<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_19_1343208</id>
	<title>"Definitive Evidence" For Ancient Lake On Mars</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245426540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.t11s.com/" rel="nofollow">TheSync</a> writes <i>"Eurekalert reports on '<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub\_releases/2009-06/uoca-uoc061709.php">definitive evidence</a>' for an ancient water lake on Mars. A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 80 square miles in area and 1,500 feet deep (roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain). Images came from the <a href="http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/">HiRISE instrument</a> on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Water carved a 30-mile-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry. The lack of additional, lower shorelines, shows that the lake dried up very quickly. Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake. On Earth, deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life, making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>TheSync writes " Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence ' for an ancient water lake on Mars .
A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 80 square miles in area and 1,500 feet deep ( roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain ) .
Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA 's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter .
Water carved a 30-mile-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry .
The lack of additional , lower shorelines , shows that the lake dried up very quickly .
Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake .
On Earth , deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life , making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TheSync writes "Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence' for an ancient water lake on Mars.
A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 80 square miles in area and 1,500 feet deep (roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain).
Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Water carved a 30-mile-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry.
The lack of additional, lower shorelines, shows that the lake dried up very quickly.
Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake.
On Earth, deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life, making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393951</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245442800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly and for the same reason microsoft has been covering up stable releases of windows for years. there is a whole shadow line of secret windows releases that only the Illuminati and obama have access to. the version they sell to the sheep consumers has the disk scratched up first before shipping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly and for the same reason microsoft has been covering up stable releases of windows for years .
there is a whole shadow line of secret windows releases that only the Illuminati and obama have access to .
the version they sell to the sheep consumers has the disk scratched up first before shipping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly and for the same reason microsoft has been covering up stable releases of windows for years.
there is a whole shadow line of secret windows releases that only the Illuminati and obama have access to.
the version they sell to the sheep consumers has the disk scratched up first before shipping.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961</id>
	<title>Old news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245430620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A three billion year old lake? Geez slashdot, can't you be any quicker with your stories?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A three billion year old lake ?
Geez slashdot , ca n't you be any quicker with your stories ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A three billion year old lake?
Geez slashdot, can't you be any quicker with your stories?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390979</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>dtml-try MyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1245430680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>403 Permission Denied</i>
<br> <br>
And a thorough job they did...</htmltext>
<tokenext>403 Permission Denied And a thorough job they did.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>403 Permission Denied
 
And a thorough job they did...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392649</id>
	<title>UC Boulder is CU Boulder</title>
	<author>caveratpaul</author>
	<datestamp>1245437940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a note that the University of Colorado at Boulder is abbreviated as CU not UC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a note that the University of Colorado at Boulder is abbreviated as CU not UC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a note that the University of Colorado at Boulder is abbreviated as CU not UC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392447</id>
	<title>Re:It is CU Boulder not UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be worse.  "CERN" is short for "European Organization for Nuclear Research".  Even when you account for the French-English word order flips (the french version is "Organisation Europeenne pour la Recherche Nucleaire"), it still doesn't quite work.</p><p>This was part of a plot by Werner Heisenberg to spread uncertainty, no doubt...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be worse .
" CERN " is short for " European Organization for Nuclear Research " .
Even when you account for the French-English word order flips ( the french version is " Organisation Europeenne pour la Recherche Nucleaire " ) , it still does n't quite work.This was part of a plot by Werner Heisenberg to spread uncertainty , no doubt... : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be worse.
"CERN" is short for "European Organization for Nuclear Research".
Even when you account for the French-English word order flips (the french version is "Organisation Europeenne pour la Recherche Nucleaire"), it still doesn't quite work.This was part of a plot by Werner Heisenberg to spread uncertainty, no doubt... :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>miowpurr</author>
	<datestamp>1245431040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, no. Read this <a href="http://drydredgers.org/martian\_crinoid.htm" title="drydredgers.org" rel="nofollow">http://drydredgers.org/martian\_crinoid.htm</a> [drydredgers.org] to see the photo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , no .
Read this http : //drydredgers.org/martian \ _crinoid.htm [ drydredgers.org ] to see the photo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, no.
Read this http://drydredgers.org/martian\_crinoid.htm [drydredgers.org] to see the photo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393243</id>
	<title>Re:It is CU Boulder not UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1245440280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably to avoid confusion with University of California.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably to avoid confusion with University of California .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably to avoid confusion with University of California.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391019</id>
	<title>Definite Evidence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245430860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391781</id>
	<title>Re:Blah blah blah, wake me when they prove it.</title>
	<author>geobeck</author>
	<datestamp>1245434040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharks</p></div></blockquote><p>The Mars sharks eat the pool of water?  Then I suppose they tell the probe "Take us with you, man, 'cause we ain't got no water left!  And besides, we'll shoot you with our frickin' laser beams if you don't!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharksThe Mars sharks eat the pool of water ?
