<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_27_0230218</id>
	<title>Alternative Energy Policies a Boon For Inflatable Electric Car</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246093980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Brian Stretch writes with a story about the Mini Utility Vehicle prototype from XP Vehicles, <a href="http://www.pddnet.com/article-the-inflatable-car-062509/">an electric car that is partly inflatable</a>. The recent struggles of the auto industry and a political climate that supports the development of alternative energy vehicles have given the car a better chance at actually hitting the market. Quoting:
<i>"Building a car takes many years and tens to hundreds of millions of dollars traditionally. XP is able to cut a lot of the costs and timeframe because its car has 70 percent less parts than a regular car, and the company is using novel materials that require simpler factory devices, and production and manufacturing processes that lower the cost to deploy. ... The seat is inflatable, the dashboard is inflatable, and the internal structure and carrying racks are inflatable, or a mesh suspension. Instead of requiring six-axis robots, XP uses radio frequency welders that look like giant waffle irons. The factory equipment is much less expensive and the car simply has less parts that could fail. The motors are built into the rear wheels in most XP prototypes. The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller, that's it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brian Stretch writes with a story about the Mini Utility Vehicle prototype from XP Vehicles , an electric car that is partly inflatable .
The recent struggles of the auto industry and a political climate that supports the development of alternative energy vehicles have given the car a better chance at actually hitting the market .
Quoting : " Building a car takes many years and tens to hundreds of millions of dollars traditionally .
XP is able to cut a lot of the costs and timeframe because its car has 70 percent less parts than a regular car , and the company is using novel materials that require simpler factory devices , and production and manufacturing processes that lower the cost to deploy .
... The seat is inflatable , the dashboard is inflatable , and the internal structure and carrying racks are inflatable , or a mesh suspension .
Instead of requiring six-axis robots , XP uses radio frequency welders that look like giant waffle irons .
The factory equipment is much less expensive and the car simply has less parts that could fail .
The motors are built into the rear wheels in most XP prototypes .
The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller , that 's it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brian Stretch writes with a story about the Mini Utility Vehicle prototype from XP Vehicles, an electric car that is partly inflatable.
The recent struggles of the auto industry and a political climate that supports the development of alternative energy vehicles have given the car a better chance at actually hitting the market.
Quoting:
"Building a car takes many years and tens to hundreds of millions of dollars traditionally.
XP is able to cut a lot of the costs and timeframe because its car has 70 percent less parts than a regular car, and the company is using novel materials that require simpler factory devices, and production and manufacturing processes that lower the cost to deploy.
... The seat is inflatable, the dashboard is inflatable, and the internal structure and carrying racks are inflatable, or a mesh suspension.
Instead of requiring six-axis robots, XP uses radio frequency welders that look like giant waffle irons.
The factory equipment is much less expensive and the car simply has less parts that could fail.
The motors are built into the rear wheels in most XP prototypes.
The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller, that's it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</id>
	<title>Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246105380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The comments here have shown me one thing: it's all in the mind of the buyer.

Cars like this don't turn over on a roundabout, neither will they be blown away by the wind. But they won't sell, cause customers (at least in the US) seem to have a different mindset. Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy, typical American concept which consumes a lot, of course.

Now maybe it's a hoax, maybe not. But they'd better look at Euro, Asian and African markets for a concept like this. Over here, we've had a number of electric vehicles on the road since 20 yrs. or so. Most of them based on existing small cars. Most of these projects were fairly succes full given their niche market, because people don't mind driving a really small car.

Tata (India) will be present in the US market real soon. First with a small car with a classic engine, later on with an air powered car. They have the size, money and production facilities to make this work. Others are coming too. But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The comments here have shown me one thing : it 's all in the mind of the buyer .
Cars like this do n't turn over on a roundabout , neither will they be blown away by the wind .
But they wo n't sell , cause customers ( at least in the US ) seem to have a different mindset .
Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy , typical American concept which consumes a lot , of course .
Now maybe it 's a hoax , maybe not .
But they 'd better look at Euro , Asian and African markets for a concept like this .
Over here , we 've had a number of electric vehicles on the road since 20 yrs .
or so .
Most of them based on existing small cars .
Most of these projects were fairly succes full given their niche market , because people do n't mind driving a really small car .
Tata ( India ) will be present in the US market real soon .
First with a small car with a classic engine , later on with an air powered car .
They have the size , money and production facilities to make this work .
Others are coming too .
But will they be able to change US ' customers mindset ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The comments here have shown me one thing: it's all in the mind of the buyer.
Cars like this don't turn over on a roundabout, neither will they be blown away by the wind.
But they won't sell, cause customers (at least in the US) seem to have a different mindset.
Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy, typical American concept which consumes a lot, of course.
Now maybe it's a hoax, maybe not.
But they'd better look at Euro, Asian and African markets for a concept like this.
Over here, we've had a number of electric vehicles on the road since 20 yrs.
or so.
Most of them based on existing small cars.
Most of these projects were fairly succes full given their niche market, because people don't mind driving a really small car.
Tata (India) will be present in the US market real soon.
First with a small car with a classic engine, later on with an air powered car.
They have the size, money and production facilities to make this work.
Others are coming too.
But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494201</id>
	<title>Re:A Boon?</title>
	<author>budgenator</author>
	<datestamp>1246113060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wish I had mod point, definitely funny and very subtle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wish I had mod point , definitely funny and very subtle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wish I had mod point, definitely funny and very subtle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494187</id>
	<title>Re:Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>topnob</author>
	<datestamp>1246112820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually I'm from Australia and I guess Australia is in the Euro, Asian and African market as well.....wait isn't that the REST of the WORLD!!


Anyway I was waiting for my friend to pick me up in his tiny car(which he bought after he traded in his fuel guzzler(v6 commodore Aussies out there)), and nearly every car that went past was small, there were only a couple of SUVs(like 1 in 10 or so). It was weird, i mentioned it to my friend when he picked me up and hes said everyone's buying small cars these days(I guess someone forgot to send the memo to me).  I wonder if there are any stats about this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I 'm from Australia and I guess Australia is in the Euro , Asian and African market as well.....wait is n't that the REST of the WORLD ! !
Anyway I was waiting for my friend to pick me up in his tiny car ( which he bought after he traded in his fuel guzzler ( v6 commodore Aussies out there ) ) , and nearly every car that went past was small , there were only a couple of SUVs ( like 1 in 10 or so ) .
It was weird , i mentioned it to my friend when he picked me up and hes said everyone 's buying small cars these days ( I guess someone forgot to send the memo to me ) .
I wonder if there are any stats about this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I'm from Australia and I guess Australia is in the Euro, Asian and African market as well.....wait isn't that the REST of the WORLD!!
Anyway I was waiting for my friend to pick me up in his tiny car(which he bought after he traded in his fuel guzzler(v6 commodore Aussies out there)), and nearly every car that went past was small, there were only a couple of SUVs(like 1 in 10 or so).
