<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_13_185216</id>
	<title>Dell Makes $3 Million From Twitter Sales</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244880960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Barence</a> writes <i>"Dell has admitted to raking in over $3 million from <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/255976/dell-makes-3-million-from-twitter-sales.html">advertising its products on Twitter</a>. The PC maker has been using Twitter for two years, and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links. Of that $3 million, the company claims that $1 million was made in the past six months, following an explosion in Twitter's popularity. (Here is an analysis indicating that <a href="http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/">72.5\% of Twitter users joined in 2009</a>.) The majority of sales have come through the @DellOutlet account, which posts six to ten special offers a week &mdash; with at least half of these being Twitter exclusives. Though the $3 million is a drop in the bucket given Dell's $12.3 billion in revenue during the first quarter of this year, it further bolsters Twitter's case for charging businesses."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " Dell has admitted to raking in over $ 3 million from advertising its products on Twitter .
The PC maker has been using Twitter for two years , and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links .
Of that $ 3 million , the company claims that $ 1 million was made in the past six months , following an explosion in Twitter 's popularity .
( Here is an analysis indicating that 72.5 \ % of Twitter users joined in 2009 .
) The majority of sales have come through the @ DellOutlet account , which posts six to ten special offers a week    with at least half of these being Twitter exclusives .
Though the $ 3 million is a drop in the bucket given Dell 's $ 12.3 billion in revenue during the first quarter of this year , it further bolsters Twitter 's case for charging businesses .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "Dell has admitted to raking in over $3 million from advertising its products on Twitter.
The PC maker has been using Twitter for two years, and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links.
Of that $3 million, the company claims that $1 million was made in the past six months, following an explosion in Twitter's popularity.
(Here is an analysis indicating that 72.5\% of Twitter users joined in 2009.
) The majority of sales have come through the @DellOutlet account, which posts six to ten special offers a week — with at least half of these being Twitter exclusives.
Though the $3 million is a drop in the bucket given Dell's $12.3 billion in revenue during the first quarter of this year, it further bolsters Twitter's case for charging businesses.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139</id>
	<title>And twitter makes...?</title>
	<author>JorDan Clock</author>
	<datestamp>1244884860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alright, so Dell makes $3 million; But how much does Twitter make from Dell's @DellOutlet account? And how much revenue does Twitter make in general?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright , so Dell makes $ 3 million ; But how much does Twitter make from Dell 's @ DellOutlet account ?
And how much revenue does Twitter make in general ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright, so Dell makes $3 million; But how much does Twitter make from Dell's @DellOutlet account?
And how much revenue does Twitter make in general?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322251</id>
	<title>THEY HAVE MONEY!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244885820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TAKE IT FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!!</p><p>This post is endorsed by the Democratic National Committee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TAKE IT FOR THE CHILDREN ! ! ! !
! This post is endorsed by the Democratic National Committee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TAKE IT FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!
!This post is endorsed by the Democratic National Committee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322287</id>
	<title>Sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244886240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically, Dell made 0,024\% of all its sales from Twitter. Yeah, what a colossal success Twitter seems to be for businesses. Posting AC because I don't feel like taking a hit from the web 2.0 crowd tonight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically , Dell made 0,024 \ % of all its sales from Twitter .
Yeah , what a colossal success Twitter seems to be for businesses .
Posting AC because I do n't feel like taking a hit from the web 2.0 crowd tonight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically, Dell made 0,024\% of all its sales from Twitter.
Yeah, what a colossal success Twitter seems to be for businesses.
Posting AC because I don't feel like taking a hit from the web 2.0 crowd tonight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322807</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter IS a good marketing tool</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1244891040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It isn't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools.</p></div><p>Then what is it about? Specifically, what can Twitter do that regular mass email can't?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools.Then what is it about ?
Specifically , what can Twitter do that regular mass email ca n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools.Then what is it about?
