<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_23_1523229</id>
	<title>John Hodgman Asks Obama,  "Are You a Nerd?"<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">147</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1245780060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Watch a video of comedian <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW7OPByRGDY">John Hodgman speak after Barack Obama</a> at the recent Radio and Television Correspondents Association dinner in DC and discuss the central question of our age: "how we can heal the great and shameful division that has plagued our nation for so long &mdash; the age old conflict between jocks and nerds" and ask Obama: <a href="http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2008/11/5-signs-preside/">Are you now, or have you ever been, a nerd?</a>"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Watch a video of comedian John Hodgman speak after Barack Obama at the recent Radio and Television Correspondents Association dinner in DC and discuss the central question of our age : " how we can heal the great and shameful division that has plagued our nation for so long    the age old conflict between jocks and nerds " and ask Obama : Are you now , or have you ever been , a nerd ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Watch a video of comedian John Hodgman speak after Barack Obama at the recent Radio and Television Correspondents Association dinner in DC and discuss the central question of our age: "how we can heal the great and shameful division that has plagued our nation for so long — the age old conflict between jocks and nerds" and ask Obama: Are you now, or have you ever been, a nerd?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445399</id>
	<title>Re:You wish</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245751860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're kidding right? I mean seriously, who qualifies more of a Nerd then a lawyer?<br>Nit picky on details, lives in obscure facts,  he's a constitution lawyer. The nerdiest of the bunch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're kidding right ?
I mean seriously , who qualifies more of a Nerd then a lawyer ? Nit picky on details , lives in obscure facts , he 's a constitution lawyer .
The nerdiest of the bunch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're kidding right?
I mean seriously, who qualifies more of a Nerd then a lawyer?Nit picky on details, lives in obscure facts,  he's a constitution lawyer.
The nerdiest of the bunch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442959</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>Stavr0</author>
	<datestamp>1245786720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suggest we first define who a nerd is.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/nerds.html" title="paulgraham.com" rel="nofollow">Someone who has better things to do than to try to be "popular" in school.</a> [paulgraham.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is .
Someone who has better things to do than to try to be " popular " in school .
[ paulgraham.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is.
Someone who has better things to do than to try to be "popular" in school.
[paulgraham.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442721</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>Bigby</author>
	<datestamp>1245785880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Jefferson Bible is the nerdiest/geekiest project in Presidential history</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Jefferson Bible is the nerdiest/geekiest project in Presidential history</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Jefferson Bible is the nerdiest/geekiest project in Presidential history</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447429</id>
	<title>Re:You know what would be really interesting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245761820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what's of ultimate importance then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's of ultimate importance then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's of ultimate importance then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442643</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1245785640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say historically wikipedia's definition is wrong. Nerds were defined by <i>particular</i> interests (e.g. Star Trek, computers, etc) and a <i>particular</i> appearance (e.g. pocket protector, calculator on belt, etc). Being smart or getting good grades wasn't required to be a Nerd.</p><p>Now days it seems to be more of a derogatory classification directed toward anyone who isn't a slacker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say historically wikipedia 's definition is wrong .
Nerds were defined by particular interests ( e.g .
Star Trek , computers , etc ) and a particular appearance ( e.g .
pocket protector , calculator on belt , etc ) .
Being smart or getting good grades was n't required to be a Nerd.Now days it seems to be more of a derogatory classification directed toward anyone who is n't a slacker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say historically wikipedia's definition is wrong.
Nerds were defined by particular interests (e.g.
Star Trek, computers, etc) and a particular appearance (e.g.
pocket protector, calculator on belt, etc).
Being smart or getting good grades wasn't required to be a Nerd.Now days it seems to be more of a derogatory classification directed toward anyone who isn't a slacker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447277</id>
	<title>Re:He's a jock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245760860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's clearly mixed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's clearly mixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's clearly mixed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442185</id>
	<title>No, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He is a fascist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is a fascist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is a fascist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443089</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1245787140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.</i></p><p>I know someone who would agree!</p><p>Nurse Diesel:  I know you better than you know yourself.<br>You live for bondage and discipline.</p><p>Dr. Montague:  Too much bondage. Not enough discipline!</p><p>Diesel:  You want discipline? I'll give you discipline.</p><p>Montague: Yes! Yes. I'm sorry!  Yes! It feels so good!</p><p>I take it you're more of a Dr. Montague to our President Diesel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.I know someone who would agree ! Nurse Diesel : I know you better than you know yourself.You live for bondage and discipline.Dr .
Montague : Too much bondage .
Not enough discipline ! Diesel : You want discipline ?
I 'll give you discipline.Montague : Yes !
Yes. I 'm sorry !
Yes ! It feels so good ! I take it you 're more of a Dr. Montague to our President Diesel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.I know someone who would agree!Nurse Diesel:  I know you better than you know yourself.You live for bondage and discipline.Dr.
Montague:  Too much bondage.
Not enough discipline!Diesel:  You want discipline?
I'll give you discipline.Montague: Yes!
Yes. I'm sorry!
Yes! It feels so good!I take it you're more of a Dr. Montague to our President Diesel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28448743</id>
	<title>Obama is not a Nerd</title>
	<author>ZonkerWilliam</author>
	<datestamp>1245774960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A nerd by definition doesn't do very well socially, since their time is taken up with learning the latest technologies or sciences rather than learning the social interactions that a politician would need to survive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A nerd by definition does n't do very well socially , since their time is taken up with learning the latest technologies or sciences rather than learning the social interactions that a politician would need to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A nerd by definition doesn't do very well socially, since their time is taken up with learning the latest technologies or sciences rather than learning the social interactions that a politician would need to survive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444269</id>
	<title>Not</title>
	<author>Parker Lewis</author>
	<datestamp>1245747900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's not. A nerd never never NEVER spoken a bad word about videogames.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not .
A nerd never never NEVER spoken a bad word about videogames .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not.
A nerd never never NEVER spoken a bad word about videogames.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279</id>
	<title>Re:Of course not</title>
	<author>bwthomas</author>
	<datestamp>1245784320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jesus had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weather, and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people "the way".</p><p>Jesus was clearly, clearly, a nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus had prodigious beard , an unkempt mane of hair , walked around in sandals in all weather , and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people " the way " .Jesus was clearly , clearly , a nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weather, and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people "the way".Jesus was clearly, clearly, a nerd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445453</id>
	<title>Re:No, he's not a nerd.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245752100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, he's a nerd.</p><p>In fact he is an Alpha Nerd. He's a constitutional lawyer. That's nerdy by default. Not a lot of jobs are nerdy be default.</p><p>BTW I am A nerd. I also won trophies for fencing, water polo and baseball.</p><p>Next weekend I get to launch rockets with my kids! Assuming we have better weather conditions then last weekend. Stupid Oregon weather.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , he 's a nerd.In fact he is an Alpha Nerd .
