<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_13_1319207</id>
	<title>Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244903880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:theodp@aol.com" rel="nofollow">theodp</a> writes <i>"The first rule of data centers is: don't talk about data centers. Still, the NY Times Magazine manages to take its readers on a nice <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/magazine/14search-t.html?\_r=1&amp;ref=magazine&amp;pagewanted=all">backstage tour of internet data centers</a>, convincing Microsoft and others to let them sneak a peek inside some of the mega-centers that make up today's cloud. And if it's been a while since you software types stepped inside a real-life computing facility, there's an accompanying <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/06/14/magazine/20090614-search-slideshow\_2.html">data-center-porn slideshow</a> that'll give you an idea where your e-mail, photos, videos, music, searches, and other online services that you take for granted these days come from."</i>
Reader coondoggie sends in a related story about a government plan to <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/42651">spend $50 million on improving data center technology</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " The first rule of data centers is : do n't talk about data centers .
Still , the NY Times Magazine manages to take its readers on a nice backstage tour of internet data centers , convincing Microsoft and others to let them sneak a peek inside some of the mega-centers that make up today 's cloud .
And if it 's been a while since you software types stepped inside a real-life computing facility , there 's an accompanying data-center-porn slideshow that 'll give you an idea where your e-mail , photos , videos , music , searches , and other online services that you take for granted these days come from .
" Reader coondoggie sends in a related story about a government plan to spend $ 50 million on improving data center technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "The first rule of data centers is: don't talk about data centers.
Still, the NY Times Magazine manages to take its readers on a nice backstage tour of internet data centers, convincing Microsoft and others to let them sneak a peek inside some of the mega-centers that make up today's cloud.
And if it's been a while since you software types stepped inside a real-life computing facility, there's an accompanying data-center-porn slideshow that'll give you an idea where your e-mail, photos, videos, music, searches, and other online services that you take for granted these days come from.
"
Reader coondoggie sends in a related story about a government plan to spend $50 million on improving data center technology.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321583</id>
	<title>Those aren't cooling conduits</title>
	<author>mabu</author>
	<datestamp>1244922660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure in one of those pictures they show electrical conduit and the caption says they're for cooling the equipment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure in one of those pictures they show electrical conduit and the caption says they 're for cooling the equipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure in one of those pictures they show electrical conduit and the caption says they're for cooling the equipment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320985</id>
	<title>Wrong pictures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244917800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what real data centers look like, before the film crew shows up: <a href="http://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingbefore3.jpg" title="rawiriblundell.com" rel="nofollow">http://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingbefore3.jpg</a> [rawiriblundell.com]<br>and<br><a href="http://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingnow.jpg" title="rawiriblundell.com" rel="nofollow">http://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingnow.jpg</a> [rawiriblundell.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what real data centers look like , before the film crew shows up : http : //rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingbefore3.jpg [ rawiriblundell.com ] andhttp : //rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingnow.jpg [ rawiriblundell.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what real data centers look like, before the film crew shows up: http://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingbefore3.jpg [rawiriblundell.com]andhttp://rawiriblundell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cablingnow.jpg [rawiriblundell.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319885</id>
	<title>I, for one, ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244908740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... welcome our new Data Center Overlord! <br>
[ What? Oh (damn glasses), never mind. ]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... welcome our new Data Center Overlord !
[ What ?
Oh ( damn glasses ) , never mind .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... welcome our new Data Center Overlord!
[ What?
Oh (damn glasses), never mind.
]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319815</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Jesterace</author>
	<datestamp>1244908140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All hail our Data Center Overlords!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail our Data Center Overlords !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail our Data Center Overlords!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319969</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>ADenyer</author>
	<datestamp>1244909520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It also makes it harder to view the articles at work, especially when you have to explain why the word shows up in your proxy logs...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It also makes it harder to view the articles at work , especially when you have to explain why the word shows up in your proxy logs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also makes it harder to view the articles at work, especially when you have to explain why the word shows up in your proxy logs...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320243</id>
	<title>Re:Reuse?</title>
	<author>Bender Unit 22</author>
	<datestamp>1244911980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember that one, great idea but personally I would never dare to do that except if the cooling water was a closed loop with some sort of heat exchange.<br>I played with watercooling my pc some years ago before I got a laptop and it was great fun and many ways to keep your computer quiet.<br>I made a combination of passive and active cooling. The outside radiator(this one in a larger version <a href="http://www.highspeedpc.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Konvgroup2.jpg" title="highspeedpc.com">http://www.highspeedpc.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Konvgroup2.jpg</a> [highspeedpc.com] ) could keep the CPU and GPU cool when not gaming, and when the water temp got too high i had a smaller radiator inside with a fan(something like this <a href="http://www.hardware-one.com/reviews/senfu\_water\_cooler/images/radiator1-big.jpg" title="hardware-one.com">http://www.hardware-one.com/reviews/senfu\_water\_cooler/images/radiator1-big.jpg</a> [hardware-one.com] ) that was controlled by a microcomputer would spin the fan up.<br>It was really a neat little thing that could be programmed with different curved with fan volt and temperature on each axis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember that one , great idea but personally I would never dare to do that except if the cooling water was a closed loop with some sort of heat exchange.I played with watercooling my pc some years ago before I got a laptop and it was great fun and many ways to keep your computer quiet.I made a combination of passive and active cooling .
The outside radiator ( this one in a larger version http : //www.highspeedpc.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Konvgroup2.jpg [ highspeedpc.com ] ) could keep the CPU and GPU cool when not gaming , and when the water temp got too high i had a smaller radiator inside with a fan ( something like this http : //www.hardware-one.com/reviews/senfu \ _water \ _cooler/images/radiator1-big.jpg [ hardware-one.com ] ) that was controlled by a microcomputer would spin the fan up.It was really a neat little thing that could be programmed with different curved with fan volt and temperature on each axis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember that one, great idea but personally I would never dare to do that except if the cooling water was a closed loop with some sort of heat exchange.I played with watercooling my pc some years ago before I got a laptop and it was great fun and many ways to keep your computer quiet.I made a combination of passive and active cooling.
The outside radiator(this one in a larger version http://www.highspeedpc.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Konvgroup2.jpg [highspeedpc.com] ) could keep the CPU and GPU cool when not gaming, and when the water temp got too high i had a smaller radiator inside with a fan(something like this http://www.hardware-one.com/reviews/senfu\_water\_cooler/images/radiator1-big.jpg [hardware-one.com] ) that was controlled by a microcomputer would spin the fan up.It was really a neat little thing that could be programmed with different curved with fan volt and temperature on each axis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320193</id>
	<title>Re:Some people's small world</title>
	<author>iggymanz</author>
	<datestamp>1244911560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>most people don't work in IT and do not know about the organization of a "data center".    For that matter, I work in IT and often in data centers, but I don't play games on either my P.C. or with other people, I have no idea of the numbers of players of these popular online games which are only names to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>most people do n't work in IT and do not know about the organization of a " data center " .
