<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_25_139218</id>
	<title>UK Launches Dedicated Cyber Security Agency</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1245938880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Jack Spine writes <i>"The UK government is launching an office <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39667231,00.htm">dedicated to cyber attack and defence</a>.  The Office of Cyber Security will focus on protecting Britain's IT infrastructure, and will be similar to the <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/197241/Pentagon-Confirms-Cyber-Command-Under-NSA-Control">US Cyber Command model</a>. While the Pentagon Cyber Command will be lead by the NSA, the UK Cyber Security Operations Centre, which will coordinate UK cyber efforts, will be based at GCHQ in Cheltenham."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack Spine writes " The UK government is launching an office dedicated to cyber attack and defence .
The Office of Cyber Security will focus on protecting Britain 's IT infrastructure , and will be similar to the US Cyber Command model .
While the Pentagon Cyber Command will be lead by the NSA , the UK Cyber Security Operations Centre , which will coordinate UK cyber efforts , will be based at GCHQ in Cheltenham .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack Spine writes "The UK government is launching an office dedicated to cyber attack and defence.
The Office of Cyber Security will focus on protecting Britain's IT infrastructure, and will be similar to the US Cyber Command model.
While the Pentagon Cyber Command will be lead by the NSA, the UK Cyber Security Operations Centre, which will coordinate UK cyber efforts, will be based at GCHQ in Cheltenham.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466263</id>
	<title>Re:I'm from the UK!</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1245944160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hear <a href="http://people.ambrosiasw.com/~andrew/funny/bloodcyber.html" title="ambrosiasw.com">this guy</a> [ambrosiasw.com] is quite hawt4dag1rl5.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear this guy [ ambrosiasw.com ] is quite hawt4dag1rl5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear this guy [ambrosiasw.com] is quite hawt4dag1rl5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466879</id>
	<title>A good way to sink more money !</title>
	<author>gygy</author>
	<datestamp>1245947340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A good way to sink more money !
Has anyone see a cyberterrorist ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A good way to sink more money !
Has anyone see a cyberterrorist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good way to sink more money !
Has anyone see a cyberterrorist ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466697</id>
	<title>Talk about internal rivalry!</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1245946380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're going to have to work hard to keep up with the brave efforts of the rest of the government to completely undermine whatever data security actually exists. Leaving unencrypted information on a train? What can man do against such reckless incompetence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're going to have to work hard to keep up with the brave efforts of the rest of the government to completely undermine whatever data security actually exists .
Leaving unencrypted information on a train ?
What can man do against such reckless incompetence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're going to have to work hard to keep up with the brave efforts of the rest of the government to completely undermine whatever data security actually exists.
Leaving unencrypted information on a train?
What can man do against such reckless incompetence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466637</id>
	<title>Re:So pretty much the same...</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1245946080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this bears a ton of significance considering the timing of the <a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/DHS-appoints-new-director-of-National-Cybersecurity-Center/article/137920/" title="scmagazineus.com">US equivalent being appointed ?</a> [scmagazineus.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this bears a ton of significance considering the timing of the US equivalent being appointed ?
[ scmagazineus.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this bears a ton of significance considering the timing of the US equivalent being appointed ?
[scmagazineus.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465933</id>
	<title>First!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245942540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28469649</id>
	<title>Yuo Fail It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245958020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">here, please do users. BSD/OS 0ver to yet another</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>here , please do users .
BSD/OS 0ver to yet another [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here, please do users.
BSD/OS 0ver to yet another [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061</id>
	<title>The good guys using DDoS?</title>
	<author>Fzz</author>
	<datestamp>1245943140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<blockquote><div><p>The government will develop information systems to allow it to launch denial-of-service attacks and to spy on chosen targets, said the official. "We will have a whole range of offensive capabilities, including distributed denial-of-service," said the official. "DDoS is not a first response -- we definitely need graduated responses."</p></div></blockquote><p>
You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, rather than rely on using them.  The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any <i>legal</i> response could.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : The government will develop information systems to allow it to launch denial-of-service attacks and to spy on chosen targets , said the official .