He 's a constitutional lawyer .
That 's nerdy by default .
Not a lot of jobs are nerdy be default.BTW I am A nerd .
I also won trophies for fencing , water polo and baseball.Next weekend I get to launch rockets with my kids !
Assuming we have better weather conditions then last weekend .
Stupid Oregon weather .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, he's a nerd.In fact he is an Alpha Nerd.
He's a constitutional lawyer.
That's nerdy by default.
Not a lot of jobs are nerdy be default.BTW I am A nerd.
I also won trophies for fencing, water polo and baseball.Next weekend I get to launch rockets with my kids!
Assuming we have better weather conditions then last weekend.
Stupid Oregon weather.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445589</id>
	<title>Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245752640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a 33rd degree freemason counts as a nerd, then yes.</p><p>F*CK THE NWO!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 33rd degree freemason counts as a nerd , then yes.F * CK THE NWO !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 33rd degree freemason counts as a nerd, then yes.F*CK THE NWO!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443153</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>blueturffan</author>
	<datestamp>1245787320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?</p></div> </blockquote><p>

John Wilkes Booth and his use of both a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.44 Derringer and the phrase "Sic semper tyrannis" seems rather disrespectful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start ?
John Wilkes Booth and his use of both a .44 Derringer and the phrase " Sic semper tyrannis " seems rather disrespectful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?
John Wilkes Booth and his use of both a .44 Derringer and the phrase "Sic semper tyrannis" seems rather disrespectful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451245</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1245851220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've gotta love a president who proclaimed "Make the most of the hemp seed and sow it everywhere"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've got ta love a president who proclaimed " Make the most of the hemp seed and sow it everywhere "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've gotta love a president who proclaimed "Make the most of the hemp seed and sow it everywhere"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875</id>
	<title>You wish</title>
	<author>Flavio</author>
	<datestamp>1245786420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama is a lawyer and a politician.</p><p>If the internet nerds are so needy and desperate for a role model in politics, they should try to elect a scientist or engineer. Even an MD would be a better nerd than a lawyer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama is a lawyer and a politician.If the internet nerds are so needy and desperate for a role model in politics , they should try to elect a scientist or engineer .
Even an MD would be a better nerd than a lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama is a lawyer and a politician.If the internet nerds are so needy and desperate for a role model in politics, they should try to elect a scientist or engineer.
Even an MD would be a better nerd than a lawyer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</id>
	<title>He's a jock</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1245788040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The press made a big deal about his basketball playing ability during the campaign, therefore he is disqualified as a nerd. He is the diametric opposite of a nerd, he is a jock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The press made a big deal about his basketball playing ability during the campaign , therefore he is disqualified as a nerd .
He is the diametric opposite of a nerd , he is a jock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The press made a big deal about his basketball playing ability during the campaign, therefore he is disqualified as a nerd.
He is the diametric opposite of a nerd, he is a jock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442447</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245784860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't help but think that Clinton's disposition for sexually harassing ugly girls and getting blow jobs from fat chicks might have lessened our respect for the office a bit. Sure, JFK was a philanderer too, but he had much better taste in women, and the press had the good sense not to report it.<br>
And of course we can't forget Obama -- I hear rumors he's been sleeping with a Black chick!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't help but think that Clinton 's disposition for sexually harassing ugly girls and getting blow jobs from fat chicks might have lessened our respect for the office a bit .
Sure , JFK was a philanderer too , but he had much better taste in women , and the press had the good sense not to report it .
And of course we ca n't forget Obama -- I hear rumors he 's been sleeping with a Black chick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't help but think that Clinton's disposition for sexually harassing ugly girls and getting blow jobs from fat chicks might have lessened our respect for the office a bit.
Sure, JFK was a philanderer too, but he had much better taste in women, and the press had the good sense not to report it.
And of course we can't forget Obama -- I hear rumors he's been sleeping with a Black chick!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449923</id>
	<title>Deep link</title>
	<author>ipX</author>
	<datestamp>1245874500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is a deep link to the part of the video where Hodgman actually starts talking about Obama being a nerd:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW7OPByRGDY#t=7m56s" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW7OPByRGDY#t=7m56s</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a deep link to the part of the video where Hodgman actually starts talking about Obama being a nerd : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = yW7OPByRGDY # t = 7m56s [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a deep link to the part of the video where Hodgman actually starts talking about Obama being a nerd:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW7OPByRGDY#t=7m56s [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444781</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, I know this one!</title>
	<author>IHawkMike</author>
	<datestamp>1245749700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this off-topic?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this off-topic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this off-topic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443623</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443927</id>
	<title>Re:He's a jock</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1245790080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, nerds aren't allowed to play sports now?  I guess I need to hand in my nerd card, since I play ultimate frisbee every week and have been known to play basketball occasionally.  I guess being ranked in the top 2,000 open source contributors by Ohloh and having released over 150K lines of open source code isn't enough these days; you have to also not play any sports.  </p><p>
On a more serious note, if you define yourself by the things you don't or can't do, rather than the things you are and do, then you are unlikely to live a happy life.  Oh, and you also obviously didn't watch the video; I suggest you do, it's entertaining.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , nerds are n't allowed to play sports now ?
I guess I need to hand in my nerd card , since I play ultimate frisbee every week and have been known to play basketball occasionally .
I guess being ranked in the top 2,000 open source contributors by Ohloh and having released over 150K lines of open source code is n't enough these days ; you have to also not play any sports .
On a more serious note , if you define yourself by the things you do n't or ca n't do , rather than the things you are and do , then you are unlikely to live a happy life .
Oh , and you also obviously did n't watch the video ; I suggest you do , it 's entertaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, nerds aren't allowed to play sports now?
I guess I need to hand in my nerd card, since I play ultimate frisbee every week and have been known to play basketball occasionally.
I guess being ranked in the top 2,000 open source contributors by Ohloh and having released over 150K lines of open source code isn't enough these days; you have to also not play any sports.
On a more serious note, if you define yourself by the things you don't or can't do, rather than the things you are and do, then you are unlikely to live a happy life.
Oh, and you also obviously didn't watch the video; I suggest you do, it's entertaining.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442509</id>
	<title>Jocks and nerds living together...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...mass hysteria!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...mass hysteria !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...mass hysteria!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442825</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Bigby</author>
	<datestamp>1245786240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The POTUS doesn't have power to do much of anything.  The position has gained un-Constitutional power President after President.  All the Presidents after George Washington have disrespected the position of our President.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The POTUS does n't have power to do much of anything .
The position has gained un-Constitutional power President after President .
All the Presidents after George Washington have disrespected the position of our President .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The POTUS doesn't have power to do much of anything.
The position has gained un-Constitutional power President after President.
