<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_15_015207</id>
	<title>A Visual Expedition Inside the Linux File Systems</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245056040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://razvan.musaloiu.com/" rel="nofollow">RazvanM</a> writes <i>"This is an attempt to visualize the relationships among the Linux File Systems through the lens of the external symbols their kernel modules use. We <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/11/2035211&amp;tid=198">took an initial look</a> a few months back but this time the scope is much broader. This analysis was done on <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/building.html">1377 kernel modules</a> from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29, but there is also a <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/bsd.html">small dip into the BSD world</a>. The <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/tux3.html">most thorough analysis</a> was done on <a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/daniel/linux-tux3.git">Daniel Phillips's tree</a>, which contains the latest two disk-based file systems for Linux: <a href="http://tux3.org/">tux3</a> and <a href="http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main\_Page">btrfs</a>. The main techniques used to establish relationships among file systems are <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/tux3.html#hclust">hierarchical clustering</a> and <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/tux3.html#pars">phylogenetic trees</a>. Also presented are a set of <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/2.6.x.html#rankings">rankings</a> based on various properties related to the evolution of the external symbols from one release to another, and complete <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/timelines.html">timelines</a> of the kernel releases for Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RazvanM writes " This is an attempt to visualize the relationships among the Linux File Systems through the lens of the external symbols their kernel modules use .
We took an initial look a few months back but this time the scope is much broader .
This analysis was done on 1377 kernel modules from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29 , but there is also a small dip into the BSD world .
The most thorough analysis was done on Daniel Phillips 's tree , which contains the latest two disk-based file systems for Linux : tux3 and btrfs .
The main techniques used to establish relationships among file systems are hierarchical clustering and phylogenetic trees .
Also presented are a set of rankings based on various properties related to the evolution of the external symbols from one release to another , and complete timelines of the kernel releases for Linux , FreeBSD , NetBSD , and OpenBSD .
In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RazvanM writes "This is an attempt to visualize the relationships among the Linux File Systems through the lens of the external symbols their kernel modules use.
We took an initial look a few months back but this time the scope is much broader.
This analysis was done on 1377 kernel modules from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29, but there is also a small dip into the BSD world.
The most thorough analysis was done on Daniel Phillips's tree, which contains the latest two disk-based file systems for Linux: tux3 and btrfs.
The main techniques used to establish relationships among file systems are hierarchical clustering and phylogenetic trees.
Also presented are a set of rankings based on various properties related to the evolution of the external symbols from one release to another, and complete timelines of the kernel releases for Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD.
In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28336563</id>
	<title>Stop merginig useless file systems</title>
	<author>edivad</author>
	<datestamp>1245086640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux should stop merging file systems used by three individuals at most.<br>
There are so many totally useless file systems inside the main tree, and I honestly fail to see why those should bloat the main tree while the junk could happily live in the hard drive of the three perspective users.<br>
For God's sake, even POHMELFS was merged! Where does it end? Where the boundary to say NO, and keep this irrelevant code out of the tree?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux should stop merging file systems used by three individuals at most .
There are so many totally useless file systems inside the main tree , and I honestly fail to see why those should bloat the main tree while the junk could happily live in the hard drive of the three perspective users .
For God 's sake , even POHMELFS was merged !
Where does it end ?
Where the boundary to say NO , and keep this irrelevant code out of the tree ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux should stop merging file systems used by three individuals at most.
There are so many totally useless file systems inside the main tree, and I honestly fail to see why those should bloat the main tree while the junk could happily live in the hard drive of the three perspective users.
For God's sake, even POHMELFS was merged!
Where does it end?
Where the boundary to say NO, and keep this irrelevant code out of the tree?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333425</id>
	<title>Re:Verry Pretty ...but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245066780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can draw several conclusions from the images. One of them is how similar some filesystems are.</p><p>Have a look to the hierarchical clustering and hamming distances graphs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can draw several conclusions from the images .
One of them is how similar some filesystems are.Have a look to the hierarchical clustering and hamming distances graphs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can draw several conclusions from the images.
