<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_13_1610203</id>
	<title>Blimps Monitor Crowds At Sporting Events</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244915940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.anus.com/metal" rel="nofollow">Death Metal</a> tips news about how defense contractor Raytheon is <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/201697">adapting military-style surveillance packages</a> for use aboard blimps at public events like the Indy 500. "Until recently, Raytheon's eye-in-the-sky technology was used in Afghanistan and Iraq to guard American military bases, working as airborne guards against any oncoming desert threat. Using infrared sensors and a map overlay not unlike Google Earth, the technology scans a large area, setting important landmarks (say, the perimeter of a military base), and constantly relays video clips back to a command center. If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated, the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera &mdash; all from a mighty-high 500 feet." Though the technology is expensive, Raytheon is shopping it around to police departments and other organizations that might want to keep an eye on large gatherings of people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Death Metal tips news about how defense contractor Raytheon is adapting military-style surveillance packages for use aboard blimps at public events like the Indy 500 .
" Until recently , Raytheon 's eye-in-the-sky technology was used in Afghanistan and Iraq to guard American military bases , working as airborne guards against any oncoming desert threat .
Using infrared sensors and a map overlay not unlike Google Earth , the technology scans a large area , setting important landmarks ( say , the perimeter of a military base ) , and constantly relays video clips back to a command center .
If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated , the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera    all from a mighty-high 500 feet .
" Though the technology is expensive , Raytheon is shopping it around to police departments and other organizations that might want to keep an eye on large gatherings of people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Death Metal tips news about how defense contractor Raytheon is adapting military-style surveillance packages for use aboard blimps at public events like the Indy 500.
"Until recently, Raytheon's eye-in-the-sky technology was used in Afghanistan and Iraq to guard American military bases, working as airborne guards against any oncoming desert threat.
Using infrared sensors and a map overlay not unlike Google Earth, the technology scans a large area, setting important landmarks (say, the perimeter of a military base), and constantly relays video clips back to a command center.
If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated, the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera — all from a mighty-high 500 feet.
" Though the technology is expensive, Raytheon is shopping it around to police departments and other organizations that might want to keep an eye on large gatherings of people.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322065</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>GreatBunzinni</author>
	<datestamp>1244884080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The issue goes far beyond the matter of reasonable expectation of privacy.  Raytheon's newest totalitarian toy serves to gather information, information that can be stored, analysed and cross-referenced with other sources. That means that when someone employs Raytheon's new toy, along with other similar systems, that someone is now able to register everything you do in public. That means where you go, who you go with, how much time you spent in a place, who you talked to... That someone is putting himself in a position where he knows everything there is to know about you. To put it in other words, that person is placing himself in a position of power over you. And why exactly should someone have that power over yourself?<br><br>Let's just put it this way. If those blimps were deployed in the 70s throughout the former soviet union then nowadays we would be talking about those blimps as an example of evil totalitarian practices that were simply unacceptable in the free world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue goes far beyond the matter of reasonable expectation of privacy .
Raytheon 's newest totalitarian toy serves to gather information , information that can be stored , analysed and cross-referenced with other sources .
That means that when someone employs Raytheon 's new toy , along with other similar systems , that someone is now able to register everything you do in public .
That means where you go , who you go with , how much time you spent in a place , who you talked to... That someone is putting himself in a position where he knows everything there is to know about you .
To put it in other words , that person is placing himself in a position of power over you .
And why exactly should someone have that power over yourself ? Let 's just put it this way .
If those blimps were deployed in the 70s throughout the former soviet union then nowadays we would be talking about those blimps as an example of evil totalitarian practices that were simply unacceptable in the free world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue goes far beyond the matter of reasonable expectation of privacy.
Raytheon's newest totalitarian toy serves to gather information, information that can be stored, analysed and cross-referenced with other sources.
That means that when someone employs Raytheon's new toy, along with other similar systems, that someone is now able to register everything you do in public.
That means where you go, who you go with, how much time you spent in a place, who you talked to... That someone is putting himself in a position where he knows everything there is to know about you.
To put it in other words, that person is placing himself in a position of power over you.
And why exactly should someone have that power over yourself?Let's just put it this way.
If those blimps were deployed in the 70s throughout the former soviet union then nowadays we would be talking about those blimps as an example of evil totalitarian practices that were simply unacceptable in the free world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322041</id>
	<title>Re:FP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244883900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There most certainly will be attacks, as there are just too many asshats for there not to be.</p><p>The first line of defense is the same as anything else: someone calls the authorities when they see one shaping up.  Then an investigation can do a "sting" and take them down, as was recently the case in New York.</p><p>The second line of defense is to stop attacks in progress if at all possible.  That means armed responders and/or civillians nearby.</p><p>Cameras may be slightly helpful, but most likely the response will still be too slow and uncoordinated to be effectual, especially in a crowd.</p><p>The last line of defense is actually the most important: realize that we can occasionally be hit, and show some resilience.  Do tell the story on the news, but don't go wall-to-wall with it for days or weeks.  Have some nuts and keep living as normally as possible.</p><p>Terrorism is a form of psychological warfare from an individual or enemy who is too weak to directly attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There most certainly will be attacks , as there are just too many asshats for there not to be.The first line of defense is the same as anything else : someone calls the authorities when they see one shaping up .
Then an investigation can do a " sting " and take them down , as was recently the case in New York.The second line of defense is to stop attacks in progress if at all possible .
That means armed responders and/or civillians nearby.Cameras may be slightly helpful , but most likely the response will still be too slow and uncoordinated to be effectual , especially in a crowd.The last line of defense is actually the most important : realize that we can occasionally be hit , and show some resilience .
Do tell the story on the news , but do n't go wall-to-wall with it for days or weeks .
Have some nuts and keep living as normally as possible.Terrorism is a form of psychological warfare from an individual or enemy who is too weak to directly attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There most certainly will be attacks, as there are just too many asshats for there not to be.The first line of defense is the same as anything else: someone calls the authorities when they see one shaping up.
Then an investigation can do a "sting" and take them down, as was recently the case in New York.The second line of defense is to stop attacks in progress if at all possible.
That means armed responders and/or civillians nearby.Cameras may be slightly helpful, but most likely the response will still be too slow and uncoordinated to be effectual, especially in a crowd.The last line of defense is actually the most important: realize that we can occasionally be hit, and show some resilience.
Do tell the story on the news, but don't go wall-to-wall with it for days or weeks.
Have some nuts and keep living as normally as possible.Terrorism is a form of psychological warfare from an individual or enemy who is too weak to directly attack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</id>
	<title>I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.</p><p>The problem is in the abuse of this, like the footage that came out of the police using their night surveillance equipment to spy on individuals having an evening with a lady in their penthouse.</p><p>So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged, what's wrong with being watched while you're in public?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as I do n't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.The problem is in the abuse of this , like the footage that came out of the police using their night surveillance equipment to spy on individuals having an evening with a lady in their penthouse.So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged , what 's wrong with being watched while you 're in public ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.The problem is in the abuse of this, like the footage that came out of the police using their night surveillance equipment to spy on individuals having an evening with a lady in their penthouse.So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged, what's wrong with being watched while you're in public?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321629</id>
	<title>Re:not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1244923140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is, what do they do with it the other 300 plus days that this is not used for an outside sporting event ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. Of course they use it.. perhaps under the pretext of "training",. but it would be used, and abused you can count on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is , what do they do with it the other 300 plus days that this is not used for an outside sporting event ?
