<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_22_1625254</id>
	<title>US Military Blocks Data On Incoming Meteors</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1245688440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/slashdot/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Nature reports that the US military has abruptly <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090612/full/459897a.html">ended an informal arrangement</a> that allowed scientists access to data on incoming meteors from classified surveillance satellites, dealing a blow to the astronomers and planetary scientists who used the information to track space rocks. 'These systems are extremely useful,' says astronomer Peter Brown, at the University of Western Ontario. 'I think the scientific community benefited enormously.' Meteor data came from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense\_Support\_Program">Defense Support Program</a> (DSP) satellite network consisting of infrared satellites in geosynchronous orbit to monitor the globe for missile launches or atmospheric nuclear blasts, forming the principal component of the United States' ballistic missile early-warning system. The satellites' effectiveness was demonstrated during Desert Storm, when <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DVQ-k6caVD0C&amp;pg=PA198&amp;lpg=PA198&amp;dq=dsp+scud&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=yDTMreqfKJ&amp;sig=Fn9F8ArX3nhCCF9aW4Nm3NEVo1c&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=2KA\_SuKXBsintgeO1KgB&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book\_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1">DSP detected the launch of Iraqi Scud missiles</a> and provided warning to civilian populations and coalition forces in Israel and Saudi Arabia. As a side benefit, the satellites could also precisely detect the time, position, altitude and brightness of meteors as they entered Earth's atmosphere, information the military didn't consider particularly useful, or classified. 'It was being dropped on the floor,' says former Air Force captain Brian Weeden. Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear, Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites' capabilities to be made public, or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.  'The decision may have been made that it was perhaps too difficult to disclose just these data.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Nature reports that the US military has abruptly ended an informal arrangement that allowed scientists access to data on incoming meteors from classified surveillance satellites , dealing a blow to the astronomers and planetary scientists who used the information to track space rocks .
'These systems are extremely useful, ' says astronomer Peter Brown , at the University of Western Ontario .
'I think the scientific community benefited enormously .
' Meteor data came from the Defense Support Program ( DSP ) satellite network consisting of infrared satellites in geosynchronous orbit to monitor the globe for missile launches or atmospheric nuclear blasts , forming the principal component of the United States ' ballistic missile early-warning system .
The satellites ' effectiveness was demonstrated during Desert Storm , when DSP detected the launch of Iraqi Scud missiles and provided warning to civilian populations and coalition forces in Israel and Saudi Arabia .
As a side benefit , the satellites could also precisely detect the time , position , altitude and brightness of meteors as they entered Earth 's atmosphere , information the military did n't consider particularly useful , or classified .
'It was being dropped on the floor, ' says former Air Force captain Brian Weeden .
Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear , Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites ' capabilities to be made public , or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously .
'The decision may have been made that it was perhaps too difficult to disclose just these data .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Nature reports that the US military has abruptly ended an informal arrangement that allowed scientists access to data on incoming meteors from classified surveillance satellites, dealing a blow to the astronomers and planetary scientists who used the information to track space rocks.
'These systems are extremely useful,' says astronomer Peter Brown, at the University of Western Ontario.
'I think the scientific community benefited enormously.
' Meteor data came from the Defense Support Program (DSP) satellite network consisting of infrared satellites in geosynchronous orbit to monitor the globe for missile launches or atmospheric nuclear blasts, forming the principal component of the United States' ballistic missile early-warning system.
The satellites' effectiveness was demonstrated during Desert Storm, when DSP detected the launch of Iraqi Scud missiles and provided warning to civilian populations and coalition forces in Israel and Saudi Arabia.
As a side benefit, the satellites could also precisely detect the time, position, altitude and brightness of meteors as they entered Earth's atmosphere, information the military didn't consider particularly useful, or classified.
'It was being dropped on the floor,' says former Air Force captain Brian Weeden.
Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear, Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites' capabilities to be made public, or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.
'The decision may have been made that it was perhaps too difficult to disclose just these data.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187</id>
	<title>Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>void process\_information(s\_information* info) {<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; if (info) {<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; if (info.is\_classified)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; process\_secretly(info)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; else<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; process\_publicly(info)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; }<br>}</p><p>Can I have my millions now for "the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>void process \ _information ( s \ _information * info ) {     if ( info ) {         if ( info.is \ _classified )             process \ _secretly ( info )         else             process \ _publicly ( info )     } } Can I have my millions now for " the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>void process\_information(s\_information* info) {
    if (info) {
        if (info.is\_classified)
            process\_secretly(info)
        else
            process\_publicly(info)
    }}Can I have my millions now for "the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424909</id>
	<title>Re:"Blocks"?</title>
	<author>ntijerino</author>
	<datestamp>1245694860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I totally agree with the parent poster. It should have read something like 'no longer shares openly.' From what I can tell, the US military was under no obligation to share the data. It isn't like the military is jamming communications channels, or otherwise blocking data that would naturally be available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally agree with the parent poster .
It should have read something like 'no longer shares openly .
' From what I can tell , the US military was under no obligation to share the data .
It is n't like the military is jamming communications channels , or otherwise blocking data that would naturally be available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally agree with the parent poster.
It should have read something like 'no longer shares openly.
' From what I can tell, the US military was under no obligation to share the data.
It isn't like the military is jamming communications channels, or otherwise blocking data that would naturally be available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425077</id>
	<title>Re:Message to scientists:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The scientists have been <a href="http://www.getyourowndirt.com/" title="getyourowndirt.com" rel="nofollow">told that before</a> [getyourowndirt.com] and didn't listen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The scientists have been told that before [ getyourowndirt.com ] and did n't listen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The scientists have been told that before [getyourowndirt.com] and didn't listen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424373</id>
	<title>two words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"north korea"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" north korea "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"north korea"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424627</id>
	<title>I hope a meteor hits this planet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope a meteor hits this horrible planet where miserable creatures are forced to kill and eat each other until they die.  Who created this horrible existence and wtf were they thinking?</p><p>--miserable creature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope a meteor hits this horrible planet where miserable creatures are forced to kill and eat each other until they die .
Who created this horrible existence and wtf were they thinking ? --miserable creature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope a meteor hits this horrible planet where miserable creatures are forced to kill and eat each other until they die.
Who created this horrible existence and wtf were they thinking?--miserable creature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425693</id>
	<title>Multilevel Security</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.</p></div><p>Sounds reasonable to me.<br>MLS systems are extremely difficult to get right, extremely difficult to accredit, and extremely difficult to maintain.<br>In general, they're a PITA.<br>My life would be so much better without them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.Sounds reasonable to me.MLS systems are extremely difficult to get right , extremely difficult to accredit , and extremely difficult to maintain.In general , they 're a PITA.My life would be so much better without them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.Sounds reasonable to me.MLS systems are extremely difficult to get right, extremely difficult to accredit, and extremely difficult to maintain.In general, they're a PITA.My life would be so much better without them.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427167</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>mkramer</author>
	<datestamp>1245702840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once touched by a classified process, the non-classified data becomes classified, until you painstakingly prove that it is not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once touched by a classified process , the non-classified data becomes classified , until you painstakingly prove that it is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once touched by a classified process, the non-classified data becomes classified, until you painstakingly prove that it is not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424485</id>
	<title>Simple Reason:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us.
