<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_18_1948230</id>
	<title>iPhone 3.0 Update Delivers Prodigious Patch Batch</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1245312000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/" rel="nofollow">CWmike</a> writes <i>"Apple <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9134548">patched 46 security vulnerabilities in the iPhone and iPod Touch</a>, half of them in the Safari browser and its WebKit rendering engine, as it <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9134494">released iPhone OS 3.0</a> on Wednesday. One of the patched WebKit vulnerabilities stands out because of the attention it received in March, when a German college student, Nils, <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9130074">walked away with a $5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari</a> at the Pwn2Own challenge. Nils used a bug in WebKit's handling of SVGList objects to crack Safari."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CWmike writes " Apple patched 46 security vulnerabilities in the iPhone and iPod Touch , half of them in the Safari browser and its WebKit rendering engine , as it released iPhone OS 3.0 on Wednesday .
One of the patched WebKit vulnerabilities stands out because of the attention it received in March , when a German college student , Nils , walked away with a $ 5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari at the Pwn2Own challenge .
Nils used a bug in WebKit 's handling of SVGList objects to crack Safari .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CWmike writes "Apple patched 46 security vulnerabilities in the iPhone and iPod Touch, half of them in the Safari browser and its WebKit rendering engine, as it released iPhone OS 3.0 on Wednesday.
One of the patched WebKit vulnerabilities stands out because of the attention it received in March, when a German college student, Nils, walked away with a $5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari at the Pwn2Own challenge.
Nils used a bug in WebKit's handling of SVGList objects to crack Safari.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381115</id>
	<title>how do you people afford this shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245321420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i can barely fucking feed myself, you are obsessed with hacking a mult-hundred dollar product that just came out.</p><p>dont you people fucking get it? a 6 foot steel fence is not going to stop massive hordes of starving homeless people, and your fucking iphone 3g jailbreak bluetooth ass blaster 2000 is not going to save you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i can barely fucking feed myself , you are obsessed with hacking a mult-hundred dollar product that just came out.dont you people fucking get it ?
a 6 foot steel fence is not going to stop massive hordes of starving homeless people , and your fucking iphone 3g jailbreak bluetooth ass blaster 2000 is not going to save you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i can barely fucking feed myself, you are obsessed with hacking a mult-hundred dollar product that just came out.dont you people fucking get it?
a 6 foot steel fence is not going to stop massive hordes of starving homeless people, and your fucking iphone 3g jailbreak bluetooth ass blaster 2000 is not going to save you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384359</id>
	<title>mo\d up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245337200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">OF AMERICA (GNAA) your own beer sinc3 then. More 1. Therefore there</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>OF AMERICA ( GNAA ) your own beer sinc3 then .
More 1 .
Therefore there [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OF AMERICA (GNAA) your own beer sinc3 then.
More 1.
Therefore there [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382447</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1245327420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The upgrade to 3.0 is free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The upgrade to 3.0 is free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The upgrade to 3.0 is free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28391417</id>
	<title>iPhone 3.0 don't do it</title>
	<author>G4Cube</author>
	<datestamp>1245432540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a G3 iPhone and I just upgraded to the 3.0 software.
Anybody else done this and notice that about 99\% of your apps do not work?
You select them the phone goes to a dark screen and then back to the app desktop.
Is there any way to step back from the 3.0 software?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a G3 iPhone and I just upgraded to the 3.0 software .
Anybody else done this and notice that about 99 \ % of your apps do not work ?
You select them the phone goes to a dark screen and then back to the app desktop .
Is there any way to step back from the 3.0 software ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a G3 iPhone and I just upgraded to the 3.0 software.
Anybody else done this and notice that about 99\% of your apps do not work?
You select them the phone goes to a dark screen and then back to the app desktop.
Is there any way to step back from the 3.0 software?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380907</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1245320640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Real iPhone users don't need copy and paste. So the feature is irrelevant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Real iPhone users do n't need copy and paste .
So the feature is irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real iPhone users don't need copy and paste.
So the feature is irrelevant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382571</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1245328020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must be a Maddog 20/20 kinda guy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be a Maddog 20/20 kinda guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be a Maddog 20/20 kinda guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380725</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Henk Poley</author>
	<datestamp>1245319860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go here on your iPhone: <a href="http://help.benm.at/" title="help.benm.at">http://help.benm.at/</a> [help.benm.at]</p><p>It will show you how to enable tethering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go here on your iPhone : http : //help.benm.at/ [ help.benm.at ] It will show you how to enable tethering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go here on your iPhone: http://help.benm.at/ [help.benm.at]It will show you how to enable tethering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381279</id>
	<title>You were just given security for life</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245322140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.</i></p><p>Probably for some of the improvements playing media, you should check a number of the lists and see if anything appeals.  Also a number of new apps are going to take advantage of 3.0 and you'll quickly find you would like to upgrade.</p><p><i>I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update. Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secure</i></p><p>But that's  the beauty of a system where a large majority (80\%+) upgrades to  new OS.  You may have security exploit that could be used, but the reality is anyone looking to write an exploit would do so against 3.0 now as there will be hardly anyone using 2.x to attack...</p><p>A security vulnerability is a combination of the ease of performing the exploit and the desirably of doing so by an attacker.  A Touch is already less likely to be exploited because it doesn't make a good zombie client (network shuts down with the screen).  Then on top of that you'd have to trick a user to come to your site... in combination the odds against anyone taking advantage of this are astronomical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iPod touch , i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.Probably for some of the improvements playing media , you should check a number of the lists and see if anything appeals .
Also a number of new apps are going to take advantage of 3.0 and you 'll quickly find you would like to upgrade.I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update .
Sucks to have to pay $ 10 to be secureBut that 's the beauty of a system where a large majority ( 80 \ % + ) upgrades to new OS .
You may have security exploit that could be used , but the reality is anyone looking to write an exploit would do so against 3.0 now as there will be hardly anyone using 2.x to attack...A security vulnerability is a combination of the ease of performing the exploit and the desirably of doing so by an attacker .
A Touch is already less likely to be exploited because it does n't make a good zombie client ( network shuts down with the screen ) .
Then on top of that you 'd have to trick a user to come to your site... in combination the odds against anyone taking advantage of this are astronomical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.Probably for some of the improvements playing media, you should check a number of the lists and see if anything appeals.
Also a number of new apps are going to take advantage of 3.0 and you'll quickly find you would like to upgrade.I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update.
Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secureBut that's  the beauty of a system where a large majority (80\%+) upgrades to  new OS.
You may have security exploit that could be used, but the reality is anyone looking to write an exploit would do so against 3.0 now as there will be hardly anyone using 2.x to attack...A security vulnerability is a combination of the ease of performing the exploit and the desirably of doing so by an attacker.
A Touch is already less likely to be exploited because it doesn't make a good zombie client (network shuts down with the screen).
Then on top of that you'd have to trick a user to come to your site... in combination the odds against anyone taking advantage of this are astronomical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385163</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245344520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MMS and tethering available here in India and working just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MMS and tethering available here in India and working just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MMS and tethering available here in India and working just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380185</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You knew when you bought it that you'd have to pay for upgrades.  Don't pretend that you "thought" they'd give you free updates if those updates included some security fixes.  You're not that dumb and we all know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You knew when you bought it that you 'd have to pay for upgrades .
Do n't pretend that you " thought " they 'd give you free updates if those updates included some security fixes .
You 're not that dumb and we all know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You knew when you bought it that you'd have to pay for upgrades.
Don't pretend that you "thought" they'd give you free updates if those updates included some security fixes.
You're not that dumb and we all know it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28394433</id>
	<title>Re:Hacking Safari?</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1245444480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If people started to use 'Webkit version xxxx.xx' already, it would be better.</p><p>I hate Apple apologizers too but people miss one fact, Safari is a shell for a Webkit with minor changes at Apple's side. Webkit isn't just 'Safari engine' anymore, it is a huge player both in browsers, multiple operating systems and even core renderer of offline/online apps.</p><p>Just on major players scene, Webkit powers Qt 4.x from Trolltech, Google Chrome, Nokia S60/S40 browser (the company sells 10 M phones in weekend) and Adobe Air.</p><p>So, Webkit bugs will be found and will be fixed, just like any popular browsing engine. Some of them will just hit Safari, some will hit other stuff.</p><p>If you are interested with security fixes, updates, you shouldn't rely on such click happy blogs. Subscribe to this</p><p><a href="http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/security-announce" title="apple.com">http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/security-announce</a> [apple.com]</p><p>get security updates and changelogs minus the drama.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If people started to use 'Webkit version xxxx.xx ' already , it would be better.I hate Apple apologizers too but people miss one fact , Safari is a shell for a Webkit with minor changes at Apple 's side .
Webkit is n't just 'Safari engine ' anymore , it is a huge player both in browsers , multiple operating systems and even core renderer of offline/online apps.Just on major players scene , Webkit powers Qt 4.x from Trolltech , Google Chrome , Nokia S60/S40 browser ( the company sells 10 M phones in weekend ) and Adobe Air.So , Webkit bugs will be found and will be fixed , just like any popular browsing engine .