It was weird, i mentioned it to my friend when he picked me up and hes said everyone's buying small cars these days(I guess someone forgot to send the memo to me).
I wonder if there are any stats about this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495195</id>
	<title>The strongest parts of a car are it tires</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1246121400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The strongest parts of a car are already inflateable.  However, those parts are quite heavy.  Inflateable parts are not necessarily lighter than metal parts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The strongest parts of a car are already inflateable .
However , those parts are quite heavy .
Inflateable parts are not necessarily lighter than metal parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The strongest parts of a car are already inflateable.
However, those parts are quite heavy.
Inflateable parts are not necessarily lighter than metal parts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28499419</id>
	<title>If it is so enery efficient, what will we sell?</title>
	<author>play\_in\_traffic</author>
	<datestamp>1246110900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phase 3 -&gt; Profit</p><p>I guess we will have to charge for the air to inflate the vehicle's parts!</p><p>-PIT</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phase 3 - &gt; ProfitI guess we will have to charge for the air to inflate the vehicle 's parts ! -PIT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phase 3 -&gt; ProfitI guess we will have to charge for the air to inflate the vehicle's parts!-PIT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493201</id>
	<title>hostel to the US</title>
	<author>hbr</author>
	<datestamp>1246098720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>all of the Lithium is located in countries that are hostel [sic] towards the U.S. - which is a bit of a problem<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>... which I guess means that they only reserve substandard accommodation for their US visitors, whereas everyone else gets 5-star.  Rough deal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : all of the Lithium is located in countries that are hostel [ sic ] towards the U.S. - which is a bit of a problem ...... which I guess means that they only reserve substandard accommodation for their US visitors , whereas everyone else gets 5-star .
Rough deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:all of the Lithium is located in countries that are hostel [sic] towards the U.S. - which is a bit of a problem ...... which I guess means that they only reserve substandard accommodation for their US visitors, whereas everyone else gets 5-star.
Rough deal.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215</id>
	<title>I wish them the best in their endeavour</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246099020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>From reading the article, it looks as if the company has put in a lot of thought and effort into making a product that not only is technically advanced but also have developed a marketing strategy and are tailoring their product for a segment- The point about removable chargeable batteries was something that had kept crossing my mind everytime i had seen an article on electric cars and I am glad someone has gotten around to implementing it (I am unsure if anyone else has..if so please feel free to correct me!) . They appear to be getting their basics right and in addition are trying to put in some real innovation (inflatable parts).I hope they get their funding problems sorted. I for one would be rooting for them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>From reading the article , it looks as if the company has put in a lot of thought and effort into making a product that not only is technically advanced but also have developed a marketing strategy and are tailoring their product for a segment- The point about removable chargeable batteries was something that had kept crossing my mind everytime i had seen an article on electric cars and I am glad someone has gotten around to implementing it ( I am unsure if anyone else has..if so please feel free to correct me !
) .
They appear to be getting their basics right and in addition are trying to put in some real innovation ( inflatable parts ) .I hope they get their funding problems sorted .
I for one would be rooting for them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From reading the article, it looks as if the company has put in a lot of thought and effort into making a product that not only is technically advanced but also have developed a marketing strategy and are tailoring their product for a segment- The point about removable chargeable batteries was something that had kept crossing my mind everytime i had seen an article on electric cars and I am glad someone has gotten around to implementing it (I am unsure if anyone else has..if so please feel free to correct me!
) .
They appear to be getting their basics right and in addition are trying to put in some real innovation (inflatable parts).I hope they get their funding problems sorted.
I for one would be rooting for them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843</id>
	<title>Does it run Linux?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1246108500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, seriously, there's no bloody way I'm getting into a car with a control system running Windows. I don't want the dashboard telling me "A fatal exception has occurred...".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , seriously , there 's no bloody way I 'm getting into a car with a control system running Windows .
I do n't want the dashboard telling me " A fatal exception has occurred... " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, seriously, there's no bloody way I'm getting into a car with a control system running Windows.
I don't want the dashboard telling me "A fatal exception has occurred...".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496009</id>
	<title>Re:That's 'fewer' parts, not 'less'...</title>
	<author>Enigma2175</author>
	<datestamp>1246128600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi. At least I'm not the illiterate clot.</p></div><p>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; </p><p>Screw the grammar, how about the spelling in the article?</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>"What we've discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension <b>chords</b> all over the place"</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>"all of the Lithium is located in countries that are <b>hostel</b> towards the U.S."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi .
At least I 'm not the illiterate clot .
    Screw the grammar , how about the spelling in the article ?
  " What we 've discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension chords all over the place "   " all of the Lithium is located in countries that are hostel towards the U.S. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi.
At least I'm not the illiterate clot.
  
  Screw the grammar, how about the spelling in the article?
  "What we've discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension chords all over the place"
  "all of the Lithium is located in countries that are hostel towards the U.S."
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494345</id>
	<title>Re:Does it run Linux?</title>
	<author>downix</author>
	<datestamp>1246114200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just imagining when a new skin turns out to have a virus.  Every so often your speedometer pops up with "Your system is infected with 69 viruses, please purchase Antivirus 2009 to correct"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just imagining when a new skin turns out to have a virus .
Every so often your speedometer pops up with " Your system is infected with 69 viruses , please purchase Antivirus 2009 to correct "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just imagining when a new skin turns out to have a virus.
Every so often your speedometer pops up with "Your system is infected with 69 viruses, please purchase Antivirus 2009 to correct"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479</id>
	<title>Re:I wish them the best in their endeavour</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246102680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I for one would be rooting for them!</p></div><p>Aww, come on. This is soo obviously a fake. Read the article again, without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles.</p><p>An inflatible car that survives crash tests. A bullet proof car at less than 1.400 lbs. "The dashboard is a preinflated airbag that has a rear projection screen." With an OLED video screen. And all that with a cost to market of $70m.</p><p>Yeah, right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one would be rooting for them ! Aww , come on .
This is soo obviously a fake .
Read the article again , without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles.An inflatible car that survives crash tests .
A bullet proof car at less than 1.400 lbs .
" The dashboard is a preinflated airbag that has a rear projection screen .
" With an OLED video screen .
And all that with a cost to market of $ 70m.Yeah , right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one would be rooting for them!Aww, come on.
This is soo obviously a fake.
Read the article again, without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles.An inflatible car that survives crash tests.
A bullet proof car at less than 1.400 lbs.
"The dashboard is a preinflated airbag that has a rear projection screen.
" With an OLED video screen.
