<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_25_1638206</id>
	<title>Cassini Spots Geysers On Saturn's Moon Enceladus</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1245948180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Huge <a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking\%2BNews/Tech\%2Band\%2BScience/Story/STIStory\_395111.html">geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus</a> may be fed by a salty sea below its surface, boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Huge geysers on Saturn 's moon Enceladus may be fed by a salty sea below its surface , boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Huge geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus may be fed by a salty sea below its surface, boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28476949</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1245947340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy."
<br> <br>
Rubbish, there is a google ad that keeps appearing on slashdot offering "1000 free solar systems"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy .
" Rubbish , there is a google ad that keeps appearing on slashdot offering " 1000 free solar systems " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy.
"
 
Rubbish, there is a google ad that keeps appearing on slashdot offering "1000 free solar systems"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475681</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1245938580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the more I learn about the human body, the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria around</p></div></blockquote><p>Someone, I can't remember who, said that "life was water's way of moving itself around."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the more I learn about the human body , the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria aroundSomeone , I ca n't remember who , said that " life was water 's way of moving itself around .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the more I learn about the human body, the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria aroundSomeone, I can't remember who, said that "life was water's way of moving itself around.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468887</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1245955200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles. Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.</p></div><p>I agree.  We should Intelligently Design such a system to deploy the bacteria in such a way to give maximum chance of life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles .
Why do n't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.I agree .
We should Intelligently Design such a system to deploy the bacteria in such a way to give maximum chance of life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles.
Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.I agree.
We should Intelligently Design such a system to deploy the bacteria in such a way to give maximum chance of life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28473813</id>
	<title>Re:Implications of this finding are profound</title>
	<author>drizek</author>
	<datestamp>1245930480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since shrimp on Earth come from salt water, I'm assuming it is the intelligence that will negate the need for additional salt?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since shrimp on Earth come from salt water , I 'm assuming it is the intelligence that will negate the need for additional salt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since shrimp on Earth come from salt water, I'm assuming it is the intelligence that will negate the need for additional salt?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063</id>
	<title>change the headline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The geysers are old news.  The new news is that Cassini has detected SALTS in Saturn's rings, pointing to a possible salty ocean under the icy surface of Enceladus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The geysers are old news .
The new news is that Cassini has detected SALTS in Saturn 's rings , pointing to a possible salty ocean under the icy surface of Enceladus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The geysers are old news.
The new news is that Cassini has detected SALTS in Saturn's rings, pointing to a possible salty ocean under the icy surface of Enceladus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468653</id>
	<title>Wrong. Little to no sodium was found</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245954240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/24/enceladus-does-and-does-not-have-a-global-ocean/</p><p>Taco, you sensacionalist twat !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/24/enceladus-does-and-does-not-have-a-global-ocean/Taco , you sensacionalist twat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/24/enceladus-does-and-does-not-have-a-global-ocean/Taco, you sensacionalist twat !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28467989</id>
	<title>Good news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245951840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Moving there, less taxes to pay</htmltext>
<tokenext>Moving there , less taxes to pay</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moving there, less taxes to pay</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468531</id>
	<title>Re:change the headline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245953880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469391</id>
	<title>Re:Ohhh the Straits Times!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245957000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This cracked me up int the article, "...hundreds of kilometres (miles) into space,..".  Since when did miles and kilometers become interchangeable?  Might have as well put the word 'kilometers' in the parenthesis...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This cracked me up int the article , " ...hundreds of kilometres ( miles ) into space,.. " .
Since when did miles and kilometers become interchangeable ?
Might have as well put the word 'kilometers ' in the parenthesis.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This cracked me up int the article, "...hundreds of kilometres (miles) into space,..".
Since when did miles and kilometers become interchangeable?
Might have as well put the word 'kilometers' in the parenthesis...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085</id>
	<title>Implications</title>
	<author>mugnyte</author>
	<datestamp>1245955860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; Ok, so let's suppose life, in some primitive form, maybe even up to the level of crustaceans are found in these oceans.  The first-non-Earth life, and quite exciting, sure.</p><p>
&nbsp; I'm unsure how this challenges the religious life-origin stories around the world.  Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  Ok , so let 's suppose life , in some primitive form , maybe even up to the level of crustaceans are found in these oceans .
The first-non-Earth life , and quite exciting , sure .
  I 'm unsure how this challenges the religious life-origin stories around the world .
Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Ok, so let's suppose life, in some primitive form, maybe even up to the level of crustaceans are found in these oceans.
The first-non-Earth life, and quite exciting, sure.
  I'm unsure how this challenges the religious life-origin stories around the world.
Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468213</id>
	<title>Maybe I'm missing* something</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245952680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but isn't it more amazing there is salt there then the possibility of water?</p><p>*Likely</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but is n't it more amazing there is salt there then the possibility of water ?
* Likely</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but isn't it more amazing there is salt there then the possibility of water?
*Likely</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469415</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>Dr\_Ken</author>
	<datestamp>1245957120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We know what these planets consist of. We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth. Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these?</p><p>If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles. Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.</p></div><p>What! And violate the <a href="http://www.70disco.com/startrek/primedir.htm" title="70disco.com" rel="nofollow"> Prime Directive. </a> [70disco.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We know what these planets consist of .
We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth .
Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these ? If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles .
Why do n't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.What !
And violate the Prime Directive .
[ 70disco.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know what these planets consist of.
We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth.
Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these?If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles.
Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.What!
And violate the  Prime Directive.
[70disco.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197</id>
	<title>Implications of this finding are profound</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It means that if we find some kind of intelligent shrimp on Enceladus we will be able to eat them without adding salt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It means that if we find some kind of intelligent shrimp on Enceladus we will be able to eat them without adding salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It means that if we find some kind of intelligent shrimp on Enceladus we will be able to eat them without adding salt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468855</id>
	<title>Re:Implications of this finding are profound</title>
	<author>MeatBag PussRocket</author>
	<datestamp>1245955080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whats wrong with the shrimp from the saltwater in the gulf of mexico? they're some of the biggest 'shrimp' known they call em prawns casue they aint really 'shrimp' per se</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whats wrong with the shrimp from the saltwater in the gulf of mexico ?
they 're some of the biggest 'shrimp ' known they call em prawns casue they aint really 'shrimp ' per se</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whats wrong with the shrimp from the saltwater in the gulf of mexico?
they're some of the biggest 'shrimp' known they call em prawns casue they aint really 'shrimp' per se</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469209</id>
	<title>Re:Ohhh the Straits Times!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1245956280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had the same gripe, but it's worse when you submit a story linking to site such as you pointed to, and after it's shot down, a week later somebody else posts the same story and links to FOX news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had the same gripe , but it 's worse when you submit a story linking to site such as you pointed to , and after it 's shot down , a week later somebody else posts the same story and links to FOX news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had the same gripe, but it's worse when you submit a story linking to site such as you pointed to, and after it's shot down, a week later somebody else posts the same story and links to FOX news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470803</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>EchaniDrgn</author>
	<datestamp>1245962760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How self defeatist is that?  We name our own sun S.O.L.</p><p>(Knew it was referred to as Sol before this guys post, but it's funnier this way.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How self defeatist is that ?
We name our own sun S.O.L .
( Knew it was referred to as Sol before this guys post , but it 's funnier this way .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How self defeatist is that?
We name our own sun S.O.L.
(Knew it was referred to as Sol before this guys post, but it's funnier this way.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28474031</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245931140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and then there's this: http://www.physorg.com/news165068514.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and then there 's this : http : //www.physorg.com/news165068514.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and then there's this: http://www.physorg.com/news165068514.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468715</id>
	<title>Return mission</title>
	<author>drerwk</author>
	<datestamp>1245954540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looking at the size of those things makes me think a sample return will be pretty easy; we won't need a plan for leaving the surface, just good timing getting into the hole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the size of those things makes me think a sample return will be pretty easy ; we wo n't need a plan for leaving the surface , just good timing getting into the hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the size of those things makes me think a sample return will be pretty easy; we won't need a plan for leaving the surface, just good timing getting into the hole.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472537</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1245925020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth.</p></div></blockquote><p>Widening your dating options, eh? I know the feeling.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth.Widening your dating options , eh ?
I know the feeling .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth.Widening your dating options, eh?
I know the feeling.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468083</id>
	<title>This is evidence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are launching pads for Italian WMDs against America and other Christian countries. Bush was right, all hail Obama the commander in chief of our WAR!!!! DEATH TO THE SATURN-ITALIAN AXIS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are launching pads for Italian WMDs against America and other Christian countries .
Bush was right , all hail Obama the commander in chief of our WAR ! ! ! !
