<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_17_2218225</id>
	<title>Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved?</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1245236640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>PRB\_Ohio writes <i>"The sun is in the middle of a century long solar minimum, and <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/17jun\_jetstream.htm?list1092811">sunspots have been puzzlingly scarce for more than two years</a>. Now, for the first time, solar physicists might understand why.

The gist is that there is a 'jet stream' like phenomenon about 7,000km below the surface of the sun. The streams migrate slowly from the poles to the equator and when a jet stream reaches the critical latitude of 22 degrees, new-cycle sunspots begin to appear.

Scientists at the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson, Arizona, used a technique called helioseismology to track and analyze the streams."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>PRB \ _Ohio writes " The sun is in the middle of a century long solar minimum , and sunspots have been puzzlingly scarce for more than two years .
Now , for the first time , solar physicists might understand why .
The gist is that there is a 'jet stream ' like phenomenon about 7,000km below the surface of the sun .
The streams migrate slowly from the poles to the equator and when a jet stream reaches the critical latitude of 22 degrees , new-cycle sunspots begin to appear .
Scientists at the National Solar Observatory ( NSO ) in Tucson , Arizona , used a technique called helioseismology to track and analyze the streams .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PRB\_Ohio writes "The sun is in the middle of a century long solar minimum, and sunspots have been puzzlingly scarce for more than two years.
Now, for the first time, solar physicists might understand why.
The gist is that there is a 'jet stream' like phenomenon about 7,000km below the surface of the sun.
The streams migrate slowly from the poles to the equator and when a jet stream reaches the critical latitude of 22 degrees, new-cycle sunspots begin to appear.
Scientists at the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson, Arizona, used a technique called helioseismology to track and analyze the streams.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370207</id>
	<title>It's obvious</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1245266580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was Carmen Sandiego.  Seriously, wasn't anyone paying attention?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was Carmen Sandiego .
Seriously , was n't anyone paying attention ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was Carmen Sandiego.
Seriously, wasn't anyone paying attention?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367645</id>
	<title>TV comercial in the making</title>
	<author>Starteck81</author>
	<datestamp>1245240780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here I was thinking the sun was finally was done with puberty or discovered Clearasil... I was way off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here I was thinking the sun was finally was done with puberty or discovered Clearasil... I was way off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here I was thinking the sun was finally was done with puberty or discovered Clearasil... I was way off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368327</id>
	<title>Oh, shoot!</title>
	<author>reboot246</author>
	<datestamp>1245246540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And all this time I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming.<br><br>Back to the drawing board.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>And all this time I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming.Back to the drawing board .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all this time I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming.Back to the drawing board.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369497</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1245258660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"that at least some climate activity isn't and can't be affected by humans"</i>
<br> <br>
Been reading Andrew Bolt's fact free opinion columns have we? Nobody who has read the IPCC reports could possibly belive that scientists dispute the existance of natural variations but plenty of politically motivated, anti-science trolls have claimed EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation. Not the least amoung these lying hypocrites is the coal industry's pet senator <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,27574,24911151-3102,00.html" title="news.com.au">Barnaby Joyce</a> [news.com.au].
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/" title="bom.gov.au">Here</a> [bom.gov.au] is what the BOM says about our climate and the <a href="http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/drought/" title="bom.gov.au">permenant drought</a> [bom.gov.au].
<br> <br>
The fact that Melbourne's dams are at their lowest level ever (for how many winter's in a row now?), or the fact that most of our major cities are on severe water rationing and scrambling to build giant de-sal plants, or the fact that our grain harvest has been cut in half for all but 2 of the last 10 yrs, may not bother you, but it certainly bothers farmers and most Aussies with more than a single brain cell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" that at least some climate activity is n't and ca n't be affected by humans " Been reading Andrew Bolt 's fact free opinion columns have we ?
Nobody who has read the IPCC reports could possibly belive that scientists dispute the existance of natural variations but plenty of politically motivated , anti-science trolls have claimed EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation .
