<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_13_175245</id>
	<title>A Supervolcano Beneath Mt. St. Helens?</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244920020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (<a href="//science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/10/2348256&amp;tid=14">not going to blow, 2004</a>; <a href="//news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/31/2248210&amp;tid=271">going to blow, 2008</a>). Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt. St. Helens might contain enough magma that the <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227124.700-supervolcano-may-be-brewing-beneath-mount-st-helens.html">area could be classed a supervolcano</a>. The jury is still out on this one. Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report. <i>"Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface. The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena. The currents are stronger when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock. ... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano. About 15 km below the surface, the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material. This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east. It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor. ... [Some researchers] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture. Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here ( not going to blow , 2004 ; going to blow , 2008 ) .
Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt .
St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano .
The jury is still out on this one .
Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report .
" Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics , which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface .
The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface , induced by lightning storms and other phenomena .
The currents are stronger when magma is present , since it is a better conductor than solid rock .
... [ M ] easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano .
About 15 km below the surface , the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material .
This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey , and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east , and Mount Adams 50 km to the east .
It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment , water being a good electrical conductor .
... [ Some researchers ] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture .
Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (not going to blow, 2004; going to blow, 2008).
Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt.
St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano.
The jury is still out on this one.
Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report.
"Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface.
The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena.
The currents are stronger when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock.
... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano.
About 15 km below the surface, the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material.
This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east.
It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor.
... [Some researchers] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture.
Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</id>
	<title>pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1244925060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did a little reading under Supervolcano on Wikipedia and it says "...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology. The term megacaldera is sometimes used.."<br> <br>
You got that? It's a Megacaldera guys. Only total n00bz call it a supervolcano! I bet you guys called Yoda a Jedi Knight too....everybody knows he was a Jedi MASTER.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>....hehe...supervolcano.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did a little reading under Supervolcano on Wikipedia and it says " ...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology .
The term megacaldera is sometimes used.. " You got that ?
It 's a Megacaldera guys .
Only total n00bz call it a supervolcano !
I bet you guys called Yoda a Jedi Knight too....everybody knows he was a Jedi MASTER .
....hehe...supervolcano .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did a little reading under Supervolcano on Wikipedia and it says "...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology.
The term megacaldera is sometimes used.." 
You got that?
It's a Megacaldera guys.
Only total n00bz call it a supervolcano!
I bet you guys called Yoda a Jedi Knight too....everybody knows he was a Jedi MASTER.
....hehe...supervolcano.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321847</id>
	<title>hmm if it did blow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The force could be enough to take out all the chairs in the Microsoft campus, regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The force could be enough to take out all the chairs in the Microsoft campus , regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The force could be enough to take out all the chairs in the Microsoft campus, regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321823</id>
	<title>I'm wondering, with all this magma?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244924820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Might there be a volcano under Mt. St. Helens?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might there be a volcano under Mt .
St. Helens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might there be a volcano under Mt.
St. Helens?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321981</id>
	<title>In Other News...</title>
	<author>Afforess</author>
	<datestamp>1244926440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scientists remember that Earth's core is made up of magma, so it only makes sense that alot of it exists...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists remember that Earth 's core is made up of magma , so it only makes sense that alot of it exists.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists remember that Earth's core is made up of magma, so it only makes sense that alot of it exists...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322721</id>
	<title>New Sensationalist again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244890140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1266189&amp;cid=28304065" title="slashdot.org">this comment</a> [slashdot.org] and the reply to it.</p><p>For more than ten years the <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/" title="newscientist.com">New Sensationalist</a> [newscientist.com] has been predicting catastrophes, world changing technologies, and the like.  It's about time someone tried to call them on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See this comment [ slashdot.org ] and the reply to it.For more than ten years the New Sensationalist [ newscientist.com ] has been predicting catastrophes , world changing technologies , and the like .
It 's about time someone tried to call them on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See this comment [slashdot.org] and the reply to it.For more than ten years the New Sensationalist [newscientist.com] has been predicting catastrophes, world changing technologies, and the like.
It's about time someone tried to call them on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321909</id>
	<title>Just terrific</title>
	<author>friedman101</author>
	<datestamp>1244925480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, first we lose the Sonics and now our city is gonna be the next Pompeii. Great era to be a Seattleite</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , first we lose the Sonics and now our city is gon na be the next Pompeii .
Great era to be a Seattleite</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, first we lose the Sonics and now our city is gonna be the next Pompeii.
Great era to be a Seattleite</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324451</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244911800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, blame it on "Republican mod bombers". Leftist idiot.  Make up an enemy whenever people disagree with you.  You're as bad as the righties you seem to loathe to the point of becoming irrational.
<br> <br>
First off: Maybe some of us Libertarians like smaller government, and less money spent on things like this (and foreign expeditions etc).
<br> <br>
Second:How the hell is this supposed to "stimulate" economic activity?  Bad legislation is bad legislation if you take off your ideological blinders. - if its deserving of the public funding, have it pass on its own merit as part of the nomral process, with actual discussion and debate of the mertis and demerits and costs.
<br> <br>
Third: the New Orleans mess happened under DEMOCRATS, not Jindal.  And your racist insinuations about Louisiana and "yankees" are pure idiocy, and proof positive that you have no real point other than attacking along bigoted lines.
<br> <br>
In short, you lose.  Try coming to your senses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , blame it on " Republican mod bombers " .
Leftist idiot .
Make up an enemy whenever people disagree with you .
You 're as bad as the righties you seem to loathe to the point of becoming irrational .
First off : Maybe some of us Libertarians like smaller government , and less money spent on things like this ( and foreign expeditions etc ) .
Second : How the hell is this supposed to " stimulate " economic activity ?
Bad legislation is bad legislation if you take off your ideological blinders .
- if its deserving of the public funding , have it pass on its own merit as part of the nomral process , with actual discussion and debate of the mertis and demerits and costs .
Third : the New Orleans mess happened under DEMOCRATS , not Jindal .
And your racist insinuations about Louisiana and " yankees " are pure idiocy , and proof positive that you have no real point other than attacking along bigoted lines .
In short , you lose .
Try coming to your senses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, blame it on "Republican mod bombers".
Leftist idiot.
Make up an enemy whenever people disagree with you.
You're as bad as the righties you seem to loathe to the point of becoming irrational.
First off: Maybe some of us Libertarians like smaller government, and less money spent on things like this (and foreign expeditions etc).
Second:How the hell is this supposed to "stimulate" economic activity?
Bad legislation is bad legislation if you take off your ideological blinders.
- if its deserving of the public funding, have it pass on its own merit as part of the nomral process, with actual discussion and debate of the mertis and demerits and costs.
Third: the New Orleans mess happened under DEMOCRATS, not Jindal.
And your racist insinuations about Louisiana and "yankees" are pure idiocy, and proof positive that you have no real point other than attacking along bigoted lines.
In short, you lose.
Try coming to your senses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322295</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244886420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You insensitive Bizatch!!!  I happen to be a Volcano Monitoring Technician.  I sit on a rock in Yellowstone for 8 hrs. day, 5 days a week, concentrating on the vibrations coming through the ground and the effects of the magnetic waves on various metal objects.  My homeless technical training makes me ideal for this position, so said PrezBO</htmltext>
<tokenext>You insensitive Bizatch ! ! !
I happen to be a Volcano Monitoring Technician .
I sit on a rock in Yellowstone for 8 hrs .
day , 5 days a week , concentrating on the vibrations coming through the ground and the effects of the magnetic waves on various metal objects .
My homeless technical training makes me ideal for this position , so said PrezBO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You insensitive Bizatch!!!
I happen to be a Volcano Monitoring Technician.
I sit on a rock in Yellowstone for 8 hrs.
day, 5 days a week, concentrating on the vibrations coming through the ground and the effects of the magnetic waves on various metal objects.
My homeless technical training makes me ideal for this position, so said PrezBO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322077</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244884200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit! "Caldera"!?! That's what SCO linux used to be called! And this is MEGA Caldera, a million times caldera! This must be the latest move of Microsoft. They're gonna blow shit up! Duck and cover!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit !
" Caldera " ! ? ! That 's what SCO linux used to be called !
And this is MEGA Caldera , a million times caldera !
This must be the latest move of Microsoft .