Some of them will just hit Safari , some will hit other stuff.If you are interested with security fixes , updates , you should n't rely on such click happy blogs .
Subscribe to thishttp : //www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/security-announce [ apple.com ] get security updates and changelogs minus the drama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If people started to use 'Webkit version xxxx.xx' already, it would be better.I hate Apple apologizers too but people miss one fact, Safari is a shell for a Webkit with minor changes at Apple's side.
Webkit isn't just 'Safari engine' anymore, it is a huge player both in browsers, multiple operating systems and even core renderer of offline/online apps.Just on major players scene, Webkit powers Qt 4.x from Trolltech, Google Chrome, Nokia S60/S40 browser (the company sells 10 M phones in weekend) and Adobe Air.So, Webkit bugs will be found and will be fixed, just like any popular browsing engine.
Some of them will just hit Safari, some will hit other stuff.If you are interested with security fixes, updates, you shouldn't rely on such click happy blogs.
Subscribe to thishttp://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/security-announce [apple.com]get security updates and changelogs minus the drama.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380607</id>
	<title>Re:Security for $10?</title>
	<author>grocer</author>
	<datestamp>1245319380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it does add copy/paste (finally), landscape keyboard in Notes &amp; Mail, global search, and nifty controls to Podcasts (30 sec skip, 2x/.5x/1x playback, e-mail button)...plus Push for apps to run in the background.  I'm satisfied with the upgrade on my 1G...but still annoyed I had to pay all 10 bucks when I don't get bluetooth headphone support (that's 2G only).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it does add copy/paste ( finally ) , landscape keyboard in Notes &amp; Mail , global search , and nifty controls to Podcasts ( 30 sec skip , 2x/.5x/1x playback , e-mail button ) ...plus Push for apps to run in the background .
I 'm satisfied with the upgrade on my 1G...but still annoyed I had to pay all 10 bucks when I do n't get bluetooth headphone support ( that 's 2G only ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it does add copy/paste (finally), landscape keyboard in Notes &amp; Mail, global search, and nifty controls to Podcasts (30 sec skip, 2x/.5x/1x playback, e-mail button)...plus Push for apps to run in the background.
I'm satisfied with the upgrade on my 1G...but still annoyed I had to pay all 10 bucks when I don't get bluetooth headphone support (that's 2G only).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389651</id>
	<title>Re:Apple charges 'by law' - Sarbanes-Oxley act</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1245425160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know... this doesn't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on the Sarbanes-Oxley act.</p></div><p>That's bullshit.  I bought iTouch OS 3.0 for $10 and assure you that it's not a bigger update than any of MS's service packs, or even their own OS X point upgrades.  Every OS company - including Apple - somehow manages to give away upgrades, but they're claiming the government made this one illegal?  Nope.  Apple wanted extra cash and they charged for it, pure and simple.  If they'd said something like "we're offering it for free to our premium customers", I think there would've been a lot less anger over it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know... this does n't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple 's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on the Sarbanes-Oxley act.That 's bullshit .
I bought iTouch OS 3.0 for $ 10 and assure you that it 's not a bigger update than any of MS 's service packs , or even their own OS X point upgrades .
Every OS company - including Apple - somehow manages to give away upgrades , but they 're claiming the government made this one illegal ?
Nope. Apple wanted extra cash and they charged for it , pure and simple .
If they 'd said something like " we 're offering it for free to our premium customers " , I think there would 've been a lot less anger over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know... this doesn't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on the Sarbanes-Oxley act.That's bullshit.
I bought iTouch OS 3.0 for $10 and assure you that it's not a bigger update than any of MS's service packs, or even their own OS X point upgrades.
Every OS company - including Apple - somehow manages to give away upgrades, but they're claiming the government made this one illegal?
Nope.  Apple wanted extra cash and they charged for it, pure and simple.
If they'd said something like "we're offering it for free to our premium customers", I think there would've been a lot less anger over it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331</id>
	<title>Yeah, but iTunes 8.2</title>
	<author>101010\_or\_0x2A</author>
	<datestamp>1245318300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is required to upgrade to 3.0. While its not a big deal for individual computers, in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not? And the "new" features are pretty pathetic really, more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is required to upgrade to 3.0 .
While its not a big deal for individual computers , in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples ( not so ) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not ?
And the " new " features are pretty pathetic really , more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is required to upgrade to 3.0.
While its not a big deal for individual computers, in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not?
And the "new" features are pretty pathetic really, more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382201</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245326160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Frankly I don't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about.</p></div></blockquote><p>With the release of 3.0, Apple has once again revolutionized the entire realm of interpersonal communications using technology and have put the rest of the computer industry on notice that things are transformed forever.</p><p>Their accomplishment?</p><p>Patches.</p><p>I'm telling you, the iPhone is the Chuck Norris of high-tech fashion accessories.  Everything that Apple does in regards to the iPhone is "revolutionary", "game-changing", and "transformative".</p><p>Patches...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly I do n't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about.With the release of 3.0 , Apple has once again revolutionized the entire realm of interpersonal communications using technology and have put the rest of the computer industry on notice that things are transformed forever.Their accomplishment ? Patches.I 'm telling you , the iPhone is the Chuck Norris of high-tech fashion accessories .
Everything that Apple does in regards to the iPhone is " revolutionary " , " game-changing " , and " transformative " .Patches.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly I don't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about.With the release of 3.0, Apple has once again revolutionized the entire realm of interpersonal communications using technology and have put the rest of the computer industry on notice that things are transformed forever.Their accomplishment?Patches.I'm telling you, the iPhone is the Chuck Norris of high-tech fashion accessories.
Everything that Apple does in regards to the iPhone is "revolutionary", "game-changing", and "transformative".Patches...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381601</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245323520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, actually it does now troll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , actually it does now troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, actually it does now troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381573</id>
	<title>Re:Security for $10?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245323340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade. I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update. Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secure.</p></div><p>US $10,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. a McDonalds meal costs what... $5 (or more depending on which one you buy) ? I don't really spend that much time annoying myself about price tags that low nor do I spend time browsing pirate bay to avoid paying them for that matter. I do agree that it kind of sucks not to get at least security updates for iPhone OS 2.X but then I wasn't terribly bothered about spending $10.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iPod touch , i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade .
I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update .
Sucks to have to pay $ 10 to be secure.US $ 10 , .. a McDonalds meal costs what... $ 5 ( or more depending on which one you buy ) ?
I do n't really spend that much time annoying myself about price tags that low nor do I spend time browsing pirate bay to avoid paying them for that matter .
I do agree that it kind of sucks not to get at least security updates for iPhone OS 2.X but then I was n't terribly bothered about spending $ 10 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.
I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update.
Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secure.US $10, .. a McDonalds meal costs what... $5 (or more depending on which one you buy) ?
I don't really spend that much time annoying myself about price tags that low nor do I spend time browsing pirate bay to avoid paying them for that matter.
I do agree that it kind of sucks not to get at least security updates for iPhone OS 2.X but then I wasn't terribly bothered about spending $10.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380685</id>
	<title>what update?</title>
	<author>wardk</author>
	<datestamp>1245319740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my iTunes isn't seeing any update from the original 3.0 upgrade yesterday.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my iTunes is n't seeing any update from the original 3.0 upgrade yesterday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my iTunes isn't seeing any update from the original 3.0 upgrade yesterday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380817</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>zaajats</author>
	<datestamp>1245320220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod? Paying for an update is ridiculous, especially when it fixes critical security flaws. I sure hope apple does the right thing.</p></div><p>Sure, paying for a security update alone is a bit strange, but really &mdash; it's only $10 and gives you so much more. Besides, it's not like your iPod has been taken over by viruses due to the bugs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod ?
Paying for an update is ridiculous , especially when it fixes critical security flaws .
I sure hope apple does the right thing.Sure , paying for a security update alone is a bit strange , but really    it 's only $ 10 and gives you so much more .
Besides , it 's not like your iPod has been taken over by viruses due to the bugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod?
Paying for an update is ridiculous, especially when it fixes critical security flaws.
I sure hope apple does the right thing.Sure, paying for a security update alone is a bit strange, but really — it's only $10 and gives you so much more.
Besides, it's not like your iPod has been taken over by viruses due to the bugs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382799</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245328980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It works on my phone here in Canada<br>~ tested on both Rogers and Fido</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It works on my phone here in Canada ~ tested on both Rogers and Fido</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works on my phone here in Canada~ tested on both Rogers and Fido</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381229</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245321900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>T-Mobile in Netherlands is <i>tolerating</i> it because they simply can't stop it. The standard iPhone rate includes all traffic (starting at 30 euro a month with 150 minutes+150 sms). Here is an easy <a href="http://www.iphoneclub.nl/forum/f14/iphone-modding/f64/iphone-3g-tips-tweaks/35611-makkelijk-tethering-aanzetten-kpn-and-t-mobile-zonder-ipcc-files.html#post296526" title="iphoneclub.nl" rel="nofollow">way in dutch</a> [iphoneclub.nl] how to set up tethering. Here's <a href="http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/60230/t-mobile-gedoogt-iphone-tethering.html" title="webwereld.nl" rel="nofollow">the article</a> [webwereld.nl] about the tolerating, also in dutch.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>T-Mobile in Netherlands is tolerating it because they simply ca n't stop it .