One of them is how similar some filesystems are.Have a look to the hierarchical clustering and hamming distances graphs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28347117</id>
	<title>What software did he use?</title>
	<author>fccoelho</author>
	<datestamp>1245164580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What software did he use for the analyses ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What software did he use for the analyses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What software did he use for the analyses ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334517</id>
	<title>Re:Satanic messages</title>
	<author>networkconsultant</author>
	<datestamp>1245077280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you try reading the other side of your macbook, I hear there's a satanic message from Steve in the apple logo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you try reading the other side of your macbook , I hear there 's a satanic message from Steve in the apple logo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you try reading the other side of your macbook, I hear there's a satanic message from Steve in the apple logo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333069</id>
	<title>Let me correct that for you!</title>
	<author>Azeroth48</author>
	<datestamp>1245060180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This analysis was done on 1337 kernel modules</htmltext>
<tokenext>This analysis was done on 1337 kernel modules</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This analysis was done on 1337 kernel modules</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333459</id>
	<title>After perusing the article, and ...</title>
	<author>OneSmartFellow</author>
	<datestamp>1245067260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...slowly loosing the will to live as my eyes became tired and I confused by the lack of any conclusions which could possibly be drawn from such an overwhelming variety of apparently useless graphical analysis of kernel ABI calls made by mostly arcane file systems, I couldn't help wondering<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.
<b>Who gives a shit ?</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>...slowly loosing the will to live as my eyes became tired and I confused by the lack of any conclusions which could possibly be drawn from such an overwhelming variety of apparently useless graphical analysis of kernel ABI calls made by mostly arcane file systems , I could n't help wondering ............. . Who gives a shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...slowly loosing the will to live as my eyes became tired and I confused by the lack of any conclusions which could possibly be drawn from such an overwhelming variety of apparently useless graphical analysis of kernel ABI calls made by mostly arcane file systems, I couldn't help wondering ..............
Who gives a shit ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28340985</id>
	<title>Re:My chart</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245061680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where does pr0n fit in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where does pr0n fit in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where does pr0n fit in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333791</id>
	<title>Re:Typo in summary.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245071580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny doesn't build up karma</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny does n't build up karma</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny doesn't build up karma</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334103</id>
	<title>Informative timelines</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1245074700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My only interests in filesystems are how much free space I have and whether mine will recover from a power outage. Thus 95\% of these graphs are a total bore to me.</p><p>But I do like the <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/timelines.html" title="jhu.edu">Timelines</a> [jhu.edu] of kernel releases. Some kernels see an exponential slowdown of release rate as they approach finalization and others are released like clockwork throughout their lifetime.</p><p>I'd love to see these methods applied to other topics I care more about, like games and science</p><p>When I develop maps for Starcraft, I usually go with a "release when it's ready" approach. That leads to a first public release long after my internal rough draft. Then there are a few quick releases as major bugs are found. And later the releases slow to a trickle as the focus move from bug fixes to balance tweaks. The magnitude of the changes also decreases over time, but each one's effect on game play can be disproportionately large.</p><p>But recently I went with a public balancing approach. I released the rough draft to get a feel for how it played. Then released new drafts as often as twice a day as suggestions were made and problems became apparent. I love to see that contrast visually or see other patterns I hadn't considered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My only interests in filesystems are how much free space I have and whether mine will recover from a power outage .
Thus 95 \ % of these graphs are a total bore to me.But I do like the Timelines [ jhu.edu ] of kernel releases .
Some kernels see an exponential slowdown of release rate as they approach finalization and others are released like clockwork throughout their lifetime.I 'd love to see these methods applied to other topics I care more about , like games and scienceWhen I develop maps for Starcraft , I usually go with a " release when it 's ready " approach .
That leads to a first public release long after my internal rough draft .
Then there are a few quick releases as major bugs are found .
And later the releases slow to a trickle as the focus move from bug fixes to balance tweaks .
The magnitude of the changes also decreases over time , but each one 's effect on game play can be disproportionately large.But recently I went with a public balancing approach .
I released the rough draft to get a feel for how it played .
Then released new drafts as often as twice a day as suggestions were made and problems became apparent .
I love to see that contrast visually or see other patterns I had n't considered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My only interests in filesystems are how much free space I have and whether mine will recover from a power outage.
Thus 95\% of these graphs are a total bore to me.But I do like the Timelines [jhu.edu] of kernel releases.
Some kernels see an exponential slowdown of release rate as they approach finalization and others are released like clockwork throughout their lifetime.I'd love to see these methods applied to other topics I care more about, like games and scienceWhen I develop maps for Starcraft, I usually go with a "release when it's ready" approach.
That leads to a first public release long after my internal rough draft.