Not the least amoung these lying hypocrites is the coal industry 's pet senator Barnaby Joyce [ news.com.au ] .
Here [ bom.gov.au ] is what the BOM says about our climate and the permenant drought [ bom.gov.au ] .
The fact that Melbourne 's dams are at their lowest level ever ( for how many winter 's in a row now ?
) , or the fact that most of our major cities are on severe water rationing and scrambling to build giant de-sal plants , or the fact that our grain harvest has been cut in half for all but 2 of the last 10 yrs , may not bother you , but it certainly bothers farmers and most Aussies with more than a single brain cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"that at least some climate activity isn't and can't be affected by humans"
 
Been reading Andrew Bolt's fact free opinion columns have we?
Nobody who has read the IPCC reports could possibly belive that scientists dispute the existance of natural variations but plenty of politically motivated, anti-science trolls have claimed EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation.
Not the least amoung these lying hypocrites is the coal industry's pet senator Barnaby Joyce [news.com.au].
Here [bom.gov.au] is what the BOM says about our climate and the permenant drought [bom.gov.au].
The fact that Melbourne's dams are at their lowest level ever (for how many winter's in a row now?
), or the fact that most of our major cities are on severe water rationing and scrambling to build giant de-sal plants, or the fact that our grain harvest has been cut in half for all but 2 of the last 10 yrs, may not bother you, but it certainly bothers farmers and most Aussies with more than a single brain cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368287</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>riverat1</author>
	<datestamp>1245246180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard on the news today that the Australian Weather Service decided to stop calling it a drought because using the word drought implies it will end at some point and they don't see this ending anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard on the news today that the Australian Weather Service decided to stop calling it a drought because using the word drought implies it will end at some point and they do n't see this ending anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard on the news today that the Australian Weather Service decided to stop calling it a drought because using the word drought implies it will end at some point and they don't see this ending anytime soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367705</id>
	<title>Sunspot cycle</title>
	<author>Psychotic\_Wrath</author>
	<datestamp>1245241260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is a neat article explaining more about sunspots
<a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr\_deepsolarminimum.htm?list56376/" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr\_deepsolarminimum.htm?list56376/</a> [nasa.gov]
It talks about the cycle in sunspots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a neat article explaining more about sunspots http : //science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr \ _deepsolarminimum.htm ? list56376/ [ nasa.gov ] It talks about the cycle in sunspots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a neat article explaining more about sunspots
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr\_deepsolarminimum.htm?list56376/ [nasa.gov]
It talks about the cycle in sunspots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368581</id>
	<title>Re:Puberty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245249180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Acne goes away when you get out of puberty.  You could have fooled me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Acne goes away when you get out of puberty .
You could have fooled me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Acne goes away when you get out of puberty.
You could have fooled me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368325</id>
	<title>NOT the biggest Mystery of the Sunspots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245246480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The biggest mystery of sunspots is why they only come out at daytime. In all the years of observation, they have never appeared at night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest mystery of sunspots is why they only come out at daytime .
In all the years of observation , they have never appeared at night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest mystery of sunspots is why they only come out at daytime.
In all the years of observation, they have never appeared at night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615</id>
	<title>Puberty</title>
	<author>CosmicRabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1245240540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My theory is way simpler. The Sun simply got out of puberty, and obviously acne started to disappear...</htmltext>
<tokenext>My theory is way simpler .
The Sun simply got out of puberty , and obviously acne started to disappear.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My theory is way simpler.
The Sun simply got out of puberty, and obviously acne started to disappear...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368301</id>
	<title>???Clue???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245246360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solar minimum refers to both sunspot counts and overall solar energy output.  The earth is being hit by  the least solar energy in a long time currently.</p><p>We are fortunate that the solar cycle is a relatively minor factor in the climate, or we'd be in a serious world of hurt (as in deaths due to famine on the order of a billion) within a decade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solar minimum refers to both sunspot counts and overall solar energy output .