The standard iPhone rate includes all traffic ( starting at 30 euro a month with 150 minutes + 150 sms ) .
Here is an easy way in dutch [ iphoneclub.nl ] how to set up tethering .
Here 's the article [ webwereld.nl ] about the tolerating , also in dutch .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>T-Mobile in Netherlands is tolerating it because they simply can't stop it.
The standard iPhone rate includes all traffic (starting at 30 euro a month with 150 minutes+150 sms).
Here is an easy way in dutch [iphoneclub.nl] how to set up tethering.
Here's the article [webwereld.nl] about the tolerating, also in dutch.
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379515</id>
	<title>Frist Pist!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245315720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boo ya!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boo ya !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boo ya!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381319</id>
	<title>It's patched about as often.</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245322320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think about it, while they don't happen at exactly the same time OS X does see about as many patches issued as the iPhone.</p><p>One thing throwing you off is that the newer Leopard has taken longer to come out with newer iPhone OS versions (like 1.x to 2.x).</p><p>They do, of course, share the same base OS but tend to sort of leapfrog each other a little as to versions of components used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think about it , while they do n't happen at exactly the same time OS X does see about as many patches issued as the iPhone.One thing throwing you off is that the newer Leopard has taken longer to come out with newer iPhone OS versions ( like 1.x to 2.x ) .They do , of course , share the same base OS but tend to sort of leapfrog each other a little as to versions of components used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think about it, while they don't happen at exactly the same time OS X does see about as many patches issued as the iPhone.One thing throwing you off is that the newer Leopard has taken longer to come out with newer iPhone OS versions (like 1.x to 2.x).They do, of course, share the same base OS but tend to sort of leapfrog each other a little as to versions of components used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28393631</id>
	<title>Re:Kiss Pay-As-You-Go "Good-bye"</title>
	<author>garote</author>
	<datestamp>1245441600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans: GoPhone, its "pay as you go" plan, and Pick Your Plan,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "</i></p><p>I swear, I misread that as "Pick Your Pain", and did not even pause...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans : GoPhone , its " pay as you go " plan , and Pick Your Plan , ... " I swear , I misread that as " Pick Your Pain " , and did not even pause.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans: GoPhone, its "pay as you go" plan, and Pick Your Plan, ... "I swear, I misread that as "Pick Your Pain", and did not even pause...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384295</id>
	<title>Only $5000?</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1245336660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>" Nils, walked away with a $5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari at the Pwn2Own challenge."
<p>.</p><p>
In other news, for at least 3 months, hackers exploiting Nils technique walked away with a few hundred thousand via identity theft, atm fraud, password access, etc...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Nils , walked away with a $ 5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari at the Pwn2Own challenge .
" .
In other news , for at least 3 months , hackers exploiting Nils technique walked away with a few hundred thousand via identity theft , atm fraud , password access , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" Nils, walked away with a $5,000 cash prize for hacking Safari at the Pwn2Own challenge.
"
.
In other news, for at least 3 months, hackers exploiting Nils technique walked away with a few hundred thousand via identity theft, atm fraud, password access, etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380399</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>jabithew</author>
	<datestamp>1245318600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>O2 in the UK allow tethering, for some crazy amount of money extra.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>O2 in the UK allow tethering , for some crazy amount of money extra .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O2 in the UK allow tethering, for some crazy amount of money extra.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380343</id>
	<title>Shows the closed development of Apple these days</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Apple wasn't so hard on itself on the DRM scene, then they would have these embedded computers behaving more than their ellusive handprint has effected; they should have a modular patch system that doesn't break any existing applications and development.  You'ld think Apple would have learned from the success of OSX Liger edition, but instead they are trying to keep it all bottled-up with DRM'd precision so they don't have a developmental moving target (so to speak).  It's only a matter of time before <a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/5233c6cac0.jpg" title="anonymouse.org" rel="nofollow">Richard Matthew STALLMAN</a> [anonymouse.org] vents his pretended frustration to call for unity in this feudal tenancy of copyright GPL'd software to make a special half-ass distribution for iPh1ne and ickeePod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple was n't so hard on itself on the DRM scene , then they would have these embedded computers behaving more than their ellusive handprint has effected ; they should have a modular patch system that does n't break any existing applications and development .
You'ld think Apple would have learned from the success of OSX Liger edition , but instead they are trying to keep it all bottled-up with DRM 'd precision so they do n't have a developmental moving target ( so to speak ) .
It 's only a matter of time before Richard Matthew STALLMAN [ anonymouse.org ] vents his pretended frustration to call for unity in this feudal tenancy of copyright GPL 'd software to make a special half-ass distribution for iPh1ne and ickeePod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple wasn't so hard on itself on the DRM scene, then they would have these embedded computers behaving more than their ellusive handprint has effected; they should have a modular patch system that doesn't break any existing applications and development.
You'ld think Apple would have learned from the success of OSX Liger edition, but instead they are trying to keep it all bottled-up with DRM'd precision so they don't have a developmental moving target (so to speak).
It's only a matter of time before Richard Matthew STALLMAN [anonymouse.org] vents his pretended frustration to call for unity in this feudal tenancy of copyright GPL'd software to make a special half-ass distribution for iPh1ne and ickeePod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381457</id>
	<title>update? thanks but no thanks!..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245322860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this upgrade is amazingly troublesome for user.i tried it today, and it was painful no end.</p><p>first they make you upgrade itunes (it must be that iphoneos3 requires special super-puper method of uploading that only itunes8.2 supports).</p><p>then they backup everything on the handset, but upon upgrade it breaks (it said something about device being lost, unexpectedly disconnected or something).<br>so the device is bricked, well, being restarted it shows "itunes and usb cable". when it's connected, itunes says "oh, the device is dead you need to restore it"... yeah, no shit!</p><p>when "restore" is pressed, it says "hey there's a new version, do you want to restore and update?". and there's no escape! there's no button "thanks but no thanks, just return me to yesterday". you either restore+update it or have it bricked. WTF?!!</p><p>once i upgraded itunes and started update, i cannot return back! and yeah, restore didn't work, i saw "preparing for restore" for 5 minutes and then bah "unknown error #1604, have a nice day". windows' restart usually heals everything, but not in this case! their web page offers to clean usb socket, re-install windows' usb drivers, yeah, right...</p><p>lucky me, i had co-worker with older itunes and iphoneos2.2 so i was able to return it to 2.2. i think it's enough of experience. mms and rotated keyboard... well i hope i'll get it with 3.1, by that time it maybe will update.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this upgrade is amazingly troublesome for user.i tried it today , and it was painful no end.first they make you upgrade itunes ( it must be that iphoneos3 requires special super-puper method of uploading that only itunes8.2 supports ) .then they backup everything on the handset , but upon upgrade it breaks ( it said something about device being lost , unexpectedly disconnected or something ) .so the device is bricked , well , being restarted it shows " itunes and usb cable " .
when it 's connected , itunes says " oh , the device is dead you need to restore it " ... yeah , no shit ! when " restore " is pressed , it says " hey there 's a new version , do you want to restore and update ? " .
and there 's no escape !
there 's no button " thanks but no thanks , just return me to yesterday " .
you either restore + update it or have it bricked .
WTF ? ! ! once i upgraded itunes and started update , i can not return back !
and yeah , restore did n't work , i saw " preparing for restore " for 5 minutes and then bah " unknown error # 1604 , have a nice day " .
windows ' restart usually heals everything , but not in this case !
their web page offers to clean usb socket , re-install windows ' usb drivers , yeah , right...lucky me , i had co-worker with older itunes and iphoneos2.2 so i was able to return it to 2.2. i think it 's enough of experience .
mms and rotated keyboard... well i hope i 'll get it with 3.1 , by that time it maybe will update .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this upgrade is amazingly troublesome for user.i tried it today, and it was painful no end.first they make you upgrade itunes (it must be that iphoneos3 requires special super-puper method of uploading that only itunes8.2 supports).then they backup everything on the handset, but upon upgrade it breaks (it said something about device being lost, unexpectedly disconnected or something).so the device is bricked, well, being restarted it shows "itunes and usb cable".
when it's connected, itunes says "oh, the device is dead you need to restore it"... yeah, no shit!when "restore" is pressed, it says "hey there's a new version, do you want to restore and update?".
and there's no escape!
there's no button "thanks but no thanks, just return me to yesterday".
you either restore+update it or have it bricked.