Then there are a few quick releases as major bugs are found.
And later the releases slow to a trickle as the focus move from bug fixes to balance tweaks.
The magnitude of the changes also decreases over time, but each one's effect on game play can be disproportionately large.But recently I went with a public balancing approach.
I released the rough draft to get a feel for how it played.
Then released new drafts as often as twice a day as suggestions were made and problems became apparent.
I love to see that contrast visually or see other patterns I hadn't considered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334243</id>
	<title>Re:BSD?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245075660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No kidding. The world was really waiting for the history of the number of exported symbols in the Linux kernel, right? Geez. If they ever legalize gay marriage where you live why don't you propose to Linus and get it over with. Until then, clean your room, your mom's pissed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding .
The world was really waiting for the history of the number of exported symbols in the Linux kernel , right ?
Geez. If they ever legalize gay marriage where you live why do n't you propose to Linus and get it over with .
Until then , clean your room , your mom 's pissed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding.
The world was really waiting for the history of the number of exported symbols in the Linux kernel, right?
Geez. If they ever legalize gay marriage where you live why don't you propose to Linus and get it over with.
Until then, clean your room, your mom's pissed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333205</id>
	<title>Re:Verry Pretty ...but</title>
	<author>frodo from middle ea</author>
	<datestamp>1245062820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>what does it all mean ?</i> <br>
ZFS rules ?<br> <br>
ducks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what does it all mean ?
ZFS rules ?
ducks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what does it all mean ?
ZFS rules ?
ducks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333287</id>
	<title>Employment sought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245064380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*spam? warning*<br>Gimme a job. This world is a zoo, but I need money.<br>I'm based in Ireland at present.<br>How the zoo could be improved:<br>Google for example could run webservers using bit torrent technology developed by the genius Bram Cohen. Bit torrent should be used in many areas  including distributed bit torrent-esque web deployments.  Imagine a virtual server farm where all accounts on clients act as servers for the greater bandwidth.</p><p>Google OS: Google brought forward google Maps and Google Earth etc. all these rich tools that u have to open in a browser like a donkey. They should be embedded inside the desktop. MS Active desktop was sh1t but the idea was good. Putting content on the desktop. Using linux, u could have multiple desktops each with a different purpose that u could flick through like thumbnails. A desktop preconfigured with a maps API embedded into it - forget that tab independent process nonsense.<br>Keep only one of these desktops in D3D mode (the one with Google Earth embedded in it) and use that for games too.</p><p>Encryption: Is there not some easier way to do it at speed and securely? Like using hash functions to and pseudo random numbers generators. U could use some kind of deliberately flawed PRNG algorithm seeding off very gray time (like hours/date of year) or seeding from a message header encoded as a number, so that the data would be all random unless u had the key. Kind of like randomized data with some back door for a key to de-random it (maybe thats what encryption is though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:&gt; )<br>Random.mess("hello world") = 010001101100 etc. backdoor.PRNG(010001101100) = "hello world"</p><p>Bit torrent uploading: We can use it for downloading but we have to upload too. This is usually time consuming as it's not the priority for servers. Why not have a distributed bit torrent based server take care of it. I upload securely to many machines all around me that in turn share the load of uploading to the server.</p><p>I'm just full of ideas. Here all day folks! Send your vacancies now!!</p><p>fandeath AT gmail DOT com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* spam ?
warning * Gim me a job .
This world is a zoo , but I need money.I 'm based in Ireland at present.How the zoo could be improved : Google for example could run webservers using bit torrent technology developed by the genius Bram Cohen .
Bit torrent should be used in many areas including distributed bit torrent-esque web deployments .
Imagine a virtual server farm where all accounts on clients act as servers for the greater bandwidth.Google OS : Google brought forward google Maps and Google Earth etc .
all these rich tools that u have to open in a browser like a donkey .
They should be embedded inside the desktop .
MS Active desktop was sh1t but the idea was good .
Putting content on the desktop .
Using linux , u could have multiple desktops each with a different purpose that u could flick through like thumbnails .
A desktop preconfigured with a maps API embedded into it - forget that tab independent process nonsense.Keep only one of these desktops in D3D mode ( the one with Google Earth embedded in it ) and use that for games too.Encryption : Is there not some easier way to do it at speed and securely ?
Like using hash functions to and pseudo random numbers generators .
