<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_19_1220258</id>
	<title>EFF Busts Illegitimate Subdomain Patent</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245415500000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://harmono.dromo.us/" rel="nofollow">eldavojohn</a> writes <i>"Unlike a lot of community support protection programs, the EFF's <a href="http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/36307/"> Patent Busting Project is starting to bear real fruit</a> instead of just <a href="//games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/01/0349211&amp;tid=155"> leveling the finger at offenders</a>. The USPTO is revoking an <a href="http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=ZIESAAAAEBAJ&amp;dq=6,687,746">illegitimate patent</a> granted in 2004 that sounds like automatically assigning subdomains. Sites like Wordpress, LiveJournal, or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time. If you have some extra cash, now's the time to <a href="https://secure.eff.org/site/Donation2">pony up a few bucks</a> so the EFF can carry on as one of the few organizations genuinely protecting your interests."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " Unlike a lot of community support protection programs , the EFF 's Patent Busting Project is starting to bear real fruit instead of just leveling the finger at offenders .
The USPTO is revoking an illegitimate patent granted in 2004 that sounds like automatically assigning subdomains .
Sites like Wordpress , LiveJournal , or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time .
If you have some extra cash , now 's the time to pony up a few bucks so the EFF can carry on as one of the few organizations genuinely protecting your interests .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "Unlike a lot of community support protection programs, the EFF's  Patent Busting Project is starting to bear real fruit instead of just  leveling the finger at offenders.
The USPTO is revoking an illegitimate patent granted in 2004 that sounds like automatically assigning subdomains.
Sites like Wordpress, LiveJournal, or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time.
If you have some extra cash, now's the time to pony up a few bucks so the EFF can carry on as one of the few organizations genuinely protecting your interests.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388823</id>
	<title>extra cash?</title>
	<author>sdaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1245421740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what is this "extra cash" of which you speak?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what is this " extra cash " of which you speak ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what is this "extra cash" of which you speak?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389283</id>
	<title>So what ?</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1245423480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does 'being a fundraising article' damage the article or the cause or the organization ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does 'being a fundraising article ' damage the article or the cause or the organization ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does 'being a fundraising article' damage the article or the cause or the organization ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389185</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>IP\_Troll</author>
	<datestamp>1245423120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not everyone is going to agree on everything and making donations a Boolean value is pretty silly.<br> <br>
Instead of punishing them for having a view point that doesn't completely match your own, how about rewarding them for doing a good job on the stuff you do agree on.<br> <br>If you hate spam 70\% of the time, hate patent trolls 30\% of the time and would have donated $100, then donate $30.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone is going to agree on everything and making donations a Boolean value is pretty silly .
Instead of punishing them for having a view point that does n't completely match your own , how about rewarding them for doing a good job on the stuff you do agree on .
If you hate spam 70 \ % of the time , hate patent trolls 30 \ % of the time and would have donated $ 100 , then donate $ 30 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone is going to agree on everything and making donations a Boolean value is pretty silly.
Instead of punishing them for having a view point that doesn't completely match your own, how about rewarding them for doing a good job on the stuff you do agree on.
If you hate spam 70\% of the time, hate patent trolls 30\% of the time and would have donated $100, then donate $30.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389203</id>
	<title>Would this money best be spent..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245423180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. fighting against patents that companies are already sending blackmail letters over?</p><p>With the state of the 'patent market', my impression is that everyone files as many as they possibly can. It's not unlikely that many of these will never be sought to be used for patent trolling at all. It should be better to only go for those that are being used while being obviously illegitimate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. fighting against patents that companies are already sending blackmail letters over ? With the state of the 'patent market ' , my impression is that everyone files as many as they possibly can .
It 's not unlikely that many of these will never be sought to be used for patent trolling at all .
It should be better to only go for those that are being used while being obviously illegitimate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. fighting against patents that companies are already sending blackmail letters over?With the state of the 'patent market', my impression is that everyone files as many as they possibly can.
It's not unlikely that many of these will never be sought to be used for patent trolling at all.
It should be better to only go for those that are being used while being obviously illegitimate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388737</id>
	<title>Any chance at getting money back?</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1245421260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone licensed the patent for a period extending past the date of revocation, can they successfully sue for a pro-rated refund?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone licensed the patent for a period extending past the date of revocation , can they successfully sue for a pro-rated refund ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone licensed the patent for a period extending past the date of revocation, can they successfully sue for a pro-rated refund?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388681</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>qortra</author>
	<datestamp>1245421020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It didn't read that way to me either.<br> <br>But it occurs to me that even if it did, that wouldn't be such a bad thing.  Any organization that exists through donations really ought to prove that they're worth a donation. This is once piece of evidence that the EFF is worth your money.<br> <br>Moreover, to those people who have already donated, this is a form of accountability.  Articles like this tell those people that they have not wasted their money - it is being put to good use doing the work that organization was created to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It did n't read that way to me either .
