<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_16_1719257</id>
	<title>Buckyballs Polymerized Into Buckywires</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245177360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://arxivblog.technologyreview.com/" rel="nofollow">KentuckyFC</a> writes <i>"Scientists have found a way to join <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerene">buckyballs</a> together so that they form buckywires. The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene. The solvent <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/23682/">links the balls together to make wires shaped like a string of pearls</a>, which then precipitate out. This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufacture. Buckywires ought to be efficient light harvesters because of their great surface area and the way they can conduct photon-liberated electrons. But perhaps the area of greatest interest is drug delivery. The researchers suggest that buckywires ought to be safer than carbon nanotubes because the production method is entirely metal-free. This contrasts with the production of nanotubes, which are formed in a reaction catalyzed by metallic nanoparticles."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>KentuckyFC writes " Scientists have found a way to join buckyballs together so that they form buckywires .
The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene .
The solvent links the balls together to make wires shaped like a string of pearls , which then precipitate out .
This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufacture .
Buckywires ought to be efficient light harvesters because of their great surface area and the way they can conduct photon-liberated electrons .
But perhaps the area of greatest interest is drug delivery .
The researchers suggest that buckywires ought to be safer than carbon nanotubes because the production method is entirely metal-free .
This contrasts with the production of nanotubes , which are formed in a reaction catalyzed by metallic nanoparticles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KentuckyFC writes "Scientists have found a way to join buckyballs together so that they form buckywires.
The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.
The solvent links the balls together to make wires shaped like a string of pearls, which then precipitate out.
This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufacture.
Buckywires ought to be efficient light harvesters because of their great surface area and the way they can conduct photon-liberated electrons.
But perhaps the area of greatest interest is drug delivery.
The researchers suggest that buckywires ought to be safer than carbon nanotubes because the production method is entirely metal-free.
This contrasts with the production of nanotubes, which are formed in a reaction catalyzed by metallic nanoparticles.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</id>
	<title>Applications?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If threads are created and those threads are woven into a fabric, then what kind of ballistic applications could we expect?  Could panels be made from strands of buckysballs and into new car skins?  Aircraft?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If threads are created and those threads are woven into a fabric , then what kind of ballistic applications could we expect ?
Could panels be made from strands of buckysballs and into new car skins ?
Aircraft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If threads are created and those threads are woven into a fabric, then what kind of ballistic applications could we expect?
Could panels be made from strands of buckysballs and into new car skins?
Aircraft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351845</id>
	<title>Re:balls, my ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>AHHHH, you said "a$$" and d@mn! Bad word!!!! Bad word!!!! Bad word!!!! Where's the word filter here?!? I though this was supposed to be a family-friendly site?!?!? You should be ashamed, mother fucker</htmltext>
<tokenext>AHHHH , you said " a $ $ " and d @ mn !
Bad word ! ! ! !
Bad word ! ! ! !
Bad word ! ! ! !
Where 's the word filter here ? ! ?
I though this was supposed to be a family-friendly site ? ! ? ! ?
You should be ashamed , mother fucker</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AHHHH, you said "a$$" and d@mn!
Bad word!!!!
Bad word!!!!
Bad word!!!!
Where's the word filter here?!?
I though this was supposed to be a family-friendly site?!?!?
You should be ashamed, mother fucker</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353951</id>
	<title>In a strand so thin, it chopps heads off.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245148200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would make one hell of a garrote</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would make one hell of a garrote</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would make one hell of a garrote</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351587</id>
	<title>Wires are no good for your balls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd suggest you keep those wires away from your balls. That includes long hair from girlfriends and wives which have a terrible habbit of wrapping around your nuts when you least expect it. It's a very delicate operation to remove it - maybe not quite as hard as polymerising buckyballs but a hell of a lot more important to me personally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd suggest you keep those wires away from your balls .
That includes long hair from girlfriends and wives which have a terrible habbit of wrapping around your nuts when you least expect it .
It 's a very delicate operation to remove it - maybe not quite as hard as polymerising buckyballs but a hell of a lot more important to me personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd suggest you keep those wires away from your balls.
That includes long hair from girlfriends and wives which have a terrible habbit of wrapping around your nuts when you least expect it.
It's a very delicate operation to remove it - maybe not quite as hard as polymerising buckyballs but a hell of a lot more important to me personally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352939</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky whatchamacallit</title>
	<author>smaddox</author>
	<datestamp>1245144120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are used in every high efficiency organic solar cell.</p><p>Then again, organic solar cells are still only in the lab, so you probably don't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are used in every high efficiency organic solar cell.Then again , organic solar cells are still only in the lab , so you probably do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are used in every high efficiency organic solar cell.Then again, organic solar cells are still only in the lab, so you probably don't care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352677</id>
	<title>Stop.</title>
	<author>Wicked Zen</author>
	<datestamp>1245143040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You had me at "drug delivery."</htmltext>
<tokenext>You had me at " drug delivery .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You had me at "drug delivery.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352915</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace</title>
	<author>Amazing Quantum Man</author>
	<datestamp>1245144060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was ZZ Top involved in this research?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was ZZ Top involved in this research ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was ZZ Top involved in this research?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351693</id>
	<title>Time to start hording buckyballs.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/science/bbe8/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/science/bbe8/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/science/bbe8/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352087</id>
	<title>Doesn't this stuff have to be high quality?</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1245183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>IIRC, chains of carbon nanotubes, graphene, buckyballs, and co. are prone to nasty weaknesses do to easily induced flaws in structures. So even if we could make a lot of this stuff, would it even be useful with these methods?</htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC , chains of carbon nanotubes , graphene , buckyballs , and co. are prone to nasty weaknesses do to easily induced flaws in structures .