Then I suppose they tell the probe " Take us with you , man , 'cause we ai n't got no water left !
And besides , we 'll shoot you with our frickin ' laser beams if you do n't !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharksThe Mars sharks eat the pool of water?
Then I suppose they tell the probe "Take us with you, man, 'cause we ain't got no water left!
And besides, we'll shoot you with our frickin' laser beams if you don't!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393145</id>
	<title>Re:Can we send rovers there please?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245439920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still think that the best spot to send a rover to would be the most hazardous of all places to do so.  That is to the bottom of the deepest part of the largest and deepest canyon on the planet, the Valles Marinaris.  This canyon is deeper than the Earth's Grand Canyon.  It is known that the bottom of the Grand Canyon has a microclimate all its own, wetter and warmer considerably than that of the plateau surface above it.  At six miles deep, consider our own planet.  The atmosphere on our planet has a pressure density at six miles above it that is not much thicker than that of Mars at it's 'mean sea level'.  That is why climbers of Mt Everest need oxygen to survive for long, and at 29000 feet this is thousands of feet LOWER than the elevation distance from floor to rim of the Valles Marinaris!  For this reason I state that pressure density of the Martian atmosphere at the bottom of the Valles Marinaris will be more dense than any other place on that planet.   Add to this that winds on the surface of the plateau above probably have limited interchange with the air on the bottom and the inescapable conclusion is that even the composition of the atmosphere on the bottom may be quite different from that outside the canyon.  If there is any surface water or flowing water on the planet it will very likely be in sheltered pools on the bottom of the Valles Marinaris.  If there is refugee life on this rock, that is also the most likely place.  Human visitors should be warned, however, that life even here may be ravenously hungry so should take precautions.  That said, this valley should also be protected from contamination from visiting spacecraft lest the bugs it finds be our own.  That further said, it is possible that assuming panspermia of sorts, life here could have originated on Mars in the first place, especially seeing Earth itself underwent several episodes of global glaciation like Mars today.  How do we know that during our own global glaciation that we were not a 'red planet' as well, with red dust from volcanic eruptions covering our own water ice.  So their bugs may look like OUR bugs and fool at least some of our scientists for honest reasons into thinking that contamination had taken place.....somehow.  Other less scrupulous 'patho-skeptik' so called 'scientists' would probably take the same position knowing the opposite to be true for more sinister reasons:  "If life was found outside Earth, then religion ON Earth would maybe fail under logical testing and cause religious wars so better to deny the fact as long as plausible deniability exists....these individuals, knowing the truth, would fiercely oppose any serious Martian exploration;  or "If life was found indigenous to Mars, then this would be against the 'prevailing so called wisdom or party line' that establishment scientists were supposed to follow if they wanted to keep their careers"!  Either one of these kinds of so-called 'scientists', and there are probably others that I have not thought of, in great numbers or influence could and would try to set us back progresswise for many years.  They have done so before, and religious of various stripes have usually been at the bottom of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still think that the best spot to send a rover to would be the most hazardous of all places to do so .
That is to the bottom of the deepest part of the largest and deepest canyon on the planet , the Valles Marinaris .
This canyon is deeper than the Earth 's Grand Canyon .
It is known that the bottom of the Grand Canyon has a microclimate all its own , wetter and warmer considerably than that of the plateau surface above it .
At six miles deep , consider our own planet .
The atmosphere on our planet has a pressure density at six miles above it that is not much thicker than that of Mars at it 's 'mean sea level' .
That is why climbers of Mt Everest need oxygen to survive for long , and at 29000 feet this is thousands of feet LOWER than the elevation distance from floor to rim of the Valles Marinaris !
For this reason I state that pressure density of the Martian atmosphere at the bottom of the Valles Marinaris will be more dense than any other place on that planet .
Add to this that winds on the surface of the plateau above probably have limited interchange with the air on the bottom and the inescapable conclusion is that even the composition of the atmosphere on the bottom may be quite different from that outside the canyon .
If there is any surface water or flowing water on the planet it will very likely be in sheltered pools on the bottom of the Valles Marinaris .
If there is refugee life on this rock , that is also the most likely place .
Human visitors should be warned , however , that life even here may be ravenously hungry so should take precautions .
That said , this valley should also be protected from contamination from visiting spacecraft lest the bugs it finds be our own .
That further said , it is possible that assuming panspermia of sorts , life here could have originated on Mars in the first place , especially seeing Earth itself underwent several episodes of global glaciation like Mars today .
How do we know that during our own global glaciation that we were not a 'red planet ' as well , with red dust from volcanic eruptions covering our own water ice .
So their bugs may look like OUR bugs and fool at least some of our scientists for honest reasons into thinking that contamination had taken place.....somehow .