DEATH TO THE SATURN-ITALIAN AXIS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are launching pads for Italian WMDs against America and other Christian countries.
Bush was right, all hail Obama the commander in chief of our WAR!!!!
DEATH TO THE SATURN-ITALIAN AXIS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468795</id>
	<title>Sensationalist headlines?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245954780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA, "Saturn moon may contain life". And I thought slashdot used sensationalist headlines! This amounts to slightly more evidence that Enceladus may be capable of supporting life, no evidence of the existence of life at all. Given the extreme conditions that bacteria have already been found under, there are LOTS of extraterrestrial objects capable of supporting life. Get back to me when Cassini captures a photo of a penguin waving...</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA , " Saturn moon may contain life " .
And I thought slashdot used sensationalist headlines !
This amounts to slightly more evidence that Enceladus may be capable of supporting life , no evidence of the existence of life at all .
Given the extreme conditions that bacteria have already been found under , there are LOTS of extraterrestrial objects capable of supporting life .
Get back to me when Cassini captures a photo of a penguin waving.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA, "Saturn moon may contain life".
And I thought slashdot used sensationalist headlines!
This amounts to slightly more evidence that Enceladus may be capable of supporting life, no evidence of the existence of life at all.
Given the extreme conditions that bacteria have already been found under, there are LOTS of extraterrestrial objects capable of supporting life.
Get back to me when Cassini captures a photo of a penguin waving...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468905</id>
	<title>Re:Ohhh the Straits Times!</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1245955260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The source is strong with this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The source is strong with this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The source is strong with this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472059</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1245923400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will just say "ahh, another glorious creation of gods". They've shown many times that inconsistent/false passages in "holy" texts can be ignored, new doctrines introduced.</p><p>It will get interesting only when we discover intelligent life that, during its evolution, didn't need the concept of gods. Though this is likely, IMHO, only in forms of intelligence that are NOT fragile, individual units (which feel the need to control the scary world, hence - gods, prayers, and so on), in case of hive-mind for example (I guess it will operate mostly in "me" and "that which does not exist" categories). But I suspect in this case religious folks will just dismiss its intelligence.</p><p>Oh well, in other cases it might be fun too - at least if "interstellar crusade" sounds fun to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will just say " ahh , another glorious creation of gods " .
They 've shown many times that inconsistent/false passages in " holy " texts can be ignored , new doctrines introduced.It will get interesting only when we discover intelligent life that , during its evolution , did n't need the concept of gods .
Though this is likely , IMHO , only in forms of intelligence that are NOT fragile , individual units ( which feel the need to control the scary world , hence - gods , prayers , and so on ) , in case of hive-mind for example ( I guess it will operate mostly in " me " and " that which does not exist " categories ) .
But I suspect in this case religious folks will just dismiss its intelligence.Oh well , in other cases it might be fun too - at least if " interstellar crusade " sounds fun to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will just say "ahh, another glorious creation of gods".
They've shown many times that inconsistent/false passages in "holy" texts can be ignored, new doctrines introduced.It will get interesting only when we discover intelligent life that, during its evolution, didn't need the concept of gods.
Though this is likely, IMHO, only in forms of intelligence that are NOT fragile, individual units (which feel the need to control the scary world, hence - gods, prayers, and so on), in case of hive-mind for example (I guess it will operate mostly in "me" and "that which does not exist" categories).
But I suspect in this case religious folks will just dismiss its intelligence.Oh well, in other cases it might be fun too - at least if "interstellar crusade" sounds fun to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469287</id>
	<title>Wow, old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245956580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The salts and possibility of organic compounds in the geyser ejecta is old news. This was the cover story on Scientific American from the issue four months ago. And the scientific journal Nature published it even before that. I guess the internet doesn't always move faster than print.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The salts and possibility of organic compounds in the geyser ejecta is old news .
This was the cover story on Scientific American from the issue four months ago .
And the scientific journal Nature published it even before that .
I guess the internet does n't always move faster than print .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The salts and possibility of organic compounds in the geyser ejecta is old news.
This was the cover story on Scientific American from the issue four months ago.
And the scientific journal Nature published it even before that.
I guess the internet doesn't always move faster than print.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468517</id>
	<title>I'll bet they're huge...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245953820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Huge geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus may be fed by a salty sea below its surface, boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System."</p><p>That's what <i>SHE</i> said!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Huge geysers on Saturn 's moon Enceladus may be fed by a salty sea below its surface , boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System .
