<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_28_186245</id>
	<title>Has NASA Found the Lost Moon Tapes?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246213200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://baylink.pitas.com/" rel="nofollow">jra</a> writes <i>"For over 5 years, various people both inside and retired from NASA have been engaged in a quest.  They were looking for the long-lost original slow-scan video tapes from the Apollo 11 moon landing, which went missing in a record-keeping snafu, <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.01/nasa.html">covered in unreasonable detail in a Wired article</a> a couple years ago.  Well now, according to the UK's Sunday Express newspaper, some tapes may or may not have been found <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/110442/WORLD-EXCLUSIVE-NASA-finds-missing-moon-landing-tapes">which may or may not be the Apollo video</a>.  Apparently &mdash; I love the British press &mdash; the NASA boffins are a bit put out that it leaked; they were hoping to blow everyone's minds with the scoop themselves."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jra writes " For over 5 years , various people both inside and retired from NASA have been engaged in a quest .
They were looking for the long-lost original slow-scan video tapes from the Apollo 11 moon landing , which went missing in a record-keeping snafu , covered in unreasonable detail in a Wired article a couple years ago .
Well now , according to the UK 's Sunday Express newspaper , some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video .
Apparently    I love the British press    the NASA boffins are a bit put out that it leaked ; they were hoping to blow everyone 's minds with the scoop themselves .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jra writes "For over 5 years, various people both inside and retired from NASA have been engaged in a quest.
They were looking for the long-lost original slow-scan video tapes from the Apollo 11 moon landing, which went missing in a record-keeping snafu, covered in unreasonable detail in a Wired article a couple years ago.
Well now, according to the UK's Sunday Express newspaper, some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.
Apparently — I love the British press — the NASA boffins are a bit put out that it leaked; they were hoping to blow everyone's minds with the scoop themselves.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508279</id>
	<title>Re:NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>jra</author>
	<datestamp>1246195200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't, actually, agree with that in this case.  As several people point out when asked to justify the cost of the moon program, we didn't pay for the *hardware*, that was incidental.</p><p>We *paid* for *the knowledge we got by using the hardware*.  Now, while, admittedly, this bit of lost knowledge is not as important as the *warehouses full of 7-track tape with data from {Voyager,Pioneer} that has never even been read* since being written, mush less converted to DVD/BD, and made available to the public -- because reading it requires machining new headwheels for the only *two* remaining drives which can read it (do you sense a pattern here?)... it's still important, and I think it would be a bit shortsighted to say "ah, hell, it's only the pictures from the vacation".</p><p>Watching that happen created a whole new generation of engineers.</p><p>It's not completely unreasonable to think that if they did find it, and they do release it -- oh, say, at the 40th anniversary celebration on 18-Jul at the Kennedy Center -- that seeing the coverage on the net, or on TV, might not inspire that 1 or 2\% of teenagers left who aren't too cynical to care about *anything at all* into wanting to go to space...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't , actually , agree with that in this case .
As several people point out when asked to justify the cost of the moon program , we did n't pay for the * hardware * , that was incidental.We * paid * for * the knowledge we got by using the hardware * .
Now , while , admittedly , this bit of lost knowledge is not as important as the * warehouses full of 7-track tape with data from { Voyager,Pioneer } that has never even been read * since being written , mush less converted to DVD/BD , and made available to the public -- because reading it requires machining new headwheels for the only * two * remaining drives which can read it ( do you sense a pattern here ? ) .. .
it 's still important , and I think it would be a bit shortsighted to say " ah , hell , it 's only the pictures from the vacation " .Watching that happen created a whole new generation of engineers.It 's not completely unreasonable to think that if they did find it , and they do release it -- oh , say , at the 40th anniversary celebration on 18-Jul at the Kennedy Center -- that seeing the coverage on the net , or on TV , might not inspire that 1 or 2 \ % of teenagers left who are n't too cynical to care about * anything at all * into wanting to go to space.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't, actually, agree with that in this case.
As several people point out when asked to justify the cost of the moon program, we didn't pay for the *hardware*, that was incidental.We *paid* for *the knowledge we got by using the hardware*.
Now, while, admittedly, this bit of lost knowledge is not as important as the *warehouses full of 7-track tape with data from {Voyager,Pioneer} that has never even been read* since being written, mush less converted to DVD/BD, and made available to the public -- because reading it requires machining new headwheels for the only *two* remaining drives which can read it (do you sense a pattern here?)...
it's still important, and I think it would be a bit shortsighted to say "ah, hell, it's only the pictures from the vacation".Watching that happen created a whole new generation of engineers.It's not completely unreasonable to think that if they did find it, and they do release it -- oh, say, at the 40th anniversary celebration on 18-Jul at the Kennedy Center -- that seeing the coverage on the net, or on TV, might not inspire that 1 or 2\% of teenagers left who aren't too cynical to care about *anything at all* into wanting to go to space...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509635</id>
	<title>Re:Hope</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and hopefully these videos will put some conspiracy nuts to rest!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and hopefully these videos will put some conspiracy nuts to rest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and hopefully these videos will put some conspiracy nuts to rest!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507125</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1246185000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It can have different connotations, more strongly emphasizing the negative possibility. For example, if I say "This book may be what you're looking for" versus "This book may or may not be what you're looking for", the 2nd suggestion is phrased in a way that makes me sound much more ambivalent about whether I actually think the book is what the person I'm addressing is looking for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It can have different connotations , more strongly emphasizing the negative possibility .
For example , if I say " This book may be what you 're looking for " versus " This book may or may not be what you 're looking for " , the 2nd suggestion is phrased in a way that makes me sound much more ambivalent about whether I actually think the book is what the person I 'm addressing is looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It can have different connotations, more strongly emphasizing the negative possibility.
For example, if I say "This book may be what you're looking for" versus "This book may or may not be what you're looking for", the 2nd suggestion is phrased in a way that makes me sound much more ambivalent about whether I actually think the book is what the person I'm addressing is looking for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28514243</id>
	<title>Re:So, Is There Hope...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246291500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently, they were left on the moon during the last mission there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , they were left on the moon during the last mission there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, they were left on the moon during the last mission there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509037</id>
	<title>The real moon hoax</title>
	<author>GISGEOLOGYGEEK</author>
	<datestamp>1246202460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is these videos.<br>.<br>.<br>cus.gus@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is these videos...cus.gus @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... is these videos...cus.gus@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510409</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1246215720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, yes! And the same for "whether". "The question of whether you're going to do this". The alternative needs to be mentioned only when it's not the opposite of what's mentioned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , yes !
And the same for " whether " .
" The question of whether you 're going to do this " .
The alternative needs to be mentioned only when it 's not the opposite of what 's mentioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, yes!
And the same for "whether".
"The question of whether you're going to do this".
The alternative needs to be mentioned only when it's not the opposite of what's mentioned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506299</id>
	<title>Next time, get the team to read 'Efficient POVRay'</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1246221180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...before you start the renderfarm.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)<blockquote><div><p>For over 5 years [...] NASA have been engaged in a quest.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...before you start the renderfarm .
; - ) For over 5 years [ ... ] NASA have been engaged in a quest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...before you start the renderfarm.