All the Presidents after George Washington have disrespected the position of our President.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</id>
	<title>Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1245784320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest we first define who a nerd is. Otherwise this being slashdot, we'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.</p><p>My submission: I agree with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerd" title="wikipedia.org"> this definition </a> [wikipedia.org] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments.</p><p><b>In part:</b> "...derogatory connotation or stereotype, that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests..."</p><p>Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is .
Otherwise this being slashdot , we 'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.My submission : I agree with this definition [ wikipedia.org ] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments.In part : " ...derogatory connotation or stereotype , that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities , esoteric knowledge , or other obscure interests... " Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is.
Otherwise this being slashdot, we'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.My submission: I agree with  this definition  [wikipedia.org] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments.In part: "...derogatory connotation or stereotype, that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests..."Thank you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446691</id>
	<title>Re:Of course not</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1245757500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fuck-the-skull-of-jesus (the best satire site on the internet; updated once every 4 years or so) had the final word on this in 2002.</p><p><a href="http://fuck-the-skull-of-jesus.mit.edu/osamajesus.html" title="mit.edu">http://fuck-the-skull-of-jesus.mit.edu/osamajesus.html</a> [mit.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck-the-skull-of-jesus ( the best satire site on the internet ; updated once every 4 years or so ) had the final word on this in 2002.http : //fuck-the-skull-of-jesus.mit.edu/osamajesus.html [ mit.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck-the-skull-of-jesus (the best satire site on the internet; updated once every 4 years or so) had the final word on this in 2002.http://fuck-the-skull-of-jesus.mit.edu/osamajesus.html [mit.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442893</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>atomic-penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1245786480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The President should not appear on talk shows, MTV, movies, or sitcoms. The President is not our friend or buddy. Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.</p></div></blockquote><p>Where have you been? This has been going on at least since the televised Kennedy/Nixon debate.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The President should not appear on talk shows , MTV , movies , or sitcoms .
The President is not our friend or buddy .
Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.Where have you been ?
This has been going on at least since the televised Kennedy/Nixon debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The President should not appear on talk shows, MTV, movies, or sitcoms.
The President is not our friend or buddy.
Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.Where have you been?
This has been going on at least since the televised Kennedy/Nixon debate.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442815</id>
	<title>The Age of Ignorance</title>
	<author>GrifterCC</author>
	<datestamp>1245786180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As an initial matter: Fire Samzenpus.
<br> <br>
Regardless of whether "nerd" is derogatory, the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is "one of us." Whether I agree with his policies, I am delighted that our current president did dramatically better in law school than I did, at a somewhat better law school that the one I went to. He engages intellectually with at least some of the issues he faces.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an initial matter : Fire Samzenpus .
Regardless of whether " nerd " is derogatory , the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is " one of us .
" Whether I agree with his policies , I am delighted that our current president did dramatically better in law school than I did , at a somewhat better law school that the one I went to .
He engages intellectually with at least some of the issues he faces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an initial matter: Fire Samzenpus.
Regardless of whether "nerd" is derogatory, the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is "one of us.
" Whether I agree with his policies, I am delighted that our current president did dramatically better in law school than I did, at a somewhat better law school that the one I went to.
He engages intellectually with at least some of the issues he faces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451059</id>
	<title>Re:You miss-quoted the article...</title>
	<author>BobGregg</author>
	<datestamp>1245849060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek. </p><p>I don't consider them quite the same. I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.</p></div><p>From Hodgman's speech (paraphrasing): </p><p>"Some of you may take issue with my saying he is a nerd, since at the beginning I mentioned him being a geek.  </p><p>You will say, 'there is a difference between a geek and a nerd.'  To you I say: Shut up, Nerds!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek .
I do n't consider them quite the same .
I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.From Hodgman 's speech ( paraphrasing ) : " Some of you may take issue with my saying he is a nerd , since at the beginning I mentioned him being a geek .
You will say , 'there is a difference between a geek and a nerd .
' To you I say : Shut up , Nerds !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek.
I don't consider them quite the same.
I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.From Hodgman's speech (paraphrasing): "Some of you may take issue with my saying he is a nerd, since at the beginning I mentioned him being a geek.
You will say, 'there is a difference between a geek and a nerd.
'  To you I say: Shut up, Nerds!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446809</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>$0.02</author>
	<datestamp>1245758100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Abe Lincoln is the only USA president who got granted a patent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Abe Lincoln is the only USA president who got granted a patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abe Lincoln is the only USA president who got granted a patent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442605</id>
	<title>Of course not,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's got a wife, doesn't he?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's got a wife , does n't he ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's got a wife, doesn't he?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</id>
	<title>First geek President?</title>
	<author>SirGarlon</author>
	<datestamp>1245784200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA says Obama would be our (the U.S.'s) "first geek president."</p><p>Hello?  Anybody out there ever heard of Thomas Jefferson?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says Obama would be our ( the U.S. 's ) " first geek president. " Hello ?
Anybody out there ever heard of Thomas Jefferson ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says Obama would be our (the U.S.'s) "first geek president."Hello?
Anybody out there ever heard of Thomas Jefferson?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442697</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>Frigga's Ring</author>
	<datestamp>1245785760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thomas Jefferson was a bit nerdy, true, but he was disqualified from being the first nerd president because it's a well-known fact that he ran his own fantasy football league. And we all know that fantasy football is the territory of jocks, not nerds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thomas Jefferson was a bit nerdy , true , but he was disqualified from being the first nerd president because it 's a well-known fact that he ran his own fantasy football league .
And we all know that fantasy football is the territory of jocks , not nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thomas Jefferson was a bit nerdy, true, but he was disqualified from being the first nerd president because it's a well-known fact that he ran his own fantasy football league.
And we all know that fantasy football is the territory of jocks, not nerds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323</id>
	<title>You miss-quoted the article...</title>
	<author>hellfire</author>
	<datestamp>1245748080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and the article misquoted John Hodgeman.</p><p>The article stated:<br>"also the first <b>geek</b> President"</p><p>Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek.  I don't consider them quite the same.  I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.</p><p>Secondly to quote John Hodgeman directly:</p><p>"He could be the first nerd president <b>of the modern era</b>."</p><p>I don't consider Obama a geek, but he has many nerd qualities, so I would agree with this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and the article misquoted John Hodgeman.The article stated : " also the first geek President " Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek .
I do n't consider them quite the same .
I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.Secondly to quote John Hodgeman directly : " He could be the first nerd president of the modern era .
" I do n't consider Obama a geek , but he has many nerd qualities , so I would agree with this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and the article misquoted John Hodgeman.The article stated:"also the first geek President"Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek.
I don't consider them quite the same.
I consider TJ a nerd but not a geek.Secondly to quote John Hodgeman directly:"He could be the first nerd president of the modern era.