Specifically, what can Twitter do that regular mass email can't?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28326439</id>
	<title>Re:And twitter makes...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244993220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, this was addressed specifically in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , this was addressed specifically in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, this was addressed specifically in TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323323</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter IS a good marketing tool</title>
	<author>Braino420</author>
	<datestamp>1244896500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a software development company, we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter. Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community. The business value is huge.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I've heard that Site Catalyst does the same thing as your company, and those in our company that work with it have been trained to use Twitter instead of filing a formal help request. Not only do we get faster responses from Twitter, but this has the added benefit of not costing us our support time. This is what you're encouraging.</p><blockquote><div><p>Each time I'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter, and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance.</p></div></blockquote><p>
The value you get out of it has no point for me; I don't want to bitch about people's products over the web and I don't work for a company that would benefit from scouring Twitter looking for whiners. Maybe others feel the same way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a software development company , we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter .
Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community .
The business value is huge .
I 've heard that Site Catalyst does the same thing as your company , and those in our company that work with it have been trained to use Twitter instead of filing a formal help request .
Not only do we get faster responses from Twitter , but this has the added benefit of not costing us our support time .
This is what you 're encouraging.Each time I 'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter , and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance .
The value you get out of it has no point for me ; I do n't want to bitch about people 's products over the web and I do n't work for a company that would benefit from scouring Twitter looking for whiners .
Maybe others feel the same way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a software development company, we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter.
Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community.
The business value is huge.
I've heard that Site Catalyst does the same thing as your company, and those in our company that work with it have been trained to use Twitter instead of filing a formal help request.
Not only do we get faster responses from Twitter, but this has the added benefit of not costing us our support time.
This is what you're encouraging.Each time I'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter, and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance.
The value you get out of it has no point for me; I don't want to bitch about people's products over the web and I don't work for a company that would benefit from scouring Twitter looking for whiners.
Maybe others feel the same way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322483</id>
	<title>Slashdot has over 1.5 million users</title>
	<author>gringofrijolero</author>
	<datestamp>1244888280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much is twitter making from all this free advertising?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much is twitter making from all this free advertising ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much is twitter making from all this free advertising?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322137</id>
	<title>Twitter for twits?</title>
	<author>Paleolibertarian</author>
	<datestamp>1244884800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry. I couldn't resist!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry .
I could n't resist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry.
I couldn't resist!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322539</id>
	<title>Re:And twitter makes...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244888880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh please, oh please let them start charging..that'll end that stupid shit once and for all and I won't have to read</p><p>@somefuckingretard #mymomfucksgoats #yourmomshouldtoo</p><p>It'll put a stop to all the attention whores, or at least the ones without the money to spend on the attention they're getting. The rest will have even less since everyone will jump ship to the-next-shiny-thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh please , oh please let them start charging..that 'll end that stupid shit once and for all and I wo n't have to read @ somefuckingretard # mymomfucksgoats # yourmomshouldtooIt 'll put a stop to all the attention whores , or at least the ones without the money to spend on the attention they 're getting .
The rest will have even less since everyone will jump ship to the-next-shiny-thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh please, oh please let them start charging..that'll end that stupid shit once and for all and I won't have to read@somefuckingretard #mymomfucksgoats #yourmomshouldtooIt'll put a stop to all the attention whores, or at least the ones without the money to spend on the attention they're getting.
The rest will have even less since everyone will jump ship to the-next-shiny-thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322815</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter for twits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244891040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twatter, more like</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twatter , more like</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twatter, more like</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322829</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1244891160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's quite simple. It's a way for lots of people to have their own mailing lists, except it uses SMS messages instead of normal SMTP email. Other than that, and the obvious character limit that's part of SMS, it does absolutely nothing that mailing lists don't do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's quite simple .
It 's a way for lots of people to have their own mailing lists , except it uses SMS messages instead of normal SMTP email .
Other than that , and the obvious character limit that 's part of SMS , it does absolutely nothing that mailing lists do n't do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's quite simple.
It's a way for lots of people to have their own mailing lists, except it uses SMS messages instead of normal SMTP email.
