<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_13_2310204</id>
	<title>Twitter "Twitpocalypse" Snags Mac, iPhone Apps</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244892360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:adam.warrenfells@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">awarrenfells</a> notes coverage in Macworld of what is being called "<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/141146/2009/06/twitpocalypse\_twitter.html">the Twitpocalypse</a>" &mdash; Twitter applications breaking as the number of tweets exceeds 32 bits. <i>"The first apparent victim of the Twitpocalypse was The Iconfactory's Twitterrific for iPhone, which stopped working immediately following the event. ... Atebits Software's Tweetie has also been affected by the Twitpocalypse. The program continues to function for browsing and posting tweets, but searches no longer work in the Mac version and results appear one at a time in the iPhone version."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>awarrenfells notes coverage in Macworld of what is being called " the Twitpocalypse "    Twitter applications breaking as the number of tweets exceeds 32 bits .
" The first apparent victim of the Twitpocalypse was The Iconfactory 's Twitterrific for iPhone , which stopped working immediately following the event .
... Atebits Software 's Tweetie has also been affected by the Twitpocalypse .
The program continues to function for browsing and posting tweets , but searches no longer work in the Mac version and results appear one at a time in the iPhone version .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>awarrenfells notes coverage in Macworld of what is being called "the Twitpocalypse" — Twitter applications breaking as the number of tweets exceeds 32 bits.
"The first apparent victim of the Twitpocalypse was The Iconfactory's Twitterrific for iPhone, which stopped working immediately following the event.
... Atebits Software's Tweetie has also been affected by the Twitpocalypse.
The program continues to function for browsing and posting tweets, but searches no longer work in the Mac version and results appear one at a time in the iPhone version.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323551</id>
	<title>Re:And...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244898900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... nothing of value was lost.</p></div><p>I beg your pardon? \_I\_ use twitter!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... nothing of value was lost.I beg your pardon ?
\ _I \ _ use twitter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... nothing of value was lost.I beg your pardon?
\_I\_ use twitter!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326059</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244988780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hold on a sec, let me open up my trusty thesaurus.</p></div><p>Don't you mean twa-saurus? *rimshot*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hold on a sec , let me open up my trusty thesaurus.Do n't you mean twa-saurus ?
* rimshot *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hold on a sec, let me open up my trusty thesaurus.Don't you mean twa-saurus?
*rimshot*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324723</id>
	<title>Correct name should be Twitterdammerung</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244915520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The correct name for the Twitter Apocalypse is "Twitterdammerung" first mentioned in <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/04/gop\_twitterdammerung.php" title="talkingpointsmemo.com">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/04/gop\_twitterdammerung.php</a> [talkingpointsmemo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The correct name for the Twitter Apocalypse is " Twitterdammerung " first mentioned in http : //www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/04/gop \ _twitterdammerung.php [ talkingpointsmemo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The correct name for the Twitter Apocalypse is "Twitterdammerung" first mentioned in http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/04/gop\_twitterdammerung.php [talkingpointsmemo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323823</id>
	<title>Re:And...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244902140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't see how the content of tweets can be any less original than that very tired post &amp; tag on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't see how the content of tweets can be any less original than that very tired post &amp; tag on /. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't see how the content of tweets can be any less original than that very tired post &amp; tag on /..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325217</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245013080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I rather like Twataclysm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather like Twataclysm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather like Twataclysm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326483</id>
	<title>twit-pocolipse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244994000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was hoping this meant that they had accidently killed everyone who used twitter using a snowcrash esc virus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was hoping this meant that they had accidently killed everyone who used twitter using a snowcrash esc virus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was hoping this meant that they had accidently killed everyone who used twitter using a snowcrash esc virus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28328505</id>
	<title>Never understood the animosity...</title>
	<author>MrPerfekt</author>
	<datestamp>1245012360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nerds seem to have a good bit of hate towards Twitter. I've never really understood why. It could be because of the ridiculous names associated with it. Twitter, tweeting, twits, etc. But these are the same people that have no problem whatsoever using Google, Yelp and even WYSIWYG apps.</p><p>Names aside, perhaps its because the 'common' people use it and find it enjoyable. Ditch the air of superiority and embrace what communication is becoming. For better or for worse, it's here to stay like e-mail. That fad from 30 years ago that is still around today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nerds seem to have a good bit of hate towards Twitter .
I 've never really understood why .
It could be because of the ridiculous names associated with it .
Twitter , tweeting , twits , etc .
But these are the same people that have no problem whatsoever using Google , Yelp and even WYSIWYG apps.Names aside , perhaps its because the 'common ' people use it and find it enjoyable .
Ditch the air of superiority and embrace what communication is becoming .
For better or for worse , it 's here to stay like e-mail .
That fad from 30 years ago that is still around today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nerds seem to have a good bit of hate towards Twitter.
I've never really understood why.
It could be because of the ridiculous names associated with it.
Twitter, tweeting, twits, etc.