For that matter , I work in IT and often in data centers , but I do n't play games on either my P.C .
or with other people , I have no idea of the numbers of players of these popular online games which are only names to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>most people don't work in IT and do not know about the organization of a "data center".
For that matter, I work in IT and often in data centers, but I don't play games on either my P.C.
or with other people, I have no idea of the numbers of players of these popular online games which are only names to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321451</id>
	<title>NJ2</title>
	<author>br00tus</author>
	<datestamp>1244921280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In case anyone is wondering what the mysterious "NJ2" data center in Weehawken, New Jersey is, it is Savvis's Weehawken data center.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In case anyone is wondering what the mysterious " NJ2 " data center in Weehawken , New Jersey is , it is Savvis 's Weehawken data center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case anyone is wondering what the mysterious "NJ2" data center in Weehawken, New Jersey is, it is Savvis's Weehawken data center.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319763</id>
	<title>russian FP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244907600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Soviet Russia, data centers don't talk about you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , data centers do n't talk about you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, data centers don't talk about you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320037</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244910360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</p></div><p>Disgusting, one really has to wonder where you can find pictures like that. I mean it must be some website?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom 's basement.Disgusting , one really has to wonder where you can find pictures like that .
I mean it must be some website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.Disgusting, one really has to wonder where you can find pictures like that.
I mean it must be some website?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321445</id>
	<title>Re:Some people's small world</title>
	<author>Johnny Mnemonic</author>
	<datestamp>1244921220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with this sentiment.  Some of the dumbest commentary I have ever read are from those that style themselves professional investigators.  No wonder they are going out of business;  they are the stupidest people in the room, so no one finds what they have to say illuminating.  And therefore it has no value.</p><p>I soothe myself thinking that the journalists are actually smarter than they write; they are just writing down to their audience.  I'm not sure I believe that, though.  I think many are just creatures of their limited perspective of the newsroom, and are constantly surprised that there is a world outside of that with complexity that they are not able to imagine.  It's no wonder that our political establishment can avoid hard scrutiny, when it is so easy to impress and distract these guys with the most trivial bs.  Just cause it's new to them doesn't mean that the rest of the world doesn't know it already.</p><p>For data center commentary, I go to Data Center Knowledge.  While they don't know a lot about the mega-datacenters, they at least have been in a colo once in awhile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with this sentiment .
Some of the dumbest commentary I have ever read are from those that style themselves professional investigators .
No wonder they are going out of business ; they are the stupidest people in the room , so no one finds what they have to say illuminating .
And therefore it has no value.I soothe myself thinking that the journalists are actually smarter than they write ; they are just writing down to their audience .
I 'm not sure I believe that , though .
I think many are just creatures of their limited perspective of the newsroom , and are constantly surprised that there is a world outside of that with complexity that they are not able to imagine .
It 's no wonder that our political establishment can avoid hard scrutiny , when it is so easy to impress and distract these guys with the most trivial bs .
Just cause it 's new to them does n't mean that the rest of the world does n't know it already.For data center commentary , I go to Data Center Knowledge .
While they do n't know a lot about the mega-datacenters , they at least have been in a colo once in awhile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with this sentiment.
Some of the dumbest commentary I have ever read are from those that style themselves professional investigators.
No wonder they are going out of business;  they are the stupidest people in the room, so no one finds what they have to say illuminating.
And therefore it has no value.I soothe myself thinking that the journalists are actually smarter than they write; they are just writing down to their audience.
I'm not sure I believe that, though.
I think many are just creatures of their limited perspective of the newsroom, and are constantly surprised that there is a world outside of that with complexity that they are not able to imagine.
It's no wonder that our political establishment can avoid hard scrutiny, when it is so easy to impress and distract these guys with the most trivial bs.
Just cause it's new to them doesn't mean that the rest of the world doesn't know it already.For data center commentary, I go to Data Center Knowledge.
While they don't know a lot about the mega-datacenters, they at least have been in a colo once in awhile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321707</id>
	<title>Slide Counting Fail</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1244923740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA <i>claims</i> there are 10 pictures, but I count only 9. Unless the image saying 'back to the beginning' counts as a slide. Come on NYT, we expect more from you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA claims there are 10 pictures , but I count only 9 .
Unless the image saying 'back to the beginning ' counts as a slide .
Come on NYT , we expect more from you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA claims there are 10 pictures, but I count only 9.
Unless the image saying 'back to the beginning' counts as a slide.
Come on NYT, we expect more from you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319811</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1244908080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it had been called "Data centers. What's up with those then?", you probably wouldn't have read it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it had been called " Data centers .
What 's up with those then ?
" , you probably would n't have read it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it had been called "Data centers.
What's up with those then?
", you probably wouldn't have read it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320457</id>
	<title>Ah, the datacenter in Quincy</title>
	<author>DurendalMac</author>
	<datestamp>1244913660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My my, how Grant County really, really fucked that one up. They got it, but the county is barely seeing a dime thanks to the grotesque incompetence of the PUD and their fiber optic program...</htmltext>
<tokenext>My my , how Grant County really , really fucked that one up .
They got it , but the county is barely seeing a dime thanks to the grotesque incompetence of the PUD and their fiber optic program.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My my, how Grant County really, really fucked that one up.
They got it, but the county is barely seeing a dime thanks to the grotesque incompetence of the PUD and their fiber optic program...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321023</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1244918100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Don't be so sensitive.  The usage is pretty common in media, like the food channel dishing out "food porn", etc.
</p><p>
Who the hell is this Catherine, btw?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be so sensitive .
The usage is pretty common in media , like the food channel dishing out " food porn " , etc .
Who the hell is this Catherine , btw ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Don't be so sensitive.
The usage is pretty common in media, like the food channel dishing out "food porn", etc.
Who the hell is this Catherine, btw?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</id>
	<title>Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244908440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"? A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn". It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the trend of calling technical info " porn " ?
A while ago on Wired , there was an article on " nanotech porn " .
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters , whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom 's basement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?
A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn".
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320641</id>
	<title>Years ago there was "Truck Porn" ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244915160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for little kids.  Nothing but earth movers and dump trucks and bucket loaders.  8 year old boys loved it, and the parents behind their backs would call it truck porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for little kids .
Nothing but earth movers and dump trucks and bucket loaders .
8 year old boys loved it , and the parents behind their backs would call it truck porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for little kids.
Nothing but earth movers and dump trucks and bucket loaders.
8 year old boys loved it, and the parents behind their backs would call it truck porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28323171</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Matheus</author>
	<datestamp>1244894940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone explain to me why journalists continue to try to find obscure references for comparison?</p><p>"Data centers worldwide now consume more energy annually than Sweden."</p><p>This sentence while having some sort of dramatic effect tells the reader nothing.  How many Swedens does Norway use?  The US? Russia? Japan?  Not to mention if you try to factor for the reality that there are data centers in Sweden using power.. are they eliminated from the Sweden unit and added to the worldwide data center total or are they included in both which makes the whole stat corrupted.</p><p>Dammit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone explain to me why journalists continue to try to find obscure references for comparison ?
