetingOn their hands - a dead starAnd oh , the plans they weaveAnd oh , the sickening greedAt the record company partyOn their hands - a dead starThe sycophantic slags all say : " I knew him first , and I knew him well " Re-issue !
Re-package !
Re-package ! Re-evaluate the songsDouble-pack with a photographExtra Track ( and a tacky badge ) A-list , playlist " Please them , please them !
" " Please them !
" ( sadly , THIS was your life ) But you could have said noIf you 'd wanted toYou could have said noIf you 'd wanted toBPI , MTV , BBC " Please them !
Please them !
" ( sadly this was your life ) But you could have said noIf you 'd wanted toYou could have walked away ...Could n't you ? I touched you at the soundcheckYou had no real way of knowingIn my heart I begged " Take me with you ...I do n't care where you 're going... " But to you I was facelessI was fawning , I was boringJust a child from those ugly new housesWho could never begin to knowWho could never really knowOh ...Best of !
Most of ! Satiate the needSlip them into different sleeves ! Buy both , and feel deceivedClimber - new entry , re-entryWorld tour !
( " media whore " ) " Please the Press in Belgium !
" ( THIS was your life... ) And when it fails to recoup ? Well , maybe : You just have n't earned it yet , babyI walked a pace behind you at the soundcheckYou 're just the same as I amWhat makes most people feel happyLeads us headlong into harmSo , in my bedroom in those 'ugly new houses'I danced my legs down to the kneesBut me and my 'true love'Will never meet again ...At the record company meetingOn their hands - at last !
- a dead star ! But they can never taint you in my eyesNo , they can never touch you nowNo , they can not hurt you , my darlingThey can not touch you nowBut me and my 'true love'Will never meet again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now they have a big excuse to make money ...At the record company meetingOn their hands - a dead starAnd oh, the plans they weaveAnd oh, the sickening greedAt the record company partyOn their hands - a dead starThe sycophantic slags all say :"I knew him first, and I knew him well"Re-issue !
Re-package !
Re-package !Re-evaluate the songsDouble-pack with a photographExtra Track (and a tacky badge)A-list, playlist"Please them , please them !
""Please them !
"(sadly, THIS was your life)But you could have said noIf you'd wanted toYou could have said noIf you'd wanted toBPI, MTV, BBC"Please them !
Please them !
"(sadly this was your life)But you could have said noIf you'd wanted toYou could have walked away ...Couldn't you ?I touched you at the soundcheckYou had no real way of knowingIn my heart I begged "Take me with you ...I don't care where you're going..."But to you I was facelessI was fawning, I was boringJust a child from those ugly new housesWho could never begin to knowWho could never really knowOh ...Best of !
Most of !Satiate the needSlip them into different sleeves !Buy both, and feel deceivedClimber - new entry, re-entryWorld tour !
("media whore")"Please the Press in Belgium !
"(THIS was your life...)And when it fails to recoup ?Well, maybe :You just haven't earned it yet, babyI walked a pace behind you at the soundcheckYou're just the same as I amWhat makes most people feel happyLeads us headlong into harmSo, in my bedroom in those 'ugly new houses'I danced my legs down to the kneesBut me and my 'true love'Will never meet again ...At the record company meetingOn their hands - at last !
- a dead star !But they can never taint you in my eyesNo, they can never touch you nowNo, they cannot hurt you, my darlingThey cannot touch you nowBut me and my 'true love'Will never meet again</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509091</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246203060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Srsly. Don't expect "humanity" to be any more mindful than any single human. It sucks but you just can't avoid it..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Srsly .
Do n't expect " humanity " to be any more mindful than any single human .
It sucks but you just ca n't avoid it. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Srsly.
Don't expect "humanity" to be any more mindful than any single human.
It sucks but you just can't avoid it..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246209480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The thing about MJ wasn't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died. He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis. Many people got texts, twitter updates, Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on. While no one thought MJ was in amazing health, he didn't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.</p></div><p>That's the right answer.</p><p>The story is exactly relevant enough and questionable enough that it needs verification. So -everyone- verifies it.</p><p>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing about MJ was n't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died .
He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis .
Many people got texts , twitter updates , Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on .
While no one thought MJ was in amazing health , he did n't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.That 's the right answer.The story is exactly relevant enough and questionable enough that it needs verification .
So -everyone- verifies it.The question should be - what about Michael Jackson 's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing about MJ wasn't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died.
He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis.
Many people got texts, twitter updates, Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on.
While no one thought MJ was in amazing health, he didn't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.That's the right answer.The story is exactly relevant enough and questionable enough that it needs verification.
So -everyone- verifies it.The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509059</id>
	<title>KABOOM!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246202700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now let's see if all the infomercials crash tonight due to the sudden death of Billy Mays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now let 's see if all the infomercials crash tonight due to the sudden death of Billy Mays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now let's see if all the infomercials crash tonight due to the sudden death of Billy Mays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511717</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1246272960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Well, right after the sept 11th attacks, the internets was pretty useless. I had access to a T3 at the time, and no news sites took less than a minute to reload.</p></div></blockquote><p>On the other hand, I didn't even bother checking the news sites.  I was logged into an IRC network, getting news reports relayed from something like 20 different cities.  The internet still worked fine for disseminating information.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , right after the sept 11th attacks , the internets was pretty useless .