U could use some kind of deliberately flawed PRNG algorithm seeding off very gray time ( like hours/date of year ) or seeding from a message header encoded as a number , so that the data would be all random unless u had the key .
Kind of like randomized data with some back door for a key to de-random it ( maybe thats what encryption is though : &gt; ) Random.mess ( " hello world " ) = 010001101100 etc .
backdoor.PRNG ( 010001101100 ) = " hello world " Bit torrent uploading : We can use it for downloading but we have to upload too .
This is usually time consuming as it 's not the priority for servers .
Why not have a distributed bit torrent based server take care of it .
I upload securely to many machines all around me that in turn share the load of uploading to the server.I 'm just full of ideas .
Here all day folks !
Send your vacancies now !
! fandeath AT gmail DOT com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*spam?
warning*Gimme a job.
This world is a zoo, but I need money.I'm based in Ireland at present.How the zoo could be improved:Google for example could run webservers using bit torrent technology developed by the genius Bram Cohen.
Bit torrent should be used in many areas  including distributed bit torrent-esque web deployments.
Imagine a virtual server farm where all accounts on clients act as servers for the greater bandwidth.Google OS: Google brought forward google Maps and Google Earth etc.
all these rich tools that u have to open in a browser like a donkey.
They should be embedded inside the desktop.
MS Active desktop was sh1t but the idea was good.
Putting content on the desktop.
Using linux, u could have multiple desktops each with a different purpose that u could flick through like thumbnails.
A desktop preconfigured with a maps API embedded into it - forget that tab independent process nonsense.Keep only one of these desktops in D3D mode (the one with Google Earth embedded in it) and use that for games too.Encryption: Is there not some easier way to do it at speed and securely?
Like using hash functions to and pseudo random numbers generators.
U could use some kind of deliberately flawed PRNG algorithm seeding off very gray time (like hours/date of year) or seeding from a message header encoded as a number, so that the data would be all random unless u had the key.
Kind of like randomized data with some back door for a key to de-random it (maybe thats what encryption is though :&gt; )Random.mess("hello world") = 010001101100 etc.
backdoor.PRNG(010001101100) = "hello world"Bit torrent uploading: We can use it for downloading but we have to upload too.
This is usually time consuming as it's not the priority for servers.
Why not have a distributed bit torrent based server take care of it.
I upload securely to many machines all around me that in turn share the load of uploading to the server.I'm just full of ideas.
Here all day folks!
Send your vacancies now!
!fandeath AT gmail DOT com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333165</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245061800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok pretty visualisations, but what do we learn from them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok pretty visualisations , but what do we learn from them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok pretty visualisations, but what do we learn from them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333859</id>
	<title>Re:Verry Pretty ...but</title>
	<author>GaryOlson</author>
	<datestamp>1245072300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This means ZFS will continue to suffer from an unknown formative malaise because it cannot be properly analyzed. Without the full analysis, a proper treatment cannot be attempted without further damaging the file system. Isolation is the best recourse at this time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This means ZFS will continue to suffer from an unknown formative malaise because it can not be properly analyzed .
Without the full analysis , a proper treatment can not be attempted without further damaging the file system .
Isolation is the best recourse at this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means ZFS will continue to suffer from an unknown formative malaise because it cannot be properly analyzed.
Without the full analysis, a proper treatment cannot be attempted without further damaging the file system.
Isolation is the best recourse at this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28335071</id>
	<title>oh Jurrasic Park, what a prophetic movie</title>
	<author>discogravy</author>
	<datestamp>1245080280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lex: It's a UNIX system! I know this!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lex : It 's a UNIX system !
I know this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lex: It's a UNIX system!
I know this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</id>
	<title>My chart</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245064080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Usefulness of a hammer:<br>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX<br><br>Usefulness of an average Slashdot article:<br>XXXXXX<br><br>Usefulness of a screen door on a submarine:<br>XXXX<br><br>Usefulness of this Slashdot article:<br>X<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Usefulness of a hammer : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUsefulness of an average Slashdot article : XXXXXXUsefulness of a screen door on a submarine : XXXXUsefulness of this Slashdot article : X</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usefulness of a hammer:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUsefulness of an average Slashdot article:XXXXXXUsefulness of a screen door on a submarine:XXXXUsefulness of this Slashdot article:X</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333729</id>
	<title>Re:My chart</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245070740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does the average Slashdot reader rate on that scale?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does the average Slashdot reader rate on that scale ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does the average Slashdot reader rate on that scale?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333285</id>
	<title>Eye-candy knowledge</title>
	<author>koolfy</author>
	<datestamp>1245064380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one not understanding a word nor the point of those graphics, but still going to print them as posters and put them everywhere in my bedroom ?<br> <br>
'cuz dude, it's so <b>beautiful</b> !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one not understanding a word nor the point of those graphics , but still going to print them as posters and put them everywhere in my bedroom ?