"I don't consider Obama a geek, but he has many nerd qualities, so I would agree with this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451453</id>
	<title>Re:You know what would be really interesting?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1245852660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A first class comedian can <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puMz1Q3E000&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">take the piss</a> [youtube.com] out of anyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A first class comedian can take the piss [ youtube.com ] out of anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A first class comedian can take the piss [youtube.com] out of anyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446875</id>
	<title>WTFV</title>
	<author>Burning1</author>
	<datestamp>1245758580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should probably WTFV (Watch the Fucking Video.)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Hodgeman makes this point pretty clear... The last administration wasn't an athletic bunch, but they did have that Jock attitude.</p><p>Obama is in good shape and plays sports, but really does seem more like the nerd type.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should probably WTFV ( Watch the Fucking Video .
) : ) Hodgeman makes this point pretty clear... The last administration was n't an athletic bunch , but they did have that Jock attitude.Obama is in good shape and plays sports , but really does seem more like the nerd type .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should probably WTFV (Watch the Fucking Video.
) :)Hodgeman makes this point pretty clear... The last administration wasn't an athletic bunch, but they did have that Jock attitude.Obama is in good shape and plays sports, but really does seem more like the nerd type.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449003</id>
	<title>Re:He's a jock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245777360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty sure Obama didn't so something as esoteric as writing 150k lines for open source projects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty sure Obama did n't so something as esoteric as writing 150k lines for open source projects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty sure Obama didn't so something as esoteric as writing 150k lines for open source projects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442507</id>
	<title>According to most 80's movies</title>
	<author>NickyGotz22</author>
	<datestamp>1245785220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>if Obamas a nerd were gonna be ok.  All we need is a catchy music montage, a wise crackin sidekick (Joe Biden = YES), maybe a panty raid or two, and we can fix the world economy in no time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if Obamas a nerd were gon na be ok. All we need is a catchy music montage , a wise crackin sidekick ( Joe Biden = YES ) , maybe a panty raid or two , and we can fix the world economy in no time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if Obamas a nerd were gonna be ok.  All we need is a catchy music montage, a wise crackin sidekick (Joe Biden = YES), maybe a panty raid or two, and we can fix the world economy in no time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443901</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1245789960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if Jefferson isn't geeky enough for you, there's always Herbert Hoover (degree in geology, worked as a mining engineer, and advocated technocratic solutions). Of course many folks don't like to claim him, for obvious reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if Jefferson is n't geeky enough for you , there 's always Herbert Hoover ( degree in geology , worked as a mining engineer , and advocated technocratic solutions ) .
Of course many folks do n't like to claim him , for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if Jefferson isn't geeky enough for you, there's always Herbert Hoover (degree in geology, worked as a mining engineer, and advocated technocratic solutions).
Of course many folks don't like to claim him, for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443183</id>
	<title>Afro-American Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.  See the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] by CNN.
<p>
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.  These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and other non-Black folks).  Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.  So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.  Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.  In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for <b>either</b> McCain <b>or</b> Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.  (A maximum of 65\% for McCain is okay.  So, European-American support at 55\% for McCain is well below this threshold and, hence, is not racist.)
</p><p>
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.  At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
</p><p>
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.  That claim is an outright lie.  Look at the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#NCDEM" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.  Consider the case of North Carolina.  Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.  Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.  Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.  Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
</p><p>
Here is the bottom line.  Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.  He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
</p><p>
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.  Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.  Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.  Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.  You need not defend your actions in any way.  Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today's moral standard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the election , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
See the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] by CNN .
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics , Asian-Americans , etc .
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites ( and other non-Black folks ) .
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian .
So , Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and , hence , serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern .
Only about 65 \ % of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama .
In other words , a maximum of 65 \ % support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and , hence , is acceptable .
( A maximum of 65 \ % for McCain is okay .
So , European-American support at 55 \ % for McCain is well below this threshold and , hence , is not racist .
) If African-Americans were not racist , then at most 65 \ % of them would have supported Obama .
At that level of support , McCain would have won the presidential race .
At this point , African-American supremacists ( and apologists ) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he ( 1 ) is a member of the Democratic party and ( 2 ) supports its ideals .
That claim is an outright lie .
Look at the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] for the Democratic primaries .
Consider the case of North Carolina .
Again , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton .
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats , and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical .
Yet , 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton .
Why ? African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
Here is the bottom line .
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America .
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans .
African-Americans have established that expressing " racial pride " by voting on the basis of skin color is 100 \ % acceptable .
Neither the " Wall Street Journal " nor the " New York Times " complained about this racist behavior .
Therefore , in future elections , please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color .
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American .
You need not defend your actions in any way .
Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today 's moral standard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
See the exit-polling data [cnn.com] by CNN.
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and other non-Black folks).
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.
So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.
Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.
In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.
(A maximum of 65\% for McCain is okay.
So, European-American support at 55\% for McCain is well below this threshold and, hence, is not racist.
)

If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.
At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.
That claim is an outright lie.
Look at the exit-polling data [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.
Consider the case of North Carolina.
Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.
Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.
Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
Here is the bottom line.
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.
Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.
Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.
You need not defend your actions in any way.
Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today's moral standard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442475</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1245785040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many terms that used to be derogatory are not anymore, some even a badge of honor.   Once Bill G. became the richest person in the world, nerds became more accepted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many terms that used to be derogatory are not anymore , some even a badge of honor .
Once Bill G. became the richest person in the world , nerds became more accepted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many terms that used to be derogatory are not anymore, some even a badge of honor.
Once Bill G. became the richest person in the world, nerds became more accepted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442241</id>
	<title>Re:Of course not</title>
	<author>un1xl0ser</author>
	<datestamp>1245784200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He's Jesus Christ himself.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div><p>Are the two mutually exclusive?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's Jesus Christ himself .
; - ) Are the two mutually exclusive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's Jesus Christ himself.
;-)Are the two mutually exclusive?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695</id>
	<title>You know what would be really interesting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When a reporter asks Obama a QUESTION.  One that's relevant to policy, and doesn't open the door to ambiguous bantering or set up another stump speech, or give Obama another chance to be 'lovable look at me I laugh at myself on date night' Mr. Wonderful.</p><p>I just think it would be really interesting to see the POTUS discuss policy in a serious way, without this 'nobody messes with Joe! hyuk hyuk' bullshit or a 'we inherited all this not my fault i dont have to solve it' non-answer (just what the fuck did he do as a senator, anyways?)</p><p>I know it's of penultimate importance to the average american, but I don't rate 'coolness' all that high when it comes to rating leadership.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When a reporter asks Obama a QUESTION .
One that 's relevant to policy , and does n't open the door to ambiguous bantering or set up another stump speech , or give Obama another chance to be 'lovable look at me I laugh at myself on date night ' Mr. Wonderful.I just think it would be really interesting to see the POTUS discuss policy in a serious way , without this 'nobody messes with Joe !
hyuk hyuk ' bullshit or a 'we inherited all this not my fault i dont have to solve it ' non-answer ( just what the fuck did he do as a senator , anyways ?
