<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_15_2317205</id>
	<title>SCO Springs a Prospective Buyer</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245090840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>clemenstimpler sends a link to Groklaw, which has been following the proceedings dealing with the conversion of SCO's bankruptcy to Chapter 7 (i.e., liquidating the company). <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090615122117389">SCO has announced a prospective buyer</a>. <i>"...SCO has suggested it has a buyer. That doesn't mean it will avoid Chapter 7 of course, nor does it mean that the bankruptcy court will OK the suggested sale. But it likely does mean more delay, which is what this is likely all about. SCO very much wants to wait until the appeals court rules in SCO v. Novell. ... Hearing set for July 16 with backup for July 27. SCO has already moved to make it July 27. combo hearing on convert and sale. Frankly, it would not totally amaze me if the three entities that filed motions to convert were to appeal this. If not, SCO got its desired delay."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>clemenstimpler sends a link to Groklaw , which has been following the proceedings dealing with the conversion of SCO 's bankruptcy to Chapter 7 ( i.e. , liquidating the company ) .
SCO has announced a prospective buyer .
" ...SCO has suggested it has a buyer .
That does n't mean it will avoid Chapter 7 of course , nor does it mean that the bankruptcy court will OK the suggested sale .
But it likely does mean more delay , which is what this is likely all about .
SCO very much wants to wait until the appeals court rules in SCO v. Novell. ... Hearing set for July 16 with backup for July 27 .
SCO has already moved to make it July 27. combo hearing on convert and sale .
Frankly , it would not totally amaze me if the three entities that filed motions to convert were to appeal this .
If not , SCO got its desired delay .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>clemenstimpler sends a link to Groklaw, which has been following the proceedings dealing with the conversion of SCO's bankruptcy to Chapter 7 (i.e., liquidating the company).
SCO has announced a prospective buyer.
"...SCO has suggested it has a buyer.
That doesn't mean it will avoid Chapter 7 of course, nor does it mean that the bankruptcy court will OK the suggested sale.
But it likely does mean more delay, which is what this is likely all about.
SCO very much wants to wait until the appeals court rules in SCO v. Novell. ... Hearing set for July 16 with backup for July 27.
SCO has already moved to make it July 27. combo hearing on convert and sale.
Frankly, it would not totally amaze me if the three entities that filed motions to convert were to appeal this.
If not, SCO got its desired delay.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345319</id>
	<title>Wrong - just advertising on someone else's work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bullshit.<br> <br>You have been conned by stupid MIT staffroom politics which has escaped onto the net.  Linux is not a GNU project, the GNU operating system is called HURD.  I think the whole gnu/linux thing and the LiGnuX thing before it was just a response to people asking RMS what he had done lately.  He has done a lot of worthwhile things but linux was put together by others.  The gnu tools are incredibly useful but make up only a small portion of most linux distributions and are not there at all in some of the embedded distributions (which use a different C library and use busybox).<br>There is a linux distibution called is "Debian gnu/linux", but all the packaging has been done by Debian without involvement by gnu.<br>It also seems you have confused GNU with the GPL and seem to think the GPL restricts commercial activity - keep in mind that not even Halliburton are afraid of it since all it really means is telling people where you got your free code from.  It isn't 1995 anymore, and even then anyone that took the time to actually read the thing wouldn't have been that worried about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .
You have been conned by stupid MIT staffroom politics which has escaped onto the net .
Linux is not a GNU project , the GNU operating system is called HURD .
I think the whole gnu/linux thing and the LiGnuX thing before it was just a response to people asking RMS what he had done lately .
He has done a lot of worthwhile things but linux was put together by others .
The gnu tools are incredibly useful but make up only a small portion of most linux distributions and are not there at all in some of the embedded distributions ( which use a different C library and use busybox ) .There is a linux distibution called is " Debian gnu/linux " , but all the packaging has been done by Debian without involvement by gnu.It also seems you have confused GNU with the GPL and seem to think the GPL restricts commercial activity - keep in mind that not even Halliburton are afraid of it since all it really means is telling people where you got your free code from .
It is n't 1995 anymore , and even then anyone that took the time to actually read the thing would n't have been that worried about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.
You have been conned by stupid MIT staffroom politics which has escaped onto the net.
Linux is not a GNU project, the GNU operating system is called HURD.
I think the whole gnu/linux thing and the LiGnuX thing before it was just a response to people asking RMS what he had done lately.
He has done a lot of worthwhile things but linux was put together by others.
The gnu tools are incredibly useful but make up only a small portion of most linux distributions and are not there at all in some of the embedded distributions (which use a different C library and use busybox).There is a linux distibution called is "Debian gnu/linux", but all the packaging has been done by Debian without involvement by gnu.It also seems you have confused GNU with the GPL and seem to think the GPL restricts commercial activity - keep in mind that not even Halliburton are afraid of it since all it really means is telling people where you got your free code from.
It isn't 1995 anymore, and even then anyone that took the time to actually read the thing wouldn't have been that worried about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348751</id>
	<title>buyer:  the Devil.  consolidating his assets.</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1245172500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>your next general release of SCO Unix will run on the Mattel Aquarius and Coleco Adam only.  please to transfer your databases to cassette tape.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>your next general release of SCO Unix will run on the Mattel Aquarius and Coleco Adam only .
please to transfer your databases to cassette tape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your next general release of SCO Unix will run on the Mattel Aquarius and Coleco Adam only.
please to transfer your databases to cassette tape.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349283</id>
	<title>Just another case of msft backed corruption?</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1245174180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is 4th "prospective buyer" in 19 months</p><p>Whenever scox's bankruptcy comes to trial, scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer, and scox gets another delay. Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years, and there is no end in sight. Of course, the dubious buyouts never materializes.</p><p>Either the judge falls for the same trick every time, or there is corruption involved. Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam (over six years ago), the possibility of corruption is real. After all, msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is 4th " prospective buyer " in 19 monthsWhenever scox 's bankruptcy comes to trial , scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer , and scox gets another delay .
Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years , and there is no end in sight .
Of course , the dubious buyouts never materializes.Either the judge falls for the same trick every time , or there is corruption involved .
Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam ( over six years ago ) , the possibility of corruption is real .
After all , msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is 4th "prospective buyer" in 19 monthsWhenever scox's bankruptcy comes to trial, scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer, and scox gets another delay.
Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years, and there is no end in sight.
Of course, the dubious buyouts never materializes.Either the judge falls for the same trick every time, or there is corruption involved.
Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam (over six years ago), the possibility of corruption is real.
After all, msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345165</id>
	<title>Idle speculation...</title>
	<author>MsGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1245184380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...would that suitor be based in Redmond, WA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...would that suitor be based in Redmond , WA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...would that suitor be based in Redmond, WA?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346437</id>
	<title>Re:what other trademarks -- Novell/SCO thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245159840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darl, just STFU.  Everybody knows you're full of it.</p><p>The court has already ruled that the asset sheet doesn't say what you're claiming it does.  Just go away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darl , just STFU .