" We will have a whole range of offensive capabilities , including distributed denial-of-service , " said the official .
" DDoS is not a first response -- we definitely need graduated responses .
" You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks , rather than rely on using them .
The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any legal response could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:The government will develop information systems to allow it to launch denial-of-service attacks and to spy on chosen targets, said the official.
"We will have a whole range of offensive capabilities, including distributed denial-of-service," said the official.
"DDoS is not a first response -- we definitely need graduated responses.
"
You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, rather than rely on using them.
The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any legal response could.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28469941</id>
	<title>Cyber security takes down websites</title>
	<author>Wowsers</author>
	<datestamp>1245959160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The UK has the BEST cyber security known, in the weekend when people MOST have time to do any work to fill in or request this that or other form on a UK government website, they find the website is taken down "for maintenence", every weekend, week in week out. So much for a 24/7 365 information economy the government keep on BS'ing about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK has the BEST cyber security known , in the weekend when people MOST have time to do any work to fill in or request this that or other form on a UK government website , they find the website is taken down " for maintenence " , every weekend , week in week out .
So much for a 24/7 365 information economy the government keep on BS'ing about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK has the BEST cyber security known, in the weekend when people MOST have time to do any work to fill in or request this that or other form on a UK government website, they find the website is taken down "for maintenence", every weekend, week in week out.
So much for a 24/7 365 information economy the government keep on BS'ing about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28496817</id>
	<title>Re:Thought Police?</title>
	<author>KingBenny</author>
	<datestamp>1246134720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are they part of the ministry of silly walks ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they part of the ministry of silly walks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they part of the ministry of silly walks ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466887</id>
	<title>Re:Naughty boys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245947400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is that it is very difficult for anyone whio has been a naughty boy to work for such an agency.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that it is very difficult for anyone whio has been a naughty boy to work for such an agency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that it is very difficult for anyone whio has been a naughty boy to work for such an agency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466179</id>
	<title>Torchwood?</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1245943800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Torchwood? They've coped with the cybermen before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Torchwood ?
They 've coped with the cybermen before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Torchwood?
They've coped with the cybermen before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28479189</id>
	<title>Re:Thought Police?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246009800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GCHQ's unique qualities are being more secretive and having single-minded employees more accepting that they're "only following orders" than the rest of the services. A specific competence is of little value without constant reflection on one's work, and one brilliant mathematical device discovered decades ago is no reflection of your organisation's current ability or utility. This service is mostly a sink for Oxbridge mathematicians and linguists who lack the balls for the City, imagination for a start-up or selflessness of academia, but who still want the gratifying sense of superiority and power which Oxbridge (well, Oxford certainly does) pounds into you.</p><p>To accuse part of the UK civil service of being "apolitical" is only to imply, with a nod of deference to <i>Yes Minister</i>, that it holds the reins and ignores its bosses: the politicians who should represent the people. If your politicians are corrupt, you don't improve things by reinforcing the problem of a civil service which answers to no-one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GCHQ 's unique qualities are being more secretive and having single-minded employees more accepting that they 're " only following orders " than the rest of the services .
A specific competence is of little value without constant reflection on one 's work , and one brilliant mathematical device discovered decades ago is no reflection of your organisation 's current ability or utility .
This service is mostly a sink for Oxbridge mathematicians and linguists who lack the balls for the City , imagination for a start-up or selflessness of academia , but who still want the gratifying sense of superiority and power which Oxbridge ( well , Oxford certainly does ) pounds into you.To accuse part of the UK civil service of being " apolitical " is only to imply , with a nod of deference to Yes Minister , that it holds the reins and ignores its bosses : the politicians who should represent the people .
If your politicians are corrupt , you do n't improve things by reinforcing the problem of a civil service which answers to no-one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GCHQ's unique qualities are being more secretive and having single-minded employees more accepting that they're "only following orders" than the rest of the services.
A specific competence is of little value without constant reflection on one's work, and one brilliant mathematical device discovered decades ago is no reflection of your organisation's current ability or utility.