The earth is being hit by the least solar energy in a long time currently.We are fortunate that the solar cycle is a relatively minor factor in the climate , or we 'd be in a serious world of hurt ( as in deaths due to famine on the order of a billion ) within a decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solar minimum refers to both sunspot counts and overall solar energy output.
The earth is being hit by  the least solar energy in a long time currently.We are fortunate that the solar cycle is a relatively minor factor in the climate, or we'd be in a serious world of hurt (as in deaths due to famine on the order of a billion) within a decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28375101</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245344340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This doesn't make any sense.  You can't assign a portion without some kind of methodology.  I could easily argue that gravity is 99.9\% responsible for our climate, because if gravity stopped the planet would disintegrate.  Yes, the sun is a critical part of how are environment works.  There are thousands of critical things without which we'd all be dead.  Each one of them is 100\% important.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't make any sense .
You ca n't assign a portion without some kind of methodology .
I could easily argue that gravity is 99.9 \ % responsible for our climate , because if gravity stopped the planet would disintegrate .
Yes , the sun is a critical part of how are environment works .
There are thousands of critical things without which we 'd all be dead .
Each one of them is 100 \ % important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't make any sense.
You can't assign a portion without some kind of methodology.
I could easily argue that gravity is 99.9\% responsible for our climate, because if gravity stopped the planet would disintegrate.
Yes, the sun is a critical part of how are environment works.
There are thousands of critical things without which we'd all be dead.
Each one of them is 100\% important.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28373761</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>Bemopolis</author>
	<datestamp>1245338880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>The problem is, and always has been, distribution.
And encroachment onto arable land.  And erosion.  And leaching of overused fertilizers and pesticides into the ground water.  Oh, and the depletion of ground water.  Not to mention the strain on infrastructure due to the tripling of the population.
<br> <br>But at least the last one will increase the odds of a good pandemic to cull the herd.  Thanks, Malthus!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is , and always has been , distribution .
And encroachment onto arable land .
And erosion .
And leaching of overused fertilizers and pesticides into the ground water .
Oh , and the depletion of ground water .
Not to mention the strain on infrastructure due to the tripling of the population .
But at least the last one will increase the odds of a good pandemic to cull the herd .
Thanks , Malthus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is, and always has been, distribution.
And encroachment onto arable land.
And erosion.
And leaching of overused fertilizers and pesticides into the ground water.
Oh, and the depletion of ground water.
Not to mention the strain on infrastructure due to the tripling of the population.
But at least the last one will increase the odds of a good pandemic to cull the herd.
Thanks, Malthus!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370975</id>
	<title>Re:HF Radio</title>
	<author>bryan1945</author>
	<datestamp>1245317640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You and the other commenter completely confused me, but it sounds neat (I do realize it has to with radio communication).  Would you mind giving me some URLs to check out more about what you are talking about?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You and the other commenter completely confused me , but it sounds neat ( I do realize it has to with radio communication ) .
Would you mind giving me some URLs to check out more about what you are talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You and the other commenter completely confused me, but it sounds neat (I do realize it has to with radio communication).
Would you mind giving me some URLs to check out more about what you are talking about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367921</id>
	<title>This is not an explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245243300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So solar output was correlated with sunspots.  Now it is also correlated with a subsurface current.  A step forward, but it is a bit premature to use the word "explain."
<p>
On a different not, how depressing that I have been pushed into resenting several forms of science.  When I saw the headline, my first thought was, "Crap. More data to cherry pick to justify central control over individuals."  And I say this as someone who has actually published in peer reviewed journals.  Gloom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So solar output was correlated with sunspots .
Now it is also correlated with a subsurface current .
A step forward , but it is a bit premature to use the word " explain .
" On a different not , how depressing that I have been pushed into resenting several forms of science .
When I saw the headline , my first thought was , " Crap .
More data to cherry pick to justify central control over individuals .
" And I say this as someone who has actually published in peer reviewed journals .