Other less scrupulous 'patho-skeptik ' so called 'scientists ' would probably take the same position knowing the opposite to be true for more sinister reasons : " If life was found outside Earth , then religion ON Earth would maybe fail under logical testing and cause religious wars so better to deny the fact as long as plausible deniability exists....these individuals , knowing the truth , would fiercely oppose any serious Martian exploration ; or " If life was found indigenous to Mars , then this would be against the 'prevailing so called wisdom or party line ' that establishment scientists were supposed to follow if they wanted to keep their careers " !
Either one of these kinds of so-called 'scientists ' , and there are probably others that I have not thought of , in great numbers or influence could and would try to set us back progresswise for many years .
They have done so before , and religious of various stripes have usually been at the bottom of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still think that the best spot to send a rover to would be the most hazardous of all places to do so.
That is to the bottom of the deepest part of the largest and deepest canyon on the planet, the Valles Marinaris.
This canyon is deeper than the Earth's Grand Canyon.
It is known that the bottom of the Grand Canyon has a microclimate all its own, wetter and warmer considerably than that of the plateau surface above it.
At six miles deep, consider our own planet.
The atmosphere on our planet has a pressure density at six miles above it that is not much thicker than that of Mars at it's 'mean sea level'.
That is why climbers of Mt Everest need oxygen to survive for long, and at 29000 feet this is thousands of feet LOWER than the elevation distance from floor to rim of the Valles Marinaris!
For this reason I state that pressure density of the Martian atmosphere at the bottom of the Valles Marinaris will be more dense than any other place on that planet.
Add to this that winds on the surface of the plateau above probably have limited interchange with the air on the bottom and the inescapable conclusion is that even the composition of the atmosphere on the bottom may be quite different from that outside the canyon.
If there is any surface water or flowing water on the planet it will very likely be in sheltered pools on the bottom of the Valles Marinaris.
If there is refugee life on this rock, that is also the most likely place.
Human visitors should be warned, however, that life even here may be ravenously hungry so should take precautions.
That said, this valley should also be protected from contamination from visiting spacecraft lest the bugs it finds be our own.
That further said, it is possible that assuming panspermia of sorts, life here could have originated on Mars in the first place, especially seeing Earth itself underwent several episodes of global glaciation like Mars today.
How do we know that during our own global glaciation that we were not a 'red planet' as well, with red dust from volcanic eruptions covering our own water ice.
So their bugs may look like OUR bugs and fool at least some of our scientists for honest reasons into thinking that contamination had taken place.....somehow.
Other less scrupulous 'patho-skeptik' so called 'scientists' would probably take the same position knowing the opposite to be true for more sinister reasons:  "If life was found outside Earth, then religion ON Earth would maybe fail under logical testing and cause religious wars so better to deny the fact as long as plausible deniability exists....these individuals, knowing the truth, would fiercely oppose any serious Martian exploration;  or "If life was found indigenous to Mars, then this would be against the 'prevailing so called wisdom or party line' that establishment scientists were supposed to follow if they wanted to keep their careers"!
Either one of these kinds of so-called 'scientists', and there are probably others that I have not thought of, in great numbers or influence could and would try to set us back progresswise for many years.
They have done so before, and religious of various stripes have usually been at the bottom of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391219</id>
	<title>Re:Old news?</title>
	<author>No2Gates</author>
	<datestamp>1245431760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey mom, me an Billy are going swimming. we'll be back in about 12 years, ok?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey mom , me an Billy are going swimming .
we 'll be back in about 12 years , ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey mom, me an Billy are going swimming.
we'll be back in about 12 years, ok?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363</id>
	<title>Translation to standard units</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245432300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence' for an ancient water lake on Mars. A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake <b>207 square Km</b> in area and <b>457 m</b> deep (roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain). Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Water carved a <b>48 Km</b>-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry. The lack of additional, lower shorelines, shows that the lake dried up very quickly. Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake. ON Earth, deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life, making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence ' for an ancient water lake on Mars .
A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 207 square Km in area and 457 m deep ( roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain ) .
Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA 's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter .
Water carved a 48 Km-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry .
The lack of additional , lower shorelines , shows that the lake dried up very quickly .
Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake .
ON Earth , deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life , making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence' for an ancient water lake on Mars.
A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 207 square Km in area and 457 m deep (roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain).
Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Water carved a 48 Km-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry.
The lack of additional, lower shorelines, shows that the lake dried up very quickly.
Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake.
ON Earth, deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life, making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177</id>
	<title>It is CU Boulder not UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245431580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For some dumb reason University of Colorado at Boulder is called CU Boulder, not UC Boulder.  I just moved to Boulder and get corrected all the time by people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some dumb reason University of Colorado at Boulder is called CU Boulder , not UC Boulder .
I just moved to Boulder and get corrected all the time by people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some dumb reason University of Colorado at Boulder is called CU Boulder, not UC Boulder.