Other than that, and the obvious character limit that's part of SMS, it does absolutely nothing that mailing lists don't do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322627</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>cupantae</author>
	<datestamp>1244889540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The hell? What do you mean "if anything"? It doesn't matter if it's not a madly revolutionary concept or technical advancement.</p><p>It always annoys me to hear people who know a bit about technology pointing out that something that's become popular isn't all that new an idea. It doesn't matter. What matters is that it is at least SOMEWHAT different to everything else. It could be the popularity or the layout or the logo. It doesn't matter what it is.</p><p>In this case, you're just so wrong it's a bit surprising. The difference between Twitter and IRC is massive. Maybe technically they're similar, but to the end user, they're not at all. The thing that people like about it is that you just go and post what you want to say to the world and let whoever wants to hear it hear. It's far more like facebook than IRC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The hell ?
What do you mean " if anything " ?
It does n't matter if it 's not a madly revolutionary concept or technical advancement.It always annoys me to hear people who know a bit about technology pointing out that something that 's become popular is n't all that new an idea .
It does n't matter .
What matters is that it is at least SOMEWHAT different to everything else .
It could be the popularity or the layout or the logo .
It does n't matter what it is.In this case , you 're just so wrong it 's a bit surprising .
The difference between Twitter and IRC is massive .
Maybe technically they 're similar , but to the end user , they 're not at all .
The thing that people like about it is that you just go and post what you want to say to the world and let whoever wants to hear it hear .
It 's far more like facebook than IRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hell?
What do you mean "if anything"?
It doesn't matter if it's not a madly revolutionary concept or technical advancement.It always annoys me to hear people who know a bit about technology pointing out that something that's become popular isn't all that new an idea.
It doesn't matter.
What matters is that it is at least SOMEWHAT different to everything else.
It could be the popularity or the layout or the logo.
It doesn't matter what it is.In this case, you're just so wrong it's a bit surprising.
The difference between Twitter and IRC is massive.
Maybe technically they're similar, but to the end user, they're not at all.
The thing that people like about it is that you just go and post what you want to say to the world and let whoever wants to hear it hear.
It's far more like facebook than IRC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322455</id>
	<title>How does this bolster anything?</title>
	<author>mehtajr</author>
	<datestamp>1244887980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>$3 million in revenue from Twitter in the last two years, versus what I count as <a href="http://www27.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Dell+revenue+2007-2009" title="wolframalpha.com">roughly $100 billion in revenue over the past two years</a> [wolframalpha.com] for Dell. That's not enough to qualify as a drop in the bucket. If I were Dell, I would laugh in Twitter's face if they demanded money-- they'd probably generate just as many sales by slipping fliers under people's windshields in parking lots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 3 million in revenue from Twitter in the last two years , versus what I count as roughly $ 100 billion in revenue over the past two years [ wolframalpha.com ] for Dell .
That 's not enough to qualify as a drop in the bucket .
If I were Dell , I would laugh in Twitter 's face if they demanded money-- they 'd probably generate just as many sales by slipping fliers under people 's windshields in parking lots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$3 million in revenue from Twitter in the last two years, versus what I count as roughly $100 billion in revenue over the past two years [wolframalpha.com] for Dell.
That's not enough to qualify as a drop in the bucket.
If I were Dell, I would laugh in Twitter's face if they demanded money-- they'd probably generate just as many sales by slipping fliers under people's windshields in parking lots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323353</id>
	<title>Re:And twitter makes...?</title>
	<author>aamcf</author>
	<datestamp>1244896800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I only understood twitter properly a few days ago. I used to think of it as a blogging service, which it isn't. Its more like a web-based version of IRC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I only understood twitter properly a few days ago .
I used to think of it as a blogging service , which it is n't .
Its more like a web-based version of IRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only understood twitter properly a few days ago.
I used to think of it as a blogging service, which it isn't.
