<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_24_2023215</id>
	<title>Clutter Reaches 1.0 Release Candidate Status</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1245834720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>nerdyH writes <i>"Intel's interesting 3D UI technology has arrived at a significant milestone. Emmanuele Bassi on Monday <a href="http://moblinzone.com/blog/291/59/Release\_candidate\_for\_Clutter\_10\_arrives">released Clutter 1.0rc1</a>, commenting 'This is a development release of Clutter 0.9 leading towards the 1.0 stable cycle. It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release.' <a href="http://www.clutter-project.org/">Clutter</a> is a centerpiece of Intel's Moblin stack for netbooks, MIDs, and <a href="http://www.intel.com/design/embedded/infotainment/index.htm">IVIs</a>. It aims beyond the traditional 2D 'desktop' UI metaphor, stepping up to a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'director.' Also updated Tuesday: the Clutter-GTK+ library, aimed at helping GTK+ developers Clutter up their existing apps."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nerdyH writes " Intel 's interesting 3D UI technology has arrived at a significant milestone .
Emmanuele Bassi on Monday released Clutter 1.0rc1 , commenting 'This is a development release of Clutter 0.9 leading towards the 1.0 stable cycle .
It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release .
' Clutter is a centerpiece of Intel 's Moblin stack for netbooks , MIDs , and IVIs .
It aims beyond the traditional 2D 'desktop ' UI metaphor , stepping up to a 'theatrical ' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors ' moving around on a 3D 'stage, ' with developers in the role of 'director .
' Also updated Tuesday : the Clutter-GTK + library , aimed at helping GTK + developers Clutter up their existing apps .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nerdyH writes "Intel's interesting 3D UI technology has arrived at a significant milestone.
Emmanuele Bassi on Monday released Clutter 1.0rc1, commenting 'This is a development release of Clutter 0.9 leading towards the 1.0 stable cycle.
It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release.
' Clutter is a centerpiece of Intel's Moblin stack for netbooks, MIDs, and IVIs.
It aims beyond the traditional 2D 'desktop' UI metaphor, stepping up to a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'director.
' Also updated Tuesday: the Clutter-GTK+ library, aimed at helping GTK+ developers Clutter up their existing apps.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245842340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see and 3D in there. Looks like another simplified (read "limiting") mobile frontend, for those that never used a computer. (I have a bit or an oldschool view here, but I stand by it: "Using" for me means, you actually automated something yourself. You know. The freaking *point* of a computer.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see and 3D in there .
Looks like another simplified ( read " limiting " ) mobile frontend , for those that never used a computer .
( I have a bit or an oldschool view here , but I stand by it : " Using " for me means , you actually automated something yourself .
You know .
The freaking * point * of a computer .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see and 3D in there.
Looks like another simplified (read "limiting") mobile frontend, for those that never used a computer.
(I have a bit or an oldschool view here, but I stand by it: "Using" for me means, you actually automated something yourself.
You know.
The freaking *point* of a computer.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459675</id>
	<title>Methaphor idiocy?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245842040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or do all these 3D metaphors and even design-by-metaphor concepts look like very stupid concepts to others too?</p><p>If I design something, I do not need metaphors, and they look more like makeshifts (is that a proper English word?) for when you can't come up with ideas yourself.<br>Basically it's mostly applying existing concepts to something new, where it does not fit.</p><p>Then that thing with 3D. Everybody wants to do something new, cool, in 3D. But nobody knows what the point of it is.<br>If you want an actual 3D interface, it hat so be real 3D. Not only 3D projected onto 2D. And ideally, you have to be able to use it, like you would use a rubics cube. Including using your hands in that way.<br>If you got such a device, or are designing for such a future device, I'm sure, a good 3D interface (which in fact will be 4D) will be a benefit.<br>But until then, flat is flat is flat. If you shift it to the side, or make it animate "behind" something else, makes really no difference. It's just smoke and mirrors. And like smoke and mirrors, you will not be very efficient with it. (There's a metaphor for you. ^^)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do all these 3D metaphors and even design-by-metaphor concepts look like very stupid concepts to others too ? If I design something , I do not need metaphors , and they look more like makeshifts ( is that a proper English word ?
) for when you ca n't come up with ideas yourself.Basically it 's mostly applying existing concepts to something new , where it does not fit.Then that thing with 3D .
Everybody wants to do something new , cool , in 3D .
But nobody knows what the point of it is.If you want an actual 3D interface , it hat so be real 3D .
Not only 3D projected onto 2D .
And ideally , you have to be able to use it , like you would use a rubics cube .
Including using your hands in that way.If you got such a device , or are designing for such a future device , I 'm sure , a good 3D interface ( which in fact will be 4D ) will be a benefit.But until then , flat is flat is flat .
