<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_24_0049240</id>
	<title>Canadian Politicians Reverse Course On DMCA</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245861540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Michael Geist reports that the two Canadian Ministers responsible for copyright <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4077/125/">seem to have reversed course on copyright</a> and now appear to oppose a Canadian DMCA. At a government event this week, Industry Minister Tony Clement spoke of how things have changed and of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLme4avxTus">need for consultation</a>, while Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore emphasized <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C\_OHx2PpsoQ">the great potential of the Internet</a> and how older politicians often don't get it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Michael Geist reports that the two Canadian Ministers responsible for copyright seem to have reversed course on copyright and now appear to oppose a Canadian DMCA .
At a government event this week , Industry Minister Tony Clement spoke of how things have changed and of the need for consultation , while Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore emphasized the great potential of the Internet and how older politicians often do n't get it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Michael Geist reports that the two Canadian Ministers responsible for copyright seem to have reversed course on copyright and now appear to oppose a Canadian DMCA.
At a government event this week, Industry Minister Tony Clement spoke of how things have changed and of the need for consultation, while Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore emphasized the great potential of the Internet and how older politicians often don't get it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>DirtyCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1245782340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canadians need an election AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.</p><p>We need to exercise democracy and first get the conservative nut wings out of government. These guys are an embarrassment to anybody with any sort of real education in Canada. That is step one, only then we can work on other parties such as the liberals (who have been going to the dark side as of late).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canadians need an election AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.We need to exercise democracy and first get the conservative nut wings out of government .
These guys are an embarrassment to anybody with any sort of real education in Canada .
That is step one , only then we can work on other parties such as the liberals ( who have been going to the dark side as of late ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canadians need an election AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.We need to exercise democracy and first get the conservative nut wings out of government.
These guys are an embarrassment to anybody with any sort of real education in Canada.
That is step one, only then we can work on other parties such as the liberals (who have been going to the dark side as of late).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449135</id>
	<title>Please read this message abou dogs!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245779100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dogs are nice and they are very super animals. They are not related to cats. I like fish and birds for large meals that look like fun animals for the dogs which are not at all like cats because mommy says Canada is far away where they do not have dogs only STUPID STUPIFD FDTUPOINEJF CATS!!!@!@!@#! I do not like snekes that have no lags or trils thukj  y PO iuu iuuiiuiuiuiu on ass fucker slashdot fodsdpoioh&amp;8778&amp;*&amp;*111981!((*@*(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dogs are nice and they are very super animals .
They are not related to cats .
I like fish and birds for large meals that look like fun animals for the dogs which are not at all like cats because mommy says Canada is far away where they do not have dogs only STUPID STUPIFD FDTUPOINEJF CATS ! ! ! @ ! @ ! @ # !
I do not like snekes that have no lags or trils thukj y PO iuu iuuiiuiuiuiu on ass fucker slashdot fodsdpoioh&amp;8778&amp; * &amp; * 111981 !
( ( * @ * (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dogs are nice and they are very super animals.
They are not related to cats.
I like fish and birds for large meals that look like fun animals for the dogs which are not at all like cats because mommy says Canada is far away where they do not have dogs only STUPID STUPIFD FDTUPOINEJF CATS!!!@!@!@#!
I do not like snekes that have no lags or trils thukj  y PO iuu iuuiiuiuiuiu on ass fucker slashdot fodsdpoioh&amp;8778&amp;*&amp;*111981!
((*@*(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449539</id>
	<title>Could this mean ACTA negotiations are failing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245783960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all generally know what ACTA is and who is largely behind it.  It seems increasingly, we see more stories of government bodies moving away from enhanced copyright assault techniques targeting individual users, abusers and consumers.  ACTA is still "secret" so we may never hear about what is going on in the negotiations, but could these laws and failures to enact laws be a sign of what may not happen?  This could be significant, after all [sarcasm] ACTA is a matter of national security [/sarcasm].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all generally know what ACTA is and who is largely behind it .
