<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_20_1547226</id>
	<title>400 Battle Bots Fight, Toss Enemies At RoboGames Competition</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1245517260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.automationmag.com/" rel="nofollow">Andre</a> writes <i>"The 6th annual RoboGames were held in San Francisco last weekend. They welcomed <a href="http://www.automationmag.com/robotics/features/robots-warriors-clash-at-robogames-and-canadian-champ-lands-gold.html">a horde of 400 non-sentient, metallic warriors</a> to do violent battle &mdash; against <em>each other</em>, of course. This army of remote-controlled and autonomous combat robots, along with walking humanoids, soccer 'bots, sumo 'bots and even androids that do kung-fu, was put to the test. Among the big <a href="http://robogames.net/2009.php">winners</a> was Canadian-made 'Ziggy' &mdash; one of the combatants in the 340-pound, super-heavyweight division (the biggest division) &mdash; who took home a gold medal for the <em>fourth</em> year in a row. The bionic brute proved its might against its final opponent, the 'Juggernaut,' by tossing it around like an empty pop can (and promptly making a mockery of its name) using a pneumatic flipper. Ziggy's newly-improved weapon results in unwanted (but totally cool) free-flying lessons for its opponents. At full power, the flipper can launch an opponent to the arena ceiling."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Andre writes " The 6th annual RoboGames were held in San Francisco last weekend .
They welcomed a horde of 400 non-sentient , metallic warriors to do violent battle    against each other , of course .
This army of remote-controlled and autonomous combat robots , along with walking humanoids , soccer 'bots , sumo 'bots and even androids that do kung-fu , was put to the test .
Among the big winners was Canadian-made 'Ziggy '    one of the combatants in the 340-pound , super-heavyweight division ( the biggest division )    who took home a gold medal for the fourth year in a row .
The bionic brute proved its might against its final opponent , the 'Juggernaut, ' by tossing it around like an empty pop can ( and promptly making a mockery of its name ) using a pneumatic flipper .
Ziggy 's newly-improved weapon results in unwanted ( but totally cool ) free-flying lessons for its opponents .
At full power , the flipper can launch an opponent to the arena ceiling .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Andre writes "The 6th annual RoboGames were held in San Francisco last weekend.
They welcomed a horde of 400 non-sentient, metallic warriors to do violent battle — against each other, of course.
This army of remote-controlled and autonomous combat robots, along with walking humanoids, soccer 'bots, sumo 'bots and even androids that do kung-fu, was put to the test.
Among the big winners was Canadian-made 'Ziggy' — one of the combatants in the 340-pound, super-heavyweight division (the biggest division) — who took home a gold medal for the fourth year in a row.
The bionic brute proved its might against its final opponent, the 'Juggernaut,' by tossing it around like an empty pop can (and promptly making a mockery of its name) using a pneumatic flipper.
Ziggy's newly-improved weapon results in unwanted (but totally cool) free-flying lessons for its opponents.
At full power, the flipper can launch an opponent to the arena ceiling.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407191</id>
	<title>Re:ESPN....man....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245514560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos [youtube.com]

I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channel</p></div><p>Robot porn?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos [ youtube.com ] I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channelRobot porn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos [youtube.com]

I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channelRobot porn?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402785</id>
	<title>Arena ceiling?</title>
	<author>Mystra007</author>
	<datestamp>1245521820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Arena Ceiling Cat is dodging incoming flying robots...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Arena Ceiling Cat is dodging incoming flying robots.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arena Ceiling Cat is dodging incoming flying robots...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28410817</id>
	<title>MindRover: The Europa Project</title>
	<author>Bones3D\_mac</author>
	<datestamp>1245600420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just wanted to take a moment to remember <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/pc-games/mindrover-the-europa-project/4505-9696\_7-31851250.html" title="cnet.com">MindRover</a> [cnet.com], a great game that never really got to see it's full potential.</p><p>For the uninformed, MindRover was a game where you'd build autonomous robots and program them for a wide range of events, ranging from races to combat. The programming was done through a process called "wiring", where you'd link your robot's physical components (sensors, motors, weapons, etc...) to logic circuits of varying complexity through flow charts.</p><p>(It sounds tedious, but it gets to be fun once you figure out how it works.)</p><p>The game originally started out on Windows and was later ported to linux and Mac OS X.</p><p>If you can still find it, it's worth a look.</p><p>In the mean time, has anyone found some other robotics apps like MindRover? I found one called <a href="http://www.cyberbotics.com/products/webots/index.html" title="cyberbotics.com">WebBots</a> [cyberbotics.com] a few months ago, but it carries a $3,200 price tag. (Not exactly ideal for "playing around"...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wanted to take a moment to remember MindRover [ cnet.com ] , a great game that never really got to see it 's full potential.For the uninformed , MindRover was a game where you 'd build autonomous robots and program them for a wide range of events , ranging from races to combat .