I had access to a T3 at the time , and no news sites took less than a minute to reload.On the other hand , I did n't even bother checking the news sites .
I was logged into an IRC network , getting news reports relayed from something like 20 different cities .
The internet still worked fine for disseminating information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, right after the sept 11th attacks, the internets was pretty useless.
I had access to a T3 at the time, and no news sites took less than a minute to reload.On the other hand, I didn't even bother checking the news sites.
I was logged into an IRC network, getting news reports relayed from something like 20 different cities.
The internet still worked fine for disseminating information.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246197480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music. The importance of "Thriller" can't really be overestimated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music .
The importance of " Thriller " ca n't really be overestimated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music.
The importance of "Thriller" can't really be overestimated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511711</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246272900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose a large portion of the problem is perspective. I had no difficulties with any of the sites I frequent when the towers fell over. However, I assume it would be a very different story within the US - particularly with some specific US focused news sites.</p><p>At what point does a slowdown of a news site, a set of news sites or even a nation get considered as an 'internet slowdown', when the vast majority of the internet is still unaffected?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose a large portion of the problem is perspective .
I had no difficulties with any of the sites I frequent when the towers fell over .
However , I assume it would be a very different story within the US - particularly with some specific US focused news sites.At what point does a slowdown of a news site , a set of news sites or even a nation get considered as an 'internet slowdown ' , when the vast majority of the internet is still unaffected ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose a large portion of the problem is perspective.
I had no difficulties with any of the sites I frequent when the towers fell over.
However, I assume it would be a very different story within the US - particularly with some specific US focused news sites.At what point does a slowdown of a news site, a set of news sites or even a nation get considered as an 'internet slowdown', when the vast majority of the internet is still unaffected?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508751</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246199640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a freshman in college, an EE professor put a chart up on the projector.  It was a fairly consistent chart with one giant spike right in the middle.  He explained this was demand on the US power grid over a period of several months, and asked the class what they thought caused the giant spike...most big world events of the 90s were thrown out by the students....and they were all wrong.</p><p>The spike that put all the country's power plants at full capacity was the announcement of the OJ Simpson verdict.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a freshman in college , an EE professor put a chart up on the projector .
It was a fairly consistent chart with one giant spike right in the middle .
He explained this was demand on the US power grid over a period of several months , and asked the class what they thought caused the giant spike...most big world events of the 90s were thrown out by the students....and they were all wrong.The spike that put all the country 's power plants at full capacity was the announcement of the OJ Simpson verdict .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a freshman in college, an EE professor put a chart up on the projector.
It was a fairly consistent chart with one giant spike right in the middle.
He explained this was demand on the US power grid over a period of several months, and asked the class what they thought caused the giant spike...most big world events of the 90s were thrown out by the students....and they were all wrong.The spike that put all the country's power plants at full capacity was the announcement of the OJ Simpson verdict.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>SL Baur</author>
	<datestamp>1246199760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music.</p></div><p>Maybe that's why I pretty much stopped listening to American music in the early 1990s.</p><p>I thought he was a crazy, drugged-out pederast.  My wife was in tears.</p><p>I'm not particularly dismayed by the reaction of some here - to each his own.  I *am* dismayed that Farrah Fawcett, who died on the same day, never got any mention here.</p><p>I find it fascinating that with all his debt issues, he was surrounded by Nation of Islam financial advisors, the same as Kareem (who ended his Hall Of Fame basketball career broke).</p><p>Now, get off my lawn and take that "King of Pop" trash with you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music.Maybe that 's why I pretty much stopped listening to American music in the early 1990s.I thought he was a crazy , drugged-out pederast .
My wife was in tears.I 'm not particularly dismayed by the reaction of some here - to each his own .
I * am * dismayed that Farrah Fawcett , who died on the same day , never got any mention here.I find it fascinating that with all his debt issues , he was surrounded by Nation of Islam financial advisors , the same as Kareem ( who ended his Hall Of Fame basketball career broke ) .Now , get off my lawn and take that " King of Pop " trash with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music.Maybe that's why I pretty much stopped listening to American music in the early 1990s.I thought he was a crazy, drugged-out pederast.
My wife was in tears.I'm not particularly dismayed by the reaction of some here - to each his own.
I *am* dismayed that Farrah Fawcett, who died on the same day, never got any mention here.I find it fascinating that with all his debt issues, he was surrounded by Nation of Islam financial advisors, the same as Kareem (who ended his Hall Of Fame basketball career broke).Now, get off my lawn and take that "King of Pop" trash with you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511881</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1246274700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, clearly I am not everyone. I did not verify it. I could not care less if he is dead or alive. I do like some of his music, but whether he is dead or not does not affect the music he already made. It does not affect the way I live my live.</p><p>To be honest, the same applies to all 'celebrities' dead or now alive, including Linus and Bill. Graveyards are full of irreplaceable people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , clearly I am not everyone .
I did not verify it .
I could not care less if he is dead or alive .