I just moved to Boulder and get corrected all the time by people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28437865</id>
	<title>Could be any liquid.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245766920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, like methane, or anything that is liquid at those temperatures.</p><p>But is *absolutely MUST be water*!!!!1!!11one, mustn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , like methane , or anything that is liquid at those temperatures.But is * absolutely MUST be water * ! ! ! ! 1 !
! 11one , must n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, like methane, or anything that is liquid at those temperatures.But is *absolutely MUST be water*!!!!1!
!11one, mustn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393807</id>
	<title>mod do3n</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245442260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">of rEality. Keep</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>of rEality .
Keep [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of rEality.
Keep [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392867</id>
	<title>Funny; at this point, I would rather NOT find life</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1245438780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>there. The reason is because Mars CAN be terriformed by plummitting a a few ammonia based asteroids from further out as well as a couple of ice based asteroids. It obviously would not occur overnight, but, once vasmir occurs, I would not be surprised to see us sending exploratory missions to locate resources on these asteroids. BUT, once life is discovered there, the west will not proceed with that (though I suspect more than a few other countries would push for it regardless of the life).</htmltext>
<tokenext>there .
The reason is because Mars CAN be terriformed by plummitting a a few ammonia based asteroids from further out as well as a couple of ice based asteroids .
It obviously would not occur overnight , but , once vasmir occurs , I would not be surprised to see us sending exploratory missions to locate resources on these asteroids .
BUT , once life is discovered there , the west will not proceed with that ( though I suspect more than a few other countries would push for it regardless of the life ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there.
The reason is because Mars CAN be terriformed by plummitting a a few ammonia based asteroids from further out as well as a couple of ice based asteroids.
It obviously would not occur overnight, but, once vasmir occurs, I would not be surprised to see us sending exploratory missions to locate resources on these asteroids.
BUT, once life is discovered there, the west will not proceed with that (though I suspect more than a few other countries would push for it regardless of the life).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391747</id>
	<title>Re:evidence of lake != lake of water</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop using epic fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop using epic fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop using epic fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392099</id>
	<title>Re:Sweet pics</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245435600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0504/WaterOnMars2\_gcc\_big.jpg" title="nasa.gov">Here you go</a> [nasa.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here you go [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here you go [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393387</id>
	<title>Why isn't there erosion over 3 billion years?</title>
	<author>fullgandoo</author>
	<datestamp>1245440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is some atmosphere on Mars and 3 billion years is a long time. Shouldn't all signs of an ancient shoreline have eroded by now? What am I missing here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is some atmosphere on Mars and 3 billion years is a long time .
Should n't all signs of an ancient shoreline have eroded by now ?
What am I missing here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is some atmosphere on Mars and 3 billion years is a long time.
Shouldn't all signs of an ancient shoreline have eroded by now?
What am I missing here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393649</id>
	<title>Re:It is CU Boulder not UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new there.  Anyone who has spent any time in Boulder can tell you the CU stands for <i>Cuntus Unconscicous</i>.</p><p>For real.  Keep your powder dry - and remember that if your date has hit the point where she is snoring in a pool of her own vomit you should interpret that as 'NO.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new there .
Anyone who has spent any time in Boulder can tell you the CU stands for Cuntus Unconscicous.For real .
Keep your powder dry - and remember that if your date has hit the point where she is snoring in a pool of her own vomit you should interpret that as 'NO .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new there.
Anyone who has spent any time in Boulder can tell you the CU stands for Cuntus Unconscicous.For real.
Keep your powder dry - and remember that if your date has hit the point where she is snoring in a pool of her own vomit you should interpret that as 'NO.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227</id>
	<title>evidence of lake != lake of water</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245431760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So where is the evidence that the lake was made of water? could be any liquid really... epic fail</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So where is the evidence that the lake was made of water ?
could be any liquid really... epic fail</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So where is the evidence that the lake was made of water?
could be any liquid really... epic fail</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392215</id>
	<title>Re:evidence of lake != lake of water</title>
	<author>pdxp</author>
	<datestamp>1245436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could've been ammonia, just like on the ironically-named planet <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocheworld" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Eau</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could 've been ammonia , just like on the ironically-named planet Eau [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could've been ammonia, just like on the ironically-named planet Eau [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105</id>
	<title>Lake champlain?</title>
	<author>allawalla</author>
	<datestamp>1245431280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is somewhere around 435 square miles, and 400 feet deep.  In which way are the two alike?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is somewhere around 435 square miles , and 400 feet deep .
In which way are the two alike ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is somewhere around 435 square miles, and 400 feet deep.