;-)For over 5 years [...] NASA have been engaged in a quest.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507667</id>
	<title>Re:NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>Stormwatch</author>
	<datestamp>1246189260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As an Space Program advocate, I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again</p></div></blockquote><p>
But, in case NASA happens not to be trustworthy, it's better that the public does not trust NASA.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an Space Program advocate , I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again But , in case NASA happens not to be trustworthy , it 's better that the public does not trust NASA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an Space Program advocate, I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again
But, in case NASA happens not to be trustworthy, it's better that the public does not trust NASA.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505915</id>
	<title>Re:Hope</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1246218240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, the tape player is still lost, and the one at the local library is broken.  And there's no money in the budget for a new one, so everyone will just have to wait until the one at the library gets fixed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , the tape player is still lost , and the one at the local library is broken .
And there 's no money in the budget for a new one , so everyone will just have to wait until the one at the library gets fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, the tape player is still lost, and the one at the local library is broken.
And there's no money in the budget for a new one, so everyone will just have to wait until the one at the library gets fixed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28511351</id>
	<title>Re:NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>HonIsCool</author>
	<datestamp>1246269360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If video was the primary function, it's kind of incredible that they almost decided not to bring the video camera with them then...

And as for "lost images", there are no lost images - all the footage is still available! This whole thing has been blown out of proportion. The tapes that are missing contain recordings of the radio stream. This is raw data and cannot be viewed without decoding and processing. The best method in the 1960s to capture this image was kinoscope, which is how it was converted to standard television. These copies still exists (as far as I know). Now, these are OF COURSE not up to current high-definition standard, but I wouldn't count on even the best signal processing on the original signal to produce such either!

If HD footage is desired, however, realize that they also brought a 16mm film camera...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If video was the primary function , it 's kind of incredible that they almost decided not to bring the video camera with them then.. . And as for " lost images " , there are no lost images - all the footage is still available !
This whole thing has been blown out of proportion .
The tapes that are missing contain recordings of the radio stream .
This is raw data and can not be viewed without decoding and processing .
The best method in the 1960s to capture this image was kinoscope , which is how it was converted to standard television .
These copies still exists ( as far as I know ) .
Now , these are OF COURSE not up to current high-definition standard , but I would n't count on even the best signal processing on the original signal to produce such either !
If HD footage is desired , however , realize that they also brought a 16mm film camera.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If video was the primary function, it's kind of incredible that they almost decided not to bring the video camera with them then...

And as for "lost images", there are no lost images - all the footage is still available!
This whole thing has been blown out of proportion.
The tapes that are missing contain recordings of the radio stream.
This is raw data and cannot be viewed without decoding and processing.
The best method in the 1960s to capture this image was kinoscope, which is how it was converted to standard television.
These copies still exists (as far as I know).
Now, these are OF COURSE not up to current high-definition standard, but I wouldn't count on even the best signal processing on the original signal to produce such either!
If HD footage is desired, however, realize that they also brought a 16mm film camera...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509467</id>
	<title>Let it go...</title>
	<author>ArchieBunker</author>
	<datestamp>1246207080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried watching some of the original episodes with the first doctor and found them unwatchable. Not sure when it finally got better, maybe the third doctor...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried watching some of the original episodes with the first doctor and found them unwatchable .
Not sure when it finally got better , maybe the third doctor.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried watching some of the original episodes with the first doctor and found them unwatchable.
Not sure when it finally got better, maybe the third doctor...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091</id>
	<title>Promotional material</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1246219560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's great that these tapes are found (and shocking that they were ever lost). But I find it a remarkable and wholly unbelievable coincidence that they were found just before the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing.<br> <br>

Yeah, no wonder NASA is pissed at it leaking now. Their marketing droids must be furious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's great that these tapes are found ( and shocking that they were ever lost ) .
But I find it a remarkable and wholly unbelievable coincidence that they were found just before the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing .
Yeah , no wonder NASA is pissed at it leaking now .
Their marketing droids must be furious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's great that these tapes are found (and shocking that they were ever lost).
But I find it a remarkable and wholly unbelievable coincidence that they were found just before the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing.
Yeah, no wonder NASA is pissed at it leaking now.
Their marketing droids must be furious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505857</id>
	<title>Conspiracy theory</title>
	<author>veektor</author>
	<datestamp>1246217760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Crucially, they could once and for all dispel 40 years of wild conspiracy theories.</i>
<br> <br>
New facts would never dispel a perfectly good conspiracy theory.  Instead, the new facts are evidence that the conspiracy is still on-going.
<br> <br>
Up your k1lt!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Crucially , they could once and for all dispel 40 years of wild conspiracy theories .
New facts would never dispel a perfectly good conspiracy theory .
Instead , the new facts are evidence that the conspiracy is still on-going .
Up your k1lt !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crucially, they could once and for all dispel 40 years of wild conspiracy theories.
New facts would never dispel a perfectly good conspiracy theory.
Instead, the new facts are evidence that the conspiracy is still on-going.
Up your k1lt!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28515133</id>
	<title>Unreasonable Detail?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246295520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you deliver a shipment of fail so large as misplacing the tapes of a <em>moon landing</em> it's reasonable to go into some detail as to how it happens, in an effort to embarrass those responsible... in the hopes of reducing the chance that it will happen again.</p><p>The people paid for that moon landing, and the records, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you deliver a shipment of fail so large as misplacing the tapes of a moon landing it 's reasonable to go into some detail as to how it happens , in an effort to embarrass those responsible... in the hopes of reducing the chance that it will happen again.The people paid for that moon landing , and the records , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you deliver a shipment of fail so large as misplacing the tapes of a moon landing it's reasonable to go into some detail as to how it happens, in an effort to embarrass those responsible... in the hopes of reducing the chance that it will happen again.The people paid for that moon landing, and the records, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506401</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246221840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only we lived in a world where government agencies got the funding that they needed regardless of current taxpayer whim.  In one example, if NASA drops in popularity then they become an easy target for Senators looking to make a name for themselves as budget cutters.</p><p>Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer's eye and help keep the budget cutters away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only we lived in a world where government agencies got the funding that they needed regardless of current taxpayer whim .
In one example , if NASA drops in popularity then they become an easy target for Senators looking to make a name for themselves as budget cutters.Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer 's eye and help keep the budget cutters away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only we lived in a world where government agencies got the funding that they needed regardless of current taxpayer whim.
In one example, if NASA drops in popularity then they become an easy target for Senators looking to make a name for themselves as budget cutters.Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer's eye and help keep the budget cutters away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28513543</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>jones\_supa</author>
	<datestamp>1246287960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent up. That's just how it goes. If you want to emphasize that the result might equally be as false as true, "may or may not" has it's place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up .
That 's just how it goes .
If you want to emphasize that the result might equally be as false as true , " may or may not " has it 's place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up.
That's just how it goes.
If you want to emphasize that the result might equally be as false as true, "may or may not" has it's place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508057</id>
	<title>Nasaspaceflight.com is commenting on Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246192920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nasaspaceflight.com is reporting the Slashdot comments on one of it's forums <a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=3318.msg428367;topicseen#new" title="nasaspaceflight.com" rel="nofollow">http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=3318.msg428367;topicseen#new</a> [nasaspaceflight.com] there are many NASA insiders and astronauts who comment there.  They seem to be skeptical about the whole story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nasaspaceflight.com is reporting the Slashdot comments on one of it 's forums http : //forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php ? topic = 3318.msg428367 ; topicseen # new [ nasaspaceflight.com ] there are many NASA insiders and astronauts who comment there .