" Data centers worldwide now consume more energy annually than Sweden .
" This sentence while having some sort of dramatic effect tells the reader nothing .
How many Swedens does Norway use ?
The US ?
Russia ? Japan ?
Not to mention if you try to factor for the reality that there are data centers in Sweden using power.. are they eliminated from the Sweden unit and added to the worldwide data center total or are they included in both which makes the whole stat corrupted.Dammit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone explain to me why journalists continue to try to find obscure references for comparison?
"Data centers worldwide now consume more energy annually than Sweden.
"This sentence while having some sort of dramatic effect tells the reader nothing.
How many Swedens does Norway use?
The US?
Russia? Japan?
Not to mention if you try to factor for the reality that there are data centers in Sweden using power.. are they eliminated from the Sweden unit and added to the worldwide data center total or are they included in both which makes the whole stat corrupted.Dammit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324747</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>zonker</author>
	<datestamp>1244916060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"? A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn". It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</p></div><p>That's hot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the trend of calling technical info " porn " ?
A while ago on Wired , there was an article on " nanotech porn " .
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters , whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom 's basement.That 's hot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?
A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn".
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.That's hot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319775</id>
	<title>Cada Denter?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244907720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tada tencer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tada tencer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tada tencer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321159</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>weicco</author>
	<datestamp>1244919180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, their innards are showing. The servers I mean, they're naked. Like C3PO in SW1!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the trend of calling technical info " porn " ? Well , their innards are showing .
The servers I mean , they 're naked .
Like C3PO in SW1 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?Well, their innards are showing.
The servers I mean, they're naked.
Like C3PO in SW1!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320283</id>
	<title>Re:Some people's small world</title>
	<author>billybob\_jcv</author>
	<datestamp>1244912220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>HG Wells said it in 1895.  The human species will bifurcate into the Morlocks who build machines and technology, and the Eloi who pick flowers.  The bad news is that we are the Morlocks.  The good news is that we eat the Eloi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>HG Wells said it in 1895 .
The human species will bifurcate into the Morlocks who build machines and technology , and the Eloi who pick flowers .
The bad news is that we are the Morlocks .
The good news is that we eat the Eloi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HG Wells said it in 1895.
The human species will bifurcate into the Morlocks who build machines and technology, and the Eloi who pick flowers.
The bad news is that we are the Morlocks.
The good news is that we eat the Eloi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320029</id>
	<title>Reuse?</title>
	<author>Temujin\_12</author>
	<datestamp>1244910240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone know what datacenters do with the water that's heated? Does anyone know if there are any datacenters out there that put the heated water to good use (like <a href="http://www.thebuehls.com/pool\_cooling/" title="thebuehls.com">this guy</a> [thebuehls.com])?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know what datacenters do with the water that 's heated ?
Does anyone know if there are any datacenters out there that put the heated water to good use ( like this guy [ thebuehls.com ] ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know what datacenters do with the water that's heated?
Does anyone know if there are any datacenters out there that put the heated water to good use (like this guy [thebuehls.com])?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28327031</id>
	<title>not nearly as cool as the old mainframe days</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1244999940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You kids. I was a computer operator for a large insurance company in the late 1970s. We had a vast room full of mainframe gear, and a sea of hard drives, each as big as a washing machine. <br> <br>Once we started the night shift "batch" jobs, those disk units would go into the spin cycle. 40 or 50 floor standing hard drives all rocking and vibrating, the entire computer room floor rumbling like the Long Island Expressway at rush hour, lights flashing, tapes spinning, reams of paper flowing like waterfalls off of line printers and a laser printer as big as a panel truck.<br> <br>All you had to do was press the red 'halt' button on the system console to bring everything to an immediate, silent pause. Hit the green "run" button, and everything picked up right where it left off. For a nineteen year old kid just out of high-school, it was a form of power and control, literally at my fingertips, that I've not experienced since in any other job.<br> <br>The computer was so big you could open the cabinet and stand up inside it. The system supported more than a thousand terminals over an entire statewide region using only 4MB of real memory.<br> <br>Today's server racks are.... boring.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You kids .
I was a computer operator for a large insurance company in the late 1970s .
We had a vast room full of mainframe gear , and a sea of hard drives , each as big as a washing machine .
Once we started the night shift " batch " jobs , those disk units would go into the spin cycle .
40 or 50 floor standing hard drives all rocking and vibrating , the entire computer room floor rumbling like the Long Island Expressway at rush hour , lights flashing , tapes spinning , reams of paper flowing like waterfalls off of line printers and a laser printer as big as a panel truck .
All you had to do was press the red 'halt ' button on the system console to bring everything to an immediate , silent pause .
Hit the green " run " button , and everything picked up right where it left off .
For a nineteen year old kid just out of high-school , it was a form of power and control , literally at my fingertips , that I 've not experienced since in any other job .
The computer was so big you could open the cabinet and stand up inside it .
The system supported more than a thousand terminals over an entire statewide region using only 4MB of real memory .
Today 's server racks are.... boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You kids.
I was a computer operator for a large insurance company in the late 1970s.
We had a vast room full of mainframe gear, and a sea of hard drives, each as big as a washing machine.
Once we started the night shift "batch" jobs, those disk units would go into the spin cycle.
40 or 50 floor standing hard drives all rocking and vibrating, the entire computer room floor rumbling like the Long Island Expressway at rush hour, lights flashing, tapes spinning, reams of paper flowing like waterfalls off of line printers and a laser printer as big as a panel truck.
All you had to do was press the red 'halt' button on the system console to bring everything to an immediate, silent pause.
Hit the green "run" button, and everything picked up right where it left off.
For a nineteen year old kid just out of high-school, it was a form of power and control, literally at my fingertips, that I've not experienced since in any other job.
The computer was so big you could open the cabinet and stand up inside it.
The system supported more than a thousand terminals over an entire statewide region using only 4MB of real memory.
Today's server racks are.... boring.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319911</id>
	<title>Fire suppression</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244908920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do these mega data-centres use for fire suppression? I don't see obvious gas or dry-pipe systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do these mega data-centres use for fire suppression ?
I do n't see obvious gas or dry-pipe systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do these mega data-centres use for fire suppression?
I don't see obvious gas or dry-pipe systems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28333159</id>
	<title>Re:Slide Counting Fail</title>
	<author>grrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1245061740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed this the very first time I ever viewed a NYT slideshow. It is consistent across them all - there is always one less slide than the total given at the top right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed this the very first time I ever viewed a NYT slideshow .
It is consistent across them all - there is always one less slide than the total given at the top right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed this the very first time I ever viewed a NYT slideshow.