Its more like a web-based version of IRC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322481</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't really justify Twitter.</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1244888280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter isn't the same as Myspace, AOL, Facebook, etc.  Twitter doesn't have a revenue stream except their funding from the VCs.  The other companies you name do or at least did at one time where Twitter is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com 2.0.</p><p>One factual error that you made is that you've implied that Facebook has peaked, they haven't peaked yet by any measure I've found, at least not yet, it is still growing.:  <a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com" title="alexa.com">http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com</a> [alexa.com]</p><p>Probably no web service will be popular for the long term, that's not a measure of anything because all things will come to an end, web services doubly so.  I wouldn't doubt that Slashdot is down a lot from its peak as well, it's not a top 100 site anymore like I recall it was at one time, not even top 1000.  The web changes so much so quickly that almost no one can predict what is going to be next.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter is n't the same as Myspace , AOL , Facebook , etc .
Twitter does n't have a revenue stream except their funding from the VCs .
The other companies you name do or at least did at one time where Twitter is .com 2.0.One factual error that you made is that you 've implied that Facebook has peaked , they have n't peaked yet by any measure I 've found , at least not yet , it is still growing .
: http : //www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com [ alexa.com ] Probably no web service will be popular for the long term , that 's not a measure of anything because all things will come to an end , web services doubly so .
I would n't doubt that Slashdot is down a lot from its peak as well , it 's not a top 100 site anymore like I recall it was at one time , not even top 1000 .
The web changes so much so quickly that almost no one can predict what is going to be next .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter isn't the same as Myspace, AOL, Facebook, etc.
Twitter doesn't have a revenue stream except their funding from the VCs.
The other companies you name do or at least did at one time where Twitter is .com 2.0.One factual error that you made is that you've implied that Facebook has peaked, they haven't peaked yet by any measure I've found, at least not yet, it is still growing.
:  http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com [alexa.com]Probably no web service will be popular for the long term, that's not a measure of anything because all things will come to an end, web services doubly so.
I wouldn't doubt that Slashdot is down a lot from its peak as well, it's not a top 100 site anymore like I recall it was at one time, not even top 1000.
The web changes so much so quickly that almost no one can predict what is going to be next.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322225</id>
	<title>How do they plan to charge businesses?</title>
	<author>basementman</author>
	<datestamp>1244885580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Charging businesses as a way of monetizing twitter just doesn't make sense. First, how do you determine just who exactly is a business. Do you only include Dell right alongside mom and pop stores? Secondly the only reason the Dell is raking in the cash is because it offers exclusive deals, which it happens to put on twitter. If they did the same thing on FaceBook, or any other platform, I imagine they would have similar results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Charging businesses as a way of monetizing twitter just does n't make sense .
First , how do you determine just who exactly is a business .
Do you only include Dell right alongside mom and pop stores ?
Secondly the only reason the Dell is raking in the cash is because it offers exclusive deals , which it happens to put on twitter .
If they did the same thing on FaceBook , or any other platform , I imagine they would have similar results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charging businesses as a way of monetizing twitter just doesn't make sense.
First, how do you determine just who exactly is a business.
Do you only include Dell right alongside mom and pop stores?
Secondly the only reason the Dell is raking in the cash is because it offers exclusive deals, which it happens to put on twitter.
If they did the same thing on FaceBook, or any other platform, I imagine they would have similar results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323045</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1244893440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd a more accurate description is an implemenation of SMS texting online and for everyone to see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd a more accurate description is an implemenation of SMS texting online and for everyone to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd a more accurate description is an implemenation of SMS texting online and for everyone to see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355</id>
	<title>Twitter IS a good marketing tool</title>
	<author>FooBarWidget</author>
	<datestamp>1244886960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a software development company, we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter. Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community. The business value is huge.</p><p>Each time I'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter, and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance. It isn't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a software development company , we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter .
Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community .
The business value is huge.Each time I 'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter , and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance .
It is n't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a software development company, we regularly use Twitter to see what people think of our software and try to improve it based on the feedback on Twitter.
Twitter has also been a tremendous help in spreading our news announcements throughout the community.
The business value is huge.Each time I'm baffled by how Slashdotters totally miss the point of Twitter, and try to paint it off as a useless website with no substance.