So even if we could make a lot of this stuff , would it even be useful with these methods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC, chains of carbon nanotubes, graphene, buckyballs, and co. are prone to nasty weaknesses do to easily induced flaws in structures.
So even if we could make a lot of this stuff, would it even be useful with these methods?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351539</id>
	<title>like a string of pearls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, a new sex toy.</p><p>And my captcha is "connects"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , a new sex toy.And my captcha is " connects "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, a new sex toy.And my captcha is "connects"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351501</id>
	<title>Re:balls, my ass</title>
	<author>decipher\_saint</author>
	<datestamp>1245181680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That must be some good Scotch if it can be used as a gasoline additive...</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,2,4-trimethylbenzene" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,2,4-trimethylbenzene</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That must be some good Scotch if it can be used as a gasoline additive...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,2,4-trimethylbenzene [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That must be some good Scotch if it can be used as a gasoline additive...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,2,4-trimethylbenzene [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28355269</id>
	<title>Meanwhile, in related news ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1245155280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... Elmer Snodgrass of Mayberry, Kansas has been collecting Buckywires for the past 35 years, wrapping them up to create the worlds largest Buckyball.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Elmer Snodgrass of Mayberry , Kansas has been collecting Buckywires for the past 35 years , wrapping them up to create the worlds largest Buckyball .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Elmer Snodgrass of Mayberry, Kansas has been collecting Buckywires for the past 35 years, wrapping them up to create the worlds largest Buckyball.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352873</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>Tweenk</author>
	<datestamp>1245143940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not possible to create fabrics woven from single molecule fibers, at least for now. And I would first expect such sort of thing done on more common polymers with more practical applications. But a "nano-fabric" could be interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not possible to create fabrics woven from single molecule fibers , at least for now .
And I would first expect such sort of thing done on more common polymers with more practical applications .
But a " nano-fabric " could be interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not possible to create fabrics woven from single molecule fibers, at least for now.
And I would first expect such sort of thing done on more common polymers with more practical applications.
But a "nano-fabric" could be interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437</id>
	<title>Effect on computing</title>
	<author>abshack</author>
	<datestamp>1245181440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does this effect computing, I wonder. I've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties (in passing conversation so I can't recall what they are). Could someone elaborate on how "buckystrings" could be used for electrical applications?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this effect computing , I wonder .
I 've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties ( in passing conversation so I ca n't recall what they are ) .
Could someone elaborate on how " buckystrings " could be used for electrical applications ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does this effect computing, I wonder.
I've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties (in passing conversation so I can't recall what they are).
Could someone elaborate on how "buckystrings" could be used for electrical applications?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351941</id>
	<title>Again with the journalist hype...</title>
	<author>toppavak</author>
	<datestamp>1245183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufacture</p></div><p>No, it doesn't. There's no specificity, you can't control the polymerization to the extent needed to build something useful at the nanoscale, the wires are precipitating out of solution because they're attracted to themselves and each other more strongly than they're attracted to the solvent, that's a problem because you have no way of actually building anything with them. That's why people have been doing this sort of things with metal colloids for over a decade and there's been no "industrial-scale" use for them discovered in anything but colloidal form because you're basically just creating fancy-shaped aggregates. Until there's a technology available that will <i>selectively</i> aggregate nanoscale materials into arbitrary shapes (rather than a bunch of copies of the same repeating structure in solution) in a manner where certain shapes and functional units can be fixed to where they need to be on a chip or in a machine there isn't going to be a use.<br> <br>Interesting chemistry, but to imagine that nanotech has any applications that require more synthetic control than bulk colloids or coatings within the next decade (or 5) is pure hype.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufactureNo , it does n't .
There 's no specificity , you ca n't control the polymerization to the extent needed to build something useful at the nanoscale , the wires are precipitating out of solution because they 're attracted to themselves and each other more strongly than they 're attracted to the solvent , that 's a problem because you have no way of actually building anything with them .
That 's why people have been doing this sort of things with metal colloids for over a decade and there 's been no " industrial-scale " use for them discovered in anything but colloidal form because you 're basically just creating fancy-shaped aggregates .
Until there 's a technology available that will selectively aggregate nanoscale materials into arbitrary shapes ( rather than a bunch of copies of the same repeating structure in solution ) in a manner where certain shapes and functional units can be fixed to where they need to be on a chip or in a machine there is n't going to be a use .
Interesting chemistry , but to imagine that nanotech has any applications that require more synthetic control than bulk colloids or coatings within the next decade ( or 5 ) is pure hype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This relatively simple procedure opens the door to industrial-scale manufactureNo, it doesn't.