" That 's what SHE said ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Huge geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus may be fed by a salty sea below its surface, boosting the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System.
"That's what SHE said!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468463</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245953700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it somehow make you superior to nit-pick perfectly understandable, though just barely technically flawed statements? Pat yourself on the back for me, will ya?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it somehow make you superior to nit-pick perfectly understandable , though just barely technically flawed statements ?
Pat yourself on the back for me , will ya ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it somehow make you superior to nit-pick perfectly understandable, though just barely technically flawed statements?
Pat yourself on the back for me, will ya?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470783</id>
	<title>Its got the essentials to support a colony</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1245962580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An underground ocean (which is what they predict is there causing the saltwater Geysers) is huge news for the idea of colonizing the planet.</p><p>That would mean we have Liquid water, and a source of energy (tides created by the planet). Build a Greenhouse, a Distillery, set up some Lights BAM<br>FARMS IN SPACE</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An underground ocean ( which is what they predict is there causing the saltwater Geysers ) is huge news for the idea of colonizing the planet.That would mean we have Liquid water , and a source of energy ( tides created by the planet ) .
Build a Greenhouse , a Distillery , set up some Lights BAMFARMS IN SPACE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An underground ocean (which is what they predict is there causing the saltwater Geysers) is huge news for the idea of colonizing the planet.That would mean we have Liquid water, and a source of energy (tides created by the planet).
Build a Greenhouse, a Distillery, set up some Lights BAMFARMS IN SPACE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28471511</id>
	<title>Easy life return mission? Perhaps with Cassini?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245921780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder...</p><p>So we have this moon that possibly has life in its ocean. And geysers which put this water into known orbits. Together with the water they put salts. And life - if one exists there.</p><p>So..."orbital scoop" flying for few years has a big chance to catch some microbes for the ride. Unfortunatelly...it will be probably several more decades before the next mission to Saturn; several more decades before we can sent purpose built spacecraft.</p><p><b>However</b>...we already have a spacecraft that was flying there for quite some time. Perhaps, once RTGs deplete to such a degree that the scientific package will have to be largery shut down, it is sensible to:</p><p>1) put Cassini into orbit which maximalises probabilities of catching something for the ride (and without too much risk of hitting some ice block)</p><p>2) after several more years - bring Cassini back (through <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary\_Transport\_Network" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary\_Transport\_Network</a> [wikipedia.org] for example). Put it into stable, high Earth orbit where it can wait for us to have means to investigate it (too bad we get rid of Shuttles, they would be usefull for that oe thing...)</p><p>It seems to me to be much better conclusion of the mission (even we won't find any signs of life on it) than sending it plunging towards Saturn...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder...So we have this moon that possibly has life in its ocean .
And geysers which put this water into known orbits .
Together with the water they put salts .
And life - if one exists there.So... " orbital scoop " flying for few years has a big chance to catch some microbes for the ride .
Unfortunatelly...it will be probably several more decades before the next mission to Saturn ; several more decades before we can sent purpose built spacecraft.However...we already have a spacecraft that was flying there for quite some time .
Perhaps , once RTGs deplete to such a degree that the scientific package will have to be largery shut down , it is sensible to : 1 ) put Cassini into orbit which maximalises probabilities of catching something for the ride ( and without too much risk of hitting some ice block ) 2 ) after several more years - bring Cassini back ( through http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary \ _Transport \ _Network [ wikipedia.org ] for example ) .
Put it into stable , high Earth orbit where it can wait for us to have means to investigate it ( too bad we get rid of Shuttles , they would be usefull for that oe thing... ) It seems to me to be much better conclusion of the mission ( even we wo n't find any signs of life on it ) than sending it plunging towards Saturn.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder...So we have this moon that possibly has life in its ocean.
And geysers which put this water into known orbits.
Together with the water they put salts.
And life - if one exists there.So..."orbital scoop" flying for few years has a big chance to catch some microbes for the ride.
Unfortunatelly...it will be probably several more decades before the next mission to Saturn; several more decades before we can sent purpose built spacecraft.However...we already have a spacecraft that was flying there for quite some time.