'cuz dude , it 's so beautiful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one not understanding a word nor the point of those graphics, but still going to print them as posters and put them everywhere in my bedroom ?
'cuz dude, it's so beautiful !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333041</id>
	<title>You left the best 'til last!</title>
	<author>Kawahee</author>
	<datestamp>1245059880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all there are 78 figures and 10 animations.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333163</id>
	<title>Typo in summary.</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1245061800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This analysis was done on 1377 kernel modules from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29</i></p><p>I think they meant 1337 kernel modules?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This analysis was done on 1377 kernel modules from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29I think they meant 1337 kernel modules ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This analysis was done on 1377 kernel modules from 2.6.0 to 2.6.29I think they meant 1337 kernel modules?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334401</id>
	<title>Re:My chart</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1245076620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When a hammer is wrong, then the result is not funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When a hammer is wrong , then the result is not funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When a hammer is wrong, then the result is not funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334497</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245077160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&lt;AOL&gt;Me too!&lt;/AOL&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333541</id>
	<title>Link to the article's Front Page please?</title>
	<author>AceJohnny</author>
	<datestamp>1245068460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear submitter,</p><p>A<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. summary is a bit like a main page on a website. Make the organization clear. Don't pile on shortcuts to different parts of the website: the reader risks being discouraged trying to find out how best to get to the important part of your website. Less is better.<br>I actually clicked on one of the links that appeared to go to the "Expedition" website (based on its similarity to other links, as shown in my browser's statusbar!), then changed the address in the address bar to get to the front page.</p><p>You actually didn't include a link to your article's <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/" title="jhu.edu">front page</a> [jhu.edu], for heaven's sake!</p><p>Hope this helps for the next time you write a summary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear submitter,A / .
summary is a bit like a main page on a website .
Make the organization clear .
Do n't pile on shortcuts to different parts of the website : the reader risks being discouraged trying to find out how best to get to the important part of your website .
Less is better.I actually clicked on one of the links that appeared to go to the " Expedition " website ( based on its similarity to other links , as shown in my browser 's statusbar !
) , then changed the address in the address bar to get to the front page.You actually did n't include a link to your article 's front page [ jhu.edu ] , for heaven 's sake ! Hope this helps for the next time you write a summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear submitter,A /.
summary is a bit like a main page on a website.
Make the organization clear.
Don't pile on shortcuts to different parts of the website: the reader risks being discouraged trying to find out how best to get to the important part of your website.
Less is better.I actually clicked on one of the links that appeared to go to the "Expedition" website (based on its similarity to other links, as shown in my browser's statusbar!
), then changed the address in the address bar to get to the front page.You actually didn't include a link to your article's front page [jhu.edu], for heaven's sake!Hope this helps for the next time you write a summary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333225</id>
	<title>Useless exercise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245063180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that it's a useless analysis, since if you're building a kernel you only build the parts that you're going to use, on your arch. Even a distributor doesn't necessarily compile "all" of the filesystems, for one example. A silly distro kernel uses initramfs and stuff so everything can be modules anyways. Not everyone loads them all. So whoopee doo if the whole mess is several megabytes.</p><p>There's a lot of functionality available, and you can choose what you want. Representing it in a meaningless graph does not at all show alarming, or even interesting trends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that it 's a useless analysis , since if you 're building a kernel you only build the parts that you 're going to use , on your arch .
Even a distributor does n't necessarily compile " all " of the filesystems , for one example .
A silly distro kernel uses initramfs and stuff so everything can be modules anyways .
Not everyone loads them all .
So whoopee doo if the whole mess is several megabytes.There 's a lot of functionality available , and you can choose what you want .
Representing it in a meaningless graph does not at all show alarming , or even interesting trends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that it's a useless analysis, since if you're building a kernel you only build the parts that you're going to use, on your arch.