.. Of course they use it.. perhaps under the pretext of " training " , .
but it would be used , and abused you can count on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is, what do they do with it the other 300 plus days that this is not used for an outside sporting event ?
.. Of course they use it.. perhaps under the pretext of "training",.
but it would be used, and abused you can count on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322747</id>
	<title>However,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244890380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not looking for you stealing nachos from the concession stand, it's looking for explosions, loud disturbances, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not looking for you stealing nachos from the concession stand , it 's looking for explosions , loud disturbances , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not looking for you stealing nachos from the concession stand, it's looking for explosions, loud disturbances, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324393</id>
	<title>Re:not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>Sabriel</author>
	<datestamp>1244910840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc</p></div><p>The problem isn't the sporting event, it's the "etc." These things are expensive.  They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever.  They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with.  Whether it's a good idea or not.  Think 'mission creep'.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle, with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd, they're not going to be able to identify individuals.</p></div></div><p>Yet. Optics is an advancing field. Combine "yet" with "mission creep"... get the picture?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events , etcThe problem is n't the sporting event , it 's the " etc .
" These things are expensive .
They 're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever .
They 'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with .
Whether it 's a good idea or not .
Think 'mission creep'.Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle , with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd , they 're not going to be able to identify individuals.Yet .
Optics is an advancing field .
Combine " yet " with " mission creep " ... get the picture ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etcThe problem isn't the sporting event, it's the "etc.
" These things are expensive.
They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever.
They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with.
Whether it's a good idea or not.
Think 'mission creep'.Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle, with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd, they're not going to be able to identify individuals.Yet.
Optics is an advancing field.
Combine "yet" with "mission creep"... get the picture?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321283</id>
	<title>This is great!</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1244919960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the fact that we've had so many problems with stadium slaughterings and bombings.</p><p>oh wait... i ate too much scramby eggs w/ sarcasm on the side.</p><p>Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the fact that we 've had so many problems with stadium slaughterings and bombings.oh wait... i ate too much scramby eggs w/ sarcasm on the side.Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the fact that we've had so many problems with stadium slaughterings and bombings.oh wait... i ate too much scramby eggs w/ sarcasm on the side.Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324259</id>
	<title>Re:"Great Squad Leader in the Sky" syndrome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244908680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main difference is that the people on the ground can get killed while those in the command center most likely not. The armchair experts want to "be part of if" so they can justify themselves.</p><p>So you'll have the grunts wanting comms/guns/ammo/tactics/robots that actually work, where the command center folk will want to have remote control of the grunts legs and trigger fingers as well as live graphics, sounds and hot coffee and big screens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main difference is that the people on the ground can get killed while those in the command center most likely not .
The armchair experts want to " be part of if " so they can justify themselves.So you 'll have the grunts wanting comms/guns/ammo/tactics/robots that actually work , where the command center folk will want to have remote control of the grunts legs and trigger fingers as well as live graphics , sounds and hot coffee and big screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main difference is that the people on the ground can get killed while those in the command center most likely not.
The armchair experts want to "be part of if" so they can justify themselves.So you'll have the grunts wanting comms/guns/ammo/tactics/robots that actually work, where the command center folk will want to have remote control of the grunts legs and trigger fingers as well as live graphics, sounds and hot coffee and big screens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321557</id>
	<title>Re:This is great!</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1244922420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems.</p></div><p>Something must be done to combat terrorism.<br>
This is something.<br>
Therefore, we must do this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems.Something must be done to combat terrorism .
This is something .
Therefore , we must do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol @ excessive response to lesser problems.Something must be done to combat terrorism.
This is something.
Therefore, we must do this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28331985</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1245002340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As TFA stated, the technology is absurdly expensive.</p><p>None of our lives are remotely interesting enough for the police to bother dedicating that many resources toward spying on our daily activities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As TFA stated , the technology is absurdly expensive.None of our lives are remotely interesting enough for the police to bother dedicating that many resources toward spying on our daily activities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As TFA stated, the technology is absurdly expensive.None of our lives are remotely interesting enough for the police to bother dedicating that many resources toward spying on our daily activities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321325</id>
	<title>People being monitored!?</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1244920380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Using traditional slashdot logic, I have arrived at the conclusion that this must be bad... somehow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using traditional slashdot logic , I have arrived at the conclusion that this must be bad... somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using traditional slashdot logic, I have arrived at the conclusion that this must be bad... somehow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321489</id>
	<title>[thread usurped for breaking news]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244921760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary forgot to mention a shocking revalation from the article, where Lee Silvestre, vice president of mission innovation talked about their choice of operating system:</p><blockquote><div><p>Linux just isn't ready for the blimp yet. It may be ready for the web servers nerds use to distribute TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average blimp operator isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface with map overlay and infrared sensors to check their terrorist threats with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere. The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing our blimp software.</p></div></blockquote><p>Now we know who's been trolling Slashdot!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary forgot to mention a shocking revalation from the article , where Lee Silvestre , vice president of mission innovation talked about their choice of operating system : Linux just is n't ready for the blimp yet .
It may be ready for the web servers nerds use to distribute TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web , but the average blimp operator is n't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface with map overlay and infrared sensors to check their terrorist threats with , especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation , as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother 's basement somewhere .
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf ( haha ) providing our blimp software.Now we know who 's been trolling Slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary forgot to mention a shocking revalation from the article, where Lee Silvestre, vice president of mission innovation talked about their choice of operating system:Linux just isn't ready for the blimp yet.
It may be ready for the web servers nerds use to distribute TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average blimp operator isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface with map overlay and infrared sensors to check their terrorist threats with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere.
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing our blimp software.Now we know who's been trolling Slashdot!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323537</id>
	<title>Do Away With it All</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244898660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say get rid of all security at all public events.  After all, they rarely do anything other than take some drugs or a bottle of booze away from paying customers.  They're not needed just like blimp security cameras.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say get rid of all security at all public events .
After all , they rarely do anything other than take some drugs or a bottle of booze away from paying customers .
They 're not needed just like blimp security cameras .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say get rid of all security at all public events.
After all, they rarely do anything other than take some drugs or a bottle of booze away from paying customers.
They're not needed just like blimp security cameras.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324345</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244910240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged, what's wrong with being watched while you're in public?</i></p><p>Who's watching the watchers?</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged , what 's wrong with being watched while you 're in public ? Who 's watching the watchers ?
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged, what's wrong with being watched while you're in public?Who's watching the watchers?
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322291</id>
	<title>Luckily...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244886300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... it's illegal in the US to fly an airship less than 1000 feet above a gathering of people, or less than 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2000 lateral feet of the airship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... it 's illegal in the US to fly an airship less than 1000 feet above a gathering of people , or less than 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2000 lateral feet of the airship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it's illegal in the US to fly an airship less than 1000 feet above a gathering of people, or less than 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2000 lateral feet of the airship.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321965</id>
	<title>Re:Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1244926320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Isn't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they're being watched?</i> </p><p>Actually, it can be quite productive to rattle the chains now and then. People make mistakes when they are spooked.</p><p><i>As long as we don't feel like we're being watched, everything's all right then.</i> </p><p>There are times and places when no one really objects much to being watched - but will object to an show of force. </p><p>The blimp floating lazily overhead just isn't that intimidating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they 're being watched ?
Actually , it can be quite productive to rattle the chains now and then .
People make mistakes when they are spooked.As long as we do n't feel like we 're being watched , everything 's all right then .
There are times and places when no one really objects much to being watched - but will object to an show of force .