In which way are the two alike?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28395081</id>
	<title>there was life on mars</title>
	<author>ldcroberts</author>
	<datestamp>1245403320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Way too long ago to matter tho.  Initially they sent a rover to earth and found no life here then, and that it was uninhabitable for them, so they went off to another planet far far away.  The rover they sent here contained bacteria from their planet, some of which adapted and became the first forms of life here - thus we are all descended from martians.  Not many of them left to go to this new planet - many of them didn't believe the planet was going to end, and the birthrates dropped there so the population dwindled.  The remaining few battled among themselves to make it onto the escape ship but even then they didn't believe that birthrates would be any better.  The trip to the new planet was so long that the only chance of success involved breeding during the journey, so those left behind never knew whether it succeeded or not.  Once they got to the new planet, it wasn't habitable enough for them, it was close, but within 5-10 years they all perished of stress and fatigue.  Many bacteria were successful on their new planet and changed the course of history there - killing off whole species and creating new species.  In the same way that the later invasion of earth from an extra solar planet killed off the dinosaurs here.  The neanderthals were alien to earth, and when they arrived they changed the course of primate evolution here - allowing humans to rise, but ultimately couldn't adapt to this environment. I'm sure I could make up more stuff but at the end of the day does it really matter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way too long ago to matter tho .
Initially they sent a rover to earth and found no life here then , and that it was uninhabitable for them , so they went off to another planet far far away .
The rover they sent here contained bacteria from their planet , some of which adapted and became the first forms of life here - thus we are all descended from martians .
Not many of them left to go to this new planet - many of them did n't believe the planet was going to end , and the birthrates dropped there so the population dwindled .
The remaining few battled among themselves to make it onto the escape ship but even then they did n't believe that birthrates would be any better .
The trip to the new planet was so long that the only chance of success involved breeding during the journey , so those left behind never knew whether it succeeded or not .
Once they got to the new planet , it was n't habitable enough for them , it was close , but within 5-10 years they all perished of stress and fatigue .
Many bacteria were successful on their new planet and changed the course of history there - killing off whole species and creating new species .
In the same way that the later invasion of earth from an extra solar planet killed off the dinosaurs here .
The neanderthals were alien to earth , and when they arrived they changed the course of primate evolution here - allowing humans to rise , but ultimately could n't adapt to this environment .
I 'm sure I could make up more stuff but at the end of the day does it really matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way too long ago to matter tho.
Initially they sent a rover to earth and found no life here then, and that it was uninhabitable for them, so they went off to another planet far far away.
The rover they sent here contained bacteria from their planet, some of which adapted and became the first forms of life here - thus we are all descended from martians.
Not many of them left to go to this new planet - many of them didn't believe the planet was going to end, and the birthrates dropped there so the population dwindled.
The remaining few battled among themselves to make it onto the escape ship but even then they didn't believe that birthrates would be any better.
The trip to the new planet was so long that the only chance of success involved breeding during the journey, so those left behind never knew whether it succeeded or not.
Once they got to the new planet, it wasn't habitable enough for them, it was close, but within 5-10 years they all perished of stress and fatigue.
Many bacteria were successful on their new planet and changed the course of history there - killing off whole species and creating new species.
In the same way that the later invasion of earth from an extra solar planet killed off the dinosaurs here.
The neanderthals were alien to earth, and when they arrived they changed the course of primate evolution here - allowing humans to rise, but ultimately couldn't adapt to this environment.
I'm sure I could make up more stuff but at the end of the day does it really matter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392039</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1245435360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rofl... NASA tries everything in their power to proof life. Even the most rediculous "evidence" is brought up by NASA to indicate water and past life on mars. FAIL!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rofl... NASA tries everything in their power to proof life .
Even the most rediculous " evidence " is brought up by NASA to indicate water and past life on mars .
FAIL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rofl... NASA tries everything in their power to proof life.
Even the most rediculous "evidence" is brought up by NASA to indicate water and past life on mars.
FAIL!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391151</id>
	<title>Blah blah blah, wake me when they prove it.</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1245431460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to get excited about all of these Mars jazz... when I was a kid; after every other Popsci mag I used to read blathered about new evidence for life/water/robots on Mars, I started getting tired of it. Years later, they're still blathering about it; frankly, I'm tired of it. Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharks, then I'll be more enthushtaotiblastic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to get excited about all of these Mars jazz... when I was a kid ; after every other Popsci mag I used to read blathered about new evidence for life/water/robots on Mars , I started getting tired of it .
Years later , they 're still blathering about it ; frankly , I 'm tired of it .
Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharks , then I 'll be more enthushtaotiblastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to get excited about all of these Mars jazz... when I was a kid; after every other Popsci mag I used to read blathered about new evidence for life/water/robots on Mars, I started getting tired of it.
Years later, they're still blathering about it; frankly, I'm tired of it.
Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharks, then I'll be more enthushtaotiblastic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391759</id>
	<title>Re:Whose standard would that be?</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1245433980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
No, these are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_System\_of\_Units" title="wikipedia.org">really standard</a> [wikipedia.org].
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>
scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system
</p></div><p>
Oh, you mean the whole world? The imperial system was abandoned decades ago.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , these are really standard [ wikipedia.org ] .
scientists or countries that do n't use the imperial system Oh , you mean the whole world ?
