<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_12_1217234</id>
	<title>Extracting Meaning From Millions of Pages</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244810880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>freakshowsam writes <i>"Technology Review has an article on a software engine, developed by researchers at the University of Washington, that <a href="http://beta.technologyreview.com/computing/22773/">pulls together facts</a> by combing through more than 500 million Web pages. <a href="http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/textrunner/">TextRunner</a> extracts information from billions of lines of text by analyzing basic relationships between words. 'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised,' says Peter Norvig, director of research at Google, which donated the database of Web pages that TextRunner analyzes. The prototype still has a fairly simple interface and is not meant for public search so much as to demonstrate the automated extraction of information from 500 million Web pages, says Oren Etzioni, a University of Washington computer scientist leading the project."</i> Try the query "Who has Microsoft acquired?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>freakshowsam writes " Technology Review has an article on a software engine , developed by researchers at the University of Washington , that pulls together facts by combing through more than 500 million Web pages .
TextRunner extracts information from billions of lines of text by analyzing basic relationships between words .
'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised, ' says Peter Norvig , director of research at Google , which donated the database of Web pages that TextRunner analyzes .
The prototype still has a fairly simple interface and is not meant for public search so much as to demonstrate the automated extraction of information from 500 million Web pages , says Oren Etzioni , a University of Washington computer scientist leading the project .
" Try the query " Who has Microsoft acquired ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>freakshowsam writes "Technology Review has an article on a software engine, developed by researchers at the University of Washington, that pulls together facts by combing through more than 500 million Web pages.
TextRunner extracts information from billions of lines of text by analyzing basic relationships between words.
'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised,' says Peter Norvig, director of research at Google, which donated the database of Web pages that TextRunner analyzes.
The prototype still has a fairly simple interface and is not meant for public search so much as to demonstrate the automated extraction of information from 500 million Web pages, says Oren Etzioni, a University of Washington computer scientist leading the project.
" Try the query "Who has Microsoft acquired?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307607</id>
	<title>Human cities torture?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1244819340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently Mount Marcy, Mount Elbrus, Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Etna are all the highest mountain. Then again, I was also informed that "high mountains are the hum of human cities torture", so I think I'll just steer clear of mountains altogether.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently Mount Marcy , Mount Elbrus , Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Etna are all the highest mountain .
Then again , I was also informed that " high mountains are the hum of human cities torture " , so I think I 'll just steer clear of mountains altogether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently Mount Marcy, Mount Elbrus, Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Etna are all the highest mountain.
Then again, I was also informed that "high mountains are the hum of human cities torture", so I think I'll just steer clear of mountains altogether.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307999</id>
	<title>Re:Exactly</title>
	<author>bxbaser</author>
	<datestamp>1244820780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The query "Who killed JFK?" suggests the CIA did it"</p><p>Hmmm....And now its not responding because its "slashdotted"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The query " Who killed JFK ?
" suggests the CIA did it " Hmmm....And now its not responding because its " slashdotted "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The query "Who killed JFK?
" suggests the CIA did it"Hmmm....And now its not responding because its "slashdotted"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307877</id>
	<title>I asked the obvious....</title>
	<author>smfreegard</author>
	<datestamp>1244820360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life, the universe and everything.</p><p>FAIL!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life , the universe and everything.FAIL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life, the universe and everything.FAIL!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308397</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>smallfries</author>
	<datestamp>1244822280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try: "where is the colleseum"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try : " where is the colleseum "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try: "where is the colleseum"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307057</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists. The query "Who killed JFK?" suggests the CIA did it.</p></div><p>For more fun, try "Who blew up the WTC?" , "Who developed the AIDS virus?" , or "Who controls world power?"</p><p>But to call this a problem with TextRunner is a bit unfair.  It's still an interesting tool for looking at the content of the web.  Yeah, the web is mostly populated by kooks, but that's life, isn't it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it can not tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends , it just repeats what other people have said , even if they are conspiracy theorists .
The query " Who killed JFK ?
" suggests the CIA did it.For more fun , try " Who blew up the WTC ?
" , " Who developed the AIDS virus ?
" , or " Who controls world power ?
" But to call this a problem with TextRunner is a bit unfair .
It 's still an interesting tool for looking at the content of the web .
Yeah , the web is mostly populated by kooks , but that 's life , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists.
The query "Who killed JFK?
" suggests the CIA did it.For more fun, try "Who blew up the WTC?
" , "Who developed the AIDS virus?
" , or "Who controls world power?
"But to call this a problem with TextRunner is a bit unfair.
It's still an interesting tool for looking at the content of the web.
Yeah, the web is mostly populated by kooks, but that's life, isn't it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309163</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244825640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you extract millions from the meaning of pages!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Sorry, couldn't resist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you extract millions from the meaning of pages !
; ) Sorry , could n't resist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you extract millions from the meaning of pages!
;)Sorry, couldn't resist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308003</id>
	<title>Re:So someone donated a copy of my copyrighted pag</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244820780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308409</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1244822340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet: "Why does Windows suck?"</p><p><i>Retrieved 0 results for Why does Windows suck?.</i></p><p>Being in Washington, MSFT has obviously paid them off to filter out unpleasant results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet : " Why does Windows suck ?
" Retrieved 0 results for Why does Windows suck ? .Being in Washington , MSFT has obviously paid them off to filter out unpleasant results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet: "Why does Windows suck?
"Retrieved 0 results for Why does Windows suck?.Being in Washington, MSFT has obviously paid them off to filter out unpleasant results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</id>
	<title>Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244814660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists. The query "Who killed JFK?" suggests the CIA did it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it can not tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends , it just repeats what other people have said , even if they are conspiracy theorists .
The query " Who killed JFK ?
" suggests the CIA did it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists.
The query "Who killed JFK?
" suggests the CIA did it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311567</id>
	<title>Who invented the internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244834700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Who invented the internet?"</p><p>Gore (396), Americans (24), US (10) 47 more... invented the Internet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Who invented the internet ?