Gloom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So solar output was correlated with sunspots.
Now it is also correlated with a subsurface current.
A step forward, but it is a bit premature to use the word "explain.
"

On a different not, how depressing that I have been pushed into resenting several forms of science.
When I saw the headline, my first thought was, "Crap.
More data to cherry pick to justify central control over individuals.
"  And I say this as someone who has actually published in peer reviewed journals.
Gloom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28379731</id>
	<title>Wait!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean my friend who insists the sunspots are missing for the same reason that the Mayan calendar doesn't go past 2012 is WRONG? It's not all tied together in some world's-end prophecy? OK, cool. Time for a nap.</p><p>ObPedanticTheory: The real, undiscoverable, unprovable reason the Mayan calendar ends in 2012 is that they simply figured that was far enough to pre-calculate for now. They would have made the next stretch of calendar, sometime, in the thousands of years of spare time available between the calendar creation and 2012. But the need for doing so was eliminated because others invented the Gregorian calendar. Simple human convenience, folks. No need to invent our own doom to explain that. So in general, calm down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean my friend who insists the sunspots are missing for the same reason that the Mayan calendar does n't go past 2012 is WRONG ?
It 's not all tied together in some world 's-end prophecy ?
OK , cool .
Time for a nap.ObPedanticTheory : The real , undiscoverable , unprovable reason the Mayan calendar ends in 2012 is that they simply figured that was far enough to pre-calculate for now .
They would have made the next stretch of calendar , sometime , in the thousands of years of spare time available between the calendar creation and 2012 .
But the need for doing so was eliminated because others invented the Gregorian calendar .
Simple human convenience , folks .
No need to invent our own doom to explain that .
So in general , calm down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean my friend who insists the sunspots are missing for the same reason that the Mayan calendar doesn't go past 2012 is WRONG?
It's not all tied together in some world's-end prophecy?
OK, cool.
Time for a nap.ObPedanticTheory: The real, undiscoverable, unprovable reason the Mayan calendar ends in 2012 is that they simply figured that was far enough to pre-calculate for now.
They would have made the next stretch of calendar, sometime, in the thousands of years of spare time available between the calendar creation and 2012.
But the need for doing so was eliminated because others invented the Gregorian calendar.
Simple human convenience, folks.
No need to invent our own doom to explain that.
So in general, calm down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28376725</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1245350700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; but plenty of politically motivated, anti-science trolls have claimed<br>&gt; EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation.</p><p>One also has to watch out for politically motivated, anti-science trolls who claim EVERYTHING can be solved by massive regulation and control...by them.</p><p>Predictions such as a billion people moving inland slowly over a century are far less a problem than, say, slowed or retrograde growth ala the former USSR or North Korea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; but plenty of politically motivated , anti-science trolls have claimed &gt; EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation.One also has to watch out for politically motivated , anti-science trolls who claim EVERYTHING can be solved by massive regulation and control...by them.Predictions such as a billion people moving inland slowly over a century are far less a problem than , say , slowed or retrograde growth ala the former USSR or North Korea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; but plenty of politically motivated, anti-science trolls have claimed&gt; EVERYTHING can be explained by natural variation.One also has to watch out for politically motivated, anti-science trolls who claim EVERYTHING can be solved by massive regulation and control...by them.Predictions such as a billion people moving inland slowly over a century are far less a problem than, say, slowed or retrograde growth ala the former USSR or North Korea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369431</id>
	<title>Re:"century-class solar minimum"</title>
	<author>Hellsbells</author>
	<datestamp>1245257940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems that our carbon emissions are also cooling Venus and Uranus.</p><p>Or it could be that these planets temperatures are changing independently of both the Sun and our carbon emissions?</p><p>There's nothing like some cherry picked data to prove a point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that our carbon emissions are also cooling Venus and Uranus.Or it could be that these planets temperatures are changing independently of both the Sun and our carbon emissions ? There 's nothing like some cherry picked data to prove a point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that our carbon emissions are also cooling Venus and Uranus.Or it could be that these planets temperatures are changing independently of both the Sun and our carbon emissions?There's nothing like some cherry picked data to prove a point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1245254700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What everybody fails to mention about Climate, is that 99\% of it is caused by the Sun.  Earth's spin gets the last 1\%, which lets the sun do cooler stuff with wind than it could without it.</p><p>We actually have a miniscule affect on climate.  The only bad part is it may not take much at all to kill us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What everybody fails to mention about Climate , is that 99 \ % of it is caused by the Sun .