Everybody knows you 're full of it.The court has already ruled that the asset sheet does n't say what you 're claiming it does .
Just go away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darl, just STFU.
Everybody knows you're full of it.The court has already ruled that the asset sheet doesn't say what you're claiming it does.
Just go away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346093</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344971</id>
	<title>Buyer for who?  Richard Matthew Stalman owns Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245095100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there is ever a human that would embrace and extend any property more than Microsoft's Bill Ghates, then it was the attempt of RMS to in-effect <a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/5233c6cac0.jpg" title="anonymouse.org" rel="nofollow">overwork Linux to the point running all theologies and distributions out of the arena by over-competition.</a> [anonymouse.org]</p><p>Is there even a Linux outside of GNU/Linux anymore?  Can anyone even assemble a Linux From Scratch, Slackware, or RedHat system without GNU and it's GPL'd tools?  I know RedHat Fedora was trying to make way for itself to carve it's own Opensource proprietary service market, but has since failed because of the pre-occupation of free-minded developers to GPL.  I mean, Open Source Initiative had all kinds of great things going for it until it became evident this decade that GNU has over-competed the marketable distributions of Linux with all kinds of useless flavors that fail in their design to scale.</p><p>The first Linux I even owned was Caldera 1.3 and RedHAT 5.4 that I bought from LinuxMall through eBay for U$5 each.  Even came with a free SuSE version.  I remember of all the distributions, SuSE wouldn't allow it to run for more than a year due to it's vendor lock-in, while Caldera and RedHAT were in the game and looked lovely with Calera's KDE 1 desktop and RedHat's FVWM.  Caldera wasn't as bad as everyone said they were, and they would've been better if they were in RedHAT's position at the time.  It would've been RedHAT slinging lawsuits at everyone if they were secondary to Caldera in this matter.  Doesn't anyone remember the IPX network code that even Caldera devoted to Linux?</p><p>I hope Caldera kicks someone's ass, even if it had to be Darryl's for sitting on their product for too long with no development.  It should've been awesome having accounted customers like Sun, Novell, and Microsoft to your code.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is ever a human that would embrace and extend any property more than Microsoft 's Bill Ghates , then it was the attempt of RMS to in-effect overwork Linux to the point running all theologies and distributions out of the arena by over-competition .
[ anonymouse.org ] Is there even a Linux outside of GNU/Linux anymore ?
Can anyone even assemble a Linux From Scratch , Slackware , or RedHat system without GNU and it 's GPL 'd tools ?
I know RedHat Fedora was trying to make way for itself to carve it 's own Opensource proprietary service market , but has since failed because of the pre-occupation of free-minded developers to GPL .
I mean , Open Source Initiative had all kinds of great things going for it until it became evident this decade that GNU has over-competed the marketable distributions of Linux with all kinds of useless flavors that fail in their design to scale.The first Linux I even owned was Caldera 1.3 and RedHAT 5.4 that I bought from LinuxMall through eBay for U $ 5 each .
Even came with a free SuSE version .
I remember of all the distributions , SuSE would n't allow it to run for more than a year due to it 's vendor lock-in , while Caldera and RedHAT were in the game and looked lovely with Calera 's KDE 1 desktop and RedHat 's FVWM .
Caldera was n't as bad as everyone said they were , and they would 've been better if they were in RedHAT 's position at the time .
It would 've been RedHAT slinging lawsuits at everyone if they were secondary to Caldera in this matter .
Does n't anyone remember the IPX network code that even Caldera devoted to Linux ? I hope Caldera kicks someone 's ass , even if it had to be Darryl 's for sitting on their product for too long with no development .
It should 've been awesome having accounted customers like Sun , Novell , and Microsoft to your code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is ever a human that would embrace and extend any property more than Microsoft's Bill Ghates, then it was the attempt of RMS to in-effect overwork Linux to the point running all theologies and distributions out of the arena by over-competition.
[anonymouse.org]Is there even a Linux outside of GNU/Linux anymore?
Can anyone even assemble a Linux From Scratch, Slackware, or RedHat system without GNU and it's GPL'd tools?
I know RedHat Fedora was trying to make way for itself to carve it's own Opensource proprietary service market, but has since failed because of the pre-occupation of free-minded developers to GPL.
I mean, Open Source Initiative had all kinds of great things going for it until it became evident this decade that GNU has over-competed the marketable distributions of Linux with all kinds of useless flavors that fail in their design to scale.The first Linux I even owned was Caldera 1.3 and RedHAT 5.4 that I bought from LinuxMall through eBay for U$5 each.
Even came with a free SuSE version.
I remember of all the distributions, SuSE wouldn't allow it to run for more than a year due to it's vendor lock-in, while Caldera and RedHAT were in the game and looked lovely with Calera's KDE 1 desktop and RedHat's FVWM.
Caldera wasn't as bad as everyone said they were, and they would've been better if they were in RedHAT's position at the time.
It would've been RedHAT slinging lawsuits at everyone if they were secondary to Caldera in this matter.
Doesn't anyone remember the IPX network code that even Caldera devoted to Linux?I hope Caldera kicks someone's ass, even if it had to be Darryl's for sitting on their product for too long with no development.
It should've been awesome having accounted customers like Sun, Novell, and Microsoft to your code.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345247</id>
	<title>IMPORTANT INFORMATION</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245185220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GOATSE http://goatse.asia/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GOATSE http : //goatse.asia/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOATSE http://goatse.asia/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277</id>
	<title>Hiding the money</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1245185640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From another article (I can't access groklaw right now, so I don't know if the same is stated on groklaw):<blockquote><div><p>The remaining SCO company will also
continue to enforce its appeal of U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball's ruling in August 2007 that found Novell, not SCO, rightfully owns the copyrights on the Unix operating system, he said.</p></div></blockquote><p>
So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell, and leave the shell of SCO (plus some mobile products that most likely have no value) to continue the lawsuit, with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From another article ( I ca n't access groklaw right now , so I do n't know if the same is stated on groklaw ) : The remaining SCO company will also continue to enforce its appeal of U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball 's ruling in August 2007 that found Novell , not SCO , rightfully owns the copyrights on the Unix operating system , he said .
So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell , and leave the shell of SCO ( plus some mobile products that most likely have no value ) to continue the lawsuit , with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From another article (I can't access groklaw right now, so I don't know if the same is stated on groklaw):The remaining SCO company will also
continue to enforce its appeal of U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball's ruling in August 2007 that found Novell, not SCO, rightfully owns the copyrights on the Unix operating system, he said.