) I know it 's of penultimate importance to the average american , but I do n't rate 'coolness ' all that high when it comes to rating leadership .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When a reporter asks Obama a QUESTION.
One that's relevant to policy, and doesn't open the door to ambiguous bantering or set up another stump speech, or give Obama another chance to be 'lovable look at me I laugh at myself on date night' Mr. Wonderful.I just think it would be really interesting to see the POTUS discuss policy in a serious way, without this 'nobody messes with Joe!
hyuk hyuk' bullshit or a 'we inherited all this not my fault i dont have to solve it' non-answer (just what the fuck did he do as a senator, anyways?
)I know it's of penultimate importance to the average american, but I don't rate 'coolness' all that high when it comes to rating leadership.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450911</id>
	<title>Re:You miss-quoted the article...</title>
	<author>skiman1979</author>
	<datestamp>1245847200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek.  I don't consider them quite the same.</p></div><p>Agreed.  Geek != Nerd.  I basically consider a geek to be a nerd with social skills.  Nerds aren't very good at socializing, but are just very good at their technical expertise.  Geeks are similar, but know how to socialize as well.  I consider myself a geek, but a somewhat shy geek.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek .
I do n't consider them quite the same.Agreed .
Geek ! = Nerd .
I basically consider a geek to be a nerd with social skills .
Nerds are n't very good at socializing , but are just very good at their technical expertise .
Geeks are similar , but know how to socialize as well .
I consider myself a geek , but a somewhat shy geek .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Sorry to split definitions but we have to agree on the definition of nerd and geek.
I don't consider them quite the same.Agreed.
Geek != Nerd.
I basically consider a geek to be a nerd with social skills.
Nerds aren't very good at socializing, but are just very good at their technical expertise.
Geeks are similar, but know how to socialize as well.
I consider myself a geek, but a somewhat shy geek.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443623</id>
	<title>Oh, I know this one!</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1245789060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet Obama knew these, but was too shamed to say so...<br> <br>

First Answer is Shai\_Halud<br>
Second Anser is Thumper<br>
Third Answer is Pre-Spice Mass</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet Obama knew these , but was too shamed to say so.. . First Answer is Shai \ _Halud Second Anser is Thumper Third Answer is Pre-Spice Mass</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet Obama knew these, but was too shamed to say so... 

First Answer is Shai\_Halud
Second Anser is Thumper
Third Answer is Pre-Spice Mass</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445895</id>
	<title>Obama != Nerd</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1245753840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nerds are not lawyers (that's being part of 'the establishment').
<p>.</p><p>.</p><p>
that is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nerds are not lawyers ( that 's being part of 'the establishment ' ) .
. . that is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nerds are not lawyers (that's being part of 'the establishment').
..
that is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442869</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>dk90406</author>
	<datestamp>1245786420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"that refers to a person who passionately <b>pursues intellectual activities</b>, esoteric knowledge, <b>or other obscure interests</b>"<br>
So pursuing intellectual activities are obscure? What a sad state the world is in (by wikipedias definition). I'd better get drunk, watch a ballgame and get in a fight like a other <i>proper</i> human being.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities , esoteric knowledge , or other obscure interests " So pursuing intellectual activities are obscure ?
What a sad state the world is in ( by wikipedias definition ) .
I 'd better get drunk , watch a ballgame and get in a fight like a other proper human being .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests"
So pursuing intellectual activities are obscure?
What a sad state the world is in (by wikipedias definition).
I'd better get drunk, watch a ballgame and get in a fight like a other proper human being.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442483</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1245785100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?</p></div><p>Dick Nixon?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start ? Dick Nixon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?Dick Nixon?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442595</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, Obama has kept the dignity of the office fairly well.  This was a press dinner, ie, although it's broadcast in various places, with clips here and there, it's not really a public address.  Obama himself was making some pretty roasting jokes (more so at the White House Correspondents dinner), and John was pretty respectful in many ways, talking up Obama's intellect and how he's doing a good-job...</p><p>Discipline is most certainly not the key to maintaining authority and respect.  He has authority because the US populace gave him it; he maintains respect by respecting the US peope who put him there, and being open and transparent, and not "talking down" to them, acting as though he's some sort of God purely because of his job.  In fact Obama has made many self deprecating jokes about how some supporters seem to idolise him but he himself doesn't take it at all seriously.<br>I'm thinking of the "And on the seventy-third day, I shall rest" joke in particular...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , Obama has kept the dignity of the office fairly well .
This was a press dinner , ie , although it 's broadcast in various places , with clips here and there , it 's not really a public address .
Obama himself was making some pretty roasting jokes ( more so at the White House Correspondents dinner ) , and John was pretty respectful in many ways , talking up Obama 's intellect and how he 's doing a good-job...Discipline is most certainly not the key to maintaining authority and respect .
He has authority because the US populace gave him it ; he maintains respect by respecting the US peope who put him there , and being open and transparent , and not " talking down " to them , acting as though he 's some sort of God purely because of his job .
In fact Obama has made many self deprecating jokes about how some supporters seem to idolise him but he himself does n't take it at all seriously.I 'm thinking of the " And on the seventy-third day , I shall rest " joke in particular.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, Obama has kept the dignity of the office fairly well.
This was a press dinner, ie, although it's broadcast in various places, with clips here and there, it's not really a public address.
Obama himself was making some pretty roasting jokes (more so at the White House Correspondents dinner), and John was pretty respectful in many ways, talking up Obama's intellect and how he's doing a good-job...Discipline is most certainly not the key to maintaining authority and respect.
He has authority because the US populace gave him it; he maintains respect by respecting the US peope who put him there, and being open and transparent, and not "talking down" to them, acting as though he's some sort of God purely because of his job.
In fact Obama has made many self deprecating jokes about how some supporters seem to idolise him but he himself doesn't take it at all seriously.I'm thinking of the "And on the seventy-third day, I shall rest" joke in particular...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442505</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1245785220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start? </i></p><p>When people tried to make the position a king above normal citizens.</p><p>When people start to think of Presidents as Emperors or Popes that are above common man, then they start acting like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start ?
When people tried to make the position a king above normal citizens.When people start to think of Presidents as Emperors or Popes that are above common man , then they start acting like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?
When people tried to make the position a king above normal citizens.When people start to think of Presidents as Emperors or Popes that are above common man, then they start acting like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447675</id>
	<title>there is more evidence</title>
	<author>mehemiah</author>
	<datestamp>1245763740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>there was a <a href="http://kotaku.com/5080161/obama-on-all-your-base-are-belong-to-us-bwah" title="kotaku.com" rel="nofollow">kotaku </a> [kotaku.com] post about it.

