<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_19_143203</id>
	<title>Google Voice Grabs 1 Million Phone Numbers</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245429240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>alphadogg writes <i>"Google has <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/061809-google-voice.html?hpg1=bn">reserved 1 million phone numbers</a> with Level 3, signaling that it may finally be ready to roll out its <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/12/1254241&amp;tid=217">long-anticipated Google Voice service</a>. The free service, announced in March, lets users unify their phone numbers, allowing them to have a single number through Google Voice that rings a call through to all their phones. Sources could not say when the 1 million numbers may be assigned. Level 3 has been supplying Google with phone numbers since the introduction of Google Voice, so the 1 million numbers are an indication Google is close to adding a significant number of users. A public launch has been anticipated since Google said in March the service would be 'open to new users soon.' One early user said: 'I've only been using Google Voice for a few months, but it's completely changed the way I use voicemail and communicate... When it goes public, I think the rush to grab Google Voice numbers is going to be stunning. I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>alphadogg writes " Google has reserved 1 million phone numbers with Level 3 , signaling that it may finally be ready to roll out its long-anticipated Google Voice service .
The free service , announced in March , lets users unify their phone numbers , allowing them to have a single number through Google Voice that rings a call through to all their phones .
Sources could not say when the 1 million numbers may be assigned .
Level 3 has been supplying Google with phone numbers since the introduction of Google Voice , so the 1 million numbers are an indication Google is close to adding a significant number of users .
A public launch has been anticipated since Google said in March the service would be 'open to new users soon .
' One early user said : 'I 've only been using Google Voice for a few months , but it 's completely changed the way I use voicemail and communicate... When it goes public , I think the rush to grab Google Voice numbers is going to be stunning .
I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alphadogg writes "Google has reserved 1 million phone numbers with Level 3, signaling that it may finally be ready to roll out its long-anticipated Google Voice service.
The free service, announced in March, lets users unify their phone numbers, allowing them to have a single number through Google Voice that rings a call through to all their phones.
Sources could not say when the 1 million numbers may be assigned.
Level 3 has been supplying Google with phone numbers since the introduction of Google Voice, so the 1 million numbers are an indication Google is close to adding a significant number of users.
A public launch has been anticipated since Google said in March the service would be 'open to new users soon.
' One early user said: 'I've only been using Google Voice for a few months, but it's completely changed the way I use voicemail and communicate... When it goes public, I think the rush to grab Google Voice numbers is going to be stunning.
I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392321</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now telemarketers, <b>religious freaks</b>, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.</p></div><p>Hey!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now telemarketers , religious freaks , and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.Hey !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now telemarketers, religious freaks, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.Hey!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28396285</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1245408360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Worst case, I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.</p></div><p>This was incredibly handy recently when I was moving and made the mistake of using one of those services which automatically requests quotes from several different moving companies at once. Several of these companies were calling me daily to try to get me to use their service. Fortunately, I had just given my Google Voice number instead of my cell (I don't have a landline), so  all the calls from unknown callers went straight to voicemail. On top of that, Google Voice automatically transcribed all the voicemails, so I didn't even need to listen to them, I could just skim the text of all my voicemails quickly and determine whether or not it was something worth responding to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst case , I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.This was incredibly handy recently when I was moving and made the mistake of using one of those services which automatically requests quotes from several different moving companies at once .
Several of these companies were calling me daily to try to get me to use their service .
Fortunately , I had just given my Google Voice number instead of my cell ( I do n't have a landline ) , so all the calls from unknown callers went straight to voicemail .
On top of that , Google Voice automatically transcribed all the voicemails , so I did n't even need to listen to them , I could just skim the text of all my voicemails quickly and determine whether or not it was something worth responding to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst case, I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.This was incredibly handy recently when I was moving and made the mistake of using one of those services which automatically requests quotes from several different moving companies at once.
Several of these companies were calling me daily to try to get me to use their service.
Fortunately, I had just given my Google Voice number instead of my cell (I don't have a landline), so  all the calls from unknown callers went straight to voicemail.
On top of that, Google Voice automatically transcribed all the voicemails, so I didn't even need to listen to them, I could just skim the text of all my voicemails quickly and determine whether or not it was something worth responding to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392347</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I plan to use this service in conjunction w/ my iphone and Skype. Since the Skype app works via wi-fi and just about everywhere I go I'm connected to a hotspot, I can take calls to my SkypeIn number without using minutes. Those times I'm called and not near a hotspot Skype is configured to forward to my cellular number directly so no matter what I wouldn't miss a call.</p><p>And, if I understand correctly, since I can set up default routing of numbers I'll be able to control who's important enough to get past my VM at any given time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I plan to use this service in conjunction w/ my iphone and Skype .
Since the Skype app works via wi-fi and just about everywhere I go I 'm connected to a hotspot , I can take calls to my SkypeIn number without using minutes .
Those times I 'm called and not near a hotspot Skype is configured to forward to my cellular number directly so no matter what I would n't miss a call.And , if I understand correctly , since I can set up default routing of numbers I 'll be able to control who 's important enough to get past my VM at any given time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I plan to use this service in conjunction w/ my iphone and Skype.
Since the Skype app works via wi-fi and just about everywhere I go I'm connected to a hotspot, I can take calls to my SkypeIn number without using minutes.
Those times I'm called and not near a hotspot Skype is configured to forward to my cellular number directly so no matter what I wouldn't miss a call.And, if I understand correctly, since I can set up default routing of numbers I'll be able to control who's important enough to get past my VM at any given time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393871</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>slapout</author>
	<datestamp>1245442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But how will you ever find out that your car warranty is about to expire?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But how will you ever find out that your car warranty is about to expire ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how will you ever find out that your car warranty is about to expire?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392995</id>
	<title>Re:But I don't want you to call my mobile!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245439380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My cell phone service provides a real cool solution to this problem.  If I see a number I don't want to answer right now then I don't and it goes to voice mail.  Check with your service carrier.  They probably have a similar service.</p><p>Why is it that so many people think they have to take every call?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My cell phone service provides a real cool solution to this problem .
If I see a number I do n't want to answer right now then I do n't and it goes to voice mail .
Check with your service carrier .
They probably have a similar service.Why is it that so many people think they have to take every call ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My cell phone service provides a real cool solution to this problem.
If I see a number I don't want to answer right now then I don't and it goes to voice mail.
Check with your service carrier.
They probably have a similar service.Why is it that so many people think they have to take every call?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392571</id>
	<title>Re:Abuse</title>
	<author>argiedot</author>
	<datestamp>1245437580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The obvious way. Have you ever used Google Calendar's SMS notifications? To enable them, you are sent a code to the number that you registered. The code then has to be entered on the Google page within a certain amount of time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The obvious way .
