<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_23_2028252</id>
	<title>Predicting SCO's Actions Post Bankruptcy</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245752940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"SCO <a href="//news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/21/1849215&amp;tid=123">lost last year</a> and began <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/14/1948257&amp;tid=88">the bankruptcy filings a long time ago</a> but PJ has some <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090623013806705">speculative bad news on what they retain</a> through the bankruptcy proceedings. SCO proposes to sell a number of assets to an outfit called UnXis, which PJ characterizes this way: 'It starts to hint that this is more a renaming, taking in some new management who seem to have financial expertise, and SCO keeps skipping along as unXis, with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll.' In their filings SCO says they retain 'their litigation and related claims against International Business Machines Corporation, Novell, Inc., AutoZone Corporation, Red Hat and certain Linux users which are not material customers of UnXis (excluding certain large-scale users of Linux servers) that are claimed to have infringed against UNIX copyrights.' So that's still a possibility they could go after anyone who is a 'certain Linux user.' And what's even worse is that they'll retain <a href="http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=1MsVAAAAEBAJ&amp;dq=6,931,544">a patent</a> for running multiple Java applications on a single Java virtual machine. We may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " SCO lost last year and began the bankruptcy filings a long time ago but PJ has some speculative bad news on what they retain through the bankruptcy proceedings .
SCO proposes to sell a number of assets to an outfit called UnXis , which PJ characterizes this way : 'It starts to hint that this is more a renaming , taking in some new management who seem to have financial expertise , and SCO keeps skipping along as unXis , with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll .
' In their filings SCO says they retain 'their litigation and related claims against International Business Machines Corporation , Novell , Inc. , AutoZone Corporation , Red Hat and certain Linux users which are not material customers of UnXis ( excluding certain large-scale users of Linux servers ) that are claimed to have infringed against UNIX copyrights .
' So that 's still a possibility they could go after anyone who is a 'certain Linux user .
' And what 's even worse is that they 'll retain a patent for running multiple Java applications on a single Java virtual machine .
We may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "SCO lost last year and began the bankruptcy filings a long time ago but PJ has some speculative bad news on what they retain through the bankruptcy proceedings.
SCO proposes to sell a number of assets to an outfit called UnXis, which PJ characterizes this way: 'It starts to hint that this is more a renaming, taking in some new management who seem to have financial expertise, and SCO keeps skipping along as unXis, with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll.
' In their filings SCO says they retain 'their litigation and related claims against International Business Machines Corporation, Novell, Inc., AutoZone Corporation, Red Hat and certain Linux users which are not material customers of UnXis (excluding certain large-scale users of Linux servers) that are claimed to have infringed against UNIX copyrights.
' So that's still a possibility they could go after anyone who is a 'certain Linux user.
' And what's even worse is that they'll retain a patent for running multiple Java applications on a single Java virtual machine.
We may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446789</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1245758040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get Oracle to buy them. They are pretty thorough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get Oracle to buy them .
They are pretty thorough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get Oracle to buy them.
They are pretty thorough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28463605</id>
	<title>My conspiracy theory</title>
	<author>WebCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1245960780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid, the name, and a whole lot of bad press?</p></div><p>Their thin and questionable patent portfolio is probably a diversion tactic.  The takeover of its legitimate operations by the shell corporation unXis is, as PJ concludes, a crass attempt to shelter assets from losses related to litigation, the way a deadbeat tries to avoid child support by selling all his assets into a corporation in the Cayman Islands.  It leaves SCO itself to be the little rubber room in which Darl can bounce around his delusional claims.  Of course, the devil is in the details, and though they would be two corporate entities they'd be involved in each others affairs like dirty shirts...meaning that the smaller or weaker customers of unXis could be offered for sacrifice before the altar of Darl, in return for being isolated from IBM and Novel's countersuits.</p><p>One thing PJ doesn't highlight but sounds "interesting" to me is that significant investment through unXis will be directed toward the development of a "next generation UNIX platform".  This bears some attention as far as interaction with SCO goes as well.  In weird and wacky SCO-land they believe Linux is a derivative of their own "one true UNIX".  Their wild Dr. Evil plan could involve the development of a Linux-based distribution.  unXis would provide "enhancements" to their own distribution including DRM and activation, perhaps through technology licensed from Microsoft (who, based on their own filed patents, are at the forefront of crippleware technology).  Needless to say, they'd provide no source code at all and would break Linux compatability or retain it where they feel it makes strategic sense in the marketing dept.  This would be an unXis product, but the SCO litigation machine would continue to exist to continue the litigation circus claiming that since the "UNIX IP" belongs to unXis (because SCO sold it to them) and that Linux stole important parts of UNIX, that Linux is unXis' to steal back, so the GPL be damned.  Though the courts have ruled that UNIX wasn't SCOs to sell, that is under appeal and being delusional, they are optimistic the decision will be reversed on appeal and some day decades from now they'll be awarded billions from IBM that they can invest in the legal destruction of Linux and perhaps the GPL itself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid , the name , and a whole lot of bad press ? Their thin and questionable patent portfolio is probably a diversion tactic .
The takeover of its legitimate operations by the shell corporation unXis is , as PJ concludes , a crass attempt to shelter assets from losses related to litigation , the way a deadbeat tries to avoid child support by selling all his assets into a corporation in the Cayman Islands .
It leaves SCO itself to be the little rubber room in which Darl can bounce around his delusional claims .
Of course , the devil is in the details , and though they would be two corporate entities they 'd be involved in each others affairs like dirty shirts...meaning that the smaller or weaker customers of unXis could be offered for sacrifice before the altar of Darl , in return for being isolated from IBM and Novel 's countersuits.One thing PJ does n't highlight but sounds " interesting " to me is that significant investment through unXis will be directed toward the development of a " next generation UNIX platform " .
This bears some attention as far as interaction with SCO goes as well .
In weird and wacky SCO-land they believe Linux is a derivative of their own " one true UNIX " .
Their wild Dr. Evil plan could involve the development of a Linux-based distribution .
unXis would provide " enhancements " to their own distribution including DRM and activation , perhaps through technology licensed from Microsoft ( who , based on their own filed patents , are at the forefront of crippleware technology ) .
Needless to say , they 'd provide no source code at all and would break Linux compatability or retain it where they feel it makes strategic sense in the marketing dept .
