<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_22_2337204</id>
	<title>Watch TV On Your Satnav</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245693420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Barence</a> writes <i>"Satnav firm Mio is launching a <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/257827/tv-satnav-worries-accident-watchdog.html">device with an integrated TV tuner</a>. The Mio Spirit range includes a digital television tuner that is intended to be used 'during breaks in the journey or at their final destination.' However, safety campaigners fear there's little to stop the television being used at the wheel. When the system is first turned on a warning message is displayed, telling the user not to watch television while driving. If this is ignored, a secondary warning message kicks in if the GPS chip detects the vehicle is moving at more than 5mph. But that's it!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " Satnav firm Mio is launching a device with an integrated TV tuner .
The Mio Spirit range includes a digital television tuner that is intended to be used 'during breaks in the journey or at their final destination .
' However , safety campaigners fear there 's little to stop the television being used at the wheel .
When the system is first turned on a warning message is displayed , telling the user not to watch television while driving .
If this is ignored , a secondary warning message kicks in if the GPS chip detects the vehicle is moving at more than 5mph .
But that 's it !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "Satnav firm Mio is launching a device with an integrated TV tuner.
The Mio Spirit range includes a digital television tuner that is intended to be used 'during breaks in the journey or at their final destination.
' However, safety campaigners fear there's little to stop the television being used at the wheel.
When the system is first turned on a warning message is displayed, telling the user not to watch television while driving.
If this is ignored, a secondary warning message kicks in if the GPS chip detects the vehicle is moving at more than 5mph.
But that's it!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437645</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1245765840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and like Unix, life doesn't have an undelete.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and like Unix , life does n't have an undelete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and like Unix, life doesn't have an undelete.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439753</id>
	<title>Re:Nice!</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1245775140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.</p></div></blockquote><p>Nobody could be against it. It is either Darwinism or Gods will.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully , these bastards will kill themselves without killing others , making the road safer for everyone else.Nobody could be against it .
It is either Darwinism or Gods will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.Nobody could be against it.
It is either Darwinism or Gods will.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436755</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>CmdrGravy</author>
	<datestamp>1245757200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If some moron watching TV whilst she should have been watching the road mows down my family and crushes my children under her wheels I can tell you I wouldn't give a toss that she'd be paying the price for her lack of personal responsibility.</p><p>There is no justification at all for anyone to ever be driving a car and watching TV at the same time. Absolutely never and that moronic contrived example of emergency broadcasts given by someone above is pure nonsense. That being the case the government should make damn sure that any such device deactivates the moment your car starts moving and punish anyone tampering with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If some moron watching TV whilst she should have been watching the road mows down my family and crushes my children under her wheels I can tell you I would n't give a toss that she 'd be paying the price for her lack of personal responsibility.There is no justification at all for anyone to ever be driving a car and watching TV at the same time .
Absolutely never and that moronic contrived example of emergency broadcasts given by someone above is pure nonsense .
That being the case the government should make damn sure that any such device deactivates the moment your car starts moving and punish anyone tampering with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If some moron watching TV whilst she should have been watching the road mows down my family and crushes my children under her wheels I can tell you I wouldn't give a toss that she'd be paying the price for her lack of personal responsibility.There is no justification at all for anyone to ever be driving a car and watching TV at the same time.
Absolutely never and that moronic contrived example of emergency broadcasts given by someone above is pure nonsense.
That being the case the government should make damn sure that any such device deactivates the moment your car starts moving and punish anyone tampering with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440951</id>
	<title>Re:My World and Welcome to It</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1245779820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Every little bit helps.</p></div><p>Every little bit has a price.  Often the price is completely out of proportion to the help.</p><p>For example, you are probably itching to point out that preventing people from "watching tv" while driving has almost no cost.  That's only superficially true.  For one thing it promulgates the nanny culture where people don't need to think about the risks they take and instead expect the system to take care of them.  In my book, that is an extremely high price because it invites a continual erosion of freedom in the name of "saving just one child."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every little bit helps.Every little bit has a price .
Often the price is completely out of proportion to the help.For example , you are probably itching to point out that preventing people from " watching tv " while driving has almost no cost .
That 's only superficially true .
For one thing it promulgates the nanny culture where people do n't need to think about the risks they take and instead expect the system to take care of them .
In my book , that is an extremely high price because it invites a continual erosion of freedom in the name of " saving just one child .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every little bit helps.Every little bit has a price.
Often the price is completely out of proportion to the help.For example, you are probably itching to point out that preventing people from "watching tv" while driving has almost no cost.
That's only superficially true.
For one thing it promulgates the nanny culture where people don't need to think about the risks they take and instead expect the system to take care of them.
In my book, that is an extremely high price because it invites a continual erosion of freedom in the name of "saving just one child.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435273</id>
	<title>Oh I promise</title>
	<author>51M02</author>
	<datestamp>1245697320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will never watch TV while driving. I swear it.</p><p>Now give me that Satnav and please desactivate those warnings. I swear they are not needed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will never watch TV while driving .
I swear it.Now give me that Satnav and please desactivate those warnings .
I swear they are not needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will never watch TV while driving.
I swear it.Now give me that Satnav and please desactivate those warnings.
I swear they are not needed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28444159</id>
	<title>Obligitory bash quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245790740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://bash.org/?195969" title="bash.org" rel="nofollow">http://bash.org/?195969</a> [bash.org] </p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>&lt;TXTerron&gt; wanna know whats geeky?<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; hmm?<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; I'm driving down the road<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; I drove down the road today too...<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; Wait, You mean you're on irc in your truck?<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; yeah, using my wireless card<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; ^\_\_\_^<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; Jason, is that safe?<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; na, i just type with one hand while I'm driving and halfway watch the road, its cool, dont worry<br>&lt;Jennifer&gt; You're good with typing with one hand?<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; shaddup<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; FUCK<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; i just rear ended a lady<br>&lt;TXTerron&gt; brb<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //bash.org/ ? 195969 [ bash.org ] wan na know whats geeky ?
hmm ? I 'm driving down the road I drove down the road today too... Wait , You mean you 're on irc in your truck ?
yeah , using my wireless card ^ \ _ \ _ \ _ ^ Jason , is that safe ?
na , i just type with one hand while I 'm driving and halfway watch the road , its cool , dont worry You 're good with typing with one hand ?
shaddup : D FUCK i just rear ended a lady brb : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://bash.org/?195969 [bash.org]   wanna know whats geeky?
hmm? I'm driving down the road I drove down the road today too... Wait, You mean you're on irc in your truck?
yeah, using my wireless card ^\_\_\_^ Jason, is that safe?
na, i just type with one hand while I'm driving and halfway watch the road, its cool, dont worry You're good with typing with one hand?
shaddup :D FUCK i just rear ended a lady brb :( 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until one day, while watching reruns of "Legend Of The Seeker" on your in-dash entertainment system and slobbering over the kind of tits you wish existed at the latest LARP convention, you manage to kill someone who doesn't share your zest for solipsism or Unix analogies.  I swear Slashdot posts stories like this just to troll the libertarians that are as thick as flies on shit around here.  "Life is like Unix and you are the superuser." And this gets an Insightful moderation.  Shit a god damn.  I suppose I'm going to have to start driving with venetian blinds on my car windows to enhance my cinematic vehicular experience, and if I drive over a libertarian I'll tell his family and friends that the free market will take care of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until one day , while watching reruns of " Legend Of The Seeker " on your in-dash entertainment system and slobbering over the kind of tits you wish existed at the latest LARP convention , you manage to kill someone who does n't share your zest for solipsism or Unix analogies .
I swear Slashdot posts stories like this just to troll the libertarians that are as thick as flies on shit around here .
" Life is like Unix and you are the superuser .
" And this gets an Insightful moderation .
Shit a god damn .
I suppose I 'm going to have to start driving with venetian blinds on my car windows to enhance my cinematic vehicular experience , and if I drive over a libertarian I 'll tell his family and friends that the free market will take care of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until one day, while watching reruns of "Legend Of The Seeker" on your in-dash entertainment system and slobbering over the kind of tits you wish existed at the latest LARP convention, you manage to kill someone who doesn't share your zest for solipsism or Unix analogies.
I swear Slashdot posts stories like this just to troll the libertarians that are as thick as flies on shit around here.
"Life is like Unix and you are the superuser.
" And this gets an Insightful moderation.
Shit a god damn.