They seem to be skeptical about the whole story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nasaspaceflight.com is reporting the Slashdot comments on one of it's forums http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=3318.msg428367;topicseen#new [nasaspaceflight.com] there are many NASA insiders and astronauts who comment there.
They seem to be skeptical about the whole story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506587</id>
	<title>Re:Promotional material</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1246180080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and shocking that they were ever lost</p></div></blockquote><p>

I think there were more tapes (from <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/13/005224" title="slashdot.org">robotic missions</a> [slashdot.org]) that were either lost or that were saved "at the last moment". Even though I understand that sometimes the new results simply obsolete whatever he had, one has to wonder whether it is really such a problem to keep the memorable bits safe (especially when they keep on shrinking  exponentially - at least compared to our growing storage capacity).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and shocking that they were ever lost I think there were more tapes ( from robotic missions [ slashdot.org ] ) that were either lost or that were saved " at the last moment " .
Even though I understand that sometimes the new results simply obsolete whatever he had , one has to wonder whether it is really such a problem to keep the memorable bits safe ( especially when they keep on shrinking exponentially - at least compared to our growing storage capacity ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and shocking that they were ever lost

I think there were more tapes (from robotic missions [slashdot.org]) that were either lost or that were saved "at the last moment".
Even though I understand that sometimes the new results simply obsolete whatever he had, one has to wonder whether it is really such a problem to keep the memorable bits safe (especially when they keep on shrinking  exponentially - at least compared to our growing storage capacity).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507077</id>
	<title>Boffins?!!!</title>
	<author>EmperorOfCanada</author>
	<datestamp>1246184400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really hate the term Boffins. A word like that hardly encourages people to strive to engineer a better life for us all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hate the term Boffins .
A word like that hardly encourages people to strive to engineer a better life for us all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hate the term Boffins.
A word like that hardly encourages people to strive to engineer a better life for us all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505995</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1246218780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video."</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's no Moon tape!

(But - seriously - if it is, it will be great to see the thing finally in HD, or whatever NASA called "high quality" at that time.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:))</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video .
" That 's no Moon tape !
( But - seriously - if it is , it will be great to see the thing finally in HD , or whatever NASA called " high quality " at that time .
: ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.
"

That's no Moon tape!
(But - seriously - if it is, it will be great to see the thing finally in HD, or whatever NASA called "high quality" at that time.
:))
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508799</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>pianosaurus</author>
	<datestamp>1246200060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No <em>true</em> Brit would claim that there are any questions to be begged in that statement. Or Scotsman, for that matter, now that we're on about logical fallacies. You may wish to google <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=\%22beg+the+question\%22&amp;btnG=Search" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">"beg the question"</a> [google.com] before using the expression again.</p><p>If you feel I'm being a top-hatted toff, or just patronising (which does not contain a zed in <em>proper</em> English), it's because you needed to hear it.</p><p>By the way, I apologise for any spelling mistakes in this post. English is not my mother tongue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No true Brit would claim that there are any questions to be begged in that statement .
Or Scotsman , for that matter , now that we 're on about logical fallacies .
You may wish to google " beg the question " [ google.com ] before using the expression again.If you feel I 'm being a top-hatted toff , or just patronising ( which does not contain a zed in proper English ) , it 's because you needed to hear it.By the way , I apologise for any spelling mistakes in this post .
English is not my mother tongue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No true Brit would claim that there are any questions to be begged in that statement.
Or Scotsman, for that matter, now that we're on about logical fallacies.
You may wish to google "beg the question" [google.com] before using the expression again.If you feel I'm being a top-hatted toff, or just patronising (which does not contain a zed in proper English), it's because you needed to hear it.By the way, I apologise for any spelling mistakes in this post.
English is not my mother tongue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749</id>
	<title>Boffins?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone called ME a boffin, I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.</p><p>But this begs the question - can anyone at NASA do the moonwalk convincingly?</p><p>Impetuous minds want to know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone called ME a boffin , I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.But this begs the question - can anyone at NASA do the moonwalk convincingly ? Impetuous minds want to know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone called ME a boffin, I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.But this begs the question - can anyone at NASA do the moonwalk convincingly?Impetuous minds want to know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506397</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246221780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe. Or maybe not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe .
Or maybe not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe.
Or maybe not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28529375</id>
	<title>Re:good news bad news worse news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the worse news is theat the autopsy report states that jackson was completely bald</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the worse news is theat the autopsy report states that jackson was completely bald</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the worse news is theat the autopsy report states that jackson was completely bald</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819</id>
	<title>good news bad news</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246217580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The good news is they found the tapes. The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news is they found the tapes .
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars , part of South Korea , and a lock of Michael Jackson 's hair .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news is they found the tapes.
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.
     </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506581</id>
	<title>Out On a Limb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246180020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video."</p><p>You're really going out on a limb there chief. I may or may not have decided that you may or may not have your head up your ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video .
" You 're really going out on a limb there chief .
I may or may not have decided that you may or may not have your head up your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.
"You're really going out on a limb there chief.
I may or may not have decided that you may or may not have your head up your ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723</id>
	<title>Re:NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1246181400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I cannot imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart, witty person for finding her two years later.</p></div><p>This isn't losing the baby in the supermarket.  This is losing some photographs of baby's first steps along with a few other personal items during a move across the Atlantic.  It's a disappointment when one discovers that the images are lost.  And it's a joy when they are uncovered.  But the imagery isn't the real focus of the activity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart , witty person for finding her two years later.This is n't losing the baby in the supermarket .
This is losing some photographs of baby 's first steps along with a few other personal items during a move across the Atlantic .
It 's a disappointment when one discovers that the images are lost .
And it 's a joy when they are uncovered .
But the imagery is n't the real focus of the activity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart, witty person for finding her two years later.This isn't losing the baby in the supermarket.
This is losing some photographs of baby's first steps along with a few other personal items during a move across the Atlantic.
It's a disappointment when one discovers that the images are lost.
And it's a joy when they are uncovered.
But the imagery isn't the real focus of the activity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506027</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>KritonK</author>
	<datestamp>1246219080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I demand that these tapes may or may not be the Apollo video!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I demand that these tapes may or may not be the Apollo video !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I demand that these tapes may or may not be the Apollo video!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509001</id>
	<title>It's all just more cover up by the government</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246201980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The footage is fake as a 3 dollar bill and all 700 boxes of it are conveniently missing. America, the only thing here that is missing is the truth. The government doesn't want you to have the truth because the truth is we've never been to the moon. The truth is that the missions/film are fake. The truth is that innocent people, including wives and children, have been murdered to cover it up. Do your research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The footage is fake as a 3 dollar bill and all 700 boxes of it are conveniently missing .
America , the only thing here that is missing is the truth .
The government does n't want you to have the truth because the truth is we 've never been to the moon .
The truth is that the missions/film are fake .
The truth is that innocent people , including wives and children , have been murdered to cover it up .
