<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_24_134211</id>
	<title>A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd ed.</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1245869700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://geekbook.org/" rel="nofollow">stoolpigeon</a> writes <i>"One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages.  My favorite distributions make it simple to always have the latest and greatest.  In fact, the distros themselves roll out new versions regularly, and I am always excited to see what new packages and features will be included.  For book publishers this must be a little less exciting.  Anything tied to a specific product that is under active development is going to quickly be behind the times.  Mark Sobell's <a href="http://books.slashdot.org/story/08/04/02/1319237/A-Practical-Guide-to-Ubuntu-Linux?art\_pos=3"> <em>A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux</em> </a>   managed to avoid the worst of this by providing a lot of information that is useful for any Linux user running any distro.  But still things move forward and almost exactly a year later we have <em>A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd ed.</em>  I was very pleased with the first edition and I think they've managed to really improve what was already a solid resource."</i> Read below for the rest of JR's review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>stoolpigeon writes " One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages .
My favorite distributions make it simple to always have the latest and greatest .
In fact , the distros themselves roll out new versions regularly , and I am always excited to see what new packages and features will be included .
For book publishers this must be a little less exciting .
Anything tied to a specific product that is under active development is going to quickly be behind the times .
Mark Sobell 's A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux managed to avoid the worst of this by providing a lot of information that is useful for any Linux user running any distro .
But still things move forward and almost exactly a year later we have A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd ed .
I was very pleased with the first edition and I think they 've managed to really improve what was already a solid resource .
" Read below for the rest of JR 's review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stoolpigeon writes "One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages.
My favorite distributions make it simple to always have the latest and greatest.
In fact, the distros themselves roll out new versions regularly, and I am always excited to see what new packages and features will be included.
For book publishers this must be a little less exciting.
Anything tied to a specific product that is under active development is going to quickly be behind the times.
Mark Sobell's  A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux    managed to avoid the worst of this by providing a lot of information that is useful for any Linux user running any distro.
But still things move forward and almost exactly a year later we have A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd ed.
I was very pleased with the first edition and I think they've managed to really improve what was already a solid resource.
" Read below for the rest of JR's review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458119</id>
	<title>UBUNTU = BANNED!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had enough of it!  It detected my 17" monitor as a 33".  It reversed the X-Y on the touch screen.  Then when the power went off, it caused it to crash so hard I had to do a complete install.  NOT ready for prime time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had enough of it !
It detected my 17 " monitor as a 33 " .
It reversed the X-Y on the touch screen .
Then when the power went off , it caused it to crash so hard I had to do a complete install .
NOT ready for prime time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had enough of it!
It detected my 17" monitor as a 33".
It reversed the X-Y on the touch screen.
Then when the power went off, it caused it to crash so hard I had to do a complete install.
NOT ready for prime time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464153</id>
	<title>Re:The main Disadvantage of Linux</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1245924000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So does that mean that is also a disadvantage that Microsoft provides updates to Windows just about every Thursday? And if they didn't, would you then be accusing them of being lax in security for not releasing frequent security updates?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So does that mean that is also a disadvantage that Microsoft provides updates to Windows just about every Thursday ?
And if they did n't , would you then be accusing them of being lax in security for not releasing frequent security updates ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does that mean that is also a disadvantage that Microsoft provides updates to Windows just about every Thursday?
And if they didn't, would you then be accusing them of being lax in security for not releasing frequent security updates?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28469427</id>
	<title>Re:The main Disadvantage of Linux</title>
	<author>nausea\_malvarma</author>
	<datestamp>1245957180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Totally, I HATE how those open source people update quickly and fix bugs so fast. What is this a race? Slow the fuck down. Some of us have high blood pressure!</p><p>Another thing about linux: It boots up too damn fast. When I was using windows, it took 7 minutes before I got to the desktop, and I used that time to make coffee. Now that linux loads so fast, I don't have time to. Thanks for ruining my morning, linux.</p><p> And I HATE how all these linux programs can be downloaded at no cost. Before linux, I used to make daily trips to best buy, where my wife works, and purchase software. Now I gotta download everything using some bizzare command called "apt-get" (what the fuck does that mean?). So now when am I gonna spend quality time with my wife?</p><p>So yeah, you can take your linux and shove it. Just give me good old crash-a-minute, slow as a snail windows from microsoft. At least they care!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Totally , I HATE how those open source people update quickly and fix bugs so fast .