" Gore ( 396 ) , Americans ( 24 ) , US ( 10 ) 47 more... invented the Internet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Who invented the internet?
"Gore (396), Americans (24), US (10) 47 more... invented the Internet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306961</id>
	<title>Towards a web with only one page: Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we moving towards a web in which Google centralises everything on their own pages? These new engines present content without the need to visit pages it originates from. Is Google basically mooching off other people's websites with hardly anything - if anything at all - in return?</p><p>It could be dangerous if the only visitor a web site can expect is the Google bot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we moving towards a web in which Google centralises everything on their own pages ?
These new engines present content without the need to visit pages it originates from .
Is Google basically mooching off other people 's websites with hardly anything - if anything at all - in return ? It could be dangerous if the only visitor a web site can expect is the Google bot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we moving towards a web in which Google centralises everything on their own pages?
These new engines present content without the need to visit pages it originates from.
Is Google basically mooching off other people's websites with hardly anything - if anything at all - in return?It could be dangerous if the only visitor a web site can expect is the Google bot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309041</id>
	<title>I'm impressed</title>
	<author>thethibs</author>
	<datestamp>1244825040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has to be played with to be appreciated. On request, it delivered a set of interesting papers about US-EPA misrepresentation of science. And, it returned a nul result for "Has any climate model been validated?"</p><p>This is going to be fun</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has to be played with to be appreciated .
On request , it delivered a set of interesting papers about US-EPA misrepresentation of science .
And , it returned a nul result for " Has any climate model been validated ?
" This is going to be fun</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has to be played with to be appreciated.
On request, it delivered a set of interesting papers about US-EPA misrepresentation of science.
And, it returned a nul result for "Has any climate model been validated?
"This is going to be fun</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307583</id>
	<title>Oops</title>
	<author>danwesnor</author>
	<datestamp>1244819160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised.</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's what they said about SkyNet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised .
That 's what they said about SkyNet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised.
That's what they said about SkyNet.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307391</id>
	<title>Re:Nascent AI?</title>
	<author>thedonger</author>
	<datestamp>1244818260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis.</p></div><p>Intelligence, like insanity, is finding links between <em>seemingly</em> unrelated facts. It can also be keen observation and recognition of interactions between things where others see chaos. Either way, truly unrelated things are just that: unrelated.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis.Intelligence , like insanity , is finding links between seemingly unrelated facts .
It can also be keen observation and recognition of interactions between things where others see chaos .
Either way , truly unrelated things are just that : unrelated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis.Intelligence, like insanity, is finding links between seemingly unrelated facts.
It can also be keen observation and recognition of interactions between things where others see chaos.
Either way, truly unrelated things are just that: unrelated.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312247</id>
	<title>Flawed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bush (34) is the best president of the US"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bush ( 34 ) is the best president of the US "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bush (34) is the best president of the US"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306963</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, just like any other search, it just shows ALL of the likely results and you are still responsible for determining for yourself which of the statements is true.  It says "CIA killed JFK" but the first result it returns is "Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK".  It also seems to pare down the results somewhat, because I know I've seen conspiracies also suggesting that the KGB killed JFK, or that the Mafia killed JFK.  I'm guessing that more people think the CIA killed JFK than the KGB or the Mafia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , just like any other search , it just shows ALL of the likely results and you are still responsible for determining for yourself which of the statements is true .
It says " CIA killed JFK " but the first result it returns is " Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK " .
It also seems to pare down the results somewhat , because I know I 've seen conspiracies also suggesting that the KGB killed JFK , or that the Mafia killed JFK .
I 'm guessing that more people think the CIA killed JFK than the KGB or the Mafia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, just like any other search, it just shows ALL of the likely results and you are still responsible for determining for yourself which of the statements is true.
It says "CIA killed JFK" but the first result it returns is "Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK".
It also seems to pare down the results somewhat, because I know I've seen conspiracies also suggesting that the KGB killed JFK, or that the Mafia killed JFK.
I'm guessing that more people think the CIA killed JFK than the KGB or the Mafia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307381</id>
	<title>Bah useless</title>
	<author>Veretax</author>
	<datestamp>1244818200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried asking the real name of Doctor Who, and the site  basically crapped out LOL, totally useless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried asking the real name of Doctor Who , and the site basically crapped out LOL , totally useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried asking the real name of Doctor Who, and the site  basically crapped out LOL, totally useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309583</id>
	<title>Retrieved 1 result for does god exist</title>
	<author>ebertx</author>
	<datestamp>1244827140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Retrieved 1 result for does god exist.
God DOES exist last night (2).

<p>Well, that answers that question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Retrieved 1 result for does god exist .
God DOES exist last night ( 2 ) .
Well , that answers that question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Retrieved 1 result for does god exist.
God DOES exist last night (2).