   </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425315</id>
	<title>Direct all your complaints</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1245696240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to the Monsanto Corporation.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Moon Whaler</htmltext>
<tokenext>to the Monsanto Corporation .
/Moon Whaler</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the Monsanto Corporation.
/Moon Whaler</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28429421</id>
	<title>Re:My vote: Retasking</title>
	<author>harlows\_monkeys</author>
	<datestamp>1245666900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good point. If scientists suddenly noticed that there has been a 50\% drop in meteors entering the atmosphere over Russia, and a 50\% increase in meteors entering the atmosphere over North Korea, it would be a pretty damn big clue that the military had moved some assets around.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good point .
If scientists suddenly noticed that there has been a 50 \ % drop in meteors entering the atmosphere over Russia , and a 50 \ % increase in meteors entering the atmosphere over North Korea , it would be a pretty damn big clue that the military had moved some assets around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good point.
If scientists suddenly noticed that there has been a 50\% drop in meteors entering the atmosphere over Russia, and a 50\% increase in meteors entering the atmosphere over North Korea, it would be a pretty damn big clue that the military had moved some assets around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425227</id>
	<title>Not really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said it shared that info between processors?</p><p>If a classified-allowed process exists, it can have non-classified data on it too. It then SENDS this unclassified data to a processor that only works on unclassified data.</p><p>Or is this "multi-processor" thingy a bit hard for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said it shared that info between processors ? If a classified-allowed process exists , it can have non-classified data on it too .
It then SENDS this unclassified data to a processor that only works on unclassified data.Or is this " multi-processor " thingy a bit hard for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said it shared that info between processors?If a classified-allowed process exists, it can have non-classified data on it too.
It then SENDS this unclassified data to a processor that only works on unclassified data.Or is this "multi-processor" thingy a bit hard for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425741</id>
	<title>Dumb question incoming.</title>
	<author>Sebilrazen</author>
	<datestamp>1245697680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given that we, and the world, know that meteors striking the atmosphere cause these infrared satellites to go off, what stops a rogue nation from figuring out when the Perseids or Leonids would be impacting above their country and using that as a launch window?  I mean, what's an extra blip in all that noise?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that we , and the world , know that meteors striking the atmosphere cause these infrared satellites to go off , what stops a rogue nation from figuring out when the Perseids or Leonids would be impacting above their country and using that as a launch window ?
I mean , what 's an extra blip in all that noise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that we, and the world, know that meteors striking the atmosphere cause these infrared satellites to go off, what stops a rogue nation from figuring out when the Perseids or Leonids would be impacting above their country and using that as a launch window?
I mean, what's an extra blip in all that noise?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426451</id>
	<title>Lacks the expensive software?</title>
	<author>MindPhlux</author>
	<datestamp>1245700380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, if the government has the software to sift through fathomless amounts of e-mail traffic and random data, only accessing it when it was intended for a party for which they have a fully cleared warrant, then surely they have the expensive software and know how to give us the locations of a few meteors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , if the government has the software to sift through fathomless amounts of e-mail traffic and random data , only accessing it when it was intended for a party for which they have a fully cleared warrant , then surely they have the expensive software and know how to give us the locations of a few meteors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, if the government has the software to sift through fathomless amounts of e-mail traffic and random data, only accessing it when it was intended for a party for which they have a fully cleared warrant, then surely they have the expensive software and know how to give us the locations of a few meteors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425567</id>
	<title>Re:Temporary</title>
	<author>Qzukk</author>
	<datestamp>1245697020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well of course it leaked information.  After all, all an evil dictator would need to do is launch a missile, then wait to see if the launch showed up in the meteor report or if his country was turned into a glassy bowl.  If the latter, try a different way of launching a missile.</p><p>On a more serious note, if you had a separate meteor detection system, you COULD identify the locations and such of the satellites by comparing your data.  For instance, my satellite at location x picked up the explosion at time t.0000003, and the US satellite picked it up at t.0000006 making it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.0000003 light seconds farther from the site.  Or my satellite at location z is picking up meteorites that the US satellites are not, indicating that location z is probably not observed by the US satellite and therefore a good place to launch from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well of course it leaked information .
After all , all an evil dictator would need to do is launch a missile , then wait to see if the launch showed up in the meteor report or if his country was turned into a glassy bowl .
If the latter , try a different way of launching a missile.On a more serious note , if you had a separate meteor detection system , you COULD identify the locations and such of the satellites by comparing your data .
For instance , my satellite at location x picked up the explosion at time t.0000003 , and the US satellite picked it up at t.0000006 making it .0000003 light seconds farther from the site .
Or my satellite at location z is picking up meteorites that the US satellites are not , indicating that location z is probably not observed by the US satellite and therefore a good place to launch from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well of course it leaked information.
After all, all an evil dictator would need to do is launch a missile, then wait to see if the launch showed up in the meteor report or if his country was turned into a glassy bowl.
If the latter, try a different way of launching a missile.On a more serious note, if you had a separate meteor detection system, you COULD identify the locations and such of the satellites by comparing your data.
For instance, my satellite at location x picked up the explosion at time t.0000003, and the US satellite picked it up at t.0000006 making it .0000003 light seconds farther from the site.
Or my satellite at location z is picking up meteorites that the US satellites are not, indicating that location z is probably not observed by the US satellite and therefore a good place to launch from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28442299</id>
	<title>Re:My vote: Retasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geosynchronous orbit means each satellite remains over a specific place on the earth's surface.  The geosynchronous satellites over, say, the USA can't be re-assigned to look at NK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geosynchronous orbit means each satellite remains over a specific place on the earth 's surface .
The geosynchronous satellites over , say , the USA ca n't be re-assigned to look at NK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geosynchronous orbit means each satellite remains over a specific place on the earth's surface.
The geosynchronous satellites over, say, the USA can't be re-assigned to look at NK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424523</id>
	<title>Re:"Blocks"?</title>
	<author>Luyseyal</author>
	<datestamp>1245693540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In all fairness, the article's subheading is "Satellite information on incoming meteors is blocked."</p><p>-l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all fairness , the article 's subheading is " Satellite information on incoming meteors is blocked .
" -l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all fairness, the article's subheading is "Satellite information on incoming meteors is blocked.
