<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_20_2018255</id>
	<title>EFF and PK Reluctantly Drop Lawsuit For ACTA Info</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245487380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://ten.nozirevta1dsekim/" rel="nofollow">mikesd81</a> notes a press release on the EFF website that begins <i>"The Obama Administration's decision to support Bush-era concealment policies has forced the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Public Knowledge (PK) to <a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/17">drop their lawsuit about the proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement</a> (ACTA). Federal judges have very little discretion to overrule Executive Branch decisions to classify information on 'national security' grounds, and the Obama Administration has recently informed the court that it intends to defend the classification claims originally made by the Bush Administration. ... Very little is known about ACTA, currently under negotiation between the US and more than a dozen other countries, other than that it is not limited to anti-counterfeiting measures. Leaked documents indicate that it could establish far-reaching customs regulations governing searches over personal computers and iPods. Multi-national IP corporations have publicly requested mandatory filtering of Internet communications for potentially copyright-infringing material, as well as the adoption of 'Three Strikes' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringement, like the legislation recently invalidated in France. Last year, more than 100 public interest organizations around the world called on ACTA country negotiators to make the draft text available for public comment."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>mikesd81 notes a press release on the EFF website that begins " The Obama Administration 's decision to support Bush-era concealment policies has forced the Electronic Frontier Foundation ( EFF ) and Public Knowledge ( PK ) to drop their lawsuit about the proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ( ACTA ) .
Federal judges have very little discretion to overrule Executive Branch decisions to classify information on 'national security ' grounds , and the Obama Administration has recently informed the court that it intends to defend the classification claims originally made by the Bush Administration .
... Very little is known about ACTA , currently under negotiation between the US and more than a dozen other countries , other than that it is not limited to anti-counterfeiting measures .
Leaked documents indicate that it could establish far-reaching customs regulations governing searches over personal computers and iPods .
Multi-national IP corporations have publicly requested mandatory filtering of Internet communications for potentially copyright-infringing material , as well as the adoption of 'Three Strikes ' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringement , like the legislation recently invalidated in France .
Last year , more than 100 public interest organizations around the world called on ACTA country negotiators to make the draft text available for public comment .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mikesd81 notes a press release on the EFF website that begins "The Obama Administration's decision to support Bush-era concealment policies has forced the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Public Knowledge (PK) to drop their lawsuit about the proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
Federal judges have very little discretion to overrule Executive Branch decisions to classify information on 'national security' grounds, and the Obama Administration has recently informed the court that it intends to defend the classification claims originally made by the Bush Administration.
... Very little is known about ACTA, currently under negotiation between the US and more than a dozen other countries, other than that it is not limited to anti-counterfeiting measures.
Leaked documents indicate that it could establish far-reaching customs regulations governing searches over personal computers and iPods.
Multi-national IP corporations have publicly requested mandatory filtering of Internet communications for potentially copyright-infringing material, as well as the adoption of 'Three Strikes' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringement, like the legislation recently invalidated in France.
Last year, more than 100 public interest organizations around the world called on ACTA country negotiators to make the draft text available for public comment.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410359</id>
	<title>Re:Get a load of that bullshit.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245596580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU? Are you on drugs? Do you live in honey bunny happy land? This treaty is an example as to exactly how the EU itself words. The EU is an institution to enforce the passing of laws that would never be possible on a national level.</p><p>It's not like they are actually helping us citizens and publish the drafts. They are blocking any attempt to publish them as well.</p><p>Plus the EU is so deep up the US' bottom, they'll blindly agree to ANYTHING. Just look at recent EU-US terror, data exchange, etc. treaties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU ?
Are you on drugs ?
Do you live in honey bunny happy land ?
This treaty is an example as to exactly how the EU itself words .
The EU is an institution to enforce the passing of laws that would never be possible on a national level.It 's not like they are actually helping us citizens and publish the drafts .
They are blocking any attempt to publish them as well.Plus the EU is so deep up the US ' bottom , they 'll blindly agree to ANYTHING .
Just look at recent EU-US terror , data exchange , etc .
treaties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU?
Are you on drugs?
Do you live in honey bunny happy land?
This treaty is an example as to exactly how the EU itself words.
The EU is an institution to enforce the passing of laws that would never be possible on a national level.It's not like they are actually helping us citizens and publish the drafts.
They are blocking any attempt to publish them as well.Plus the EU is so deep up the US' bottom, they'll blindly agree to ANYTHING.
Just look at recent EU-US terror, data exchange, etc.
treaties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409637</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>Ocker3</author>
	<datestamp>1245587100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>because if we knew what they were putting in it, we'd start protesting like it's Tehran?</htmltext>
<tokenext>because if we knew what they were putting in it , we 'd start protesting like it 's Tehran ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because if we knew what they were putting in it, we'd start protesting like it's Tehran?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409133</id>
	<title>Re:Look at Iran for an example</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245579540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There are many who believe that an energized, educated citizenry is crucial to a free society. But I'll tell you now that a lethargic, dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence. Energy and knowledge lead to discontent, and discontent leads to violence. Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.</p></div><p>wtf? "dumb citizens are the key to freedom". are you one of the "dumb citizens"?</p><p>"knowledge leads to discontent"? Perhaps: oppressive governments lead to discontent.</p><p>You are either deluded or a troll</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are many who believe that an energized , educated citizenry is crucial to a free society .
But I 'll tell you now that a lethargic , dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence .
Energy and knowledge lead to discontent , and discontent leads to violence .
Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.wtf ?
" dumb citizens are the key to freedom " .
are you one of the " dumb citizens " ?
" knowledge leads to discontent " ?
Perhaps : oppressive governments lead to discontent.You are either deluded or a troll</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are many who believe that an energized, educated citizenry is crucial to a free society.
But I'll tell you now that a lethargic, dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence.
Energy and knowledge lead to discontent, and discontent leads to violence.
Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.wtf?
"dumb citizens are the key to freedom".
are you one of the "dumb citizens"?
"knowledge leads to discontent"?
Perhaps: oppressive governments lead to discontent.You are either deluded or a troll
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412733</id>
	<title>When purchasing...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1245615540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When purchasing products, I have never really considered the fact that it may, or may not be, copyrighted.</p><p>When the day comes that copyright violation is a criminal offense, I will be looking for that little mark on products AND AVOID THEM LIKE THE PLAGUE.</p><p>Why? Because I don't want to take the risk of jail time just so I can buy a product. I know that may sound reactionary, but think about it. How many times have you heard of people being jailed for violating a law unintentionally? Am I to know and understand the whole of copyright law in order to protect myself?</p><p>It is far easier to just not purchase the products that are marked as copyrighted and avoid the whole mess.</p><p>When are these companies/Corporations going to realize that they are killing their own businesses by alienating their customers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When purchasing products , I have never really considered the fact that it may , or may not be , copyrighted.When the day comes that copyright violation is a criminal offense , I will be looking for that little mark on products AND AVOID THEM LIKE THE PLAGUE.Why ?
Because I do n't want to take the risk of jail time just so I can buy a product .
I know that may sound reactionary , but think about it .
How many times have you heard of people being jailed for violating a law unintentionally ?
Am I to know and understand the whole of copyright law in order to protect myself ? It is far easier to just not purchase the products that are marked as copyrighted and avoid the whole mess.When are these companies/Corporations going to realize that they are killing their own businesses by alienating their customers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When purchasing products, I have never really considered the fact that it may, or may not be, copyrighted.When the day comes that copyright violation is a criminal offense, I will be looking for that little mark on products AND AVOID THEM LIKE THE PLAGUE.Why?
Because I don't want to take the risk of jail time just so I can buy a product.
I know that may sound reactionary, but think about it.
How many times have you heard of people being jailed for violating a law unintentionally?
Am I to know and understand the whole of copyright law in order to protect myself?It is far easier to just not purchase the products that are marked as copyrighted and avoid the whole mess.When are these companies/Corporations going to realize that they are killing their own businesses by alienating their customers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409581</id>
	<title>So exactly how much money...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1245586140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... did the Obama Campaign receive from IP holders?  Was it a landslide enough to help him get elected, I wonder?</p><p>Between having so many "friends of the RIAA" in the Department of Justice, VP Biden bragging that Big Media will love the new Copyright Czar, and this continued tight-lipped-ness about ACTA, I think it's pretty damned clear what Obama's REAL agenda will be for the next four years.</p><p>All of you fools that thought Obama was the Messiah screwed-up: you voted for Judas instead.  The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich, and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC *and* voters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... did the Obama Campaign receive from IP holders ?
Was it a landslide enough to help him get elected , I wonder ? Between having so many " friends of the RIAA " in the Department of Justice , VP Biden bragging that Big Media will love the new Copyright Czar , and this continued tight-lipped-ness about ACTA , I think it 's pretty damned clear what Obama 's REAL agenda will be for the next four years.All of you fools that thought Obama was the Messiah screwed-up : you voted for Judas instead .
The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich , and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC * and * voters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... did the Obama Campaign receive from IP holders?
Was it a landslide enough to help him get elected, I wonder?Between having so many "friends of the RIAA" in the Department of Justice, VP Biden bragging that Big Media will love the new Copyright Czar, and this continued tight-lipped-ness about ACTA, I think it's pretty damned clear what Obama's REAL agenda will be for the next four years.All of you fools that thought Obama was the Messiah screwed-up: you voted for Judas instead.
The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich, and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC *and* voters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445</id>
	<title>Obama is just a tool as any other president</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245583860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He'll be better than GWB (heck, even my cat would be) but he still has orders to execute. For those who live under a rock, keep in mind that the US President decides absolutely nothing: he jumps when the Congress says to jump, and the Congress says "jump" when the financial/economic oligarchy that rules the western world says "tell him to jump". If we as a whole don't change tha way the economic world got corrupted until today (ie, corporations being more important than people) we shouldn't expect a single human, be it the US President, to do anything good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 'll be better than GWB ( heck , even my cat would be ) but he still has orders to execute .
For those who live under a rock , keep in mind that the US President decides absolutely nothing : he jumps when the Congress says to jump , and the Congress says " jump " when the financial/economic oligarchy that rules the western world says " tell him to jump " .