But these are the same people that have no problem whatsoever using Google, Yelp and even WYSIWYG apps.Names aside, perhaps its because the 'common' people use it and find it enjoyable.
Ditch the air of superiority and embrace what communication is becoming.
For better or for worse, it's here to stay like e-mail.
That fad from 30 years ago that is still around today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325299</id>
	<title>there sure are a lot of wankers on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244971560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>ooo, look at me! I'm posting on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. which is such a trendy social news site! I better make a post about how I dont see the point in another social communication site, and how lame it is; since that'll get me modded up, leading to me getting mod privileges, leading to me feeling slightly better about my small penis.</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br>christ, you sound like such tryhard posers. wake up and listen to yourself!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ooo , look at me !
I 'm posting on / .
which is such a trendy social news site !
I better make a post about how I dont see the point in another social communication site , and how lame it is ; since that 'll get me modded up , leading to me getting mod privileges , leading to me feeling slightly better about my small penis .
  christ , you sound like such tryhard posers .
wake up and listen to yourself !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ooo, look at me!
I'm posting on /.
which is such a trendy social news site!
I better make a post about how I dont see the point in another social communication site, and how lame it is; since that'll get me modded up, leading to me getting mod privileges, leading to me feeling slightly better about my small penis.
  christ, you sound like such tryhard posers.
wake up and listen to yourself!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324163</id>
	<title>Yet another reason...</title>
	<author>polymerousgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244907300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to use unsigned 128-bit integers for everything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to use unsigned 128-bit integers for everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to use unsigned 128-bit integers for everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323495</id>
	<title>On a related note</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244898240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm quickly running out of synonyms for 'pointless' to troll all these Twitter stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm quickly running out of synonyms for 'pointless ' to troll all these Twitter stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm quickly running out of synonyms for 'pointless' to troll all these Twitter stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323517</id>
	<title>God save us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244898480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this have to do with <a href="http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">creating thousands of accounts</a> [slashdot.org] that run amok around a website, pretending they're someone else??</p><p>Oh wait, wrong twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this have to do with creating thousands of accounts [ slashdot.org ] that run amok around a website , pretending they 're someone else ?
? Oh wait , wrong twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this have to do with creating thousands of accounts [slashdot.org] that run amok around a website, pretending they're someone else?
?Oh wait, wrong twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325021</id>
	<title>Twitter is full of twats</title>
	<author>B33RM17</author>
	<datestamp>1244922060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I too had my hopes dashed when this did not confirm Twitter no longer worked as well <br> <br>
It provides nothing of intrinsic value. Just the illusion that some semblance of human interaction is taking place.
<br> <br>
And to any jackass that defended twitter in their comment...  Why?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I too had my hopes dashed when this did not confirm Twitter no longer worked as well It provides nothing of intrinsic value .
Just the illusion that some semblance of human interaction is taking place .
And to any jackass that defended twitter in their comment... Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I too had my hopes dashed when this did not confirm Twitter no longer worked as well  
It provides nothing of intrinsic value.
Just the illusion that some semblance of human interaction is taking place.
And to any jackass that defended twitter in their comment...  Why?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324091</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>tqft</author>
	<datestamp>1244905740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just seems to me if have something worthwhile to say 140 char isn't enough.</p><p>With the volume of information I am interested in increasing I know there is a sacrifice between speed, completeness and size.  I can't see getting good info from 140 char to make it worthwhile - unless we are going to play follow the link and I would rather hit a big blog (eg<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ) that has summaries and many links than try and follow a vast volume of little stuff and piece it together.</p><p>Maybe it just won't work for the way I want my information.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just seems to me if have something worthwhile to say 140 char is n't enough.With the volume of information I am interested in increasing I know there is a sacrifice between speed , completeness and size .
I ca n't see getting good info from 140 char to make it worthwhile - unless we are going to play follow the link and I would rather hit a big blog ( eg / .
) that has summaries and many links than try and follow a vast volume of little stuff and piece it together.Maybe it just wo n't work for the way I want my information .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just seems to me if have something worthwhile to say 140 char isn't enough.With the volume of information I am interested in increasing I know there is a sacrifice between speed, completeness and size.
I can't see getting good info from 140 char to make it worthwhile - unless we are going to play follow the link and I would rather hit a big blog (eg /.
) that has summaries and many links than try and follow a vast volume of little stuff and piece it together.Maybe it just won't work for the way I want my information.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323287</id>
	<title>Is it just me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244896140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or does Twitter seem to be the most unreliable of all social networking sites? I mean, between these outages and the "fail whale" that appears every day or so, can't they get some decent servers? I mean, even Facebook which has way more people consuming way more bandwidth doesn't go down near this often.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or does Twitter seem to be the most unreliable of all social networking sites ?
I mean , between these outages and the " fail whale " that appears every day or so , ca n't they get some decent servers ?
I mean , even Facebook which has way more people consuming way more bandwidth does n't go down near this often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or does Twitter seem to be the most unreliable of all social networking sites?
I mean, between these outages and the "fail whale" that appears every day or so, can't they get some decent servers?