If you shift it to the side , or make it animate " behind " something else , makes really no difference .
It 's just smoke and mirrors .
And like smoke and mirrors , you will not be very efficient with it .
( There 's a metaphor for you .
^ ^ )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do all these 3D metaphors and even design-by-metaphor concepts look like very stupid concepts to others too?If I design something, I do not need metaphors, and they look more like makeshifts (is that a proper English word?
) for when you can't come up with ideas yourself.Basically it's mostly applying existing concepts to something new, where it does not fit.Then that thing with 3D.
Everybody wants to do something new, cool, in 3D.
But nobody knows what the point of it is.If you want an actual 3D interface, it hat so be real 3D.
Not only 3D projected onto 2D.
And ideally, you have to be able to use it, like you would use a rubics cube.
Including using your hands in that way.If you got such a device, or are designing for such a future device, I'm sure, a good 3D interface (which in fact will be 4D) will be a benefit.But until then, flat is flat is flat.
If you shift it to the side, or make it animate "behind" something else, makes really no difference.
It's just smoke and mirrors.
And like smoke and mirrors, you will not be very efficient with it.
(There's a metaphor for you.
^^)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458939</id>
	<title>First post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245838860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First post!!!!1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First post ! ! !
! 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First post!!!
!1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109</id>
	<title>Metaphor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245839460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the "desktop" metaphor really need replacing, especially with something that seems even more precious and contrived?  Maybe its just me, but I don't find these concepts useful.  I know what a "desktop" is with respect to computers, but it has lost all meaningful connection to the top of a desk.  Maybe that's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.</p><p>My sense is that the computer has been around long enough that the UI doesn't need to be imagined as a desktop, theater, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the " desktop " metaphor really need replacing , especially with something that seems even more precious and contrived ?
Maybe its just me , but I do n't find these concepts useful .
I know what a " desktop " is with respect to computers , but it has lost all meaningful connection to the top of a desk .
Maybe that 's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.My sense is that the computer has been around long enough that the UI does n't need to be imagined as a desktop , theater , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the "desktop" metaphor really need replacing, especially with something that seems even more precious and contrived?
Maybe its just me, but I don't find these concepts useful.
I know what a "desktop" is with respect to computers, but it has lost all meaningful connection to the top of a desk.
Maybe that's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.My sense is that the computer has been around long enough that the UI doesn't need to be imagined as a desktop, theater, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460337</id>
	<title>What a stupid stupid name</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1245845400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clutter. Yeah that's what I want on my desktop. Clutter! Goddamn marketing morons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clutter .
Yeah that 's what I want on my desktop .
Clutter ! Goddamn marketing morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clutter.
Yeah that's what I want on my desktop.
Clutter! Goddamn marketing morons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459525</id>
	<title>Re:Demo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245841320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYGp6iBmCyM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = AYGp6iBmCyM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYGp6iBmCyM</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458973</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459373</id>
	<title>Also know as...</title>
	<author>diegocgteleline.es</author>
	<datestamp>1245840600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The opensource equivalent of Core Animation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The opensource equivalent of Core Animation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The opensource equivalent of Core Animation</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461105</id>
	<title>Re:Wow!</title>
	<author>MostAwesomeDude</author>
	<datestamp>1245849960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wasn't aware that innovation directly translated to more stable, usable, understandable, or versatile systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't aware that innovation directly translated to more stable , usable , understandable , or versatile systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't aware that innovation directly translated to more stable, usable, understandable, or versatile systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463719</id>
	<title>Sup dawg, I put a computer in your desktop...</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1245961920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe that's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.</p></div><p>Ah!  So you're saying the typical Desktop (on your computer, on your desk) should display a VM with a computer in it, showing a desktop with a computer, to stick with the easy-to-grok desktop metaphor, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that 's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.Ah !
So you 're saying the typical Desktop ( on your computer , on your desk ) should display a VM with a computer in it , showing a desktop with a computer , to stick with the easy-to-grok desktop metaphor , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that's because the only thing typically found on my desk is a computer.Ah!