This would be an unXis product , but the SCO litigation machine would continue to exist to continue the litigation circus claiming that since the " UNIX IP " belongs to unXis ( because SCO sold it to them ) and that Linux stole important parts of UNIX , that Linux is unXis ' to steal back , so the GPL be damned .
Though the courts have ruled that UNIX was n't SCOs to sell , that is under appeal and being delusional , they are optimistic the decision will be reversed on appeal and some day decades from now they 'll be awarded billions from IBM that they can invest in the legal destruction of Linux and perhaps the GPL itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid, the name, and a whole lot of bad press?Their thin and questionable patent portfolio is probably a diversion tactic.
The takeover of its legitimate operations by the shell corporation unXis is, as PJ concludes, a crass attempt to shelter assets from losses related to litigation, the way a deadbeat tries to avoid child support by selling all his assets into a corporation in the Cayman Islands.
It leaves SCO itself to be the little rubber room in which Darl can bounce around his delusional claims.
Of course, the devil is in the details, and though they would be two corporate entities they'd be involved in each others affairs like dirty shirts...meaning that the smaller or weaker customers of unXis could be offered for sacrifice before the altar of Darl, in return for being isolated from IBM and Novel's countersuits.One thing PJ doesn't highlight but sounds "interesting" to me is that significant investment through unXis will be directed toward the development of a "next generation UNIX platform".
This bears some attention as far as interaction with SCO goes as well.
In weird and wacky SCO-land they believe Linux is a derivative of their own "one true UNIX".
Their wild Dr. Evil plan could involve the development of a Linux-based distribution.
unXis would provide "enhancements" to their own distribution including DRM and activation, perhaps through technology licensed from Microsoft (who, based on their own filed patents, are at the forefront of crippleware technology).
Needless to say, they'd provide no source code at all and would break Linux compatability or retain it where they feel it makes strategic sense in the marketing dept.
This would be an unXis product, but the SCO litigation machine would continue to exist to continue the litigation circus claiming that since the "UNIX IP" belongs to unXis (because SCO sold it to them) and that Linux stole important parts of UNIX, that Linux is unXis' to steal back, so the GPL be damned.
Though the courts have ruled that UNIX wasn't SCOs to sell, that is under appeal and being delusional, they are optimistic the decision will be reversed on appeal and some day decades from now they'll be awarded billions from IBM that they can invest in the legal destruction of Linux and perhaps the GPL itself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448519</id>
	<title>Re:UnXis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245772500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One uses the single letters to pronounce it.
</p><p>S C O
</p><p>Santa Cruz Operations
</p><p>Yeah, I thought it was a weird way to name a company too.
</p><p>But it's easy to pronounce.
</p><p>And Santa Cruz used to be a Rockin' town, then the '89 earthquake changed it for the worse.
</p><p>Perhaps the earthquake opened a fissure and Darl climbed out and assumed command?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One uses the single letters to pronounce it .
S C O Santa Cruz Operations Yeah , I thought it was a weird way to name a company too .
But it 's easy to pronounce .
And Santa Cruz used to be a Rockin ' town , then the '89 earthquake changed it for the worse .
Perhaps the earthquake opened a fissure and Darl climbed out and assumed command ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One uses the single letters to pronounce it.
S C O
Santa Cruz Operations
Yeah, I thought it was a weird way to name a company too.
But it's easy to pronounce.
And Santa Cruz used to be a Rockin' town, then the '89 earthquake changed it for the worse.
Perhaps the earthquake opened a fissure and Darl climbed out and assumed command?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448371</id>
	<title>Re:Why worry?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245770880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>unless they are a law firm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>unless they are a law firm : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless they are a law firm :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447333</id>
	<title>What's next?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245761220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Orwell summed it up pretty well: "The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Orwell summed it up pretty well : " The creatures outside looked from pig to man , and from man to pig , and from pig to man again ; but already it was impossible to say which was which .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Orwell summed it up pretty well: "The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449947</id>
	<title>On the patent,</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1245874920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>JX, a java operating system that does what their patent covers, was in development <a href="http://www.jxos.org/history.html" title="jxos.org">long before</a> [jxos.org] they filed that patent application.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>JX , a java operating system that does what their patent covers , was in development long before [ jxos.org ] they filed that patent application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JX, a java operating system that does what their patent covers, was in development long before [jxos.org] they filed that patent application.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447599</id>
	<title>Predicting MY actions</title>
	<author>PingXao</author>
	<datestamp>1245763140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Post-SCO fiasco trial that was a waste of the court system's time and money, I'll go out on a limb here and predict my own actions post-SCO-bankruptcy.</p><p>I predict my respect for the legal system will fall several notches on a permanent basis if Darl McBride doesn't do jail time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Post-SCO fiasco trial that was a waste of the court system 's time and money , I 'll go out on a limb here and predict my own actions post-SCO-bankruptcy.I predict my respect for the legal system will fall several notches on a permanent basis if Darl McBride does n't do jail time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Post-SCO fiasco trial that was a waste of the court system's time and money, I'll go out on a limb here and predict my own actions post-SCO-bankruptcy.I predict my respect for the legal system will fall several notches on a permanent basis if Darl McBride doesn't do jail time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449975</id>
	<title>Re:UnXis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245875220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Un-tiss, Un-tiss, Un-tiss baby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Un-tiss , Un-tiss , Un-tiss baby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Un-tiss, Un-tiss, Un-tiss baby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447903</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft Corp. today announced..</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1245765600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, they're paying 3x the share price?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , they 're paying 3x the share price ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, they're paying 3x the share price?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449565</id>
	<title>Re:pronouced "unctuous"</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1245784260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, I wasn't expecting any real insight to come from my tossed out, slightly bitchy post, but you pulled out some real gold.  That HAS to be how that company is referred to from now on.  Please, Slashdot, take note of this young man and his comment full of genius.  This company must be called Unctuous from now on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I was n't expecting any real insight to come from my tossed out , slightly bitchy post , but you pulled out some real gold .
That HAS to be how that company is referred to from now on .
Please , Slashdot , take note of this young man and his comment full of genius .
This company must be called Unctuous from now on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I wasn't expecting any real insight to come from my tossed out, slightly bitchy post, but you pulled out some real gold.
That HAS to be how that company is referred to from now on.