It seems increasingly , we see more stories of government bodies moving away from enhanced copyright assault techniques targeting individual users , abusers and consumers .
ACTA is still " secret " so we may never hear about what is going on in the negotiations , but could these laws and failures to enact laws be a sign of what may not happen ?
This could be significant , after all [ sarcasm ] ACTA is a matter of national security [ /sarcasm ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all generally know what ACTA is and who is largely behind it.
It seems increasingly, we see more stories of government bodies moving away from enhanced copyright assault techniques targeting individual users, abusers and consumers.
ACTA is still "secret" so we may never hear about what is going on in the negotiations, but could these laws and failures to enact laws be a sign of what may not happen?
This could be significant, after all [sarcasm] ACTA is a matter of national security [/sarcasm].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450761</id>
	<title>Re:Of course older politicans don't get it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245844620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "tax" (actually a tariff) on blank audio media is there to keep the CRIA from suing anyone that downloads music. We have "fair use" because they lobbied for that tariff, which does straight to them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " tax " ( actually a tariff ) on blank audio media is there to keep the CRIA from suing anyone that downloads music .
We have " fair use " because they lobbied for that tariff , which does straight to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "tax" (actually a tariff) on blank audio media is there to keep the CRIA from suing anyone that downloads music.
We have "fair use" because they lobbied for that tariff, which does straight to them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111</id>
	<title>Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245778920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Conservative Party of Canada isn't kowtowing to american business interests?</p><p>What?<br>I think my brain just had a core dump.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Conservative Party of Canada is n't kowtowing to american business interests ? What ? I think my brain just had a core dump .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Conservative Party of Canada isn't kowtowing to american business interests?What?I think my brain just had a core dump.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193</id>
	<title>They didn't necessarily reverse course.</title>
	<author>Ragingguppy</author>
	<datestamp>1245779820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have to look at this in the context of whats going on in the Canadian parliament. They are a minority government and they don't want to necessarily do anything stupid that would alienate half the population. So they have decided to not go forward with that legislation.  They may decide to go ahead anyways. Right now they are consulting not with the public but with so called most successful CEO's in industry. Which means that they are just going tow the party line and not do anything all that innovative.  So put your faith in the snakes that are the Canadian politicians. They are bigger liars then George W Bush.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have to look at this in the context of whats going on in the Canadian parliament .
They are a minority government and they do n't want to necessarily do anything stupid that would alienate half the population .
So they have decided to not go forward with that legislation .
They may decide to go ahead anyways .
Right now they are consulting not with the public but with so called most successful CEO 's in industry .
Which means that they are just going tow the party line and not do anything all that innovative .
So put your faith in the snakes that are the Canadian politicians .
They are bigger liars then George W Bush .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have to look at this in the context of whats going on in the Canadian parliament.
They are a minority government and they don't want to necessarily do anything stupid that would alienate half the population.
So they have decided to not go forward with that legislation.
They may decide to go ahead anyways.
Right now they are consulting not with the public but with so called most successful CEO's in industry.
Which means that they are just going tow the party line and not do anything all that innovative.
So put your faith in the snakes that are the Canadian politicians.
They are bigger liars then George W Bush.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451819</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>Maury Markowitz</author>
	<datestamp>1245855300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DCMA is a four-letter word, and that does seem to effect a lot of people's thinking. There are definitely some very good provisions in the package. Others, not so good.</p><p>I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner, for everyone involved. ISP's have been a bit easy to scare into believing the takedowns and not bothering to check if they're for real, but it seems that they're calming down now. I would be perfectly happy to see a similar provision in Canadian law.</p><p>On the other hand, there's the reverse-engineering issue. This is clearly a very bad idea, and from what I can see, unenforceable. Had this section been left out, I think everyone would consider DCMA as generally positive, but instead it generates massive hate. Sad really.</p><p>Maury</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DCMA is a four-letter word , and that does seem to effect a lot of people 's thinking .
There are definitely some very good provisions in the package .
Others , not so good.I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner , for everyone involved .
