<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_26_1534253</id>
	<title>Fake News Scam Sites Advertising On Real News Sites</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1246037100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Virtual\_Raider writes <i>"Wired is running a story about a new twist in the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage. Old: Scammers are creating fake news sites that look almost like the real thing. New: They are <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/fake\_news">advertising on real news sites</a>, making it difficult for unwary readers to catch on they are being duped with fake coverage of get-rich-quick scams. Among those running the scam 'news' ads are the Huffington Post and Salon. From the article: 'The story has art, it has a sidebar, there's weather, supposed reader comments &mdash; even ads. Steadman is described as "a mother from San Francisco" &mdash; at least, when I read the article. Thanks to cutting-edge reporting techniques perfected by News 5, she will automatically move to the geolocation of your internet IP address when you read it. Look, she lives right in your neighborhood!'"</i> Forbes also <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/15/mehmet-oz-oprah-business-media-resveratrol.html">wrote about the scam news sites</a> a couple of weeks back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Virtual \ _Raider writes " Wired is running a story about a new twist in the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum 's adage .
Old : Scammers are creating fake news sites that look almost like the real thing .
New : They are advertising on real news sites , making it difficult for unwary readers to catch on they are being duped with fake coverage of get-rich-quick scams .
Among those running the scam 'news ' ads are the Huffington Post and Salon .
From the article : 'The story has art , it has a sidebar , there 's weather , supposed reader comments    even ads .
Steadman is described as " a mother from San Francisco "    at least , when I read the article .
Thanks to cutting-edge reporting techniques perfected by News 5 , she will automatically move to the geolocation of your internet IP address when you read it .
Look , she lives right in your neighborhood !
' " Forbes also wrote about the scam news sites a couple of weeks back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Virtual\_Raider writes "Wired is running a story about a new twist in the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage.
Old: Scammers are creating fake news sites that look almost like the real thing.
New: They are advertising on real news sites, making it difficult for unwary readers to catch on they are being duped with fake coverage of get-rich-quick scams.
Among those running the scam 'news' ads are the Huffington Post and Salon.
From the article: 'The story has art, it has a sidebar, there's weather, supposed reader comments — even ads.
Steadman is described as "a mother from San Francisco" — at least, when I read the article.
Thanks to cutting-edge reporting techniques perfected by News 5, she will automatically move to the geolocation of your internet IP address when you read it.
Look, she lives right in your neighborhood!
'" Forbes also wrote about the scam news sites a couple of weeks back.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487891</id>
	<title>I just saw something like this on CNN</title>
	<author>SamsLembas</author>
	<datestamp>1246008900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a few minutes ago I saw something like this on CNN. It claimed that Obama is encouraging people to refinance (and presumably would have offered to help me out with the process had I clicked on it).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a few minutes ago I saw something like this on CNN .
It claimed that Obama is encouraging people to refinance ( and presumably would have offered to help me out with the process had I clicked on it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a few minutes ago I saw something like this on CNN.
It claimed that Obama is encouraging people to refinance (and presumably would have offered to help me out with the process had I clicked on it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</id>
	<title>ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246041060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>

Intriguing article.  I like the ad that uses Barbara Walters' photo and claims<p><div class="quote"><p>Barbara talks about the "Miracle Pill" known as Resveratrol</p></div><p>Notice they didn't user her last name.  But they use her image and the abc News logo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... their domain name is hilarious, <a href="http://whois.net/whois/news3news.com" title="whois.net" rel="nofollow">news3news.com</a> [whois.net] (looks like newsnews and 3news were taken, ha) which leads one to the registrant residing at:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> PO Box 12068<br>
 <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=George+Town,+Grand+Cayman+KY&amp;sll=19.32217,-81.240869&amp;sspn=0.204434,0.308647&amp;gl=us&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;z=14&amp;iwloc=A" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1010</a> [google.com]</p> </div><p>P.O. Box in the Cayman Islands.  Imagine that.  They don't even bother to use <a href="http://domainsbyproxy.com/Default.aspx?prog\_id=" title="domainsbyproxy.com" rel="nofollow">domainsbyproxy</a> [domainsbyproxy.com] or a similar service like most of the other domains listed in this Wired story.  <br> <br>

Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but using abc's logo and Walters' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy.  I hope some of these companies go after this scum.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Intriguing article .
I like the ad that uses Barbara Walters ' photo and claimsBarbara talks about the " Miracle Pill " known as ResveratrolNotice they did n't user her last name .
But they use her image and the abc News logo ... their domain name is hilarious , news3news.com [ whois.net ] ( looks like newsnews and 3news were taken , ha ) which leads one to the registrant residing at : PO Box 12068 George Town , Grand Cayman KY1-1010 [ google.com ] P.O .
Box in the Cayman Islands .
Imagine that .
They do n't even bother to use domainsbyproxy [ domainsbyproxy.com ] or a similar service like most of the other domains listed in this Wired story .
Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute ... but using abc 's logo and Walters ' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy .
I hope some of these companies go after this scum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Intriguing article.
I like the ad that uses Barbara Walters' photo and claimsBarbara talks about the "Miracle Pill" known as ResveratrolNotice they didn't user her last name.
But they use her image and the abc News logo ... their domain name is hilarious, news3news.com [whois.net] (looks like newsnews and 3news were taken, ha) which leads one to the registrant residing at: PO Box 12068
 George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1010 [google.com] P.O.
Box in the Cayman Islands.
Imagine that.
They don't even bother to use domainsbyproxy [domainsbyproxy.com] or a similar service like most of the other domains listed in this Wired story.
Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute ... but using abc's logo and Walters' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy.
I hope some of these companies go after this scum.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486763</id>
	<title>Pot, meet kettle</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1246047480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's funny about this story is that it's <i>Wired dot com</i> that's complaining about "phony news stories" that are really advertisements.</p><p>8 out of 10 stories on Wired dot com are little more than advertisements.  I started counting the stories that appeared there in the last few months alone:  Let's see, we had a story about how the iPhone was going to transform the video game industry.  Another one about how the iPhone was going to transform personal communications (because it now had a movie camera), how the iPhone was going to transform the way people bought software, how the iPhone was going to transform art (no kidding!) and how the iPhone was certainly transforming travel and navigation (GPS!!!).</p><p>That's not counting the countless stories leading up to the announcement of the new iPhone models, how much better the iPhone was than the Pre (I guess Palm didn't have quite the advertising budget of Wired dot com) and even a couple of stories about <i>new patches for the iPhone.</i></p><p>And now, a breaking story about <i>news web sites that have stories that are really advertisements</i> and how that was going to destroy journalism.</p><p>Next we'll get a cover story in Wired magazine about how glossy paper is bad for the environment.  Conde Nast has no shame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's funny about this story is that it 's Wired dot com that 's complaining about " phony news stories " that are really advertisements.8 out of 10 stories on Wired dot com are little more than advertisements .
I started counting the stories that appeared there in the last few months alone : Let 's see , we had a story about how the iPhone was going to transform the video game industry .