And all that with a cost to market of $70m.Yeah, right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493641</id>
	<title>Sounds like a bunch of crap to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246105080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>srsly.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>srsly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>srsly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493175</id>
	<title>which way does the wind blow ... your car over?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>;P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>; P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>;P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28499795</id>
	<title>Re:Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1246113720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</p></div><p>Absolutely not. Nobody is going to put their family in this inflatable go kart deathtrap; it would be humiliating to drive such a crappy little car. Americans prefer a larger, heavier, and safer vehicle (preferably stylish too although that is not always possible) above fuel economy. Do we complain about higher fuel prices? Sure we do. Is it enough to get us out of our SUV family haulers or large sedans? Of course not. The problem with the small-car people is that all of their arguments are bunko for the typical American family. Advanced safety features can be part of any car in any size category so, all other things being equal, a larger and more massive vehicle is safer. If people want to drive their families around in econo-box death traps then that is their choice I suppose, but they will pry the keys to my Mercedes S class from my cold dead hands. I don't care if the gas mileage is only ~20mpg; I want safety, luxury, and performance not some clove-smoking birkenstock wearing hippie's idea of what I should be <i>permitted</i> to drive (not a very American concept telling people what they can and cannot drive). That is why GM will fail in the green econo box market; many Americans wouldn't even consider a car in that class under any circumstances and those who would probably select the Toyota Prius or Honda Insight instead.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will they be able to change US ' customers mindset ? Absolutely not .
Nobody is going to put their family in this inflatable go kart deathtrap ; it would be humiliating to drive such a crappy little car .
Americans prefer a larger , heavier , and safer vehicle ( preferably stylish too although that is not always possible ) above fuel economy .
Do we complain about higher fuel prices ?
Sure we do .
Is it enough to get us out of our SUV family haulers or large sedans ?
Of course not .
The problem with the small-car people is that all of their arguments are bunko for the typical American family .
Advanced safety features can be part of any car in any size category so , all other things being equal , a larger and more massive vehicle is safer .
If people want to drive their families around in econo-box death traps then that is their choice I suppose , but they will pry the keys to my Mercedes S class from my cold dead hands .
I do n't care if the gas mileage is only ~ 20mpg ; I want safety , luxury , and performance not some clove-smoking birkenstock wearing hippie 's idea of what I should be permitted to drive ( not a very American concept telling people what they can and can not drive ) .
That is why GM will fail in the green econo box market ; many Americans would n't even consider a car in that class under any circumstances and those who would probably select the Toyota Prius or Honda Insight instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?Absolutely not.
Nobody is going to put their family in this inflatable go kart deathtrap; it would be humiliating to drive such a crappy little car.
Americans prefer a larger, heavier, and safer vehicle (preferably stylish too although that is not always possible) above fuel economy.
Do we complain about higher fuel prices?
Sure we do.
Is it enough to get us out of our SUV family haulers or large sedans?
Of course not.
The problem with the small-car people is that all of their arguments are bunko for the typical American family.
Advanced safety features can be part of any car in any size category so, all other things being equal, a larger and more massive vehicle is safer.
If people want to drive their families around in econo-box death traps then that is their choice I suppose, but they will pry the keys to my Mercedes S class from my cold dead hands.
I don't care if the gas mileage is only ~20mpg; I want safety, luxury, and performance not some clove-smoking birkenstock wearing hippie's idea of what I should be permitted to drive (not a very American concept telling people what they can and cannot drive).
That is why GM will fail in the green econo box market; many Americans wouldn't even consider a car in that class under any circumstances and those who would probably select the Toyota Prius or Honda Insight instead.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495543</id>
	<title>Microsoft XP Vehicle</title>
	<author>rs232</author>
	<datestamp>1246124340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'XP started out with an investment from Microsoft, which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management. XP is basing its collaborative space around the <a href="http://www.pddnet.com/article-the-inflatable-car-062509/" title="pddnet.com">Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server</a> [pddnet.com]'</htmltext>
<tokenext>'XP started out with an investment from Microsoft , which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management .
XP is basing its collaborative space around the Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server [ pddnet.com ] '</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'XP started out with an investment from Microsoft, which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management.
XP is basing its collaborative space around the Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server [pddnet.com]'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493151</id>
	<title>http://www.support1000.com</title>
	<author>anilnithi</author>
	<datestamp>1246098060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for sharing this info blog.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for sharing this info blog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for sharing this info blog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495103</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246120620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will this inflatable car have solid steel wheels?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this inflatable car have solid steel wheels ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this inflatable car have solid steel wheels?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28500225</id>
	<title>Re:Utah is the investment scam capital of US</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246117500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet, I didn't know we were the capital of anything. Now we finally know what to put on our license plates. Good thing I invested in that plate manufacturing company...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet , I did n't know we were the capital of anything .
Now we finally know what to put on our license plates .
Good thing I invested in that plate manufacturing company.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet, I didn't know we were the capital of anything.
Now we finally know what to put on our license plates.
Good thing I invested in that plate manufacturing company...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494871</id>
	<title>OK.  The dashboard \_concept\_ is "interesting" but</title>
	<author>smchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246119180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is this really a need crying out to be filled?  I thought a smart car was already plastic hung on a metal frame.  Maybe for things like the seats materials science could come up with a durable and rigid foamed substance that was still light but wasn't actually inflatable?  Same for the dashboard.  Why not a rigid material?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is this really a need crying out to be filled ?
I thought a smart car was already plastic hung on a metal frame .
Maybe for things like the seats materials science could come up with a durable and rigid foamed substance that was still light but was n't actually inflatable ?
Same for the dashboard .
Why not a rigid material ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this really a need crying out to be filled?
I thought a smart car was already plastic hung on a metal frame.
Maybe for things like the seats materials science could come up with a durable and rigid foamed substance that was still light but wasn't actually inflatable?
Same for the dashboard.
Why not a rigid material?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493223</id>
	<title>In other news</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1246099020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bolivia is suspected to have substantial stocks of WMDs; especially under Salar de Uyuni</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bolivia is suspected to have substantial stocks of WMDs ; especially under Salar de Uyuni</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bolivia is suspected to have substantial stocks of WMDs; especially under Salar de Uyuni</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28595471</id>
	<title>You just know..</title>
	<author>mattr</author>
	<datestamp>1246900200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...It will be coolest to have a car that's partly deflated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...It will be coolest to have a car that 's partly deflated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...It will be coolest to have a car that's partly deflated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28506573</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>markov\_chain</author>
	<datestamp>1246180020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that, this car will need patches all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , this car will need patches all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, this car will need patches all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496263</id>
	<title>Re:I wish them the best in their endeavour</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1246131180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remove the bullet proof and it starts sounding more likely. Now note that they don't claim it's bullet proof, just that the bullets won't deflate the car like a beach ball when they go through it.</p><p>Much of the cost of developing a car is in the crash testing because they have to total the car. The XP is expected to remain serviceable after the test, so will cost a lot less to test.</p><p>The $70M probably doesn't include the cost of developing OLED projection technology itse'f, there are plenty of others who will handle that for many applications. They just need to use the results of that development.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remove the bullet proof and it starts sounding more likely .
Now note that they do n't claim it 's bullet proof , just that the bullets wo n't deflate the car like a beach ball when they go through it.Much of the cost of developing a car is in the crash testing because they have to total the car .