Please, Slashdot, take note of this young man and his comment full of genius.
This company must be called Unctuous from now on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447509</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28454025</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>nexxuz</author>
	<datestamp>1245864360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Matter of fact<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... FORGET the fire trucks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Matter of fact ... FORGET the fire trucks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Matter of fact ... FORGET the fire trucks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446563</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448027</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245766800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ability to provide Linux FUD. It's helped them stay funded so far, if you follow the "Microsoft Partnership" sponsorship that kept them alive, and their interference with IBM and Novell and RedHat have been significant.</p><p>They aren't producing new usable products, and their old market niche of rock-solid x86 server class UNIX systems has evaporated in the face of Linux and other, more technically progressive and less lawsuit driven companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ability to provide Linux FUD .
It 's helped them stay funded so far , if you follow the " Microsoft Partnership " sponsorship that kept them alive , and their interference with IBM and Novell and RedHat have been significant.They are n't producing new usable products , and their old market niche of rock-solid x86 server class UNIX systems has evaporated in the face of Linux and other , more technically progressive and less lawsuit driven companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ability to provide Linux FUD.
It's helped them stay funded so far, if you follow the "Microsoft Partnership" sponsorship that kept them alive, and their interference with IBM and Novell and RedHat have been significant.They aren't producing new usable products, and their old market niche of rock-solid x86 server class UNIX systems has evaporated in the face of Linux and other, more technically progressive and less lawsuit driven companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449909</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Ultracrepidarian</author>
	<datestamp>1245874440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Holly stake? Silver bullet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Holly stake ?
Silver bullet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holly stake?
Silver bullet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081</id>
	<title>UnXis</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1245759600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know nothing about the company, but I hate it passionately, if only because of its name.<br> <br>

UnXis.  How the hell are you supposed to pronounce that?  Unzis?  Unks-is? Un-Eks-is?  Damn them to hell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know nothing about the company , but I hate it passionately , if only because of its name .
UnXis. How the hell are you supposed to pronounce that ?
Unzis ? Unks-is ?
Un-Eks-is ? Damn them to hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know nothing about the company, but I hate it passionately, if only because of its name.
UnXis.  How the hell are you supposed to pronounce that?
Unzis?  Unks-is?
Un-Eks-is?  Damn them to hell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446563</id>
	<title>Maybe...</title>
	<author>actionbastard</author>
	<datestamp>1245756900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A wild party. With hookers and fire trucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A wild party .
With hookers and fire trucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A wild party.
With hookers and fire trucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447585</id>
	<title>Re:Litigiousity</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1245763020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it would be a way too low risk method to move forward for the lawyers.  The counter suit was the downside, so it would be a real disservice to allow SCO to drop their obligations/debits to Novell and the other legal agreements they signed, then broke (allegedly), to get these patents in the first place. Then allow some new company to just assume the patents.  Not that all laws are fair, but it would be insane to assign any of the patent portfolio to anyone but IBM or Novell, without lugging all the obligations along with those patents.  Seams Novell has already raised this point, I am guessing this whole speculation of the article, is not really a possibility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it would be a way too low risk method to move forward for the lawyers .
The counter suit was the downside , so it would be a real disservice to allow SCO to drop their obligations/debits to Novell and the other legal agreements they signed , then broke ( allegedly ) , to get these patents in the first place .
Then allow some new company to just assume the patents .
Not that all laws are fair , but it would be insane to assign any of the patent portfolio to anyone but IBM or Novell , without lugging all the obligations along with those patents .
Seams Novell has already raised this point , I am guessing this whole speculation of the article , is not really a possibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it would be a way too low risk method to move forward for the lawyers.
The counter suit was the downside, so it would be a real disservice to allow SCO to drop their obligations/debits to Novell and the other legal agreements they signed, then broke (allegedly), to get these patents in the first place.
Then allow some new company to just assume the patents.
Not that all laws are fair, but it would be insane to assign any of the patent portfolio to anyone but IBM or Novell, without lugging all the obligations along with those patents.
Seams Novell has already raised this point, I am guessing this whole speculation of the article, is not really a possibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448301</id>
	<title>Lets quit screwing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245769980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need to catch them while they sleep, just after dawn, drive a stake through the heart, cut off it's head, surround the body with blessed hosts and sprinkle it with holy water.</p><p>Worse thing about Salt Lake City, could never get used to all the damn Mormons^H^H^H^H^H^H^HVampires.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to catch them while they sleep , just after dawn , drive a stake through the heart , cut off it 's head , surround the body with blessed hosts and sprinkle it with holy water.Worse thing about Salt Lake City , could never get used to all the damn Mormons ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ HVampires .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to catch them while they sleep, just after dawn, drive a stake through the heart, cut off it's head, surround the body with blessed hosts and sprinkle it with holy water.Worse thing about Salt Lake City, could never get used to all the damn Mormons^H^H^H^H^H^H^HVampires.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447925</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>canuck57</author>
	<datestamp>1245765780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We'll have to nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.</p></div><p>Maybe not as bad as you think.  Publish their IPs with a program to syn/ping flood them off the internet.  Ya, I know, it isn't good netiquette.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll have to nuke them from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure.Maybe not as bad as you think .
Publish their IPs with a program to syn/ping flood them off the internet .
Ya , I know , it is n't good netiquette .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll have to nuke them from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.Maybe not as bad as you think.
Publish their IPs with a program to syn/ping flood them off the internet.
Ya, I know, it isn't good netiquette.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447509</id>
	<title>pronouced "unctuous"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245762420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. excessively ingratiating: attempting to charm or convince somebody in an unpleasantly suave, smug, or smooth way</p><p>2. oily, fatty, or greasy: resembling or containing oil, fat, or grease</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1. excessively ingratiating : attempting to charm or convince somebody in an unpleasantly suave , smug , or smooth way2 .
oily , fatty , or greasy : resembling or containing oil , fat , or grease</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1. excessively ingratiating: attempting to charm or convince somebody in an unpleasantly suave, smug, or smooth way2.
oily, fatty, or greasy: resembling or containing oil, fat, or grease</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446519</id>
	<title>Simple prediction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245756720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will hire an army of gay nigger soldiers (of butt fortune) to attack the GNU headquaters in Iowa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will hire an army of gay nigger soldiers ( of butt fortune ) to attack the GNU headquaters in Iowa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will hire an army of gay nigger soldiers (of butt fortune) to attack the GNU headquaters in Iowa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631</id>
	<title>Why worry?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245757260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SCO or whatever they become will keep losing cases. Those who are supporting them are treating it like a high risk investment and hoping it pays off.</p><p>They're a parasite with no turnover of any significant amount, you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SCO or whatever they become will keep losing cases .