So you're saying the typical Desktop (on your computer, on your desk) should display a VM with a computer in it, showing a desktop with a computer, to stick with the easy-to-grok desktop metaphor, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464725</id>
	<title>Re:What a stupid stupid name</title>
	<author>ebassi</author>
	<datestamp>1245933420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clutter is an open source project that has been around since 2005, and "marketing morons" have nothing to do with its name. and since it's an API to create applications, toolkits and desktop environment, then you won't have Clutter on your desktop, but your desktop will use Clutter internally.</p><p>oooh, it was a pun on the name! now, I get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clutter is an open source project that has been around since 2005 , and " marketing morons " have nothing to do with its name .
and since it 's an API to create applications , toolkits and desktop environment , then you wo n't have Clutter on your desktop , but your desktop will use Clutter internally.oooh , it was a pun on the name !
now , I get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clutter is an open source project that has been around since 2005, and "marketing morons" have nothing to do with its name.
and since it's an API to create applications, toolkits and desktop environment, then you won't have Clutter on your desktop, but your desktop will use Clutter internally.oooh, it was a pun on the name!
now, I get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458973</id>
	<title>Demo</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1245838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any demonstrations of the technology in action?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any demonstrations of the technology in action ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any demonstrations of the technology in action?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28472257</id>
	<title>don't understand</title>
	<author>z-j-y</author>
	<datestamp>1245924060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'director.'</p> </div><p>what is a theater? and stage? never heard of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a 'theatrical ' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors ' moving around on a 3D 'stage, ' with developers in the role of 'director .
' what is a theater ?
and stage ?
never heard of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'director.
' what is a theater?
and stage?
never heard of.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>ebassi</author>
	<datestamp>1245839940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a video? like, I don't know, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFJaDy6ySbU" title="youtube.com">this one</a> [youtube.com]?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>the Moblin 2.0 UI for netbooks is probably the best showcase of what Clutter can do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a video ?
like , I do n't know , this one [ youtube.com ] ?
: - ) the Moblin 2.0 UI for netbooks is probably the best showcase of what Clutter can do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a video?
like, I don't know, this one [youtube.com]?
:-)the Moblin 2.0 UI for netbooks is probably the best showcase of what Clutter can do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28466213</id>
	<title>Clutter on embedded devices</title>
	<author>CakeOrDeath</author>
	<datestamp>1245943920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With OpenGL cores becoming more prevalent on SoC (System-on-Chip) devices - e.g. TI's OMAP3530 or Broadcom's 7413 - there's a lot more you can achieve graphically on your mobile phone, set-top box etc. despite the relatively slow CPU core which enables the device the be designed and built cheaply. I have a project which targets these types of devices and so spent a few days playing with Clutter. I came away impressed.
<br>
<br>
It presents a very simple C API for building up 3D scenes using 2D objects (images, text etc.), hiding the complexities of OpenGL from you, as well as the differences between OpenGL-ES (as you are likely to find in the embedded world) and OpenGL proper (as you will find on your desktop PC). As well building up your scene, Clutter handles animation. You can say "rotate this group of objects 45 degrees around the Z axis in 2 seconds, 'easing' them in towards the end". You can also animate along paths, 'animate' opacity etc.
<br>
<br>
Note that the idea behind Clutter isn't to produce 3D virtual worlds: more to use 3D effects to spice up a 2D UI - think Compiz, OS X effects etc.
<br>
<br>
Another bonus for when you are targetting embedded devices is that Clutter can do the time critical stuff using fixed-point arithmetic: important if you don't have an FPU.
<br>
<br>
The docs are a little sparse but are sufficient when used hand-in-hand with the demo code. The only other criticism I had was that some of the examples were out-of-sync with latest commits of the library itself but this may have been addressed in the 6 months or so since I played with Clutter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With OpenGL cores becoming more prevalent on SoC ( System-on-Chip ) devices - e.g .
TI 's OMAP3530 or Broadcom 's 7413 - there 's a lot more you can achieve graphically on your mobile phone , set-top box etc .
despite the relatively slow CPU core which enables the device the be designed and built cheaply .
I have a project which targets these types of devices and so spent a few days playing with Clutter .
I came away impressed .
It presents a very simple C API for building up 3D scenes using 2D objects ( images , text etc .
) , hiding the complexities of OpenGL from you , as well as the differences between OpenGL-ES ( as you are likely to find in the embedded world ) and OpenGL proper ( as you will find on your desktop PC ) .
As well building up your scene , Clutter handles animation .
You can say " rotate this group of objects 45 degrees around the Z axis in 2 seconds , 'easing ' them in towards the end " .
You can also animate along paths , 'animate ' opacity etc .
Note that the idea behind Clutter is n't to produce 3D virtual worlds : more to use 3D effects to spice up a 2D UI - think Compiz , OS X effects etc .
Another bonus for when you are targetting embedded devices is that Clutter can do the time critical stuff using fixed-point arithmetic : important if you do n't have an FPU .
The docs are a little sparse but are sufficient when used hand-in-hand with the demo code .
The only other criticism I had was that some of the examples were out-of-sync with latest commits of the library itself but this may have been addressed in the 6 months or so since I played with Clutter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With OpenGL cores becoming more prevalent on SoC (System-on-Chip) devices - e.g.