What is this a race ?
Slow the fuck down .
Some of us have high blood pressure ! Another thing about linux : It boots up too damn fast .
When I was using windows , it took 7 minutes before I got to the desktop , and I used that time to make coffee .
Now that linux loads so fast , I do n't have time to .
Thanks for ruining my morning , linux .
And I HATE how all these linux programs can be downloaded at no cost .
Before linux , I used to make daily trips to best buy , where my wife works , and purchase software .
Now I got ta download everything using some bizzare command called " apt-get " ( what the fuck does that mean ? ) .
So now when am I gon na spend quality time with my wife ? So yeah , you can take your linux and shove it .
Just give me good old crash-a-minute , slow as a snail windows from microsoft .
At least they care !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Totally, I HATE how those open source people update quickly and fix bugs so fast.
What is this a race?
Slow the fuck down.
Some of us have high blood pressure!Another thing about linux: It boots up too damn fast.
When I was using windows, it took 7 minutes before I got to the desktop, and I used that time to make coffee.
Now that linux loads so fast, I don't have time to.
Thanks for ruining my morning, linux.
And I HATE how all these linux programs can be downloaded at no cost.
Before linux, I used to make daily trips to best buy, where my wife works, and purchase software.
Now I gotta download everything using some bizzare command called "apt-get" (what the fuck does that mean?).
So now when am I gonna spend quality time with my wife?So yeah, you can take your linux and shove it.
Just give me good old crash-a-minute, slow as a snail windows from microsoft.
At least they care!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456641</id>
	<title>First post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245873360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First post!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775</id>
	<title>Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245874020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., it's about time they get their own icon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , /. , it 's about time they get their own icon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, /., it's about time they get their own icon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459447</id>
	<title>Re:Coincidentally</title>
	<author>dr\_wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1245840900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damnit.. I accidentally modded you down instead of up. Must have been a libc5 rounding error. &gt;:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damnit.. I accidentally modded you down instead of up .
Must have been a libc5 rounding error .
&gt; : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damnit.. I accidentally modded you down instead of up.
Must have been a libc5 rounding error.
&gt;:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458977</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot going downhill.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are focusing on operating systems that people can actually use on their desktop, you know linux and OSX.  Oh! You mean operating systems people actually have on their machines but can't do anything with!  Sorry my bad, I get those so confused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are focusing on operating systems that people can actually use on their desktop , you know linux and OSX .
Oh ! You mean operating systems people actually have on their machines but ca n't do anything with !
Sorry my bad , I get those so confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are focusing on operating systems that people can actually use on their desktop, you know linux and OSX.
Oh! You mean operating systems people actually have on their machines but can't do anything with!
Sorry my bad, I get those so confused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589</id>
	<title>Slashdot going downhill.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245877140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could we get less Ubuntu/Linux and more Windows/OSX, you know... operating systems that people actually USE on their desktop computers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could we get less Ubuntu/Linux and more Windows/OSX , you know... operating systems that people actually USE on their desktop computers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could we get less Ubuntu/Linux and more Windows/OSX, you know... operating systems that people actually USE on their desktop computers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456653</id>
	<title>3 Easy Steps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245873420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Lower your expectations<br>2. ???<br>3. Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Lower your expectations2 .
? ? ? 3. Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Lower your expectations2.
???3. Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457855</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1245835080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recommend the ass one</p><p><a href="http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/images/3ubuntu.jpg" title="gnome.org">http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/images/3ubuntu.jpg</a> [gnome.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recommend the ass onehttp : //www.gnome.org/ ~ jdub/images/3ubuntu.jpg [ gnome.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recommend the ass onehttp://www.gnome.org/~jdub/images/3ubuntu.jpg [gnome.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458049</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot going downhill.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245835800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But does it run Linux?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245875280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest the actual Ubuntu (from Canonical actually) tri-segmented open circle with little ball thingies half embedded each mid-arc canted +15 degrees off-north axis. Why invent something new? Also concur with earlier recommendation (Jeremy Erwin) to use more proper reference to Ubuntu as a Debian based GNU/Linux distribution...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest the actual Ubuntu ( from Canonical actually ) tri-segmented open circle with little ball thingies half embedded each mid-arc canted + 15 degrees off-north axis .