So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell, and leave the shell of SCO (plus some mobile products that most likely have no value) to continue the lawsuit, with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345155</id>
	<title>Undead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SCO the UnDead.</p><p>But actually, this is what one should normally expect from a litigation company.  The US legal system makes it easy for this sort of harassment (in this case, of Linux supporters IBM/Novell/etc) to continue virtually forever.</p><p>This is obvious.  But the takeaway message is worth posting clearly... Just because you're in the Right, you cannot assume the courts will vindicate you.  Once accused in civil court, you are mired for as long as the other side wants (or can afford).  Don't.  Get.  Sued.  In.  The.  USA.  Broken System.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SCO the UnDead.But actually , this is what one should normally expect from a litigation company .
The US legal system makes it easy for this sort of harassment ( in this case , of Linux supporters IBM/Novell/etc ) to continue virtually forever.This is obvious .
But the takeaway message is worth posting clearly... Just because you 're in the Right , you can not assume the courts will vindicate you .
Once accused in civil court , you are mired for as long as the other side wants ( or can afford ) .
Do n't. Get .
Sued. In .
The. USA .
Broken System .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SCO the UnDead.But actually, this is what one should normally expect from a litigation company.
The US legal system makes it easy for this sort of harassment (in this case, of Linux supporters IBM/Novell/etc) to continue virtually forever.This is obvious.
But the takeaway message is worth posting clearly... Just because you're in the Right, you cannot assume the courts will vindicate you.
Once accused in civil court, you are mired for as long as the other side wants (or can afford).
Don't.  Get.
Sued.  In.
The.  USA.
Broken System.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429</id>
	<title>in this day and age?</title>
	<author>MoFoQ</author>
	<datestamp>1245144660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there's someone still stupid^H^H^H^H^H^Hbold enough to buy SCO?<br>Man....can someone get me his number? I've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him, not to mention a few automobiles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM 's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there 's someone still stupid ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hbold enough to buy SCO ? Man....can someone get me his number ?
I 've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him , not to mention a few automobiles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there's someone still stupid^H^H^H^H^H^Hbold enough to buy SCO?Man....can someone get me his number?
I've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him, not to mention a few automobiles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346115</id>
	<title>Re:Hiding the money</title>
	<author>Lorien\_the\_first\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1245155820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps, but with the current administration, and the new legislation winding it's way through, it could conceivably get easier to pierce the corporate veil.  This lawsuit represents the height of corporate avarice.  What makes it all the more interesting is that the only newspaper willing to continue to run stories on it seems to be the Salt Lake Tribune.  Yet the lawsuit will have worldwide influence once the appeals have run their course.
<br> <br>
I'm really looking forward to the trial of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO\_v.\_IBM#IBM\_counterclaims\_against\_SCO" title="wikipedia.org">IBM's counterclaims</a> [wikipedia.org], and the damages decided from them.  At that point, we're very likely to see where the money for the suit came from.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps , but with the current administration , and the new legislation winding it 's way through , it could conceivably get easier to pierce the corporate veil .
This lawsuit represents the height of corporate avarice .
What makes it all the more interesting is that the only newspaper willing to continue to run stories on it seems to be the Salt Lake Tribune .
Yet the lawsuit will have worldwide influence once the appeals have run their course .
I 'm really looking forward to the trial of IBM 's counterclaims [ wikipedia.org ] , and the damages decided from them .
At that point , we 're very likely to see where the money for the suit came from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps, but with the current administration, and the new legislation winding it's way through, it could conceivably get easier to pierce the corporate veil.
This lawsuit represents the height of corporate avarice.
What makes it all the more interesting is that the only newspaper willing to continue to run stories on it seems to be the Salt Lake Tribune.
Yet the lawsuit will have worldwide influence once the appeals have run their course.
I'm really looking forward to the trial of IBM's counterclaims [wikipedia.org], and the damages decided from them.
At that point, we're very likely to see where the money for the suit came from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346203</id>
	<title>That would be Glenn Reynolds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245157320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/" title="pajamasmedia.com">http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/</a> [pajamasmedia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/ [ pajamasmedia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/ [pajamasmedia.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345177</id>
	<title>Chinese?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Far out. With the current financial situation I wouldn't have thought anyone would want to part with $10 just for SCO! It must be the Chinese...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Far out .
With the current financial situation I would n't have thought anyone would want to part with $ 10 just for SCO !
It must be the Chinese.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Far out.
With the current financial situation I wouldn't have thought anyone would want to part with $10 just for SCO!
It must be the Chinese...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346039</id>
	<title>zzzz</title>
	<author>apodyopsis</author>
	<datestamp>1245154920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not dead! I feel fine! I think I'll go for a walk! I'm getting better!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>Honestly, its like the monster that will not die, nothing works - garlic, holy water, silver bullets, stake, decapitation, fire and even the BFG9000 could not finish it.</p><p>Just stay down, everybody will be much happier and we are all waiting for the party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not dead !
I feel fine !
I think I 'll go for a walk !
I 'm getting better !
..Honestly , its like the monster that will not die , nothing works - garlic , holy water , silver bullets , stake , decapitation , fire and even the BFG9000 could not finish it.Just stay down , everybody will be much happier and we are all waiting for the party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not dead!
I feel fine!
I think I'll go for a walk!
I'm getting better!
..Honestly, its like the monster that will not die, nothing works - garlic, holy water, silver bullets, stake, decapitation, fire and even the BFG9000 could not finish it.Just stay down, everybody will be much happier and we are all waiting for the party.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344949</id>
	<title>Why Won't You Die?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245094740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Beneath this balance sheet there is more than cash. Beneath this balance sheet there is a fraud, Your Honor, and frauds are lawyerproof.
<p>
- With apologies to Alan Moore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beneath this balance sheet there is more than cash .
Beneath this balance sheet there is a fraud , Your Honor , and frauds are lawyerproof .
- With apologies to Alan Moore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beneath this balance sheet there is more than cash.
Beneath this balance sheet there is a fraud, Your Honor, and frauds are lawyerproof.
- With apologies to Alan Moore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345449</id>
	<title>Tagging 'diealready' (n/t)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245144960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is time to die, SCO. Die in peace, but die already (and never come back)!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is time to die , SCO .
Die in peace , but die already ( and never come back ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is time to die, SCO.
Die in peace, but die already (and never come back)!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345539</id>
	<title>Re:How many hops to M$ ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah... these SCO versus Novell epics always confuse me, after all, it's Micro$oft vs. Micro$oft after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... these SCO versus Novell epics always confuse me , after all , it 's Micro $ oft vs. Micro $ oft after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... these SCO versus Novell epics always confuse me, after all, it's Micro$oft vs. Micro$oft after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346147</id>
	<title>Re:For our Benefit</title>
	<author>Muad'Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1245156480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As Willy Wonka said, "The suspense is <i>killing</i> me. I hope it lasts."</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Willy Wonka said , " The suspense is killing me .
I hope it lasts .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Willy Wonka said, "The suspense is killing me.