I mean, even Facebook which has way more people consuming way more bandwidth doesn't go down near this often.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324195</id>
	<title>31 bits, not 32</title>
	<author>pescadero</author>
	<datestamp>1244907840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A bit of nitpicking, but 2 billion (and change) is only the maximum value for 31 bits. So only apps which treat this number as a signed int are affected. Apps that treat it as an unsigned int won't be affected for another year or two (when the count passes 4 billion and change).</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bit of nitpicking , but 2 billion ( and change ) is only the maximum value for 31 bits .
So only apps which treat this number as a signed int are affected .
Apps that treat it as an unsigned int wo n't be affected for another year or two ( when the count passes 4 billion and change ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bit of nitpicking, but 2 billion (and change) is only the maximum value for 31 bits.
So only apps which treat this number as a signed int are affected.
Apps that treat it as an unsigned int won't be affected for another year or two (when the count passes 4 billion and change).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28336075</id>
	<title>Re:I must be getting old...</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1245084660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's just me, but I thought the Twitpocalypse happened some time around September 1, 1993.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just me , but I thought the Twitpocalypse happened some time around September 1 , 1993 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just me, but I thought the Twitpocalypse happened some time around September 1, 1993.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324013</id>
	<title>Didn't Affect Twittering From My C64</title>
	<author>fyrie</author>
	<datestamp>1244904600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny... Breadbin64 was not affected by this issue:<br><a href="http://www.vandenbrande.com/wp/2009/06/breadbox64-a-twitter-client-for-the-c64/" title="vandenbrande.com">http://www.vandenbrande.com/wp/2009/06/breadbox64-a-twitter-client-for-the-c64/</a> [vandenbrande.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny... Breadbin64 was not affected by this issue : http : //www.vandenbrande.com/wp/2009/06/breadbox64-a-twitter-client-for-the-c64/ [ vandenbrande.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny... Breadbin64 was not affected by this issue:http://www.vandenbrande.com/wp/2009/06/breadbox64-a-twitter-client-for-the-c64/ [vandenbrande.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323535</id>
	<title>FAIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244898660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057</a> [twitter.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [ twitter.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [twitter.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28333309</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1245064740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't get the trend for following celebrities? When you follow them you, like, get to, like, be their friend and say you're, like, friends with them and everything...</p><p>Hang on, no, you get to "follow them". That'd make you sound more like a stalker! I suspect the lives of celebrities are about as interesting as every other person I know - i.e. not. I'm quite happy with my own life, thank you very much, without trying to follow someone else's life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't get the trend for following celebrities ?
When you follow them you , like , get to , like , be their friend and say you 're , like , friends with them and everything...Hang on , no , you get to " follow them " .
That 'd make you sound more like a stalker !
I suspect the lives of celebrities are about as interesting as every other person I know - i.e .
not. I 'm quite happy with my own life , thank you very much , without trying to follow someone else 's life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't get the trend for following celebrities?
When you follow them you, like, get to, like, be their friend and say you're, like, friends with them and everything...Hang on, no, you get to "follow them".
That'd make you sound more like a stalker!
I suspect the lives of celebrities are about as interesting as every other person I know - i.e.
not. I'm quite happy with my own life, thank you very much, without trying to follow someone else's life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323307</id>
	<title>Overflowing 32 bits</title>
	<author>AuMatar</author>
	<datestamp>1244896380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that means there are 2-4 billion messages (depending on if they meant signed or unsigned)?  There goes the last of my faith in humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that means there are 2-4 billion messages ( depending on if they meant signed or unsigned ) ?
There goes the last of my faith in humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that means there are 2-4 billion messages (depending on if they meant signed or unsigned)?
There goes the last of my faith in humanity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324129</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244906580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Twitastrophe. Twinihilation. Holotwaust. <b>Twataclysm</b>. Twitimation...</p></div><p>
I think I saw a porno named twataclysm once...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Twitastrophe .
Twinihilation. Holotwaust .
Twataclysm. Twitimation.. . I think I saw a porno named twataclysm once.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Twitastrophe.
Twinihilation. Holotwaust.
Twataclysm. Twitimation...
I think I saw a porno named twataclysm once...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323539</id>
	<title>Re:Overflowing 32 bits</title>
	<author>johnlcallaway</author>
	<datestamp>1244898660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have faith<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. if you ignore the <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2219995/" title="slate.com">orphan tweets</a> [slate.com], the remaining messages were only created by 37 people who aren't smart enough to realize that their friends don't really give a crap about what they are doing, or are willing to wait to hear about the important stuff when they get together to do stuff instead of sitting with deer eyes in front of the iPhone waiting for the next tweet to show up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have faith .. if you ignore the orphan tweets [ slate.com ] , the remaining messages were only created by 37 people who are n't smart enough to realize that their friends do n't really give a crap about what they are doing , or are willing to wait to hear about the important stuff when they get together to do stuff instead of sitting with deer eyes in front of the iPhone waiting for the next tweet to show up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have faith .. if you ignore the orphan tweets [slate.com], the remaining messages were only created by 37 people who aren't smart enough to realize that their friends don't really give a crap about what they are doing, or are willing to wait to hear about the important stuff when they get together to do stuff instead of sitting with deer eyes in front of the iPhone waiting for the next tweet to show up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323595</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244899260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What do <b>we</b> get out of <a href="http://slashdot.org/" title="slashdot.org">this</a> [slashdot.org]? Is it any different?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do we get out of this [ slashdot.org ] ?