Perhaps, once RTGs deplete to such a degree that the scientific package will have to be largery shut down, it is sensible to:1) put Cassini into orbit which maximalises probabilities of catching something for the ride (and without too much risk of hitting some ice block)2) after several more years - bring Cassini back (through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary\_Transport\_Network [wikipedia.org] for example).
Put it into stable, high Earth orbit where it can wait for us to have means to investigate it (too bad we get rid of Shuttles, they would be usefull for that oe thing...)It seems to me to be much better conclusion of the mission (even we won't find any signs of life on it) than sending it plunging towards Saturn...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469351</id>
	<title>Re:change the headline</title>
	<author>multisync</author>
	<datestamp>1245956880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ?</p></div></blockquote><p>That would explain the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20412049/ns/technology\_and\_science-space/" title="msn.com">rings</a> [msn.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ? That would explain the rings [ msn.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are these similar to the methane geysers which were found recently to shoot out of Uranus ?That would explain the rings [msn.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468161</id>
	<title>its all about the water</title>
	<author>MeatBag PussRocket</author>
	<datestamp>1245952500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My understanding is that the major thing of interest is that there is \_salt water\_ on this moon. salt usually comes from rocks and to get it into water pretty much requires \_liquid\_ water, therefore the possibility of a life sustaining habitat. the geysers indicate is its possible that it has a liquid core, though i could be mistaken on that part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that the major thing of interest is that there is \ _salt water \ _ on this moon .
salt usually comes from rocks and to get it into water pretty much requires \ _liquid \ _ water , therefore the possibility of a life sustaining habitat .
the geysers indicate is its possible that it has a liquid core , though i could be mistaken on that part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that the major thing of interest is that there is \_salt water\_ on this moon.
salt usually comes from rocks and to get it into water pretty much requires \_liquid\_ water, therefore the possibility of a life sustaining habitat.
the geysers indicate is its possible that it has a liquid core, though i could be mistaken on that part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469423</id>
	<title>Nature already does this with meteors</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1245957120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>About 50 Martian meteors have been discovered so- mostly on Antarctica glaciers. Thats probably a tiny fraction of thousands upon thousands to have rained upon the Earth. Couple this with discoveries that bacteria apparently have lived inside of rock deep in the Earth for tens of millions of year and you have a mechanism of infecting the entire solar system over the eons. Gravity wells make some transport directions more likely than others.  But over the vast amounts of time probably samples of every planet and moon have reached every other.
<br> <br>
My prediction is some parts of Mars are hospitable to extremophile life and we will eventually discover it.  It may be canyons where water-bearing layers appear to leak now and then.  I further predict this life will very much look like Earth's.  And the interesting follow-on question will be which planet did life start on first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>About 50 Martian meteors have been discovered so- mostly on Antarctica glaciers .
Thats probably a tiny fraction of thousands upon thousands to have rained upon the Earth .
Couple this with discoveries that bacteria apparently have lived inside of rock deep in the Earth for tens of millions of year and you have a mechanism of infecting the entire solar system over the eons .
Gravity wells make some transport directions more likely than others .
But over the vast amounts of time probably samples of every planet and moon have reached every other .
My prediction is some parts of Mars are hospitable to extremophile life and we will eventually discover it .
It may be canyons where water-bearing layers appear to leak now and then .
I further predict this life will very much look like Earth 's .
And the interesting follow-on question will be which planet did life start on first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About 50 Martian meteors have been discovered so- mostly on Antarctica glaciers.
Thats probably a tiny fraction of thousands upon thousands to have rained upon the Earth.
Couple this with discoveries that bacteria apparently have lived inside of rock deep in the Earth for tens of millions of year and you have a mechanism of infecting the entire solar system over the eons.
Gravity wells make some transport directions more likely than others.
But over the vast amounts of time probably samples of every planet and moon have reached every other.
My prediction is some parts of Mars are hospitable to extremophile life and we will eventually discover it.
It may be canyons where water-bearing layers appear to leak now and then.
I further predict this life will very much look like Earth's.
And the interesting follow-on question will be which planet did life start on first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468727</id>
	<title>Enchiladas</title>
	<author>Saint Stephen</author>
	<datestamp>1245954540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas?</p><p>Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas ? Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas?Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</id>
	<title>Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>FreakinSyco</author>
	<datestamp>1245952500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We know what these planets consist of. We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth. Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these?</p><p>If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles. Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We know what these planets consist of .
We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth .
Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these ? If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles .
Why do n't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know what these planets consist of.