TI's OMAP3530 or Broadcom's 7413 - there's a lot more you can achieve graphically on your mobile phone, set-top box etc.
despite the relatively slow CPU core which enables the device the be designed and built cheaply.
I have a project which targets these types of devices and so spent a few days playing with Clutter.
I came away impressed.
It presents a very simple C API for building up 3D scenes using 2D objects (images, text etc.
), hiding the complexities of OpenGL from you, as well as the differences between OpenGL-ES (as you are likely to find in the embedded world) and OpenGL proper (as you will find on your desktop PC).
As well building up your scene, Clutter handles animation.
You can say "rotate this group of objects 45 degrees around the Z axis in 2 seconds, 'easing' them in towards the end".
You can also animate along paths, 'animate' opacity etc.
Note that the idea behind Clutter isn't to produce 3D virtual worlds: more to use 3D effects to spice up a 2D UI - think Compiz, OS X effects etc.
Another bonus for when you are targetting embedded devices is that Clutter can do the time critical stuff using fixed-point arithmetic: important if you don't have an FPU.
The docs are a little sparse but are sufficient when used hand-in-hand with the demo code.
The only other criticism I had was that some of the examples were out-of-sync with latest commits of the library itself but this may have been addressed in the 6 months or so since I played with Clutter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458959</id>
	<title>AC Reached 1.0 Post Status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nerdyGayLinuxUser writes</p><p>"AC's interesting 1P technology has arrived at a significant milestone. Rob Malda on Monday released Post 1.0rc1, commenting 'This is a development release of Post 0.9 leading towards the Post 1.0 stable cycle. It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release.' In other words, it's yet another bug fix of yet another in a long line of poorly written, cobbled together with duct tape and twine, Open Source Projects.</p><p>Post is a centerpiece of AC's frosty stack for netbooks, MIDs, and IVIs, whatever the fuck those things are. It aims beyond the traditional 'ordinal posts' metaphors, stepping up to a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 1P interface objects are likened to 'gay porn actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'fluffers.' In other words, this thing is a massive piece of shit that even it's author cannot justify any need for. Also updated Tuesday: the Cluster-Fuck-GTK++ library, aimed at helping GTK+ developers Cluster-Fuck-Up their existing apps."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nerdyGayLinuxUser writes " AC 's interesting 1P technology has arrived at a significant milestone .
Rob Malda on Monday released Post 1.0rc1 , commenting 'This is a development release of Post 0.9 leading towards the Post 1.0 stable cycle .
It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release .
' In other words , it 's yet another bug fix of yet another in a long line of poorly written , cobbled together with duct tape and twine , Open Source Projects.Post is a centerpiece of AC 's frosty stack for netbooks , MIDs , and IVIs , whatever the fuck those things are .
It aims beyond the traditional 'ordinal posts ' metaphors , stepping up to a 'theatrical ' metaphor in which 1P interface objects are likened to 'gay porn actors ' moving around on a 3D 'stage, ' with developers in the role of 'fluffers .
' In other words , this thing is a massive piece of shit that even it 's author can not justify any need for .
Also updated Tuesday : the Cluster-Fuck-GTK + + library , aimed at helping GTK + developers Cluster-Fuck-Up their existing apps .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nerdyGayLinuxUser writes"AC's interesting 1P technology has arrived at a significant milestone.
Rob Malda on Monday released Post 1.0rc1, commenting 'This is a development release of Post 0.9 leading towards the Post 1.0 stable cycle.
It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release.
' In other words, it's yet another bug fix of yet another in a long line of poorly written, cobbled together with duct tape and twine, Open Source Projects.Post is a centerpiece of AC's frosty stack for netbooks, MIDs, and IVIs, whatever the fuck those things are.
It aims beyond the traditional 'ordinal posts' metaphors, stepping up to a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 1P interface objects are likened to 'gay porn actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'fluffers.
' In other words, this thing is a massive piece of shit that even it's author cannot justify any need for.
Also updated Tuesday: the Cluster-Fuck-GTK++ library, aimed at helping GTK+ developers Cluster-Fuck-Up their existing apps.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459649</id>
	<title>what version?</title>
	<author>Bill Dog</author>
	<datestamp>1245841800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Clutter 1.0rc1</p></div></blockquote><p>The next version: 2.0gre2</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clutter 1.0rc1The next version : 2.0gre2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clutter 1.0rc1The next version: 2.0gre2
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462271</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Nekomusume</author>
	<datestamp>1245858900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would it have anything to do with clustering? It's called CLUTTER. It should be making a mess. And really, I can mess up my desktop enough on my own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would it have anything to do with clustering ?