Have you ever used Google Calendar 's SMS notifications ?
To enable them , you are sent a code to the number that you registered .
The code then has to be entered on the Google page within a certain amount of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The obvious way.
Have you ever used Google Calendar's SMS notifications?
To enable them, you are sent a code to the number that you registered.
The code then has to be entered on the Google page within a certain amount of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392935</id>
	<title>Re:Will it work when my nets die? Or with 911?</title>
	<author>vidarh</author>
	<datestamp>1245439080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So why do people care? First time I saw a commercial service that offered that was ca. 10 years ago. Several services like that are still around, but none of them have managed to convince enough people that it matters to actually make it big.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So why do people care ?
First time I saw a commercial service that offered that was ca .
10 years ago .
Several services like that are still around , but none of them have managed to convince enough people that it matters to actually make it big .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why do people care?
First time I saw a commercial service that offered that was ca.
10 years ago.
Several services like that are still around, but none of them have managed to convince enough people that it matters to actually make it big.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391887</id>
	<title>Re:But I don't want you to call my mobile!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245434580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, you can flag numbers to direct straight to voice mail.  Which then gets transcibed into and email.  The service gives you some pretty good controls over handling calls and routing, based on factors like time, caller and your availability.</p><p>In your case, you can give out the number freely and only forward people in your "Friends" group to you cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , you can flag numbers to direct straight to voice mail .
Which then gets transcibed into and email .
The service gives you some pretty good controls over handling calls and routing , based on factors like time , caller and your availability.In your case , you can give out the number freely and only forward people in your " Friends " group to you cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, you can flag numbers to direct straight to voice mail.
Which then gets transcibed into and email.
The service gives you some pretty good controls over handling calls and routing, based on factors like time, caller and your availability.In your case, you can give out the number freely and only forward people in your "Friends" group to you cell phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391699</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all wonder when posters will quit using the subject line for beginning a sentence. Aargh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all wonder when posters will quit using the subject line for beginning a sentence .
Aargh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all wonder when posters will quit using the subject line for beginning a sentence.
Aargh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393515</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ooh!  I've been trying to reach you!  Did you know that your vehicle warranty has expired?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooh !
I 've been trying to reach you !
Did you know that your vehicle warranty has expired ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooh!
I've been trying to reach you!
Did you know that your vehicle warranty has expired?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393031</id>
	<title>Re:inbound number transfer</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1245439440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but... they have been saying that for a while, so I wouldn't hold my breath.</p><p>The question is: why is it taking them so long?  That seems like a pretty straightforward feature, in particular since they already handle outbound number transfers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but... they have been saying that for a while , so I would n't hold my breath.The question is : why is it taking them so long ?
That seems like a pretty straightforward feature , in particular since they already handle outbound number transfers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but... they have been saying that for a while, so I wouldn't hold my breath.The question is: why is it taking them so long?
That seems like a pretty straightforward feature, in particular since they already handle outbound number transfers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811</id>
	<title>inbound number transfer</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1245434220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Google has a number shortage, it's kind of odd that they don't let people transfer their existing numbers to Google Voice.  That would probably free up a lot of the numbers they already have.</p><p>I have a Google Voice number, and if I could transfer my existing number into it, I would do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google has a number shortage , it 's kind of odd that they do n't let people transfer their existing numbers to Google Voice .
That would probably free up a lot of the numbers they already have.I have a Google Voice number , and if I could transfer my existing number into it , I would do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google has a number shortage, it's kind of odd that they don't let people transfer their existing numbers to Google Voice.
That would probably free up a lot of the numbers they already have.I have a Google Voice number, and if I could transfer my existing number into it, I would do so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392257</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no pride to be had in ignorance, son.  Educate yourself about the topic before spreading your ass cheeks over the keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no pride to be had in ignorance , son .
Educate yourself about the topic before spreading your ass cheeks over the keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no pride to be had in ignorance, son.
Educate yourself about the topic before spreading your ass cheeks over the keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391973</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245435000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think about it this way: It is google, may be ull get a notification that its a spam call before you pick it up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about it this way : It is google , may be ull get a notification that its a spam call before you pick it up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about it this way: It is google, may be ull get a notification that its a spam call before you pick it up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392009</id>
	<title>Re:Abuse</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1245435180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine it involves some process where you have to 'enroll' each physical number in to the service by dialing in from that location. If you can't get to Palin's line, for example, you can't mess with it. Existing call forwarding schemes use some version of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine it involves some process where you have to 'enroll ' each physical number in to the service by dialing in from that location .
If you ca n't get to Palin 's line , for example , you ca n't mess with it .
Existing call forwarding schemes use some version of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine it involves some process where you have to 'enroll' each physical number in to the service by dialing in from that location.
If you can't get to Palin's line, for example, you can't mess with it.
Existing call forwarding schemes use some version of this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755</id>
	<title>But I don't want you to call my mobile!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I only give my mobile number out sparingly.  I tell most people to call my land line.  I do this because I don't want to be accessible to every one all the time.  Most calls can wait.  If I had this service it would mean more relatives calling me up while driving to tell me to go on line and look at some random news story.  Right now, I think I'll stick with having two numbers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I only give my mobile number out sparingly .
I tell most people to call my land line .
I do this because I do n't want to be accessible to every one all the time .
Most calls can wait .
If I had this service it would mean more relatives calling me up while driving to tell me to go on line and look at some random news story .
Right now , I think I 'll stick with having two numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only give my mobile number out sparingly.
I tell most people to call my land line.
I do this because I don't want to be accessible to every one all the time.
Most calls can wait.
If I had this service it would mean more relatives calling me up while driving to tell me to go on line and look at some random news story.
Right now, I think I'll stick with having two numbers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392221</id>
	<title>Re:Will it work when my nets die? Or with 911?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is NOT voip. Google Voice forwards to other phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is NOT voip .
Google Voice forwards to other phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is NOT voip.
Google Voice forwards to other phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392361</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>GameMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1245436620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, NPR had a piece yesterday about how the number of people with only cell phones (no landlines) just surpassed the number with landlines in the US.   However, "Jason Levine" is right that even people with only one phone might find this useful.  Personally, since moving to Chicago from upstate NY I haven't changed my area code (I save a lot of money by staying on my parents "Friends and Family plan" and would want to give up my phone number even if I could).  However, if I decide I want to submit resumes for jobs I want the phone number to have a local area code.  My concern is that the unusual area code will either make them think I'm applying from out of state or that it's a type (my old NY area code is only one number off from one of the area codes in the Chicago area).  Either of those two possibilities could be used as a way for them to weed out my application early in the hiring process.  Before this, I had to buy cheap pre-paid phone with a local number and keep putting a little money into it every month, or so, to keep it active.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , NPR had a piece yesterday about how the number of people with only cell phones ( no landlines ) just surpassed the number with landlines in the US .