Is it any different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do we get out of this [slashdot.org]?
Is it any different?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325095</id>
	<title>Re:Well.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245009780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to see some heads roll. Not over this specific problem, but over Twitter in general.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see some heads roll .
Not over this specific problem , but over Twitter in general .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see some heads roll.
Not over this specific problem, but over Twitter in general.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323729</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me...</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1244900940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mostly agree with you, but I'm going to take it easy on hating twitter for the time being, since it seems to be the <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the\_daily\_dish/2009/06/the-revolution-will-be-twittered-1.html" title="theatlantic.com">only mass media still operating in Iran at the moment</a> [theatlantic.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mostly agree with you , but I 'm going to take it easy on hating twitter for the time being , since it seems to be the only mass media still operating in Iran at the moment [ theatlantic.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mostly agree with you, but I'm going to take it easy on hating twitter for the time being, since it seems to be the only mass media still operating in Iran at the moment [theatlantic.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</id>
	<title>Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244896680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2^32 * 140 char is approx 2^40  = 280Gb   so all the actual tweets would fit one smallish (new) hard drive</p><p>Amount of time used - a lot</p><p>Benefit?  Unknown.</p><p>What do people get out of it?  I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.  I just took a week off from my regular news sources (website - bloomberg and newspaper types), because I am not having a holiday this year and needed a break.  There a few hundred unread rss messages waiting for me (/., groklaw and so on).</p><p>Educate me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ^ 32 * 140 char is approx 2 ^ 40 = 280Gb so all the actual tweets would fit one smallish ( new ) hard driveAmount of time used - a lotBenefit ?
Unknown.What do people get out of it ?
I thought about it and do n't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything .
I just took a week off from my regular news sources ( website - bloomberg and newspaper types ) , because I am not having a holiday this year and needed a break .
There a few hundred unread rss messages waiting for me ( /. , groklaw and so on ) .Educate me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2^32 * 140 char is approx 2^40  = 280Gb   so all the actual tweets would fit one smallish (new) hard driveAmount of time used - a lotBenefit?
Unknown.What do people get out of it?
I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.
I just took a week off from my regular news sources (website - bloomberg and newspaper types), because I am not having a holiday this year and needed a break.
There a few hundred unread rss messages waiting for me (/., groklaw and so on).Educate me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323941</id>
	<title>Re:Well.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244903580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe most all the TWiTs saw this coming, at least as soon as the twats at Twitter said something about it.</p><p>I'm just not sure what you think Leo, Alex, Andy, Colleen, Amber, Steve, Dick, Sarah, or Martin could have done about this...</p><p>I'm a TWiT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe most all the TWiTs saw this coming , at least as soon as the twats at Twitter said something about it.I 'm just not sure what you think Leo , Alex , Andy , Colleen , Amber , Steve , Dick , Sarah , or Martin could have done about this...I 'm a TWiT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe most all the TWiTs saw this coming, at least as soon as the twats at Twitter said something about it.I'm just not sure what you think Leo, Alex, Andy, Colleen, Amber, Steve, Dick, Sarah, or Martin could have done about this...I'm a TWiT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323987</id>
	<title>why use a signed integer for that?</title>
	<author>MrBallistic</author>
	<datestamp>1244904240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you know you're getting a positive number back, why not just use uint?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you know you 're getting a positive number back , why not just use uint ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you know you're getting a positive number back, why not just use uint?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325399</id>
	<title>Twitter in plain english (Re:Let's see)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244974020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What do people get out of it? I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything. (..)</p><p>Educate me.</p></div><p>Things I get from the video below:<br>- It makes people feel connected<br>- You can learn about hidden interests<br>- see different sides of people.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>So it breaks down the walls between people, and brings them closer to each other. The video explains it quite nicely imho.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do people get out of it ?
I thought about it and do n't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything .
( .. ) Educate me.Things I get from the video below : - It makes people feel connected- You can learn about hidden interests- see different sides of people.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ddO9idmax0o [ youtube.com ] So it breaks down the walls between people , and brings them closer to each other .
The video explains it quite nicely imho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do people get out of it?
I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.
(..)Educate me.Things I get from the video below:- It makes people feel connected- You can learn about hidden interests- see different sides of people.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o [youtube.com]So it breaks down the walls between people, and brings them closer to each other.