I hope it lasts.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345661</id>
	<title>Re:How many hops to M$ ?</title>
	<author>FithisUX</author>
	<datestamp>1245148500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Microsoft is behind I suggest Microsoft to opensource it and base Windows8 on Unixware ala Apple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Microsoft is behind I suggest Microsoft to opensource it and base Windows8 on Unixware ala Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Microsoft is behind I suggest Microsoft to opensource it and base Windows8 on Unixware ala Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28350923</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>MoFoQ</author>
	<datestamp>1245179400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it would definitely have to be renamed to avoid the pitchforks and torches, especially of those who went into hiding due to the economy imploding (that and H1N1)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it would definitely have to be renamed to avoid the pitchforks and torches , especially of those who went into hiding due to the economy imploding ( that and H1N1 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it would definitely have to be renamed to avoid the pitchforks and torches, especially of those who went into hiding due to the economy imploding (that and H1N1)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345875</id>
	<title>One</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1245152280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>One hop : <br>
<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/sco-strikes-gold-verizon-just-strikes-728" title="infoworld.com">http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/sco-strikes-gold-verizon-just-strikes-728</a> [infoworld.com] <br>
Microsoft bought $6 million of "licenses" to SCO in 2003.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One hop : http : //www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/sco-strikes-gold-verizon-just-strikes-728 [ infoworld.com ] Microsoft bought $ 6 million of " licenses " to SCO in 2003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One hop : 
http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/sco-strikes-gold-verizon-just-strikes-728 [infoworld.com] 
Microsoft bought $6 million of "licenses" to SCO in 2003.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>sumdumass</author>
	<datestamp>1245170460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would buy SCO if I had the money. Not because I think it is a gold mine or anything but because of all the people claiming rights to Unix, SCO is the only company trying to claim Linux is a derivative and do something about it.</p><p>If a few geeks, maybe backed by Novel, IMB, or some other companies using linux in their products purchased SCO at the liquidated price, they could operate their own distro, are large enough to demand Unix drivers and could open enough specs to allow OSS drivers, and put an end to this saga once and for all. We could call this pack, GLOSCO or Geeks for Linux and getting Over SCO.</p><p>I'm seriously wondering why we have seen talk of something like that. SCO or SCOGQ is trading for around 15 cents a share now, if every geek in the world contributed $100, that would be 666 shares. With 15.2 million shares outstanding, it shouldn't take much more than 22 or 23 thousand people to buy it outright at $100 plops. Get IBM, Hitachi, Motorola, Novels, perhaps a few of the distros to donate and that number drops fast. All the IP gained could be placed into a trust account and SCO can operate as a commercial development platform with OSS driver access and open improvements for the rest of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would buy SCO if I had the money .
Not because I think it is a gold mine or anything but because of all the people claiming rights to Unix , SCO is the only company trying to claim Linux is a derivative and do something about it.If a few geeks , maybe backed by Novel , IMB , or some other companies using linux in their products purchased SCO at the liquidated price , they could operate their own distro , are large enough to demand Unix drivers and could open enough specs to allow OSS drivers , and put an end to this saga once and for all .
We could call this pack , GLOSCO or Geeks for Linux and getting Over SCO.I 'm seriously wondering why we have seen talk of something like that .
SCO or SCOGQ is trading for around 15 cents a share now , if every geek in the world contributed $ 100 , that would be 666 shares .
With 15.2 million shares outstanding , it should n't take much more than 22 or 23 thousand people to buy it outright at $ 100 plops .
Get IBM , Hitachi , Motorola , Novels , perhaps a few of the distros to donate and that number drops fast .
All the IP gained could be placed into a trust account and SCO can operate as a commercial development platform with OSS driver access and open improvements for the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would buy SCO if I had the money.
Not because I think it is a gold mine or anything but because of all the people claiming rights to Unix, SCO is the only company trying to claim Linux is a derivative and do something about it.If a few geeks, maybe backed by Novel, IMB, or some other companies using linux in their products purchased SCO at the liquidated price, they could operate their own distro, are large enough to demand Unix drivers and could open enough specs to allow OSS drivers, and put an end to this saga once and for all.
We could call this pack, GLOSCO or Geeks for Linux and getting Over SCO.I'm seriously wondering why we have seen talk of something like that.
SCO or SCOGQ is trading for around 15 cents a share now, if every geek in the world contributed $100, that would be 666 shares.
With 15.2 million shares outstanding, it shouldn't take much more than 22 or 23 thousand people to buy it outright at $100 plops.
Get IBM, Hitachi, Motorola, Novels, perhaps a few of the distros to donate and that number drops fast.
All the IP gained could be placed into a trust account and SCO can operate as a commercial development platform with OSS driver access and open improvements for the rest of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28352927</id>
	<title>Re:I get it</title>
	<author>La\_Boca</author>
	<datestamp>1245144120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Prove it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Prove it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prove it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947</id>
	<title>Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1245094740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article's title gave me the mental image of a decomposing zombie clawing its' way up out of the ground.</p><p>Hopefully as the article suggests, the sale will be forestalled, and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article 's title gave me the mental image of a decomposing zombie clawing its ' way up out of the ground.Hopefully as the article suggests , the sale will be forestalled , and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article's title gave me the mental image of a decomposing zombie clawing its' way up out of the ground.Hopefully as the article suggests, the sale will be forestalled, and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348801</id>
	<title>more time wasting cobblers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the hell does the American leagal system just stop fingering their collective fannys and kill this bunch of ambiguos twats off once and for all end dead terminated you will NOT be back this is now getting a little tiring a few months yes but years do me a favour hello are you awake F**K them off will ya  be done with it</p><p>Sheessh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the hell does the American leagal system just stop fingering their collective fannys and kill this bunch of ambiguos twats off once and for all end dead terminated you will NOT be back this is now getting a little tiring a few months yes but years do me a favour hello are you awake F * * K them off will ya be done with itSheessh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the hell does the American leagal system just stop fingering their collective fannys and kill this bunch of ambiguos twats off once and for all end dead terminated you will NOT be back this is now getting a little tiring a few months yes but years do me a favour hello are you awake F**K them off will ya  be done with itSheessh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345617</id>
	<title>What if it is Microsoft?!</title>
	<author>G3ckoG33k</author>
	<datestamp>1245147960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if the prospective buyer is Microsoft?! Who could object to that, and on what grounds?!</p><p>Scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the prospective buyer is Microsoft ? !
Who could object to that , and on what grounds ?
! Scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the prospective buyer is Microsoft?!
Who could object to that, and on what grounds?
!Scary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346955</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1245163680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I doubt it. A bankruptcy judge's job is essentially to ensure that SCO's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law. From that perspective, liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution, particularly for companies deeply in debt.</p></div></blockquote><p>Right now, realistically, the best the creditors can hope for is liquidation and for someone to buy up "substantially all the assets" of the company.  That probably amounts to zero, but at least it allows them to finally write off the bad debt and be finished with the litigation.  Zero all they can expect in any case, the only question is whether it is zero now or zero later.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt it .