Do your research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The footage is fake as a 3 dollar bill and all 700 boxes of it are conveniently missing.
America, the only thing here that is missing is the truth.
The government doesn't want you to have the truth because the truth is we've never been to the moon.
The truth is that the missions/film are fake.
The truth is that innocent people, including wives and children, have been murdered to cover it up.
Do your research.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507171</id>
	<title>Not that important, really.</title>
	<author>HonIsCool</author>
	<datestamp>1246185420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, it's too late and I'm right about to hit the sakc so I've no time to read up on things, but as far as I remember, there are already better versions of the Apollo 11 video footage than the popular one making the rounds. The missing tapes are the recordings of the raw signal from the spaceship. This is not NTSC and it takes a custom machine to read data off the tapes. This machine, if it still exists and is functioning, can playback the video and the better quality copies were made off of this screen. The live broadcast (and poor quality copy) was made in a different way that degraded the quality further. Even so, of course it's great if they found the recordings. If they dedicate to build a new tape machine they could even digitize the signals and process them which should make for the best quality version of course.

Nevertheless, it's completely innane to think this has any bearing on any stupid conspiracy theory. There are already excellent video (well, excellent as far as the technology was capable of back then) from later missions, as well as 16mm film footage from the data acquisition cameras. This footage will still be superior to Apollo 11's, even with the best of reconstructions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , it 's too late and I 'm right about to hit the sakc so I 've no time to read up on things , but as far as I remember , there are already better versions of the Apollo 11 video footage than the popular one making the rounds .
The missing tapes are the recordings of the raw signal from the spaceship .
This is not NTSC and it takes a custom machine to read data off the tapes .
This machine , if it still exists and is functioning , can playback the video and the better quality copies were made off of this screen .
The live broadcast ( and poor quality copy ) was made in a different way that degraded the quality further .
Even so , of course it 's great if they found the recordings .
If they dedicate to build a new tape machine they could even digitize the signals and process them which should make for the best quality version of course .
Nevertheless , it 's completely innane to think this has any bearing on any stupid conspiracy theory .
There are already excellent video ( well , excellent as far as the technology was capable of back then ) from later missions , as well as 16mm film footage from the data acquisition cameras .
This footage will still be superior to Apollo 11 's , even with the best of reconstructions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, it's too late and I'm right about to hit the sakc so I've no time to read up on things, but as far as I remember, there are already better versions of the Apollo 11 video footage than the popular one making the rounds.
The missing tapes are the recordings of the raw signal from the spaceship.
This is not NTSC and it takes a custom machine to read data off the tapes.
This machine, if it still exists and is functioning, can playback the video and the better quality copies were made off of this screen.
The live broadcast (and poor quality copy) was made in a different way that degraded the quality further.
Even so, of course it's great if they found the recordings.
If they dedicate to build a new tape machine they could even digitize the signals and process them which should make for the best quality version of course.
Nevertheless, it's completely innane to think this has any bearing on any stupid conspiracy theory.
There are already excellent video (well, excellent as far as the technology was capable of back then) from later missions, as well as 16mm film footage from the data acquisition cameras.
This footage will still be superior to Apollo 11's, even with the best of reconstructions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505821</id>
	<title>HD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28519767</id>
	<title>reminds me of an unrelated conspiracy theory</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1246269780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some people were suspicious that Osama would magically be captured right before the 2004 election..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some people were suspicious that Osama would magically be captured right before the 2004 election. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some people were suspicious that Osama would magically be captured right before the 2004 election..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506343</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246221420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But what if they want the exclusive-may? Saying "XOR" in casual conversation still isn't accepted, so it's probably going to be a long time before Xmay is accepted. It might help Xmay that Xma is in common parlance, though you usually only see lots of Xmas late in the calendar year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what if they want the exclusive-may ?
Saying " XOR " in casual conversation still is n't accepted , so it 's probably going to be a long time before Xmay is accepted .
It might help Xmay that Xma is in common parlance , though you usually only see lots of Xmas late in the calendar year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what if they want the exclusive-may?
Saying "XOR" in casual conversation still isn't accepted, so it's probably going to be a long time before Xmay is accepted.
It might help Xmay that Xma is in common parlance, though you usually only see lots of Xmas late in the calendar year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505933</id>
	<title>One Giant Screwup for Mankind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wired's article is not unreasonable. When a group collectively acts like they have an IQ of 1 they deserve the condemnation. Everyone responsible for the loss should have lost their job and pension. Maybe if NASA had been decapitated then we'd have a better NASA now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wired 's article is not unreasonable .
When a group collectively acts like they have an IQ of 1 they deserve the condemnation .
Everyone responsible for the loss should have lost their job and pension .
Maybe if NASA had been decapitated then we 'd have a better NASA now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wired's article is not unreasonable.
When a group collectively acts like they have an IQ of 1 they deserve the condemnation.
Everyone responsible for the loss should have lost their job and pension.
Maybe if NASA had been decapitated then we'd have a better NASA now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506951</id>
	<title>Re:Hope</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246183260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>What was the greatest achievement of Columbus? Is it colonizing a world already discovered and inhabited by native Americans centuries before the whites wiped their civilizations?</p><p>I'd compare the achievement of Yuri and that of Appolo programs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus ...What was the greatest achievement of Columbus ?
Is it colonizing a world already discovered and inhabited by native Americans centuries before the whites wiped their civilizations ? I 'd compare the achievement of Yuri and that of Appolo programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus ...What was the greatest achievement of Columbus?
Is it colonizing a world already discovered and inhabited by native Americans centuries before the whites wiped their civilizations?I'd compare the achievement of Yuri and that of Appolo programs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507065</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1246184280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need "eye candy" for the public to appreciate what they are doing. A graph of the chemical composition of moon rocks will be meaningless to most of the public. A multi-color cartographic map of the moon with different rock compositions in different colors looks cool on a teenagers bedroom wall. But just about everyone can appreciate high resolution images on a webpage or Google Moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need " eye candy " for the public to appreciate what they are doing .
A graph of the chemical composition of moon rocks will be meaningless to most of the public .
A multi-color cartographic map of the moon with different rock compositions in different colors looks cool on a teenagers bedroom wall .
But just about everyone can appreciate high resolution images on a webpage or Google Moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need "eye candy" for the public to appreciate what they are doing.
A graph of the chemical composition of moon rocks will be meaningless to most of the public.
A multi-color cartographic map of the moon with different rock compositions in different colors looks cool on a teenagers bedroom wall.
But just about everyone can appreciate high resolution images on a webpage or Google Moon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506197</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1246220280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But - seriously - if it is, it will be great to see the thing finally in HD, or whatever NASA called "high quality" at that time.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>It's not HD; actually, according to the Wired article, the video is a mere 320 lines, 10 frames per second. (There wasn't enough bandwidth for a full NTSC-quality signal).<br> <br>
Even so, *if* these are the tapes of the original moon landing, then it'll let us see it in much higher quality than we could originally.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But - seriously - if it is , it will be great to see the thing finally in HD , or whatever NASA called " high quality " at that time .
: ) It 's not HD ; actually , according to the Wired article , the video is a mere 320 lines , 10 frames per second .
( There was n't enough bandwidth for a full NTSC-quality signal ) .