The XP is expected to remain serviceable after the test , so will cost a lot less to test.The $ 70M probably does n't include the cost of developing OLED projection technology itse'f , there are plenty of others who will handle that for many applications .
They just need to use the results of that development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remove the bullet proof and it starts sounding more likely.
Now note that they don't claim it's bullet proof, just that the bullets won't deflate the car like a beach ball when they go through it.Much of the cost of developing a car is in the crash testing because they have to total the car.
The XP is expected to remain serviceable after the test, so will cost a lot less to test.The $70M probably doesn't include the cost of developing OLED projection technology itse'f, there are plenty of others who will handle that for many applications.
They just need to use the results of that development.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494451</id>
	<title>Badly Faked</title>
	<author>Andy\_R</author>
	<datestamp>1246115100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pictures in the linked article are of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart\_(automobile)" title="wikipedia.org"> 2003 model MCC Smart</a> [wikipedia.org]. It's been stretched out a bit, they didn't even bother to make the wheels fit into the wheelarches after stretching!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pictures in the linked article are of a 2003 model MCC Smart [ wikipedia.org ] .
It 's been stretched out a bit , they did n't even bother to make the wheels fit into the wheelarches after stretching !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pictures in the linked article are of a  2003 model MCC Smart [wikipedia.org].
It's been stretched out a bit, they didn't even bother to make the wheels fit into the wheelarches after stretching!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493349</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>portalcake625</author>
	<datestamp>1246100700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This looks like a big, late April's fool joke. <br>
If they're gonna run Windows XP on it, better be XPe, just to be safe. <br>
I sure hope it's not going to be internet-connected.<br>
Anyone think it can be used to run *nix?<br>
because just imagine it, riding your brand-new inflatable car to your wife then... it turns blue with 0x7B errors... lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>This looks like a big , late April 's fool joke .
If they 're gon na run Windows XP on it , better be XPe , just to be safe .
I sure hope it 's not going to be internet-connected .
Anyone think it can be used to run * nix ?
because just imagine it , riding your brand-new inflatable car to your wife then... it turns blue with 0x7B errors... lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This looks like a big, late April's fool joke.
If they're gonna run Windows XP on it, better be XPe, just to be safe.
I sure hope it's not going to be internet-connected.
Anyone think it can be used to run *nix?
because just imagine it, riding your brand-new inflatable car to your wife then... it turns blue with 0x7B errors... lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493841</id>
	<title>Re:less parts to fail..</title>
	<author>WytErp</author>
	<datestamp>1246108500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the battery "swap by mail-in subscription service" -- looks like you'll be able to use any old Netflix envelopes you have lying around...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the battery " swap by mail-in subscription service " -- looks like you 'll be able to use any old Netflix envelopes you have lying around.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the battery "swap by mail-in subscription service" -- looks like you'll be able to use any old Netflix envelopes you have lying around...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493315</id>
	<title>If you fill it with Helium, will it float . . . ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246100340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> . . . maybe this is breakthrough that we have been waiting for on the "Flying Car" front?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
maybe this is breakthrough that we have been waiting for on the " Flying Car " front ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .
. .
maybe this is breakthrough that we have been waiting for on the "Flying Car" front?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493831</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>squeeze69</author>
	<datestamp>1246108320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone would drive a Vista car?
With the UAC asking if you really want to stop or start anytime?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone would drive a Vista car ?
With the UAC asking if you really want to stop or start anytime ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone would drive a Vista car?
With the UAC asking if you really want to stop or start anytime?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493789</id>
	<title>Re:less parts to fail..</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1246107720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster.</p><p>never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product (they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs), <b>you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon.</b> </p></div><p>Rigid Inflatable Boats (RIBs) have been around for quite some time.</p><p>Self-sealing gloop (like mountain bike tyres) FTW.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster.never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product ( they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs ) , you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon .
Rigid Inflatable Boats ( RIBs ) have been around for quite some time.Self-sealing gloop ( like mountain bike tyres ) FTW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster.never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product (they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs), you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon.
Rigid Inflatable Boats (RIBs) have been around for quite some time.Self-sealing gloop (like mountain bike tyres) FTW.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28503659</id>
	<title>Re:I wish them the best in their endeavour</title>
	<author>BobPaul</author>
	<datestamp>1246203000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 4 door model Tesla Motors is working on will have removable batteries. They are working to get swap stations setup across the country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 4 door model Tesla Motors is working on will have removable batteries .
They are working to get swap stations setup across the country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 4 door model Tesla Motors is working on will have removable batteries.
They are working to get swap stations setup across the country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494109</id>
	<title>sorry, not going to change the world</title>
	<author>MagicMerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1246112040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish them the best, but their project is doomed.  The EV market is clearly going towards batteries, the comments in the article about the scarcity of lithium (11th most numerous element in the ocean) are laughable.   In current battery costs, only a small percentage goes towards the lithium raw material purchase.  At least EVs more or less piggyback off the current electric grid, which obviously couldn't handle transportation demands, but its a start.<br>The problems with fuel cells are numerous.  Where do you buy your fuel cells?  How do you get your hydrogen from point A to point B?  The problem with these guys is that their project was initiated when fuel cells were 'hot' to those without common sense (government) before they went on to the next brainless strategy...ethanol (oops).<br>Not only that, commercially recoverable hydrogen comes from natural gas...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish them the best , but their project is doomed .
The EV market is clearly going towards batteries , the comments in the article about the scarcity of lithium ( 11th most numerous element in the ocean ) are laughable .
In current battery costs , only a small percentage goes towards the lithium raw material purchase .
At least EVs more or less piggyback off the current electric grid , which obviously could n't handle transportation demands , but its a start.The problems with fuel cells are numerous .
Where do you buy your fuel cells ?
How do you get your hydrogen from point A to point B ?
The problem with these guys is that their project was initiated when fuel cells were 'hot ' to those without common sense ( government ) before they went on to the next brainless strategy...ethanol ( oops ) .Not only that , commercially recoverable hydrogen comes from natural gas.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish them the best, but their project is doomed.
The EV market is clearly going towards batteries, the comments in the article about the scarcity of lithium (11th most numerous element in the ocean) are laughable.
In current battery costs, only a small percentage goes towards the lithium raw material purchase.
At least EVs more or less piggyback off the current electric grid, which obviously couldn't handle transportation demands, but its a start.The problems with fuel cells are numerous.
Where do you buy your fuel cells?
How do you get your hydrogen from point A to point B?
The problem with these guys is that their project was initiated when fuel cells were 'hot' to those without common sense (government) before they went on to the next brainless strategy...ethanol (oops).Not only that, commercially recoverable hydrogen comes from natural gas...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494145</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246112400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if so, it will have uses for some. If you want to get rid of your spouse or somebody, buy them one. You know that it will crash sooner or later and take everything important with it. Of course, be prepared to have it stolen, and to pay lots of extra money to try and avoid that. You Kids will be taking it for joy rides. Yeah, I might just buy one for a worst enemy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if so , it will have uses for some .