The programming was done through a process called " wiring " , where you 'd link your robot 's physical components ( sensors , motors , weapons , etc... ) to logic circuits of varying complexity through flow charts .
( It sounds tedious , but it gets to be fun once you figure out how it works .
) The game originally started out on Windows and was later ported to linux and Mac OS X.If you can still find it , it 's worth a look.In the mean time , has anyone found some other robotics apps like MindRover ?
I found one called WebBots [ cyberbotics.com ] a few months ago , but it carries a $ 3,200 price tag .
( Not exactly ideal for " playing around " ... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wanted to take a moment to remember MindRover [cnet.com], a great game that never really got to see it's full potential.For the uninformed, MindRover was a game where you'd build autonomous robots and program them for a wide range of events, ranging from races to combat.
The programming was done through a process called "wiring", where you'd link your robot's physical components (sensors, motors, weapons, etc...) to logic circuits of varying complexity through flow charts.
(It sounds tedious, but it gets to be fun once you figure out how it works.
)The game originally started out on Windows and was later ported to linux and Mac OS X.If you can still find it, it's worth a look.In the mean time, has anyone found some other robotics apps like MindRover?
I found one called WebBots [cyberbotics.com] a few months ago, but it carries a $3,200 price tag.
(Not exactly ideal for "playing around"...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28412771</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots = imba</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245615840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, this brings me back. I remember when I was in high school thinking that the flip-bot would have been beatable simply by taking advantage of it's limited range. I always thought that a pair of pikes on each face of a bot would keep the flip-bot at a distance and something like a Giant Hammer or maybe an Industrial Saw would finish the job. The pikes would first keep the Flip-bot at a distance preventing it from getting underneath the center of gravity and also act as a range finder for the weapon. There must have been something in the rules because it just seemed to obvious to me. It's a shame that by the time I had the money and know how to build one the show was off the air so I lost interest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , this brings me back .
I remember when I was in high school thinking that the flip-bot would have been beatable simply by taking advantage of it 's limited range .
I always thought that a pair of pikes on each face of a bot would keep the flip-bot at a distance and something like a Giant Hammer or maybe an Industrial Saw would finish the job .
The pikes would first keep the Flip-bot at a distance preventing it from getting underneath the center of gravity and also act as a range finder for the weapon .
There must have been something in the rules because it just seemed to obvious to me .
It 's a shame that by the time I had the money and know how to build one the show was off the air so I lost interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, this brings me back.
I remember when I was in high school thinking that the flip-bot would have been beatable simply by taking advantage of it's limited range.
I always thought that a pair of pikes on each face of a bot would keep the flip-bot at a distance and something like a Giant Hammer or maybe an Industrial Saw would finish the job.
The pikes would first keep the Flip-bot at a distance preventing it from getting underneath the center of gravity and also act as a range finder for the weapon.
There must have been something in the rules because it just seemed to obvious to me.
It's a shame that by the time I had the money and know how to build one the show was off the air so I lost interest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403751</id>
	<title>Re:ESPN....man....</title>
	<author>c</author>
	<datestamp>1245529800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day.</p><p>Yes, it certainly was "amazing". They took a 30 minute show which they could have filled start-to-finish with footage of RC vehicles beating the crap out of each other, and they added all the assorted filler junk like questionable"expert" analysis and commentary, talking head interviews, builder backgrounds, etc. Oh, and some random supermodel down in "the pit".</p><p>The end result was more like pro-wrestling than anything I could recognize as a science show.</p><p>c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day.Yes , it certainly was " amazing " .
They took a 30 minute show which they could have filled start-to-finish with footage of RC vehicles beating the crap out of each other , and they added all the assorted filler junk like questionable " expert " analysis and commentary , talking head interviews , builder backgrounds , etc .
Oh , and some random supermodel down in " the pit " .The end result was more like pro-wrestling than anything I could recognize as a science show.c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day.Yes, it certainly was "amazing".
They took a 30 minute show which they could have filled start-to-finish with footage of RC vehicles beating the crap out of each other, and they added all the assorted filler junk like questionable"expert" analysis and commentary, talking head interviews, builder backgrounds, etc.