We know of some pretty crazy bacteria here on earth.
Why not shoot a rocket full of random bacteria that can survive our most extreme conditions to places like these?If I recall correctly NASA has always been super careful about bacteria on space vehicles.
Why don't we just infect everything and kick start this whole ET thing ourselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472641</id>
	<title>Re:Enchiladas</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1245925380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas? Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas...</p></div></blockquote><p>And Jupiter's moon Io looks like pizza:</p><p><a href="http://www.astronet.ru/db/xware/msg/1159737" title="astronet.ru" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronet.ru/db/xware/msg/1159737</a> [astronet.ru]</p><p>Now all we need is a hamburger moon and a fries moon(s), and the junkfoodification of the solar system is complete. (I hear Enceladus' geysers taste like coke, so we got that covered.)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas ?
Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas...And Jupiter 's moon Io looks like pizza : http : //www.astronet.ru/db/xware/msg/1159737 [ astronet.ru ] Now all we need is a hamburger moon and a fries moon ( s ) , and the junkfoodification of the solar system is complete .
( I hear Enceladus ' geysers taste like coke , so we got that covered .
)    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else read that as Moon Enchiladas?
Mmmm.. Moon enchiladas...And Jupiter's moon Io looks like pizza:http://www.astronet.ru/db/xware/msg/1159737 [astronet.ru]Now all we need is a hamburger moon and a fries moon(s), and the junkfoodification of the solar system is complete.
(I hear Enceladus' geysers taste like coke, so we got that covered.
)
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468573</id>
	<title>The headline is misleading...</title>
	<author>anandamide</author>
	<datestamp>1245954000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the presence of geysers doesn't increase the likelihood of life, which would require a much more complex set of conditions and events to occur.<br>You might as well write "Iron detected on Enceladus, increasing the likelihood of Cadillac Dealerships."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the presence of geysers does n't increase the likelihood of life , which would require a much more complex set of conditions and events to occur.You might as well write " Iron detected on Enceladus , increasing the likelihood of Cadillac Dealerships .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the presence of geysers doesn't increase the likelihood of life, which would require a much more complex set of conditions and events to occur.You might as well write "Iron detected on Enceladus, increasing the likelihood of Cadillac Dealerships.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468605</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1245954120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think what you mean to say....is there is only one Solar system per say, as the word derived from the use of Sol to create a subculture for that phenomenon. If we use kleenex as the example...pass mea kleenex, means tissue as well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...sort of...but there is only one Kleenex....There are many solar systems out there, but only one true Solar system!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think what you mean to say....is there is only one Solar system per say , as the word derived from the use of Sol to create a subculture for that phenomenon .
If we use kleenex as the example...pass mea kleenex , means tissue as well ...sort of...but there is only one Kleenex....There are many solar systems out there , but only one true Solar system !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think what you mean to say....is there is only one Solar system per say, as the word derived from the use of Sol to create a subculture for that phenomenon.
If we use kleenex as the example...pass mea kleenex, means tissue as well ...sort of...but there is only one Kleenex....There are many solar systems out there, but only one true Solar system!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469397</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>wonderboss</author>
	<datestamp>1245957060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
  Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews?</p></div><p>Denial.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews ? Denial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Any one wants to take a stab at predicting the reactions from the traditional Earth-centric worldviews?Denial.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468587</id>
	<title>Re:change the headline</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1245954060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So these are old geysers who DON'T complain about people being worth their salt?  Wow, it really is an alien world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So these are old geysers who DO N'T complain about people being worth their salt ?
Wow , it really is an alien world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So these are old geysers who DON'T complain about people being worth their salt?
Wow, it really is an alien world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470355</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>MeatBag PussRocket</author>
	<datestamp>1245960660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to quote one of my favorite movies "Contact":<br>Ellie Arroway: [to a group of children] I'll tell you one thing about the universe, though. The universe is a pretty big place. It's bigger than anything anyone has ever dreamed of before. So if it's just us... seems like an awful waste of space. Right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>to quote one of my favorite movies " Contact " : Ellie Arroway : [ to a group of children ] I 'll tell you one thing about the universe , though .
The universe is a pretty big place .
It 's bigger than anything anyone has ever dreamed of before .
So if it 's just us... seems like an awful waste of space .
Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to quote one of my favorite movies "Contact":Ellie Arroway: [to a group of children] I'll tell you one thing about the universe, though.