Why invent something new ?
Also concur with earlier recommendation ( Jeremy Erwin ) to use more proper reference to Ubuntu as a Debian based GNU/Linux distribution.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest the actual Ubuntu (from Canonical actually) tri-segmented open circle with little ball thingies half embedded each mid-arc canted +15 degrees off-north axis.
Why invent something new?
Also concur with earlier recommendation (Jeremy Erwin) to use more proper reference to Ubuntu as a Debian based GNU/Linux distribution...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069</id>
	<title>The main Disadvantage of Linux</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1245844140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464415</id>
	<title>ASP.NET</title>
	<author>Alarash</author>
	<datestamp>1245927780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This wasn't mentioned in the review so I suppose that's already an answer, but I figured I'd ask anyway. Is there any topic that covers running ASP.NET (through the Mono Project) under Ubuntu Server? Is there any Database-related topics, specifically for PostgreSQL? I don't need 300 pages books for these topics (not yet anyway), so that kind of "Jack of all trades" book is interesting to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was n't mentioned in the review so I suppose that 's already an answer , but I figured I 'd ask anyway .
Is there any topic that covers running ASP.NET ( through the Mono Project ) under Ubuntu Server ?
Is there any Database-related topics , specifically for PostgreSQL ?
I do n't need 300 pages books for these topics ( not yet anyway ) , so that kind of " Jack of all trades " book is interesting to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wasn't mentioned in the review so I suppose that's already an answer, but I figured I'd ask anyway.
Is there any topic that covers running ASP.NET (through the Mono Project) under Ubuntu Server?
Is there any Database-related topics, specifically for PostgreSQL?
I don't need 300 pages books for these topics (not yet anyway), so that kind of "Jack of all trades" book is interesting to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458305</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1245836640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Seriously,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., it's about time they get their own icon.</i> </p><p>It's time to retire the Borg and stained glass Window. They set the tone. They reinforce stereotypes that have not served the geek well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , /. , it 's about time they get their own icon .
It 's time to retire the Borg and stained glass Window .
They set the tone .
They reinforce stereotypes that have not served the geek well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, /., it's about time they get their own icon.
It's time to retire the Borg and stained glass Window.
They set the tone.
They reinforce stereotypes that have not served the geek well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457231</id>
	<title>Updates? Don't need no stinkin Updates!</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1245875760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages.</p></div><p>Though not a Linux geek, I see the same thing on a smaller scale when Firefox keeps offering to update my plugins. I should probably turn this feature off, because every once in a while I get an update that breaks the whole browser.</p><p>Not a big fan of automatic updates. Bad idea to upgrade something without analyzing the benefits and risks.</p><p>Incidentally, my name appears in the "Thanks" section of this book. Which doesn't mean I actually contributed anything to it. Many years ago (don't recall how long, but the woolly mammoth had just made the endangered species list) I reviewed the system administration chapter  from a book called "A Practical Guide to UNIX". My resulting credit said that I had contributed mightily to this chapter. UNIX System administration has changed a lot since then, and I'm now probably the farthest thing from an expert on the subject this side of John McCain. So I was not miffed when Sobell reduced my credit to a mere mention. Indeed, he probably should take me out altogether.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages.Though not a Linux geek , I see the same thing on a smaller scale when Firefox keeps offering to update my plugins .
I should probably turn this feature off , because every once in a while I get an update that breaks the whole browser.Not a big fan of automatic updates .
Bad idea to upgrade something without analyzing the benefits and risks.Incidentally , my name appears in the " Thanks " section of this book .
Which does n't mean I actually contributed anything to it .
Many years ago ( do n't recall how long , but the woolly mammoth had just made the endangered species list ) I reviewed the system administration chapter from a book called " A Practical Guide to UNIX " .
