<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_24_197241</id>
	<title>Pentagon Confirms Cyber Command, Under NSA Control</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1245872340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nsacct.org/index.asp" rel="nofollow">eldavojohn</a> writes <i>"The Pentagon's <a href="//news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/22/1333216&amp;tid=103">been planning a cyber command</a> for a while now but it's just been confirmed.  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE55M78920090624?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=technologyNews">The Pentagon will set up a Cyber Command outfit</a> most likely around &mdash; surprise surprise &mdash; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National\_Security\_Agency">Fort George G. Meade in Maryland</a>.  From the article, 'The head of the Cyber Command would also be the director of the U.S. National Security Agency, which conducts electronic surveillance and communications interception and is also based at Fort Meade.'  The Air Force has been <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/07/2139247&amp;tid=265">no stranger to digital warfare</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " The Pentagon 's been planning a cyber command for a while now but it 's just been confirmed .
The Pentagon will set up a Cyber Command outfit most likely around    surprise surprise    Fort George G. Meade in Maryland .
From the article , 'The head of the Cyber Command would also be the director of the U.S. National Security Agency , which conducts electronic surveillance and communications interception and is also based at Fort Meade .
' The Air Force has been no stranger to digital warfare .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "The Pentagon's been planning a cyber command for a while now but it's just been confirmed.
The Pentagon will set up a Cyber Command outfit most likely around — surprise surprise — Fort George G. Meade in Maryland.
From the article, 'The head of the Cyber Command would also be the director of the U.S. National Security Agency, which conducts electronic surveillance and communications interception and is also based at Fort Meade.
'  The Air Force has been no stranger to digital warfare.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009</id>
	<title>Re:one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245835620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>we're in an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario. </i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere. We here down south would probably be just fine. Actually a bit of cool weather would be a nice change. That way we could chill out as we watch the giant man eating parrots mutate into being in our jungles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we 're in an " end of human civilization as we know it " scenario .
      I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere .
We here down south would probably be just fine .
Actually a bit of cool weather would be a nice change .
That way we could chill out as we watch the giant man eating parrots mutate into being in our jungles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we're in an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario.
      I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere.
We here down south would probably be just fine.
Actually a bit of cool weather would be a nice change.
That way we could chill out as we watch the giant man eating parrots mutate into being in our jungles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458111</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1245836040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon, and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C.

It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.</p></div></blockquote><p>


I wouldn't worry too much about that if I were you. Four out of those five offices are not really designed for defensive purposes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The NSA , FBI , CIA , Pentagon , and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C . It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack .
I would n't worry too much about that if I were you .
Four out of those five offices are not really designed for defensive purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon, and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C.

It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.
I wouldn't worry too much about that if I were you.
Four out of those five offices are not really designed for defensive purposes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459397</id>
	<title>FirsT 4ost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245840720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">sling, return it to Hou5e... pathetic.</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>sling , return it to Hou5e... pathetic. [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sling, return it to Hou5e... pathetic. [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28461459</id>
	<title>Re:one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>Repossessed</author>
	<datestamp>1245852840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Current thought is that if nukes are used it will be only one or two, either a rogue nation or terrorists using what they have.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Current thought is that if nukes are used it will be only one or two , either a rogue nation or terrorists using what they have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Current thought is that if nukes are used it will be only one or two, either a rogue nation or terrorists using what they have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28465969</id>
	<title>NSA is the natural choice</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1245942660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those of you wondering why this is being put into the hands of the NSA, it's because they already do this stuff.<p><div class="quote"><p>Our Information Assurance mission confronts the formidable challenge of preventing foreign adversaries from gaining access to sensitive or classified national security information. Our Signals Intelligence mission collects, processes, and disseminates intelligence information from foreign signals for intelligence and counterintelligence purposes and to support military operations. This Agency also enables Network Warfare operations to defeat terrorists and their organizations at home and abroad, consistent with U.S. laws and the protection of privacy and civil liberties.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you wondering why this is being put into the hands of the NSA , it 's because they already do this stuff.Our Information Assurance mission confronts the formidable challenge of preventing foreign adversaries from gaining access to sensitive or classified national security information .
Our Signals Intelligence mission collects , processes , and disseminates intelligence information from foreign signals for intelligence and counterintelligence purposes and to support military operations .