If we as a whole do n't change tha way the economic world got corrupted until today ( ie , corporations being more important than people ) we should n't expect a single human , be it the US President , to do anything good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He'll be better than GWB (heck, even my cat would be) but he still has orders to execute.
For those who live under a rock, keep in mind that the US President decides absolutely nothing: he jumps when the Congress says to jump, and the Congress says "jump" when the financial/economic oligarchy that rules the western world says "tell him to jump".
If we as a whole don't change tha way the economic world got corrupted until today (ie, corporations being more important than people) we shouldn't expect a single human, be it the US President, to do anything good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28415543</id>
	<title>Soap, ballot, ammo.</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1245596940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neither the soap box nor the ballot box has worked for Americans, when will they reach for the ammo box and settle the matter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither the soap box nor the ballot box has worked for Americans , when will they reach for the ammo box and settle the matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither the soap box nor the ballot box has worked for Americans, when will they reach for the ammo box and settle the matter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410905</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1245601020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>http://www.sjgames.com/secret.html<br><br>Seriously though, we need some federal judges with a security clearance beefy enough to see this "national security" bullshit for what it really is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.sjgames.com/secret.htmlSeriously though , we need some federal judges with a security clearance beefy enough to see this " national security " bullshit for what it really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.sjgames.com/secret.htmlSeriously though, we need some federal judges with a security clearance beefy enough to see this "national security" bullshit for what it really is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409693</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1245588000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security?</p></div><p>By \_securing\_ our \_nations\_ income by charging for the same item a few tens of times over and making it a crime if you don't willingly let them steal that money?</p><p>Yea, no, its just BS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security ? By \ _securing \ _ our \ _nations \ _ income by charging for the same item a few tens of times over and making it a crime if you do n't willingly let them steal that money ? Yea , no , its just BS : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security?By \_securing\_ our \_nations\_ income by charging for the same item a few tens of times over and making it a crime if you don't willingly let them steal that money?Yea, no, its just BS :/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409281</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>ms1234</author>
	<datestamp>1245581580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to accept the EULA first. Then you can read it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to accept the EULA first .
Then you can read it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to accept the EULA first.
Then you can read it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409701</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>icomxwing</author>
	<datestamp>1245588000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>in Soviet Russia vodka drinks YOU</htmltext>
<tokenext>in Soviet Russia vodka drinks YOU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in Soviet Russia vodka drinks YOU</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411019</id>
	<title>Hey, EFF!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245601920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, EFF, come back! YOU'RE NOT DONE YET.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , EFF , come back !
YOU 'RE NOT DONE YET .
                                             </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, EFF, come back!
YOU'RE NOT DONE YET.
                                             </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410143</id>
	<title>THIS Fp FOR GNNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245594540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">sadness and it was</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>sadness and it was [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sadness and it was [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413621</id>
	<title>Re:what is probably in it</title>
	<author>Gravedigger3</author>
	<datestamp>1245579180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It can say whatever the hell they want, they will never be able to enforce it. If they try I suspect the backlash will show them that despite their delusions WE are more powerful than they are, we just haven't realized it yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It can say whatever the hell they want , they will never be able to enforce it .
If they try I suspect the backlash will show them that despite their delusions WE are more powerful than they are , we just have n't realized it yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It can say whatever the hell they want, they will never be able to enforce it.
If they try I suspect the backlash will show them that despite their delusions WE are more powerful than they are, we just haven't realized it yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412913</id>
	<title>Re:Obama is just a tool as any other president</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245616800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but it's still GWB fault amirite?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but it 's still GWB fault amirite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it's still GWB fault amirite?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409711</id>
	<title>Back door to legislation w/o democracy</title>
	<author>Cacadril</author>
	<datestamp>1245588180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the aim of negotiations is a binding treaty, this is a back door to legislation without democratic control.<br> <br>

Has the general public ever had the use of reason? Secrecy is justified in two kinds cases. Protecting the privacy of individuals, and protecting military installations, weapon systems, response plans, etc. But none of these cases are of legislative nature. Why is it at all possible to pretend legislative or quasi-legislative preparations need secrecy, and get away with it? It is a blatant inconsistency in terms. It ought to completely discredit whoever forwards it. It should have elicited unanimous uproar from the congress...<br> <br>

Good grief.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the aim of negotiations is a binding treaty , this is a back door to legislation without democratic control .
Has the general public ever had the use of reason ?
Secrecy is justified in two kinds cases .
Protecting the privacy of individuals , and protecting military installations , weapon systems , response plans , etc .
But none of these cases are of legislative nature .
Why is it at all possible to pretend legislative or quasi-legislative preparations need secrecy , and get away with it ?
It is a blatant inconsistency in terms .
It ought to completely discredit whoever forwards it .
It should have elicited unanimous uproar from the congress.. . Good grief .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the aim of negotiations is a binding treaty, this is a back door to legislation without democratic control.
Has the general public ever had the use of reason?
Secrecy is justified in two kinds cases.
Protecting the privacy of individuals, and protecting military installations, weapon systems, response plans, etc.
But none of these cases are of legislative nature.
Why is it at all possible to pretend legislative or quasi-legislative preparations need secrecy, and get away with it?
It is a blatant inconsistency in terms.
It ought to completely discredit whoever forwards it.
It should have elicited unanimous uproar from the congress... 

Good grief.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409893</id>
	<title>Re:Obama is just a tool as any other president</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245590940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gyafu!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gyafu !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gyafu!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28425045</id>
	<title>Re:Change...</title>
	<author>againjj</author>
	<datestamp>1245695400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look around this page.  There are a lot of people here throwing in their 2c (please adjust for national currency).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look around this page .
There are a lot of people here throwing in their 2c ( please adjust for national currency ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look around this page.
There are a lot of people here throwing in their 2c (please adjust for national currency).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</id>
	<title>Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245577980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ACTA will mandate software patents, criminalization of copyright infringements, censorship lists, data retention.  States that today resist such measures due to local democratic pressure will be able to cite "Obligations under International Law" as an excuse to move towards eFascism.  The goal is to send 4chan, piratebay, and anyone else who offends the powerful to jail.</p><p>This is a major campaign in the war on the future, by the past.  Winning this war will push the digital majority towards adulthood.</p><p>Bring it on, I say!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ACTA will mandate software patents , criminalization of copyright infringements , censorship lists , data retention .
States that today resist such measures due to local democratic pressure will be able to cite " Obligations under International Law " as an excuse to move towards eFascism .
The goal is to send 4chan , piratebay , and anyone else who offends the powerful to jail.This is a major campaign in the war on the future , by the past .
Winning this war will push the digital majority towards adulthood.Bring it on , I say !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ACTA will mandate software patents, criminalization of copyright infringements, censorship lists, data retention.
States that today resist such measures due to local democratic pressure will be able to cite "Obligations under International Law" as an excuse to move towards eFascism.
The goal is to send 4chan, piratebay, and anyone else who offends the powerful to jail.This is a major campaign in the war on the future, by the past.
Winning this war will push the digital majority towards adulthood.Bring it on, I say!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411537</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>Nexus7</author>
	<datestamp>1245606780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ask Slashdot, I suppose, but what is the state of free music (that the artistes release on to the internet)? I know there are streaming radio stations, and there are videos on YouTube, etc. But is there a cultural matrix in which these are embedded? In other words, can one get, say, a smartphone, and listen to internet radio all day long (or all commute long), get the music, and news, traffic, and weather, and all the time consume only unencubmered content?</p><p>I suppose, with a smartphone, traffic and weather is a few click away, but at least music? Is there a directory of these things, or does one accidentally stumble into isolated sub-cultures?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask Slashdot , I suppose , but what is the state of free music ( that the artistes release on to the internet ) ?
I know there are streaming radio stations , and there are videos on YouTube , etc .
But is there a cultural matrix in which these are embedded ?
In other words , can one get , say , a smartphone , and listen to internet radio all day long ( or all commute long ) , get the music , and news , traffic , and weather , and all the time consume only unencubmered content ? I suppose , with a smartphone , traffic and weather is a few click away , but at least music ?
Is there a directory of these things , or does one accidentally stumble into isolated sub-cultures ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask Slashdot, I suppose, but what is the state of free music (that the artistes release on to the internet)?
I know there are streaming radio stations, and there are videos on YouTube, etc.
But is there a cultural matrix in which these are embedded?
In other words, can one get, say, a smartphone, and listen to internet radio all day long (or all commute long), get the music, and news, traffic, and weather, and all the time consume only unencubmered content?I suppose, with a smartphone, traffic and weather is a few click away, but at least music?
Is there a directory of these things, or does one accidentally stumble into isolated sub-cultures?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410407</id>
	<title>Re:Still fighting?</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1245597060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Am I the only one who thinks the war is already won? You can not put the majority of a country's population in jail.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Yes, you can.  You can turn the whole country into a prison and get half the inmates watching the other half.  Read \_1984\_, or for a more convincing example, consider the German Democratic Republic (East Germany).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who thinks the war is already won ?
You can not put the majority of a country 's population in jail .
Yes , you can .
You can turn the whole country into a prison and get half the inmates watching the other half .
Read \ _1984 \ _ , or for a more convincing example , consider the German Democratic Republic ( East Germany ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who thinks the war is already won?
You can not put the majority of a country's population in jail.
Yes, you can.
You can turn the whole country into a prison and get half the inmates watching the other half.
Read \_1984\_, or for a more convincing example, consider the German Democratic Republic (East Germany).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409023</id>
	<title>Obama for 2009</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245578340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Corporatism we can believe in!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Corporatism we can believe in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Corporatism we can believe in!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503</id>
	<title>Still fighting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245584580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is a major campaign in the war on the future</p></div><p>Am I the only one who thinks the war is already won? You can not put the majority of a country's population in jail. The culture of the internet has <strong>already</strong> changed the game and no matter how many laws are passed, lawsuits are won, technology and attitudes are already ahead of those that seek to put the genie back in the bottle.<br> <br>

This just smacks of desperation. The powerful seem to be busy enacting policies which they hope will change attitudes whilst the rest of us are busy ignoring them and getting on with our lives.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a major campaign in the war on the futureAm I the only one who thinks the war is already won ?