It is consistent across them all - there is always one less slide than the total given at the top right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28323905</id>
	<title>Any real data center pictures?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244903160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked in many data centers of Fortune 100 companies and I've seen HUGE data centers, ones that are multi-floor and require you to practically take bicycles to get from one end to another.  The pictures in these stories look like a tiny co-lo room in some data center.  If you really want to see great sights and massiveness of racks there is a building in New York City, it used to be known as MFN and then renamed to the longer name <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=72+9th+ave,+ny+ny&amp;sll=40.741774,-74.00301&amp;sspn=0.003703,0.008428&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.741598,-74.003153&amp;spn=0.001894,0.004214&amp;z=19&amp;iwloc=A" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Metromedia Fibre Networks at 72 9th Avenue, New York, NY</a> [google.com] that takes up the whole block from 15th to 16th Street.  The building is the size of an entire city block and length of an entire avenue with at least 10-floors high and some basements also.  The place is filled with data centers from all the communications companies that you could name.  The place is discrete and you could never tell what is inside it and how much data runs through the place.  The FBI and NSA even have their own secret facilities in there for wire tapping, I've been told.  Each floor is split into huge long running rooms and the rooms a full of racks and racks of computer and communications equipment.</p><p>I worked in this building a few years ago building out an entire room for a company and once I took a walk down the hallways during a work day only to see most of these high security rooms open when technicians going in and out doing build-outs and maintenance work.  Normally every room is protected by multiple access biometric security devices, hand, fingerprint, weight, ID badge, and code but on that day there was so much work going on in these rooms that the door were propped open because this was after WTC 9/11 where all places with data center space started getting rented out because so much data center space was lost after the towers collapsed and also after the surrounding buildings were damaged or made inaccessible.</p><p>The rooms were all massive and all filled with comm cables and racks of equipment.  I didn't have a camera or a camera phone back in those days so I couldn't take any pictures as a keepsake but the sights were amazing.  I did take some pictures of the data center that I build out to document the progression of work and I still have those pictures that make these little shots in the stories look like computer closets and not real data centers.</p><p>If you're ever in New York City and want to worship a shrine to data centers and communications visit this little building and marvel at it.  The <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=72+9th+ave,+ny+ny&amp;sll=40.741774,-74.00301&amp;sspn=0.003703,0.008428&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.741746,-74.003831&amp;spn=0.003788,0.008428&amp;z=18&amp;iwloc=A&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=40.741968,-74.004687&amp;panoid=h26WhDywyWKCoKXiYSACig&amp;cbp=12,157.28,,1,2.29" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">real entrance to it is in the back of the building next to StarBucks</a> [google.com] and the lobby of that entrance looks like a boring little elevator lobby to some rinky-dink place.  Believe me that is the magic doorway to one of the largest data center and communications buildings on the planet.</p><p>There is <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=homestead+steakhouse,+new+york,+ny&amp;sll=40.741598,-74.003153&amp;sspn=0.001894,0.004214&amp;g=72+9th+ave,+ny+ny&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.742443,-74.00447&amp;spn=0.001851,0.004214&amp;z=19&amp;iwloc=A" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Homestead Steakhouse</a> [google.com] on block down from which I only had one chance to try their fantastic but super expensive steaks after spending my holidays working in the building and across the street is the</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked in many data centers of Fortune 100 companies and I 've seen HUGE data centers , ones that are multi-floor and require you to practically take bicycles to get from one end to another .
The pictures in these stories look like a tiny co-lo room in some data center .
If you really want to see great sights and massiveness of racks there is a building in New York City , it used to be known as MFN and then renamed to the longer name Metromedia Fibre Networks at 72 9th Avenue , New York , NY [ google.com ] that takes up the whole block from 15th to 16th Street .
The building is the size of an entire city block and length of an entire avenue with at least 10-floors high and some basements also .
The place is filled with data centers from all the communications companies that you could name .
The place is discrete and you could never tell what is inside it and how much data runs through the place .
The FBI and NSA even have their own secret facilities in there for wire tapping , I 've been told .
Each floor is split into huge long running rooms and the rooms a full of racks and racks of computer and communications equipment.I worked in this building a few years ago building out an entire room for a company and once I took a walk down the hallways during a work day only to see most of these high security rooms open when technicians going in and out doing build-outs and maintenance work .
Normally every room is protected by multiple access biometric security devices , hand , fingerprint , weight , ID badge , and code but on that day there was so much work going on in these rooms that the door were propped open because this was after WTC 9/11 where all places with data center space started getting rented out because so much data center space was lost after the towers collapsed and also after the surrounding buildings were damaged or made inaccessible.The rooms were all massive and all filled with comm cables and racks of equipment .
I did n't have a camera or a camera phone back in those days so I could n't take any pictures as a keepsake but the sights were amazing .
I did take some pictures of the data center that I build out to document the progression of work and I still have those pictures that make these little shots in the stories look like computer closets and not real data centers.If you 're ever in New York City and want to worship a shrine to data centers and communications visit this little building and marvel at it .
The real entrance to it is in the back of the building next to StarBucks [ google.com ] and the lobby of that entrance looks like a boring little elevator lobby to some rinky-dink place .
Believe me that is the magic doorway to one of the largest data center and communications buildings on the planet.There is Homestead Steakhouse [ google.com ] on block down from which I only had one chance to try their fantastic but super expensive steaks after spending my holidays working in the building and across the street is the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked in many data centers of Fortune 100 companies and I've seen HUGE data centers, ones that are multi-floor and require you to practically take bicycles to get from one end to another.
The pictures in these stories look like a tiny co-lo room in some data center.
If you really want to see great sights and massiveness of racks there is a building in New York City, it used to be known as MFN and then renamed to the longer name Metromedia Fibre Networks at 72 9th Avenue, New York, NY [google.com] that takes up the whole block from 15th to 16th Street.
The building is the size of an entire city block and length of an entire avenue with at least 10-floors high and some basements also.
The place is filled with data centers from all the communications companies that you could name.
The place is discrete and you could never tell what is inside it and how much data runs through the place.
The FBI and NSA even have their own secret facilities in there for wire tapping, I've been told.
Each floor is split into huge long running rooms and the rooms a full of racks and racks of computer and communications equipment.I worked in this building a few years ago building out an entire room for a company and once I took a walk down the hallways during a work day only to see most of these high security rooms open when technicians going in and out doing build-outs and maintenance work.
Normally every room is protected by multiple access biometric security devices, hand, fingerprint, weight, ID badge, and code but on that day there was so much work going on in these rooms that the door were propped open because this was after WTC 9/11 where all places with data center space started getting rented out because so much data center space was lost after the towers collapsed and also after the surrounding buildings were damaged or made inaccessible.The rooms were all massive and all filled with comm cables and racks of equipment.
I didn't have a camera or a camera phone back in those days so I couldn't take any pictures as a keepsake but the sights were amazing.