But it occurs to me that even if it did , that would n't be such a bad thing .
Any organization that exists through donations really ought to prove that they 're worth a donation .
This is once piece of evidence that the EFF is worth your money .
Moreover , to those people who have already donated , this is a form of accountability .
Articles like this tell those people that they have not wasted their money - it is being put to good use doing the work that organization was created to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It didn't read that way to me either.
But it occurs to me that even if it did, that wouldn't be such a bad thing.
Any organization that exists through donations really ought to prove that they're worth a donation.
This is once piece of evidence that the EFF is worth your money.
Moreover, to those people who have already donated, this is a form of accountability.
Articles like this tell those people that they have not wasted their money - it is being put to good use doing the work that organization was created to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389755</id>
	<title>Re:"prior" art?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245425520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cars weren't invented by Ford.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cars were n't invented by Ford .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cars weren't invented by Ford.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388793</id>
	<title>At least</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1245421560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it helps sets a precedent of what is patentable software technology. This helps other foundations that wish to fight patent trolls.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it helps sets a precedent of what is patentable software technology .
This helps other foundations that wish to fight patent trolls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it helps sets a precedent of what is patentable software technology.
This helps other foundations that wish to fight patent trolls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28400237</id>
	<title>Re:their next patent request</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1245491700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd buy that for a dollar!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd buy that for a dollar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd buy that for a dollar!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</id>
	<title>Is it just me...</title>
	<author>GreenTech11</author>
	<datestamp>1245420120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?

<p>Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.  </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is this essentially a fundraising article ?
Donate to us , because we got a patent revoked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?
Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113</id>
	<title>"prior" art?</title>
	<author>Theaetetus</author>
	<datestamp>1245422880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sites like Wordpress, LiveJournal, or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time.</p></div><p>Wordpress first appeared in 2003.  This patent was filed in 1999.<br>
Not saying it's novel or nonobvious, or that there isn't <i>other</i> prior art, but citing Wordpress is like saying "cars aren't anything new and Ford didn't invent anything. Why, the Toyota Prius has been around for quite some time."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sites like Wordpress , LiveJournal , or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time.Wordpress first appeared in 2003 .
This patent was filed in 1999 .
Not saying it 's novel or nonobvious , or that there is n't other prior art , but citing Wordpress is like saying " cars are n't anything new and Ford did n't invent anything .
Why , the Toyota Prius has been around for quite some time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sites like Wordpress, LiveJournal, or basically anyone with generated subdomains have been doing this for quite some time.Wordpress first appeared in 2003.
This patent was filed in 1999.
Not saying it's novel or nonobvious, or that there isn't other prior art, but citing Wordpress is like saying "cars aren't anything new and Ford didn't invent anything.
Why, the Toyota Prius has been around for quite some time.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389195</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>ergo98</author>
	<datestamp>1245423120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?</p><p>Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.</p></div> </blockquote><p>They're showing how they are fulfilling their mandate. What's the problem?</p><p>I would think that a lot of big companies would be filling the EFF's coffers, working together to take down the wolves that pray on those they can separate from the herd. Of course that won't happen, because many of those big companies occasionally become the target of the EFF.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is this essentially a fundraising article ? Donate to us , because we got a patent revoked .
They 're showing how they are fulfilling their mandate .
What 's the problem ? I would think that a lot of big companies would be filling the EFF 's coffers , working together to take down the wolves that pray on those they can separate from the herd .
Of course that wo n't happen , because many of those big companies occasionally become the target of the EFF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.
They're showing how they are fulfilling their mandate.
What's the problem?I would think that a lot of big companies would be filling the EFF's coffers, working together to take down the wolves that pray on those they can separate from the herd.
Of course that won't happen, because many of those big companies occasionally become the target of the EFF.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388701</id>
	<title>List</title>
	<author>calcio</author>
	<datestamp>1245421080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a much better copy of this article at <a href="http://www.precor-incorporated.com/" title="precor-incorporated.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.precor-incorporated.com/</a> [precor-incorporated.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a much better copy of this article at http : //www.precor-incorporated.com/ [ precor-incorporated.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a much better copy of this article at http://www.precor-incorporated.com/ [precor-incorporated.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388777</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1245421440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard they're also really into kiddie snuff porn.