You can not put the majority of a country 's population in jail .
The culture of the internet has already changed the game and no matter how many laws are passed , lawsuits are won , technology and attitudes are already ahead of those that seek to put the genie back in the bottle .
This just smacks of desperation .
The powerful seem to be busy enacting policies which they hope will change attitudes whilst the rest of us are busy ignoring them and getting on with our lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a major campaign in the war on the futureAm I the only one who thinks the war is already won?
You can not put the majority of a country's population in jail.
The culture of the internet has already changed the game and no matter how many laws are passed, lawsuits are won, technology and attitudes are already ahead of those that seek to put the genie back in the bottle.
This just smacks of desperation.
The powerful seem to be busy enacting policies which they hope will change attitudes whilst the rest of us are busy ignoring them and getting on with our lives.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127</id>
	<title>WTF</title>
	<author>Godji</author>
	<datestamp>1245579480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public. Somebody please explain!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public .
Somebody please explain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public.
Somebody please explain!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412459</id>
	<title>This could be really interesting...</title>
	<author>lazlo</author>
	<datestamp>1245612960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>adoption of 'Three Strikes' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringement</p></div><p>Now, on the face of it, that sounds terrible, but think about it:  it could be so much worse than we imagine, that it's actually better.  So there's little or no penalty for false allegations (I'm sure Big Content, doing massive numbers of allegations, wouldn't stand for penalties when they do so poorly), and you don't actually have to prove infringement, just allege it.  So it's sort of like the middle eastern countries where you can divorce your wife by saying "I divorce you" three times.  Except instead of getting divorced, they get banned from the Internet.  And instead of being their husband, all you have to be is someone who holds a copyright.  "I allege you've infringed my copyright, I allege you've infringed my copyright, I allege you've infringed my copyright, POOF!  Goodbye."  Note here that, as I understand it, everyone holds implicit copyright to every work they create.  So this is kind of like giving everyone a "nuke" button.</p><p>So, on the one hand, you've got thousands of employees of RIAA, MPAA, MediaSentry, et al, sending out infringement allegations with little to no regard for truth or justice... and on the other hand, you've got millions of pissed off geeks more than happy to play whack-a-mole with every ISP that RIAA/MPAA goes to, sending in allegations that "RIAA <em>totally</em> infringed the copyright I hold on the video I put up on my website of my cat licking it's balls for half an hour".  How long before MediaSentry is lucky to be able to find a dial-up account in Uzbekistan to try and do their investigations from?  How much uptime will the RIAA's website have once it can be, not technically hacked, but legally hacked within 5 minutes them finding an ISP foolish enough to host it?</p><p>I say, Rock on!  It's the end of the Internet as we know it, and I feel fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>adoption of 'Three Strikes ' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringementNow , on the face of it , that sounds terrible , but think about it : it could be so much worse than we imagine , that it 's actually better .
So there 's little or no penalty for false allegations ( I 'm sure Big Content , doing massive numbers of allegations , would n't stand for penalties when they do so poorly ) , and you do n't actually have to prove infringement , just allege it .
So it 's sort of like the middle eastern countries where you can divorce your wife by saying " I divorce you " three times .
Except instead of getting divorced , they get banned from the Internet .
And instead of being their husband , all you have to be is someone who holds a copyright .
" I allege you 've infringed my copyright , I allege you 've infringed my copyright , I allege you 've infringed my copyright , POOF !
Goodbye. " Note here that , as I understand it , everyone holds implicit copyright to every work they create .
So this is kind of like giving everyone a " nuke " button.So , on the one hand , you 've got thousands of employees of RIAA , MPAA , MediaSentry , et al , sending out infringement allegations with little to no regard for truth or justice... and on the other hand , you 've got millions of pissed off geeks more than happy to play whack-a-mole with every ISP that RIAA/MPAA goes to , sending in allegations that " RIAA totally infringed the copyright I hold on the video I put up on my website of my cat licking it 's balls for half an hour " .
How long before MediaSentry is lucky to be able to find a dial-up account in Uzbekistan to try and do their investigations from ?
How much uptime will the RIAA 's website have once it can be , not technically hacked , but legally hacked within 5 minutes them finding an ISP foolish enough to host it ? I say , Rock on !
It 's the end of the Internet as we know it , and I feel fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adoption of 'Three Strikes' policies requiring the termination of Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright infringementNow, on the face of it, that sounds terrible, but think about it:  it could be so much worse than we imagine, that it's actually better.
So there's little or no penalty for false allegations (I'm sure Big Content, doing massive numbers of allegations, wouldn't stand for penalties when they do so poorly), and you don't actually have to prove infringement, just allege it.
So it's sort of like the middle eastern countries where you can divorce your wife by saying "I divorce you" three times.
Except instead of getting divorced, they get banned from the Internet.
And instead of being their husband, all you have to be is someone who holds a copyright.
"I allege you've infringed my copyright, I allege you've infringed my copyright, I allege you've infringed my copyright, POOF!
Goodbye."  Note here that, as I understand it, everyone holds implicit copyright to every work they create.
So this is kind of like giving everyone a "nuke" button.So, on the one hand, you've got thousands of employees of RIAA, MPAA, MediaSentry, et al, sending out infringement allegations with little to no regard for truth or justice... and on the other hand, you've got millions of pissed off geeks more than happy to play whack-a-mole with every ISP that RIAA/MPAA goes to, sending in allegations that "RIAA totally infringed the copyright I hold on the video I put up on my website of my cat licking it's balls for half an hour".
How long before MediaSentry is lucky to be able to find a dial-up account in Uzbekistan to try and do their investigations from?
How much uptime will the RIAA's website have once it can be, not technically hacked, but legally hacked within 5 minutes them finding an ISP foolish enough to host it?I say, Rock on!
It's the end of the Internet as we know it, and I feel fine.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412313</id>
	<title>!hope, !freedom, and worst: !change</title>
	<author>toby</author>
	<datestamp>1245612120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409373</id>
	<title>Meet the new boss</title>
	<author>ReallyEvilCanine</author>
	<datestamp>1245583080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same as the old boss. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzdUy90vTuk" title="youtube.com">Almost</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same as the old boss .
Almost [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same as the old boss.
Almost [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</id>
	<title>National Security?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245578520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can the non-disclosure of the terms of an international treaty be justified on <b>national</b> security grounds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can the non-disclosure of the terms of an international treaty be justified on national security grounds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can the non-disclosure of the terms of an international treaty be justified on national security grounds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408981</id>
	<title>Yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245577980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another victory for transparent democracy</p><p>HIP HIP...<br>HIP HIP...<br>HIP HIP...</p><p>Why no HURRAHs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another victory for transparent democracyHIP HIP...HIP HIP...HIP HIP...Why no HURRAHs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another victory for transparent democracyHIP HIP...HIP HIP...HIP HIP...Why no HURRAHs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412889</id>
	<title>EFF Should Keep Fighting</title>
	<author>cc\_pirate</author>
	<datestamp>1245616680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EFF shouldn't drop this.  Judges CAN call the Executive out on fraudulent claims of 'National Security' at least to the point of reading what it is that is supposedly classified for 'national security' reasons.  When he reads it and finds out that it is just a draconian IP rights treaty, he can allow the trial to continue.</p><p>People pooh pooh this and pretend they can't shove the genie back into the bottle when it comes to the net, but it wouldn't be hard at all.  Are YOU willing to go to jail to avoid having your net transfers searched?  Are YOU willing to go to jail to prevent having your laptop searched at the US, European and other borders?</p><p>Most people aren't.</p><p>Sadly, I almost see the reasoning for doing this.  At this  point the US is no longer a manufacturing nation.  Most of our GNP is from 'information' work.  If we allow that to be devalued our GNP will be much lower than it could be, which means less fancy fighter jets, etc for the defense industrial complex...  This is almost 100\% certainly the reason this thing is 'classified'.  And this will almost 100\% be the reason our 'representatives' vote it into law over all our objections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EFF should n't drop this .
Judges CAN call the Executive out on fraudulent claims of 'National Security ' at least to the point of reading what it is that is supposedly classified for 'national security ' reasons .
When he reads it and finds out that it is just a draconian IP rights treaty , he can allow the trial to continue.People pooh pooh this and pretend they ca n't shove the genie back into the bottle when it comes to the net , but it would n't be hard at all .
Are YOU willing to go to jail to avoid having your net transfers searched ?
Are YOU willing to go to jail to prevent having your laptop searched at the US , European and other borders ? Most people are n't.Sadly , I almost see the reasoning for doing this .
At this point the US is no longer a manufacturing nation .
Most of our GNP is from 'information ' work .
If we allow that to be devalued our GNP will be much lower than it could be , which means less fancy fighter jets , etc for the defense industrial complex... This is almost 100 \ % certainly the reason this thing is 'classified' .
And this will almost 100 \ % be the reason our 'representatives ' vote it into law over all our objections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EFF shouldn't drop this.
Judges CAN call the Executive out on fraudulent claims of 'National Security' at least to the point of reading what it is that is supposedly classified for 'national security' reasons.
When he reads it and finds out that it is just a draconian IP rights treaty, he can allow the trial to continue.People pooh pooh this and pretend they can't shove the genie back into the bottle when it comes to the net, but it wouldn't be hard at all.
Are YOU willing to go to jail to avoid having your net transfers searched?
Are YOU willing to go to jail to prevent having your laptop searched at the US, European and other borders?Most people aren't.Sadly, I almost see the reasoning for doing this.
At this  point the US is no longer a manufacturing nation.
Most of our GNP is from 'information' work.
If we allow that to be devalued our GNP will be much lower than it could be, which means less fancy fighter jets, etc for the defense industrial complex...  This is almost 100\% certainly the reason this thing is 'classified'.