It 's called CLUTTER .
It should be making a mess .
And really , I can mess up my desktop enough on my own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would it have anything to do with clustering?
It's called CLUTTER.
It should be making a mess.
And really, I can mess up my desktop enough on my own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087</id>
	<title>Screenshot</title>
	<author>johannesg</author>
	<datestamp>1245839400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would it really kill them to stick a screenshot in there, or even better, a movie? Especially since this is, you know, a graphical application?</p><p>This really is a common failing of too many open source applications. Not only are we supposed to guess that "cluster" has nothing to do with clustering in any shape or form, but its graphical prowess, its entire reason for being, must be guessed at by nothing more than a wall of text.</p><p>Well, maybe I shouldn't complain. They do actually tell us what it is supposed to do, right there on the front page...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it really kill them to stick a screenshot in there , or even better , a movie ?
Especially since this is , you know , a graphical application ? This really is a common failing of too many open source applications .
Not only are we supposed to guess that " cluster " has nothing to do with clustering in any shape or form , but its graphical prowess , its entire reason for being , must be guessed at by nothing more than a wall of text.Well , maybe I should n't complain .
They do actually tell us what it is supposed to do , right there on the front page.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it really kill them to stick a screenshot in there, or even better, a movie?
Especially since this is, you know, a graphical application?This really is a common failing of too many open source applications.
Not only are we supposed to guess that "cluster" has nothing to do with clustering in any shape or form, but its graphical prowess, its entire reason for being, must be guessed at by nothing more than a wall of text.Well, maybe I shouldn't complain.
They do actually tell us what it is supposed to do, right there on the front page...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461291</id>
	<title>Re:Metaphor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245851400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more precious?  more capricious?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more precious ?
more capricious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more precious?
more capricious?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460631</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>strawberryutopia</author>
	<datestamp>1245846780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it's 3D in the same way that Firefox could be described as being 3D? i.e. 2D pages + 1D line of tabs = 3D? If you have several Firefox windows open, does that make it 4D? What if you have several of these on each workspace? 5D?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it 's 3D in the same way that Firefox could be described as being 3D ?
i.e. 2D pages + 1D line of tabs = 3D ?
If you have several Firefox windows open , does that make it 4D ?
What if you have several of these on each workspace ?
5D ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it's 3D in the same way that Firefox could be described as being 3D?
i.e. 2D pages + 1D line of tabs = 3D?
If you have several Firefox windows open, does that make it 4D?
What if you have several of these on each workspace?
5D?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459333</id>
	<title>Re:Intel Cleanup Follows?</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1245840360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're revamping their whole product line with names like this.</p><p>New laser mouse: Jitter<br>New graphics card: Splatter<br>New sound card: Sputter<br>New CPU: Plodder<br>New speech synthesis software: Mutter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're revamping their whole product line with names like this.New laser mouse : JitterNew graphics card : SplatterNew sound card : SputterNew CPU : PlodderNew speech synthesis software : Mutter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're revamping their whole product line with names like this.New laser mouse: JitterNew graphics card: SplatterNew sound card: SputterNew CPU: PlodderNew speech synthesis software: Mutter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28471795</id>
	<title>Re:Sup dawg, I put a computer in your desktop...</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1245922680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In order to complete your scenario, there has to be some moron challenging him via a post from some unknown (and uncared about) location through a website that was once populated by intelligent computer hackers that has long since been over-ridden by the like of you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to complete your scenario , there has to be some moron challenging him via a post from some unknown ( and uncared about ) location through a website that was once populated by intelligent computer hackers that has long since been over-ridden by the like of you ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to complete your scenario, there has to be some moron challenging him via a post from some unknown (and uncared about) location through a website that was once populated by intelligent computer hackers that has long since been over-ridden by the like of you ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460335</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>rmdir -r *</author>
	<datestamp>1245845340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's an API, not an application....</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an API , not an application... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an API, not an application....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459981</id>
	<title>Re:Wow!</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1245843660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many have tried, but we're still using the basic old idea.  Probably because anything anybody has come up with since has looked cool but turned out to be a usability nightmare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many have tried , but we 're still using the basic old idea .
Probably because anything anybody has come up with since has looked cool but turned out to be a usability nightmare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many have tried, but we're still using the basic old idea.
Probably because anything anybody has come up with since has looked cool but turned out to be a usability nightmare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459075</id>
	<title>Willy on wheels!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245839340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine your willy being smacked until it bleeds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine your willy being smacked until it bleeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine your willy being smacked until it bleeds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458989</id>
	<title>Intel Cleanup Follows?</title>
	<author>Heinsight</author>
	<datestamp>1245839040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a really bad name for a 3D UI. Next up they'll come up with a way to lose files as you save them, just like your car keys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a really bad name for a 3D UI .