The blimp floating lazily overhead just is n't that intimidating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they're being watched?
Actually, it can be quite productive to rattle the chains now and then.
People make mistakes when they are spooked.As long as we don't feel like we're being watched, everything's all right then.
There are times and places when no one really objects much to being watched - but will object to an show of force.
The blimp floating lazily overhead just isn't that intimidating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321941</id>
	<title>Locked On Blimp: +1, Helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6y46B6G\_3c" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">waiting for interception command</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Yours In Avionics,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>waiting for interception command [ youtube.com ] .Yours In Avionics,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>waiting for interception command [youtube.com].Yours In Avionics,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322711</id>
	<title>Cool new section!</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1244890080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must have missed the announcement... when did Slashdot add the new Your Rights Outside section?</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must have missed the announcement... when did Slashdot add the new Your Rights Outside section ? -</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must have missed the announcement... when did Slashdot add the new Your Rights Outside section?-</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323179</id>
	<title>Wait what?</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1244895000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How come this didn't get sold to North Korea?  I can already see the implementations there.  Gatherings of one or more persons on a street corner are illegal.  Actually maybe this thing needs a !NK and !2people tag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How come this did n't get sold to North Korea ?
I can already see the implementations there .
Gatherings of one or more persons on a street corner are illegal .
Actually maybe this thing needs a ! NK and ! 2people tag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How come this didn't get sold to North Korea?
I can already see the implementations there.
Gatherings of one or more persons on a street corner are illegal.
Actually maybe this thing needs a !NK and !2people tag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321721</id>
	<title>Re:Good old Raytheon</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244923860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are several open UAV platforms out there now, including planes, helicopters, and quadrocopters. Any sizable and stable remote controlled aircraft is a candidate, but the quadrocopters are probably your best bet for video surveillance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are several open UAV platforms out there now , including planes , helicopters , and quadrocopters .
Any sizable and stable remote controlled aircraft is a candidate , but the quadrocopters are probably your best bet for video surveillance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are several open UAV platforms out there now, including planes, helicopters, and quadrocopters.
Any sizable and stable remote controlled aircraft is a candidate, but the quadrocopters are probably your best bet for video surveillance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322537</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1244888820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with surveillance is, it WILL be abused.  Just think of the political uses.  You happen to be mayor, governor, or senator, incumbent in a pretty close race.  Oh, wait, sweet.  We can just put a surveillance team on the challenger, and wait for SOMETHING to happen.  If the candidate doesn't do something illegal, immoral, or unethical, one of his aides or advisors will.  Sweet.  Just think of the possibilities!!</p><p>I could give you hundreds of other potential abuses without trying very hard.  Just use your imagination - if you can't come up with a lot of scary scenarios for yourself, you are challenged in some way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with surveillance is , it WILL be abused .
Just think of the political uses .
You happen to be mayor , governor , or senator , incumbent in a pretty close race .
Oh , wait , sweet .
We can just put a surveillance team on the challenger , and wait for SOMETHING to happen .
If the candidate does n't do something illegal , immoral , or unethical , one of his aides or advisors will .
Sweet. Just think of the possibilities !
! I could give you hundreds of other potential abuses without trying very hard .
Just use your imagination - if you ca n't come up with a lot of scary scenarios for yourself , you are challenged in some way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with surveillance is, it WILL be abused.
Just think of the political uses.
You happen to be mayor, governor, or senator, incumbent in a pretty close race.
Oh, wait, sweet.
We can just put a surveillance team on the challenger, and wait for SOMETHING to happen.
If the candidate doesn't do something illegal, immoral, or unethical, one of his aides or advisors will.
Sweet.  Just think of the possibilities!
!I could give you hundreds of other potential abuses without trying very hard.
Just use your imagination - if you can't come up with a lot of scary scenarios for yourself, you are challenged in some way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321433</id>
	<title>Raytheon is a For-Profit Corp. No Surprise Here!</title>
	<author>LuxuryYacht</author>
	<datestamp>1244921160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Raytheon is a for-profit corporation in a country where everything is for sale including the country. They are just trying to make a profit off of the pop-fear of domestic terrorism.</p><p>Try to change the culture of "profit first" above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Raytheon is a for-profit corporation in a country where everything is for sale including the country .
They are just trying to make a profit off of the pop-fear of domestic terrorism.Try to change the culture of " profit first " above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raytheon is a for-profit corporation in a country where everything is for sale including the country.
They are just trying to make a profit off of the pop-fear of domestic terrorism.Try to change the culture of "profit first" above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322677</id>
	<title>Re:Not quite right</title>
	<author>c\_forq</author>
	<datestamp>1244889780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So next time my girlfriend drags me to a tennis match I'm not interested I'm going to get detained, searched, and questioned?  (Yeah, yeah, I know, I'm on slashdot, so don't have a girlfriend, and wouldn't leave the basement, etc., etc.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So next time my girlfriend drags me to a tennis match I 'm not interested I 'm going to get detained , searched , and questioned ?
( Yeah , yeah , I know , I 'm on slashdot , so do n't have a girlfriend , and would n't leave the basement , etc. , etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So next time my girlfriend drags me to a tennis match I'm not interested I'm going to get detained, searched, and questioned?
(Yeah, yeah, I know, I'm on slashdot, so don't have a girlfriend, and wouldn't leave the basement, etc., etc.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373</id>
	<title>not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fact that this is in yro makes it sound like someone thought it would be a privacy issue, but I don't see why. The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc., where they don't have any expectation of privacy. Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle, with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd, they're not going to be able to identify individuals. They propose zooming in to a particular region if there are gunshots or something, and maybe then, if the angle is appropriate, they could get some kind of view of an individual's face, although it seems unlikely. What makes surveillance like this scary is if it (a) goes into places where you do have an expectation of privacy (like the Obama administration's plans to read email that crosses international borders), (b) is ubiquitous (as it is in the UK), (c) raises the prospect of aggregating data in creepy ways (like being denied health insurance because you buy too much vodka with your preferred customer card at Albertson's), or (d) forces us to take the government's word that it isn't going to be used more than they said (like the Bush administration's wiretaps). The blimp concept doesn't seem to lend itself to any of these.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that this is in yro makes it sound like someone thought it would be a privacy issue , but I do n't see why .
The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events , etc. , where they do n't have any expectation of privacy .
Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle , with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd , they 're not going to be able to identify individuals .
They propose zooming in to a particular region if there are gunshots or something , and maybe then , if the angle is appropriate , they could get some kind of view of an individual 's face , although it seems unlikely .
What makes surveillance like this scary is if it ( a ) goes into places where you do have an expectation of privacy ( like the Obama administration 's plans to read email that crosses international borders ) , ( b ) is ubiquitous ( as it is in the UK ) , ( c ) raises the prospect of aggregating data in creepy ways ( like being denied health insurance because you buy too much vodka with your preferred customer card at Albertson 's ) , or ( d ) forces us to take the government 's word that it is n't going to be used more than they said ( like the Bush administration 's wiretaps ) .
The blimp concept does n't seem to lend itself to any of these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that this is in yro makes it sound like someone thought it would be a privacy issue, but I don't see why.
The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc., where they don't have any expectation of privacy.
Viewing from 500 feet and at a high angle, with a field of view wide enough to take in the whole crowd, they're not going to be able to identify individuals.
They propose zooming in to a particular region if there are gunshots or something, and maybe then, if the angle is appropriate, they could get some kind of view of an individual's face, although it seems unlikely.