Well, that answers that question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307231</id>
	<title>what causes cancer?</title>
	<author>umundane</author>
	<datestamp>1244817480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I learned that</p><p>&gt; smoking (387) causes cancer.</p><p>I was also surprised to learn that</p><p>&gt; girls and women (11) cause most cases of cervical cancer</p><p>This is a great resource if you need to cite a reference for a Wikipedia article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I learned that &gt; smoking ( 387 ) causes cancer.I was also surprised to learn that &gt; girls and women ( 11 ) cause most cases of cervical cancerThis is a great resource if you need to cite a reference for a Wikipedia article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I learned that&gt; smoking (387) causes cancer.I was also surprised to learn that&gt; girls and women (11) cause most cases of cervical cancerThis is a great resource if you need to cite a reference for a Wikipedia article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306743</id>
	<title>So someone donated a copy of my copyrighted pages?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244814840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the heck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the heck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the heck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307633</id>
	<title>Screw that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244819460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is my TV suddenly not working anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is my TV suddenly not working anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is my TV suddenly not working anymore?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306983</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>JDHannan</author>
	<datestamp>1244816100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>And even worse:<br><br>Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life, the universe and everything?. </tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>And even worse : Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life , the universe and everything ? .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And even worse:Retrieved 0 results for what is the answer to life, the universe and everything?. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307497</id>
	<title>'How do I shot web?'</title>
	<author>John Guilt</author>
	<datestamp>1244818800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No answers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No answers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No answers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307011</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>datapharmer</author>
	<datestamp>1244816220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep. I concur - it couldn't even tell me what the number 42 was used for!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
I concur - it could n't even tell me what the number 42 was used for !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
I concur - it couldn't even tell me what the number 42 was used for!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309563</id>
	<title>Not too Smart: "What is TextRunner"</title>
	<author>Phrogman</author>
	<datestamp>1244827140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>produces 0 results<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>produces 0 results : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>produces 0 results :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307239</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244817540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CIA hasn't killed JFK?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CIA has n't killed JFK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CIA hasn't killed JFK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308277</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1244821800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just found out: If you just type "airspeed velocity", you'll get as first two results:</p><blockquote><div><p>airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow is roughly 11 meters (10), 24 miles (9), 10 meters (2)<br>average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 24 mph (2)</p></div></blockquote><p>It seems to have trouble understanding units, but otherwise the information is found.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just found out : If you just type " airspeed velocity " , you 'll get as first two results : airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow is roughly 11 meters ( 10 ) , 24 miles ( 9 ) , 10 meters ( 2 ) average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 24 mph ( 2 ) It seems to have trouble understanding units , but otherwise the information is found .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just found out: If you just type "airspeed velocity", you'll get as first two results:airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow is roughly 11 meters (10), 24 miles (9), 10 meters (2)average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 24 mph (2)It seems to have trouble understanding units, but otherwise the information is found.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307983</id>
	<title>Correction....</title>
	<author>wowbagger</author>
	<datestamp>1244820720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...that pulls together facts by combing through more than 500 million Web pages."</p><p>Correction:</p><p>"...that pulls together <i>assertions</i> by combing through more than 500 million Web pages."</p><p>Whether those assertions are correct or even reasonable is a completely different issue.</p><p>It might be interesting to then take those assertions and have some means to validate or invalidate them, but currently that's going to require meat, not metal.</p><p>Now, if you could come up with some form of AI^Walgorithm to do that automatically, then you would have something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...that pulls together facts by combing through more than 500 million Web pages .
" Correction : " ...that pulls together assertions by combing through more than 500 million Web pages .
" Whether those assertions are correct or even reasonable is a completely different issue.It might be interesting to then take those assertions and have some means to validate or invalidate them , but currently that 's going to require meat , not metal.Now , if you could come up with some form of AI ^ Walgorithm to do that automatically , then you would have something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...that pulls together facts by combing through more than 500 million Web pages.
"Correction:"...that pulls together assertions by combing through more than 500 million Web pages.
"Whether those assertions are correct or even reasonable is a completely different issue.It might be interesting to then take those assertions and have some means to validate or invalidate them, but currently that's going to require meat, not metal.Now, if you could come up with some form of AI^Walgorithm to do that automatically, then you would have something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307105</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>fmarkham</author>
	<datestamp>1244816760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>"How long before TextRunner is slashdotted?"<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How long before TextRunner is slashdotted ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How long before TextRunner is slashdotted?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307019</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244816280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... and yet "Who was responsible for the World Trade Centre attacks?" returns no results...<br> <br>[/tinfoilhat]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and yet " Who was responsible for the World Trade Centre attacks ?
" returns no results... [ /tinfoilhat ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and yet "Who was responsible for the World Trade Centre attacks?
" returns no results... [/tinfoilhat]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308023</id>
	<title>"Who has Microsoft acquired?"</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1244820840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I take it this thing also hates grammar?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I take it this thing also hates grammar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I take it this thing also hates grammar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28314147</id>
	<title>I must admit it's rather entertaining...</title>
	<author>Kazoo the Clown</author>
	<datestamp>1244801340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Entering the query "Who is George Bush?" returned the following tidbits among other things:
<br> <br>

General Draper was George Bush's guru<br>
Hurricane Katrina is George Bush's Monica Lewinsky<br>
Tony Blair is George Bush's poodle<br>
democratic Iraq is George Bush's formidable legacy<br>
Iraq is George Bush's waterloo<br>
Hillary is the democratic version of good old George W. Bush<br>
blue socks are Critics of George W. Bush<br>
Bruce Bartlett is George W. Bush Bankrupted America<br>
biggest terrorist is George W. Bush</htmltext>
<tokenext>Entering the query " Who is George Bush ?
" returned the following tidbits among other things : General Draper was George Bush 's guru Hurricane Katrina is George Bush 's Monica Lewinsky Tony Blair is George Bush 's poodle democratic Iraq is George Bush 's formidable legacy Iraq is George Bush 's waterloo Hillary is the democratic version of good old George W. Bush blue socks are Critics of George W. Bush Bruce Bartlett is George W. Bush Bankrupted America biggest terrorist is George W. Bush</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Entering the query "Who is George Bush?
" returned the following tidbits among other things:
 

General Draper was George Bush's guru
Hurricane Katrina is George Bush's Monica Lewinsky
Tony Blair is George Bush's poodle
democratic Iraq is George Bush's formidable legacy
Iraq is George Bush's waterloo
Hillary is the democratic version of good old George W. Bush
blue socks are Critics of George W. Bush
Bruce Bartlett is George W. Bush Bankrupted America
biggest terrorist is George W. Bush</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309105</id>
	<title>Carmen San Diego?</title>
	<author>tech\_fixer</author>
	<datestamp>1244825340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I asked "Where in the world is Carmen San Diego?". The page trhew up a Java error.</p><p>I guess nobody really knows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I asked " Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ? " .
The page trhew up a Java error.I guess nobody really knows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I asked "Where in the world is Carmen San Diego?".