"-l</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424135</id>
	<title>Chicken Little</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would too, do you want people running around like Chicken Little?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would too , do you want people running around like Chicken Little ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would too, do you want people running around like Chicken Little?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424359</id>
	<title>I have a solution</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1245692940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>alter table SatelliteInfo add IsClassified bit not null default 1<br> <br>

Then update the rows for the non-Classified ones.<br> <br>
But seriously, "Expensive software"? Isn't most of this stuff custom-built anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>alter table SatelliteInfo add IsClassified bit not null default 1 Then update the rows for the non-Classified ones .
But seriously , " Expensive software " ?
Is n't most of this stuff custom-built anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alter table SatelliteInfo add IsClassified bit not null default 1 

Then update the rows for the non-Classified ones.
But seriously, "Expensive software"?
Isn't most of this stuff custom-built anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427049</id>
	<title>SBIRS</title>
	<author>captainbeardo</author>
	<datestamp>1245702480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>SBIRS, can't kill it, can't make it live.
<br> <br>
I'm guessing that a defense contract that's 4 times it's initial budget and 10 years late doesn't have the time to worry about filtering out the non-classified data to give to scientists. IR data is very very noisy so it's pretty difficult to separate out the parts you care about vs the noise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SBIRS , ca n't kill it , ca n't make it live .
I 'm guessing that a defense contract that 's 4 times it 's initial budget and 10 years late does n't have the time to worry about filtering out the non-classified data to give to scientists .
IR data is very very noisy so it 's pretty difficult to separate out the parts you care about vs the noise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SBIRS, can't kill it, can't make it live.
I'm guessing that a defense contract that's 4 times it's initial budget and 10 years late doesn't have the time to worry about filtering out the non-classified data to give to scientists.
IR data is very very noisy so it's pretty difficult to separate out the parts you care about vs the noise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975</id>
	<title>My vote: Retasking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is probable that the military has re-assigned the satellites so that more are looking in the direction of North Korea and possibly Iran. It would make a lot of sense to point the satellites in that direction and keep it secret.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is probable that the military has re-assigned the satellites so that more are looking in the direction of North Korea and possibly Iran .
It would make a lot of sense to point the satellites in that direction and keep it secret .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is probable that the military has re-assigned the satellites so that more are looking in the direction of North Korea and possibly Iran.
It would make a lot of sense to point the satellites in that direction and keep it secret.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427189</id>
	<title>Re:Simple Reason:</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1245702900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us.</i></p><p>God damn studio NDAs.  Everything has to be a perfectly coordinated media campaign with those bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us.God damn studio NDAs .
Everything has to be a perfectly coordinated media campaign with those bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they are hiding the Transformer invasion from us.God damn studio NDAs.
Everything has to be a perfectly coordinated media campaign with those bastards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425333</id>
	<title>aliens and enemies?</title>
	<author>wesw02</author>
	<datestamp>1245696300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems likely to me that our enemies have teamed up with aliens to defeat us. The military must being trying to hide it for our own good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems likely to me that our enemies have teamed up with aliens to defeat us .
The military must being trying to hide it for our own good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems likely to me that our enemies have teamed up with aliens to defeat us.
The military must being trying to hide it for our own good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425533</id>
	<title>Clarification</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1245696960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The satellites were picking up data on meteors <b>as they hit the atmosphere</b>. This has nothing to do with the search for large objects that may or may not hit the earth.<br> <br>
This is technically made clear by the use of the word meteor, as opposed to asteroid, but I only remembered that as I type this so I expect I am not the only one that could have used a clarifying sentence in the summary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The satellites were picking up data on meteors as they hit the atmosphere .
This has nothing to do with the search for large objects that may or may not hit the earth .
This is technically made clear by the use of the word meteor , as opposed to asteroid , but I only remembered that as I type this so I expect I am not the only one that could have used a clarifying sentence in the summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The satellites were picking up data on meteors as they hit the atmosphere.
This has nothing to do with the search for large objects that may or may not hit the earth.
This is technically made clear by the use of the word meteor, as opposed to asteroid, but I only remembered that as I type this so I expect I am not the only one that could have used a clarifying sentence in the summary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447</id>
	<title>Message to scientists:</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1245693360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get your own damn satellites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get your own damn satellites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get your own damn satellites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424891</id>
	<title>Obligatory X-Files quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CHIEF KORETZ:  Sir, I have flash traffic at 24-18. Repeated calls for ID go unanswered. And it's not in the orbital or suborbital inventory.</p><p>MALE OFFICER #2: 24-18.  Isn't that where...</p><p>CHIEF KORETZ:  Same exact spot, sir.  Although I am reading a much larger craft his time.</p><p>MALE OFFICER #2: Meteor, Ms. Koretz.</p><p>CHIEF KORETZ:  A much larger meteor, sir. Hold on a second.
(Putting hand to earpiece) We have a confirm. Whitmarsh Air Force Base is tracking...</p><p>MALE OFFICER #2: Where is it?</p><p>CHIEF KORETZ:  Well, sir.  The - meteor - seems to be hovering over a small town in Eastern Wisconsin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CHIEF KORETZ : Sir , I have flash traffic at 24-18 .
Repeated calls for ID go unanswered .
And it 's not in the orbital or suborbital inventory.MALE OFFICER # 2 : 24-18 .
Is n't that where...CHIEF KORETZ : Same exact spot , sir .
Although I am reading a much larger craft his time.MALE OFFICER # 2 : Meteor , Ms. Koretz.CHIEF KORETZ : A much larger meteor , sir .
Hold on a second .
( Putting hand to earpiece ) We have a confirm .
Whitmarsh Air Force Base is tracking...MALE OFFICER # 2 : Where is it ? CHIEF KORETZ : Well , sir .
The - meteor - seems to be hovering over a small town in Eastern Wisconsin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CHIEF KORETZ:  Sir, I have flash traffic at 24-18.
Repeated calls for ID go unanswered.
And it's not in the orbital or suborbital inventory.MALE OFFICER #2: 24-18.
Isn't that where...CHIEF KORETZ:  Same exact spot, sir.
Although I am reading a much larger craft his time.MALE OFFICER #2: Meteor, Ms. Koretz.CHIEF KORETZ:  A much larger meteor, sir.
Hold on a second.
(Putting hand to earpiece) We have a confirm.
Whitmarsh Air Force Base is tracking...MALE OFFICER #2: Where is it?CHIEF KORETZ:  Well, sir.
The - meteor - seems to be hovering over a small town in Eastern Wisconsin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28431183</id>
	<title>we're all going to die</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they just don't want us to know about the giant meteor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they just do n't want us to know about the giant meteor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they just don't want us to know about the giant meteor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425449</id>
	<title>Invaders!</title>
	<author>danwesnor</author>
	<datestamp>1245696660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously they heard the Decepticons are coming and they don't want them to know the the capabilities of our space surveillance system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously they heard the Decepticons are coming and they do n't want them to know the the capabilities of our space surveillance system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously they heard the Decepticons are coming and they don't want them to know the the capabilities of our space surveillance system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28428699</id>
	<title>Re:Planet X</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1245664380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're kidding right?  Man, Dec 22, 2012 is going to be a funny day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're kidding right ?