A bankruptcy judge 's job is essentially to ensure that SCO 's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law .
From that perspective , liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution , particularly for companies deeply in debt.Right now , realistically , the best the creditors can hope for is liquidation and for someone to buy up " substantially all the assets " of the company .
That probably amounts to zero , but at least it allows them to finally write off the bad debt and be finished with the litigation .
Zero all they can expect in any case , the only question is whether it is zero now or zero later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt it.
A bankruptcy judge's job is essentially to ensure that SCO's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law.
From that perspective, liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution, particularly for companies deeply in debt.Right now, realistically, the best the creditors can hope for is liquidation and for someone to buy up "substantially all the assets" of the company.
That probably amounts to zero, but at least it allows them to finally write off the bad debt and be finished with the litigation.
Zero all they can expect in any case, the only question is whether it is zero now or zero later.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349373</id>
	<title>Just another case of msft backed corruption?</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1245174480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just another case of msft backed corruption?</p><p>This is 4th "prospective buyer" in 19 months</p><p>Whenever scox's bankruptcy comes to trial, scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer, and scox gets another delay. Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years, and there is no end in sight. Of course, the dubious buyouts never materializes.</p><p>Either the judge falls for the same trick every time, or there is corruption involved. Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam (over six years ago), the possibility of corruption is real. After all, msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just another case of msft backed corruption ? This is 4th " prospective buyer " in 19 monthsWhenever scox 's bankruptcy comes to trial , scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer , and scox gets another delay .
Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years , and there is no end in sight .
Of course , the dubious buyouts never materializes.Either the judge falls for the same trick every time , or there is corruption involved .
Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam ( over six years ago ) , the possibility of corruption is real .
After all , msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just another case of msft backed corruption?This is 4th "prospective buyer" in 19 monthsWhenever scox's bankruptcy comes to trial, scox tells the judge about some mysterious prospective buyer, and scox gets another delay.
Scox has been playing this game for nearly two years, and there is no end in sight.
Of course, the dubious buyouts never materializes.Either the judge falls for the same trick every time, or there is corruption involved.
Considering that msft has been behind the scox-scam every step of the way since the beginning of the scam (over six years ago), the possibility of corruption is real.
After all, msft is the company that admitted to bribing public officials in the OOXML scam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346587</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1245160980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should go all in and just bring in Bruce Campbell, he's only a hundred, I'm sure he can still fight off a horde of IP attorneys and zombies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should go all in and just bring in Bruce Campbell , he 's only a hundred , I 'm sure he can still fight off a horde of IP attorneys and zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should go all in and just bring in Bruce Campbell, he's only a hundred, I'm sure he can still fight off a horde of IP attorneys and zombies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348135</id>
	<title>Why won't they die??????</title>
	<author>motherpusbucket</author>
	<datestamp>1245170040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this keeps up, we'll have to add SCO to the nuclear attack survivor list currently including cockroaches and Cher.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this keeps up , we 'll have to add SCO to the nuclear attack survivor list currently including cockroaches and Cher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this keeps up, we'll have to add SCO to the nuclear attack survivor list currently including cockroaches and Cher.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346881</id>
	<title>"Potential" is the key word here</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1245163080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really think there is any serious buyer.  Previously SCO tried to launch an <a href="http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS8554039771.html" title="linux-watch.com">emergency sale to York management</a> [linux-watch.com] only to have the bankruptcy court and all its creditors object to the deal.  What SCO never made clear (or tried to hide) in that deal was who would get the liabilities from the Novell judgment against them.  If the sale had gone through, Novell would have had to spend years figuring out who owed them the money.  This is just another ploy to stall for time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really think there is any serious buyer .
Previously SCO tried to launch an emergency sale to York management [ linux-watch.com ] only to have the bankruptcy court and all its creditors object to the deal .
What SCO never made clear ( or tried to hide ) in that deal was who would get the liabilities from the Novell judgment against them .
If the sale had gone through , Novell would have had to spend years figuring out who owed them the money .
This is just another ploy to stall for time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really think there is any serious buyer.
Previously SCO tried to launch an emergency sale to York management [linux-watch.com] only to have the bankruptcy court and all its creditors object to the deal.
What SCO never made clear (or tried to hide) in that deal was who would get the liabilities from the Novell judgment against them.
If the sale had gone through, Novell would have had to spend years figuring out who owed them the money.
This is just another ploy to stall for time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348171</id>
	<title>Erm....guys?</title>
	<author>Sj0</author>
	<datestamp>1245170160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hang on.</p><p>So they lied about linux containing unix code.<br>Then they lied about owning full unix rights.<br>Then they lied constantly about their ability to handle it in court.<br>Then they lied to the court by using stalling tactics pretending they needed information.</p><p>Maybe they're lying? You know, flat-out, bald faced shameless lying? They're already so badly in trouble in the courts, what's one more lie if it helps stave off death a bit longer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hang on.So they lied about linux containing unix code.Then they lied about owning full unix rights.Then they lied constantly about their ability to handle it in court.Then they lied to the court by using stalling tactics pretending they needed information.Maybe they 're lying ?
You know , flat-out , bald faced shameless lying ?
They 're already so badly in trouble in the courts , what 's one more lie if it helps stave off death a bit longer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hang on.So they lied about linux containing unix code.Then they lied about owning full unix rights.Then they lied constantly about their ability to handle it in court.Then they lied to the court by using stalling tactics pretending they needed information.Maybe they're lying?
You know, flat-out, bald faced shameless lying?
They're already so badly in trouble in the courts, what's one more lie if it helps stave off death a bit longer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173</id>
	<title>How many hops to M$ ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How far do we need to follow the money to find Microsoft ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How far do we need to follow the money to find Microsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How far do we need to follow the money to find Microsoft ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345681</id>
	<title>Rest of the deal</title>
	<author>parcanman</author>
	<datestamp>1245149040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if SCO told their buyer that Linux (all of it) is part of the sale?

They probably said "yea, this guy with a blue blanket and a red and black striped shirt who calls himself Linus is gonna try to tell you that Linux isn't ours to sell, yea, just ignore him".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if SCO told their buyer that Linux ( all of it ) is part of the sale ?
They probably said " yea , this guy with a blue blanket and a red and black striped shirt who calls himself Linus is gon na try to tell you that Linux is n't ours to sell , yea , just ignore him " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if SCO told their buyer that Linux (all of it) is part of the sale?
They probably said "yea, this guy with a blue blanket and a red and black striped shirt who calls himself Linus is gonna try to tell you that Linux isn't ours to sell, yea, just ignore him".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945</id>
	<title>For our Benefit</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1245094740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're dragging it out so we can savor it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're dragging it out so we can savor it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're dragging it out so we can savor it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345639</id>
	<title>remeber</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245148260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That MS funds *both* SCO and Novel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That MS funds * both * SCO and Novel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That MS funds *both* SCO and Novel</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346241</id>
	<title>Potential buyer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245158040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I almost bought SCO. But I spent the $10 at McDonalds instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I almost bought SCO .