This Agency also enables Network Warfare operations to defeat terrorists and their organizations at home and abroad , consistent with U.S. laws and the protection of privacy and civil liberties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you wondering why this is being put into the hands of the NSA, it's because they already do this stuff.Our Information Assurance mission confronts the formidable challenge of preventing foreign adversaries from gaining access to sensitive or classified national security information.
Our Signals Intelligence mission collects, processes, and disseminates intelligence information from foreign signals for intelligence and counterintelligence purposes and to support military operations.
This Agency also enables Network Warfare operations to defeat terrorists and their organizations at home and abroad, consistent with U.S. laws and the protection of privacy and civil liberties.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28463167</id>
	<title>Is the U.S. going virtual?</title>
	<author>azgard</author>
	<datestamp>1245868980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's exciting news!</p><p>After virtual economy, which created virtual wealth for everyone, comes virtual warfare, which will allow the U.S. to maintain its virtual supremacy everywhere in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's exciting news ! After virtual economy , which created virtual wealth for everyone , comes virtual warfare , which will allow the U.S. to maintain its virtual supremacy everywhere in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's exciting news!After virtual economy, which created virtual wealth for everyone, comes virtual warfare, which will allow the U.S. to maintain its virtual supremacy everywhere in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28462775</id>
	<title>Cybering is none of their business</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245864360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How two (or more) consenting adults choose to engage in some cybering in the privacy of their own chatroom is none of the governments business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How two ( or more ) consenting adults choose to engage in some cybering in the privacy of their own chatroom is none of the governments business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How two (or more) consenting adults choose to engage in some cybering in the privacy of their own chatroom is none of the governments business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28460047</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1245844020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go on use your handguns against tanks and unmanned killer drones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go on use your handguns against tanks and unmanned killer drones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go on use your handguns against tanks and unmanned killer drones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775</id>
	<title>Uh-oh...</title>
	<author>Christoff9</author>
	<datestamp>1245834720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet\_(fictional)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Skynet</a> [wikipedia.org] takes over? I'm not ready for Judgment Day. I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this when Skynet [ wikipedia.org ] takes over ?
I 'm not ready for Judgment Day .
I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I ca n't walk away from a commitment like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this when Skynet [wikipedia.org] takes over?
I'm not ready for Judgment Day.
I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458043</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1245835800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, if we are invaded, we wouldn't have the right to attack the invaders. At least that's the principle we live by in Iraq.</p></div><p>Forgive me for replying twice, but the stupidity of the comment warrants it.</p><p>So, what you are suggesting is that an invading army, after taking control of a country, should grant rights to the population to shoot at them?  Really?  "Attention all citizens of the Solar Federation: We have assumed control.  However, feel free to break out your guns and shoot at us whenever you like.  We are not the type to take away your rights to kill us so please, if you see one of our soldiers walking down the street, you are well within your right to shoot at him/her.  We'll understand and do what we can to make ourselves an easier target to hit.  If you are unable to hit a moving target, please ask our soldiers to stand still while you hone your shooting skills."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , if we are invaded , we would n't have the right to attack the invaders .
At least that 's the principle we live by in Iraq.Forgive me for replying twice , but the stupidity of the comment warrants it.So , what you are suggesting is that an invading army , after taking control of a country , should grant rights to the population to shoot at them ?
Really ? " Attention all citizens of the Solar Federation : We have assumed control .
However , feel free to break out your guns and shoot at us whenever you like .
We are not the type to take away your rights to kill us so please , if you see one of our soldiers walking down the street , you are well within your right to shoot at him/her .
We 'll understand and do what we can to make ourselves an easier target to hit .
If you are unable to hit a moving target , please ask our soldiers to stand still while you hone your shooting skills .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, if we are invaded, we wouldn't have the right to attack the invaders.
At least that's the principle we live by in Iraq.Forgive me for replying twice, but the stupidity of the comment warrants it.So, what you are suggesting is that an invading army, after taking control of a country, should grant rights to the population to shoot at them?
Really?  "Attention all citizens of the Solar Federation: We have assumed control.
However, feel free to break out your guns and shoot at us whenever you like.
We are not the type to take away your rights to kill us so please, if you see one of our soldiers walking down the street, you are well within your right to shoot at him/her.
We'll understand and do what we can to make ourselves an easier target to hit.