However , " Jason Levine " is right that even people with only one phone might find this useful .
Personally , since moving to Chicago from upstate NY I have n't changed my area code ( I save a lot of money by staying on my parents " Friends and Family plan " and would want to give up my phone number even if I could ) .
However , if I decide I want to submit resumes for jobs I want the phone number to have a local area code .
My concern is that the unusual area code will either make them think I 'm applying from out of state or that it 's a type ( my old NY area code is only one number off from one of the area codes in the Chicago area ) .
Either of those two possibilities could be used as a way for them to weed out my application early in the hiring process .
Before this , I had to buy cheap pre-paid phone with a local number and keep putting a little money into it every month , or so , to keep it active .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, NPR had a piece yesterday about how the number of people with only cell phones (no landlines) just surpassed the number with landlines in the US.
However, "Jason Levine" is right that even people with only one phone might find this useful.
Personally, since moving to Chicago from upstate NY I haven't changed my area code (I save a lot of money by staying on my parents "Friends and Family plan" and would want to give up my phone number even if I could).
However, if I decide I want to submit resumes for jobs I want the phone number to have a local area code.
My concern is that the unusual area code will either make them think I'm applying from out of state or that it's a type (my old NY area code is only one number off from one of the area codes in the Chicago area).
Either of those two possibilities could be used as a way for them to weed out my application early in the hiring process.
Before this, I had to buy cheap pre-paid phone with a local number and keep putting a little money into it every month, or so, to keep it active.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391483</id>
	<title>first post bitches</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>lick my asshole clean you linux fags.</htmltext>
<tokenext>lick my asshole clean you linux fags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lick my asshole clean you linux fags.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391959</id>
	<title>google grabbed 1 million numbers huh?</title>
	<author>bmecoli</author>
	<datestamp>1245435000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how long it'll take for google to call each number, breathe heavily for a few seconds, then hang up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how long it 'll take for google to call each number , breathe heavily for a few seconds , then hang up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how long it'll take for google to call each number, breathe heavily for a few seconds, then hang up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</id>
	<title>How big is the market?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me that the same people that would be all for a techy solution like this are the very same people who are unlikely to even own a landline. Nearly universally, everyone who I know in their mid 20s - early 30s don't have a landline and have only one number - their cellphone.</p><p>I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home, a private line at work, and another line at their second home. But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that the same people that would be all for a techy solution like this are the very same people who are unlikely to even own a landline .
Nearly universally , everyone who I know in their mid 20s - early 30s do n't have a landline and have only one number - their cellphone.I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home , a private line at work , and another line at their second home .
But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that the same people that would be all for a techy solution like this are the very same people who are unlikely to even own a landline.
Nearly universally, everyone who I know in their mid 20s - early 30s don't have a landline and have only one number - their cellphone.I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home, a private line at work, and another line at their second home.
But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391935</id>
	<title>Re:Lame anecdotal evidence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245434880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.</i></p><p>Or conversely, how unpopular something will be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.Or conversely , how unpopular something will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.Or conversely, how unpopular something will be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641</id>
	<title>Will it work when my nets die? Or with 911?</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1245433560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>One reason I never liked other net phone services is that you can't dial 911 and when my computer reboots, or decides to explode, my phone dies; will GVoice suffer from these problems as well? I'm not entirely sure how this is supposed to work (yes yes, I could google it, but that would be one less answer on google. You know, ever google a question only to find people pointing you to google?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>One reason I never liked other net phone services is that you ca n't dial 911 and when my computer reboots , or decides to explode , my phone dies ; will GVoice suffer from these problems as well ?
I 'm not entirely sure how this is supposed to work ( yes yes , I could google it , but that would be one less answer on google .
You know , ever google a question only to find people pointing you to google ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One reason I never liked other net phone services is that you can't dial 911 and when my computer reboots, or decides to explode, my phone dies; will GVoice suffer from these problems as well?
I'm not entirely sure how this is supposed to work (yes yes, I could google it, but that would be one less answer on google.
You know, ever google a question only to find people pointing you to google?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392399</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>idiotnot</author>
	<datestamp>1245436800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I've already registered mine on the DNC list</i></p><p>Yeah, so have I, both of them.  Got three different calls telling me I needed to go vote for Barack Obama in November.  The third one I slipped through my asterisk-fu.</p><p>"We hope you'll go out and vote today!"<br>"I already did this morning.  For Senator McCain."<br>"Oh."  (long pause)  "Have a nice day, then, I guess."</p><p>There's only so much you can do, and reporting the non-profits and/or pols doesn't do much good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already registered mine on the DNC listYeah , so have I , both of them .
Got three different calls telling me I needed to go vote for Barack Obama in November .
The third one I slipped through my asterisk-fu .
" We hope you 'll go out and vote today !
" " I already did this morning .
For Senator McCain. " " Oh .
" ( long pause ) " Have a nice day , then , I guess .
" There 's only so much you can do , and reporting the non-profits and/or pols does n't do much good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already registered mine on the DNC listYeah, so have I, both of them.
Got three different calls telling me I needed to go vote for Barack Obama in November.
The third one I slipped through my asterisk-fu.
"We hope you'll go out and vote today!
""I already did this morning.
For Senator McCain.""Oh.
"  (long pause)  "Have a nice day, then, I guess.
"There's only so much you can do, and reporting the non-profits and/or pols doesn't do much good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1245434640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now telemarketers, religious freaks, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.</p></div><p>I am a Google voice user.<br>Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me.  The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone(s).  No automated system knows how to do that so far.</p><p>Even if a real person calls and does get past the name prompt, I can "answer" the phone by sending the call to voice-mail and listening in, the way you can with a real physical answering machine.</p><p>I am also able to blacklist specific caller-id numbers to either go directly to voice-mail or to play the "this number has been disconnected" recording and tone pattern.</p><p>Worst case, I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.</p><p>Since signing up with GrandCentral a year or two ago (the predecessor company that google purchased) my annoying call rate has gone to zero.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now telemarketers , religious freaks , and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.I am a Google voice user.Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me .
The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id 's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone ( s ) .