WTF?!!once i upgraded itunes and started update, i cannot return back!
and yeah, restore didn't work, i saw "preparing for restore" for 5 minutes and then bah "unknown error #1604, have a nice day".
windows' restart usually heals everything, but not in this case!
their web page offers to clean usb socket, re-install windows' usb drivers, yeah, right...lucky me, i had co-worker with older itunes and iphoneos2.2 so i was able to return it to 2.2. i think it's enough of experience.
mms and rotated keyboard... well i hope i'll get it with 3.1, by that time it maybe will update.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380543</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>njfuzzy</author>
	<datestamp>1245319200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381275</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but iTunes 8.2</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1245322140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not</p></div><p>Or there's the part where the new functionality in the phone requires a new software version to control it?  You know, as in, "we couldn't predict the future with iTunes 8.1 to know what it would need for the third-gen iPhone coming out next year".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>another one of Apples ( not so ) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or notOr there 's the part where the new functionality in the phone requires a new software version to control it ?
You know , as in , " we could n't predict the future with iTunes 8.1 to know what it would need for the third-gen iPhone coming out next year " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or notOr there's the part where the new functionality in the phone requires a new software version to control it?
You know, as in, "we couldn't predict the future with iTunes 8.1 to know what it would need for the third-gen iPhone coming out next year".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380483</id>
	<title>I am NOT disappointed!</title>
	<author>Eggz Factor</author>
	<datestamp>1245318900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have a data plan of 1 gig per month or better, tethering data comes out of your regular monthly allowance - no extra charge. I must say that this was a pleasant surprise. The fine print in the agreement is that Rogers / Fido may rethink the current arrangement in the new year after assessing the actual hit to the network that tethering may or may not incur.</p><p>Fingers crossed...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have a data plan of 1 gig per month or better , tethering data comes out of your regular monthly allowance - no extra charge .
I must say that this was a pleasant surprise .
The fine print in the agreement is that Rogers / Fido may rethink the current arrangement in the new year after assessing the actual hit to the network that tethering may or may not incur.Fingers crossed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have a data plan of 1 gig per month or better, tethering data comes out of your regular monthly allowance - no extra charge.
I must say that this was a pleasant surprise.
The fine print in the agreement is that Rogers / Fido may rethink the current arrangement in the new year after assessing the actual hit to the network that tethering may or may not incur.Fingers crossed...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389901</id>
	<title>This is the wrong heading...</title>
	<author>SOTEC</author>
	<datestamp>1245426060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple: iPhone 3.0 Update Delivers Pompous Patch Batch

There, all better now.

Continue commenting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple : iPhone 3.0 Update Delivers Pompous Patch Batch There , all better now .
Continue commenting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple: iPhone 3.0 Update Delivers Pompous Patch Batch

There, all better now.
Continue commenting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389555</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1245424680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You knew when you bought it that you'd have to pay for upgrades.</p></div><p>I certainly didn't know I'd be paying for updates that other people are getting for free.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You knew when you bought it that you 'd have to pay for upgrades.I certainly did n't know I 'd be paying for updates that other people are getting for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You knew when you bought it that you'd have to pay for upgrades.I certainly didn't know I'd be paying for updates that other people are getting for free.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895</id>
	<title>Hacking Safari?</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245316860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I am missing something, but the article linked in the summary (about Pwn2Own's prize for hacking Safari) appears to be about someone hacking IE, not Safari.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I am missing something , but the article linked in the summary ( about Pwn2Own 's prize for hacking Safari ) appears to be about someone hacking IE , not Safari .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I am missing something, but the article linked in the summary (about Pwn2Own's prize for hacking Safari) appears to be about someone hacking IE, not Safari.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</id>
	<title>I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly I don't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about. I was hoping to use compass with google map after the update on my iPhone 3G, but all I got was a lousy voice-memo software.</p><p>And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G didn't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple! I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs!!</p><p>On a serious note, tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone, but it is not available in US, and it is not available in Germany. Could someone tell me where it is available? Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly I do n't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about .
I was hoping to use compass with google map after the update on my iPhone 3G , but all I got was a lousy voice-memo software.And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G did n't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple !
I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs !
! On a serious note , tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone , but it is not available in US , and it is not available in Germany .
Could someone tell me where it is available ?
Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly I don't know what all the hoopla about iPhone OS 3.0 is about.
I was hoping to use compass with google map after the update on my iPhone 3G, but all I got was a lousy voice-memo software.And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G didn't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple!
I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs!
!On a serious note, tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone, but it is not available in US, and it is not available in Germany.
Could someone tell me where it is available?
Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121</id>
	<title>Security for $10?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.  I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update.  Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secure.</p><p>
&nbsp; Although if i don't, it's easier to pWn and run cydia on it I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iPod touch , i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade .
I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update .
Sucks to have to pay $ 10 to be secure .
  Although if i do n't , it 's easier to pWn and run cydia on it I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iPod touch, i was wondering if it was worth it to upgrade.
I also wonder if these Safari bugs will be fixed in a 2.x update.
Sucks to have to pay $10 to be secure.
  Although if i don't, it's easier to pWn and run cydia on it I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380339</id>
	<title>Justifying piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fellow pirates,</p><p>I implore you to continue your campaign on Slashdot to make me feel less guilty.  I know that not paying someone for their work is wrong, but if Slashdot posts enough articles bashing the RIAA/MPAA/copyright law/whatever, it's easier for me to accept what I'm doing emotionally by visualizing <em>someone else</em> as the bad guy.  Once on the forefront of relevant IT news, Slashdot is now a lame repository of mainstream pseudoscience links and pro-piracy articles to appease a dwindling readership.  I am overjoyed.</p><p>Even though the open source community is about giving back as much as it is taking, I'm just going to take.  I'm a human leech with self-serving beliefs and an inability to empathize with content creators who are trying to make a living.</p><p>I don't believe John Carmack should be paid for his work.  I'm going to sit on my ass while he spends years coding the next advanced 3D engine from id Software.  When their game comes out, I'm going to pirate it without giving a second thought about paying John Carmack for his work.  I'm just so used to pirating things now that I take it for granted.  If anyone mentions John Carmack to make me feel guilty, I'll look for Slashdot articles that bolster my viewpoint, such as <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/18/0311216/Harvard-Study-Says-Weak-Copyright-Benefits-Society" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this one</a> [slashdot.org], amusingly posted in the Your Rights Online section even though none of my rights are being violated.</p><p>According to that study, it's okay to not pay people for their work because there's some vague hope that they'll make up the difference in income through "concerts and speaking tours."  Artists are now forced to take time out of doing what they want to do.  John Carmack must stop programming in order to make money from programming.  It's genius.  The study does exactly what I need it to--make me feel less guilty when I pirate.  We've managed to stretch the truth so far that we're actually telling ourselves that we're helping artists by not paying them for their work.  Excellent job.</p><p>I look forward to Slashdot telling me everyday who the bad guys are.  Even though Slashdot has sued websites in the past for copyright infringement, and they've <a href="http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/30/0036206" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">pretended to care about plagiarism</a> [slashdot.org], we're supposed to go along with Slashdot's anti-copyright agenda.  I'm okay with that hypocrisy because it serves me.  It makes me feel less guilty when I pirate something.  Remember, I'm not the bad guy--the RIAA/MPAA/whatever is.  That makes it okay for me to not pay people for their work.</p><p>EULAs and copyright licenses are wrong, yet the GPL is good.  Piracy isn't theft, yet GPL violations are referred to as "stolen GPL code."  I accept all of these double-standards because it serves me.  I pretend not to notice when someone points out that the GPL relies on copyright law, and if I want to get rid of copyright, my beloved open source code will no longer be protected by the GPL.  I don't care, because I'm too busy concerning myself with what I want for free, not about the consequences.  I want to get rid of copyrights because I've been told that copyrights are the bad guy, and they are an obstacle to my rampant piracy.</p><p>Fellow pirates, let us continue our selfish leeching.  Let us paint others as the bad guys to absolve us of our emotional guilt.  Our goal is to convince people that piracy is something the good guys are doing in a fight with the evil corporations.  Making money is wrong, even though Slashdot displays ads, and it cost me money to buy the computer I'm using to pirate stuff.</p><p>Yours truly,<br>A fellow Slashbot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fellow pirates,I implore you to continue your campaign on Slashdot to make me feel less guilty .
I know that not paying someone for their work is wrong , but if Slashdot posts enough articles bashing the RIAA/MPAA/copyright law/whatever , it 's easier for me to accept what I 'm doing emotionally by visualizing someone else as the bad guy .
Once on the forefront of relevant IT news , Slashdot is now a lame repository of mainstream pseudoscience links and pro-piracy articles to appease a dwindling readership .
I am overjoyed.Even though the open source community is about giving back as much as it is taking , I 'm just going to take .
I 'm a human leech with self-serving beliefs and an inability to empathize with content creators who are trying to make a living.I do n't believe John Carmack should be paid for his work .