They 're gon na blow shit up !
Duck and cover !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit!
"Caldera"!?! That's what SCO linux used to be called!
And this is MEGA Caldera, a million times caldera!
This must be the latest move of Microsoft.
They're gonna blow shit up!
Duck and cover!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322915</id>
	<title>Predict catastrophe, get highway.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244892060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#1. Predict catastrophe<br>#2. <a href="http://www.katu.com/news/48002962.html#idc-container" title="katu.com" rel="nofollow">Build highway</a> [katu.com]<br>#2. ???<br>#3. Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># 1 .
Predict catastrophe # 2 .
Build highway [ katu.com ] # 2 .
? ? ? # 3. Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#1.
Predict catastrophe#2.
Build highway [katu.com]#2.
???#3. Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323069</id>
	<title>This just in...</title>
	<author>d4nowar</author>
	<datestamp>1244893680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mt. St. Helens is a big volcano!</p><p>Tune in at eleven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mt .
St. Helens is a big volcano ! Tune in at eleven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mt.
St. Helens is a big volcano!Tune in at eleven.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685</id>
	<title>Mount Helen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244923680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, most slashdotters would mount anyone with that name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , most slashdotters would mount anyone with that name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, most slashdotters would mount anyone with that name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322819</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1244891100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a motivational speaker.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a motivational speaker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a motivational speaker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</id>
	<title>Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>PotatoFiend</author>
	<datestamp>1244924400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach. Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the largest government spending bill in history, with a price tag of more than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... $140 million for something called "volcano monitoring." Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.<br> <br>-- Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach .
Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money , they passed the largest government spending bill in history , with a price tag of more than $ 1 trillion with interest .
While some of the projects in the bill make sense , their legislation is larded with wasteful spending .
It includes ... $ 140 million for something called " volcano monitoring .
" Instead of monitoring volcanoes , what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington , D.C. -- Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach.
Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the largest government spending bill in history, with a price tag of more than $1 trillion with interest.
While some of the projects in the bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending.
It includes ... $140 million for something called "volcano monitoring.
" Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C. -- Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322809</id>
	<title>Re:If the west coast blows up</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1244891040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well Silicon Valley already had its bubble burst. So are you saying its about time it blows up by a volcano? When the city of Atlantis rises again, we'll see who the fools are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Silicon Valley already had its bubble burst .
So are you saying its about time it blows up by a volcano ?
When the city of Atlantis rises again , we 'll see who the fools are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Silicon Valley already had its bubble burst.
So are you saying its about time it blows up by a volcano?
When the city of Atlantis rises again, we'll see who the fools are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869</id>
	<title>He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This volcano monitoring spending was part of an economic stimulus bill.<br>What in the hell does spending on volcano monitoring have to do with stimulating the economy, I have no idea.  Maybe we should be funding this, but it has nothing to do with the issue that he was addressing.</p><p>It was a bit clumsy, but Jindal was dead on correct in criticizing the pork that goes on in Congress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This volcano monitoring spending was part of an economic stimulus bill.What in the hell does spending on volcano monitoring have to do with stimulating the economy , I have no idea .
Maybe we should be funding this , but it has nothing to do with the issue that he was addressing.It was a bit clumsy , but Jindal was dead on correct in criticizing the pork that goes on in Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This volcano monitoring spending was part of an economic stimulus bill.What in the hell does spending on volcano monitoring have to do with stimulating the economy, I have no idea.
Maybe we should be funding this, but it has nothing to do with the issue that he was addressing.It was a bit clumsy, but Jindal was dead on correct in criticizing the pork that goes on in Congress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323553</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>UziBeatle</author>
	<datestamp>1244898900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Larry blurbed:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/quote larry bagina (561269) Alter Relationship   on Saturday June 13, @03:25PM (#28322177) Journal</p><p>Stimulus? bwahaha. Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months. This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/endquote</p><p>
&nbsp; BXZZXT&gt; WRONG.</p><p>
&nbsp; Despite the rest of your post being full of goodness and all the above 'fact' is a lie and distortion.  It is true that the high lord of the progressive party, Barak Obama, asserted what<br>you say. What is not true is that the head of Caterpillar thought the same way. After that speech where Barack sandbagged the CEO of Caterpillar, the CEO later said he was 'misled' by the Obama brown shirt pre team (brown shirts my interpretation) and said that is was HIGHLY LIKELY more layoffs were to be coming for Caterpillar. He said the stimulus would have LITTLE effect on what<br>Caterpillar would have to do to survive the upcoming year.</p><p>
&nbsp; Don't believe me? Look it up. THis was widely reported in the media unless your main source<br>of news is CNN or ABC/NBC/CBS and the like.</p><p>
&nbsp; No need to spread the lies of Obama progressives and stuff them into the mouths of people who never asserted such lies and no need to allow such lies to promulgate in public.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I'd add to your other good ideas it would have  made more sense to give every American rich or poor a 70 percent tax break this year (or last year actually) and issue huge rebate checks.<br>
&nbsp; And yes, GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to go Bankrupt along with BOA and the rest of the charlatans but 'they' do not listen to the likes of us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Larry blurbed : /quote larry bagina ( 561269 ) Alter Relationship on Saturday June 13 , @ 03 : 25PM ( # 28322177 ) JournalStimulus ?
bwahaha. Earlier this week , Caterpillar ( bulldozers and stuff ) announced 66 more employees would be laid off , on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months .
This is noteworthy because they ( and Barack Obama ) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening /endquote   BXZZXT &gt; WRONG .
  Despite the rest of your post being full of goodness and all the above 'fact ' is a lie and distortion .
It is true that the high lord of the progressive party , Barak Obama , asserted whatyou say .
What is not true is that the head of Caterpillar thought the same way .
After that speech where Barack sandbagged the CEO of Caterpillar , the CEO later said he was 'misled ' by the Obama brown shirt pre team ( brown shirts my interpretation ) and said that is was HIGHLY LIKELY more layoffs were to be coming for Caterpillar .
He said the stimulus would have LITTLE effect on whatCaterpillar would have to do to survive the upcoming year .
  Do n't believe me ?
Look it up .
THis was widely reported in the media unless your main sourceof news is CNN or ABC/NBC/CBS and the like .
  No need to spread the lies of Obama progressives and stuff them into the mouths of people who never asserted such lies and no need to allow such lies to promulgate in public .
    I 'd add to your other good ideas it would have made more sense to give every American rich or poor a 70 percent tax break this year ( or last year actually ) and issue huge rebate checks .
  And yes , GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to go Bankrupt along with BOA and the rest of the charlatans but 'they ' do not listen to the likes of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Larry blurbed: /quote larry bagina (561269) Alter Relationship   on Saturday June 13, @03:25PM (#28322177) JournalStimulus?
bwahaha. Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months.
This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening /endquote
  BXZZXT&gt; WRONG.
  Despite the rest of your post being full of goodness and all the above 'fact' is a lie and distortion.
It is true that the high lord of the progressive party, Barak Obama, asserted whatyou say.
What is not true is that the head of Caterpillar thought the same way.
After that speech where Barack sandbagged the CEO of Caterpillar, the CEO later said he was 'misled' by the Obama brown shirt pre team (brown shirts my interpretation) and said that is was HIGHLY LIKELY more layoffs were to be coming for Caterpillar.
He said the stimulus would have LITTLE effect on whatCaterpillar would have to do to survive the upcoming year.
  Don't believe me?
Look it up.
THis was widely reported in the media unless your main sourceof news is CNN or ABC/NBC/CBS and the like.
  No need to spread the lies of Obama progressives and stuff them into the mouths of people who never asserted such lies and no need to allow such lies to promulgate in public.
    I'd add to your other good ideas it would have  made more sense to give every American rich or poor a 70 percent tax break this year (or last year actually) and issue huge rebate checks.
  And yes, GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to go Bankrupt along with BOA and the rest of the charlatans but 'they' do not listen to the likes of us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322169</id>
	<title>Comments</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1244885040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging by the comments posted so far, if it is a super volcano, and it does blow, nothing of value will be lost.<br> That is all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the comments posted so far , if it is a super volcano , and it does blow , nothing of value will be lost .
That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the comments posted so far, if it is a super volcano, and it does blow, nothing of value will be lost.