Man , Dec 22 , 2012 is going to be a funny day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're kidding right?
Man, Dec 22, 2012 is going to be a funny day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425173</id>
	<title>Perhaps the wait is over...</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1245695760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... Military satellites stop transmitting information about incoming meteor and space objects... Alien craft move in around the planet, setting up positions over major cities and military bases... Are they friend? Are they foe?...

Duke Nukem Forever... the Live Action Game!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Military satellites stop transmitting information about incoming meteor and space objects... Alien craft move in around the planet , setting up positions over major cities and military bases... Are they friend ?
Are they foe ? .. .
Duke Nukem Forever... the Live Action Game ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Military satellites stop transmitting information about incoming meteor and space objects... Alien craft move in around the planet, setting up positions over major cities and military bases... Are they friend?
Are they foe?...
Duke Nukem Forever... the Live Action Game!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424861</id>
	<title>Outbound Meteors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More importantly, are they going to block the information on the outbound meteors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly , are they going to block the information on the outbound meteors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly, are they going to block the information on the outbound meteors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425597</id>
	<title>Re:Planet X</title>
	<author>ezwip</author>
	<datestamp>1245697140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with this statement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with this statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with this statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424179</id>
	<title>Tinfoil isn't just for Jiffy Pop anymore</title>
	<author>Torodung</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I assume this means the mothership is now on final approach, and we don't want those scientists causing a panic.</p><p>I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. Advanced warning is only useful if you are against them. Join us.</p><p>--<br>Toro</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume this means the mothership is now on final approach , and we do n't want those scientists causing a panic.I , for one , welcome our new alien overlords .
Advanced warning is only useful if you are against them .
Join us.--Toro</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume this means the mothership is now on final approach, and we don't want those scientists causing a panic.I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords.
Advanced warning is only useful if you are against them.
Join us.--Toro</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28428835</id>
	<title>Or...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1245664800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or...it could be we finally are going to have a crashing asteroid hit our planet, as everybody has been to the movies has seen already.<br>This is it, the end is coming, the end is coming....quick, where is my umbrella?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or...it could be we finally are going to have a crashing asteroid hit our planet , as everybody has been to the movies has seen already.This is it , the end is coming , the end is coming....quick , where is my umbrella ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or...it could be we finally are going to have a crashing asteroid hit our planet, as everybody has been to the movies has seen already.This is it, the end is coming, the end is coming....quick, where is my umbrella?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424361</id>
	<title>Temporary</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1245693000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are most likely worried that the pictures might infer classified information or they think it had happened with the older system. Maybe you are able to map the positions of the satellites using the pictures. Its only a matter of time before things like that are figured out. The military will then likely declassify the information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are most likely worried that the pictures might infer classified information or they think it had happened with the older system .
Maybe you are able to map the positions of the satellites using the pictures .
Its only a matter of time before things like that are figured out .
The military will then likely declassify the information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are most likely worried that the pictures might infer classified information or they think it had happened with the older system.
Maybe you are able to map the positions of the satellites using the pictures.
Its only a matter of time before things like that are figured out.
The military will then likely declassify the information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28432867</id>
	<title>reasons why</title>
	<author>jbdigriz</author>
	<datestamp>1245680700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or it could be that the military does not wish to give the civilian bureaucrats over at DHS/NAO (National Applications Office) any excuse to wrest further control over military satellites from the DOD.  As conditioned as we are to give facile short shrift to the military establishment's motives in these kinds of secret matters, it may be that this is very definitely the lesser of two evils. The loss to science, or even to national security, is regrettable. Perhaps, esp. in light of the latter, this data is at least being archived for possible scientific analysis at some future date.</p><p>I don't guess you can get any more circumspect than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or it could be that the military does not wish to give the civilian bureaucrats over at DHS/NAO ( National Applications Office ) any excuse to wrest further control over military satellites from the DOD .
As conditioned as we are to give facile short shrift to the military establishment 's motives in these kinds of secret matters , it may be that this is very definitely the lesser of two evils .
The loss to science , or even to national security , is regrettable .
Perhaps , esp .
in light of the latter , this data is at least being archived for possible scientific analysis at some future date.I do n't guess you can get any more circumspect than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or it could be that the military does not wish to give the civilian bureaucrats over at DHS/NAO (National Applications Office) any excuse to wrest further control over military satellites from the DOD.
As conditioned as we are to give facile short shrift to the military establishment's motives in these kinds of secret matters, it may be that this is very definitely the lesser of two evils.
The loss to science, or even to national security, is regrettable.
Perhaps, esp.
in light of the latter, this data is at least being archived for possible scientific analysis at some future date.I don't guess you can get any more circumspect than that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426127</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>sdpuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1245699180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Remember that size, temperature and speed will be variable within each type.</p></div><p>Mod this post up - interesting.
</p><p>
My girlfriend told me that just the other day (although I think she was sparing my feelings)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember that size , temperature and speed will be variable within each type.Mod this post up - interesting .
My girlfriend told me that just the other day ( although I think she was sparing my feelings )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember that size, temperature and speed will be variable within each type.Mod this post up - interesting.
My girlfriend told me that just the other day (although I think she was sparing my feelings)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425863</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Said function would only be needed for a <b>real-time</b> system.  The meteor data was being gleaned from <i>old<i> data.</i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Said function would only be needed for a real-time system .
The meteor data was being gleaned from old data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Said function would only be needed for a real-time system.
The meteor data was being gleaned from old data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations, you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor.  If you want to handle classified data, a processor can only handle classified data, you cannot mix and match.  In devices that are forced to mix and match (edge devices, like encryptors typically) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves (typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device, with a single wire connecting them.  That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it (even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side). <br>
<br>
Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor .
If you want to handle classified data , a processor can only handle classified data , you can not mix and match .
In devices that are forced to mix and match ( edge devices , like encryptors typically ) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves ( typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device , with a single wire connecting them .
That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it ( even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side ) .
Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor.
If you want to handle classified data, a processor can only handle classified data, you cannot mix and match.
In devices that are forced to mix and match (edge devices, like encryptors typically) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves (typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device, with a single wire connecting them.
That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it (even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side).
Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424125</id>
	<title>Dare I say it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First Post?</htmltext>
<tokenext>First Post ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Post?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426019</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Xeriar</author>
	<datestamp>1245698820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A meteor will not have a speed less than 11 kps outside of a capture orbit (not likely). No terrestrial-sourced object is going to reach that sort of speed with the expectation that it is going to land again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A meteor will not have a speed less than 11 kps outside of a capture orbit ( not likely ) .