Oh, and some random supermodel down in "the pit".The end result was more like pro-wrestling than anything I could recognize as a science show.c.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883</id>
	<title>Was Homer participating?</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1245522480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't spoil this but if you haven't seen the episode of the Simpson's where Bart is "helped" by Homer to compete in a robot competition you absolutely must.  I think it was one of the funniest episodes EVER at least for us slashdotters.  (Funnier even than the treehouse of horrors!).</p><p>Has anyone ever been caught "participating" in one of these events in the way Homer did?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't spoil this but if you have n't seen the episode of the Simpson 's where Bart is " helped " by Homer to compete in a robot competition you absolutely must .
I think it was one of the funniest episodes EVER at least for us slashdotters .
( Funnier even than the treehouse of horrors !
) .Has anyone ever been caught " participating " in one of these events in the way Homer did ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't spoil this but if you haven't seen the episode of the Simpson's where Bart is "helped" by Homer to compete in a robot competition you absolutely must.
I think it was one of the funniest episodes EVER at least for us slashdotters.
(Funnier even than the treehouse of horrors!
).Has anyone ever been caught "participating" in one of these events in the way Homer did?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402729</id>
	<title>Best... Competition</title>
	<author>lorenlal</author>
	<datestamp>1245521340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>EVAR.</htmltext>
<tokenext>EVAR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EVAR.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403011</id>
	<title>Ignore the "battle bots". Check out the humanoids.</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1245523440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The "battle bots" are mostly the usual stupid R/C "battery-motor-wheels" stuff. But some of the humanoid hobbyist robots on display are getting good.  Dynamixel servos, which have useful feedback to the controller, are taking over. (They have a 1mb/sec polled serial link shared by all the servos.  It's RS-485, which is 1970s technology, but that's progress over the usual one-way PWM interface.)  The latest prototype Dynamixel servos can reach 500 degrees/sec, which means there's hope of making legged running work.  Some of the humanoid robots have a 6DOF inertial unit, although balancing software is way below the Big Dog level and none of the humanoids had force-sensing feet.
</p><p>
The better hobbyist humanoids are almost at the hardware level at which Asimo/Big Dog performance becomes possible.  The more advanced robot hobbyists now understand about ZMP.  We're getting there.
</p><p>
For better coverage, see <a href="http://www.robots-dreams.com/" title="robots-dreams.com">Robots-Dreams</a> [robots-dreams.com], which also covers the Japanese hobbyist robot scene.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " battle bots " are mostly the usual stupid R/C " battery-motor-wheels " stuff .
But some of the humanoid hobbyist robots on display are getting good .
Dynamixel servos , which have useful feedback to the controller , are taking over .
( They have a 1mb/sec polled serial link shared by all the servos .
It 's RS-485 , which is 1970s technology , but that 's progress over the usual one-way PWM interface .
) The latest prototype Dynamixel servos can reach 500 degrees/sec , which means there 's hope of making legged running work .
Some of the humanoid robots have a 6DOF inertial unit , although balancing software is way below the Big Dog level and none of the humanoids had force-sensing feet .
The better hobbyist humanoids are almost at the hardware level at which Asimo/Big Dog performance becomes possible .
The more advanced robot hobbyists now understand about ZMP .
We 're getting there .
For better coverage , see Robots-Dreams [ robots-dreams.com ] , which also covers the Japanese hobbyist robot scene .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The "battle bots" are mostly the usual stupid R/C "battery-motor-wheels" stuff.
But some of the humanoid hobbyist robots on display are getting good.
Dynamixel servos, which have useful feedback to the controller, are taking over.
(They have a 1mb/sec polled serial link shared by all the servos.
It's RS-485, which is 1970s technology, but that's progress over the usual one-way PWM interface.
)  The latest prototype Dynamixel servos can reach 500 degrees/sec, which means there's hope of making legged running work.
Some of the humanoid robots have a 6DOF inertial unit, although balancing software is way below the Big Dog level and none of the humanoids had force-sensing feet.
The better hobbyist humanoids are almost at the hardware level at which Asimo/Big Dog performance becomes possible.
The more advanced robot hobbyists now understand about ZMP.
We're getting there.
For better coverage, see Robots-Dreams [robots-dreams.com], which also covers the Japanese hobbyist robot scene.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404975</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots = imba</title>
	<author>InfernalRuss</author>
	<datestamp>1245497820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In UK's robot wars series there were always 2 robots that stood out to me "Razer" and "hypnodisc" these things were lethal!

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCzrBR3cyCg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCzrBR3cyCg</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>In UK 's robot wars series there were always 2 robots that stood out to me " Razer " and " hypnodisc " these things were lethal !