That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322019</id>
	<title>Re:Volcano!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244883660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone woke you last time an hurricane lvl 5 hit a big city?<br><br>Change happens, and some of it is big and abrupt. Will happen tomorrow? next century? Is not for losing the sleep for what could happen that you cant predict nor prevent, but neither is for denying that will happen in some moment of the (maybe far, maybe near) future.<br><br>If makes you happy, you can take it as the "news" that Mars will hit Earth like in a billon years, odds are not low that it will no happen in your lifetime (specially if a big tidal wave from Canary Islands sinks Florida in the next few days<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone woke you last time an hurricane lvl 5 hit a big city ? Change happens , and some of it is big and abrupt .
Will happen tomorrow ?
next century ?
Is not for losing the sleep for what could happen that you cant predict nor prevent , but neither is for denying that will happen in some moment of the ( maybe far , maybe near ) future.If makes you happy , you can take it as the " news " that Mars will hit Earth like in a billon years , odds are not low that it will no happen in your lifetime ( specially if a big tidal wave from Canary Islands sinks Florida in the next few days : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone woke you last time an hurricane lvl 5 hit a big city?Change happens, and some of it is big and abrupt.
Will happen tomorrow?
next century?
Is not for losing the sleep for what could happen that you cant predict nor prevent, but neither is for denying that will happen in some moment of the (maybe far, maybe near) future.If makes you happy, you can take it as the "news" that Mars will hit Earth like in a billon years, odds are not low that it will no happen in your lifetime (specially if a big tidal wave from Canary Islands sinks Florida in the next few days :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321845</id>
	<title>If the west coast blows up</title>
	<author>kbrasee</author>
	<datestamp>1244925000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>can I have your stuff?</htmltext>
<tokenext>can I have your stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can I have your stuff?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322163</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1244885040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if they want a big grant, they'll soon learn to start calling things by their more dramatic names.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they want a big grant , they 'll soon learn to start calling things by their more dramatic names .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they want a big grant, they'll soon learn to start calling things by their more dramatic names.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321943</id>
	<title>A threat to Mentifex artificial intelligence</title>
	<author>Mentifex</author>
	<datestamp>1244925960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mount St. Helens is close enough to Seattle WAC USA that I used to watch eruptions from the shores of Green Lake in North Seattle. A superuption from a supervolcano could take out the <a href="http://microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Microsoft campus</a> [microsoft.com] in Redmond WA USA and the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/mindforth" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Mentifex AI Project</a> [google.com] in Seattle. Then maybe the world would be better off without either of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mount St. Helens is close enough to Seattle WAC USA that I used to watch eruptions from the shores of Green Lake in North Seattle .
A superuption from a supervolcano could take out the Microsoft campus [ microsoft.com ] in Redmond WA USA and the Mentifex AI Project [ google.com ] in Seattle .
Then maybe the world would be better off without either of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mount St. Helens is close enough to Seattle WAC USA that I used to watch eruptions from the shores of Green Lake in North Seattle.
A superuption from a supervolcano could take out the Microsoft campus [microsoft.com] in Redmond WA USA and the Mentifex AI Project [google.com] in Seattle.
Then maybe the world would be better off without either of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324057</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244905200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jindal is da Debbil!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jindal is da Debbil !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jindal is da Debbil!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331909</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1245001500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting -- you infer GM et.al. should be allowed to fail, but not Caterpillar?  Fine set of double standards you have there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting -- you infer GM et.al .
should be allowed to fail , but not Caterpillar ?
Fine set of double standards you have there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting -- you infer GM et.al.
should be allowed to fail, but not Caterpillar?
Fine set of double standards you have there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327137</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245000780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(never forget minnesota!)</p></div><p>
I'm from MN you insensitive clod, and am sick of people preying on our disaster for their political goals.  Especially when they misrepresent what happened.
<br>
You realize lack of repairs was not the cause of the bridge collapse?  The analysis showed that the Civil Engineers fscked up, and signed off on 1/4" plates when 1/2" plates were needed.
<br>
I have trouble taking the rest of your post seriously after this kind of emotional bs leading off your post.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/endrant</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( never forget minnesota !
) I 'm from MN you insensitive clod , and am sick of people preying on our disaster for their political goals .
Especially when they misrepresent what happened .
You realize lack of repairs was not the cause of the bridge collapse ?
The analysis showed that the Civil Engineers fscked up , and signed off on 1/4 " plates when 1/2 " plates were needed .
I have trouble taking the rest of your post seriously after this kind of emotional bs leading off your post .
/endrant</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(never forget minnesota!
)
I'm from MN you insensitive clod, and am sick of people preying on our disaster for their political goals.
Especially when they misrepresent what happened.
You realize lack of repairs was not the cause of the bridge collapse?
The analysis showed that the Civil Engineers fscked up, and signed off on 1/4" plates when 1/2" plates were needed.
I have trouble taking the rest of your post seriously after this kind of emotional bs leading off your post.
/endrant
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323601</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>stonewallred</author>
	<datestamp>1244899320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck, where are my mod points so I can mod you up +5 or so for telling the fucking truth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck , where are my mod points so I can mod you up + 5 or so for telling the fucking truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck, where are my mod points so I can mod you up +5 or so for telling the fucking truth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325981</id>
	<title>Re:I'm wondering, with all this magma?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244987580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's volcanoes all the way down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's volcanoes all the way down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's volcanoes all the way down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322575</id>
	<title>Re:hmm if it did blow  "I used to say the West..."</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1244889120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is, the upper northern West Coast was LONNNNG overdue for a tsunami or Mt. St. Helens mega eruption, and that if it took out ms, that that would be fine by me. Unfortunately, ms would have enough backups around the world to rise from the ash, either as a new fearsome giant, or a bunch of smaller ones that some expected the anti-trust cases might produce.</p><p>BUT... maybe Mt. St. Helens might become the new force of open source? Or, the new source of open FORCE. If it smacks ms, it would be a New Caldera Era, SCO (Sporadic, Combustible Obliteration)....Yikes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is , the upper northern West Coast was LONNNNG overdue for a tsunami or Mt .
St. Helens mega eruption , and that if it took out ms , that that would be fine by me .
Unfortunately , ms would have enough backups around the world to rise from the ash , either as a new fearsome giant , or a bunch of smaller ones that some expected the anti-trust cases might produce.BUT... maybe Mt .
St. Helens might become the new force of open source ?
Or , the new source of open FORCE .
If it smacks ms , it would be a New Caldera Era , SCO ( Sporadic , Combustible Obliteration ) ....Yikes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is, the upper northern West Coast was LONNNNG overdue for a tsunami or Mt.
St. Helens mega eruption, and that if it took out ms, that that would be fine by me.
Unfortunately, ms would have enough backups around the world to rise from the ash, either as a new fearsome giant, or a bunch of smaller ones that some expected the anti-trust cases might produce.BUT... maybe Mt.
St. Helens might become the new force of open source?
Or, the new source of open FORCE.
If it smacks ms, it would be a New Caldera Era, SCO (Sporadic, Combustible Obliteration)....Yikes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322453</id>
	<title>Re:Volcano!</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1244887980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Let me rephrase my previous response.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Hurricanes happen a lot.  Category 5 hurricanes happen enough to make it a concern.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Volcano's erupt<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... umm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  Well, the last major eruption in the US was Mt. St. Helens in 1980, and there haven't been <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/media\_701500557/major\_volcanic\_eruptions\_since\_1900.html" title="msn.com">any major eruptions in the last decade</a> [msn.com].</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Compare that to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_Category\_5\_Atlantic\_hurricanes#Listed\_in\_chronological\_order" title="wikipedia.org">8 Category 5 hurricanes</a> [wikipedia.org] in the Atlantic in the last decade.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Or we could look at a longer time span.  14 major volcanic eruptions world wide in the last century.  There were at least 32 Category 5 North Atlantic hurricanes and 12 Category 5 Pacific Cyclones in the last century, but there may have been more that were not detected since our technology wasn't good enough to detect them.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; The list of total hurricanes is really long.  Long enough where I couldn't find a straight list of them.  Just looking at hurricanes that hit Florida there have been 327 in the last century.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; We kind of joke about some of them though.  It's sometimes hard to tell the difference between a regular afternoon thunderstorm, tropical depression, tropical storm, or category 1 or 2 hurricane, without a proper weather forecast.  We can have storms that knock down trees that are just thunderstorms.  There was a thunderstorm not too long ago that induced tornados that destroyed several homes.  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22283350/" title="msn.com">Here's an example from 2007</a> [msn.com], where a building collapsed, and several vehicles were overturned.  <a href="http://www.baynews9.com/content/36/2006/12/25/209620.html" title="baynews9.com">Here's another example from 2006</a> [baynews9.com] of approx 100 homes damaged, 15 condemned after the storm.  Both of these are NOT tropical weather formation related.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; They broadcast warnings on all stations on the radio and TV (that pesky <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency\_Alert\_System" title="wikipedia.org">EAS</a> [wikipedia.org] thing) to let people know to seek shelter.  I used to have a neat add-on on my old work cell phone that would beep at me and show me the text and map of dangerous weather.   We were out shopping a few years ago, and as it turned out a tornado was headed directly towards us.  We got went inside a safe building, and they advised all customers to get to the back of the store, just in case.  No panic.  No "oh my god, it's the end of the world", just get back where it's safe, away from the windows.  The tornado dissipated before it reached us, but there were power lines down, and trees thrown across roads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Let me rephrase my previous response .