I suppose I'm going to have to start driving with venetian blinds on my car windows to enhance my cinematic vehicular experience, and if I drive over a libertarian I'll tell his family and friends that the free market will take care of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435471</id>
	<title>Re:Simple safety solution</title>
	<author>GuldKalle</author>
	<datestamp>1245699060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if you know the way, and your kids want to watch TV while you're driving?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you know the way , and your kids want to watch TV while you 're driving ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you know the way, and your kids want to watch TV while you're driving?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436403</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward 4566</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245752760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>already got that TV stuff on my 5 year old Pioneer SatNav, so nothing new under the sun...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>already got that TV stuff on my 5 year old Pioneer SatNav , so nothing new under the sun.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>already got that TV stuff on my 5 year old Pioneer SatNav, so nothing new under the sun...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28443677</id>
	<title>Ferry me!</title>
	<author>DriveDog</author>
	<datestamp>1245789240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A recent indash unit purchase has a line to the parking brake sensor so that (if installed according to directions) it won't show video if the parking brake is off, unless the additional line connected to the reverse gear sensor indicates that the car is in reverse, in which case it will display the video sourced from the input supposedly from the backup camera. Like I'm going to dig around and splice into those wires when I could use what's left of my brain to decide not to watch Wildest Police Videos while driving...</p><p>It also has an internal motion sensor that overrides the parking brake sensor if it decides the car is in motion, which could be a drawback...</p><p>But... THIS device uses satellite info to determine whether the car is in motion relative to Earth's surface. Sometimes I really want to watch a video while on board the 2.5 hour ferry from Ocracoke, but even though no one's driving the car, the system will decide not to show video? Poor design decision, that.</p><p>What's more, I use a car GPS device occasionally on my bicycle. Maybe I want to watch TV while bicycling in heavy traffic, because that's still not as dangerous as applying eye makeup while yapping and smoking and swilling coffee behind the wheel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent indash unit purchase has a line to the parking brake sensor so that ( if installed according to directions ) it wo n't show video if the parking brake is off , unless the additional line connected to the reverse gear sensor indicates that the car is in reverse , in which case it will display the video sourced from the input supposedly from the backup camera .
Like I 'm going to dig around and splice into those wires when I could use what 's left of my brain to decide not to watch Wildest Police Videos while driving...It also has an internal motion sensor that overrides the parking brake sensor if it decides the car is in motion , which could be a drawback...But... THIS device uses satellite info to determine whether the car is in motion relative to Earth 's surface .
Sometimes I really want to watch a video while on board the 2.5 hour ferry from Ocracoke , but even though no one 's driving the car , the system will decide not to show video ?
Poor design decision , that.What 's more , I use a car GPS device occasionally on my bicycle .
Maybe I want to watch TV while bicycling in heavy traffic , because that 's still not as dangerous as applying eye makeup while yapping and smoking and swilling coffee behind the wheel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A recent indash unit purchase has a line to the parking brake sensor so that (if installed according to directions) it won't show video if the parking brake is off, unless the additional line connected to the reverse gear sensor indicates that the car is in reverse, in which case it will display the video sourced from the input supposedly from the backup camera.
Like I'm going to dig around and splice into those wires when I could use what's left of my brain to decide not to watch Wildest Police Videos while driving...It also has an internal motion sensor that overrides the parking brake sensor if it decides the car is in motion, which could be a drawback...But... THIS device uses satellite info to determine whether the car is in motion relative to Earth's surface.
Sometimes I really want to watch a video while on board the 2.5 hour ferry from Ocracoke, but even though no one's driving the car, the system will decide not to show video?
Poor design decision, that.What's more, I use a car GPS device occasionally on my bicycle.
Maybe I want to watch TV while bicycling in heavy traffic, because that's still not as dangerous as applying eye makeup while yapping and smoking and swilling coffee behind the wheel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439855</id>
	<title>Re:TV while drivin is Darwin Award worthy...</title>
	<author>hviniciusg</author>
	<datestamp>1245775740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Emmmmmm. can u explain me what good does a SatNav on the back sit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Emmmmmm .
can u explain me what good does a SatNav on the back sit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Emmmmmm.
can u explain me what good does a SatNav on the back sit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436807</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1245757740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Consider this, maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose </i> </p><p>Unless everyone in the car is deaf, listening to the radio is perfectly sufficient and much less distracting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this , maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose Unless everyone in the car is deaf , listening to the radio is perfectly sufficient and much less distracting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this, maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose  Unless everyone in the car is deaf, listening to the radio is perfectly sufficient and much less distracting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435939</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>GF678</author>
	<datestamp>1245790380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.</p></div></blockquote><p>A chemist friend of mine keeps an extremely corrosive acid (I forget what type) in a bottle marked "rm -rf"</p><p>Very apt name for whoever gets their hands covered in it...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With that comes the power to 'rm -rf ' the system.. intentionally or not.A chemist friend of mine keeps an extremely corrosive acid ( I forget what type ) in a bottle marked " rm -rf " Very apt name for whoever gets their hands covered in it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.A chemist friend of mine keeps an extremely corrosive acid (I forget what type) in a bottle marked "rm -rf"Very apt name for whoever gets their hands covered in it...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435641</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>mail2345</author>
	<datestamp>1245787320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>With that, I say:
And if your sharing the system(the road) with others?</htmltext>
<tokenext>With that , I say : And if your sharing the system ( the road ) with others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With that, I say:
And if your sharing the system(the road) with others?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437133</id>
	<title>Re:Because if only..</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1245761820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.</p></div><p>Can you tell me ONE "legitimate use" for using a TV while driving?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.Can you tell me ONE " legitimate use " for using a TV while driving ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.Can you tell me ONE "legitimate use" for using a TV while driving?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436259</id>
	<title>Re:Simple safety solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245751200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just unplug the GPS antenna or cover it with tinfoil. Sheesh, a slashdotter who doesn't have tinfoil at hand^W head.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just unplug the GPS antenna or cover it with tinfoil .
Sheesh , a slashdotter who does n't have tinfoil at hand ^ W head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just unplug the GPS antenna or cover it with tinfoil.
Sheesh, a slashdotter who doesn't have tinfoil at hand^W head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28452305</id>
	<title>Watch TV On Your Satnav</title>
	<author>dysonapr</author>
	<datestamp>1245857820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to worry. This will earn a 3rd-degree criminal idiocy conviction under the new laws I'm going to buy, so I can fill my new chain of privately-run-for-profit lunatic asylums. As it'll be my tame shrinks who decide who's fit to leave, no-one will ever get out. Problem solved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to worry .
This will earn a 3rd-degree criminal idiocy conviction under the new laws I 'm going to buy , so I can fill my new chain of privately-run-for-profit lunatic asylums .
As it 'll be my tame shrinks who decide who 's fit to leave , no-one will ever get out .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to worry.
This will earn a 3rd-degree criminal idiocy conviction under the new laws I'm going to buy, so I can fill my new chain of privately-run-for-profit lunatic asylums.
As it'll be my tame shrinks who decide who's fit to leave, no-one will ever get out.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438623</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>TheSeventh</author>
	<datestamp>1245770940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What really, really Grinds My Gears about this, is what about the passenger?  They can't watch TV or a movie on this because the driver might look at it?<br> <br>
Enforce more personal responsibility, make fines and sentences much harsher for those who cause accidents and problems because they can't pay attention and let the rest of us make our own choices and not be restricted because of the Lowest Common Denominator of human stupidity.<br> <br>
Texting while driving isn't allowed in many areas, but your cellphone doesn't warn you if you are trying to text while moving down the road.  Is this the next step in human de-evolution?  Just dumb everything down so the Idiots Among Us never need to engage any extra brain cells?<br> <br>
All of this just makes me to want to get my own island and outlaw stupidity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What really , really Grinds My Gears about this , is what about the passenger ?
They ca n't watch TV or a movie on this because the driver might look at it ?
Enforce more personal responsibility , make fines and sentences much harsher for those who cause accidents and problems because they ca n't pay attention and let the rest of us make our own choices and not be restricted because of the Lowest Common Denominator of human stupidity .
Texting while driving is n't allowed in many areas , but your cellphone does n't warn you if you are trying to text while moving down the road .
Is this the next step in human de-evolution ?
Just dumb everything down so the Idiots Among Us never need to engage any extra brain cells ?
All of this just makes me to want to get my own island and outlaw stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What really, really Grinds My Gears about this, is what about the passenger?
They can't watch TV or a movie on this because the driver might look at it?
Enforce more personal responsibility, make fines and sentences much harsher for those who cause accidents and problems because they can't pay attention and let the rest of us make our own choices and not be restricted because of the Lowest Common Denominator of human stupidity.
Texting while driving isn't allowed in many areas, but your cellphone doesn't warn you if you are trying to text while moving down the road.
Is this the next step in human de-evolution?
Just dumb everything down so the Idiots Among Us never need to engage any extra brain cells?
All of this just makes me to want to get my own island and outlaw stupidity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435493</id>
	<title>Re:Because if only..</title>
	<author>JaxTJ</author>
	<datestamp>1245699300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely.  I used to have a 45-minute commute to work when I lived in New Jersey and I honestly can't remember the number of times that I was almost run into by someone in a 3-ton SUV that was talking or texting instead of driving.<br> <br> Japanese taxi drivers frequently have the TV playing on their nav units while driving, but they are among the safest drivers I've ever ridden with.  I think two way communication is far more taxing to a driver's attention than a receive-only medium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely .
I used to have a 45-minute commute to work when I lived in New Jersey and I honestly ca n't remember the number of times that I was almost run into by someone in a 3-ton SUV that was talking or texting instead of driving .
Japanese taxi drivers frequently have the TV playing on their nav units while driving , but they are among the safest drivers I 've ever ridden with .
I think two way communication is far more taxing to a driver 's attention than a receive-only medium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely.
I used to have a 45-minute commute to work when I lived in New Jersey and I honestly can't remember the number of times that I was almost run into by someone in a 3-ton SUV that was talking or texting instead of driving.
Japanese taxi drivers frequently have the TV playing on their nav units while driving, but they are among the safest drivers I've ever ridden with.