Another one about how the iPhone was going to transform personal communications ( because it now had a movie camera ) , how the iPhone was going to transform the way people bought software , how the iPhone was going to transform art ( no kidding !
) and how the iPhone was certainly transforming travel and navigation ( GPS ! ! !
) .That 's not counting the countless stories leading up to the announcement of the new iPhone models , how much better the iPhone was than the Pre ( I guess Palm did n't have quite the advertising budget of Wired dot com ) and even a couple of stories about new patches for the iPhone.And now , a breaking story about news web sites that have stories that are really advertisements and how that was going to destroy journalism.Next we 'll get a cover story in Wired magazine about how glossy paper is bad for the environment .
Conde Nast has no shame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's funny about this story is that it's Wired dot com that's complaining about "phony news stories" that are really advertisements.8 out of 10 stories on Wired dot com are little more than advertisements.
I started counting the stories that appeared there in the last few months alone:  Let's see, we had a story about how the iPhone was going to transform the video game industry.
Another one about how the iPhone was going to transform personal communications (because it now had a movie camera), how the iPhone was going to transform the way people bought software, how the iPhone was going to transform art (no kidding!
) and how the iPhone was certainly transforming travel and navigation (GPS!!!
).That's not counting the countless stories leading up to the announcement of the new iPhone models, how much better the iPhone was than the Pre (I guess Palm didn't have quite the advertising budget of Wired dot com) and even a couple of stories about new patches for the iPhone.And now, a breaking story about news web sites that have stories that are really advertisements and how that was going to destroy journalism.Next we'll get a cover story in Wired magazine about how glossy paper is bad for the environment.
Conde Nast has no shame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485975</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246043640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is packed with conservative partisans, though.  You will be modded down for your heretical post and they will be modded up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is packed with conservative partisans , though .
You will be modded down for your heretical post and they will be modded up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is packed with conservative partisans, though.
You will be modded down for your heretical post and they will be modded up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489213</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1246015680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm.  According to the article:<blockquote><div><p> <tt>Mary, a mother from &lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;document.write(geoip\_city());&lt;/script&gt;, &lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;document.write(geoip\_region());&lt;/script&gt; is thriving,</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>geoip\_city()... I think I may have been there once or twice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
According to the article : Mary , a mother from document.write ( geoip \ _city ( ) ) ; , document.write ( geoip \ _region ( ) ) ; is thriving , geoip \ _city ( ) ... I think I may have been there once or twice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
According to the article: Mary, a mother from document.write(geoip\_city());, document.write(geoip\_region()); is thriving, geoip\_city()... I think I may have been there once or twice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486071</id>
	<title>Re:Fake news site</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246043940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/" title="foxnews.com" rel="nofollow">Same here!</a> [foxnews.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here !
[ foxnews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here!
[foxnews.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486149</id>
	<title>Served by Pulse 360</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246044300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For your amusement, here is another one that is running: http://the-daily-tribune.com/breaking/13/?t202id=4693&amp;t202kw=6417707</p><p>I see a ton of these ads served by a company called <a href="http://www.pulse360.com/index.html" title="pulse360.com">Pulse 360</a> [pulse360.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For your amusement , here is another one that is running : http : //the-daily-tribune.com/breaking/13/ ? t202id = 4693&amp;t202kw = 6417707I see a ton of these ads served by a company called Pulse 360 [ pulse360.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For your amusement, here is another one that is running: http://the-daily-tribune.com/breaking/13/?t202id=4693&amp;t202kw=6417707I see a ton of these ads served by a company called Pulse 360 [pulse360.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485783</id>
	<title>This isn't news....</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1246042680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't much news, there are ads over most of my local stations with fake "self improvement" guides. My favorite was an ad that said "Hurricane season is near, are you prepared?", this ad was on a midwestern news station. Quite funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't much news , there are ads over most of my local stations with fake " self improvement " guides .
My favorite was an ad that said " Hurricane season is near , are you prepared ?
" , this ad was on a midwestern news station .
Quite funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't much news, there are ads over most of my local stations with fake "self improvement" guides.
My favorite was an ad that said "Hurricane season is near, are you prepared?
", this ad was on a midwestern news station.
Quite funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489543</id>
	<title>Re:Barnum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246017900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> he [Barnum] took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum's\_American\_Museum#Attractions" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">This way to the egress.</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>Not exactly satisfying.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>he [ Barnum ] took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied .
This way to the egress .
[ wikipedia.org ] Not exactly satisfying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> he [Barnum] took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.
This way to the egress.
[wikipedia.org]Not exactly satisfying.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486023</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1246043820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I got redirected to an obviously <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/" title="foxnews.com">fake news site.</a> [foxnews.com]</p> </div><p>Fixed</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got redirected to an obviously fake news site .
[ foxnews.com ] Fixed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got redirected to an obviously fake news site.
[foxnews.com] Fixed
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485797</id>
	<title>Re:Old news.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and back in 2004, some anti-Bush spammers bought long ads on CBS deliberately designed to look like real CBS news, even including a doctored video made to look like Dan Rather presenting documents proving Bush skipped out on his National Guard service.</p><p>What's funny is, they didn't even bother to make the documents look realistic.</p><p>Why CBS even approved the "ads", I have no idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and back in 2004 , some anti-Bush spammers bought long ads on CBS deliberately designed to look like real CBS news , even including a doctored video made to look like Dan Rather presenting documents proving Bush skipped out on his National Guard service.What 's funny is , they did n't even bother to make the documents look realistic.Why CBS even approved the " ads " , I have no idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and back in 2004, some anti-Bush spammers bought long ads on CBS deliberately designed to look like real CBS news, even including a doctored video made to look like Dan Rather presenting documents proving Bush skipped out on his National Guard service.What's funny is, they didn't even bother to make the documents look realistic.Why CBS even approved the "ads", I have no idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479</id>
	<title>Barnum</title>
	<author>Deadstick</author>
	<datestamp>1246041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage</i> <p>
I'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution, and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom's Social Security check. He promoted a lot of hokum, but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.</p><p>
And he brought us Jenny Lind...</p><p>
rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum 's adage I 'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution , and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom 's Social Security check .
He promoted a lot of hokum , but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied .
And he brought us Jenny Lind.. . rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage 
I'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution, and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom's Social Security check.
He promoted a lot of hokum, but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.
And he brought us Jenny Lind...
rj</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>tb3</author>
	<datestamp>1246043400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard. Think about it; it's illegal to receive stolen goods, or sell stolen property, but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks. And, oh yeah, taking a cut (something like 3 - 5\%). If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts, under penalty of law, I'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard .
Think about it ; it 's illegal to receive stolen goods , or sell stolen property , but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks .
And , oh yeah , taking a cut ( something like 3 - 5 \ % ) .
If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts , under penalty of law , I 'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard.
Think about it; it's illegal to receive stolen goods, or sell stolen property, but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks.
And, oh yeah, taking a cut (something like 3 - 5\%).