ISP 's have been a bit easy to scare into believing the takedowns and not bothering to check if they 're for real , but it seems that they 're calming down now .
I would be perfectly happy to see a similar provision in Canadian law.On the other hand , there 's the reverse-engineering issue .
This is clearly a very bad idea , and from what I can see , unenforceable .
Had this section been left out , I think everyone would consider DCMA as generally positive , but instead it generates massive hate .
Sad really.Maury</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DCMA is a four-letter word, and that does seem to effect a lot of people's thinking.
There are definitely some very good provisions in the package.
Others, not so good.I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner, for everyone involved.
ISP's have been a bit easy to scare into believing the takedowns and not bothering to check if they're for real, but it seems that they're calming down now.
I would be perfectly happy to see a similar provision in Canadian law.On the other hand, there's the reverse-engineering issue.
This is clearly a very bad idea, and from what I can see, unenforceable.
Had this section been left out, I think everyone would consider DCMA as generally positive, but instead it generates massive hate.
Sad really.Maury</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450969</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245848100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would think that spending years on a website without having some bit of dynamic scripting/community around to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/make/ the site ad revenue non-trivial.  Those are things that a script/mirror can't duplicate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think that spending years on a website without having some bit of dynamic scripting/community around to /make/ the site ad revenue non-trivial .
Those are things that a script/mirror ca n't duplicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think that spending years on a website without having some bit of dynamic scripting/community around to /make/ the site ad revenue non-trivial.
Those are things that a script/mirror can't duplicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</id>
	<title>Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>gnupun</author>
	<datestamp>1245786420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DMCA prevents copyrighted material being ripped off by other leeches. Imagine spending years writing hundreds of web pages and then working to make your website a success -- ad money is rolling in. Then some leech, tempted by your profits, spends less than one week, using the curl tool to download your site and recreate it. The profits of the original site start to rapidly dwindle and go towards the leeches, and more leeches  join the fray.</p><p>DMCA can be used to quickly shut down this leech sites. After a while, few people will be interested in investing years of their lives to supporting leeches or the indifferent consumers who don't care about anyone except getting their product for free or cheap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DMCA prevents copyrighted material being ripped off by other leeches .
Imagine spending years writing hundreds of web pages and then working to make your website a success -- ad money is rolling in .
Then some leech , tempted by your profits , spends less than one week , using the curl tool to download your site and recreate it .
The profits of the original site start to rapidly dwindle and go towards the leeches , and more leeches join the fray.DMCA can be used to quickly shut down this leech sites .
After a while , few people will be interested in investing years of their lives to supporting leeches or the indifferent consumers who do n't care about anyone except getting their product for free or cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DMCA prevents copyrighted material being ripped off by other leeches.
Imagine spending years writing hundreds of web pages and then working to make your website a success -- ad money is rolling in.
Then some leech, tempted by your profits, spends less than one week, using the curl tool to download your site and recreate it.
The profits of the original site start to rapidly dwindle and go towards the leeches, and more leeches  join the fray.DMCA can be used to quickly shut down this leech sites.
After a while, few people will be interested in investing years of their lives to supporting leeches or the indifferent consumers who don't care about anyone except getting their product for free or cheap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454369</id>
	<title>Election</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1245865440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A) Trying to avoid an election</p><p>or</p><p>B) Trying to cozy up to voters before an election.</p><p>and</p><p>C) If they win the election they will try and ram the stuff through again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A ) Trying to avoid an electionorB ) Trying to cozy up to voters before an election.andC ) If they win the election they will try and ram the stuff through again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A) Trying to avoid an electionorB) Trying to cozy up to voters before an election.andC) If they win the election they will try and ram the stuff through again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450517</id>
	<title>Re:Bounced Checks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245840900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is a shame, as it should be 'checks and balances' not 'bounced checks'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is a shame , as it should be 'checks and balances ' not 'bounced checks' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is a shame, as it should be 'checks and balances' not 'bounced checks'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449229</id>
	<title>Bounced Checks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245780240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like some checks bounced.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like some checks bounced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like some checks bounced.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449635</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless Canadians are way smarter than the people in my country, elections don't change jack. Your politicians, as well as mine, are a shame to anyone with an eduction that goes beyond "count to 100", but appearantly there ain't too many people who managed to get such an education.</p><p>People are more easily cowed, scared and conned into following a "strong leader" that promises easy solutions for nontrivial problems. Sure, the solutions don't work, but fortunately he doesn't even implement what he promises. Then he promises the same mumbo jumbo for the next elections and gets reelected.</p><p>Do you really think an election can solve that problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless Canadians are way smarter than the people in my country , elections do n't change jack .