I think two way communication is far more taxing to a driver's attention than a receive-only medium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436215</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245750660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>unfortunately there will always be retards who do need baby sat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>unfortunately there will always be retards who do need baby sat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unfortunately there will always be retards who do need baby sat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293</id>
	<title>TV while drivin is Darwin Award worthy...</title>
	<author>Max Romantschuk</author>
	<datestamp>1245697440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But should it really be up to the device to monitor this? Can't I use my navigator to let the kids watch TV in the back seat if I don't need it for navigating?</p><p>A nav system integrated into the front console would be another story though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But should it really be up to the device to monitor this ?
Ca n't I use my navigator to let the kids watch TV in the back seat if I do n't need it for navigating ? A nav system integrated into the front console would be another story though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But should it really be up to the device to monitor this?
Can't I use my navigator to let the kids watch TV in the back seat if I don't need it for navigating?A nav system integrated into the front console would be another story though...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436841</id>
	<title>Passengers?</title>
	<author>sanosuke001</author>
	<datestamp>1245758340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about passengers? Just because the car is moving means the passengers aren't allowed to watch TV? Now if they use seat sensors to determine if someone else is in the car first, I would find that as a suitable compromise. However, I'd rather see a suspended license law if caught driving recklessly while the TV is on or something. Not just a ticket, but suspend their license. Most people would think twice if1 strike and they're out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about passengers ?
Just because the car is moving means the passengers are n't allowed to watch TV ?
Now if they use seat sensors to determine if someone else is in the car first , I would find that as a suitable compromise .
However , I 'd rather see a suspended license law if caught driving recklessly while the TV is on or something .
Not just a ticket , but suspend their license .
Most people would think twice if1 strike and they 're out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about passengers?
Just because the car is moving means the passengers aren't allowed to watch TV?
Now if they use seat sensors to determine if someone else is in the car first, I would find that as a suitable compromise.
However, I'd rather see a suspended license law if caught driving recklessly while the TV is on or something.
Not just a ticket, but suspend their license.
Most people would think twice if1 strike and they're out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439053</id>
	<title>Lets outlaw everything!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245772680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of the children thing really needs to stop..... What's next? Let's make speedometers go blank while driving because driver looking at it for a split second could be distracted, or better yet lets block off all side windows so driver can't look at trees and what not because they are too distracting. Come on... If you're a moron who will attentively watch TV going 70mph on a highway, or if you're a parent who allows his kid to play on a highway, you both deserve to die. I can perfectly drive with a screen next to me, just listening, I have 40 gigs of music videos that play on my ipod all the time, does that mean I always stare at my ipod while i drive?!!? No, no accidents in 9 years of driving. I don't see how this would be different from me listening to the news on TV and once in a while throwing a quick glance at the screen to see the face of who's talking and let my imagination do the rest as I listen. Why shouldn't I be allowed to make the jugdement of when it's safe to glance at the screen, or change station, or dial a number, or light up a cigarette, or to look out my window and check out that hottie walking on the sidewalk!?! Why do people want to outlaw everything? Why don't you start putting people on trial for crimes they may or may not commit in the future? When I crash into someone, sue me or put me in jail, until then stay the f...k out of my freedoms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the children thing really needs to stop..... What 's next ?
Let 's make speedometers go blank while driving because driver looking at it for a split second could be distracted , or better yet lets block off all side windows so driver ca n't look at trees and what not because they are too distracting .
Come on... If you 're a moron who will attentively watch TV going 70mph on a highway , or if you 're a parent who allows his kid to play on a highway , you both deserve to die .
I can perfectly drive with a screen next to me , just listening , I have 40 gigs of music videos that play on my ipod all the time , does that mean I always stare at my ipod while i drive ? ! ! ?
No , no accidents in 9 years of driving .
I do n't see how this would be different from me listening to the news on TV and once in a while throwing a quick glance at the screen to see the face of who 's talking and let my imagination do the rest as I listen .
Why should n't I be allowed to make the jugdement of when it 's safe to glance at the screen , or change station , or dial a number , or light up a cigarette , or to look out my window and check out that hottie walking on the sidewalk ! ? !
Why do people want to outlaw everything ?
Why do n't you start putting people on trial for crimes they may or may not commit in the future ?
When I crash into someone , sue me or put me in jail , until then stay the f...k out of my freedoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the children thing really needs to stop..... What's next?
Let's make speedometers go blank while driving because driver looking at it for a split second could be distracted, or better yet lets block off all side windows so driver can't look at trees and what not because they are too distracting.
Come on... If you're a moron who will attentively watch TV going 70mph on a highway, or if you're a parent who allows his kid to play on a highway, you both deserve to die.
I can perfectly drive with a screen next to me, just listening, I have 40 gigs of music videos that play on my ipod all the time, does that mean I always stare at my ipod while i drive?!!?
No, no accidents in 9 years of driving.
I don't see how this would be different from me listening to the news on TV and once in a while throwing a quick glance at the screen to see the face of who's talking and let my imagination do the rest as I listen.
Why shouldn't I be allowed to make the jugdement of when it's safe to glance at the screen, or change station, or dial a number, or light up a cigarette, or to look out my window and check out that hottie walking on the sidewalk!?!
Why do people want to outlaw everything?
Why don't you start putting people on trial for crimes they may or may not commit in the future?
When I crash into someone, sue me or put me in jail, until then stay the f...k out of my freedoms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436379</id>
	<title>What is the news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245752580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tv-tuner in the satnav is nothing new? Audi's had it since 2000 or even earlier<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. nothing to see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tv-tuner in the satnav is nothing new ?
Audi 's had it since 2000 or even earlier .. nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tv-tuner in the satnav is nothing new?
Audi's had it since 2000 or even earlier .. nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436145</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1245749700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, yeah, clearly the solution is to empower the government to do whatever it take in order to "protect" us.  I hear that George Orwell wrote an instructional manual on that subject - perhaps you could forward a copy to your local politician, just to get the ball rolling</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yeah , clearly the solution is to empower the government to do whatever it take in order to " protect " us .
I hear that George Orwell wrote an instructional manual on that subject - perhaps you could forward a copy to your local politician , just to get the ball rolling</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yeah, clearly the solution is to empower the government to do whatever it take in order to "protect" us.
I hear that George Orwell wrote an instructional manual on that subject - perhaps you could forward a copy to your local politician, just to get the ball rolling</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Unipuma</author>
	<datestamp>1245787440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, they are not on the road all on their own. And as much as I won't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV, I'm a bit less happy if they're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I'm driving (or more likely, in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls).</p><p>(Kind of like I'm fine with them being superuser on their own system, but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , they are not on the road all on their own .
And as much as I wo n't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV , I 'm a bit less happy if they 're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I 'm driving ( or more likely , in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls ) .
( Kind of like I 'm fine with them being superuser on their own system , but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, they are not on the road all on their own.
And as much as I won't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV, I'm a bit less happy if they're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I'm driving (or more likely, in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls).
(Kind of like I'm fine with them being superuser on their own system, but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435443</id>
	<title>Really not such a big deal</title>
	<author>JaxTJ</author>
	<datestamp>1245698820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The TV/Nav units in Japan (and other parts of Asia) have no such restriction and it's only a problem for lazy stupid Americans.*

<br> <br> <br>

*Disclaimer: JaxTJ is an American that is motivated by laziness and sometimes does stupid things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The TV/Nav units in Japan ( and other parts of Asia ) have no such restriction and it 's only a problem for lazy stupid Americans .
* * Disclaimer : JaxTJ is an American that is motivated by laziness and sometimes does stupid things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TV/Nav units in Japan (and other parts of Asia) have no such restriction and it's only a problem for lazy stupid Americans.
*

  

*Disclaimer: JaxTJ is an American that is motivated by laziness and sometimes does stupid things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435813</id>
	<title>Re:First post?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>honestly, hasn't this reached its momentary max yet?<br>
point being, as soon as audi, bmw, merc or jag include dvd players with screens in front AND back seats, the lesser companies will do this same and once this once innovative and now (essentially useless) stuff is fabricated in the lesser models "teh shiznit" has to come up with some newer stuff to stay "teh shiznit".<br> <br>
truth be told, my moms boyfriend had a bmw - I never knew which one - what I do know is it was a 3 litre tdi automatic luxury model. around 2004-5 it had an analog AND dvb-t tuner installed. the screen switched off, ie to GPS mode, automatically as soon as the car moved more than approx 5mph.<br> <br>
the real question isn't whether manufacturers will force a blank screen (or whatever), as soon as the car is moving, but whether there will be competition between safety standards.<br> <br>
again, I couldn't care less about americans or saudis dying in car crashes and thankfully I live in the EU, which will protect me from car crashes and censor my internet of child pornography.<br> <br>
but just because some random gps company includes dvbt in their package, does that make it newsworthy? either they'll abide to rules or not. and THAT might be newsworthy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>honestly , has n't this reached its momentary max yet ?
point being , as soon as audi , bmw , merc or jag include dvd players with screens in front AND back seats , the lesser companies will do this same and once this once innovative and now ( essentially useless ) stuff is fabricated in the lesser models " teh shiznit " has to come up with some newer stuff to stay " teh shiznit " .
truth be told , my moms boyfriend had a bmw - I never knew which one - what I do know is it was a 3 litre tdi automatic luxury model .
around 2004-5 it had an analog AND dvb-t tuner installed .