If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts, under penalty of law, I'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486005</id>
	<title>Obama Forum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246043700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read about these fake news sites on <a href="http://www.theobamaforum.com/" title="theobamaforum.com" rel="nofollow">The Obama Forum</a> [theobamaforum.com] and they said that Obama will be censoring those websites very soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read about these fake news sites on The Obama Forum [ theobamaforum.com ] and they said that Obama will be censoring those websites very soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read about these fake news sites on The Obama Forum [theobamaforum.com] and they said that Obama will be censoring those websites very soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895</id>
	<title>I always assumed "NewsMax" was fake</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1246043280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And it is. It's run by an evangelical theo-conservative crazy. The fact is, any news organization owned by a large corporation is basically fake. You get the corporate view. Fox "news" and "CNN" are just mouthpieces for this. Both are politically themed amusement for the rubes. For real news, let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it is .
It 's run by an evangelical theo-conservative crazy .
The fact is , any news organization owned by a large corporation is basically fake .
You get the corporate view .
Fox " news " and " CNN " are just mouthpieces for this .
Both are politically themed amusement for the rubes .
For real news , let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it is.
It's run by an evangelical theo-conservative crazy.
The fact is, any news organization owned by a large corporation is basically fake.
You get the corporate view.
Fox "news" and "CNN" are just mouthpieces for this.
Both are politically themed amusement for the rubes.
For real news, let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487275</id>
	<title>The Onion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246049580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't call it "America's Finest News Source" for nothing.  They've been <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28784" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">remarkably prescient</a> [theonion.com] about a <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/point/this\_war\_will\_destabilize\_the?utm\_source=Distributed&amp;utm\_medium=Embedded\%2BHTML&amp;utm\_campaign=Widgets" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">great many</a> [theonion.com] <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33930" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">things</a> [theonion.com].  Kind of like the John Stewart show is one of the few genuinely critical news shows remaining.</p><p>It's only natural that the (cough) "legitimate" news media want to get in on the action.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't call it " America 's Finest News Source " for nothing .
They 've been remarkably prescient [ theonion.com ] about a great many [ theonion.com ] things [ theonion.com ] .
Kind of like the John Stewart show is one of the few genuinely critical news shows remaining.It 's only natural that the ( cough ) " legitimate " news media want to get in on the action .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't call it "America's Finest News Source" for nothing.
They've been remarkably prescient [theonion.com] about a great many [theonion.com] things [theonion.com].
Kind of like the John Stewart show is one of the few genuinely critical news shows remaining.It's only natural that the (cough) "legitimate" news media want to get in on the action.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485431</id>
	<title>We are all traveling...</title>
	<author>wrekd</author>
	<datestamp>1246041300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are all traveling on the disinformation superhighway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are all traveling on the disinformation superhighway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are all traveling on the disinformation superhighway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486375</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>numbski</author>
	<datestamp>1246045560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, Resveratrol isn't a "med", it's just a compound found in red wine that may very well have beneficial side effect, but it's unproven in humans (at least, so far).</p><p>It's still sleazy as all get out, but just to be fair - resveratrol is perfectly safe as a supplement, but it's by no means a "med".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Resveratrol is n't a " med " , it 's just a compound found in red wine that may very well have beneficial side effect , but it 's unproven in humans ( at least , so far ) .It 's still sleazy as all get out , but just to be fair - resveratrol is perfectly safe as a supplement , but it 's by no means a " med " .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Resveratrol isn't a "med", it's just a compound found in red wine that may very well have beneficial side effect, but it's unproven in humans (at least, so far).It's still sleazy as all get out, but just to be fair - resveratrol is perfectly safe as a supplement, but it's by no means a "med".
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486981</id>
	<title>Fake News on real sites such as CNN</title>
	<author>ItsPaPPy</author>
	<datestamp>1246048560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lots of sites have cross site scripting vulnerabilities, and news sites are one of them.

CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other local new sites, have the ability to inject HTML into the pages. So the domain still reads the sites original URL, but contains altered text.

Dont believe me? <a href="http://xssed.com/" title="xssed.com" rel="nofollow">http://xssed.com/</a> [xssed.com]
is a database oh sites that currently have such security hole. Take a look at common sites you use, and maybe demand these sites fix them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of sites have cross site scripting vulnerabilities , and news sites are one of them .
CNN , Fox News , MSNBC and other local new sites , have the ability to inject HTML into the pages .
So the domain still reads the sites original URL , but contains altered text .
Dont believe me ?
http : //xssed.com/ [ xssed.com ] is a database oh sites that currently have such security hole .
Take a look at common sites you use , and maybe demand these sites fix them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of sites have cross site scripting vulnerabilities, and news sites are one of them.
CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other local new sites, have the ability to inject HTML into the pages.
So the domain still reads the sites original URL, but contains altered text.
Dont believe me?
http://xssed.com/ [xssed.com]
is a database oh sites that currently have such security hole.
Take a look at common sites you use, and maybe demand these sites fix them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445</id>
	<title>Old news.</title>
	<author>SatanicPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1246041360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newspapers run similar ads (with a tiny "Paid Advertisment" banner on the top) and I've heard of TV stations doing the same thing with "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/02/nyregion/zimmer-drops-ad-featuring-fake-newscast.html" title="nytimes.com">Fake Newscasts</a> [nytimes.com]" but that's usually more common during election years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newspapers run similar ads ( with a tiny " Paid Advertisment " banner on the top ) and I 've heard of TV stations doing the same thing with " Fake Newscasts [ nytimes.com ] " but that 's usually more common during election years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newspapers run similar ads (with a tiny "Paid Advertisment" banner on the top) and I've heard of TV stations doing the same thing with "Fake Newscasts [nytimes.com]" but that's usually more common during election years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487845</id>
	<title>Re:Served by Pulse 360</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1246008720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First of all, the crap at the end of that link is bullshit to make it look like a real news site. The whole domain has only one breaking news posted on it, so you can go to <a href="http://the-daily-tribune.com/" title="the-daily-tribune.com">http://the-daily-tribune.com/</a> [the-daily-tribune.com] to see the breaking news.
<br> <br>But I went there and the page is titled "The Mason DAILY TRIBUNE" and the story is about Mary, a mother from Mason, OH... and here's the funny thing, I am connected through an ISP in Mason, OH. If I had an IQ of a cell phone totting minivan driving soccer mom, I'd say "OMG that's totally where I'm from! Mary can do it, so can I! I am so totally gonna give this a try!"  But instead I change my proxy, and reload the page, and guess what? Now it's the "The Pennington DAILY TRIBUNE" and the story is about Mary, a mother from San Jose, CA.
<br> <br>
They take the "relate to your readers" to a whole new level. I wish real news sites like CNN would do that too:<br>
"A deadly car bombing in [your town] during the early hours of [today's date] killed 42 people and injured hundreds more in a crowded [strip mall/mosque/church/market]."... that's news nobody would want to miss!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , the crap at the end of that link is bullshit to make it look like a real news site .