Even so , * if * these are the tapes of the original moon landing , then it 'll let us see it in much higher quality than we could originally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But - seriously - if it is, it will be great to see the thing finally in HD, or whatever NASA called "high quality" at that time.
:)It's not HD; actually, according to the Wired article, the video is a mere 320 lines, 10 frames per second.
(There wasn't enough bandwidth for a full NTSC-quality signal).
Even so, *if* these are the tapes of the original moon landing, then it'll let us see it in much higher quality than we could originally.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508833</id>
	<title>Re:FYI</title>
	<author>Bearpaw</author>
	<datestamp>1246200360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle's most reliable newspaper.</p></div><p>What?!  The Daily Express is The World's Greatest Newspaper!  It says so right on the front page!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle 's most reliable newspaper.What ? !
The Daily Express is The World 's Greatest Newspaper !
It says so right on the front page !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle's most reliable newspaper.What?!
The Daily Express is The World's Greatest Newspaper!
It says so right on the front page!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506305</id>
	<title>Re:HD</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246221180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot.</p></div><p>And the only question remaining is:  does Buzz Aldrin shoot first in the new version?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot.And the only question remaining is : does Buzz Aldrin shoot first in the new version ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just means that NASA re-shot the moon landing using HD on the Hollywood back lot.And the only question remaining is:  does Buzz Aldrin shoot first in the new version?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509313</id>
	<title>Re:Hope</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the timing of this scoop is suspicious.  NASA had already recovered the tapes but was still processing them using advanced digital manipulation techniques (in partnership with ILM and cinematographer Daniel Mindel). This "reboot" to be titled simply "Moon Landing" and released as a summer blockbuster on July 20, 2009.
In this improved version, new fast-paced drama will be introduced and secret relationships revealed, Mission Control looks like the Apple Store, and of course there will be EVEN MORE lens flare...
<br>
<a href="http://www.clavius.org/lensflare.html" title="clavius.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.clavius.org/lensflare.html</a> [clavius.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the timing of this scoop is suspicious .
NASA had already recovered the tapes but was still processing them using advanced digital manipulation techniques ( in partnership with ILM and cinematographer Daniel Mindel ) .
This " reboot " to be titled simply " Moon Landing " and released as a summer blockbuster on July 20 , 2009 .
In this improved version , new fast-paced drama will be introduced and secret relationships revealed , Mission Control looks like the Apple Store , and of course there will be EVEN MORE lens flare.. . http : //www.clavius.org/lensflare.html [ clavius.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the timing of this scoop is suspicious.
NASA had already recovered the tapes but was still processing them using advanced digital manipulation techniques (in partnership with ILM and cinematographer Daniel Mindel).
This "reboot" to be titled simply "Moon Landing" and released as a summer blockbuster on July 20, 2009.
In this improved version, new fast-paced drama will be introduced and secret relationships revealed, Mission Control looks like the Apple Store, and of course there will be EVEN MORE lens flare...

http://www.clavius.org/lensflare.html [clavius.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506769</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1246181940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every single Government agency that exists is worried about how they appear to the public.  They exist at the public's whim.  Even an agency that does a decent job will lose funding if some over-eager reporter manages to portray them as incompetent and ineffective.</p><p>With that said - are you really, really sure this is the situation?  Read that article again.  Pay close attention to this:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps unhappy that a secret they had planned to grandly announce in three weeks had been rumbled, he added: "At this point, I'm not prepared to discuss what has or has not been found.</p><p>"The research team is preparing its final report and we'll release those findings publicly in the coming weeks."</p></div><p>Note how much the reporter is reading in to what is actually said.  This could be NASA wanting to be thorough as much as them playing up a "mass-media" event.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every single Government agency that exists is worried about how they appear to the public .
They exist at the public 's whim .
Even an agency that does a decent job will lose funding if some over-eager reporter manages to portray them as incompetent and ineffective.With that said - are you really , really sure this is the situation ?
Read that article again .
Pay close attention to this : Perhaps unhappy that a secret they had planned to grandly announce in three weeks had been rumbled , he added : " At this point , I 'm not prepared to discuss what has or has not been found .
" The research team is preparing its final report and we 'll release those findings publicly in the coming weeks .
" Note how much the reporter is reading in to what is actually said .
This could be NASA wanting to be thorough as much as them playing up a " mass-media " event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every single Government agency that exists is worried about how they appear to the public.
They exist at the public's whim.
Even an agency that does a decent job will lose funding if some over-eager reporter manages to portray them as incompetent and ineffective.With that said - are you really, really sure this is the situation?
Read that article again.
Pay close attention to this:Perhaps unhappy that a secret they had planned to grandly announce in three weeks had been rumbled, he added: "At this point, I'm not prepared to discuss what has or has not been found.
"The research team is preparing its final report and we'll release those findings publicly in the coming weeks.
"Note how much the reporter is reading in to what is actually said.
This could be NASA wanting to be thorough as much as them playing up a "mass-media" event.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506421</id>
	<title>We all know the moon landings were faked...</title>
	<author>Terminus32</author>
	<datestamp>1246221960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...so which studio was this filmed in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...so which studio was this filmed in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so which studio was this filmed in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506109</id>
	<title>Re:good news bad news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246219620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The good news is they found the tapes. The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; </p></div><p>I say offer the whole Jackson family and see if he'll go for it. I'd say to offer to throw in Brittany Spears but that might be pushing our luck.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news is they found the tapes .
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars , part of South Korea , and a lock of Michael Jackson 's hair .
    I say offer the whole Jackson family and see if he 'll go for it .
I 'd say to offer to throw in Brittany Spears but that might be pushing our luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news is they found the tapes.
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.
    I say offer the whole Jackson family and see if he'll go for it.
I'd say to offer to throw in Brittany Spears but that might be pushing our luck.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507723</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>fj40</author>
	<datestamp>1246189740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given that this "news" actually appeared across the intertubes in November 06 I find it amusing that the Sunday Express is reporting this now.

Just one example: <a href="http://www.bloggernews.net/11476" title="bloggernews.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloggernews.net/11476</a> [bloggernews.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that this " news " actually appeared across the intertubes in November 06 I find it amusing that the Sunday Express is reporting this now .
Just one example : http : //www.bloggernews.net/11476 [ bloggernews.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that this "news" actually appeared across the intertubes in November 06 I find it amusing that the Sunday Express is reporting this now.
Just one example: http://www.bloggernews.net/11476 [bloggernews.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506239</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>criptic08</author>
	<datestamp>1246220640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give them a break. They already have a hard time getting their fair share of attention from the public.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give them a break .
They already have a hard time getting their fair share of attention from the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give them a break.