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = rCzrBR3cyCg [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In UK's robot wars series there were always 2 robots that stood out to me "Razer" and "hypnodisc" these things were lethal!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCzrBR3cyCg [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28410551</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots = imba</title>
	<author>Thelasko</author>
	<datestamp>1245598140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OCW\_fHsHko&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">Apparently flamethrowers are allowed.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently flamethrowers are allowed .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently flamethrowers are allowed.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403525</id>
	<title>BattleBots sucked because they were not bots</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245527700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Battlebots did indeed have production values, but I always hated the show because they were just fancy remote controlled cars.</p><p>I want to see real human crafted AI having to decide what is up in the arena with saws and flame and terrible liquids.  I want spectators to be required to sit no less than a half-mile away behind protective screens - and also have to wear goggles and helmets.</p><p>Robot fighting could be really fun, if done right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Battlebots did indeed have production values , but I always hated the show because they were just fancy remote controlled cars.I want to see real human crafted AI having to decide what is up in the arena with saws and flame and terrible liquids .
I want spectators to be required to sit no less than a half-mile away behind protective screens - and also have to wear goggles and helmets.Robot fighting could be really fun , if done right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Battlebots did indeed have production values, but I always hated the show because they were just fancy remote controlled cars.I want to see real human crafted AI having to decide what is up in the arena with saws and flame and terrible liquids.
I want spectators to be required to sit no less than a half-mile away behind protective screens - and also have to wear goggles and helmets.Robot fighting could be really fun, if done right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405937</id>
	<title>Re:Was Homer participating?</title>
	<author>sentientbeing</author>
	<datestamp>1245503640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Danny Baker did it with an R2D2. It was so good it even fooled darth Vader, and he BUILT the thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Danny Baker did it with an R2D2 .
It was so good it even fooled darth Vader , and he BUILT the thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Danny Baker did it with an R2D2.
It was so good it even fooled darth Vader, and he BUILT the thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28406463</id>
	<title>Flippers and Wedges</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245507420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really wish they would ditch the flat floor concept in RC bot combat.  It leads to very boring battles largely between flippers and wedges zipping around.  If it were run on a dirt or sculpted 3D course, competitor tactics and design would be more radical/diverse to compensate.  Wedges and flippers would be useless with 30 degree slopes and hilltops.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really wish they would ditch the flat floor concept in RC bot combat .
It leads to very boring battles largely between flippers and wedges zipping around .
If it were run on a dirt or sculpted 3D course , competitor tactics and design would be more radical/diverse to compensate .
Wedges and flippers would be useless with 30 degree slopes and hilltops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really wish they would ditch the flat floor concept in RC bot combat.
It leads to very boring battles largely between flippers and wedges zipping around.
If it were run on a dirt or sculpted 3D course, competitor tactics and design would be more radical/diverse to compensate.
Wedges and flippers would be useless with 30 degree slopes and hilltops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28409377</id>
	<title>Boring</title>
	<author>crossmr</author>
	<datestamp>1245583080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've watched countless battles but I can't muster 1/10th of the enthusiasm some of these announcers seem to have. They're literally losing their mind when all the bots are doing is sitting there bumping in to each other. They desperately need to relax the rules on weapons. I assume this is why we don't see projectiles, explosives, electric shock, etc. As well as form factor. I can't imagine faced with all the flipper bots that someone hasn't just thought "Why don't I turn this guy into some kind of human style shape, or something without a circular base?"</p><p>keep the competitors safe in protected booths and let the bots loose with crazy weapons and arenas. It might prove to be actually be interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've watched countless battles but I ca n't muster 1/10th of the enthusiasm some of these announcers seem to have .
They 're literally losing their mind when all the bots are doing is sitting there bumping in to each other .
They desperately need to relax the rules on weapons .
I assume this is why we do n't see projectiles , explosives , electric shock , etc .
As well as form factor .
I ca n't imagine faced with all the flipper bots that someone has n't just thought " Why do n't I turn this guy into some kind of human style shape , or something without a circular base ?
" keep the competitors safe in protected booths and let the bots loose with crazy weapons and arenas .
It might prove to be actually be interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've watched countless battles but I can't muster 1/10th of the enthusiasm some of these announcers seem to have.
They're literally losing their mind when all the bots are doing is sitting there bumping in to each other.
They desperately need to relax the rules on weapons.
I assume this is why we don't see projectiles, explosives, electric shock, etc.
As well as form factor.
I can't imagine faced with all the flipper bots that someone hasn't just thought "Why don't I turn this guy into some kind of human style shape, or something without a circular base?