    Hurricanes happen a lot .
Category 5 hurricanes happen enough to make it a concern .
    Volcano 's erupt ... umm ... Well , the last major eruption in the US was Mt .
St. Helens in 1980 , and there have n't been any major eruptions in the last decade [ msn.com ] .
      Compare that to 8 Category 5 hurricanes [ wikipedia.org ] in the Atlantic in the last decade .
    Or we could look at a longer time span .
14 major volcanic eruptions world wide in the last century .
There were at least 32 Category 5 North Atlantic hurricanes and 12 Category 5 Pacific Cyclones in the last century , but there may have been more that were not detected since our technology was n't good enough to detect them .
    The list of total hurricanes is really long .
Long enough where I could n't find a straight list of them .
Just looking at hurricanes that hit Florida there have been 327 in the last century .
    We kind of joke about some of them though .
It 's sometimes hard to tell the difference between a regular afternoon thunderstorm , tropical depression , tropical storm , or category 1 or 2 hurricane , without a proper weather forecast .
We can have storms that knock down trees that are just thunderstorms .
There was a thunderstorm not too long ago that induced tornados that destroyed several homes .
Here 's an example from 2007 [ msn.com ] , where a building collapsed , and several vehicles were overturned .
Here 's another example from 2006 [ baynews9.com ] of approx 100 homes damaged , 15 condemned after the storm .
Both of these are NOT tropical weather formation related .
    They broadcast warnings on all stations on the radio and TV ( that pesky EAS [ wikipedia.org ] thing ) to let people know to seek shelter .
I used to have a neat add-on on my old work cell phone that would beep at me and show me the text and map of dangerous weather .
We were out shopping a few years ago , and as it turned out a tornado was headed directly towards us .
We got went inside a safe building , and they advised all customers to get to the back of the store , just in case .
No panic .
No " oh my god , it 's the end of the world " , just get back where it 's safe , away from the windows .
The tornado dissipated before it reached us , but there were power lines down , and trees thrown across roads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Let me rephrase my previous response.
    Hurricanes happen a lot.
Category 5 hurricanes happen enough to make it a concern.
    Volcano's erupt ... umm ...  Well, the last major eruption in the US was Mt.
St. Helens in 1980, and there haven't been any major eruptions in the last decade [msn.com].
      Compare that to 8 Category 5 hurricanes [wikipedia.org] in the Atlantic in the last decade.
    Or we could look at a longer time span.
14 major volcanic eruptions world wide in the last century.
There were at least 32 Category 5 North Atlantic hurricanes and 12 Category 5 Pacific Cyclones in the last century, but there may have been more that were not detected since our technology wasn't good enough to detect them.
    The list of total hurricanes is really long.
Long enough where I couldn't find a straight list of them.
Just looking at hurricanes that hit Florida there have been 327 in the last century.
    We kind of joke about some of them though.
It's sometimes hard to tell the difference between a regular afternoon thunderstorm, tropical depression, tropical storm, or category 1 or 2 hurricane, without a proper weather forecast.
We can have storms that knock down trees that are just thunderstorms.
There was a thunderstorm not too long ago that induced tornados that destroyed several homes.
Here's an example from 2007 [msn.com], where a building collapsed, and several vehicles were overturned.
Here's another example from 2006 [baynews9.com] of approx 100 homes damaged, 15 condemned after the storm.
Both of these are NOT tropical weather formation related.
    They broadcast warnings on all stations on the radio and TV (that pesky EAS [wikipedia.org] thing) to let people know to seek shelter.
I used to have a neat add-on on my old work cell phone that would beep at me and show me the text and map of dangerous weather.
We were out shopping a few years ago, and as it turned out a tornado was headed directly towards us.
We got went inside a safe building, and they advised all customers to get to the back of the store, just in case.
No panic.
No "oh my god, it's the end of the world", just get back where it's safe, away from the windows.
The tornado dissipated before it reached us, but there were power lines down, and trees thrown across roads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322213</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1244885460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really, it's neither.
<br> <br>
Technically, either a volcano <b>or</b> a volcano is where volcanic activity is exposed on the surface. A volcano is a source of magma. A caldera is the "crater" that often appears at the center of a volcano. Neither have a whole lot to do with a massive reservoir of magma, which is... a massive reservoir of magma.
<br> <br>
Except for the postulated mix of magma and water, there is not much new here. It has long been accepted that Mount Ranier, Mount St. Helens, and probably Mount Baker are connected underground by channels, if not a huge lake, of magma.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , it 's neither .
Technically , either a volcano or a volcano is where volcanic activity is exposed on the surface .
A volcano is a source of magma .
A caldera is the " crater " that often appears at the center of a volcano .
Neither have a whole lot to do with a massive reservoir of magma , which is... a massive reservoir of magma .
Except for the postulated mix of magma and water , there is not much new here .
It has long been accepted that Mount Ranier , Mount St. Helens , and probably Mount Baker are connected underground by channels , if not a huge lake , of magma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, it's neither.
Technically, either a volcano or a volcano is where volcanic activity is exposed on the surface.
A volcano is a source of magma.
A caldera is the "crater" that often appears at the center of a volcano.
Neither have a whole lot to do with a massive reservoir of magma, which is... a massive reservoir of magma.
Except for the postulated mix of magma and water, there is not much new here.
It has long been accepted that Mount Ranier, Mount St. Helens, and probably Mount Baker are connected underground by channels, if not a huge lake, of magma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321929</id>
	<title>Re:Volcano!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest you actually read the summary.  It doesn't say that Mount St. Helens is going erupt and destroy life as we know it, or anything like that.  It says "Hey guys, what if that large area under the ground isn't actually water like we thought and is actually semi molten rock?".  To which the answer is, "Well that might mean we need to classify it differently."  That's it.  No grand and dire warnings, suggest an idea that would further our understanding of at least a piece of the earth.</p><p>But don't let me interrupt your off topic rant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest you actually read the summary .
It does n't say that Mount St. Helens is going erupt and destroy life as we know it , or anything like that .
It says " Hey guys , what if that large area under the ground is n't actually water like we thought and is actually semi molten rock ? " .
To which the answer is , " Well that might mean we need to classify it differently .
" That 's it .
No grand and dire warnings , suggest an idea that would further our understanding of at least a piece of the earth.But do n't let me interrupt your off topic rant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest you actually read the summary.
It doesn't say that Mount St. Helens is going erupt and destroy life as we know it, or anything like that.
It says "Hey guys, what if that large area under the ground isn't actually water like we thought and is actually semi molten rock?".
To which the answer is, "Well that might mean we need to classify it differently.
"  That's it.