The page trhew up a Java error.I guess nobody really knows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306941</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, what did you expect... Did you mean an African or a European swallow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , what did you expect... Did you mean an African or a European swallow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, what did you expect... Did you mean an African or a European swallow?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841</id>
	<title>Nascent AI?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis. This project may very well lead to new ideas to create the first true AI.<p>
I'll start stockpiling food and armor piercing rounds for the moment Skynet goes live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis .
This project may very well lead to new ideas to create the first true AI .
I 'll start stockpiling food and armor piercing rounds for the moment Skynet goes live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always viewed intelligence as the ability to take unrelated facts and create new and original ideas from their synthesis.
This project may very well lead to new ideas to create the first true AI.
I'll start stockpiling food and armor piercing rounds for the moment Skynet goes live.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306859</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244815380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The major problem is that it assumes the presence of meaning in Web pages in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The major problem is that it assumes the presence of meaning in Web pages in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The major problem is that it assumes the presence of meaning in Web pages in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</id>
	<title>Try the query....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244814540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Who has dumped Vista?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Who has dumped Vista ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Who has dumped Vista?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310891</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, impressive, but prior art...</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1244832180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're missing the point. This is an AI project - it's research. Presumably, the questions you are typing in haven't been processed by a complicated nest of if-thens written by someone who knows English; instead, statistical models of language and meaning were extracted from the internet. Some people claim this is the equivalent of "teaching" a computer.</p><p>The first example, which is what most search engines do, leads to impressive search results but is limited by the logic people can code up. This AI, on the other hand, may be a primitive example of the way Google will work 15 years from now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're missing the point .
This is an AI project - it 's research .
Presumably , the questions you are typing in have n't been processed by a complicated nest of if-thens written by someone who knows English ; instead , statistical models of language and meaning were extracted from the internet .
Some people claim this is the equivalent of " teaching " a computer.The first example , which is what most search engines do , leads to impressive search results but is limited by the logic people can code up .
This AI , on the other hand , may be a primitive example of the way Google will work 15 years from now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're missing the point.
This is an AI project - it's research.
Presumably, the questions you are typing in haven't been processed by a complicated nest of if-thens written by someone who knows English; instead, statistical models of language and meaning were extracted from the internet.
Some people claim this is the equivalent of "teaching" a computer.The first example, which is what most search engines do, leads to impressive search results but is limited by the logic people can code up.
This AI, on the other hand, may be a primitive example of the way Google will work 15 years from now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306945</id>
	<title>Zero results</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244815920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried half a dozen queries of the sort I often use Google for (example: "What is the velocity of sound in hydraulic fluid?").  No answers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried half a dozen queries of the sort I often use Google for ( example : " What is the velocity of sound in hydraulic fluid ? " ) .
No answers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried half a dozen queries of the sort I often use Google for (example: "What is the velocity of sound in hydraulic fluid?").
No answers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308377</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>Chninkel</author>
	<datestamp>1244822220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why the query<p><div class="quote"><p>Who has not been acquired by Microsoft</p></div><p>doesn't return Yahoo ?
<br>
actually it doesn't return any result<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the queryWho has not been acquired by Microsoftdoes n't return Yahoo ?
actually it does n't return any result .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the queryWho has not been acquired by Microsoftdoesn't return Yahoo ?
actually it doesn't return any result ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310003</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1244828580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the number of pages on the web, It is highly plausible that 500 million pages can be wrong. It is much harder to believe that 500 million incorrect pages are the entire database it runs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the number of pages on the web , It is highly plausible that 500 million pages can be wrong .
It is much harder to believe that 500 million incorrect pages are the entire database it runs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the number of pages on the web, It is highly plausible that 500 million pages can be wrong.
It is much harder to believe that 500 million incorrect pages are the entire database it runs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306921</id>
	<title>Textrunner confirms it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Retrieved 0 results for Is Linux ready for the desktop?."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Retrieved 0 results for Is Linux ready for the desktop ? .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Retrieved 0 results for Is Linux ready for the desktop?.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311699</id>
	<title>Re:TextRunner confirms it:</title>
	<author>mpthompson</author>
	<datestamp>1244835240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Who bombed WTC<br>Al Qaeda (5), Bush (5), Clinton (2), 4 more... bombed the WTC</i></p><p>So, what I really want to know is who those "4 more" where...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who bombed WTCAl Qaeda ( 5 ) , Bush ( 5 ) , Clinton ( 2 ) , 4 more... bombed the WTCSo , what I really want to know is who those " 4 more " where.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who bombed WTCAl Qaeda (5), Bush (5), Clinton (2), 4 more... bombed the WTCSo, what I really want to know is who those "4 more" where...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307601</id>
	<title>source code ? implementation details?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244819340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>is this closed source ?  Any idea what language this is implemented in ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is this closed source ?
Any idea what language this is implemented in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this closed source ?
Any idea what language this is implemented in ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309305</id>
	<title>Who is John Galt?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244826180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>0 results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>0 results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0 results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307261</id>
	<title>Slashdot is not ...</title>
	<author>Xyberu</author>
	<datestamp>1244817600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot isn't<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a professional news site<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a normal news site<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a social news site<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a News Site<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a valid source<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a reputable source<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the right source<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a healthy online community<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a goddamn online community<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a Terrorist Organization</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is n't         a professional news site         a normal news site         a social news site         a News Site         a valid source         a reputable source         the right source         a healthy online community         a goddamn online community         a Terrorist Organization</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot isn't
        a professional news site
        a normal news site
        a social news site
        a News Site
        a valid source
        a reputable source
        the right source
        a healthy online community
        a goddamn online community
        a Terrorist Organization</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312879</id>
	<title>Re:Nascent AI?</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1244839380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Skynet is already live and it is us.  Google: unmanned military vehicles; if you don't believe me.  The way we disassociate killing from a distance with the act itself is scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Skynet is already live and it is us .
Google : unmanned military vehicles ; if you do n't believe me .
The way we disassociate killing from a distance with the act itself is scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Skynet is already live and it is us.
Google: unmanned military vehicles; if you don't believe me.