Earth 's spin gets the last 1 \ % , which lets the sun do cooler stuff with wind than it could without it.We actually have a miniscule affect on climate .
The only bad part is it may not take much at all to kill us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What everybody fails to mention about Climate, is that 99\% of it is caused by the Sun.
Earth's spin gets the last 1\%, which lets the sun do cooler stuff with wind than it could without it.We actually have a miniscule affect on climate.
The only bad part is it may not take much at all to kill us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370185</id>
	<title>Re:"century-class solar minimum"</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1245265980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So why aren't "these guys" showing us that Mars and Jupiter are cooling, because the GW denier's latest claim is that Earth is in a cooling spell because of the Sunspot minimum?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So why are n't " these guys " showing us that Mars and Jupiter are cooling , because the GW denier 's latest claim is that Earth is in a cooling spell because of the Sunspot minimum ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why aren't "these guys" showing us that Mars and Jupiter are cooling, because the GW denier's latest claim is that Earth is in a cooling spell because of the Sunspot minimum?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371453</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1245322200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We actually have a minuscule effect on climate, yes.</p><p>But our greenhouse gases have effect on how our planet adsorbs and reflects Solar radiation. And Sun, as you've said, is more than 99\% of climate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We actually have a minuscule effect on climate , yes.But our greenhouse gases have effect on how our planet adsorbs and reflects Solar radiation .
And Sun , as you 've said , is more than 99 \ % of climate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We actually have a minuscule effect on climate, yes.But our greenhouse gases have effect on how our planet adsorbs and reflects Solar radiation.
And Sun, as you've said, is more than 99\% of climate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367819</id>
	<title>I have sunspots...</title>
	<author>Penguinshit</author>
	<datestamp>1245242280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... I call them <b>freckles.</b> If a sunspot moves or grows the dermatologist deals with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I call them freckles .
If a sunspot moves or grows the dermatologist deals with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I call them freckles.
If a sunspot moves or grows the dermatologist deals with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374041</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1245340080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it is still pretty warm despite the lack of sunspots, so when sunspot activity picks up again, as it will at some point, expect things to get even warmer still.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it is still pretty warm despite the lack of sunspots , so when sunspot activity picks up again , as it will at some point , expect things to get even warmer still .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it is still pretty warm despite the lack of sunspots, so when sunspot activity picks up again, as it will at some point, expect things to get even warmer still.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367567</id>
	<title>Lunix fucked my dad in the butt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245240300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux just isn't ready for the sunspot detector yet. It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average computer user isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check sunspots with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere. The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing me my OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux just is n't ready for the sunspot detector yet .
It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web , but the average computer user is n't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check sunspots with , especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation , as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother 's basement somewhere .
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf ( haha ) providing me my OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux just isn't ready for the sunspot detector yet.
It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average computer user isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check sunspots with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere.