They already have a hard time getting their fair share of attention from the public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507573</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1246188480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides, wouldn't losing lots of video be something more likely to happen to a Took than a Boffin?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , would n't losing lots of video be something more likely to happen to a Took than a Boffin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, wouldn't losing lots of video be something more likely to happen to a Took than a Boffin?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510133</id>
	<title>Re:Sunday Express article "fiction", says NASA</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1246213200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes haven't actually been found, or the way they were found is completely made up, is anyone's guess,</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, since the "search" is "winding down," either they've found at least one of the tapes, or they're being extremely quick to completely give up on recovering one of the most significant historical artifacts in all of human history...</p><p>Which do you think is more likely?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes have n't actually been found , or the way they were found is completely made up , is anyone 's guess,Well , since the " search " is " winding down , " either they 've found at least one of the tapes , or they 're being extremely quick to completely give up on recovering one of the most significant historical artifacts in all of human history...Which do you think is more likely ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes haven't actually been found, or the way they were found is completely made up, is anyone's guess,Well, since the "search" is "winding down," either they've found at least one of the tapes, or they're being extremely quick to completely give up on recovering one of the most significant historical artifacts in all of human history...Which do you think is more likely?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443</id>
	<title>So, Is There Hope...?</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1246222200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512447</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1246280340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer's eye and help keep the budget cutters away."</p><p>Ah, so the 'root of veracity' as it were, is to be found in determining which is the more credible attention-whore?</p><p>Either:<br>- the desperate-for-publicity agency of a democracy careening full speed into bread-and-circuses governance; or<br>- the British press</p><p>It is a challenge, grasshopper, indeed....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer 's eye and help keep the budget cutters away .
" Ah , so the 'root of veracity ' as it were , is to be found in determining which is the more credible attention-whore ? Either : - the desperate-for-publicity agency of a democracy careening full speed into bread-and-circuses governance ; or- the British pressIt is a challenge , grasshopper , indeed... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Thus any scoops or special announcements that they can come up with help keep them popular in the taxpayer's eye and help keep the budget cutters away.
"Ah, so the 'root of veracity' as it were, is to be found in determining which is the more credible attention-whore?Either:- the desperate-for-publicity agency of a democracy careening full speed into bread-and-circuses governance; or- the British pressIt is a challenge, grasshopper, indeed....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507007</id>
	<title>now...</title>
	<author>hh4m</author>
	<datestamp>1246183860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... in HDTV!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... in HDTV !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... in HDTV!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506161</id>
	<title>I've see quite a few 'shops in my time...</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1246219980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a shame the moon conspiracy-believers will claim that "Of course they've found the tapes NOW, now that computers are powerful enough to fake it properly"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a shame the moon conspiracy-believers will claim that " Of course they 've found the tapes NOW , now that computers are powerful enough to fake it properly "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a shame the moon conspiracy-believers will claim that "Of course they've found the tapes NOW, now that computers are powerful enough to fake it properly"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787</id>
	<title>NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an Space Program advocate, I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again; knowing that NASA can keep track of its mission assets would be the very basic start.</p><p>Whoever found the tapes (if they really were found) should not feel disappointed about not breaking the news him or herself. It is a shame they were lost in the first place, and finding them is nothing to feel proud about. I cannot imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart, witty person for finding her two years later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an Space Program advocate , I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again ; knowing that NASA can keep track of its mission assets would be the very basic start.Whoever found the tapes ( if they really were found ) should not feel disappointed about not breaking the news him or herself .
It is a shame they were lost in the first place , and finding them is nothing to feel proud about .
I can not imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart , witty person for finding her two years later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an Space Program advocate, I certainly hope they find them-- the public needs to trust NASA again; knowing that NASA can keep track of its mission assets would be the very basic start.Whoever found the tapes (if they really were found) should not feel disappointed about not breaking the news him or herself.
It is a shame they were lost in the first place, and finding them is nothing to feel proud about.
I cannot imagine loosing my baby in the supermarket and then feeling like a real smart, witty person for finding her two years later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508645</id>
	<title>fake, who cares. what about those murdered...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246198260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for knowing too much - the truth. It's amazing that there's more media about some lost tapes, that are absolutely fake to begin with - there aren't even stars in the clips because they couldn't properly fake those too at the time in a way that wouldn't be detectable later on and used as proof so they left them out entirely. Holy hell batman if you can't see a mile wide hole in that you should uninstall asap., than the lost lives of all the people silenced for knowing the truth about the alleged missions to the moon, some even scheduled to testify about it? Innocent people have been murdered too many times for knowing the truth about things our government wishes to hide and this is just one of them. Why do people tolerate others silencing the truth? Why is slashdot going to silence me and keep removing my posts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for knowing too much - the truth .
It 's amazing that there 's more media about some lost tapes , that are absolutely fake to begin with - there are n't even stars in the clips because they could n't properly fake those too at the time in a way that would n't be detectable later on and used as proof so they left them out entirely .
Holy hell batman if you ca n't see a mile wide hole in that you should uninstall asap. , than the lost lives of all the people silenced for knowing the truth about the alleged missions to the moon , some even scheduled to testify about it ?
Innocent people have been murdered too many times for knowing the truth about things our government wishes to hide and this is just one of them .
Why do people tolerate others silencing the truth ?
Why is slashdot going to silence me and keep removing my posts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for knowing too much - the truth.
It's amazing that there's more media about some lost tapes, that are absolutely fake to begin with - there aren't even stars in the clips because they couldn't properly fake those too at the time in a way that wouldn't be detectable later on and used as proof so they left them out entirely.
Holy hell batman if you can't see a mile wide hole in that you should uninstall asap., than the lost lives of all the people silenced for knowing the truth about the alleged missions to the moon, some even scheduled to testify about it?
Innocent people have been murdered too many times for knowing the truth about things our government wishes to hide and this is just one of them.
Why do people tolerate others silencing the truth?
Why is slashdot going to silence me and keep removing my posts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506023</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246219080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If someone called ME a boffin, I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's why people call you pervert<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone called ME a boffin , I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.That 's why people call you pervert ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone called ME a boffin, I might be obliged to bandy their knickers a bit.That's why people call you pervert ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505777</id>
	<title>FYI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle's most reliable newspaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle 's most reliable newspaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sunday Express is hardly our fair isle's most reliable newspaper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509133</id>
	<title>Just take a freakin picture alread...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246203600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think of myself as a conspiracy nut, and I'm kinda on the fence with the moon landing stuff (ie. it could be an extravagent coverup I guess) but why can't someone just show me a recent freakin picture of the shit they left on the moon.</p><p>The Japanese launched that orbitor about 2 years ago, and so did someone else I believe.  Satellite type deals which orbit the moon quite closely with supa-dupa high res cameras aboard.  Just take a fuckin picture of the moon buggy already, god dammit!</p><p>What about these telescope thingo's we have on earth, diameters of like 12 football fields that can see shit in other galaxies, but we can't point that fucker at the moon at just once...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think of myself as a conspiracy nut , and I 'm kinda on the fence with the moon landing stuff ( ie .
it could be an extravagent coverup I guess ) but why ca n't someone just show me a recent freakin picture of the shit they left on the moon.The Japanese launched that orbitor about 2 years ago , and so did someone else I believe .
Satellite type deals which orbit the moon quite closely with supa-dupa high res cameras aboard .
Just take a fuckin picture of the moon buggy already , god dammit ! What about these telescope thingo 's we have on earth , diameters of like 12 football fields that can see shit in other galaxies , but we ca n't point that fucker at the moon at just once.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think of myself as a conspiracy nut, and I'm kinda on the fence with the moon landing stuff (ie.
it could be an extravagent coverup I guess) but why can't someone just show me a recent freakin picture of the shit they left on the moon.The Japanese launched that orbitor about 2 years ago, and so did someone else I believe.