If you want to get rid of your spouse or somebody , buy them one .
You know that it will crash sooner or later and take everything important with it .
Of course , be prepared to have it stolen , and to pay lots of extra money to try and avoid that .
You Kids will be taking it for joy rides .
Yeah , I might just buy one for a worst enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if so, it will have uses for some.
If you want to get rid of your spouse or somebody, buy them one.
You know that it will crash sooner or later and take everything important with it.
Of course, be prepared to have it stolen, and to pay lots of extra money to try and avoid that.
You Kids will be taking it for joy rides.
Yeah, I might just buy one for a worst enemy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493459</id>
	<title>new meaning to news items</title>
	<author>naeone</author>
	<datestamp>1246102380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>so when we now hear of a car being blown up in an incident it doesn't mean its terror related</htmltext>
<tokenext>so when we now hear of a car being blown up in an incident it does n't mean its terror related</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so when we now hear of a car being blown up in an incident it doesn't mean its terror related</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493769</id>
	<title>Definitely a babe magnet</title>
	<author>Biff Stu</author>
	<datestamp>1246107420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My inflatable date will just love it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My inflatable date will just love it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My inflatable date will just love it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493393</id>
	<title>I feel for the poor 6-axis robots</title>
	<author>johannesg</author>
	<datestamp>1246101300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are now too expensive as well, and their work will be outsourced to cheaper waffle irons that are presumably located somewhere in Belgium...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are now too expensive as well , and their work will be outsourced to cheaper waffle irons that are presumably located somewhere in Belgium.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are now too expensive as well, and their work will be outsourced to cheaper waffle irons that are presumably located somewhere in Belgium...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493211</id>
	<title>Just Re-Tool...</title>
	<author>BlueStrat</author>
	<datestamp>1246098960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brilliant!</p><p>They can expand production facilities cheaply by buying up old whoopy-cushion factories and doing minimal re-tooling! They could even re-hire the old employees, as the same skill-sets would apply!</p><p>However, I don't think I'll be the first in line to buy a new "Whoopy-Mobile". It would simply be too embarrassing to deflate at a public parking facility.</p><p>Strat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brilliant ! They can expand production facilities cheaply by buying up old whoopy-cushion factories and doing minimal re-tooling !
They could even re-hire the old employees , as the same skill-sets would apply ! However , I do n't think I 'll be the first in line to buy a new " Whoopy-Mobile " .
It would simply be too embarrassing to deflate at a public parking facility.Strat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brilliant!They can expand production facilities cheaply by buying up old whoopy-cushion factories and doing minimal re-tooling!
They could even re-hire the old employees, as the same skill-sets would apply!However, I don't think I'll be the first in line to buy a new "Whoopy-Mobile".
It would simply be too embarrassing to deflate at a public parking facility.Strat</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494239</id>
	<title>Speaking of innovative body construction and drive</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1246113300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking of innovative body construction and drive train technology, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B00000IRTS/sr=8-1/qid=1246109374/ref=dp\_image\_z\_0?ie=UTF8&amp;n=165793011&amp;s=toys-and-games&amp;qid=1246109374&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com">here</a> [amazon.com] is car which is constructed almost entirely of injection molded parts, and whose biomass powered drive train qualifies it as a zero emissions vehicle.</p><p>On top of that, it has that elusive quality that makes a car a hit: style.  Within the target market segment, its appeal is undeniable.   Best of all, it's not a concept car.  You can buy it today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of innovative body construction and drive train technology , here [ amazon.com ] is car which is constructed almost entirely of injection molded parts , and whose biomass powered drive train qualifies it as a zero emissions vehicle.On top of that , it has that elusive quality that makes a car a hit : style .
Within the target market segment , its appeal is undeniable .
Best of all , it 's not a concept car .
You can buy it today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of innovative body construction and drive train technology, here [amazon.com] is car which is constructed almost entirely of injection molded parts, and whose biomass powered drive train qualifies it as a zero emissions vehicle.On top of that, it has that elusive quality that makes a car a hit: style.
Within the target market segment, its appeal is undeniable.
Best of all, it's not a concept car.
You can buy it today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494111</id>
	<title>Re:That's 'fewer' parts, not 'less'...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246112040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The much repeated "rule" was pulled out of a hat by Baker in 1770.  The rule didn't match usage then and has never matched usage since.  'Less' has been used for countables for over a thousand years.</p><p>

I won't call you a clot, but I will call you a clod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The much repeated " rule " was pulled out of a hat by Baker in 1770 .
The rule did n't match usage then and has never matched usage since .
'Less ' has been used for countables for over a thousand years .
I wo n't call you a clot , but I will call you a clod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The much repeated "rule" was pulled out of a hat by Baker in 1770.
The rule didn't match usage then and has never matched usage since.
'Less' has been used for countables for over a thousand years.
I won't call you a clot, but I will call you a clod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493461</id>
	<title>you willy ain't gonna inflate no more</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246102380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>imagine you willy being smacked until it bleeds</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>imagine you willy being smacked until it bleeds</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagine you willy being smacked until it bleeds</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493853</id>
	<title>Even if they are serious</title>
	<author>Lonewolf666</author>
	<datestamp>1246108620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt their ability to build the car, considering that they obviously don't understand the difference between power and energy. From the table in TFA:</p><p>-"Available power" given in kWh</p><p>-and three rows below a "hybrid power" for the Volt that is completely meaningless, considering that the Volt drives on electric motors and only uses the petrol engine for recharging.</p><p>Unless David Mantey, Editor, PD&amp;D has cooked up this drivel on his own. In that case I apologize to the  XP Vehicles Inc. crew and David Mantey may considered himself bashed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt their ability to build the car , considering that they obviously do n't understand the difference between power and energy .
From the table in TFA : - " Available power " given in kWh-and three rows below a " hybrid power " for the Volt that is completely meaningless , considering that the Volt drives on electric motors and only uses the petrol engine for recharging.Unless David Mantey , Editor , PD&amp;D has cooked up this drivel on his own .
In that case I apologize to the XP Vehicles Inc. crew and David Mantey may considered himself bashed ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt their ability to build the car, considering that they obviously don't understand the difference between power and energy.
From the table in TFA:-"Available power" given in kWh-and three rows below a "hybrid power" for the Volt that is completely meaningless, considering that the Volt drives on electric motors and only uses the petrol engine for recharging.Unless David Mantey, Editor, PD&amp;D has cooked up this drivel on his own.
In that case I apologize to the  XP Vehicles Inc. crew and David Mantey may considered himself bashed ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675</id>
	<title>That's 'fewer' parts, not 'less'...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246105740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi. At least I'm not the illiterate clot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi .
At least I 'm not the illiterate clot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So go ahead and call me a grammar Nazi.