<a href="http://kotaku.com/5080161/obama-on-all-your-base-are-belong-to-us-bwah" title="kotaku.com" rel="nofollow">http://kotaku.com/5080161/obama-on-all-your-base-are-belong-to-us-bwah</a> [kotaku.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>there was a kotaku [ kotaku.com ] post about it .
http : //kotaku.com/5080161/obama-on-all-your-base-are-belong-to-us-bwah [ kotaku.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there was a kotaku  [kotaku.com] post about it.
http://kotaku.com/5080161/obama-on-all-your-base-are-belong-to-us-bwah [kotaku.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442297</id>
	<title>Now I know the site is broken.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm blocking Idle and it's still showing on the main page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm blocking Idle and it 's still showing on the main page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm blocking Idle and it's still showing on the main page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444227</id>
	<title>Re:You wish</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1245747720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's a constitutional lawyer, which is a whole different breed.  And who says a nerd has to be a certain profession?</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's a constitutional lawyer , which is a whole different breed .
And who says a nerd has to be a certain profession ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's a constitutional lawyer, which is a whole different breed.
And who says a nerd has to be a certain profession?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443841</id>
	<title>Re:The Age of Ignorance</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1245789780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As an initial matter: Fire Samzenpus.</p></div><p>Priorities, please.  Fire kdawson first.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is "one of us."</p></div><p>I suggest you watch the video to the end.  Although it's done with humour, he's making a serious point not too dissimilar to this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an initial matter : Fire Samzenpus.Priorities , please .
Fire kdawson first .
the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is " one of us .
" I suggest you watch the video to the end .
Although it 's done with humour , he 's making a serious point not too dissimilar to this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an initial matter: Fire Samzenpus.Priorities, please.
Fire kdawson first.
the thing that gives me the most heart about the fact that this question is being asked is that we seem to have gotten over our national obsession with having a president who is "one of us.
"I suggest you watch the video to the end.
Although it's done with humour, he's making a serious point not too dissimilar to this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446301</id>
	<title>Obama is no nerd.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1245755640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama is far from being anything resembling a nerd.  Positions of power, particularly the presidencies, have been filled by people about as non-nerd as you get.  The people here saying Obama is a nerd are like most of Obama supporters--projecting their own identity or hopes and dreams into them because they like the man and want him to be like them.  If you've seen some of the almost spooky Obama worship going on, this will not at all surprise you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama is far from being anything resembling a nerd .
Positions of power , particularly the presidencies , have been filled by people about as non-nerd as you get .
The people here saying Obama is a nerd are like most of Obama supporters--projecting their own identity or hopes and dreams into them because they like the man and want him to be like them .
If you 've seen some of the almost spooky Obama worship going on , this will not at all surprise you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama is far from being anything resembling a nerd.
Positions of power, particularly the presidencies, have been filled by people about as non-nerd as you get.
The people here saying Obama is a nerd are like most of Obama supporters--projecting their own identity or hopes and dreams into them because they like the man and want him to be like them.
If you've seen some of the almost spooky Obama worship going on, this will not at all surprise you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442757</id>
	<title>Hooray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245786000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad this got modded up because I absolutely love hearing everything about our deal leader. Are we also going to modup a story about how Obama's shit had corn in it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad this got modded up because I absolutely love hearing everything about our deal leader .
Are we also going to modup a story about how Obama 's shit had corn in it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad this got modded up because I absolutely love hearing everything about our deal leader.
Are we also going to modup a story about how Obama's shit had corn in it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442579</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Respect is not vested in the clothes a person wears, or in the networks they speak on; these things you complain about are attempts to engage more members of the voting public, a group whose standards for behavior and means of communication are frequently changing.  A President may comport themselves with humor or with stoicism, but neither of these is incompatible with maintaining the seriousness of the office itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Respect is not vested in the clothes a person wears , or in the networks they speak on ; these things you complain about are attempts to engage more members of the voting public , a group whose standards for behavior and means of communication are frequently changing .
A President may comport themselves with humor or with stoicism , but neither of these is incompatible with maintaining the seriousness of the office itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Respect is not vested in the clothes a person wears, or in the networks they speak on; these things you complain about are attempts to engage more members of the voting public, a group whose standards for behavior and means of communication are frequently changing.
A President may comport themselves with humor or with stoicism, but neither of these is incompatible with maintaining the seriousness of the office itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447971</id>
	<title>Re:He's a jock</title>
	<author>TornCityVenz</author>
	<datestamp>1245766140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only did they make a big deal about it, but at one campaign stop when tossed a ball he shot an off the hip Swish from behind the 3 point line, while on camera...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only did they make a big deal about it , but at one campaign stop when tossed a ball he shot an off the hip Swish from behind the 3 point line , while on camera.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only did they make a big deal about it, but at one campaign stop when tossed a ball he shot an off the hip Swish from behind the 3 point line, while on camera...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442939</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>ckuttruff</author>
	<datestamp>1245786660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe Hodgman said the first of this <i>era</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe Hodgman said the first of this era .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe Hodgman said the first of this era.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449389</id>
	<title>Re:He's a jock</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1245782340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't you be both at the same time? Or does it go against your culture of pigeonholing in which you're either a nerd or a jock, or also in Obama's case a black man or a white man (I'm bringing it up because in America Obama is referred to as a black man, whereas in France he's referred to as being mixed race).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't you be both at the same time ?
Or does it go against your culture of pigeonholing in which you 're either a nerd or a jock , or also in Obama 's case a black man or a white man ( I 'm bringing it up because in America Obama is referred to as a black man , whereas in France he 's referred to as being mixed race ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't you be both at the same time?
Or does it go against your culture of pigeonholing in which you're either a nerd or a jock, or also in Obama's case a black man or a white man (I'm bringing it up because in America Obama is referred to as a black man, whereas in France he's referred to as being mixed race).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449889</id>
	<title>Re:Of course not</title>
	<author>dintech</author>
	<datestamp>1245874080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Jesus had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weather, and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people "the way".</p></div></blockquote><p>Does that mean Osama Bin Laden is a nerd too?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus had prodigious beard , an unkempt mane of hair , walked around in sandals in all weather , and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people " the way " .Does that mean Osama Bin Laden is a nerd too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weather, and saw himself as a man with divine powers who was put on the earth to show people "the way".Does that mean Osama Bin Laden is a nerd too?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443805</id>
	<title>Re:Of course not</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245789600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weather</p></div><p>Yeah well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>had prodigious beard , an unkempt mane of hair , walked around in sandals in all weatherYeah well , you know , that 's just like , your opinion , man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>had prodigious beard, an unkempt mane of hair, walked around in sandals in all weatherYeah well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442649</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245785640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In short:<br>Nerds=bad<br>Geeks=good<br> <br>
They share similar skillsets and mentalities, but as a wise man once said: "Geeks get it done". I think he mean that a nerd is a geek that has not actually achieved anything noteworthy. Or that a geek is a nerd or has.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In short : Nerds = badGeeks = good They share similar skillsets and mentalities , but as a wise man once said : " Geeks get it done " .