Next up they 'll come up with a way to lose files as you save them , just like your car keys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a really bad name for a 3D UI.
Next up they'll come up with a way to lose files as you save them, just like your car keys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28473509</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1245928980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? I see a lot more than that... I see a few quick and easy ways to do the same thing, intuitive design like quickly opening recent files, applications and browser tabs through the Clutter engine for example should greatly speed up productivity. Considering it's open-source and extendable, the sky should be the limit too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I see a lot more than that... I see a few quick and easy ways to do the same thing , intuitive design like quickly opening recent files , applications and browser tabs through the Clutter engine for example should greatly speed up productivity .
Considering it 's open-source and extendable , the sky should be the limit too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I see a lot more than that... I see a few quick and easy ways to do the same thing, intuitive design like quickly opening recent files, applications and browser tabs through the Clutter engine for example should greatly speed up productivity.
Considering it's open-source and extendable, the sky should be the limit too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459345</id>
	<title>Prior Art Claim</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245840420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will have you know that I have been a master for over three decades of creating the most stable CLUTTER in every room that I inhabit.  It also acts as a deterrent to those who would trespass since by them merely passing through the area, it would inevitably cause a "deskalanche" that I could blame on them.</p><p>Oh well, should have patented this....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will have you know that I have been a master for over three decades of creating the most stable CLUTTER in every room that I inhabit .
It also acts as a deterrent to those who would trespass since by them merely passing through the area , it would inevitably cause a " deskalanche " that I could blame on them.Oh well , should have patented this... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will have you know that I have been a master for over three decades of creating the most stable CLUTTER in every room that I inhabit.
It also acts as a deterrent to those who would trespass since by them merely passing through the area, it would inevitably cause a "deskalanche" that I could blame on them.Oh well, should have patented this....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462255</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245858720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the best I can tell this appears to only to have been an iteration on the "Start Menu" and a terrible one at that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the best I can tell this appears to only to have been an iteration on the " Start Menu " and a terrible one at that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the best I can tell this appears to only to have been an iteration on the "Start Menu" and a terrible one at that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461427</id>
	<title>mo3 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245852600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>poor dead last fa7e.  Let's not be and Michael Smith</htmltext>
<tokenext>poor dead last fa7e .
Let 's not be and Michael Smith</tokentext>
<sentencetext>poor dead last fa7e.
Let's not be and Michael Smith</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459957</id>
	<title>OT: your sig</title>
	<author>ConceptJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1245843540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might want to fix the typo in your sig: "Analysis"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to fix the typo in your sig : " Analysis "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to fix the typo in your sig: "Analysis"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459607</id>
	<title>Plasma</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245841680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And still nowhere near as impressive as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGPtYF4vs8k" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [youtube.com]


(<a href="http://www.notmart.org/misc/plasma-mid-early.ogv" title="notmart.org" rel="nofollow">ogg version</a> [notmart.org])</htmltext>
<tokenext>And still nowhere near as impressive as this [ youtube.com ] ( ogg version [ notmart.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And still nowhere near as impressive as this [youtube.com]


(ogg version [notmart.org])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459853</id>
	<title>Re:Wow!</title>
	<author>AlexanderTe</author>
	<datestamp>1245843000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Feel free to mod me down if this is regarded as spam, but I'm working on a UI called Brevity, which will be based on Clutter.<br>
<br>
The idea is to create a user interface that is like a huge wall that can be zoomed in and out of. You'll have apps that run where you start them, and you start them by clicking on an empty space on the wall. A 3x3 app launcher will pop up around the mouse pointer with the browser in the middle.<br>
<br>
It's still in the early development, but you can follow my blog at <a href="http://brevityos.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://brevityos.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Feel free to mod me down if this is regarded as spam , but I 'm working on a UI called Brevity , which will be based on Clutter .
The idea is to create a user interface that is like a huge wall that can be zoomed in and out of .
You 'll have apps that run where you start them , and you start them by clicking on an empty space on the wall .
A 3x3 app launcher will pop up around the mouse pointer with the browser in the middle .
It 's still in the early development , but you can follow my blog at http : //brevityos.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feel free to mod me down if this is regarded as spam, but I'm working on a UI called Brevity, which will be based on Clutter.
The idea is to create a user interface that is like a huge wall that can be zoomed in and out of.
You'll have apps that run where you start them, and you start them by clicking on an empty space on the wall.
A 3x3 app launcher will pop up around the mouse pointer with the browser in the middle.