the screen switched off , ie to GPS mode , automatically as soon as the car moved more than approx 5mph .
the real question is n't whether manufacturers will force a blank screen ( or whatever ) , as soon as the car is moving , but whether there will be competition between safety standards .
again , I could n't care less about americans or saudis dying in car crashes and thankfully I live in the EU , which will protect me from car crashes and censor my internet of child pornography .
but just because some random gps company includes dvbt in their package , does that make it newsworthy ?
either they 'll abide to rules or not .
and THAT might be newsworthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>honestly, hasn't this reached its momentary max yet?
point being, as soon as audi, bmw, merc or jag include dvd players with screens in front AND back seats, the lesser companies will do this same and once this once innovative and now (essentially useless) stuff is fabricated in the lesser models "teh shiznit" has to come up with some newer stuff to stay "teh shiznit".
truth be told, my moms boyfriend had a bmw - I never knew which one - what I do know is it was a 3 litre tdi automatic luxury model.
around 2004-5 it had an analog AND dvb-t tuner installed.
the screen switched off, ie to GPS mode, automatically as soon as the car moved more than approx 5mph.
the real question isn't whether manufacturers will force a blank screen (or whatever), as soon as the car is moving, but whether there will be competition between safety standards.
again, I couldn't care less about americans or saudis dying in car crashes and thankfully I live in the EU, which will protect me from car crashes and censor my internet of child pornography.
but just because some random gps company includes dvbt in their package, does that make it newsworthy?
either they'll abide to rules or not.
and THAT might be newsworthy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438387</id>
	<title>In Dash DVD player</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245769860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I bought my SUV the Lexus sales person said the in Dash DVD player would not work while in Drive (safety feature).  BUT it was also indicated it was really easy to by-pass and could do it myself or they knew non-lexus shops that would do it for $20 cash (no questions asked).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I bought my SUV the Lexus sales person said the in Dash DVD player would not work while in Drive ( safety feature ) .
BUT it was also indicated it was really easy to by-pass and could do it myself or they knew non-lexus shops that would do it for $ 20 cash ( no questions asked ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I bought my SUV the Lexus sales person said the in Dash DVD player would not work while in Drive (safety feature).
BUT it was also indicated it was really easy to by-pass and could do it myself or they knew non-lexus shops that would do it for $20 cash (no questions asked).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28442473</id>
	<title>Re:Simple safety solution</title>
	<author>pimpimpim</author>
	<datestamp>1245784980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry, the ferries will be ok. But what about furries?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , the ferries will be ok. But what about furries ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, the ferries will be ok. But what about furries?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243</id>
	<title>First post?</title>
	<author>RockoTDF</author>
	<datestamp>1245697080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always thought that warning messages were more likely to get you killed in the 0.05s you spend pressing "ok" when you could have done the one thing you wanted to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought that warning messages were more likely to get you killed in the 0.05s you spend pressing " ok " when you could have done the one thing you wanted to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought that warning messages were more likely to get you killed in the 0.05s you spend pressing "ok" when you could have done the one thing you wanted to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</id>
	<title>Because if only..</title>
	<author>profplump</author>
	<datestamp>1245697980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths.</p><p>Seriously, there is an endless supply of stupid, distracting things people can do while driving, with out without GPS, a cell phone, TV, children, or any of the other things they might have in their car. If someone is stupid enough to be distracted by TV while they're driving they'll likely be able to find something similarly stupid to do even if you ban every bit of technology you can name from the dashboard. Like DRM, the only thing you'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths.Seriously , there is an endless supply of stupid , distracting things people can do while driving , with out without GPS , a cell phone , TV , children , or any of the other things they might have in their car .
If someone is stupid enough to be distracted by TV while they 're driving they 'll likely be able to find something similarly stupid to do even if you ban every bit of technology you can name from the dashboard .
Like DRM , the only thing you 'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths.Seriously, there is an endless supply of stupid, distracting things people can do while driving, with out without GPS, a cell phone, TV, children, or any of the other things they might have in their car.
If someone is stupid enough to be distracted by TV while they're driving they'll likely be able to find something similarly stupid to do even if you ban every bit of technology you can name from the dashboard.
Like DRM, the only thing you'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435427</id>
	<title>THIRD WARNING</title>
	<author>jsse</author>
	<datestamp>1245698700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd say you've got about two minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say you 've got about two minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say you've got about two minutes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435705</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Interlock Override</title>
	<author>sndtech</author>
	<datestamp>1245787800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the ignition based DVD-players this would work. but from the article it uses the GPS to figure out if you are moving, so you could block the antenna if you wanted to watch your family guy, but you couldn't switch over to mapping very quickly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the ignition based DVD-players this would work .
but from the article it uses the GPS to figure out if you are moving , so you could block the antenna if you wanted to watch your family guy , but you could n't switch over to mapping very quickly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the ignition based DVD-players this would work.
but from the article it uses the GPS to figure out if you are moving, so you could block the antenna if you wanted to watch your family guy, but you couldn't switch over to mapping very quickly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28443965</id>
	<title>Re:TV while drivin is Darwin Award worthy...</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1245790200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose the problem is that it ISN'T Darwin worthy. The Darwins require that bystanders not be harmed by the idiocy.</p><p>The other factor is stupid civil courts. I can all too easily see some idiot killing people on the highway because he just HAD to see the latest reality TV and then suing the manufacturer for making it possible.

</p><p>I do see your point though. It's a shame to limit functionality just because some people are dumber than bricks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose the problem is that it IS N'T Darwin worthy .
The Darwins require that bystanders not be harmed by the idiocy.The other factor is stupid civil courts .
I can all too easily see some idiot killing people on the highway because he just HAD to see the latest reality TV and then suing the manufacturer for making it possible .
I do see your point though .
It 's a shame to limit functionality just because some people are dumber than bricks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose the problem is that it ISN'T Darwin worthy.
The Darwins require that bystanders not be harmed by the idiocy.The other factor is stupid civil courts.
I can all too easily see some idiot killing people on the highway because he just HAD to see the latest reality TV and then suing the manufacturer for making it possible.
I do see your point though.
It's a shame to limit functionality just because some people are dumber than bricks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437243</id>
	<title>Yes.. but we all have free will</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245762960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, there will always be an exception to the rule, but how far do we go to attempt to catch all?  There's no feasable method unless you start forcing people, and I guess this is where you have to draw the line if you want free will or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , there will always be an exception to the rule , but how far do we go to attempt to catch all ?
There 's no feasable method unless you start forcing people , and I guess this is where you have to draw the line if you want free will or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, there will always be an exception to the rule, but how far do we go to attempt to catch all?
There's no feasable method unless you start forcing people, and I guess this is where you have to draw the line if you want free will or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436203</id>
	<title>This is new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245750540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in Asia, we've had cars with integrated satnav/tv/dvd for the better part of this decade. But the TV and DVD on the front screen won't operate unless the car is in park. This is of course easily defeated, and no more silly than any other 3rd party ICE system you install in your car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in Asia , we 've had cars with integrated satnav/tv/dvd for the better part of this decade .
But the TV and DVD on the front screen wo n't operate unless the car is in park .
This is of course easily defeated , and no more silly than any other 3rd party ICE system you install in your car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in Asia, we've had cars with integrated satnav/tv/dvd for the better part of this decade.
But the TV and DVD on the front screen won't operate unless the car is in park.
This is of course easily defeated, and no more silly than any other 3rd party ICE system you install in your car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437771</id>
	<title>What I *NEVER* want my epitath to read</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1245766380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Killed by a guy who just couldn't wait until he got home to watch that 'Home Improvement' rerun"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Killed by a guy who just could n't wait until he got home to watch that 'Home Improvement ' rerun "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Killed by a guy who just couldn't wait until he got home to watch that 'Home Improvement' rerun"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435389</id>
	<title>I never watch TV while driving ...</title>
	<author>electricprof</author>
	<datestamp>1245698340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never watch TV while driving<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... however, I do frequently shower and shave while driving.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never watch TV while driving ... however , I do frequently shower and shave while driving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never watch TV while driving ... however, I do frequently shower and shave while driving.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436489</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>wisty</author>
	<datestamp>1245753960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sadly, they are not on the road all on their own. And as much as I won't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV, I'm a bit less happy if they're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I'm driving (or more likely, in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls).</p><p>(Kind of like I'm fine with them being superuser on their own system, but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work)</p></div><p>So it's more like a shared DOS system, where everyone is a superuser, and they can all FORMAT C?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , they are not on the road all on their own .
And as much as I wo n't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV , I 'm a bit less happy if they 're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I 'm driving ( or more likely , in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls ) .
( Kind of like I 'm fine with them being superuser on their own system , but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work ) So it 's more like a shared DOS system , where everyone is a superuser , and they can all FORMAT C ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, they are not on the road all on their own.
And as much as I won't miss them if they drive into a ravine while watching TV, I'm a bit less happy if they're driving in the oncoming lane on the same road I'm driving (or more likely, in my lane while they are fiddling with the controls).