Those who are supporting them are treating it like a high risk investment and hoping it pays off.They 're a parasite with no turnover of any significant amount , you ca n't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SCO or whatever they become will keep losing cases.
Those who are supporting them are treating it like a high risk investment and hoping it pays off.They're a parasite with no turnover of any significant amount, you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28451463</id>
	<title>Darl McBride = Genious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245852720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to say even though I LOATH the man and SCO I have to be impressed with their legal jujitsu. If I ever want to stretch a case out SO long that rocks erode first I KNOW who I'll be contacting! The threat alone that they will pursue a water dripping torture like gorilla jungle warfare legal strategy should be enough to force whomever to settle (except IBM of course! The Nazgul are patient)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say even though I LOATH the man and SCO I have to be impressed with their legal jujitsu .
If I ever want to stretch a case out SO long that rocks erode first I KNOW who I 'll be contacting !
The threat alone that they will pursue a water dripping torture like gorilla jungle warfare legal strategy should be enough to force whomever to settle ( except IBM of course !
The Nazgul are patient )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say even though I LOATH the man and SCO I have to be impressed with their legal jujitsu.
If I ever want to stretch a case out SO long that rocks erode first I KNOW who I'll be contacting!
The threat alone that they will pursue a water dripping torture like gorilla jungle warfare legal strategy should be enough to force whomever to settle (except IBM of course!
The Nazgul are patient)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447043</id>
	<title>SCO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245759360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, SCO the crap corporation that won't die.
</p><p>I had a girlfriend who worked for them in the 80's, and she said they were a bigger clusterfuck than Borland was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , SCO the crap corporation that wo n't die .
I had a girlfriend who worked for them in the 80 's , and she said they were a bigger clusterfuck than Borland was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, SCO the crap corporation that won't die.
I had a girlfriend who worked for them in the 80's, and she said they were a bigger clusterfuck than Borland was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447639</id>
	<title>Issue Preclusion / Claim Preclusion</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1245763380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of issues and claims have already been resolved in prior cases.  A thorough analysis of the risk of future SCO-Spawn-Litigation depends upon the preclusive effect of those cases.  In other words, SCO's children don't get to relitigate things that SCO has already litigated (and lost) once.</p><p>The instant discussion isn't very informative because it appears to omit a thorough discussion of the effect of SCO's previous defeats on SCO's children's future prospects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of issues and claims have already been resolved in prior cases .
A thorough analysis of the risk of future SCO-Spawn-Litigation depends upon the preclusive effect of those cases .
In other words , SCO 's children do n't get to relitigate things that SCO has already litigated ( and lost ) once.The instant discussion is n't very informative because it appears to omit a thorough discussion of the effect of SCO 's previous defeats on SCO 's children 's future prospects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of issues and claims have already been resolved in prior cases.
A thorough analysis of the risk of future SCO-Spawn-Litigation depends upon the preclusive effect of those cases.
In other words, SCO's children don't get to relitigate things that SCO has already litigated (and lost) once.The instant discussion isn't very informative because it appears to omit a thorough discussion of the effect of SCO's previous defeats on SCO's children's future prospects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446599</id>
	<title>Microsoft Corp. today announced..</title>
	<author>NervousNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1245757080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft Corp. announced today that they were planning on acquiring SCO for $1985.67. "I believe this is a great opportunity for us to diversify our product portfolio", Steve Ballmer said in a press conference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Corp. announced today that they were planning on acquiring SCO for $ 1985.67 .
" I believe this is a great opportunity for us to diversify our product portfolio " , Steve Ballmer said in a press conference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Corp. announced today that they were planning on acquiring SCO for $1985.67.
"I believe this is a great opportunity for us to diversify our product portfolio", Steve Ballmer said in a press conference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28463025</id>
	<title>SCO are not permitted to pursue action</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245867300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the outcomes of the Novell Vs SCO case was that the SCO group were not permitted to pursue action against Redhat and the SCO Vs Redhat case was dropped.</p><p>The truth is and the outcome of the trial was : SCO leased UNIX from Novell under a license and SCO thought that they had bought it outright or thought that they could get away with stealing it by claiming that they owned it just by buying a license.</p><p>Even if SCO did own UNIX (Which they don't) There is no UNIX code in Linux and it's extremely likely that Linus has or can prove that without a shadow of a doubt. So spreading FUD like saying "SCO's filling for bankruptcy and then re branding, we may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet." Makes absolutely no sense.<br>Linux has NOTHING to fear from SCO, their staff and lawyers are morons and sleeping dogs should be left to lie.</p><p>This story is obsurd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the outcomes of the Novell Vs SCO case was that the SCO group were not permitted to pursue action against Redhat and the SCO Vs Redhat case was dropped.The truth is and the outcome of the trial was : SCO leased UNIX from Novell under a license and SCO thought that they had bought it outright or thought that they could get away with stealing it by claiming that they owned it just by buying a license.Even if SCO did own UNIX ( Which they do n't ) There is no UNIX code in Linux and it 's extremely likely that Linus has or can prove that without a shadow of a doubt .
So spreading FUD like saying " SCO 's filling for bankruptcy and then re branding , we may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet .
" Makes absolutely no sense.Linux has NOTHING to fear from SCO , their staff and lawyers are morons and sleeping dogs should be left to lie.This story is obsurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the outcomes of the Novell Vs SCO case was that the SCO group were not permitted to pursue action against Redhat and the SCO Vs Redhat case was dropped.The truth is and the outcome of the trial was : SCO leased UNIX from Novell under a license and SCO thought that they had bought it outright or thought that they could get away with stealing it by claiming that they owned it just by buying a license.Even if SCO did own UNIX (Which they don't) There is no UNIX code in Linux and it's extremely likely that Linus has or can prove that without a shadow of a doubt.
So spreading FUD like saying "SCO's filling for bankruptcy and then re branding, we may not be out of the SCO litigation woods yet.