And this will almost 100\% be the reason our 'representatives' vote it into law over all our objections.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409325</id>
	<title>Re:what is probably in it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245582420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They want to control everything!</p><p>Form  F 90- TD 22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts</p><p>
&nbsp; US law (money laundering) requires that US person complete and file this information report with the US Treasury if at any time during the calendar year they had an aggregate of $10,000 US dollars or equivalent in foreign bank account(s).  So, even if you had less than $10,000 in two or more foreign banks, but the total of all these accounts exceed $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, you would be required to file the report.<br>Note: A US Person includes a citizen or resident of the United States, or a person in and doing business in the United States.  The term "person" includes individuals and all forms of business entities, trusts, and estates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They want to control everything ! Form F 90- TD 22.1 , Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts   US law ( money laundering ) requires that US person complete and file this information report with the US Treasury if at any time during the calendar year they had an aggregate of $ 10,000 US dollars or equivalent in foreign bank account ( s ) .
So , even if you had less than $ 10,000 in two or more foreign banks , but the total of all these accounts exceed $ 10,000 at any time during the calendar year , you would be required to file the report.Note : A US Person includes a citizen or resident of the United States , or a person in and doing business in the United States .
The term " person " includes individuals and all forms of business entities , trusts , and estates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They want to control everything!Form  F 90- TD 22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts
  US law (money laundering) requires that US person complete and file this information report with the US Treasury if at any time during the calendar year they had an aggregate of $10,000 US dollars or equivalent in foreign bank account(s).
So, even if you had less than $10,000 in two or more foreign banks, but the total of all these accounts exceed $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, you would be required to file the report.Note: A US Person includes a citizen or resident of the United States, or a person in and doing business in the United States.
The term "person" includes individuals and all forms of business entities, trusts, and estates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410513</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245597960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A revolution every 200 or so years is a good thing for democracy.. it reminds the government that it is the people, not cabals that decide the fate of the country.</p><p>light of view is the best policy disinfectant..</p><p>()</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A revolution every 200 or so years is a good thing for democracy.. it reminds the government that it is the people , not cabals that decide the fate of the country.light of view is the best policy disinfectant.. ( )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A revolution every 200 or so years is a good thing for democracy.. it reminds the government that it is the people, not cabals that decide the fate of the country.light of view is the best policy disinfectant..()</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412679</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Timothy Brownawell</author>
	<datestamp>1245615120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since when does the US care about international law?</p></div><p>When it's useful, for exporting laws or evading opposition to desired laws.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when does the US care about international law ? When it 's useful , for exporting laws or evading opposition to desired laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when does the US care about international law?When it's useful, for exporting laws or evading opposition to desired laws.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411939</id>
	<title>Re:Change...</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1245609480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't spend it all on booze.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't spend it all on booze .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't spend it all on booze.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410233</id>
	<title>Re:Still fighting?</title>
	<author>DarkOx</author>
	<datestamp>1245595500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the attitude that may cause us to loose.  Freedom can only be obtained and maintained with vigilance. We must never think its impossible to be deprived of our freedom and must always remain wary of those who would seek to curtail it.   The war is never over so long as overly ambitious and overly greedy individuals exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the attitude that may cause us to loose .
Freedom can only be obtained and maintained with vigilance .
We must never think its impossible to be deprived of our freedom and must always remain wary of those who would seek to curtail it .
The war is never over so long as overly ambitious and overly greedy individuals exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the attitude that may cause us to loose.
Freedom can only be obtained and maintained with vigilance.
We must never think its impossible to be deprived of our freedom and must always remain wary of those who would seek to curtail it.
The war is never over so long as overly ambitious and overly greedy individuals exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245584880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a law, it's an international multilateral agreement.  This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law, without all the fuss of democratic discussion.  There have been many examples, some good, some bad.</p><p>In Europe the TRIPS agreement (which ACTA in part replaces, since TRIPS has been hijacked by troublesome BRIC - Brazil, India, China - countries) has often been used as an excuse for software patents: "TRIPS obliges patents on software and genes".</p><p>Same in the UK with data retention: law was quashed by Parliament in 2005, then the Blair govt. got it pushed through the EU with minimum discussion ("terrorism, crime and child porn" was the justification), and then six months later got it through the UK parliament with almost zero discussion.  180-degree U-turn.</p><p>ACTA is like this: "treaty-washing" of legislation that would never pass at the national level.</p><p>Please put pressure on the EFF to restart this.  It is a major, major threat to global Internet freedom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a law , it 's an international multilateral agreement .
This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law , without all the fuss of democratic discussion .
There have been many examples , some good , some bad.In Europe the TRIPS agreement ( which ACTA in part replaces , since TRIPS has been hijacked by troublesome BRIC - Brazil , India , China - countries ) has often been used as an excuse for software patents : " TRIPS obliges patents on software and genes " .Same in the UK with data retention : law was quashed by Parliament in 2005 , then the Blair govt .
got it pushed through the EU with minimum discussion ( " terrorism , crime and child porn " was the justification ) , and then six months later got it through the UK parliament with almost zero discussion .
180-degree U-turn.ACTA is like this : " treaty-washing " of legislation that would never pass at the national level.Please put pressure on the EFF to restart this .
It is a major , major threat to global Internet freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a law, it's an international multilateral agreement.
This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law, without all the fuss of democratic discussion.
There have been many examples, some good, some bad.In Europe the TRIPS agreement (which ACTA in part replaces, since TRIPS has been hijacked by troublesome BRIC - Brazil, India, China - countries) has often been used as an excuse for software patents: "TRIPS obliges patents on software and genes".Same in the UK with data retention: law was quashed by Parliament in 2005, then the Blair govt.
got it pushed through the EU with minimum discussion ("terrorism, crime and child porn" was the justification), and then six months later got it through the UK parliament with almost zero discussion.
180-degree U-turn.ACTA is like this: "treaty-washing" of legislation that would never pass at the national level.Please put pressure on the EFF to restart this.
It is a major, major threat to global Internet freedom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409521</id>
	<title>C.H.A.N.G.E., staring the most unqualified/puppet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245585060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See <a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=Hopenosis&amp;btnG=Search+Images&amp;gbv=1" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">this image</a> [google.com] if you don't understand that the election of Barry Sotoro was nothign more than racism in action by the uneducated mass of people that having nothing to do in a day of life other than apply for the same kind of free-money grants sold by Kevin Trudeau rather than create a useful productive job for themselves.  I'm talking about people so-low that they wouldn't even know they could be out in a dirt-field sowing seed or grooming sheep, that is how low.  Yea, I'm talking about all of you that thought you Can. Help. A. Nigga. Get. Elected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See this image [ google.com ] if you do n't understand that the election of Barry Sotoro was nothign more than racism in action by the uneducated mass of people that having nothing to do in a day of life other than apply for the same kind of free-money grants sold by Kevin Trudeau rather than create a useful productive job for themselves .
I 'm talking about people so-low that they would n't even know they could be out in a dirt-field sowing seed or grooming sheep , that is how low .
Yea , I 'm talking about all of you that thought you Can .
Help. A. Nigga. Get .
Elected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See this image [google.com] if you don't understand that the election of Barry Sotoro was nothign more than racism in action by the uneducated mass of people that having nothing to do in a day of life other than apply for the same kind of free-money grants sold by Kevin Trudeau rather than create a useful productive job for themselves.
I'm talking about people so-low that they wouldn't even know they could be out in a dirt-field sowing seed or grooming sheep, that is how low.
Yea, I'm talking about all of you that thought you Can.
Help. A. Nigga. Get.
Elected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410059</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245593460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I can tell you, this changed nearly completely, since the beginning of the Bush era. Most people in whole Europe (NOT a country btw.) do not blindly side with the USA anymore. Even with the traditional media working hard to reinstate that state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I can tell you , this changed nearly completely , since the beginning of the Bush era .
Most people in whole Europe ( NOT a country btw .
) do not blindly side with the USA anymore .
Even with the traditional media working hard to reinstate that state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I can tell you, this changed nearly completely, since the beginning of the Bush era.
Most people in whole Europe (NOT a country btw.
) do not blindly side with the USA anymore.
Even with the traditional media working hard to reinstate that state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412785</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1245615900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>BRIC - Brazil, India, China - countries</p></div><p>"BRIC" is actually "Brazil, Russia, India, China".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>BRIC - Brazil , India , China - countries " BRIC " is actually " Brazil , Russia , India , China " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BRIC - Brazil, India, China - countries"BRIC" is actually "Brazil, Russia, India, China".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1245594900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when does the US care about international law?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when does the US care about international law ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when does the US care about international law?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161</id>
	<title>what is probably in it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245579840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if it is anything like the bank secrecy act it is probably<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... like what they do for money now, but applied to 'intellectual property'. and full of the following:</p><p>specific indications of what should 'trigger' investigations of people, and/or their transactions, i.e., certain amounts of certain types of IP put through within a certain amount of time.</p><p>requirements to 'report' all transactions over a certain amount to government authorities... ie in money its , say, 3,000 $... in data it might be, 1 terabyte or something.</p><p>the illegalization fo trying to 'avoid' aforementioned 'reporting requirements'. IE, in money, if you separate out your transactions into smaller ones, it doesnt have to be reported to the government... its illegal, so... in data maybe they will say 'you cant split up a 5 TB file into smaller pieces to avoid reporting'</p><p>requirements about proof of identity for anyone performing transactions of certain amounts. ie, you have to prove youre a citizen or something before you can transfer a large file, with a photo ID or some other proof.</p><p>gag orders against all government and corporate employees who are responsible for reporting these suspicions to the federal government department in charge of the program. ie, these workers cannot discuss anything they report with anyone, including coworkers, or they will be in violation of law and subject to punishment.</p><p>add in a bunch of international crap to this...</p><p>maybe some standradization on what is in the reports... banks in the US have standard forms to fill out to report transactions over certain amounts to the government.</p><p>there is also the state department list of countries you cannot trade money with or whatever. well, now they will probably apply that to data too, or something.</p><p>who knows what other crazy shit they will put in here. it is absolutely ridiculous though to keep it a secret.</p><p>the trouble is that Mark Felt types dont usually work in huge corporations... not a lot of leakers on the board of goldman sachs or microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if it is anything like the bank secrecy act it is probably .... like what they do for money now , but applied to 'intellectual property' .
and full of the following : specific indications of what should 'trigger ' investigations of people , and/or their transactions , i.e. , certain amounts of certain types of IP put through within a certain amount of time.requirements to 'report ' all transactions over a certain amount to government authorities... ie in money its , say , 3,000 $ ... in data it might be , 1 terabyte or something.the illegalization fo trying to 'avoid ' aforementioned 'reporting requirements' .