(Kind of like I'm fine with them being superuser on their own system, but what do you do when they need to have modify rights to a network drive which also contains my work)So it's more like a shared DOS system, where everyone is a superuser, and they can all FORMAT C?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438563</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1245770640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he does the `rm -rf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/` I could not care less. It is when he becomes a spam proxy that I have problems.</p><p>Same goes with the car. If he hits a tree, I do not care. If he moves all over the road and I have to evade him and I then hit somebody else, he does not care, but two other unrelated people are crippled for life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he does the ` rm -rf / ` I could not care less .
It is when he becomes a spam proxy that I have problems.Same goes with the car .
If he hits a tree , I do not care .
If he moves all over the road and I have to evade him and I then hit somebody else , he does not care , but two other unrelated people are crippled for life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he does the `rm -rf /` I could not care less.
It is when he becomes a spam proxy that I have problems.Same goes with the car.
If he hits a tree, I do not care.
If he moves all over the road and I have to evade him and I then hit somebody else, he does not care, but two other unrelated people are crippled for life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435901</id>
	<title>Re:Really not such a big deal</title>
	<author>weirdo557</author>
	<datestamp>1245789960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i think the problem is the lazy stupid people themselves. but natural selection has a way of dealing with that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think the problem is the lazy stupid people themselves .
but natural selection has a way of dealing with that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think the problem is the lazy stupid people themselves.
but natural selection has a way of dealing with that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439735</id>
	<title>CRTs In Motion</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1245775080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>RoSPA believes that the law regarding video devices in cars is "fuzzy" and needs updating. The group points out that the use of cathode ray televisions in cars is illegal, but that there is no mention of LCD technology.</p></div><p>Well, that may be the case over there, but I don't think it is here in the states. The only reason you can no longer buy little 5" CRTs that have car lighter/aux power adapters here is because there are no signals for them to tune into anymore.</p><p>I look forward to seeing more portable ATSC-tuning TVs in the future. We need some high-pixel-density LCDs in consumer products. Then we can rip them out and build them into our shuttle PCs. Mmm... 5" 1080p front-panel-display computer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>RoSPA believes that the law regarding video devices in cars is " fuzzy " and needs updating .
The group points out that the use of cathode ray televisions in cars is illegal , but that there is no mention of LCD technology.Well , that may be the case over there , but I do n't think it is here in the states .
The only reason you can no longer buy little 5 " CRTs that have car lighter/aux power adapters here is because there are no signals for them to tune into anymore.I look forward to seeing more portable ATSC-tuning TVs in the future .
We need some high-pixel-density LCDs in consumer products .
Then we can rip them out and build them into our shuttle PCs .
Mmm... 5 " 1080p front-panel-display computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RoSPA believes that the law regarding video devices in cars is "fuzzy" and needs updating.
The group points out that the use of cathode ray televisions in cars is illegal, but that there is no mention of LCD technology.Well, that may be the case over there, but I don't think it is here in the states.
The only reason you can no longer buy little 5" CRTs that have car lighter/aux power adapters here is because there are no signals for them to tune into anymore.I look forward to seeing more portable ATSC-tuning TVs in the future.
We need some high-pixel-density LCDs in consumer products.
Then we can rip them out and build them into our shuttle PCs.
Mmm... 5" 1080p front-panel-display computer.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436109</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>swarsron</author>
	<datestamp>1245749220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more like 'rm -rf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/*'. Nobody would care about 'rm -rf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/root'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more like 'rm -rf /home/ * ' .
Nobody would care about 'rm -rf /root ' .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more like 'rm -rf /home/*'.
Nobody would care about 'rm -rf /root' ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28449581</id>
	<title>Re:Japan Too</title>
	<author>k-macjapan</author>
	<datestamp>1245784320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My personal favourite here is children running around in cars while they are in motion. Not to mention sitting in between the driver and their seat, in between the driver and the steering wheel, ON the dashboard... It's really quite disgusting. But don't you dare ride a bicycle at night without a light on it!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My personal favourite here is children running around in cars while they are in motion .
Not to mention sitting in between the driver and their seat , in between the driver and the steering wheel , ON the dashboard... It 's really quite disgusting .
But do n't you dare ride a bicycle at night without a light on it ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My personal favourite here is children running around in cars while they are in motion.
Not to mention sitting in between the driver and their seat, in between the driver and the steering wheel, ON the dashboard... It's really quite disgusting.
But don't you dare ride a bicycle at night without a light on it!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436245</id>
	<title>Safety features...</title>
	<author>Bert64</author>
	<datestamp>1245751020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of these "safety features" are just a nuisance...<br>Many satnavs wont let you adjust the route if you're moving, but what if a passenger in the vehicle is trying the adjust the route on behalf of the driver? Similarly with TV, what if passengers want to watch it?</p><p>Stupid drivers will kill themselves regardless, if they can't watch tv on this as they drive they will just take their own portable set, or portable dvd player, or use a phone, or whatever else they're gonna do which is dangerous. All these "safety features" do is inconvenience the legitimate users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of these " safety features " are just a nuisance...Many satnavs wont let you adjust the route if you 're moving , but what if a passenger in the vehicle is trying the adjust the route on behalf of the driver ?
Similarly with TV , what if passengers want to watch it ? Stupid drivers will kill themselves regardless , if they ca n't watch tv on this as they drive they will just take their own portable set , or portable dvd player , or use a phone , or whatever else they 're gon na do which is dangerous .
All these " safety features " do is inconvenience the legitimate users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of these "safety features" are just a nuisance...Many satnavs wont let you adjust the route if you're moving, but what if a passenger in the vehicle is trying the adjust the route on behalf of the driver?
Similarly with TV, what if passengers want to watch it?Stupid drivers will kill themselves regardless, if they can't watch tv on this as they drive they will just take their own portable set, or portable dvd player, or use a phone, or whatever else they're gonna do which is dangerous.
All these "safety features" do is inconvenience the legitimate users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435753</id>
	<title>Japan Too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is amazing how many drivers here in Japan (specifically near Toyota City, but I assume elsewhere in this country) are watching TV while driving. Add in texting on a cell phone, not wearing seat belts and things get more dangerous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is amazing how many drivers here in Japan ( specifically near Toyota City , but I assume elsewhere in this country ) are watching TV while driving .
Add in texting on a cell phone , not wearing seat belts and things get more dangerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is amazing how many drivers here in Japan (specifically near Toyota City, but I assume elsewhere in this country) are watching TV while driving.
Add in texting on a cell phone, not wearing seat belts and things get more dangerous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439037</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1245772620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Life is like Unix and you are the superuser. With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system..</i></p><p>Wait, I don't understand. Can someone supply a car analogy please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Life is like Unix and you are the superuser .
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf ' the system..Wait , I do n't understand .
Can someone supply a car analogy please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life is like Unix and you are the superuser.
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system..Wait, I don't understand.
Can someone supply a car analogy please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439681</id>
	<title>Re:Nice!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245774900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers.  Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we'll have the shittiest drivers on the road.  Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.</p><p>Oh well, back to reality.</p></div><p>As sad as it is: This is the reality here in the United Arab Emirates. Many people are so bored driving on these empty desolate stretches of highway between Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Al Ain (or any other highway here in the UAE) the first thing they do is to enable the TV whilst driving. The aftermarket (and there is a huge one) takes care of it - and of fitting the second and third, fourth fifth  units dedicated for drivers, front passenger, kids<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers .
Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we 'll have the shittiest drivers on the road .
Hopefully , these bastards will kill themselves without killing others , making the road safer for everyone else.Oh well , back to reality.As sad as it is : This is the reality here in the United Arab Emirates .
Many people are so bored driving on these empty desolate stretches of highway between Dubai , Abu Dhabi and Al Ain ( or any other highway here in the UAE ) the first thing they do is to enable the TV whilst driving .
The aftermarket ( and there is a huge one ) takes care of it - and of fitting the second and third , fourth fifth units dedicated for drivers , front passenger , kids .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers.
Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we'll have the shittiest drivers on the road.
Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.Oh well, back to reality.As sad as it is: This is the reality here in the United Arab Emirates.
Many people are so bored driving on these empty desolate stretches of highway between Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Al Ain (or any other highway here in the UAE) the first thing they do is to enable the TV whilst driving.
The aftermarket (and there is a huge one) takes care of it - and of fitting the second and third, fourth fifth  units dedicated for drivers, front passenger, kids ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28446219</id>
	<title>Satan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245755220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else read "Satan" ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else read " Satan " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else read "Satan" ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436219</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245750720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility </i> <p>

Your personal responsibility should be limited to your net worth. Otherwise, it's not your personal responsibility, but someone elses (whoever has to eat the difference between what you and your insurance are able to pay and the actual damage you caused).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility Your personal responsibility should be limited to your net worth .
Otherwise , it 's not your personal responsibility , but someone elses ( whoever has to eat the difference between what you and your insurance are able to pay and the actual damage you caused ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility  

Your personal responsibility should be limited to your net worth.
Otherwise, it's not your personal responsibility, but someone elses (whoever has to eat the difference between what you and your insurance are able to pay and the actual damage you caused).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436141</id>
	<title>Re:South Korea</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1245749640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I experienced the same thing in Finland five years ago. It was kind of scary, but finnish traffic is fortunately quite calm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I experienced the same thing in Finland five years ago .
It was kind of scary , but finnish traffic is fortunately quite calm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I experienced the same thing in Finland five years ago.