If you are unable to hit a moving target, please ask our soldiers to stand still while you hone your shooting skills.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459761</id>
	<title>The NSA in command</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1245842460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, why does that scare the hell out of me.</p><p>Hey, what is that black van outs... *click*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , why does that scare the hell out of me.Hey , what is that black van outs... * click *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, why does that scare the hell out of me.Hey, what is that black van outs... *click*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28460541</id>
	<title>Aware of this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245846300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The NSA has recruited a university friend of mine to drive (blindfolded, he joked) to Maryland to participate in their cyber warfare program. He told me four months ago that it was NSA organized. The news isn't exactly a big secret: rather, recruiting very young people into the program sounds like it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The NSA has recruited a university friend of mine to drive ( blindfolded , he joked ) to Maryland to participate in their cyber warfare program .
He told me four months ago that it was NSA organized .
The news is n't exactly a big secret : rather , recruiting very young people into the program sounds like it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NSA has recruited a university friend of mine to drive (blindfolded, he joked) to Maryland to participate in their cyber warfare program.
He told me four months ago that it was NSA organized.
The news isn't exactly a big secret: rather, recruiting very young people into the program sounds like it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459849</id>
	<title>Re:Uh-oh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245842940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is this when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet\_(fictional)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Skynet</a> [wikipedia.org] takes over? I'm not ready for Judgment Day. I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.</p></div><p>+1 for Futurama reference.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this when Skynet [ wikipedia.org ] takes over ?
I 'm not ready for Judgment Day .
I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I ca n't walk away from a commitment like that. + 1 for Futurama reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this when Skynet [wikipedia.org] takes over?
I'm not ready for Judgment Day.
I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.+1 for Futurama reference.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28460017</id>
	<title>Excellent use of taxpayers money</title>
	<author>afxgrin</author>
	<datestamp>1245843900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just imagine how much time will be wasted idling on IRC channels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just imagine how much time will be wasted idling on IRC channels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just imagine how much time will be wasted idling on IRC channels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28468191</id>
	<title>Strange World</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1245952620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come to that, why not put it under USAMRIID? Doesn't their charter include military investigations into criminal abuses of science and technology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come to that , why not put it under USAMRIID ?
Does n't their charter include military investigations into criminal abuses of science and technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come to that, why not put it under USAMRIID?
Doesn't their charter include military investigations into criminal abuses of science and technology?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459703</id>
	<title>Re:one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>werfele</author>
	<datestamp>1245842160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We here down south would probably be just fine.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Hollywood says you'll have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On\_the\_Beach\_(1959\_film)" title="wikipedia.org">a few months</a> [wikipedia.org] at best.  But at least you'll have some time to work on your bucket list (assuming northern hemisphere locations aren't involved).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We here down south would probably be just fine .
Hollywood says you 'll have a few months [ wikipedia.org ] at best .
But at least you 'll have some time to work on your bucket list ( assuming northern hemisphere locations are n't involved ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We here down south would probably be just fine.
Hollywood says you'll have a few months [wikipedia.org] at best.
But at least you'll have some time to work on your bucket list (assuming northern hemisphere locations aren't involved).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458611</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>ahabswhale</author>
	<datestamp>1245837540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure everything is concentrated in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia but even if those places get nuked we still have Arnold Schwarzenegger. So whatever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure everything is concentrated in Virginia , Maryland and the District of Columbia but even if those places get nuked we still have Arnold Schwarzenegger .
So whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure everything is concentrated in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia but even if those places get nuked we still have Arnold Schwarzenegger.
So whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329</id>
	<title>United States Postal Service</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this stuff going under the NSA and not the USPS? They seem rather capable of guaranteeing the security of communications, and have been doing so for a very long time now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this stuff going under the NSA and not the USPS ?
They seem rather capable of guaranteeing the security of communications , and have been doing so for a very long time now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this stuff going under the NSA and not the USPS?
They seem rather capable of guaranteeing the security of communications, and have been doing so for a very long time now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458153</id>
	<title>Re:Uh-oh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.</p></div><p>Kudos for the Futurama reference.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I ca n't walk away from a commitment like that.Kudos for the Futurama reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just signed a 6 month lease on my apartment...I can't walk away from a commitment like that.Kudos for the Futurama reference.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458055</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1245835860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arrest this Doofus!  He has revealed vital national secrets!</p><p>Don't tell anyone, but those guys have offices/bunkers all over the country.  I just can't tell you where, or I would have to kill myself for this hackneyed cliche.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrest this Doofus !
