<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_16_1935236</id>
	<title>Revived Microbe May Hold Clues For ET Lifeforms</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245142680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>krou writes <i>"Science Daily is reporting that a microbe, Herminiimonas glaciei, buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland, and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years, has <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090614201734.htm">been brought back to life</a> (<a href="http://ijs.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/59/6/1272">abstract</a>). The microbe, some ten to fifty times smaller than E. coli, was brought back over several months by slowly incubating it at gradually increasing temperatures. After 11.5 months, the microbe began to replicate. Scientists believe that it could help us understand how life may exist on other planets. Dr. Jennifer Loveland-Curtze, who headed up the team of scientists from Pennsylvania State University, said: 'These extremely cold environments are the best analogues of possible extraterrestrial habitats. ... [S]tudying these bacteria can provide insights into how cells can survive and even grow under extremely harsh conditions, such as temperatures down to -56C, little oxygen, low nutrients, high pressure and limited space.' She also added that it 'isn't a pathogen and is not harmful to humans, but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter, which is the filter pore size commonly used in sterilization of fluids in laboratories and hospitals. If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens, then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile. In a clear solution very tiny cells might grow but not create the density sufficient to make the solution cloudy.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>krou writes " Science Daily is reporting that a microbe , Herminiimonas glaciei , buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland , and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years , has been brought back to life ( abstract ) .
The microbe , some ten to fifty times smaller than E. coli , was brought back over several months by slowly incubating it at gradually increasing temperatures .
After 11.5 months , the microbe began to replicate .
Scientists believe that it could help us understand how life may exist on other planets .
Dr. Jennifer Loveland-Curtze , who headed up the team of scientists from Pennsylvania State University , said : 'These extremely cold environments are the best analogues of possible extraterrestrial habitats .
... [ S ] tudying these bacteria can provide insights into how cells can survive and even grow under extremely harsh conditions , such as temperatures down to -56C , little oxygen , low nutrients , high pressure and limited space .
' She also added that it 'is n't a pathogen and is not harmful to humans , but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter , which is the filter pore size commonly used in sterilization of fluids in laboratories and hospitals .
If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens , then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile .
In a clear solution very tiny cells might grow but not create the density sufficient to make the solution cloudy .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>krou writes "Science Daily is reporting that a microbe, Herminiimonas glaciei, buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland, and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years, has been brought back to life (abstract).
The microbe, some ten to fifty times smaller than E. coli, was brought back over several months by slowly incubating it at gradually increasing temperatures.
After 11.5 months, the microbe began to replicate.
Scientists believe that it could help us understand how life may exist on other planets.
Dr. Jennifer Loveland-Curtze, who headed up the team of scientists from Pennsylvania State University, said: 'These extremely cold environments are the best analogues of possible extraterrestrial habitats.
... [S]tudying these bacteria can provide insights into how cells can survive and even grow under extremely harsh conditions, such as temperatures down to -56C, little oxygen, low nutrients, high pressure and limited space.
' She also added that it 'isn't a pathogen and is not harmful to humans, but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter, which is the filter pore size commonly used in sterilization of fluids in laboratories and hospitals.
If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens, then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile.
In a clear solution very tiny cells might grow but not create the density sufficient to make the solution cloudy.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356871</id>
	<title>Chaos Will Ensue</title>
	<author>Flere Imsaho</author>
	<datestamp>1245165720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, yeah. Oooh, ahhh, that's how it always starts. Then later there's running and screaming</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , yeah .
Oooh , ahhh , that 's how it always starts .
Then later there 's running and screaming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, yeah.
Oooh, ahhh, that's how it always starts.
Then later there's running and screaming</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28362489</id>
	<title>Hmmmmm</title>
	<author>ammit</author>
	<datestamp>1245258480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not tossing out my zombie survival guide yet.

We know nothing about it but it's harmless.  *raises eyebrow*</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not tossing out my zombie survival guide yet .
We know nothing about it but it 's harmless .
* raises eyebrow *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not tossing out my zombie survival guide yet.