The universe is a pretty big place.
It's bigger than anything anyone has ever dreamed of before.
So if it's just us... seems like an awful waste of space.
Right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468231</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like it.</p><p>Besides, the more I learn about the human body, the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria around, so this is a logic extension of out purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like it.Besides , the more I learn about the human body , the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria around , so this is a logic extension of out purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like it.Besides, the more I learn about the human body, the more convinced our real purpose is to move bacteria around, so this is a logic extension of out purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469293</id>
	<title>Re:Why not create our own ET life?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245956640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with this.  sure "we" won't see results for possibly millenia,  but it would have its perks.  such as terraforming.  just think if we could create a bacteria that say neutralizes acid we could potentially terraform venus.  or some sorta bateria that converts a hostile element in the atmosphere to something benign to us.  should we do this on a planet with life? No. but what will it hurt to try things like this on planets that don't contain life.  The human race needs to stop being so short-sited and start planing for a better future for our descendants.  If our race is to survive we need to start doing stuff like this.  Earth can't support us forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with this .
sure " we " wo n't see results for possibly millenia , but it would have its perks .
such as terraforming .
just think if we could create a bacteria that say neutralizes acid we could potentially terraform venus .
or some sorta bateria that converts a hostile element in the atmosphere to something benign to us .
should we do this on a planet with life ?
No. but what will it hurt to try things like this on planets that do n't contain life .
The human race needs to stop being so short-sited and start planing for a better future for our descendants .
If our race is to survive we need to start doing stuff like this .
Earth ca n't support us forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with this.
sure "we" won't see results for possibly millenia,  but it would have its perks.
such as terraforming.
just think if we could create a bacteria that say neutralizes acid we could potentially terraform venus.
or some sorta bateria that converts a hostile element in the atmosphere to something benign to us.
should we do this on a planet with life?
No. but what will it hurt to try things like this on planets that don't contain life.
The human race needs to stop being so short-sited and start planing for a better future for our descendants.
If our race is to survive we need to start doing stuff like this.
Earth can't support us forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468415</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1245953520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA disagrees: <a href="http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spitzer/signs/sign\_glossary.shtml#S" title="nasa.gov">http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spitzer/signs/sign\_glossary.shtml#S</a> [nasa.gov]</p><p>"solar system<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A system of planets, moons, asteroids, comets, dust, gas, and any other objects that orbit a star, tied to it by the star's gravitational force. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA disagrees : http : //spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spitzer/signs/sign \ _glossary.shtml # S [ nasa.gov ] " solar system         A system of planets , moons , asteroids , comets , dust , gas , and any other objects that orbit a star , tied to it by the star 's gravitational force .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA disagrees: http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spitzer/signs/sign\_glossary.shtml#S [nasa.gov]"solar system
        A system of planets, moons, asteroids, comets, dust, gas, and any other objects that orbit a star, tied to it by the star's gravitational force.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469223</id>
	<title>Return sample mission</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245956340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geysers are turning out to be common features of the moons of Jovian planets.  Tidal forces experienced by moons orbiting these planets are high.  Io (orbiting Jupiter) has large, frequent volcanic geysers as well.</p><p>This is a great opportunity for a sample return mission.  If Enceladus does host any microbiology it should be present in at least trace amounts in the water being ejected in space.  Seems like it would be comparatively easy (although slow) to collect orbiting ice particles for return and analysis.</p><p>Cross pollination of extremophiles on planets and moons orbiting yellow dwarfs like our sun is inevitable; the system is too small to provide isolation.  There is no need to take an extreme position on the possibility of "ruining" alien habits; the solar system has already exposed whatever exists.  The most likely result of any discovery of alien lifeforms in our solar system is a distant relation to something already present on Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geysers are turning out to be common features of the moons of Jovian planets .
Tidal forces experienced by moons orbiting these planets are high .
Io ( orbiting Jupiter ) has large , frequent volcanic geysers as well.This is a great opportunity for a sample return mission .
If Enceladus does host any microbiology it should be present in at least trace amounts in the water being ejected in space .
Seems like it would be comparatively easy ( although slow ) to collect orbiting ice particles for return and analysis.Cross pollination of extremophiles on planets and moons orbiting yellow dwarfs like our sun is inevitable ; the system is too small to provide isolation .
There is no need to take an extreme position on the possibility of " ruining " alien habits ; the solar system has already exposed whatever exists .