What makes surveillance like this scary is if it (a) goes into places where you do have an expectation of privacy (like the Obama administration's plans to read email that crosses international borders), (b) is ubiquitous (as it is in the UK), (c) raises the prospect of aggregating data in creepy ways (like being denied health insurance because you buy too much vodka with your preferred customer card at Albertson's), or (d) forces us to take the government's word that it isn't going to be used more than they said (like the Bush administration's wiretaps).
The blimp concept doesn't seem to lend itself to any of these.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324367</id>
	<title>great walls of fire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244910600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ya know the Iraqis and Afghanis have a new technique for spotting terrorists. Apparently they're often found hiding under blimps. Watch out when blimps come to America.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know the Iraqis and Afghanis have a new technique for spotting terrorists .
Apparently they 're often found hiding under blimps .
Watch out when blimps come to America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know the Iraqis and Afghanis have a new technique for spotting terrorists.
Apparently they're often found hiding under blimps.
Watch out when blimps come to America.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322369</id>
	<title>There is no privacy at a preannounced public event</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1244887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like a football game or political rally, you can be expected to be monitored by police, event security and the media.</p><p>blimps have been at football games with cameras for 49 years. The idea of using blimps for anti-terrorism purposes is not scary nor is it that big of a news story.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a football game or political rally , you can be expected to be monitored by police , event security and the media.blimps have been at football games with cameras for 49 years .
The idea of using blimps for anti-terrorism purposes is not scary nor is it that big of a news story .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a football game or political rally, you can be expected to be monitored by police, event security and the media.blimps have been at football games with cameras for 49 years.
The idea of using blimps for anti-terrorism purposes is not scary nor is it that big of a news story.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597</id>
	<title>Re:not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1244922900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc</p></div></blockquote><p>
The problem isn't the sporting event, it's the "etc."<br> <br>
These things are expensive.  They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever.  They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with.  Whether it's a good idea or not.  Think 'mission creep'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events , etc The problem is n't the sporting event , it 's the " etc .
" These things are expensive .
They 're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever .
They 'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with .
Whether it 's a good idea or not .
Think 'mission creep' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc
The problem isn't the sporting event, it's the "etc.
" 
These things are expensive.
They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever.
They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with.
Whether it's a good idea or not.
Think 'mission creep'.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323111</id>
	<title>Re:Raytheon is a For-Profit Corp. No Surprise Here</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244894220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Try to change the culture of "profit first" above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again.</p></div></blockquote><p>Someone tried to remove the profit motive once.  Soviet Russia, called it was I think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try to change the culture of " profit first " above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again.Someone tried to remove the profit motive once .
Soviet Russia , called it was I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try to change the culture of "profit first" above anything else and educate the masses if you want to never see programs like this again.Someone tried to remove the profit motive once.
Soviet Russia, called it was I think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321815</id>
	<title>Re:Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244924760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, if they are Israelis</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , if they are Israelis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, if they are Israelis</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321377</id>
	<title>Black Sunday?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a book with a movie followup about putting a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.</p><p>Looks like it just got easier to do that.<br>Who watches the watchers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a book with a movie followup about putting a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.Looks like it just got easier to do that.Who watches the watchers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a book with a movie followup about putting a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.Looks like it just got easier to do that.Who watches the watchers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321717</id>
	<title>Re:What happens when you shoot the blimp?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244923860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting as AC for obvious reasons.  An SA-7 or two would make short work of it.  (That's provided the blimp doesn't spot the gunners first.)</p><p>/ ironic captcha: "freest"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting as AC for obvious reasons .
An SA-7 or two would make short work of it .
( That 's provided the blimp does n't spot the gunners first .
) / ironic captcha : " freest "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting as AC for obvious reasons.
An SA-7 or two would make short work of it.
(That's provided the blimp doesn't spot the gunners first.
)/ ironic captcha: "freest"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322211</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1244885400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe there'll be a great upheaval of some sort and some crazy privacy zealots will gain control over the country and all the data and then they will line you anti-privacy people against the wall and shoot you? That's why you need privacy, to protect you from the crazy privacy zealots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe there 'll be a great upheaval of some sort and some crazy privacy zealots will gain control over the country and all the data and then they will line you anti-privacy people against the wall and shoot you ?
That 's why you need privacy , to protect you from the crazy privacy zealots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe there'll be a great upheaval of some sort and some crazy privacy zealots will gain control over the country and all the data and then they will line you anti-privacy people against the wall and shoot you?
That's why you need privacy, to protect you from the crazy privacy zealots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322361</id>
	<title>Re:not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1244887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>&gt;&gt;The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc</p></div>
</blockquote><blockquote><div><p>&gt;These things are expensive. They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever. They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with. Whether it's a good idea or not. Think 'mission creep'.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
The slippery slope is always something to worry about. But I'd like to hear a realistic description of how that would work here. Its overhead point of view, hundreds of feet up, is going to give it mostly blurry shots of the tops of people's heads, with the line of sight often blocked by buildings. Suppose I wanted to use this thing for Maximum Evil. What exactly would I do?
</p><p>
To me, it seems inherently less worrisome than the pervasive surveillance cameras on the streets in many places in the UK. For one thing, it's going to be pretty obvious that there's a blimp in the sky, whereas it's pretty easy to miss the fact that there's a surveillance camera mounted high up on a building. There's the whole creepy thing in the UK with the voice from the video camera scolding you for spitting on the sidewalk; that can't be done with the blimp, either.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events , etc &gt; These things are expensive .
They 're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever .
They 'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with .
Whether it 's a good idea or not .
Think 'mission creep' .
The slippery slope is always something to worry about .
But I 'd like to hear a realistic description of how that would work here .
Its overhead point of view , hundreds of feet up , is going to give it mostly blurry shots of the tops of people 's heads , with the line of sight often blocked by buildings .
Suppose I wanted to use this thing for Maximum Evil .
What exactly would I do ?
To me , it seems inherently less worrisome than the pervasive surveillance cameras on the streets in many places in the UK .
For one thing , it 's going to be pretty obvious that there 's a blimp in the sky , whereas it 's pretty easy to miss the fact that there 's a surveillance camera mounted high up on a building .
There 's the whole creepy thing in the UK with the voice from the video camera scolding you for spitting on the sidewalk ; that ca n't be done with the blimp , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;The idea is to use it on crowds of people at sports events, etc
&gt;These things are expensive.
They're not going to sit there just for Superbowl Sunday or whatever.
They'll be used for as much surveillance as they can get away with.
Whether it's a good idea or not.
Think 'mission creep'.
The slippery slope is always something to worry about.
But I'd like to hear a realistic description of how that would work here.
Its overhead point of view, hundreds of feet up, is going to give it mostly blurry shots of the tops of people's heads, with the line of sight often blocked by buildings.
Suppose I wanted to use this thing for Maximum Evil.
What exactly would I do?
To me, it seems inherently less worrisome than the pervasive surveillance cameras on the streets in many places in the UK.
For one thing, it's going to be pretty obvious that there's a blimp in the sky, whereas it's pretty easy to miss the fact that there's a surveillance camera mounted high up on a building.