My resulting credit said that I had contributed mightily to this chapter .
UNIX System administration has changed a lot since then , and I 'm now probably the farthest thing from an expert on the subject this side of John McCain .
So I was not miffed when Sobell reduced my credit to a mere mention .
Indeed , he probably should take me out altogether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing I love about Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates that allow me to run the latest versions of all my favorite software packages.Though not a Linux geek, I see the same thing on a smaller scale when Firefox keeps offering to update my plugins.
I should probably turn this feature off, because every once in a while I get an update that breaks the whole browser.Not a big fan of automatic updates.
Bad idea to upgrade something without analyzing the benefits and risks.Incidentally, my name appears in the "Thanks" section of this book.
Which doesn't mean I actually contributed anything to it.
Many years ago (don't recall how long, but the woolly mammoth had just made the endangered species list) I reviewed the system administration chapter  from a book called "A Practical Guide to UNIX".
My resulting credit said that I had contributed mightily to this chapter.
UNIX System administration has changed a lot since then, and I'm now probably the farthest thing from an expert on the subject this side of John McCain.
So I was not miffed when Sobell reduced my credit to a mere mention.
Indeed, he probably should take me out altogether.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456715</id>
	<title>soft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245873720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ubuntu is for noobs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ubuntu is for noobs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ubuntu is for noobs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457747</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245834600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are those supposed to be people holding hands or something? I have always wondered.</p><p>"Icon depicts all three linux users forming a happy circle."</p><p>I keed, I keed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are those supposed to be people holding hands or something ?
I have always wondered .
" Icon depicts all three linux users forming a happy circle .
" I keed , I keed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are those supposed to be people holding hands or something?
I have always wondered.
"Icon depicts all three linux users forming a happy circle.
"I keed, I keed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983</id>
	<title>My experience with Ubunto</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245874860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard so many great things, I thought I'd try it.  Installed it easily.  Tried to use something that is pretty standard (wget, I think but not sure).  So I got the source and tried to compile it.  To my surprise and disgust, no compilers were installed.  Sure they were easy to install but with such basic tools missing, I decided I didn't have time for such a toy distro.  I wasn't going to be surprised around every corner when something I have taken for granted as standard for years is missing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard so many great things , I thought I 'd try it .
Installed it easily .
Tried to use something that is pretty standard ( wget , I think but not sure ) .
So I got the source and tried to compile it .
To my surprise and disgust , no compilers were installed .
Sure they were easy to install but with such basic tools missing , I decided I did n't have time for such a toy distro .
I was n't going to be surprised around every corner when something I have taken for granted as standard for years is missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard so many great things, I thought I'd try it.
Installed it easily.
Tried to use something that is pretty standard (wget, I think but not sure).
So I got the source and tried to compile it.
To my surprise and disgust, no compilers were installed.
Sure they were easy to install but with such basic tools missing, I decided I didn't have time for such a toy distro.
I wasn't going to be surprised around every corner when something I have taken for granted as standard for years is missing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28463193</id>
	<title>Re:The main Disadvantage of Linux</title>
	<author>bursch-X</author>
	<datestamp>1245869160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The biggest disadvantage of Linux is, it's so good you feel unworthy of using it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest disadvantage of Linux is , it 's so good you feel unworthy of using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest disadvantage of Linux is, it's so good you feel unworthy of using it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464827</id>
	<title>Hoping there's</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1245935040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a chapter telling how to cure an Ubuntu install infected with Mono.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a chapter telling how to cure an Ubuntu install infected with Mono .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a chapter telling how to cure an Ubuntu install infected with Mono.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458127</id>
	<title>Re:Let me be the first to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel.</i> </p><p>This pretty much sums up why "Linux" gets a bare 1\% of the client desktop. OSX and Windows are clearly defined products that are usable out of the box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel .
This pretty much sums up why " Linux " gets a bare 1 \ % of the client desktop .
OSX and Windows are clearly defined products that are usable out of the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel.
This pretty much sums up why "Linux" gets a bare 1\% of the client desktop.