Even a distributor doesn't necessarily compile "all" of the filesystems, for one example.
A silly distro kernel uses initramfs and stuff so everything can be modules anyways.
Not everyone loads them all.
So whoopee doo if the whole mess is several megabytes.There's a lot of functionality available, and you can choose what you want.
Representing it in a meaningless graph does not at all show alarming, or even interesting trends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333037</id>
	<title>Lick my</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245059880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fucking anus.</p><p>Please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fucking anus.Please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fucking anus.Please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28335023</id>
	<title>Re:My chart</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1245080040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have thought a screen door on a submarine was on par with an average article, or rather the average of all articles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have thought a screen door on a submarine was on par with an average article , or rather the average of all articles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have thought a screen door on a submarine was on par with an average article, or rather the average of all articles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333591</id>
	<title>Odd visualization, but not so bad</title>
	<author>AceJohnny</author>
	<datestamp>1245068940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My first reaction when browsing through the article was disgust about the measure being used. I couldn't see the value of graphs about the number of symbols used by different file-system modules. So vfat doesn't use kprintf, woo-fucking-hoo!</p><p>But then, the Hamming distance and hierarchical structure struck a chord. Huh, so NFS, uses a very different set of symbols than, ext3. (ok, this may be biased by NFS using a metric fuckton of external symbols where ext3 uses less), which implies that NFS is pretty different, internally, than ext3.</p><p>So now, I agree that such a visualisation, while very abstract from the implementation details, can be pretty useful to have a (very) rough overview of the filesystems and their code structure. And I think we need more abstract overviews like this.</p><p>Reminds me of <a href="http://vis.cs.ucdavis.edu/~ogawa/codeswarm/" title="ucdavis.edu">Code Swarm</a> [ucdavis.edu], which creates a movie of commits to a repository.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My first reaction when browsing through the article was disgust about the measure being used .
I could n't see the value of graphs about the number of symbols used by different file-system modules .
So vfat does n't use kprintf , woo-fucking-hoo ! But then , the Hamming distance and hierarchical structure struck a chord .
Huh , so NFS , uses a very different set of symbols than , ext3 .
( ok , this may be biased by NFS using a metric fuckton of external symbols where ext3 uses less ) , which implies that NFS is pretty different , internally , than ext3.So now , I agree that such a visualisation , while very abstract from the implementation details , can be pretty useful to have a ( very ) rough overview of the filesystems and their code structure .
And I think we need more abstract overviews like this.Reminds me of Code Swarm [ ucdavis.edu ] , which creates a movie of commits to a repository .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first reaction when browsing through the article was disgust about the measure being used.
I couldn't see the value of graphs about the number of symbols used by different file-system modules.
So vfat doesn't use kprintf, woo-fucking-hoo!But then, the Hamming distance and hierarchical structure struck a chord.
Huh, so NFS, uses a very different set of symbols than, ext3.
(ok, this may be biased by NFS using a metric fuckton of external symbols where ext3 uses less), which implies that NFS is pretty different, internally, than ext3.So now, I agree that such a visualisation, while very abstract from the implementation details, can be pretty useful to have a (very) rough overview of the filesystems and their code structure.
And I think we need more abstract overviews like this.Reminds me of Code Swarm [ucdavis.edu], which creates a movie of commits to a repository.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333845</id>
	<title>This is Linux... I know this!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245072120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This immediately conjured up thoughts of Jurassic Park, where the young girl is surfing through the "city block" of file systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This immediately conjured up thoughts of Jurassic Park , where the young girl is surfing through the " city block " of file systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This immediately conjured up thoughts of Jurassic Park, where the young girl is surfing through the "city block" of file systems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333035</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245059820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could use a visual expedition among the various links on this summary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could use a visual expedition among the various links on this summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could use a visual expedition among the various links on this summary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334373</id>
	<title>Re:One other observation though...</title>
	<author>jiriw</author>
	<datestamp>1245076500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call "register\_filesystem" ?</p></div><p>If you 'rtfa'... it <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/tux3.html" title="jhu.edu" rel="nofollow">stated</a> [jhu.edu]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Another (again expected) observation is that the lack of (un)register\_filesystem identifiers in the modules which only provides services to others: dlm, lockd, fat, and jbd2/jbd2.</p> </div><p>Yes I did read the article and thought it was very interesting. For one thing the fact that in earlier kernel releases file system drivers used to use more or less the same set of external symbols and in recent releases they more often used exclusive external symbols. If that's a good or a bad thing I don't know because I'm not an expert in file systems. It may indicate file system kernel module writers are re-using code less or do no longer compare their work that much anymore or it could mean file systems are now functioning more efficiently because they use more specialized external functions now... or maybe it means nothing or something completely else<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I don't know really<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call " register \ _filesystem " ? If you 'rtfa'... it stated [ jhu.edu ] : Another ( again expected ) observation is that the lack of ( un ) register \ _filesystem identifiers in the modules which only provides services to others : dlm , lockd , fat , and jbd2/jbd2 .