I do like some of his music , but whether he is dead or not does not affect the music he already made .
It does not affect the way I live my live.To be honest , the same applies to all 'celebrities ' dead or now alive , including Linus and Bill .
Graveyards are full of irreplaceable people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, clearly I am not everyone.
I did not verify it.
I could not care less if he is dead or alive.
I do like some of his music, but whether he is dead or not does not affect the music he already made.
It does not affect the way I live my live.To be honest, the same applies to all 'celebrities' dead or now alive, including Linus and Bill.
Graveyards are full of irreplaceable people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510859</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Firehawke</author>
	<datestamp>1246306140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't necessarily agree here. It's not the verification, it's the "Okay, what facts do we have?" question.</p><p>At least in my case, someone told me the guy had died and my first reaction was to google it and see HOW he had died. I'd think that's more likely than the suspicion of a hoax.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't necessarily agree here .
It 's not the verification , it 's the " Okay , what facts do we have ?
" question.At least in my case , someone told me the guy had died and my first reaction was to google it and see HOW he had died .
I 'd think that 's more likely than the suspicion of a hoax .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't necessarily agree here.
It's not the verification, it's the "Okay, what facts do we have?
" question.At least in my case, someone told me the guy had died and my first reaction was to google it and see HOW he had died.
I'd think that's more likely than the suspicion of a hoax.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509053</id>
	<title>I thought he was a has-been</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1246202640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I thought of him as just another has-been celebrity fuckup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought of him as just another has-been celebrity fuckup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I thought of him as just another has-been celebrity fuckup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513279</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>neomunk</author>
	<datestamp>1246286400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, c'mon.  Zombies would not be nearly as ubiquitous in modern culture without MJ's groundbreaking documentary on the subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , c'mon .
Zombies would not be nearly as ubiquitous in modern culture without MJ 's groundbreaking documentary on the subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, c'mon.
Zombies would not be nearly as ubiquitous in modern culture without MJ's groundbreaking documentary on the subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508547</id>
	<title>Will people Google for</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246197480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft death too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft death too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft death too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510001</id>
	<title>Cripes</title>
	<author>mellestad</author>
	<datestamp>1246211820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sheeple?  "The Masses"?

If Gates or Linus croaked one day you would all be Googling the shit out of it, but when something happens outside of your comfort zone you mock and deride it.  Sheeple indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sheeple ?
" The Masses " ?
If Gates or Linus croaked one day you would all be Googling the shit out of it , but when something happens outside of your comfort zone you mock and deride it .
Sheeple indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sheeple?
"The Masses"?
If Gates or Linus croaked one day you would all be Googling the shit out of it, but when something happens outside of your comfort zone you mock and deride it.
Sheeple indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510015</id>
	<title>The assault Google is realy afraid from is Dolymah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246212000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWit8ckPkxg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Dolymah</a> [youtube.com] has legendary line-dance attack that would shimmy more than the Stars that God created back in the Book of Gens'Isis</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear Dolymah [ youtube.com ] has legendary line-dance attack that would shimmy more than the Stars that God created back in the Book of Gens'Isis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear Dolymah [youtube.com] has legendary line-dance attack that would shimmy more than the Stars that God created back in the Book of Gens'Isis</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508831</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1246200360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I guess so. Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something?</p></div><p>He's a 7 digit, my friend.  MJ hasn't made any new truly popular music for a long time, so GP has only seen the mutilated face, the pedophilia, and the baby-dangling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess so .
Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something ? He 's a 7 digit , my friend .
MJ has n't made any new truly popular music for a long time , so GP has only seen the mutilated face , the pedophilia , and the baby-dangling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess so.
Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something?He's a 7 digit, my friend.
MJ hasn't made any new truly popular music for a long time, so GP has only seen the mutilated face, the pedophilia, and the baby-dangling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246194660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If any other news " event " has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people are n't this into any " real " news that actually impacts them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509421</id>
	<title>failure to understand cloud computing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Not have a cloud bursting strategy in the age of cloud computing isn't just wrong &#195;" it's idiotic,' wrote one cloud blogger."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Not have a cloud bursting strategy in the age of cloud computing is n't just wrong   " it 's idiotic, ' wrote one cloud blogger .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Not have a cloud bursting strategy in the age of cloud computing isn't just wrong Ã" it's idiotic,' wrote one cloud blogger.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508573</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246197660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I guess so. Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something? Or do you have no friends?
</p><p>
Or are you just bullshitting? Your Asperger's must be pretty severe to not have heard of Michael Jackson.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess so .
Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something ?
Or do you have no friends ?
Or are you just bullshitting ?
Your Asperger 's must be pretty severe to not have heard of Michael Jackson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I guess so.
Did your parents lock you in a cave as a kid or something?
Or do you have no friends?
Or are you just bullshitting?
Your Asperger's must be pretty severe to not have heard of Michael Jackson.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508727</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246199220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If all you self-important mofos stop whining about why people care about Jacko's death, you can actually spend more of your obviously superior intellect and time doing whatever super important stuff you're whining about.  Douchebags.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If all you self-important mofos stop whining about why people care about Jacko 's death , you can actually spend more of your obviously superior intellect and time doing whatever super important stuff you 're whining about .