"keep the competitors safe in protected booths and let the bots loose with crazy weapons and arenas.
It might prove to be actually be interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28406803</id>
	<title>Ziggy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245510720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deploy all ZIGS! For great justice!<br>I for one welcome our new robotic overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deploy all ZIGS !
For great justice ! I for one welcome our new robotic overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deploy all ZIGS!
For great justice!I for one welcome our new robotic overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402731</id>
	<title>The arena ceiling!?</title>
	<author>JCSoRocks</author>
	<datestamp>1245521340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is *awesome*. How is this not on TV anymore? Anyone know if it's on the Internet someplace? (other than really awful shaky YouTube crap.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is * awesome * .
How is this not on TV anymore ?
Anyone know if it 's on the Internet someplace ?
( other than really awful shaky YouTube crap .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is *awesome*.
How is this not on TV anymore?
Anyone know if it's on the Internet someplace?
(other than really awful shaky YouTube crap.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969</id>
	<title>ESPN....man....</title>
	<author>VinylRecords</author>
	<datestamp>1245523140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who works in the ABC/ESPN hierarchy, and is also a big nerd, I was blown away when rumor was that ESPN was bringing back the BattleBots brand to television. Eventually it was official that ESPN was looking to display a robot fighting competition on ESPNU (the College brand for ESPN) and see how much interest there was in it. The competition was between College teams and wasn't nearly the production level of the BattleBots show that was on Comedy Central years before.</p><p>And unfortunately that all fell through...nothing ever came out of it. ESPN didn't show any robot competition on any of its branded stations (or even on the web at ESPN360).</p><p>BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day. High end production values, commentary and color analysis, and of course machines killing each other. Live crowd reactions, story lines, personalities (of the drivers)....I can't believe ESPN missed this opportunity.</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/03/11/064233/BattleBots-amp-ESPN-Strike-TV-Deal" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/03/11/064233/BattleBots-amp-ESPN-Strike-TV-Deal</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://www.battlebots.com/BattleBots.com/Events.html" title="battlebots.com">http://www.battlebots.com/BattleBots.com/Events.html</a> [battlebots.com]</p><p>I guess CBS Sports Online is going to put up footage eventually of the competition.</p><p>Either way I remember rooting for Bio-Hazard vs Vlad the Impaler as much as I root for Sox vs Yankees.</p><p>I wish stuff like this would make a comeback. Especially because it's a nice way to generate interest in science, robotics, mechanics, engineering, math, and critical thinking skills for children as well as highly entertaining.</p><p>Lastly YouTube proving it's worth for me once again:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channel...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who works in the ABC/ESPN hierarchy , and is also a big nerd , I was blown away when rumor was that ESPN was bringing back the BattleBots brand to television .
Eventually it was official that ESPN was looking to display a robot fighting competition on ESPNU ( the College brand for ESPN ) and see how much interest there was in it .
The competition was between College teams and was n't nearly the production level of the BattleBots show that was on Comedy Central years before.And unfortunately that all fell through...nothing ever came out of it .
ESPN did n't show any robot competition on any of its branded stations ( or even on the web at ESPN360 ) .BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day .
High end production values , commentary and color analysis , and of course machines killing each other .
Live crowd reactions , story lines , personalities ( of the drivers ) ....I ca n't believe ESPN missed this opportunity.http : //science.slashdot.org/story/08/03/11/064233/BattleBots-amp-ESPN-Strike-TV-Deal [ slashdot.org ] http : //www.battlebots.com/BattleBots.com/Events.html [ battlebots.com ] I guess CBS Sports Online is going to put up footage eventually of the competition.Either way I remember rooting for Bio-Hazard vs Vlad the Impaler as much as I root for Sox vs Yankees.I wish stuff like this would make a comeback .
Especially because it 's a nice way to generate interest in science , robotics , mechanics , engineering , math , and critical thinking skills for children as well as highly entertaining.Lastly YouTube proving it 's worth for me once again : http : //www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos [ youtube.com ] I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channel.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who works in the ABC/ESPN hierarchy, and is also a big nerd, I was blown away when rumor was that ESPN was bringing back the BattleBots brand to television.
Eventually it was official that ESPN was looking to display a robot fighting competition on ESPNU (the College brand for ESPN) and see how much interest there was in it.
The competition was between College teams and wasn't nearly the production level of the BattleBots show that was on Comedy Central years before.And unfortunately that all fell through...nothing ever came out of it.
ESPN didn't show any robot competition on any of its branded stations (or even on the web at ESPN360).BattleBots on Comedy Central was amazing back in the day.