No terrestrial-sourced object is going to reach that sort of speed with the expectation that it is going to land again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A meteor will not have a speed less than 11 kps outside of a capture orbit (not likely).
No terrestrial-sourced object is going to reach that sort of speed with the expectation that it is going to land again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28473619</id>
	<title>Burlington News trumps anything Pederast AB voiced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245929520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the information from BURLINGTONNEWS.NET, as recent as 1999 it has been common knowledge in leading intelligence positions of the Reptilian Race to hybridize with humans.  This is better documented by David Ike where he has written about certain behaviours in world leaders that are only explainable on a scientific perspective; consider the fact that the only similarities so-far between a snake or lizard's brain to a human brain is the lower region known as the Archon center which defines all primitive feelings.  A human has additional structure on-top of this that allows for a more complex conscience that is only attainable when abating the primitives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the information from BURLINGTONNEWS.NET , as recent as 1999 it has been common knowledge in leading intelligence positions of the Reptilian Race to hybridize with humans .
This is better documented by David Ike where he has written about certain behaviours in world leaders that are only explainable on a scientific perspective ; consider the fact that the only similarities so-far between a snake or lizard 's brain to a human brain is the lower region known as the Archon center which defines all primitive feelings .
A human has additional structure on-top of this that allows for a more complex conscience that is only attainable when abating the primitives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the information from BURLINGTONNEWS.NET, as recent as 1999 it has been common knowledge in leading intelligence positions of the Reptilian Race to hybridize with humans.
This is better documented by David Ike where he has written about certain behaviours in world leaders that are only explainable on a scientific perspective; consider the fact that the only similarities so-far between a snake or lizard's brain to a human brain is the lower region known as the Archon center which defines all primitive feelings.
A human has additional structure on-top of this that allows for a more complex conscience that is only attainable when abating the primitives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424551</id>
	<title>North Korea</title>
	<author>i\_ate\_god</author>
	<datestamp>1245693600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would think the problem is that North Korea is supposedly going to be sending a missile over to Hawaii. Perhaps meteor monitoring was simply a bad use of the satellites' time as the US military is gearing up to track North Korea's launch.</p><p>Doesn't seem too far fetched to me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think the problem is that North Korea is supposedly going to be sending a missile over to Hawaii .
Perhaps meteor monitoring was simply a bad use of the satellites ' time as the US military is gearing up to track North Korea 's launch.Does n't seem too far fetched to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think the problem is that North Korea is supposedly going to be sending a missile over to Hawaii.
Perhaps meteor monitoring was simply a bad use of the satellites' time as the US military is gearing up to track North Korea's launch.Doesn't seem too far fetched to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28433817</id>
	<title>blocking data</title>
	<author>neonsignal</author>
	<datestamp>1245686100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, that's some firewall. Is this like some sort of asteroid based network?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that 's some firewall .
Is this like some sort of asteroid based network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that's some firewall.
Is this like some sort of asteroid based network?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424415</id>
	<title>Re:"Blocks"?</title>
	<author>SquirrelsUnite</author>
	<datestamp>1245693240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kudos to everyone in the program who provided this information so far. They had no obligation, they couldn't hope to get recognized for their work either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos to everyone in the program who provided this information so far .
They had no obligation , they could n't hope to get recognized for their work either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos to everyone in the program who provided this information so far.
They had no obligation, they couldn't hope to get recognized for their work either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425909</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit. Misusing "classified" is a felony, a go to federal pound me in the ass penitentiary sort of felony. Of the many things the federal government abuses, classifying information is a rare exception. Authority to classify informatino resides at very high civilian levels (not in the military) and we are specifically prohibited from hiding embarassing information under the classification system.<br>Many of us in the military are uncomfortable with the president's decision to classify pictures from Abu Graib. Legally, the pictures are likely to do "grave harm" to the United States, which is a requisite to classifying them. However, it's dubious whether that will withstand a FOIA request and follow-on lawsuit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .
Misusing " classified " is a felony , a go to federal pound me in the ass penitentiary sort of felony .
Of the many things the federal government abuses , classifying information is a rare exception .
Authority to classify informatino resides at very high civilian levels ( not in the military ) and we are specifically prohibited from hiding embarassing information under the classification system.Many of us in the military are uncomfortable with the president 's decision to classify pictures from Abu Graib .
Legally , the pictures are likely to do " grave harm " to the United States , which is a requisite to classifying them .
However , it 's dubious whether that will withstand a FOIA request and follow-on lawsuit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.
Misusing "classified" is a felony, a go to federal pound me in the ass penitentiary sort of felony.
Of the many things the federal government abuses, classifying information is a rare exception.
Authority to classify informatino resides at very high civilian levels (not in the military) and we are specifically prohibited from hiding embarassing information under the classification system.Many of us in the military are uncomfortable with the president's decision to classify pictures from Abu Graib.
Legally, the pictures are likely to do "grave harm" to the United States, which is a requisite to classifying them.
However, it's dubious whether that will withstand a FOIA request and follow-on lawsuit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424663</id>
	<title>Or it could be</title>
	<author>DRAGONWEEZEL</author>
	<datestamp>1245693960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that we are preparing for a strike, counterstrike situation w/ N. Korea or Iran.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that we are preparing for a strike , counterstrike situation w/ N. Korea or Iran .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that we are preparing for a strike, counterstrike situation w/ N. Korea or Iran.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28428407</id>
	<title>War in space?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245663540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I first heard about this from Richard C. Hoagland on the Wed. June 10, 2009 Coast to Coast show -<br><a href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/06/10" title="coasttocoastam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/06/10</a> [coasttocoastam.com]<br>where Hoagland claims that there is a space war going on among the ETs, and that the military blocked further acquisition of meteor data to prevent the public learning of this space war.</p><p>Of course, I believe none of it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I just provide it for your amusement, and that you can glean some nuggets of information from questionable sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I first heard about this from Richard C. Hoagland on the Wed. June 10 , 2009 Coast to Coast show -http : //www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/06/10 [ coasttocoastam.com ] where Hoagland claims that there is a space war going on among the ETs , and that the military blocked further acquisition of meteor data to prevent the public learning of this space war.Of course , I believe none of it ... I just provide it for your amusement , and that you can glean some nuggets of information from questionable sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first heard about this from Richard C. Hoagland on the Wed. June 10, 2009 Coast to Coast show -http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/06/10 [coasttocoastam.com]where Hoagland claims that there is a space war going on among the ETs, and that the military blocked further acquisition of meteor data to prevent the public learning of this space war.Of course, I believe none of it ... I just provide it for your amusement, and that you can glean some nuggets of information from questionable sources.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28457451</id>
	<title>Re:Chicken Little</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245876720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They already are.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnjx6KETmi4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnjx6KETmi4</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They already are.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = wnjx6KETmi4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already are.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnjx6KETmi4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541</id>
	<title>Planet X</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just one of many attempts at covering up the pending PlanetX disaster of 2012.