I did take some pictures of the data center that I build out to document the progression of work and I still have those pictures that make these little shots in the stories look like computer closets and not real data centers.If you're ever in New York City and want to worship a shrine to data centers and communications visit this little building and marvel at it.
The real entrance to it is in the back of the building next to StarBucks [google.com] and the lobby of that entrance looks like a boring little elevator lobby to some rinky-dink place.
Believe me that is the magic doorway to one of the largest data center and communications buildings on the planet.There is Homestead Steakhouse [google.com] on block down from which I only had one chance to try their fantastic but super expensive steaks after spending my holidays working in the building and across the street is the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320505</id>
	<title>I like the 'secure cages'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244914080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see. "trading engines of several large financial exchanges" secured by cages sitting on a raised floor. What could possibly go wrong?<p>I hope they at least have cameras or under-floor motion detectors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see .
" trading engines of several large financial exchanges " secured by cages sitting on a raised floor .
What could possibly go wrong ? I hope they at least have cameras or under-floor motion detectors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see.
"trading engines of several large financial exchanges" secured by cages sitting on a raised floor.
What could possibly go wrong?I hope they at least have cameras or under-floor motion detectors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320323</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Joebert</author>
	<datestamp>1244912640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can someone explain me why is this article called "Data Center Overload" ?</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Quantum entanglement between <a href="http://www.ozzu.com/website-design-forum/typography-overload-t98298.html" title="ozzu.com">me</a> [ozzu.com] and Soulskill.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone explain me why is this article called " Data Center Overload " ?
Quantum entanglement between me [ ozzu.com ] and Soulskill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone explain me why is this article called "Data Center Overload" ?
Quantum entanglement between me [ozzu.com] and Soulskill.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320201</id>
	<title>I knew it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244911620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha, no SD card slots suckas!<br>My new MacBook roolz...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha , no SD card slots suckas ! My new MacBook roolz.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha, no SD card slots suckas!My new MacBook roolz...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319853</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244908440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well I for one welcome them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I for one welcome them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I for one welcome them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989</id>
	<title>Some people's small world</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1244909820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Walking home, I ruminated on the number. Sixty-six thousand is the population of a small city  Muncie, Ind., for one. Who and where was this invisible metropolis? What infrastructure was needed to create this city of ether?</i> <br>Anyone else struck by the open-eyed naivete in this?  How does this guy even grow up in the United States and this is a mystery to him?  It is the profound ignorance of men like him that is most troubling - and this one is a journalist, supposedly worldly!  And this fool has the clout to get Microsoft's GM of datacenters to give him a guided tour of the Xbox facility.  "Look, Tommy, here's where your packets mix with those of others" "Gee willikers thanks Mr. Manos!"  Is this the level journalists are at?  Tourists?<p>

<i>We have an almost inimical incuriosity when it comes to infrastructure.</i> <br>No, buddy, I think from the huge number of programs on our entertainment programs that most people find the subject highly interesting.  It's just you and your journalist clique who have an incuriousity to anything not of your own small world.  Please stop including me when you say "we".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Walking home , I ruminated on the number .
Sixty-six thousand is the population of a small city Muncie , Ind. , for one .
Who and where was this invisible metropolis ?
What infrastructure was needed to create this city of ether ?
Anyone else struck by the open-eyed naivete in this ?
How does this guy even grow up in the United States and this is a mystery to him ?
It is the profound ignorance of men like him that is most troubling - and this one is a journalist , supposedly worldly !
And this fool has the clout to get Microsoft 's GM of datacenters to give him a guided tour of the Xbox facility .
" Look , Tommy , here 's where your packets mix with those of others " " Gee willikers thanks Mr .
Manos ! " Is this the level journalists are at ?
Tourists ? We have an almost inimical incuriosity when it comes to infrastructure .
No , buddy , I think from the huge number of programs on our entertainment programs that most people find the subject highly interesting .
It 's just you and your journalist clique who have an incuriousity to anything not of your own small world .
Please stop including me when you say " we " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Walking home, I ruminated on the number.
Sixty-six thousand is the population of a small city  Muncie, Ind., for one.
Who and where was this invisible metropolis?
What infrastructure was needed to create this city of ether?
Anyone else struck by the open-eyed naivete in this?
How does this guy even grow up in the United States and this is a mystery to him?
It is the profound ignorance of men like him that is most troubling - and this one is a journalist, supposedly worldly!
And this fool has the clout to get Microsoft's GM of datacenters to give him a guided tour of the Xbox facility.
"Look, Tommy, here's where your packets mix with those of others" "Gee willikers thanks Mr.
Manos!"  Is this the level journalists are at?
Tourists?

We have an almost inimical incuriosity when it comes to infrastructure.
No, buddy, I think from the huge number of programs on our entertainment programs that most people find the subject highly interesting.
It's just you and your journalist clique who have an incuriousity to anything not of your own small world.
Please stop including me when you say "we".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320499</id>
	<title>Re:Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244914020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
  Maybe I'm spoiled, but I've seen much bigger, denser datacenters.  I have some pictures that I'm not suppose to have.  This looked like a fairy tame facility, nothing I'd be impressed by.</p><p>
  Try Equinix Ashburn VA, Equinix Chicago, Level3 New York, One Wilshire Los Angeles, or a dozen others that I've been in that I don't feel like listing out right now.  These pictures could have been out of any of dozens of mom and pop datacenters I've been in around the country.  If you were standing in one section, and all you see is cages and densely stacked equipment in all directions, and 100 feet away there's a door that leads to the next section that's the same, followed by another door that leads to the same, then you're looking at a dense datacenter.   If you look into a cage and just see an entire row of Cisco 8500's, that are feeding adjoining racks and cage space, plus transit fiber and in/out fiber, that's impressive.  I was at InterNAP Seattle, which is a smaller facility, but the next cage space to the one I was working in was a row of maybe 15 racks, each stuffed with 40 1u SuperMicro servers.  Behind that, 8 more rows exactly the same.  Every one of them had drive and network lights blinking away.  On the other side, across a row, 3 rows of 20 racks stuffed with Dell 1u servers.  In the next room it was the same.  In the next suite, WaMu sign decorated the doors, but secure access was required to get to through the door.  Someone in the building told me they had toured the suite and it was floor to ceiling and wall to wall equipment.  In a suite down the hall?  Microsoft.  They had a similar configuration.  another suite down the hall, probably at least 10,000 sq/ft, they were building out new space for Microsoft.  The  building was shut down one day just so they could airlift air conditioners to the roof for the new space (I have YouTube video of part of the airlift).</p><p>
  In Los Angeles, I don't know who owned the space, but it was their laser printer room.  They had blinds on the window (like, cheap residential blinds).  I peeked through a gap and saw racks full of laser printers.  It belonged to a bank, I just don't know which one.  In the basement, heavily armed security escorted armored trucks in and out of a vehicle trap (double steel roll gates), so I never saw what was inside, and judging by the weaponry it was a bad choice to approach a guard while they were outside the gate.  I kept my distance, and they didn't threaten me.  That was just one floor.</p><p>
  One customer I knew of on another floor there started out with a dozen racks of 1u servers (stuffed 40u).  Their hosting business grew.  Then it grew more.  I talked to them and they really knew what they were doing.  A small staff that knew what they were doing, but a huge business, the perfect blend.  Last time I was there, I walked the outside of their cage area and if I recall correctly, I gave up counting at a few hundred racks, each stuffed with 1u machines, except the occasional rack that held the redundant switches for that section.</p><p>
  If I had pictures of everything I've seen, that would make for an impressive display.  Most facilities have strict "no recording devices of any sort" rules.  No cameras, video recorders, cell phones with cameras, etc.  It's probably fine to know that a huge hosting company is as big as they say, but what if you're told that you're hosting with a huge company, to find that their "datacenter" is just a rack at a mom and pop place, and their rack is populated by 1/2 dozen old desktop PC's stacked on each other?  Intelligence gathered from a DC can be dangerous. Some places put stickers on with the hostname and IP of every unit.  So, if Mr. Evil Hacker (not me, of course) knows X hosting has 4 xisco x500 routers and 8 xisco x590 switches, all labeled, and looking at the photos he can follow the cables through and sees that the routers at 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 (public IP's) are the only incoming connections so he start looking harder and fin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm spoiled , but I 've seen much bigger , denser datacenters .