High end production values, commentary and color analysis, and of course machines killing each other.
Live crowd reactions, story lines, personalities (of the drivers)....I can't believe ESPN missed this opportunity.http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/03/11/064233/BattleBots-amp-ESPN-Strike-TV-Deal [slashdot.org]http://www.battlebots.com/BattleBots.com/Events.html [battlebots.com]I guess CBS Sports Online is going to put up footage eventually of the competition.Either way I remember rooting for Bio-Hazard vs Vlad the Impaler as much as I root for Sox vs Yankees.I wish stuff like this would make a comeback.
Especially because it's a nice way to generate interest in science, robotics, mechanics, engineering, math, and critical thinking skills for children as well as highly entertaining.Lastly YouTube proving it's worth for me once again:http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlebotvideos [youtube.com]I think you can figure out what kind of videos are on that channel...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403463</id>
	<title>'Remote-Control Autonomous'</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1245527280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alright, what the hell does 'remote-control autonomous' even mean? I think we're getting scammed by calling it that. If it's just 'remote control', then I doubt very much it's what could be called 'robot'. Robotic, maybe, but otherwise it's just humans against humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright , what the hell does 'remote-control autonomous ' even mean ?
I think we 're getting scammed by calling it that .
If it 's just 'remote control ' , then I doubt very much it 's what could be called 'robot' .
Robotic , maybe , but otherwise it 's just humans against humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright, what the hell does 'remote-control autonomous' even mean?
I think we're getting scammed by calling it that.
If it's just 'remote control', then I doubt very much it's what could be called 'robot'.
Robotic, maybe, but otherwise it's just humans against humans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402767</id>
	<title>400 ACs Fight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245521700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Toss firsties at FrostPost competition</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Toss firsties at FrostPost competition</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Toss firsties at FrostPost competition</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402693</id>
	<title>Hasta la vista</title>
	<author>juanergie</author>
	<datestamp>1245521100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>baby</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>baby</tokentext>
<sentencetext>baby</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404185</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots are weak</title>
	<author>Hubbell</author>
	<datestamp>1245491100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ziggy is only an example of a superheavy flipbot.  I saw one entrant on battlebots that was a dual sided flipper, the arm could be used to flip bots over, as well as flip the bot itself over (the flipper went both ways, and the bot was workable in the same way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ziggy is only an example of a superheavy flipbot .
I saw one entrant on battlebots that was a dual sided flipper , the arm could be used to flip bots over , as well as flip the bot itself over ( the flipper went both ways , and the bot was workable in the same way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ziggy is only an example of a superheavy flipbot.
I saw one entrant on battlebots that was a dual sided flipper, the arm could be used to flip bots over, as well as flip the bot itself over (the flipper went both ways, and the bot was workable in the same way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559</id>
	<title>Flipbots are weak</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245528000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say don't ban flipbots.</p><p>Flipbots are weak, a team just needs to exploit the weakness.  Look at Ziggy, after it flips you it's totally exposed.</p><p>What about an Enveloper bot that grabs the flipper as it is thrust underneath and uses the combination of the flip and its own mass to tear the flipper off?</p><p>What about a Foldbot that when you flip it, simply has half of it fold over the other half and use the action to drive a spike into the other bot?</p><p>That's a lot of energy the flipbots are giving away for free.  Don't let it go to waste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say do n't ban flipbots.Flipbots are weak , a team just needs to exploit the weakness .
Look at Ziggy , after it flips you it 's totally exposed.What about an Enveloper bot that grabs the flipper as it is thrust underneath and uses the combination of the flip and its own mass to tear the flipper off ? What about a Foldbot that when you flip it , simply has half of it fold over the other half and use the action to drive a spike into the other bot ? That 's a lot of energy the flipbots are giving away for free .
Do n't let it go to waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say don't ban flipbots.Flipbots are weak, a team just needs to exploit the weakness.
Look at Ziggy, after it flips you it's totally exposed.What about an Enveloper bot that grabs the flipper as it is thrust underneath and uses the combination of the flip and its own mass to tear the flipper off?What about a Foldbot that when you flip it, simply has half of it fold over the other half and use the action to drive a spike into the other bot?That's a lot of energy the flipbots are giving away for free.