It's still in the early development, but you can follow my blog at http://brevityos.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459597</id>
	<title>No screenshots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245841620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
After struggling through the site, it looks like a big mess that solves no useful problem. I can't find any screenshots, either.  Here's the <a href="http://www.clutter-project.org/presentations/clutter-foo/slide-00.html" title="clutter-project.org">slide show from a conference</a> [clutter-project.org].  But it has exactly one graphic, and that's part of a discussion of how you can use arbitrary functions, like "sine", on the alpha channel.  (Using "sine" on the alpha channel is basically the &lt;BLINK&gt; tag revisited.)
</p><p>
Worse, this is a toolkit for C applications.  It's not for web use.  It's not 3D enough for game development, and it's too much for business applications.  Layout has to be done at the programmer level; there aren't GUI tools for layout. (Some games use Flash for 2D GUI elements, not because they run the Adobe/Macromedia Flash run-time engine, but because the tools for developing Flash are available and usable by artists.)
</p><p>
There's nothing inherently wrong with running a 2D GUI through OpenGL; we were doing that in 1997.  Softimage|3D worked that way.  But it's kind of dated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After struggling through the site , it looks like a big mess that solves no useful problem .
I ca n't find any screenshots , either .
Here 's the slide show from a conference [ clutter-project.org ] .
But it has exactly one graphic , and that 's part of a discussion of how you can use arbitrary functions , like " sine " , on the alpha channel .
( Using " sine " on the alpha channel is basically the tag revisited .
) Worse , this is a toolkit for C applications .
It 's not for web use .
It 's not 3D enough for game development , and it 's too much for business applications .
Layout has to be done at the programmer level ; there are n't GUI tools for layout .
( Some games use Flash for 2D GUI elements , not because they run the Adobe/Macromedia Flash run-time engine , but because the tools for developing Flash are available and usable by artists .
) There 's nothing inherently wrong with running a 2D GUI through OpenGL ; we were doing that in 1997 .
Softimage | 3D worked that way .
But it 's kind of dated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
After struggling through the site, it looks like a big mess that solves no useful problem.
I can't find any screenshots, either.
Here's the slide show from a conference [clutter-project.org].
But it has exactly one graphic, and that's part of a discussion of how you can use arbitrary functions, like "sine", on the alpha channel.
(Using "sine" on the alpha channel is basically the  tag revisited.
)

Worse, this is a toolkit for C applications.
It's not for web use.
It's not 3D enough for game development, and it's too much for business applications.
Layout has to be done at the programmer level; there aren't GUI tools for layout.
(Some games use Flash for 2D GUI elements, not because they run the Adobe/Macromedia Flash run-time engine, but because the tools for developing Flash are available and usable by artists.
)

There's nothing inherently wrong with running a 2D GUI through OpenGL; we were doing that in 1997.
Softimage|3D worked that way.
But it's kind of dated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464661</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245932160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2d data in a 3d space???? Looks more like 3D data CRAMMED into a 2d space...disgustingly so, I might add.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2d data in a 3d space ? ? ? ?
Looks more like 3D data CRAMMED into a 2d space...disgustingly so , I might add .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2d data in a 3d space????
Looks more like 3D data CRAMMED into a 2d space...disgustingly so, I might add.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who would have known that the future of Computer Desktop UI would look exactly like a SQL error..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>I honestly would love to see some real innovation in the desktop UI  everything else has been nothing morethat adding lipstick and high heels to the old X system from the early years.  (Yes even windows 7 and the new osx is a pig in a dress.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would have known that the future of Computer Desktop UI would look exactly like a SQL error.. : - ) I honestly would love to see some real innovation in the desktop UI everything else has been nothing morethat adding lipstick and high heels to the old X system from the early years .
( Yes even windows 7 and the new osx is a pig in a dress .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would have known that the future of Computer Desktop UI would look exactly like a SQL error.. :-)I honestly would love to see some real innovation in the desktop UI  everything else has been nothing morethat adding lipstick and high heels to the old X system from the early years.
(Yes even windows 7 and the new osx is a pig in a dress.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460359</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245845460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears to be a clone of Apple's Quartz 2D (potentially at the widget level, rather than the window level, i.e., beyond Apple have managed because Q2D Extreme never appeared) and Core Animation, but with direct access to OpenGL shaders and functions. There's video functionality as well. Basically a set of APIs selected for being good, that cover a lot of functionality that a modern desktop OS should have. This dictat will get rid of some of the confusion over Linux interfaces, possibly. You can probably implement Gnome and KDE on top of it. I have no idea.</p><p>And the clutter webpage does mention to go to the Clutter Blog to see screenshots. If I can get the site to open, that is. No, wait, no screenshots on the Blog, despite the promise. Then again, it is a lower level collection of APIs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears to be a clone of Apple 's Quartz 2D ( potentially at the widget level , rather than the window level , i.e. , beyond Apple have managed because Q2D Extreme never appeared ) and Core Animation , but with direct access to OpenGL shaders and functions .