OSX and Windows are clearly defined products that are usable out of the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464095</id>
	<title>Re:The main Disadvantage of Linux</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1245923280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates.</i></p><p>I haven't used Linux in years but I think that's an advantage not a disadvantage.  Just because an update is available that doesn't mean it has to be installed.  When I used Windows I didn't install all the updates, and I don't install all of them on my Mac now.  It's nice they're available but I check to see if I need each one before installing them.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates.I have n't used Linux in years but I think that 's an advantage not a disadvantage .
Just because an update is available that does n't mean it has to be installed .
When I used Windows I did n't install all the updates , and I do n't install all of them on my Mac now .
It 's nice they 're available but I check to see if I need each one before installing them .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main Disadvantage of Linux is the rapid development and frequent updates.I haven't used Linux in years but I think that's an advantage not a disadvantage.
Just because an update is available that doesn't mean it has to be installed.
When I used Windows I didn't install all the updates, and I don't install all of them on my Mac now.
It's nice they're available but I check to see if I need each one before installing them.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457399</id>
	<title>Second edition?</title>
	<author>sacrilicious</author>
	<datestamp>1245876420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd edition</p></div></blockquote><p>

I think Ubuntu got past its second edition long ago... aren't they up to 9.04?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd edition I think Ubuntu got past its second edition long ago... are n't they up to 9.04 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux 2nd edition

I think Ubuntu got past its second edition long ago... aren't they up to 9.04?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457987</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot going downhill.</title>
	<author>masshuu</author>
	<datestamp>1245835560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we do.</p><p>We get news about how windows is killing its self off<br><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/16/1756229/Windows-7-Licensing-a-Disaster-For-XP-Shops?art\_pos=12" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/16/1756229/Windows-7-Licensing-a-Disaster-For-XP-Shops?art\_pos=12</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>but trying to make its products look better<br><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/19/033241/Microsoft-Launches-New-Get-the-Facts-Campaign?art\_pos=6" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/19/033241/Microsoft-Launches-New-Get-the-Facts-Campaign?art\_pos=6</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>and how the mac guy is dying<br><a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/0251213/Hospital-Confirms-Steve-Jobss-Liver-Transplant?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/0251213/Hospital-Confirms-Steve-Jobss-Liver-Transplant?art\_pos=1</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>but he still is obsessed with keeping mac locked up<br><a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/23/205244/Apples-Obsession-With-Secrecy-Grows-Stronger?art\_pos=2" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/23/205244/Apples-Obsession-With-Secrecy-Grows-Stronger?art\_pos=2</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we do.We get news about how windows is killing its self offhttp : //tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/16/1756229/Windows-7-Licensing-a-Disaster-For-XP-Shops ? art \ _pos = 12 [ slashdot.org ] but trying to make its products look betterhttp : //tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/19/033241/Microsoft-Launches-New-Get-the-Facts-Campaign ? art \ _pos = 6 [ slashdot.org ] and how the mac guy is dyinghttp : //apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/0251213/Hospital-Confirms-Steve-Jobss-Liver-Transplant ? art \ _pos = 1 [ slashdot.org ] but he still is obsessed with keeping mac locked uphttp : //apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/23/205244/Apples-Obsession-With-Secrecy-Grows-Stronger ? art \ _pos = 2 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we do.We get news about how windows is killing its self offhttp://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/16/1756229/Windows-7-Licensing-a-Disaster-For-XP-Shops?art\_pos=12 [slashdot.org]but trying to make its products look betterhttp://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/19/033241/Microsoft-Launches-New-Get-the-Facts-Campaign?art\_pos=6 [slashdot.org]and how the mac guy is dyinghttp://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/0251213/Hospital-Confirms-Steve-Jobss-Liver-Transplant?art\_pos=1 [slashdot.org]but he still is obsessed with keeping mac locked uphttp://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/06/23/205244/Apples-Obsession-With-Secrecy-Grows-Stronger?art\_pos=2 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458279</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu really is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245836580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Ubuntu relies on Debian...it's a little like saying, "Windows7 is for those who can't install Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Ubuntu relies on Debian...it 's a little like saying , " Windows7 is for those who ca n't install Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Ubuntu relies on Debian...it's a little like saying, "Windows7 is for those who can't install Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456727</id>
	<title>A Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1245873780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mandatory: <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ubuntu" title="lmgtfy.com">Let me Google that for you</a> [lmgtfy.com]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandatory : Let me Google that for you [ lmgtfy.com ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandatory: Let me Google that for you [lmgtfy.com]...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458531</id>
	<title>Coincidentally</title>
	<author>Yosho</author>
	<datestamp>1245837240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Debian" is an ancient African word for "can't compile Slackware."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Debian " is an ancient African word for " ca n't compile Slackware .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Debian" is an ancient African word for "can't compile Slackware.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457383</id>
	<title>Re:Ubuntu needs an icon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A bicycle with square wheels sums it up nicely. Maybe throw a fish in there trying to ride it, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A bicycle with square wheels sums it up nicely .