The video explains it quite nicely imho.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324385</id>
	<title>Wondering if</title>
	<author>metachimp</author>
	<datestamp>1244910780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is 'twat' the past tense of tweet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is 'twat ' the past tense of tweet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is 'twat' the past tense of tweet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326083</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244989140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously: you value your RSS news feeds - but can't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know?</p></div><p>Oddly enough, I have personal conversations (in real life, or online) with my friends rather than just reading "status updates" broadcast as summaries to the masses.  Generally I couldn't care less about the status of people who aren't my friends, let alone people I don't even know (there seems to be a trend for people to follow celebrities on twitter that I just don't get...).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously : you value your RSS news feeds - but ca n't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know ? Oddly enough , I have personal conversations ( in real life , or online ) with my friends rather than just reading " status updates " broadcast as summaries to the masses .
Generally I could n't care less about the status of people who are n't my friends , let alone people I do n't even know ( there seems to be a trend for people to follow celebrities on twitter that I just do n't get... ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously: you value your RSS news feeds - but can't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know?Oddly enough, I have personal conversations (in real life, or online) with my friends rather than just reading "status updates" broadcast as summaries to the masses.
Generally I couldn't care less about the status of people who aren't my friends, let alone people I don't even know (there seems to be a trend for people to follow celebrities on twitter that I just don't get...).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323513</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>strredwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244898480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's mainly chatter, so if you could fit it in a few gig with some nice compression.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's mainly chatter , so if you could fit it in a few gig with some nice compression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's mainly chatter, so if you could fit it in a few gig with some nice compression.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323893</id>
	<title>Re:I must be getting old...</title>
	<author>WebManWalking</author>
	<datestamp>1244903040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read and wrote without a chart: 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read and wrote without a chart : 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read and wrote without a chart: 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324925</id>
	<title>Re:I must be getting old...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244920440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh twitpocalypse, the fabled moment when all the twits die. Can't wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh twitpocalypse , the fabled moment when all the twits die .
Ca n't wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh twitpocalypse, the fabled moment when all the twits die.
Can't wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347</id>
	<title>I must be getting old...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244896740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny computing names like beans, cookies and web were pretty cool and hip... then came blogs, vlogs and pods, which I found rather to be rather silly words... but Twitpocalypse???  WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny computing names like beans , cookies and web were pretty cool and hip... then came blogs , vlogs and pods , which I found rather to be rather silly words... but Twitpocalypse ? ? ?
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny computing names like beans, cookies and web were pretty cool and hip... then came blogs, vlogs and pods, which I found rather to be rather silly words... but Twitpocalypse???
WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325735</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter uses 64bits, 3rd party apps do not</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244982540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter's fault. Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally. The "problem" is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer.</p><p> <a href="http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057</a> [twitter.com] </p><p>Disclaimer: I've never used twitter.</p></div><p>I think the problem is with people thinking their friends want to know when this sit, $hit, eat, sleep or talk about someone else.  The vast majority of a person's life is minutia and no one really needs to know about it.</p><p>The funny thing is that these are probably the same poeple who then complain about personal privacy and pubic safety cameras watching them.</p><p>lol</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter 's fault .
Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally .
The " problem " is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter 's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer .
http : //twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [ twitter.com ] Disclaimer : I 've never used twitter.I think the problem is with people thinking their friends want to know when this sit , $ hit , eat , sleep or talk about someone else .
The vast majority of a person 's life is minutia and no one really needs to know about it.The funny thing is that these are probably the same poeple who then complain about personal privacy and pubic safety cameras watching them.lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter's fault.
Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally.
The "problem" is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer.
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [twitter.com] Disclaimer: I've never used twitter.I think the problem is with people thinking their friends want to know when this sit, $hit, eat, sleep or talk about someone else.
The vast majority of a person's life is minutia and no one really needs to know about it.The funny thing is that these are probably the same poeple who then complain about personal privacy and pubic safety cameras watching them.lol
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323487</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323705</id>
	<title>Can you see the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244900580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I don't see the point". That's a lazy response. Millions of people are sending billions of tweets, surely not every single one of them is completely a fool, deserving to be humbled by your genius' stated lack of understanding?</p><p>Whatever the reason, you seem to think it's important to tell everyone how much you don't understand, and really it just looks silly.</p><p>Maybe you say "I tried it for a while and I didn't get it". OK, you tried to understand, and couldn't, so you gave up. It's not any more impressive than just outright telling us you don't understand.</p><p>Understanding why people do things, even if you disagree, is a good thing. Understanding lets you work with people. Understanding gives you insight towards changing their mind. You should strive for understanding, rather than wallow in telling people how much you don't understand. "I don't see the point" is a step on the road towards anti-intellectualism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't see the point " .
That 's a lazy response .
Millions of people are sending billions of tweets , surely not every single one of them is completely a fool , deserving to be humbled by your genius ' stated lack of understanding ? Whatever the reason , you seem to think it 's important to tell everyone how much you do n't understand , and really it just looks silly.Maybe you say " I tried it for a while and I did n't get it " .
OK , you tried to understand , and could n't , so you gave up .
It 's not any more impressive than just outright telling us you do n't understand.Understanding why people do things , even if you disagree , is a good thing .
Understanding lets you work with people .