But I spent the $ 10 at McDonalds instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I almost bought SCO.
But I spent the $10 at McDonalds instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346317</id>
	<title>Red Dwarf quote?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245158820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"He's like a blind old, incontinent sheep dog. Take him out to the barn with your shotgun and blow the mutha away! It's the kindest thing!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" He 's like a blind old , incontinent sheep dog .
Take him out to the barn with your shotgun and blow the mutha away !
It 's the kindest thing !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He's like a blind old, incontinent sheep dog.
Take him out to the barn with your shotgun and blow the mutha away!
It's the kindest thing!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348017</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1245169440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only sure-fire way to "put a stake in it" is to aim straight for the heart: Darl McBride.  Lock him up in a windowless cell with no Internet access, or better yet castrate him to make sure there will never be a Darl 2.0.  Darl McBride is one of the true "useless eaters" that eugenicists were debating in the early part of last Century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only sure-fire way to " put a stake in it " is to aim straight for the heart : Darl McBride .
Lock him up in a windowless cell with no Internet access , or better yet castrate him to make sure there will never be a Darl 2.0 .
Darl McBride is one of the true " useless eaters " that eugenicists were debating in the early part of last Century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only sure-fire way to "put a stake in it" is to aim straight for the heart: Darl McBride.
Lock him up in a windowless cell with no Internet access, or better yet castrate him to make sure there will never be a Darl 2.0.
Darl McBride is one of the true "useless eaters" that eugenicists were debating in the early part of last Century.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28359709</id>
	<title>Is it me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245241380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope it wasn't from when I said, 'I'd give them a dollar', here on slashdot, because I was only joking!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it was n't from when I said , 'I 'd give them a dollar ' , here on slashdot , because I was only joking ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it wasn't from when I said, 'I'd give them a dollar', here on slashdot, because I was only joking!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28356305</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245161700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, I've CALLED Darl's house before. D: Don't throw that phony shit up.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:x The number was floating around on Freenet back in 2004. I'm sure someone could find it if they looked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , I 've CALLED Darl 's house before .
D : Do n't throw that phony shit up .
: x The number was floating around on Freenet back in 2004 .
I 'm sure someone could find it if they looked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, I've CALLED Darl's house before.
D: Don't throw that phony shit up.
:x The number was floating around on Freenet back in 2004.
I'm sure someone could find it if they looked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345227</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>eugene2k</author>
	<datestamp>1245184920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now, imagine the appeals court rules SCO has the rights to Unix! Won't that be fun!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , imagine the appeals court rules SCO has the rights to Unix !
Wo n't that be fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, imagine the appeals court rules SCO has the rights to Unix!
Won't that be fun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28351167</id>
	<title>Did this prospective buyer KNOW of SCO?</title>
	<author>crovira</author>
	<datestamp>1245180360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe its like those crappy telephone "bait and switch" scams and somebody just thought they were just buying "Naughty Nurses" porn.</p><p>Suddenly instead of a DVD of said "Naughty Nurses" they suddenly open a box full of SCO stock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe its like those crappy telephone " bait and switch " scams and somebody just thought they were just buying " Naughty Nurses " porn.Suddenly instead of a DVD of said " Naughty Nurses " they suddenly open a box full of SCO stock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe its like those crappy telephone "bait and switch" scams and somebody just thought they were just buying "Naughty Nurses" porn.Suddenly instead of a DVD of said "Naughty Nurses" they suddenly open a box full of SCO stock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349723</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're wrong. My advisers have assured me that my bid of $24.38 will almost certainly be successful.</p><p>My first action as the new owner will be to fire everybody in a senior management position, then invite the underlings, excluding the legal team,  to take what they want of the remaining office equipment.. Everything else on eBay by the weekend.</p><p>Seriously, is this not another example of why companies go the litigious route? Why bother actually doing anything when all you need to do is sue a load of people, followed by more legal pontification when you lose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're wrong .
My advisers have assured me that my bid of $ 24.38 will almost certainly be successful.My first action as the new owner will be to fire everybody in a senior management position , then invite the underlings , excluding the legal team , to take what they want of the remaining office equipment.. Everything else on eBay by the weekend.Seriously , is this not another example of why companies go the litigious route ?
Why bother actually doing anything when all you need to do is sue a load of people , followed by more legal pontification when you lose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're wrong.
My advisers have assured me that my bid of $24.38 will almost certainly be successful.My first action as the new owner will be to fire everybody in a senior management position, then invite the underlings, excluding the legal team,  to take what they want of the remaining office equipment.. Everything else on eBay by the weekend.Seriously, is this not another example of why companies go the litigious route?
Why bother actually doing anything when all you need to do is sue a load of people, followed by more legal pontification when you lose?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346093</id>
	<title>what other trademarks -- Novell/SCO thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245155580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the deal, as many may remember. (I'll probably get flamed for this BTW)<br>------------</p><p>1.1(a)<br>1. All rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare, including but not limited to all versions of UNIX and UnixWare and all copies of UNIX and UnixWare<br>1.1(b)<br>V. Intellectual Property:<br>A. All copyrights and trademarks, except for the trademarks UNIX and UnixWare.<br>B. All Patents<br>-------------</p><p>In terms of 50/50 -- civil, not criminal.</p><p>What other trademarks? 1.1a is "all rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare", then 1.1b is except "all copyrights and trademarks", except UNIX and UnixWare.</p><p>What other trademarks?  Do you see what I'm getting at?  Why even mention it?</p><p>In other words, could you actually list the copyrights in UNIX and Unixware? How hard is it to take the kernel GPL3? What's Sun's "excuse" (3rd parties) why they can't go GPL?</p><p>Define UNIX and UnixWare copyrights. List them. File by file, author by author, owner by owner. Stuff sneaks in.</p><p>Here's what it is -- it seems to me now, having stumbled upon some ideas (and again, I'm talking 50/50 preponderance here, not criminal (tell me SCO is not viewed as criminals<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Novell sold all "UNIX and UnixWare" copyright. They excluded all other copyrights.</p><p>Novell retains all copyrights they didn't actually own until they find out they don't own them. (they're just protecting themselves) .</p><p>But they sold all "UNIX and Unixware" copyrights.</p><p>Again, what other trademarks if all that was sold was UNIX and UnixWare? Why even bring it up? Why would going GPL3 be such an undertaking for the Linux kernel?</p><p>It's a type of confusion. So many files, so many authors, so many contributions -- stuff sneaks in. They HAVE to say that. They retain the copyrights, but that's the "other" copyrights, copyrights that aren't UNIX and UnixWare copyrights.</p><p>In a 50/50 preponderence situation, I'd be thinking like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the deal , as many may remember .