Your politicians , as well as mine , are a shame to anyone with an eduction that goes beyond " count to 100 " , but appearantly there ai n't too many people who managed to get such an education.People are more easily cowed , scared and conned into following a " strong leader " that promises easy solutions for nontrivial problems .
Sure , the solutions do n't work , but fortunately he does n't even implement what he promises .
Then he promises the same mumbo jumbo for the next elections and gets reelected.Do you really think an election can solve that problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless Canadians are way smarter than the people in my country, elections don't change jack.
Your politicians, as well as mine, are a shame to anyone with an eduction that goes beyond "count to 100", but appearantly there ain't too many people who managed to get such an education.People are more easily cowed, scared and conned into following a "strong leader" that promises easy solutions for nontrivial problems.
Sure, the solutions don't work, but fortunately he doesn't even implement what he promises.
Then he promises the same mumbo jumbo for the next elections and gets reelected.Do you really think an election can solve that problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177</id>
	<title>Of course older politicans don't get it.</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1245779580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its a world that has changed more growing ever recently, its not hard to blame them for not catching up on everything. Technology is multiplying its growth rapidly.<p>However It would be a good idea to keep up on the events that can influence their own reelections and how they are perceived by the public.</p><p>As I understand it (I am American and in Texas, far from Canada) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the US, as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such, and I would assume there is more BS like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a world that has changed more growing ever recently , its not hard to blame them for not catching up on everything .
Technology is multiplying its growth rapidly.However It would be a good idea to keep up on the events that can influence their own reelections and how they are perceived by the public.As I understand it ( I am American and in Texas , far from Canada ) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the US , as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such , and I would assume there is more BS like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a world that has changed more growing ever recently, its not hard to blame them for not catching up on everything.
Technology is multiplying its growth rapidly.However It would be a good idea to keep up on the events that can influence their own reelections and how they are perceived by the public.As I understand it (I am American and in Texas, far from Canada) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the US, as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such, and I would assume there is more BS like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449415</id>
	<title>Translation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245782760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Translation: We didn't expect this strong an outpouring of opposition and we know we already only have a minority government so we're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off. Sound good?<br> <br>
And, yes - it does sound good. Stop messing things up! Stop selling our country out! More importantly, stop selling our country out to foreign media corporations!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Translation : We did n't expect this strong an outpouring of opposition and we know we already only have a minority government so we 're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off .
Sound good ?
And , yes - it does sound good .
Stop messing things up !
Stop selling our country out !
More importantly , stop selling our country out to foreign media corporations !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Translation: We didn't expect this strong an outpouring of opposition and we know we already only have a minority government so we're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off.
Sound good?
And, yes - it does sound good.
Stop messing things up!
Stop selling our country out!
More importantly, stop selling our country out to foreign media corporations!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451441</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245852600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My guess is that it is an indication of how badly America has fallen over the last 8 years. Sad. Really sad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess is that it is an indication of how badly America has fallen over the last 8 years .
Sad. Really sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess is that it is an indication of how badly America has fallen over the last 8 years.
Sad. Really sad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454139</id>
	<title>Re:Of course older politicans don't get it.</title>
	<author>atomic777</author>
	<datestamp>1245864780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As I understand it (I am American and in Texas, far from Canada) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the US</p></div><p>This is "bad" depending on your perspective. Bad for American media companies that want free access to the Canadian market, good for nationalist Canadians that fear cultural assimilation from the behemoth to the south. One could argue that we would not have such a vibrant music scene producing bands like Arcade Fire (ironically the lead singer is an American from Texas!) if not for these protectionist measures.