The whole domain has only one breaking news posted on it , so you can go to http : //the-daily-tribune.com/ [ the-daily-tribune.com ] to see the breaking news .
But I went there and the page is titled " The Mason DAILY TRIBUNE " and the story is about Mary , a mother from Mason , OH... and here 's the funny thing , I am connected through an ISP in Mason , OH .
If I had an IQ of a cell phone totting minivan driving soccer mom , I 'd say " OMG that 's totally where I 'm from !
Mary can do it , so can I !
I am so totally gon na give this a try !
" But instead I change my proxy , and reload the page , and guess what ?
Now it 's the " The Pennington DAILY TRIBUNE " and the story is about Mary , a mother from San Jose , CA .
They take the " relate to your readers " to a whole new level .
I wish real news sites like CNN would do that too : " A deadly car bombing in [ your town ] during the early hours of [ today 's date ] killed 42 people and injured hundreds more in a crowded [ strip mall/mosque/church/market ] . " .. .
that 's news nobody would want to miss !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, the crap at the end of that link is bullshit to make it look like a real news site.
The whole domain has only one breaking news posted on it, so you can go to http://the-daily-tribune.com/ [the-daily-tribune.com] to see the breaking news.
But I went there and the page is titled "The Mason DAILY TRIBUNE" and the story is about Mary, a mother from Mason, OH... and here's the funny thing, I am connected through an ISP in Mason, OH.
If I had an IQ of a cell phone totting minivan driving soccer mom, I'd say "OMG that's totally where I'm from!
Mary can do it, so can I!
I am so totally gonna give this a try!
"  But instead I change my proxy, and reload the page, and guess what?
Now it's the "The Pennington DAILY TRIBUNE" and the story is about Mary, a mother from San Jose, CA.
They take the "relate to your readers" to a whole new level.
I wish real news sites like CNN would do that too:
"A deadly car bombing in [your town] during the early hours of [today's date] killed 42 people and injured hundreds more in a crowded [strip mall/mosque/church/market]."...
that's news nobody would want to miss!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485851</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on. Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion.</p></div><p>I smell another "Conservative" idiot who can't distinguish between news and editorial, and is thus enraged by "Liberal" news and gratified by "Fair and Balanced" news.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on .
Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion.I smell another " Conservative " idiot who ca n't distinguish between news and editorial , and is thus enraged by " Liberal " news and gratified by " Fair and Balanced " news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on.
Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion.I smell another "Conservative" idiot who can't distinguish between news and editorial, and is thus enraged by "Liberal" news and gratified by "Fair and Balanced" news.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485639</id>
	<title>they are even moding the story for other countries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get</p><p>"Mary, a mother from Crowborough, E2 is thriving"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get " Mary , a mother from Crowborough , E2 is thriving "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get"Mary, a mother from Crowborough, E2 is thriving"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486379</id>
	<title>Oh Come On</title>
	<author>castorvx</author>
	<datestamp>1246045560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fox has to get traffic somehow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox has to get traffic somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox has to get traffic somehow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485945</id>
	<title>i found one..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246043460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>www.foxnews.com</htmltext>
<tokenext>www.foxnews.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.foxnews.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485365</id>
	<title>Don't use Linux unless you hate yourself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux is a shitty OS that was designed by a bisexual man named Linus "Torn Anus" Torvalds who likes to go to the glory hole to have sex with Richard "Bathroom Stall Fellater" Stallman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is a shitty OS that was designed by a bisexual man named Linus " Torn Anus " Torvalds who likes to go to the glory hole to have sex with Richard " Bathroom Stall Fellater " Stallman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is a shitty OS that was designed by a bisexual man named Linus "Torn Anus" Torvalds who likes to go to the glory hole to have sex with Richard "Bathroom Stall Fellater" Stallman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485745</id>
	<title>Re:Old news.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sports Illustrated sometimes runs paid articles (that are marked as Paid Advertisements). I'm sure other magazines do as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sports Illustrated sometimes runs paid articles ( that are marked as Paid Advertisements ) .
I 'm sure other magazines do as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sports Illustrated sometimes runs paid articles (that are marked as Paid Advertisements).
I'm sure other magazines do as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485341</id>
	<title>Yeah, they're all claiming Michael Jackson died...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... just to get you to click thru</htmltext>
<tokenext>... just to get you to click thru</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... just to get you to click thru</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485391</id>
	<title>Real News?</title>
	<author>Bigby</author>
	<datestamp>1246041180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What site brings real news? (except Slashdot, of course)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What site brings real news ?
( except Slashdot , of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What site brings real news?
(except Slashdot, of course)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487671</id>
	<title>Kinda funny if you live someplace remote...</title>
	<author>keysdisease</author>
	<datestamp>1246007880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was pretty easy for me to spot these... cause I live the FL Keys and they tagged everything with Key West.... mom, internet entrepreneur, teeth whitening,  etc.  Except for moms, we don't have any of those... especially white teeth...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was pretty easy for me to spot these... cause I live the FL Keys and they tagged everything with Key West.... mom , internet entrepreneur , teeth whitening , etc .
Except for moms , we do n't have any of those... especially white teeth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was pretty easy for me to spot these... cause I live the FL Keys and they tagged everything with Key West.... mom, internet entrepreneur, teeth whitening,  etc.
Except for moms, we don't have any of those... especially white teeth...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489633</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>tie\_guy\_matt</author>
	<datestamp>1246018620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Huffington Post and Salon have news with liberal commentary. The problem here is that the news is based on reality and facts. As Stephen Cobert pointed out (at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner,) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias. So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased. I supposed you could just make stuff up like Fox news does. Then you would have a "fair and balanced" site full of utter BS. Hmmm I wonder why that guy who keeps identifying republicans who have affairs as democrats hasn't been fired yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Huffington Post and Salon have news with liberal commentary .
The problem here is that the news is based on reality and facts .
As Stephen Cobert pointed out ( at the 2006 White House Correspondents ' Association Dinner , ) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias .
So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased .
I supposed you could just make stuff up like Fox news does .
Then you would have a " fair and balanced " site full of utter BS .
Hmmm I wonder why that guy who keeps identifying republicans who have affairs as democrats has n't been fired yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Huffington Post and Salon have news with liberal commentary.
The problem here is that the news is based on reality and facts.
As Stephen Cobert pointed out (at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner,) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias.
So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased.
I supposed you could just make stuff up like Fox news does.
Then you would have a "fair and balanced" site full of utter BS.
Hmmm I wonder why that guy who keeps identifying republicans who have affairs as democrats hasn't been fired yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28488415</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Come On</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1246011120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahem, you might want to RTFS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Salon and HuffPo were the ones caught serving this crap.  Arianna is gonna slap the hell out of you for confusing her site with Fox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem , you might want to RTFS ... Salon and HuffPo were the ones caught serving this crap .
Arianna is gon na slap the hell out of you for confusing her site with Fox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem, you might want to RTFS ... Salon and HuffPo were the ones caught serving this crap.