Understanding gives you insight towards changing their mind .
You should strive for understanding , rather than wallow in telling people how much you do n't understand .
" I do n't see the point " is a step on the road towards anti-intellectualism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't see the point".
That's a lazy response.
Millions of people are sending billions of tweets, surely not every single one of them is completely a fool, deserving to be humbled by your genius' stated lack of understanding?Whatever the reason, you seem to think it's important to tell everyone how much you don't understand, and really it just looks silly.Maybe you say "I tried it for a while and I didn't get it".
OK, you tried to understand, and couldn't, so you gave up.
It's not any more impressive than just outright telling us you don't understand.Understanding why people do things, even if you disagree, is a good thing.
Understanding lets you work with people.
Understanding gives you insight towards changing their mind.
You should strive for understanding, rather than wallow in telling people how much you don't understand.
"I don't see the point" is a step on the road towards anti-intellectualism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283</id>
	<title>Well.</title>
	<author>dov\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1244896140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which twit didn't see that one coming? Surely it should have shown up in testing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which twit did n't see that one coming ?
Surely it should have shown up in testing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which twit didn't see that one coming?
Surely it should have shown up in testing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325153</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245011220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here I go:</p><p>1. My research computer cluster at work twitters to tell me simulations are done.</p><p>2. The journal of the American Chemical Society twitters updates on interesting papers and news</p><p>3. My friends twitter at research conferences to tell me about a good seminar (so I can read about the research)</p><p>4. I twitter status updates about when I'll be at work, late for a meeting, running simulations for a few hours, just finished edits on a paper, or when the firewall is screwing around with me.</p><p>I'm a graduate student, if you couldn't guess. Although many of these things could be done with RSS and e-mail, it's just nice to have everything in one spot and quickly digestible. Hopefully this should clear any confusion for the "get off my lawn" slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here I go : 1 .
My research computer cluster at work twitters to tell me simulations are done.2 .
The journal of the American Chemical Society twitters updates on interesting papers and news3 .
My friends twitter at research conferences to tell me about a good seminar ( so I can read about the research ) 4 .
I twitter status updates about when I 'll be at work , late for a meeting , running simulations for a few hours , just finished edits on a paper , or when the firewall is screwing around with me.I 'm a graduate student , if you could n't guess .
Although many of these things could be done with RSS and e-mail , it 's just nice to have everything in one spot and quickly digestible .
Hopefully this should clear any confusion for the " get off my lawn " slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here I go:1.
My research computer cluster at work twitters to tell me simulations are done.2.
The journal of the American Chemical Society twitters updates on interesting papers and news3.
My friends twitter at research conferences to tell me about a good seminar (so I can read about the research)4.
I twitter status updates about when I'll be at work, late for a meeting, running simulations for a few hours, just finished edits on a paper, or when the firewall is screwing around with me.I'm a graduate student, if you couldn't guess.
Although many of these things could be done with RSS and e-mail, it's just nice to have everything in one spot and quickly digestible.
Hopefully this should clear any confusion for the "get off my lawn" slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323609</id>
	<title>Re:Wait the most important thing was left out...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1244899320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably it was this one ((2^31)+1, ids around 2.2 billion don't exist yet, so apparently the broken apps were using signed numbers):</p><p><a href="http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649</a> [twitter.com]</p><p>Don't worry, they are rather simple to find:</p><p><a href="http://twitter.com/statuses/show/2147483649.xml" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/statuses/show/2147483649.xml</a> [twitter.com]</p><p>(The first url can be constructed with information from the second...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably it was this one ( ( 2 ^ 31 ) + 1 , ids around 2.2 billion do n't exist yet , so apparently the broken apps were using signed numbers ) : http : //twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649 [ twitter.com ] Do n't worry , they are rather simple to find : http : //twitter.com/statuses/show/2147483649.xml [ twitter.com ] ( The first url can be constructed with information from the second... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably it was this one ((2^31)+1, ids around 2.2 billion don't exist yet, so apparently the broken apps were using signed numbers):http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649 [twitter.com]Don't worry, they are rather simple to find:http://twitter.com/statuses/show/2147483649.xml [twitter.com](The first url can be constructed with information from the second...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324101</id>
	<title>Doh</title>
	<author>J05H</author>
	<datestamp>1244906040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some clients didn't plan for growth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some clients did n't plan for growth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some clients didn't plan for growth?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323415</id>
	<title>This is not a Twitter problem</title>
	<author>jabelli</author>
	<datestamp>1244897400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please note that this is not a problem with Twitter, only some third-party clients that were not smart enough to use 64-bit integers for the tweet ID.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please note that this is not a problem with Twitter , only some third-party clients that were not smart enough to use 64-bit integers for the tweet ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please note that this is not a problem with Twitter, only some third-party clients that were not smart enough to use 64-bit integers for the tweet ID.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443</id>
	<title>Wait the most important thing was left out...</title>
	<author>immortalpob</author>
	<datestamp>1244897640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What was the tweet that did it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the tweet that did it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the tweet that did it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324431</id>
	<title>Python</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244911560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interestingly, the Twitter client I use is written in Python, so this wasn't even an issue.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly , the Twitter client I use is written in Python , so this was n't even an issue .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly, the Twitter client I use is written in Python, so this wasn't even an issue.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324603</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244913900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What do people get out of it?</p></div><p>A feeling of being connected, part of the herd, maybe.</p><p>Perhaps it's a substitute for family or friends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do people get out of it ? A feeling of being connected , part of the herd , maybe.Perhaps it 's a substitute for family or friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do people get out of it?A feeling of being connected, part of the herd, maybe.Perhaps it's a substitute for family or friends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323281</id>
	<title>Strangely reminiscent of a facebook group</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244896140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208738307&amp;ref=ts" title="facebook.com">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208738307&amp;ref=ts</a> [facebook.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.facebook.com/group.php ? gid = 2208738307&amp;ref = ts [ facebook.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208738307&amp;ref=ts [facebook.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323685</id>
	<title>Re:Wait the most important thing was left out...</title>
	<author>brajesh</author>
	<datestamp>1244900280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What was the tweet that did it?</p></div><p> <a href="http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649</a> [twitter.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the tweet that did it ?