IE , in money , if you separate out your transactions into smaller ones , it doesnt have to be reported to the government... its illegal , so... in data maybe they will say 'you cant split up a 5 TB file into smaller pieces to avoid reporting'requirements about proof of identity for anyone performing transactions of certain amounts .
ie , you have to prove youre a citizen or something before you can transfer a large file , with a photo ID or some other proof.gag orders against all government and corporate employees who are responsible for reporting these suspicions to the federal government department in charge of the program .
ie , these workers can not discuss anything they report with anyone , including coworkers , or they will be in violation of law and subject to punishment.add in a bunch of international crap to this...maybe some standradization on what is in the reports... banks in the US have standard forms to fill out to report transactions over certain amounts to the government.there is also the state department list of countries you can not trade money with or whatever .
well , now they will probably apply that to data too , or something.who knows what other crazy shit they will put in here .
it is absolutely ridiculous though to keep it a secret.the trouble is that Mark Felt types dont usually work in huge corporations... not a lot of leakers on the board of goldman sachs or microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if it is anything like the bank secrecy act it is probably .... like what they do for money now, but applied to 'intellectual property'.
and full of the following:specific indications of what should 'trigger' investigations of people, and/or their transactions, i.e., certain amounts of certain types of IP put through within a certain amount of time.requirements to 'report' all transactions over a certain amount to government authorities... ie in money its , say, 3,000 $... in data it might be, 1 terabyte or something.the illegalization fo trying to 'avoid' aforementioned 'reporting requirements'.
IE, in money, if you separate out your transactions into smaller ones, it doesnt have to be reported to the government... its illegal, so... in data maybe they will say 'you cant split up a 5 TB file into smaller pieces to avoid reporting'requirements about proof of identity for anyone performing transactions of certain amounts.
ie, you have to prove youre a citizen or something before you can transfer a large file, with a photo ID or some other proof.gag orders against all government and corporate employees who are responsible for reporting these suspicions to the federal government department in charge of the program.
ie, these workers cannot discuss anything they report with anyone, including coworkers, or they will be in violation of law and subject to punishment.add in a bunch of international crap to this...maybe some standradization on what is in the reports... banks in the US have standard forms to fill out to report transactions over certain amounts to the government.there is also the state department list of countries you cannot trade money with or whatever.
well, now they will probably apply that to data too, or something.who knows what other crazy shit they will put in here.
it is absolutely ridiculous though to keep it a secret.the trouble is that Mark Felt types dont usually work in huge corporations... not a lot of leakers on the board of goldman sachs or microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409515</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245584940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>ACTA will mandate software patents, criminalization of copyright infringements, censorship lists, data retention.</p></div></blockquote><p>
You don't really think Big Media supports Obama for <i>free</i>, now do you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>ACTA will mandate software patents , criminalization of copyright infringements , censorship lists , data retention .
You do n't really think Big Media supports Obama for free , now do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ACTA will mandate software patents, criminalization of copyright infringements, censorship lists, data retention.
You don't really think Big Media supports Obama for free, now do you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412213</id>
	<title>Re:Obama is just a tool as any other president</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245611640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh... but you forget - just how EASY they have made it to delclare Martial Law...</p><p>A President of Conscience could use this power to eliminate both the Private Federal Reserve and the Military Industrial Complex - puting all Military back under the DoD as orginally intended.</p><p>All we need is the Right man for the job - and a strong outpouring of popular support!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh... but you forget - just how EASY they have made it to delclare Martial Law...A President of Conscience could use this power to eliminate both the Private Federal Reserve and the Military Industrial Complex - puting all Military back under the DoD as orginally intended.All we need is the Right man for the job - and a strong outpouring of popular support !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh... but you forget - just how EASY they have made it to delclare Martial Law...A President of Conscience could use this power to eliminate both the Private Federal Reserve and the Military Industrial Complex - puting all Military back under the DoD as orginally intended.All we need is the Right man for the job - and a strong outpouring of popular support!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409273</id>
	<title>Re:Look at Iran for an example</title>
	<author>Zarluk</author>
	<datestamp>1245581460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No! He's being SARCASTIC (I hope).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No !
He 's being SARCASTIC ( I hope ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No!
He's being SARCASTIC (I hope).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409609</id>
	<title>Hobbyists Are So Screwed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245586500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ACTA isn't a concern for p2p software use exclusively. Copy-right protected material for general non-profit use, will be considered illegal. As you can see, the issue already contested. Although the law currently to date has not given a verdict as to the legality of the issue.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA</a> [youtube.com] , <a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255" title="animemusicvideos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255</a> [animemusicvideos.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ACTA is n't a concern for p2p software use exclusively .
Copy-right protected material for general non-profit use , will be considered illegal .
As you can see , the issue already contested .
Although the law currently to date has not given a verdict as to the legality of the issue .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Hla7KMY8OFA [ youtube.com ] , http : //www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php ? t = 60255 [ animemusicvideos.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ACTA isn't a concern for p2p software use exclusively.
Copy-right protected material for general non-profit use, will be considered illegal.
As you can see, the issue already contested.
Although the law currently to date has not given a verdict as to the legality of the issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA [youtube.com] , http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255 [animemusicvideos.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28419569</id>
	<title>Re:So exactly how much money...</title>
	<author>True Grit</author>
	<datestamp>1245673320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich, and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC *and* voters.</p></div><p>What we *really* need is to get people to stop thinking that only the Presidency makes a difference.  There is no Messiah, its the <b>60 votes in the Senate</b> that controls all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich , and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC * and * voters.What we * really * need is to get people to stop thinking that only the Presidency makes a difference .
There is no Messiah , its the 60 votes in the Senate that controls all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real Messiah might have been Dennis Kucinich, and coincidentally he got crucified... both by the DNC *and* voters.What we *really* need is to get people to stop thinking that only the Presidency makes a difference.
There is no Messiah, its the 60 votes in the Senate that controls all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1245579960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That could even be. If it was a treaty on, say, a common defense strategy, or a military proposal. Even a joint attempt to increase cooperation in crime fighting. But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That could even be .
If it was a treaty on , say , a common defense strategy , or a military proposal .
Even a joint attempt to increase cooperation in crime fighting .
But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That could even be.
If it was a treaty on, say, a common defense strategy, or a military proposal.
Even a joint attempt to increase cooperation in crime fighting.
But how can a treaty on COPYRIGHT be about national security?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409567</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Elektroschock</author>
	<datestamp>1245585900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is still a way to get the document, the EU <a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5632032" title="europa.eu">Public Access to documents reform</a> [europa.eu].</p><p>I wonder if the Swedish Presidency will move forward with this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is still a way to get the document , the EU Public Access to documents reform [ europa.eu ] .I wonder if the Swedish Presidency will move forward with this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is still a way to get the document, the EU Public Access to documents reform [europa.eu].I wonder if the Swedish Presidency will move forward with this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409453</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413007</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245617460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;It's not a law, it's an international multilateral agreement. This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law, without all the fuss of democratic discussion.</p><p>Doesn't it also bypass the bit about rights not given to congress are reserved for the the states and the people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; It 's not a law , it 's an international multilateral agreement .
This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law , without all the fuss of democratic discussion.Does n't it also bypass the bit about rights not given to congress are reserved for the the states and the people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;It's not a law, it's an international multilateral agreement.
This is better than a law because it creates the obligation to enact law, without all the fuss of democratic discussion.Doesn't it also bypass the bit about rights not given to congress are reserved for the the states and the people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28425177</id>
	<title>Civil war?</title>
	<author>fugue</author>
	<datestamp>1245695820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the contract that gives our government the authority to govern is ignored, then isn't that grounds for ignoring the laws illegally imposed?  Of course, this means civil war...  *sigh*</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the contract that gives our government the authority to govern is ignored , then is n't that grounds for ignoring the laws illegally imposed ?
Of course , this means civil war... * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the contract that gives our government the authority to govern is ignored, then isn't that grounds for ignoring the laws illegally imposed?
Of course, this means civil war...  *sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28416109</id>
	<title>Crying wolf</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1245601440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you keep slapping the label of national security on something to keep it out of public view, eventually people are going to call bullshit on it.  Then there will come a time where something legitimately needs to be classified and no one believes it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you keep slapping the label of national security on something to keep it out of public view , eventually people are going to call bullshit on it .
Then there will come a time where something legitimately needs to be classified and no one believes it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you keep slapping the label of national security on something to keep it out of public view, eventually people are going to call bullshit on it.
Then there will come a time where something legitimately needs to be classified and no one believes it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28463161</id>
	<title>Well I'm stating for the record</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245868860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>      I'm stating for the record, I'm not subject to secret laws.  I'm not going to try to find out what this is about or make any attempt to follow it.  I call on lawyers, prosecutors, and DAs to ignore secret laws, and judges to as well -- they were not discussed in the open or voted on, and (being secret) are certainly not on law or treaty books.    They are, in other words, just stacks of paper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm stating for the record , I 'm not subject to secret laws .
I 'm not going to try to find out what this is about or make any attempt to follow it .
I call on lawyers , prosecutors , and DAs to ignore secret laws , and judges to as well -- they were not discussed in the open or voted on , and ( being secret ) are certainly not on law or treaty books .
They are , in other words , just stacks of paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>      I'm stating for the record, I'm not subject to secret laws.
I'm not going to try to find out what this is about or make any attempt to follow it.
I call on lawyers, prosecutors, and DAs to ignore secret laws, and judges to as well -- they were not discussed in the open or voted on, and (being secret) are certainly not on law or treaty books.
They are, in other words, just stacks of paper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412607</id>
	<title>Re:Obama is just a tool as any other president</title>
	<author>Doctor\_Jest</author>
	<datestamp>1245614280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He is the same as Congress, yet we voted the "other" party back into power.  Funny that.  If this isn't PROOF FUCKING POSITIVE that there IS no two-party system anymore, I'll eat my hat.  Don't give him such a free pass, though.  If you blamed Bush for anything in the last 8 years, you can't now NOT blame Obama for the same fucking things.