At least I'm not the illiterate clot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493597</id>
	<title>Inflatable wings option?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246104420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inexpensive flying cars finally arrive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inexpensive flying cars finally arrive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inexpensive flying cars finally arrive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</id>
	<title>A Boon?</title>
	<author>ZirconCode</author>
	<datestamp>1246098120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It takes certain talent to imagine a boon in inflatable cars...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It takes certain talent to imagine a boon in inflatable cars.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It takes certain talent to imagine a boon in inflatable cars...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493707</id>
	<title>...that's it</title>
	<author>Valtor</author>
	<datestamp>1246106400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller, that's it.</p></div><p>You mean there is no batteries ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller , that 's it.You mean there is no batteries ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first cars to reach the market will have two rear hub motors and a motor controller, that's it.You mean there is no batteries ?
;-)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28501025</id>
	<title>Will this also pump up the inflatable girlfriend?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246124340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geeks want to know if this will have any spill over on the inflatable girlfriend market...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geeks want to know if this will have any spill over on the inflatable girlfriend market.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geeks want to know if this will have any spill over on the inflatable girlfriend market...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494191</id>
	<title>Re:Does it run Linux?</title>
	<author>topnob</author>
	<datestamp>1246112880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats actually exactly what I thought as well....Make sure you reboot it nightly just in case.... lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats actually exactly what I thought as well....Make sure you reboot it nightly just in case.... lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats actually exactly what I thought as well....Make sure you reboot it nightly just in case.... lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</id>
	<title>Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>StCredZero</author>
	<datestamp>1246099620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't this sound like a hoax?  The CEO is named Redmond.  The Car is called the XP.  "XP started out with an investment from Microsoft, which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management."  Aren't these some sort of reference to eXtreme Programming and and Windows XP?</p><p>Are they going to come out with a Sport Utility model called the eXtreme?  Will the next models be called the Vista and the Seven?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't this sound like a hoax ?
The CEO is named Redmond .
The Car is called the XP .
" XP started out with an investment from Microsoft , which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management .
" Are n't these some sort of reference to eXtreme Programming and and Windows XP ? Are they going to come out with a Sport Utility model called the eXtreme ?
Will the next models be called the Vista and the Seven ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't this sound like a hoax?
The CEO is named Redmond.
The Car is called the XP.
"XP started out with an investment from Microsoft, which offered a majority of its software products and a very large number of its licenses to build some process management.
"  Aren't these some sort of reference to eXtreme Programming and and Windows XP?Are they going to come out with a Sport Utility model called the eXtreme?
Will the next models be called the Vista and the Seven?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493185</id>
	<title>XP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>I hope they don't run xp in their factory or the car.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they do n't run xp in their factory or the car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they don't run xp in their factory or the car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493881</id>
	<title>Re:That's 'fewer' parts, not 'less'...</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1246109040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>less</i></p><p><i>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; determiner &amp; pronoun 1 a smaller amount of; not as much. 2 fewer in number</i></p><p>(source: Compact Oxford English Dictionary)</p><p>Sounds like meaning 2 is correct in this situation.  Yes, fewer is better, but I don't think less is actually incorrect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>less       determiner &amp; pronoun 1 a smaller amount of ; not as much .
2 fewer in number ( source : Compact Oxford English Dictionary ) Sounds like meaning 2 is correct in this situation .
Yes , fewer is better , but I do n't think less is actually incorrect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>less
      determiner &amp; pronoun 1 a smaller amount of; not as much.
2 fewer in number(source: Compact Oxford English Dictionary)Sounds like meaning 2 is correct in this situation.
Yes, fewer is better, but I don't think less is actually incorrect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493379</id>
	<title>Looks like a classic startup operation</title>
	<author>operator\_error</author>
	<datestamp>1246101060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Develop a plan.</p><p>Execute it well.</p><p>Possibly get bought buy a larger rival. Or, the way things are going... build up resources until a 'larger' competitor with access to markets is bought.</p><p>No tears for GM or Chrysler, please; I'm a stockholder and I want to see honest, prudent, and environmentally responsible returns.</p><p>Release the Cruft.</p><p>God-speed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Develop a plan.Execute it well.Possibly get bought buy a larger rival .
Or , the way things are going... build up resources until a 'larger ' competitor with access to markets is bought.No tears for GM or Chrysler , please ; I 'm a stockholder and I want to see honest , prudent , and environmentally responsible returns.Release the Cruft.God-speed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Develop a plan.Execute it well.Possibly get bought buy a larger rival.
Or, the way things are going... build up resources until a 'larger' competitor with access to markets is bought.No tears for GM or Chrysler, please; I'm a stockholder and I want to see honest, prudent, and environmentally responsible returns.Release the Cruft.God-speed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493509</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246103220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From <a href="http://www.myxpcar.com/" title="myxpcar.com" rel="nofollow">their website</a> [myxpcar.com]. If you don't feel like reading the answer, it's "we haven't got one to show you".</p><p><i>Q. Where can I see one of your cars?</i></p><p><i>A. It takes many years and tens of millions of dollars to create a domestic automobile for the retail market. Our competitors, are, in many cases, showing "mock-ups" of cars they hope to raise funding for. When we have spent the time and the money on a real car, we will show that car to our customers. We may allow some documentation of our mock-ups but we will not represent those efforts as engineered, market ready vehicles.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From their website [ myxpcar.com ] .
If you do n't feel like reading the answer , it 's " we have n't got one to show you " .Q .
Where can I see one of your cars ? A .
It takes many years and tens of millions of dollars to create a domestic automobile for the retail market .
Our competitors , are , in many cases , showing " mock-ups " of cars they hope to raise funding for .
When we have spent the time and the money on a real car , we will show that car to our customers .
We may allow some documentation of our mock-ups but we will not represent those efforts as engineered , market ready vehicles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From their website [myxpcar.com].
If you don't feel like reading the answer, it's "we haven't got one to show you".Q.
Where can I see one of your cars?A.
It takes many years and tens of millions of dollars to create a domestic automobile for the retail market.
Our competitors, are, in many cases, showing "mock-ups" of cars they hope to raise funding for.
When we have spent the time and the money on a real car, we will show that car to our customers.
We may allow some documentation of our mock-ups but we will not represent those efforts as engineered, market ready vehicles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257</id>
	<title>less parts to fail..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246099440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster.<p>
never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product (they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs), you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon.</p><p>
RTFA for such gem's as this "What we have discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension chords all over the place because you trip and fall" - genius, just pure genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster .
never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product ( they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs ) , you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon .
RTFA for such gem 's as this " What we have discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension chords all over the place because you trip and fall " - genius , just pure genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... means nothing when the few parts you do have are prone to disaster.
never fear though - this is yet another imaginary product (they have nothing more than a computer rendering ffs), you need not fear that your car will deflate on you any time soon.