Douchebags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If all you self-important mofos stop whining about why people care about Jacko's death, you can actually spend more of your obviously superior intellect and time doing whatever super important stuff you're whining about.
Douchebags.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508713</id>
	<title>Did you know that</title>
	<author>enoz</author>
	<datestamp>1246198980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you type Jackson into Google, you <em>can</em> break The Internet.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrQUWUfmR\_I" title="youtube.com">They were so close to the truth!</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you type Jackson into Google , you can break The Internet.They were so close to the truth !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you type Jackson into Google, you can break The Internet.They were so close to the truth!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508595</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>basil64</author>
	<datestamp>1246197780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hell, in 2001 a minute to load a page was pretty damn good, T3 or not...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , in 2001 a minute to load a page was pretty damn good , T3 or not.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, in 2001 a minute to load a page was pretty damn good, T3 or not...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508569</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>bendodge</author>
	<datestamp>1246197600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514445</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246292460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if there is such a thing, but perhaps Google should open up "Google News," and hire some staff to keep an eye out for potential search engine killer news.</p><p>If anyone doubted that Michael Jackson could generate this much interest; they've obviously been too busy getting coffee enemas and ordering double silly extra mocha chocolate sprinkles with whipped cream and caramel cafe lattes. Ironically, it's these same people that are prone to say no one cares about MJ while posting on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if there is such a thing , but perhaps Google should open up " Google News , " and hire some staff to keep an eye out for potential search engine killer news.If anyone doubted that Michael Jackson could generate this much interest ; they 've obviously been too busy getting coffee enemas and ordering double silly extra mocha chocolate sprinkles with whipped cream and caramel cafe lattes .
Ironically , it 's these same people that are prone to say no one cares about MJ while posting on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if there is such a thing, but perhaps Google should open up "Google News," and hire some staff to keep an eye out for potential search engine killer news.If anyone doubted that Michael Jackson could generate this much interest; they've obviously been too busy getting coffee enemas and ordering double silly extra mocha chocolate sprinkles with whipped cream and caramel cafe lattes.
Ironically, it's these same people that are prone to say no one cares about MJ while posting on /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28524559</id>
	<title>LA Times: MJ dead, head missing</title>
	<author>sean4u</author>
	<datestamp>1246299780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I added the article to a hobby project I've been working on, it choked the page indexer. Not only was MJ dead, but the HEAD was missing, and still is:</p><p>

<a href="http://blog.lolyco.com/sean/2009/06/26/la-times-reports-michael-jackson-dead-head-missing/" title="lolyco.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.lolyco.com/sean/2009/06/26/la-times-reports-michael-jackson-dead-head-missing/</a> [lolyco.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I added the article to a hobby project I 've been working on , it choked the page indexer .
Not only was MJ dead , but the HEAD was missing , and still is : http : //blog.lolyco.com/sean/2009/06/26/la-times-reports-michael-jackson-dead-head-missing/ [ lolyco.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I added the article to a hobby project I've been working on, it choked the page indexer.
Not only was MJ dead, but the HEAD was missing, and still is:

http://blog.lolyco.com/sean/2009/06/26/la-times-reports-michael-jackson-dead-head-missing/ [lolyco.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508877</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>while(true)</author>
	<datestamp>1246200900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't know about searching, but 9/11 caused several of the worlds <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-273053.html" title="cnet.com">largest news sites to be inaccessible</a> [cnet.com] for over an hour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know about searching , but 9/11 caused several of the worlds largest news sites to be inaccessible [ cnet.com ] for over an hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know about searching, but 9/11 caused several of the worlds largest news sites to be inaccessible [cnet.com] for over an hour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510769</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And who was this Jackson cretin?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And who was this Jackson cretin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And who was this Jackson cretin?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509131</id>
	<title>I was away from all media this weekend</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1246203540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot even begin to describe how utterly nice it felt to know nothing more than he's dead and I don't have to be inundated with inane television coverage.</p><p>I do think his funeral is going to be a bigger circus than the pope and Reagan combined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not even begin to describe how utterly nice it felt to know nothing more than he 's dead and I do n't have to be inundated with inane television coverage.I do think his funeral is going to be a bigger circus than the pope and Reagan combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot even begin to describe how utterly nice it felt to know nothing more than he's dead and I don't have to be inundated with inane television coverage.I do think his funeral is going to be a bigger circus than the pope and Reagan combined.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</id>
	<title>Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246196460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who had only ever heard of this guy in the context of pedophilia and absurd paranoid claims?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who had only ever heard of this guy in the context of pedophilia and absurd paranoid claims ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who had only ever heard of this guy in the context of pedophilia and absurd paranoid claims?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509109</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>DanJ\_UK</author>
	<datestamp>1246203240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the BBC announced it over in the UK, they kept playing the video on repeat of him holding the baby out the window on BBC news, I'd actually forgotten about that incident until it had been rammed into my brain again!</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the BBC announced it over in the UK , they kept playing the video on repeat of him holding the baby out the window on BBC news , I 'd actually forgotten about that incident until it had been rammed into my brain again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the BBC announced it over in the UK, they kept playing the video on repeat of him holding the baby out the window on BBC news, I'd actually forgotten about that incident until it had been rammed into my brain again!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508979</id>
	<title>Dangerous Pattern</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246201800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All a foreign gov't has to do is to kill a few big-name celebrities via snipers or poison, and our infrastructure is crippled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All a foreign gov't has to do is to kill a few big-name celebrities via snipers or poison , and our infrastructure is crippled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All a foreign gov't has to do is to kill a few big-name celebrities via snipers or poison, and our infrastructure is crippled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28518025</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1246306680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?</p></div><p>When someone forwards me a chain letter about some shocking bit of news, the first thing I do is look it up online.  If it's a hoax (which forwarded chain letters almost always are), I reply back to the sender (or reply to all, if I'm really annoyed and want to publicly embarrass them) and try to stop the spreading of misinformation.</p><p>When someone told me airplanes had crashed into the WTC and Pentagon, the first thing I did was look it up online.  Since the first few news sites I tried were all overloaded, I immediately went to the TV to find out why.</p><p>When someone told me Michael Jackson was dead, the first thing I did was look it up online.  Once I had confirmed that it was true, that was really all I needed to know.  I did read one article with some details, so that I would be prepared to converse intelligently about it, because I knew that people would be talking about this.  I don't really care that much, but as a functioning member of society, I like to be aware of the things that other people are talking about.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson 's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified ? When someone forwards me a chain letter about some shocking bit of news , the first thing I do is look it up online .