</p><p>I mean, on principle.  Sure, on <em>principle</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard they 're also really into kiddie snuff porn .
I mean , on principle .
Sure , on principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard they're also really into kiddie snuff porn.
I mean, on principle.
Sure, on principle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28391463</id>
	<title>Re:their next patent request</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1245432780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, the EFF is infringing my patent on "a method to detect and bust illegitimate patents."</p><p>They will be hearing from my other Slashdot alias, which claims to be a lawyer.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the EFF is infringing my patent on " a method to detect and bust illegitimate patents .
" They will be hearing from my other Slashdot alias , which claims to be a lawyer.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the EFF is infringing my patent on "a method to detect and bust illegitimate patents.
"They will be hearing from my other Slashdot alias, which claims to be a lawyer.- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481</id>
	<title>their next patent request</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245420120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A method to autonomously direct the expansion and contraction of lungs for the purpose of oxygen extraction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A method to autonomously direct the expansion and contraction of lungs for the purpose of oxygen extraction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A method to autonomously direct the expansion and contraction of lungs for the purpose of oxygen extraction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388635</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>Ltap</author>
	<datestamp>1245420780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to me - it's proof that they can actually do what they say. Although, depending on how you look at it, every article is a fundraising article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to me - it 's proof that they can actually do what they say .
Although , depending on how you look at it , every article is a fundraising article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to me - it's proof that they can actually do what they say.
Although, depending on how you look at it, every article is a fundraising article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390749</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245429660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny.... I've been on the Internet for over a decade yet I don't have the spam problems that I hear people constantly complain about... About ~20\% of all email I get is spam, and I get around 40-50 messages a day. Is that a lot? No, but I don't believe for a second that spam is a linear concept.</p><p>Could it be that you, or people that have your email, have been careless in its sharing? I knew LONG ago, circa 1996, to be careful with whom and where I release my email address. Can you say the same thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny.... I 've been on the Internet for over a decade yet I do n't have the spam problems that I hear people constantly complain about... About ~ 20 \ % of all email I get is spam , and I get around 40-50 messages a day .
Is that a lot ?
No , but I do n't believe for a second that spam is a linear concept.Could it be that you , or people that have your email , have been careless in its sharing ?
I knew LONG ago , circa 1996 , to be careful with whom and where I release my email address .
Can you say the same thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny.... I've been on the Internet for over a decade yet I don't have the spam problems that I hear people constantly complain about... About ~20\% of all email I get is spam, and I get around 40-50 messages a day.
Is that a lot?
No, but I don't believe for a second that spam is a linear concept.Could it be that you, or people that have your email, have been careless in its sharing?
I knew LONG ago, circa 1996, to be careful with whom and where I release my email address.
Can you say the same thing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389311</id>
	<title>yea, our biggest threat to internet is spam indeed</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1245423660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>please fuck off. eff is fighting a LOT of shit that you rant against in slashdot. so dont bring irrelevant bullshit like spam. so you got a few emails, SO what ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>please fuck off .
eff is fighting a LOT of shit that you rant against in slashdot .
so dont bring irrelevant bullshit like spam .
so you got a few emails , SO what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please fuck off.
eff is fighting a LOT of shit that you rant against in slashdot.
so dont bring irrelevant bullshit like spam.
so you got a few emails, SO what ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</id>
	<title>The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245420720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll donate to the EFF when they get a clue about spam. Their official position is that spam is protected free speech, and measures to fight it are far worse than the problem. They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll donate to the EFF when they get a clue about spam .
Their official position is that spam is protected free speech , and measures to fight it are far worse than the problem .
They do n't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll donate to the EFF when they get a clue about spam.
Their official position is that spam is protected free speech, and measures to fight it are far worse than the problem.
They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390693</id>
	<title>Re:The obvious question.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245429420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a funny question, but also insightful.  That is--will the patent examiners who approved this one be fired for incompetence?  This ruling means nothing unless it successfully pushes for accountability.  Treat ninja as a proxy for some form of punishment, and answer me this:  who is the guilty party, exactly?  What will be done to them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a funny question , but also insightful .
That is--will the patent examiners who approved this one be fired for incompetence ?
This ruling means nothing unless it successfully pushes for accountability .