There's no specificity, you can't control the polymerization to the extent needed to build something useful at the nanoscale, the wires are precipitating out of solution because they're attracted to themselves and each other more strongly than they're attracted to the solvent, that's a problem because you have no way of actually building anything with them.
That's why people have been doing this sort of things with metal colloids for over a decade and there's been no "industrial-scale" use for them discovered in anything but colloidal form because you're basically just creating fancy-shaped aggregates.
Until there's a technology available that will selectively aggregate nanoscale materials into arbitrary shapes (rather than a bunch of copies of the same repeating structure in solution) in a manner where certain shapes and functional units can be fixed to where they need to be on a chip or in a machine there isn't going to be a use.
Interesting chemistry, but to imagine that nanotech has any applications that require more synthetic control than bulk colloids or coatings within the next decade (or 5) is pure hype.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351865</id>
	<title>Re:Wires are no good for your balls</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1245182940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the fur pie is that bad perhaps you should tell them to get a Brazilian.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the fur pie is that bad perhaps you should tell them to get a Brazilian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the fur pie is that bad perhaps you should tell them to get a Brazilian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351587</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351487</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1245181620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So can I get some <b>cheap</b> fishing line that doesn't break now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So can I get some cheap fishing line that does n't break now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So can I get some cheap fishing line that doesn't break now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352567</id>
	<title>Re:Again with the journalist hype...</title>
	<author>Rudisaurus</author>
	<datestamp>1245185820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, a polymer is nothing more than an aggregate of repeating units<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... much like a Buckywire, in fact. And polymer chains can be tailored to be of specific (average) length, to have a certain average side-chain frequency and length, to have a given frequency of cross-linking, etc. So there's no reason why the kinetics of the wire-building reaction (for a reaction it is, whether chemical or physical), once they're understood, can't be utilized to customize the end-product. We do that all the time.
<br> <br>
I have a post-graduate degree in chemical engineering. I have worked in polymerization reaction engineering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , a polymer is nothing more than an aggregate of repeating units ... much like a Buckywire , in fact .
And polymer chains can be tailored to be of specific ( average ) length , to have a certain average side-chain frequency and length , to have a given frequency of cross-linking , etc .
So there 's no reason why the kinetics of the wire-building reaction ( for a reaction it is , whether chemical or physical ) , once they 're understood , ca n't be utilized to customize the end-product .
We do that all the time .
I have a post-graduate degree in chemical engineering .
I have worked in polymerization reaction engineering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, a polymer is nothing more than an aggregate of repeating units ... much like a Buckywire, in fact.
And polymer chains can be tailored to be of specific (average) length, to have a certain average side-chain frequency and length, to have a given frequency of cross-linking, etc.
So there's no reason why the kinetics of the wire-building reaction (for a reaction it is, whether chemical or physical), once they're understood, can't be utilized to customize the end-product.
We do that all the time.
I have a post-graduate degree in chemical engineering.
I have worked in polymerization reaction engineering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353579</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky whatchamacallit</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1245146520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can't recall a single substantial application. What are they?</p></div><p>So far, most applications involve applications for grant money.</p><p>Kim Allen's fullerene page is a pretty good reference in general.</p><p>This sub page:</p><p><a href="http://kimallen.sheepdogdesign.net/Fuller/apps.html" title="sheepdogdesign.net">http://kimallen.sheepdogdesign.net/Fuller/apps.html</a> [sheepdogdesign.net]</p><p>summarizes the current situation.  Pretty much, nothing but a lot of wouldn't it be cool.  Its the chemistry version of astronomy students pondering how cool it would be to have a warp drive, or poli-sci students dreaming of true communism.</p><p>It is a geometrical-numerological approach to chemistry, encouraged by occasional past success.  "If it looks cool to a human being, it must be chemically useful".</p><p>Benzene is attractively symmetric and cool looking and is also pretty vital.  On a really large scale DNA is pretty cool looking and does come in handy, mostly because its self replicating (with a little help).  Little lego building blocks of NaCl are pretty and industrially important.  A pretty matrix of silicon is very handy.  Similarily, a pretty handful of silicone is way off the chemistry topic here but also enjoyable (is this like the worst slashdot joke ever?)</p><p>On the other hand, there are plenty of examples, such as anthracene, with structures that look really super duper cool, but are more or less useless.  Add fullerenes to that list of cool looking, mostly useless structures.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't recall a single substantial application .
What are they ? So far , most applications involve applications for grant money.Kim Allen 's fullerene page is a pretty good reference in general.This sub page : http : //kimallen.sheepdogdesign.net/Fuller/apps.html [ sheepdogdesign.net ] summarizes the current situation .
Pretty much , nothing but a lot of would n't it be cool .
Its the chemistry version of astronomy students pondering how cool it would be to have a warp drive , or poli-sci students dreaming of true communism.It is a geometrical-numerological approach to chemistry , encouraged by occasional past success .
" If it looks cool to a human being , it must be chemically useful " .Benzene is attractively symmetric and cool looking and is also pretty vital .
On a really large scale DNA is pretty cool looking and does come in handy , mostly because its self replicating ( with a little help ) .
Little lego building blocks of NaCl are pretty and industrially important .