If it 's a hoax ( which forwarded chain letters almost always are ) , I reply back to the sender ( or reply to all , if I 'm really annoyed and want to publicly embarrass them ) and try to stop the spreading of misinformation.When someone told me airplanes had crashed into the WTC and Pentagon , the first thing I did was look it up online .
Since the first few news sites I tried were all overloaded , I immediately went to the TV to find out why.When someone told me Michael Jackson was dead , the first thing I did was look it up online .
Once I had confirmed that it was true , that was really all I needed to know .
I did read one article with some details , so that I would be prepared to converse intelligently about it , because I knew that people would be talking about this .
I do n't really care that much , but as a functioning member of society , I like to be aware of the things that other people are talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?When someone forwards me a chain letter about some shocking bit of news, the first thing I do is look it up online.
If it's a hoax (which forwarded chain letters almost always are), I reply back to the sender (or reply to all, if I'm really annoyed and want to publicly embarrass them) and try to stop the spreading of misinformation.When someone told me airplanes had crashed into the WTC and Pentagon, the first thing I did was look it up online.
Since the first few news sites I tried were all overloaded, I immediately went to the TV to find out why.When someone told me Michael Jackson was dead, the first thing I did was look it up online.
Once I had confirmed that it was true, that was really all I needed to know.
I did read one article with some details, so that I would be prepared to converse intelligently about it, because I knew that people would be talking about this.
I don't really care that much, but as a functioning member of society, I like to be aware of the things that other people are talking about.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509523</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1246207560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think you are grasping the whole picture, and your post is modded up by the same kind of people who complain that MJ out-twittered Iran for a little while.  Do you believe that we are really incapable of being concerned about multiple topics at once?  I am, of course, way more concerned for the people in Iran and the conflict that is happening there than I am about MJ's death - but did I search Google after my friend came by my desk that afternoon and said, "Michael Jackson died!"  - of course I did!  Does that mean I don't care about the coup in Honduras or the sham trial in Burma, or about Obama's new healthcare plans?  No.  And frankly, that's stupid to even suggest.<br> <br>

You see, those other things I listed are not surprise, immediate events.  Those things are not likely to have caused millions upon millions of people with internet access to suddenly, at the same time, wonder, "is that true?"  I'll let you finish thinking about only this post while I go check out some pr0n, read my email, and browse some other news headlines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you are grasping the whole picture , and your post is modded up by the same kind of people who complain that MJ out-twittered Iran for a little while .
Do you believe that we are really incapable of being concerned about multiple topics at once ?
I am , of course , way more concerned for the people in Iran and the conflict that is happening there than I am about MJ 's death - but did I search Google after my friend came by my desk that afternoon and said , " Michael Jackson died !
" - of course I did !
Does that mean I do n't care about the coup in Honduras or the sham trial in Burma , or about Obama 's new healthcare plans ?
No. And frankly , that 's stupid to even suggest .
You see , those other things I listed are not surprise , immediate events .
Those things are not likely to have caused millions upon millions of people with internet access to suddenly , at the same time , wonder , " is that true ?
" I 'll let you finish thinking about only this post while I go check out some pr0n , read my email , and browse some other news headlines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you are grasping the whole picture, and your post is modded up by the same kind of people who complain that MJ out-twittered Iran for a little while.
Do you believe that we are really incapable of being concerned about multiple topics at once?
I am, of course, way more concerned for the people in Iran and the conflict that is happening there than I am about MJ's death - but did I search Google after my friend came by my desk that afternoon and said, "Michael Jackson died!
"  - of course I did!
Does that mean I don't care about the coup in Honduras or the sham trial in Burma, or about Obama's new healthcare plans?