No automated system knows how to do that so far.Even if a real person calls and does get past the name prompt , I can " answer " the phone by sending the call to voice-mail and listening in , the way you can with a real physical answering machine.I am also able to blacklist specific caller-id numbers to either go directly to voice-mail or to play the " this number has been disconnected " recording and tone pattern.Worst case , I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.Since signing up with GrandCentral a year or two ago ( the predecessor company that google purchased ) my annoying call rate has gone to zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now telemarketers, religious freaks, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.I am a Google voice user.Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me.
The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone(s).
No automated system knows how to do that so far.Even if a real person calls and does get past the name prompt, I can "answer" the phone by sending the call to voice-mail and listening in, the way you can with a real physical answering machine.I am also able to blacklist specific caller-id numbers to either go directly to voice-mail or to play the "this number has been disconnected" recording and tone pattern.Worst case, I can also configure all unknown caller-id numbers to go directly to voice-mail too.Since signing up with GrandCentral a year or two ago (the predecessor company that google purchased) my annoying call rate has gone to zero.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392393</id>
	<title>Re:I'm waiting....</title>
	<author>Evan Charlton</author>
	<datestamp>1245436800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a heads up: the current Android client (found here: <a href="http://www.cyrket.com/package/com.evancharlton.googlevoice" title="cyrket.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyrket.com/package/com.evancharlton.googlevoice</a> [cyrket.com]) is *not* official in any way, shape or form.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a heads up : the current Android client ( found here : http : //www.cyrket.com/package/com.evancharlton.googlevoice [ cyrket.com ] ) is * not * official in any way , shape or form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a heads up: the current Android client (found here: http://www.cyrket.com/package/com.evancharlton.googlevoice [cyrket.com]) is *not* official in any way, shape or form.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394991</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>Patch86</author>
	<datestamp>1245402960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only.</p><p>Where I live (UK) a working phone line is the prerequisite for a broadband package, whether it be over BT's ADSL network or Virgin's fibre-optic cable network. I get a working phone line and phone number whether I want it or not, as long as I want internet access.</p><p>Of course I could choose to not plug a handset into it and never give out the number, but I still do own a landline. As local call rates tend to be cheaper over landline than mobile, plugging a cheap handset in seems like a sensible idea for most.</p><p>GV seems like a nice idea if you do make use of said landline and also have a mobile phone. Throw an office number in there too and there are definitely going to be some benefits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only.Where I live ( UK ) a working phone line is the prerequisite for a broadband package , whether it be over BT 's ADSL network or Virgin 's fibre-optic cable network .
I get a working phone line and phone number whether I want it or not , as long as I want internet access.Of course I could choose to not plug a handset into it and never give out the number , but I still do own a landline .
As local call rates tend to be cheaper over landline than mobile , plugging a cheap handset in seems like a sensible idea for most.GV seems like a nice idea if you do make use of said landline and also have a mobile phone .
Throw an office number in there too and there are definitely going to be some benefits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only.Where I live (UK) a working phone line is the prerequisite for a broadband package, whether it be over BT's ADSL network or Virgin's fibre-optic cable network.
I get a working phone line and phone number whether I want it or not, as long as I want internet access.Of course I could choose to not plug a handset into it and never give out the number, but I still do own a landline.
As local call rates tend to be cheaper over landline than mobile, plugging a cheap handset in seems like a sensible idea for most.GV seems like a nice idea if you do make use of said landline and also have a mobile phone.
Throw an office number in there too and there are definitely going to be some benefits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392669</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>TarrVetus</author>
	<datestamp>1245438000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home, a private line at work, and another line at their second home. But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user?</p></div><p>Absolutely.<br> <br>I have one phone, and it's my cell phone.  I don't have an unlimited calling/ unlimited text messaging service for my phone, and I cannot justify paying for it right now.  In the last month, however, I've had a spike in my call volume--instead of using less than 300 minutes, I'm moving upward to 500 or so, and they're from many different numbers.<br> <br>With Google Voice, I can give out one number and have it ring to my cell phone, and a cheap temporary service on my computer, such as Skype.  If I am at my computer, I can pick up the phone there; if out, the call will go to my cellphone.<br> <br>This allows me to overcome the temporary spike in the number of calls I am receiving for much less than paying for extra cell minutes (and less problems than switching to another cellphone plan),and by only having to hand out one number to my contacts.<br> <br>Google Voice gives me one number for whatever phone(s) I want.  It could help me save hundreds of dollars with minimal hassle.  Change my phone service?  Have a pay Skype account for three months?  No worries!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home , a private line at work , and another line at their second home .
But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user ? Absolutely .
I have one phone , and it 's my cell phone .
I do n't have an unlimited calling/ unlimited text messaging service for my phone , and I can not justify paying for it right now .
In the last month , however , I 've had a spike in my call volume--instead of using less than 300 minutes , I 'm moving upward to 500 or so , and they 're from many different numbers .
With Google Voice , I can give out one number and have it ring to my cell phone , and a cheap temporary service on my computer , such as Skype .
If I am at my computer , I can pick up the phone there ; if out , the call will go to my cellphone .
This allows me to overcome the temporary spike in the number of calls I am receiving for much less than paying for extra cell minutes ( and less problems than switching to another cellphone plan ) ,and by only having to hand out one number to my contacts .
Google Voice gives me one number for whatever phone ( s ) I want .
It could help me save hundreds of dollars with minimal hassle .
Change my phone service ?
Have a pay Skype account for three months ?
No worries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see a market for this for intense businessmen who might have 2 lines at home, a private line at work, and another line at their second home.
But is there a demand from the tech savy young google user?Absolutely.
I have one phone, and it's my cell phone.
I don't have an unlimited calling/ unlimited text messaging service for my phone, and I cannot justify paying for it right now.
In the last month, however, I've had a spike in my call volume--instead of using less than 300 minutes, I'm moving upward to 500 or so, and they're from many different numbers.
With Google Voice, I can give out one number and have it ring to my cell phone, and a cheap temporary service on my computer, such as Skype.
If I am at my computer, I can pick up the phone there; if out, the call will go to my cellphone.
This allows me to overcome the temporary spike in the number of calls I am receiving for much less than paying for extra cell minutes (and less problems than switching to another cellphone plan),and by only having to hand out one number to my contacts.
Google Voice gives me one number for whatever phone(s) I want.
It could help me save hundreds of dollars with minimal hassle.
Change my phone service?
Have a pay Skype account for three months?