<a href="http://www.december212012.com/media\_push.htm" title="december212012.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.december212012.com/media\_push.htm</a> [december212012.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just one of many attempts at covering up the pending PlanetX disaster of 2012 . http : //www.december212012.com/media \ _push.htm [ december212012.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just one of many attempts at covering up the pending PlanetX disaster of 2012.
http://www.december212012.com/media\_push.htm [december212012.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424853</id>
	<title>FAILZORS?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>haS steadily the reaper BSD's fellow travellers? fanatic known again. There are</htmltext>
<tokenext>haS steadily the reaper BSD 's fellow travellers ?
fanatic known again .
There are</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haS steadily the reaper BSD's fellow travellers?
fanatic known again.
There are</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424653</id>
	<title>Coast to Coast?</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1245693900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear</p></div></blockquote><p>So, this entire thread is essentially just a bait for idle speculation and conspiracy theories. Art Bell would be proud.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclearSo , this entire thread is essentially just a bait for idle speculation and conspiracy theories .
Art Bell would be proud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclearSo, this entire thread is essentially just a bait for idle speculation and conspiracy theories.
Art Bell would be proud.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424367</id>
	<title>The info become classified</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1245693000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427445</id>
	<title>Information, secrets, intelligence world...</title>
	<author>valinor89</author>
	<datestamp>1245703560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not that I'm an Intelligence expert, nor I'm from the USA, but I allways tought that it is better to control the information that you give than to simply stop giving it.

 I mean, I can give them the info that I want and then controlling the situation becouse I CAN know what they know and act acordingly and even possibly make them act the way I want. Now they (USA) just don't have any idea about what the others ( the usual suspects ) might know and they (USA) can't influence the other countries (the usual suspects) in theyr weapons devolopment. What happens if the other country (your favourite evil empire, kingdom, country...) just goes overkill and excedes the USS spy tech, who knows?, USA is not what used to be, becouse they (the usual suspects) don't think (information control) that they know that les advanced tech would suffice? Kind of mind blowing isn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I 'm an Intelligence expert , nor I 'm from the USA , but I allways tought that it is better to control the information that you give than to simply stop giving it .
I mean , I can give them the info that I want and then controlling the situation becouse I CAN know what they know and act acordingly and even possibly make them act the way I want .
Now they ( USA ) just do n't have any idea about what the others ( the usual suspects ) might know and they ( USA ) ca n't influence the other countries ( the usual suspects ) in theyr weapons devolopment .
What happens if the other country ( your favourite evil empire , kingdom , country... ) just goes overkill and excedes the USS spy tech , who knows ? , USA is not what used to be , becouse they ( the usual suspects ) do n't think ( information control ) that they know that les advanced tech would suffice ?
Kind of mind blowing is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I'm an Intelligence expert, nor I'm from the USA, but I allways tought that it is better to control the information that you give than to simply stop giving it.
I mean, I can give them the info that I want and then controlling the situation becouse I CAN know what they know and act acordingly and even possibly make them act the way I want.
Now they (USA) just don't have any idea about what the others ( the usual suspects ) might know and they (USA) can't influence the other countries (the usual suspects) in theyr weapons devolopment.
What happens if the other country (your favourite evil empire, kingdom, country...) just goes overkill and excedes the USS spy tech, who knows?, USA is not what used to be, becouse they (the usual suspects) don't think (information control) that they know that les advanced tech would suffice?
Kind of mind blowing isn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426383</id>
	<title>Re:North Korea</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1245700140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I left comments on various sites, including <a href="http://intensedebate.com/people/romanmir" title="intensedebate.com">this one</a> [intensedebate.com] and some of my comments have been disappearing.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> Isn't it an awfully big coincidence that the destruction of US dollar and these fears of NK nuclear bombs and missiles are happening at exactly the same time? I wouldn't put it past the US government to do with NK what they did with Iraq: create a lie and push it to start a war so that US could have its fleet in Asia. There they could 'protect the world from crazy NK' in return for the largest debt owner of US (Japan) forgiving most of it and creating enough threat for China not to try and call US on its debt (not switching from US dollar to some other currency, say gold.) I absolutely believe that US government, the real government - banks, insurance companies, credit companies, military contractors are totally capable of starting a war even a nuclear war to protect their currency and wealth.</p><p>A US destroyer was sent to NK shores, isn't that convenient, a single destroyer. They have cruiser missiles on destroyers now, don't they? The 'news' that NK was going to launch a missile at Hawaii came from Japan, and at about the same time Japanese Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano delivered a speech saying that Japan's confidence in US Treasuries and the US dollar "is absolutely unshakable", he also said "I have faith in the U.S. dollar's status as a reserve currency." So Japan props up the USD and at the same time supplies 'intel' that NK is preparing a strike on US territory? You make me LOL so hard.</p><p>Anyone remembers how Vietnam started? US fabricated bombing of its ship on the 4th of August 1964. In 2005 data came out from the US gov't that there was no bombing, but the Vietnam war started anyway. How did Iraq start? Saddam decided to switch from USD to Euro as main currency of payment for Oil. US has the largest military for a reason - to protect its interests, and right now its interests are protecting its currency. NK 'going nuclear' is a ruse, the real news are: US dollar is dying.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I left comments on various sites , including this one [ intensedebate.com ] and some of my comments have been disappearing .
Is n't it an awfully big coincidence that the destruction of US dollar and these fears of NK nuclear bombs and missiles are happening at exactly the same time ?
I would n't put it past the US government to do with NK what they did with Iraq : create a lie and push it to start a war so that US could have its fleet in Asia .
There they could 'protect the world from crazy NK ' in return for the largest debt owner of US ( Japan ) forgiving most of it and creating enough threat for China not to try and call US on its debt ( not switching from US dollar to some other currency , say gold .
) I absolutely believe that US government , the real government - banks , insurance companies , credit companies , military contractors are totally capable of starting a war even a nuclear war to protect their currency and wealth.A US destroyer was sent to NK shores , is n't that convenient , a single destroyer .
They have cruiser missiles on destroyers now , do n't they ?
The 'news ' that NK was going to launch a missile at Hawaii came from Japan , and at about the same time Japanese Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano delivered a speech saying that Japan 's confidence in US Treasuries and the US dollar " is absolutely unshakable " , he also said " I have faith in the U.S. dollar 's status as a reserve currency .
" So Japan props up the USD and at the same time supplies 'intel ' that NK is preparing a strike on US territory ?
You make me LOL so hard.Anyone remembers how Vietnam started ?
US fabricated bombing of its ship on the 4th of August 1964 .
In 2005 data came out from the US gov't that there was no bombing , but the Vietnam war started anyway .
How did Iraq start ?