Don't let it go to waste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404219</id>
	<title>Re:Was Homer participating?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245491460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bob Herzog did it in Muncie, but I'm not sure if he was caught.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bob Herzog did it in Muncie , but I 'm not sure if he was caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bob Herzog did it in Muncie, but I'm not sure if he was caught.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402865</id>
	<title>im not fooled</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah thats how it starts off "ohhh awwww look cute little robots arent they funny"<br> <br>Then later its with the running and the screaming and the shooting and buildings blowing up the time travel. Then its with the "Hello this is a final recorded message from john connor last of the humans"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah thats how it starts off " ohhh awwww look cute little robots arent they funny " Then later its with the running and the screaming and the shooting and buildings blowing up the time travel .
Then its with the " Hello this is a final recorded message from john connor last of the humans "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah thats how it starts off "ohhh awwww look cute little robots arent they funny" Then later its with the running and the screaming and the shooting and buildings blowing up the time travel.
Then its with the "Hello this is a final recorded message from john connor last of the humans"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403461</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>jayhawk88</author>
	<datestamp>1245527220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...when the robots eventually take over and kill all humans, do you think this day will be remembered as sort of a Robot Memorial Day? Will it be marked like we mark 9/11 or 12/7?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...when the robots eventually take over and kill all humans , do you think this day will be remembered as sort of a Robot Memorial Day ?
Will it be marked like we mark 9/11 or 12/7 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...when the robots eventually take over and kill all humans, do you think this day will be remembered as sort of a Robot Memorial Day?
Will it be marked like we mark 9/11 or 12/7?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402743</id>
	<title>First rule of Robot Fight club</title>
	<author>gijoel</author>
	<datestamp>1245521460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is we don't talk about robot fight club. The Second rule is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <br> <br>

*pulls out a flash card*

<br> <br> Oh, ah no smoking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is we do n't talk about robot fight club .
The Second rule is .. . * pulls out a flash card * Oh , ah no smoking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is we don't talk about robot fight club.
The Second rule is ...  

*pulls out a flash card*

  Oh, ah no smoking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</id>
	<title>Flipbots = imba</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245521460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember watching battlebots and the matches were always good unless one of the bots was a flipbot (what ziggy is, and now almost all of them are cause it's an incredibly overpowered design) and feel that in such competitions flipbots should be banned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember watching battlebots and the matches were always good unless one of the bots was a flipbot ( what ziggy is , and now almost all of them are cause it 's an incredibly overpowered design ) and feel that in such competitions flipbots should be banned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember watching battlebots and the matches were always good unless one of the bots was a flipbot (what ziggy is, and now almost all of them are cause it's an incredibly overpowered design) and feel that in such competitions flipbots should be banned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404325</id>
	<title>"non-sentient" for now. This technology will lead</title>
	<author>Dr\_Ken</author>
	<datestamp>1245492600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ultimately to an actual Terminator style killer android. It's bound to. Give America's boundless and insatiable Pentagon and its parasitical enable in the military/industrial complex some group within the political class will urge the military brass to build them. Look at the logic. DARPA money for the universities and think tanks, big contract money for the war industries, big new budgets for the Pentagon, jobs for congressional supporters districts, and no more worrying about casualty reports on the Six O'clock news. Everyone body wins! Until <a href="http://terminator.wikia.com/wiki/Skynet" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">Sky Net nukes us all.</a> [wikia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>ultimately to an actual Terminator style killer android .
It 's bound to .
Give America 's boundless and insatiable Pentagon and its parasitical enable in the military/industrial complex some group within the political class will urge the military brass to build them .
Look at the logic .
DARPA money for the universities and think tanks , big contract money for the war industries , big new budgets for the Pentagon , jobs for congressional supporters districts , and no more worrying about casualty reports on the Six O'clock news .
Everyone body wins !
Until Sky Net nukes us all .
[ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ultimately to an actual Terminator style killer android.
It's bound to.
Give America's boundless and insatiable Pentagon and its parasitical enable in the military/industrial complex some group within the political class will urge the military brass to build them.
Look at the logic.
DARPA money for the universities and think tanks, big contract money for the war industries, big new budgets for the Pentagon, jobs for congressional supporters districts, and no more worrying about casualty reports on the Six O'clock news.
Everyone body wins!
Until Sky Net nukes us all.
[wikia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402939</id>
	<title>'bots?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245522840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remote control cars with armor and weapons strapped on actually.</p><p>I understand that the reason for the form factor in this environment, but please, let's be realistic about this. This isn't anything exciting from a tech perspective.  Hell, I could have seen the -exact same- thing 9 years ago on the original battlebots. At least that had Bill Nye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remote control cars with armor and weapons strapped on actually.I understand that the reason for the form factor in this environment , but please , let 's be realistic about this .
This is n't anything exciting from a tech perspective .
Hell , I could have seen the -exact same- thing 9 years ago on the original battlebots .