" Makes absolutely no sense.Linux has NOTHING to fear from SCO, their staff and lawyers are morons and sleeping dogs should be left to lie.This story is obsurd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447731</id>
	<title>After?!?!?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245764160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You keep using that word .
I do not think it means what you think it means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449595</id>
	<title>Can't IBM just buy them and shut them down?</title>
	<author>lotho brandybuck</author>
	<datestamp>1245784380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't IBM, or IBM+Novell+Redhat+maybe Oracle up the bid for the "assets" and then just shut it all down?

Not that I'm sure I trust any of these companies with this sort of thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't IBM , or IBM + Novell + Redhat + maybe Oracle up the bid for the " assets " and then just shut it all down ?
Not that I 'm sure I trust any of these companies with this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't IBM, or IBM+Novell+Redhat+maybe Oracle up the bid for the "assets" and then just shut it all down?
Not that I'm sure I trust any of these companies with this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28453721</id>
	<title>Add this code to the Linux kernel...</title>
	<author>motherpusbucket</author>
	<datestamp>1245863340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>/*stolen SCO code */<br>
int Darl;<br>
int douchebag;<br>

Darl=douchebag;<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/* end of stolen code */<br>

Bury it in the kernel and expose it in court for a good laugh</htmltext>
<tokenext>/ * stolen SCO code * / int Darl ; int douchebag ; Darl = douchebag ; / * end of stolen code * / Bury it in the kernel and expose it in court for a good laugh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/*stolen SCO code */
int Darl;
int douchebag;

Darl=douchebag; /* end of stolen code */

Bury it in the kernel and expose it in court for a good laugh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447735</id>
	<title>Well, depends...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245764220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...on how long they still find some total retard, who is willing to throw money in a defunct company with a clear course towards making it even worse.</p><p>Wait for Cramer to advertise them on his show.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...on how long they still find some total retard , who is willing to throw money in a defunct company with a clear course towards making it even worse.Wait for Cramer to advertise them on his show .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...on how long they still find some total retard, who is willing to throw money in a defunct company with a clear course towards making it even worse.Wait for Cramer to advertise them on his show.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450227</id>
	<title>Bwahahahahah!!!</title>
	<author>rts008</author>
	<datestamp>1245835440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right!</p></div><p>Your UID precludes me from asking if you are new here, but seriously?</p><p>Mhuwahahahahahahahahhah!</p><p>I <b>can</b> ask this:<br>Have you visited here lately...actually reading the comments?</p><p>Funny, man....very funny!</p><p>BTW, I agree with you on the rest of your comment, but that one sentence just jumped out at me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right ! Your UID precludes me from asking if you are new here , but seriously ? Mhuwahahahahahahahahhah ! I can ask this : Have you visited here lately...actually reading the comments ? Funny , man....very funny ! BTW , I agree with you on the rest of your comment , but that one sentence just jumped out at me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right!Your UID precludes me from asking if you are new here, but seriously?Mhuwahahahahahahahahhah!I can ask this:Have you visited here lately...actually reading the comments?Funny, man....very funny!BTW, I agree with you on the rest of your comment, but that one sentence just jumped out at me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1245757020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We'll have to nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll have to nuke them from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll have to nuke them from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28451827</id>
	<title>Is there anything left to salvage?</title>
	<author>morgauxo</author>
	<datestamp>1245855360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Here's the part that surprised me in all this... "Most of the current SCO staff, including developers, support personnel, sales and marketing are expected to join unXis."<br><br>They still have developers?&nbsp; And marketing staff? Beyond the guy writing the BS on their website?<br><br>SCO was a respectable Unix company once, "first UNIX company" according to Eric Raymond. They also were Caldera which may have never been the biggest player in Linux distros but was certainly an interesting one and not a bad Desktop environment for the time.&nbsp; I can't find any evidence of this on Google today but I'm sure I remember that it was actually Caldera not RedHat that wrote the first version of RPM.&nbsp; They did this not for themselves but under contract for RedHat thus RedHat owned it and RedHat got their name on it.<br><br>Is there actually something of this still alive?&nbsp; With SCO containing the distilled evil could there actually be something good to come from unXis?&nbsp; It's hard to believe but it's an interesting idea.&nbsp; Kind of like a glimpse into an alternate reality where the combined Caldera/SCO remained a Unix/Linux company rather than become what it is.<br><br>On another note, aren't corporate executives legally bound to do what is in the interest of shareholders? Hasn't SCO pretty much been gutted for it's executives personal project of Linux FUD? Can the shareholders sue the executives? It does seem like a form of theft.&nbsp; My mother has SCO stock.&nbsp; She wanted stock in a Linux company back when the internet boom was tapering off and some people were looking to Linux companies for the next boom.&nbsp; I told her to buy RedHat when they first come out.&nbsp; She waited and it went up w/out her.&nbsp; She asked if there was another, I told her to buy Mandrake but don't keep it long as it is over-hyped and would shoot up then down.&nbsp; She passed on it and it did exactly that.&nbsp; Then one day out of the blue she informed me she just bought Caldera stock. WTF!?!&nbsp; She said she read it was really big in Asia or something like that.&nbsp; Now she has a stock shaped piece of toilet paper.<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the part that surprised me in all this... " Most of the current SCO staff , including developers , support personnel , sales and marketing are expected to join unXis .
" They still have developers ?   And marketing staff ?
Beyond the guy writing the BS on their website ? SCO was a respectable Unix company once , " first UNIX company " according to Eric Raymond .
They also were Caldera which may have never been the biggest player in Linux distros but was certainly an interesting one and not a bad Desktop environment for the time.   I ca n't find any evidence of this on Google today but I 'm sure I remember that it was actually Caldera not RedHat that wrote the first version of RPM.   They did this not for themselves but under contract for RedHat thus RedHat owned it and RedHat got their name on it.Is there actually something of this still alive ?   With SCO containing the distilled evil could there actually be something good to come from unXis ?   It 's hard to believe but it 's an interesting idea.   Kind of like a glimpse into an alternate reality where the combined Caldera/SCO remained a Unix/Linux company rather than become what it is.On another note , are n't corporate executives legally bound to do what is in the interest of shareholders ?
Has n't SCO pretty much been gutted for it 's executives personal project of Linux FUD ?