This service is mostly a sink for Oxbridge mathematicians and linguists who lack the balls for the City, imagination for a start-up or selflessness of academia, but who still want the gratifying sense of superiority and power which Oxbridge (well, Oxford certainly does) pounds into you.To accuse part of the UK civil service of being "apolitical" is only to imply, with a nod of deference to Yes Minister, that it holds the reins and ignores its bosses: the politicians who should represent the people.
If your politicians are corrupt, you don't improve things by reinforcing the problem of a civil service which answers to no-one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466097</id>
	<title>Re:Freshen Ya Drink, Govna?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245943380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.</p><p>America is better than England, and we are better than you.</p></div><p>Is that an Obama quote?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.America is better than England , and we are better than you.Is that an Obama quote ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.America is better than England, and we are better than you.Is that an Obama quote?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466129</id>
	<title>Just like 24</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245943560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As in 24 teeth remaining.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As in 24 teeth remaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As in 24 teeth remaining.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466667</id>
	<title>Logo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245946260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But will they have as good a logo as the Office of Government Commerce?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But will they have as good a logo as the Office of Government Commerce ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will they have as good a logo as the Office of Government Commerce?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466273</id>
	<title>Re:Tony Blair: The Son of Satan +1, True</title>
	<author>bothemeson</author>
	<datestamp>1245944220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Blair which?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blair which ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blair which?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466007</id>
	<title>So pretty much the same...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245942840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GCHQ is basically the UK NSA.  So it looks like the cousins plans are pretty much the same as ours.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GCHQ is basically the UK NSA .
So it looks like the cousins plans are pretty much the same as ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GCHQ is basically the UK NSA.
So it looks like the cousins plans are pretty much the same as ours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466153</id>
	<title>Thankfully the UK,...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245943680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...sporting the absolutely worst, most under-developed IT infrastructure in the developed world, will have little to keep check on. Lucky bstrds and their "1mbps Top Tier High-Speed(tm)" ADSL network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...sporting the absolutely worst , most under-developed IT infrastructure in the developed world , will have little to keep check on .
Lucky bstrds and their " 1mbps Top Tier High-Speed ( tm ) " ADSL network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...sporting the absolutely worst, most under-developed IT infrastructure in the developed world, will have little to keep check on.
Lucky bstrds and their "1mbps Top Tier High-Speed(tm)" ADSL network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465953</id>
	<title>Freshen Ya Drink, Govna?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245942600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.</p><p>America is better than England, and we are better than you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.America is better than England , and we are better than you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kiss my ass you British douchebags.America is better than England, and we are better than you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466343</id>
	<title>Re:We just do...</title>
	<author>mtremsal</author>
	<datestamp>1245944580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it happened the other way round...</p><p>Kidding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it happened the other way round...Kidding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it happened the other way round...Kidding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985</id>
	<title>Thought Police?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245942720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will this department handle weeding out dissenters or is that a different section?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this department handle weeding out dissenters or is that a different section ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this department handle weeding out dissenters or is that a different section?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466801</id>
	<title>Re:Tony Blair: The Son of Satan +1, True</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1245946980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do know Tony Blair isn't even in office anymore it is Gordon Brown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know Tony Blair is n't even in office anymore it is Gordon Brown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know Tony Blair isn't even in office anymore it is Gordon Brown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466399</id>
	<title>Naughty boys</title>
	<author>PhilHibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1245944880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/politics/8118348.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">Lord West</a> [bbc.co.uk]:</p><p>"You need youngsters who are deep into this stuff... If they have been slightly naughty boys, very often they really enjoy stopping other naughty boys," he said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lord West [ bbc.co.uk ] : " You need youngsters who are deep into this stuff... If they have been slightly naughty boys , very often they really enjoy stopping other naughty boys , " he said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lord West [bbc.co.uk]:"You need youngsters who are deep into this stuff... If they have been slightly naughty boys, very often they really enjoy stopping other naughty boys," he said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199</id>