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing me my OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368087</id>
	<title>Someone notify al gore!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245244500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The global warming religious nutters are going to have a field day with this one!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The global warming religious nutters are going to have a field day with this one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The global warming religious nutters are going to have a field day with this one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368633</id>
	<title>Not old news ...</title>
	<author>oneiros27</author>
	<datestamp>1245249960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This week is the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Solar Physics Division, which explains the timing of the press release.</p><p>There have been a number of talks regarding the long solar minimum, and although I've been avoiding most of the oral sessions, there was one by Frank Hill (another NSO person) yesterday showing that um<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... okay, I can't remember what the axii on the graphs were, but that the general activity below the 'surface' of the sun was showing a more gradual ramp up than the last solar minimum, but we're roughly at the same level of activity as when we started cycle 23.</p><p>(disclaimer -- I'm not a solar physicist, but I am an affiliate SPD member<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'd link to the abstract, but the system won't give me a useful URL)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This week is the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society 's Solar Physics Division , which explains the timing of the press release.There have been a number of talks regarding the long solar minimum , and although I 've been avoiding most of the oral sessions , there was one by Frank Hill ( another NSO person ) yesterday showing that um ... okay , I ca n't remember what the axii on the graphs were , but that the general activity below the 'surface ' of the sun was showing a more gradual ramp up than the last solar minimum , but we 're roughly at the same level of activity as when we started cycle 23 .
( disclaimer -- I 'm not a solar physicist , but I am an affiliate SPD member ... I 'd link to the abstract , but the system wo n't give me a useful URL )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This week is the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Solar Physics Division, which explains the timing of the press release.There have been a number of talks regarding the long solar minimum, and although I've been avoiding most of the oral sessions, there was one by Frank Hill (another NSO person) yesterday showing that um ... okay, I can't remember what the axii on the graphs were, but that the general activity below the 'surface' of the sun was showing a more gradual ramp up than the last solar minimum, but we're roughly at the same level of activity as when we started cycle 23.
(disclaimer -- I'm not a solar physicist, but I am an affiliate SPD member ... I'd link to the abstract, but the system won't give me a useful URL)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367769</id>
	<title>Wrong Logo Attached to Article</title>
	<author>sk999</author>
	<datestamp>1245241980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA's logo is attached to the article, but the National Solar Observatory is funded by the National Science Foundation.  Different agency entirely.  <a href="http://www.nso.edu/" title="nso.edu">http://www.nso.edu/</a> [nso.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA 's logo is attached to the article , but the National Solar Observatory is funded by the National Science Foundation .
Different agency entirely .
http : //www.nso.edu/ [ nso.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA's logo is attached to the article, but the National Solar Observatory is funded by the National Science Foundation.
Different agency entirely.
http://www.nso.edu/ [nso.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367647</id>
	<title>Obligatory..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245240780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I guess this is what happens when you cross the streams...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I guess this is what happens when you cross the streams.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I guess this is what happens when you cross the streams...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368063</id>
	<title>I'm an astronaut too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245244260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sometimes I just feel all these astronomers do is come up with mumbo-jumbo that no one can explain. In some ways, they seem no better than the village witch who comes up with some shit to explain something which cannot be proven.

Next they'll start telling us the moon's made out of low-fat cheese.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes I just feel all these astronomers do is come up with mumbo-jumbo that no one can explain .
In some ways , they seem no better than the village witch who comes up with some shit to explain something which can not be proven .
Next they 'll start telling us the moon 's made out of low-fat cheese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes I just feel all these astronomers do is come up with mumbo-jumbo that no one can explain.
In some ways, they seem no better than the village witch who comes up with some shit to explain something which cannot be proven.
Next they'll start telling us the moon's made out of low-fat cheese.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369649</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1245259860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So we could be looking at 22+ years of cold cold weather.</p></div></blockquote><p>Just enough time to fix global warming...</p><p>BTW, that must be a HUGE groundhog.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So we could be looking at 22 + years of cold cold weather.Just enough time to fix global warming...BTW , that must be a HUGE groundhog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we could be looking at 22+ years of cold cold weather.Just enough time to fix global warming...BTW, that must be a HUGE groundhog.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613</id>
	<title>Re:"century-class solar minimum"</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245249660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, unless <a href="http://www.livescience.com/environment/070312\_solarsys\_warming.html" title="livescience.com">these</a> [livescience.com] <a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=551bfe58-882f-4889-ab76-5ce1e02dced7" title="canada.com">guys</a> [canada.com] are wrong (or lying, paid for by big oil and coal <i>of course!</i>), our carbon emissions are heating Mars and Jupiter...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , unless these [ livescience.com ] guys [ canada.com ] are wrong ( or lying , paid for by big oil and coal of course !