Can the shareholders sue the executives ?
It does seem like a form of theft.   My mother has SCO stock.   She wanted stock in a Linux company back when the internet boom was tapering off and some people were looking to Linux companies for the next boom.   I told her to buy RedHat when they first come out.   She waited and it went up w/out her.   She asked if there was another , I told her to buy Mandrake but do n't keep it long as it is over-hyped and would shoot up then down.   She passed on it and it did exactly that.   Then one day out of the blue she informed me she just bought Caldera stock .
WTF ! ? !   She said she read it was really big in Asia or something like that.   Now she has a stock shaped piece of toilet paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the part that surprised me in all this... "Most of the current SCO staff, including developers, support personnel, sales and marketing are expected to join unXis.
"They still have developers?  And marketing staff?
Beyond the guy writing the BS on their website?SCO was a respectable Unix company once, "first UNIX company" according to Eric Raymond.
They also were Caldera which may have never been the biggest player in Linux distros but was certainly an interesting one and not a bad Desktop environment for the time.  I can't find any evidence of this on Google today but I'm sure I remember that it was actually Caldera not RedHat that wrote the first version of RPM.  They did this not for themselves but under contract for RedHat thus RedHat owned it and RedHat got their name on it.Is there actually something of this still alive?  With SCO containing the distilled evil could there actually be something good to come from unXis?  It's hard to believe but it's an interesting idea.  Kind of like a glimpse into an alternate reality where the combined Caldera/SCO remained a Unix/Linux company rather than become what it is.On another note, aren't corporate executives legally bound to do what is in the interest of shareholders?
Hasn't SCO pretty much been gutted for it's executives personal project of Linux FUD?
Can the shareholders sue the executives?
It does seem like a form of theft.  My mother has SCO stock.  She wanted stock in a Linux company back when the internet boom was tapering off and some people were looking to Linux companies for the next boom.  I told her to buy RedHat when they first come out.  She waited and it went up w/out her.  She asked if there was another, I told her to buy Mandrake but don't keep it long as it is over-hyped and would shoot up then down.  She passed on it and it did exactly that.  Then one day out of the blue she informed me she just bought Caldera stock.
WTF!?!  She said she read it was really big in Asia or something like that.  Now she has a stock shaped piece of toilet paper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447299</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, SCO!</title>
	<author>capnkr</author>
	<datestamp>1245761040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[<b>outrageous</b>\_French\_accent] I fart in your general direction.[/<b>outrageous</b>\_French\_accent]</p></div><p>Fixed <a href="http://www.uselessmoviequotes.com/umq\_m010.htm" title="uselessmoviequotes.com">that</a> [uselessmoviequotes.com] for you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ outrageous \ _French \ _accent ] I fart in your general direction .
[ /outrageous \ _French \ _accent ] Fixed that [ uselessmoviequotes.com ] for you .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[outrageous\_French\_accent] I fart in your general direction.
[/outrageous\_French\_accent]Fixed that [uselessmoviequotes.com] for you.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450735</id>
	<title>Re:Why worry?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245844140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>'...you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases.'</i></p><p>Unless you're a Law firm!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'...you ca n't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases .
'Unless you 're a Law firm !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'...you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases.
'Unless you're a Law firm!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446769</id>
	<title>Bet on it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245757860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever they do, it will be the most ridiculous, idiotic, and/or moronic and asinine thing possible!<br><br>Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever they do , it will be the most ridiculous , idiotic , and/or moronic and asinine thing possible ! Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever they do, it will be the most ridiculous, idiotic, and/or moronic and asinine thing possible!Pretty much nobody here is warped enough to predict it right!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448773</id>
	<title>Re:UnXis</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1245775200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Needless to say its an anagram of Unix, presumably a play on Un-Unix.  Whomever owns the Unix trademark should suit them!!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Can you sue for anagrams of trademarks?  SCO doesn't own the Unix trademark do they, I lost track?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Needless to say its an anagram of Unix , presumably a play on Un-Unix .
Whomever owns the Unix trademark should suit them ! ! !
... Can you sue for anagrams of trademarks ?
SCO does n't own the Unix trademark do they , I lost track ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Needless to say its an anagram of Unix, presumably a play on Un-Unix.
Whomever owns the Unix trademark should suit them!!!
... Can you sue for anagrams of trademarks?
SCO doesn't own the Unix trademark do they, I lost track?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1245757440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid, the name, and a whole lot of bad press?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid , the name , and a whole lot of bad press ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what does SCO have other than a few patents that may or may not be invalid, the name, and a whole lot of bad press?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448575</id>
	<title>Re:SCO</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1245772980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That'd be old SCO then, the infamous jerks are new SCO, formerly known as Caldera Linux before they bought old SCO's rights over UNIX and trademarks for their name, hired a complete idiot as CEO and changed their name to SCO while old SCO changed theirs to Tarantella, were later bought by Sun, who were later bought by Oracle.</p><p>So yeah, its messy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 'd be old SCO then , the infamous jerks are new SCO , formerly known as Caldera Linux before they bought old SCO 's rights over UNIX and trademarks for their name , hired a complete idiot as CEO and changed their name to SCO while old SCO changed theirs to Tarantella , were later bought by Sun , who were later bought by Oracle.So yeah , its messy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That'd be old SCO then, the infamous jerks are new SCO, formerly known as Caldera Linux before they bought old SCO's rights over UNIX and trademarks for their name, hired a complete idiot as CEO and changed their name to SCO while old SCO changed theirs to Tarantella, were later bought by Sun, who were later bought by Oracle.So yeah, its messy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448797</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1245775440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Computers, furniture, wall art, buildings and/or leases with time left on them, company vehicles, network gear, general office supplies, etc.</p><p>Liquidation means sell <i>EVERYTHING</i>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Computers , furniture , wall art , buildings and/or leases with time left on them , company vehicles , network gear , general office supplies , etc.Liquidation means sell EVERYTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computers, furniture, wall art, buildings and/or leases with time left on them, company vehicles, network gear, general office supplies, etc.Liquidation means sell EVERYTHING!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28458147</id>
	<title>unxis.com</title>
	<author>morgauxo</author>
	<datestamp>1245836160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like a unxis.com is currently one of those "this domain might be for sale" pages.  Minimum bid is $60, don't know what it would take to get them to actually sell if someone wants to get it before SCO does!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like a unxis.com is currently one of those " this domain might be for sale " pages .