It was kind of scary, but finnish traffic is fortunately quite calm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435673</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1245787560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if you kill someone, you can just restore him from a backup!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if you kill someone , you can just restore him from a backup !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if you kill someone, you can just restore him from a backup!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438689</id>
	<title>Re:Because if only..</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1245771240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally a post with some sense.</p><p>From personal experience I've driven while watching movies before.  It isn't as bad as you make it out to be.  For starters you don't look at the screen when in traffic or side streets.  It is pretty much only on the freeway when you're on a long enough trip where you could watch a full movie.  Second I usually follow the 2 second rule, sometimes 3, even in heavy traffic under normal driving conditions.  When you're watching TV on the interstate you have need to give you self at least 6 seconds between you and the car in front of you.  If you can't do that you don't look at the screen and you only listen.  You constantly glance back and forth between the screen and the road, anything that enters your peripheral vision focuses you back on the road.</p><p>I've actually glossed over more listening to NPR than I ever did watching movies on long car trips.  I knew it was dangerous so I was more alert to my surroundings.  I made it a point to focus on the road, not the movie.  With the radio you become complacent.</p><p>Second when driving I find that everyone else on the road is an idiot.  I assume that ever other driver is a drunk idiot and they are going to do something completely mind boggling at any moment.  If they take someone out with them it is most likely as much the person being taken out as it was the person who caused it.  The only exception is if you're parked and you get rear ended.  In any other circumstance you should be aware of the other vehicles around you and always have a plan to get out of the way.  You should assume the car next to you isn't going to see you and is going to shift into your lane, you should assume the car coming up behind you is going to clip you so give them space or get out of their way, you assume that the semi next to you is going to blow a tire and swerve into your lane.  In every one of those instances you need to know where you can go to avoid the accident, if you don't you'll wind up being a victim one day.</p><p>If a car has on its blinker, assume they forgot it was on, never trust a blinker.  Assume every car is going to run the red light, this one saved my life as a semi hurled through a red light and had I gone just because the light was green I'd be dead.  There is always a car in your blind spot.  The cars next to you, behind you and in front of you are all watching tv and not paying attention to you.  You must pay attention to them.</p><p>Complacency is the killer, not the other idiots on the road.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally a post with some sense.From personal experience I 've driven while watching movies before .
It is n't as bad as you make it out to be .
For starters you do n't look at the screen when in traffic or side streets .
It is pretty much only on the freeway when you 're on a long enough trip where you could watch a full movie .
Second I usually follow the 2 second rule , sometimes 3 , even in heavy traffic under normal driving conditions .
When you 're watching TV on the interstate you have need to give you self at least 6 seconds between you and the car in front of you .
If you ca n't do that you do n't look at the screen and you only listen .
You constantly glance back and forth between the screen and the road , anything that enters your peripheral vision focuses you back on the road.I 've actually glossed over more listening to NPR than I ever did watching movies on long car trips .
I knew it was dangerous so I was more alert to my surroundings .
I made it a point to focus on the road , not the movie .
With the radio you become complacent.Second when driving I find that everyone else on the road is an idiot .
I assume that ever other driver is a drunk idiot and they are going to do something completely mind boggling at any moment .
If they take someone out with them it is most likely as much the person being taken out as it was the person who caused it .
The only exception is if you 're parked and you get rear ended .
In any other circumstance you should be aware of the other vehicles around you and always have a plan to get out of the way .
You should assume the car next to you is n't going to see you and is going to shift into your lane , you should assume the car coming up behind you is going to clip you so give them space or get out of their way , you assume that the semi next to you is going to blow a tire and swerve into your lane .
In every one of those instances you need to know where you can go to avoid the accident , if you do n't you 'll wind up being a victim one day.If a car has on its blinker , assume they forgot it was on , never trust a blinker .
Assume every car is going to run the red light , this one saved my life as a semi hurled through a red light and had I gone just because the light was green I 'd be dead .
There is always a car in your blind spot .
The cars next to you , behind you and in front of you are all watching tv and not paying attention to you .
You must pay attention to them.Complacency is the killer , not the other idiots on the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally a post with some sense.From personal experience I've driven while watching movies before.
It isn't as bad as you make it out to be.
For starters you don't look at the screen when in traffic or side streets.
It is pretty much only on the freeway when you're on a long enough trip where you could watch a full movie.
Second I usually follow the 2 second rule, sometimes 3, even in heavy traffic under normal driving conditions.
When you're watching TV on the interstate you have need to give you self at least 6 seconds between you and the car in front of you.
If you can't do that you don't look at the screen and you only listen.
You constantly glance back and forth between the screen and the road, anything that enters your peripheral vision focuses you back on the road.I've actually glossed over more listening to NPR than I ever did watching movies on long car trips.
I knew it was dangerous so I was more alert to my surroundings.
I made it a point to focus on the road, not the movie.
With the radio you become complacent.Second when driving I find that everyone else on the road is an idiot.
I assume that ever other driver is a drunk idiot and they are going to do something completely mind boggling at any moment.
If they take someone out with them it is most likely as much the person being taken out as it was the person who caused it.
The only exception is if you're parked and you get rear ended.
In any other circumstance you should be aware of the other vehicles around you and always have a plan to get out of the way.
You should assume the car next to you isn't going to see you and is going to shift into your lane, you should assume the car coming up behind you is going to clip you so give them space or get out of their way, you assume that the semi next to you is going to blow a tire and swerve into your lane.
In every one of those instances you need to know where you can go to avoid the accident, if you don't you'll wind up being a victim one day.If a car has on its blinker, assume they forgot it was on, never trust a blinker.
Assume every car is going to run the red light, this one saved my life as a semi hurled through a red light and had I gone just because the light was green I'd be dead.
There is always a car in your blind spot.
The cars next to you, behind you and in front of you are all watching tv and not paying attention to you.
You must pay attention to them.Complacency is the killer, not the other idiots on the road.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437303</id>
	<title>My World and Welcome to It</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1245763320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths.</i> </p><p>Every little bit helps.</p><p>But I can't help wondering why the multi-tasking geek always trots out this excuse for inaction.</p><p> It's a patently false dilemma.</p><p> We can do other things while we do <b>this</b> one thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths .
Every little bit helps.But I ca n't help wondering why the multi-tasking geek always trots out this excuse for inaction .
It 's a patently false dilemma .
We can do other things while we do this one thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if only we could prevent this one particular stupid thing people can do while driving we will eliminate all driving-related injuries and deaths.
Every little bit helps.But I can't help wondering why the multi-tasking geek always trots out this excuse for inaction.
It's a patently false dilemma.
We can do other things while we do this one thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437283</id>
	<title>Don't waste time and money</title>
	<author>RickRussellTX</author>
	<datestamp>1245763200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would suggest that no safety concern justifies the implementation of *ineffectual* safety requirements. The ubiquity of portable television devices and personal media players (heck, my *phone* is a personal media player) insure that anybody who wants to watch TV while driving will have the ability to do so. Arbitrarily closing out one of the many LCD screens available to them is not going to prevent someone from <a href="http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&amp;q=portable\%20HDTV&amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;rlz=1B3GGGL\_enUS326US326&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wf" title="google.com">watching a video screen</a> [google.com] if they so choose.</p><p>The only real deterrent would be enforcement -- police see a motion video screen operating in the front seat while the car is moving, and they fine your ass into the next decade. I'm not comfortable with that either, but it would at least have an effect. Arbitrary limits on a single LCD panel will do nothing, and we'll be greeted by an army of Chinese import devices that ignore the restriction anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would suggest that no safety concern justifies the implementation of * ineffectual * safety requirements .
The ubiquity of portable television devices and personal media players ( heck , my * phone * is a personal media player ) insure that anybody who wants to watch TV while driving will have the ability to do so .
Arbitrarily closing out one of the many LCD screens available to them is not going to prevent someone from watching a video screen [ google.com ] if they so choose.The only real deterrent would be enforcement -- police see a motion video screen operating in the front seat while the car is moving , and they fine your ass into the next decade .
I 'm not comfortable with that either , but it would at least have an effect .
Arbitrary limits on a single LCD panel will do nothing , and we 'll be greeted by an army of Chinese import devices that ignore the restriction anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would suggest that no safety concern justifies the implementation of *ineffectual* safety requirements.
The ubiquity of portable television devices and personal media players (heck, my *phone* is a personal media player) insure that anybody who wants to watch TV while driving will have the ability to do so.
Arbitrarily closing out one of the many LCD screens available to them is not going to prevent someone from watching a video screen [google.com] if they so choose.The only real deterrent would be enforcement -- police see a motion video screen operating in the front seat while the car is moving, and they fine your ass into the next decade.
I'm not comfortable with that either, but it would at least have an effect.
Arbitrary limits on a single LCD panel will do nothing, and we'll be greeted by an army of Chinese import devices that ignore the restriction anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435611</id>
	<title>Re:Speed Interlock Override</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated. In most cases, all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector, and it always thinks you are parked.</p></div><p>I've heard some people who want a GPS/DVD player with the GPS functions disabled take the even more nefarious route of just buying a DVD player<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated .
In most cases , all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector , and it always thinks you are parked.I 've heard some people who want a GPS/DVD player with the GPS functions disabled take the even more nefarious route of just buying a DVD player : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated.