) , our carbon emissions are heating Mars and Jupiter.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, unless these [livescience.com] guys [canada.com] are wrong (or lying, paid for by big oil and coal of course!
), our carbon emissions are heating Mars and Jupiter...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371481</id>
	<title>Re:Puberty</title>
	<author>Cr0vv</author>
	<datestamp>1245322740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason the Sunspot's are not appearing is because of a large magnetic planet passing by the sun.  At the moment, one of it's poles is facing the sun that is "quieting" the sun's surface.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason the Sunspot 's are not appearing is because of a large magnetic planet passing by the sun .
At the moment , one of it 's poles is facing the sun that is " quieting " the sun 's surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason the Sunspot's are not appearing is because of a large magnetic planet passing by the sun.
At the moment, one of it's poles is facing the sun that is "quieting" the sun's surface.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370355</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, shoot!</title>
	<author>thhamm</author>
	<datestamp>1245355260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming</i> <br> <br>what is this, soviet russia?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming what is this , soviet russia ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the lack of sunspots was caused by global warming  what is this, soviet russia?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374229</id>
	<title>Re:HF Radio</title>
	<author>molo</author>
	<datestamp>1245340860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio\_propagation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio\_propagation</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur\_radio" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur\_radio</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX\_communication" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX\_communication</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Cheers. -molo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio \ _propagation [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur \ _radio [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX \ _communication [ wikipedia.org ] Cheers .
-molo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio\_propagation [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur\_radio [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX\_communication [wikipedia.org]Cheers.
-molo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367653</id>
	<title>"century-class solar minimum"</title>
	<author>ventmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1245240780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet I still global warming deniers claim the earth is only warming due to the 11 year solar cycle.  How long can they believe that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet I still global warming deniers claim the earth is only warming due to the 11 year solar cycle .
How long can they believe that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet I still global warming deniers claim the earth is only warming due to the 11 year solar cycle.
How long can they believe that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367955</id>
	<title>HF Radio</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1245243420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>i know the upper part of the HF spectrum has been acting like the next solar cycle has already started, the DX/Skip has been incredibly good and dependable and any HF enthusiast knows that by now if they have a HF rig handy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i know the upper part of the HF spectrum has been acting like the next solar cycle has already started , the DX/Skip has been incredibly good and dependable and any HF enthusiast knows that by now if they have a HF rig handy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i know the upper part of the HF spectrum has been acting like the next solar cycle has already started, the DX/Skip has been incredibly good and dependable and any HF enthusiast knows that by now if they have a HF rig handy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245241980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is old news.  Its been known for a few years now that the solar conveyor belt has slowed.  The question is how long solar activity will remain weak.</p><p>During the Maunder minimum it remained weak from about 1645 to 1710.  Other minimums also occurred over a fairly long duration.  During these minimums the earth tends to be quite cold.  Read the wikipedia article on the maunder minimum and related minimums.</p><p>Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed.</p><p>Its too early to tell yet, but cycle #24 is over 2 years late and cycle #25 is expected to be weak as well.  So we could be looking at 22+ years of cold cold weather.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is old news .
Its been known for a few years now that the solar conveyor belt has slowed .
The question is how long solar activity will remain weak.During the Maunder minimum it remained weak from about 1645 to 1710 .
Other minimums also occurred over a fairly long duration .
During these minimums the earth tends to be quite cold .
Read the wikipedia article on the maunder minimum and related minimums.Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed.Its too early to tell yet , but cycle # 24 is over 2 years late and cycle # 25 is expected to be weak as well .
So we could be looking at 22 + years of cold cold weather .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is old news.
Its been known for a few years now that the solar conveyor belt has slowed.