http : //twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649 [ twitter.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the tweet that did it?
http://twitter.com/nk/status/2147483649 [twitter.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324355</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244910420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you don't have any friends?</p><p>Seriously: you value your RSS news feeds - but can't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know?</p><p>It's just a matter of priorities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you do n't have any friends ? Seriously : you value your RSS news feeds - but ca n't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know ? It 's just a matter of priorities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you don't have any friends?Seriously: you value your RSS news feeds - but can't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know?It's just a matter of priorities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324833</id>
	<title>Re:why use a signed integer for that?</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1244917560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe -1 would be a code for something, like, post not found? I know it doesn't seem to make sense to used a signed integer for things that can only be positive at first but here's a few things about using signeds instead :

</p><ul>
<li>you can use the negatives for some extra stuff like codes</li><li>it can avoid you some bugs if you do a subtraction of integers and use the result for some more maths (so you get 4 billion something instead of -1)</li><li>and then concerning the range, there are only a few cases when 2 billion numbers is not enough but 4 billion is always enough. If you care about range it doesn't matter whether you get 31 or 32 bits, either you have enough with 2 billions or you use 64-bit integers.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe -1 would be a code for something , like , post not found ?
I know it does n't seem to make sense to used a signed integer for things that can only be positive at first but here 's a few things about using signeds instead : you can use the negatives for some extra stuff like codesit can avoid you some bugs if you do a subtraction of integers and use the result for some more maths ( so you get 4 billion something instead of -1 ) and then concerning the range , there are only a few cases when 2 billion numbers is not enough but 4 billion is always enough .
If you care about range it does n't matter whether you get 31 or 32 bits , either you have enough with 2 billions or you use 64-bit integers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe -1 would be a code for something, like, post not found?
I know it doesn't seem to make sense to used a signed integer for things that can only be positive at first but here's a few things about using signeds instead :


you can use the negatives for some extra stuff like codesit can avoid you some bugs if you do a subtraction of integers and use the result for some more maths (so you get 4 billion something instead of -1)and then concerning the range, there are only a few cases when 2 billion numbers is not enough but 4 billion is always enough.
If you care about range it doesn't matter whether you get 31 or 32 bits, either you have enough with 2 billions or you use 64-bit integers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324321</id>
	<title>Re:I must be getting old...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244909820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be worse:</p><p>Twigedy (tragedy)<br>Twitamity (calamity)<br>Twitaster (disaster)<br>Twitastrophe (catastrophe)<br>Twitaclysm (cataclysm)</p><p>And my personal favorite:</p><p>Twitocaust (holocaust)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be worse : Twigedy ( tragedy ) Twitamity ( calamity ) Twitaster ( disaster ) Twitastrophe ( catastrophe ) Twitaclysm ( cataclysm ) And my personal favorite : Twitocaust ( holocaust )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be worse:Twigedy (tragedy)Twitamity (calamity)Twitaster (disaster)Twitastrophe (catastrophe)Twitaclysm (cataclysm)And my personal favorite:Twitocaust (holocaust)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563</id>
	<title>Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Reed Solomon</author>
	<datestamp>1244898960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man am I glad I never got on this bandwagon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man am I glad I never got on this bandwagon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man am I glad I never got on this bandwagon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309</id>
	<title>And...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244896380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... nothing of value was lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... nothing of value was lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... nothing of value was lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326369</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244992440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What do people get out of it? I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.</p></div><p>Yeah, that's pretty much it. These days you can be a twat and twit from your mobile device, so you can be connected all the time.</p><p>Eventually, <em>everyone</em> will be connected all the time. We'll all grow up with ubiquitous, always-on high speed internet access wherever we go (well, or civilization will collapse first, but let's be positive) and we'll all want to be talking to people we know (and maybe people we don't) all the time.</p><p>Google allows you to know what people are doing and thinking about; Twitter lets you know what they're doing and thinking about <em>right now</em>. It's a vast source of intelligence that can let you know <em>to the second</em> what is happening and where, and moreover, what people think about it. Just imagining what you could do with that kind of intelligence in the stock market should make you dizzy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do people get out of it ?