<br> <br>
There is no free pass.  Obama has the bully pulpit (the press), and could conceivably do better if he were actually DIFFERENT from the last moron in charge.  But it's clear that he IS NOT.  Change indeed.  What fucking change?  I  blame Obama as much as Bush for raping the Constitution.  They both have left their retarded DNA all over our sacred document.  The same with Congress.... so cutting Obama slack because he's "just a puppet" and vilifying Shrub for the same thing is a double standard.  Blame them all appropriately and maybe, just fucking maybe, we'll get some REAL change with an ACTUAL different party.  But I won't hold my breath... sentiment like yours is exactly why we never change... we find ways to avoid blaming THEM ALL, and doing what the Founders said... GET RID OF THEM.  *sigh*  I am really close to giving up... but Obama, like Shrub, is pissing me off entirely too much to throw in the towel just yet.  It's close though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is the same as Congress , yet we voted the " other " party back into power .
Funny that .
If this is n't PROOF FUCKING POSITIVE that there IS no two-party system anymore , I 'll eat my hat .
Do n't give him such a free pass , though .
If you blamed Bush for anything in the last 8 years , you ca n't now NOT blame Obama for the same fucking things .
There is no free pass .
Obama has the bully pulpit ( the press ) , and could conceivably do better if he were actually DIFFERENT from the last moron in charge .
But it 's clear that he IS NOT .
Change indeed .
What fucking change ?
I blame Obama as much as Bush for raping the Constitution .
They both have left their retarded DNA all over our sacred document .
The same with Congress.... so cutting Obama slack because he 's " just a puppet " and vilifying Shrub for the same thing is a double standard .
Blame them all appropriately and maybe , just fucking maybe , we 'll get some REAL change with an ACTUAL different party .
But I wo n't hold my breath... sentiment like yours is exactly why we never change... we find ways to avoid blaming THEM ALL , and doing what the Founders said... GET RID OF THEM .
* sigh * I am really close to giving up... but Obama , like Shrub , is pissing me off entirely too much to throw in the towel just yet .
It 's close though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is the same as Congress, yet we voted the "other" party back into power.
Funny that.
If this isn't PROOF FUCKING POSITIVE that there IS no two-party system anymore, I'll eat my hat.
Don't give him such a free pass, though.
If you blamed Bush for anything in the last 8 years, you can't now NOT blame Obama for the same fucking things.
There is no free pass.
Obama has the bully pulpit (the press), and could conceivably do better if he were actually DIFFERENT from the last moron in charge.
But it's clear that he IS NOT.
Change indeed.
What fucking change?
I  blame Obama as much as Bush for raping the Constitution.
They both have left their retarded DNA all over our sacred document.
The same with Congress.... so cutting Obama slack because he's "just a puppet" and vilifying Shrub for the same thing is a double standard.
Blame them all appropriately and maybe, just fucking maybe, we'll get some REAL change with an ACTUAL different party.
But I won't hold my breath... sentiment like yours is exactly why we never change... we find ways to avoid blaming THEM ALL, and doing what the Founders said... GET RID OF THEM.
*sigh*  I am really close to giving up... but Obama, like Shrub, is pissing me off entirely too much to throw in the towel just yet.
It's close though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1245579720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because "national security" depends on America being able to control the world with our shitty pop culture. <br> <br>

Foreigners are hooked on it. When they get it for free, our influence and our revenue streams, along with the ability to defend ourselves, go bye-bye.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because " national security " depends on America being able to control the world with our shitty pop culture .
Foreigners are hooked on it .
When they get it for free , our influence and our revenue streams , along with the ability to defend ourselves , go bye-bye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because "national security" depends on America being able to control the world with our shitty pop culture.
Foreigners are hooked on it.
When they get it for free, our influence and our revenue streams, along with the ability to defend ourselves, go bye-bye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409559</id>
	<title>Hobbists Are So Screwed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245585840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ACTA isn't a concern for p2p software use exclusively. Copy-right protected material for the general use of non-profit will be considered illegal. As you can see, the issue already contested. Although the law currently to date has given a verdict as to the legality of the issue. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA</a> [youtube.com] , <a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255" title="animemusicvideos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255</a> [animemusicvideos.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ACTA is n't a concern for p2p software use exclusively .
Copy-right protected material for the general use of non-profit will be considered illegal .
As you can see , the issue already contested .
Although the law currently to date has given a verdict as to the legality of the issue .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Hla7KMY8OFA [ youtube.com ] , http : //www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php ? t = 60255 [ animemusicvideos.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ACTA isn't a concern for p2p software use exclusively.
Copy-right protected material for the general use of non-profit will be considered illegal.
As you can see, the issue already contested.
Although the law currently to date has given a verdict as to the legality of the issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hla7KMY8OFA [youtube.com] , http://www.animemusicvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60255 [animemusicvideos.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410277</id>
	<title>Re:Still fighting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245595980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I understand, America's primary export is information.  We don't export oil, steel, plastic toys, electronics, etc.  Maybe we export some corn or something, but digital content of every variety is what we really offer the rest of the world.</p><p>Therefore, it is clearly in the interest of America's economy, and America's status as a strong Global power, for there to be worldwide buy-in to very strict information-control (ie copyright) policies, and very strict enforcement.</p><p>A world where information is free is a world where America is poor.</p><p>Of course, the fact that this wealth depends on things that clearly do not make sense (introducing tremendous, and obviously bogus, artificial scarcity) and assumptions that clearly will not be true in the future (other countries will never be able to produce digital content as well or as much as we can), means nothing to the politicians that are making these decisions.  They see a problem right now, and they see "eFascism" as the best way of solving that problem over the period of time that they will retain office while also pleasing their wealthy campaign supporters.  From their perspective, it is the obvious choice (and the people be damned, as usual).</p><p>There may even be some politicians who honestly believe this solution is sustainable in the long term...such are not competent to hold office, though that won't stop them.</p><p>I find the situation quite depressing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand , America 's primary export is information .
We do n't export oil , steel , plastic toys , electronics , etc .
Maybe we export some corn or something , but digital content of every variety is what we really offer the rest of the world.Therefore , it is clearly in the interest of America 's economy , and America 's status as a strong Global power , for there to be worldwide buy-in to very strict information-control ( ie copyright ) policies , and very strict enforcement.A world where information is free is a world where America is poor.Of course , the fact that this wealth depends on things that clearly do not make sense ( introducing tremendous , and obviously bogus , artificial scarcity ) and assumptions that clearly will not be true in the future ( other countries will never be able to produce digital content as well or as much as we can ) , means nothing to the politicians that are making these decisions .
They see a problem right now , and they see " eFascism " as the best way of solving that problem over the period of time that they will retain office while also pleasing their wealthy campaign supporters .
From their perspective , it is the obvious choice ( and the people be damned , as usual ) .There may even be some politicians who honestly believe this solution is sustainable in the long term...such are not competent to hold office , though that wo n't stop them.I find the situation quite depressing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand, America's primary export is information.
We don't export oil, steel, plastic toys, electronics, etc.
Maybe we export some corn or something, but digital content of every variety is what we really offer the rest of the world.Therefore, it is clearly in the interest of America's economy, and America's status as a strong Global power, for there to be worldwide buy-in to very strict information-control (ie copyright) policies, and very strict enforcement.A world where information is free is a world where America is poor.Of course, the fact that this wealth depends on things that clearly do not make sense (introducing tremendous, and obviously bogus, artificial scarcity) and assumptions that clearly will not be true in the future (other countries will never be able to produce digital content as well or as much as we can), means nothing to the politicians that are making these decisions.
They see a problem right now, and they see "eFascism" as the best way of solving that problem over the period of time that they will retain office while also pleasing their wealthy campaign supporters.
From their perspective, it is the obvious choice (and the people be damned, as usual).There may even be some politicians who honestly believe this solution is sustainable in the long term...such are not competent to hold office, though that won't stop them.I find the situation quite depressing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409575</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>siddesu</author>
	<datestamp>1245586080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Propaganda and convenience. Hollywood's been manufacturing the propaganda for the US gubermint for a long time. Small wonder the gubermint will throw them a bone back when asked. And covering it under "national security" totally removes any need to \_work\_ to justify the law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Propaganda and convenience .
Hollywood 's been manufacturing the propaganda for the US gubermint for a long time .
Small wonder the gubermint will throw them a bone back when asked .
And covering it under " national security " totally removes any need to \ _work \ _ to justify the law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Propaganda and convenience.
Hollywood's been manufacturing the propaganda for the US gubermint for a long time.
Small wonder the gubermint will throw them a bone back when asked.
And covering it under "national security" totally removes any need to \_work\_ to justify the law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411949</id>
	<title>Re:Still fighting?</title>
	<author>kosty</author>
	<datestamp>1245609540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking of jailing anyone or everyone, this is the seatbelt "Click-It or Ticket" crap just waaaaaaaaaaaay worse.  E.g., if pulled over on the road by the police for any reason -- or NO reason -- a routine traffic stop sometimes leads  to a stack of tickets or worse.  During the 80's one could argue in court - sometimes successfully -- that the initial stop wasn't warranted [actions by the SPOTUS in the recent past not withstanding].  Get used to hearing "I didn't see a seatbelt on the driver or passenger" early and often.  Viola -- instant justification to stop ANYONE for ANYTHING.</p><p>Now to the present: Need a reason to search / question / detain some person or persons?  Maybe deprive them of their computer(s); business, financial, or personal info; or perhaps other property?  Seems anyone with an internet connection may be fair game for God* knows what, e.g., "We accuse \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ of copyright infringement!"  Not that I'm paranoid or cynical -- I AM.  It may be a bad habit or out and out neurosis, but I can't help but look for worst-case scenarios whenever congress gets "busy" these days.  Oh, to be blissfully ignorant again...</p><p>* Or invisible cloud-dwelling super-being of your choice.  Your mileage may vary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of jailing anyone or everyone , this is the seatbelt " Click-It or Ticket " crap just waaaaaaaaaaaay worse .
E.g. , if pulled over on the road by the police for any reason -- or NO reason -- a routine traffic stop sometimes leads to a stack of tickets or worse .
During the 80 's one could argue in court - sometimes successfully -- that the initial stop was n't warranted [ actions by the SPOTUS in the recent past not withstanding ] .