Yes I did read the article and thought it was very interesting .
For one thing the fact that in earlier kernel releases file system drivers used to use more or less the same set of external symbols and in recent releases they more often used exclusive external symbols .
If that 's a good or a bad thing I do n't know because I 'm not an expert in file systems .
It may indicate file system kernel module writers are re-using code less or do no longer compare their work that much anymore or it could mean file systems are now functioning more efficiently because they use more specialized external functions now... or maybe it means nothing or something completely else ... I do n't know really ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call "register\_filesystem" ?If you 'rtfa'... it stated [jhu.edu]:Another (again expected) observation is that the lack of (un)register\_filesystem identifiers in the modules which only provides services to others: dlm, lockd, fat, and jbd2/jbd2.
Yes I did read the article and thought it was very interesting.
For one thing the fact that in earlier kernel releases file system drivers used to use more or less the same set of external symbols and in recent releases they more often used exclusive external symbols.
If that's a good or a bad thing I don't know because I'm not an expert in file systems.
It may indicate file system kernel module writers are re-using code less or do no longer compare their work that much anymore or it could mean file systems are now functioning more efficiently because they use more specialized external functions now... or maybe it means nothing or something completely else ... I don't know really ....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333125</id>
	<title>BSD?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245061140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they finally managed to recover <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/bsd/freebsd/summary.7.2.png" title="jhu.edu">DNA evidence on BSD's corpse</a> [jhu.edu] after all. Hopefully we'll find out who killed it.</p><p>Seriously, what a useless "analysis". It's all a bunch of unreadable tables, graphs and other things, such as the history of the number of exported symbols in the BSD kernel (yeah right...) nobody cares about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they finally managed to recover DNA evidence on BSD 's corpse [ jhu.edu ] after all .
Hopefully we 'll find out who killed it.Seriously , what a useless " analysis " .
It 's all a bunch of unreadable tables , graphs and other things , such as the history of the number of exported symbols in the BSD kernel ( yeah right... ) nobody cares about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they finally managed to recover DNA evidence on BSD's corpse [jhu.edu] after all.
Hopefully we'll find out who killed it.Seriously, what a useless "analysis".
It's all a bunch of unreadable tables, graphs and other things, such as the history of the number of exported symbols in the BSD kernel (yeah right...) nobody cares about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333727</id>
	<title>Is it just me or ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245070680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me or do those thing remind anyone else of those back inside covers of old Mad magazine?</p><p>I have this strange feeling that if I looked at the monitor for the edge that a bucktooth grin of Alfred E. Neuman would appear saying "What, me worry?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or do those thing remind anyone else of those back inside covers of old Mad magazine ? I have this strange feeling that if I looked at the monitor for the edge that a bucktooth grin of Alfred E. Neuman would appear saying " What , me worry ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or do those thing remind anyone else of those back inside covers of old Mad magazine?I have this strange feeling that if I looked at the monitor for the edge that a bucktooth grin of Alfred E. Neuman would appear saying "What, me worry?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333703</id>
	<title>Re:Typo in summary.</title>
	<author>rant64</author>
	<datestamp>1245070500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Umm, I don't think this was meant to be informative. I think SharpFang was trying to be funny.</p></div><p>You're trying to be informative, Wise Guy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , I do n't think this was meant to be informative .
I think SharpFang was trying to be funny.You 're trying to be informative , Wise Guy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, I don't think this was meant to be informative.