A pretty matrix of silicon is very handy .
Similarily , a pretty handful of silicone is way off the chemistry topic here but also enjoyable ( is this like the worst slashdot joke ever ?
) On the other hand , there are plenty of examples , such as anthracene , with structures that look really super duper cool , but are more or less useless .
Add fullerenes to that list of cool looking , mostly useless structures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't recall a single substantial application.
What are they?So far, most applications involve applications for grant money.Kim Allen's fullerene page is a pretty good reference in general.This sub page:http://kimallen.sheepdogdesign.net/Fuller/apps.html [sheepdogdesign.net]summarizes the current situation.
Pretty much, nothing but a lot of wouldn't it be cool.
Its the chemistry version of astronomy students pondering how cool it would be to have a warp drive, or poli-sci students dreaming of true communism.It is a geometrical-numerological approach to chemistry, encouraged by occasional past success.
"If it looks cool to a human being, it must be chemically useful".Benzene is attractively symmetric and cool looking and is also pretty vital.
On a really large scale DNA is pretty cool looking and does come in handy, mostly because its self replicating (with a little help).
Little lego building blocks of NaCl are pretty and industrially important.
A pretty matrix of silicon is very handy.
Similarily, a pretty handful of silicone is way off the chemistry topic here but also enjoyable (is this like the worst slashdot joke ever?
)On the other hand, there are plenty of examples, such as anthracene, with structures that look really super duper cool, but are more or less useless.
Add fullerenes to that list of cool looking, mostly useless structures.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331</id>
	<title>balls, my ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.</p></div></blockquote><p>Aromatic hydrocarbon, my ass. Those damn kids have been into my Scotch again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.Aromatic hydrocarbon , my ass .
Those damn kids have been into my Scotch again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wires form when buckyballs are dissolved in an aromatic hydrocarbon called 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.Aromatic hydrocarbon, my ass.
Those damn kids have been into my Scotch again.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352147</id>
	<title>hate the smell of buckyball wires in the  morning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>smells like gasoline<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>smells like gasoline : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>smells like gasoline :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353243</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245145260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was thinking Space Elevators when I first saw the title.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking Space Elevators when I first saw the title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking Space Elevators when I first saw the title.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353847</id>
	<title>NOT related to nanotubes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the image in the article, the individual buckyballs are linked by SP3 carbons (@-CH2-Phi-CH2-@) from the solvent. This means, there is no pi electron system, and therefore no electrical connectivity, between the buckyball entities. The physical characteristics of this material are vastly different from nanotubes, which are a single extended pi system. I highly doubt that this stuff can be a replacement for any application which requires long-distance electron flow, such as light harvesting, microelectronics, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the image in the article , the individual buckyballs are linked by SP3 carbons ( @ -CH2-Phi-CH2- @ ) from the solvent .
This means , there is no pi electron system , and therefore no electrical connectivity , between the buckyball entities .
The physical characteristics of this material are vastly different from nanotubes , which are a single extended pi system .
I highly doubt that this stuff can be a replacement for any application which requires long-distance electron flow , such as light harvesting , microelectronics , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the image in the article, the individual buckyballs are linked by SP3 carbons (@-CH2-Phi-CH2-@) from the solvent.
This means, there is no pi electron system, and therefore no electrical connectivity, between the buckyball entities.
The physical characteristics of this material are vastly different from nanotubes, which are a single extended pi system.
I highly doubt that this stuff can be a replacement for any application which requires long-distance electron flow, such as light harvesting, microelectronics, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353041</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky whatchamacallit</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1245144480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
"What are they?"
</p><p>
I mean applications, not buckyball.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What are they ?
" I mean applications , not buckyball .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
"What are they?
"

I mean applications, not buckyball.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351713</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha-Ha!  You win one free Internet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha-Ha !
You win one free Internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha-Ha!
You win one free Internet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351841</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>Saysys</author>
	<datestamp>1245182820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From: (PDF warning) <a href="http://www.davis-floyd.com/USERIMAGES/File/Bucky\%20balls\%20Fullereness\%20and\%20the\%20future.pdf" title="davis-floyd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.davis-floyd.com/USERIMAGES/File/Bucky\%20balls\%20Fullereness\%20and\%20the\%20future.pdf</a> [davis-floyd.com]
<br> <br>
being the strong, macroscopic person that you are, you get a hold of this, and you stretch it and stretch it and stretch it, and before it breaks you can stretch it to 20 or 30 percent longer than it was to begin with. The tensile strength is very high.
<br> <br>
The indication is that when it finally does break, it doesn't break brittly but pulls out a little chain of carbon atoms the break is a plastic failure, not a brittle failure. One thing that we do know from actual tubes that have been made and distorted, is that you can take this tube and you can bend it. You can bend it so much that it buckles like a soda straw and then when you let go, it just snaps right back it does not break.