Get used to hearing " I did n't see a seatbelt on the driver or passenger " early and often .
Viola -- instant justification to stop ANYONE for ANYTHING.Now to the present : Need a reason to search / question / detain some person or persons ?
Maybe deprive them of their computer ( s ) ; business , financial , or personal info ; or perhaps other property ?
Seems anyone with an internet connection may be fair game for God * knows what , e.g. , " We accuse \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ of copyright infringement !
" Not that I 'm paranoid or cynical -- I AM .
It may be a bad habit or out and out neurosis , but I ca n't help but look for worst-case scenarios whenever congress gets " busy " these days .
Oh , to be blissfully ignorant again... * Or invisible cloud-dwelling super-being of your choice .
Your mileage may vary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of jailing anyone or everyone, this is the seatbelt "Click-It or Ticket" crap just waaaaaaaaaaaay worse.
E.g., if pulled over on the road by the police for any reason -- or NO reason -- a routine traffic stop sometimes leads  to a stack of tickets or worse.
During the 80's one could argue in court - sometimes successfully -- that the initial stop wasn't warranted [actions by the SPOTUS in the recent past not withstanding].
Get used to hearing "I didn't see a seatbelt on the driver or passenger" early and often.
Viola -- instant justification to stop ANYONE for ANYTHING.Now to the present: Need a reason to search / question / detain some person or persons?
Maybe deprive them of their computer(s); business, financial, or personal info; or perhaps other property?
Seems anyone with an internet connection may be fair game for God* knows what, e.g., "We accuse \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ of copyright infringement!
"  Not that I'm paranoid or cynical -- I AM.
It may be a bad habit or out and out neurosis, but I can't help but look for worst-case scenarios whenever congress gets "busy" these days.
Oh, to be blissfully ignorant again...* Or invisible cloud-dwelling super-being of your choice.
Your mileage may vary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409453</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245583920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I understanding this ACTA thing correctly; is this a law that cannot be judged?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I understanding this ACTA thing correctly ; is this a law that can not be judged ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I understanding this ACTA thing correctly; is this a law that cannot be judged?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412759</id>
	<title>Re:National Security?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1245615780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>because if we knew what they were putting in it, we'd start protesting like it's Tehran?</p></div><p>You didn't start protesting like it's Tehran over things far worse and far-reaching than some copyright treaty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>because if we knew what they were putting in it , we 'd start protesting like it 's Tehran ? You did n't start protesting like it 's Tehran over things far worse and far-reaching than some copyright treaty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because if we knew what they were putting in it, we'd start protesting like it's Tehran?You didn't start protesting like it's Tehran over things far worse and far-reaching than some copyright treaty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409995</id>
	<title>Re:Look at Iran for an example</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1245592620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better a gram than a damn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better a gram than a damn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better a gram than a damn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412819</id>
	<title>when does the US care about international law</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1245616260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When the US dictates the law.  Of course it makes sure there're loopholes for it.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the US dictates the law .
Of course it makes sure there 're loopholes for it .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the US dictates the law.
Of course it makes sure there're loopholes for it.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410071</id>
	<title>Re:Change...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245593640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here are some new clothes. Change into them.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>*gives santax pirate clothes*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are some new clothes .
Change into them .
: ) * gives santax pirate clothes *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are some new clothes.
Change into them.
:)*gives santax pirate clothes*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410239</id>
	<title>Meet the new boss...</title>
	<author>PinchDuck</author>
	<datestamp>1245595560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change you can believe in, but not really expect. Thanks for limiting our freedoms and working for big business, Democrats! You're just as bad as Bush.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change you can believe in , but not really expect .
Thanks for limiting our freedoms and working for big business , Democrats !
You 're just as bad as Bush .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change you can believe in, but not really expect.
Thanks for limiting our freedoms and working for big business, Democrats!
You're just as bad as Bush.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409573</id>
	<title>Everyone, the voting doesn't end. It's all a SHAM.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245586080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vote this, vote that, immoral vote this, unlawful vote that; can we proceed with any of these?  Why do the delegates keep appearing?  Why does Congress continue to assemple on such ill-behaved matters that are neither necessity or productive?  VOTING IS ONLY IN SIMULATION.  It's up to the execution to decide.  I'll tell you why:</p><p>BECAUSE THEY ARE THE PROBLEM, AND GAINING YOUR REPRESENTATION JUST PUTS A STRAWMAN IN THEIR CHAMBERS TO PUT A BULLSEYE UPON TO BLAME YOU FOR ALL THE BAD DECISIONS THEY MAKE.</p><p>Cops do it, Army and Navy does it, telemarketers do it, grocers do it, IRS agents do it.  They just want to represent you: into the grave you go!  They just want to make bad decisions on your behalf, without recourse to them.</p><p>HANG THEM HIGH!  SLICE THEIR LOWER-ABDOMEN BEFORE THE STOP IS KICKED-OUT UNDERNEATH THEM. IF YOU DON'T HANG THEM IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILY AND CHILDREN, THEN NONE WILL HAVE A DECENT RESPECT FOR THEIR NEIGHBOR.</p><p>U.S. Congress is stuck on the Law of the Jungle, where there is a 5-to-1 vote always agreeing that Gang-rape is favorable.  Where in reality can people decide to vote on an issue, regardless of Natural law?</p><p>VOTING IS INSURRECTION.  VOTING DOESN'T OCCUR IN NATURE, BECAUSE IT'S ALL ARTIFICE.  WHEN YOU VOTE FOR SOMTHING TO BE DONE THAT MANIPULATES THE STORED VALUE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS' PROPERTY, THEN IT VIOLATES THE 10 COMMANDMENTS.  LOOK IN THE BOOK OF JOSHUA OF A KING JAMES BIBLE 1611, BECAUSE THE ONLY TIME ISRAEL EVER VOTED WAS TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE: HOW TO AGREE WITH ONE ANOTHER TO OPTIMIZE THEIR WRONG-DOING TO THEIR FAVOR.</p><p>Barack HUSSEIN o'Bama is not the first black African President; he's perhaps the 13th after the 1st ten mollatos prior to 1776, then mollatos Washington and Jackson and Abraham Lincoln.  The 14th Amendment to Constitution of the United States secures voting as a practice for insurection and rebellion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vote this , vote that , immoral vote this , unlawful vote that ; can we proceed with any of these ?
Why do the delegates keep appearing ?
Why does Congress continue to assemple on such ill-behaved matters that are neither necessity or productive ?
VOTING IS ONLY IN SIMULATION .
It 's up to the execution to decide .
I 'll tell you why : BECAUSE THEY ARE THE PROBLEM , AND GAINING YOUR REPRESENTATION JUST PUTS A STRAWMAN IN THEIR CHAMBERS TO PUT A BULLSEYE UPON TO BLAME YOU FOR ALL THE BAD DECISIONS THEY MAKE.Cops do it , Army and Navy does it , telemarketers do it , grocers do it , IRS agents do it .
They just want to represent you : into the grave you go !
They just want to make bad decisions on your behalf , without recourse to them.HANG THEM HIGH !
SLICE THEIR LOWER-ABDOMEN BEFORE THE STOP IS KICKED-OUT UNDERNEATH THEM .
IF YOU DO N'T HANG THEM IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILY AND CHILDREN , THEN NONE WILL HAVE A DECENT RESPECT FOR THEIR NEIGHBOR.U.S .
Congress is stuck on the Law of the Jungle , where there is a 5-to-1 vote always agreeing that Gang-rape is favorable .
Where in reality can people decide to vote on an issue , regardless of Natural law ? VOTING IS INSURRECTION .
VOTING DOES N'T OCCUR IN NATURE , BECAUSE IT 'S ALL ARTIFICE .
WHEN YOU VOTE FOR SOMTHING TO BE DONE THAT MANIPULATES THE STORED VALUE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS ' PROPERTY , THEN IT VIOLATES THE 10 COMMANDMENTS .
LOOK IN THE BOOK OF JOSHUA OF A KING JAMES BIBLE 1611 , BECAUSE THE ONLY TIME ISRAEL EVER VOTED WAS TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE : HOW TO AGREE WITH ONE ANOTHER TO OPTIMIZE THEIR WRONG-DOING TO THEIR FAVOR.Barack HUSSEIN o'Bama is not the first black African President ; he 's perhaps the 13th after the 1st ten mollatos prior to 1776 , then mollatos Washington and Jackson and Abraham Lincoln .
The 14th Amendment to Constitution of the United States secures voting as a practice for insurection and rebellion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vote this, vote that, immoral vote this, unlawful vote that; can we proceed with any of these?
Why do the delegates keep appearing?
Why does Congress continue to assemple on such ill-behaved matters that are neither necessity or productive?
VOTING IS ONLY IN SIMULATION.
It's up to the execution to decide.
I'll tell you why:BECAUSE THEY ARE THE PROBLEM, AND GAINING YOUR REPRESENTATION JUST PUTS A STRAWMAN IN THEIR CHAMBERS TO PUT A BULLSEYE UPON TO BLAME YOU FOR ALL THE BAD DECISIONS THEY MAKE.Cops do it, Army and Navy does it, telemarketers do it, grocers do it, IRS agents do it.
They just want to represent you: into the grave you go!
They just want to make bad decisions on your behalf, without recourse to them.HANG THEM HIGH!
SLICE THEIR LOWER-ABDOMEN BEFORE THE STOP IS KICKED-OUT UNDERNEATH THEM.
IF YOU DON'T HANG THEM IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILY AND CHILDREN, THEN NONE WILL HAVE A DECENT RESPECT FOR THEIR NEIGHBOR.U.S.
Congress is stuck on the Law of the Jungle, where there is a 5-to-1 vote always agreeing that Gang-rape is favorable.
Where in reality can people decide to vote on an issue, regardless of Natural law?VOTING IS INSURRECTION.
VOTING DOESN'T OCCUR IN NATURE, BECAUSE IT'S ALL ARTIFICE.
WHEN YOU VOTE FOR SOMTHING TO BE DONE THAT MANIPULATES THE STORED VALUE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS' PROPERTY, THEN IT VIOLATES THE 10 COMMANDMENTS.