No.  And frankly, that's stupid to even suggest.
You see, those other things I listed are not surprise, immediate events.
Those things are not likely to have caused millions upon millions of people with internet access to suddenly, at the same time, wonder, "is that true?
"  I'll let you finish thinking about only this post while I go check out some pr0n, read my email, and browse some other news headlines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508955</id>
	<title>that just like</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246201680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that's like how many have mistaken jackson for being a man of talents beyond a few dance moves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's like how many have mistaken jackson for being a man of talents beyond a few dance moves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's like how many have mistaken jackson for being a man of talents beyond a few dance moves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508651</id>
	<title>Jackson Brown does ROCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246198320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jackson Brown does ROCK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jackson Brown does ROCK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jackson Brown does ROCK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508315</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246195560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Keep in mind that every day, month and year that passes increases the ubiquitousness of web enabled devices and services (i.e. twitter, etc.) geometrically. And sad but true, celebrity foibles and deaths are and always have been more fascinating to the masses than any 'real' news.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind that every day , month and year that passes increases the ubiquitousness of web enabled devices and services ( i.e .
twitter , etc .
) geometrically .
And sad but true , celebrity foibles and deaths are and always have been more fascinating to the masses than any 'real ' news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind that every day, month and year that passes increases the ubiquitousness of web enabled devices and services (i.e.
twitter, etc.
) geometrically.
And sad but true, celebrity foibles and deaths are and always have been more fascinating to the masses than any 'real' news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509097</id>
	<title>Conspiracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246203120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MJ didn't die from a heart attack, he had a stroke in the children's ward</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MJ did n't die from a heart attack , he had a stroke in the children 's ward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MJ didn't die from a heart attack, he had a stroke in the children's ward</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510325</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246215000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not at all clear to me that Google had a "problem" in the sense of not being able to handle the load. Reading the article, it almost sounds like some programmatic DDOS attack sensor went of and automatically responded by putting up the error page. This would seem to be a reasonable response to take if they actually were under some sort of massive DDOS attack and taking the action automatically might be deemed by Google to be necessary/appropriate in such a set of circumstances.  The article says that Google users were getting the error page instead of actual results for Michael Jackson searches for about 25 minutes.  If the decision to start responding to searches with the error page was made by a human then SURELY it would not have taken that human (i.e. someone with authority to make such a call) 25 minutes to discover that Michael Jackson had died (i.e. something pretty MAJOR in Michael Jackson land had just happened).  On the other hand, if the "decision" to start responding with an error page was made automatically, one can easily imagine that there might be some delay between the time that the error page starts appearing and someone with the authority to turn it off decides to turn it off. In such a scenario, a 25 minute interval during which they responded with the error page doesn't sound all that far out of line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not at all clear to me that Google had a " problem " in the sense of not being able to handle the load .
Reading the article , it almost sounds like some programmatic DDOS attack sensor went of and automatically responded by putting up the error page .
This would seem to be a reasonable response to take if they actually were under some sort of massive DDOS attack and taking the action automatically might be deemed by Google to be necessary/appropriate in such a set of circumstances .
The article says that Google users were getting the error page instead of actual results for Michael Jackson searches for about 25 minutes .
If the decision to start responding to searches with the error page was made by a human then SURELY it would not have taken that human ( i.e .
someone with authority to make such a call ) 25 minutes to discover that Michael Jackson had died ( i.e .
something pretty MAJOR in Michael Jackson land had just happened ) .
On the other hand , if the " decision " to start responding with an error page was made automatically , one can easily imagine that there might be some delay between the time that the error page starts appearing and someone with the authority to turn it off decides to turn it off .
In such a scenario , a 25 minute interval during which they responded with the error page does n't sound all that far out of line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not at all clear to me that Google had a "problem" in the sense of not being able to handle the load.
Reading the article, it almost sounds like some programmatic DDOS attack sensor went of and automatically responded by putting up the error page.
This would seem to be a reasonable response to take if they actually were under some sort of massive DDOS attack and taking the action automatically might be deemed by Google to be necessary/appropriate in such a set of circumstances.
The article says that Google users were getting the error page instead of actual results for Michael Jackson searches for about 25 minutes.
If the decision to start responding to searches with the error page was made by a human then SURELY it would not have taken that human (i.e.
someone with authority to make such a call) 25 minutes to discover that Michael Jackson had died (i.e.
something pretty MAJOR in Michael Jackson land had just happened).
On the other hand, if the "decision" to start responding with an error page was made automatically, one can easily imagine that there might be some delay between the time that the error page starts appearing and someone with the authority to turn it off decides to turn it off.
In such a scenario, a 25 minute interval during which they responded with the error page doesn't sound all that far out of line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509019</id>
	<title>Poor boys will have to find Priests now ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246202280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that Micheal's gone,  I guess it's just Walmart that has little boy's pants half off.</p><p>cus.gus@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that Micheal 's gone , I guess it 's just Walmart that has little boy 's pants half off.cus.gus @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that Micheal's gone,  I guess it's just Walmart that has little boy's pants half off.cus.gus@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511241</id>
	<title>Cached responses</title>
	<author>JerryQ</author>
	<datestamp>1246267440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder whether Google will develop, or have developed, a cached response mechanism for situations such as this.  There would seem little point, during a massive spike, in actually loading the servers with the search element of these queries.  I know it's what I would do.  why would you not do so?  I ask because, as a designer, I would be interested in what the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ers would think to be the pros and cons of that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder whether Google will develop , or have developed , a cached response mechanism for situations such as this .