In most cases, all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector, and it always thinks you are parked.I've heard some people who want a GPS/DVD player with the GPS functions disabled take the even more nefarious route of just buying a DVD player :-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</id>
	<title>That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we don't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.</p><p>Life is like Unix and you are the superuser. With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.</p><p>--iamnotayam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we do n't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.Life is like Unix and you are the superuser .
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf ' the system.. intentionally or not.--iamnotayam</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we don't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.Life is like Unix and you are the superuser.
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.--iamnotayam</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438641</id>
	<title>Re:Because if only..</title>
	<author>profplump</author>
	<datestamp>1245771000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use as an audio device. We seem to have accepted radio usage while driving, and there's no reason a TV couldn't be used in the same way simply by not looking at the screen.</p><p>Or entertaining the passengers. Particularly if they are young, you may reduce the overall level of driver distraction by providing some passenger distraction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use as an audio device .
We seem to have accepted radio usage while driving , and there 's no reason a TV could n't be used in the same way simply by not looking at the screen.Or entertaining the passengers .
Particularly if they are young , you may reduce the overall level of driver distraction by providing some passenger distraction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use as an audio device.
We seem to have accepted radio usage while driving, and there's no reason a TV couldn't be used in the same way simply by not looking at the screen.Or entertaining the passengers.
Particularly if they are young, you may reduce the overall level of driver distraction by providing some passenger distraction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253</id>
	<title>Speed Interlock Override</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated. In most cases, all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector, and it always thinks you are parked. My brother has been playing Family Guy DVDs in his in-dash unit for years. The SAME Family Guy DVD.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated .
In most cases , all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector , and it always thinks you are parked .
My brother has been playing Family Guy DVDs in his in-dash unit for years .
The SAME Family Guy DVD .
          Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even the current GPS units/DVD players can easily be defeated.
In most cases, all you need to do is ground one of the pins in the connector, and it always thinks you are parked.
My brother has been playing Family Guy DVDs in his in-dash unit for years.
The SAME Family Guy DVD.
          Brett</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435657</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we don't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.</p><p>Life is like Unix and you are the superuser. With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.</p><p>--iamnotayam</p></div><p>Nobody really cares if the driver kills himself while being terminally stupid. The problem is that they tend to take other people with them, people who did not have any part in their idiot choices. Your right to watch TV while driving does not override other people's right to live.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we do n't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.Life is like Unix and you are the superuser .
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf ' the system.. intentionally or not.--iamnotayamNobody really cares if the driver kills himself while being terminally stupid .
The problem is that they tend to take other people with them , people who did not have any part in their idiot choices .
Your right to watch TV while driving does not override other people 's right to live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..there is such a thing as personal responsibility and we don't need a nanny to babysit us all the time.Life is like Unix and you are the superuser.
With that comes the power to 'rm -rf' the system.. intentionally or not.--iamnotayamNobody really cares if the driver kills himself while being terminally stupid.
The problem is that they tend to take other people with them, people who did not have any part in their idiot choices.
Your right to watch TV while driving does not override other people's right to live.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245789960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad you got that off your chest?</p><p>Notice how I didn't say that the person has no responsibility for their actions? If by their actions they manage to injure/kill someone then they should bear the full force of the law.. there are plenty on the books for driving when distracted, it's called careless/wreckless driving and it's enforced in all 50 states.</p><p>All I'm saying is that restricting the capabilities of a device 'because it knows better than the human' is not the right decision, hence the Unix analogy. Consider this, maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose and now the car must stop because the TV wont work over 5 MPH, allowing the tornado/zombies to harm the car.</p><p>Also, I'm not a libertarian.. just a believer in not having a nanny state that is reduced to the lowest UNcommon denominator and I do appreciate the tits on the LoTS, yum.</p><p>--iamnotayam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad you got that off your chest ? Notice how I did n't say that the person has no responsibility for their actions ?
If by their actions they manage to injure/kill someone then they should bear the full force of the law.. there are plenty on the books for driving when distracted , it 's called careless/wreckless driving and it 's enforced in all 50 states.All I 'm saying is that restricting the capabilities of a device 'because it knows better than the human ' is not the right decision , hence the Unix analogy .
Consider this , maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose and now the car must stop because the TV wont work over 5 MPH , allowing the tornado/zombies to harm the car.Also , I 'm not a libertarian.. just a believer in not having a nanny state that is reduced to the lowest UNcommon denominator and I do appreciate the tits on the LoTS , yum.--iamnotayam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad you got that off your chest?Notice how I didn't say that the person has no responsibility for their actions?
If by their actions they manage to injure/kill someone then they should bear the full force of the law.. there are plenty on the books for driving when distracted, it's called careless/wreckless driving and it's enforced in all 50 states.All I'm saying is that restricting the capabilities of a device 'because it knows better than the human' is not the right decision, hence the Unix analogy.
Consider this, maybe the front passenger is looking at the news/weather during an emergency.. a perfectly legitimate purpose and now the car must stop because the TV wont work over 5 MPH, allowing the tornado/zombies to harm the car.Also, I'm not a libertarian.. just a believer in not having a nanny state that is reduced to the lowest UNcommon denominator and I do appreciate the tits on the LoTS, yum.--iamnotayam</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435779</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>rastoboy29</author>
	<datestamp>1245788520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>That is fine, except for the existence of nincompoops who are liable to rm -rf *you* or *me* while their texting or watching tv while driving.<br><br>Some people should not be allowed to have root access sometimes. </tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is fine , except for the existence of nincompoops who are liable to rm -rf * you * or * me * while their texting or watching tv while driving.Some people should not be allowed to have root access sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is fine, except for the existence of nincompoops who are liable to rm -rf *you* or *me* while their texting or watching tv while driving.Some people should not be allowed to have root access sometimes. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437591</id>
	<title>Re:Because if only..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245765540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Like DRM, the only thing you'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.</p></div><p>Amen to that.  My grandparents have a combination GPS/Satellite Radio system in their car that locks out a number of functions while the car's in motion.  I found it rather obnoxious that it imposed those restrictions on me even though I was a passenger at the time.  Even worse is that it just grays the options out but doesn't tell you why they're disabled -- since I started playing with it on a stretch of road with no stops, it took a while for me to realize what was going on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like DRM , the only thing you 'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.Amen to that .
My grandparents have a combination GPS/Satellite Radio system in their car that locks out a number of functions while the car 's in motion .
I found it rather obnoxious that it imposed those restrictions on me even though I was a passenger at the time .
Even worse is that it just grays the options out but does n't tell you why they 're disabled -- since I started playing with it on a stretch of road with no stops , it took a while for me to realize what was going on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like DRM, the only thing you'll accomplish by adding silly technologically restrictions like this is annoyance for people who have legitimate uses.Amen to that.
My grandparents have a combination GPS/Satellite Radio system in their car that locks out a number of functions while the car's in motion.
I found it rather obnoxious that it imposed those restrictions on me even though I was a passenger at the time.
Even worse is that it just grays the options out but doesn't tell you why they're disabled -- since I started playing with it on a stretch of road with no stops, it took a while for me to realize what was going on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437791</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245766560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. Lets pull the warning labels off of everything, and let the problem solve itself.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>(No idea who said this first. So if you know it, pipe up.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Lets pull the warning labels off of everything , and let the problem solve itself .
: ) ( No idea who said this first .
So if you know it , pipe up .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Lets pull the warning labels off of everything, and let the problem solve itself.
:)(No idea who said this first.
So if you know it, pipe up.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440385</id>
	<title>Re:TV while drivin is Darwin Award worthy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245777840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is technology being developed by several LCD manufacturers that provide a dual-view to the nav display.  This way, the passenger can watch a movie or TV and the driver can see the nav map simultaneously.</p><p>I believe this technology was recently demonstrated in a prototype Ford Mustang a couple of years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is technology being developed by several LCD manufacturers that provide a dual-view to the nav display .
This way , the passenger can watch a movie or TV and the driver can see the nav map simultaneously.I believe this technology was recently demonstrated in a prototype Ford Mustang a couple of years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is technology being developed by several LCD manufacturers that provide a dual-view to the nav display.
This way, the passenger can watch a movie or TV and the driver can see the nav map simultaneously.I believe this technology was recently demonstrated in a prototype Ford Mustang a couple of years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438915</id>
	<title>Thank you!</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1245772200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My only problem with devices like this is that they harass the user with needless "warning" messages that have to be clicked through.</p><p>I'm not stupid enough to actually try to watch TV while I'm driving.  (Is there really anything on that's even worth it anyway?  Most of the time, I'd say the scenery out my window while driving is probably more interesting... but that's another topic.)</p><p>The point is, though - if a device is sold with features X, Y and Z, I should be able to easily use those features whenever I decide to do so.  I don't want annoying pop-up screens blocking me first, and I don't want the device trying to second-guess my reasons for choosing a feature and selectively refusing to do what I tell it!</p><p>As people pointed out, you'd *probably* want to use the TV or video feature while driving so a PASSENGER can watch it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My only problem with devices like this is that they harass the user with needless " warning " messages that have to be clicked through.I 'm not stupid enough to actually try to watch TV while I 'm driving .
( Is there really anything on that 's even worth it anyway ?
Most of the time , I 'd say the scenery out my window while driving is probably more interesting... but that 's another topic .
) The point is , though - if a device is sold with features X , Y and Z , I should be able to easily use those features whenever I decide to do so .