Arianna is gonna slap the hell out of you for confusing her site with Fox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28511597</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>dodobh</author>
	<datestamp>1246271880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already precent for this though. allofmp3.com is a nice precedent to cite. Visa and Mastercard already did this once, they should do it again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already precent for this though .
allofmp3.com is a nice precedent to cite .
Visa and Mastercard already did this once , they should do it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already precent for this though.
allofmp3.com is a nice precedent to cite.
Visa and Mastercard already did this once, they should do it again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491419</id>
	<title>Re:You know how I know it's fake?</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1246037400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, Slashdot is safe on that count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Slashdot is safe on that count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Slashdot is safe on that count.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486489</id>
	<title>A fake twitter user to plug this scam</title>
	<author>juniorkindergarten</author>
	<datestamp>1246046100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone used my Gmail address to create a Twitter account to pump a google links get rich quick scam. <br>
 I hadn't checked my Gmail for a few weeks and in that time someone used my email address to set up a twitter account.  I had tons of tweets from strangers in my inbox.  Some dude from wisconson was running some get rich quick scam with google links.  I had never signed up for a twitter account so I decided to take it away from the scammer.. <br>
<br>
Voila, down goes one scammer/spammer and a twitter account for me to boot....not that I couldn't have got one anyways....

Now to figure out how to get rid of the fake followers......suggestions?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone used my Gmail address to create a Twitter account to pump a google links get rich quick scam .
I had n't checked my Gmail for a few weeks and in that time someone used my email address to set up a twitter account .
I had tons of tweets from strangers in my inbox .
Some dude from wisconson was running some get rich quick scam with google links .
I had never signed up for a twitter account so I decided to take it away from the scammer. . Voila , down goes one scammer/spammer and a twitter account for me to boot....not that I could n't have got one anyways... . Now to figure out how to get rid of the fake followers......suggestions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone used my Gmail address to create a Twitter account to pump a google links get rich quick scam.
I hadn't checked my Gmail for a few weeks and in that time someone used my email address to set up a twitter account.
I had tons of tweets from strangers in my inbox.
Some dude from wisconson was running some get rich quick scam with google links.
I had never signed up for a twitter account so I decided to take it away from the scammer.. 

Voila, down goes one scammer/spammer and a twitter account for me to boot....not that I couldn't have got one anyways....

Now to figure out how to get rid of the fake followers......suggestions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491193</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246035540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As Stephen Cobert pointed out (at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner,) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias. So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Reality has no political bias - certainly not a leftist bias, as leftists contort and deny objective reality to suit their ideological agenda.
</p><p>
Those who repeat that stupid Colbert quote all need to be tortured and killed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Stephen Cobert pointed out ( at the 2006 White House Correspondents ' Association Dinner , ) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias .
So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased .
Reality has no political bias - certainly not a leftist bias , as leftists contort and deny objective reality to suit their ideological agenda .
Those who repeat that stupid Colbert quote all need to be tortured and killed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Stephen Cobert pointed out (at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner,) reality and facts have a well known liberal bias.
So you see it is difficult to have a fact and reality based site based on facts and reality without it being liberally biased.
Reality has no political bias - certainly not a leftist bias, as leftists contort and deny objective reality to suit their ideological agenda.
Those who repeat that stupid Colbert quote all need to be tortured and killed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485743</id>
	<title>Here is how it works</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those wondering how these advertisers make money here is the basic rundown.</p><p>1. They pitch you the product with a news site as mentioned above or a flog (fake blog) posing as a midwestern housewife giving a legitmate review of the product. Unauthorized endorsements by Ophrah and Barbra Walters are also popular.</p><p>2. Rebills, you pay the $2.00 you think it costs to buy the product. Turns out that's only for the 15 day free trial and so they can get your credit card. If you don't call them and cancel within that time they will charge another $100/month or so to get the product shipped to your house ever month. They bury this fact in a page long terms and conditions no one ever reads.</p><p>3. Acai, Resveratrol, Colon Cleanse, bizops (get rich quick), Google Money Tree and the like are popular products.</p><p>4. Most of the people doing this aren't big companies, but affiliate marketers who get a substantial cut every time they refer a sale.</p><p>5. Thankfully the FTC and state attorney generals are trying to crack down on this sort of thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those wondering how these advertisers make money here is the basic rundown.1 .
They pitch you the product with a news site as mentioned above or a flog ( fake blog ) posing as a midwestern housewife giving a legitmate review of the product .
Unauthorized endorsements by Ophrah and Barbra Walters are also popular.2 .
Rebills , you pay the $ 2.00 you think it costs to buy the product .
Turns out that 's only for the 15 day free trial and so they can get your credit card .
If you do n't call them and cancel within that time they will charge another $ 100/month or so to get the product shipped to your house ever month .
They bury this fact in a page long terms and conditions no one ever reads.3 .
Acai , Resveratrol , Colon Cleanse , bizops ( get rich quick ) , Google Money Tree and the like are popular products.4 .
Most of the people doing this are n't big companies , but affiliate marketers who get a substantial cut every time they refer a sale.5 .
Thankfully the FTC and state attorney generals are trying to crack down on this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those wondering how these advertisers make money here is the basic rundown.1.
They pitch you the product with a news site as mentioned above or a flog (fake blog) posing as a midwestern housewife giving a legitmate review of the product.
Unauthorized endorsements by Ophrah and Barbra Walters are also popular.2.
Rebills, you pay the $2.00 you think it costs to buy the product.
Turns out that's only for the 15 day free trial and so they can get your credit card.
If you don't call them and cancel within that time they will charge another $100/month or so to get the product shipped to your house ever month.
They bury this fact in a page long terms and conditions no one ever reads.3.
Acai, Resveratrol, Colon Cleanse, bizops (get rich quick), Google Money Tree and the like are popular products.4.
Most of the people doing this aren't big companies, but affiliate marketers who get a substantial cut every time they refer a sale.5.
Thankfully the FTC and state attorney generals are trying to crack down on this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486615</id>
	<title>Wishing Well And Such</title>
	<author>tholomyes</author>
	<datestamp>1246046640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sometimes the thing that you think isn't a scam, is a scam, and the thing that you think is a scam, isn't a scam at all.  And sometimes that, itself, is the scam!  So as you can see, things can be pretty tricky out there for consumers."</p><p>"And for reporters!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sometimes the thing that you think is n't a scam , is a scam , and the thing that you think is a scam , is n't a scam at all .
And sometimes that , itself , is the scam !
So as you can see , things can be pretty tricky out there for consumers .
" " And for reporters !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sometimes the thing that you think isn't a scam, is a scam, and the thing that you think is a scam, isn't a scam at all.
And sometimes that, itself, is the scam!
So as you can see, things can be pretty tricky out there for consumers.