We know nothing about it but it's harmless.
*raises eyebrow*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355191</id>
	<title>Re:Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245154860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just assumed that, given its location, it was really just pining for the fjords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just assumed that , given its location , it was really just pining for the fjords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just assumed that, given its location, it was really just pining for the fjords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355113</id>
	<title>Reviving things buried in ice</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1245154440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0370263/" title="imdb.com">Whatcouldpossiblygowrong.</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatcouldpossiblygowrong .
[ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatcouldpossiblygowrong.
[imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353981</id>
	<title>Do they know how an immune system would respond?</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1245148320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[disclaimer] I don't have much knowledge in this area [/disclaimer], but is it possible (not probable) that there is a danger that it could provoke an immune reaction? The article says it's not a pathogen, so I'm not worried that it's a threat, or that it would get in hollywood fashion out even in the very tiny tiny chance it was dangerous in anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ disclaimer ] I do n't have much knowledge in this area [ /disclaimer ] , but is it possible ( not probable ) that there is a danger that it could provoke an immune reaction ?
The article says it 's not a pathogen , so I 'm not worried that it 's a threat , or that it would get in hollywood fashion out even in the very tiny tiny chance it was dangerous in anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[disclaimer] I don't have much knowledge in this area [/disclaimer], but is it possible (not probable) that there is a danger that it could provoke an immune reaction?
The article says it's not a pathogen, so I'm not worried that it's a threat, or that it would get in hollywood fashion out even in the very tiny tiny chance it was dangerous in anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358085</id>
	<title>Re:Any chance we're going to get a dinosaur?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Any chance we're going to get a new dinosaur out of this? I don't know about you, but I've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13.</p></div><p>Since you were 13? Wow. You must be very good at <i>running and screaming</i> by now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any chance we 're going to get a new dinosaur out of this ?
I do n't know about you , but I 've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13.Since you were 13 ?
Wow. You must be very good at running and screaming by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any chance we're going to get a new dinosaur out of this?
I don't know about you, but I've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13.Since you were 13?
Wow. You must be very good at running and screaming by now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354181</id>
	<title>Re:Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245149160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just so happens that your friend here is only MOSTLY dead.</p><p>There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just so happens that your friend here is only MOSTLY dead.There 's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead .
Mostly dead is slightly alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just so happens that your friend here is only MOSTLY dead.There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead.
Mostly dead is slightly alive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735</id>
	<title>Don't want to be a party pooper</title>
	<author>dedazo</author>
	<datestamp>1245147120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I hope they're being <i>very</i> careful with these things. Excited Chrichton-like sci-fi visions notwithstanding, we could easily get ourselves into a lot of trouble with things like these. And I'm not thinking about dinosaurs, but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I hope they 're being very careful with these things .
Excited Chrichton-like sci-fi visions notwithstanding , we could easily get ourselves into a lot of trouble with things like these .
And I 'm not thinking about dinosaurs , but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I hope they're being very careful with these things.
Excited Chrichton-like sci-fi visions notwithstanding, we could easily get ourselves into a lot of trouble with things like these.
And I'm not thinking about dinosaurs, but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357111</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1245167700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Its a bacteria.  What viruses live inside it?</p></div><p>It's a <b>bacterium</b>. If there are two or more, then they are <b>bacteria</b>.</p><p>If we are to be killed by resurrected ancient bacteria, at least let us be grammatically correct when we die!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a bacteria .
What viruses live inside it ? It 's a bacterium .
If there are two or more , then they are bacteria.If we are to be killed by resurrected ancient bacteria , at least let us be grammatically correct when we die !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a bacteria.
What viruses live inside it?It's a bacterium.