LOOK IN THE BOOK OF JOSHUA OF A KING JAMES BIBLE 1611, BECAUSE THE ONLY TIME ISRAEL EVER VOTED WAS TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE: HOW TO AGREE WITH ONE ANOTHER TO OPTIMIZE THEIR WRONG-DOING TO THEIR FAVOR.Barack HUSSEIN o'Bama is not the first black African President; he's perhaps the 13th after the 1st ten mollatos prior to 1776, then mollatos Washington and Jackson and Abraham Lincoln.
The 14th Amendment to Constitution of the United States secures voting as a practice for insurection and rebellion!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409671</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1245587580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public. Somebody please explain!</p></div><p>It isn't legal.</p><p>That hasn't appeared to be a requirement for our government to do something for some time now however.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public .
Somebody please explain ! It is n't legal.That has n't appeared to be a requirement for our government to do something for some time now however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand how it is legal to enact a law whose text is not public.
Somebody please explain!It isn't legal.That hasn't appeared to be a requirement for our government to do something for some time now however.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409223</id>
	<title>Afro-American Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245580620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.  See the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] by CNN.
<p>
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.  These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and non-Black folks).  Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.  So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.  Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.  In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.
</p><p>
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.  At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
</p><p>
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.  That claim is an outright lie.  Look at the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#NCDEM" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.  Consider the case of North Carolina.  Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.  Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.  Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.  Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
</p><p>
Here is the bottom line.  Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.  He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
</p><p>
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.  Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.  Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.  Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.  You need not defend your actions in any way.  Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the election , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
See the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] by CNN .
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics , Asian-Americans , etc .
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites ( and non-Black folks ) .
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian .
So , Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and , hence , serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern .
Only about 65 \ % of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama .
In other words , a maximum of 65 \ % support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and , hence , is acceptable .
If African-Americans were not racist , then at most 65 \ % of them would have supported Obama .
At that level of support , McCain would have won the presidential race .
At this point , African-American supremacists ( and apologists ) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he ( 1 ) is a member of the Democratic party and ( 2 ) supports its ideals .
That claim is an outright lie .
Look at the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] for the Democratic primaries .
Consider the case of North Carolina .
Again , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton .
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats , and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical .
Yet , 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton .
Why ? African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
Here is the bottom line .
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America .
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans .
African-Americans have established that expressing " racial pride " by voting on the basis of skin color is 100 \ % acceptable .
Neither the " Wall Street Journal " nor the " New York Times " complained about this racist behavior .
Therefore , in future elections , please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color .
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American .
You need not defend your actions in any way .
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today 's moral values .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
See the exit-polling data [cnn.com] by CNN.
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against Whites (and non-Black folks).
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is Hispanic or Asian.
So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate and, hence, serve as the reference by which we detect a racist voting pattern.
Only about 65\% of Hispanics and Asian-Americans supported Obama.
In other words, a maximum of 65\% support by any ethnic or racial group for either McCain or Obama is not racist and, hence, is acceptable.
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.
At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.
That claim is an outright lie.
Look at the exit-polling data [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.
Consider the case of North Carolina.
Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.
Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.
Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
Here is the bottom line.
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.
Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.
Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.
You need not defend your actions in any way.
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013</id>
	<title>Look at Iran for an example</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245578280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bloodshed and violence going on in Iran right now is precisely what happens when you pit a corrupt government against a small band of rabble rousers. Let it be clear that I am not saying that the protesters in Iran aren't justified in protesting the elections, or even that the violence against them is in any way justified. The deaths are senseless and tragic. In the current situation, there is no good solution that wouldn't throw the entire country into a bloody civil war.</p><p>But the early protests were not violent. It wasn't until a few violent protesters lashed out against government forces, as was also the case in Seattle and Milan, that the true revolt began in earnest.</p><p>There are many who believe that an energized, educated citizenry is crucial to a free society. But I'll tell you now that a lethargic, dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence. Energy and knowledge lead to discontent, and discontent leads to violence. Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.</p><p>When the EFF tries to play gotcha with the Bush Administration, in their minds they are doing the right thing. However pure their motives, their methods are not thought through. Like children on the playground, they only look at today and their own goals.</p><p>Whatever is in those documents is useless. We face our current situation as reality, not because someone once wrote something somewhere in confidential documents. Lobby to change the laws, which are public for all to see. Don't foment anger because there is no peace at the end of that road.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bloodshed and violence going on in Iran right now is precisely what happens when you pit a corrupt government against a small band of rabble rousers .
Let it be clear that I am not saying that the protesters in Iran are n't justified in protesting the elections , or even that the violence against them is in any way justified .
The deaths are senseless and tragic .
In the current situation , there is no good solution that would n't throw the entire country into a bloody civil war.But the early protests were not violent .
It was n't until a few violent protesters lashed out against government forces , as was also the case in Seattle and Milan , that the true revolt began in earnest.There are many who believe that an energized , educated citizenry is crucial to a free society .
But I 'll tell you now that a lethargic , dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence .
Energy and knowledge lead to discontent , and discontent leads to violence .
Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.When the EFF tries to play gotcha with the Bush Administration , in their minds they are doing the right thing .
However pure their motives , their methods are not thought through .
Like children on the playground , they only look at today and their own goals.Whatever is in those documents is useless .
We face our current situation as reality , not because someone once wrote something somewhere in confidential documents .
Lobby to change the laws , which are public for all to see .
Do n't foment anger because there is no peace at the end of that road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bloodshed and violence going on in Iran right now is precisely what happens when you pit a corrupt government against a small band of rabble rousers.
Let it be clear that I am not saying that the protesters in Iran aren't justified in protesting the elections, or even that the violence against them is in any way justified.
The deaths are senseless and tragic.
In the current situation, there is no good solution that wouldn't throw the entire country into a bloody civil war.But the early protests were not violent.
It wasn't until a few violent protesters lashed out against government forces, as was also the case in Seattle and Milan, that the true revolt began in earnest.There are many who believe that an energized, educated citizenry is crucial to a free society.
But I'll tell you now that a lethargic, dumb citizenry is the true key to both freedom and affluence.
Energy and knowledge lead to discontent, and discontent leads to violence.
Lethargy and ignorance preserve the status quo which is typically comfortable for all involved.When the EFF tries to play gotcha with the Bush Administration, in their minds they are doing the right thing.
However pure their motives, their methods are not thought through.
Like children on the playground, they only look at today and their own goals.Whatever is in those documents is useless.
We face our current situation as reality, not because someone once wrote something somewhere in confidential documents.
Lobby to change the laws, which are public for all to see.
Don't foment anger because there is no peace at the end of that road.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28414893</id>
	<title>Ministry of National Security</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245590100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're thinking of "national security" as meaning what the words mean to a regular person, i.e. the literal meaning. Just remember your Orwell. What "national" means to government is "private business," while "security" means "harmful to regular people." When a government says "national security" the most frequent meaning is "multinational business interests that take from the public" though it sometimes applies to smaller local businesses, and occasionally can mean "military acts to hide from the public" (this one has the "blowback" caveat, which is quite a nuisance for the government to hide and the public to comprehend).</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're thinking of " national security " as meaning what the words mean to a regular person , i.e .
the literal meaning .
Just remember your Orwell .
What " national " means to government is " private business , " while " security " means " harmful to regular people .
" When a government says " national security " the most frequent meaning is " multinational business interests that take from the public " though it sometimes applies to smaller local businesses , and occasionally can mean " military acts to hide from the public " ( this one has the " blowback " caveat , which is quite a nuisance for the government to hide and the public to comprehend ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're thinking of "national security" as meaning what the words mean to a regular person, i.e.
the literal meaning.
Just remember your Orwell.
What "national" means to government is "private business," while "security" means "harmful to regular people.
" When a government says "national security" the most frequent meaning is "multinational business interests that take from the public" though it sometimes applies to smaller local businesses, and occasionally can mean "military acts to hide from the public" (this one has the "blowback" caveat, which is quite a nuisance for the government to hide and the public to comprehend).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410345</id>
	<title>Pirate Wars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, After ACTA passes and the civil unrest sparks the Pirate Wars of 2013, we'll have a cool pirate decal as banner and logo. that's good enough for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , After ACTA passes and the civil unrest sparks the Pirate Wars of 2013 , we 'll have a cool pirate decal as banner and logo .
that 's good enough for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, After ACTA passes and the civil unrest sparks the Pirate Wars of 2013, we'll have a cool pirate decal as banner and logo.
that's good enough for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049</id>
	<title>Change...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245578580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could use some<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could use some : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could use some :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409689</id>
	<title>Get a load of that bullshit.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245587940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'state secret' 'bush era policy'. we dont give a crap. this thing is not something related to internal affairs or security. its being FORCED on every country. and it affects citizen's individual rights, personal freedoms. if american legal system is SO stupid as to allow a law that no citizen has seen to be forced upon citizens, europe isnt that stupid. it will be sued and obtained in europe, and probably Eu will pull the plug on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'state secret ' 'bush era policy' .
we dont give a crap .
this thing is not something related to internal affairs or security .
its being FORCED on every country .
and it affects citizen 's individual rights , personal freedoms .
if american legal system is SO stupid as to allow a law that no citizen has seen to be forced upon citizens , europe isnt that stupid .
it will be sued and obtained in europe , and probably Eu will pull the plug on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'state secret' 'bush era policy'.
we dont give a crap.
this thing is not something related to internal affairs or security.
its being FORCED on every country.
and it affects citizen's individual rights, personal freedoms.
if american legal system is SO stupid as to allow a law that no citizen has seen to be forced upon citizens, europe isnt that stupid.
it will be sued and obtained in europe, and probably Eu will pull the plug on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411703</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-Internet Freedom Agreement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245607800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The goal is to send 4chan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... to jail.</p></div><p>Anyone here have a problem with that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The goal is to send 4chan ... to jail.Anyone here have a problem with that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The goal is to send 4chan ... to jail.Anyone here have a problem with that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28425045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28419569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28414893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_2018255_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28425045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410185
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412679
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409453
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409503
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410277
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410407
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411949
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410233
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28408981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410359
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28413007
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409133
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28414893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409637
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28412759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409575
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409701
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409147
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28411537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28410905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_2018255.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28409581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_2018255.28419569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