No grand and dire warnings, suggest an idea that would further our understanding of at least a piece of the earth.But don't let me interrupt your off topic rant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322353</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1244886960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't Megacaldera a heavy metal tribute band from the SCO group?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't Megacaldera a heavy metal tribute band from the SCO group ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't Megacaldera a heavy metal tribute band from the SCO group?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323385</id>
	<title>oh no!</title>
	<author>Eternal Annoyance</author>
	<datestamp>1244897100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This thing is going to explode tomorrow and kill millions!<br>We're all going to dieeeee!<br><br>Now, where can I best observe the carnage and mass panic?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is going to explode tomorrow and kill millions ! We 're all going to dieeeee ! Now , where can I best observe the carnage and mass panic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is going to explode tomorrow and kill millions!We're all going to dieeeee!Now, where can I best observe the carnage and mass panic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322321</id>
	<title>Re:So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdo</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1244886660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real question is whether this is just large enough to be a supervolcano, or merely a really large volcano (and the age of the scientist determining this).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question is whether this is just large enough to be a supervolcano , or merely a really large volcano ( and the age of the scientist determining this ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question is whether this is just large enough to be a supervolcano, or merely a really large volcano (and the age of the scientist determining this).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325341</id>
	<title>Re:Volcano!</title>
	<author>bazorg</author>
	<datestamp>1244972640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you should have finished somewhere around the middle of the third paragraph with [NO CARRIER]</htmltext>
<tokenext>you should have finished somewhere around the middle of the third paragraph with [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you should have finished somewhere around the middle of the third paragraph with [NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327561</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>Zancarius</author>
	<datestamp>1245004860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast. Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.</p></div></blockquote><p>It could've been a Libertarian or even some Democrat who was paid off by him. I realize it's quite popular to blame everything on Republicans these days, but c'mon! There are plenty of nutjob groups on both sides of the fence.</p><p>I'm a Republican. I never mod <i>down</i> posts--not even quite hateful ones directed to people like me. 1) It ain't worth it and 2) bigoted speech (even the kind most Slashdotters sadly agree with) should be placed on display so everyone is made well aware of the crap coming out of people from both sides of the political spectrum.</p><p>That said, Jindal <i>could</i> have been using it to make a rather comical or sarcastic statement (eruption of money from Washington was pretty funny), but there were PLENTY of other things he could have pointed to in that bill besides monitoring volcanoes as overzealous spending. In my opinion, we <i>need</i> to monitor these things. Why? Because we can save lives the better we understand volcanoes. Well, assuming people living near the darned things actually heed evacuation warnings.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Perhaps I'm a <i>little</i> left-leaning in that sense: I see spending on research as a necessity, especially when it could potentially save lives or help us understand our natural environment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , parent got modded troll pretty fast .
Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.It could 've been a Libertarian or even some Democrat who was paid off by him .
I realize it 's quite popular to blame everything on Republicans these days , but c'mon !
There are plenty of nutjob groups on both sides of the fence.I 'm a Republican .
I never mod down posts--not even quite hateful ones directed to people like me .
1 ) It ai n't worth it and 2 ) bigoted speech ( even the kind most Slashdotters sadly agree with ) should be placed on display so everyone is made well aware of the crap coming out of people from both sides of the political spectrum.That said , Jindal could have been using it to make a rather comical or sarcastic statement ( eruption of money from Washington was pretty funny ) , but there were PLENTY of other things he could have pointed to in that bill besides monitoring volcanoes as overzealous spending .
In my opinion , we need to monitor these things .
Why ? Because we can save lives the better we understand volcanoes .
Well , assuming people living near the darned things actually heed evacuation warnings .
; ) Perhaps I 'm a little left-leaning in that sense : I see spending on research as a necessity , especially when it could potentially save lives or help us understand our natural environment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast.
Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.It could've been a Libertarian or even some Democrat who was paid off by him.
I realize it's quite popular to blame everything on Republicans these days, but c'mon!
There are plenty of nutjob groups on both sides of the fence.I'm a Republican.
I never mod down posts--not even quite hateful ones directed to people like me.
1) It ain't worth it and 2) bigoted speech (even the kind most Slashdotters sadly agree with) should be placed on display so everyone is made well aware of the crap coming out of people from both sides of the political spectrum.That said, Jindal could have been using it to make a rather comical or sarcastic statement (eruption of money from Washington was pretty funny), but there were PLENTY of other things he could have pointed to in that bill besides monitoring volcanoes as overzealous spending.
In my opinion, we need to monitor these things.
Why? Because we can save lives the better we understand volcanoes.
Well, assuming people living near the darned things actually heed evacuation warnings.
;)Perhaps I'm a little left-leaning in that sense: I see spending on research as a necessity, especially when it could potentially save lives or help us understand our natural environment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323701</id>
	<title>Re:Mount Helen?</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1244900520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mount a saint?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mount a saint ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mount a saint?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323547</id>
	<title>Re:Don't panic</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1244898840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you all are what the plunger needs to unplug the toilet from. I mean the internet tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you all are what the plunger needs to unplug the toilet from .
I mean the internet tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you all are what the plunger needs to unplug the toilet from.
I mean the internet tubes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</id>
	<title>Volcano!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; There's always a volcano about to erupt, or a fault going to shatter in an earthquake, or a comet that's going to smash into the earth, or a polar ice cap that's going to melt.  It's always something.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Wake me up when Vesuvius erupts; California becomes "the Island previously known as California"; New York is under water; or an planet splitting meteor strikes.  Otherwise, it's not news, it's fear mongering.  Wolf has been cried too many times for people to be concerned any more.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I've lived in Florida for years.  Hurricanes are far more likely to blow through than a volcano destroying a vast swath of the US, yet seasoned residents (those of us who have lived through more hurricanes than we can count) just make sure we have some food and water at home, and a way to cook.  Live on high ground, and cross your fingers a tornado doesn't take your house away.  Tornadoes during hurricanes are very likely, but the square footage of land destroyed (houses, upturned cars, etc) are so small compared to the square miles of potential damage area that you may as well play the lottery and expect to win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    There 's always a volcano about to erupt , or a fault going to shatter in an earthquake , or a comet that 's going to smash into the earth , or a polar ice cap that 's going to melt .
It 's always something .
    Wake me up when Vesuvius erupts ; California becomes " the Island previously known as California " ; New York is under water ; or an planet splitting meteor strikes .
Otherwise , it 's not news , it 's fear mongering .
Wolf has been cried too many times for people to be concerned any more .
    I 've lived in Florida for years .
Hurricanes are far more likely to blow through than a volcano destroying a vast swath of the US , yet seasoned residents ( those of us who have lived through more hurricanes than we can count ) just make sure we have some food and water at home , and a way to cook .
Live on high ground , and cross your fingers a tornado does n't take your house away .
Tornadoes during hurricanes are very likely , but the square footage of land destroyed ( houses , upturned cars , etc ) are so small compared to the square miles of potential damage area that you may as well play the lottery and expect to win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    There's always a volcano about to erupt, or a fault going to shatter in an earthquake, or a comet that's going to smash into the earth, or a polar ice cap that's going to melt.
It's always something.
    Wake me up when Vesuvius erupts; California becomes "the Island previously known as California"; New York is under water; or an planet splitting meteor strikes.
Otherwise, it's not news, it's fear mongering.
Wolf has been cried too many times for people to be concerned any more.
    I've lived in Florida for years.
Hurricanes are far more likely to blow through than a volcano destroying a vast swath of the US, yet seasoned residents (those of us who have lived through more hurricanes than we can count) just make sure we have some food and water at home, and a way to cook.
Live on high ground, and cross your fingers a tornado doesn't take your house away.
Tornadoes during hurricanes are very likely, but the square footage of land destroyed (houses, upturned cars, etc) are so small compared to the square miles of potential damage area that you may as well play the lottery and expect to win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321735</id>
	<title>i just got off the toilet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244924040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i shit out an obama.<br> <br>plop!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i shit out an obama .
plop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i shit out an obama.
plop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324827</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244917380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously not written by anyone who's studied geology in the past fifty years. This "supervolcano" is a regular pull-apart basin that will be a bunch of copper mines in a few million years. The same structures can be seen, eroded and exposed, all over the world near porphyry deposits. 15km below surface is dead-on predictions for these types of structures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously not written by anyone who 's studied geology in the past fifty years .
This " supervolcano " is a regular pull-apart basin that will be a bunch of copper mines in a few million years .
The same structures can be seen , eroded and exposed , all over the world near porphyry deposits .
15km below surface is dead-on predictions for these types of structures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously not written by anyone who's studied geology in the past fifty years.