If there are two or more, then they are bacteria.If we are to be killed by resurrected ancient bacteria, at least let us be grammatically correct when we die!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358841</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>ahabswhale</author>
	<datestamp>1245230160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes because the real scientific community has so much experience with 120,000 year old bacteria...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes because the real scientific community has so much experience with 120,000 year old bacteria.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes because the real scientific community has so much experience with 120,000 year old bacteria...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353761</id>
	<title>Re:This doesn't look good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFAbstract, the bacteria are 0.043 um^3 in volume.  I know they're rod-shaped, but a sphere of that volume has a radius of 0.22 um; depending on the aspect ratio of the rod, they could be narrow enough to pass through 0.2 um pores (eg, if the rod is 0.2 um in diameter, it would have to be 1.4 um long).  And yes, I know the pore size is nominal.  Either way, there are far tighter filters that could be used if pathogenic bacteria on this scale are discovered.  Membranes with 0.1 um nominal pores are used to clear mycoplasma, for example.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFAbstract , the bacteria are 0.043 um ^ 3 in volume .
I know they 're rod-shaped , but a sphere of that volume has a radius of 0.22 um ; depending on the aspect ratio of the rod , they could be narrow enough to pass through 0.2 um pores ( eg , if the rod is 0.2 um in diameter , it would have to be 1.4 um long ) .
And yes , I know the pore size is nominal .
Either way , there are far tighter filters that could be used if pathogenic bacteria on this scale are discovered .
Membranes with 0.1 um nominal pores are used to clear mycoplasma , for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFAbstract, the bacteria are 0.043 um^3 in volume.
I know they're rod-shaped, but a sphere of that volume has a radius of 0.22 um; depending on the aspect ratio of the rod, they could be narrow enough to pass through 0.2 um pores (eg, if the rod is 0.2 um in diameter, it would have to be 1.4 um long).
And yes, I know the pore size is nominal.
Either way, there are far tighter filters that could be used if pathogenic bacteria on this scale are discovered.
Membranes with 0.1 um nominal pores are used to clear mycoplasma, for example.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357775</id>
	<title>Lep!!6?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">raise or lower th3 '*BSD Sux0rs'. This of challenges that conflicts that</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>raise or lower th3 ' * BSD Sux0rs' .
This of challenges that conflicts that [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>raise or lower th3 '*BSD Sux0rs'.
This of challenges that conflicts that [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357353</id>
	<title>The earth is only 10,000 years old</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245170040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>102,000 is more like 10,000.  Carbon dating is the largest lie in history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>102,000 is more like 10,000 .
Carbon dating is the largest lie in history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>102,000 is more like 10,000.
Carbon dating is the largest lie in history.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353645</id>
	<title>l4d</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>two weeks after first infection...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>two weeks after first infection.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>two weeks after first infection...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357597</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>ormondotvos</author>
	<datestamp>1245172620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like this is happening in many places right now as we melt old ice in our carbon hubris.

And that wicked old sun keeps irradiating genomes with UV, doo dah...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like this is happening in many places right now as we melt old ice in our carbon hubris .
And that wicked old sun keeps irradiating genomes with UV , doo dah.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like this is happening in many places right now as we melt old ice in our carbon hubris.
And that wicked old sun keeps irradiating genomes with UV, doo dah...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356461</id>
	<title>Origins of Life</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1245162900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These things are now some of the smallest known biological systems.  They're still too big to give us sufficient hints to the origin of life.  It is hard to believe that there are not smaller biological systems out there waiting to be found.  It has been suggested that Mars may still have some life on it deep underground and these may be more likely to be "closer" to the origin of life.. but maybe not.  If not, that might imply that life didn't originate in our solar system and both Mars and Earth were seeded by extra-solar asteroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These things are now some of the smallest known biological systems .
They 're still too big to give us sufficient hints to the origin of life .
It is hard to believe that there are not smaller biological systems out there waiting to be found .
It has been suggested that Mars may still have some life on it deep underground and these may be more likely to be " closer " to the origin of life.. but maybe not .
If not , that might imply that life did n't originate in our solar system and both Mars and Earth were seeded by extra-solar asteroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These things are now some of the smallest known biological systems.
They're still too big to give us sufficient hints to the origin of life.
It is hard to believe that there are not smaller biological systems out there waiting to be found.
It has been suggested that Mars may still have some life on it deep underground and these may be more likely to be "closer" to the origin of life.. but maybe not.