	<title>Tony Blair: The Son of Satan +1, True</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245943860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that Tony Blair is the spawn of Satan. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on Blair's plaints. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, Blair presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering.</p><p>Blair says that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. I would like nothing more than to view the realms of pessimism and insurrectionism not as two opposing poles but as two continua. Once we realize that, what do we do? The appropriate thing, in my judgment, is to attack Blair's malice and hypocrisy. I say that because he makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, Blair's claim that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. The fact of the matter is that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to flout all of society's rules.</p><p>Even though Blair has aired his disapproval of being criticized, I still warrant that I have never been in favor of being gratuitously superstitious. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to reinforce what is best in people. All the deals he makes are strictly one-way. Blair gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, now that I've been exposed to his editorials I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps he claims to be supportive of my plan to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, he'll detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity&#226;"family, class, private associations. Not only that, but Blair uses big words like "parasympathomimetic" to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Blair's remonstrations may reek like a skunk, most people react to Blair's nutty asseverations as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so. Speaking of resentment, no one likes being attacked by violent libidinous-types. Even worse, Blair exploits our fear of those attacks&#226;"which he claims will evolve before the year is over into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks&#226;"as a pretext to ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Blair's writings are designed to cater to the basest instincts of the most pertinacious goof-offs you'll ever see. And they're working; they're having the desired effect.</p><p>Blair's infernal attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful. Really, Blair, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective. It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is hardly surprising that he wants to declare that the majority of ultra-malign popinjays are heroes, if not saints. After all, this is the same intrusive wisenheimer whose unholy prattle informed us that society is screaming for his histrionics. He has been working under a veil of bureaucracy and secrecy to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress. Even more remarkable, if he isn't hypocritical, I don't know who is. I stand by what I've writ</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that before I launch into this letter , I should tell you that Tony Blair is the spawn of Satan .
Although not without overlap and simplification , I plan to identify three primary positions on Blair 's plaints .
I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions .
Nevertheless , Blair presents one face to the public , a face that tells people what they want to hear .
Then , in private , he devises new schemes to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering.Blair says that the bogeyman is going to get us if we do n't agree to his demands .
That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life .
I would like nothing more than to view the realms of pessimism and insurrectionism not as two opposing poles but as two continua .
Once we realize that , what do we do ?
The appropriate thing , in my judgment , is to attack Blair 's malice and hypocrisy .
I say that because he makes a lot of exaggerated claims .
All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant 's mother .
Consider , for example , Blair 's claim that the average working-class person ca n't see through his chicanery .
The fact of the matter is that I 'm not a psychiatrist .
Sometimes , though , I wish I were , so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to flout all of society 's rules.Even though Blair has aired his disapproval of being criticized , I still warrant that I have never been in favor of being gratuitously superstitious .
I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to reinforce what is best in people .
All the deals he makes are strictly one-way .
Blair gets all the rights , and the other party gets all the obligations .
While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements , now that I 've been exposed to his editorials I must admit that I do n't completely understand them .
Perhaps I need to get out more .
Or perhaps he claims to be supportive of my plan to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction .
Do n't trust him , though ; he 's a wolf in sheep 's clothing .
Before you know it , he 'll detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity   " family , class , private associations .
Not only that , but Blair uses big words like " parasympathomimetic " to make himself sound important .
For that matter , benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature , the skunk , with a means of making itself seem important , too .
Although Blair 's remonstrations may reek like a skunk , most people react to Blair 's nutty asseverations as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep .
Even when they can cope , they resent having to do so .
Speaking of resentment , no one likes being attacked by violent libidinous-types .
Even worse , Blair exploits our fear of those attacks   " which he claims will evolve before the year is over into biological , chemical , or nuclear attacks   " as a pretext to ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism .
If you think that 's scary , then you should remember that Blair 's writings are designed to cater to the basest instincts of the most pertinacious goof-offs you 'll ever see .
And they 're working ; they 're having the desired effect.Blair 's infernal attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful .
Really , Blair , stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective .
It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is hardly surprising that he wants to declare that the majority of ultra-malign popinjays are heroes , if not saints .
After all , this is the same intrusive wisenheimer whose unholy prattle informed us that society is screaming for his histrionics .