""And for reporters!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485793</id>
	<title>Re:Old news.</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1246042680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fake newscasts are the reason I no longer watch the news on TV... And since Radio news is a refuge of the rightwing wackos (at least where I live), I am left with newspapers and the internet.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...so visiting newspaper's websites (with adblock plus) is the best compromise for me</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fake newscasts are the reason I no longer watch the news on TV... And since Radio news is a refuge of the rightwing wackos ( at least where I live ) , I am left with newspapers and the internet .
...so visiting newspaper 's websites ( with adblock plus ) is the best compromise for me</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fake newscasts are the reason I no longer watch the news on TV... And since Radio news is a refuge of the rightwing wackos (at least where I live), I am left with newspapers and the internet.
...so visiting newspaper's websites (with adblock plus) is the best compromise for me</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487155</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1246049220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but using abc's logo and Walters' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy. I hope some of these companies go after this scum.</p></div><p>Unfortunatly, the worst they'll get is a Cease and Desist letter, at which point they will move on to some other image / name theft. This is really not much different than the fake drug sites (are there any REAL on-line pharmacies?).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute ... but using abc 's logo and Walters ' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy .
I hope some of these companies go after this scum.Unfortunatly , the worst they 'll get is a Cease and Desist letter , at which point they will move on to some other image / name theft .
This is really not much different than the fake drug sites ( are there any REAL on-line pharmacies ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Selling questionable meds is probably pretty hard to prosecute ... but using abc's logo and Walters' image for advertising is definitely prosecution worthy.
I hope some of these companies go after this scum.Unfortunatly, the worst they'll get is a Cease and Desist letter, at which point they will move on to some other image / name theft.
This is really not much different than the fake drug sites (are there any REAL on-line pharmacies?
).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487523</id>
	<title>Actually the spammers have already started that</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1246007340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't got my first one of them yet, but the news reports have been saying that Twitter, Youtube, and ITunes have been getting swamped with Jacko traffic, and spammers have already started firing out scams, probably "Click here to install the video player so you can see Michael Jackson video" etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't got my first one of them yet , but the news reports have been saying that Twitter , Youtube , and ITunes have been getting swamped with Jacko traffic , and spammers have already started firing out scams , probably " Click here to install the video player so you can see Michael Jackson video " etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't got my first one of them yet, but the news reports have been saying that Twitter, Youtube, and ITunes have been getting swamped with Jacko traffic, and spammers have already started firing out scams, probably "Click here to install the video player so you can see Michael Jackson video" etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485451</id>
	<title>You almost got me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a moment there, I thought this was a real article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a moment there , I thought this was a real article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a moment there, I thought this was a real article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489167</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1246015380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard. Think about it; it's illegal to receive stolen goods, or sell stolen property, but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks. And, oh yeah, taking a cut (something like 3 - 5\%). If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts, under penalty of law, I'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate.</p></div><p>Interesting thought.  How, though, are the CC companies supposed to judge who is a legitimate business and who is committing fraud?  What procedures would you have them put in place?  What is their burden to examine their customers' business practices?  What rights do they have to terminate a merchant account based on what kind of business they conduct?  Would merchants have reciprocal rights protecting them from wrongful termination?  What would be the limits on the CC company's liability for loss of business if they terminate a legitimate account by mistake?</p><p>It might be more feasible to give CC companies the responsibility to forward complaints of fraud to the appropriate authorities.  Maybe if someone challenges a charge, they can ask that person if they would like to file a fraud investigation request.  That request would include authorization for the CC company to turn over that particular customer's records of transactions with that particular merchant to appropriate law enforcement officials for investigative purposes.  Then they'd have sort of a "mandated reporter" status, where if they don't pass on the information to the authorities, they could be held liable, but they are not *themselves* responsible for enforcing law.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard .
Think about it ; it 's illegal to receive stolen goods , or sell stolen property , but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks .
And , oh yeah , taking a cut ( something like 3 - 5 \ % ) .
If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts , under penalty of law , I 'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate.Interesting thought .
How , though , are the CC companies supposed to judge who is a legitimate business and who is committing fraud ?
What procedures would you have them put in place ?
What is their burden to examine their customers ' business practices ?
What rights do they have to terminate a merchant account based on what kind of business they conduct ?
Would merchants have reciprocal rights protecting them from wrongful termination ?
What would be the limits on the CC company 's liability for loss of business if they terminate a legitimate account by mistake ? It might be more feasible to give CC companies the responsibility to forward complaints of fraud to the appropriate authorities .
Maybe if someone challenges a charge , they can ask that person if they would like to file a fraud investigation request .
That request would include authorization for the CC company to turn over that particular customer 's records of transactions with that particular merchant to appropriate law enforcement officials for investigative purposes .
Then they 'd have sort of a " mandated reporter " status , where if they do n't pass on the information to the authorities , they could be held liable , but they are not * themselves * responsible for enforcing law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the crackdown should be on Visa and Mastercard.
Think about it; it's illegal to receive stolen goods, or sell stolen property, but the credit card companies are acting as intermediaries for these crooks.
And, oh yeah, taking a cut (something like 3 - 5\%).
If the credit card companies had to take more responsibility for who they granted merchant accounts, under penalty of law, I'll bet these fraudsters would find it a lot harder to operate.Interesting thought.
How, though, are the CC companies supposed to judge who is a legitimate business and who is committing fraud?
What procedures would you have them put in place?
What is their burden to examine their customers' business practices?
What rights do they have to terminate a merchant account based on what kind of business they conduct?
Would merchants have reciprocal rights protecting them from wrongful termination?
What would be the limits on the CC company's liability for loss of business if they terminate a legitimate account by mistake?It might be more feasible to give CC companies the responsibility to forward complaints of fraud to the appropriate authorities.
Maybe if someone challenges a charge, they can ask that person if they would like to file a fraud investigation request.
That request would include authorization for the CC company to turn over that particular customer's records of transactions with that particular merchant to appropriate law enforcement officials for investigative purposes.
Then they'd have sort of a "mandated reporter" status, where if they don't pass on the information to the authorities, they could be held liable, but they are not *themselves* responsible for enforcing law.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486339</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246045320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, you should also add the New York Times, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NBC, CBC, CTV, and anything that else that isn't Fox News.</p><p>Let's face, the only true source of News today is Fox News.</p><p>Wish everyone would just block MSNBC, ABC, NBC, New York TImes and CNN from their network.</p><p>Fox News is the only American News source which is not afraid to stand up to Obama, and provide all information to it's viewers.  Why is it that Fox News is the only news source in American willing to question about the US government is doing?</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , you should also add the New York Times , MSNBC , CNN , CBS , NBC , CBC , CTV , and anything that else that is n't Fox News.Let 's face , the only true source of News today is Fox News.Wish everyone would just block MSNBC , ABC , NBC , New York TImes and CNN from their network.Fox News is the only American News source which is not afraid to stand up to Obama , and provide all information to it 's viewers .
Why is it that Fox News is the only news source in American willing to question about the US government is doing ?