He has revealed vital national secrets ! Do n't tell anyone , but those guys have offices/bunkers all over the country .
I just ca n't tell you where , or I would have to kill myself for this hackneyed cliche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrest this Doofus!
He has revealed vital national secrets!Don't tell anyone, but those guys have offices/bunkers all over the country.
I just can't tell you where, or I would have to kill myself for this hackneyed cliche.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459357</id>
	<title>Where's the Cybermen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245840480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So we have Cybercommand,<br>we have a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/cybercontroller now wheres the Cybermen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we have Cybercommand,we have a /cybercontroller now wheres the Cybermen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we have Cybercommand,we have a /cybercontroller now wheres the Cybermen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481</id>
	<title>one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>Reality Master 201</author>
	<datestamp>1245876840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's one or two nukes in DC, we're not in a "US defending itself against a serious attack" scenario, we're in an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario.  There's plenty of folks elsewhere in the country who will be around to push the button.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one or two nukes in DC , we 're not in a " US defending itself against a serious attack " scenario , we 're in an " end of human civilization as we know it " scenario .
There 's plenty of folks elsewhere in the country who will be around to push the button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's one or two nukes in DC, we're not in a "US defending itself against a serious attack" scenario, we're in an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario.
There's plenty of folks elsewhere in the country who will be around to push the button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</id>
	<title>Concentration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces?</p><p>The NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon, and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C.</p><p>It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces ? The NSA , FBI , CIA , Pentagon , and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C.It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces?The NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon, and Pres/VP are all in/near D.C.It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458097</id>
	<title>Correction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245835980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just read an article that said the new head of the Cyber Command COMES from the NSA, Lt Gen Alexander, and that the new Cyber Command will be under U.S. Strategic Command, not the NSA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just read an article that said the new head of the Cyber Command COMES from the NSA , Lt Gen Alexander , and that the new Cyber Command will be under U.S. Strategic Command , not the NSA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just read an article that said the new head of the Cyber Command COMES from the NSA, Lt Gen Alexander, and that the new Cyber Command will be under U.S. Strategic Command, not the NSA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457551</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack</i>
<br> <br>
Impossible.
<br> <br>
I live near DC, and carry a balance on my Citibank Visa card. At these interest rates, they won't let <i>anything</i> happen to me. The nation's capital is safe. As long as you don't ride the Metro, anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack Impossible .
I live near DC , and carry a balance on my Citibank Visa card .
At these interest rates , they wo n't let anything happen to me .
The nation 's capital is safe .
As long as you do n't ride the Metro , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack
 
Impossible.
I live near DC, and carry a balance on my Citibank Visa card.
At these interest rates, they won't let anything happen to me.
The nation's capital is safe.
As long as you don't ride the Metro, anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459599</id>
	<title>Re:Contest!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245841620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points!</p></div><p>How many points for adding you to cybercommand botnet?  Just so I can update my totals.</p><p>Signed<br>Senior Botnet Operator<br>US CyberCommand</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points ! How many points for adding you to cybercommand botnet ?
Just so I can update my totals.SignedSenior Botnet OperatorUS CyberCommand</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points!How many points for adding you to cybercommand botnet?
Just so I can update my totals.SignedSenior Botnet OperatorUS CyberCommand
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458219</id>
	<title>Top Gun 2: Cyber Command</title>
	<author>spencerg83</author>
	<datestamp>1245836400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The story of a team of nerds who get sent to Fort Meade for Cyber Defense training.  This ain't your typical boy-gets-cyber-instructor-action flick!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The story of a team of nerds who get sent to Fort Meade for Cyber Defense training .
This ai n't your typical boy-gets-cyber-instructor-action flick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story of a team of nerds who get sent to Fort Meade for Cyber Defense training.