<br> <br>
So, any tube, like the soda straw, as you begin to bend it, the material of the soda straw at the top of the bend has to stretch and underneath, on the inside of the bend, so that the bending stiffness of it depends on just how hard it is to stretch that material and this is the hardest material in the universe to stretch, so the stiffness of this little nanotube will be higher than any other object you can build out of the tinker toy set, forever and anon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From : ( PDF warning ) http : //www.davis-floyd.com/USERIMAGES/File/Bucky \ % 20balls \ % 20Fullereness \ % 20and \ % 20the \ % 20future.pdf [ davis-floyd.com ] being the strong , macroscopic person that you are , you get a hold of this , and you stretch it and stretch it and stretch it , and before it breaks you can stretch it to 20 or 30 percent longer than it was to begin with .
The tensile strength is very high .
The indication is that when it finally does break , it does n't break brittly but pulls out a little chain of carbon atoms the break is a plastic failure , not a brittle failure .
One thing that we do know from actual tubes that have been made and distorted , is that you can take this tube and you can bend it .
You can bend it so much that it buckles like a soda straw and then when you let go , it just snaps right back it does not break .
So , any tube , like the soda straw , as you begin to bend it , the material of the soda straw at the top of the bend has to stretch and underneath , on the inside of the bend , so that the bending stiffness of it depends on just how hard it is to stretch that material and this is the hardest material in the universe to stretch , so the stiffness of this little nanotube will be higher than any other object you can build out of the tinker toy set , forever and anon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From: (PDF warning) http://www.davis-floyd.com/USERIMAGES/File/Bucky\%20balls\%20Fullereness\%20and\%20the\%20future.pdf [davis-floyd.com]
 
being the strong, macroscopic person that you are, you get a hold of this, and you stretch it and stretch it and stretch it, and before it breaks you can stretch it to 20 or 30 percent longer than it was to begin with.
The tensile strength is very high.
The indication is that when it finally does break, it doesn't break brittly but pulls out a little chain of carbon atoms the break is a plastic failure, not a brittle failure.
One thing that we do know from actual tubes that have been made and distorted, is that you can take this tube and you can bend it.
You can bend it so much that it buckles like a soda straw and then when you let go, it just snaps right back it does not break.
So, any tube, like the soda straw, as you begin to bend it, the material of the soda straw at the top of the bend has to stretch and underneath, on the inside of the bend, so that the bending stiffness of it depends on just how hard it is to stretch that material and this is the hardest material in the universe to stretch, so the stiffness of this little nanotube will be higher than any other object you can build out of the tinker toy set, forever and anon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379</id>
	<title>Bucky whatchamacallit</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1245185040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Buckyball's been around a while now, predates slashdot's existence, with whole buncha stories stories posted on slashdot over the years, but I can't recall a single substantial application.  What are they?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buckyball 's been around a while now , predates slashdot 's existence , with whole buncha stories stories posted on slashdot over the years , but I ca n't recall a single substantial application .
What are they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buckyball's been around a while now, predates slashdot's existence, with whole buncha stories stories posted on slashdot over the years, but I can't recall a single substantial application.
What are they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352637</id>
	<title>Re:Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245142860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you say, Pearl Balls?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you say , Pearl Balls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you say, Pearl Balls?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351677</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>The Mysterious Dr. X</author>
	<datestamp>1245182220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably depends on the tensile properties. From what I gather, nanotubes and buckywires could have different characteristics there, since they don't really share the same structure. Without knowing any details, I wonder if the difference would make them more elastic... That would have a mix of effects on ballistics, I suppose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably depends on the tensile properties .
From what I gather , nanotubes and buckywires could have different characteristics there , since they do n't really share the same structure .
Without knowing any details , I wonder if the difference would make them more elastic... That would have a mix of effects on ballistics , I suppose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably depends on the tensile properties.
From what I gather, nanotubes and buckywires could have different characteristics there, since they don't really share the same structure.
Without knowing any details, I wonder if the difference would make them more elastic... That would have a mix of effects on ballistics, I suppose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353107</id>
	<title>Re:Effect on computing</title>
	<author>Conditioner</author>
	<datestamp>1245144660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  How does this <b>affect</b> computing, I wonder. I've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties (in passing conversation so I can't recall what they are). Could someone elaborate on how "buckystrings" could be used for electrical applications?</p></div><p>there, fixed that for ya!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this affect computing , I wonder .
I 've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties ( in passing conversation so I ca n't recall what they are ) .
Could someone elaborate on how " buckystrings " could be used for electrical applications ? there , fixed that for ya !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  How does this affect computing, I wonder.
I've heard that buckyballs have some interesting electrical properties (in passing conversation so I can't recall what they are).