It isn't about whether blogs/mailing lists/email/etc are better communication tools.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322331</id>
	<title>An admission of guilt?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244886720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Dell has admitted to raking in over $3 million from advertising its products on Twitter."</p><p>"Admitted"? What a curious choice of words, almost as if there were something wrong with a business making money! So Dell found a new way to boost sales. Good for them! I'm sure their stockholders appreciate the effort, even if<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Dell has admitted to raking in over $ 3 million from advertising its products on Twitter. " " Admitted " ?
What a curious choice of words , almost as if there were something wrong with a business making money !
So Dell found a new way to boost sales .
Good for them !
I 'm sure their stockholders appreciate the effort , even if / .
does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Dell has admitted to raking in over $3 million from advertising its products on Twitter.""Admitted"?
What a curious choice of words, almost as if there were something wrong with a business making money!
So Dell found a new way to boost sales.
Good for them!
I'm sure their stockholders appreciate the effort, even if /.
doesn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322443</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter IS a good marketing tool</title>
	<author>nausea\_malvarma</author>
	<datestamp>1244887920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Business value != communication value.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Business value ! = communication value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Business value != communication value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28325883</id>
	<title>The manner of their advertising</title>
	<author>rpillala</author>
	<datestamp>1244985960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also consider that if the article is correct, Dell is doing this advertising completely within the Twitter rules and even the twitter mission.  These are small, informative ads that are visible only to parties who have opted in.  If Dell was spam creating users and following them as a way to push information to users, that would be different.</p><p>Adding a paid service for some place like Dell would just muddy the waters.  It would only lead to feature creep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also consider that if the article is correct , Dell is doing this advertising completely within the Twitter rules and even the twitter mission .
These are small , informative ads that are visible only to parties who have opted in .
If Dell was spam creating users and following them as a way to push information to users , that would be different.Adding a paid service for some place like Dell would just muddy the waters .
It would only lead to feature creep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also consider that if the article is correct, Dell is doing this advertising completely within the Twitter rules and even the twitter mission.
These are small, informative ads that are visible only to parties who have opted in.
If Dell was spam creating users and following them as a way to push information to users, that would be different.Adding a paid service for some place like Dell would just muddy the waters.
It would only lead to feature creep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322189</id>
	<title>I'm one of those @Outlet buyers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244885220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me clue you in. People that shop at the outlet are cheap bastards. We scour the web for dell coupons, and then buy second hand stuff to save a couple of bucks. We couldn't care less were we have to scour for that information.. Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons. In fact Twitter should pay Dell for driving the traffic to Twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me clue you in .
People that shop at the outlet are cheap bastards .
We scour the web for dell coupons , and then buy second hand stuff to save a couple of bucks .
We could n't care less were we have to scour for that information.. Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons .
In fact Twitter should pay Dell for driving the traffic to Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me clue you in.
People that shop at the outlet are cheap bastards.
We scour the web for dell coupons, and then buy second hand stuff to save a couple of bucks.
We couldn't care less were we have to scour for that information.. Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons.
In fact Twitter should pay Dell for driving the traffic to Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28335379</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>Conficio</author>
	<datestamp>1245081780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter is technically SMS on the Internet.</p><p>For the layman it is subscription to telegrams. Imagine instead a publisher who publishes only telegrams of less than 140 characters, instead of  whole articles or a magazine. And you can write back to the editor in 140 chars or less. It so happens that you can get these messages forwarded to your cell-phone and also send them from there. So it opens up some billions of users who don't have personal Internet access but carry a cell phone with unlimited texting/SMS or simply are not at a computer at the moment.</p><p>That is all there is to it and like a roller coaster you don't really know what it is unless you tried it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter is technically SMS on the Internet.For the layman it is subscription to telegrams .
Imagine instead a publisher who publishes only telegrams of less than 140 characters , instead of whole articles or a magazine .
And you can write back to the editor in 140 chars or less .
It so happens that you can get these messages forwarded to your cell-phone and also send them from there .
So it opens up some billions of users who do n't have personal Internet access but carry a cell phone with unlimited texting/SMS or simply are not at a computer at the moment.That is all there is to it and like a roller coaster you do n't really know what it is unless you tried it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter is technically SMS on the Internet.For the layman it is subscription to telegrams.