If not, that might imply that life didn't originate in our solar system and both Mars and Earth were seeded by extra-solar asteroids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354631</id>
	<title>Re:Don't want to be a party pooper</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1245151560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hopefully that's not the way it works.. I mean, isn't the genome mostly stuff which 'appears' to have no value? Maybe this is the archive of things useful from past ages.</p><p>*touches plastic-covered glue-and-wood-chips*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems.Hopefully that 's not the way it works.. I mean , is n't the genome mostly stuff which 'appears ' to have no value ?
Maybe this is the archive of things useful from past ages .
* touches plastic-covered glue-and-wood-chips *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but rather things like our collective genomes losing resistance to things that are supposed to have disappeared from our ecosystems.Hopefully that's not the way it works.. I mean, isn't the genome mostly stuff which 'appears' to have no value?
Maybe this is the archive of things useful from past ages.
*touches plastic-covered glue-and-wood-chips*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28360977</id>
	<title>a Falsehood presented as Fact ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245250740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To say "..brought back to life" is, plainly an exhageration at best, and profound irresponsible hyperbole at worst:

There is NO proof that anything was brought back to life!  Yes, the team apparently observed aspects of metabolism but they note that at the extremely low temperatures and extremely high pressures existing at their normal habitat the specimens could have been doing the very same things, for thousands of years, but at a velocity so low as not to be appreciated.

Bringing them 'up to temperature' certainly would increase likelihood that  metabolism might increase enough to be measureable<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. This seems more probable than to suggest that the specimens were not alive and then became living creatures once again.

To come 'back to life' suggests they were not at that point when their warming journey began.  Shame on those who might use such journalistic tricks for any purpose!</htmltext>
<tokenext>To say " ..brought back to life " is , plainly an exhageration at best , and profound irresponsible hyperbole at worst : There is NO proof that anything was brought back to life !
Yes , the team apparently observed aspects of metabolism but they note that at the extremely low temperatures and extremely high pressures existing at their normal habitat the specimens could have been doing the very same things , for thousands of years , but at a velocity so low as not to be appreciated .
Bringing them 'up to temperature ' certainly would increase likelihood that metabolism might increase enough to be measureable .. This seems more probable than to suggest that the specimens were not alive and then became living creatures once again .
To come 'back to life ' suggests they were not at that point when their warming journey began .
Shame on those who might use such journalistic tricks for any purpose !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To say "..brought back to life" is, plainly an exhageration at best, and profound irresponsible hyperbole at worst:

There is NO proof that anything was brought back to life!
Yes, the team apparently observed aspects of metabolism but they note that at the extremely low temperatures and extremely high pressures existing at their normal habitat the specimens could have been doing the very same things, for thousands of years, but at a velocity so low as not to be appreciated.
Bringing them 'up to temperature' certainly would increase likelihood that  metabolism might increase enough to be measureable .. This seems more probable than to suggest that the specimens were not alive and then became living creatures once again.
To come 'back to life' suggests they were not at that point when their warming journey began.
Shame on those who might use such journalistic tricks for any purpose!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28363689</id>
	<title>Locked in a box in a box?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1245263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder, why those Scientists always think in such extremely limited ways?</p><p>As if the form of extraterrestrial life would even be close to genetics, cells, plants, animals and other lifeforms with hands, eyes, brains out or neurons, a head, etc.</p><p>They will not even see extraterrestrial life, when it sits/floats right in front of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , why those Scientists always think in such extremely limited ways ? As if the form of extraterrestrial life would even be close to genetics , cells , plants , animals and other lifeforms with hands , eyes , brains out or neurons , a head , etc.They will not even see extraterrestrial life , when it sits/floats right in front of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, why those Scientists always think in such extremely limited ways?As if the form of extraterrestrial life would even be close to genetics, cells, plants, animals and other lifeforms with hands, eyes, brains out or neurons, a head, etc.They will not even see extraterrestrial life, when it sits/floats right in front of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</id>
	<title>Welcome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our new tiny frigid overlords.  And for once I am not talking about my wife<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new tiny frigid overlords .