I think SharpFang was trying to be funny.You're trying to be informative, Wise Guy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333539</id>
	<title>One other observation though...</title>
	<author>OneSmartFellow</author>
	<datestamp>1245068460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call "register\_filesystem" ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call " register \ _filesystem " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How is it possible to create a file system driver which does not call "register\_filesystem" ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333245</id>
	<title>Warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245063480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot user BadAnalogyGuy is a scientologist.<br>If he offers you a free personality test, firmly refuse him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot user BadAnalogyGuy is a scientologist.If he offers you a free personality test , firmly refuse him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot user BadAnalogyGuy is a scientologist.If he offers you a free personality test, firmly refuse him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28339399</id>
	<title>Re:My chart</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1245098400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot</p><p><tt>CowboyNeal:<br>(-INF)</tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgotCowboyNeal : ( -INF )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgotCowboyNeal:(-INF)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333655</id>
	<title>Satanic messages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245070020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, I just thought I saw some obscured letters in one of the heatmaps but then realized it was just my damn glossy Macbook screen reflecting the writing on my t-shirt... Damn it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , I just thought I saw some obscured letters in one of the heatmaps but then realized it was just my damn glossy Macbook screen reflecting the writing on my t-shirt... Damn it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, I just thought I saw some obscured letters in one of the heatmaps but then realized it was just my damn glossy Macbook screen reflecting the writing on my t-shirt... Damn it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357</id>
	<title>Re:Typo in summary.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245065820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, I don't think this was meant to be informative. I think SharpFang was trying to be funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , I do n't think this was meant to be informative .
I think SharpFang was trying to be funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, I don't think this was meant to be informative.
I think SharpFang was trying to be funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333745</id>
	<title>it's obviously</title>
	<author>viralMeme</author>
	<datestamp>1245070920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Taking a look at the <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/summary.tux3.png" title="jhu.edu">image</a> [jhu.edu], it's obviously a signal from some alien civilization. Now if we could only decode it. Oh, wait that's what all the coders are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_minor\_characters\_from\_The\_Hitchhiker's\_Guide\_to\_the\_Galaxy#Deep\_Thought" title="wikipedia.org">about</a> [wikipedia.org]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Taking a look at the image [ jhu.edu ] , it 's obviously a signal from some alien civilization .
Now if we could only decode it .
Oh , wait that 's what all the coders are about [ wikipedia.org ] .. : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taking a look at the image [jhu.edu], it's obviously a signal from some alien civilization.
Now if we could only decode it.
Oh, wait that's what all the coders are about [wikipedia.org] .. :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137</id>
	<title>Verry Pretty ...but</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1245061260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does it all mean?<br>Is having a large number of external symbols good because it has more integration points or bad because of bloat? I don't think I have ever RTFA and come away with so little understanding before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it all mean ? Is having a large number of external symbols good because it has more integration points or bad because of bloat ?
I do n't think I have ever RTFA and come away with so little understanding before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it all mean?Is having a large number of external symbols good because it has more integration points or bad because of bloat?
I don't think I have ever RTFA and come away with so little understanding before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28389895</id>
	<title>Painfully obvious</title>
	<author>Xylene2301</author>
	<datestamp>1245426060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ho hum...
Why did this nerd waste his time researching a matter that's obvious to everyone here.  They had us run all this stuff down in the first 6 weeks of CS 101.
I guess he thinks we're stupid!
Harumph!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ho hum.. . Why did this nerd waste his time researching a matter that 's obvious to everyone here .
They had us run all this stuff down in the first 6 weeks of CS 101 .
I guess he thinks we 're stupid !
Harumph !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ho hum...
Why did this nerd waste his time researching a matter that's obvious to everyone here.
They had us run all this stuff down in the first 6 weeks of CS 101.
I guess he thinks we're stupid!
Harumph!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333449</id>
	<title>External symbols for 2.6.29 + tux3</title>
	<author>bagsta</author>
	<datestamp>1245067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I can tell, from this <a href="http://cs.jhu.edu/~razvanm/fs-expedition/map.html" title="jhu.edu" rel="nofollow">table</a> [jhu.edu] the external symbol <i>mcount</i> is used by all file systems...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br>

<br>
And Obama is president of US...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I can tell , from this table [ jhu.edu ] the external symbol mcount is used by all file systems... : ) And Obama is president of US.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I can tell, from this table [jhu.edu] the external symbol mcount is used by all file systems... :)



And Obama is president of US...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28339399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28340985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28335023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28347117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_015207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333357
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28347117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333205
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28340985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28339399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28335023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333541
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334497
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28334243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28333459
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_015207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_015207.28336563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