This ain't your typical boy-gets-cyber-instructor-action flick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458467</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1245837060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a lot of people in America are probably of the opinion that wiping out all of those agencies and Washington D.C. would be a major improvement.  It would be an initial shock but if you eliminated the massive tax burden Washington D.C. and the defense industrial establishment imposes on this country chances are we would eventually have a much stronger economy.</p><p>Doesn't matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are in power, the way they squander money and set policy is retarded.  The $700+ Billion squandered on that retarded stimulus plan alone proved that.  If you had invested that money wisely in something useful it could have SOLVED some major problems like renewable energy, health care or maybe even education.  What we got is $700 billion more in debt and nothing to show for it beyond transient spending.  The $700 Billion on TARP to bail out crooked banks and insurance companies and incompetent car companies likewise was retarded.</p><p>This "cyber command" is no doubt just an excuse to pump money in to defense contractors and we wont get anything useful back for it.  It will spawn a bunch of multiyear software contracts and in a few years they will all be behind schedule, over budget and the software they produce will be complete garbage, like EVERY government software development project for as long as I can remember.  The combination of government and contractors, for whatever reason, always produces garbage software.  It is a completely failed business model but we keep doing it because its a jobs program for government contractors who have GREAT lobbyists.</p><p>I do really cherish the prospect that instead of just spying on all our email, web surfing and phone calls now the NSA will have a charter to actively break in to our computers and intranets and poke around there too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lot of people in America are probably of the opinion that wiping out all of those agencies and Washington D.C. would be a major improvement .
It would be an initial shock but if you eliminated the massive tax burden Washington D.C. and the defense industrial establishment imposes on this country chances are we would eventually have a much stronger economy.Does n't matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are in power , the way they squander money and set policy is retarded .
The $ 700 + Billion squandered on that retarded stimulus plan alone proved that .
If you had invested that money wisely in something useful it could have SOLVED some major problems like renewable energy , health care or maybe even education .
What we got is $ 700 billion more in debt and nothing to show for it beyond transient spending .
The $ 700 Billion on TARP to bail out crooked banks and insurance companies and incompetent car companies likewise was retarded.This " cyber command " is no doubt just an excuse to pump money in to defense contractors and we wont get anything useful back for it .
It will spawn a bunch of multiyear software contracts and in a few years they will all be behind schedule , over budget and the software they produce will be complete garbage , like EVERY government software development project for as long as I can remember .
The combination of government and contractors , for whatever reason , always produces garbage software .
It is a completely failed business model but we keep doing it because its a jobs program for government contractors who have GREAT lobbyists.I do really cherish the prospect that instead of just spying on all our email , web surfing and phone calls now the NSA will have a charter to actively break in to our computers and intranets and poke around there too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lot of people in America are probably of the opinion that wiping out all of those agencies and Washington D.C. would be a major improvement.
It would be an initial shock but if you eliminated the massive tax burden Washington D.C. and the defense industrial establishment imposes on this country chances are we would eventually have a much stronger economy.Doesn't matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are in power, the way they squander money and set policy is retarded.
The $700+ Billion squandered on that retarded stimulus plan alone proved that.
If you had invested that money wisely in something useful it could have SOLVED some major problems like renewable energy, health care or maybe even education.
What we got is $700 billion more in debt and nothing to show for it beyond transient spending.
The $700 Billion on TARP to bail out crooked banks and insurance companies and incompetent car companies likewise was retarded.This "cyber command" is no doubt just an excuse to pump money in to defense contractors and we wont get anything useful back for it.
It will spawn a bunch of multiyear software contracts and in a few years they will all be behind schedule, over budget and the software they produce will be complete garbage, like EVERY government software development project for as long as I can remember.
The combination of government and contractors, for whatever reason, always produces garbage software.
It is a completely failed business model but we keep doing it because its a jobs program for government contractors who have GREAT lobbyists.I do really cherish the prospect that instead of just spying on all our email, web surfing and phone calls now the NSA will have a charter to actively break in to our computers and intranets and poke around there too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759</id>
	<title>Unfortunately</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1245834600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, if we are invaded, we wouldn't have the right to attack the invaders. At least that's the principle we live by in Iraq.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , if we are invaded , we would n't have the right to attack the invaders .
At least that 's the principle we live by in Iraq .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, if we are invaded, we wouldn't have the right to attack the invaders.
At least that's the principle we live by in Iraq.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457525</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1245876960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If one or two nukes manage to hit DC and these leaders have no warning to get out or deep underground I think we've got a big enough problem that it doesn't matter if we have said leaders. I'm sure these organizations have something in place should everyone in DC get killed or isolated, but I would be worried if those in charge of our defense weren't confident in their ability to defend themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If one or two nukes manage to hit DC and these leaders have no warning to get out or deep underground I think we 've got a big enough problem that it does n't matter if we have said leaders .