The way we disassociate killing from a distance with the act itself is scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308731</id>
	<title>Found the cause of global warming....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244823600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Retrieved 8 results for What causes global warming?</p><p>Human(10) vommitting.BUTT PLUGS (2).</p><p>Sorry everyone... I'll take it out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Retrieved 8 results for What causes global warming ? Human ( 10 ) vommitting.BUTT PLUGS ( 2 ) .Sorry everyone... I 'll take it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Retrieved 8 results for What causes global warming?Human(10) vommitting.BUTT PLUGS (2).Sorry everyone... I'll take it out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306951</id>
	<title>Concise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try "Who paid SCO?" Concise, to the point. Nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try " Who paid SCO ?
" Concise , to the point .
Nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try "Who paid SCO?
" Concise, to the point.
Nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307929</id>
	<title>something i've never head of</title>
	<author>n30na</author>
	<datestamp>1244820540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Turns out to be way cooler than Wolfram Alpha.  Now just think if it has the whole web.  Wait, scratch that, I bet wikipedia's already in there.  Also, skynet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out to be way cooler than Wolfram Alpha .
Now just think if it has the whole web .
Wait , scratch that , I bet wikipedia 's already in there .
Also , skynet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out to be way cooler than Wolfram Alpha.
Now just think if it has the whole web.
Wait, scratch that, I bet wikipedia's already in there.
Also, skynet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311431</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244834160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if your ass was limping, you could slap your bum ass, Fanny, on the Arse.

sorry to threadjack with a sig comment, no one else will give this a read anyhow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if your ass was limping , you could slap your bum ass , Fanny , on the Arse .
sorry to threadjack with a sig comment , no one else will give this a read anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if your ass was limping, you could slap your bum ass, Fanny, on the Arse.
sorry to threadjack with a sig comment, no one else will give this a read anyhow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308611</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>msbmsb</author>
	<datestamp>1244823120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Semantic processing systems like this (it's not something new) aren't usually able to determine correctness. The truth of a statement is assumed and the best these <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural\_language\_processing" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">NLP</a> [wikipedia.org] engines can do at the moment is identify conflicts and maybe use some reputation metrics to assign a veracity rating to a particular statement, or notify the user that there are differing conclusions. These systems are just really, like the summary states, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information\_extraction" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">information extraction</a> [wikipedia.org]" systems. Just as a regular search engine will return you the results from the data set, that's what these types of semantic extraction engines usually do, except the data is processed in a semantically-organized way so that you can query with semantics/natural language constraints instead of just keywords and boolean constraints.<br> <br>There are some that incorporate some intention or opinion polarity detection, but even those are not capable to sorting "truth" versus "conspiracy". <br> <br>Additionally, semantic extraction output, like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Named\_Entity\_Recognition" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">named entities</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship\_Extraction" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">semantic relations</a> [wikipedia.org], are useful for many other applications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Semantic processing systems like this ( it 's not something new ) are n't usually able to determine correctness .
The truth of a statement is assumed and the best these NLP [ wikipedia.org ] engines can do at the moment is identify conflicts and maybe use some reputation metrics to assign a veracity rating to a particular statement , or notify the user that there are differing conclusions .
These systems are just really , like the summary states , " information extraction [ wikipedia.org ] " systems .
Just as a regular search engine will return you the results from the data set , that 's what these types of semantic extraction engines usually do , except the data is processed in a semantically-organized way so that you can query with semantics/natural language constraints instead of just keywords and boolean constraints .
There are some that incorporate some intention or opinion polarity detection , but even those are not capable to sorting " truth " versus " conspiracy " .
Additionally , semantic extraction output , like named entities [ wikipedia.org ] and semantic relations [ wikipedia.org ] , are useful for many other applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Semantic processing systems like this (it's not something new) aren't usually able to determine correctness.
The truth of a statement is assumed and the best these NLP [wikipedia.org] engines can do at the moment is identify conflicts and maybe use some reputation metrics to assign a veracity rating to a particular statement, or notify the user that there are differing conclusions.
These systems are just really, like the summary states, "information extraction [wikipedia.org]" systems.
Just as a regular search engine will return you the results from the data set, that's what these types of semantic extraction engines usually do, except the data is processed in a semantically-organized way so that you can query with semantics/natural language constraints instead of just keywords and boolean constraints.
There are some that incorporate some intention or opinion polarity detection, but even those are not capable to sorting "truth" versus "conspiracy".
Additionally, semantic extraction output, like named entities [wikipedia.org] and semantic relations [wikipedia.org], are useful for many other applications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307349</id>
	<title>I'd like to see it extracting Millions of Meanings</title>
	<author>Klistvud</author>
	<datestamp>1244818020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...from me being completely silent, mouth shut and all, like my wife does!

And she never had a single reboot in 43 years! Then again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... maybe that's precisely the problem?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...from me being completely silent , mouth shut and all , like my wife does !
And she never had a single reboot in 43 years !
Then again ... maybe that 's precisely the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...from me being completely silent, mouth shut and all, like my wife does!
And she never had a single reboot in 43 years!
Then again ... maybe that's precisely the problem?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307493</id>
	<title>online as in real life</title>
	<author>xerxesVII</author>
	<datestamp>1244818740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Who is your daddy?" got 0 results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Who is your daddy ?
" got 0 results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Who is your daddy?
" got 0 results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306993</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>datapharmer</author>
	<datestamp>1244816160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>shhhh! we aren't supposed to talk about the grassy knoll or the bad men will come again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>shhhh !
we are n't supposed to talk about the grassy knoll or the bad men will come again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shhhh!
we aren't supposed to talk about the grassy knoll or the bad men will come again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308063</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1244820960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least you got 0 results. With "where is New York" I got -1 result!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least you got 0 results .
With " where is New York " I got -1 result !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least you got 0 results.
With "where is New York" I got -1 result!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311551</id>
	<title>Re:Nascent AI?</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1244834640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's easy to create new and original ideas.  A random generator can do that.  What is difficult is selecting the valuable ones.