At least that had Bill Nye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remote control cars with armor and weapons strapped on actually.I understand that the reason for the form factor in this environment, but please, let's be realistic about this.
This isn't anything exciting from a tech perspective.
Hell, I could have seen the -exact same- thing 9 years ago on the original battlebots.
At least that had Bill Nye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404849</id>
	<title>*not* 400, it was 63 - I was there</title>
	<author>societyofrobots</author>
	<datestamp>1245496920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There were only ~63 battlebots there. The other robots were mostly autonomous, and were not involved in combat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There were only ~ 63 battlebots there .
The other robots were mostly autonomous , and were not involved in combat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There were only ~63 battlebots there.
The other robots were mostly autonomous, and were not involved in combat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407139</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots are weak</title>
	<author>Anonymatt</author>
	<datestamp>1245513960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There're other types to fight before you happened to get to a flipbot. Maybe in a few years there'll be autonomous subsystems that control responses to things like flipping apparatus. You know, robot vision to track parts. You could have a camera onboard that feeds to the operators. It would track movement and the operator could assist in guiding its tracking by selecting paths with a stylus or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 're other types to fight before you happened to get to a flipbot .
Maybe in a few years there 'll be autonomous subsystems that control responses to things like flipping apparatus .
You know , robot vision to track parts .
You could have a camera onboard that feeds to the operators .
It would track movement and the operator could assist in guiding its tracking by selecting paths with a stylus or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There're other types to fight before you happened to get to a flipbot.
Maybe in a few years there'll be autonomous subsystems that control responses to things like flipping apparatus.
You know, robot vision to track parts.
You could have a camera onboard that feeds to the operators.
It would track movement and the operator could assist in guiding its tracking by selecting paths with a stylus or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405743</id>
	<title>Re:Flipbots = imba</title>
	<author>PatrickThomson</author>
	<datestamp>1245502320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Robot wars here in the UK had a few contenders for alternate paradigms - there was one particularly expensive and high-tech bot that had a stabbing axe that could punch through a respectable layer of armour. There was also one that had a spiked flywheel that debuted by tearing a schoolboy entry into tiny chunks.</p><p>Problem is, if you don't have something to right yourself after a flip, you may as well just throw in the towel on your first match against a flipping bot. There was an early episode, a previously-dominating flipper bot got turned over by a wedge bot, and we thought it was all over, the announcer called it for the wedge and then the flipper bot promptly did a sumersault. The idea of self-righting never entered our minds until it happened in that match.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Robot wars here in the UK had a few contenders for alternate paradigms - there was one particularly expensive and high-tech bot that had a stabbing axe that could punch through a respectable layer of armour .
There was also one that had a spiked flywheel that debuted by tearing a schoolboy entry into tiny chunks.Problem is , if you do n't have something to right yourself after a flip , you may as well just throw in the towel on your first match against a flipping bot .
There was an early episode , a previously-dominating flipper bot got turned over by a wedge bot , and we thought it was all over , the announcer called it for the wedge and then the flipper bot promptly did a sumersault .
The idea of self-righting never entered our minds until it happened in that match .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Robot wars here in the UK had a few contenders for alternate paradigms - there was one particularly expensive and high-tech bot that had a stabbing axe that could punch through a respectable layer of armour.
There was also one that had a spiked flywheel that debuted by tearing a schoolboy entry into tiny chunks.Problem is, if you don't have something to right yourself after a flip, you may as well just throw in the towel on your first match against a flipping bot.
There was an early episode, a previously-dominating flipper bot got turned over by a wedge bot, and we thought it was all over, the announcer called it for the wedge and then the flipper bot promptly did a sumersault.
The idea of self-righting never entered our minds until it happened in that match.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402867</id>
	<title>Good thing Bob wasn't there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He'd have torn that Flipper to shreds with a DFA attack!</p><p>Oh sure, he'd probably have a few broken bones to hide, but who wouldn't believe a BBS operator in Muncie could program a fully mobile humanoid robot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 'd have torn that Flipper to shreds with a DFA attack ! Oh sure , he 'd probably have a few broken bones to hide , but who would n't believe a BBS operator in Muncie could program a fully mobile humanoid robot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He'd have torn that Flipper to shreds with a DFA attack!Oh sure, he'd probably have a few broken bones to hide, but who wouldn't believe a BBS operator in Muncie could program a fully mobile humanoid robot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28410551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28412771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_20_1547226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28410817
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28412771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28410551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28407191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28403751
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28406463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28404219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28405937
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_20_1547226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_20_1547226.28402743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