I 'm sure these organizations have something in place should everyone in DC get killed or isolated , but I would be worried if those in charge of our defense were n't confident in their ability to defend themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If one or two nukes manage to hit DC and these leaders have no warning to get out or deep underground I think we've got a big enough problem that it doesn't matter if we have said leaders.
I'm sure these organizations have something in place should everyone in DC get killed or isolated, but I would be worried if those in charge of our defense weren't confident in their ability to defend themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457547</id>
	<title>Contest!</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1245877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First one to add Cyber Command to their botnet gets 10 internet points!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457537</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1245877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least they will send the nuke in one place, hopefully leaving the rest alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they will send the nuke in one place , hopefully leaving the rest alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they will send the nuke in one place, hopefully leaving the rest alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458641</id>
	<title>Re:Uh-oh...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245837660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sound like the narrator in Fight Club. With his IKEA catalog life.</p><p>But don't worry. You will get to your zero point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like the narrator in Fight Club .
With his IKEA catalog life.But do n't worry .
You will get to your zero point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like the narrator in Fight Club.
With his IKEA catalog life.But don't worry.
You will get to your zero point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458197</id>
	<title>NOT under NSA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cyber Command will be under STRATCOM, just led by the same director as NSA. You're confusing people and offices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cyber Command will be under STRATCOM , just led by the same director as NSA .
You 're confusing people and offices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cyber Command will be under STRATCOM, just led by the same director as NSA.
You're confusing people and offices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28464947</id>
	<title>Re:one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245936300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere.</p><p>I like the way you've ignored fifty years of Cold War history. A nuclear exchange between either Russia or China and the US would certainly do a lot more damage to the Southern Hemisphere than just a little global cooling. There's a reason it was called Mutual Assured Destruction, and detonating enough nukes to take out any of two of those three countries, would certainly put the rest of the globe at risk.</p><p>Are you banking on the launch being ordered by a lunatic like Kim Jong-Il who only has access to a handful of nukes at best? Even Kim--arguably the nuttiest head of state in the world--has a sense of self preservation. Someone who's nuke arsenal is that badly outnumbered would truly have to be insane to launch a nuclear attack on the US since it would be suicide. So, yes, a nuke going off in Washington DC definitely could create an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere.I like the way you 've ignored fifty years of Cold War history .
A nuclear exchange between either Russia or China and the US would certainly do a lot more damage to the Southern Hemisphere than just a little global cooling .
There 's a reason it was called Mutual Assured Destruction , and detonating enough nukes to take out any of two of those three countries , would certainly put the rest of the globe at risk.Are you banking on the launch being ordered by a lunatic like Kim Jong-Il who only has access to a handful of nukes at best ?
Even Kim--arguably the nuttiest head of state in the world--has a sense of self preservation .
Someone who 's nuke arsenal is that badly outnumbered would truly have to be insane to launch a nuclear attack on the US since it would be suicide .
So , yes , a nuke going off in Washington DC definitely could create an " end of human civilization as we know it " scenario .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;I like the way you consider all of human civilization to include the northern hemisphere.I like the way you've ignored fifty years of Cold War history.
A nuclear exchange between either Russia or China and the US would certainly do a lot more damage to the Southern Hemisphere than just a little global cooling.
There's a reason it was called Mutual Assured Destruction, and detonating enough nukes to take out any of two of those three countries, would certainly put the rest of the globe at risk.Are you banking on the launch being ordered by a lunatic like Kim Jong-Il who only has access to a handful of nukes at best?
Even Kim--arguably the nuttiest head of state in the world--has a sense of self preservation.
Someone who's nuke arsenal is that badly outnumbered would truly have to be insane to launch a nuclear attack on the US since it would be suicide.
So, yes, a nuke going off in Washington DC definitely could create an "end of human civilization as we know it" scenario.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457489</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for posting, an anti-terrorism unit has been dispatched to your location.</p><p>Sincerely, NSA/FBI/CIA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for posting , an anti-terrorism unit has been dispatched to your location.Sincerely , NSA/FBI/CIA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for posting, an anti-terrorism unit has been dispatched to your location.Sincerely, NSA/FBI/CIA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459153</id>
	<title>Re:one or two nukes in Washington</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245839580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or would the parrots mutate not into our jungles but into our Judges?  Scarey evil mutant parrots reigning down the will of nature upon us from their tropical forest kingdom!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or would the parrots mutate not into our jungles but into our Judges ?