No worries!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391543</id>
	<title>I wonder....</title>
	<author>Jaysyn</author>
	<datestamp>1245433140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... how long it will be before we see a civil or criminal suit arising from a competitor, user or law-enforcement looking for a user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... how long it will be before we see a civil or criminal suit arising from a competitor , user or law-enforcement looking for a user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... how long it will be before we see a civil or criminal suit arising from a competitor, user or law-enforcement looking for a user.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392041</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1245435360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if you only have one line, you might like to use this.  If a business asks for your phone number, you could give them the Google Talk number.  Then, if they abuse it, you simply tell Google Talk to either always push them to voice mail or (better yet) to play the "this line is disconnected" message.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if you only have one line , you might like to use this .
If a business asks for your phone number , you could give them the Google Talk number .
Then , if they abuse it , you simply tell Google Talk to either always push them to voice mail or ( better yet ) to play the " this line is disconnected " message .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if you only have one line, you might like to use this.
If a business asks for your phone number, you could give them the Google Talk number.
Then, if they abuse it, you simply tell Google Talk to either always push them to voice mail or (better yet) to play the "this line is disconnected" message.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391715</id>
	<title>Awesomeness</title>
	<author>dburkland</author>
	<datestamp>1245433860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This could be very useful especially for pranking Ahmad in Boston at 4AM CST</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be very useful especially for pranking Ahmad in Boston at 4AM CST</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be very useful especially for pranking Ahmad in Boston at 4AM CST</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28429773</id>
	<title>Re:Abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245668160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>presumably they call you on the landline (maybe sms for cell) with a code which you have to then enter before it authenticates your number.  just guessing cause i'm still on the waiting list, but that's how all other phone # authentication services work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>presumably they call you on the landline ( maybe sms for cell ) with a code which you have to then enter before it authenticates your number .
just guessing cause i 'm still on the waiting list , but that 's how all other phone # authentication services work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>presumably they call you on the landline (maybe sms for cell) with a code which you have to then enter before it authenticates your number.
just guessing cause i'm still on the waiting list, but that's how all other phone # authentication services work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392711</id>
	<title>You CAN intiate a call from your phone directly</title>
	<author>Brit\_in\_the\_USA</author>
	<datestamp>1245438180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just want to add that you can initiate a call from your phone directly. You can call your own Google number and then press "2" to dial out to a new number (including international) and end with a "#" to start ringing. I now have a few international numbers on speed dial on my cell phone (I have bought some google credit for this), the entries are in the format:<br>
my\_google\_number   p   2   p   destiantion\_number   # <br>
note that "p" inserts a ~2 second pause on most dialers.
<br> <br>
To get this working seamlessly you need to go to your account settings and disable PIN entry for mail box and use caller ID instead to identify your cell phone as authorized to go straight in. If you don't want to do that you need to include the right pauses and pin dialing codes in that example above.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to add that you can initiate a call from your phone directly .
You can call your own Google number and then press " 2 " to dial out to a new number ( including international ) and end with a " # " to start ringing .
I now have a few international numbers on speed dial on my cell phone ( I have bought some google credit for this ) , the entries are in the format : my \ _google \ _number p 2 p destiantion \ _number # note that " p " inserts a ~ 2 second pause on most dialers .
To get this working seamlessly you need to go to your account settings and disable PIN entry for mail box and use caller ID instead to identify your cell phone as authorized to go straight in .
If you do n't want to do that you need to include the right pauses and pin dialing codes in that example above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to add that you can initiate a call from your phone directly.
You can call your own Google number and then press "2" to dial out to a new number (including international) and end with a "#" to start ringing.
I now have a few international numbers on speed dial on my cell phone (I have bought some google credit for this), the entries are in the format:
my\_google\_number   p   2   p   destiantion\_number   # 
note that "p" inserts a ~2 second pause on most dialers.
To get this working seamlessly you need to go to your account settings and disable PIN entry for mail box and use caller ID instead to identify your cell phone as authorized to go straight in.
If you don't want to do that you need to include the right pauses and pin dialing codes in that example above.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398987</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245429780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've put mine on the DNC list.  GVoice is the greatest thing ever.  I have more than one number.  I re-registered to vote with one GVoice number to put an end to callers telling me how to think and vote.  The calls go to voice mail.  I never give a number where I can directly be reached to any internet business, and to those whom I allow to ring me, the numbers direct to my cell phone so that I can use Caller ID.  I have a home phone, but do not pay $9.95 monthly to see who is calling.  Not answering is the better deal, using an answering machine.  Landline service is super cheap, and that's where I get my DSL for $19.95 a month, so I don't see a reason to disconnect.  I recently got an e-mail from joiphone.com about new telecom services from them, and it does make me curious.  I used them way back when for cheap dial-up, and they were fine for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've put mine on the DNC list .
GVoice is the greatest thing ever .
I have more than one number .
I re-registered to vote with one GVoice number to put an end to callers telling me how to think and vote .
The calls go to voice mail .
I never give a number where I can directly be reached to any internet business , and to those whom I allow to ring me , the numbers direct to my cell phone so that I can use Caller ID .
I have a home phone , but do not pay $ 9.95 monthly to see who is calling .
Not answering is the better deal , using an answering machine .
Landline service is super cheap , and that 's where I get my DSL for $ 19.95 a month , so I do n't see a reason to disconnect .
I recently got an e-mail from joiphone.com about new telecom services from them , and it does make me curious .
I used them way back when for cheap dial-up , and they were fine for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've put mine on the DNC list.
GVoice is the greatest thing ever.
I have more than one number.
I re-registered to vote with one GVoice number to put an end to callers telling me how to think and vote.
The calls go to voice mail.
I never give a number where I can directly be reached to any internet business, and to those whom I allow to ring me, the numbers direct to my cell phone so that I can use Caller ID.
I have a home phone, but do not pay $9.95 monthly to see who is calling.
Not answering is the better deal, using an answering machine.
Landline service is super cheap, and that's where I get my DSL for $19.95 a month, so I don't see a reason to disconnect.
I recently got an e-mail from joiphone.com about new telecom services from them, and it does make me curious.