Imagine instead a publisher who publishes only telegrams of less than 140 characters, instead of  whole articles or a magazine.
And you can write back to the editor in 140 chars or less.
It so happens that you can get these messages forwarded to your cell-phone and also send them from there.
So it opens up some billions of users who don't have personal Internet access but carry a cell phone with unlimited texting/SMS or simply are not at a computer at the moment.That is all there is to it and like a roller coaster you don't really know what it is unless you tried it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28330211</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>eloki</author>
	<datestamp>1244983680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of Slashdotters seem to ascribe no value to Twitter, or maybe they're just more vocal. Here's my experience, and a general comment on the social media scorn we read here.</p><p>Like perhaps many geeks/nerds I'm not a very social person, but I used a Twitter client that let me see messages from people in my local area (Sydney), much like an IRC channel except people write from places other than home/work. After a while of reading and occasional replying I found it quite enjoyable, followed a bunch and and managed to become somewhat friends with some.</p><p>There's no fundamental difference between IRC, a forum, Facebook or Twitter; they are all mediums of socialising. Slashdotters laugh at the last two because they are seen as "not special", which is true, but not the same as being "of no value". My local Thai restaurant is nothing special but that doesn't mean it has no value.</p><p>On Facebook, I understand the scorn that you don't want to be friends with classmates you never cared about then or now. But you don't have to use it for that, so it's like complaining that you don't like pad thai (I don't) so why go to a Thai restaurant? One of the reasons Facebook provides groups, fan pages and even apps is to provide other ways for you to interact with users. Yes some of those apps (like the quiz ones) are VERY annoying, but a small number of apps have been pretty fun and addictive (generally trading games) and I've made a few more online Facebook friends that way, people who I otherwise would never have met or interacted with.</p><p>It has been ephemeral, some of those people I don't talk to much anymore. But that is just like IRC and real life, where some of my friendships have lapsed over the years and new ones have taken their place. People move in and out of our lives, and Facebook and Twitter are just another ordinary way for this to happen. They are not worthy of the hype, but neither are they worthy of the derision.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of Slashdotters seem to ascribe no value to Twitter , or maybe they 're just more vocal .
Here 's my experience , and a general comment on the social media scorn we read here.Like perhaps many geeks/nerds I 'm not a very social person , but I used a Twitter client that let me see messages from people in my local area ( Sydney ) , much like an IRC channel except people write from places other than home/work .
After a while of reading and occasional replying I found it quite enjoyable , followed a bunch and and managed to become somewhat friends with some.There 's no fundamental difference between IRC , a forum , Facebook or Twitter ; they are all mediums of socialising .
Slashdotters laugh at the last two because they are seen as " not special " , which is true , but not the same as being " of no value " .
My local Thai restaurant is nothing special but that does n't mean it has no value.On Facebook , I understand the scorn that you do n't want to be friends with classmates you never cared about then or now .
But you do n't have to use it for that , so it 's like complaining that you do n't like pad thai ( I do n't ) so why go to a Thai restaurant ?
One of the reasons Facebook provides groups , fan pages and even apps is to provide other ways for you to interact with users .
Yes some of those apps ( like the quiz ones ) are VERY annoying , but a small number of apps have been pretty fun and addictive ( generally trading games ) and I 've made a few more online Facebook friends that way , people who I otherwise would never have met or interacted with.It has been ephemeral , some of those people I do n't talk to much anymore .
But that is just like IRC and real life , where some of my friendships have lapsed over the years and new ones have taken their place .
People move in and out of our lives , and Facebook and Twitter are just another ordinary way for this to happen .
They are not worthy of the hype , but neither are they worthy of the derision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of Slashdotters seem to ascribe no value to Twitter, or maybe they're just more vocal.
Here's my experience, and a general comment on the social media scorn we read here.Like perhaps many geeks/nerds I'm not a very social person, but I used a Twitter client that let me see messages from people in my local area (Sydney), much like an IRC channel except people write from places other than home/work.