The question is how long solar activity will remain weak.During the Maunder minimum it remained weak from about 1645 to 1710.
Other minimums also occurred over a fairly long duration.
During these minimums the earth tends to be quite cold.
Read the wikipedia article on the maunder minimum and related minimums.Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed.Its too early to tell yet, but cycle #24 is over 2 years late and cycle #25 is expected to be weak as well.
So we could be looking at 22+ years of cold cold weather.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367735</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>arun84h</author>
	<datestamp>1245241740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I figured the Hardy Boys would be long dead by now!

Great job, boys!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I figured the Hardy Boys would be long dead by now !
Great job , boys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I figured the Hardy Boys would be long dead by now!
Great job, boys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368585</id>
	<title>Nah.</title>
	<author>jd</author>
	<datestamp>1245249240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mice wanted to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8105963.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">recoup the cost of getting Earth built</a> [bbc.co.uk] and were wagering the sunspots at Las Vegas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mice wanted to recoup the cost of getting Earth built [ bbc.co.uk ] and were wagering the sunspots at Las Vegas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mice wanted to recoup the cost of getting Earth built [bbc.co.uk] and were wagering the sunspots at Las Vegas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368179</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245245100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the hell will Al Gore do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell will Al Gore do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell will Al Gore do?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731</id>
	<title>It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245241680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that at least some climate activity isn't and can't be affected by humans.</p><p>I'm hoping the missing sunspots has contributed to the extended drought in Australia. "The driest *insert month or time period* on record" is getting tiresome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that at least some climate activity is n't and ca n't be affected by humans.I 'm hoping the missing sunspots has contributed to the extended drought in Australia .
" The driest * insert month or time period * on record " is getting tiresome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that at least some climate activity isn't and can't be affected by humans.I'm hoping the missing sunspots has contributed to the extended drought in Australia.
"The driest *insert month or time period* on record" is getting tiresome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368093</id>
	<title>The Economy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245244560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, the fact that we have the worst global recession in 70 years at the same time as a low in sunspot activity is Entirely Coincidental.  Seriously, I haven't studied this in depth, so I don't really know, but it sure seems suspicious, and it's certainly been proposed in the past that the sunspot cycle affected the economy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the fact that we have the worst global recession in 70 years at the same time as a low in sunspot activity is Entirely Coincidental .
Seriously , I have n't studied this in depth , so I do n't really know , but it sure seems suspicious , and it 's certainly been proposed in the past that the sunspot cycle affected the economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the fact that we have the worst global recession in 70 years at the same time as a low in sunspot activity is Entirely Coincidental.
Seriously, I haven't studied this in depth, so I don't really know, but it sure seems suspicious, and it's certainly been proposed in the past that the sunspot cycle affected the economy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368293</id>
	<title>Re:Old news</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1245246240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed.</i> <br> <br>No worries though.  In the time it takes for the population to triple, our agricultural output quadruples.  The problem is, and always has been, distribution.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed .
No worries though .
In the time it takes for the population to triple , our agricultural output quadruples .
The problem is , and always has been , distribution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thing is we may face many decades of reduced agricultural output at a time when we have many mouths to feed.
No worries though.
In the time it takes for the population to triple, our agricultural output quadruples.
The problem is, and always has been, distribution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28372123</id>
	<title>Re:It's sort of refreshing...</title>
	<author>cryptolemur</author>
	<datestamp>1245329940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely! That's why we have climate only during the day, but none when the sun sets... no, wait! Never mind...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely !
That 's why we have climate only during the day , but none when the sun sets... no , wait !
Never mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely!
That's why we have climate only during the day, but none when the sun sets... no, wait!
Never mind...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28376725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28372123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28375101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_17_2218225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28373761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368093
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369497
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28376725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369151
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371453
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28375101
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28372123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370975
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374229
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368613
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369431
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28370185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368179
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28374041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368293
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28373761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28369649
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367615
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28371481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28368585
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367647
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_17_2218225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_17_2218225.28367921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