I 'm going to sit on my ass while he spends years coding the next advanced 3D engine from id Software .
When their game comes out , I 'm going to pirate it without giving a second thought about paying John Carmack for his work .
I 'm just so used to pirating things now that I take it for granted .
If anyone mentions John Carmack to make me feel guilty , I 'll look for Slashdot articles that bolster my viewpoint , such as this one [ slashdot.org ] , amusingly posted in the Your Rights Online section even though none of my rights are being violated.According to that study , it 's okay to not pay people for their work because there 's some vague hope that they 'll make up the difference in income through " concerts and speaking tours .
" Artists are now forced to take time out of doing what they want to do .
John Carmack must stop programming in order to make money from programming .
It 's genius .
The study does exactly what I need it to--make me feel less guilty when I pirate .
We 've managed to stretch the truth so far that we 're actually telling ourselves that we 're helping artists by not paying them for their work .
Excellent job.I look forward to Slashdot telling me everyday who the bad guys are .
Even though Slashdot has sued websites in the past for copyright infringement , and they 've pretended to care about plagiarism [ slashdot.org ] , we 're supposed to go along with Slashdot 's anti-copyright agenda .
I 'm okay with that hypocrisy because it serves me .
It makes me feel less guilty when I pirate something .
Remember , I 'm not the bad guy--the RIAA/MPAA/whatever is .
That makes it okay for me to not pay people for their work.EULAs and copyright licenses are wrong , yet the GPL is good .
Piracy is n't theft , yet GPL violations are referred to as " stolen GPL code .
" I accept all of these double-standards because it serves me .
I pretend not to notice when someone points out that the GPL relies on copyright law , and if I want to get rid of copyright , my beloved open source code will no longer be protected by the GPL .
I do n't care , because I 'm too busy concerning myself with what I want for free , not about the consequences .
I want to get rid of copyrights because I 've been told that copyrights are the bad guy , and they are an obstacle to my rampant piracy.Fellow pirates , let us continue our selfish leeching .
Let us paint others as the bad guys to absolve us of our emotional guilt .
Our goal is to convince people that piracy is something the good guys are doing in a fight with the evil corporations .
Making money is wrong , even though Slashdot displays ads , and it cost me money to buy the computer I 'm using to pirate stuff.Yours truly,A fellow Slashbot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fellow pirates,I implore you to continue your campaign on Slashdot to make me feel less guilty.
I know that not paying someone for their work is wrong, but if Slashdot posts enough articles bashing the RIAA/MPAA/copyright law/whatever, it's easier for me to accept what I'm doing emotionally by visualizing someone else as the bad guy.
Once on the forefront of relevant IT news, Slashdot is now a lame repository of mainstream pseudoscience links and pro-piracy articles to appease a dwindling readership.
I am overjoyed.Even though the open source community is about giving back as much as it is taking, I'm just going to take.
I'm a human leech with self-serving beliefs and an inability to empathize with content creators who are trying to make a living.I don't believe John Carmack should be paid for his work.
I'm going to sit on my ass while he spends years coding the next advanced 3D engine from id Software.
When their game comes out, I'm going to pirate it without giving a second thought about paying John Carmack for his work.
I'm just so used to pirating things now that I take it for granted.
If anyone mentions John Carmack to make me feel guilty, I'll look for Slashdot articles that bolster my viewpoint, such as this one [slashdot.org], amusingly posted in the Your Rights Online section even though none of my rights are being violated.According to that study, it's okay to not pay people for their work because there's some vague hope that they'll make up the difference in income through "concerts and speaking tours.
"  Artists are now forced to take time out of doing what they want to do.
John Carmack must stop programming in order to make money from programming.
It's genius.
The study does exactly what I need it to--make me feel less guilty when I pirate.
We've managed to stretch the truth so far that we're actually telling ourselves that we're helping artists by not paying them for their work.
Excellent job.I look forward to Slashdot telling me everyday who the bad guys are.
Even though Slashdot has sued websites in the past for copyright infringement, and they've pretended to care about plagiarism [slashdot.org], we're supposed to go along with Slashdot's anti-copyright agenda.
I'm okay with that hypocrisy because it serves me.
It makes me feel less guilty when I pirate something.
Remember, I'm not the bad guy--the RIAA/MPAA/whatever is.
That makes it okay for me to not pay people for their work.EULAs and copyright licenses are wrong, yet the GPL is good.
Piracy isn't theft, yet GPL violations are referred to as "stolen GPL code.
"  I accept all of these double-standards because it serves me.
I pretend not to notice when someone points out that the GPL relies on copyright law, and if I want to get rid of copyright, my beloved open source code will no longer be protected by the GPL.
I don't care, because I'm too busy concerning myself with what I want for free, not about the consequences.
I want to get rid of copyrights because I've been told that copyrights are the bad guy, and they are an obstacle to my rampant piracy.Fellow pirates, let us continue our selfish leeching.
Let us paint others as the bad guys to absolve us of our emotional guilt.
Our goal is to convince people that piracy is something the good guys are doing in a fight with the evil corporations.
Making money is wrong, even though Slashdot displays ads, and it cost me money to buy the computer I'm using to pirate stuff.Yours truly,A fellow Slashbot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28396255</id>
	<title>Re:Apple charges 'by law' - Sarbanes-Oxley act</title>
	<author>ksheff</author>
	<datestamp>1245408240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about OS X updates that enable new features?  Why don't they charge for them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about OS X updates that enable new features ?
Why do n't they charge for them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about OS X updates that enable new features?
Why don't they charge for them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380627</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245319500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go ahead and search Google for the following string, it contains the patches you requested: iPod2,1\_3.0\_7A341\_Restore.ipsw</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go ahead and search Google for the following string , it contains the patches you requested : iPod2,1 \ _3.0 \ _7A341 \ _Restore.ipsw</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go ahead and search Google for the following string, it contains the patches you requested: iPod2,1\_3.0\_7A341\_Restore.ipsw</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379563</id>
	<title>First!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245315840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First Post!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First Post ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Post!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380407</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty simple, I'm not sure why you think it's convoluted.</p><p>Here's the instructions for tethering<br>1) go to a link in safari on the phone<br>2) turn on tethering.</p><p>Here's MMS<br>1) go to the same link<br>2) pull out sim<br>3) put in MMS capable phone<br>4) go to attmobile.com<br>5) change text plan from iphone to a regular Messaging plan<br>6) put sim back in iPhone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty simple , I 'm not sure why you think it 's convoluted.Here 's the instructions for tethering1 ) go to a link in safari on the phone2 ) turn on tethering.Here 's MMS1 ) go to the same link2 ) pull out sim3 ) put in MMS capable phone4 ) go to attmobile.com5 ) change text plan from iphone to a regular Messaging plan6 ) put sim back in iPhone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty simple, I'm not sure why you think it's convoluted.Here's the instructions for tethering1) go to a link in safari on the phone2) turn on tethering.Here's MMS1) go to the same link2) pull out sim3) put in MMS capable phone4) go to attmobile.com5) change text plan from iphone to a regular Messaging plan6) put sim back in iPhone</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380351</id>
	<title>Re:Hacking Safari?</title>
	<author>Em Ellel</author>
	<datestamp>1245318360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, you are missing the part where you should read the article</p><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>IE8 wasn't the only browser Nils hacked yesterday. After he took down IE8, he moved on to Apple Inc.'s Safari and Mozilla Corp.'s Firefox, both of which he successfully exploited with attack code he had created earlier. His total for the afternoon: $15,000 in cash from TippingPoint, and the Sony laptop</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , you are missing the part where you should read the articleFrom TFA : IE8 was n't the only browser Nils hacked yesterday .
After he took down IE8 , he moved on to Apple Inc. 's Safari and Mozilla Corp. 's Firefox , both of which he successfully exploited with attack code he had created earlier .
His total for the afternoon : $ 15,000 in cash from TippingPoint , and the Sony laptop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, you are missing the part where you should read the articleFrom TFA:IE8 wasn't the only browser Nils hacked yesterday.
After he took down IE8, he moved on to Apple Inc.'s Safari and Mozilla Corp.'s Firefox, both of which he successfully exploited with attack code he had created earlier.
His total for the afternoon: $15,000 in cash from TippingPoint, and the Sony laptop
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379651</id>
	<title>Loving it so far</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1245316080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had the dev version on the phone which was great, but at one point bricked my phone.</p><p>I've never seen a portable device add so much functionality on a regular basis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had the dev version on the phone which was great , but at one point bricked my phone.I 've never seen a portable device add so much functionality on a regular basis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had the dev version on the phone which was great, but at one point bricked my phone.I've never seen a portable device add so much functionality on a regular basis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28386737</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>uglyduckling</author>
	<datestamp>1245403920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tethering is available in the UK, but you have to <a href="http://shop.o2.co.uk/update/internet.html" title="o2.co.uk">pay a 'bolt-on' fee</a> [o2.co.uk] which is only a penny cheaper than their most expensive pay monthly (=no contract) USB dongle, even though the monthly contract includes 'unlimited internet'.  Nice of them to support their loyal customers like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering is available in the UK , but you have to pay a 'bolt-on ' fee [ o2.co.uk ] which is only a penny cheaper than their most expensive pay monthly ( = no contract ) USB dongle , even though the monthly contract includes 'unlimited internet' .