RTFA for such gem's as this "What we have discovered is that the insurance industry is not going to let electric cars run extension chords all over the place because you trip and fall" - genius, just pure genius.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494635</id>
	<title>Re:Parent is making a reference - This is a Hoax?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246116900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Redmond, XP, Microsoft...</p><p>San Francisco...</p><p>It's the most PC car yet conceived!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Redmond , XP , Microsoft...San Francisco...It 's the most PC car yet conceived !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Redmond, XP, Microsoft...San Francisco...It's the most PC car yet conceived!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495217</id>
	<title>Re:I wish them the best in their endeavour</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246121520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Aww, come on. This is soo obviously a fake. Read the article again, without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Why do you hate the future?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aww , come on .
This is soo obviously a fake .
Read the article again , without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles .
Why do you hate the future ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aww, come on.
This is soo obviously a fake.
Read the article again, without i-wish-this-to-be-true-goggles.
Why do you hate the future?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496099</id>
	<title>My car already...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246129560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... has inflatable tires.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... has inflatable tires .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... has inflatable tires.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494537</id>
	<title>Power is not measured in kWh...</title>
	<author>kybur</author>
	<datestamp>1246115820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Power is not measured in kWh...
<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...That's a unit of energy  (in case you didn't have time to RTFA).  If they can't make a simple table without screwing up their units, can they really make a car?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Power is not measured in kWh.. . ...That 's a unit of energy ( in case you did n't have time to RTFA ) .
If they ca n't make a simple table without screwing up their units , can they really make a car ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Power is not measured in kWh...
 ...That's a unit of energy  (in case you didn't have time to RTFA).
If they can't make a simple table without screwing up their units, can they really make a car?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493673</id>
	<title>Potential safety problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246105680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are potentially significant safety problems with these futuristic types of car design.</p><p>Specifically, when e.g. an inflatable car collides head on with a good-ol-gasoline-based car. The latter has a heavy engine in the front, surrounded by metallic stuctures designed to absorb the force of an impact, thus protecting the passengers. What does an inflatable car do to protect the passengers in these types of collisions?</p><p>A big engine compartment and the protection it provides has been an essential component of automobile design for decades, and when developing new car models with new power sources, the lessons learned regarding safety should not be forgotten.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are potentially significant safety problems with these futuristic types of car design.Specifically , when e.g .
an inflatable car collides head on with a good-ol-gasoline-based car .
The latter has a heavy engine in the front , surrounded by metallic stuctures designed to absorb the force of an impact , thus protecting the passengers .
What does an inflatable car do to protect the passengers in these types of collisions ? A big engine compartment and the protection it provides has been an essential component of automobile design for decades , and when developing new car models with new power sources , the lessons learned regarding safety should not be forgotten .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are potentially significant safety problems with these futuristic types of car design.Specifically, when e.g.
an inflatable car collides head on with a good-ol-gasoline-based car.
The latter has a heavy engine in the front, surrounded by metallic stuctures designed to absorb the force of an impact, thus protecting the passengers.
What does an inflatable car do to protect the passengers in these types of collisions?A big engine compartment and the protection it provides has been an essential component of automobile design for decades, and when developing new car models with new power sources, the lessons learned regarding safety should not be forgotten.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493817</id>
	<title>Re:A Boon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246108020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you won't need to imagine much longer.  Once Obama and his cronies ram the still-unread Waxman Global Warming bill through the Senate, you'll have your very own inflatable car.  Because SUVs are teh devil, and it's all you'll be able to afford when the middle class gets soaked yet again to prop up more runaway spending.  Want to know what this country's financial future looks like?  Just keep your eye on California for another month or so.  Hey, weren't we promised that our taxes wouldn't go up if we made under some arbitrary yearly income?  Oh wait, I guess Obongo wasn't talking about hidden energy taxes that get passed on to the consumer.  You all might want to learn Spanish so that you can follow all the jobs down to Mexico.  Boy, now won't that be fucking ironic...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you wo n't need to imagine much longer .
Once Obama and his cronies ram the still-unread Waxman Global Warming bill through the Senate , you 'll have your very own inflatable car .
Because SUVs are teh devil , and it 's all you 'll be able to afford when the middle class gets soaked yet again to prop up more runaway spending .
Want to know what this country 's financial future looks like ?
Just keep your eye on California for another month or so .
Hey , were n't we promised that our taxes would n't go up if we made under some arbitrary yearly income ?
Oh wait , I guess Obongo was n't talking about hidden energy taxes that get passed on to the consumer .
You all might want to learn Spanish so that you can follow all the jobs down to Mexico .
Boy , now wo n't that be fucking ironic.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you won't need to imagine much longer.
Once Obama and his cronies ram the still-unread Waxman Global Warming bill through the Senate, you'll have your very own inflatable car.
Because SUVs are teh devil, and it's all you'll be able to afford when the middle class gets soaked yet again to prop up more runaway spending.
Want to know what this country's financial future looks like?
Just keep your eye on California for another month or so.
Hey, weren't we promised that our taxes wouldn't go up if we made under some arbitrary yearly income?
Oh wait, I guess Obongo wasn't talking about hidden energy taxes that get passed on to the consumer.
You all might want to learn Spanish so that you can follow all the jobs down to Mexico.
Boy, now won't that be fucking ironic...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495777</id>
	<title>Re:Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>toppavak</author>
	<datestamp>1246126260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They have the size, money and production facilities to make this work. Others are coming too. But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</p></div><p>I think you nailed it on the head right there- the problem isn't technology but culture. Not just the culture of the consumer either, but the culture of the company in charge. Tata is, historically, a very socially-focused company. Its historical roots are deeply intertwined with the Indian people and it shows in a lot of the work they do. Amartya Sen has an excellent essay on the history of Tata in The Argumentative Indian. Americans and American companies need to learn to dream again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They have the size , money and production facilities to make this work .
Others are coming too .
But will they be able to change US ' customers mindset ? I think you nailed it on the head right there- the problem is n't technology but culture .
Not just the culture of the consumer either , but the culture of the company in charge .
Tata is , historically , a very socially-focused company .
Its historical roots are deeply intertwined with the Indian people and it shows in a lot of the work they do .
Amartya Sen has an excellent essay on the history of Tata in The Argumentative Indian .
Americans and American companies need to learn to dream again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have the size, money and production facilities to make this work.
Others are coming too.
But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?I think you nailed it on the head right there- the problem isn't technology but culture.
Not just the culture of the consumer either, but the culture of the company in charge.
Tata is, historically, a very socially-focused company.
Its historical roots are deeply intertwined with the Indian people and it shows in a lot of the work they do.
Amartya Sen has an excellent essay on the history of Tata in The Argumentative Indian.