There's the whole creepy thing in the UK with the voice from the video camera scolding you for spitting on the sidewalk; that can't be done with the blimp, either.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321367</id>
	<title>Interesting?</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1244920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder how many of these were flying over the skies of Pittsburgh and Detroit last night?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder how many of these were flying over the skies of Pittsburgh and Detroit last night ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder how many of these were flying over the skies of Pittsburgh and Detroit last night?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321653</id>
	<title>I propose we</title>
	<author>nausea\_malvarma</author>
	<datestamp>1244923380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Combine this technology with the techniques used in the DIY Arduino Blimp Drone project discussed here before, add some offensive capabilities, and create our own <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Viper\_probe\_droid" title="wikia.com">surveillance droids</a> [wikia.com] to you know, keep the neighbor's kids off our lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Combine this technology with the techniques used in the DIY Arduino Blimp Drone project discussed here before , add some offensive capabilities , and create our own surveillance droids [ wikia.com ] to you know , keep the neighbor 's kids off our lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combine this technology with the techniques used in the DIY Arduino Blimp Drone project discussed here before, add some offensive capabilities, and create our own surveillance droids [wikia.com] to you know, keep the neighbor's kids off our lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321293</id>
	<title>Oops</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1244920140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read the title, I thought this was about donut-eating cops.
</p><p>Never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read the title , I thought this was about donut-eating cops .
Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read the title, I thought this was about donut-eating cops.
Never mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322047</id>
	<title>Re:"Great Squad Leader in the Sky" syndrome</title>
	<author>tuxedobob</author>
	<datestamp>1244883960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're thinking about it from a wartime point of view. Ideally, if you go to, say, a NASCAR race, you're hoping somebody <i>won't</i> start opening with gunfire or blowing stuff up. You're looking for <i>any</i> activity in a sea of non-activity, and it sounds like this is well-adapted to the purpose.</p><p>I don't imagine they'll use it for something as simple as a car race, but I could see some potential application for very high-profile events like the Super Bowl or New Year's Eve in New York City.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're thinking about it from a wartime point of view .
Ideally , if you go to , say , a NASCAR race , you 're hoping somebody wo n't start opening with gunfire or blowing stuff up .
You 're looking for any activity in a sea of non-activity , and it sounds like this is well-adapted to the purpose.I do n't imagine they 'll use it for something as simple as a car race , but I could see some potential application for very high-profile events like the Super Bowl or New Year 's Eve in New York City .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're thinking about it from a wartime point of view.
Ideally, if you go to, say, a NASCAR race, you're hoping somebody won't start opening with gunfire or blowing stuff up.
You're looking for any activity in a sea of non-activity, and it sounds like this is well-adapted to the purpose.I don't imagine they'll use it for something as simple as a car race, but I could see some potential application for very high-profile events like the Super Bowl or New Year's Eve in New York City.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28332013</id>
	<title>Re:Surveillance isn't ubiquitous in the UK</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1245002580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet, people are somehow okay with ubiquitous surveillance present in every supermarket and convenience store on the planet.</p><p>I also don't understand how anybody in the "heavily survailed" areas of London has any expectation of privacy to begin with.  London is a very large and crowded city.  All major public areas are likely to have several police on patrol as it is.</p><p>(Parent poster is also correct that there is considerable geographic diversity within the UK.  Cultural variations between adjacent cities can be larger than the cultural divide between entire US states on opposite ends of the country)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet , people are somehow okay with ubiquitous surveillance present in every supermarket and convenience store on the planet.I also do n't understand how anybody in the " heavily survailed " areas of London has any expectation of privacy to begin with .
London is a very large and crowded city .
All major public areas are likely to have several police on patrol as it is .
( Parent poster is also correct that there is considerable geographic diversity within the UK .
Cultural variations between adjacent cities can be larger than the cultural divide between entire US states on opposite ends of the country )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet, people are somehow okay with ubiquitous surveillance present in every supermarket and convenience store on the planet.I also don't understand how anybody in the "heavily survailed" areas of London has any expectation of privacy to begin with.
London is a very large and crowded city.
All major public areas are likely to have several police on patrol as it is.
(Parent poster is also correct that there is considerable geographic diversity within the UK.
Cultural variations between adjacent cities can be larger than the cultural divide between entire US states on opposite ends of the country)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321379</id>
	<title>Re:Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we don't feel like they're doing it?"</p><p>Isn't that what happens now with the Israeli government?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we do n't feel like they 're doing it ?
" Is n't that what happens now with the Israeli government ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we don't feel like they're doing it?
"Isn't that what happens now with the Israeli government?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321343</id>
	<title>So much for those rooftop romances</title>
	<author>Mad-Bassist</author>
	<datestamp>1244920560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then again, haven't they always had those "weather satellites"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then again , have n't they always had those " weather satellites " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then again, haven't they always had those "weather satellites"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28325163</id>
	<title>Silly Raytheon...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1245011580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...In other news, Goodyear and Raytheon announced a partnership that promises to increase national security by 107\% over the next 8 years. The new system, designed by Raytheon, is expected to be in service once final miniaturization is completed. Currently, Raytheon is testing new light-weight designs with great success. The newest design attaches to the nose piece of the Goodyear blimp..."</p><p><a href="http://www.feldmanbd.com/GoodyearBlimpCrash.jpg" title="feldmanbd.com">http://www.feldmanbd.com/GoodyearBlimpCrash.jpg</a> [feldmanbd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...In other news , Goodyear and Raytheon announced a partnership that promises to increase national security by 107 \ % over the next 8 years .
The new system , designed by Raytheon , is expected to be in service once final miniaturization is completed .
Currently , Raytheon is testing new light-weight designs with great success .
The newest design attaches to the nose piece of the Goodyear blimp... " http : //www.feldmanbd.com/GoodyearBlimpCrash.jpg [ feldmanbd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...In other news, Goodyear and Raytheon announced a partnership that promises to increase national security by 107\% over the next 8 years.
The new system, designed by Raytheon, is expected to be in service once final miniaturization is completed.
Currently, Raytheon is testing new light-weight designs with great success.
The newest design attaches to the nose piece of the Goodyear blimp..."http://www.feldmanbd.com/GoodyearBlimpCrash.jpg [feldmanbd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323739</id>
	<title>Re:FP</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1244901000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But there are pissed off Gypsies who don't like police helicopters flying over their camps:</p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1181534/Gypsies-smash-5million-police-helicopter-axes-revenge-spy-flights.html" title="dailymail.co.uk">Gypsies smash 5 million pound police helicopter</a> [dailymail.co.uk]</p><p>Now the police could just tether a blimp from the nearest car showroom and nobody would know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But there are pissed off Gypsies who do n't like police helicopters flying over their camps : Gypsies smash 5 million pound police helicopter [ dailymail.co.uk ] Now the police could just tether a blimp from the nearest car showroom and nobody would know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there are pissed off Gypsies who don't like police helicopters flying over their camps:Gypsies smash 5 million pound police helicopter [dailymail.co.uk]Now the police could just tether a blimp from the nearest car showroom and nobody would know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323715</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>BewireNomali</author>
	<datestamp>1244900760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>devil's advocate: google?</htmltext>
<tokenext>devil 's advocate : google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>devil's advocate: google?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417</id>
	<title>Good old Raytheon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244921040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if they offer cool tech for us regular citizens to watch over the authorities. Kinda doubt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they offer cool tech for us regular citizens to watch over the authorities .
Kinda doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they offer cool tech for us regular citizens to watch over the authorities.
Kinda doubt it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321439</id>
	<title>Re:Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244921220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are probably correct.</p><p>For example, I just got done taking a huge dumpster. But today's deuce was a bowl full of floaters. Now while the floaters exit the anus much easier, with the accompanying fanfare of the sound and smell of the trapped methane jetting out of my asshole during the whole experience, I found myself longing for the normal deuce -- a massive pile of brown reaching up from the depths of the bowl and, on special days, actually rising above the water like a volcanic island being born.</p><p>Airshit is okay, but it is overrated IMHO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are probably correct.For example , I just got done taking a huge dumpster .