Nice of them to support their loyal customers like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering is available in the UK, but you have to pay a 'bolt-on' fee [o2.co.uk] which is only a penny cheaper than their most expensive pay monthly (=no contract) USB dongle, even though the monthly contract includes 'unlimited internet'.
Nice of them to support their loyal customers like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380251</id>
	<title>Next month...</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1245317940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>... oh hai it's meh jobs guys, i forgets dis 1 bug, 10$ for fixes plox.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>... oh hai it 's meh jobs guys , i forgets dis 1 bug , 10 $ for fixes plox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... oh hai it's meh jobs guys, i forgets dis 1 bug, 10$ for fixes plox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384081</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>RedWizzard</author>
	<datestamp>1245335340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On a serious note, tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone, but it is not available in US, and it is not available in Germany. Could someone tell me where it is available? Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.</p></div><p>Works in NZ. Very nice via Bluetooth!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a serious note , tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone , but it is not available in US , and it is not available in Germany .
Could someone tell me where it is available ?
Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.Works in NZ .
Very nice via Bluetooth !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a serious note, tethering was supposed to be there without the need to jailbreak your phone, but it is not available in US, and it is not available in Germany.
Could someone tell me where it is available?
Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.Works in NZ.
Very nice via Bluetooth!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381423</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1245322740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.</i></p><p>Certain companies with certain phones may well be. My phone Just Works on tethering and other things without the need to jailbreak anything<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) (I didn't even know it had a special name like "tethering" to be honest - I just thought it was something that worked as standard out of the box with any phone. There's nothing special about my phone, it's just a commonly available cheap bog-standard one.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.Certain companies with certain phones may well be .
My phone Just Works on tethering and other things without the need to jailbreak anything : ) ( I did n't even know it had a special name like " tethering " to be honest - I just thought it was something that worked as standard out of the box with any phone .
There 's nothing special about my phone , it 's just a commonly available cheap bog-standard one .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phone companies are the scum that are only slightly worse than the music industry.Certain companies with certain phones may well be.
My phone Just Works on tethering and other things without the need to jailbreak anything :) (I didn't even know it had a special name like "tethering" to be honest - I just thought it was something that worked as standard out of the box with any phone.
There's nothing special about my phone, it's just a commonly available cheap bog-standard one.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380669</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but iTunes 8.2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245319680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who says you *have* to use it? i use itunes elusively for iPhone updates. nothing requires you to use the software for mp3s or anything else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who says you * have * to use it ?
i use itunes elusively for iPhone updates .
nothing requires you to use the software for mp3s or anything else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who says you *have* to use it?
i use itunes elusively for iPhone updates.
nothing requires you to use the software for mp3s or anything else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Hel Toupee</author>
	<datestamp>1245317940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a first generation iPod Touch.  It says on the back of the box that software bugfixes are free for life.  I'd post a link to google images, but noone's managed to get a picture of the back of the box, go figure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a first generation iPod Touch .
It says on the back of the box that software bugfixes are free for life .
I 'd post a link to google images , but noone 's managed to get a picture of the back of the box , go figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a first generation iPod Touch.
It says on the back of the box that software bugfixes are free for life.
I'd post a link to google images, but noone's managed to get a picture of the back of the box, go figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380645</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>someonehasmyname</author>
	<datestamp>1245319560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, just jailbreak, already. How can you be a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. member and resist the urge to pwn your phone?</p><p>Jailbreaking doesn't void anything. I bought a 3G 2 weeks before the 'new model' was 'leaked', and broke it within an hour. Then 2 days before my 30 day 'tryout' was over, I backed it all up, restored it to default non-jailbroken firmware, and returned it 'because it sucked'.  Then I went back to the store to preorder the day the 3GS was announced.</p><p>My 3GS will be here in a few days, and it gets broken immediately as well.  You're missing out on so much good stuff.</p><p>You could prevent the lock screen from showing private sms and call data, tethering works over usb or ad-hoc wifi, springjumps+iblank rocks. my home screen icons all jumped to pages of categories laid out how I wanted them, different keyboard layouts (iTypeFastR, BB Storm, etc), being able to install themes/ringtones, BossPrefs, Folders to hide pron! (or password lists, etc.), Docs, NES, SNES4iPhone. I was 1/2 done with Link to The Past on my iPhone when I had to take it back.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , just jailbreak , already .
How can you be a / .
member and resist the urge to pwn your phone ? Jailbreaking does n't void anything .
I bought a 3G 2 weeks before the 'new model ' was 'leaked ' , and broke it within an hour .
Then 2 days before my 30 day 'tryout ' was over , I backed it all up , restored it to default non-jailbroken firmware , and returned it 'because it sucked' .
Then I went back to the store to preorder the day the 3GS was announced.My 3GS will be here in a few days , and it gets broken immediately as well .
You 're missing out on so much good stuff.You could prevent the lock screen from showing private sms and call data , tethering works over usb or ad-hoc wifi , springjumps + iblank rocks .
my home screen icons all jumped to pages of categories laid out how I wanted them , different keyboard layouts ( iTypeFastR , BB Storm , etc ) , being able to install themes/ringtones , BossPrefs , Folders to hide pron !
( or password lists , etc .
) , Docs , NES , SNES4iPhone .
I was 1/2 done with Link to The Past on my iPhone when I had to take it back .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, just jailbreak, already.
How can you be a /.
member and resist the urge to pwn your phone?Jailbreaking doesn't void anything.
I bought a 3G 2 weeks before the 'new model' was 'leaked', and broke it within an hour.
Then 2 days before my 30 day 'tryout' was over, I backed it all up, restored it to default non-jailbroken firmware, and returned it 'because it sucked'.
Then I went back to the store to preorder the day the 3GS was announced.My 3GS will be here in a few days, and it gets broken immediately as well.
You're missing out on so much good stuff.You could prevent the lock screen from showing private sms and call data, tethering works over usb or ad-hoc wifi, springjumps+iblank rocks.
my home screen icons all jumped to pages of categories laid out how I wanted them, different keyboard layouts (iTypeFastR, BB Storm, etc), being able to install themes/ringtones, BossPrefs, Folders to hide pron!
(or password lists, etc.
), Docs, NES, SNES4iPhone.
I was 1/2 done with Link to The Past on my iPhone when I had to take it back.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379839</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep.<br> <br>

Pays to RTFA, eh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
Pays to RTFA , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
Pays to RTFA, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28387201</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Richard\_at\_work</author>
	<datestamp>1245409500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a first generation iPod Touch as well, and I can state for a fact that the box says no such thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a first generation iPod Touch as well , and I can state for a fact that the box says no such thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a first generation iPod Touch as well, and I can state for a fact that the box says no such thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380961</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but iTunes 8.2</title>
	<author>ameyer17</author>
	<datestamp>1245320820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More like "should have been in 1.0" in some cases<br>Seriously, no copy and paste in 2009?</p><p>And it's theoretically possible Apple will release a 2.2.2 firmware for the iPod Touch with backported security fixes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More like " should have been in 1.0 " in some casesSeriously , no copy and paste in 2009 ? And it 's theoretically possible Apple will release a 2.2.2 firmware for the iPod Touch with backported security fixes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like "should have been in 1.0" in some casesSeriously, no copy and paste in 2009?And it's theoretically possible Apple will release a 2.2.2 firmware for the iPod Touch with backported security fixes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28383601</id>
	<title>(plus one Informa\tive)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245332460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>end, we nned you deEper into the</htmltext>
<tokenext>end , we nned you deEper into the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>end, we nned you deEper into the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291</id>
	<title>Apple charges 'by law' - Sarbanes-Oxley act</title>
	<author>RudeIota</author>
	<datestamp>1245336600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know... this doesn't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on <a href="http://notes.kateva.org/2007/01/sarbanes-oxley-means-no-features-in.html" title="kateva.org" rel="nofollow">the Sarbanes-Oxley act</a> [kateva.org].<br> <br>From what I understand, SOX is a law that intends to make public companies more accountable to share holders. Apple has interpreted SOX in such a way that it feels as though it *must* charge for updates which unleash new features that substantially increase the potential value of the device. This appears to be applicable to virtually all hardware-enabling features and reasonably 'novel' software features. 3.0 is such an update.<br> <br>Why doesn't this affect the iPhone? That's because the iPhone is a subscription-based device. As such, it continually generates profit for the company and its shareholders. The iPod Touch has no subscription, meaning that anytime Apple unleashes a new set of big features for free, they supposedly have "cheated" shareholders by not releasing a new product instead. To generate revenue, they charge for the update. The idea is this keeps them in compliance with SOX by generating extra revenue for 'shareholders'. Obviously, Apple is making a profit, but I understand SOX compliance also <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley\_Act#Criticism" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">costs big companies millions of dollars</a> [wikipedia.org] in fees (lawyers, accountants and God knows what else)... Who knows. And remember: Minor updates are supposedly fine; major updates are supposedly not fine -- although I'm not sure who the legally viable arbiter of that decision would be, exactly.<br> <br>Like it or not... Believe it or not... It's the way Apple has dealth with this. Incidentally, it's the same reason they charged $2.99 for 802.11n support on Macbooks through Software Updater.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know... this does n't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple 's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on the Sarbanes-Oxley act [ kateva.org ] .