Treat ninja as a proxy for some form of punishment , and answer me this : who is the guilty party , exactly ?
What will be done to them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a funny question, but also insightful.
That is--will the patent examiners who approved this one be fired for incompetence?
This ruling means nothing unless it successfully pushes for accountability.
Treat ninja as a proxy for some form of punishment, and answer me this:  who is the guilty party, exactly?
What will be done to them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388747</id>
	<title>device-for-breathing-in-then-breathing-out dept.?</title>
	<author>rarel</author>
	<datestamp>1245421320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>HA, checkmate Darth Vader, we got prior art! <p> Pony up the cash or you're toast!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HA , checkmate Darth Vader , we got prior art !
Pony up the cash or you 're toast !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HA, checkmate Darth Vader, we got prior art!
Pony up the cash or you're toast!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392545</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1245437520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Asking for money isn't evil.<br><br>After all, the EFF patent attorneys who do the grunt work of getting the patents busted still have to eat.<br><br>I for one would be happy to donate to them if I wasn't already broke.<br><br>Thanks a lot economy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Asking for money is n't evil.After all , the EFF patent attorneys who do the grunt work of getting the patents busted still have to eat.I for one would be happy to donate to them if I was n't already broke.Thanks a lot economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asking for money isn't evil.After all, the EFF patent attorneys who do the grunt work of getting the patents busted still have to eat.I for one would be happy to donate to them if I wasn't already broke.Thanks a lot economy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389367</id>
	<title>Oh noes..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245423900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's actually seed money for skynet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually seed money for skynet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually seed money for skynet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388755</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1245421320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?</p></div><p>As a regular submitter, I assure you that when I wrote the fourth sentence as nothing but a request for donations I had no idea anyone would bother to read that far into the summary.  <br> <br>

Disclaimer: I do not work for the EFF but I do send them a twenty every now and then.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.</p></div><p>I was hoping it would sound more like "Donate to us because we can get <b>more</b> patents revoked."  And really, who else is working towards that?  Once the USPTO grants a patent, it's done.  They don't get as much from me as I give to public radio or open source software but I'll give them <i>some</i> change to fight that fight.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is this essentially a fundraising article ? As a regular submitter , I assure you that when I wrote the fourth sentence as nothing but a request for donations I had no idea anyone would bother to read that far into the summary .
Disclaimer : I do not work for the EFF but I do send them a twenty every now and then.Donate to us , because we got a patent revoked.I was hoping it would sound more like " Donate to us because we can get more patents revoked .
" And really , who else is working towards that ?
Once the USPTO grants a patent , it 's done .
They do n't get as much from me as I give to public radio or open source software but I 'll give them some change to fight that fight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?As a regular submitter, I assure you that when I wrote the fourth sentence as nothing but a request for donations I had no idea anyone would bother to read that far into the summary.
Disclaimer: I do not work for the EFF but I do send them a twenty every now and then.Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.I was hoping it would sound more like "Donate to us because we can get more patents revoked.
"  And really, who else is working towards that?
Once the USPTO grants a patent, it's done.
They don't get as much from me as I give to public radio or open source software but I'll give them some change to fight that fight.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388871</id>
	<title>Fuck you Linus Torvalds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245421920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rob Malda is a mongoloid who fucks little boys and dogs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rob Malda is a mongoloid who fucks little boys and dogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rob Malda is a mongoloid who fucks little boys and dogs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390169</id>
	<title>Re:their next patent request</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1245427200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, 2nd post and you still got beat...</p><p><div class="quote"><p> <strong>from the method-and-device-for-breathing-in-then-breathing-out dept</strong></p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , 2nd post and you still got beat... from the method-and-device-for-breathing-in-then-breathing-out dept</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, 2nd post and you still got beat... from the method-and-device-for-breathing-in-then-breathing-out dept 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390063</id>
	<title>Re:"prior" art?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245426720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well Ford invented many things, but not the car, as you seem to imply. Credit usually goes to this guy: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl\_Benz" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl\_Benz</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Ford invented many things , but not the car , as you seem to imply .
Credit usually goes to this guy : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl \ _Benz [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Ford invented many things, but not the car, as you seem to imply.