And for once I am not talking about my wife : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new tiny frigid overlords.
And for once I am not talking about my wife :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354683</id>
	<title>Is this the Oldest Living Thing?</title>
	<author>popo</author>
	<datestamp>1245152040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... does this mean that this bacterium is now the "oldest living thing"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So ... does this mean that this bacterium is now the " oldest living thing " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So ... does this mean that this bacterium is now the "oldest living thing"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353839</id>
	<title>Watch out!</title>
	<author>Flea of Pain</author>
	<datestamp>1245147540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should probably send their little frozen cousins on the moon a quick warning about the incoming NASA rocket!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should probably send their little frozen cousins on the moon a quick warning about the incoming NASA rocket !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should probably send their little frozen cousins on the moon a quick warning about the incoming NASA rocket!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354643</id>
	<title>Re:Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245151680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I've seen people brought back to life, in one case after almost 5 minutes.</p><p>Clinically dead, is dead.<br>Go to a graveyard, all those people underground? there clinically dead to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I 've seen people brought back to life , in one case after almost 5 minutes.Clinically dead , is dead.Go to a graveyard , all those people underground ?
there clinically dead to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I've seen people brought back to life, in one case after almost 5 minutes.Clinically dead, is dead.Go to a graveyard, all those people underground?
there clinically dead to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354345</id>
	<title>Re:Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>pjt33</author>
	<datestamp>1245150060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it was dead dead. And now that it's alive and going to have to start paying taxes again, it's going to be really pissed off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it was dead dead .
And now that it 's alive and going to have to start paying taxes again , it 's going to be really pissed off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it was dead dead.
And now that it's alive and going to have to start paying taxes again, it's going to be really pissed off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353805</id>
	<title>What Could Possibly...</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1245147420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it begins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it begins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it begins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1245146580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Science Daily is reporting that a microbe, Herminiimonas glaciei, buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland, and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years, has been brought back to life (abstract).</p></div><p>Jeeze, don't anyone learn from history? Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one! Burn it! You have to burn it! <br> <br>
Det er ikke ei bikkje, det er en slags ting!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Science Daily is reporting that a microbe , Herminiimonas glaciei , buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland , and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years , has been brought back to life ( abstract ) .Jeeze , do n't anyone learn from history ?
Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one !
Burn it !
You have to burn it !
Det er ikke ei bikkje , det er en slags ting !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Science Daily is reporting that a microbe, Herminiimonas glaciei, buried some 3 km under glacial ice in Greenland, and believed to have been frozen for some 120,000 years, has been brought back to life (abstract).Jeeze, don't anyone learn from history?
Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one!
Burn it!
You have to burn it!
Det er ikke ei bikkje, det er en slags ting!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355299</id>
	<title>Re:Is this the Oldest Living Thing?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1245155400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple orders of magnitude too young to claim that crown, according to <a href="http://www.extremescience.com/OldestLivingThing.htm" title="extremescience.com" rel="nofollow">this site</a> [extremescience.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple orders of magnitude too young to claim that crown , according to this site [ extremescience.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple orders of magnitude too young to claim that crown, according to this site [extremescience.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353557</id>
	<title>wasn't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this posted yesterday?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this posted yesterday ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this posted yesterday?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356005</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>imamac</author>
	<datestamp>1245159540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatcouldpossiblygowrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353605</id>
	<title>Any chance we're going to get a dinosaur?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any chance we're going to get a new dinosaur out of this? I don't know about you, but I've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any chance we 're going to get a new dinosaur out of this ?
I do n't know about you , but I 've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any chance we're going to get a new dinosaur out of this?
I don't know about you, but I've been preparing to go to Jurassic park since I was 13.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354189</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1245149220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The vast majority of microbes are not harmful to us. There are thousands of different species in a gram of dirt, and thousands of yet more species in another gram of dirt. If a significant fraction of them were harmful it would be impossible to stay healthy. I think our odds are plenty safe in assuming this microbe won't hurt us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The vast majority of microbes are not harmful to us .