But today 's deuce was a bowl full of floaters .
Now while the floaters exit the anus much easier , with the accompanying fanfare of the sound and smell of the trapped methane jetting out of my asshole during the whole experience , I found myself longing for the normal deuce -- a massive pile of brown reaching up from the depths of the bowl and , on special days , actually rising above the water like a volcanic island being born.Airshit is okay , but it is overrated IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are probably correct.For example, I just got done taking a huge dumpster.
But today's deuce was a bowl full of floaters.
Now while the floaters exit the anus much easier, with the accompanying fanfare of the sound and smell of the trapped methane jetting out of my asshole during the whole experience, I found myself longing for the normal deuce -- a massive pile of brown reaching up from the depths of the bowl and, on special days, actually rising above the water like a volcanic island being born.Airshit is okay, but it is overrated IMHO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323081</id>
	<title>Re:Not quite right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244893920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think if you like to goto tennis matches we should just shoot you now and put you out of your misery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think if you like to goto tennis matches we should just shoot you now and put you out of your misery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think if you like to goto tennis matches we should just shoot you now and put you out of your misery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322677</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321871</id>
	<title>unconstitutional, also I hate J.K. Rowling</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244925180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where in the constitution does it say they're allowed to spy on you with a Zeppelin while you're watching a football game.</p><p>NOWHERE, that's where!</p><p>Next they'll be putting cameras in your bathroom, just in case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where in the constitution does it say they 're allowed to spy on you with a Zeppelin while you 're watching a football game.NOWHERE , that 's where ! Next they 'll be putting cameras in your bathroom , just in case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where in the constitution does it say they're allowed to spy on you with a Zeppelin while you're watching a football game.NOWHERE, that's where!Next they'll be putting cameras in your bathroom, just in case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321539</id>
	<title>Re:Good old Raytheon</title>
	<author>JudgeSlash</author>
	<datestamp>1244922300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are there American laws regarding sousveillance? What would be the ramifications to a citizen who flew a ROV Blimp with camera gear and either filmed the other blimp or filmed the crowd in the stadium in the same fashion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there American laws regarding sousveillance ?
What would be the ramifications to a citizen who flew a ROV Blimp with camera gear and either filmed the other blimp or filmed the crowd in the stadium in the same fashion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there American laws regarding sousveillance?
What would be the ramifications to a citizen who flew a ROV Blimp with camera gear and either filmed the other blimp or filmed the crowd in the stadium in the same fashion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323059</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>Black Sabbath</author>
	<datestamp>1244893620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged...<br>I'm sure any abuse will be monitored and discouraged to the same extent it currently is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>Oh and by the way, your back-yard is now considered a public space. Don't be alarmed though, we won't tell anyone what you get up to there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged...I 'm sure any abuse will be monitored and discouraged to the same extent it currently is : - ) Oh and by the way , your back-yard is now considered a public space .
Do n't be alarmed though , we wo n't tell anyone what you get up to there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; So as long as abuse is monitored and actively discouraged...I'm sure any abuse will be monitored and discouraged to the same extent it currently is :-)Oh and by the way, your back-yard is now considered a public space.
Don't be alarmed though, we won't tell anyone what you get up to there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28334279</id>
	<title>So then...</title>
	<author>M-RES</author>
	<datestamp>1245075840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...how does it detect a weapon with a silencer? Or stop a bomb with a remote detonator/timer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...how does it detect a weapon with a silencer ?
Or stop a bomb with a remote detonator/timer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...how does it detect a weapon with a silencer?
Or stop a bomb with a remote detonator/timer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322031</id>
	<title>Bravo the Military Industrial Complex!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244883780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using high-tech blimps to spy on sporting crowds is a fantastic idea to fill the gap until our intelligence services work out some way to get their own people into the crowds of these events, but to do that they would need to crack the intelligence crown jewels and figure out how and when these events will be held. It's great the things that government and the military industrial concept can achieve that a lesser mind might be tempted to do on the cheap.</p><p>And to the NSA guy sneering at this post, why aren't you doing something about bin Laden instead? He's on the Afgani-Pakistan border. Everyone knows it. The Daily Show event did a live cross from there. Or don't you guys get cable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using high-tech blimps to spy on sporting crowds is a fantastic idea to fill the gap until our intelligence services work out some way to get their own people into the crowds of these events , but to do that they would need to crack the intelligence crown jewels and figure out how and when these events will be held .
It 's great the things that government and the military industrial concept can achieve that a lesser mind might be tempted to do on the cheap.And to the NSA guy sneering at this post , why are n't you doing something about bin Laden instead ?
He 's on the Afgani-Pakistan border .
Everyone knows it .
The Daily Show event did a live cross from there .
Or do n't you guys get cable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using high-tech blimps to spy on sporting crowds is a fantastic idea to fill the gap until our intelligence services work out some way to get their own people into the crowds of these events, but to do that they would need to crack the intelligence crown jewels and figure out how and when these events will be held.
It's great the things that government and the military industrial concept can achieve that a lesser mind might be tempted to do on the cheap.And to the NSA guy sneering at this post, why aren't you doing something about bin Laden instead?
He's on the Afgani-Pakistan border.
Everyone knows it.
The Daily Show event did a live cross from there.
Or don't you guys get cable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321879</id>
	<title>the technology is expensive</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1244925180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So ? They will just raise taxes to pay for it. Remember folks, its 'for the children'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So ?
They will just raise taxes to pay for it .
Remember folks , its 'for the children' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So ?
They will just raise taxes to pay for it.
Remember folks, its 'for the children'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321851</id>
	<title>Not quite right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends...</i> </p><p>I believe the scenario is Alfred Hitchcock's:</p><p> The crowd at a tennis match is following the action.</p><p> Back and forth, back and forth, their heads and bodies constantly on the move, bobbing, twisting, in unison with the play.</p><p>All but one....</p><p>The killer is <b>in</b> the crowd, but he is not truly <b>part</b> of the crowd, and that is a subtle and important distinction.</p><p>It can be a useful - practical - distinction.</p><p> Something you can see, something you can act on.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends... I believe the scenario is Alfred Hitchcock 's : The crowd at a tennis match is following the action .
Back and forth , back and forth , their heads and bodies constantly on the move , bobbing , twisting , in unison with the play.All but one....The killer is in the crowd , but he is not truly part of the crowd , and that is a subtle and important distinction.It can be a useful - practical - distinction .
Something you can see , something you can act on .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends... I believe the scenario is Alfred Hitchcock's: The crowd at a tennis match is following the action.
Back and forth, back and forth, their heads and bodies constantly on the move, bobbing, twisting, in unison with the play.All but one....The killer is in the crowd, but he is not truly part of the crowd, and that is a subtle and important distinction.It can be a useful - practical - distinction.
Something you can see, something you can act on.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</id>
	<title>FP</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1244919600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silly Raytheon.<br> <br>

There aren't going to be any terrorist attacks.<br> <br>

You just throw money at congressmen.<br> <br>

But seriously, this is <b>horseshit</b>. The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in

the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends who are discretely giving them

head or playing <a href="http://www.break.com/usercontent/2007/8/Couple-caught-having-sex-at-a-baseball-game-353366.html" title="break.com" rel="nofollow">"bouncy-horse"</a> [break.com] on their laps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly Raytheon .
There are n't going to be any terrorist attacks .
You just throw money at congressmen .
But seriously , this is horseshit .