The imperial system was abandoned decades ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
No, these are really standard [wikipedia.org].
scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system

Oh, you mean the whole world?
The imperial system was abandoned decades ago.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391481</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Space shrimp? I'd rather have some space burgers instead. Damn, I'm starving</htmltext>
<tokenext>Space shrimp ?
I 'd rather have some space burgers instead .
Damn , I 'm starving</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Space shrimp?
I'd rather have some space burgers instead.
Damn, I'm starving</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</id>
	<title>NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>BigHungryJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1245430380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life. Look at <a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/\_articles/03-08-2004/images/Crinoid\%20Martian\%20Fossil.jpg" title="enterprisemission.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [enterprisemission.com] picture of what I call a "space shrimp".</p><p>NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life .
Look at this [ enterprisemission.com ] picture of what I call a " space shrimp " .NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life.
Look at this [enterprisemission.com] picture of what I call a "space shrimp".NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393129</id>
	<title>Re:Old news?</title>
	<author>grub</author>
	<datestamp>1245439800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>God made a lake on Mars 3 billion years ago.<br> <br>2,999,994,000 years later he made earth.<br> <br>lolz</htmltext>
<tokenext>God made a lake on Mars 3 billion years ago .
2,999,994,000 years later he made earth .
lolz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God made a lake on Mars 3 billion years ago.
2,999,994,000 years later he made earth.
lolz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391851</id>
	<title>Re:Whose standard would that be?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245434400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>which is pretty much the whole word, except for backward USA</htmltext>
<tokenext>which is pretty much the whole word , except for backward USA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which is pretty much the whole word, except for backward USA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391225</id>
	<title>Re:Definite Evidence</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1245431760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence?</p></div><p>It is different from supposed evidence. Remember, we have not gotten their yet, so until someone pulls up something wet there are varying degrees of "evidence".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence ? It is different from supposed evidence .
Remember , we have not gotten their yet , so until someone pulls up something wet there are varying degrees of " evidence " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is definite evidence different from regular evidence?It is different from supposed evidence.
Remember, we have not gotten their yet, so until someone pulls up something wet there are varying degrees of "evidence".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391005</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245430800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This isn't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life.</p></div></blockquote><p>Errrm?  Are you serious?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life.Errrm ?
Are you serious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't news to those of us who investigate NASA cover ups of alien life.Errrm?
Are you serious?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392213</id>
	<title>Re:Lake champlain?</title>
	<author>ArieKremen</author>
	<datestamp>1245436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But Martian gravity is lower.  When you normalize by  the accelecration due to gravity the numbers will work out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Martian gravity is lower .
When you normalize by the accelecration due to gravity the numbers will work out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Martian gravity is lower.
When you normalize by  the accelecration due to gravity the numbers will work out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392311</id>
	<title>Re:evidence of lake != lake of water</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.</p><p>Using "epic fail" is indeed epic fail.</p><p>Oh shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree.Using " epic fail " is indeed epic fail.Oh shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.Using "epic fail" is indeed epic fail.Oh shit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477</id>
	<title>Whose standard would that be?</title>
	<author>gbutler69</author>
	<datestamp>1245432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, you mean, "Standard Units" for scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , you mean , " Standard Units " for scientists or countries that do n't use the imperial system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, you mean, "Standard Units" for scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392265</id>
	<title>How do they know ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1245436260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... its a shoreline? By the old boat launches and bait shops?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... its a shoreline ?
By the old boat launches and bait shops ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... its a shoreline?
By the old boat launches and bait shops?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392301</id>
	<title>Re:Lake champlain?</title>
	<author>R3d M3rcury</author>
	<datestamp>1245436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and, more importantly, did the Mars lake have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champ\_(legend)" title="wikipedia.org">a monster</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and , more importantly , did the Mars lake have a monster [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and, more importantly, did the Mars lake have a monster [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393301</id>
	<title>Re:UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245440400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>University of Michigan is U of M not MU.  University of Texas is UT not TU (except in College Station TX).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>University of Michigan is U of M not MU .
University of Texas is UT not TU ( except in College Station TX ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>University of Michigan is U of M not MU.
University of Texas is UT not TU (except in College Station TX).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393351</id>
	<title>Re:Whose standard would that be?</title>
	<author>eclectro</author>
	<datestamp>1245440580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh, you mean, Standard Units" for scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system.</p></div><p>You know, socialists.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , you mean , Standard Units " for scientists or countries that do n't use the imperial system.You know , socialists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, you mean, Standard Units" for scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system.You know, socialists.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989</id>
	<title>Can we send rovers there please?</title>
	<author>CosmicRabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1245430740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So knowing how on Earth water and life are so intrinsically associated, this seems like the perfect spot to send a future rover mission. In the past we got some inconclusive results from biochemical analysis of the soil in more arid zones of the red planet. Perhaps on this spot we can be more lucky?<br>
Also, the proof of early existence of liquid water on the planet also hints at a denser atmosphere and warmer temperatures on those times. This is very promising!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So knowing how on Earth water and life are so intrinsically associated , this seems like the perfect spot to send a future rover mission .