There are thousands of different species in a gram of dirt , and thousands of yet more species in another gram of dirt .
If a significant fraction of them were harmful it would be impossible to stay healthy .
I think our odds are plenty safe in assuming this microbe wo n't hurt us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The vast majority of microbes are not harmful to us.
There are thousands of different species in a gram of dirt, and thousands of yet more species in another gram of dirt.
If a significant fraction of them were harmful it would be impossible to stay healthy.
I think our odds are plenty safe in assuming this microbe won't hurt us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353547</id>
	<title>This doesn't look good</title>
	<author>arizwebfoot</author>
	<datestamp>1245146400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter... If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens, then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile.</p> </div><p>
Okay, I'm sufficiently worried enough to get my tin hat.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter... If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens , then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile .
Okay , I 'm sufficiently worried enough to get my tin hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> but it can pass through a 0.2 micron filter... If there are other ultra-small bacteria that are pathogens, then they could be present in solutions presumed to be sterile.
Okay, I'm sufficiently worried enough to get my tin hat.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353961</id>
	<title>Re:Don't want to be a party pooper</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1245148200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're telling me I shouldn't have licked the samples when I was working as a lab assistant there?</p><p>Seriously, they aren't shooting them up or anything, and it's just as likely that we've evolved some super-effective method of removing these microbes in the meantime. Maybe that's even what caused them to seek out the safety of the frozen north!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're telling me I should n't have licked the samples when I was working as a lab assistant there ? Seriously , they are n't shooting them up or anything , and it 's just as likely that we 've evolved some super-effective method of removing these microbes in the meantime .
Maybe that 's even what caused them to seek out the safety of the frozen north !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're telling me I shouldn't have licked the samples when I was working as a lab assistant there?Seriously, they aren't shooting them up or anything, and it's just as likely that we've evolved some super-effective method of removing these microbes in the meantime.
Maybe that's even what caused them to seek out the safety of the frozen north!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356499</id>
	<title>mo3 do3n</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245163080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">world. GNAA members share. FreeBSD is we- need to address</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>world .
GNAA members share .
FreeBSD is we- need to address [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>world.
GNAA members share.
FreeBSD is we- need to address [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354185</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1245149220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Jeeze, don't anyone learn from history? Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one! Burn it! You have to burn it!</p></div><p>Or even worse, it might become a lawyer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeeze , do n't anyone learn from history ?
Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one !
Burn it !
You have to burn it ! Or even worse , it might become a lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeeze, don't anyone learn from history?
Last time they dug up a frozen creature from the ice it began killing its way through the Norwegian base and then the American one!
Burn it!
You have to burn it!Or even worse, it might become a lawyer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</id>
	<title>Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245147660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this was 'brought back to life' (assuming the process was done by mere mortals), then it was never truly dead. It may have been dormant, in suspended animation, or beyond modern sciences' ability to detect life, but it certainly was not dead. Dead is what something is when it doesn't come back. And don't talk about 'my uncle died on the operating table three times...'. That's <i>clinically</i> dead, an altogether different thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was 'brought back to life ' ( assuming the process was done by mere mortals ) , then it was never truly dead .
It may have been dormant , in suspended animation , or beyond modern sciences ' ability to detect life , but it certainly was not dead .
Dead is what something is when it does n't come back .
And do n't talk about 'my uncle died on the operating table three times...' .
That 's clinically dead , an altogether different thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was 'brought back to life' (assuming the process was done by mere mortals), then it was never truly dead.
It may have been dormant, in suspended animation, or beyond modern sciences' ability to detect life, but it certainly was not dead.
Dead is what something is when it doesn't come back.
And don't talk about 'my uncle died on the operating table three times...'.