Credit usually goes to this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl\_Benz [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389375</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245423960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, is it just me, or you would like the donations rather go your way?<br>What have you done for that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , is it just me , or you would like the donations rather go your way ? What have you done for that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, is it just me, or you would like the donations rather go your way?What have you done for that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28396669</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245410220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.</p><p>The EFF is as hip to the problems of spam as anyone. They get as much or more than anyone else, and are made aware of the consequences of spam every day.</p><p>Think of the problems for the EFF if the government starts implementing anti-spam solutions. All of a sudden, they have a foot in the door to complete control of the internet. If you can scan each mail for spam content, why not scan for other nefarious data as well?</p><p>Spam solutions have to be technical based on secure standards, not government solutions. The EFF sees the truth in that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; They do n't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.The EFF is as hip to the problems of spam as anyone .
They get as much or more than anyone else , and are made aware of the consequences of spam every day.Think of the problems for the EFF if the government starts implementing anti-spam solutions .
All of a sudden , they have a foot in the door to complete control of the internet .
If you can scan each mail for spam content , why not scan for other nefarious data as well ? Spam solutions have to be technical based on secure standards , not government solutions .
The EFF sees the truth in that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.The EFF is as hip to the problems of spam as anyone.
They get as much or more than anyone else, and are made aware of the consequences of spam every day.Think of the problems for the EFF if the government starts implementing anti-spam solutions.
All of a sudden, they have a foot in the door to complete control of the internet.
If you can scan each mail for spam content, why not scan for other nefarious data as well?Spam solutions have to be technical based on secure standards, not government solutions.
The EFF sees the truth in that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392117</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245435660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?</p><p>Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.</p></div> </blockquote><p>It could be worse. It could have been a Cory Doctorow novel.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is this essentially a fundraising article ? Donate to us , because we got a patent revoked .
It could be worse .
It could have been a Cory Doctorow novel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is this essentially a fundraising article?Donate to us, because we got a patent revoked.
It could be worse.
It could have been a Cory Doctorow novel.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457</id>
	<title>The obvious question.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245420000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just one clarification is needed.</p><p>Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one clarification is needed.Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one clarification is needed.Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389355</id>
	<title>fFrist stop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245423840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">with the number With THOUSANDS of BSD culminated in study. [rice.edu] Shouts To the Fueling internal about half of 7he guest and never get from now on or</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>with the number With THOUSANDS of BSD culminated in study .
[ rice.edu ] Shouts To the Fueling internal about half of 7he guest and never get from now on or [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with the number With THOUSANDS of BSD culminated in study.
[rice.edu] Shouts To the Fueling internal about half of 7he guest and never get from now on or [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388763</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1245421380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not to me - it's proof that they can actually do what they say. Although, depending on how you look at it, every article is a fundraising article.</p></div><p>Whenever a non-profit communicates with the public through the press, the Internet, etc., the intended purpose, directly or indirectly, is to generate funds, yes.  The reason being, if they don't keep in the public eye, donations will drop off.  Out of sight; out of mind.  They depend on those donations for continued operation.  Without them they would cease to exist.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to me - it 's proof that they can actually do what they say .
Although , depending on how you look at it , every article is a fundraising article.Whenever a non-profit communicates with the public through the press , the Internet , etc. , the intended purpose , directly or indirectly , is to generate funds , yes .
The reason being , if they do n't keep in the public eye , donations will drop off .
Out of sight ; out of mind .
They depend on those donations for continued operation .
Without them they would cease to exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to me - it's proof that they can actually do what they say.
Although, depending on how you look at it, every article is a fundraising article.Whenever a non-profit communicates with the public through the press, the Internet, etc., the intended purpose, directly or indirectly, is to generate funds, yes.
The reason being, if they don't keep in the public eye, donations will drop off.
Out of sight; out of mind.
They depend on those donations for continued operation.
Without them they would cease to exist.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388635</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388685</id>
	<title>Re:The obvious question.</title>
	<author>commlinx</author>
	<datestamp>1245421020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yes, David Carradine is no longer available.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party ?
Yes , David Carradine is no longer available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will donation money be used to send ninjas to the offending party?
Yes, David Carradine is no longer available.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28393781</id>
	<title>What's with the asking for money?</title>
	<author>slapout</author>
	<datestamp>1245442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every time there's a mention of the EFF on Slashdot there's a plea for money in the summary. I don't recall any other group getting such treatment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time there 's a mention of the EFF on Slashdot there 's a plea for money in the summary .
I do n't recall any other group getting such treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time there's a mention of the EFF on Slashdot there's a plea for money in the summary.