There would seem little point , during a massive spike , in actually loading the servers with the search element of these queries .
I know it 's what I would do .
why would you not do so ?
I ask because , as a designer , I would be interested in what the / .
ers would think to be the pros and cons of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder whether Google will develop, or have developed, a cached response mechanism for situations such as this.
There would seem little point, during a massive spike, in actually loading the servers with the search element of these queries.
I know it's what I would do.
why would you not do so?
I ask because, as a designer, I would be interested in what the /.
ers would think to be the pros and cons of that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508875</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246200900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.</p></div><p>It isn't necessarily the "impact" factor but the fact that no one expected it. It was a sudden death. He was 50 years old. This is similar to the death of Heath Ledger. When someone young dies people are going to be shocked and wonder what happened. This is also one of the reasons for an autopsy. Old people who die usually don't have an autopsy done on their bodies unless something is out of whack. Someone dying young is one of those "out of whack" things. It is a curiousity thing just like staring at a car wreck and death is something anyone can relate to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If any other news " event " has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people are n't this into any " real " news that actually impacts them.It is n't necessarily the " impact " factor but the fact that no one expected it .
It was a sudden death .
He was 50 years old .
This is similar to the death of Heath Ledger .
When someone young dies people are going to be shocked and wonder what happened .
This is also one of the reasons for an autopsy .
Old people who die usually do n't have an autopsy done on their bodies unless something is out of whack .
Someone dying young is one of those " out of whack " things .
It is a curiousity thing just like staring at a car wreck and death is something anyone can relate to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If any other news "event" has ever caused there to be such a massive amount of searching - it worries me that it is a celebrity causing this and that people aren't this into any "real" news that actually impacts them.It isn't necessarily the "impact" factor but the fact that no one expected it.
It was a sudden death.
He was 50 years old.
This is similar to the death of Heath Ledger.
When someone young dies people are going to be shocked and wonder what happened.
This is also one of the reasons for an autopsy.
Old people who die usually don't have an autopsy done on their bodies unless something is out of whack.
Someone dying young is one of those "out of whack" things.
It is a curiousity thing just like staring at a car wreck and death is something anyone can relate to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508851</id>
	<title>As far as "breaking the news"...</title>
	<author>I\_am\_Syrinx</author>
	<datestamp>1246200540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson's death."</i>
<br> <br>


It was actually TMZ.com that "broke" the news, many minutes before anyone else. The other news sites waited until someone they considered "legitimate" reported it before accepting it as fact. I guess they were trying to avoid a "Dewey defeats Truman" moment...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson 's death .
" It was actually TMZ.com that " broke " the news , many minutes before anyone else .
The other news sites waited until someone they considered " legitimate " reported it before accepting it as fact .
I guess they were trying to avoid a " Dewey defeats Truman " moment.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson's death.
"
 


It was actually TMZ.com that "broke" the news, many minutes before anyone else.
The other news sites waited until someone they considered "legitimate" reported it before accepting it as fact.
I guess they were trying to avoid a "Dewey defeats Truman" moment...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514633</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1246293180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?</p></div><p>Well, in my case, because my brother used to prank me exactly that way when we were younger.  He would occasionally tell me "Michael Jackson died" and then laugh when I found out it wasn't true.  I assumed it was a common prank people played, like they do with Stephen King.</p><p>Then when a co-worker told me MJ died, I assumed the same thing was going on, and was like, "you're joking right?"  But I didn't do more than load news.google.com, which I do anyway, to verify.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson 's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified ? Well , in my case , because my brother used to prank me exactly that way when we were younger .
He would occasionally tell me " Michael Jackson died " and then laugh when I found out it was n't true .
I assumed it was a common prank people played , like they do with Stephen King.Then when a co-worker told me MJ died , I assumed the same thing was going on , and was like , " you 're joking right ?
" But I did n't do more than load news.google.com , which I do anyway , to verify .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?Well, in my case, because my brother used to prank me exactly that way when we were younger.
He would occasionally tell me "Michael Jackson died" and then laugh when I found out it wasn't true.
I assumed it was a common prank people played, like they do with Stephen King.Then when a co-worker told me MJ died, I assumed the same thing was going on, and was like, "you're joking right?
"  But I didn't do more than load news.google.com, which I do anyway, to verify.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512129</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1246277220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the reason a lot of people searched Google News is because they heard about it and weren't sure if it was true or not.  If someone wanted to spread an untrue rumour about something, this is the sort of subject they would choose.</p><p>I searched Google News for that reason, and when I saw it was reported on news sources that are usually reliable for that type of news, like BBC and Sky News, I then believed it was true.</p><p>Also, like a million or so other people, I have tickets for his show in London next month, so it does impact me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the reason a lot of people searched Google News is because they heard about it and were n't sure if it was true or not .