In the past we got some inconclusive results from biochemical analysis of the soil in more arid zones of the red planet .
Perhaps on this spot we can be more lucky ?
Also , the proof of early existence of liquid water on the planet also hints at a denser atmosphere and warmer temperatures on those times .
This is very promising !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So knowing how on Earth water and life are so intrinsically associated, this seems like the perfect spot to send a future rover mission.
In the past we got some inconclusive results from biochemical analysis of the soil in more arid zones of the red planet.
Perhaps on this spot we can be more lucky?
Also, the proof of early existence of liquid water on the planet also hints at a denser atmosphere and warmer temperatures on those times.
This is very promising!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391023</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Xistenz99</author>
	<datestamp>1245430860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FAIL:       Look at this [enterprisemission.com] picture of what I call a "space shrimp".</htmltext>
<tokenext>FAIL : Look at this [ enterprisemission.com ] picture of what I call a " space shrimp " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FAIL:       Look at this [enterprisemission.com] picture of what I call a "space shrimp".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400269</id>
	<title>Re:Can we send rovers there please?</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1245492420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main problem I see with trying to find evidence of life on Mars is that it lost its Mojo so long ago.   Short of bacterial fossils I do not think that much will be found.</p><p>3.5By ago, Earth had lots of single celled soup.   Why would Mars be any different.   It takes a long time to go from SCO(Single Celled Organisms, not a pariah to FOSS) to MCO and eventually to Vertebrates.</p><p>If anything resembling a virus or SCO is found I'd be amazed, if they find higher order life I'd suspect the sources.</p><p>$0.02....  thats all it's worth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main problem I see with trying to find evidence of life on Mars is that it lost its Mojo so long ago .
Short of bacterial fossils I do not think that much will be found.3.5By ago , Earth had lots of single celled soup .
Why would Mars be any different .
It takes a long time to go from SCO ( Single Celled Organisms , not a pariah to FOSS ) to MCO and eventually to Vertebrates.If anything resembling a virus or SCO is found I 'd be amazed , if they find higher order life I 'd suspect the sources. $ 0.02.... thats all it 's worth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main problem I see with trying to find evidence of life on Mars is that it lost its Mojo so long ago.
Short of bacterial fossils I do not think that much will be found.3.5By ago, Earth had lots of single celled soup.
Why would Mars be any different.
It takes a long time to go from SCO(Single Celled Organisms, not a pariah to FOSS) to MCO and eventually to Vertebrates.If anything resembling a virus or SCO is found I'd be amazed, if they find higher order life I'd suspect the sources.$0.02....  thats all it's worth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393469</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1245441000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From da link: "Even here in our local area many specimens are collected that "look like" something else. Sedimentary structures and <b>broken pieces of larger fossils</b> often look very much like other legitimate fossils."</p><p>ZOMG!  That's not a crinoid fossil, that's a broken piece of a dinosaur fossil!  Definitive proof of a Martian T-Rex!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From da link : " Even here in our local area many specimens are collected that " look like " something else .
Sedimentary structures and broken pieces of larger fossils often look very much like other legitimate fossils. " ZOMG !
That 's not a crinoid fossil , that 's a broken piece of a dinosaur fossil !
Definitive proof of a Martian T-Rex !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From da link: "Even here in our local area many specimens are collected that "look like" something else.
Sedimentary structures and broken pieces of larger fossils often look very much like other legitimate fossils."ZOMG!
That's not a crinoid fossil, that's a broken piece of a dinosaur fossil!
Definitive proof of a Martian T-Rex!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28396451</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245409200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there's a martian totem pole of some kind/fossilized medicine man? in the bottom right corner as well!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's a martian totem pole of some kind/fossilized medicine man ?
in the bottom right corner as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's a martian totem pole of some kind/fossilized medicine man?
in the bottom right corner as well!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390941</id>
	<title>Sweet pics</title>
	<author>SoupGuru</author>
	<datestamp>1245430560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, wouldn't it be neat if there was new evidence of water on Mars based on hi res pictures and someone would actually link to said pictures?  That would be neat-o.</p><p>Don't get me wrong, Defrosting Spots Over Polygonal Ground sounds interesting and all, but...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , would n't it be neat if there was new evidence of water on Mars based on hi res pictures and someone would actually link to said pictures ?
That would be neat-o.Do n't get me wrong , Defrosting Spots Over Polygonal Ground sounds interesting and all , but.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, wouldn't it be neat if there was new evidence of water on Mars based on hi res pictures and someone would actually link to said pictures?