Maybe throw a fish in there trying to ride it , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bicycle with square wheels sums it up nicely.
Maybe throw a fish in there trying to ride it, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459179</id>
	<title>Re:My experience with Ubunto</title>
	<author>FrostDust</author>
	<datestamp>1245839700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I recall correctly, the reason Ubuntu doesn't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user shouldn't have to deal with compiling a program.<br>By having a large base of potential users without the know-how or capability to compile a program from source, people developing programs for Linux-based systems would be encouraged to release binaries.</p><p>While I'm sure the more experienced of you may cringe at this, Ubuntu is designed to be a Linux distribution approachable for newbs from the outset. If you disagree with this, you can very easily do "apt-get install gcc", or simply try another distro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I recall correctly , the reason Ubuntu does n't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user should n't have to deal with compiling a program.By having a large base of potential users without the know-how or capability to compile a program from source , people developing programs for Linux-based systems would be encouraged to release binaries.While I 'm sure the more experienced of you may cringe at this , Ubuntu is designed to be a Linux distribution approachable for newbs from the outset .
If you disagree with this , you can very easily do " apt-get install gcc " , or simply try another distro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I recall correctly, the reason Ubuntu doesn't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user shouldn't have to deal with compiling a program.By having a large base of potential users without the know-how or capability to compile a program from source, people developing programs for Linux-based systems would be encouraged to release binaries.While I'm sure the more experienced of you may cringe at this, Ubuntu is designed to be a Linux distribution approachable for newbs from the outset.
If you disagree with this, you can very easily do "apt-get install gcc", or simply try another distro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458205</id>
	<title>Re:My experience with Ubunto</title>
	<author>someSnarkyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1245836340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firstly, IIRC, wget is installed by default on Ubuntu. Secondly, why were you building wget from source, there are packages for it available in the repos. Silly troll, compilers are for devs!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firstly , IIRC , wget is installed by default on Ubuntu .
Secondly , why were you building wget from source , there are packages for it available in the repos .
Silly troll , compilers are for devs ! !
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firstly, IIRC, wget is installed by default on Ubuntu.
Secondly, why were you building wget from source, there are packages for it available in the repos.
Silly troll, compilers are for devs!!
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28465469</id>
	<title>really?</title>
	<author>Odinlake</author>
	<datestamp>1245940020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Myself I dread all the broken dependencies and conflicts that I inadvertably get with a major upgrade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Myself I dread all the broken dependencies and conflicts that I inadvertably get with a major upgrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Myself I dread all the broken dependencies and conflicts that I inadvertably get with a major upgrade.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863</id>
	<title>Ubuntu really is</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1245835080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>an ancient African word for "Can't install Debian".</htmltext>
<tokenext>an ancient African word for " Ca n't install Debian " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an ancient African word for "Can't install Debian".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28466203</id>
	<title>Re:My experience with Ubunto</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245943860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If you disagree with this, you can very easily do "apt-get install gcc", or simply try another distro.</i></p><p>If you're going to do any dev/compile work on Ubuntu you want to install the "build-essential" metapackage.</p><p><i>If I recall correctly, the reason Ubuntu doesn't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user shouldn't have to deal with compiling a program.</i></p><p>And also, if you're not capable of installing "build-essential" then you're clearly not capable of compiling anything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you disagree with this , you can very easily do " apt-get install gcc " , or simply try another distro.If you 're going to do any dev/compile work on Ubuntu you want to install the " build-essential " metapackage.If I recall correctly , the reason Ubuntu does n't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user should n't have to deal with compiling a program.And also , if you 're not capable of installing " build-essential " then you 're clearly not capable of compiling anything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you disagree with this, you can very easily do "apt-get install gcc", or simply try another distro.If you're going to do any dev/compile work on Ubuntu you want to install the "build-essential" metapackage.If I recall correctly, the reason Ubuntu doesn't come with a compiler by default was because Mark Shuttleworth thought that the average computer user shouldn't have to deal with compiling a program.And also, if you're not capable of installing "build-essential" then you're clearly not capable of compiling anything!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456753</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245873900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux != Ubuntu != Linux<br>even though many people would equate them.</p><p>Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel.</p><p>I am not a Ubuntu user even though I have tried and tried again. The way Canonical view the way people work is just plain awkward even though I have been a SUSE &amp; Slackware(since V1.1) user for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux ! = Ubuntu ! = Linuxeven though many people would equate them.Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel.I am not a Ubuntu user even though I have tried and tried again .