Satellite type deals which orbit the moon quite closely with supa-dupa high res cameras aboard.
Just take a fuckin picture of the moon buggy already, god dammit!What about these telescope thingo's we have on earth, diameters of like 12 football fields that can see shit in other galaxies, but we can't point that fucker at the moon at just once...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507271</id>
	<title>typical aussie's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246186320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>im not saying aussie's are dumb for losing the tapes, thats what they like, i.e dumb and not good looking</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>im not saying aussie 's are dumb for losing the tapes , thats what they like , i.e dumb and not good looking</tokentext>
<sentencetext>im not saying aussie's are dumb for losing the tapes, thats what they like, i.e dumb and not good looking</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506081</id>
	<title>What they don't tell you</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1246219500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they aren't saying is that the Sunday Press borrowed them all along, and never returned them.</p><p>They didn't even bother to rewind, those selfish jerks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they are n't saying is that the Sunday Press borrowed them all along , and never returned them.They did n't even bother to rewind , those selfish jerks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they aren't saying is that the Sunday Press borrowed them all along, and never returned them.They didn't even bother to rewind, those selfish jerks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506461</id>
	<title>Found ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246222320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... in the Universal Pictures studio vault, mis-labeled as a Michael Jackson video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... in the Universal Pictures studio vault , mis-labeled as a Michael Jackson video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... in the Universal Pictures studio vault, mis-labeled as a Michael Jackson video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</id>
	<title>Hope</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be great if true. To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought. (And the existing copies are poor quality.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be great if true .
To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought .
( And the existing copies are poor quality .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be great if true.
To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought.
(And the existing copies are poor quality.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</id>
	<title>"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>jimhill</author>
	<datestamp>1246219200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently someone forgot to tell NASA that they're a government agency and not some kind of mass-media Nielsen-dependent agency that relies on "scoops" and "special announcements".  When they find something, they should announce it immediately.  Suppose they'd found these tapes on July 21...would they have thought it appropriate to sit on them until July 20, 2019, just to have something special to go with the 50th anniversary?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently someone forgot to tell NASA that they 're a government agency and not some kind of mass-media Nielsen-dependent agency that relies on " scoops " and " special announcements " .
When they find something , they should announce it immediately .
Suppose they 'd found these tapes on July 21...would they have thought it appropriate to sit on them until July 20 , 2019 , just to have something special to go with the 50th anniversary ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently someone forgot to tell NASA that they're a government agency and not some kind of mass-media Nielsen-dependent agency that relies on "scoops" and "special announcements".
When they find something, they should announce it immediately.
Suppose they'd found these tapes on July 21...would they have thought it appropriate to sit on them until July 20, 2019, just to have something special to go with the 50th anniversary?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506451</id>
	<title>No human has ever been to the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246222260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why were they lost in the first place?</p><p>They're fake. And the government doesn't want that truth exposed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why were they lost in the first place ? They 're fake .
And the government does n't want that truth exposed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why were they lost in the first place?They're fake.
And the government doesn't want that truth exposed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509413</id>
	<title>Re:So, Is There Hope...?</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1246206660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes?</p></div><p>Sorry, not with today's technology.  The Doctor was last seen looking for them.  Unfortunately it's rumoured he'd carried a copy of Hofstadter's "Goedel-Escher-Bach" with him and was midway through an exciting chapter when he reached for the pushcorn by mistake.  He's currently lost in a prison of his plot device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes ? Sorry , not with today 's technology .
The Doctor was last seen looking for them .
Unfortunately it 's rumoured he 'd carried a copy of Hofstadter 's " Goedel-Escher-Bach " with him and was midway through an exciting chapter when he reached for the pushcorn by mistake .
He 's currently lost in a prison of his plot device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Is there hope for finding the missing Dr Who episodes?Sorry, not with today's technology.
The Doctor was last seen looking for them.
Unfortunately it's rumoured he'd carried a copy of Hofstadter's "Goedel-Escher-Bach" with him and was midway through an exciting chapter when he reached for the pushcorn by mistake.
He's currently lost in a prison of his plot device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507229</id>
	<title>Sunday Express article "fiction", says NASA</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1246186020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA has yet to release a formal statement, but one of their spokespeople is <a href="http://twitter.com/bnjacobs/status/2374782343" title="twitter.com">describing the Sunday Express's article as "fiction"</a> [twitter.com]. Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes haven't actually been found, or the way they were found is completely made up, is anyone's guess, but it shows the risks of taking a tabloid newspaper's breakthrough discovery which <i>doesn't name any of its sources</i> at face value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA has yet to release a formal statement , but one of their spokespeople is describing the Sunday Express 's article as " fiction " [ twitter.com ] .
Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes have n't actually been found , or the way they were found is completely made up , is anyone 's guess , but it shows the risks of taking a tabloid newspaper 's breakthrough discovery which does n't name any of its sources at face value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA has yet to release a formal statement, but one of their spokespeople is describing the Sunday Express's article as "fiction" [twitter.com].
Whether this means the Apollo 11 tapes haven't actually been found, or the way they were found is completely made up, is anyone's guess, but it shows the risks of taking a tabloid newspaper's breakthrough discovery which doesn't name any of its sources at face value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506729</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246181520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are pretty rare tapes, AFAIK 1 device in the world still exists to read it, they really don't know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are pretty rare tapes , AFAIK 1 device in the world still exists to read it , they really do n't know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are pretty rare tapes, AFAIK 1 device in the world still exists to read it, they really don't know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508581</id>
	<title>Re:"Scoop" ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246197720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently you have overlooked the fact that NASA supports a public relations department that is extremely conscious of how internal events are perceived by the outside world.  I would not be surprised if the PR budget of NASA far exceeds that of its archival department -- which would perhaps explain how the tapes got lost in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently you have overlooked the fact that NASA supports a public relations department that is extremely conscious of how internal events are perceived by the outside world .
I would not be surprised if the PR budget of NASA far exceeds that of its archival department -- which would perhaps explain how the tapes got lost in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently you have overlooked the fact that NASA supports a public relations department that is extremely conscious of how internal events are perceived by the outside world.
I would not be surprised if the PR budget of NASA far exceeds that of its archival department -- which would perhaps explain how the tapes got lost in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509263</id>
	<title>Re:Hope</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1246205160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That would be great if true. To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought. (And the existing copies are poor quality.)</p></div><p>Agree.  So, when will we get to see the copies on You Tube?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be great if true .
To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought .
( And the existing copies are poor quality. ) Agree .
So , when will we get to see the copies on You Tube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be great if true.
To lose the originals of the greatest technological and exploration achievement event since Columbus is a gut-wrenching thought.
(And the existing copies are poor quality.)Agree.
So, when will we get to see the copies on You Tube?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512973</id>
	<title>Re:good news bad news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246284180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The good news is they found the tapes. The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; </p></div><p>to bad Jackson was bold.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news is they found the tapes .
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars , part of South Korea , and a lock of Michael Jackson 's hair .
    to bad Jackson was bold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news is they found the tapes.