That's clinically dead, an altogether different thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353775</id>
	<title>Great!  Glacier water...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now bottled water from glaciers is suspect. I feel for these folks: <br> <br>
<a href="http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200906/1244408897.html" title="free-press-release.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200906/1244408897.html</a> [free-press-release.com] <br>
and these folks<br>
<a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Luxury-Water-Utilities-Llc-864814.html" title="marketwire.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Luxury-Water-Utilities-Llc-864814.html</a> [marketwire.com] <br>
<br>
From the second one: <br>
"Glacier water is superior to common water sources, because it is not filtered through the ground where a variety of dissolved solids and organic particles such as rocks, sand, metals, chemicals and underground pollutants can attach to each water molecule. It is essentially an exclusive worry-free water source &#226;" clear of heavy chemicals, drug residues, jet fuel, toxins, dust particulates, etc. &#226;" unlocked from glaciers that are over 10,000 years old. Not only will our clients be able to drink and bathe in this premium untainted water, they can also breathe indoor air that is hydrated or humidified with pollution-free water."


<br> <br>
Drink up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now bottled water from glaciers is suspect .
I feel for these folks : http : //www.free-press-release.com/news/200906/1244408897.html [ free-press-release.com ] and these folks http : //www.marketwire.com/press-release/Luxury-Water-Utilities-Llc-864814.html [ marketwire.com ] From the second one : " Glacier water is superior to common water sources , because it is not filtered through the ground where a variety of dissolved solids and organic particles such as rocks , sand , metals , chemicals and underground pollutants can attach to each water molecule .
It is essentially an exclusive worry-free water source   " clear of heavy chemicals , drug residues , jet fuel , toxins , dust particulates , etc .
  " unlocked from glaciers that are over 10,000 years old .
Not only will our clients be able to drink and bathe in this premium untainted water , they can also breathe indoor air that is hydrated or humidified with pollution-free water .
" Drink up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now bottled water from glaciers is suspect.
I feel for these folks:  
http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200906/1244408897.html [free-press-release.com] 
and these folks
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Luxury-Water-Utilities-Llc-864814.html [marketwire.com] 

From the second one: 
"Glacier water is superior to common water sources, because it is not filtered through the ground where a variety of dissolved solids and organic particles such as rocks, sand, metals, chemicals and underground pollutants can attach to each water molecule.
It is essentially an exclusive worry-free water source â" clear of heavy chemicals, drug residues, jet fuel, toxins, dust particulates, etc.
â" unlocked from glaciers that are over 10,000 years old.
Not only will our clients be able to drink and bathe in this premium untainted water, they can also breathe indoor air that is hydrated or humidified with pollution-free water.
"


 
Drink up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28364261</id>
	<title>MARK the spot</title>
	<author>anoopdotk</author>
	<datestamp>1245266820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please don't forget the spot where you found it.
We will have to bury it in the same spot if something goes bad.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do n't forget the spot where you found it .
We will have to bury it in the same spot if something goes bad .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please don't forget the spot where you found it.
We will have to bury it in the same spot if something goes bad.
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354761</id>
	<title>consider this</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1245152520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone ever think there might be a good idea that this little microbe was buried beneath the ice at an abnormal depth and frozen to almost complete immobility for so long? Seriously why wake an unknown microbe before we even have anything that can protect us from its potential spread.  I'm going to go lock myself in 2 ziplock freezer bags and wait for the destruction.<p><div class="quote"><p>there are things worse than goblins in the depths of the world.M</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ever think there might be a good idea that this little microbe was buried beneath the ice at an abnormal depth and frozen to almost complete immobility for so long ?
Seriously why wake an unknown microbe before we even have anything that can protect us from its potential spread .
I 'm going to go lock myself in 2 ziplock freezer bags and wait for the destruction.there are things worse than goblins in the depths of the world.M</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone ever think there might be a good idea that this little microbe was buried beneath the ice at an abnormal depth and frozen to almost complete immobility for so long?
Seriously why wake an unknown microbe before we even have anything that can protect us from its potential spread.