From what I understand , SOX is a law that intends to make public companies more accountable to share holders .
Apple has interpreted SOX in such a way that it feels as though it * must * charge for updates which unleash new features that substantially increase the potential value of the device .
This appears to be applicable to virtually all hardware-enabling features and reasonably 'novel ' software features .
3.0 is such an update .
Why does n't this affect the iPhone ?
That 's because the iPhone is a subscription-based device .
As such , it continually generates profit for the company and its shareholders .
The iPod Touch has no subscription , meaning that anytime Apple unleashes a new set of big features for free , they supposedly have " cheated " shareholders by not releasing a new product instead .
To generate revenue , they charge for the update .
The idea is this keeps them in compliance with SOX by generating extra revenue for 'shareholders' .
Obviously , Apple is making a profit , but I understand SOX compliance also costs big companies millions of dollars [ wikipedia.org ] in fees ( lawyers , accountants and God knows what else ) ... Who knows .
And remember : Minor updates are supposedly fine ; major updates are supposedly not fine -- although I 'm not sure who the legally viable arbiter of that decision would be , exactly .
Like it or not... Believe it or not... It 's the way Apple has dealth with this .
Incidentally , it 's the same reason they charged $ 2.99 for 802.11n support on Macbooks through Software Updater .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know... this doesn't change the fact they charge for iPod firmware updates -- and Apple's reasoning is certainly open to well-deserved criticism -- but they lay the blame squarely on the Sarbanes-Oxley act [kateva.org].
From what I understand, SOX is a law that intends to make public companies more accountable to share holders.
Apple has interpreted SOX in such a way that it feels as though it *must* charge for updates which unleash new features that substantially increase the potential value of the device.
This appears to be applicable to virtually all hardware-enabling features and reasonably 'novel' software features.
3.0 is such an update.
Why doesn't this affect the iPhone?
That's because the iPhone is a subscription-based device.
As such, it continually generates profit for the company and its shareholders.
The iPod Touch has no subscription, meaning that anytime Apple unleashes a new set of big features for free, they supposedly have "cheated" shareholders by not releasing a new product instead.
To generate revenue, they charge for the update.
The idea is this keeps them in compliance with SOX by generating extra revenue for 'shareholders'.
Obviously, Apple is making a profit, but I understand SOX compliance also costs big companies millions of dollars [wikipedia.org] in fees (lawyers, accountants and God knows what else)... Who knows.
And remember: Minor updates are supposedly fine; major updates are supposedly not fine -- although I'm not sure who the legally viable arbiter of that decision would be, exactly.
Like it or not... Believe it or not... It's the way Apple has dealth with this.
Incidentally, it's the same reason they charged $2.99 for 802.11n support on Macbooks through Software Updater.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382383</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1245327000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could be walking backwards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could be walking backwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could be walking backwards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380087</id>
	<title>Update the iPhone as often as Leopard</title>
	<author>jskoda</author>
	<datestamp>1245317460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder why the iPhone doesn't see more patches and updates.  If the iPhone OS is a branch of Mac OS why isn't the phone patches as much as the desktop OS?  Do Windows Mobile machines patch every Tuesday?  I never updated my CrackBerry.  Perhaps Apple doesn't want the iPhone to appear to need patches more often than it's competitors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why the iPhone does n't see more patches and updates .
If the iPhone OS is a branch of Mac OS why is n't the phone patches as much as the desktop OS ?
Do Windows Mobile machines patch every Tuesday ?
I never updated my CrackBerry .
Perhaps Apple does n't want the iPhone to appear to need patches more often than it 's competitors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why the iPhone doesn't see more patches and updates.
If the iPhone OS is a branch of Mac OS why isn't the phone patches as much as the desktop OS?
Do Windows Mobile machines patch every Tuesday?
I never updated my CrackBerry.
Perhaps Apple doesn't want the iPhone to appear to need patches more often than it's competitors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381445</id>
	<title>Another Iphone Story.</title>
	<author>thomasw\_lrd</author>
	<datestamp>1245322800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must not be geeky enough, I'm tired of Iphone stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must not be geeky enough , I 'm tired of Iphone stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must not be geeky enough, I'm tired of Iphone stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380443</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple a doodley always does the right thing man!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple a doodley always does the right thing man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple a doodley always does the right thing man!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175</id>
	<title>Kiss Pay-As-You-Go "Good-bye"</title>
	<author>ackthpt</author>
	<datestamp>1245317700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.mobiletechreview.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Number=33485" title="mobiletechreview.com" rel="nofollow">GoPhone subscribers warned the upgrade will be the end of the service.</a> [mobiletechreview.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/166763/atandt\_narrows\_prepaid\_plan\_options.html" title="pcworld.com" rel="nofollow">AT&amp;T Narrows Prepaid Plan Options</a> [pcworld.com]</p><p><i>"AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans: GoPhone, its "pay as you go" plan, and Pick Your Plan, its "prepay once a month" plan. AT&amp;T's statement says that GoPhone will not be available for either original iPhones or iPhone 3Gs; Pick Your Plan will only continue to work for existing subscribers using the original iPhone, as long as they have an unlimited data plan. Current Pick Your Plan users who don't have an unlimited data plan will be asked to add one. iPhone 3G users are not eligible for Pick Your Plan.</i></p><p><i>According to Erica Sadun at TUAW, who's been investigating this issue, all pay-as-you-go users are being strongly encouraged to sign up for a postpaid plan, which includes making a new two-year commitment."</i></p><p>Looks like I'll be waiting a year for the Apple/AT&amp;T agreement to time-out. I'll not do a two year agreement again, ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GoPhone subscribers warned the upgrade will be the end of the service .
[ mobiletechreview.com ] AT&amp;T Narrows Prepaid Plan Options [ pcworld.com ] " AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans : GoPhone , its " pay as you go " plan , and Pick Your Plan , its " prepay once a month " plan .
AT&amp;T 's statement says that GoPhone will not be available for either original iPhones or iPhone 3Gs ; Pick Your Plan will only continue to work for existing subscribers using the original iPhone , as long as they have an unlimited data plan .
Current Pick Your Plan users who do n't have an unlimited data plan will be asked to add one .
iPhone 3G users are not eligible for Pick Your Plan.According to Erica Sadun at TUAW , who 's been investigating this issue , all pay-as-you-go users are being strongly encouraged to sign up for a postpaid plan , which includes making a new two-year commitment .
" Looks like I 'll be waiting a year for the Apple/AT&amp;T agreement to time-out .
I 'll not do a two year agreement again , ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GoPhone subscribers warned the upgrade will be the end of the service.
[mobiletechreview.com]AT&amp;T Narrows Prepaid Plan Options [pcworld.com]"AT&amp;T currently offers two types of prepaid plans: GoPhone, its "pay as you go" plan, and Pick Your Plan, its "prepay once a month" plan.
AT&amp;T's statement says that GoPhone will not be available for either original iPhones or iPhone 3Gs; Pick Your Plan will only continue to work for existing subscribers using the original iPhone, as long as they have an unlimited data plan.
Current Pick Your Plan users who don't have an unlimited data plan will be asked to add one.
iPhone 3G users are not eligible for Pick Your Plan.According to Erica Sadun at TUAW, who's been investigating this issue, all pay-as-you-go users are being strongly encouraged to sign up for a postpaid plan, which includes making a new two-year commitment.
"Looks like I'll be waiting a year for the Apple/AT&amp;T agreement to time-out.
I'll not do a two year agreement again, ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381285</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1245322140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G didn't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple! I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs!!</p></div><p>Why not use the difference of GPS coordinates to determine the last direction walked and use that to orient your google maps/compass?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G did n't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple !
I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs !
! Why not use the difference of GPS coordinates to determine the last direction walked and use that to orient your google maps/compass ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And before anyone points out that iPhone 3G didn't have compass built into the hardware - It is supposed to be apple!
I expect nothing sort of miracles from Steve Jobs!
!Why not use the difference of GPS coordinates to determine the last direction walked and use that to orient your google maps/compass?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379833</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384913</id>
	<title>Re:Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>O111000001100100</author>
	<datestamp>1245341280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny thing - I too have a first gen iTouch (Lennon Legend on the front of the box) and staring at the box as I type, I see no mention of any free software updates. It does however say "Song not included."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny thing - I too have a first gen iTouch ( Lennon Legend on the front of the box ) and staring at the box as I type , I see no mention of any free software updates .