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, you should also add the New York Times, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NBC, CBC, CTV, and anything that else that isn't Fox News.Let's face, the only true source of News today is Fox News.Wish everyone would just block MSNBC, ABC, NBC, New York TImes and CNN from their network.Fox News is the only American News source which is not afraid to stand up to Obama, and provide all information to it's viewers.
Why is it that Fox News is the only news source in American willing to question about the US government is doing?
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486257</id>
	<title>Dating ads on CNN</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1246044900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The other day I remember there being a lot of ads for mate one on CNN. The many good looking 'single' girls that are in my area ads from mate one were funny.</p><p>Mate one is a hook up site. Or see how many single guys you can get to respond to my ad site. I am not sure which. Cause the census of 20 25-40 year old people by me agree that most of the ads from women, are ads from guys pretending to me women.</p><p>I wonder if big sites are using ads rotation from another site, and that other site got hijacked? It seems odd that CNN or other big named site would let 3-4 big dating ads appear per page in news stories. In yahoo email, maybe, but on the search or main page, no. Could the ad servers been compromised? maybe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The other day I remember there being a lot of ads for mate one on CNN .
The many good looking 'single ' girls that are in my area ads from mate one were funny.Mate one is a hook up site .
Or see how many single guys you can get to respond to my ad site .
I am not sure which .
Cause the census of 20 25-40 year old people by me agree that most of the ads from women , are ads from guys pretending to me women.I wonder if big sites are using ads rotation from another site , and that other site got hijacked ?
It seems odd that CNN or other big named site would let 3-4 big dating ads appear per page in news stories .
In yahoo email , maybe , but on the search or main page , no .
Could the ad servers been compromised ?
maybe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The other day I remember there being a lot of ads for mate one on CNN.
The many good looking 'single' girls that are in my area ads from mate one were funny.Mate one is a hook up site.
Or see how many single guys you can get to respond to my ad site.
I am not sure which.
Cause the census of 20 25-40 year old people by me agree that most of the ads from women, are ads from guys pretending to me women.I wonder if big sites are using ads rotation from another site, and that other site got hijacked?
It seems odd that CNN or other big named site would let 3-4 big dating ads appear per page in news stories.
In yahoo email, maybe, but on the search or main page, no.
Could the ad servers been compromised?
maybe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489387</id>
	<title>Re:they are even moding the story for other countr</title>
	<author>pcgabe</author>
	<datestamp>1246016700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Mary isn't from anywhere.  I guess it doesn't work if you have NoScript.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Mary is n't from anywhere .
I guess it does n't work if you have NoScript .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Mary isn't from anywhere.
I guess it doesn't work if you have NoScript.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486273</id>
	<title>Re:What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1246044960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhm, they are all perfectly reliable if you realize they aren't in any way trying to be real news sites and that its a gag every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhm , they are all perfectly reliable if you realize they are n't in any way trying to be real news sites and that its a gag every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhm, they are all perfectly reliable if you realize they aren't in any way trying to be real news sites and that its a gag every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486117</id>
	<title>Careful!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246044180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Slashdot, home of fashionable right-leaning so-called "libertarians."  If you put "conservative" anywhere near "crazy" you will be modded down for sacrilege!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Slashdot , home of fashionable right-leaning so-called " libertarians .
" If you put " conservative " anywhere near " crazy " you will be modded down for sacrilege !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Slashdot, home of fashionable right-leaning so-called "libertarians.
"  If you put "conservative" anywhere near "crazy" you will be modded down for sacrilege!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486401</id>
	<title>Re:Barnum</title>
	<author>Beat The Odds</author>
	<datestamp>1246045620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage</i>

I'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution, and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom's Social Security check. He promoted a lot of hokum, but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.</p></div><p>I think that you're a little confused. The adage that was being referred to is the famous quote: "There's a sucker born every minute."<br>Whether he actually said it is another matter.</p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's\_a\_sucker\_born\_every\_minute/" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's\_a\_sucker\_born\_every\_minute/</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum 's adage I 'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution , and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom 's Social Security check .
He promoted a lot of hokum , but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.I think that you 're a little confused .
The adage that was being referred to is the famous quote : " There 's a sucker born every minute .
" Whether he actually said it is another matter .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There 's \ _a \ _sucker \ _born \ _every \ _minute/ [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the never-ending quest to prove P. T. Barnum's adage

I'll give the author a pass on the libelous misattribution, and just point out that Barnum did not take your savings or your mom's Social Security check.
He promoted a lot of hokum, but he took your fifty cents and sent you home satisfied.I think that you're a little confused.
The adage that was being referred to is the famous quote: "There's a sucker born every minute.
"Whether he actually said it is another matter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's\_a\_sucker\_born\_every\_minute/ [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486415</id>
	<title>Since when</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246045740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is The Huffington Post consider a "news" site?</p><p>If I want to listen to idiots foaming at the mouth and blaming all the world's problems on a President who's been out of office for almost six months, I'll turn on MSNBC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is The Huffington Post consider a " news " site ? If I want to listen to idiots foaming at the mouth and blaming all the world 's problems on a President who 's been out of office for almost six months , I 'll turn on MSNBC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is The Huffington Post consider a "news" site?If I want to listen to idiots foaming at the mouth and blaming all the world's problems on a President who's been out of office for almost six months, I'll turn on MSNBC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491299</id>
	<title>Kill those who tagged this article 'foxnews'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246036560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the left-wing liberal pieces of shit who tagged this article 'foxnews' are implying that Fox News is somehow "fake news" because they have an editorial slant to the right of Pol Pot and report both sides of a story.</p><p>Those who tagged this article 'foxnews' all deserve to be tortured and killed. If Bush was still President, I would suggest that they be tortured and killed at Abu Ghraib after being sodomized and forced to eat shit. But alas, the best we can do is hire death squads to kill these so-called "people".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the left-wing liberal pieces of shit who tagged this article 'foxnews ' are implying that Fox News is somehow " fake news " because they have an editorial slant to the right of Pol Pot and report both sides of a story.Those who tagged this article 'foxnews ' all deserve to be tortured and killed .
If Bush was still President , I would suggest that they be tortured and killed at Abu Ghraib after being sodomized and forced to eat shit .
But alas , the best we can do is hire death squads to kill these so-called " people " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the left-wing liberal pieces of shit who tagged this article 'foxnews' are implying that Fox News is somehow "fake news" because they have an editorial slant to the right of Pol Pot and report both sides of a story.Those who tagged this article 'foxnews' all deserve to be tortured and killed.
If Bush was still President, I would suggest that they be tortured and killed at Abu Ghraib after being sodomized and forced to eat shit.
But alas, the best we can do is hire death squads to kill these so-called "people".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486865</id>
	<title>Re:Fake news site</title>
	<author>Rude Turnip</author>
	<datestamp>1246047960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It goes deeper than that.  Some of the users' signatures are actually ads in disguise!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It goes deeper than that .
Some of the users ' signatures are actually ads in disguise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It goes deeper than that.