The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends who are discretely giving them head or playing " bouncy-horse " [ break.com ] on their laps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly Raytheon.
There aren't going to be any terrorist attacks.
You just throw money at congressmen.
But seriously, this is horseshit.
The only bad guys they catch will be the ones up in

the nosebleed section sitting alone with their girlfriends who are discretely giving them

head or playing "bouncy-horse" [break.com] on their laps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322981</id>
	<title>Re:Surveillance isn't ubiquitous in the UK</title>
	<author>hachete</author>
	<datestamp>1244892780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, we have too much surveillance. And it hasn't reduced crime by an amount commensurate with the cost, IMO.</p><p>The English used to refer to England standing in for the whole of the UK. A synecdoche if you will. So, the monarch of this torpid islands used to sign themselves King or Queen of England, and that would apply to the whole. The multiple volume Oxford History of England was, you guessed it, a history of the UK. It has changed, particularly since devolution. We are British now, apparently, although this tends to apply those outside of London.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , we have too much surveillance .
And it has n't reduced crime by an amount commensurate with the cost , IMO.The English used to refer to England standing in for the whole of the UK .
A synecdoche if you will .
So , the monarch of this torpid islands used to sign themselves King or Queen of England , and that would apply to the whole .
The multiple volume Oxford History of England was , you guessed it , a history of the UK .
It has changed , particularly since devolution .
We are British now , apparently , although this tends to apply those outside of London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, we have too much surveillance.
And it hasn't reduced crime by an amount commensurate with the cost, IMO.The English used to refer to England standing in for the whole of the UK.
A synecdoche if you will.
So, the monarch of this torpid islands used to sign themselves King or Queen of England, and that would apply to the whole.
The multiple volume Oxford History of England was, you guessed it, a history of the UK.
It has changed, particularly since devolution.
We are British now, apparently, although this tends to apply those outside of London.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322021</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244883660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As long as I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.</p></div><p>Since I live in a free society, I reasonably expect that I wont be subjected to wholesale surveillance simply because I am in public.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as I do n't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.Since I live in a free society , I reasonably expect that I wont be subjected to wholesale surveillance simply because I am in public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.Since I live in a free society, I reasonably expect that I wont be subjected to wholesale surveillance simply because I am in public.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323441</id>
	<title>Re:FP</title>
	<author>Ezrymyrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244897580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn you for providing that link! i had to watch it over and over to.... Oh i get it.
Thank you</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn you for providing that link !
i had to watch it over and over to.... Oh i get it .
Thank you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn you for providing that link!
i had to watch it over and over to.... Oh i get it.
Thank you</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322275</id>
	<title>Re:I'm okay with surveillance</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1244886120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're out in public someplace, and you notice someone staring at you. Creepy! You move a little bit and he follows you with his eyes. Scary! You walk away, hoping he doesn't follow you... then you realize he is in a blimp 500ft in the sky and there is nowhere to hide. And he is also taking video, calling up your DMV records, and logging your location for the FBI. Time to buy a shoulder-fired rocket!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're out in public someplace , and you notice someone staring at you .
Creepy ! You move a little bit and he follows you with his eyes .
Scary ! You walk away , hoping he does n't follow you... then you realize he is in a blimp 500ft in the sky and there is nowhere to hide .
And he is also taking video , calling up your DMV records , and logging your location for the FBI .
Time to buy a shoulder-fired rocket !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're out in public someplace, and you notice someone staring at you.
Creepy! You move a little bit and he follows you with his eyes.
Scary! You walk away, hoping he doesn't follow you... then you realize he is in a blimp 500ft in the sky and there is nowhere to hide.
And he is also taking video, calling up your DMV records, and logging your location for the FBI.
Time to buy a shoulder-fired rocket!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635</id>
	<title>Look! Over there!</title>
	<author>nick\_davison</author>
	<datestamp>1244923200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <em>"If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated, the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera."</em></p> </div><p>Note to self: if ever wanting to defeat the system, remotely or have a friend, set off a string of fire crackers somewhere else while I carry on unwatched.</p><p><em>"Though the technology is expensive, Raytheon is..."</em> hoping customers won't be put off by a system that falls for the equivalent of "Look! Elvis!"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated , the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera .
" Note to self : if ever wanting to defeat the system , remotely or have a friend , set off a string of fire crackers somewhere else while I carry on unwatched .
" Though the technology is expensive , Raytheon is... " hoping customers wo n't be put off by a system that falls for the equivalent of " Look !
Elvis ! " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "If a gun fires or a bomb is detonated, the airships can detect the noise and focus the camera.
" Note to self: if ever wanting to defeat the system, remotely or have a friend, set off a string of fire crackers somewhere else while I carry on unwatched.
"Though the technology is expensive, Raytheon is..." hoping customers won't be put off by a system that falls for the equivalent of "Look!
Elvis!"?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321893</id>
	<title>Re:Good old Raytheon</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1244925300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How dare you ask such a thing citizen, please come with us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How dare you ask such a thing citizen , please come with us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How dare you ask such a thing citizen, please come with us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322151</id>
	<title>Re:Look! Over there!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244884920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NJ has had a gun shot detection system in place for a little while.  Recently it picked up on a shooting where a little kid was shot and before 911 could be called police were on the way.  Sometimes violence just happens it isn't planned out.</p><p>http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/new\_jersey\_police\_herald\_gunsh.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NJ has had a gun shot detection system in place for a little while .
Recently it picked up on a shooting where a little kid was shot and before 911 could be called police were on the way .
Sometimes violence just happens it is n't planned out.http : //www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/new \ _jersey \ _police \ _herald \ _gunsh.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NJ has had a gun shot detection system in place for a little while.
Recently it picked up on a shooting where a little kid was shot and before 911 could be called police were on the way.
Sometimes violence just happens it isn't planned out.http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/new\_jersey\_police\_herald\_gunsh.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737</id>
	<title>Surveillance isn't ubiquitous in the UK</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1244924040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surveillance isn't ubiquitous in the UK.</p><p>Not unless you're one of those folks who think UK=England, and England=London. Of which there are quite a few.</p><p>(Actually I've never quite understood why people mix up the UK and England as being synonymous, any ideas?)</p><p>Mind you I accept there is too much surveillance over here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surveillance is n't ubiquitous in the UK.Not unless you 're one of those folks who think UK = England , and England = London .
Of which there are quite a few .
( Actually I 've never quite understood why people mix up the UK and England as being synonymous , any ideas ?
) Mind you I accept there is too much surveillance over here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surveillance isn't ubiquitous in the UK.Not unless you're one of those folks who think UK=England, and England=London.
Of which there are quite a few.
(Actually I've never quite understood why people mix up the UK and England as being synonymous, any ideas?
)Mind you I accept there is too much surveillance over here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323703</id>
	<title>Re:Black Sunday?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244900580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.</p></div><p>Sounds like some sort of scatological fetish book to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.Sounds like some sort of scatological fetish book to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a bomb in a blimp over the super bowl.Sounds like some sort of scatological fetish book to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321267</id>
	<title>Stupid and shortsighted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This technology is useless without an active targeting and response system.</p><p>Your enemies will think you are weak without an accompanying predator drone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This technology is useless without an active targeting and response system.Your enemies will think you are weak without an accompanying predator drone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This technology is useless without an active targeting and response system.Your enemies will think you are weak without an accompanying predator drone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471</id>
	<title>"Great Squad Leader in the Sky" syndrome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244921460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Probably a bad idea.  This is known in the military as the "Great Squad Leader in the Sky" syndrome (a phrase coined by David Hackworth, one of the greats of small-unit combat), and has been since Vietnam.  Leadership from a helicopter overlooking a combat zone sounded like a great idea; at last, the commander could see everything.  In practice, it works very badly.