Minimum bid is $ 60 , do n't know what it would take to get them to actually sell if someone wants to get it before SCO does !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like a unxis.com is currently one of those "this domain might be for sale" pages.
Minimum bid is $60, don't know what it would take to get them to actually sell if someone wants to get it before SCO does!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709</id>
	<title>Litigiousity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245757560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"... with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll."</p><p>Don't count on it. The deal with their lawyers for the lawsuits was, a cut of the winnings if they won, a cut of the company if they lost. They lost. The landsharks inherited big chunks of the bloody corpse. Just imagine them trying to keep from turning the company into a perpetual replay of the last couple years. They'd bust a vein with the effort. I say the company will become the lawyers' hammer for every nail worth suing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ... with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll .
" Do n't count on it .
The deal with their lawyers for the lawsuits was , a cut of the winnings if they won , a cut of the company if they lost .
They lost .
The landsharks inherited big chunks of the bloody corpse .
Just imagine them trying to keep from turning the company into a perpetual replay of the last couple years .
They 'd bust a vein with the effort .
I say the company will become the lawyers ' hammer for every nail worth suing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"... with the dangerous litigation spun off safely into a litigation troll.
"Don't count on it.
The deal with their lawyers for the lawsuits was, a cut of the winnings if they won, a cut of the company if they lost.
They lost.
The landsharks inherited big chunks of the bloody corpse.
Just imagine them trying to keep from turning the company into a perpetual replay of the last couple years.
They'd bust a vein with the effort.
I say the company will become the lawyers' hammer for every nail worth suing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447467</id>
	<title>Re:Why worry?</title>
	<author>TheRealMindChild</author>
	<datestamp>1245762120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases</i> <br> <br>There is about a billion law firms out there that beg to differ</htmltext>
<tokenext>you ca n't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases There is about a billion law firms out there that beg to differ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can't keep a business going if the sole source of income is from court cases  There is about a billion law firms out there that beg to differ</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447253</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>capnkr</author>
	<datestamp>1245760740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, over the years we have seen that they do have authoritative, quality tech spokesperson journalists like Rob En<i>darl</i>e, <i>Moo</i>reen O'gara, and Daniel <i>Lyin</i>'s in their pocket.<br> <br>Maybe they can get a thriving "Shill For Hire" business going. They obviously have the staff for it...<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , over the years we have seen that they do have authoritative , quality tech spokesperson journalists like Rob Endarle , Mooreen O'gara , and Daniel Lyin 's in their pocket .
Maybe they can get a thriving " Shill For Hire " business going .
They obviously have the staff for it... : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, over the years we have seen that they do have authoritative, quality tech spokesperson journalists like Rob Endarle, Mooreen O'gara, and Daniel Lyin's in their pocket.
Maybe they can get a thriving "Shill For Hire" business going.
They obviously have the staff for it...  :/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446743</id>
	<title>Hey, SCO!</title>
	<author>the\_rajah</author>
	<datestamp>1245757740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>[French\_accent] I fart in your general direction.[/French\_accent]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ French \ _accent ] I fart in your general direction .
[ /French \ _accent ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[French\_accent] I fart in your general direction.
[/French\_accent]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446893</id>
	<title>Whipping a dead horse</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1245758640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be honest we've been worrying about SCO for years now, "the sky is falling" worrying, a couple front page<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. articles a month kind of worrying, and to date SCO has won basically nothing, and have done very little actual harm excepting that caused by people worrying about and being scared by them enough to do stupid things they didn't need to do.  They've run up some legal bills but they were mostly paid by companies that could afford them like IBM and Novell, and those big companies usually have lawyers sitting around spoiling for a fight anyway.</p><p>I'm making a resolution to absolutely stop caring about SCO until they actually win something in a courtroom or do ANYTHING which actually proves to be a real and substantive threat.  Everyone constantly worrying about them has done more damage than if we had just yawned, and said "move along, nothing to see here".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest we 've been worrying about SCO for years now , " the sky is falling " worrying , a couple front page / .
articles a month kind of worrying , and to date SCO has won basically nothing , and have done very little actual harm excepting that caused by people worrying about and being scared by them enough to do stupid things they did n't need to do .
They 've run up some legal bills but they were mostly paid by companies that could afford them like IBM and Novell , and those big companies usually have lawyers sitting around spoiling for a fight anyway.I 'm making a resolution to absolutely stop caring about SCO until they actually win something in a courtroom or do ANYTHING which actually proves to be a real and substantive threat .
Everyone constantly worrying about them has done more damage than if we had just yawned , and said " move along , nothing to see here " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest we've been worrying about SCO for years now, "the sky is falling" worrying, a couple front page /.
articles a month kind of worrying, and to date SCO has won basically nothing, and have done very little actual harm excepting that caused by people worrying about and being scared by them enough to do stupid things they didn't need to do.
They've run up some legal bills but they were mostly paid by companies that could afford them like IBM and Novell, and those big companies usually have lawyers sitting around spoiling for a fight anyway.I'm making a resolution to absolutely stop caring about SCO until they actually win something in a courtroom or do ANYTHING which actually proves to be a real and substantive threat.