After a while of reading and occasional replying I found it quite enjoyable, followed a bunch and and managed to become somewhat friends with some.There's no fundamental difference between IRC, a forum, Facebook or Twitter; they are all mediums of socialising.
Slashdotters laugh at the last two because they are seen as "not special", which is true, but not the same as being "of no value".
My local Thai restaurant is nothing special but that doesn't mean it has no value.On Facebook, I understand the scorn that you don't want to be friends with classmates you never cared about then or now.
But you don't have to use it for that, so it's like complaining that you don't like pad thai (I don't) so why go to a Thai restaurant?
One of the reasons Facebook provides groups, fan pages and even apps is to provide other ways for you to interact with users.
Yes some of those apps (like the quiz ones) are VERY annoying, but a small number of apps have been pretty fun and addictive (generally trading games) and I've made a few more online Facebook friends that way, people who I otherwise would never have met or interacted with.It has been ephemeral, some of those people I don't talk to much anymore.
But that is just like IRC and real life, where some of my friendships have lapsed over the years and new ones have taken their place.
People move in and out of our lives, and Facebook and Twitter are just another ordinary way for this to happen.
They are not worthy of the hype, but neither are they worthy of the derision.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322727</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244890140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A reimplementation of IRC over HTML</p></div><p>Quite close except that there are <a href="http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/appendix#demographics" title="sysomos.com" rel="nofollow">more chicks</a> [sysomos.com] on Twitter than IRC.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A reimplementation of IRC over HTMLQuite close except that there are more chicks [ sysomos.com ] on Twitter than IRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A reimplementation of IRC over HTMLQuite close except that there are more chicks [sysomos.com] on Twitter than IRC.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322197</id>
	<title>Re:And twitter makes...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244885280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If twitter could charge news media a nickel for mentioning their name, they'd have a viable business model... One that would function for several months, if not two years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If twitter could charge news media a nickel for mentioning their name , they 'd have a viable business model... One that would function for several months , if not two years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If twitter could charge news media a nickel for mentioning their name, they'd have a viable business model... One that would function for several months, if not two years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28327337</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those @Outlet buyers</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1245002760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons.</p></div><p>But you said it yourself, you don't care if you have to scour for that information. If they made the information too easily available, then those that do care about having to waste time looking for coupons, and normally wouldn't bother, would start getting the discounts as well and Dell would not make as much money. And you wouldn't have the satisfaction of finding a great hidden deal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons.But you said it yourself , you do n't care if you have to scour for that information .
If they made the information too easily available , then those that do care about having to waste time looking for coupons , and normally would n't bother , would start getting the discounts as well and Dell would not make as much money .
And you would n't have the satisfaction of finding a great hidden deal : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell should just save us the trouble and put the information here www.dell.com/coupons.But you said it yourself, you don't care if you have to scour for that information.
If they made the information too easily available, then those that do care about having to waste time looking for coupons, and normally wouldn't bother, would start getting the discounts as well and Dell would not make as much money.
And you wouldn't have the satisfaction of finding a great hidden deal :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322217</id>
	<title>Doesn't really justify Twitter.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244885460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what? Dell has effective marketing people. Why is this news?<br> <br>

They are simply milking an overhyped communication medium, one where there are doubtless many easily influenced and gullible users -- their gullibility being the reason they are using Twitter in the first place.<br> <br>

Twitter made nothing from this. Twitter makes nothing at all -- other than an enormous amount of hot air. Sure, companies like Dell should ride the gravy train while it's still on the tracks, but it won't last. just like it didn't with Myspace, AOL, Facebook etc, etc, etc...<br> <br>

And if anything else, the more companies using Twitter to market themselves the even less cool and useful Twitter will be to the few who use it. It will die faster.<br> <br>

They are still bleeding more users than they retain, this kind of thing will only make it worse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what ?
Dell has effective marketing people .
Why is this news ?
They are simply milking an overhyped communication medium , one where there are doubtless many easily influenced and gullible users -- their gullibility being the reason they are using Twitter in the first place .
Twitter made nothing from this .
Twitter makes nothing at all -- other than an enormous amount of hot air .