I do n't want annoying pop-up screens blocking me first , and I do n't want the device trying to second-guess my reasons for choosing a feature and selectively refusing to do what I tell it ! As people pointed out , you 'd * probably * want to use the TV or video feature while driving so a PASSENGER can watch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My only problem with devices like this is that they harass the user with needless "warning" messages that have to be clicked through.I'm not stupid enough to actually try to watch TV while I'm driving.
(Is there really anything on that's even worth it anyway?
Most of the time, I'd say the scenery out my window while driving is probably more interesting... but that's another topic.
)The point is, though - if a device is sold with features X, Y and Z, I should be able to easily use those features whenever I decide to do so.
I don't want annoying pop-up screens blocking me first, and I don't want the device trying to second-guess my reasons for choosing a feature and selectively refusing to do what I tell it!As people pointed out, you'd *probably* want to use the TV or video feature while driving so a PASSENGER can watch it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436549</id>
	<title>Natural selection test ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245754800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Natural selection is put to test. Creationists may be suprised by de results...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Natural selection is put to test .
Creationists may be suprised by de results.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Natural selection is put to test.
Creationists may be suprised by de results...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315</id>
	<title>Nice!</title>
	<author>madfilipino</author>
	<datestamp>1245697800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers.  Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we'll have the shittiest drivers on the road.  Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.<br>
<br>
Oh well, back to reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers .
Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we 'll have the shittiest drivers on the road .
Hopefully , these bastards will kill themselves without killing others , making the road safer for everyone else .
Oh well , back to reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get shitty drivers and give them mobile phones to talk on so they become even shittier drivers.
Now get those bastards to watch TV while talking and texting on their mobile phones and we'll have the shittiest drivers on the road.
Hopefully, these bastards will kill themselves without killing others, making the road safer for everyone else.
Oh well, back to reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437301</id>
	<title>ATSC</title>
	<author>Reed Solomon</author>
	<datestamp>1245763320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't one of the drawbacks of an ATSC digital signal that it's difficult to maintain a lock on it while you're in motion?   They're advertising it as something to do once you arrive in your destination, so its not like people haven't been warned about the realities of the situation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't one of the drawbacks of an ATSC digital signal that it 's difficult to maintain a lock on it while you 're in motion ?
They 're advertising it as something to do once you arrive in your destination , so its not like people have n't been warned about the realities of the situation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't one of the drawbacks of an ATSC digital signal that it's difficult to maintain a lock on it while you're in motion?
They're advertising it as something to do once you arrive in your destination, so its not like people haven't been warned about the realities of the situation</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401</id>
	<title>Simple safety solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TV should not work while the satnav moves faster than, say, 5 km/h!`<br>
Or, if you switch TV on, it must stay still otherwise it will turn off.<br>It's simple, but will never be implemented!</htmltext>
<tokenext>TV should not work while the satnav moves faster than , say , 5 km/h ! ` Or , if you switch TV on , it must stay still otherwise it will turn off.It 's simple , but will never be implemented !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TV should not work while the satnav moves faster than, say, 5 km/h!`
Or, if you switch TV on, it must stay still otherwise it will turn off.It's simple, but will never be implemented!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436097</id>
	<title>amazing news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245749040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this news? Satnavs in cars have been able to show television for years now (including restrictions like "not showing TV while car is moving").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this news ?
Satnavs in cars have been able to show television for years now ( including restrictions like " not showing TV while car is moving " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this news?
Satnavs in cars have been able to show television for years now (including restrictions like "not showing TV while car is moving").</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437811</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine..</title>
	<author>Bazar</author>
	<datestamp>1245766620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know i'm usually one for freedom of rights and all, but lets get a few things right.</p><p>Driving is not a right inherent to all of us, its a <b>privilege</b>.<br>A privilege given to us by the state, and subject to the conditions they impose, and can both be denied and revoked.<br>The roads you drive on are not your own, they are the states.</p><p>If you want to drive around at 80MPH on your own private backyard watching the tv instead of the wheel, by all means you can. Hell its Darwinism at its finest. But you keep your erratic driving to yourself, and on your own property.</p><p>Its well within the powers of your state to ban cars with that functionality from being licensed for road use. Passing a law addressing the issue probably isn't needed, but at the end of the day its just easier for everyone. (Except perhaps people who do drive at 80mph on their own turf)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know i 'm usually one for freedom of rights and all , but lets get a few things right.Driving is not a right inherent to all of us , its a privilege.A privilege given to us by the state , and subject to the conditions they impose , and can both be denied and revoked.The roads you drive on are not your own , they are the states.If you want to drive around at 80MPH on your own private backyard watching the tv instead of the wheel , by all means you can .
Hell its Darwinism at its finest .
But you keep your erratic driving to yourself , and on your own property.Its well within the powers of your state to ban cars with that functionality from being licensed for road use .
Passing a law addressing the issue probably is n't needed , but at the end of the day its just easier for everyone .
( Except perhaps people who do drive at 80mph on their own turf )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know i'm usually one for freedom of rights and all, but lets get a few things right.Driving is not a right inherent to all of us, its a privilege.A privilege given to us by the state, and subject to the conditions they impose, and can both be denied and revoked.The roads you drive on are not your own, they are the states.If you want to drive around at 80MPH on your own private backyard watching the tv instead of the wheel, by all means you can.
Hell its Darwinism at its finest.
But you keep your erratic driving to yourself, and on your own property.Its well within the powers of your state to ban cars with that functionality from being licensed for road use.
Passing a law addressing the issue probably isn't needed, but at the end of the day its just easier for everyone.
(Except perhaps people who do drive at 80mph on their own turf)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435483</id>
	<title>Re:First post?</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1245699180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed.  My in-dash navigation system often pops up warnings telling me that the map information hasn't been verified for the area that I'm in... covering up the map in doing so.. requiring me to press OK on the touch screen or wait 30 seconds.. which is about 10x longer than it needs to be there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
My in-dash navigation system often pops up warnings telling me that the map information has n't been verified for the area that I 'm in... covering up the map in doing so.. requiring me to press OK on the touch screen or wait 30 seconds.. which is about 10x longer than it needs to be there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
My in-dash navigation system often pops up warnings telling me that the map information hasn't been verified for the area that I'm in... covering up the map in doing so.. requiring me to press OK on the touch screen or wait 30 seconds.. which is about 10x longer than it needs to be there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283</id>
	<title>South Korea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Similar devices are all over the place in South Korea.  There isn't much scarier than weaving through traffic while your cab driver's watching the big game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar devices are all over the place in South Korea .
There is n't much scarier than weaving through traffic while your cab driver 's watching the big game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar devices are all over the place in South Korea.
There isn't much scarier than weaving through traffic while your cab driver's watching the big game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437497</id>
	<title>Ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245764880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because no one could EVER find a safe use for mobile TV while moving more than 5 MPH.  I don't know, shot in the dark here, but Handing It Back to The Passengers Might Be One!  This Nanny society crap is getting ridiculous.  What's next, hardwiring cars to not go over 25MPH and requiring full body padding to drive the 5 Miles to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because no one could EVER find a safe use for mobile TV while moving more than 5 MPH .
I do n't know , shot in the dark here , but Handing It Back to The Passengers Might Be One !
This Nanny society crap is getting ridiculous .
What 's next , hardwiring cars to not go over 25MPH and requiring full body padding to drive the 5 Miles to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because no one could EVER find a safe use for mobile TV while moving more than 5 MPH.
I don't know, shot in the dark here, but Handing It Back to The Passengers Might Be One!
This Nanny society crap is getting ridiculous.
What's next, hardwiring cars to not go over 25MPH and requiring full body padding to drive the 5 Miles to work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775</id>
	<title>Re:Simple safety solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about ferries? A hour long ferry ride would be the perfect use for a TV, but the satnav shuts itself down when the ferry leaves the port.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about ferries ?
A hour long ferry ride would be the perfect use for a TV , but the satnav shuts itself down when the ferry leaves the port .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about ferries?
A hour long ferry ride would be the perfect use for a TV, but the satnav shuts itself down when the ferry leaves the port.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436251</id>
	<title>Just a few years ahead of the curve</title>
	<author>zmollusc</author>
	<datestamp>1245751080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A road I often travel down used to have no speed limit, then it was 40mph, then 30mph and soon it will be 20mph. I have no doubt that the speed limit will eventually be a rigidly enforced 5mph and I can happily watch tv to while away the many hours on the road.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A road I often travel down used to have no speed limit , then it was 40mph , then 30mph and soon it will be 20mph .
I have no doubt that the speed limit will eventually be a rigidly enforced 5mph and I can happily watch tv to while away the many hours on the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A road I often travel down used to have no speed limit, then it was 40mph, then 30mph and soon it will be 20mph.
I have no doubt that the speed limit will eventually be a rigidly enforced 5mph and I can happily watch tv to while away the many hours on the road.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437149</id>
	<title>Given how visually noise most CD players are</title>
	<author>mlk</author>
	<datestamp>1245762060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think TV would be fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think TV would be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think TV would be fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28443965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28442473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28449581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_2337204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435775
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436259
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28442473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28443965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436379
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435753
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28449581
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438387
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435779
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435653
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28439037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435787
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435899
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436807
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28436841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_2337204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28435493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437303
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28440951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28437133
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_2337204.28438641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