<p>
I generally view intelligence as the ability to detect and recognize patterns.  If you are good at exact patterns, that is math/logic/science.  If you are good at general patterns, then we are talking art/creativity/language.
</p><p>Computers have ALWAYS been good at recognizing exact patterns.  But they generally need a human to first detect the pattern.  They have never been good at recognizing general patterns.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's easy to create new and original ideas .
A random generator can do that .
What is difficult is selecting the valuable ones .
I generally view intelligence as the ability to detect and recognize patterns .
If you are good at exact patterns , that is math/logic/science .
If you are good at general patterns , then we are talking art/creativity/language .
Computers have ALWAYS been good at recognizing exact patterns .
But they generally need a human to first detect the pattern .
They have never been good at recognizing general patterns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's easy to create new and original ideas.
A random generator can do that.
What is difficult is selecting the valuable ones.
I generally view intelligence as the ability to detect and recognize patterns.
If you are good at exact patterns, that is math/logic/science.
If you are good at general patterns, then we are talking art/creativity/language.
Computers have ALWAYS been good at recognizing exact patterns.
But they generally need a human to first detect the pattern.
They have never been good at recognizing general patterns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307247</id>
	<title>TextRunner confirms it:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244817540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who is at Area 51<br>aliens (3), Carter (2), Colonel Sanders (2), Hi Group (2) is at Area 51</p><p>Who bombed WTC<br>Al Qaeda (5), Bush (5), Clinton (2), 4 more... bombed the WTC</p><p>Who built the pyramids (example on site):<br>Egyptians (298), aliens (73), Pharaohs (40), 77 more... built the pyramids</p><p>What contains antioxidants (example on site):<br>Coffee (17), Recent scientific research (15), food (6), 5 more... contain significant amounts of antioxidants</p><p>-- man, I gotta get me some more recent scientific research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is at Area 51aliens ( 3 ) , Carter ( 2 ) , Colonel Sanders ( 2 ) , Hi Group ( 2 ) is at Area 51Who bombed WTCAl Qaeda ( 5 ) , Bush ( 5 ) , Clinton ( 2 ) , 4 more... bombed the WTCWho built the pyramids ( example on site ) : Egyptians ( 298 ) , aliens ( 73 ) , Pharaohs ( 40 ) , 77 more... built the pyramidsWhat contains antioxidants ( example on site ) : Coffee ( 17 ) , Recent scientific research ( 15 ) , food ( 6 ) , 5 more... contain significant amounts of antioxidants-- man , I got ta get me some more recent scientific research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is at Area 51aliens (3), Carter (2), Colonel Sanders (2), Hi Group (2) is at Area 51Who bombed WTCAl Qaeda (5), Bush (5), Clinton (2), 4 more... bombed the WTCWho built the pyramids (example on site):Egyptians (298), aliens (73), Pharaohs (40), 77 more... built the pyramidsWhat contains antioxidants (example on site):Coffee (17), Recent scientific research (15), food (6), 5 more... contain significant amounts of antioxidants-- man, I gotta get me some more recent scientific research.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309271</id>
	<title>What makes grass grow?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244826060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes grass grow?</p><p>Answer - (1 thing)</p><p>blood...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes grass grow ? Answer - ( 1 thing ) blood.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes grass grow?Answer - (1 thing)blood...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307125</id>
	<title>A million monkeys on keyboards...</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1244816880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But AOL is nothing like Shakespeare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But AOL is nothing like Shakespeare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But AOL is nothing like Shakespeare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308327</id>
	<title>Who Framed Roger Rabbit?</title>
	<author>Mork29</author>
	<datestamp>1244822040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>same fuckers(2) that Framed Roger Rabbit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>same fuckers ( 2 ) that Framed Roger Rabbit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>same fuckers(2) that Framed Roger Rabbit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307297</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>jerep</author>
	<datestamp>1244817780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it just repeats what other people have said</p></div><p>I don't see anything new here, most people have done this since the beginning of time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it just repeats what other people have saidI do n't see anything new here , most people have done this since the beginning of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it just repeats what other people have saidI don't see anything new here, most people have done this since the beginning of time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308705</id>
	<title>Who killed Kennedy?</title>
	<author>aaaaaaargh!</author>
	<datestamp>1244823480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>==&gt; CIA (26), Lee Harvey Oswald (18), Castro (13)</tt> <p>

I knew it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>= = &gt; CIA ( 26 ) , Lee Harvey Oswald ( 18 ) , Castro ( 13 ) I knew it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>==&gt; CIA (26), Lee Harvey Oswald (18), Castro (13) 

I knew it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</id>
	<title>500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1244815560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet strangely, I get a result of:</p><p>TextRunner took 9 seconds.<br>Retrieved 0 results for what is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?.</p><p>Meh, call me when this stuff can answer the really USEFUL questions in life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet strangely , I get a result of : TextRunner took 9 seconds.Retrieved 0 results for what is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow ? .Meh , call me when this stuff can answer the really USEFUL questions in life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet strangely, I get a result of:TextRunner took 9 seconds.Retrieved 0 results for what is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?.Meh, call me when this stuff can answer the really USEFUL questions in life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309243</id>
	<title>Re:User invalid, deleting user</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1244826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on now, be specific. What it actually said was, "I'll be back".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on now , be specific .
What it actually said was , " I 'll be back " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on now, be specific.
What it actually said was, "I'll be back".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28320495</id>
	<title>Tried "How do I enlarge my penis?"</title>
	<author>spiralofhope</author>
	<datestamp>1244913960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got zero results.  In 500 million pages, this should have been answered 500 million and one times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got zero results .
In 500 million pages , this should have been answered 500 million and one times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got zero results.