He has been working under a veil of bureaucracy and secrecy to inflict untold misery , suffering , and distress .
Even more remarkable , if he is n't hypocritical , I do n't know who is .
I stand by what I 've writ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that Tony Blair is the spawn of Satan.
Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on Blair's plaints.
I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions.
Nevertheless, Blair presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear.
Then, in private, he devises new schemes to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering.Blair says that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands.
That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life.
I would like nothing more than to view the realms of pessimism and insurrectionism not as two opposing poles but as two continua.
Once we realize that, what do we do?
The appropriate thing, in my judgment, is to attack Blair's malice and hypocrisy.
I say that because he makes a lot of exaggerated claims.
All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother.
Consider, for example, Blair's claim that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery.
The fact of the matter is that I'm not a psychiatrist.
Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to flout all of society's rules.Even though Blair has aired his disapproval of being criticized, I still warrant that I have never been in favor of being gratuitously superstitious.
I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to reinforce what is best in people.
All the deals he makes are strictly one-way.
Blair gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.
While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, now that I've been exposed to his editorials I must admit that I don't completely understand them.
Perhaps I need to get out more.
Or perhaps he claims to be supportive of my plan to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction.
Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Before you know it, he'll detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identityâ"family, class, private associations.
Not only that, but Blair uses big words like "parasympathomimetic" to make himself sound important.
For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too.
Although Blair's remonstrations may reek like a skunk, most people react to Blair's nutty asseverations as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep.
Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so.
Speaking of resentment, no one likes being attacked by violent libidinous-types.
Even worse, Blair exploits our fear of those attacksâ"which he claims will evolve before the year is over into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacksâ"as a pretext to ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism.
If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Blair's writings are designed to cater to the basest instincts of the most pertinacious goof-offs you'll ever see.
And they're working; they're having the desired effect.Blair's infernal attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful.
Really, Blair, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective.
It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is hardly surprising that he wants to declare that the majority of ultra-malign popinjays are heroes, if not saints.
After all, this is the same intrusive wisenheimer whose unholy prattle informed us that society is screaming for his histrionics.
He has been working under a veil of bureaucracy and secrecy to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress.
Even more remarkable, if he isn't hypocritical, I don't know who is.
I stand by what I've writ</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466617</id>
	<title>Re:Thought Police?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1245945960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given that it's run by GCHQ, that will probably be some other department.  GCHQ is full of competent people and manages to be a lot more successfully apolitical than other parts of the security service.  Probably because they already know all of the elected politicians' dirty secrets.  These are the guys who invented RSA decades before it was first published, not the guys who leave briefcases full of classified documents on trains.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that it 's run by GCHQ , that will probably be some other department .
GCHQ is full of competent people and manages to be a lot more successfully apolitical than other parts of the security service .
Probably because they already know all of the elected politicians ' dirty secrets .
These are the guys who invented RSA decades before it was first published , not the guys who leave briefcases full of classified documents on trains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that it's run by GCHQ, that will probably be some other department.
GCHQ is full of competent people and manages to be a lot more successfully apolitical than other parts of the security service.
Probably because they already know all of the elected politicians' dirty secrets.
These are the guys who invented RSA decades before it was first published, not the guys who leave briefcases full of classified documents on trains.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466121</id>
	<title>I'm from the UK!</title>
	<author>neokushan</author>
	<datestamp>1245943500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else want to cyber with me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else want to cyber with me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else want to cyber with me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466571</id>
	<title>Breaking News!</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1245945780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Daily Telegraph and Guido Fawkes report their websites have suddenly gone down.<br> <br>

Google also appears to be unable to retrieve searches for "MP's Expenses", "Iraq War Public Enquiry", "Is John Bercow the modern Incitatus?", "UK CCTV", "Metropolitan Police brutality", or "MOD data left on hard disc on train", amongst many other things...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Daily Telegraph and Guido Fawkes report their websites have suddenly gone down .
Google also appears to be unable to retrieve searches for " MP 's Expenses " , " Iraq War Public Enquiry " , " Is John Bercow the modern Incitatus ?