If someone wanted to spread an untrue rumour about something , this is the sort of subject they would choose.I searched Google News for that reason , and when I saw it was reported on news sources that are usually reliable for that type of news , like BBC and Sky News , I then believed it was true.Also , like a million or so other people , I have tickets for his show in London next month , so it does impact me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the reason a lot of people searched Google News is because they heard about it and weren't sure if it was true or not.
If someone wanted to spread an untrue rumour about something, this is the sort of subject they would choose.I searched Google News for that reason, and when I saw it was reported on news sources that are usually reliable for that type of news, like BBC and Sky News, I then believed it was true.Also, like a million or so other people, I have tickets for his show in London next month, so it does impact me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1246201500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing about MJ wasn't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died. He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis. Many people got texts, twitter updates, Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on. While no one thought MJ was in amazing health, he didn't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing about MJ was n't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died .
He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis .
Many people got texts , twitter updates , Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on .
While no one thought MJ was in amazing health , he did n't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing about MJ wasn't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died.
He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis.
Many people got texts, twitter updates, Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on.
While no one thought MJ was in amazing health, he didn't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511115</id>
	<title>Michael Jackson, Dead at 50</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246309080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?</p><p>Ever see those troll posts saying "Xyz, dead at ##.  Truly an American icon."?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The question should be - what about Michael Jackson 's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified ? Ever see those troll posts saying " Xyz , dead at # # .
Truly an American icon .
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The question should be - what about Michael Jackson's life leads people to believe that news of his death is so likely to be a prank that it must be immediately verified?Ever see those troll posts saying "Xyz, dead at ##.
Truly an American icon.
"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509909</id>
	<title>Worked fine</title>
	<author>S-100</author>
	<datestamp>1246211160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the MJ news first hit, one of the early sites handling the rumor was TMZ.COM.  I was on the page before CNN and other sources had reported MJ dead.  The TMZ page automatically loaded a streaming video window with live reports of the ongoing story.  I left the page open while I attended to other matters, and other than the video blanking out now and then, the stream was stable for hours.  I was thinking to myself that surely this story would overload their servers, what with the home page automatically generating a live video stream, but it just never happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the MJ news first hit , one of the early sites handling the rumor was TMZ.COM .
I was on the page before CNN and other sources had reported MJ dead .
The TMZ page automatically loaded a streaming video window with live reports of the ongoing story .
I left the page open while I attended to other matters , and other than the video blanking out now and then , the stream was stable for hours .
I was thinking to myself that surely this story would overload their servers , what with the home page automatically generating a live video stream , but it just never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the MJ news first hit, one of the early sites handling the rumor was TMZ.COM.
I was on the page before CNN and other sources had reported MJ dead.
The TMZ page automatically loaded a streaming video window with live reports of the ongoing story.
I left the page open while I attended to other matters, and other than the video blanking out now and then, the stream was stable for hours.
I was thinking to myself that surely this story would overload their servers, what with the home page automatically generating a live video stream, but it just never happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511205</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>JerryQ</author>
	<datestamp>1246267080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that had the internet been around when John Lennon was shot, (it was so 'instant', verifiable and on the street) the spike would have been massive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that had the internet been around when John Lennon was shot , ( it was so 'instant ' , verifiable and on the street ) the spike would have been massive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that had the internet been around when John Lennon was shot, (it was so 'instant', verifiable and on the street) the spike would have been massive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509385</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because he was a formative influence doesn't mean that modern music is representative of what his music was like. Jackson's music was 1000 times (arbitrary I know) classier and thoughtful than almost anything made these days from his influence. Have you ever even heard his music?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because he was a formative influence does n't mean that modern music is representative of what his music was like .
Jackson 's music was 1000 times ( arbitrary I know ) classier and thoughtful than almost anything made these days from his influence .
Have you ever even heard his music ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because he was a formative influence doesn't mean that modern music is representative of what his music was like.
Jackson's music was 1000 times (arbitrary I know) classier and thoughtful than almost anything made these days from his influence.
Have you ever even heard his music?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161</id>
	<title>sheesh!</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1246203900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i will be glad when michael jackson is buried and forgoten, i am tired of the damn media coverage of some dead popstar/pedophole</htmltext>
<tokenext>i will be glad when michael jackson is buried and forgoten , i am tired of the damn media coverage of some dead popstar/pedophole</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i will be glad when michael jackson is buried and forgoten, i am tired of the damn media coverage of some dead popstar/pedophole</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509211</id>
	<title>TMZ Broke the news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246204560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TMZ broke the news of his death, not the LA Times. Let's give credit where credit is due.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TMZ broke the news of his death , not the LA Times .
Let 's give credit where credit is due .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TMZ broke the news of his death, not the LA Times.
Let's give credit where credit is due.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28524751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28518025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_003214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513929
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511205
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509757
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28524751
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28518025
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514633
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510859
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511881
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508473
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508595
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511711
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508731
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509909
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509269
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509091
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28514445
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28512031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508547
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511247
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_003214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508551
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508829
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28513279
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508771
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28511135
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28509385
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28510015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508573
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_003214.28508831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