Saddam decided to switch from USD to Euro as main currency of payment for Oil .
US has the largest military for a reason - to protect its interests , and right now its interests are protecting its currency .
NK 'going nuclear ' is a ruse , the real news are : US dollar is dying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I left comments on various sites, including this one [intensedebate.com] and some of my comments have been disappearing.
Isn't it an awfully big coincidence that the destruction of US dollar and these fears of NK nuclear bombs and missiles are happening at exactly the same time?
I wouldn't put it past the US government to do with NK what they did with Iraq: create a lie and push it to start a war so that US could have its fleet in Asia.
There they could 'protect the world from crazy NK' in return for the largest debt owner of US (Japan) forgiving most of it and creating enough threat for China not to try and call US on its debt (not switching from US dollar to some other currency, say gold.
) I absolutely believe that US government, the real government - banks, insurance companies, credit companies, military contractors are totally capable of starting a war even a nuclear war to protect their currency and wealth.A US destroyer was sent to NK shores, isn't that convenient, a single destroyer.
They have cruiser missiles on destroyers now, don't they?
The 'news' that NK was going to launch a missile at Hawaii came from Japan, and at about the same time Japanese Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano delivered a speech saying that Japan's confidence in US Treasuries and the US dollar "is absolutely unshakable", he also said "I have faith in the U.S. dollar's status as a reserve currency.
" So Japan props up the USD and at the same time supplies 'intel' that NK is preparing a strike on US territory?
You make me LOL so hard.Anyone remembers how Vietnam started?
US fabricated bombing of its ship on the 4th of August 1964.
In 2005 data came out from the US gov't that there was no bombing, but the Vietnam war started anyway.
How did Iraq start?
Saddam decided to switch from USD to Euro as main currency of payment for Oil.
US has the largest military for a reason - to protect its interests, and right now its interests are protecting its currency.
NK 'going nuclear' is a ruse, the real news are: US dollar is dying.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425417</id>
	<title>Re:The info become classified</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1245696540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors.</p></div><p>Well, <a href="http://www.lyricsdownload.com/adam-and-the-ants-don-t-be-square-be-there-lyrics.html" title="lyricsdownload.com" rel="nofollow">at least we know the meteors weren't square</a> [lyricsdownload.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors.Well , at least we know the meteors were n't square [ lyricsdownload.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after the government started a new secret weapon program collecting adamantium meteors.Well, at least we know the meteors weren't square [lyricsdownload.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28432037</id>
	<title>The dumber and more embarassing. . .</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1245676800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dumber and more embarrassing the various bits of conspiracy nonsense in evidence, the bigger and more remarkable the secret being covered up by the dissemination of said ridiculous bits of conspiracy nonsense. . .</p><p>The best way to make people look the other way is to make them cringe.</p><p>Psyche 1 oh 1.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dumber and more embarrassing the various bits of conspiracy nonsense in evidence , the bigger and more remarkable the secret being covered up by the dissemination of said ridiculous bits of conspiracy nonsense .
. .The best way to make people look the other way is to make them cringe.Psyche 1 oh 1.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dumber and more embarrassing the various bits of conspiracy nonsense in evidence, the bigger and more remarkable the secret being covered up by the dissemination of said ridiculous bits of conspiracy nonsense.
. .The best way to make people look the other way is to make them cringe.Psyche 1 oh 1.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427171</id>
	<title>Canada</title>
	<author>Bigby</author>
	<datestamp>1245702840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does a Canadian professor expect free access to the byproduct of an organization funded by the American taxpayers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does a Canadian professor expect free access to the byproduct of an organization funded by the American taxpayers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does a Canadian professor expect free access to the byproduct of an organization funded by the American taxpayers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424685</id>
	<title>Security Risk?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the military believed that, given the meteor information, a black hat could deduce not only the capabilities of the satellites, but their actual orbits, that would certainly give them cause to discontinue the program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the military believed that , given the meteor information , a black hat could deduce not only the capabilities of the satellites , but their actual orbits , that would certainly give them cause to discontinue the program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the military believed that, given the meteor information, a black hat could deduce not only the capabilities of the satellites, but their actual orbits, that would certainly give them cause to discontinue the program.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427451</id>
	<title>Flying Object Hilarity</title>
	<author>dlfretz</author>
	<datestamp>1245703620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's no moon. It's a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's no moon .
It 's a .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's no moon.
It's a ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175</id>
	<title>"Blocks"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFS, the military stopped giving out unclassified information that was a byproduct of a military function - a windfall.</p><p>"Blocks" means that the information would flow but for the military's action.</p><p>The editors (snicker) should have used "stops" - more ambiguous and yet more accurate at the same time.  But I guess that wouldn't generate the clicks, now would it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFS , the military stopped giving out unclassified information that was a byproduct of a military function - a windfall .
" Blocks " means that the information would flow but for the military 's action.The editors ( snicker ) should have used " stops " - more ambiguous and yet more accurate at the same time .
But I guess that would n't generate the clicks , now would it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFS, the military stopped giving out unclassified information that was a byproduct of a military function - a windfall.
"Blocks" means that the information would flow but for the military's action.The editors (snicker) should have used "stops" - more ambiguous and yet more accurate at the same time.
But I guess that wouldn't generate the clicks, now would it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424189</id>
	<title>Good news everyone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meteors are coming, everyone panic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meteors are coming , everyone panic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meteors are coming, everyone panic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424507</id>
	<title>Large UFO fleet of is going to visit us soon..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is obviously deliberate, those scientists might get alarmed by the strange data when Dalmatians enter orbit, especially motherships.
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/s</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is obviously deliberate , those scientists might get alarmed by the strange data when Dalmatians enter orbit , especially motherships .
/s</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is obviously deliberate, those scientists might get alarmed by the strange data when Dalmatians enter orbit, especially motherships.
/s</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, sure, I'll just need one more quick function from you. Please write something to determine whether the high speed ballistic object that just showed up on the satellite is a missile, plane, or meteor.
<br> <br>
Remember that size, temperature and speed will be variable within each type. Also, once you've identified the type of object, please determine classification. Accuracy of this product must be 100\%.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , sure , I 'll just need one more quick function from you .
Please write something to determine whether the high speed ballistic object that just showed up on the satellite is a missile , plane , or meteor .
Remember that size , temperature and speed will be variable within each type .
Also , once you 've identified the type of object , please determine classification .
Accuracy of this product must be 100 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, sure, I'll just need one more quick function from you.
Please write something to determine whether the high speed ballistic object that just showed up on the satellite is a missile, plane, or meteor.
Remember that size, temperature and speed will be variable within each type.
Also, once you've identified the type of object, please determine classification.
Accuracy of this product must be 100\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426269</id>
	<title>Re:I have a solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245699720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To pass classified data to unclassified requires a specially accredited system known as a "guard".  The data is checked according to sets of rules, which means that the guard has to be able to parse the data fully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To pass classified data to unclassified requires a specially accredited system known as a " guard " .