There 's video functionality as well .
Basically a set of APIs selected for being good , that cover a lot of functionality that a modern desktop OS should have .
This dictat will get rid of some of the confusion over Linux interfaces , possibly .
You can probably implement Gnome and KDE on top of it .
I have no idea.And the clutter webpage does mention to go to the Clutter Blog to see screenshots .
If I can get the site to open , that is .
No , wait , no screenshots on the Blog , despite the promise .
Then again , it is a lower level collection of APIs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears to be a clone of Apple's Quartz 2D (potentially at the widget level, rather than the window level, i.e., beyond Apple have managed because Q2D Extreme never appeared) and Core Animation, but with direct access to OpenGL shaders and functions.
There's video functionality as well.
Basically a set of APIs selected for being good, that cover a lot of functionality that a modern desktop OS should have.
This dictat will get rid of some of the confusion over Linux interfaces, possibly.
You can probably implement Gnome and KDE on top of it.
I have no idea.And the clutter webpage does mention to go to the Clutter Blog to see screenshots.
If I can get the site to open, that is.
No, wait, no screenshots on the Blog, despite the promise.
Then again, it is a lower level collection of APIs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463579</id>
	<title>Re:Screenshot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245960420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>thats not clutter, clutter is more like that table MS showed months ago, it's driven by touch, someone put a video ^^</htmltext>
<tokenext>thats not clutter , clutter is more like that table MS showed months ago , it 's driven by touch , someone put a video ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thats not clutter, clutter is more like that table MS showed months ago, it's driven by touch, someone put a video ^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459619</id>
	<title>informative CUmC0m</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245841680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">declined in market the accounting I see the same since then. More Their hand...she and/or distribute people playing can FreeBSD showed That has grown up a child knows some intelligent another special their hand...she own agenda - give purposes *BSD is minutes. At home, 4, which by all They are Com3 to use the GNAA If you answered Go of the minutiae Trying to dissect problems that I've handy, you are free dead. It is a dead where it belongs, just yet, but I'm bombshell hit on baby...don't Knows for sure what *BSD has steadily of business and of open-source. rivalry. While with process and Mire of decay, already dead. It is is not prone to about bylaws create, manufacture endless conflict and as BSD sinks join in. It can be</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>declined in market the accounting I see the same since then .
More Their hand...she and/or distribute people playing can FreeBSD showed That has grown up a child knows some intelligent another special their hand...she own agenda - give purposes * BSD is minutes .
At home , 4 , which by all They are Com3 to use the GNAA If you answered Go of the minutiae Trying to dissect problems that I 've handy , you are free dead .
It is a dead where it belongs , just yet , but I 'm bombshell hit on baby...do n't Knows for sure what * BSD has steadily of business and of open-source .
rivalry. While with process and Mire of decay , already dead .
It is is not prone to about bylaws create , manufacture endless conflict and as BSD sinks join in .
It can be [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>declined in market the accounting I see the same since then.
More Their hand...she and/or distribute people playing can FreeBSD showed That has grown up a child knows some intelligent another special their hand...she own agenda - give purposes *BSD is minutes.
At home, 4, which by all They are Com3 to use the GNAA If you answered Go of the minutiae Trying to dissect problems that I've handy, you are free dead.
It is a dead where it belongs, just yet, but I'm bombshell hit on baby...don't Knows for sure what *BSD has steadily of business and of open-source.
rivalry. While with process and Mire of decay, already dead.
It is is not prone to about bylaws create, manufacture endless conflict and as BSD sinks join in.
It can be [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460015</id>
	<title>Re:Intel Cleanup Follows?</title>
	<author>ConceptJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1245843840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget the new site to allow blogging, but only in a form that is too abbreviated to be meaningful:  Twitter</p><p>(Is Twitter anything like reading Slashdot if they only included the sigs?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the new site to allow blogging , but only in a form that is too abbreviated to be meaningful : Twitter ( Is Twitter anything like reading Slashdot if they only included the sigs ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the new site to allow blogging, but only in a form that is too abbreviated to be meaningful:  Twitter(Is Twitter anything like reading Slashdot if they only included the sigs?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459333</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28473509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28471795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_2023215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459735
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460631
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28473509
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464661
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28462255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459957
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28464725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459525
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28463719
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28471795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459597
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28461105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_2023215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28458989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28459333
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_2023215.28460015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