Some of the users' signatures are actually ads in disguise!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486691</id>
	<title>Websites responsible for Ads?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1246047000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When will websites be responsible for the content of their ads?  I'm sure that most of these sites have no idea what ad at any one time will appear in a given box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When will websites be responsible for the content of their ads ?
I 'm sure that most of these sites have no idea what ad at any one time will appear in a given box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will websites be responsible for the content of their ads?
I'm sure that most of these sites have no idea what ad at any one time will appear in a given box.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486187</id>
	<title>You know how I know it's fake?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246044480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The comments down at the bottom are all spelled correctly and using proper grammer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The comments down at the bottom are all spelled correctly and using proper grammer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The comments down at the bottom are all spelled correctly and using proper grammer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381</id>
	<title>What news sites is it showing up on?</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1246041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on. Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on .
Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary could at least tell us what news sites it is showing up on.
Huffington Post and Salon are almost as reliable as The Onion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486831</id>
	<title>Re:ABC Should Crack Down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246047780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've long argued that spamming/internet fraud operations should be taken down with RICO-style prosecutions that include all the "legitimate" business entities that wink-wink-nudge-nudge participate in the fraud associated with spam.  SOMEBODY has to process the credit cards used to buy penis pills, transfer monies, provide hosting, etc.  MANY of these entities realize they are dealing with someone less than above board but don't care (or charge more!) and supply services anyway.</p><p>Once a few major ISPs, hosting companies, and banks are tied in publicly AND find their senior executives that approved these deals in the dock answering charges they will quickly stop doing business with the "marginal" internet, and the ones who remain will charge such a percentage that there really won't be any money in it anymore.</p><p>It's kind of tiresome to watch fraud happen and keep hearing "we can't do anything about it" as if Joe Fraudster were operating out of the back of his car solo without any cooperation.  The other thing I like about a RICO prosecution is that the fines and jail sentences were designed around crushing the mafia -- 10 years in prison and $25,000 fines *per count*.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've long argued that spamming/internet fraud operations should be taken down with RICO-style prosecutions that include all the " legitimate " business entities that wink-wink-nudge-nudge participate in the fraud associated with spam .
SOMEBODY has to process the credit cards used to buy penis pills , transfer monies , provide hosting , etc .
MANY of these entities realize they are dealing with someone less than above board but do n't care ( or charge more !
) and supply services anyway.Once a few major ISPs , hosting companies , and banks are tied in publicly AND find their senior executives that approved these deals in the dock answering charges they will quickly stop doing business with the " marginal " internet , and the ones who remain will charge such a percentage that there really wo n't be any money in it anymore.It 's kind of tiresome to watch fraud happen and keep hearing " we ca n't do anything about it " as if Joe Fraudster were operating out of the back of his car solo without any cooperation .
The other thing I like about a RICO prosecution is that the fines and jail sentences were designed around crushing the mafia -- 10 years in prison and $ 25,000 fines * per count * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've long argued that spamming/internet fraud operations should be taken down with RICO-style prosecutions that include all the "legitimate" business entities that wink-wink-nudge-nudge participate in the fraud associated with spam.
SOMEBODY has to process the credit cards used to buy penis pills, transfer monies, provide hosting, etc.
MANY of these entities realize they are dealing with someone less than above board but don't care (or charge more!
) and supply services anyway.Once a few major ISPs, hosting companies, and banks are tied in publicly AND find their senior executives that approved these deals in the dock answering charges they will quickly stop doing business with the "marginal" internet, and the ones who remain will charge such a percentage that there really won't be any money in it anymore.It's kind of tiresome to watch fraud happen and keep hearing "we can't do anything about it" as if Joe Fraudster were operating out of the back of his car solo without any cooperation.
The other thing I like about a RICO prosecution is that the fines and jail sentences were designed around crushing the mafia -- 10 years in prison and $25,000 fines *per count*.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487737</id>
	<title>Re:I always assumed "NewsMax" was fake</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1246008240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> For real news, let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom.</p></div><p>"Real news" involves professional reporters, investigative journalists, phone calls, interviews, and a strict editorial process that vets anything before it goes live.</p><p>Blogging involves leeching off the above with the commands Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v and frequently adds nothing more but spin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For real news , let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom .
" Real news " involves professional reporters , investigative journalists , phone calls , interviews , and a strict editorial process that vets anything before it goes live.Blogging involves leeching off the above with the commands Ctrl + c and Ctrl + v and frequently adds nothing more but spin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For real news, let a thousand relatively uncensored blogs bloom.
"Real news" involves professional reporters, investigative journalists, phone calls, interviews, and a strict editorial process that vets anything before it goes live.Blogging involves leeching off the above with the commands Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v and frequently adds nothing more but spin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435</id>
	<title>Fake news site</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1246041300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got redirected to an <a href="http://www.slashdot.org/" title="slashdot.org">obviously fake news site</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got redirected to an obviously fake news site [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got redirected to an obviously fake news site [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486949</id>
	<title>Real News Sites?</title>
	<author>DustoneGT</author>
	<datestamp>1246048380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What real news sites?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What real news sites ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What real news sites?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485791</id>
	<title>shopped</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the funniest part is how clearly the logo banner is a bad photoshop job</p><p><a href="http://news3news.com/images/logo-faces.jpg" title="news3news.com" rel="nofollow">Logo Faces.jpg</a> [news3news.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the funniest part is how clearly the logo banner is a bad photoshop jobLogo Faces.jpg [ news3news.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the funniest part is how clearly the logo banner is a bad photoshop jobLogo Faces.jpg [news3news.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486705</id>
	<title>Mom's commercially-viable wisdom</title>
	<author>MattGWU</author>
	<datestamp>1246047120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anybody else noticed the use of moms in banner ads?</p><p>From one site alone, I'm given to understand that a mom has discovered the secret to weight loss, a startling new method of teeth whitening, and revealed to us the miracle of the a'cai berry.  I guess this is why Obama wants them to return to college (online college, naturally).</p><p>What gives? Targeting a new market?  Playing off the old 'mom knows best'? An extension of the old advertising strategy where the man is an idiot but his wife has all the answers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anybody else noticed the use of moms in banner ads ? From one site alone , I 'm given to understand that a mom has discovered the secret to weight loss , a startling new method of teeth whitening , and revealed to us the miracle of the a'cai berry .
I guess this is why Obama wants them to return to college ( online college , naturally ) .What gives ?
Targeting a new market ?
Playing off the old 'mom knows best ' ?
An extension of the old advertising strategy where the man is an idiot but his wife has all the answers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anybody else noticed the use of moms in banner ads?From one site alone, I'm given to understand that a mom has discovered the secret to weight loss, a startling new method of teeth whitening, and revealed to us the miracle of the a'cai berry.
I guess this is why Obama wants them to return to college (online college, naturally).What gives?
Targeting a new market?
Playing off the old 'mom knows best'?
An extension of the old advertising strategy where the man is an idiot but his wife has all the answers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28511597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1534253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28488415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489387
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486005
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489543
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28491193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487845
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487523
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28489167
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28511597
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28488415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28487737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1534253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28485435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1534253.28486865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