( I 'll probably get flamed for this BTW ) ------------1.1 ( a ) 1 .
All rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare , including but not limited to all versions of UNIX and UnixWare and all copies of UNIX and UnixWare1.1 ( b ) V. Intellectual Property : A. All copyrights and trademarks , except for the trademarks UNIX and UnixWare.B .
All Patents-------------In terms of 50/50 -- civil , not criminal.What other trademarks ?
1.1a is " all rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare " , then 1.1b is except " all copyrights and trademarks " , except UNIX and UnixWare.What other trademarks ?
Do you see what I 'm getting at ?
Why even mention it ? In other words , could you actually list the copyrights in UNIX and Unixware ?
How hard is it to take the kernel GPL3 ?
What 's Sun 's " excuse " ( 3rd parties ) why they ca n't go GPL ? Define UNIX and UnixWare copyrights .
List them .
File by file , author by author , owner by owner .
Stuff sneaks in.Here 's what it is -- it seems to me now , having stumbled upon some ideas ( and again , I 'm talking 50/50 preponderance here , not criminal ( tell me SCO is not viewed as criminals : ) Novell sold all " UNIX and UnixWare " copyright .
They excluded all other copyrights.Novell retains all copyrights they did n't actually own until they find out they do n't own them .
( they 're just protecting themselves ) .But they sold all " UNIX and Unixware " copyrights.Again , what other trademarks if all that was sold was UNIX and UnixWare ?
Why even bring it up ?
Why would going GPL3 be such an undertaking for the Linux kernel ? It 's a type of confusion .
So many files , so many authors , so many contributions -- stuff sneaks in .
They HAVE to say that .
They retain the copyrights , but that 's the " other " copyrights , copyrights that are n't UNIX and UnixWare copyrights.In a 50/50 preponderence situation , I 'd be thinking like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the deal, as many may remember.
(I'll probably get flamed for this BTW)------------1.1(a)1.
All rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare, including but not limited to all versions of UNIX and UnixWare and all copies of UNIX and UnixWare1.1(b)V. Intellectual Property:A. All copyrights and trademarks, except for the trademarks UNIX and UnixWare.B.
All Patents-------------In terms of 50/50 -- civil, not criminal.What other trademarks?
1.1a is "all rights and ownership of UNIX and UnixWare", then 1.1b is except "all copyrights and trademarks", except UNIX and UnixWare.What other trademarks?
Do you see what I'm getting at?
Why even mention it?In other words, could you actually list the copyrights in UNIX and Unixware?
How hard is it to take the kernel GPL3?
What's Sun's "excuse" (3rd parties) why they can't go GPL?Define UNIX and UnixWare copyrights.
List them.
File by file, author by author, owner by owner.
Stuff sneaks in.Here's what it is -- it seems to me now, having stumbled upon some ideas (and again, I'm talking 50/50 preponderance here, not criminal (tell me SCO is not viewed as criminals :)Novell sold all "UNIX and UnixWare" copyright.
They excluded all other copyrights.Novell retains all copyrights they didn't actually own until they find out they don't own them.
(they're just protecting themselves) .But they sold all "UNIX and Unixware" copyrights.Again, what other trademarks if all that was sold was UNIX and UnixWare?
Why even bring it up?
Why would going GPL3 be such an undertaking for the Linux kernel?It's a type of confusion.
So many files, so many authors, so many contributions -- stuff sneaks in.
They HAVE to say that.
They retain the copyrights, but that's the "other" copyrights, copyrights that aren't UNIX and UnixWare copyrights.In a 50/50 preponderence situation, I'd be thinking like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28512169</id>
	<title>y do u think so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246277580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you think that bankruptcy court will not OK the suggested sale?<br>i mean is there any clear logic behind your prediction?<br><a href="http://www.exam-builder.com/70-270.htm" title="exam-builder.com" rel="nofollow">70-270 exam</a> [exam-builder.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think that bankruptcy court will not OK the suggested sale ? i mean is there any clear logic behind your prediction ? 70-270 exam [ exam-builder.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think that bankruptcy court will not OK the suggested sale?i mean is there any clear logic behind your prediction?70-270 exam [exam-builder.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349713</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>jamstar7</author>
	<datestamp>1245175620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's all very well and good, except for two things.<p>
1. The cash would go directly into Darl's pocket.  Yeah, we might be finally rid of him, but still...</p><p>
2. The company would get stuck with all the debt from the lawsuit &amp; such, with no income being generated.  Remember, SCO is running on fumes, and what little comes in goes right back out to Darl &amp; the lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all very well and good , except for two things .
1. The cash would go directly into Darl 's pocket .
Yeah , we might be finally rid of him , but still.. . 2. The company would get stuck with all the debt from the lawsuit &amp; such , with no income being generated .
Remember , SCO is running on fumes , and what little comes in goes right back out to Darl &amp; the lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all very well and good, except for two things.
1. The cash would go directly into Darl's pocket.
Yeah, we might be finally rid of him, but still...
2. The company would get stuck with all the debt from the lawsuit &amp; such, with no income being generated.
Remember, SCO is running on fumes, and what little comes in goes right back out to Darl &amp; the lawyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349627</id>
	<title>Re:Hiding the money</title>
	<author>jamstar7</author>
	<datestamp>1245175320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell, and leave the shell of SCO (plus some mobile products that most likely have no value) to continue the lawsuit, with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Sounds bout right.  As long as Darl gets paid, who really cares?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell , and leave the shell of SCO ( plus some mobile products that most likely have no value ) to continue the lawsuit , with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals .
Sounds bout right .
As long as Darl gets paid , who really cares ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is an attempt to get the remaining cash and Unix assets out of reach of Novell, and leave the shell of SCO (plus some mobile products that most likely have no value) to continue the lawsuit, with no money left over for Novell and IBM when they eventually run out of appeals.
Sounds bout right.
As long as Darl gets paid, who really cares?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345455</id>
	<title>The REAL reason</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1245145020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand they just need a bit more time to conclude their purchase of the Duke Nukem Forever codebase and issue a call for investors to fund completion of this vital work.</p><p>Oh, there won't be a game coming out of all this - SCO will have a pile of algorithms and methods specific to the gaming world stretching back as far as the first annoucement of DNF and so they can then start to examine games produced since that date from all the big players to see if they have 'pinched' anything.</p><p>3. Profit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand they just need a bit more time to conclude their purchase of the Duke Nukem Forever codebase and issue a call for investors to fund completion of this vital work.Oh , there wo n't be a game coming out of all this - SCO will have a pile of algorithms and methods specific to the gaming world stretching back as far as the first annoucement of DNF and so they can then start to examine games produced since that date from all the big players to see if they have 'pinched ' anything.3 .