It does however say " Song not included .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny thing - I too have a first gen iTouch (Lennon Legend on the front of the box) and staring at the box as I type, I see no mention of any free software updates.
It does however say "Song not included.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381671</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245323820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you mean like this? http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512\_7-10265889-233.html</p><p>enable tethering, no jailbreak required.  Do NOT do what the article says, instead read the comments.  Worked for me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you mean like this ?
http : //reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512 \ _7-10265889-233.htmlenable tethering , no jailbreak required .
Do NOT do what the article says , instead read the comments .
Worked for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you mean like this?
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512\_7-10265889-233.htmlenable tethering, no jailbreak required.
Do NOT do what the article says, instead read the comments.
Worked for me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385115</id>
	<title>Re:Kiss Pay-As-You-Go "Good-bye"</title>
	<author>soldoutactivist</author>
	<datestamp>1245343860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I held on to a prepaid iPhone for more than a year and a half. And then I broke it. And then I was fucked over by AT&amp;T. Now I've bought a 3GS.<br> <br>

This time he'll be nice to me. He's changed. I love him so much. He's just... angry sometimes. Nobody's perfect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I held on to a prepaid iPhone for more than a year and a half .
And then I broke it .
And then I was fucked over by AT&amp;T .
Now I 've bought a 3GS .
This time he 'll be nice to me .
He 's changed .
I love him so much .
He 's just... angry sometimes .
Nobody 's perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I held on to a prepaid iPhone for more than a year and a half.
And then I broke it.
And then I was fucked over by AT&amp;T.
Now I've bought a 3GS.
This time he'll be nice to me.
He's changed.
I love him so much.
He's just... angry sometimes.
Nobody's perfect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379987</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>Nixoloco</author>
	<datestamp>1245317220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
If you have AT&amp;T in the US, you can enable tethering and MMS without jailbreaking. It is pretty convoluted process, but it works. This isn't Apple's fault though, but AT&amp;T's.
<br>
<a href="http://www.krillr.com/blog/3DPQHBZ3/i-have-tethering-and-mms-on-my-iphone-and-yes-im-on-att" title="krillr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.krillr.com/blog/3DPQHBZ3/i-have-tethering-and-mms-on-my-iphone-and-yes-im-on-att</a> [krillr.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have AT&amp;T in the US , you can enable tethering and MMS without jailbreaking .
It is pretty convoluted process , but it works .
This is n't Apple 's fault though , but AT&amp;T 's .
http : //www.krillr.com/blog/3DPQHBZ3/i-have-tethering-and-mms-on-my-iphone-and-yes-im-on-att [ krillr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
If you have AT&amp;T in the US, you can enable tethering and MMS without jailbreaking.
It is pretty convoluted process, but it works.
This isn't Apple's fault though, but AT&amp;T's.
http://www.krillr.com/blog/3DPQHBZ3/i-have-tethering-and-mms-on-my-iphone-and-yes-im-on-att [krillr.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382515</id>
	<title>Re:I am disappointed!</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1245327780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not going to point out that you're just being a dick for no reason. Nope. Won't bother to do so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not going to point out that you 're just being a dick for no reason .
Nope. Wo n't bother to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not going to point out that you're just being a dick for no reason.
Nope. Won't bother to do so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381163</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, but iTunes 8.2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245321600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is required to upgrade to 3.0. While its not a big deal for individual computers, in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not? And the "new" features are pretty pathetic really, more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software.</p></div><p>So... let me get this straight, your office environment somehow includes lots and lots of people with iPhones, and this is a requirement (hence why you are apparently concerned with said phones being upgraded while at work).  Meaning that, if I were to go out on a limb, the office at which you work, in some way, shape, or form, most likely specializes in iPhone app programming.  Aaaaaand yet it does NOT have any sort of plan in place to upgrade iTunes (an important part of iPhone maintenance, which will update itself and alert you to this fact), not to mention the fact that this office is perfectly willing to stay behind a version of iPhone firmware in what is undeniably a viciously competitive market.</p><p>Alternatively, your office does NOT specialize in iPhone app development and you're just whining because you're too stubborn and/or paranoid and/or aimlessly idealistic to upgrade iTunes, and will most likely be bitching in a month or so anyway when some flaw is discovered in said program and it bites you hard because you heroically refused to upgrade iTunes for whatever reason seems right in your head.</p><p>Either way, I present a quote from the game Team Fortress 2 which, if I may be so bold to suggest, sums up the opinions of everyone who read your post: <b>"CRY SOME MORE!!!"</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is required to upgrade to 3.0 .
While its not a big deal for individual computers , in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples ( not so ) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not ?
And the " new " features are pretty pathetic really , more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software.So... let me get this straight , your office environment somehow includes lots and lots of people with iPhones , and this is a requirement ( hence why you are apparently concerned with said phones being upgraded while at work ) .
Meaning that , if I were to go out on a limb , the office at which you work , in some way , shape , or form , most likely specializes in iPhone app programming .
Aaaaaand yet it does NOT have any sort of plan in place to upgrade iTunes ( an important part of iPhone maintenance , which will update itself and alert you to this fact ) , not to mention the fact that this office is perfectly willing to stay behind a version of iPhone firmware in what is undeniably a viciously competitive market.Alternatively , your office does NOT specialize in iPhone app development and you 're just whining because you 're too stubborn and/or paranoid and/or aimlessly idealistic to upgrade iTunes , and will most likely be bitching in a month or so anyway when some flaw is discovered in said program and it bites you hard because you heroically refused to upgrade iTunes for whatever reason seems right in your head.Either way , I present a quote from the game Team Fortress 2 which , if I may be so bold to suggest , sums up the opinions of everyone who read your post : " CRY SOME MORE ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is required to upgrade to 3.0.
While its not a big deal for individual computers, in an office environment its not as trivial..another one of Apples (not so) subtle schemes to get you using a particular software version whether you like it or not?
And the "new" features are pretty pathetic really, more like they should have been in the 2.0 version of the software.So... let me get this straight, your office environment somehow includes lots and lots of people with iPhones, and this is a requirement (hence why you are apparently concerned with said phones being upgraded while at work).
Meaning that, if I were to go out on a limb, the office at which you work, in some way, shape, or form, most likely specializes in iPhone app programming.
Aaaaaand yet it does NOT have any sort of plan in place to upgrade iTunes (an important part of iPhone maintenance, which will update itself and alert you to this fact), not to mention the fact that this office is perfectly willing to stay behind a version of iPhone firmware in what is undeniably a viciously competitive market.Alternatively, your office does NOT specialize in iPhone app development and you're just whining because you're too stubborn and/or paranoid and/or aimlessly idealistic to upgrade iTunes, and will most likely be bitching in a month or so anyway when some flaw is discovered in said program and it bites you hard because you heroically refused to upgrade iTunes for whatever reason seems right in your head.Either way, I present a quote from the game Team Fortress 2 which, if I may be so bold to suggest, sums up the opinions of everyone who read your post: "CRY SOME MORE!!!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813</id>
	<title>Well that's just fantastic</title>
	<author>keeegan</author>
	<datestamp>1245316560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod? Paying for an update is ridiculous, especially when it fixes critical security flaws. I sure hope apple does the right thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod ?
Paying for an update is ridiculous , especially when it fixes critical security flaws .
I sure hope apple does the right thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when are they going to patch these security flaws on my 2.1 ipod?
Paying for an update is ridiculous, especially when it fixes critical security flaws.
I sure hope apple does the right thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381475</id>
	<title>Re:But the real question is...</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1245322920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is the above modded a Troll? iPhone OS2 does not support Copy &amp; paste so this is a legitimate questions. His intent might be to flame a bit, but the question remains legitimate. Let's not just mod people down just because we don't agree or because we're fanboys of this or that brand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the above modded a Troll ?
iPhone OS2 does not support Copy &amp; paste so this is a legitimate questions .
His intent might be to flame a bit , but the question remains legitimate .
Let 's not just mod people down just because we do n't agree or because we 're fanboys of this or that brand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the above modded a Troll?
iPhone OS2 does not support Copy &amp; paste so this is a legitimate questions.
His intent might be to flame a bit, but the question remains legitimate.
Let's not just mod people down just because we don't agree or because we're fanboys of this or that brand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751</id>
	<title>But the real question is...</title>
	<author>abshack</author>
	<datestamp>1245316380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it support copy &amp; paste?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it support copy &amp; paste ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it support copy &amp; paste?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28393631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28394433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28386737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28387201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28396255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1948230_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381275
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28393631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380185
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380249
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28387201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384291
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28396255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28389651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28394433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379987
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28384081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28385163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28386737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28382383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381423
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28379833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1948230.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28380087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1948230.28381319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