I don't recall any other group getting such treatment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28402657</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>ReedYoung</author>
	<datestamp>1245520680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new here.  In fact, your user ID # proves that you are, even more so than I am.  In my months as a frequent but not regular<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.er, I have noticed that most of those who frequently comment consider censorship to be fully included in the category "stuff that matters" and that those who self-identify, either implicitly or explicitly, as "nerds" tend strongly to oppose censorship.  I suspect that you will either come around to this way of thinking, at least learn to appreciate its merits even if you continue to think the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. mainstream is "extreme," or you will just go away, perhaps after some interval of unfulfilling trolling or perhaps more quickly and less noisily, depending on your character, about which I don't pretend to know.  We don't all necessarily intend to be unfriendly to disagreement, certainly not when it appears genuine and intellectually honest, but censorship <strong>is</strong> always worse than what it purports to correct.  Always.</p><p>The similarity to censorship of granting corporate overlords unearned claims of control over "intellectual property" is trivially obvious, and therefore left as a <em>gedanken</em> exercise for the reader.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here .
In fact , your user ID # proves that you are , even more so than I am .
In my months as a frequent but not regular /.er , I have noticed that most of those who frequently comment consider censorship to be fully included in the category " stuff that matters " and that those who self-identify , either implicitly or explicitly , as " nerds " tend strongly to oppose censorship .
I suspect that you will either come around to this way of thinking , at least learn to appreciate its merits even if you continue to think the / .
mainstream is " extreme , " or you will just go away , perhaps after some interval of unfulfilling trolling or perhaps more quickly and less noisily , depending on your character , about which I do n't pretend to know .
We do n't all necessarily intend to be unfriendly to disagreement , certainly not when it appears genuine and intellectually honest , but censorship is always worse than what it purports to correct .
Always.The similarity to censorship of granting corporate overlords unearned claims of control over " intellectual property " is trivially obvious , and therefore left as a gedanken exercise for the reader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here.
In fact, your user ID # proves that you are, even more so than I am.
In my months as a frequent but not regular /.er, I have noticed that most of those who frequently comment consider censorship to be fully included in the category "stuff that matters" and that those who self-identify, either implicitly or explicitly, as "nerds" tend strongly to oppose censorship.
I suspect that you will either come around to this way of thinking, at least learn to appreciate its merits even if you continue to think the /.
mainstream is "extreme," or you will just go away, perhaps after some interval of unfulfilling trolling or perhaps more quickly and less noisily, depending on your character, about which I don't pretend to know.
We don't all necessarily intend to be unfriendly to disagreement, certainly not when it appears genuine and intellectually honest, but censorship is always worse than what it purports to correct.
Always.The similarity to censorship of granting corporate overlords unearned claims of control over "intellectual property" is trivially obvious, and therefore left as a gedanken exercise for the reader.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389529</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1245424560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The EFF is not there to fight spam.  It has nothing to do with their mission.  That's like a gun owner refusing to donate to the NRA because of they don't do anything to stop spam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The EFF is not there to fight spam .
It has nothing to do with their mission .
That 's like a gun owner refusing to donate to the NRA because of they do n't do anything to stop spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EFF is not there to fight spam.
It has nothing to do with their mission.
That's like a gun owner refusing to donate to the NRA because of they don't do anything to stop spam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389127</id>
	<title>Re:The EFF isn't entirely protecting our rights</title>
	<author>howlingmadhowie</author>
	<datestamp>1245422940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.</p></div><p>it's quite a risky stance to claim to know what the EFF understands and what it does not understand.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.it 's quite a risky stance to claim to know what the EFF understands and what it does not understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't understand that spam is highly destructive to the net as a form of communication.it's quite a risky stance to claim to know what the EFF understands and what it does not understand.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389205</id>
	<title>The list of the shameless "inventors" is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245423180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brian Shuster, Johnson Leong, Matthew Price, Brian Lam, Desmond Ford Johnson.</p><p>So that their names show up in this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. post every time somebody googles them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brian Shuster , Johnson Leong , Matthew Price , Brian Lam , Desmond Ford Johnson.So that their names show up in this / .
post every time somebody googles them .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brian Shuster, Johnson Leong, Matthew Price, Brian Lam, Desmond Ford Johnson.So that their names show up in this /.
post every time somebody googles them ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388487</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>jack2000</author>
	<datestamp>1245420120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A sudden outbreak of common sense!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A sudden outbreak of common sense !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sudden outbreak of common sense!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28391463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28400237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28402657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28396669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_19_1220258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28392117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28402657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388635
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389205
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28391463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28400237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28390749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28396669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28389355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_19_1220258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_19_1220258.28388487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