<br> <br>
While our current conservative government in many ways is just an offshoot of the republican party, even they will not dare be perceived by the public as a government that is selling the country out to the US and will back off any legislation that stirs up such sentiment. Democracy is not dead in Canada just yet!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it ( I am American and in Texas , far from Canada ) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the USThis is " bad " depending on your perspective .
Bad for American media companies that want free access to the Canadian market , good for nationalist Canadians that fear cultural assimilation from the behemoth to the south .
One could argue that we would not have such a vibrant music scene producing bands like Arcade Fire ( ironically the lead singer is an American from Texas !
) if not for these protectionist measures .
While our current conservative government in many ways is just an offshoot of the republican party , even they will not dare be perceived by the public as a government that is selling the country out to the US and will back off any legislation that stirs up such sentiment .
Democracy is not dead in Canada just yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it (I am American and in Texas, far from Canada) Canada has some really bad setup of restrictions on media already since most of it is imported from the USThis is "bad" depending on your perspective.
Bad for American media companies that want free access to the Canadian market, good for nationalist Canadians that fear cultural assimilation from the behemoth to the south.
One could argue that we would not have such a vibrant music scene producing bands like Arcade Fire (ironically the lead singer is an American from Texas!
) if not for these protectionist measures.
While our current conservative government in many ways is just an offshoot of the republican party, even they will not dare be perceived by the public as a government that is selling the country out to the US and will back off any legislation that stirs up such sentiment.
Democracy is not dead in Canada just yet!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450267</id>
	<title>Re:Could this mean ACTA negotiations are failing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245835920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many shit you can relate to ACTA is being implemented. Like in France. Although blocked by court. So these might only be minor setbacks in a larger scale. One won battle does not mean you won the war!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many shit you can relate to ACTA is being implemented .
Like in France .
Although blocked by court .
So these might only be minor setbacks in a larger scale .
One won battle does not mean you won the war !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many shit you can relate to ACTA is being implemented.
Like in France.
Although blocked by court.
So these might only be minor setbacks in a larger scale.
One won battle does not mean you won the war!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454357</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245865440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, a world where everyone is just Maury, and the media companies.  Pretty depressing. The word "everyone" does not mean what you think it means.  Let me rephrase and explain what I believe happened here.</p><p><b>You and a group of media company owners</b> think DMCA takedowns are a good idea, but you also suspect the majority disagrees.  Fortunately, in your world vision, "everyone" does not include all those icky masses, so it comes out in Maury-speech as:</p><p><i>I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner, for everyone involved.</i></p><p>or maybe you were just joking.  Either option is believable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , a world where everyone is just Maury , and the media companies .
Pretty depressing .
The word " everyone " does not mean what you think it means .
Let me rephrase and explain what I believe happened here.You and a group of media company owners think DMCA takedowns are a good idea , but you also suspect the majority disagrees .
Fortunately , in your world vision , " everyone " does not include all those icky masses , so it comes out in Maury-speech as : I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner , for everyone involved.or maybe you were just joking .
Either option is believable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, a world where everyone is just Maury, and the media companies.
Pretty depressing.
The word "everyone" does not mean what you think it means.
Let me rephrase and explain what I believe happened here.You and a group of media company owners think DMCA takedowns are a good idea, but you also suspect the majority disagrees.
Fortunately, in your world vision, "everyone" does not include all those icky masses, so it comes out in Maury-speech as:I think everyone agrees that the takedown system is a winner, for everyone involved.or maybe you were just joking.
Either option is believable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451603</id>
	<title>Re:Translation</title>
	<author>marcosdumay</author>
	<datestamp>1245853980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"we already only have a minority government so we're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off"</p></div> </blockquote><p>It is nice to see democracy working the way it should. Normaly they'd just bribe other parties until they get a majority, and then piss people off.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" we already only have a minority government so we 're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off " It is nice to see democracy working the way it should .