I have some pictures that I 'm not suppose to have .
This looked like a fairy tame facility , nothing I 'd be impressed by .
Try Equinix Ashburn VA , Equinix Chicago , Level3 New York , One Wilshire Los Angeles , or a dozen others that I 've been in that I do n't feel like listing out right now .
These pictures could have been out of any of dozens of mom and pop datacenters I 've been in around the country .
If you were standing in one section , and all you see is cages and densely stacked equipment in all directions , and 100 feet away there 's a door that leads to the next section that 's the same , followed by another door that leads to the same , then you 're looking at a dense datacenter .
If you look into a cage and just see an entire row of Cisco 8500 's , that are feeding adjoining racks and cage space , plus transit fiber and in/out fiber , that 's impressive .
I was at InterNAP Seattle , which is a smaller facility , but the next cage space to the one I was working in was a row of maybe 15 racks , each stuffed with 40 1u SuperMicro servers .
Behind that , 8 more rows exactly the same .
Every one of them had drive and network lights blinking away .
On the other side , across a row , 3 rows of 20 racks stuffed with Dell 1u servers .
In the next room it was the same .
In the next suite , WaMu sign decorated the doors , but secure access was required to get to through the door .
Someone in the building told me they had toured the suite and it was floor to ceiling and wall to wall equipment .
In a suite down the hall ?
Microsoft. They had a similar configuration .
another suite down the hall , probably at least 10,000 sq/ft , they were building out new space for Microsoft .
The building was shut down one day just so they could airlift air conditioners to the roof for the new space ( I have YouTube video of part of the airlift ) .
In Los Angeles , I do n't know who owned the space , but it was their laser printer room .
They had blinds on the window ( like , cheap residential blinds ) .
I peeked through a gap and saw racks full of laser printers .
It belonged to a bank , I just do n't know which one .
In the basement , heavily armed security escorted armored trucks in and out of a vehicle trap ( double steel roll gates ) , so I never saw what was inside , and judging by the weaponry it was a bad choice to approach a guard while they were outside the gate .
I kept my distance , and they did n't threaten me .
That was just one floor .
One customer I knew of on another floor there started out with a dozen racks of 1u servers ( stuffed 40u ) .
Their hosting business grew .
Then it grew more .
I talked to them and they really knew what they were doing .
A small staff that knew what they were doing , but a huge business , the perfect blend .
Last time I was there , I walked the outside of their cage area and if I recall correctly , I gave up counting at a few hundred racks , each stuffed with 1u machines , except the occasional rack that held the redundant switches for that section .
If I had pictures of everything I 've seen , that would make for an impressive display .
Most facilities have strict " no recording devices of any sort " rules .
No cameras , video recorders , cell phones with cameras , etc .
It 's probably fine to know that a huge hosting company is as big as they say , but what if you 're told that you 're hosting with a huge company , to find that their " datacenter " is just a rack at a mom and pop place , and their rack is populated by 1/2 dozen old desktop PC 's stacked on each other ?
Intelligence gathered from a DC can be dangerous .
Some places put stickers on with the hostname and IP of every unit .
So , if Mr. Evil Hacker ( not me , of course ) knows X hosting has 4 xisco x500 routers and 8 xisco x590 switches , all labeled , and looking at the photos he can follow the cables through and sees that the routers at 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 ( public IP 's ) are the only incoming connections so he start looking harder and fin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Maybe I'm spoiled, but I've seen much bigger, denser datacenters.
I have some pictures that I'm not suppose to have.
This looked like a fairy tame facility, nothing I'd be impressed by.
Try Equinix Ashburn VA, Equinix Chicago, Level3 New York, One Wilshire Los Angeles, or a dozen others that I've been in that I don't feel like listing out right now.
These pictures could have been out of any of dozens of mom and pop datacenters I've been in around the country.
If you were standing in one section, and all you see is cages and densely stacked equipment in all directions, and 100 feet away there's a door that leads to the next section that's the same, followed by another door that leads to the same, then you're looking at a dense datacenter.
If you look into a cage and just see an entire row of Cisco 8500's, that are feeding adjoining racks and cage space, plus transit fiber and in/out fiber, that's impressive.
I was at InterNAP Seattle, which is a smaller facility, but the next cage space to the one I was working in was a row of maybe 15 racks, each stuffed with 40 1u SuperMicro servers.
Behind that, 8 more rows exactly the same.
Every one of them had drive and network lights blinking away.
On the other side, across a row, 3 rows of 20 racks stuffed with Dell 1u servers.
In the next room it was the same.
In the next suite, WaMu sign decorated the doors, but secure access was required to get to through the door.
Someone in the building told me they had toured the suite and it was floor to ceiling and wall to wall equipment.
In a suite down the hall?
Microsoft.  They had a similar configuration.
another suite down the hall, probably at least 10,000 sq/ft, they were building out new space for Microsoft.
The  building was shut down one day just so they could airlift air conditioners to the roof for the new space (I have YouTube video of part of the airlift).
In Los Angeles, I don't know who owned the space, but it was their laser printer room.
They had blinds on the window (like, cheap residential blinds).
I peeked through a gap and saw racks full of laser printers.
It belonged to a bank, I just don't know which one.
In the basement, heavily armed security escorted armored trucks in and out of a vehicle trap (double steel roll gates), so I never saw what was inside, and judging by the weaponry it was a bad choice to approach a guard while they were outside the gate.
I kept my distance, and they didn't threaten me.
That was just one floor.
One customer I knew of on another floor there started out with a dozen racks of 1u servers (stuffed 40u).