I'm going to go lock myself in 2 ziplock freezer bags and wait for the destruction.there are things worse than goblins in the depths of the world.M
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353811</id>
	<title>The Plague 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait until "is not harmful to humans" turns into "wasn't supposed to be harmful to humans"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait until " is not harmful to humans " turns into " was n't supposed to be harmful to humans "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait until "is not harmful to humans" turns into "wasn't supposed to be harmful to humans"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353765</id>
	<title>tiny bacteria</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to question her qualifications as a scientist or anything but I suspect that being a woman she forgot to account for shrinkage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to question her qualifications as a scientist or anything but I suspect that being a woman she forgot to account for shrinkage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to question her qualifications as a scientist or anything but I suspect that being a woman she forgot to account for shrinkage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358609</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1245270600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.</p><p>And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.</p><p>Its a bacteria.  What viruses live inside it?</p><p>What could Possibly Go Wrong here?</p></div><p>
Because that's whay<b>they want you to believe!</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , humorous as " The Thing " reference was meant to be , one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen ( when virtually NOTHING else is known about it ) seems of little comfort.Its a bacteria .
What viruses live inside it ? What could Possibly Go Wrong here ?
Because that 's whaythey want you to believe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.Its a bacteria.
What viruses live inside it?What could Possibly Go Wrong here?
Because that's whaythey want you to believe!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353983</id>
	<title>Re:Dead? Not so much,,,,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245148320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not clinically dead if you "die" on an operating table and are revived. It's ambiguous and, essentially, meaningless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not clinically dead if you " die " on an operating table and are revived .
It 's ambiguous and , essentially , meaningless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not clinically dead if you "die" on an operating table and are revived.
It's ambiguous and, essentially, meaningless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354555</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245151200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first thing that could go wrong is some yahoos on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. without on real knowledge or experiences start saying clueless speculation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing that could go wrong is some yahoos on / .
without on real knowledge or experiences start saying clueless speculation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing that could go wrong is some yahoos on /.
without on real knowledge or experiences start saying clueless speculation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356553</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1245163380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.<br> <br>

And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.</p></div><p>I felt a need to lighten the mood seeing as this is definitely a remnant of the Star Spawn and it heralds the awakening of the sleeper! ai! ai! ai!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , humorous as " The Thing " reference was meant to be , one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters .
And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen ( when virtually NOTHING else is known about it ) seems of little comfort.I felt a need to lighten the mood seeing as this is definitely a remnant of the Star Spawn and it heralds the awakening of the sleeper !
ai ! ai !
ai !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.
And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.I felt a need to lighten the mood seeing as this is definitely a remnant of the Star Spawn and it heralds the awakening of the sleeper!
ai! ai!
ai!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353913</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245148020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She's not so frigid for me.</p><p>-Picard</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She 's not so frigid for me.-Picard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She's not so frigid for me.-Picard</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1245148560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.</p><p>And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.</p><p>Its a bacteria.  What viruses live inside it?</p><p>What could Possibly Go Wrong here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , humorous as " The Thing " reference was meant to be , one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen ( when virtually NOTHING else is known about it ) seems of little comfort.Its a bacteria .
What viruses live inside it ? What could Possibly Go Wrong here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, humorous as "The Thing" reference was meant to be, one has to wonder how controlled the lab environment was when this thing was discovered passing thru filters.And the fact that a bug not seen in 102,000 years is known not to be a pathogen (when virtually NOTHING else is known about it) seems of little comfort.Its a bacteria.
What viruses live inside it?What could Possibly Go Wrong here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353843</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw a movie like this once, it didn't end well for us...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw a movie like this once , it did n't end well for us.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw a movie like this once, it didn't end well for us...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28367155</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome!</title>
	<author>CommanderIsm</author>
	<datestamp>1245237420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>thank god for that,

a joke americans - i know you are, - but this is</htmltext>
<tokenext>thank god for that , a joke americans - i know you are , - but this is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thank god for that,

a joke americans - i know you are, - but this is</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358609
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28367155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1935236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353765
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358085
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28360977
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28355191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1935236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28353591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354185
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354043
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354555
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358841
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357353
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28354189
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28358609
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28356553
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28357111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1935236.28367155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