Profit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand they just need a bit more time to conclude their purchase of the Duke Nukem Forever codebase and issue a call for investors to fund completion of this vital work.Oh, there won't be a game coming out of all this - SCO will have a pile of algorithms and methods specific to the gaming world stretching back as far as the first annoucement of DNF and so they can then start to examine games produced since that date from all the big players to see if they have 'pinched' anything.3.
Profit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348507</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1245171660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't be surprised if they received their share of the economic stimulus package.</p><p>I mean, look at all the people they keep working. Lawyers, grocklaw, shashdot posters, Microsoft's anti-linux commissions, Novell, IBM,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Sure, they produce nothing useful, beyond the entertainment value, but don't you want to "save" all those jobs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't be surprised if they received their share of the economic stimulus package.I mean , look at all the people they keep working .
Lawyers , grocklaw , shashdot posters , Microsoft 's anti-linux commissions , Novell , IBM , ...Sure , they produce nothing useful , beyond the entertainment value , but do n't you want to " save " all those jobs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't be surprised if they received their share of the economic stimulus package.I mean, look at all the people they keep working.
Lawyers, grocklaw, shashdot posters, Microsoft's anti-linux commissions, Novell, IBM, ...Sure, they produce nothing useful, beyond the entertainment value, but don't you want to "save" all those jobs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>Dhalka226</author>
	<datestamp>1245145260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hopefully as the article suggests, the sale will be forestalled, and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all.</p></div></blockquote><p>I doubt it.  A bankruptcy judge's job is essentially to ensure that SCO's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law.  From that perspective, liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution, particularly for companies deeply in debt.  A buyer is, of course, the best solution: Somebody willing to assume that debt and, hopefully, turn the company around to making some money again.  Then it can start to pay back its creditors and if it falls apart again, well, you're just right back at the liquidation stage -- little lost but time.

</p><p>So unless the judge can determine this is nothing but a bullshit stalling tactic on the part of SCO--and I doubt any judge would do so without at least a hearing or two on the matter--they're almost certain to let it pass.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully as the article suggests , the sale will be forestalled , and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all.I doubt it .
A bankruptcy judge 's job is essentially to ensure that SCO 's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law .
From that perspective , liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution , particularly for companies deeply in debt .
A buyer is , of course , the best solution : Somebody willing to assume that debt and , hopefully , turn the company around to making some money again .
Then it can start to pay back its creditors and if it falls apart again , well , you 're just right back at the liquidation stage -- little lost but time .
So unless the judge can determine this is nothing but a bullshit stalling tactic on the part of SCO--and I doubt any judge would do so without at least a hearing or two on the matter--they 're almost certain to let it pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully as the article suggests, the sale will be forestalled, and some judge will finally put a stake in this monster once and for all.I doubt it.
A bankruptcy judge's job is essentially to ensure that SCO's creditors get the maximum amount of money back under the law.
From that perspective, liquidation tends to be a fairly lousy solution, particularly for companies deeply in debt.
A buyer is, of course, the best solution: Somebody willing to assume that debt and, hopefully, turn the company around to making some money again.
Then it can start to pay back its creditors and if it falls apart again, well, you're just right back at the liquidation stage -- little lost but time.
So unless the judge can determine this is nothing but a bullshit stalling tactic on the part of SCO--and I doubt any judge would do so without at least a hearing or two on the matter--they're almost certain to let it pass.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113</id>
	<title>Re:Paging Buffy Summers...</title>
	<author>iCodemonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1245183720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>why cant we come up with the legal equivalent of a shotgun. shotguns ALWAYS work against zombies, or im i wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>why cant we come up with the legal equivalent of a shotgun .
shotguns ALWAYS work against zombies , or im i wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why cant we come up with the legal equivalent of a shotgun.
shotguns ALWAYS work against zombies, or im i wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345211</id>
	<title>Justice</title>
	<author>davro</author>
	<datestamp>1245184800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give the judge a trench gun and be done with these pesky zombies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give the judge a trench gun and be done with these pesky zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give the judge a trench gun and be done with these pesky zombies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348537</id>
	<title>Re:in this day and age?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245171720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there's someone still stupid^H^H^H^H^H^Hbold enough to buy SCO?<br>Man....can someone get me his number? I've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him, not to mention a few automobiles."</p></div></blockquote><p>Sure - his number is 202-456-1414.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM 's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there 's someone still stupid ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hbold enough to buy SCO ? Man....can someone get me his number ?
I 've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him , not to mention a few automobiles .
" Sure - his number is 202-456-1414 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"in this day and age...after the credit implosion and GM's bankruptcy..after Madoff....there's someone still stupid^H^H^H^H^H^Hbold enough to buy SCO?Man....can someone get me his number?
I've got a few dozen bridges and landmarks to sell him, not to mention a few automobiles.
"Sure - his number is 202-456-1414.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345157</id>
	<title>I get it</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1245184380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're getting a bailout! The government will now own Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're getting a bailout !
The government will now own Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're getting a bailout!
The government will now own Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345219</id>
	<title>No appeal of the delay</title>
	<author>Mostly a lurker</author>
	<datestamp>1245184860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I very much hope the Office of the US Trustee, IBM, Novell and others do not appeal the delay.  Of course, they have excellent grounds for doing so, but the result would likely just be a longer delay.  SCO has successfully gamed the system, and will probably gain a six week delay in the process.  If this is appealed, it will probably take longer than six weeks just to argue and get a decision.  Meanwhile, SCO will argue that the purchase agreement cannot go forward with the Chapter 7 conversion hanging over their head (BS, of course, but prove it).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I very much hope the Office of the US Trustee , IBM , Novell and others do not appeal the delay .
Of course , they have excellent grounds for doing so , but the result would likely just be a longer delay .
SCO has successfully gamed the system , and will probably gain a six week delay in the process .
If this is appealed , it will probably take longer than six weeks just to argue and get a decision .
Meanwhile , SCO will argue that the purchase agreement can not go forward with the Chapter 7 conversion hanging over their head ( BS , of course , but prove it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I very much hope the Office of the US Trustee, IBM, Novell and others do not appeal the delay.
Of course, they have excellent grounds for doing so, but the result would likely just be a longer delay.
SCO has successfully gamed the system, and will probably gain a six week delay in the process.
If this is appealed, it will probably take longer than six weeks just to argue and get a decision.
Meanwhile, SCO will argue that the purchase agreement cannot go forward with the Chapter 7 conversion hanging over their head (BS, of course, but prove it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348625</id>
	<title>Re:For our Benefit</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1245172020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, if I had to guess they're probably dragging it out so Darl et al can continue to draw salaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , if I had to guess they 're probably dragging it out so Darl et al can continue to draw salaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, if I had to guess they're probably dragging it out so Darl et al can continue to draw salaries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28352927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28350923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346437
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28356305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_2317205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345227
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345219
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28356305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349713
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28350923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346093
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345639
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28344947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28348017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345469
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28349723
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346587
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28352927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28346241
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345455
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_2317205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_2317205.28345155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