This "supervolcano" is a regular pull-apart basin that will be a bunch of copper mines in a few million years.
The same structures can be seen, eroded and exposed, all over the world near porphyry deposits.
15km below surface is dead-on predictions for these types of structures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322015</id>
	<title>Re:Just terrific</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244883660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look on the bright side.  A volcano just does what it does.  It won't try to hold a city hostage like professional sports teams do!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look on the bright side .
A volcano just does what it does .
It wo n't try to hold a city hostage like professional sports teams do !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look on the bright side.
A volcano just does what it does.
It won't try to hold a city hostage like professional sports teams do!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331929</id>
	<title>Re:Lava life?</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1245001620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zounds!  It's full of ions!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zounds !
It 's full of ions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zounds!
It's full of ions!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321719</id>
	<title>Lava life?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244923860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yay, they found more Lava.
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... umm.  Now what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay , they found more Lava .
... umm .
Now what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay, they found more Lava.
... umm.
Now what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28333523</id>
	<title>Secret Hiding Spot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245068220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's brilliant!</p><p>Nobody would ever think to look for the secret super-volcano under the well-known regular volcano.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's brilliant ! Nobody would ever think to look for the secret super-volcano under the well-known regular volcano .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's brilliant!Nobody would ever think to look for the secret super-volcano under the well-known regular volcano.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322535</id>
	<title>Re:I'm wondering, with all this magma?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244888760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure why this is off-topic.  The title struck me as odd, too.  Wouldn't Mt. St. Helens <i>be</i> the volcano?  I don't think you can have a volcano beneath a volcano.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure why this is off-topic .
The title struck me as odd , too .
Would n't Mt .
St. Helens be the volcano ?
I do n't think you can have a volcano beneath a volcano .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure why this is off-topic.
The title struck me as odd, too.
Wouldn't Mt.
St. Helens be the volcano?
I don't think you can have a volcano beneath a volcano.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322413</id>
	<title>Just as old newspaper proverb says...</title>
	<author>dvh.tosomja</author>
	<datestamp>1244887500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there is question mark in the title - answer is no!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is question mark in the title - answer is no !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is question mark in the title - answer is no!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322571</id>
	<title>but didn't congress</title>
	<author>teknosapien</author>
	<datestamp>1244889060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vote down Volcano monitoring here in the US? Stating that it was not necessary?
I wonder what this news will do to the thought that its not needed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vote down Volcano monitoring here in the US ?
Stating that it was not necessary ?
I wonder what this news will do to the thought that its not needed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vote down Volcano monitoring here in the US?
Stating that it was not necessary?
I wonder what this news will do to the thought that its not needed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322233</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1244885640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If well looks very shortsighted, there is another thing we should think around this. If a deployed volcano monitoring system confirms that it will blow in short time, what could be done? Defusing? Will the probably short time before it happens give any advantage in the preparations for it over starting after or starting now, making us more prepared in general for any mid-sized disaster? Of course, could make a difference to people living in a somewhat short range of the explosion.<br><br>In the other hand... a supervolcano could not happen in his lifetime, but another election surely will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If well looks very shortsighted , there is another thing we should think around this .
If a deployed volcano monitoring system confirms that it will blow in short time , what could be done ?
Defusing ? Will the probably short time before it happens give any advantage in the preparations for it over starting after or starting now , making us more prepared in general for any mid-sized disaster ?
Of course , could make a difference to people living in a somewhat short range of the explosion.In the other hand... a supervolcano could not happen in his lifetime , but another election surely will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If well looks very shortsighted, there is another thing we should think around this.
If a deployed volcano monitoring system confirms that it will blow in short time, what could be done?
Defusing? Will the probably short time before it happens give any advantage in the preparations for it over starting after or starting now, making us more prepared in general for any mid-sized disaster?
Of course, could make a difference to people living in a somewhat short range of the explosion.In the other hand... a supervolcano could not happen in his lifetime, but another election surely will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321985</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1244926500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology. The term megacaldera is sometimes used.."</i></p><p>It's a supervolcano if it wears it's underwear on the outside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology .
The term megacaldera is sometimes used.. " It 's a supervolcano if it wears it 's underwear on the outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology.
The term megacaldera is sometimes used.."It's a supervolcano if it wears it's underwear on the outside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324839</id>
	<title>Magma is an Urban Myth</title>
	<author>JamesonLewis3rd</author>
	<datestamp>1244917920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stylish asbestos footwear is available; though it is contraband and, therefore, hard to score sometimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stylish asbestos footwear is available ; though it is contraband and , therefore , hard to score sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stylish asbestos footwear is available; though it is contraband and, therefore, hard to score sometimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322561</id>
	<title>Mega Caldera?!?!</title>
	<author>absurdist</author>
	<datestamp>1244889000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jesus, does this mean we're going to have to go through the whole SCO fiasco again on a grander scale?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus , does this mean we 're going to have to go through the whole SCO fiasco again on a grander scale ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus, does this mean we're going to have to go through the whole SCO fiasco again on a grander scale?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322865</id>
	<title>Re:Don't panic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244891700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That isn't a moon. It's a space station.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is n't a moon .
It 's a space station .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That isn't a moon.
It's a space station.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325905</id>
	<title>I don't think this is a supercaldera.</title>
	<author>MtViewGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1244986320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given what we know about the geology of the area around Mt. Saint Helens, it's definitely not a candidate for a <i>supercaldera</i>. Otherwise, you would see something akin to the Long Valley Caldera in eastern California with its gigantic lava flows measuring many kilometers in every direction--something you see at the Toba and Yellowstone <i>supercaldera</i> sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given what we know about the geology of the area around Mt .
Saint Helens , it 's definitely not a candidate for a supercaldera .
Otherwise , you would see something akin to the Long Valley Caldera in eastern California with its gigantic lava flows measuring many kilometers in every direction--something you see at the Toba and Yellowstone supercaldera sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given what we know about the geology of the area around Mt.
Saint Helens, it's definitely not a candidate for a supercaldera.
Otherwise, you would see something akin to the Long Valley Caldera in eastern California with its gigantic lava flows measuring many kilometers in every direction--something you see at the Toba and Yellowstone supercaldera sites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819</id>
	<title>Don't panic</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1244924760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It connects to Yellowstone, and will soon be a second moon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It connects to Yellowstone , and will soon be a second moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It connects to Yellowstone, and will soon be a second moon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321859</id>
	<title>Evil Americans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"These enormous eruptions can spew enough sunlight-blocking ash into the atmosphere to cool the climate by several degrees Celsius."<br>
&nbsp; .<br>This is yet another Yankee trick to deny global warming. Go home, and turn off your volcano.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" These enormous eruptions can spew enough sunlight-blocking ash into the atmosphere to cool the climate by several degrees Celsius .
"   .This is yet another Yankee trick to deny global warming .
Go home , and turn off your volcano .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"These enormous eruptions can spew enough sunlight-blocking ash into the atmosphere to cool the climate by several degrees Celsius.
"
  .This is yet another Yankee trick to deny global warming.
Go home, and turn off your volcano.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1244925420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast.  Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.</p><p>It is a fact that Jindal, governor of a state (Louisiana) which has suffered mightily from natural disasters (hurricanes) in the recent past and will inevitably do so in the future, criticized Federal spending on a program designed to predict and prepare for natural disasters (volcanoes) which could easily be as devastating if not more so.  It is also a fact that Jindal made this a partisan issue.  Pointing this out does not constitute a troll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , parent got modded troll pretty fast .
Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.It is a fact that Jindal , governor of a state ( Louisiana ) which has suffered mightily from natural disasters ( hurricanes ) in the recent past and will inevitably do so in the future , criticized Federal spending on a program designed to predict and prepare for natural disasters ( volcanoes ) which could easily be as devastating if not more so .
It is also a fact that Jindal made this a partisan issue .
Pointing this out does not constitute a troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast.
Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.It is a fact that Jindal, governor of a state (Louisiana) which has suffered mightily from natural disasters (hurricanes) in the recent past and will inevitably do so in the future, criticized Federal spending on a program designed to predict and prepare for natural disasters (volcanoes) which could easily be as devastating if not more so.
It is also a fact that Jindal made this a partisan issue.