I used them way back when for cheap dial-up, and they were fine for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391995</id>
	<title>privacy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245435120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>could someone indicate how this works? are there privacy issues involved? can google 'monitor' my activity (cell use, numbers coming in and out)? can they sell the data? what about international laws? does my privacy fall under american law (google location) or my own country's law? seems to me people are too quick to embrace 'services' now without questioning what it is they are giving up in return.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could someone indicate how this works ?
are there privacy issues involved ?
can google 'monitor ' my activity ( cell use , numbers coming in and out ) ?
can they sell the data ?
what about international laws ?
does my privacy fall under american law ( google location ) or my own country 's law ?
seems to me people are too quick to embrace 'services ' now without questioning what it is they are giving up in return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could someone indicate how this works?
are there privacy issues involved?
can google 'monitor' my activity (cell use, numbers coming in and out)?
can they sell the data?
what about international laws?
does my privacy fall under american law (google location) or my own country's law?
seems to me people are too quick to embrace 'services' now without questioning what it is they are giving up in return.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393711</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1245441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's the problem: how do you keep the unwanted callers from calling your private numbers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the problem : how do you keep the unwanted callers from calling your private numbers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the problem: how do you keep the unwanted callers from calling your private numbers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392683</id>
	<title>Re:privacy?</title>
	<author>tgd</author>
	<datestamp>1245438060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess what.</p><p>If you pick up a phone, you have no privacy. Your telco monitors your activity. The telco of the receiving end of the call monitors the activity. The NSA monitors it. Hell, the NSA may be recording it. Networks the call traverse record bits of information about it. Any one of them can figure out the location, and the laws (when followed) are the laws of both ends of the call and every country the call transits.</p><p>If you want to know how it works, you can try googling about it. However, your inane privacy rant, I suspect, was the real purpose of your post... not some inquiry into how Google Voice works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess what.If you pick up a phone , you have no privacy .
Your telco monitors your activity .
The telco of the receiving end of the call monitors the activity .
The NSA monitors it .
Hell , the NSA may be recording it .
Networks the call traverse record bits of information about it .
Any one of them can figure out the location , and the laws ( when followed ) are the laws of both ends of the call and every country the call transits.If you want to know how it works , you can try googling about it .
However , your inane privacy rant , I suspect , was the real purpose of your post... not some inquiry into how Google Voice works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess what.If you pick up a phone, you have no privacy.
Your telco monitors your activity.
The telco of the receiving end of the call monitors the activity.
The NSA monitors it.
Hell, the NSA may be recording it.
Networks the call traverse record bits of information about it.
Any one of them can figure out the location, and the laws (when followed) are the laws of both ends of the call and every country the call transits.If you want to know how it works, you can try googling about it.
However, your inane privacy rant, I suspect, was the real purpose of your post... not some inquiry into how Google Voice works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392185</id>
	<title>Re:inbound number transfer</title>
	<author>blindd0t</author>
	<datestamp>1245435960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><blockquote><div><p>Last week, TechCrunch reported that Google would add number portability later this year to Google Voice, which would let users keep one of their existing phone numbers as their Google Voice number. For example, users could make their cell phone number their Google Voice number. </p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : Last week , TechCrunch reported that Google would add number portability later this year to Google Voice , which would let users keep one of their existing phone numbers as their Google Voice number .
For example , users could make their cell phone number their Google Voice number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:Last week, TechCrunch reported that Google would add number portability later this year to Google Voice, which would let users keep one of their existing phone numbers as their Google Voice number.
For example, users could make their cell phone number their Google Voice number.  
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</id>
	<title>Abuse</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1245433980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do they prevent abuse? Say unifying Pizza Express with someone's landline - or Sarah Palin with PETA... and so on</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they prevent abuse ?
Say unifying Pizza Express with someone 's landline - or Sarah Palin with PETA... and so on</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they prevent abuse?
Say unifying Pizza Express with someone's landline - or Sarah Palin with PETA... and so on</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394073</id>
	<title>Re:How big is the market?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245443220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet!  You typo-ed "typo"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet !
You typo-ed " typo " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet!
You typo-ed "typo"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392019</id>
	<title>Re:Abuse</title>
	<author>Crazy Man on Fire</author>
	<datestamp>1245435240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure they have a verification step just like many other services.  Just a guess, but they probably place a call to the number you want to register and you have to key in a code that they have given to you to prove that you are in control of the phone number in question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure they have a verification step just like many other services .
Just a guess , but they probably place a call to the number you want to register and you have to key in a code that they have given to you to prove that you are in control of the phone number in question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure they have a verification step just like many other services.
Just a guess, but they probably place a call to the number you want to register and you have to key in a code that they have given to you to prove that you are in control of the phone number in question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393905</id>
	<title>Re:inbound number transfer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what I'm waiting for!  Then I can dump all phones except my cell, and get calls either on my PC or my cell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I 'm waiting for !
Then I can dump all phones except my cell , and get calls either on my PC or my cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I'm waiting for!
Then I can dump all phones except my cell, and get calls either on my PC or my cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392401</id>
	<title>Re:I want Jenny's number...</title>
	<author>buckadude</author>
	<datestamp>1245436800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>at my college 360-867-5309 called the media lab.  the jenny joke there is oooooold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>at my college 360-867-5309 called the media lab .
the jenny joke there is oooooold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at my college 360-867-5309 called the media lab.
the jenny joke there is oooooold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391737</id>
	<title>Lame anecdotal evidence</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1245433920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it."</p><p>And I have friends who have never heard of Google Voice and completely lack the technical understanding to want to use it. I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.</p><p>Most of my friends actually have just one phone (their cell) to their name anyway. While I see some of the features being semi-useful for a single-phone user, many require one to be at their computer, or at least have a smart phone, thus eliminating their usefulness in a large variety of circumstances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it .
" And I have friends who have never heard of Google Voice and completely lack the technical understanding to want to use it .
I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.Most of my friends actually have just one phone ( their cell ) to their name anyway .
While I see some of the features being semi-useful for a single-phone user , many require one to be at their computer , or at least have a smart phone , thus eliminating their usefulness in a large variety of circumstances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I know some of my friends check the Google Voice page almost every day to see when they can grab a number and get started using it.
"And I have friends who have never heard of Google Voice and completely lack the technical understanding to want to use it.
I hate it when people use anecdotal evidence to suggest how great or grand something is going to be.Most of my friends actually have just one phone (their cell) to their name anyway.
While I see some of the features being semi-useful for a single-phone user, many require one to be at their computer, or at least have a smart phone, thus eliminating their usefulness in a large variety of circumstances.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28400755</id>
	<title>Re:I'm waiting....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245500100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you tried Hullomail (http://www.hullomail.com/) ? That's pretty good and they've now got an android app too....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried Hullomail ( http : //www.hullomail.com/ ) ?
That 's pretty good and they 've now got an android app too... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried Hullomail (http://www.hullomail.com/) ?
That's pretty good and they've now got an android app too....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392247</id>
	<title>Re:Abuse</title>
	<author>AntiRush</author>
	<datestamp>1245436200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To register a phone number with your Google Voice account you have to answer an automated call and enter a touchtone passkey that is provided on the website.  If you don't have access to the phone you can't add it to the ring list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To register a phone number with your Google Voice account you have to answer an automated call and enter a touchtone passkey that is provided on the website .
If you do n't have access to the phone you ca n't add it to the ring list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To register a phone number with your Google Voice account you have to answer an automated call and enter a touchtone passkey that is provided on the website.