I think he mean that a nerd is a geek that has not actually achieved anything noteworthy .
Or that a geek is a nerd or has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In short:Nerds=badGeeks=good 
They share similar skillsets and mentalities, but as a wise man once said: "Geeks get it done".
I think he mean that a nerd is a geek that has not actually achieved anything noteworthy.
Or that a geek is a nerd or has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</id>
	<title>He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?  Must have been around the first Clinton Administration.  He tried to appeal to the younger crowd by appearing on MTV, and dressing casually, etc.  I'm not talking about necessarily respecting the man, but respect the position.  I haven't respected a President since Ronald Reagan, but I do respect the position.  The President should not appear on talk shows, MTV, movies, or sitcoms.  The President is not our friend or buddy.  Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start ?
Must have been around the first Clinton Administration .
He tried to appeal to the younger crowd by appearing on MTV , and dressing casually , etc .
I 'm not talking about necessarily respecting the man , but respect the position .
I have n't respected a President since Ronald Reagan , but I do respect the position .
The President should not appear on talk shows , MTV , movies , or sitcoms .
The President is not our friend or buddy .
Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did all of this disrespect for the position of our President start?
Must have been around the first Clinton Administration.
He tried to appeal to the younger crowd by appearing on MTV, and dressing casually, etc.
I'm not talking about necessarily respecting the man, but respect the position.
I haven't respected a President since Ronald Reagan, but I do respect the position.
The President should not appear on talk shows, MTV, movies, or sitcoms.
The President is not our friend or buddy.
Discipline is needed to keep respect and authority.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442503</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>cephus</author>
	<datestamp>1245785220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, what a nerd!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , what a nerd !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, what a nerd!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442857</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245786360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well we have the actual video. What John actually says is "the First Nerd President of the Modern Era", but I guess you're too much of a jock to fact-check rather than jump to conclusions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well we have the actual video .
What John actually says is " the First Nerd President of the Modern Era " , but I guess you 're too much of a jock to fact-check rather than jump to conclusions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well we have the actual video.
What John actually says is "the First Nerd President of the Modern Era", but I guess you're too much of a jock to fact-check rather than jump to conclusions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121</id>
	<title>Of course not</title>
	<author>PeeAitchPee</author>
	<datestamp>1245783840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's Jesus Christ himself.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's Jesus Christ himself .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's Jesus Christ himself.
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443761</id>
	<title>No, he's not a nerd.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245789540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be an ass.  He's a jock of the "team captain" type.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be an ass .
He 's a jock of the " team captain " type .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be an ass.
He's a jock of the "team captain" type.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443535</id>
	<title>Afro-American Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.  See the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] by CNN.
<p>
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.  These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and other non-Black folks).  Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.  So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.  Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.  In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for <b>either</b> McCain <b>or</b> Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.  (A maximum of 65\% for McCain is okay.  So, European-American support at 55\% for McCain is well below this threshold and, hence, is not racist.)
</p><p>
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.  At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
</p><p>
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.  That claim is an outright lie.  Look at the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#NCDEM" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.  Consider the case of North Carolina.  Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.  Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.  Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.  Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
</p><p>
Here is the bottom line.  Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.  He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
</p><p>
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.  Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.  Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.  Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.  You need not defend your actions in any way.  Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today's moral standard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the election , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
See the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] by CNN .
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics , Asian-Americans , etc .
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites ( and other non-Black folks ) .
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian .
So , Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and , hence , serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern .
Only about 65 \ % of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama .
In other words , a maximum of 65 \ % support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and , hence , is acceptable .
( A maximum of 65 \ % for McCain is okay .
So , European-American support at 55 \ % for McCain is well below this threshold and , hence , is not racist .
) If African-Americans were not racist , then at most 65 \ % of them would have supported Obama .
At that level of support , McCain would have won the presidential race .
At this point , African-American supremacists ( and apologists ) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he ( 1 ) is a member of the Democratic party and ( 2 ) supports its ideals .
That claim is an outright lie .
Look at the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] for the Democratic primaries .
Consider the case of North Carolina .
Again , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton .
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats , and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical .
Yet , 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton .
Why ? African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
Here is the bottom line .
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America .
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans .
African-Americans have established that expressing " racial pride " by voting on the basis of skin color is 100 \ % acceptable .
Neither the " Wall Street Journal " nor the " New York Times " complained about this racist behavior .
Therefore , in future elections , please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color .
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American .
You need not defend your actions in any way .
Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today 's moral standard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
See the exit-polling data [cnn.com] by CNN.
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and other non-Black folks).
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.
So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.
Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.
In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.
(A maximum of 65\% for McCain is okay.
So, European-American support at 55\% for McCain is well below this threshold and, hence, is not racist.
)

If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.
At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.
That claim is an outright lie.
Look at the exit-polling data [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.
Consider the case of North Carolina.
Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.
Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.
Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
Here is the bottom line.
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.
Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.
Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.
You need not defend your actions in any way.
Voting on the basis of skin color is quite acceptable by today's moral standard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442583</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we finally lost all respect for the Presidency with George W Bush.</p><p>The way he got the government to systematically hold people down so they could be raped by his corporate contributors is a disgrace to all Americans. His constant and consequential blunders weakened our whole  country, not just the Presidency.</p><p>George W Bush was the worst president ever, and it had nothing to do with MTV</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we finally lost all respect for the Presidency with George W Bush.The way he got the government to systematically hold people down so they could be raped by his corporate contributors is a disgrace to all Americans .
His constant and consequential blunders weakened our whole country , not just the Presidency.George W Bush was the worst president ever , and it had nothing to do with MTV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we finally lost all respect for the Presidency with George W Bush.The way he got the government to systematically hold people down so they could be raped by his corporate contributors is a disgrace to all Americans.
His constant and consequential blunders weakened our whole  country, not just the Presidency.George W Bush was the worst president ever, and it had nothing to do with MTV</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450955</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>skiman1979</author>
	<datestamp>1245847920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suggest we first define who a nerd is. Otherwise this being slashdot, we'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.</p><p>My submission: I agree with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerd" title="wikipedia.org"> this definition </a> [wikipedia.org] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments.</p><p> <b>In part:</b> "...derogatory connotation or stereotype, that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests..."</p><p>Thank you.</p></div><p>As opposed to a geek which, according to Wikipedia is (in a more recent school of thought)...</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...simply a description. It is taken to be someone who is an enthusiast, often in things outside of the mainstream spectrum, of note is that in this definition, there is no reference to being socially inept in the slightest.</p></div><p>Geeks can socialize.  Nerds can't... usually.  I was a bit of a nerd in high school, but I've transformed into a geek in more recent years.  I wear my Geek Badge proudly!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is .