Americans and American companies need to learn to dream again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494119</id>
	<title>Re:Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246112100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy, typical American concept which consumes a lot, of course. Now maybe it's a hoax, maybe not.</p></div><p>You're dumb. What the commenters want is to <em>not die</em>. Conceptually I would love to drive a tiny car like this if only I would fit in it (I am two meters tall) but realistically someone with a midsize car and no clue could come along and vaporize you. With vehicles like my super cab F250 on the road, and people who should in no wise be permitted to pilot a bicycle let alone an automobile often driving them, a small vehicle like that is mostly a pre-formed coffin.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Others are coming too. But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</p></div><p>Nope. It's a chicken-and-egg situation. If you changed the laws to get the unnecessarily large vehicles off the road... well, you'd destroy the US automakers overnight<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy , typical American concept which consumes a lot , of course .
Now maybe it 's a hoax , maybe not.You 're dumb .
What the commenters want is to not die .
Conceptually I would love to drive a tiny car like this if only I would fit in it ( I am two meters tall ) but realistically someone with a midsize car and no clue could come along and vaporize you .
With vehicles like my super cab F250 on the road , and people who should in no wise be permitted to pilot a bicycle let alone an automobile often driving them , a small vehicle like that is mostly a pre-formed coffin.Others are coming too .
But will they be able to change US ' customers mindset ? Nope .
It 's a chicken-and-egg situation .
If you changed the laws to get the unnecessarily large vehicles off the road... well , you 'd destroy the US automakers overnight : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the commenters seem to want a heavy, typical American concept which consumes a lot, of course.
Now maybe it's a hoax, maybe not.You're dumb.
What the commenters want is to not die.
Conceptually I would love to drive a tiny car like this if only I would fit in it (I am two meters tall) but realistically someone with a midsize car and no clue could come along and vaporize you.
With vehicles like my super cab F250 on the road, and people who should in no wise be permitted to pilot a bicycle let alone an automobile often driving them, a small vehicle like that is mostly a pre-formed coffin.Others are coming too.
But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?Nope.
It's a chicken-and-egg situation.
If you changed the laws to get the unnecessarily large vehicles off the road... well, you'd destroy the US automakers overnight :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493367</id>
	<title>Utah is the investment scam capital of US</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246101000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>State of Utah has more than its fair share of investment scams:</p><p>Here is one of several articles I have seen on the topic:<br><a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi\_qn4188/is\_20070107/ai\_n17107556/" title="findarticles.com">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi\_qn4188/is\_20070107/ai\_n17107556/</a> [findarticles.com]</p><p>And after story about the inflatable car, I got the impression that these people were looking to scam investors, and/or the federal govt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>State of Utah has more than its fair share of investment scams : Here is one of several articles I have seen on the topic : http : //findarticles.com/p/articles/mi \ _qn4188/is \ _20070107/ai \ _n17107556/ [ findarticles.com ] And after story about the inflatable car , I got the impression that these people were looking to scam investors , and/or the federal govt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>State of Utah has more than its fair share of investment scams:Here is one of several articles I have seen on the topic:http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi\_qn4188/is\_20070107/ai\_n17107556/ [findarticles.com]And after story about the inflatable car, I got the impression that these people were looking to scam investors, and/or the federal govt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179</id>
	<title>Just don't buy the upgrade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just don't buy the upgrade</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just do n't buy the upgrade</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just don't buy the upgrade</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494043</id>
	<title>Re:A Boon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246111320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe so, but all I can say is FINALLY!!! I can drive to Europe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe so , but all I can say is FINALLY ! ! !
I can drive to Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe so, but all I can say is FINALLY!!!
I can drive to Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494501</id>
	<title>Waxman-Markey Bill...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246115520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Economic colonization of middle America by failed coastal states...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Economic colonization of middle America by failed coastal states.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Economic colonization of middle America by failed coastal states...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496245</id>
	<title>Re:Now really think about it...</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1246131060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?</p></div><p>Probably depends on the price point. People bought Pintos - even used ones. But you're right: If this isn't vaporware, these guys have a lot of social inertia to overcome. I confess I'm surprised at how much resistance there is to the idea here - the general public will probably be much harsher.

</p><p>Side note: What's <i>wrong</i> with you people?!? One hundred and nine comments and not a single <a href="http://sluggy.com/daily.php?date=990702" title="sluggy.com">Dr. Schlock</a> [sluggy.com] reference?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will they be able to change US ' customers mindset ? Probably depends on the price point .
People bought Pintos - even used ones .
But you 're right : If this is n't vaporware , these guys have a lot of social inertia to overcome .
I confess I 'm surprised at how much resistance there is to the idea here - the general public will probably be much harsher .
Side note : What 's wrong with you people ? ! ?
One hundred and nine comments and not a single Dr. Schlock [ sluggy.com ] reference ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will they be able to change US' customers mindset?Probably depends on the price point.
People bought Pintos - even used ones.
But you're right: If this isn't vaporware, these guys have a lot of social inertia to overcome.
I confess I'm surprised at how much resistance there is to the idea here - the general public will probably be much harsher.
Side note: What's wrong with you people?!?
One hundred and nine comments and not a single Dr. Schlock [sluggy.com] reference?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28502593</id>
	<title>Re:sorry, not going to change the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246192260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, this is awesome: inflatable car + hydrogen = flying car (finally!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this is awesome : inflatable car + hydrogen = flying car ( finally !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this is awesome: inflatable car + hydrogen = flying car (finally!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494431</id>
	<title>These guys have read way too much Sluggy Freelance</title>
	<author>Liquidape</author>
	<datestamp>1246114920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The web comic Sluggy Freelance ( <a href="http://www.sluggy.com/" title="sluggy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sluggy.com/</a> [sluggy.com] ) has had an ongoing character for years that developed all sorts of inflatable tech.  I was halfway expecting to see the name Dr. Schlock in the article.</p><p>Dave.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The web comic Sluggy Freelance ( http : //www.sluggy.com/ [ sluggy.com ] ) has had an ongoing character for years that developed all sorts of inflatable tech .
I was halfway expecting to see the name Dr. Schlock in the article.Dave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The web comic Sluggy Freelance ( http://www.sluggy.com/ [sluggy.com] ) has had an ongoing character for years that developed all sorts of inflatable tech.
I was halfway expecting to see the name Dr. Schlock in the article.Dave.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493621</id>
	<title>Re:A Boon?</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246104840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagining a boon in inflatable cars is bad enough, but a boon in inflatable <strong>electric</strong> cars?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagining a boon in inflatable cars is bad enough , but a boon in inflatable electric cars ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagining a boon in inflatable cars is bad enough, but a boon in inflatable electric cars?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495465</id>
	<title>I would rather like ...</title>
	<author>32771</author>
	<datestamp>1246123800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would rather like to have a RealCar.</p><p>I will read the article now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would rather like to have a RealCar.I will read the article now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would rather like to have a RealCar.I will read the article now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28499795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28502593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28503659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28500225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28506573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_0230218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493459
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28502593
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28500225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493479
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28503659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493223
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493267
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28506573
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494635
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493853
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493509
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_0230218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28493657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28494187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28496245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28495777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_0230218.28499795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