I thought about it and do n't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.Yeah , that 's pretty much it .
These days you can be a twat and twit from your mobile device , so you can be connected all the time.Eventually , everyone will be connected all the time .
We 'll all grow up with ubiquitous , always-on high speed internet access wherever we go ( well , or civilization will collapse first , but let 's be positive ) and we 'll all want to be talking to people we know ( and maybe people we do n't ) all the time.Google allows you to know what people are doing and thinking about ; Twitter lets you know what they 're doing and thinking about right now .
It 's a vast source of intelligence that can let you know to the second what is happening and where , and moreover , what people think about it .
Just imagining what you could do with that kind of intelligence in the stock market should make you dizzy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do people get out of it?
I thought about it and don't see the point unless I am desperate for continual updates about everything.Yeah, that's pretty much it.
These days you can be a twat and twit from your mobile device, so you can be connected all the time.Eventually, everyone will be connected all the time.
We'll all grow up with ubiquitous, always-on high speed internet access wherever we go (well, or civilization will collapse first, but let's be positive) and we'll all want to be talking to people we know (and maybe people we don't) all the time.Google allows you to know what people are doing and thinking about; Twitter lets you know what they're doing and thinking about right now.
It's a vast source of intelligence that can let you know to the second what is happening and where, and moreover, what people think about it.
Just imagining what you could do with that kind of intelligence in the stock market should make you dizzy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324217</id>
	<title>Y2K</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244908140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh boy..haven't they learn from Y2K bug?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh boy..have n't they learn from Y2K bug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh boy..haven't they learn from Y2K bug?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28328335</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245011280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Twagnorok ? Twiskcatology is fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Twagnorok ?
Twiskcatology is fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Twagnorok ?
Twiskcatology is fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244903100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just wait for the Twitargeddon. And then the Twapture.

Hold on a sec, let me open up my trusty thesaurus.

Twitastrophe. Twinihilation. Holotwaust. Twataclysm. Twitimation. End of the tworld.

Don't let Elmer Fudd find out about this cause that would be a great big Twagedy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait for the Twitargeddon .
And then the Twapture .
Hold on a sec , let me open up my trusty thesaurus .
Twitastrophe. Twinihilation .
Holotwaust. Twataclysm .
Twitimation. End of the tworld .
Do n't let Elmer Fudd find out about this cause that would be a great big Twagedy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait for the Twitargeddon.
And then the Twapture.
Hold on a sec, let me open up my trusty thesaurus.
Twitastrophe. Twinihilation.
Holotwaust. Twataclysm.
Twitimation. End of the tworld.
Don't let Elmer Fudd find out about this cause that would be a great big Twagedy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323487</id>
	<title>Twitter uses 64bits, 3rd party apps do not</title>
	<author>ZyBex</author>
	<datestamp>1244898180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter's fault. Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally. The "problem" is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer.</p><p><a href="http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057</a> [twitter.com]</p><p>Disclaimer: I've never used twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter 's fault .
Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally .
The " problem " is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter 's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer.http : //twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [ twitter.com ] Disclaimer : I 've never used twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kind of tired with reading that this is Twitter's fault.
Twitter actually uses 64 bits ID internally.
The "problem" is with 3rd party apps that interface with Twitter's API and expect to receive only a signed 32 bit integer.http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/2048659057 [twitter.com]Disclaimer: I've never used twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323409</id>
	<title>Re:And...</title>
	<author>russlar</author>
	<datestamp>1244897280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If anything screams for that tag, this is it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anything screams for that tag , this is it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anything screams for that tag, this is it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325973</id>
	<title>Re:Let's see</title>
	<author>Peganthyrus</author>
	<datestamp>1244987520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's "having an IRC window open to the channel all your buddies hang out in all day long", without the part where it is actually happening via this cryptic old protocol called IRC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's " having an IRC window open to the channel all your buddies hang out in all day long " , without the part where it is actually happening via this cryptic old protocol called IRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's "having an IRC window open to the channel all your buddies hang out in all day long", without the part where it is actually happening via this cryptic old protocol called IRC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28332385</id>
	<title>Re:Twitpocalypse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245007380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twat-aclysm?  Perhaps that's better suited for a pr0n horror flick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twat-aclysm ?
Perhaps that 's better suited for a pr0n horror flick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twat-aclysm?
Perhaps that's better suited for a pr0n horror flick!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28333309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323609
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28332385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28328335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28336075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_2310204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323495
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325095
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28336075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28328505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28328335
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326059
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324129
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28332385
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324723
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28325973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323595
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324355
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28326083
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28333309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28324603
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_2310204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_2310204.28323609
</commentlist>
</conversation>