Sure , companies like Dell should ride the gravy train while it 's still on the tracks , but it wo n't last .
just like it did n't with Myspace , AOL , Facebook etc , etc , etc.. . And if anything else , the more companies using Twitter to market themselves the even less cool and useful Twitter will be to the few who use it .
It will die faster .
They are still bleeding more users than they retain , this kind of thing will only make it worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what?
Dell has effective marketing people.
Why is this news?
They are simply milking an overhyped communication medium, one where there are doubtless many easily influenced and gullible users -- their gullibility being the reason they are using Twitter in the first place.
Twitter made nothing from this.
Twitter makes nothing at all -- other than an enormous amount of hot air.
Sure, companies like Dell should ride the gravy train while it's still on the tracks, but it won't last.
just like it didn't with Myspace, AOL, Facebook etc, etc, etc... 

And if anything else, the more companies using Twitter to market themselves the even less cool and useful Twitter will be to the few who use it.
It will die faster.
They are still bleeding more users than they retain, this kind of thing will only make it worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505</id>
	<title>What exactly is twitter?</title>
	<author>V50</author>
	<datestamp>1244888520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite all this talk of Twitter, I still haven't figured out what, if anything, Twitter actually is. The two main descriptions that keep recurring are:</p><p>A reimplementation of IRC over HTML and<br>A site where people talk about how great Twitter is, and occasionally panic over current events</p><p>Does that pretty much sum Twitter for non, uh, twits up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite all this talk of Twitter , I still have n't figured out what , if anything , Twitter actually is .
The two main descriptions that keep recurring are : A reimplementation of IRC over HTML andA site where people talk about how great Twitter is , and occasionally panic over current eventsDoes that pretty much sum Twitter for non , uh , twits up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite all this talk of Twitter, I still haven't figured out what, if anything, Twitter actually is.
The two main descriptions that keep recurring are:A reimplementation of IRC over HTML andA site where people talk about how great Twitter is, and occasionally panic over current eventsDoes that pretty much sum Twitter for non, uh, twits up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322555</id>
	<title>High technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244889000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links."</p><p>Wow, knowing which link someone clicked on to get to your site?    That sounds magical!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links .
" Wow , knowing which link someone clicked on to get to your site ?
That sounds magical !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links.
"Wow, knowing which link someone clicked on to get to your site?
That sounds magical!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322653</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter IS a good marketing tool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244889660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am not sure how good a marketing tool it is. After all, most users are not that active. Apparently top-10\% (which translates to 115K users) are responsible for <a href="http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/" title="sysomos.com" rel="nofollow">86\% of all activity</a> [sysomos.com] based on the survey of 11.5M users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not sure how good a marketing tool it is .
After all , most users are not that active .
Apparently top-10 \ % ( which translates to 115K users ) are responsible for 86 \ % of all activity [ sysomos.com ] based on the survey of 11.5M users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not sure how good a marketing tool it is.
After all, most users are not that active.
Apparently top-10\% (which translates to 115K users) are responsible for 86\% of all activity [sysomos.com] based on the survey of 11.5M users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322701</id>
	<title>Why is this in the summary?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1244890020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter links</p></div><p>Seems like its only purpose is to invoke an anti-Dell sentiment by linking them to evil proprietary software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter linksSeems like its only purpose is to invoke an anti-Dell sentiment by linking them to evil proprietary software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and employs proprietary software to track sales from users clicking through from Twitter linksSeems like its only purpose is to invoke an anti-Dell sentiment by linking them to evil proprietary software.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322293</id>
	<title>List.</title>
	<author>Kamineko</author>
	<datestamp>1244886420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A simple of list of timely, valid coupons leads to increased sales.

Who'd have thought it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A simple of list of timely , valid coupons leads to increased sales .
Who 'd have thought it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A simple of list of timely, valid coupons leads to increased sales.
Who'd have thought it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28335379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28330211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28327337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_185216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28326439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322815
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322455
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322287
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322539
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28326439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28327337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28330211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28335379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322481
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_185216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28323323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_185216.28322653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