The data is checked according to sets of rules , which means that the guard has to be able to parse the data fully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To pass classified data to unclassified requires a specially accredited system known as a "guard".
The data is checked according to sets of rules, which means that the guard has to be able to parse the data fully.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425191</id>
	<title>Re:Message to scientists:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Get your own damn satellites.</p></div></blockquote><p>We paid for them.</p><p>"Classified" is too often abused, that includes things that perhaps should automatically belong to the General Public. Public funds used to pay for things that end up privately patented or copyrighted is also another form of stealing from the public.</p><p>Besides, if you have to hide it then you must be doing something wrong is a fairer assumption on a government then it is on a free person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get your own damn satellites.We paid for them .
" Classified " is too often abused , that includes things that perhaps should automatically belong to the General Public .
Public funds used to pay for things that end up privately patented or copyrighted is also another form of stealing from the public.Besides , if you have to hide it then you must be doing something wrong is a fairer assumption on a government then it is on a free person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get your own damn satellites.We paid for them.
"Classified" is too often abused, that includes things that perhaps should automatically belong to the General Public.
Public funds used to pay for things that end up privately patented or copyrighted is also another form of stealing from the public.Besides, if you have to hide it then you must be doing something wrong is a fairer assumption on a government then it is on a free person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425361</id>
	<title>Re:"Blocks"?</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1245696360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear, Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites' capabilities to be made public, <b>or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.</b></p></div> </blockquote><p>
My guess is that it is an oversight on the part of whoever ordered the software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear , Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites ' capabilities to be made public , or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously .
My guess is that it is an oversight on the part of whoever ordered the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although the reason for ending the arrangement remains unclear, Weeden notes that it coincides with the launch of a new generation of surveillance satellites and speculates that the Pentagon may not want details of the new satellites' capabilities to be made public, or it may simply lack the expensive software needed to handle classified and declassified data simultaneously.
My guess is that it is an oversight on the part of whoever ordered the software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426899</id>
	<title>Bush's Fault?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245702060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bush's Fault?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bush 's Fault ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bush's Fault?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426861</id>
	<title>wake up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245701940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And next week some country (insert n-korea, Iran etc...) apparently and without any reason attacked something or some country wich only the militairy can prove and there u go.. a valid reason to go to war again..</p><p>duh... wake up people</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And next week some country ( insert n-korea , Iran etc... ) apparently and without any reason attacked something or some country wich only the militairy can prove and there u go.. a valid reason to go to war again..duh... wake up people</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And next week some country (insert n-korea, Iran etc...) apparently and without any reason attacked something or some country wich only the militairy can prove and there u go.. a valid reason to go to war again..duh... wake up people</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425607</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this moderated interesting? Meteors have a fairly simple trajectory that should be easily distinguishable from the trajectory of rockets, planes, or any other objects launched from earth.</p><p>And accuracy must not be 100\%, as long as no classified information leaks (i.e. sometimes wrongly hiding non-classified data would no be a problem)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this moderated interesting ?
Meteors have a fairly simple trajectory that should be easily distinguishable from the trajectory of rockets , planes , or any other objects launched from earth.And accuracy must not be 100 \ % , as long as no classified information leaks ( i.e .
sometimes wrongly hiding non-classified data would no be a problem )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this moderated interesting?
Meteors have a fairly simple trajectory that should be easily distinguishable from the trajectory of rockets, planes, or any other objects launched from earth.And accuracy must not be 100\%, as long as no classified information leaks (i.e.
sometimes wrongly hiding non-classified data would no be a problem)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424197</id>
	<title>Too expensive for the US military???</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1245692400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's crazy talk.</p><p>Generals!  Let me help you out.  Me and right wing buddies will start posting stories about how the USA is dropping its guard against meteors, and potentially large asteroid strikes, and we'll create a groundswell of support for getting this thing turned back on.  If the lefties can come up with some stuff about how good it is to have this government program, then, I'm sure we can form a bipartisan consensus to get you the funding you need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's crazy talk.Generals !
Let me help you out .
Me and right wing buddies will start posting stories about how the USA is dropping its guard against meteors , and potentially large asteroid strikes , and we 'll create a groundswell of support for getting this thing turned back on .
If the lefties can come up with some stuff about how good it is to have this government program , then , I 'm sure we can form a bipartisan consensus to get you the funding you need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's crazy talk.Generals!
Let me help you out.
Me and right wing buddies will start posting stories about how the USA is dropping its guard against meteors, and potentially large asteroid strikes, and we'll create a groundswell of support for getting this thing turned back on.
If the lefties can come up with some stuff about how good it is to have this government program, then, I'm sure we can form a bipartisan consensus to get you the funding you need.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425441</id>
	<title>Congrats!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the awful headline making me read a story that was neither negative, nor audacious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the awful headline making me read a story that was neither negative , nor audacious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the awful headline making me read a story that was neither negative, nor audacious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425905</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive software?</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1245698340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Congratulations, you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor.  If you want to handle classified data, a processor can only handle classified data, you cannot mix and match.  In devices that are forced to mix and match (edge devices, like encryptors typically) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves (typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device, with a single wire connecting them.  That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it (even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side).

Does this mean I'm fired?

Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort.</p></div><p>Does this mean I'm fired?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor .
If you want to handle classified data , a processor can only handle classified data , you can not mix and match .
In devices that are forced to mix and match ( edge devices , like encryptors typically ) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves ( typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device , with a single wire connecting them .
That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it ( even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side ) .
Does this mean I 'm fired ?
Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort.Does this mean I 'm fired ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you just failed your NSA cert because you attempted to mix classified and non-classified processing in the same processor.
If you want to handle classified data, a processor can only handle classified data, you cannot mix and match.
In devices that are forced to mix and match (edge devices, like encryptors typically) you have to build your device in two halves and minimize the contact between the halves (typically they will be in separate metal boxes inside of the device, with a single wire connecting them.
That single wire will eat up pages and pages of documentation when you try to get your device certified explaining how there is no possible way to leak information out of it (even in cases like slamming the crypto with bad traffic on the red side to cause it to slow down in some pattern that could be identified on the black side).
Does this mean I'm fired?
Your failure in design just cost your company a million dollars and several man-years of effort.Does this mean I'm fired?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424283</id>
	<title>I know why...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...something the size of Texas is headed our way and they don't want us to know yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...something the size of Texas is headed our way and they do n't want us to know yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...something the size of Texas is headed our way and they don't want us to know yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28473619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28428699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28457451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28442299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28429421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1625254_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424125
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28442299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28429421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28428699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28473619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28457451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1625254.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425905
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425227
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28427167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28424651
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426019
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28426127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1625254.28425863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