Their hosting business grew.
Then it grew more.
I talked to them and they really knew what they were doing.
A small staff that knew what they were doing, but a huge business, the perfect blend.
Last time I was there, I walked the outside of their cage area and if I recall correctly, I gave up counting at a few hundred racks, each stuffed with 1u machines, except the occasional rack that held the redundant switches for that section.
If I had pictures of everything I've seen, that would make for an impressive display.
Most facilities have strict "no recording devices of any sort" rules.
No cameras, video recorders, cell phones with cameras, etc.
It's probably fine to know that a huge hosting company is as big as they say, but what if you're told that you're hosting with a huge company, to find that their "datacenter" is just a rack at a mom and pop place, and their rack is populated by 1/2 dozen old desktop PC's stacked on each other?
Intelligence gathered from a DC can be dangerous.
Some places put stickers on with the hostname and IP of every unit.
So, if Mr. Evil Hacker (not me, of course) knows X hosting has 4 xisco x500 routers and 8 xisco x590 switches, all labeled, and looking at the photos he can follow the cables through and sees that the routers at 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 (public IP's) are the only incoming connections so he start looking harder and fin</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319957</id>
	<title>In the Beginning</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244909340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are Borg...</p><p>It had to all start somewhere. It started with "We will not be Slashdotted."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are Borg...It had to all start somewhere .
It started with " We will not be Slashdotted .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are Borg...It had to all start somewhere.
It started with "We will not be Slashdotted.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791</id>
	<title>Data Center Overload</title>
	<author>Jerome H</author>
	<datestamp>1244907960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone explain me why is this article called "Data Center Overload" ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone explain me why is this article called " Data Center Overload " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone explain me why is this article called "Data Center Overload" ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321195</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>...whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</em></p><p>Where can I find said images?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom 's basement.Where can I find said images ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.Where can I find said images?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321285</id>
	<title>Sometimes ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1244920020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... "don't talk about X" is just cover for "we don't want to show you how badly we've f*cked up".
</p><p>I used to work for a major corporation that consolidated all of its redundant data centers into one location, located a few hundred feet from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle\_Fault" title="wikipedia.org">Seattle Fault</a> [wikipedia.org]. Then, there's the time they discovered an electrical problem in a component of what was supposed to be a redundant power system that required a complete shutdown of that data center for several days. To replace a couple of mis-torqued bolts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... " do n't talk about X " is just cover for " we do n't want to show you how badly we 've f * cked up " .
I used to work for a major corporation that consolidated all of its redundant data centers into one location , located a few hundred feet from the Seattle Fault [ wikipedia.org ] .
Then , there 's the time they discovered an electrical problem in a component of what was supposed to be a redundant power system that required a complete shutdown of that data center for several days .
To replace a couple of mis-torqued bolts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... "don't talk about X" is just cover for "we don't want to show you how badly we've f*cked up".
I used to work for a major corporation that consolidated all of its redundant data centers into one location, located a few hundred feet from the Seattle Fault [wikipedia.org].
Then, there's the time they discovered an electrical problem in a component of what was supposed to be a redundant power system that required a complete shutdown of that data center for several days.
To replace a couple of mis-torqued bolts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319819</id>
	<title>We don't need no stinking datacenter</title>
	<author>Bender Unit 22</author>
	<datestamp>1244908200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that he mentions XBL:<br>We here at Xbox Live make the users fiddle with hosting their own sessons and make them pay a subscribtion fee for it too! muhaha.<br>Problems with lag, not being able to play with many users in one session, getting everyone disconnected when the host don't want to host anymore? We don't care, we don't have to, we are XBL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that he mentions XBL : We here at Xbox Live make the users fiddle with hosting their own sessons and make them pay a subscribtion fee for it too !
muhaha.Problems with lag , not being able to play with many users in one session , getting everyone disconnected when the host do n't want to host anymore ?
We do n't care , we do n't have to , we are XBL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that he mentions XBL:We here at Xbox Live make the users fiddle with hosting their own sessons and make them pay a subscribtion fee for it too!
muhaha.Problems with lag, not being able to play with many users in one session, getting everyone disconnected when the host don't want to host anymore?
We don't care, we don't have to, we are XBL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320843</id>
	<title>And we're surprised newspapers are going broke?</title>
	<author>thebian</author>
	<datestamp>1244916900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gee whiz. </p><p>
Surely this isn't the stuff democracy can't live without.<br>
Perhaps newspaper editors don't have a clue about what people need/want to read.<br>
Project the level of sophistication shown in this article in the glamorous Times Magazine onto stuff reporters and editors are expected to know about. Imagine the dopey insight we get about the economy, nuclear proliferation, cultural trends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gee whiz .
Surely this is n't the stuff democracy ca n't live without .
Perhaps newspaper editors do n't have a clue about what people need/want to read .
Project the level of sophistication shown in this article in the glamorous Times Magazine onto stuff reporters and editors are expected to know about .
Imagine the dopey insight we get about the economy , nuclear proliferation , cultural trends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gee whiz.
Surely this isn't the stuff democracy can't live without.
Perhaps newspaper editors don't have a clue about what people need/want to read.
Project the level of sophistication shown in this article in the glamorous Times Magazine onto stuff reporters and editors are expected to know about.
Imagine the dopey insight we get about the economy, nuclear proliferation, cultural trends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320111</id>
	<title>Every server center has one of thee</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1244910900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/06/14/magazine/20090614-search-slideshow\_6.html" title="nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/06/14/magazine/20090614-search-slideshow\_6.html</a> [nytimes.com]
<br> <br>
In the case of the one I designed it was a huge red slam button labeled "Master Shutdown" and was under a flip cover.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/06/14/magazine/20090614-search-slideshow \ _6.html [ nytimes.com ] In the case of the one I designed it was a huge red slam button labeled " Master Shutdown " and was under a flip cover .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/06/14/magazine/20090614-search-slideshow\_6.html [nytimes.com]
 
In the case of the one I designed it was a huge red slam button labeled "Master Shutdown" and was under a flip cover.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28326821</id>
	<title>yea I'm in one on a daily basis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244998260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gotta swap tapes.</p><p>Its actually an impressive facility. solid security too.</p><p>Our stuff is in an AT&amp;T facility. They recently jacked the rates and half the place seems to be emptying out... Everyone was shaking their heads at the "boneheaded" decision.</p><p>I actually wonder if their cooling, electrical, and backup utilities are enough to supply the massive amount of server space on the data center floor. I'm thinking they might have raised rates to clear the place out a little until they can upgrade their stuff to provide the 99.9\% uptime they claim.</p><p>One client that left was spending 1 million dollars a month for their cage space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Got ta swap tapes.Its actually an impressive facility .
solid security too.Our stuff is in an AT&amp;T facility .
They recently jacked the rates and half the place seems to be emptying out... Everyone was shaking their heads at the " boneheaded " decision.I actually wonder if their cooling , electrical , and backup utilities are enough to supply the massive amount of server space on the data center floor .