</p><p>
Piping vast amounts of imagery back to a command center is popular with commanders and politicians, but not with grunts.  It's useful for finding enemy activity, but not much help once the enemy has been engaged.
</p><p>
It turns out that the technology the people on the ground really like is small robots.  Sending in a robot first in urban warfare is <i>very</i> popular with the troops.  Nobody likes going into a possible ambush or booby trap several times a day. Eventually the odds catch up with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably a bad idea .
This is known in the military as the " Great Squad Leader in the Sky " syndrome ( a phrase coined by David Hackworth , one of the greats of small-unit combat ) , and has been since Vietnam .
Leadership from a helicopter overlooking a combat zone sounded like a great idea ; at last , the commander could see everything .
In practice , it works very badly .
Piping vast amounts of imagery back to a command center is popular with commanders and politicians , but not with grunts .
It 's useful for finding enemy activity , but not much help once the enemy has been engaged .
It turns out that the technology the people on the ground really like is small robots .
Sending in a robot first in urban warfare is very popular with the troops .
Nobody likes going into a possible ambush or booby trap several times a day .
Eventually the odds catch up with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Probably a bad idea.
This is known in the military as the "Great Squad Leader in the Sky" syndrome (a phrase coined by David Hackworth, one of the greats of small-unit combat), and has been since Vietnam.
Leadership from a helicopter overlooking a combat zone sounded like a great idea; at last, the commander could see everything.
In practice, it works very badly.
Piping vast amounts of imagery back to a command center is popular with commanders and politicians, but not with grunts.
It's useful for finding enemy activity, but not much help once the enemy has been engaged.
It turns out that the technology the people on the ground really like is small robots.
Sending in a robot first in urban warfare is very popular with the troops.
Nobody likes going into a possible ambush or booby trap several times a day.
Eventually the odds catch up with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322125</id>
	<title>Re:Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1244884680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make a good point, but I'd like to chime in that one thing about big brother is precisely to make us feel watched. If you make people feel watched all the time, they will internalize the surveillance and they will watch themselves and you won't even have to watch them. Panopticon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make a good point , but I 'd like to chime in that one thing about big brother is precisely to make us feel watched .
If you make people feel watched all the time , they will internalize the surveillance and they will watch themselves and you wo n't even have to watch them .
Panopticon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make a good point, but I'd like to chime in that one thing about big brother is precisely to make us feel watched.
If you make people feel watched all the time, they will internalize the surveillance and they will watch themselves and you won't even have to watch them.
Panopticon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321867</id>
	<title>Re:not a privacy issue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until corps start buying the footage with facial recognition and compare it to those that have called in for the day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until corps start buying the footage with facial recognition and compare it to those that have called in for the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until corps start buying the footage with facial recognition and compare it to those that have called in for the day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251</id>
	<title>Irritating line from TFA</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1244919840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"The airship is great because it doesn't have that Big Brother feel, or create feelings of invasiveness," says Lee Silvestre, vice president of mission innovation in Raytheon's Integrated Defense division.</i></p><p>Oh, okay.  As long as we don't <b>feel</b> like we're being watched, everything's all right then.</p><p>Excuse me?  Isn't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they're being watched?  Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we don't feel like they're doing it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The airship is great because it does n't have that Big Brother feel , or create feelings of invasiveness , " says Lee Silvestre , vice president of mission innovation in Raytheon 's Integrated Defense division.Oh , okay .
As long as we do n't feel like we 're being watched , everything 's all right then.Excuse me ?
Is n't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they 're being watched ?
Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we do n't feel like they 're doing it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The airship is great because it doesn't have that Big Brother feel, or create feelings of invasiveness," says Lee Silvestre, vice president of mission innovation in Raytheon's Integrated Defense division.Oh, okay.
As long as we don't feel like we're being watched, everything's all right then.Excuse me?
Isn't the whole idea of a good spy not to make the targets feel like they're being watched?
Is it okay for foreign agents to get copies of classified documents as long as we don't feel like they're doing it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321469</id>
	<title>What happens when you shoot the blimp?</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1244921400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't this make the blimp an obvious target for anybody
who really wants to do mischief?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't this make the blimp an obvious target for anybody who really wants to do mischief ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't this make the blimp an obvious target for anybody
who really wants to do mischief?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322871</id>
	<title>Only the black blimps...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244891700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ones without id numbers.</p><p>With stealth mode.</p><p>Fortunately, I have my apt rigged with incendiary devices and a set of fireman's gear in the secret room.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ones without id numbers.With stealth mode.Fortunately , I have my apt rigged with incendiary devices and a set of fireman 's gear in the secret room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ones without id numbers.With stealth mode.Fortunately, I have my apt rigged with incendiary devices and a set of fireman's gear in the secret room.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321231</id>
	<title>Big Brother Overlords.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our eye in the sky Big Brother (hey some of us actually like our big brothers) Overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our eye in the sky Big Brother ( hey some of us actually like our big brothers ) Overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our eye in the sky Big Brother (hey some of us actually like our big brothers) Overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321891</id>
	<title>What do you guys do in real life?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244925300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey nimrods, blimps use helium which is NOT combustible.  But they do hide the black helicopters flying above them.  Don't worry, that's just the Obamas going to NYC, or Paris or Las Vegas.<br>Get a life!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey nimrods , blimps use helium which is NOT combustible .
But they do hide the black helicopters flying above them .
Do n't worry , that 's just the Obamas going to NYC , or Paris or Las Vegas.Get a life !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey nimrods, blimps use helium which is NOT combustible.
But they do hide the black helicopters flying above them.
Don't worry, that's just the Obamas going to NYC, or Paris or Las Vegas.Get a life!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321559</id>
	<title>Should have been kept quiet?</title>
	<author>awarrenfells</author>
	<datestamp>1244922420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call me silly, but I think something like this would have been far more effective if they had just shut up about it.  I mean, I am not all for big brother, but if they are gonna do it, it's going to be far more effective if no one knows about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me silly , but I think something like this would have been far more effective if they had just shut up about it .
I mean , I am not all for big brother , but if they are gon na do it , it 's going to be far more effective if no one knows about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me silly, but I think something like this would have been far more effective if they had just shut up about it.
I mean, I am not all for big brother, but if they are gonna do it, it's going to be far more effective if no one knows about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321249</id>
	<title>Right to peaceably assemble</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Transformers 2, we are faced with the possible annihilation of the human race at the hands of the Decepticons. The scary thing is that these robot/aliens take on forms that make them blend in with our everyday environment. We don't see the threat because the threat is masquerading as part of our normal world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Transformers 2 , we are faced with the possible annihilation of the human race at the hands of the Decepticons .
The scary thing is that these robot/aliens take on forms that make them blend in with our everyday environment .
We do n't see the threat because the threat is masquerading as part of our normal world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Transformers 2, we are faced with the possible annihilation of the human race at the hands of the Decepticons.
The scary thing is that these robot/aliens take on forms that make them blend in with our everyday environment.
We don't see the threat because the threat is masquerading as part of our normal world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28325163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28331985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28332013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1610203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321737
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28332013
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321597
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322361
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321231
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321249
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321815
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324367
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28324345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28331985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322065
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1610203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322677
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28321489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28325163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28323739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1610203.28322041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