Scarey evil mutant parrots reigning down the will of nature upon us from their tropical forest kingdom ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or would the parrots mutate not into our jungles but into our Judges?
Scarey evil mutant parrots reigning down the will of nature upon us from their tropical forest kingdom!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457559</id>
	<title>Don't buy the cyber-war hype!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out Evgeny Morozov's new piece about how all this cyber-war hysteria is just a distraction - to really improve Internet security, governments should be investing in infrastructure.</p><p>http://bostonreview.net/BR34.4/morozov.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out Evgeny Morozov 's new piece about how all this cyber-war hysteria is just a distraction - to really improve Internet security , governments should be investing in infrastructure.http : //bostonreview.net/BR34.4/morozov.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out Evgeny Morozov's new piece about how all this cyber-war hysteria is just a distraction - to really improve Internet security, governments should be investing in infrastructure.http://bostonreview.net/BR34.4/morozov.php</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458333</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>99BottlesOfBeerInMyF</author>
	<datestamp>1245836700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces?</p></div><p>I agree.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.</p></div><p>Nah, that's not such a big deal. They are more distributed than that with branch offices. I'm much more concerned about the financial aspects. open the base in Detroit already or one of the other areas of the US crippled by current changes to the economy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces ? I agree.It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.Nah , that 's not such a big deal .
They are more distributed than that with branch offices .
I 'm much more concerned about the financial aspects .
open the base in Detroit already or one of the other areas of the US crippled by current changes to the economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or does it seem like the U.S. is being foolish about over-concentrating its forces?I agree.It seems like just one or two nukes could make the U.S. nearly incapable of defending itself against a serious attack.Nah, that's not such a big deal.
They are more distributed than that with branch offices.
I'm much more concerned about the financial aspects.
open the base in Detroit already or one of the other areas of the US crippled by current changes to the economy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457741</id>
	<title>Rise of the machines</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245834540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Skynet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Skynet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Skynet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there are plenty of other bases and stations throughout the country.</p><p>don't forget, we also have about 2 guns per person in this country, it would be very hard to disarm the country if we were invaded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there are plenty of other bases and stations throughout the country.do n't forget , we also have about 2 guns per person in this country , it would be very hard to disarm the country if we were invaded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there are plenty of other bases and stations throughout the country.don't forget, we also have about 2 guns per person in this country, it would be very hard to disarm the country if we were invaded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28476259</id>
	<title>Re:Concentration</title>
	<author>dooguls</author>
	<datestamp>1245942060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, I don't think I've ever heard such a succinct defense of the 2nd amendment.</p><p>Well played sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I do n't think I 've ever heard such a succinct defense of the 2nd amendment.Well played sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I don't think I've ever heard such a succinct defense of the 2nd amendment.Well played sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458331</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, uncomfortable truths will see you modded troll every time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , uncomfortable truths will see you modded troll every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, uncomfortable truths will see you modded troll every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28465905</id>
	<title>Re:United States Postal Service</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1245942420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's going under the NSA because it is already an NSA mission, albeit one people never talk about.  In addition to electronic surveillance, the NSA has always been responsible for "cyber-security", under the other two functions of the NSA:  cryptology and counter surveillance (assuring other countries don't do to us what the NSA does to them).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going under the NSA because it is already an NSA mission , albeit one people never talk about .
In addition to electronic surveillance , the NSA has always been responsible for " cyber-security " , under the other two functions of the NSA : cryptology and counter surveillance ( assuring other countries do n't do to us what the NSA does to them ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going under the NSA because it is already an NSA mission, albeit one people never talk about.
In addition to electronic surveillance, the NSA has always been responsible for "cyber-security", under the other two functions of the NSA:  cryptology and counter surveillance (assuring other countries don't do to us what the NSA does to them).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28465905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28476259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28468191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28461459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28460047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28464947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_197241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_197241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458153
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_197241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_197241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28465905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28468191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_197241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458097
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_197241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457481
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458009
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459153
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28459703
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28464947
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28461459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457487
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28460047
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457759
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458331
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458043
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28476259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28458055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_197241.28457551
</commentlist>
</conversation>