In 500 million pages, this should have been answered 500 million and one times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306855</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244815380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, try "Who has VA Linux acquired?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , try " Who has VA Linux acquired ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, try "Who has VA Linux acquired?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307133</id>
	<title>Re:500 million web pages can't be wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244816940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously it's not indexing <a href="http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/" title="style.org">http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/</a> [style.org] </p><blockquote><div><p>estimate that the average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is roughly 11 meters per second, or 24 miles an hour.</p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously it 's not indexing http : //www.style.org/unladenswallow/ [ style.org ] estimate that the average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is roughly 11 meters per second , or 24 miles an hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously it's not indexing http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/ [style.org] estimate that the average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is roughly 11 meters per second, or 24 miles an hour. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308789</id>
	<title>Wow, impressive, but prior art...</title>
	<author>Pedrito</author>
	<datestamp>1244823840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>TextRunner gets rid of that manual labor. A user can enter, for example, "kills bacteria," and the engine will come up with of pages that offer the insights that "chlorine kills bacteria" or "ultraviolet light kills bacteria" or "heat kills bacteria"--results called "triples"--and provide ways to preview the text and then visit the Web page that it comes from.</i> <br> <br>

Wow, incredible. Because doing a search of "kills bacteria" with the quotes on Google won't get you those kind of results. Oh wait, yeah it will. In fact, it too will "chlorine kills bacteria" and "ultraviolet light kills bacteria" and "heat kills bacteria". And google also provides a way to preview the text and then visit the web page that it comes from.<br> <br>

Yeah, I know, I know, they just put a bad example in the article, but it's a ridiculously bad example.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TextRunner gets rid of that manual labor .
A user can enter , for example , " kills bacteria , " and the engine will come up with of pages that offer the insights that " chlorine kills bacteria " or " ultraviolet light kills bacteria " or " heat kills bacteria " --results called " triples " --and provide ways to preview the text and then visit the Web page that it comes from .
Wow , incredible .
Because doing a search of " kills bacteria " with the quotes on Google wo n't get you those kind of results .
Oh wait , yeah it will .
In fact , it too will " chlorine kills bacteria " and " ultraviolet light kills bacteria " and " heat kills bacteria " .
And google also provides a way to preview the text and then visit the web page that it comes from .
Yeah , I know , I know , they just put a bad example in the article , but it 's a ridiculously bad example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TextRunner gets rid of that manual labor.
A user can enter, for example, "kills bacteria," and the engine will come up with of pages that offer the insights that "chlorine kills bacteria" or "ultraviolet light kills bacteria" or "heat kills bacteria"--results called "triples"--and provide ways to preview the text and then visit the Web page that it comes from.
Wow, incredible.
Because doing a search of "kills bacteria" with the quotes on Google won't get you those kind of results.
Oh wait, yeah it will.
In fact, it too will "chlorine kills bacteria" and "ultraviolet light kills bacteria" and "heat kills bacteria".
And google also provides a way to preview the text and then visit the web page that it comes from.
Yeah, I know, I know, they just put a bad example in the article, but it's a ridiculously bad example.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306991</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244816160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists. The query "Who killed JFK?" suggests the CIA did it.</p></div></blockquote><p>

So much like Wikipedia then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it can not tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends , it just repeats what other people have said , even if they are conspiracy theorists .
The query " Who killed JFK ?
" suggests the CIA did it .
So much like Wikipedia then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends, it just repeats what other people have said, even if they are conspiracy theorists.
The query "Who killed JFK?
" suggests the CIA did it.
So much like Wikipedia then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308061</id>
	<title>What is the meaning of life</title>
	<author>soundhack</author>
	<datestamp>1244820960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>love (53), song (19), Life (16), 81 more... is the meaning of life</p><p>1) of the 81 more, 42 doesnt show up anywhere<br>2) the stupid javascript hiding makes copy and paste a pain</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>love ( 53 ) , song ( 19 ) , Life ( 16 ) , 81 more... is the meaning of life1 ) of the 81 more , 42 doesnt show up anywhere2 ) the stupid javascript hiding makes copy and paste a pain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>love (53), song (19), Life (16), 81 more... is the meaning of life1) of the 81 more, 42 doesnt show up anywhere2) the stupid javascript hiding makes copy and paste a pain</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307399</id>
	<title>Re:Try the query....</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244818260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh man, it's the new sucks-rules-o-meter for sure. Who hates vista: 55 results. Who loves vista: 11 results. Obviously, vista blows hairy goats. It becomes even more clear when you look at the actual results: somehow "<br>Bookmark Islamic Screensaver download-All people (12) love screensaver-Windows Vista Downloads" counts as a hit.. ahh there, a reload with js and the spam disappears leaving 9<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , it 's the new sucks-rules-o-meter for sure .
Who hates vista : 55 results .
Who loves vista : 11 results .
Obviously , vista blows hairy goats .
It becomes even more clear when you look at the actual results : somehow " Bookmark Islamic Screensaver download-All people ( 12 ) love screensaver-Windows Vista Downloads " counts as a hit.. ahh there , a reload with js and the spam disappears leaving 9 : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, it's the new sucks-rules-o-meter for sure.
Who hates vista: 55 results.
Who loves vista: 11 results.
Obviously, vista blows hairy goats.
It becomes even more clear when you look at the actual results: somehow "Bookmark Islamic Screensaver download-All people (12) love screensaver-Windows Vista Downloads" counts as a hit.. ahh there, a reload with js and the spam disappears leaving 9 :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308083</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>knewter</author>
	<datestamp>1244821020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you suggest they didn't?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you suggest they did n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you suggest they didn't?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310341</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244829960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's kind of like Wikipedia, then...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's kind of like Wikipedia , then.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's kind of like Wikipedia, then...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309301</id>
	<title>Who performs warrantless wiretapping?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244826180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TextRunner took 2 seconds.<br>Retrieved 0 results for who performs warrantless wiretapping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TextRunner took 2 seconds.Retrieved 0 results for who performs warrantless wiretapping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TextRunner took 2 seconds.Retrieved 0 results for who performs warrantless wiretapping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311399</id>
	<title>Why is marijuana illegal?</title>
	<author>Timtimes</author>
	<datestamp>1244834040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No answer provided.