Normaly they 'd just bribe other parties until they get a majority , and then piss people off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"we already only have a minority government so we're just going to lay low a bit and not piss people off" It is nice to see democracy working the way it should.
Normaly they'd just bribe other parties until they get a majority, and then piss people off.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449903</id>
	<title>Re:^\_^</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1245874380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Offtopic: the underline on your subject line makes it look like a happy cat.  That's kind-of cool.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Offtopic : the underline on your subject line makes it look like a happy cat .
That 's kind-of cool .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offtopic: the underline on your subject line makes it look like a happy cat.
That's kind-of cool.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451089</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1245849420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your analogy assumes that a) The site makes good revenue from ads, which is not exactly a common experience for most websites, and b) The leech is hosted in a country that gives a damn about the DMCA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your analogy assumes that a ) The site makes good revenue from ads , which is not exactly a common experience for most websites , and b ) The leech is hosted in a country that gives a damn about the DMCA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your analogy assumes that a) The site makes good revenue from ads, which is not exactly a common experience for most websites, and b) The leech is hosted in a country that gives a damn about the DMCA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453443</id>
	<title>Re:They didn't necessarily reverse course.</title>
	<author>parlancex</author>
	<datestamp>1245862380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll push it ahead in next year's budget like they did last year with all the controversial legislation they wanted to railroad through our "democratic" parliament. The opposition parties will make a big song and dance again and threaten to take down the government with another vote of non-confidence, the conservatives will label <i>them</i> as the scary monsters that don't respect Canadian democracy again, and then Stephen will ask the governor general to suspend parliament again until the opposition's alliance loses momentum and they have enough time to spread a campaign of misinformation to ensure that they would at least win a minority government again if an election was called in the vote.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll push it ahead in next year 's budget like they did last year with all the controversial legislation they wanted to railroad through our " democratic " parliament .
The opposition parties will make a big song and dance again and threaten to take down the government with another vote of non-confidence , the conservatives will label them as the scary monsters that do n't respect Canadian democracy again , and then Stephen will ask the governor general to suspend parliament again until the opposition 's alliance loses momentum and they have enough time to spread a campaign of misinformation to ensure that they would at least win a minority government again if an election was called in the vote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll push it ahead in next year's budget like they did last year with all the controversial legislation they wanted to railroad through our "democratic" parliament.
The opposition parties will make a big song and dance again and threaten to take down the government with another vote of non-confidence, the conservatives will label them as the scary monsters that don't respect Canadian democracy again, and then Stephen will ask the governor general to suspend parliament again until the opposition's alliance loses momentum and they have enough time to spread a campaign of misinformation to ensure that they would at least win a minority government again if an election was called in the vote.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449123</id>
	<title>Hosers!</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1245778980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>DMCA or DMC eh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>DMCA or DMC eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DMCA or DMC eh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453281</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>parlancex</author>
	<datestamp>1245861840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to believe that and get genuinely excited about my country's democratic system, but I think it's more likely that someone with opposing interests probably just gave them a bigger bribe (campaign contribution, whatever you want to call it) and upped the ante. I suppose we should be thankful because this time it aligned with <i>our</i> interests?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to believe that and get genuinely excited about my country 's democratic system , but I think it 's more likely that someone with opposing interests probably just gave them a bigger bribe ( campaign contribution , whatever you want to call it ) and upped the ante .
I suppose we should be thankful because this time it aligned with our interests ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to believe that and get genuinely excited about my country's democratic system, but I think it's more likely that someone with opposing interests probably just gave them a bigger bribe (campaign contribution, whatever you want to call it) and upped the ante.