Could someone elaborate on how "buckystrings" could be used for electrical applications?there, fixed that for ya!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352695</id>
	<title>Re:metal free...?</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1245143160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Benzene boiling point 80 degrees C at STP</p><p>Iron boiling point 2860 degrees C at STP</p><p>It would seem much easier to vacuum distill benzene out of the buckywire product than iron, because of the difference in boiling points.  If 80 degrees C is still too hot for buckywires, then vacuum distillation will work at a lower temperature.  So the technology to separate the good from the bad is much easier with the benzene process so it'll probably be done better.</p><p>Benzene traps are simple cheap and easy to use (well, relatively anyway), whereas nanoparticle "traps" are basically expensive filters that may or may not work and or be maintained, so just blowing filtered N2 thru the product and cleaning the contaminated N2 stream would probably work pretty well.  Recycling benzene is simple, but I think all you can do with nanoparticles is bury them or maybe dissolve the whole filter in a super strong acid.  So, trapping / recycling bad stuff using the benzene process is much simpler and easier to do, so it'll probably be done better.</p><p>Finally monitoring benzene levels (to verify your containment is working, detect when it fails) is pretty trivial, but monitoring nanoparticle contamination levels is pretty much a mystery or at least not standardized.  And when you have a spill, the fire department and EPA know exactly what to do with spilled benzene but would be mystified by nanoparticles.  So, when the bad stuff inevitably gets released into the environment, "we" know exactly how to handle the benzene process, but not the nanoparticle process.</p><p>Making eco-judgements about a chemistry topic, when all you can base it on is sloganeering like benzene is bad, is not going to result in useful judgments.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Benzene and many derivatives, are just as toxic (if not more so) than a lot of metals.</p></div><p>That's about as vague of a "statement" as can be made, but if you really believe it is true, we can set up a little wager and I'll wash my hands in a bucket of pure benzene if you'll agree to wash your hands or any other appendage with a mercury organometallic and we'll see who ends up healthier.  Or if you don't like mercury organometallics, I'll let you chose any soluble lead compound.  Or, how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Benzene boiling point 80 degrees C at STPIron boiling point 2860 degrees C at STPIt would seem much easier to vacuum distill benzene out of the buckywire product than iron , because of the difference in boiling points .
If 80 degrees C is still too hot for buckywires , then vacuum distillation will work at a lower temperature .
So the technology to separate the good from the bad is much easier with the benzene process so it 'll probably be done better.Benzene traps are simple cheap and easy to use ( well , relatively anyway ) , whereas nanoparticle " traps " are basically expensive filters that may or may not work and or be maintained , so just blowing filtered N2 thru the product and cleaning the contaminated N2 stream would probably work pretty well .
Recycling benzene is simple , but I think all you can do with nanoparticles is bury them or maybe dissolve the whole filter in a super strong acid .
So , trapping / recycling bad stuff using the benzene process is much simpler and easier to do , so it 'll probably be done better.Finally monitoring benzene levels ( to verify your containment is working , detect when it fails ) is pretty trivial , but monitoring nanoparticle contamination levels is pretty much a mystery or at least not standardized .
And when you have a spill , the fire department and EPA know exactly what to do with spilled benzene but would be mystified by nanoparticles .
So , when the bad stuff inevitably gets released into the environment , " we " know exactly how to handle the benzene process , but not the nanoparticle process.Making eco-judgements about a chemistry topic , when all you can base it on is sloganeering like benzene is bad , is not going to result in useful judgments.Benzene and many derivatives , are just as toxic ( if not more so ) than a lot of metals.That 's about as vague of a " statement " as can be made , but if you really believe it is true , we can set up a little wager and I 'll wash my hands in a bucket of pure benzene if you 'll agree to wash your hands or any other appendage with a mercury organometallic and we 'll see who ends up healthier .
Or if you do n't like mercury organometallics , I 'll let you chose any soluble lead compound .
Or , how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Benzene boiling point 80 degrees C at STPIron boiling point 2860 degrees C at STPIt would seem much easier to vacuum distill benzene out of the buckywire product than iron, because of the difference in boiling points.
If 80 degrees C is still too hot for buckywires, then vacuum distillation will work at a lower temperature.
So the technology to separate the good from the bad is much easier with the benzene process so it'll probably be done better.Benzene traps are simple cheap and easy to use (well, relatively anyway), whereas nanoparticle "traps" are basically expensive filters that may or may not work and or be maintained, so just blowing filtered N2 thru the product and cleaning the contaminated N2 stream would probably work pretty well.
Recycling benzene is simple, but I think all you can do with nanoparticles is bury them or maybe dissolve the whole filter in a super strong acid.
So, trapping / recycling bad stuff using the benzene process is much simpler and easier to do, so it'll probably be done better.Finally monitoring benzene levels (to verify your containment is working, detect when it fails) is pretty trivial, but monitoring nanoparticle contamination levels is pretty much a mystery or at least not standardized.
And when you have a spill, the fire department and EPA know exactly what to do with spilled benzene but would be mystified by nanoparticles.
So, when the bad stuff inevitably gets released into the environment, "we" know exactly how to handle the benzene process, but not the nanoparticle process.Making eco-judgements about a chemistry topic, when all you can base it on is sloganeering like benzene is bad, is not going to result in useful judgments.Benzene and many derivatives, are just as toxic (if not more so) than a lot of metals.That's about as vague of a "statement" as can be made, but if you really believe it is true, we can set up a little wager and I'll wash my hands in a bucket of pure benzene if you'll agree to wash your hands or any other appendage with a mercury organometallic and we'll see who ends up healthier.
Or if you don't like mercury organometallics, I'll let you chose any soluble lead compound.