Enjoy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No answer provided .
Enjoy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No answer provided.
Enjoy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307375</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1244818140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legends</p></div><p>Most humans can't either, how do you expect a search engine to?</p><p>There will be a lot of false positives and negatives that will be hard to identify as such unless it directly works with something like snopes.com , which kind of defeats the purpose because it means someone has had to research every question anyway.</p><p>If a project like this which simply scoured the whole 'net, you wouldn't really be able to verify anything beyond people's opinions or beliefs, which may or may not be 'true'.</p><p>I think something like this would work really well for factual results if it was only allowed to draw conclusions from verified sources, say something like Wikipedia articles that have been verified by experts in the appropriate field (I've not been following all this type of thing recently but perhaps that is what Wolfram Alpha does already). It could perhaps be useful to have it search the general internet for supplementary results for some questions though, especially those of a philosophical nature where it may be impossible to establish definite answers ("is there a god" and the like).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it can not tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legendsMost humans ca n't either , how do you expect a search engine to ? There will be a lot of false positives and negatives that will be hard to identify as such unless it directly works with something like snopes.com , which kind of defeats the purpose because it means someone has had to research every question anyway.If a project like this which simply scoured the whole 'net , you would n't really be able to verify anything beyond people 's opinions or beliefs , which may or may not be 'true'.I think something like this would work really well for factual results if it was only allowed to draw conclusions from verified sources , say something like Wikipedia articles that have been verified by experts in the appropriate field ( I 've not been following all this type of thing recently but perhaps that is what Wolfram Alpha does already ) .
It could perhaps be useful to have it search the general internet for supplementary results for some questions though , especially those of a philosophical nature where it may be impossible to establish definite answers ( " is there a god " and the like ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose the major problem with this is that it cannot tell the difference between truth and lies or urban legendsMost humans can't either, how do you expect a search engine to?There will be a lot of false positives and negatives that will be hard to identify as such unless it directly works with something like snopes.com , which kind of defeats the purpose because it means someone has had to research every question anyway.If a project like this which simply scoured the whole 'net, you wouldn't really be able to verify anything beyond people's opinions or beliefs, which may or may not be 'true'.I think something like this would work really well for factual results if it was only allowed to draw conclusions from verified sources, say something like Wikipedia articles that have been verified by experts in the appropriate field (I've not been following all this type of thing recently but perhaps that is what Wolfram Alpha does already).
It could perhaps be useful to have it search the general internet for supplementary results for some questions though, especially those of a philosophical nature where it may be impossible to establish definite answers ("is there a god" and the like).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307465</id>
	<title>User invalid, deleting user</title>
	<author>uncanny</author>
	<datestamp>1244818560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I typed in "how does a computer become self aware?"

it just said something about it being busy because it's currently controlling california!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I typed in " how does a computer become self aware ?
" it just said something about it being busy because it 's currently controlling california !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I typed in "how does a computer become self aware?
"

it just said something about it being busy because it's currently controlling california!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311661</id>
	<title>Re:Not entirely helpful</title>
	<author>hoooocheymomma</author>
	<datestamp>1244835120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did the CIA kill JFK?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did the CIA kill JFK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did the CIA kill JFK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309741</id>
	<title>Slashdotted</title>
	<author>jvkjvk</author>
	<datestamp>1244827740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> 'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised,' says Peter Norvig, director of research at Google,</p></div><p>I really wondered what he was getting at with this.  It seems almost nonsensical, like something someone in marketing would come up with.</p><p>Now that the site is slashdotted I know that he means if only a few people use it, it's very scalable, but if a bunch of people are directed to use it (say, through Slashdot) then it doesn't scale very well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised, ' says Peter Norvig , director of research at Google,I really wondered what he was getting at with this .
It seems almost nonsensical , like something someone in marketing would come up with.Now that the site is slashdotted I know that he means if only a few people use it , it 's very scalable , but if a bunch of people are directed to use it ( say , through Slashdot ) then it does n't scale very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 'The significance of TextRunner is that it is scalable because it is unsupervised,' says Peter Norvig, director of research at Google,I really wondered what he was getting at with this.
It seems almost nonsensical, like something someone in marketing would come up with.Now that the site is slashdotted I know that he means if only a few people use it, it's very scalable, but if a bunch of people are directed to use it (say, through Slashdot) then it doesn't scale very well.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307701</id>
	<title>"What is Slasdot?"</title>
	<author>Arthur B.</author>
	<datestamp>1244819760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try<br>"What is Slasdot?"</p><p>Answer<br>Digg is Slashdot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try " What is Slasdot ?
" AnswerDigg is Slashdot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try"What is Slasdot?
"AnswerDigg is Slashdot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312589</id>
	<title>Where is Osama Bin Laden...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>explains that Osama is George Bush.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>explains that Osama is George Bush .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>explains that Osama is George Bush.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307179</id>
	<title>Not entirely helpful predicting the futute?</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1244817120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why deal with uncertainties about who-killed-who in the past, when you can have a lot more fun with what could be in the future.<br>
"Who killed obama?"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... seems an inside job by Hillary is most probable just below a vicious murder by Ted Nugent. Scary!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why deal with uncertainties about who-killed-who in the past , when you can have a lot more fun with what could be in the future .
" Who killed obama ?
" ... seems an inside job by Hillary is most probable just below a vicious murder by Ted Nugent .
Scary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why deal with uncertainties about who-killed-who in the past, when you can have a lot more fun with what could be in the future.
"Who killed obama?
" ... seems an inside job by Hillary is most probable just below a vicious murder by Ted Nugent.
Scary!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311691</id>
	<title>Re:Nascent AI?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry. It isn't self-conscious yet!<br>Try "what is text runner?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry .
It is n't self-conscious yet ! Try " what is text runner ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry.
It isn't self-conscious yet!Try "what is text runner?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1217234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307601
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307125
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307261
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28309741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311431
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1217234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28310341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306991
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28312589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28311661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28306859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28307057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1217234.28308083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