If you don't have access to the phone you can't add it to the ring list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633</id>
	<title>I'm waiting....</title>
	<author>Laebshade</author>
	<datestamp>1245433560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for this for my G1.  I'm surprised this wasn't included, even though it's in closed beta.  PF Voicemail Fusion works ok, but youmail is horrible for the G1.  Google Voice already has an android app, so I can't wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for this for my G1 .
I 'm surprised this was n't included , even though it 's in closed beta .
PF Voicemail Fusion works ok , but youmail is horrible for the G1 .
Google Voice already has an android app , so I ca n't wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for this for my G1.
I'm surprised this wasn't included, even though it's in closed beta.
PF Voicemail Fusion works ok, but youmail is horrible for the G1.
Google Voice already has an android app, so I can't wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393659</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1245441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I am a Google voice user. Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me. The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone(s). <b>No automated system knows how to do that so far</b>.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>


You mean... Google is...alive?!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a Google voice user .
Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me .
The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id 's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone ( s ) .
No automated system knows how to do that so far .
You mean... Google is...alive ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a Google voice user.
Zero automated telemarketing calls get through to me.
The system defaults to requiring callers with previously unseen caller-id's to state their name before it will even ring my real phone(s).
No automated system knows how to do that so far.
You mean... Google is...alive?!
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391769</id>
	<title>I want Jenny's number...</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1245433980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yeah, it's 867-530-niiiiiii-eeee-iii-een.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , it 's 867-530-niiiiiii-eeee-iii-een .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, it's 867-530-niiiiiii-eeee-iii-een.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391891</id>
	<title>Re:But I don't want you to call my mobile!</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1245434580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the cool thing.  You can set up profiles and automatically direct some people to only a specific phone, or right into voice mail.  You can even set up personalized ring-back tones and VM outgoing messages so that if your father calls you, the VM says, "Hi Dad, sorry you didn't make it past the screen!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the cool thing .
You can set up profiles and automatically direct some people to only a specific phone , or right into voice mail .
You can even set up personalized ring-back tones and VM outgoing messages so that if your father calls you , the VM says , " Hi Dad , sorry you did n't make it past the screen !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the cool thing.
You can set up profiles and automatically direct some people to only a specific phone, or right into voice mail.
You can even set up personalized ring-back tones and VM outgoing messages so that if your father calls you, the VM says, "Hi Dad, sorry you didn't make it past the screen!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391977</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245435060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The spam filters on GV are great and can be set at a very fine grained level, unlike the phone company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The spam filters on GV are great and can be set at a very fine grained level , unlike the phone company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spam filters on GV are great and can be set at a very fine grained level, unlike the phone company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819</id>
	<title>Re:Will it work when my nets die? Or with 911?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245434220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't a net phone, per se; it's a phone abstraction.  A number that lives out there in the phone cloud, which you point to whatever number(s) you wish to receive calls at.

You can still dial directly out from your cell phone, home phone, office phone, whatever.  911 is based on the number you're calling from.  However, if you want your GVoice number to show up on caller ID, you would instead initiate the call from the GVoice web site or the android/iphone app.

In other words, as long as you've got a working phone, you've got 911.  The use of GVoice doesn't change that at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a net phone , per se ; it 's a phone abstraction .
A number that lives out there in the phone cloud , which you point to whatever number ( s ) you wish to receive calls at .
You can still dial directly out from your cell phone , home phone , office phone , whatever .
911 is based on the number you 're calling from .
However , if you want your GVoice number to show up on caller ID , you would instead initiate the call from the GVoice web site or the android/iphone app .
In other words , as long as you 've got a working phone , you 've got 911 .
The use of GVoice does n't change that at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a net phone, per se; it's a phone abstraction.
A number that lives out there in the phone cloud, which you point to whatever number(s) you wish to receive calls at.
You can still dial directly out from your cell phone, home phone, office phone, whatever.
911 is based on the number you're calling from.
However, if you want your GVoice number to show up on caller ID, you would instead initiate the call from the GVoice web site or the android/iphone app.
In other words, as long as you've got a working phone, you've got 911.
The use of GVoice doesn't change that at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391907</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Elwood P Dowd</author>
	<datestamp>1245434700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, the whole point is that you get to decide which of your contacts can reach you at which phone. You can make it so that if they're not in your contact list, they get voice mail only.</p><p>You can also screen callers (they state their name to a recording) based on whether they are in your contact list or whether they are blocking caller ID.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the whole point is that you get to decide which of your contacts can reach you at which phone .
You can make it so that if they 're not in your contact list , they get voice mail only.You can also screen callers ( they state their name to a recording ) based on whether they are in your contact list or whether they are blocking caller ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the whole point is that you get to decide which of your contacts can reach you at which phone.
You can make it so that if they're not in your contact list, they get voice mail only.You can also screen callers (they state their name to a recording) based on whether they are in your contact list or whether they are blocking caller ID.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28452259</id>
	<title>Re:You CAN intiate a call from your phone directly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245857640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only problem when u initiate the call from your phone directly is that your google number won't show up on the caller ID of the person you are calling... which makes it even more annoying to try and get your friends/colleagues to start calling you back on your google number instead of your regular number! And I think that's the google number's biggest weakness (actually getting people to start calling you on it)</p><p>One thing that helped me get my google number out to my friends/colleagues (at least those who I wanted to have it), was to use http://www.avakit.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem when u initiate the call from your phone directly is that your google number wo n't show up on the caller ID of the person you are calling... which makes it even more annoying to try and get your friends/colleagues to start calling you back on your google number instead of your regular number !
And I think that 's the google number 's biggest weakness ( actually getting people to start calling you on it ) One thing that helped me get my google number out to my friends/colleagues ( at least those who I wanted to have it ) , was to use http : //www.avakit.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem when u initiate the call from your phone directly is that your google number won't show up on the caller ID of the person you are calling... which makes it even more annoying to try and get your friends/colleagues to start calling you back on your google number instead of your regular number!