I suppose we should be thankful because this time it aligned with our interests?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28456425</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives doing the right thing?</title>
	<author>BluenoseJake</author>
	<datestamp>1245872580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had enough of elections, thank you very much, I have participated in 3 in the last 4 years, and that is sufficient.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had enough of elections , thank you very much , I have participated in 3 in the last 4 years , and that is sufficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had enough of elections, thank you very much, I have participated in 3 in the last 4 years, and that is sufficient.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28452737</id>
	<title>Re:Of course older politicans don't get it.</title>
	<author>tixxit</author>
	<datestamp>1245859740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such, and I would assume there is more BS like that.</p></div><p>Yeah, we pay ~$0.20 per CD in tax. However, we don't have courts awarding record companies $2m from a single citizen who shared 24 songs. Not sure which BS I would rather subscribe to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such , and I would assume there is more BS like that.Yeah , we pay ~ $ 0.20 per CD in tax .
However , we do n't have courts awarding record companies $ 2m from a single citizen who shared 24 songs .
Not sure which BS I would rather subscribe to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as well as some tax on blank media since it COULD be used for illegal copies and such, and I would assume there is more BS like that.Yeah, we pay ~$0.20 per CD in tax.
However, we don't have courts awarding record companies $2m from a single citizen who shared 24 songs.
Not sure which BS I would rather subscribe to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451187</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>daid303</author>
	<datestamp>1245850680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To bad nothing stops the leech from sending a DMCA to YOUR site! Increasing there own profits even more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To bad nothing stops the leech from sending a DMCA to YOUR site !
Increasing there own profits even more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To bad nothing stops the leech from sending a DMCA to YOUR site!
Increasing there own profits even more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450185</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to slavery</title>
	<author>Iori Branford</author>
	<datestamp>1245834780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hurrr, durrrr, my new work looking EXACTLY like someone else's successful and long-established work sure won't shit up my reputation or anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hurrr , durrrr , my new work looking EXACTLY like someone else 's successful and long-established work sure wo n't shit up my reputation or anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hurrr, durrrr, my new work looking EXACTLY like someone else's successful and long-established work sure won't shit up my reputation or anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450999</id>
	<title>Re:They didn't necessarily reverse course.</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1245848400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may have something to do with all of the people that wrote to their MP's. There are also other good signs, such as a huge display of condemnation regarding a bill giving police the power to get ISP subscriber information without a warrant (this was on the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/18/tech-internet-police-bill-intercept-electronic-communications.html" title="www.cbc.ca">CBC site</a> [www.cbc.ca], check the comments). People seem surprisingle informed and politicians may be taking note. Of course, I could be blindly optimistic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may have something to do with all of the people that wrote to their MP 's .
There are also other good signs , such as a huge display of condemnation regarding a bill giving police the power to get ISP subscriber information without a warrant ( this was on the CBC site [ www.cbc.ca ] , check the comments ) .
People seem surprisingle informed and politicians may be taking note .
Of course , I could be blindly optimistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may have something to do with all of the people that wrote to their MP's.
There are also other good signs, such as a huge display of condemnation regarding a bill giving police the power to get ISP subscriber information without a warrant (this was on the CBC site [www.cbc.ca], check the comments).
People seem surprisingle informed and politicians may be taking note.
Of course, I could be blindly optimistic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449117</id>
	<title>^\_^</title>
	<author>master5o1</author>
	<datestamp>1245778920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like it when this sort of thing happens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like it when this sort of thing happens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like it when this sort of thing happens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449411</id>
	<title>title and such is flawed</title>
	<author>CHRONOSS2008</author>
	<datestamp>1245782640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>doesn't actually say anywhere either of those two mentioned that they are AGAINST a canuck DMCA and what about that other nazi law they want to bring in that privacy patriot act crap to canada</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't actually say anywhere either of those two mentioned that they are AGAINST a canuck DMCA and what about that other nazi law they want to bring in that privacy patriot act crap to canada</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't actually say anywhere either of those two mentioned that they are AGAINST a canuck DMCA and what about that other nazi law they want to bring in that privacy patriot act crap to canada</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28456425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28452737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_24_0049240_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449391
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28456425
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28453443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449123
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28454139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28452737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28450761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_24_0049240.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28449415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_24_0049240.28451603
</commentlist>
</conversation>