The bad news is Kim Jong-il has them and wants 20 billion dollars, part of South Korea, and a lock of Michael Jackson's hair.
    to bad Jackson was bold.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28511195</id>
	<title>Is this for real?</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1246266960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*snicker*<br>No they didn't lose the tapes... They're right here:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy8S9VQ8OhY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy8S9VQ8OhY</a> [youtube.com]  (vid of Michael Jackson)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* snicker * No they did n't lose the tapes... They 're right here : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Qy8S9VQ8OhY [ youtube.com ] ( vid of Michael Jackson )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*snicker*No they didn't lose the tapes... They're right here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy8S9VQ8OhY [youtube.com]  (vid of Michael Jackson)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506517</id>
	<title>True, but possibly unimportant.</title>
	<author>jd</author>
	<datestamp>1246222740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's data on them, it's data that was lost from some mission or other. There are plenty of missions (such as the Venus landings) where a bucket of extra data spools could provide massively valuable scientific data, even to this day.</p><p>Now that the moon has been (at least partially, if not fully) mapped in high-def, and a host of other probes have been sent to collect all kinds of other data, moon tapes would be really more interesting from a historic standpoint. Nothing wrong with that, especially as staggering achievements tend to wake public interest and open the money taps, but from a scientific standpoint there must be huge numbers of reels of tape that would actually be of greater value to NASA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's data on them , it 's data that was lost from some mission or other .
There are plenty of missions ( such as the Venus landings ) where a bucket of extra data spools could provide massively valuable scientific data , even to this day.Now that the moon has been ( at least partially , if not fully ) mapped in high-def , and a host of other probes have been sent to collect all kinds of other data , moon tapes would be really more interesting from a historic standpoint .
Nothing wrong with that , especially as staggering achievements tend to wake public interest and open the money taps , but from a scientific standpoint there must be huge numbers of reels of tape that would actually be of greater value to NASA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's data on them, it's data that was lost from some mission or other.
There are plenty of missions (such as the Venus landings) where a bucket of extra data spools could provide massively valuable scientific data, even to this day.Now that the moon has been (at least partially, if not fully) mapped in high-def, and a host of other probes have been sent to collect all kinds of other data, moon tapes would be really more interesting from a historic standpoint.
Nothing wrong with that, especially as staggering achievements tend to wake public interest and open the money taps, but from a scientific standpoint there must be huge numbers of reels of tape that would actually be of greater value to NASA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506381</id>
	<title>May or may not be?</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1246221600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.</p></div></blockquote><p>Vroomfondel, is that you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.Vroomfondel , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some tapes may or may not have been found which may or may not be the Apollo video.Vroomfondel, is that you?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508349</id>
	<title>Story's false</title>
	<author>Captain Nitpick</author>
	<datestamp>1246195860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/bnjacobs" title="linkedin.com">Bob Jacobs</a> [linkedin.com], the deputy assistant administrator for public affairs at NASA, <a href="http://twitter.com/bnjacobs/status/2374782343" title="twitter.com">says the story's fiction</a> [twitter.com].</p><p>(<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/28/lost-apollo-11-video-tapes-found/" title="discovermagazine.com">via Phil Plait</a> [discovermagazine.com])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bob Jacobs [ linkedin.com ] , the deputy assistant administrator for public affairs at NASA , says the story 's fiction [ twitter.com ] .
( via Phil Plait [ discovermagazine.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Bob Jacobs [linkedin.com], the deputy assistant administrator for public affairs at NASA, says the story's fiction [twitter.com].
(via Phil Plait [discovermagazine.com])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</id>
	<title>May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't it be nice if people (such as the summary writer) understood that "may" inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually "does", or perhaps "does not"?  Then they wouldn't feel compelled to append the completely redundant "<i>or may not</i>" every time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be nice if people ( such as the summary writer ) understood that " may " inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually " does " , or perhaps " does not " ?
Then they would n't feel compelled to append the completely redundant " or may not " every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be nice if people (such as the summary writer) understood that "may" inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually "does", or perhaps "does not"?
Then they wouldn't feel compelled to append the completely redundant "or may not" every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506209</id>
	<title>Hey! Me too!</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1246220400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I also may or may not have found tapes which may or may not be the Apollo videos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also may or may not have found tapes which may or may not be the Apollo videos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also may or may not have found tapes which may or may not be the Apollo videos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507669</id>
	<title>Re:NASA's credibility</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1246189260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<i>But the imagery isn't the real focus of the activity.</i>
</p><p>
Yes, it is.  The primary function of Apollo was to produce good television.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the imagery is n't the real focus of the activity .
Yes , it is .
The primary function of Apollo was to produce good television .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
But the imagery isn't the real focus of the activity.
Yes, it is.
The primary function of Apollo was to produce good television.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506231</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246220580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are technically correct.  However, there is a subtle difference between 'may' and 'may not'.</p><p>While both imply uncertainty, I think 'may' is generally more certain than 'may not'.</p><p>Think of it this way:<br>'may' - 75\% certain<br>'may not' - 25\% certain<br>'may or may not' - 50\% certain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are technically correct .
However , there is a subtle difference between 'may ' and 'may not'.While both imply uncertainty , I think 'may ' is generally more certain than 'may not'.Think of it this way : 'may ' - 75 \ % certain'may not ' - 25 \ % certain'may or may not ' - 50 \ % certain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are technically correct.
However, there is a subtle difference between 'may' and 'may not'.While both imply uncertainty, I think 'may' is generally more certain than 'may not'.Think of it this way:'may' - 75\% certain'may not' - 25\% certain'may or may not' - 50\% certain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506909</id>
	<title>Re:good news bad news</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1246183080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We don't have the money so give him the whole corpse and a third equity in the reformed GM. Then Kim and Jacko can go cruising around NK in a hummer, ala Weekend at Bernies, while the rest of us enjoy quality video of a more triumphant era.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't have the money so give him the whole corpse and a third equity in the reformed GM .
Then Kim and Jacko can go cruising around NK in a hummer , ala Weekend at Bernies , while the rest of us enjoy quality video of a more triumphant era .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't have the money so give him the whole corpse and a third equity in the reformed GM.
Then Kim and Jacko can go cruising around NK in a hummer, ala Weekend at Bernies, while the rest of us enjoy quality video of a more triumphant era.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505999</id>
	<title>Re:May "or may not"</title>
	<author>snaz555</author>
	<datestamp>1246218840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't it be nice if people (such as the summary writer) understood that "may" inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually "does", or perhaps "does not"?  Then they wouldn't feel compelled to append the completely redundant "<i>or may not</i>" every time.</p></div><p>It wasn't expressed with a high rate of accuracy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be nice if people ( such as the summary writer ) understood that " may " inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually " does " , or perhaps " does not " ?
Then they would n't feel compelled to append the completely redundant " or may not " every time.It was n't expressed with a high rate of accuracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be nice if people (such as the summary writer) understood that "may" inherently includes the uncertainty as to whether it actually "does", or perhaps "does not"?
Then they wouldn't feel compelled to append the completely redundant "or may not" every time.It wasn't expressed with a high rate of accuracy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28514243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28513543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509413
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28519767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28511351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28529375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_186245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506723
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508279
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507669
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28511351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28514243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506581
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506305
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28509263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28519767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506231
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28513543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28529375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506109
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28510133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28515133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28507065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28508581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28506401
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28512447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_186245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_186245.28505857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