" , " UK CCTV " , " Metropolitan Police brutality " , or " MOD data left on hard disc on train " , amongst many other things.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Daily Telegraph and Guido Fawkes report their websites have suddenly gone down.
Google also appears to be unable to retrieve searches for "MP's Expenses", "Iraq War Public Enquiry", "Is John Bercow the modern Incitatus?
", "UK CCTV", "Metropolitan Police brutality", or "MOD data left on hard disc on train", amongst many other things...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466387</id>
	<title>Re:The good guys using DDoS?</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1245944820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, rather than rely on using them. The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any legal response could.</p></div><p>You also might have thought it would be better to prevent Microsoft Windows rather than using it. But I guess it's too late in both cases because the stuff is owned, licensed, and controlled by third parties.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks , rather than rely on using them .
The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any legal response could.You also might have thought it would be better to prevent Microsoft Windows rather than using it .
But I guess it 's too late in both cases because the stuff is owned , licensed , and controlled by third parties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might have thought it would be better to fund development of mechanisms to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, rather than rely on using them.
The bad guys will always be able to command more bots than any legal response could.You also might have thought it would be better to prevent Microsoft Windows rather than using it.
But I guess it's too late in both cases because the stuff is owned, licensed, and controlled by third parties.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467907</id>
	<title>Re:The good guys using DDoS?</title>
	<author>Dragoness Eclectic</author>
	<datestamp>1245951600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*laughs*</p><p>That's like saying gangsters can command more guns than any legal response--in a war zone. Against the military.</p><p>This is government and national security that's being discussed, in a war situation. I don't think they actually care what the legal options for civilians vs. criminals are. Military law and treaties are what's relevant here.</p><p>Is there anything in the Geneva Convention or military law that stops the government from using every possible computer to take down an enemy attacker's infrastructure and attack capability?  I don't think so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* laughs * That 's like saying gangsters can command more guns than any legal response--in a war zone .
Against the military.This is government and national security that 's being discussed , in a war situation .
I do n't think they actually care what the legal options for civilians vs. criminals are .
Military law and treaties are what 's relevant here.Is there anything in the Geneva Convention or military law that stops the government from using every possible computer to take down an enemy attacker 's infrastructure and attack capability ?
I do n't think so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*laughs*That's like saying gangsters can command more guns than any legal response--in a war zone.
Against the military.This is government and national security that's being discussed, in a war situation.
I don't think they actually care what the legal options for civilians vs. criminals are.
Military law and treaties are what's relevant here.Is there anything in the Geneva Convention or military law that stops the government from using every possible computer to take down an enemy attacker's infrastructure and attack capability?
I don't think so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466465</id>
	<title>Re:We just do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245945240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly, the US made the UK into a police state.</p><p>No wait.  That's retarded.  Never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , the US made the UK into a police state.No wait .
That 's retarded .
Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, the US made the UK into a police state.No wait.
That's retarded.
Never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466395</id>
	<title>Re:We just do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245944820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well they did rebuild your country after WWII.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well they did rebuild your country after WWII .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well they did rebuild your country after WWII.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119</id>
	<title>We just do...</title>
	<author>EddyPearson</author>
	<datestamp>1245943500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...what the US tells us to, don't we?</p><p>*sigh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...what the US tells us to , do n't we ?
* sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...what the US tells us to, don't we?
*sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467987</id>
	<title>Re:Naughty boys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245951840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, they probably don't want just script kiddies.<br>I'd Guess they'd want someone with a degree from the right university or have connections.<br>Getting a job right now sux, even worse if you have a criminal record.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , they probably do n't want just script kiddies.I 'd Guess they 'd want someone with a degree from the right university or have connections.Getting a job right now sux , even worse if you have a criminal record .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, they probably don't want just script kiddies.I'd Guess they'd want someone with a degree from the right university or have connections.Getting a job right now sux, even worse if you have a criminal record.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466887</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28479189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28496817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_25_139218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466617
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28479189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28496817
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466153
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28467907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28465953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466097
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_25_139218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_25_139218.28466263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