That would be neat-o.Don't get me wrong, Defrosting Spots Over Polygonal Ground sounds interesting and all, but...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391513</id>
	<title>Re:If it's definitive evidence...</title>
	<author>Robin47</author>
	<datestamp>1245432960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because  it's 'alleged' definitive evidence?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's 'alleged ' definitive evidence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because  it's 'alleged' definitive evidence?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392871</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245438840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignoring the large glaring errors, let's look at the practicality of the situation:<br>If NASA had proof of intellegent life on MArs, they would get a blank check to get there.<br>I is in NASAs best interest to NOT have a cover-up.<br>It's also in the governments best interest not to ahve a cover up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignoring the large glaring errors , let 's look at the practicality of the situation : If NASA had proof of intellegent life on MArs , they would get a blank check to get there.I is in NASAs best interest to NOT have a cover-up.It 's also in the governments best interest not to ahve a cover up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignoring the large glaring errors, let's look at the practicality of the situation:If NASA had proof of intellegent life on MArs, they would get a blank check to get there.I is in NASAs best interest to NOT have a cover-up.It's also in the governments best interest not to ahve a cover up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392043</id>
	<title>Re:If it's definitive evidence...</title>
	<author>Bakkster</author>
	<datestamp>1245435360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because it's a direct quote "from the article".</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's a direct quote " from the article " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's a direct quote "from the article".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391475</id>
	<title>Site slashdotted</title>
	<author>PrecorInc</author>
	<datestamp>1245432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The linked article appears to be slashdotted, there is a mirror at <a href="http://eurekalert.precor-incorporated.com/" title="precor-incorporated.com" rel="nofollow">http://eurekalert.precor-incorporated.com/</a> [precor-incorporated.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The linked article appears to be slashdotted , there is a mirror at http : //eurekalert.precor-incorporated.com/ [ precor-incorporated.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The linked article appears to be slashdotted, there is a mirror at http://eurekalert.precor-incorporated.com/ [precor-incorporated.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400239</id>
	<title>Counter-proof</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245491880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, that image has been very thoroughly debunked. Look at <a href="http://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=3&amp;url=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.goatse.fr\%2F&amp;ei=uqM8SuTPLZ68jAe58NT6Dw&amp;usg=AFQjCNEQrt2r4WV11iUaZAwigFzUE9oHkw&amp;sig2=bddipJn-4Vw2e5sIV\_GbuQ" title="google.dk" rel="nofollow">this</a> [google.dk] picture from which yours originated. It's rather shocking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , that image has been very thoroughly debunked .
Look at this [ google.dk ] picture from which yours originated .
It 's rather shocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, that image has been very thoroughly debunked.
Look at this [google.dk] picture from which yours originated.
It's rather shocking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28396943</id>
	<title>Infinite loop</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1245411540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Define "Definitive".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Define " Definitive " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Define "Definitive".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28398593</id>
	<title>Liquid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245425340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this definitively water? Wouldn't any flowing liquid leave a similar deposit? Would a molten sulphur (or something) flow do the same?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this definitively water ?
Would n't any flowing liquid leave a similar deposit ?
Would a molten sulphur ( or something ) flow do the same ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this definitively water?
Wouldn't any flowing liquid leave a similar deposit?
Would a molten sulphur (or something) flow do the same?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391535</id>
	<title>UC Boulder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245433080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of the original Big-8 schools without a "state" in their names reverse their initials.  Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma are CU, MU, NU, and OU respectively.  There is no UC Boulder.  It is CU Boulder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the original Big-8 schools without a " state " in their names reverse their initials .
Colorado , Missouri , Nebraska , and Oklahoma are CU , MU , NU , and OU respectively .
There is no UC Boulder .
It is CU Boulder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the original Big-8 schools without a "state" in their names reverse their initials.
Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma are CU, MU, NU, and OU respectively.
There is no UC Boulder.
It is CU Boulder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297</id>
	<title>If it's definitive evidence...</title>
	<author>HuckleCom</author>
	<datestamp>1245432060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are we still putting quotes around 'definitive evidence' ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are we still putting quotes around 'definitive evidence ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are we still putting quotes around 'definitive evidence' ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28397775</id>
	<title>Re:NASA has been hiding life on Mars for years</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1245417660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil!</p></div></blockquote><p>Dear World,</p><p>Please stop referring to our rovers as fossils.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>NASA.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil ! Dear World,Please stop referring to our rovers as fossils.Thanks,NASA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA used the rock grinder on the rover to destroy this invaluable fossil!Dear World,Please stop referring to our rovers as fossils.Thanks,NASA.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390891</id>
	<title>First or second or third post!</title>
	<author>iamapizza</author>
	<datestamp>1245430380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[Redundant comment here]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Redundant comment here ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Redundant comment here]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28396451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28397775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391019
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1343208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393649
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391781
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392039
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28397775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393469
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28396451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391219
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28400269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391747
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28390941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392649
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391477
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28393351
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391759
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1343208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28391105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1343208.28392301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