The way Canonical view the way people work is just plain awkward even though I have been a SUSE &amp; Slackware ( since V1.1 ) user for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux != Ubuntu != Linuxeven though many people would equate them.Linux is the Kernel and only the Kernel.I am not a Ubuntu user even though I have tried and tried again.
The way Canonical view the way people work is just plain awkward even though I have been a SUSE &amp; Slackware(since V1.1) user for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456999</id>
	<title>Pfft.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245874920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ubuntu is for Windows users. Real Linux people would never touch it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntu is for Windows users .
Real Linux people would never touch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntu is for Windows users.
Real Linux people would never touch it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457195</id>
	<title>8.1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245875640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should be Ubuntu 8.10, as in 2008-10, the release month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should be Ubuntu 8.10 , as in 2008-10 , the release month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should be Ubuntu 8.10, as in 2008-10, the release month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457081</id>
	<title>1244 pages</title>
	<author>tcopeland</author>
	<datestamp>1245875220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sympathize with the author on the decision on what to include in the book... no doubt he cut a fair number of things but still ended up with a prodigious book.  Reminds me of the "Java in a Nutshell" books - the last one I bought was almost square.</p><p>These days I'm finding more value in books like Rich Bowen's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001D4SRNE?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=militproferea-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B001D4SRNE" title="amazon.com">The Definitive Guide to Apache mod\_rewrite</a> [amazon.com].  These smaller more focused books go digging deep into parts of various utilities that don't Google answers as easily.  I can find 100 tutorials on installing Apache, but not so many on using RewriteMap.  And they seem to have a longer shelf life; that mod\_rewrite book is a couple years old but still very relevant and useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sympathize with the author on the decision on what to include in the book... no doubt he cut a fair number of things but still ended up with a prodigious book .
Reminds me of the " Java in a Nutshell " books - the last one I bought was almost square.These days I 'm finding more value in books like Rich Bowen 's The Definitive Guide to Apache mod \ _rewrite [ amazon.com ] .
These smaller more focused books go digging deep into parts of various utilities that do n't Google answers as easily .
I can find 100 tutorials on installing Apache , but not so many on using RewriteMap .
And they seem to have a longer shelf life ; that mod \ _rewrite book is a couple years old but still very relevant and useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sympathize with the author on the decision on what to include in the book... no doubt he cut a fair number of things but still ended up with a prodigious book.
Reminds me of the "Java in a Nutshell" books - the last one I bought was almost square.These days I'm finding more value in books like Rich Bowen's The Definitive Guide to Apache mod\_rewrite [amazon.com].
These smaller more focused books go digging deep into parts of various utilities that don't Google answers as easily.
I can find 100 tutorials on installing Apache, but not so many on using RewriteMap.
And they seem to have a longer shelf life; that mod\_rewrite book is a couple years old but still very relevant and useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28469427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28463193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28466203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_134211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28460069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28469427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28463193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464153
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28464827
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457747
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459179
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28466203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458531
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28459447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458279
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28456753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458127
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28458119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_134211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_134211.28457081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