Otherwise this being slashdot , we 'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.My submission : I agree with this definition [ wikipedia.org ] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments .
In part : " ...derogatory connotation or stereotype , that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities , esoteric knowledge , or other obscure interests... " Thank you.As opposed to a geek which , according to Wikipedia is ( in a more recent school of thought ) ... ...simply a description .
It is taken to be someone who is an enthusiast , often in things outside of the mainstream spectrum , of note is that in this definition , there is no reference to being socially inept in the slightest.Geeks can socialize .
Nerds ca n't... usually. I was a bit of a nerd in high school , but I 've transformed into a geek in more recent years .
I wear my Geek Badge proudly !
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest we first define who a nerd is.
Otherwise this being slashdot, we'll end up submitting comments about something that is entirely different depending on who is posting.My submission: I agree with  this definition  [wikipedia.org] and hope that all of you use it as a bench mark as you post your comments.
In part: "...derogatory connotation or stereotype, that refers to a person who passionately pursues intellectual activities, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests..."Thank you.As opposed to a geek which, according to Wikipedia is (in a more recent school of thought)... ...simply a description.
It is taken to be someone who is an enthusiast, often in things outside of the mainstream spectrum, of note is that in this definition, there is no reference to being socially inept in the slightest.Geeks can socialize.
Nerds can't... usually.  I was a bit of a nerd in high school, but I've transformed into a geek in more recent years.
I wear my Geek Badge proudly!
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442755</id>
	<title>Re:First geek President?</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1245786000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>George Washington was a bit of a nerd himself being into surveying and map making.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>George Washington was a bit of a nerd himself being into surveying and map making .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>George Washington was a bit of a nerd himself being into surveying and map making.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445301</id>
	<title>You old men, you!</title>
	<author>Tybalt\_Capulet</author>
	<datestamp>1245751560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I graduated High School in 07, and you old men make me laugh. There's not much difference between the Jocks and the Nerds anymore, now the Jocks are tools and the Nerds are just losers.</p><p>Until college no one has school pride.</p><p>Thank the 90's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I graduated High School in 07 , and you old men make me laugh .
There 's not much difference between the Jocks and the Nerds anymore , now the Jocks are tools and the Nerds are just losers.Until college no one has school pride.Thank the 90 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I graduated High School in 07, and you old men make me laugh.
There's not much difference between the Jocks and the Nerds anymore, now the Jocks are tools and the Nerds are just losers.Until college no one has school pride.Thank the 90's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446347</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Korey Kaczor</author>
	<datestamp>1245755880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think he's a nerd, since he never worked for the Willy Wonka Candy Company, and isn't covered in sugar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think he 's a nerd , since he never worked for the Willy Wonka Candy Company , and is n't covered in sugar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think he's a nerd, since he never worked for the Willy Wonka Candy Company, and isn't covered in sugar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442829</id>
	<title>Re:He is President of the United States</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1245786240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically our President shouldn't communicate with us. Or maybe, President TV? With official looking logos and red or blue backgrounds that respect the position. I joke but that actually sounds kind of cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically our President should n't communicate with us .
Or maybe , President TV ?
With official looking logos and red or blue backgrounds that respect the position .
I joke but that actually sounds kind of cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically our President shouldn't communicate with us.
Or maybe, President TV?
With official looking logos and red or blue backgrounds that respect the position.
I joke but that actually sounds kind of cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442109</id>
	<title>No, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245783780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...he IS a NIGGER!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...he IS a NIGGER !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...he IS a NIGGER!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443693</id>
	<title>Re:Hooray</title>
	<author>Zordak</author>
	<datestamp>1245789300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just in the past week, I've seen, pitched as front-page news, that Barack Obama KILLED A FLY and had FROZEN CUSTARD with his kids.  A couple of weeks ago, it was similarly reported that he HAD A HAMBURGER.  Corn can't be too far behind.  Apparently nothing about the Dear Leader is so trivial that the media drones will not wet themselves with delight and dutifully report it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in the past week , I 've seen , pitched as front-page news , that Barack Obama KILLED A FLY and had FROZEN CUSTARD with his kids .
A couple of weeks ago , it was similarly reported that he HAD A HAMBURGER .
Corn ca n't be too far behind .
Apparently nothing about the Dear Leader is so trivial that the media drones will not wet themselves with delight and dutifully report it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in the past week, I've seen, pitched as front-page news, that Barack Obama KILLED A FLY and had FROZEN CUSTARD with his kids.
A couple of weeks ago, it was similarly reported that he HAD A HAMBURGER.
Corn can't be too far behind.
Apparently nothing about the Dear Leader is so trivial that the media drones will not wet themselves with delight and dutifully report it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446635</id>
	<title>Re:Let's first agree on one thing</title>
	<author>Cstryon</author>
	<datestamp>1245757260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obscure may not mean what you think it means.

<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscure" title="merriam-webster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscure</a> [merriam-webster.com]

2: not readily understood or clearly expressed.

Computers, Science (In general), D&amp;D, all these are not readily understood, unless you are in the proper setting, like a university, or the IT department.

Definition 1;b is funny, when thinking about the stereotypical nerd.
b: shrouded in or hidden by darkness .</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obscure may not mean what you think it means .
http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscure [ merriam-webster.com ] 2 : not readily understood or clearly expressed .
Computers , Science ( In general ) , D&amp;D , all these are not readily understood , unless you are in the proper setting , like a university , or the IT department .
Definition 1 ; b is funny , when thinking about the stereotypical nerd .
b : shrouded in or hidden by darkness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obscure may not mean what you think it means.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscure [merriam-webster.com]

2: not readily understood or clearly expressed.
Computers, Science (In general), D&amp;D, all these are not readily understood, unless you are in the proper setting, like a university, or the IT department.
Definition 1;b is funny, when thinking about the stereotypical nerd.
b: shrouded in or hidden by darkness .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442493</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..he IS a FASCIST.  So was Bush, though Obama floored the gas pedal on the road to total fascism.</p><p>"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini</p><p>Plus, everyone needs to watch <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">The Obama Deception.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..he IS a FASCIST .
So was Bush , though Obama floored the gas pedal on the road to total fascism .
" Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power .
" -- Benito MussoliniPlus , everyone needs to watch The Obama Deception .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..he IS a FASCIST.
So was Bush, though Obama floored the gas pedal on the road to total fascism.
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
" -- Benito MussoliniPlus, everyone needs to watch The Obama Deception.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442109</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_23_1523229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442605
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442279
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443805
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449889
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444781
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442493
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445399
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28449389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28447971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28448743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28444323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28451059
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443535
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28443089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28446635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28450955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28445895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_23_1523229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_23_1523229.28442297
</commentlist>
</conversation>