And I think that's the google number's biggest weakness (actually getting people to start calling you on it)One thing that helped me get my google number out to my friends/colleagues (at least those who I wanted to have it), was to use http://www.avakit.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</id>
	<title>Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now telemarketers, religious freaks, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.<br><br>I wonder if we'll be able to register that line on the DNC list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now telemarketers , religious freaks , and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.I wonder if we 'll be able to register that line on the DNC list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now telemarketers, religious freaks, and campaign-donation guys will be able to find me no matter where I am.I wonder if we'll be able to register that line on the DNC list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391693</id>
	<title>Where are the Telco's Lawyers</title>
	<author>mpapet</author>
	<datestamp>1245433740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Queue Dr. Evil '1 million phone numbers...  MMUUUAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!'</p><p>It certainly sounds like a big number, but it isn't.  What I am wondering is what the Telco execs are doing about it.</p><p>A little history for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ The telco's stuck it to Vonage two different ways.<br>1. whisper campaign in the equity markets claiming Vonage didn't own the value-drivers in their business.  100\% bunk.  Amazon doesn't own the 'tubes' that connect to their service, has fantastical valuations. With Vonage, it *is* a very big problem???  But equity manager ran with it and hammered Vonage.<br>2. Patent litigation.  Especially bad and ridiculously obvious patents were used to extract the Telco's vig.  (hint, look up the word vigorish)</p><p>Google's much more well-capitalized and swimming in the deep end of Telco waters if they attempt to unify POTS/wireless with VOIP.  When will Telco exec's send the legal dogs after Google?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue Dr. Evil '1 million phone numbers.. .
MMUUUAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH ! 'It certainly sounds like a big number , but it is n't .
What I am wondering is what the Telco execs are doing about it.A little history for ./ The telco 's stuck it to Vonage two different ways.1 .
whisper campaign in the equity markets claiming Vonage did n't own the value-drivers in their business .
100 \ % bunk .
Amazon does n't own the 'tubes ' that connect to their service , has fantastical valuations .
With Vonage , it * is * a very big problem ? ? ?
But equity manager ran with it and hammered Vonage.2 .
Patent litigation .
Especially bad and ridiculously obvious patents were used to extract the Telco 's vig .
( hint , look up the word vigorish ) Google 's much more well-capitalized and swimming in the deep end of Telco waters if they attempt to unify POTS/wireless with VOIP .
When will Telco exec 's send the legal dogs after Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue Dr. Evil '1 million phone numbers...
MMUUUAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!'It certainly sounds like a big number, but it isn't.
What I am wondering is what the Telco execs are doing about it.A little history for ./ The telco's stuck it to Vonage two different ways.1.
whisper campaign in the equity markets claiming Vonage didn't own the value-drivers in their business.
100\% bunk.
Amazon doesn't own the 'tubes' that connect to their service, has fantastical valuations.
With Vonage, it *is* a very big problem???
But equity manager ran with it and hammered Vonage.2.
Patent litigation.
Especially bad and ridiculously obvious patents were used to extract the Telco's vig.
(hint, look up the word vigorish)Google's much more well-capitalized and swimming in the deep end of Telco waters if they attempt to unify POTS/wireless with VOIP.
When will Telco exec's send the legal dogs after Google?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393003</id>
	<title>Did they need it?</title>
	<author>phorm</author>
	<datestamp>1245439380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having dealt with Vonage's crappy customer service, particular when cancelling a "no contract plan", I'd have to say that the Telcos had little to worry about. I thought that the local telco was the worst it could get *until* I tried Vonage.</p><p>Did you know that they don't have a phone number for their disputes department, and then you must send them a letter to some address in nowhere USA within X (I believe 14) days of the issue/cancellation? A *phone* company that doesn't have a number for a major department... imagine that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having dealt with Vonage 's crappy customer service , particular when cancelling a " no contract plan " , I 'd have to say that the Telcos had little to worry about .
I thought that the local telco was the worst it could get * until * I tried Vonage.Did you know that they do n't have a phone number for their disputes department , and then you must send them a letter to some address in nowhere USA within X ( I believe 14 ) days of the issue/cancellation ?
A * phone * company that does n't have a number for a major department... imagine that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having dealt with Vonage's crappy customer service, particular when cancelling a "no contract plan", I'd have to say that the Telcos had little to worry about.
I thought that the local telco was the worst it could get *until* I tried Vonage.Did you know that they don't have a phone number for their disputes department, and then you must send them a letter to some address in nowhere USA within X (I believe 14) days of the issue/cancellation?
A *phone* company that doesn't have a number for a major department... imagine that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391693</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391837</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1245434340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've already registered mine on the DNC list, but additionally, you can also do fun things like push all unknown callers directly to voice mail.  Then you can quickly review and delete your VM's on their web site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already registered mine on the DNC list , but additionally , you can also do fun things like push all unknown callers directly to voice mail .
Then you can quickly review and delete your VM 's on their web site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already registered mine on the DNC list, but additionally, you can also do fun things like push all unknown callers directly to voice mail.
Then you can quickly review and delete your VM's on their web site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398649</id>
	<title>Glacial innovation speed of the telecoms!</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1245426000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since signing up [...] my annoying call rate has gone to zero.</p></div><p>This, and other benefits of Google Voice I've heard throughout this thread seems to tell me one thing:</p><p>The features of Google Voice coming into existing <em>only now</em> (really, two years ago is still "now", considering the lifetime of the telephone system) is damning evidence that the innovation speed at the telecom companies is <em>absolutely glacial</em>.</p><p>What's the highest-impact innovation in the telephony space in the last ten years?  Many would agree that it's the iPhone.  What does it tell you about the telecoms that the biggest innovation in their field is not made by them, the telecoms?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since signing up [ ... ] my annoying call rate has gone to zero.This , and other benefits of Google Voice I 've heard throughout this thread seems to tell me one thing : The features of Google Voice coming into existing only now ( really , two years ago is still " now " , considering the lifetime of the telephone system ) is damning evidence that the innovation speed at the telecom companies is absolutely glacial.What 's the highest-impact innovation in the telephony space in the last ten years ?
Many would agree that it 's the iPhone .
What does it tell you about the telecoms that the biggest innovation in their field is not made by them , the telecoms ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since signing up [...] my annoying call rate has gone to zero.This, and other benefits of Google Voice I've heard throughout this thread seems to tell me one thing:The features of Google Voice coming into existing only now (really, two years ago is still "now", considering the lifetime of the telephone system) is damning evidence that the innovation speed at the telecom companies is absolutely glacial.What's the highest-impact innovation in the telephony space in the last ten years?
Many would agree that it's the iPhone.
What does it tell you about the telecoms that the biggest innovation in their field is not made by them, the telecoms?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394679</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that's just great...</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1245402000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A pity that some callers spoof their ID</htmltext>
<tokenext>A pity that some callers spoof their ID</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A pity that some callers spoof their ID</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28452259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28396285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28400755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28429773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_143203_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391935
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392185
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391887
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28429773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28400755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392683
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394679
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28398649
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393711
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393515
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28396285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393659
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28393871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391837
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392711
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28452259
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392935
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_143203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28391665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392361
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28394991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_143203.28392347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