Or, how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351895</id>
	<title>Re:Effect on computing</title>
	<author>The Mysterious Dr. X</author>
	<datestamp>1245183120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the article, it should make decent wiring for molecular circuit boards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the article , it should make decent wiring for molecular circuit boards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the article, it should make decent wiring for molecular circuit boards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511</id>
	<title>Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace"</p><p>Who would have guessed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace " Who would have guessed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bucky Balls create Pearl Necklace"Who would have guessed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351871</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1245183000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So can I get some <b>cheap</b> fishing line that doesn't break now?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes.  Yes you can.  <br> <br>2 cm diameter nylon rope will rarely break under normal fishing use.<br> <br>What... you wanted to be able to *catch* something with it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So can I get some cheap fishing line that does n't break now ? Yes .
Yes you can .
2 cm diameter nylon rope will rarely break under normal fishing use .
What... you wanted to be able to * catch * something with it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So can I get some cheap fishing line that doesn't break now?Yes.
Yes you can.
2 cm diameter nylon rope will rarely break under normal fishing use.
What... you wanted to be able to *catch* something with it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352551</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245185760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bucky balls can be used in automotive applications to create a more durable pair of TruckBalls for your Ford F-150.  Other tentative applications are weather-resistant 'Calvin Pissing' and 'No Fear' stickers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bucky balls can be used in automotive applications to create a more durable pair of TruckBalls for your Ford F-150 .
Other tentative applications are weather-resistant 'Calvin Pissing ' and 'No Fear ' stickers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bucky balls can be used in automotive applications to create a more durable pair of TruckBalls for your Ford F-150.
Other tentative applications are weather-resistant 'Calvin Pissing' and 'No Fear' stickers</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352669</id>
	<title>Re:metal free...?</title>
	<author>Tweenk</author>
	<datestamp>1245142980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You argument is actually in favor of metal-free synthesis. Even if the solvent was toxic, you can just evaporate it, which is trivial. However, it is not. A small structural change can lead to a drastic change in toxicity: benzene is highly toxic and carcinogenic, toluene (methylbenzene) is not carcinogenic and only slightly toxic. I expect their solvent to be relatively non-toxic.</p><p>On the other hand, metal contamination is an a very big problem, especially in drug synthesis. You can't easily get rid of trace amounts of metal. The only good approach is to avoid it, by using stable catalysts that can be separated with very high efficiency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You argument is actually in favor of metal-free synthesis .
Even if the solvent was toxic , you can just evaporate it , which is trivial .
However , it is not .
A small structural change can lead to a drastic change in toxicity : benzene is highly toxic and carcinogenic , toluene ( methylbenzene ) is not carcinogenic and only slightly toxic .
I expect their solvent to be relatively non-toxic.On the other hand , metal contamination is an a very big problem , especially in drug synthesis .
You ca n't easily get rid of trace amounts of metal .
The only good approach is to avoid it , by using stable catalysts that can be separated with very high efficiency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You argument is actually in favor of metal-free synthesis.
Even if the solvent was toxic, you can just evaporate it, which is trivial.
However, it is not.
A small structural change can lead to a drastic change in toxicity: benzene is highly toxic and carcinogenic, toluene (methylbenzene) is not carcinogenic and only slightly toxic.
I expect their solvent to be relatively non-toxic.On the other hand, metal contamination is an a very big problem, especially in drug synthesis.
You can't easily get rid of trace amounts of metal.
The only good approach is to avoid it, by using stable catalysts that can be separated with very high efficiency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351997</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I love about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., you can have a faux pas and while still getting the message across you create wonderful laughter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I love about /. , you can have a faux pas and while still getting the message across you create wonderful laughter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I love about /., you can have a faux pas and while still getting the message across you create wonderful laughter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352343</id>
	<title>Re:Applications?</title>
	<author>TheHawke</author>
	<datestamp>1245184800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clothlike photovolatics. You'd be quite literally wearing a patch of solar cells on your jacket, powering your appliances. Self-charging power cells, when it runs low, it'll tell you through audibles or a simple electroluminescent indicator. Just set it outside and it'll happily charge itself.</p><p>New processes for PV's to be built. Self-charging billboards using LED's or other low voltage lighting, eliminating high powered spots that pollute the night sky. I don't know how they would stand up to the rigors of space travel, but I'll bet they'll come up with something, perhaps laminating BB PV's in Lexan or a similiar transparent material.</p><p>Maybe a paint using them, making once again, self powered equipment, or hybrid wind generators that keep generating power even when the wind is calm!</p><p>How are they at being a wearing face? New generations of bearing materials that have an even lower friction coefficient than the current materials.</p><p>Also, new formulations for fuel using polymer chains of BB's maybe in order, making it an excellent replacement for sulfur as a lubricating additive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clothlike photovolatics .
You 'd be quite literally wearing a patch of solar cells on your jacket , powering your appliances .
Self-charging power cells , when it runs low , it 'll tell you through audibles or a simple electroluminescent indicator .
Just set it outside and it 'll happily charge itself.New processes for PV 's to be built .
Self-charging billboards using LED 's or other low voltage lighting , eliminating high powered spots that pollute the night sky .
I do n't know how they would stand up to the rigors of space travel , but I 'll bet they 'll come up with something , perhaps laminating BB PV 's in Lexan or a similiar transparent material.Maybe a paint using them , making once again , self powered equipment , or hybrid wind generators that keep generating power even when the wind is calm ! How are they at being a wearing face ?