Pointing this out does not constitute a troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322593</id>
	<title>HOUSE FOR SALE</title>
	<author>kibrenner</author>
	<datestamp>1244889300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scenic Blue zone location...  peek a boo view of the mountain... today...
OK so I live between St Helens and Rainier... (the mountains, not the towns)   I guess if the megacaldera DOES go..  I won't have to worry about the value of my home.....

Back to mowing....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scenic Blue zone location... peek a boo view of the mountain... today.. . OK so I live between St Helens and Rainier... ( the mountains , not the towns ) I guess if the megacaldera DOES go.. I wo n't have to worry about the value of my home.... . Back to mowing... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scenic Blue zone location...  peek a boo view of the mountain... today...
OK so I live between St Helens and Rainier... (the mountains, not the towns)   I guess if the megacaldera DOES go..  I won't have to worry about the value of my home.....

Back to mowing....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009</id>
	<title>So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdot:</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244883600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the supernova don't get us the supervolcano will!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the supernova do n't get us the supervolcano will !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the supernova don't get us the supervolcano will!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321885</id>
	<title>Wake me</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1244925240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me when Rainer and Adams all start smoking at the same time.</p><p>Otherwise, in people as well as volcanoes, an occasional good healthy belch relieves a lot of pressure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me when Rainer and Adams all start smoking at the same time.Otherwise , in people as well as volcanoes , an occasional good healthy belch relieves a lot of pressure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me when Rainer and Adams all start smoking at the same time.Otherwise, in people as well as volcanoes, an occasional good healthy belch relieves a lot of pressure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322391</id>
	<title>Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano"</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1244887260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my opinion, all volcanoes are all "super." Monsters like Mt. Etna and Vesuvius would be typical in size. Super would be what? The size of Cuba, Iceland, Tasmania - that would be super. How about exovolcanoes (or is it exoplanetary volcanoes)? Do you use the same scale?</p><p>I suppose that since the Mt. St-Helens is in the USA, it must be a super something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my opinion , all volcanoes are all " super .
" Monsters like Mt .
Etna and Vesuvius would be typical in size .
Super would be what ?
The size of Cuba , Iceland , Tasmania - that would be super .
How about exovolcanoes ( or is it exoplanetary volcanoes ) ?
Do you use the same scale ? I suppose that since the Mt .
St-Helens is in the USA , it must be a super something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my opinion, all volcanoes are all "super.
" Monsters like Mt.
Etna and Vesuvius would be typical in size.
Super would be what?
The size of Cuba, Iceland, Tasmania - that would be super.
How about exovolcanoes (or is it exoplanetary volcanoes)?
Do you use the same scale?I suppose that since the Mt.
St-Helens is in the USA, it must be a super something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327261</id>
	<title>Re:Volcano!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245002160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NxfmWCg4Gc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">When the mountain becomes a fountain!</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the mountain becomes a fountain !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the mountain becomes a fountain!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331949</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1245001860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unlike many government programs, volcano monitoring can be easily justified with solid numbers and statistics.</p><p>I worked with a few folks in a volcano-monitoring <a href="http://avo.alaska.edu/" title="alaska.edu">program</a> [alaska.edu] a few years ago.</p><p>Much of the justification for their existence comes from an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLM\_Flight\_867" title="wikipedia.org">incident</a> [wikipedia.org]that took place in 1989, in which a 747 flew into a cloud of volcanic ash, causing all 4 engines to fail.</p><p>A similar incident took place in 1982 with a British Airways 747.  In both cases, the pilots at the controls had experience flying unpowered aircraft, and were able to perform a set of maneuvers to unclog and restart the engines, and land the planes safely.  Both planes were severely damaged, and the KLM jet was nearly written off, requiring over $80 million worth of repairs.  The landings had to be performed on instruments alone, as the ash sandblasted the windscreens, rendering them unusable.</p><p>Much like the infamous US Airways water landing that took place last year, it was a statistical anomaly that either of these planes landed safely.  The odds of safely recovering from a complete loss of power are staggeringly low.  (The presence of an unusually-experienced pilot with glider training can also be considered somewhat of an anomaly.)</p><p>Volcano monitoring can be tricky business, given that ash clouds look almost exactly like "normal" clouds on radar.  (Popular legend states that the pilots didn't know anything was wrong until the engines abruptly stopped).</p><p>A 747-8 costs about $300 million in 2007 dollars, and can carry 467 passengers.  An Airbus A-380 costs a bit more, and can hold up to 853 people in an all-economy configuration.</p><p>If one of these large planes were to crash in this manner, the monetary expenses due to the loss of the airframe, the recovery effort, and the inevitable insurance settlement could easily exceed several billion dollars.</p><p>If we prevent <i>one</i> such crash every 15 years, the program pays for itself.  Additionally, much of the money spent is used to fund basic science research, and can be statistically demonstrated to have saved lives.</p><p>Since 1989, we have improved our ability to detect eruptions, and the major volcano observatories now have a direct line to the FAA, and the appropriate emergency management agencies to divert air traffic, and mobilize first responders within minutes of detection.</p><p><b>The governor of Louisiana</b> should know better than to protest funding of an emergency preparedness measure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlike many government programs , volcano monitoring can be easily justified with solid numbers and statistics.I worked with a few folks in a volcano-monitoring program [ alaska.edu ] a few years ago.Much of the justification for their existence comes from an incident [ wikipedia.org ] that took place in 1989 , in which a 747 flew into a cloud of volcanic ash , causing all 4 engines to fail.A similar incident took place in 1982 with a British Airways 747 .
In both cases , the pilots at the controls had experience flying unpowered aircraft , and were able to perform a set of maneuvers to unclog and restart the engines , and land the planes safely .
Both planes were severely damaged , and the KLM jet was nearly written off , requiring over $ 80 million worth of repairs .
The landings had to be performed on instruments alone , as the ash sandblasted the windscreens , rendering them unusable.Much like the infamous US Airways water landing that took place last year , it was a statistical anomaly that either of these planes landed safely .
The odds of safely recovering from a complete loss of power are staggeringly low .
( The presence of an unusually-experienced pilot with glider training can also be considered somewhat of an anomaly .
) Volcano monitoring can be tricky business , given that ash clouds look almost exactly like " normal " clouds on radar .
( Popular legend states that the pilots did n't know anything was wrong until the engines abruptly stopped ) .A 747-8 costs about $ 300 million in 2007 dollars , and can carry 467 passengers .
An Airbus A-380 costs a bit more , and can hold up to 853 people in an all-economy configuration.If one of these large planes were to crash in this manner , the monetary expenses due to the loss of the airframe , the recovery effort , and the inevitable insurance settlement could easily exceed several billion dollars.If we prevent one such crash every 15 years , the program pays for itself .
Additionally , much of the money spent is used to fund basic science research , and can be statistically demonstrated to have saved lives.Since 1989 , we have improved our ability to detect eruptions , and the major volcano observatories now have a direct line to the FAA , and the appropriate emergency management agencies to divert air traffic , and mobilize first responders within minutes of detection.The governor of Louisiana should know better than to protest funding of an emergency preparedness measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlike many government programs, volcano monitoring can be easily justified with solid numbers and statistics.I worked with a few folks in a volcano-monitoring program [alaska.edu] a few years ago.Much of the justification for their existence comes from an incident [wikipedia.org]that took place in 1989, in which a 747 flew into a cloud of volcanic ash, causing all 4 engines to fail.A similar incident took place in 1982 with a British Airways 747.
In both cases, the pilots at the controls had experience flying unpowered aircraft, and were able to perform a set of maneuvers to unclog and restart the engines, and land the planes safely.
Both planes were severely damaged, and the KLM jet was nearly written off, requiring over $80 million worth of repairs.
The landings had to be performed on instruments alone, as the ash sandblasted the windscreens, rendering them unusable.Much like the infamous US Airways water landing that took place last year, it was a statistical anomaly that either of these planes landed safely.
The odds of safely recovering from a complete loss of power are staggeringly low.
(The presence of an unusually-experienced pilot with glider training can also be considered somewhat of an anomaly.
)Volcano monitoring can be tricky business, given that ash clouds look almost exactly like "normal" clouds on radar.
(Popular legend states that the pilots didn't know anything was wrong until the engines abruptly stopped).A 747-8 costs about $300 million in 2007 dollars, and can carry 467 passengers.