Everyone constantly worrying about them has done more damage than if we had just yawned, and said "move along, nothing to see here".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447003</id>
	<title>this fr1$t p0$t for GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245759120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gnaa.us/" title="www.gnaa.us" rel="nofollow">8==C=O=C=K=S=L=A=P==D~~</a> [www.gnaa.us]  gay niggers attack gnu hq</htmltext>
<tokenext>8 = = C = O = C = K = S = L = A = P = = D ~ ~ [ www.gnaa.us ] gay niggers attack gnu hq</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8==C=O=C=K=S=L=A=P==D~~ [www.gnaa.us]  gay niggers attack gnu hq</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28553573</id>
	<title>cheap wow gold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246465500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weekends to people<a href="http://www.ig2t.net/" title="ig2t.net" rel="nofollow">ig2t</a> [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day <a href="http://www.wowgold4europe.net/" title="wowgold4europe.net" rel="nofollow">wowgold4europe</a> [wowgold4europe.net] good rest. For example&#239;&#188;OE people <a href="http://www.gameusd.org/" title="gameusd.org" rel="nofollow">gameusd</a> [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get <a href="http://www.meinwowgold.com/" title="meinwowgold.com" rel="nofollow">meinwowgold</a> [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each <a href="http://www.storeingame.net/" title="storeingame.net" rel="nofollow">storeingame</a> [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the <a href="http://www.speebie.org/" title="speebie.org" rel="nofollow">speebie</a> [speebie.org] whole family.<br>Everyone spends <a href="http://www.agamegold.org/" title="agamegold.org" rel="nofollow">agamegold</a> [agamegold.org] weekends in his own<a href="http://www.mmofly.org/" title="mmofly.org" rel="nofollow">mmofly</a> [mmofly.org] way. Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music&#239;&#188;OE reading novels&#239;&#188;OEor watching<a href="http://www.ogeworld.org/" title="ogeworld.org" rel="nofollow">ogeworld</a> [ogeworld.org] films. Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball&#239;&#188;OEwimming or<a href="http://www.mmorpgvip.net/" title="mmorpgvip.net" rel="nofollow">mmorpgvip</a> [mmorpgvip.net] dancing. Different people have different <a href="http://www.gamesavor.net/" title="gamesavor.net" rel="nofollow">gamesavor</a> [gamesavor.net] relaxations.<br>I often spend weekends with<a href="http://www.oggsale.net/" title="oggsale.net" rel="nofollow">oggsale</a> [oggsale.net] my family or my friends. Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends. Sometimes<a href="http://www.gamersell.net/" title="gamersell.net" rel="nofollow">gamersell</a> [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books to<a href="http://www.mmovirtex.net/" title="mmovirtex.net" rel="nofollow">mmovirtex</a> [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge. I also go to see various exhibition to broaden<a href="http://www.rpg-trader.net/" title="rpg-trader.net" rel="nofollow">rpg trader</a> [rpg-trader.net] my vision. An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends. Weekends are always enjoyable for me.<br><a href="http://www.igxe.org/" title="igxe.org" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [igxe.org] <a href="http://www.swagvault.org/" title="swagvault.org" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.org] oforu <a href="http://www.wowgold-usa.org/" title="wowgold-usa.org" rel="nofollow">wowgold-usa</a> [wowgold-usa.org] <a href="http://www.ignmax.org/" title="ignmax.org" rel="nofollow">ignmax</a> [ignmax.org] <a href="http://www.wowgoldlive.net/" title="wowgoldlive.net" rel="nofollow">wowgoldlive</a> [wowgoldlive.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.net/" title="brogame.net" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.net]  <a href="http://www.thsale.org/" title="thsale.org" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.org] <a href="http://www.goldrocku.net/" title="goldrocku.net" rel="nofollow">GoldRockU</a> [goldrocku.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.us/" title="brogame.us" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.us]<br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://www.swagvault.us/" title="swagvault.us" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.us] <a href="http://www.goldsoon.us/" title="goldsoon.us" rel="nofollow">goldsoon</a> [goldsoon.us] <a href="http://www.oforu.us/" title="oforu.us" rel="nofollow">oforu</a> [oforu.us] <a href="http://www.igxe.us/" title="www.igxe.us" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [www.igxe.us] <a href="http://www.thsale.us/" title="thsale.us" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ ig2t.net ] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [ wowgold4europe.net ] good rest .
For example     OE people gameusd [ gameusd.org ] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [ meinwowgold.com ] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [ storeingame.net ] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [ speebie.org ] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [ agamegold.org ] weekends in his ownmmofly [ mmofly.org ] way .
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music     OE reading novels     OEor watchingogeworld [ ogeworld.org ] films .
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball     OEwimming ormmorpgvip [ mmorpgvip.net ] dancing .
Different people have different gamesavor [ gamesavor.net ] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [ oggsale.net ] my family or my friends .
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends .
Sometimesgamersell [ gamersell.net ] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [ mmovirtex.net ] gain much knowledge .
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [ rpg-trader.net ] my vision .
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends .
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [ igxe.org ] swagvault [ swagvault.org ] oforu wowgold-usa [ wowgold-usa.org ] ignmax [ ignmax.org ] wowgoldlive [ wowgoldlive.net ] brogame [ brogame.net ] thsale [ thsale.org ] GoldRockU [ goldrocku.net ] brogame [ brogame.us ]   swagvault [ swagvault.us ] goldsoon [ goldsoon.us ] oforu [ oforu.us ] igxe [ www.igxe.us ] thsale [ thsale.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [wowgold4europe.net] good rest.
For exampleï¼OE people gameusd [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [speebie.org] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [agamegold.org] weekends in his ownmmofly [mmofly.org] way.
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to musicï¼OE reading novelsï¼OEor watchingogeworld [ogeworld.org] films.
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketballï¼OEwimming ormmorpgvip [mmorpgvip.net] dancing.
Different people have different gamesavor [gamesavor.net] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [oggsale.net] my family or my friends.
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends.
Sometimesgamersell [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge.
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [rpg-trader.net] my vision.
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends.
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [igxe.org] swagvault [swagvault.org] oforu wowgold-usa [wowgold-usa.org] ignmax [ignmax.org] wowgoldlive [wowgoldlive.net] brogame [brogame.net]  thsale [thsale.org] GoldRockU [goldrocku.net] brogame [brogame.us]
  swagvault [swagvault.us] goldsoon [goldsoon.us] oforu [oforu.us] igxe [www.igxe.us] thsale [thsale.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446887</id>
	<title>Re:Litigiousity</title>
	<author>qbzzt</author>
	<datestamp>1245758640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as they keep losing. Some law firms deserve to waste their efforts on non-renumerative issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they keep losing .
Some law firms deserve to waste their efforts on non-renumerative issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they keep losing.
Some law firms deserve to waste their efforts on non-renumerative issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446785</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1245757920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So when can we get a dropship from the Sulaco?
Oh wait, That crashed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So when can we get a dropship from the Sulaco ?
Oh wait , That crashed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when can we get a dropship from the Sulaco?
Oh wait, That crashed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28463605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28454025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446519
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_2028252_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447585
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450227
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449595
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28463605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28454025
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447509
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28449975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28446631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28450735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448371
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_2028252.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28447043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_2028252.28448575
</commentlist>
</conversation>