New generations of bearing materials that have an even lower friction coefficient than the current materials.Also , new formulations for fuel using polymer chains of BB 's maybe in order , making it an excellent replacement for sulfur as a lubricating additive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clothlike photovolatics.
You'd be quite literally wearing a patch of solar cells on your jacket, powering your appliances.
Self-charging power cells, when it runs low, it'll tell you through audibles or a simple electroluminescent indicator.
Just set it outside and it'll happily charge itself.New processes for PV's to be built.
Self-charging billboards using LED's or other low voltage lighting, eliminating high powered spots that pollute the night sky.
I don't know how they would stand up to the rigors of space travel, but I'll bet they'll come up with something, perhaps laminating BB PV's in Lexan or a similiar transparent material.Maybe a paint using them, making once again, self powered equipment, or hybrid wind generators that keep generating power even when the wind is calm!How are they at being a wearing face?
New generations of bearing materials that have an even lower friction coefficient than the current materials.Also, new formulations for fuel using polymer chains of BB's maybe in order, making it an excellent replacement for sulfur as a lubricating additive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352731</id>
	<title>Why Bucky-wires and not Bucky-snot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article is kinda light on details.  So, to you chemists out there, what controls where and how many times the trimethylbenzene bonds to the Buckyball?  Why doesn't it form all sorts of bonds all over the ball and cause a giant, crystalized glop of randomly bonded Bucky-snot to precipitate out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is kinda light on details .
So , to you chemists out there , what controls where and how many times the trimethylbenzene bonds to the Buckyball ?
Why does n't it form all sorts of bonds all over the ball and cause a giant , crystalized glop of randomly bonded Bucky-snot to precipitate out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is kinda light on details.
So, to you chemists out there, what controls where and how many times the trimethylbenzene bonds to the Buckyball?
Why doesn't it form all sorts of bonds all over the ball and cause a giant, crystalized glop of randomly bonded Bucky-snot to precipitate out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28383233</id>
	<title>Re:metal free...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245330480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or, how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound?</p></div><p>The "tastiness" of Uranium should be known since it has been used in dental porcelain for decades (no longer of course): http://www.orau.org/PTP/collection/consumer\%20products/dentures.htm</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound ? The " tastiness " of Uranium should be known since it has been used in dental porcelain for decades ( no longer of course ) : http : //www.orau.org/PTP/collection/consumer \ % 20products/dentures.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, how about a tasty ionic Uranium compound?The "tastiness" of Uranium should be known since it has been used in dental porcelain for decades (no longer of course): http://www.orau.org/PTP/collection/consumer\%20products/dentures.htm
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351903</id>
	<title>So, Johnny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245183120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...have you ever heard of Buckeywires?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...have you ever heard of Buckeywires ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...have you ever heard of Buckeywires?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353373</id>
	<title>Re:Effect on computing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245145740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I try to keep my buckyballs as far away from electricity as possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I try to keep my buckyballs as far away from electricity as possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I try to keep my buckyballs as far away from electricity as possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28362539</id>
	<title>Re:NOT related to nanotubes</title>
	<author>Mal-2</author>
	<datestamp>1245258660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Benzene is conductive because it has "floating" double bonds in its six-carbon ring. This may leave enough electrons free to conduct between buckyballs.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Benzene is conductive because it has " floating " double bonds in its six-carbon ring .
This may leave enough electrons free to conduct between buckyballs.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Benzene is conductive because it has "floating" double bonds in its six-carbon ring.
This may leave enough electrons free to conduct between buckyballs.Mal-2</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719</id>
	<title>metal free...?</title>
	<author>ByOhTek</author>
	<datestamp>1245182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Metal free production is nice, but in the end, it's not just what is used in production, but how you take out the undesirable things.</p><p>Benzene and many derivatives, are just as toxic (if not more so) than a lot of metals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Metal free production is nice , but in the end , it 's not just what is used in production , but how you take out the undesirable things.Benzene and many derivatives , are just as toxic ( if not more so ) than a lot of metals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Metal free production is nice, but in the end, it's not just what is used in production, but how you take out the undesirable things.Benzene and many derivatives, are just as toxic (if not more so) than a lot of metals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353621</id>
	<title>Not Science, not anything</title>
	<author>Super Happy Fun Chem</author>
	<datestamp>1245146640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article is so bad as to not even be publishable.  They see less 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in aged samples?  Guess what, trimethylbenzene evaporates slowly. Less soluble?  Ever heard of decomposition?

There's a reason this isn't in Science or JACS, and that's because its complete and utter fantasy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is so bad as to not even be publishable .
They see less 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in aged samples ?
Guess what , trimethylbenzene evaporates slowly .
Less soluble ?
Ever heard of decomposition ?
There 's a reason this is n't in Science or JACS , and that 's because its complete and utter fantasy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is so bad as to not even be publishable.
They see less 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in aged samples?
Guess what, trimethylbenzene evaporates slowly.
Less soluble?
Ever heard of decomposition?
There's a reason this isn't in Science or JACS, and that's because its complete and utter fantasy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28362539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28383233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1719257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28383233
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28362539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351871
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28353579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28352939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1719257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1719257.28351865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