An Airbus A-380 costs a bit more, and can hold up to 853 people in an all-economy configuration.If one of these large planes were to crash in this manner, the monetary expenses due to the loss of the airframe, the recovery effort, and the inevitable insurance settlement could easily exceed several billion dollars.If we prevent one such crash every 15 years, the program pays for itself.
Additionally, much of the money spent is used to fund basic science research, and can be statistically demonstrated to have saved lives.Since 1989, we have improved our ability to detect eruptions, and the major volcano observatories now have a direct line to the FAA, and the appropriate emergency management agencies to divert air traffic, and mobilize first responders within minutes of detection.The governor of Louisiana should know better than to protest funding of an emergency preparedness measure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324575</id>
	<title>Re:So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdo</title>
	<author>rivaldufus</author>
	<datestamp>1244913540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fortunately, there's no real hierarchy for the front page. So, an imminent natural disaster is no more important than the latest gossip about the RIAA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , there 's no real hierarchy for the front page .
So , an imminent natural disaster is no more important than the latest gossip about the RIAA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, there's no real hierarchy for the front page.
So, an imminent natural disaster is no more important than the latest gossip about the RIAA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28328177</id>
	<title>Re:Mount Helen?</title>
	<author>shwa</author>
	<datestamp>1245009960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i don't know anyone desperate enough to tap that ash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i do n't know anyone desperate enough to tap that ash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i don't know anyone desperate enough to tap that ash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322467</id>
	<title>Don't worry</title>
	<author>Leuf</author>
	<datestamp>1244888160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once the magnetosphere starts to reverse it will wipe out all communications and you won't have to hear any more about potential disasters.  However you'll be mutating into a jellyfish from the cosmic rays, so it's a bit of a toss up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once the magnetosphere starts to reverse it will wipe out all communications and you wo n't have to hear any more about potential disasters .
However you 'll be mutating into a jellyfish from the cosmic rays , so it 's a bit of a toss up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once the magnetosphere starts to reverse it will wipe out all communications and you won't have to hear any more about potential disasters.
However you'll be mutating into a jellyfish from the cosmic rays, so it's a bit of a toss up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177</id>
	<title>Re:He Was Exactly Right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244885100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Stimulus?  bwahaha.  Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months.  This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening.  Maybe if that money was spent on repairing roads and bridges (never forget minnesota!).
</p><p>
So far, the stimulus money has only had one effect: raising interest rates.  46\% (or more) of government spending is borrowed money.  People with money to lend are getting vocal about the US being a credit risk (Hillary Clinton and Tim Geithner both made trips to China to beg them to keep loaning money).  This has resulted in a spike in interest rates which makes it more expensive to refinance mortgages (the one bright spot in our economy) or buy a house.
</p><p>
I'm in the process of buying a house right now and that translates to $10,000 being thrown around my community, mostly to small businesses.  Plus I'll be spending another few thousand on furniture and appliances (which will be made in the US if at all possible).
</p><p>
The economy will recover when housing prices deflate to their true value, consumers start buying houses again, and zombie companies (Citibank, BoA, Chrysler, GM) are allowed to fail.
</p><p>
The stimulus should have consisted of an $8000 tax credit for house purchases (to everyone, not just new home owners), ban credit default swaps, ban interest only mortgages, ban option-arm mortgages, and have fannie mae/freddy mac (if not all banks) require 10\% downpayment on all mortgages.  Get rid of the speculation, get rid of the gambling, get rid of the liar loans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stimulus ?
bwahaha. Earlier this week , Caterpillar ( bulldozers and stuff ) announced 66 more employees would be laid off , on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months .
This is noteworthy because they ( and Barack Obama ) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening .
Maybe if that money was spent on repairing roads and bridges ( never forget minnesota ! ) .
So far , the stimulus money has only had one effect : raising interest rates .
46 \ % ( or more ) of government spending is borrowed money .
People with money to lend are getting vocal about the US being a credit risk ( Hillary Clinton and Tim Geithner both made trips to China to beg them to keep loaning money ) .
This has resulted in a spike in interest rates which makes it more expensive to refinance mortgages ( the one bright spot in our economy ) or buy a house .
I 'm in the process of buying a house right now and that translates to $ 10,000 being thrown around my community , mostly to small businesses .
Plus I 'll be spending another few thousand on furniture and appliances ( which will be made in the US if at all possible ) .
The economy will recover when housing prices deflate to their true value , consumers start buying houses again , and zombie companies ( Citibank , BoA , Chrysler , GM ) are allowed to fail .
The stimulus should have consisted of an $ 8000 tax credit for house purchases ( to everyone , not just new home owners ) , ban credit default swaps , ban interest only mortgages , ban option-arm mortgages , and have fannie mae/freddy mac ( if not all banks ) require 10 \ % downpayment on all mortgages .
Get rid of the speculation , get rid of the gambling , get rid of the liar loans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Stimulus?
bwahaha.  Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months.
This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening.
Maybe if that money was spent on repairing roads and bridges (never forget minnesota!).
So far, the stimulus money has only had one effect: raising interest rates.
46\% (or more) of government spending is borrowed money.
People with money to lend are getting vocal about the US being a credit risk (Hillary Clinton and Tim Geithner both made trips to China to beg them to keep loaning money).
This has resulted in a spike in interest rates which makes it more expensive to refinance mortgages (the one bright spot in our economy) or buy a house.
I'm in the process of buying a house right now and that translates to $10,000 being thrown around my community, mostly to small businesses.
Plus I'll be spending another few thousand on furniture and appliances (which will be made in the US if at all possible).
The economy will recover when housing prices deflate to their true value, consumers start buying houses again, and zombie companies (Citibank, BoA, Chrysler, GM) are allowed to fail.
The stimulus should have consisted of an $8000 tax credit for house purchases (to everyone, not just new home owners), ban credit default swaps, ban interest only mortgages, ban option-arm mortgages, and have fannie mae/freddy mac (if not all banks) require 10\% downpayment on all mortgages.
Get rid of the speculation, get rid of the gambling, get rid of the liar loans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324429</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244911560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm confused, aren't all volcanoes on the entire Earth connected to each other if you go down far enough?</p><p>This just sounds like improved sensing technology is allowing us to more specifically identify the size and shape of the magma chambers underneath volcanoes with greater depth and accuracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused , are n't all volcanoes on the entire Earth connected to each other if you go down far enough ? This just sounds like improved sensing technology is allowing us to more specifically identify the size and shape of the magma chambers underneath volcanoes with greater depth and accuracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused, aren't all volcanoes on the entire Earth connected to each other if you go down far enough?This just sounds like improved sensing technology is allowing us to more specifically identify the size and shape of the magma chambers underneath volcanoes with greater depth and accuracy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322091</id>
	<title>Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1244884320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, he's right to some extent.  Funding for ongoing projects (like volcano monitoring) should be in the normal budget - the stimulus bill was supposed to be for one-time expenses and to kick start the economy, not for pork or to circumvent the normal budget process.  I can't help but wonder how much 'seed' money for ongoing projects/pork is hidden in the stimulus money.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Disclaimer:  Puget Sound area resident, and one aware of the difference between volcano monitoring and basic research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , he 's right to some extent .
Funding for ongoing projects ( like volcano monitoring ) should be in the normal budget - the stimulus bill was supposed to be for one-time expenses and to kick start the economy , not for pork or to circumvent the normal budget process .
I ca n't help but wonder how much 'seed ' money for ongoing projects/pork is hidden in the stimulus money .
  Disclaimer : Puget Sound area resident , and one aware of the difference between volcano monitoring and basic research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, he's right to some extent.
Funding for ongoing projects (like volcano monitoring) should be in the normal budget - the stimulus bill was supposed to be for one-time expenses and to kick start the economy, not for pork or to circumvent the normal budget process.
I can't help but wonder how much 'seed' money for ongoing projects/pork is hidden in the stimulus money.
  Disclaimer:  Puget Sound area resident, and one aware of the difference between volcano monitoring and basic research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28328177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_175245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325905
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322019
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321985
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28328177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322295
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322177
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331909
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323553
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327137
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321903
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28327561
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322233
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28331929
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322575
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322721
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28323547
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28324575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322321
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_175245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28321823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28322535
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_175245.28325981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