I 'm thinking they might have raised rates to clear the place out a little until they can upgrade their stuff to provide the 99.9 \ % uptime they claim.One client that left was spending 1 million dollars a month for their cage space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gotta swap tapes.Its actually an impressive facility.
solid security too.Our stuff is in an AT&amp;T facility.
They recently jacked the rates and half the place seems to be emptying out... Everyone was shaking their heads at the "boneheaded" decision.I actually wonder if their cooling, electrical, and backup utilities are enough to supply the massive amount of server space on the data center floor.
I'm thinking they might have raised rates to clear the place out a little until they can upgrade their stuff to provide the 99.9\% uptime they claim.One client that left was spending 1 million dollars a month for their cage space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28322581</id>
	<title>Too clean</title>
	<author>Todd Fisher</author>
	<datestamp>1244889180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those data centers are too organized. I prefer mine to like this:

<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cable\_mess.jpg" title="gizmodo.com" rel="nofollow">http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cable\_mess.jpg</a> [gizmodo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those data centers are too organized .
I prefer mine to like this : http : //cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cable \ _mess.jpg [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those data centers are too organized.
I prefer mine to like this:

http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cable\_mess.jpg [gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28322925</id>
	<title>Way to neat inside???</title>
	<author>luke69</author>
	<datestamp>1244892180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I been in a lot of big Data Centers and gone are the Mainframes they were designed for and replaced with racks of servers that throw off more heat than a hot plate!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I been in a lot of big Data Centers and gone are the Mainframes they were designed for and replaced with racks of servers that throw off more heat than a hot plate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I been in a lot of big Data Centers and gone are the Mainframes they were designed for and replaced with racks of servers that throw off more heat than a hot plate!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320381</id>
	<title>Re:Some people's small world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244913060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I should point out that in photo #8 in the slideshow, the text describes hot and cold isles, but the photo is of electrical conduit.<p>
Yes, the journalist was a tourist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I should point out that in photo # 8 in the slideshow , the text describes hot and cold isles , but the photo is of electrical conduit .
Yes , the journalist was a tourist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I should point out that in photo #8 in the slideshow, the text describes hot and cold isles, but the photo is of electrical conduit.
Yes, the journalist was a tourist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320955</id>
	<title>The three monkeys</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1244917620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The first rule of data centers is: don't talk about data centers.</i> </p><p>You know, for all his talk of openness, the geek can be pretty shut-mouthed at times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first rule of data centers is : do n't talk about data centers .
You know , for all his talk of openness , the geek can be pretty shut-mouthed at times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first rule of data centers is: don't talk about data centers.
You know, for all his talk of openness, the geek can be pretty shut-mouthed at times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320609</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1244914860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br>It's only a trend if you've been living in a cardboard box somewhere in Outer Mongolia for the last decade and some...  (And it's not just 'techie' stuff either.  I first heard the term 'foodie porn' back in the mid 90's.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the trend of calling technical info " porn " ?
  It 's only a trend if you 've been living in a cardboard box somewhere in Outer Mongolia for the last decade and some... ( And it 's not just 'techie ' stuff either .
I first heard the term 'foodie porn ' back in the mid 90 's .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?
  It's only a trend if you've been living in a cardboard box somewhere in Outer Mongolia for the last decade and some...  (And it's not just 'techie' stuff either.
I first heard the term 'foodie porn' back in the mid 90's.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320133</id>
	<title>Overload?</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1244911140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What overload? How is anything there supposed to be called an 'overload'?</p><p>Normally I decry bad submissions, but this one is just confusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What overload ?
How is anything there supposed to be called an 'overload ' ? Normally I decry bad submissions , but this one is just confusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What overload?
How is anything there supposed to be called an 'overload'?Normally I decry bad submissions, but this one is just confusing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319975</id>
	<title>Re:Data center "porn"?</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1244909700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"? A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn". It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Not to mention the inanity of using the word "cloud". This also suggests that tech guys are a bunch of dumb, unthinking, corporate drone, buzzword-spouting jerks. Whereas, in fact, we all now that's marketing people. So the word "cloud" shouldn't be used on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. at all (along with blogosphere or any similar alpha-simian corporate-speak). Unless of course "cloud" refers to water vapour in the sky, or a spaceship called cloud, or something similar. <br> <br>

It's really quite simple. If you use buzzwords you are a dick, not a geek.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the trend of calling technical info " porn " ?
A while ago on Wired , there was an article on " nanotech porn " .
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters , whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom 's basement .
Not to mention the inanity of using the word " cloud " .
This also suggests that tech guys are a bunch of dumb , unthinking , corporate drone , buzzword-spouting jerks .
Whereas , in fact , we all now that 's marketing people .
So the word " cloud " should n't be used on / .
at all ( along with blogosphere or any similar alpha-simian corporate-speak ) .
Unless of course " cloud " refers to water vapour in the sky , or a spaceship called cloud , or something similar .
It 's really quite simple .
If you use buzzwords you are a dick , not a geek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What's with the trend of calling technical info "porn"?
A while ago on Wired, there was an article on "nanotech porn".
It really reinforces the stereotype that tech guys are all a bunch of creepy bearded child molesters, whacking off to photoshopped images of Catherine Janeway in their mom's basement.
Not to mention the inanity of using the word "cloud".
This also suggests that tech guys are a bunch of dumb, unthinking, corporate drone, buzzword-spouting jerks.
Whereas, in fact, we all now that's marketing people.
So the word "cloud" shouldn't be used on /.
at all (along with blogosphere or any similar alpha-simian corporate-speak).
Unless of course "cloud" refers to water vapour in the sky, or a spaceship called cloud, or something similar.
It's really quite simple.
If you use buzzwords you are a dick, not a geek.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324417</id>
	<title>Re:Those aren't cooling conduits</title>
	<author>starfishsystems</author>
	<datestamp>1244911320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could be anything in those conduits.  Fiber maybe.  But certainly not cool air.
<br> <br>
I also had to laugh at the caption that went with the pretty array of blue network cable and red connectors: "Data centers run enormously scaled software applications with millions of users."  Well good.  That's why we're looking at a patch panel then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be anything in those conduits .
Fiber maybe .
But certainly not cool air .
I also had to laugh at the caption that went with the pretty array of blue network cable and red connectors : " Data centers run enormously scaled software applications with millions of users .
" Well good .
That 's why we 're looking at a patch panel then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be anything in those conduits.
Fiber maybe.
But certainly not cool air.
I also had to laugh at the caption that went with the pretty array of blue network cable and red connectors: "Data centers run enormously scaled software applications with millions of users.
"  Well good.
That's why we're looking at a patch panel then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321583</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320609
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28333159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28323171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_13_1319207_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28323171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28333159
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28324747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28321023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28320037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_13_1319207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_13_1319207.28319775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