The most likely result of any discovery of alien lifeforms in our solar system is a distant relation to something already present on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geysers are turning out to be common features of the moons of Jovian planets.
Tidal forces experienced by moons orbiting these planets are high.
Io (orbiting Jupiter) has large, frequent volcanic geysers as well.This is a great opportunity for a sample return mission.
If Enceladus does host any microbiology it should be present in at least trace amounts in the water being ejected in space.
Seems like it would be comparatively easy (although slow) to collect orbiting ice particles for return and analysis.Cross pollination of extremophiles on planets and moons orbiting yellow dwarfs like our sun is inevitable; the system is too small to provide isolation.
There is no need to take an extreme position on the possibility of "ruining" alien habits; the solar system has already exposed whatever exists.
The most likely result of any discovery of alien lifeforms in our solar system is a distant relation to something already present on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469037</id>
	<title>Re:Implications of this finding are profound</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245955680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody puts shrimp on Enceladus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody puts shrimp on Enceladus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody puts shrimp on Enceladus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</id>
	<title>Which System?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...the odds of extraterrestrial life in <b>our own</b> Solar System.</i></p><p>There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy.  This is because the name the star that Earth orbits is "Sol", hence the <b>Sol</b>al System.  There are other stellar systems (I think that's the right phrase) out there, but only one Solar System.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System.There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy .
This is because the name the star that Earth orbits is " Sol " , hence the Solal System .
There are other stellar systems ( I think that 's the right phrase ) out there , but only one Solar System .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the odds of extraterrestrial life in our own Solar System.There is only one Solar System in the entire galaxy.
This is because the name the star that Earth orbits is "Sol", hence the Solal System.
There are other stellar systems (I think that's the right phrase) out there, but only one Solar System.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28486805</id>
	<title>The only two possible names left....</title>
	<author>photomonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246047660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Popplers or tastesicles.</p><p>Hopefully, it's popplers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Popplers or tastesicles.Hopefully , it 's popplers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Popplers or tastesicles.Hopefully, it's popplers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468639</id>
	<title>Boosting the odds</title>
	<author>aardwolf64</author>
	<datestamp>1245954240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it's boosting the odds from 1 in 800 kazillion to 1 in 799.999999999 kazillion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it 's boosting the odds from 1 in 800 kazillion to 1 in 799.999999999 kazillion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it's boosting the odds from 1 in 800 kazillion to 1 in 799.999999999 kazillion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285</id>
	<title>Ohhh the Straits Times!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245952920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that's where I get all my planetary science news! <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090624/full/news.2009.596.html" title="nature.com">not</a> [nature.com]. <a href="http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/newsreleases/newsrelease20090624/" title="nasa.gov">also</a> [nasa.gov]. <a href="http://colorado.edu/news/r/b31ca2928f7cb0fba7aa3341ff400e16.html" title="colorado.edu">also</a> [colorado.edu]. Why do people do this? This is the internet, not your local morning paper. You can go wherever you want to get this information. WHY NOT GO DIRECTLY TO THE SOURCE!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that 's where I get all my planetary science news !
not [ nature.com ] .
also [ nasa.gov ] .
also [ colorado.edu ] .
Why do people do this ?
This is the internet , not your local morning paper .
You can go wherever you want to get this information .
WHY NOT GO DIRECTLY TO THE SOURCE !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that's where I get all my planetary science news!
not [nature.com].
also [nasa.gov].
also [colorado.edu].
Why do people do this?
This is the internet, not your local morning paper.
You can go wherever you want to get this information.
WHY NOT GO DIRECTLY TO THE SOURCE!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475075</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1245935160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know of no religion that denies the possibilty of extraterrestrial life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know of no religion that denies the possibilty of extraterrestrial life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know of no religion that denies the possibilty of extraterrestrial life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472485</id>
	<title>Re:Which System?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1245924840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But they forgot to make it a unique key in the Galactic Relational Database. Slacker galactic gov't workers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But they forgot to make it a unique key in the Galactic Relational Database .
Slacker galactic gov't workers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they forgot to make it a unique key in the Galactic Relational Database.
Slacker galactic gov't workers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28476949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28471511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28473813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_1638206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468639
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470783
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468213
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28467989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28470803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28476949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28473813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468231
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28475681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28472641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_1638206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28471511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28468531
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_1638206.28469351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
